Dictionary of Indonesia
Dictionary of Indonesia
Dictionary of Indonesia
CRIBB &
KAHIN
HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES OF ASIA, OCEANIA, AND THE MIDDLE EAST, NO. 51
SECOND EDITION
Praise for the first edition:
“This weighty volume . . . will be extremely useful for anyone needing quick
information about Indonesia’s past and present.”
Historical Dictionary
—Australian Journal of International Affairs
“A sophisticated reference tool that will aid the user, of whatever background, to
find immediate information about Indonesian history.”
—The Journal of Asian Studies
of INDONESIA
Indonesia is Asia’s third largest country in both population and area, a sprawling
tropical archipelago of 180 million people, representing hundreds of ethnic
groups, with a complex, turbulent history. One of Asia’s newly industrializing countries,
it is already a major economic powerhouse. In more than 800 clear and succinct
entries, Historical Dictionary of Indonesia covers people, places, and organizations,
as well as economics, culture, and politics from Indonesia’s ancient history until the
recent past. With a comprehensive bibliography, maps, chronology, list of abbre-
viations, and appendix of election results and major office-holders, this second
edition has been thoroughly updated and expanded to include the past fifteen years.
HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF
INDONESIA
Robert Cribb is senior fellow at the Australian National University in Canberra. His
research interests focus on Indonesia and include political violence, national identity,
and historical geography. He is the author of several books on Indonesia.
Audrey Kahin was managing editor of Southeast Asia publications at Cornell and
coeditor and editor of the journal Indonesia from 1978 to 1995. She has also written
extensively on Indonesia and Southeast Asia and visits the region frequently.
SECOND
For orders and information please contact the publisher EDITION
SCARECROW PRESS, INC.
A wholly owned subsidiary of
The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200
ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-4935-8
ROBERT CRIBB
Lanham, Maryland 20706 ISBN-10: 0-8108-4935-6
1-800-462-6420
fax 717-794-3803
90000
AUDREY KAHIN
9 7 80 8 1 0 84 9 3 58
www.scarecrowpress.com
HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES
OF WAR, REVOLUTION, AND CIVIL UNREST
Edited by Jon Woronoff
Asia
1. Vietnam, by William J. Duiker. 1989. Out of print. See No. 27.
2. Bangladesh, 2nd ed., by Craig Baxter and Syedur Rahman. 1996. Out
of print. See No. 48.
3. Pakistan, by Shahid Javed Burki. 1991. Out of print. See No. 33.
4. Jordan, by Peter Gubser. 1991
5. Afghanistan, by Ludwig W. Adamec. 1991. Out of print. See No. 47.
6. Laos, by Martin Stuart-Fox and Mary Kooyman. 1992. Out of print.
See No. 35.
7. Singapore, by K. Mulliner and Lian The-Mulliner. 1991
8. Israel, by Bernard Reich. 1992
9. Indonesia, by Robert Cribb. 1992. Out of print. See No. 51.
10. Hong Kong and Macau, by Elfed Vaughan Roberts, Sum Ngai Ling,
and Peter Bradshaw. 1992
11. Korea, by Andrew C. Nahm. 1993
12. Taiwan, by John F. Copper. 1993. Out of print. See No. 34.
13. Malaysia, by Amarjit Kaur. 1993. Out of print. See No. 36.
14. Saudi Arabia, by J. E. Peterson. 1993. Out of print. See No. 45.
15. Myanmar, by Jan Becka. 1995
16. Iran, by John H. Lorentz. 1995
17. Yemen, by Robert D. Burrowes. 1995
18. Thailand, by May Kyi Win and Harold Smith. 1995
19. Mongolia, by Alan J. K. Sanders. 1996. Out of print. See No. 42.
20. India, by Surjit Mansingh. 1996
21. Gulf Arab States, by Malcolm C. Peck. 1996
22. Syria, by David Commins. 1996. Out of Print. See No. 50.
23. Palestine, by Nafez Y. Nazzal and Laila A. Nazzal. 1997
24. Philippines, by Artemio R. Guillermo and May Kyi Win. 1997
Oceania
1. Australia, by James C. Docherty. 1992. Out of print. See No. 32.
2. Polynesia, by Robert D. Craig. 1993. Out of print. See No. 39.
3. Guam and Micronesia, by William Wuerch and Dirk Ballendorf.
1994
4. Papua New Guinea, by Ann Turner. 1994. Out of print. See No. 37.
5. New Zealand, by Keith Jackson and Alan McRobie. 1996
New Combined Series
25. Brunei Darussalam, by D. S. Ranjit Singh and Jatswan S. Sidhu.
1997
26. Sri Lanka, by S. W. R. de A. Samarasinghe and Vidyamali Samaras-
inghe. 1998
27. Vietnam, 2nd ed., by William J. Duiker. 1998
28. People’s Republic of China: 1949–1997, by Lawrence R. Sullivan,
with the assistance of Nancy Hearst. 1998
29. Afghanistan, 2nd ed., by Ludwig W. Adamec. 1997. Out of print. See
No. 47.
30. Lebanon, by As’ad AbuKhalil. 1998
31. Azerbaijan, by Tadeusz Swietochowski and Brian C. Collins. 1999
32. Australia, 2nd ed., by James C. Docherty. 1999
33. Pakistan, 2nd ed., by Shahid Javed Burki. 1999
34. Taiwan (Republic of China), 2nd ed., by John F. Copper. 2000
35. Laos, 2nd ed., by Martin Stuart-Fox. 2001
36. Malaysia, 2nd ed., by Amarjit Kaur. 2001
37. Papua New Guinea, 2nd ed., by Ann Turner. 2001
38. Tajikistan, by Kamoludin Abdullaev and Shahram Akbarzedeh. 2002
39. Polynesia, 2nd ed., by Robert D. Craig. 2002
40. North Korea, by Ilpyong J. Kim. 2003
41. Armenia, by Rouben Paul Adalian. 2002
42. Mongolia, 2nd ed., by Alan J. K. Sanders. 2003
43. Cambodia, by Justin Corfield and Laura Summers. 2003
44. Iraq, by Edmund A. Ghareeb with the assistance of Beth Dougherty.
2004
45. Saudi Arabia, 2nd ed., by J. E. Peterson. 2003
46. Nepal, by Nanda R. Shrestha and Keshav Bhattarai. 2003
47. Afghanistan, 3rd ed., by Ludwig W. Adamec. 2003
48. Bangladesh, 3rd ed., by Craig Baxter and Syedur Rahman. 2003
49. Kyrgyzstan, by Rafis Abazov. 2004
50. Syria, 2nd ed., by David Commins. 2004
51. Indonesia, 2nd ed., by Robert Cribb and Audrey Kahin. 2004
Historical Dictionary
of Indonesia
Second Edition
Robert Cribb
Audrey Kahin
PO Box 317
Oxford
OX2 9RU, UK
v
Editor’s Foreword
When the first edition of this volume appeared just over a decade ago, it
would have seemed almost pointless to ask in which direction Indonesia
would turn. Everything seemed perfectly clear. It had a political regime that
was, if anything, too stable and an economy that was moving smartly ahead
toward a secure status as a newly industrialized country. But now, with the
damage caused by the Asian financial crisis and the uncertainty since the
fall of Suharto, there are many questions to answer: political, economic, so-
cial, and even religious. Will democracy take hold this time, or will insta-
bility reign (unless the army intervenes again)? Will industrialization con-
tinue and supplement weaker agricultural and mining sectors, and will the
states leave more room for private enterprise? Will the many peoples, re-
gions, and classes come together or splinter further? Will Islam cohabit
comfortably with other religions, or will the appeal (or fear) of an Islamic
state be too strong? This book cannot provide the answers, but it can cer-
tainly elucidate the questions and give some idea of where Indonesia is
headed at present. So it is of much greater interest for all those concerned
about Indonesia, the Indonesians first and foremost, followed by the rest of
Southeast Asia and the broader world as well.
This second edition of the Historical Dictionary of Indonesia has been
thoroughly updated and considerably expanded, partly to round out its
overall coverage, and very much also to include information about the
many things that have occurred meanwhile. It has a double advantage in ex-
amining Indonesia as a country but also looking closely at its numerous
components, without which nothing makes sense. Thus, while the chronol-
ogy and introduction help us see the overall thrust, some of the most useful
dictionary entries deal with the specific ethnic groups, islands, and regions,
giving their history prior to the creation of the state of Indonesia and even
prior to Dutch colonization. Others present the most notable leaders of all
periods and important aspects of politics, economics, and social, cultural,
vii
viii • EDITOR’S FOREWORD
and religious life. The bibliography, which is also expanded and updated,
has the additional advantage of relating specific works to specific entries,
so readers know where to seek further information. And the list of
acronyms and abbreviations is virtually indispensable.
This book is the result of a joint effort. It is based on an excellent and
much-admired first edition by Robert Cribb, who has written widely about
Indonesian history and politics; was professor of Southeast Asian history at
the University of Queensland in St. Lucia, Australia; and is now at Aus-
tralian National University. It has been updated and expanded, while main-
taining much of the original text, by Audrey Kahin, who was managing ed-
itor of Southeast Asia Publications at Cornell University and coeditor, and
then editor, of Indonesia. She has also written extensively on Indonesia, in-
cluding several books, and is presently a freelance editor and writer.
What they both obviously share is an intense interest in the country,
where they have traveled frequently and widely, and an ability to convey
this interest to others. That may explain why this book is, among other
things, written in a style that can be easily read by students while including
a wealth of information that is not readily available elsewhere, and cer-
tainly not in such an accessible form.
Jon Woronoff
Series Editor
Preface
ix
x • PREFACE
also a greater focus in the dictionary on the Indonesian regions outside Java.
Although East Timor gained its independence in 1999, there are still several
extensive entries dealing with that territory and its relations with Indonesia,
for the Suharto regime’s invasion of East Timor in 1975 and the struggle
leading to its ultimate liberation have had a profound effect on the recent
history of the Republic of Indonesia.
Acknowledgments
Audrey Kahin
xi
Reader’s Note
Several changes have been made in the order of the components in the re-
vised Historical Dictionary of Indonesia to bring it into line with other vol-
umes in this series. The following is a brief guide to the main sections com-
prising the dictionary.
After this reader’s note, there is a list of acronyms and abbreviations.
This list is by no means exhaustive, as Indonesians seem to have an ongo-
ing inclination to update and introduce acronyms into their language at a
spectacular pace. It has also been necessary to retain many of the acronyms
that were of importance in earlier decades of Indonesia’s history but are no
longer in use. As in the first edition of the dictionary, I have followed the
rule that where the acronymic origin of a word has become obscure (e.g.,
Gestapu, Masjumi, Fretilin, Golkar, and PRRI/Permesta), the entry appears
under the acronym with a cross-reference from the full name. In the list of
acronyms, as in the dictionary as a whole, cross-references to other dic-
tionary entries are usually indicated by the use of bold type. I have at-
tempted to maintain a consistent use of terminology both in the acronym
and its translation. In using the dictionary, readers not familiar with an or-
ganization’s full title or its English meaning will find these in this list.
In the chronology that follows the maps, as in most of the rest of the dic-
tionary, the emphasis is on the more recent period rather than on the early
history of the archipelago. The same chronological divisions are used here
as in the historical section of the bibliography, so that it should be easy to
refer to the literature relating to the different periods. As is the practice
throughout the volume, bold type has been used to indicate a cross-refer-
ence to the relevant dictionary entries.
The introduction has been expanded to provide a more detailed back-
ground of Indonesia’s history, especially in the postindependence period,
and give a broader context for the entries that follow.
xiii
xiv • READER’S NOTE
Note: The headings under which the terms appear in the dictionary are set
in bold type.
xvii
xviii • ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
xlv
xlvi • CHRONOLOGY
1942 27–28 February: Battle of the Java Sea. 9 March: Dutch forces
on Java capitulate to Japan at Kalijati. 27 March: Dutch forces on Suma-
tra surrender unconditionally.
1943 June: Japanese order establishment of volunteer armies (Peta on
Java, Giyu gun on Sumatra).
1944 September: Japanese Prime Minister Kuniaki Koiso issues decla-
ration promising Indonesian independence.
1945 March: Japanese set up Investigatory Body for Indonesian indepen-
dence. June: Sukarno formulates Pancasila. 15 August: Japan surrenders.
17 August: Indonesia declares independence. 18 August: Constitution prom-
ulgated and Republic of Indonesia established. 29 September: First Allied
landings in Jakarta. 5 October: Formation of Indonesian army. 10 October:
CHRONOLOGY • li
1993 January–February: ABRI and PDI propose Try Sutrisno for vice
president. 27 February: Edi Sudrajat replaces Try as panglima. 17 March:
Sixth Development Cabinet announced; Benny Murdani dismissed as
minister of defense.
1995 January: Army kills three East Timor civilians. May: State Ad-
ministrative Court says government acted unlawfully in closing Tempo. 19
July: Pramoedya Ananta Toer awarded Magsaysay prize. August:
Netherlands Queen Beatrice visits Indonesia. 17 August: Indonesia cele-
brates 50 years of independence.
1996 Early January: Rebels in Papua seize British, Dutch, and Indone-
sian prisoners. April: Death of Suharto’s wife (Siti Hartinah “Tien”).
April–May: Sri Bintang Pamungkas sentenced to 34 months in jail. 20
June: Megawati Sukarnoputri excluded from Partai Demokrasi Indone-
sia (PDI) party congress held in Medan, and Suryadi endorsed as party
head. 19–20 June: Over 100 injured in protest demonstrations. June: Ten
churches burned or ransacked in Surabaya. 27 July: Government support-
ers attack and occupy Megawati’s party headquarters. 30 July: Muchtar
Pakpaham detained. 7 August: Suharto accuses Partai Rakyat Demokrasi
(PRD) of being like PKI. 9 August: Megawati appears at police headquar-
ters with other PDI members. 11–12 August: Budiman Sudjatmiko ar-
rested. 13 August: Suharto accuses PRD of trying to topple the govern-
ment. 11 October: Bishop Belo and Jose Ramos Horta awarded Nobel
CHRONOLOGY • lvii
Peace Prize. October: Several churches burned near Situbondo, East Java.
21 December: Churches ransacked in Tasikmalaya.
1997 30 January: Anti-Christian/Chinese violence in Rengadengklok.
January–March: Dayak Madurese violence in West Kalimantan leaves
hundreds dead. 29 May: In national elections, Golkar wins 74 percent of
the vote, PDI 3 percent, and PPP 23 percent. June–October: Jakarta
stock exchange falls over 30 percent. 14 August: Rupiah floated. Sep-
tember: Race riots in Sulawesi. 11 September: Parliament approves a
new labor law. September–October: Forest fires rage in Kalimantan and
Sumatra. 19 October: Suharto announces he will run again as president.
20 October: Central bank cuts interest rates. 31 October: First Interna-
tional Monetary Fund (IMF) package announced. November: Govern-
ment closes 16 banks.
Post-Suharto: 1998–Present
(syariah). 15 August: Human rights court clears six army and police offi-
cers of crimes against humanity in East Timor. 31 August: Gunmen attack
jeep near Freeport mine in Papua, killing two Americans and an Indone-
sian. September: Akbar Tanjung, Golkar head and speaker of Parliament,
sentenced to three years in jail for misusing $4 million of government funds.
He appeals. 30 September: Army–police clash over marijuana trade near
Medan leaves eight dead and over 20 wounded. 12 October: Bomb blast
destroys nightclub in Bali, killing 202 people, about half foreign, 88 of them
Australian tourists. Mid-October: 1,000 members of Laskar Jihad return to
Java from Ambon; their leader Ja’far Umar Thalib states that they have dis-
banded. 18 October: Indonesia issues emergency decree on terrorism. Late
October: Government orders arrest of Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, allegedly spiri-
tual leader of Jemaah Islamiah; despite being in hospital, he is taken into de-
tention. 5 November: Police arrest Amrozi bin Nurhasyim, who allegedly
bought and transported the bombs used in the Bali bombings. 9 December:
Indonesian government and Acehnese rebel negotiators sign a peace agree-
ment. 17 December: The World Court awards the small Celebes Sea islands
of Ligitan and Sipadan to Malaysia. December: East Timor’s parliament
ratifies a treaty with Australia on production, profit sharing, and distribution
of royalties and taxes from oil and gas reserves.
2003 January: Lt. Col. Sujarwo, former army commander in East Timor,
is convicted of failing to prevent attacks on home of Bishop Belo; Jakarta
High Court upholds jail sentence against Akbar Tanjung; government raises
prices for fuels, electricity, and communications, sparking large protest
demonstrations in many Indonesian cities; a presidential instruction (inpres)
proposes dividing Papua into three provinces; FBI links Indonesian soldiers
to the 31 August 2002 killing of two Americans near the Freeport mine in
Papua; in response to public opposition, government repeals many of the
price hikes on fuel and other items. 2 February: Police arrest terrorist sus-
pect Selamat Kastari, accused of complicity in terrorist attacks. February:
Megawati confirms that she will run for reelection in 2004. 25 February:
United Nations indicts General Wiranto and other officers for crimes against
humanity during East Timor’s independence vote in 1999. March: Indone-
sia states it will ignore the UN’s arrest warrants for Wiranto and the others
accused. 13 March: Former East Timor commander Brig. Gen. Noer Moeis
sentenced to five years in jail. 26 March: Megawati addresses meeting of
Non-Aligned Movement in Kuala Lumpur, and Indonesia formally requests
UN Security Council to convene an emergency meeting on Iraq. 31 March:
Hundreds of thousands participate in antiwar protests against U.S.-led war
in Iraq. 4 April: Government declares severe acute respiratory syndrome
lxii • CHRONOLOGY
A wide-flung archipelago lying between the Pacific and Indian Oceans, In-
donesia is the world’s most populous Islamic country. For over 2,000 years,
it was a crossroads on the major trading route between China and India, but
was not brought together into a single entity until the Dutch extended their
rule throughout the Netherlands East Indies in the early part of the 20th
century. Declaring its independence from the Dutch in 1945, the Republic
of Indonesia was ruled by only two regimes over the next half century—the
nonaligned parliamentary and Guided Democracy of the flamboyant
Sukarno and the Western-oriented authoritarian military rule of General
Suharto. Neither regime was able to realize the country’s potential either
economically or politically, and after Suharto’s resignation in 1998 his suc-
cessors have struggled in varying degrees to introduce a more democratic
and representative structure of government. They have been faced on the
one hand with separatist movements and widespread ethnic and religious
violence and on the other with a military eager to reassert its dominance of
the state. At the same time, there have been formidable economic chal-
lenges to be overcome in the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis of the
last years of the 20th century.
Lying between the Asian and Australian continents and between the Indian
and Pacific Oceans, the Indonesian archipelago straddles the Equator, be-
tween 6º08'N and 11º15'S and between 94º45'W and 141º05'E. The Repub-
lic of Indonesia shares land borders with Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, and
Australia. There are three official time zones, 7–9 hours ahead of Green-
wich mean time.
lxiii
lxiv • INTRODUCTION
ging that has taken place over the past three decades, soil degradation has
been rapid. In Java and West Sumatra, basic andesitic volcanic materials
ejected from volcanoes are responsible for the high levels of fertility in
those regions. There are approximately 829 active volcanoes in Indonesia
today.
Indonesia’s population is predominantly mixed Austronesian-Austrome-
lanesian in origin, with the Austromelanesian component becoming
stronger in the east. There has always been a basic cultural division be-
tween the coastal peoples and the upland interior groups (such as the Bataks
of Sumatra and the Dayaks of Kalimantan), who until recently depended on
shifting slash-and-burn agriculture. Over the centuries, there has been con-
siderable admixture of Chinese and Arab elements, and a large Chinese mi-
nority exists throughout the archipelago mainly in urban areas. The popu-
lation is estimated in the 2000 census at 206.3 million, of whom the
majority live on Java. Islam is the principal religion, but there are signifi-
cant Christian (Protestant and Catholic), Hindu, and Buddhist minorities.
EARLY HISTORY
Although the first human settlement in the archipelago has been dated from
1.9 million years ago, the ancestors of most modern Indonesians arrived
from the north from about 3000 B.C. Hindu and Buddhist kingdoms
emerged in many parts of the western archipelago from the fifth century
A.D. In the early centuries of the Christian era, trading ships from India be-
gan to ply the Melaka Strait, and it was perhaps two centuries later that di-
rect trade began between the western archipelago and China. Indian culture,
in particular, exerted a powerful influence on the character of the states that
developed in the archipelago. By the seventh century, there were two prin-
cipal types of political units: the maritime trading states along the coasts of
Sumatra, North Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, and some of the other eastern
islands, and the rice-based inland kingdoms, particularly those in East and
Central Java.
Predominant among the maritime states was Srivijaya, a Mahayana Bud-
dhist kingdom on Sumatra’s southeast coast, which, by the late seventh cen-
tury, was a center of trade with India and for several centuries monopolized
much of China’s commerce with the Malacca Strait and the western archi-
pelago. Several rice-based Hindu-Buddhist kingdoms developed in the in-
terior of Java between the eighth and 14th centuries, including the Hindu
kingdom of Mataram, which flourished on Central Java’s Dieng Plateau in
lxvi • INTRODUCTION
From the early 16th century, the trading states of island Southeast Asia
faced growing pressure from the Portuguese, British, Spaniards, and Dutch,
all of whom were seeking to profit from the European demand for spices.
The Portuguese made a major effort to wrest the spice trade from the local
Islamic states. They conquered the Sultanate of Melaka in 1511, and from
there attempted to exclude all competitors from the trade to Europe. In re-
sponse, the local powers strove to establish alternative trading routes. The
most powerful of the competing trading states was Aceh, which by the 16th
INTRODUCTION • lxvii
system was partly responsible for the widespread famine that swept parts
of Java in the 1840s and 1850s.
Concurrently, Dutch power was spreading over other parts of the archi-
pelago. Their forces intervened in West Sumatra against the reformist Mus-
lim Paderi movement, finally defeating and exiling its leader, Tuanku Imam
Bonjol, in 1837. In the 1850s they annexed Sumatra’s northeast coast prin-
cipalities and the tin-mining island of Belitung (Billiton). Finally, after 30
years of warfare, Dutch forces subdued Aceh and Bali in 1908 and 1909
and continued to bring regions of Sulawesi, Maluku, the Lesser Sundas,
and most of Kalimantan under firmer control.
A bitter campaign by Dutch liberals against the Cultivation System suc-
ceeded by the 1870s in removing some of its harsher aspects, though forced
deliveries of coffee continued until 1919. Oil, tin, and rubber, coming
mostly from the newly acquired areas of Sumatra and Kalimantan, began to
replace coffee, sugar, and tobacco as the main exports to Europe. At the be-
ginning of the 20th century, the Dutch introduced their “Ethical Policy” in
part as a response to domestic criticisms of government policies in the In-
dies, but also as a means of training a local workforce to help run the ex-
panding state bureaucracy. Infrastructure of the archipelago was expanded
through the development of railways, roads, and interisland shipping, and
more health and educational facilities were provided for the local people.
Although this change had very limited results, with only a few thousand
Indonesians receiving even a secondary-level Western education, the pol-
icy did help create two new social elements in the archipelago: a small
Western-educated intelligentsia, particularly on Java, which served the
colonial regime (mostly in clerical roles); and an even smaller group of en-
trepreneurs and smallholders on some other islands, who began to compete
with a still predominantly Chinese commercial class. In time, both ele-
ments became resentful of a colonial structure that denied them a role
commensurate with their education and abilities.
Local entrepreneurs formed the basis of the first major anti-Dutch nation-
alist movement, the Sarekat Islam (SI, Islamic Union), established in 1912,
which grew out of an association of batik merchants formed in an attempt
to contain competition from Chinese entrepreneurs. By 1918 it claimed a
membership of more than 2 million, with branches throughout the Nether-
INTRODUCTION • lxix
lands East Indies. Responding in part to the SI’s calls for self-government,
the Dutch established a Volksraad (People’s Council) at the end of World
War I, but the few indigenous members of this advisory body had little in-
fluence.
Other organizations questioning Dutch rule also developed during the
1910s, the strongest being the Indies Social Democratic Association (ISDV),
made up largely of intellectuals—Dutch, Eurasian, and Indonesian—who
saw socialist teachings as directly relevant to the colonial situation they
faced in the Indies. At that time it was possible to hold membership in more
than one political party, so these radicals also constituted an influential com-
ponent of the SI. In 1920 the ISDV became the Communist Association of
the Indies, which developed into the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI).
Conflict grew between the communist and Islamic streams within the
Sarekat Islam, until the communists were expelled from all branches of the
party in 1923. Severely weakened by this struggle, the Sarekat Islam never
regained its coherence, size, and unity. A deep schism also developed within
the Communist Party, and an effort to mount a nationwide anticolonial rev-
olution planned for 1926 resulted in only a few scattered outbreaks, mainly
in Banten and West Sumatra. The Dutch easily suppressed these uprisings
and then took harsh steps to eradicate the influence of the communists and
other anticolonial groups from the Indies.
From then on, the anti-Dutch political movement in Indonesia was
headed by leaders who were not identified closely with either communism
or Islam. Sukarno, Mohammad Hatta, and Sutan Sjahrir emerged as the
foremost nationalist leaders. Sukarno founded the Indonesian National
Party (PNI) in 1927, an organization that demanded complete indepen-
dence from the Dutch. In October 1928, a youth congress articulated In-
donesian aspirations in the slogan “Indonesia, one people, one language,
one motherland” and adopted Indonesian as the national language.
Alarmed by the strength of Sukarno’s following, the Dutch arrested him,
together with seven other party leaders, at the end of 1929. The remaining
leader of the PNI dissolved the party and adopted more cautious policies.
Although Sukarno was released from jail in 1931, he was arrested again
two years later and sent into exile until the Japanese released him in 1942.
Mohammad Hatta and Sutan Sjahrir, who saw Sukarno’s 1929 arrest as
proof of their contention that mass parties under charismatic leadership
were very vulnerable to Dutch counterattack, sought instead to train a small
cadre of potential leaders in many parts of Indonesia. But this effort also
failed and both leaders were arrested in 1934, remaining in exile until the
eve of the Japanese occupation.
lxx • INTRODUCTION
After these arrests, more moderate leaders and parties emerged who were
willing to work within the parameters set by the colonial administration.
They based their party programs on cooperation with the Dutch and grad-
ual achievement of self-government but attracted only a small following.
The Netherlands government rejected even such modest proposals as the
Volksraad’s request for an Indonesian parliament and the Soetardjo petition
(mid-1936) calling for evolutionary development toward self-government.
Only in 1941 after Germany overran the Netherlands did the Dutch queen
promise some postwar devolution of political authority.
The Japanese dealt a humiliating defeat to the Dutch in early 1942, and
three and a half years of Japanese occupation dismantled the Dutch power
structure, dividing the archipelago into three separate military administra-
tions. Of these, the Japanese regime on Java was most sympathetic to the
Indonesian nationalists, allowing Sukarno, Hatta, and other prewar leaders
freedom to address large audiences in return for their help in mobilizing In-
donesian support for the Japanese war effort. Outside Java, the Japanese
military authorities were extremely repressive, permitting the nationalists
no more latitude than had the Dutch.
From September 1943, the Japanese established “volunteer” militias in
Java, Bali, Sumatra, and Kalimantan to help repel expected Allied landings.
In October 1944, in an effort to muster support against these anticipated at-
tacks, the Japanese promised independence to Indonesia and partially re-
laxed controls over the nationalist leaders’ activities on Java; but prior to
their surrender to the Allies on 15 August 1945, they paid little more than
lip service to their promise of self-government.
On 17 August 1945, Sukarno and Hatta proclaimed Indonesia’s indepen-
dence, and the following day members of a Japanese-sponsored preparatory
committee for independence elected them president and vice president of the
new Republic of Indonesia. By late September, when British forces on be-
half of the Allied command began to land in Java and Sumatra to accept the
Japanese surrender, a functioning Republican administration already existed
in much of these two islands. When the British attempted to take over the
administration on behalf of the Dutch, they met with fierce resistance in
many parts of Java and Sumatra. But in the eastern archipelago, Australian
forces had already established themselves in New Guinea and parts of Kali-
mantan before the Japanese surrender, and they were able to restore Dutch
authority with comparative ease to most of these areas. The relative strength
of the Republic in Java and Sumatra and of the Dutch in the eastern archi-
pelago was reluctantly acknowledged by both sides. Thus, before their with-
drawal in November 1946, the British were able to persuade the Dutch as
INTRODUCTION • lxxi
Suspicions between the center of power on Java and the other islands
were exacerbated by views with regard to Islam’s role in the new state. In
1945 the formateurs of the Constitution had established the Pancasila, or
Five Principles—belief in the one God, humanitarianism, nationalism, de-
mocracy, and social justice—as the ideology on which the state would rest.
The lack of a specifically Islamic religious orientation created dissatisfac-
tion, particularly in the strongly Muslim areas of the Outer Islands and West
Java, a dissatisfaction that soon led to serious rebellions by the Darul Islam
(House of Islam) especially in West Java, Aceh, and South Sulawesi.
There was also a severe rift between the new state’s civilian and military
sectors. Most army officers regarded themselves and their forces as the ma-
jor component in Indonesia’s achievement of independence. They viewed
with contempt the faction-torn, ineffective, and often corrupt governments
that followed each other in rapid succession during the early 1950s. The na-
tionwide elections finally held in 1955 did little to resolve the country’s
problems, for there was no clear winner. Four parties emerged with sub-
stantial support—the National Party (PNI), the modernist Islamic Masjumi,
the traditionalist Islamic NU, and the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI).
Only one of these parties, the Masjumi, had a major following outside Java.
Outer-island disillusionment with political developments was further
strengthened by the insufficient funds allocated to economic development
of regions outside Java, despite their providing most of the country’s export
earnings. Responding to this dissatisfaction, regional military commanders,
particularly in Sumatra and Sulawesi, began large-scale smuggling in copra
and rubber, using the profits for themselves, their soldiers, and their re-
gions. In a series of largely bloodless coups between December 1956 and
March 1957, army-led councils seized power from the local civilian au-
thorities in several regions of Sumatra and Sulawesi. The dissidents in
Sumatra were joined in December 1957 by several top Masjumi party lead-
ers forced to flee Jakarta by increased harassment from leftist mobs in the
aftermath of an assassination attempt against Sukarno at the end of No-
vember. Emboldened by support from these civilian political leaders, the
dissident colonels in Sumatra and Sulawesi challenged the government in
Jakarta by proclaiming a competing Revolutionary Government of the Re-
public of Indonesia (PRRI) on 15 February 1958. Despite arms and covert
paramilitary assistance to the insurgents from the United States and Taiwan,
Jakarta’s army soon defeated the major rebel forces on Sumatra, though it
took longer for government troops to gain the upper hand in Sulawesi.
Guerrilla activity against the central government continued on both islands
until 1961.
INTRODUCTION • lxxiii
presidential power to him on 11 March 1966. The army alleged PKI re-
sponsibility in the Gestapu, and, despite Sukarno’s efforts to prevent the
bloodshed, during 1965–1966 army units together with some Muslim or-
ganizations and others launched massacres of communists and supporters
of their mass organizations, with estimates of the dead ranging between
300,000 and 1 million. The PKI was banned on 13 March 1966, and the
army arrested hundreds of thousands of people accused of having ties to the
party.
At the end of the Sukarno era, Indonesia was left with an economy close
to collapse. Sukarno’s renunciation of Western aid had exacerbated the
country’s parlous economic situation and expanded its debt. Budget deficits
were nearly half of the country’s gross domestic product, exports had de-
clined drastically, and inflation had risen to an annual rate of almost 600
percent.
was the only contender allowed to organize at the village level. Through
constant manipulation, the government was able to ensure that Golkar’s
share of the vote never fell below 62 percent. By the 1987 elections when
Golkar achieved a record 73.2 percent of the vote, it seemed that Suharto
had effectively turned the political parties into nonoppositional bodies.
But although the government was successful in eliminating any challenge
in the political arena, particularly from Islamic organizations, critics of the
regime, lacking a legitimate spokesperson, had little option but to oppose the
government in less legitimate ways. Eruptions of discontent surfaced peri-
odically throughout the New Order, from the Malari of 1974 to the violent
demonstrations that eventually removed Suharto from power in 1998.
The Suharto regime also perceived maintenance of national integration as
a basic problem, and to preserve the country’s unity the government em-
ployed a policy of militarization and centralization. In 1969 Suharto reor-
ganized the armed forces into a system of regional commands in which Ja-
vanese dominated all top echelons of the army hierarchy, especially in the
regions outside Java. Through the army’s territorial structure, the regime
was able to exert political pressure at every level of society, monitoring and
largely controlling political and social developments. It expanded the con-
cept of the army’s dual function (dwifungsi), originally developed by former
army commander A. H. Nasution in the 1950s, asserting the army’s duty to
participate as a “social-political force” throughout the society. The firmness
of central military control was successful in preventing any serious chal-
lenge to Jakarta from any of the previously volatile regional commands.
At the same time, Jakarta utilized one of the major components of In-
donesia’s development policy, the transmigration program, to strengthen its
control over potentially dissident areas, transferring people from the
densely populated provinces of Central and East Java to Sumatra, Kali-
mantan, and Sulawesi as well as East Timor and Irian Jaya (Papua). But this
program also increased fears of Javanese colonization in these areas, and
the ecological damage inflicted by many of these settlements strengthened
opposition to the policy and led to international criticism. In the final years
of the Suharto regime, the policy was reduced drastically.
These measures were insufficient to prevent, and indeed may have en-
couraged, strong disaffection in three major regions: East Timor, Papua
(Irian Jaya), and Aceh. Indonesia’s invasion of East Timor at the end of 1975
was never accepted by the people of that territory and led to a long, drawn-
out, bloody, and brutal war in which perhaps a third of East Timor’s popu-
lation died. Similarly in Papua, after the Dutch finally relinquished control
via the United Nations, Jakarta had to wage a “secret war” against stubborn
lxxvi • INTRODUCTION
resistance from a number of Papuan groups, the largest being the Organiza-
tion for a Free Papua (OPM), which were increasingly supported by local
dissatisfaction at the exploitation of their region’s resources and the brutal
repression that accompanied this. In Aceh, too, local outrage at Jakarta’s ex-
ploitation of the region’s oil and gas resources and the brutal policies used
to enforce this succeeded in turning what began as a weak, locally based
Free Aceh Movement (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka, GAM) into a potent force
enjoying considerable popular support throughout the province.
Between Suharto’s accession to power in 1966 and the early 1990s, In-
donesia experienced rapid economic development that contributed to a ris-
ing standard of living for its population. Between 1965 and 1996, its econ-
omy grew at an annual rate of about 7 percent, a growth underpinned in
large part by foreign investment. This economic growth was accompanied
by a decline in the incidence of absolute poverty and by marked improve-
ment in both education and health care. During these years there was a
striking shift from agriculture to industry, in large part based on the pro-
cessing of petroleum and natural gas. By 1993 the World Bank character-
ized Indonesia as a “high-performing Asian economy.” But its development
during these years had been built in large part on loans negotiated at the be-
ginning of the Suharto era, and by the late 1980s Indonesia had the largest
foreign debt in Southeast Asia, with the burden of servicing this debt ac-
counting for 37 percent of all government expenditures. In Suharto’s final
years, moreover, his economic achievements were undermined by the
widespread corruption that increasingly permeated all parts of his govern-
ment. Together with the economy’s growing ties to global capital markets,
this corruption rendered it vulnerable in the aftermath of the collapse of the
Thai currency and the onset of the Asian financial crisis in 1997.
This financial crisis, along with the perception that the Suharto regime
was riddled with corruption and the perception of an alternative as
Megawati Sukarnoputri emerged at the head of the revitalized PDI, all con-
tributed to a growing crisis that engulfed the regime in early 1998 and
forced Suharto’s resignation in May of that year. His unexpected and rapid
capitulation to the forces confronting him opened the way for Vice Presi-
dent B. J. Habibie’s accession to the presidency.
The relatively smooth transfer of power in May 1998 left almost all of the
New Order structure in place, impeding efforts to implement the reformasi
INTRODUCTION • lxxvii
that had been the battle cry of the forces opposing Suharto. Although
viewed as weak and mercurial, B. J. Habibie instituted policies that had a
significant effect on Indonesia’s future course, most notably by initiating
steps that ultimately enabled East Timor to gain its independence and by in-
troducing a decentralization law dismantling the centralized structure that
had characterized the Indonesian state since independence. Habibie also
oversaw a remarkably successful and peaceful election process, the first
fair election held since 1955. Megawati Sukarnoputri’s Democratic Party of
Struggle (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan, PDI-P) emerged from
the election with a plurality of the vote. Golkar and the PPP came in sec-
ond and fourth, and longtime NU head Abdurrachman Wahid’s new Rise of
the People Party (Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa, PKB) took third place.
Wahid’s political maneuvering enabled him to succeed Habibie as presi-
dent, but through his erratic behavior and apparent inability to confront the
country’s major problems, he squandered the opportunity offered him. He
antagonized both parliament and the military and was ultimately im-
peached in July 2001, with Megawati voted in as his successor.
The government under both Wahid and Megawati continued to be
plagued by the corruption that had characterized the Suharto regime, espe-
cially in its later years. Although the implementation of the decentralization
law proceeded much more smoothly than had been anticipated, it did not
stem the ethnic and religious violence that had broken out in many parts of
the archipelago, especially Kalimantan, Maluku, and Sulawesi, in the wake
of Suharto’s resignation. In addition, the heavy-handedness of the Indone-
sian military response to the separatist movements in both Aceh and Papua
exacerbated the disaffection in those two provinces. Under Megawati, the
armed forces were given a much freer hand, particularly in Aceh, to crush
the rebels by whatever means necessary. The all-out military operation
against the rebels in Aceh further exacerbated opposition there to the cen-
tral government, as the government’s division of the province of Papua into
three smaller provinces antagonized the disaffected population there.
These problems were rendered only more intractable by the terrorist
movements that emerged in many parts of the world in the wake of the Sep-
tember 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington, DC. Pressure on the
Indonesian government to take strong action against radical Islamic ele-
ments came not only from the United States but also from Indonesia’s
neighbors, Malaysia and Singapore. Finally, in response to a disastrous
bombing attack in Bali in October 2002 that killed over 200 people,
Megawati’s government cracked down on suspected members of the shad-
owy organization, the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI, Islamic Community), which
lxxviii • INTRODUCTION
At the same time, there was a slow but steady improvement in Indone-
sia’s economic situation, as the rupiah strengthened and inflation was
curbed. Foreign investment remained sluggish in the aftermath of the ter-
rorist attacks, but the economic outlook for 2004 was relatively good with
an anticipated growth rate of between 4 and 5 percent. In October 2003 the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) praised the government’s handling of
the economy, approving a final loan in the program set up in the late 1990s
to help Indonesia recover from the Asian financial crisis. The Indonesian
government intended to end the loan program at the end of 2003, thus free-
ing itself from IMF conditions that it felt were not in tune with Indonesia’s
social and economic needs.
The Dictionary
–A–
1
2 • ABDURRACHMAN WAHID
years previously for his impeachment, a dismissal that was upheld by the
Jakarta High Court. [0771, 0760, 1029]
ADAT. Arabic term literally meaning “custom,” as distinct from law laid
down in the Qur’an and other texts. Adat has come to denote all indige-
nous customary law in Indonesia, as opposed to the codified civil and
criminal law of the colonial and Republican governments, as well as,
more narrowly, the body of customary law as recorded in the late 19th
and early 20th century by Dutch scholars, notably Cornelis van Vol-
lenhoven, Snouck Hurgronje, and G. A. Wilken and given the name
adatrecht (“adat law”). The compilers identified 19 adatrechtskringen
or adat law zones of similar legal tradition. This codification was un-
dertaken to allow the partial application of “traditional” law to the in-
digenous peoples of the regions as part of a more general policy of
indirect rule. Adat law, as codified, has tended to emphasize the collec-
tivist aspects of traditional practice, in which crimes committed by an
individual against another are seen as committed by and against the
whole community. See also ISLAM; LAW; ZELFBESTUREN. [0479,
1075, 1082, 1083, 1084]
AGRARIAN LAW OF 1870 • 7
AIDS. Since the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was first identified
in Indonesia in 1985, AIDS has spread rapidly in Indonesian society. By
2001 an estimated 80,000 to 120,000 Indonesians were living with HIV,
and according to the Indonesian government cumulative HIV/AIDS
cases jumped 60 percent from 2000 to 2001, with 635 AIDS cases and
1,678 HIV infections reported from January to September 2001. An esti-
mated 3,856 AIDS deaths had occurred through 2000, and a further 274
AIDS deaths were reported between January and September 2001. The
first infections were probably brought by Western tourists to Bali, but at
least since the early 1990s the main conduits of infection have been
sailors and fishermen from Thailand and India, and long-distance truck
and bus drivers in Indonesia itself. Ignorance of the cause of infection,
religious objection to the use of condoms, widespread extramarital sex
by men, and routine reuse of needles in medical procedures have all con-
tributed to the spread of the disease. In 1987 the government launched a
National AIDS Control Commission (NACC) and in 1994 created a min-
isterial AIDS Prevention and Control Commission. The campaign to
limit the spread of AIDS has concentrated on the “family values” of fi-
delity and chastity rather than on “safe sex.” See also HEALTH; PROS-
TITUTION; SEX. [1205, 1206]
and Bali. After the fall of Srivijaya in 1024–1025, he expanded his power
on Java, creating a network of alliances and vassalages centered on the
Brantas river valley. Although regional chiefs (bupati) remained power-
ful, Airlangga’s kingdom was more centralized than any before that time.
He built irrigation works in the Brantas delta, which controlled flooding
and enabled a major expansion in the cultivation of rice, which was ex-
ported through the new deepened harbor of Surabaya to other parts of
the archipelago. He is also credited with increasing the Javanese content
of court culture and with diminishing its Indian elements. In about 1045,
according to legend, Airlangga abdicated to become an ascetic after hav-
ing divided his kingdom between his two sons to form the kingdoms of
Kediri and Janggala. [0509, 0512, 0516, 0520]
ALI-BABA FIRMS. They had their roots in the cooperation between Chi-
nese smugglers and Indonesian officials during the Japanese occupa-
ALIRAN • 13
tion and particularly during the revolutionary war, when the Republic
sanctioned the trading of local products in exchange for hard cash or mil-
itary supplies, using Chinese businessmen. In the 1950s establishment of
such firms was an effort to circumvent legislation encouraging pribumi
business at the expense of the Chinese. In practice firms were still run by
a Chinese (“Baba”), with an Indonesian (“Ali”) as nominal head, some-
times providing political protection. See also CUKONG; INDONE-
SIANIZATION. [1045, 1068]
news agency in 1945. Several agencies were merged with Antara in 1963
to form the Lembaga Kantor Berita Nasional (LKBN, National News
Agency Institute), but the name Antara is retained for daily use. [1304]
ARMY (Angkatan Darat, AD). The Indonesian army dates its founding to
5 October 1945, when the new national government announced the cre-
ation of a Tentara Keamanan Rakyat (TKR, People’s Security Army) and
gave a mandate for the actual formation of an army to Urip Sumoharjo,
a retired major from the Dutch colonial army (Koninklijk Nederland-
sch Indisch Leger [KNIL]). The government had previously (on 22 Au-
gust) created a quasi-military Badan Keamanan Rakyat (BKR, People’s
Security Organization), responsibility for which was largely devolved to
regional national committees (Komité Nasional Indonesia, KNI); BKR
units in general formed the basis of the TKR.
The new army drew its officer corps principally from former soldiers
and officers of the KNIL and the Japanese-sponsored Pembela Tanah
Air (Peta) on Java and Giyugun on Sumatra. For about 40 years, the
army remained under the domination of the so-called Generation of ’45
(see GENERATIONS) who first made their mark and obtained com-
mand posts during the national Revolution. The ranks of this generation
ARMY • 23
held by the navy and air force were taken over by the army. The aims of
the reorganization were primarily to emphasize the importance of inter-
nal security vis-à-vis that of external threat. In 1988 army personnel of-
ficially numbered 215,000. Murdani’s strengthening grip on the military,
however, drew the suspicion of the president, leading to his abrupt re-
moval from his position as commander in chief in February 1988 (though
he was appointed minister of defense and held onto his post as Kop-
kamtib commander) and replacement by army chief of staff and former
Suharto aide, Try Sutrisno.
From that point on, particularly after Murdani’s later dismissal from
his post as minister of defense in 1993, it became clear that Suharto was
attempting to strengthen his personal control over the army, a situation
reflected in the rapid personnel changes in the top army leadership
throughout the mid-1990s. The growing strength of Suharto’s connection
to Muslim organizations and the resultant increase in the influence of
Muslim officers, together with a shift in the army’s relations with
Golkar and the increasing influence of Suharto family members, such as
the president’s son-in-law Prabowo Subianto in the army and his
daughter Siti Hardijanti Rukmana (Tutut) in Golkar, led to increasing
schisms within the officer corps and a resultant weakening of its power.
As dissension grew with the financial crisis and collapse of the rupiah
in late 1997 and early 1998, Suharto made efforts to protect himself by
placing officers of undisputed loyalty in key positions around the na-
tion’s capital, but the army became incapable of decisive action. This
was clear in May 1998 when Suharto called on the military to defend him
and, instead, Armed Forces Commander in Chief Wiranto was one of
those who advised the president to abdicate in favor of his vice president
B. J. Habibie.
Immediately after Suharto’s resignation Prabowo, as Kostrad com-
mander, made an effort to replace Wiranto but was instead himself dis-
missed. Subsequently Wiranto moved to remove or transfer officers
closely allied with Prabowo from influential positions and subsequently
announced a program of military reforms reducing the army’s political
role in Indonesian society. On Armed Forces Day (5 October) 1998, he
announced the separation of the national police from the armed forces
and the reversion of the armed forces’ name to Tentara Nasional Indone-
sia (TNI), publicly cutting the army’s ties to Golkar and declaring its
neutrality in the forthcoming electoral campaign. He also agreed to the
TNI’s representation in parliament being reduced from 75 to 38 seats,
and he drastically reduced the numbers of army personnel seconded to
26 • ARMY
ASLI (“original”). Term widely used to describe cultural elements and tradi-
tions believed to predate Muslim, Christian, and often Hindu-Buddhist in-
fluence. Several small tribal groups—the Badui (West Java), Tenggerese
(East Java), Bali Aga (Bali), Buda (Lombok), and Donggo (Sumbawa)—
are believed to preserve the traditional culture of their respective regions.
(See also SAMIN MOVEMENT. [0487])
Asli is also an ambiguous term for indigenous people, often used in the
context of some form of discrimination against foreigners. Asli may
mean “born in Indonesia”—the 1945 Constitution prescribes that the
president shall be asli and seems to be based on the article of the U.S.
constitution, which requires the president to be native-born—or it may
30 • ASMAT
–B–
BAJAU. Also known as Sea People (orang laut) or Sea Gypsies, the Bajau
are a seafaring Malay people of eastern Indonesia and the southern Philip-
pines, typically living aboard boats or in small settlements of temporary
BALI • 39
houses on stilts over the sea. Their dispersal from a presumed home in
southern Sulawesi may date from the fall of Makassar to Dutch and
Bugis forces in 1667 or to the commercial opportunities offered by
trepang collection. During the 18th–19th centuries, Bajau fleets ranged as
far as Australia in search of trepang for the China trade. [0549]
BALI. Although the culture and society of Bali have been studied exten-
sively, until recently relatively little was written on the island’s history.
Probably Hindu from the eighth or ninth century (the first Hindu inscrip-
tions record a king Warmadewa in the ninth century), Bali was ruled at
least in part by the Javanese king Airlangga in the early 11th century and
was conquered by Majapahit in 1334. A period of intensive Javanization
followed, and contemporary Balinese sometimes refer to themselves as
wong Majapahit (people of Majapahit). There is said, too, to have been
considerable migration of Javanese Hindus to Bali following the fall of
Majapahit to the pasisir states in 1527. The island remained divided be-
tween nine or so independent states—Klungkung, Karangasem, Mengwi,
Badung, Bangli, Tabanan, Gianyar, Buleleng, and Jembrana—though the
40 • BALI
During the 1980s, the islands were developed for tourism by Des
Alwi (whom Sjahrir had adopted during his exile on the island), but their
popularity declined markedly during the interethnic violence following
the fall of Suharto, which engulfed the Maluku islands. [0087, 0491]
BANGKA. Large island off the southeast coast of Sumatra, site of major
tin mines since 1710, operated at first by the sultan of Palembang, who
began to introduce laborers from China, Siam, and Vietnam. British
forces seized Bangka in 1806 and abolished the sultanate in 1816, but the
island was restored to the Dutch, who continued tin mining as a govern-
ment enterprise. The island also became a major exporter of white pep-
per in the 19th century, producing 90 percent of the world supply. After
falling to the Japanese in World War II, Bangka was reoccupied by the
Dutch in early 1946. The Dutch exiled Sukarno, Mohammad Hatta,
Haji Agus Salim (1884–1954), and other Republican leaders to the island
after their second “Police Action” of 19 December 1948. [0658, 0801]
BANKING. The Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) initially drew its
capital from the Netherlands and, having a monopoly of trade in the ar-
chipelago, had no wish to allow local credit facilities for others. In 1746,
however, Governor-General Gustaaf Willem, baron van Imhoff
(1705–1750), established a Bank van Leening (Lending Bank) in Batavia
for the support of trade enterprises. This minor retreat of Dutch capital
from direct investment to the financing of others was continued in the
19th century by the Nederlandsche Handel Maatschappij, which be-
gan as a trading company and ended as a largely banking operation.
Other major banks in the Netherlands Indies were the Nederlandsch-
Indische Handelsbank (established 1863), the Nederlandsch-Indische
Escompto-Maatschappij (established 1857), and the Koloniale Bank.
The Java Bank (Javasche Bank) was established in 1828 as a semipri-
vate, semigovernment bank of circulation (issuing currency), while the
Algemene Volkscredietbank (founded 1934) undertook small-scale loans
to and from the public.
During the Japanese occupation, commercial banking was taken
over by the Yokohama Specie bank while the Syomin Ginko replaced
the Volkscredietbank, becoming Bank Rakyat after independence.
When the Indonesian Republic nationalized the Java Bank in 1953,
turning it into the Bank Indonesia, the Bank Industri Negara (origi-
nally the Bureau Herstel Financiering, established by the Dutch in
1948) was made responsible for financing industrial development,
while the BNI financed imports and exports. Other Dutch banks were
nationalized in 1958, Escompto becoming the Bank Dagang Negara
(State Trading Bank), which subsequently especially financed mining.
In 1965 the various state banks were merged into the BNI, but they
separated again in December 1968. A National Development Savings
Scheme (Tabanas, Tabungan Pembangunan Nasional) was introduced
in 1971. On 27 October 1988 Indonesia announced a major deregula-
tion of the banking sector, including easier availability of foreign ex-
change licenses and permitting state enterprises to deposit funds with
private banks.
As a result, the number of banks increased from 112 in 1988 to 239 in
1996, many of which were not financially sound, as they had been mis-
managed or exploited by their owners. There was an immense volume of
uncollectable credits that had often been used to finance property proj-
ects run by other companies under the aegis of a bank’s owners. The cen-
tral bank (Bank Indonesia) had to come to the assistance of the failing
banks, and there was a growing number of financial scandals (see BANK
46 • BANKING
BARUS. Port on the west coast of Sumatra, north of Sibolga, and probably
the entry place for Indian influences penetrating the Batak interior. The
hinterland of Barus was an important source of camphor and benzoin,
and the port was possibly the one known as “P’o-lu” in Chinese records
of the seventh to eighth centuries. It was certainly the “Fansur” mentioned
as an important source of camphor in Arabic records of the ninth century
onward. By the early 16th century when it appears in the Suma Oriental
of Tomé Pires, it was a rich and busy port. Apparently the Minangkabau
rulers exerted influence over the region, but Acehnese territorial influence
spread there and by the late 16th century Aceh controlled the trade of
Barus along with that of other west Sumatran ports. [0793]
BATAVIA. Capital city of the Netherlands Indies, site of a Dutch East In-
dies Company (VOC) post from 1610, and founded in 1619 by J. P.
Coen as regional headquarters for the VOC, on the site of the Banten
port of Jayakarta. It was first constructed as a Dutch city, complete with
canals and walls to resist attack from Mataram, and much of the sur-
rounding countryside was cleared of its inhabitants to create a kind of
cordon sanitaire around the city. Batavia became a major center of set-
tlement by Chinese, who lived within the city under their own laws. Ten-
sion between the Dutch and the Chinese led to a massacre of Chinese in
1740. The social composition of the city was also influenced by a large
slave community, much of it Balinese in origin (see SLAVERY), who
formed the basis for a constantly evolving mestizo culture. By the 19th
century, observers identified the Betawi as a distinct ethnic group. (See
also PARTICULIERE LANDERIJEN.)
Chronic health problems as a result of waterborne diseases, especially
malaria, led the colonial authorities in 1810 to shift the center of ad-
ministration to Weltevreden (the area around the Koningsplein, the pres-
ent Medan Merdeka). Further government offices shifted to Bogor and
Bandung. A modern harbor was completed at Tanjung Priok in 1886. In
1905, as part of more general administrative reforms, the city was made
a gemeente (municipality) with limited autonomy (see DECENTRAL-
IZATION). The city’s population in the 1930 census was 435,000. In
1942, Batavia was occupied by Japanese forces, and its name was
changed the following year to Jakarta. See also HEALTH. [0491, 0584,
0585, 0609]
BATIG SLOT (budgetary surplus). From 1799 to 1903, the treasury of the
Netherlands Indies was part of that of the Netherlands. From the incep-
tion of the Cultivation System in 1831 until 1877, regular batig slot
transfers were made to the Dutch treasury from the Indies, totaling ƒ823
million over the four decades. See also “EERESCHULD, EEN”; INDIË
VERLOREN, RAMPSPOED GEBOREN.
in that most batik painters employ craftspeople to do the waxing and dye-
ing, based on the artist’s specifications. Batik has generally been seen as
socially conservative, though after independence Sukarno promoted a
bright pattern called “batik Indonesia.” The Solo designer Mohamad Hadi
incorporated left-wing motifs in cloths in the early 1960s.
The time-consuming work of fine batik production is commonly the
work of women, both in villages and in the courts. Village producers
were generally dependent on bakul (suppliers of cloth and materials),
and much batik trading came into Chinese hands in the early 20th cen-
tury, prompting a struggle between indigenous and Chinese merchants
that contributed to the emergence of nationalism (see SAREKAT IS-
LAM). A number of successful trade cooperatives emerged in the 1920s
and 1930s to keep the industry in indigenous hands. Recent dramatic
price rises for high-quality batik have allowed the reemergence of in-
digenous batik entrepreneurs. At the same time, modern mass production
has introduced a new range of motifs and patterns, drawing on the deco-
rative style of non-batik-making cultures. [0144, 0173, 0202, 1403]
BAUXITE. Has been mined on Bintan Island in Riau since the 1920s. Most
of the product has been exported to Japan, but since 1982 some process-
ing to alumina has taken place in the Inalum plant at Asahan. Mining op-
erations were taken over by the state firm, PT Aneka Tambang. In the late
1970s extensive deposits were found in West Kalimantan, but they were
judged not feasible for exploitation. [0413]
hampered especially by a poor harbor. After a brief period under the en-
ergetic rule of Thomas Stamford Raffles, who tried to expand the pro-
duction of nutmeg, cloves, and cassia, Bengkulu was ceded to the
Dutch in the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824. But the Dutch did not move
to subdue the region, which became a center of piracy, until 1868. It
never reemerged as a major trading center. It was Sukarno’s place of
exile from 1938 to 1942, and it became capital of the newly reconsti-
tuted province of Bengkulu in 1967. [0491, 0780]
BERAU. State in east Kalimantan, founded in the 17th century. It was ini-
tially subject to Banjarmasin but became independent in circa 1750 un-
der Sultan Hasanuddin and dominated the neighboring states of Bulun-
gan and Sumbaliung. Some authorities believe that it was the model for
Patusan in Lord Jim by Joseph Conrad. A Dutch protectorate was es-
tablished there in 1906.
right enabled village elites to allocate rice land to sugar companies on ro-
tating leases. The different growing cycles and irrigation methods of the
two crops worked against rice production. The term beschikkingsrecht
also applied to the right of the colonial government to allocate woeste or
wasteland, that is, areas not under active cultivation, to European compa-
nies, for sugar production, as forest reserve, or for other purposes, though
Cornelis van Vollenhoven argued in the 1920s that this practice should
not permit villages to be deprived of their usufruct rights over nonagri-
cultural land. See also AGRARIAN LAW OF 1870.
BETEL. The seed or “nut” of the palm Areca catechu (Arecaceae), jambe,
or pinang, native to the region. It has been reported that it was chewed
as early as the seventh century, generally in combination with other sub-
stances: commonly lime, pepper leaf (sirih), and gambier, and occasion-
ally opium, amomum, cloves, camphor, nutmeg, and/or tobacco. Seeds
were exported to China in the 13th century. Betel chewing is addictive
and leads to loss of appetite, excessive salivation, and general deteriora-
tion. Although partially displaced by tobacco smoking from the 16th cen-
tury, the custom of betel chewing remains widespread, especially in ru-
ral areas. [0576]
and was governor of the short-lived Aceh province from January to Au-
gust 1950. Hostile to the inclusion of Aceh in North Sumatra province
along with the Christian Bataks, disappointed at the failure of the central
government to adopt Islam as the basic principle of the state, and alarmed
by the arrest of PUSA activists in August 1951 (at a time when commu-
nists were being arrested elsewhere in Indonesia), he joined the Darul Is-
lam in circa September 1953, declaring Aceh to be part of the Islamic
State of Indonesia and launching a general revolt throughout the region.
The rebels never controlled more than half the province and failed to cap-
ture the capital, Banda Aceh, but they were well entrenched in the coun-
tryside, especially in the north. Beureu’eh headed both civil and military
commands for the Islamic state in Aceh and in January 1955 was ap-
pointed vice president next to Sekarmaji Marijan Kartosuwiryo, but
there was little effective coordination with the rebellion elsewhere. As the
rebellion dragged on, many on both sides began feeling their way toward
a compromise, but it was only after Beureu’eh’s followers deposed him in
a bloodless coup in March 1959 that a settlement was reached, Aceh re-
ceiving the status of a Daerah Istimewa (Special Territory). Beureu’eh
then briefly formed an alliance with remnants of the PRRI/Permesta re-
bellion now formed into the Republik Persatuan Indonesia (RPI), but
ceased resistance in May 1962.
After the advent of the Suharto regime, Beureu’eh was appointed to
the regime-sponsored Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI), but was re-
moved two years later, possibly because of his independent stance. He
did not officially support the Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM), reportedly
because it had not adopted Islam as its ideology, but the government was
fearful enough that he might sympathize with it that they removed him
to Jakarta in 1978. In the early elections of the New Order, he sup-
ported Islamic parties in the elections, but in the final year of his life he
gave his “blessing” to a Golkar victory in the province of Aceh. [0808,
0820, 0827, 1258]
BHINNEKA TUNGGAL IKA (Old Javanese “They are many, they are
one,” usually translated as “Unity in diversity”). Phrase reputedly coined
BINNENLANDSCH BESTUUR • 57
“BIG FIVE.” The five major Dutch trading houses in late colonial In-
donesia, which also held a dominant place in the export economy until
they were nationalized in 1957. They were the Internationale Crediet en
Handelsvereeniging Rotterdam (Internatio), Jacobson van den Bergh,
Borneo Sumatra Maatschappij (Borsumij), Lindetevis Stokvis, and Geo.
Wehry. See also NATIONALIZATION. [0315]
contacts by the Indonesian masses with their rulers would be through fel-
low Indonesians. In 1865 the Europeesch Bestuur on Java numbered
only 175 men, backed of course by the colonial army. On Java, the rank
of controleur was paired with that of bupati in the Inlandsch Bestuur as
a putative advisory “elder brother” to the Indonesian ruler. In time the
Europeesch Bestuur developed an extended hierarchy running (from be-
low) adspirant controleur, controleur, assistent resident, resident, and
gouverneur, and holders of senior posts were generally recruited from
lower ranks in the hierarchy.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, the role of the BB was diminished by
the emergence of distinct specialist branches of government, beginning
with finances in 1854. By the end of the colonial era, departments of jus-
tice, finances, education and religion, economic affairs, transport and
water affairs, war, and naval affairs had emerged alongside the BB, all of
them open at all levels, unlike the EB, to Indonesians. [0479, 0604]
lished a private house there in 1745 and the official residence of the gov-
ernor-general was gradually transferred there. The city was the site of an
agricultural research station that became the basis of the Land-
bouwkundige Faculteit, subsequently the Bogor Agricultural Institute
(Institut Pertanian Bogor; see EDUCATION) and of a botanical
gardens.
BONE. Bugis state in southern Sulawesi, founded in the 14th century and
the main rival of Makassar, which conquered it and converted it to Is-
lam in 1611, though it was left autonomous. Bone was awarded by the
Dutch to Arung Palakka under the Treaty of Bungaya in 1667. The
Bone kingdom became a centralized state, and it was at this time that
Buginese and Makassarese began migrating from its authoritarian rule to
establish themselves in other regions of the archipelago. The rulers of
Bone took advantage of the opportunity offered by the British interreg-
num in the Indies during the Napoleonic Wars to repudiate the treaty of
Bungaya, and in 1824 they launched a war on local Dutch garrisons.
Though defeated by Dutch and Makassarese forces from Gowa in 1825,
Bone continued to resist the Dutch during the Java War and accepted
the renewed treaty only in 1838. The power of the Bone kingdom de-
clined in the 19th century, and its weakening centralized system opened
the way for aristocrats to conduct trade activities and commercialized
agriculture. In 1859 the Dutch sent an expedition against Bone, depos-
ing its queen and formally making the kingdom a subject, rather than an
ally, of the Dutch. A further expedition in 1905 captured the capital,
Watampone, and deposed the ruler, who was not replaced until 1931.
[0502, 0529, 0549]
native to Java (though formerly they were imported from Sumatra), and
a cockatoo, which is not found in India.
Borobudur was damaged by earthquakes and buried by volcanic ash
some time after its construction and was first reexcavated by Thomas
Stamford Raffles in 1814. A full-scale reconstruction was undertaken
by the colonial archeological service under Theodor van Erp in
1907–1912, and a further restoration occurred under the auspices of
UNESCO from 1973 to 1983, costing US$60 million. In 1985 an ex-
plosion of uncertain origin damaged the upper part of the monument,
though this was subsequently repaired. See also ARCHEOLOGY.
[0113, 0116]
against the Japanese in 1941–1942; and after the Allied counterattack be-
gan, Sumatra was included in the predominantly British South East Asia
Command under Lord Louis Mountbatten. On 16 August 1945, this com-
mand was extended to cover the entire Netherlands Indies, thus giving the
British primary responsibility for accepting the Japanese surrender, evac-
uating Allied prisoners-of-war and internees, and restoring the colonial
government. By the time British forces arrived in Jakarta in late Sep-
tember, however, the Indonesian Republic was relatively firmly estab-
lished. Unwilling to fight a major colonial war to restore Dutch control
(especially since Britain was in the process of withdrawing from India),
the British attempted to play a mediating role between the Dutch and the
Republic, sponsoring first informal contacts and then negotiations that ul-
timately led to the Linggajati Agreement. Britain’s formal postsurrender
responsibilities ended on 30 November 1946.
During the 1950s Indonesia became suspicious of British intentions in
retaining the Singapore naval base, and relations declined sharply as
Britain’s formula for granting independence to its Southeast Asian pos-
sessions involved creation of a Malaysian federation, including Singa-
pore and the north Borneo territories, without giving up its Singapore
base. In response, in September 1963 Sukarno instituted a policy of
Confrontation against Malaysia. In May 1965 he claimed, on the basis
of a letter said to be from the British ambassador Sir Anthony Gilchrist,
that Britain was plotting with army groups to overthrow him.
After Suharto’s accession to power, Confrontation was ended and re-
lations between Britain and Indonesia improved markedly. Within the
context of the Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia (IGGI),
British loans to Indonesia totaled more than US$736 million and further
sums were pledged during the 1990s within the framework of the Con-
sultative Group on Indonesia (CGI) and in accordance with a series of
so-called UK–Indonesia Concessional Loan Arrangements (CLA),
which financed projects in such sectors as power, transportation, broad-
casting, higher education, and forestry. [0478, 0661, 0726, 1120]
and outbreaks continued on the island until the 1940s. The death toll
from the disease in the period 1911–1939 is officially given as 215,000,
but was almost certainly many more. Fears of the virulence of the dis-
ease led the colonial government, through its Dienst der Pestbestrijding
(plague control service), founded in 1915, to undertake a massive control
program, which included extensive quarantine, the destruction and fumi-
gation of property, the reconstruction of 1.25 million houses to rat-proof
designs, and, from 1934, an extensive vaccination program in which 7
million people were vaccinated or revaccinated. The common method of
diagnosing plague deaths, by puncturing the spleen of the deceased, was
strongly resisted by Muslims, who saw it as a violation of the dead. See
also ETHICAL POLICY; HEALTH. [0576, 1204]
“BUNG.” Common term of address (for males) during the Revolution, de-
rived from Javanese abang (“brother”) and implying revolutionary
equality; it is now seldom used except to refer to leaders of the Revolu-
tion, especially Bung Karno (Sukarno). The Sundanese equivalent,
“Bang,” is routinely adopted by governors of Jakarta as a populist ges-
ture. See also BAPAK.
–C–
CATTLE (Bos taurus and B. indicus). Cattle were abundant on Java from
the 10th century, and dried meat was exported to China in the 19th cen-
tury. There was little traditional use of milk in the archipelago except in
parts of Sumatra and for ritual purposes. Dairies, however, were estab-
lished by the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) in Ambon and the
Batavia region in the 17th century, and milk became a luxury especially
associated with European ways of life. From 1880, condensed milk was
imported from Europe and Australia, and use of milk began to spread
increasingly to Indonesians. The colonial agriculture department began
systematic improvement of cattle strains in 1904. The first hygiene reg-
ulations for milk were issued in 1920. Under the New Order, attempts
70 • CELEBES
were made to develop the cattle industry as consumer demand for meat
and milk grew. See also BANTENG; KERBAU; PASTEUR INSTITUTE.
the population of the Indies in 1905, a more extensive count in 1920, and
a full census in 1930. A further census planned for 1940 was canceled be-
cause of the war. The first census in independent Indonesia was held in
1961 but was incomplete, and many of the detailed results have since
been lost. Full censuses were held in 1971, 1980, 1990, and 2000. In
2000 the census bureau was more ambitious than in previous censuses
and attempted to administer a full questionnaire, involving, in addition to
a complete enumeration of the population on such common topics as
name, sex, and age, more detailed information on such matters as rela-
tionship to head of household, marital status, socioeconomic characteris-
tics, education, fertility, mobility, and housing conditions. [0069, 0071,
0072, 0075, 1318]
(Jusuf Wanandi), Jusuf Panglaykim, and Harry Tjan Silalahi. With the
death of its highest political sponsors and the establishment of Ikatan
Cendekiawan Muslim Indonesia (ICMI)’s think tank, the Centre for
Information and Development Studies (CIDES), in the early 1990s, the
influence of CSIS declined somewhat, but it maintained its reputation as
an institution producing important research and information in the policy
and international fields. Even after Suharto’s fall, it retained influence es-
pecially with respect to Indonesia’s relations with the United States. See
also KOMITÉ NASIONAL PEMUDA INDONESIA. [0313, 0733, 0756]
CHAIRIL ANWAR (1922–1949). Poet. Though his total output was tiny,
Chairil Anwar is credited with enormously widening the scope of Indone-
sian poetry from the formal style of the kakawin and pantun to a terse, per-
sonal style. See also GENERATIONS; JASSIN, H. B. [0225, 0228, 0234]
also an important staging post on trade routes between India and China
(see SRIVIJAYA). This early trade was the basis for a political relation-
ship between China and Indonesian states that is still not clear. Until the
10th century, trade seems to have been largely in the hands of local
traders whose large vessels took spices and forest products to the ports
of South China and carried Chinese goods, especially ceramics and silk,
back to Southeast Asia for local consumption and onward trade. These
traders were permitted to operate in Chinese courts only if their rulers ac-
knowledged Chinese suzerainty and paid tribute to China. Much trade, in
fact, was conducted within this framework, goods from Southeast Asia
being delivered as “tribute” with Chinese goods being returned as impe-
rial “largesse.” Imperial sale of goods obtained in this fashion was an im-
portant source of state revenue, especially during the Sung period, and in
1381 an imperial edict forbade Southeast Asian “envoys” from using
their “diplomatic” status to trade privately. Some rulers, on the other
hand, seem to have courted Chinese imperial favor to mark their senior-
ity over neighboring kingdoms, and a few requested diplomatic and mil-
itary assistance against enemies in a way that suggests true vassal status
(see “HO-LO-TAN”). No practical Chinese assistance, however, ever
appears to have reached the archipelago.
Between the 10th and 12th centuries, the tributary trade was gradually
displaced by so-called private trade, in which Chinese traders came for
the first time to Southeast Asia. The manufacture of ceramics for the
Southeast Asian market was a major industry in southern China during
the Southern Sung (1127–1179) and Yuan (1279–1368) dynasties. In the
13th century, the Mongol rulers of China misinterpreted the China–In-
donesia relationship to assume a much closer vassalage. Their effort to
assert this authority on Java in 1292, however, was a failure (see MA-
JAPAHIT). Under the first Ming emperor, the tributary trade was re-
stored, and Chinese exports dramatically declined. With the rise of the
Dutch East Indies Company (VOC), relations were dominated by the
question of China’s responsibility for and to the local Chinese commu-
nity, and policy varied from outright rejection to enthusiastic espousal of
local Chinese interests. See also CHINESE IN INDONESIA; ZHENG
HE. [0543, 0544, 0545]
low level to minimize official Chinese contact with local Chinese. Rela-
tions improved after Sukarno visited China in 1956, and China granted
Indonesia credits of US$11.2 million for rice and textiles in 1958. They
cooled again when China opposed the 1959 law expelling Chinese
traders from the countryside (see CHINESE IN INDONESIA). China’s
global anti-imperialist policy, however, fitted well with Sukarno’s ac-
tivist foreign policy and in 1961 the two countries signed a treaty of
friendship and cooperation. By 1964 there was talk of a Jakarta–Peking
anti-imperialist axis. Initially the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) kept
some distance from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in order to
avoid appearing to take sides in the Sino-Soviet dispute, but by 1964
most observers considered the PKI to be pro-Beijing rather than pro-
Moscow. After the 1965 coup, however, China was accused of having
abetted the PKI, especially by allegedly importing 100,000 small arms
for use by the “Fifth Force” under PKI control. Demonstrators attacked
the Chinese embassy, and in October 1967 Indonesia officially broke off
relations. Diplomatic contacts resumed in 1973 and direct trade in 1985,
but did not until 1990 the two countries normalized relations after a 23-
year break. A 1980 citizenship law in China removed all recognition of
dual nationality. Indonesia and China have disputed claims to areas of
the South China Sea, especially over the portion that includes the Natuna
gas field.
After Megawati Sukarnoputri became president in 2001, relations be-
tween the two countries warmed as Indonesia sought to become China’s
major source of oil and gas supplies. Chinese oil companies invested in
Indonesia’s oil and gas fields, looking to double China’s oil supply over
the next decade. Although Indonesia lost out to Australia over a contract
to supply $13 billion worth of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to China over
the next 25 years, China began negotiations with Jakarta with respect to
the Pertamina LNG field in Papua, and on 26 September 2002 the China
National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) signed a long-term contract
worth $12.5 billion (over 25 years) for Indonesia to supply China with 2.6
million metric tons of gas a year from this Tangguh field. CNOOC would
participate with British Petroleum (BP) in developing the field. At the
same time, other Chinese companies pledged investments in Indonesia of
more than $2 billion, including a preliminary accord to construct a gas
pipeline linking Kalimantan and Java. [1130, 1139, 1145]
(ratified in 1958) requiring all with dual nationality to choose one or the
other by December 1962. Under the New Order, Indonesia repudiated this
treaty unilaterally in April 1969, thus voiding citizenships taken out under
it and leaving about 80,000 Chinese stateless. There are presently some
5 million people in Indonesia identified as “Chinese,” of whom about two
thirds are Indonesian citizens and 1 million are citizens of the People’s Re-
public of China (PRC). Procedures for resident Chinese to obtain citizen-
ship were simplified in 1980, but corruption and obstruction by officials
and reluctance on the part of Chinese slowed the acceptance rate.
In August 1958 the Guomindang was banned and the army took over
the property of pro-Taiwan Chinese. Then, on 14 May 1959, a govern-
ment order revoked the licenses for alien Chinese to operate in retail
trade in rural areas, affecting an estimated 83,783 out of 86,690 traders.
This led to an exodus to the cities. Some 119,000 left Indonesia for the
PRC and 17,000 for Taiwan. Other restrictions on Chinese Indonesians
since 1965 have included the abolition of the Chinese-language press,
except for the government-controlled bilingual Warta Indonesia; a ban
on the import of Chinese-language materials; encouragement for Chi-
nese to take “Indonesian” (commonly Sanskritic or Muslim) names; and
a 2 percent limit on the proportion of Chinese enrollments at most state
tertiary educational institutions (and a 30 percent limit in private institu-
tions). Still, however, Chinese are widely perceived as being privileged,
especially because of the position of cukong, and anti-Chinese violence
has broken out on many occasions. Particularly extensive riots took place
in Central Java in November 1980.
New Order policy initially tended to equate Chinese culture with com-
munist influence, and the government pressured the overseas Chinese
community to assimilate. After 1966, all remaining Chinese-language
schools had to adopt Indonesian as the sole language of instruction and
a national curriculum. All purely Chinese organizations, whether or not
they were political, were forbidden, as was the use of Chinese characters
even on shop signs. A presidential decree in 1980, which applied to cer-
tain areas of Indonesia with large numbers of ethnic Chinese (including
North Sumatra, Riau, Bangka, Belitung, parts of West Java, and West
Kalimantan), greatly loosened the restrictions on Chinese becoming In-
donesian citizens, and a large proportion of the resident Chinese com-
munity in these areas took advantage of the opportunity.
The growing ties between top Chinese businessmen and the Suharto
family during the closing years of Suharto’s rule made the Chinese com-
munity, and small businessmen in particular, a natural target for protesters
at the collapsing economy. The final years of the New Order were marked
CHUO SANGI-IN • 79
CITIES. In contrast with the great European cities, many of which have
been major centers for millennia, the location of Indonesian cities has
tended to change with time, and most of the large cities of the modern ar-
chipelago were not important centers 500 years ago. This was partly due
to the custom of traditional rulers shifting their capitals, partly due per-
haps to the impermanence of much traditional architecture and partly
due to the fact that ritual, rather than monument, was the essential fea-
ture of royal display. (See also PORTS.)
Modern urban growth began in the 1870s with the expansion of
Batavia, Surabaya, Bandung, Yogyakarta, Surakarta, and Se-
CLASS ANALYSIS • 81
CLASS ANALYSIS. Before 1925, even Marxists rarely used class categories
in analyzing Indonesian society, many believing that the Indonesian-Dutch
conflict transcended class divisions within Indonesian society (see also
NATIONALISM). Most class analysts have acknowledged the existence
of an aristocratic class or classes. Debate has focused rather on the existence
and nature of the commercial bourgeoisie (middle class) and the identifica-
tion of potential allies of the proletariat.
Since early times, extensive commerce has taken place in the coastal
regions of Indonesia, but no indigenous capitalist bourgeoisie emerged to
seize state power. This has been attributed variously to culture (see DU-
ALISM; SHARED POVERTY), religion, and the fact that taxation in
various forms prevented traders from accumulating investment capital.
Colonial policies in turn inhibited the rise of an Indonesian bourgeoisie
that would compete with Dutch interests and instead allowed middle lev-
els of the economy to be dominated by the Chinese. Although the Chi-
nese constituted a bourgeoisie in some senses, they were precluded from
gaining political power because they did not assimilate culturally. In in-
dependent Indonesia, the state itself seized Dutch investments (see NA-
TIONALIZATION), restricted Chinese business, and sought to foster
an Indonesian middle class. The Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) de-
scribed those who administered state enterprises and profited from gov-
ernment patronage as “bureaucratic capitalists” (kapitalis birokrat,
82 • CLASS ANALYSIS
in the late Suharto period both by the state and by speculators from the
urban areas. See also MARHAEN; PATRIMONIALISM. [0313, 0373,
0399, 0895, 0904, 0921]
CLOTH. The earliest cloth in the archipelago was made of felted bark in
a style still found in parts of Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Seram, and
Papua. With the arrival, however, of cotton, weaving became a major
activity, symbolic of creation and preeminently the work of women, as
metalworking was the work of men. Many traditional cultures of the
archipelago use ritual cloths, such as the famous ship cloths of Lam-
pung, to celebrate rites of passage. Indonesian cloth manufacture is
best known for its dyeing techniques, especially ikat, in which the
threads are tie-dyed before weaving, and batik. Traditional dyes were
indigo, soga (a brown dye from plant roots), and the red mengkudu.
The complexity of the production process made cloth a rare commod-
ity and until the 14th century most people continued to wear clothes of
bark and plaited vegetable fiber. Large quantities of Indian cotton cloth
and smaller amounts of Chinese silk began to arrive in the 14th cen-
tury, partly to pay for spices purchased in the archipelago, and the
sarung became a common item of clothing, though local weaving con-
tinued in many areas and the finest of cloth, such as the songket of Is-
lamic Sumatra with its gold and silver thread, continued to be made in
the archipelago.
In the 20th century, Japanese cloth strongly penetrated the Indonesian
market, leading the colonial government to apply quotas in the 1930s.
This encouraged an expansion of domestic production dominated by in-
digenous entrepreneurs such as A. M. Dasaad. Within a few years, how-
ever, the industry was largely in the hands of Chinese businessmen. Au-
tomated weaving began in the 1960s and 1970s, and Japanese industrial
cloth production expanded after 1965. [0147, 0151, 0439]
COAL. With the development of steamships in the 19th century, the coal
deposits of the archipelago became important as a source of fuel, espe-
cially for the navy. The first coal reserve was discovered in Pengaron,
Kalimantan, and a mine was opened there in 1848, but eventually
failed. Two other coalmines were launched during the 19th century in
Kalimantan and were developed by both private enterprise and the
Dutch colonial government. A major coal deposit of what proved to be
the best quality of coal in the archipelago was found in West Sumatra in
1868, and a second major deposit was found at Bukit Asam in South
Sumatra shortly thereafter. The Ombilin mine at Sawahlunto in West
Sumatra began production in 1892 as a state enterprise, employing both
open-cast and underground mining. Production at this mine reached over
600 tons in 1924, falling to less than 500 tons as a result of miners’
strikes in 1925 and 1926. Total coal production in the Netherlands East
Indies reached a peak in 1930 of nearly 1.9 million tons.
COCONUT • 85
For some producers, sugar production from coconut flowers is now more
lucrative than copra. [0331, 0332, 0449]
COFFEE (Coffea spp. Rubiaceae). Native to the Middle East, coffee plants
were brought to Indonesia by the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC)
in 1696. The company encouraged planting by the bupatis in Priangan
in the early 18th century, and it was soon taken up as a cash crop by the
local population. The first Java coffee was sold in Amsterdam in 1712,
and in 1725 production exceeded that of the previous market leader,
Yemen; after 1726, the VOC controlled 50–75 percent of the world’s cof-
fee trade. Cultivation was initially free, but in 1725 came under a VOC
monopoly and became one of the major crops of the West Java Pre-
angerstelsel (forced cultivation system). Production of C. arabica in cen-
tral and eastern Java expanded greatly, especially under Herman Willem
Daendels, so that Java coffee dominated world markets by 1811. Coffee
then became one of the principal crops of the Cultivation System, and a
government monopoly of production on Java was maintained until 1915.
Estate production of coffee began in East Java in 1870. In 1878, the cof-
fee leaf disease Hemileia vastatrix devastated plantations on Java, lead-
ing to a shift to C. robusta in the late 19th century and an expansion of
cultivation in southern Sumatra, Bali, Timor, and Sulawesi, but coffee’s
share of the total value of Indies exports never recovered, standing at 2.27
percent in 1938 and declining further after World War II. Production in
1950 was 12 percent of that before the war, but expansion of cultivation,
especially by transmigrants in Lampung, made Indonesia the world’s
third largest producer, with 7 percent of global production and export.
The smallholder cultivation of coffee has always been linked to the crop’s
price on the international market, and it surged in the late 1970s.
The financial crisis of 1997–1998 stimulated a further spurt in coffee
production as prices for this export crop multiplied to six or seven times
COMMISSIONER-GENERAL • 87
those of the precrisis period. In the uplands of South Sumatra and Su-
lawesi, migrants joined the local people in planting coffee trees, con-
verting rice land to coffee cultivation, and attempting to maximize their
yield. The subsequent drop in prices reversed the trend. [0331, 0332,
0340, 0765, 0797]
COPPER. Found in West Sumatra, West Java, and Timor, copper was
mined since early times for the production of bronze, often with a high
lead content (see also TIN). Production was never extensive and de-
clined with the large-scale import of Chinese copper cash from the 15th
century and Dutch copper doit in the 18th century. A huge mine in the
Carstensz Mountains of West Irian (Papua) was opened by Freeport
Minerals Inc. in April 1967 to mine the copper and gold existing there.
Its impact on the people and resources of the area was a major factor in
mobilizing support for the separatist Organisasi Papua Merdeka
(OPM). See also CURRENCY; MINING.
duly, the significance of “corruption” in this period was the habits and
contacts it formed, rather than its direct effect on public welfare.
During the 1950s and 1960s, corruption became part of an adminis-
trative vicious circle, in which lack of revenue led to inadequate salaries
for officials, in turn diminishing government performance and reducing
both the contribution of the state to general economic welfare and the
state’s capacity to collect revenue. These problems remained acute under
the New Order. In 1970 a presidential inquiry, known as the Commis-
sion of Four, investigated corruption in the Badan Urusan Logistik Na-
sional (Bulog), Pertamina, the Department of Forestry, and the state
tin company, P. N. Timah. Such investigations typically caught a number
of small offenders while leaving the most corrupt unscathed. The oil
boom of the 1970s led to even more extravagant instances of corruption
in upper levels of the government.
In the 1980s a trend toward administrative deregulation diminished for
a while some of the opportunities formerly available for corruption. In
1985, for instance, the government contracted the Swiss firm Société
Générale de Surveillance to undertake customs inspections on its behalf,
thus bypassing the notoriously corrupt state customs service. Customs
officials were suspended on full pay but with dramatically diminished in-
come (see also SHIPPING).
However, in the 1990s, as members of the Suharto family and their
close associates solidified control over the most lucrative sectors of In-
donesia’s economy, corruption became endemic in all sections of the
country’s economic life. In 1993 Indonesia was nominated as the most
corrupt of 10 Asian countries by the Hong Kong–based Political and
Economic Risk consultancy. The extent of the corruption was a major fo-
cus of the protests against the Suharto regime during the financial cri-
sis of the late 1990s and was a major reason for the overthrow of the New
Order government. Antigovernment demonstrations protested against
“Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism” (KKN, Korupsi, Kolusi, dan
Neopotisme). But the corruption was so deeply engrained in the society
that it survived the change in regime, and Abdurrachman Wahid’s tol-
erant attitude toward it was a major element in his impeachment in 2001.
Nor did matters improve under his successor, Megawati Sukarnoputri,
with news reports asserting in early 2003 that 20 percent of World Bank
and other foreign loans were being siphoned off, and accusations being
made that the situation was even worse than under Suharto, because then
“only Suharto’s cronies were able to commit corruption” while all politi-
cians under Megawati participated in it. [0297, 0748, 0763, 0961, 1398]
98 • CORVÉE LABOR
to be had from acting as agents of the state discouraged the priyayi from
moving into land ownership and agricultural production themselves and
therefore averted the formation of a powerful class of rural landowners
(see CLASS ANALYSIS).
The system began to be dismantled around 1850, initially because of
a hostility in the Netherlands, under the new more democratic constitu-
tion of 1848, to the favored position of the sugar contractors and the
NHM, and later because of growing interest in larger-scale private inter-
est in the Indies and because of political indignation over the oppressive
practices linked with the cultivation system, especially as described in
the novel Max Havelaar (see CORRUPTION). The Agrarian Law of
1870, which formally abolished forced cultivation, is generally regarded
as the end of the Cultivation System in Java, though some forced culti-
vation continued to 1890 and vestiges of the system lingered on into the
20th century in the form of the coffee monopoly, which was not abol-
ished until 1915. The Cultivation System was not restricted to Java and
was introduced as the Forced Delivery system into other regions of the
archipelago, including Sumatra. In West Sumatra it was introduced in
1847 in an attempt to monopolize coffee production, relying on peasants
to plant, grow, and deliver coffee at low fixed prices to government
warehouses. It was profitable for a while before falling into irreversible
decline. Nevertheless, it lasted longer than on Java before being largely
abolished in the early years of the 20th century. It was one of the factors
sparking the dissidence that led to the 1908 rebellion there. See MI-
NANGKABAU. [0421, 0601, 0603, 0605, 0797, 0838]
CURRENCY. The use of gold and silver coinage in West Sumatra and
Central and East Java dates from at least the eighth century, the earliest
coins being gold masa of 2.42g stamped with a simple sesame seed de-
sign and silver coins of a similar weight stamped with a stylized sandal-
wood flower. The source of the metal is not certain, but early accounts
speak of gold and silver production on both islands and it is reasonable
to assume that some of this went into coinage. These relatively high-
value coins were probably not in day-to-day circulation but were used for
storing wealth and for ritual purposes. Although there is some evidence
of an iron bar currency called iket wsi in use in the late eighth century,
the general use of coins in daily life did not apparently begin until the
11th century, with the appearance of a number of smaller denominations
(kupang = 1/4 masa) in port areas, presumably in response to a greater
marketization of the economy. By the 13th century, gold coins were used
extensively for the payment of salaries, debts, and fines. In Burton (Bu-
tung), in southeast Sulawesi, small squares of cloth were reportedly
used as currency.
Large quantities of low-denomination Chinese copper and copper-
lead cash, or picis, began to appear on Java in the late 12th century,
prompting local imitations in tin, copper, and silver and displacing the
older currency for most purposes by 1300. Picis became the standard
currency of Majapahit and their use spread to Sulawesi, Kalimantan,
102 • CURRENCY
and Sumatra, though from the 14th century several Islamic states on
Sumatra minted their own gold and tin coins. Picis were carried about in
strings of fixed numbers from 200 to 100,000. Leaden and tin-lead picis,
worth much less than copper, were fragile and often broke or disinte-
grated after a few years’ use; copper coins, by contrast, were often taken
from circulation for ceremonial purposes. So great was the flow of cop-
per coins to Indonesia that the Chinese government banned their export
for many years. The widely available picis led to a greater monetariza-
tion of the economy than before, allowing traders, often Chinese, to deal
directly, for instance, with the hill people who provided pepper to Ban-
ten and encouraged the use of credit facilities. Leonard Blussé argues
that the perishable nature of the picis also encouraged people to spend
them quickly, thus promoting the circulation of money.
From circa 1580, silver coinage in the form of Spanish reals, minted
from Peruvian and Mexican silver, became increasingly abundant, espe-
cially as extensive imports of lead by the Dutch and other Europeans in
the 17th century drove down the value of the picis. The Dutch East In-
dies Company (VOC) also produced silver rijksdaalders and from 1733
copper doit, though picis remained in circulation in many places into the
18th century. In the 19th century, locally minted tin currency was the
dominant currency in much of Sumatra.
From 1782 the VOC in Maluku issued promissory notes in denomi-
nations of 25 to 1,000 rijksdaalders; though bearing interest at 6 percent,
these also acted in some respects as paper currency and continued in cir-
culation into the early 19th century, as did bonds issued in 1810 by the
Dutch authorities in East Java on security of 1 million rijksdaalders due
in silver over 10 years from a Chinese pacht holder in Probolinggo. This
confused currency situation was somewhat regularized by the issue in
1815 of Netherlands Indies guilder (gulden) currency notes with hand-
written serial number and signature. In 1851 the Java Bank took on the
production of bank notes (backed by gold reserves), though the colonial
government continued to issue low-value currency notes. Later in the
century plantations companies, especially in East Sumatra, often issued
their own currency notes (muntbiljetten) for the payment of workers.
During the Japanese occupation, the military authorities initially
provided currency notes, but in March 1943 bank notes were issued by
the Nanpo Kaihatsu Kinko (Southern Regions Development Bank). This
currency rapidly depreciated in value, but it was retained in circulation
by both the Allies and the Indonesian Republic after the Japanese sur-
render. Postwar Netherlands Indies currency notes were not issued on
DAENDELS, HERMAN WILLEM • 103
Java until March 1946, and Republican rupiah (ORI, Oeang, i.e., Uang
Republik Indonesia) were first issued only in November. Separate local
emergency Republican currencies were later issued in several parts of
Sumatra and Java. In 1950 a new federal rupiah was issued, and previ-
ous Dutch and Republican currencies were exchanged for it at various
rates. Dutch colonial authorities in West New Guinea (Papua) issued
separate New Guinea notes from 1950, while various rebel governments
such as that of the PRRI/Permesta rebels overprinted Republican cur-
rency for internal circulation.
In January 1950 US$1.00 purchased Rp 3.80. A devaluation on 13
March 1950 took this to Rp 7.60; a system of multiple exchange rates
complicated the picture, but most observers argue that the rupiah was
overvalued in this period, thus encouraging imports and discouraging ex-
ports. After a period of sustained inflation in the late 1950s, the currency
was drastically reformed on 28 August 1959, with the freezing (i.e., de-
monetization) of notes of Rp 25,000 and above and the reduction of other
currency to one tenth of its nominal value (i.e., Rp 1,000 became Rp
100). Further depreciation of the currency under Guided Democracy led
to a similar measure on 13 December 1965, Rp 1,000 becoming Rp 1. In
the early 1970s the exchange rate stabilized at US$1.00 = Rp 415, but
this jumped to Rp 625 in late 1978, to Rp 970 in 1982, to Rp 1,700 in the
late 1980s, and to Rp 2,600 in mid-1997.
The devaluation of the Thai baht in July 1997 sparked a financial cri-
sis throughout Southeast Asia and had a devastating effect on the value
of the rupiah, which plumetted to more than Rp 10,000 to US$1.00 by
January 1998. Over subsequent years it rarely dropped below Rp 8,000
to US$1 and occasionally rose as high as Rp 16,000. In 2001 it started
the year at Rp 9,450 and ended it around Rp 11,000. During 2002, with
austerity measures being introduced, the rupiah began to strengthen, dip-
ping to below the 9,000 mark in the middle of the year, and by mid-2003
it was one of Asia’s strongest currencies. See also BANKING;
SJAFRUDDIN PRAWIRANEGARA. [0057, 0379, 0391, 0398, 0479]
–D–
DANI. Ethnic group in Papua, inhabiting the Baliem Valley of the interior
highlands, “discovered” only in the 1930s. They construct terraced, irri-
gated fields. [1230]
DARTS. Propelled from blowpipes and often smeared with poisons such as
upas, they were the classic weapon of hunting in Indonesian jungles, es-
pecially Kalimantan, where room to move was limited and projectiles
were not often deflected by winds. See also WEAPONS.
DARUL ISLAM (DI, House of Islam). General name for the Muslim rev-
olutionary movement launched in West Java in 1948 by S. M. Karto-
DAYAKS • 105
suwiryo with the twin aims of establishing an Islamic state and vigor-
ously prosecuting the war of independence against the Dutch. The move-
ment arose immediately after the Indonesian Republic had agreed, under
the January 1948 Renville Agreement, to withdraw its armed forces
from West Java. In March 1948 the Darul Islam decided to establish its
own administration in the region, but stopped short of a total break with
the Republic. It formally repudiated the Republic on 7 August 1949, af-
ter the final cease-fire between Dutch and Republican forces, by declar-
ing an Islamic state, the Negara Islam Indonesia (NII).
The movement attracted not just those who wanted the implementa-
tion of Islamic law in independent Indonesia but also many who opposed
the strength of Dutch influence in the new Republik Indonesia Serikat
(RIS), and the DI spread in varying degrees to most Muslim parts of the
archipelago, encompassing the rebellion in Aceh under Daud
Beureu’eh, the rebellion of Kahar Muzakkar in South Sulawesi, and
that of Ibnu Hajar in Banjarmasin. From the start the Masjumi was am-
bivalent toward it, sympathetic toward its aims but rejecting its methods.
West Java was always the core of the movement, and fighting was espe-
cially fierce there although DI forces occasionally reached the outskirts
of Jakarta. The movement largely crumbled after Kartosuwiryo was
killed in 1962. In an attempt to discredit opposition to the Suharto gov-
ernment in the 1977 elections, the Darul Islam was reactivated by Gen-
eral Ali Murtopo in the mid-1970s and given the name Komando Ji-
had. [0693, 1019, 1031]
took over a total debt of approximately ƒ4,6 billion (US$1.7 billion) from
the former Netherlands Indies. This was a source of considerable resent-
ment, since it included some of the costs of the colonial war against the
Republic and represented a drain on independent Indonesia’s program of
economic development. The Ali Sastroamijoyo government repudiated
85 percent of this debt on 4 August 1956, by which time, however, only
$171 million of the debt was still outstanding. Under Sukarno, Indone-
sia acquired a debt of US$2.4 billion (of which $990 million was to the
Soviet Union and its allies).
In facing the crisis of the late 1960s, the Suharto government was
helped by the Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia (IGGI), set up
in 1967, which provided more than 75 percent of development expenses
during the regime’s early years. As a result of these and other loans ne-
gotiated at the beginning of the Suharto era, Indonesia in early 1988 had
the largest foreign debt in Southeast Asia, totaling US$43.2 billion. In
1988 debt servicing accounted for 37 percent of all government expen-
diture and was estimated to total about $6.3 billion for the year. In 1995
total trade and foreign debt were 52 and 57 percent of GDP and GNP re-
spectively. By the end of 1997, the volume of short-term debts was
US$20 billion, with the total debt in November 1997 estimated by Min-
ister of Finance Mar’ie Muhammad at US$65 billion. At the end of De-
cember, a Private Foreign Debt Settlement Team (TPULNS, Tim
Penanggulangan Utang Luar Negeri Swasta) was formed, and its head,
Radius Prawiro, estimated the total of private foreign debts to be US$74
billion, with the debt of the government and state companies at well over
US$60 billion. In 2002 the debt was running at 90 percent of GDP and if
the government were to reduce it to its targeted 60 percent of GDP by
2004 there would need to be an annual growth rate in the economy of 6
percent (rather than an actual 3.3 percent).
On 12 April 2002 the group of creditor nations known as the Paris
Club agreed to reschedule the $5.4 billion of the Indonesian debt that fell
due between 1 April 2002 and 31 December 2003, agreeing to forgo both
principal and interest. Indonesia was granted 20 years to repay foreign
development aid loans, and other official foreign aid would be repaid
over 18 years. Nevertheless, Indonesia’s external debt burden remained
crushing at $140 billion—nearly 100 percent of its GDP, a figure that
dropped to just over 70 percent by the beginning of 2003. Goals set in re-
structuring agreements signed by some of the companies most seriously
in default (e.g., Asia Pulp & Paper, which defaulted on $14 billion in
debts in 2001) were rarely met. To appease international lenders,
108 • DEBT OF HONOR
DEFENSE POLICY. For most of the 19th century, after Britain restored
the Indies to the Dutch in 1816, the principal task of the colonial army,
the Koninklijk Nederlandsch Indisch Leger (KNIL), was extending
colonial power throughout the archipelago and guarding against rebel-
lion in areas already controlled. External threats were few and were met
by diplomatic rather than military precautions. In the late 19th century
the rise of German, Japanese, and Russian sea power aroused Dutch
alarm, but colonial defense policy focused on the defense of Java by
land forces. During World War I, extensive debate took place over the
desirability of an Indies militia, and in 1923 military service was made
compulsory for Dutch citizens (thus excluding the majority of Indone-
sians). Possible expansion of the colony’s naval defenses was also much
discussed, but not until 1936 did naval expenditure significantly in-
crease.
Army officers of the Republic after 1945 initially disagreed sharply on
questions of military strategy. In general, former KNIL officers favored
construction of a compact, Western-style, disciplined army that might
defeat the Dutch on their own terms, while former Pembela Tanah Air
(Peta) officers advocated a larger armed force whose strength would lie
in its confidence and commitment to an independent Indonesia. Both,
however, thought in terms of frontal warfare, and only after a long series
of setbacks, beginning with the battle of Surabaya in November 1945,
DEFENSE POLICY • 111
national emergency. The armed forces chief would be the one to deter-
mine that the well being of the state was at risk and would only need to
inform the president 24 hours after forces were deployed. Although the
measure was unlikely to pass, it signaled the renewed confidence of the
armed forces in the face of civilian authorities’ perceived failure to main-
tain the security of the state. For a list of defense ministers, see APPEN-
DIX E. [0668, 0714, 0731, 0966, 0972, 0974]
be cleared, and this area was handed over in 1913 as a nature reserve to
the Netherlands Indies Society for Nature Protection. See also CON-
SERVATION, NATURE.
DEPRESSION OF THE 1930s. The Great Depression struck the Nether-
lands Indies severely, halving the colony’s exports and forcing dramatic
cuts in the budget. Austerity measures effectively ended the Ethical Pol-
icy’s program of government expenditure, leading on the one hand to the
mutiny on the vessel Zeven Provinciën and on the other to the formation
of the Stuw group of progressive colonial officials. Unemployment rose
and taxes increased. In an effort to preserve the Western-dominated large
rubber plantations, the government placed heavy restrictions on small-
holder production in Sumatra.
DESA (village). According to common belief, the desa was the main unit
of social organization in rural Java in precolonial times. Villages are said
to have been geographically distinct entities comprising rice fields
(sawah), orchards, and dwellings, often in a single cluster, sometimes
distributed among two or more hamlets (kampung). Village life, under an
elected head, or lurah, was said to be a model of Indonesian democracy,
decisions being taken by a process of exhaustive deliberation
(musyawarah) producing a consensus (mufakat) articulated by the lurah.
A sense of common destiny gave the villagers collective responsibility so
that while the interests of an individual would always be subordinate to
those of the desa, the community as a whole took an active interest in the
welfare of all its members. This led to the habit of gotong royong or mu-
tual self-help and, according to Clifford Geertz, ultimately to “shared
poverty” (see AGRICULTURAL INVOLUTION). This view of vil-
lage life influenced leaders searching for Indonesian forms of democ-
racy; Guided Democracy was explicitly an attempt to implement village
democratic forms at the national level.
Recent research has cast doubt on this view of the precolonial village and
suggests that rural society was organized in much smaller households
(cacah) that were not geographically clustered and that were in patron–
client relationships with local officials who acted as intermediaries between
rulers, especially bupati, and households. The collectivist enclosed village
seems to have become an article of government faith first under Thomas
Stamford Raffles, who saw the village as an alternative unit of adminis-
tration to the bupati. Villages were convenient administrative units for the
levying of taxes and the mobilization of corvée labor, and British and Dutch
policies on land rent and labor did much to create a communal village life.
DEVELOPMENT IDEOLOGY • 115
(pembangunan) was necessary, but it was only under the New Order that
Pembangunan, conceived as a long-term process of perhaps 25 years, was
elevated to become a central pillar of government policy. The precise na-
ture of this program was always under debate, especially between the
advocates of a more free-market economy and proponents of import-
substitution industrialization, and more quietly over the extent to which
true national prosperity (kemakmuran) could be divorced from justice
(keadilan). During its early decades the economic policies of the New Or-
der were responsible for massive economic growth, and in 1983 President
Suharto assumed the title Bapak Pembangunan (“father of development”).
See also BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL;
CLASS ANALYSIS. [0299, 0353, 0358, 0364, 0738, 0914, 0928]
the two chambers of the RIS parliament, together with the members of the
1945 Republic’s Dewan Pertimbangan Agung (DPA) and the Working
Committee of the KNIP. Members of parliament elected in 1955 took their
seats in March 1956. In 1959 members of this elected parliament became,
with a few exceptions, members of a provisional DPR under the restored
1945 Constitution. Sukarno, however, suspended this DPR in 1960 after
it refused to pass his budget and installed instead the DPR–Gotong Roy-
ong, whose members were appointed by him and which could be dissolved
at his will. The DPR-GR was purged of its Partai Komunis Indonesia
(PKI) and other left-wing members in October and November 1965.
Under the New Order, elections in 1971 reconstituted the DPR, then
numbering 460, of whom 360 were elected and 100 appointed, 75 from
the armed forces and 25 from other groups. In 1987 membership was in-
creased to 500, with 100 appointed from the armed forces. Although con-
stitutionally empowered to initiate legislation and monitor government
actions, the DPR was a very weak institution during the New Order pe-
riod. Government manipulation of the political process ensured that its
membership was overwhelmingly progovernment.
The situation changed dramatically with the resignation of Suharto,
the movement for reformasi, and the 1999 elections. After these elec-
tions, the 500-member body was constituted as follows: Partai
Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan (PDI-P), 153 seats; Golongan
Karya (Golkar), 120; Partai Persatuan Pembangunan (PPP), 58;
Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB), 51; Partai Amanat Nasional
(PAN), 34; with the remaining parties sharing 46 seats and the armed
forces retaining only 38 seats. (Thus, Golkar’s percentage of the seats
fell from 76 percent in 1997 to 26 percent in 1999, and the allocation to
the armed forces was cut by half from the preelection number of 75
seats.) Although Abdurrachman Wahid was able to manipulate the par-
liament to win the presidency despite his party’s poor showing in the
elections, his lack of a majority base was partly responsible for the DPR
moving so consistently toward his impeachment in July 2001 and for his
replacement by Megawati Sukarnoputri, whose PDI-P party held the
largest bloc of seats. Constitutional changes introduced in 2002 created
a new legislative body, the Regional Representatives Council (DPD),
that, together with the DPR, forms the reconstituted MPR. The DPD,
however, is a largely advisory body and cannot veto legislation adopted
by the DPR. Despite Megawati’s close relations with the army, the MPR
passed a measure in 2002 whereby the military would relinquish all its
seats in the DPR in 2004. [0695, 0756, 0765]
118 • DEWANTORO, KI HAJAR
(1825–1830) against the Dutch but was captured by the Dutch General
Hendrik Merkus Baron de Kock while under guarantee of safe conduct
for negotiations and was exiled to Makassar, where he died. [0597]
that the indigenous economy was not driven by wages, prices, and capi-
tal but by mutual social obligations. He saw this precapitalist economy as
an unchanging feature of the society (see GOTONG ROYONG;
SHARED POVERTY), partly because modern capitalism was too ad-
vanced to offer the indigenous economy a point of entry. Boeke’s ideas
were criticized in the volume Indonesian Economics. [0292, 0299, 0304]
2. Characteristic of traditional Indonesian religions identified by
Dutch structural anthropology and described as the symbolic union of
opposites, such as man-woman, earth-sky, and left-right, within a whole.
Hinduism and Buddhism are seen as dual aspects of a single truth.
[0019, 0480, 1222]
3. Dualism was also used to refer to the division of the Binnenlands
Bestuur (BB) into European and native services. [0479]
their period of service, and blijvers, who planned to retire in the Indies.
Colonial society was governed by a strict social hierarchy, with govern-
ment officials at the top, followed then by military officers, businessmen,
and churchmen. In 1930 the European population of Indonesia was about
240,000, of whom 70 percent were Indo-European. Half the European
population was concentrated in nine cities (37,200 in the Batavia-
Meester Cornelis conurbation). In the sociëteiten (clubs) a strong jazz
tradition developed, and the Europeans of the colony produced an exten-
sive literature. Political activity, such as it was, was focused on the
Netherlands rather than on the colony, and a branch of the Nederlandsche
Vereeniging voor Vrouwenkiesrecht (Netherlands Association for Fe-
male Suffrage) was founded in 1908. Only with the rise of Indonesian
nationalism did serious local politicking begin, especially through the
Vaderlandse Club, formed in 1929. During the Depression, the Dutch
Nazi party, NSB, won considerable support in the colony, and some NSB
members were interned after the fall of Holland in 1940.
As the Japanese approached, the governor-general instructed the Eu-
ropean population of Indonesia to stay put and share the fate of the In-
donesians, and approximately 100,000 were interned for the latter part of
the Japanese occupation. Approximately one in six died in the substan-
dard conditions, and many were detained by Indonesian revolutionary
groups after 1945 as hostages for Dutch good behavior; some were not
released until 1947. Dutch citizens were permitted to stay in Indonesia
under liberal conditions after the transfer of sovereignty, but many chose
to leave and on 5 December 1957 the remaining 45,000 were expelled
over the Netherlands’ retention of West Irian (Papua). See also COUPE-
RUS, LOUIS. [0248, 0491, 0584, 0608, 0622, 0659, 1407, 1425]
–E–
Under the 1953 Organic Law on Overseas Territories, East Timor for-
mally became a province of Portugal, divided into 13 districts called conçel-
hos (councils) under Portuguese administrators. Below these were 58 pos-
tos, of which 60 percent were headed by Timorese. An anti-Portuguese
uprising, which apparently had some Indonesian backing, was suppressed
in 1959.
After the Armed Forces coup in Portugal in April of 1974, the new
authorities announced three possibilities for the future of East Timor:
independence, continued association with Portugal, and integration
with Indonesia. Three political groups—União Democrática Timo-
rense (UDT), Frente Revolucionária do Timor Leste Indepen-
dente (Fretilin), and Associação Popular Democrática Timorese
(APODETI)—formed to promote these possibilities respectively. In
June 1975 the Portuguese government announced firm plans for a three-
year transitional period to full independence for the territory, including a
general election in October 1976.
Popular support for Fretilin was now such that it was likely to win a
full majority in elections, and UDT sought to forestall this by staging a
coup in Dili on 11 August 1975 with the help of the police force.
Fretilin, supported by Timorese sections of the colonial army, resisted
the UDT move, and full civil war quickly broke out. Fretilin forces
soon seized power in the major centers, but UDT and APODETI sup-
porters fled across the border into Indonesian Timor, where they re-
grouped along with Indonesian “volunteers” in what was called “Op-
erasi Komodo” and began a gradual invasion of East Timor, in the
course of which five journalists from Australia were killed. On 11 Oc-
tober Fretilin formed a “transitional” government and on 28 November
declared the independence of the Democratic Republic of East Timor.
On 30 November, Portugal requested United Nations help in regaining
control of the territory.
With the acquiescence of the United States, Indonesian armed forces
mounted a full-scale attack on Dili on 7 December 1975, deploying an
estimated 20,000 troops in East Timor by the end of the month. They
soon extended their control to all major population centers at the cost of
extensive casualties among the civilian population. UDT, APODETI, and
other anti-Fretilin groups formed a provisional government under In-
donesian auspices, and on 31 May 1976 an Indonesian-sponsored “Peo-
ple’s Representative Council” requested integration with Indonesia as its
27th province; this took place on 15 July. The United Nations never rec-
ognized Indonesian sovereignty.
EAST TIMOR • 127
ECONOMY. In 1950 Indonesia’s inherited debt from the Dutch had a de-
bilitating effect on the new nation’s economy. Although most of its lead-
ers favored a modified socialist system with a large cooperative compo-
nent for the economy, many of the country’s major plantations and
industries remained in the hands of the Dutch and other foreign compa-
nies. In 1958 Sukarno nationalized Dutch property and during the pe-
riod of Confrontation also expropriated British and American firms, re-
jecting American aid in 1964. During the closing years of Sukarno’s rule
there was increasing inflation, growing debt, and declining exports,
while foreign reserves shrank to zero.
When Suharto assumed power, he appealed for economic support
from the West and brought into his government a number of American-
trained economists, the so-called Berkeley Mafia headed by Widjojo Ni-
tisastro. At their urging, in 1967 the Inter-Governmental Group on
130 • ECONOMY
Indonesia (IGGI) was set up, and it, together with the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund (IMF), provided more than 75 percent of
development expenses during Suharto’s early years. As a result, the in-
flation rate fell from about 600 percent in 1966 to 22 percent for the
years 1969–1972. In the government’s first five-year development plan
(Rencana Pembangunan Lima Tahun), which began in April 1969,
major attention focused on agriculture, and by the mid-1980s Indonesia
was self sufficient in rice. At the same time the country was opened to
foreign investment. New discoveries of oil and the dramatic surge in oil
prices during the 1970s further boosted the economy. This boom was
threatened in 1975 by the crisis in the state-owned oil enterprise, Perta-
mina, but through project cancellations and further foreign help Jakarta
was able to salvage the situation by late 1977.
The Indonesian economy was hit hard by the collapse in oil prices in
the mid-1980s, and in response the government inaugurated an austerity
program and devalued the rupiah by 31 percent in the fall of 1986, at-
tempting to diversify Indonesia’s exports and increase its non-oil do-
mestic revenues. Between 1969 and 1994, GDP expanded at an average
yearly rate of 6.8 percent and during the early 1990s averaged 8 percent.
At the same time after the mid-1980s inflation was kept to single digits,
being 6 percent in 1997. But at the same time, Indonesia’s economy was
undermined by its huge foreign debt.
The forest fires and drought of 1997 combined with the Asian finan-
cial crisis to plunge Indonesia in the second half of the year into a severe
recession, with the rupiah falling to a rate of Rp 10,000 to US$1. In Oc-
tober 1997 the government announced it would seek help from the inter-
national financial organizations and under strong pressure from the IMF
Suharto finally signed his agreement to the terms of the fund’s $33 billion
bailout plan. The government held down prices of rice and fuel, hoping to
avoid the riots that would break out in the face of the austerity measures
in the plan, but it continued to protect banks owned by Suharto’s family
and friends. When the president then refused to carry out the measures he
had agreed to with the IMF and openly defied it by appointing loyalists
and cronies to his new cabinet, the Indonesian economy was on the brink
of collapse.
After Suharto resigned, the chaos continued with the rupiah dropping
to Rp 16,500 to US$1 by June 1998 and foreign capital fleeing the coun-
try. President B. J. Habibie committed himself to implementing the
IMF’s policies, recalled Widjojo Nitisastro to an advisory role in the gov-
ernment, and launched attempts to reform the entire banking and corpo-
EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS • 131
in Indonesia and was probably responsible, for instance, for a high level of
literacy in precolonial times (see WRITING SYSTEMS).
Under Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) rule, schools were small,
locally based, and mostly religiously oriented. The company distrusted
the effects of education on its indigenous subjects and gave schools little
encouragement, and from 1648 to 1778 the giving of any kind of lessons
required a government license. Only after the company’s fall did exten-
sive, government-sponsored education begin. A Dutch-language primary
school was set up in Batavia in 1816 followed by a three-year public el-
ementary school in 1849 and a teacher training school in 1852. From 1864
the colonial state maintained so-called Europeesche Lagere Scholen
(ELS, European Lower Schools), offering a seven-year, Dutch-language
course, though it was not until 1867 that a Department of Education was
established. Western education at this time was intended primarily for Eu-
ropeans, and it was expected that the children of Dutch residents would
return to the Netherlands for more advanced studies if desired. The ELS,
however, were opened to “qualified” Indonesians, and some 1,870 were
enrolled by 1900. From 1860 the colonial government began to establish
Hogere Burger Scholen (HBS, Higher Civil Schools), rigorous secondary
schools following the Dutch metropolitan curriculum and so qualifying
graduates for admission to Dutch universities.
General education for Indonesians was taken up on a large scale first
by the Nederlandsch Zendelinggenootschap (see PROTESTANTISM)
from 1830. In 1848, the state set up 20 “regentschapscholen” (regency
schools) to teach the children of the priyayi, but general education for In-
donesians was not provided until 1907, when J. B. van Heutsz estab-
lished Volksscholen (dessascholen) offering a three-year course in local
languages with indigenous teachers. In 1940, about 45 percent of children
received some education at this level, though graduation rates were low.
In 1908 Hollandsch-Chineesche Scholen (HCS) and in 1914 Hollandsch-
Inlandsche Scholen (HIS) were established to provide more advanced pri-
mary education to Chinese and Indonesians. The curriculum was much
the same as that of the ELS, but the first years were taught in Chinese or
Malay/Indonesian. From 1914, a kind of lower secondary education was
provided by the Meer Uitgebreide Lagere Onderwijs (MULO, Broader
Lower Education), which fed in turn into the Algemene Middelbare Sc-
holen (AMS, General Secondary Schools) from 1919, intended to prepare
MULO graduates for tertiary education. The interlinking of the lower ed-
ucation system was completed in 1921 with the creation of so-called
schakelscholen (bridging schools) to prepare Volksschool graduates for
EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS • 133
ELECTIONS. These were first held in the Netherlands Indies in 1903 for
members of municipal councils. Although the franchise was highly re-
stricted and Europeans dominated the councils, with reserved seats for
each racial group, these elections provided Indonesia with its first expe-
rience of electoral competition (see DECENTRALIZATION). Mem-
bers of the Volksraad were elected by members of these councils.
During the Revolution, village elections were held in many parts of
Republican territory in early 1946 and in Yogyakarta in 1948. Indone-
sia’s first general elections after the transfer of sovereignty were not held
until 1955. Voter turnout was 91 percent. Using proportional representa-
tion with effectively a single electoral district for the entire country, they
produced what many saw as an inconclusive result, the Partai Nasional
Indonesia (PNI) gaining 57 seats with 22.3 percent of the vote,
Masjumi 57 seats (20.9 percent), Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) 45 seats (18.4
percent), and the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) 39 seats (16.4 per-
cent) in a parliament of 257. Twenty-four other parties, including inde-
ELECTIONS • 137
pendents, were represented. General elections due for 1959 were never
held, partly because a substantial gain in PKI votes seemed likely.
Under the New Order, government-controlled elections were held in
1971, then every five years in 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, and 1997 (for de-
tailed results, see APPENDIX). In all these elections, with the exception
of the first, only the government electoral organization Golongan Karya
(Golkar) and the two officially sponsored political parties, Partai
Demokrasi Indonesia (PDI) and Partai Persatuan Pembangunan
(PPP), were allowed to participate, and campaigning was restricted to a
period of 60 days before polling day. All parties had to submit their can-
didates and campaign slogans to the security authorities for approval.
Challenging the Pancasila or the Broad Outlines of State Policy and crit-
icizing racial, social, or religious groups (see SARA) were not permitted.
Civil servants normally had to vote at their offices and were expected,
under the doctrine of monoloyalitas, to vote for Golkar. In the villages,
too, Golkar drew extensively on support from the army and the bureau-
cracy, sometimes banning campaigning by nongovernment groups on the
grounds that the residents had already decided to vote for Golkar. In the
New Order elections it was not possible for any party but Golkar to win
overall, and government rhetoric portrayed the occasion as one of danger
when the social antagonisms of the 1950s and 1960s risked being revived.
After 1971 elections used proportional representation by province, the
provincial allocation of seats being weighted to ensure that the provinces
on Java, with two thirds of the voters, nonetheless elected only half the
members of parliament. The final election under the New Order, that of
May 1997, was the bloodiest ever. Divisions within the PDI and govern-
ment attempts a year earlier to suppress the faction headed by Megawati
Sukarnoputri led many of the party’s faithful supporters either to boy-
cott the election or vote for another party. As a result PDI received only
3 percent of the vote, and the election as a whole lacked even the legiti-
macy of the previous ones.
The 1999 election was the first free election since that of 1955. Of the
more than 140 parties that were registered, 48 were allowed to contest
the election (for the results, see APPENDIX F). Megawati’s Indonesian
Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) received the most votes
(35,589,073), with Golkar coming in second (23,741,758), and the three
largest Islamic parties, Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB), PPP,
and Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN), taking the next three positions.
Twenty-four parties met the criteria laid out in the Law on General Elec-
tions (No. 12/2003) for participating in the general elections scheduled
138 • ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY
for 5 April 2004. In these elections voters were to elect party candidates
for the national, provincial and district legislatures (DPR and DPRD) and
also individual candidates for the new Regional Representative Council
(DPD). Law No. 23/2003 provided for the direct election of the presi-
dent and vice president. Nomination of candidates for these offices was
limited to political parties that won at least 3 percent of the seats or 5 per-
cent of the votes in the April 2004 general election (in later elections the
limit would be raised to 15 percent of the seats or 20 percent of the
votes). If no presidential candidate received more than 50 percent of the
votes in the 5 July 2004 presidential election, a run-off between the top
two vote-getters was be held on 20 September.
The final number of eligible voters for the 2004 elections was
145,701,637, a 23-percent increase over the 118.15 million voters in the
1999 legislative elections. See also PARTIES, POLITICAL. [0695,
0739, 1004–1015]
ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY. Chartered by Queen Elizabeth I in
1600, this was, like the Dutch East Indies Company, a joint-stock com-
pany enjoying a national monopoly of trade in the region. The company’s
first expedition to Java in 1601 brought back so much pepper that the
market was glutted and the company began to diversify. It established
bases in Banten, Aceh, Makassar, Maluku, and Masulipatam (southern
India) in the first decades of the 17th century, but by the end of the century
had been driven out of the archipelago by the Dutch, except for the West
Sumatra colony of Bengkulu. (See also “AMBOYNA MASSACRE.”)
The company was taken over by the British crown in 1858 after the Indian
Mutiny. See also BRITAIN, HISTORICAL LINKS WITH. [0491]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Three issues have dominated en-
vironmental concerns in the Indonesian archipelago since the late 19th
century: the preservation of unique animal and plant species (for which
see CONSERVATION, NATURE), the maintenance of a stable water
regime by maintaining forest cover and preventing erosion, and the con-
trol of pollution.
Forest protection for environmental reasons (rather than from illicit
collectors of forest products) became an element of Dutch colonial pol-
icy only late in the 19th century, though in the middle of the century
F. W. Junghuhn had suggested that areas above 500 meters should not
be cleared. It was realized already that rainfall and runoff were more reg-
ular on forested slopes and that the agricultural prosperity of Java de-
pended in part on leaving areas of the island with their forest cover in-
tact, though the preservation of forests for timber production was also a
ETHICAL POLICY • 139
major consideration. Under the New Order regime, there was large-
scale indiscriminate clearing in the 1970s. Protests against this caused
the government to pay attention to protection of forests, reforestation (re-
boisasi), and afforestation (penghijauan), but efforts in this direction lost
out generally to the perceived needs of the timber industry. (See also
FORESTRY; HASAN, MUHAMMAD “BOB”.)
To deal with the environmental consequences of economic growth,
President Suharto appointed Emil Salim (1930–) as the first minister for
the environment in 1978, with the mandate to find a way of combining
economic development with protection of the environment. Salim lacked
the authority to be effective in this task. An environmental nongovern-
mental organization (NGO), the Indonesian Environmental Forum (Wa-
hana Lingkungan Hidup, Walhi), was established in October 1980 as an
umbrella organization for groups and individuals interested in protecting
the environment. It played an important role in drafting environmental
laws, especially the basic law of 1982, and it brought several lawsuits
against corporations negligent in implementing environmental regula-
tions. Domestically it has worked with other influential NGOs and has
close ties with environmental groups and NGOs in other Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, through the Southeast
Asian Coalition (SEACON) established in 1990. It has not yet, however,
developed an autonomous organization and is dependent on funding
from other agencies. In 1990 the government set up the Environmental
Impact Management Agency (Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkun-
gan, Bapedal), and in the early 1990s the minister of the environment
also launched the Clean Rivers Project (Prokasih), which had limited
success in compelling industrial polluters to install sewerage treatment
facilities. It also established an Environmental Achievements Award
(Kalpataru), which helped spread environmental awareness. See also
WERENG. [0730, 0756, 0763, 0943, 1160, 1169, 1183]
ers, going on the haj to Mecca was a means of voluntary exile. After in-
dependence, figures such as Chaerul Saleh were informally exiled
abroad on study tours, while under the New Order many senior army of-
ficers have been didubeskan (“ambassadored off”). In 1961 Sukarno re-
sumed the right to place citizens under internal exile, and this right was
reaffirmed by the Suharto government in 1969. Though the inherited
provisions of the exorbitante rechten have not been used in New Order
Indonesia, the enforced residence of political prisoners (tahanan politik)
on Buru amounted to much the same thing. The Portuguese practice of
exiling dissidents from their African colonies to East Timor contributed
to the radicalization of political opinion there. [0634, 0865]
–F–
FEDERALISM. The notion that Indonesia’s many ethnic groups might co-
exist more happily in a relatively decentralized federal state than in a
centralized unitary one was a matter of relatively uncontentious discus-
sion by Indonesian nationalists before World War II. Figures such as Mo-
hammad Hatta could then be proponents of a federal system for inde-
pendent Indonesia without in any way compromising their nationalism.
The Dutch bestuurshervorming law of 1922 (see DECENTRALIZA-
TION) might have encouraged this trend if it had been earlier and more
extensively implemented.
In 1946, however, in the midst of the national Revolution, Dutch au-
thorities proposed a federal system as part of their political alternative to
the independent Indonesian Republic. Conceived originally as a means of
easing the reunification of the country, which had been administratively
divided since 1942, federalism soon became a part of Dutch plans to iso-
late and ultimately to suppress what they saw as the radicalism of the In-
donesian Republic. By playing on outer-island fears of communism and
of Javanese domination, they established a series of federal states (negara)
in the territories they controlled. They hoped thereby to entrench a con-
servative coalition of bureaucrats, aristocrats, Hindus, and Christians in
the constitution of independent Indonesia and so ensure continuing polit-
ical and economic Dutch influence. Thus the first of the federal states, the
Negara Indonesia Timur (NIT), covered the entire, ethnically diverse
eastern end of the archipelago (except West New Guinea [Papua]) and
was intended as a powerful counterweight to the Indonesian Republic.
During the late 1940s, however, federalism became less a vehicle for
political conservatism and more a format for ethnic separatism. Plans
were abandoned for a negara in Kalimantan because of the island’s eth-
nic diversity, and the negara Pasundan, formed in 1948, was explicitly
“FIFTH FORCE” • 143
a state of the Sundanese people of West Java. Within the NIT itself, sev-
eral semiautonomous ethnically based regions were established from
1947. From July 1948 the federal states and protostates were assembled
in a permanent Bijeenkomst voor Federale Overleg (BFO, Meeting for
Federal Consultation), and it was the BFO with which the Republic of
Indonesia fused to form the Republik Indonesia Serikat (RIS), which
gained independence in 1949. The official recognition of ethnic subna-
tionalism, however, later encouraged the revolt of the Republik Maluku
Selatan (RMS) and provided a basis for the Dutch to retain control of
West New Guinea after the transfer of sovereignty in 1949.
This Dutch experiment wholly compromised the idea of federalism in
the eyes of Indonesian nationalists, and the federal negara were quickly
dissolved after the transfer of sovereignty, the last disappearing on 17
August 1950. After that, advocacy of a federal state was viewed as tan-
tamount to treason, and it compromised the chances of success for any
movement aimed at creating either a decentralized or federal state.
In March 1960, after government troops had defeated the major forces
of the PRRI/Permesta rebellion, its leaders on Sumatra proclaimed the
establishment of a federal system, the Republik Persatuan Indonesia (RPI,
United Republic of Indonesia), consisting of 10 component states (incor-
porating the regions under rebel control on Sumatra and Sulawesi, to-
gether with those in which the Darul Islam was active). According to the
RPI’s constitution, each of these states would form individual governments
in accordance with the culture and wishes of their peoples. This RPI really
existed only on paper and disappeared with the surrender of the rebels.
Only after the fall of Suharto was the issue of federalism again tenta-
tively raised in the context of the 1999 decentralization law, when some
form of federal relationship seemed to offer a possible rubric for main-
taining the loyalty of such dissident regions as Aceh and Papua. After
Megawati Sukarnoputri became president, however, her adherence to
the idea of the unitary state seemed to preclude the possibility of any
moves toward federalism. See also NATIVE TROOPS; PROVINCES;
SUCCESSION. [0563, 0674, 0679, 0695, 1146]
offered Indonesia 100,000 small arms for the new force, and by the Par-
tai Komunis Indonesia (PKI), which pointed to Article 30 of the Con-
stitution (“Every citizen shall have the right and duty to participate in
the defense of the state”) and argued that victory in the struggle de-
manded the arming of the workers and peasants. In May 1965 Sukarno
described such a body as a “fifth force” alongside the four existing
armed forces (army, navy, air force, and police) and ordered the exist-
ing armed forces to prepare plans for it. Zhou Enlai repeated China’s of-
fer of arms in April 1965, and in July the air force began training some
2,000 PKI civilians at Halim Air Force Base. The army saw this as a PKI
attempt to gain weapons for an insurrection and its leaders resisted the
proposal strenuously, except for General Ahmad Jusuf Mokoginta in
North Sumatra, who made use of the directive to arm his own force of
workers and peasants. In the weeks before the Gestapu coup of Septem-
ber, extensive rumors circulated of a clandestine shipment of arms from
the PRC to equip the force, though the truth of these rumors was never
proven. [0714, 0807, 0859]
FILM. Indonesia’s film industry began before World War II, with several
local studios, especially Tan Brothers, producing a range of films,
mainly on romantic and adventure themes. The 1925 Filmordonnantie
(revised in 1940) gave the colonial government power to ban films on
moral or social grounds, and films were thus little used by the national-
ist movement, although the Gerindo leader A. K. Gani starred in some
productions. Films from the United States were widely shown during
the 1950s, though Chinese and Indian films also held an important
share of the market. This sparked a hostile reaction that criticized both
the effect of foreign films on the domestic industry and the allegedly
corrupting effect of displaying Western lifestyles. During the early
1960s, the campaign against Western film was spearheaded by the left-
wing cultural organization Lembaga Kebudayaan Rakyat (Lekra)
while local filmmakers produced a number of left-oriented films. After
the Gestapu coup of 1965, the Indonesian film industry was thoroughly
purged and many films of the early 1960s were destroyed. Film cen-
sorship was strict and most contemporary filmmakers concentrated on
romantic and historical topics, eschewing any social criticism. When
these films dealt with recent history, they hewed closely to the govern-
ment’s propaganda, the most notable example being Pengkhianatan
G30s/PKI (The Treason of GESTAPU/PKI, 1984). See also MEDIA.
[0188, 0189, 1306]
FISHERIES • 145
FLAG. The national flag of red over white (merah-putih) was formally
adopted by the pergerakan at the second Youth Congress in 1928.
FORESTRY. From early times, forest products were major items of trade
in the archipelago, while the teak forests of Java were an important eco-
nomic resource for the island’s rulers for housing, shipbuilding, and fire-
wood. A government forestry service (Dienst van het Boschwezen) was
established on Java under Herman Willem Daendels and with it
emerged a category of forest villages exempt from other forms of taxa-
tion in exchange for carrying out the often difficult and onerous tasks of
forest management. The colonial government introduced German ex-
perts to give training and advice from 1849 and laid down comprehen-
sive forest laws in 1865. Patrols of the state forests began in 1880. Dur-
ing the Japanese occupation, large areas of forest were cleared both for
firewood and construction and to release land for the planting of other
148 • FORESTRY
crops, and a shortage of fuel during the Revolution led to further cutting.
In the early 1960s the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) often took the
side of peasants in the vicinity of state forests in claiming land or the
right to collect firewood.
In 1967 under the New Order, the Basic Forestry Law (BFL, Undang-
Undang Dasar Kehutanan) established state control over forests on the is-
lands outside Java. Logging then became a major area of foreign invest-
ment, since the allocation of logging permits and the clearing of tropical
forests required relatively little economic infrastructure. Between 1967
and 1980 logging rights over 4 million hectares were given to state-owned
forestry enterprises. Typically concessions were granted to joint opera-
tions between large Western firms such as Weyerhaeuser and Indonesian
sleeping partners who contributed no capital to the venture and were
members or friends of the ruling elite. On Java and Madura, forestry was
managed by the state-owned Perum Perhutani (State Forestry Corpora-
tion). Timber became the country’s second largest export after oil, and in
1973 Indonesia exported 18 million cubic meters of tropical timber.
In 1975 the Indonesian government began to encourage loggers to
process timber in Indonesia rather than exporting raw logs. In 1980 each
company’s export of raw logs was limited to 32 percent of its total out-
put, and on 1 January 1985 all export of unprocessed logs was banned.
This policy led many Western firms such as Weyerhaeuser to withdraw
from Indonesia, but their place was taken by Japanese and Korean firms
and a dramatic expansion of plywood production occurred. With
Suharto’s backing, Muhammad “Bob” Hasan transformed the In-
donesian Wood Panel Processors Association (Asosiasi Produsen Panel
Kayu Indonesia, Apkindo) into a cartel controlling the trade practices of
111 plywood producers. Indonesia became the world’s largest exporter
of plywood, with annual exports totaling US$1 billion in value. In 1988
Hasan formed a joint venture with a Japanese trading company to be-
come Japan’s sole importer of Indonesian plywood.
By the late 1980s there was growing concern that after 15 years of in-
tensive logging in Kalimantan and Sumatra, a great part of their forests
had been degraded. The government instituted a “sustainable forestry”
policy to rehabilitate the degraded forests and increase the yield from
other forestland. This, however, led to even greater clear-cutting, espe-
cially in Kalimantan, as money from the reforestation fund was used to
finance establishment of state-owned plantations, especially of oil palm.
The collapse of the Suharto regime was soon followed by a huge up-
surge in illegal logging. Between 1995 and 2000 Indonesia’s forest cover
FREEPORT • 149
fell from 162 million hectares to only 98 million hectares, and defor-
estation rates in 2001 were in excess of 1.7 million hectares a year even
by official government figures. This situation led Indonesia’s largest en-
vironmental nongovernmental organization (NGO) to call for a complete
moratorium on logging for two to three years. An unpublished report
from the World Bank predicted that all the lowland forests in Sumatra
would be extinct before 2005 and in Kalimantan by 2010. To help con-
trol the worst effects of the destructive large-scale logging, an indepen-
dent working group of local NGOs and academics had formed an In-
donesian Ecolabeling Institute (LEI), which in 2000 signed a Joint
Certification Protocol with the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), an in-
ternational nonprofit organization promoting responsible forestry, to is-
sue certificates for Sustainable Forest Management, an internationally
recognized labeling system for timber products. But their efforts seemed
unable to counter the growth in illegal logging, exacerbated by the new
decentralization legislation under which local authorities in the regions
began granting thousands of small logging concessions to companies to
take over local forest areas. In 2002 Indonesia placed a temporary ban on
log export, and in June Malaysia banned import of logs from Indonesia.
The disastrous forestry policies were a major factor in the fires that en-
gulfed many of the forests of Kalimantan and Sumatra in late 1997 to
1998 and again in subsequent years, spreading a pall of smog over In-
donesia’s neighbors, especially Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand, and
costing an estimated $9 billion in damages to health, tourism, transport,
and agricultural losses. The dry conditions returned in 2002, again spark-
ing widespread forest fires, particularly on Kalimantan. See also CON-
SERVATION, NATURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. [0329,
0343, 0375, 0404, 1173, 1379]
wildlife, and it helped fuel local resistance in association with the Or-
ganisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM). In 1977 the local people, assisted by
the OPM, sabotaged the mine’s operations by blowing up the pipeline car-
rying the copper concentrate to the coast. In response the Indonesian mil-
itary carried out reprisals, killing hundreds, perhaps thousands, of vil-
lagers and forcibly resettling the people in lower altitudes. By 1980
epidemics swept through the resettled villagers, killing more than 20 per-
cent of their infants.
In an effort to gain local support, Freeport claimed to have spent more
than $150 million to build schools, houses, places of worship, a modern
hospital, and community facilities over the 1990s. After the fall of
Suharto when the company became an increased target for dissidents,
including the OPM, the share price of Freeport’s stock fell drastically
(from around $35 in 1998 to $7.50 in 2000).
Freeport provides the Indonesian armed forces with approximately
$6 million a year to pay for a 550-man task force to guard the company’s
properties in Papua. At the end of August 2002, gunmen fired on vehi-
cles near the Freeport mine, killing two Americans and an Indonesian
and injuring 12 others. It was later discovered that this incident had prob-
ably been carried out by members of the Indonesian army and was
blamed by them on the OPM. FBI investigators were sent to Papua to de-
termine whether this was in fact the case. Landslides in October and De-
cember 2003 disrupted Freeport’s operations, cutting its daily extraction
of copper ore by more than a half, down to approximately 100,000 met-
ric tons a day in the early months of 2004. See also UNITED STATES,
RELATIONS WITH. [0730, 0754, 0755, 0760]
–G–
(Gerindo) and Partai Sarekat Islam Indonesia (PSII). It called for In-
donesian self-determination and an elected parliament, using the slogan
Indonesia berparlemen (“Indonesia with a parliament”). In December
1939 it sponsored a Kongres Rakyat Indonesia (Indonesian People’s
Congress), which called unsuccessfully for cooperation between Indone-
sians and Dutch in the face of the deteriorating world situation. See also
SUTARJO PETITION. [0586]
even this is banned in Aceh. The net revenue from the porkas in 1988
was approximately Rp 962 billion. See also SADIKIN, ALI. [0576]
gamelan types are still in use on Bali. During the Majapahit era (13th–16th
centuries), gongs and gamelan ensembles were apparently exported exten-
sively from Java and Bali to other parts of the archipelago and to the South-
east Asian mainland, though development of distinctive local styles was
rapid.
Gamelan on Java has become “high” art associated with the courts and
with ritual (one scholar has described it as “music not to listen to”), but
it is nonetheless played on a great number of occasions, though increas-
ingly the use of cassettes is reducing demand for musicians. On Bali,
gamelan remains much more popular, partly because of the importance
of musical offering in Hindu ceremonies, partly because musicians have
consciously developed brighter rhythms and more exciting forms. Keb-
yar style on Bali now recognizes individual musicians, composers, and
dancers as artists.
Gamelan has attracted considerable attention among Western musi-
cians. Claude Debussy was inspired by gamelan performances at the
Paris Exposition of 1896 to include gamelan motifs in his composition,
while Olivier Messiaen has also made extensive used of gamelan
themes. See also DANGDUT; KRONCONG. [0091, 0135, 0159, 0174,
0175, 0177, 0179, 0183, 0184, 0204]
GARUDA. 1. Mythological eagle, the vehicle of the god Vishnu, and the
conqueror of serpents in Hindu mythology. In 1951 it was chosen as the
Republic’s official coat of arms, with a symbolic representation of the
Pancasila on a shield around its neck and the motto Bhinneka tunggal
ika. 2. Garuda is also the name of Indonesia’s international airline, formed
on 31 March 1950. Initially a joint venture with KLM, it became wholly
Indonesian in 1954. After a period of declining standards and profitability
in the late 1950s and early 1960s, and the loss of many staff in the purges
of 1965–1966, Garuda improved its position during the 1970s. Wiweko
Suparno, appointed by Suharto to head the airline in 1968, expanded the
fleet of wide-bodied jets as well as its domestic routes, though at the cost
of a considerable accumulation of debt. By 1980 Garuda had the second
largest fleet of planes in Asia. Merpati Nusantara Airlines was founded in
1962 to operate domestic flights and became a Garuda subsidiary in 1978.
In 1989 Garuda faced its first real competitor when Tommy Suharto and
Bob Hasan’s Sempati air challenged its monopoly on the use of jet engine
aircraft and flying international routes; three years later Suparno was fired
from his job as the airline’s president apparently because of his unwilling-
ness to accommodate the needs of the Suharto family. During the finan-
cial crisis of the late 1990s, Garuda was faced with bankruptcy and had to
abandon six of its 10 routes to Europe and return several of its leased air-
craft. See also AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY; INDONESIAN AIRWAYS.
[0467, 0748, 0760]
GAS (LNG, liquefied natural gas). Indonesia’s first major natural gas re-
serves were found in the 1970s in the waters around Natuna Island in the
South China Sea (see map 11), where gas fields contained reserves of an
estimated 45 trillion cubic feet. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) was also
found in Aceh and East Kalimantan. The fields in Arun in north Aceh
(an estimated 17 trillion cubic feet) began exporting LNG in 1978. These
reserves were expected to run out by 2012–2014, though they still gen-
erated $1.2 billion a year in exports in 2001. In 1982 Indonesia’s LNG
exports were valued at US$2.6 billion. In the early 1990s new fields were
discovered in east Aceh (with an estimated 24 trillion cubic feet of natu-
ral gas), and during that decade Indonesia became the world’s largest ex-
porter of natural gas. Acehnese gas exports to Japan and Korea were in-
terrupted by violence from armed militants in March 2001, and
156 • GAYO
ExxonMobil was forced to stop production at its oil and gas fields until
August of that year. After the plant reopened, more than 3,000 Indone-
sian troops patrolled its perimeter. Local villagers filed a lawsuit in
United States federal court against ExxonMobil in July 2001 alleging it
ignored the brutality of these troops, a suit that the U.S. State Department
urged the court to dismiss.
Huge fields were also opened up in East Kalimantan at the Bontang
natural gas facility, giving Pertamina flexibility in managing its exports
to north Asia. Further exploration began at Tangguh natural gas field in
the Birds Head region of western Irian Jaya (see PAPUA), where British
Petroleum (BP) planned to use a low-impact program in developing the
reserves of an estimated 24 trillion cubic feet. It was hoped that these
enormous deposits would fill the supply gap after the Acehnese fields ran
out or if guerrilla activity in that area forced suspension of operations
there. In 2002 Pertamina signed a $12.5 billion deal to supply gas to
China from the Tangguh field over 25 years.
GAYO. Ethnic group in the highland areas of central and southern Aceh,
culturally intermediate between the Acehnese and Batak peoples. Mus-
lim since the 17th century, the Gayo were incorporated into the Acehnese
kingdom by Iskandar Muda and were annexed to the Netherlands In-
dies in 1904. Strong local resistance continued until 1913 and during the
late colonial period the Indonesian nationalist movement was strong in
the area. There is a tradition of merantau. Many from the region joined
in the Darul Islam rebellion of the 1950s, and resentments fueled by the
rebellion led to the killing of many people accused of communist affili-
ations in 1965 (see MASSACRES OF 1965–1966), with estimates rang-
ing from 800 to 3,000 deaths. [0783]
coup was the work of a group of middle-ranking army and senior air
force officers patriotically concerned over their superiors’ hostility to
Sukarno and that Sukarno himself may have inspired them. Some have
speculated that Suharto planned or contributed to the affair in a Machi-
avellian plot to remove Sukarno, his commanding officers, and the PKI,
a view that was openly propagated after Suharto’s fall. That no orthodox
scholarly interpretation has yet emerged is due partly to the formidable
problems of evidence and plausibility, and partly to the difficulty of con-
ducting research on the event during the New Order period in Indonesia,
when many of the participants had been killed or jailed, and it was diffi-
cult for impartial scholars to query the official version of events. The of-
ficial interpretation was only allowed to be questioned within Indonesia
after Suharto’s resignation in 1998, when several members of Sukarno’s
government were released from jail and some began to publish their own
versions of what occurred in 1965. See also “CORNELL PAPER”;
GUIDED DEMOCRACY; SUPERSEMAR. [0689, 0690, 0692, 0702,
0712, 0714, 0715, 0857]
GIYANTI, TREATY OF. Signed in 1755 by the Dutch East Indies Com-
pany and the rebel prince Mangkubumi, it partitioned the rump of the
kingdom of Mataram into the Sunanate of Surakarta under Pakubu-
wono III and the Sultanate of Yogyakarta under Mangkubumi, who took
the name Hamengkubuwono I. [0577]
the emperor Vespasian banned the export of gold from the Roman em-
pire. At various times Banjarmasin and Minangkabau were major cen-
ters of the gold trade. Gold coins were minted in the region from the
eighth century (see CURRENCY). Major gold extraction began in west-
ern Kalimantan in the 1740s, largely in the hands of Chinese (see
KONGSI WARS), and in the mid-19th century the same area was cov-
ered with concessions to around 150 European mining companies, most
of which failed within a few years. In 1987 a further gold rush began in
the interior of East Kalimantan. Since the 1960s PT Freeport has mined
the gold in Papua, which has the largest-known gold reserve of any sin-
gle operating mine in the world. [0413, 0526, 0538, 0540, 0791, 1048]
had collected, but as the number of harvesters grew with the village pop-
ulation, the share of the crop received by the harvesters en masse tended
to grow in accord with the principles of gotong royong. Landlords, how-
ever, have often tried to restrict access to the harvest to smaller groups of
privileged workers, sometimes entirely from outside the village, in order
to increase their own crop share and to ensure a more docile workforce.
The concept was also discredited during World War II when Japanese
authorities instructed village officials to use it in extracting forced labor
from the villagers in projects for the Japanese war effort. Similarly under
the Suharto administration, people outside Java in particular viewed go-
tong royong as a method by which the government sought local cooperation
in imposing its centralizing policies. See also LAND REFORM; RICE.
–H–
being his willingness to allow East Timor to move along the path to in-
dependence and his approval of measures for decentralizing the Indone-
sian political and economic structure. [0760, 0761]
HAJ. The Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the five pillars of Islam.
The steady stream of Indonesian pilgrims was and remains one of the
important channels of political and cultural contact between Indonesia
and the Arab world. Already itself a sign of faith, the haj tends to in-
crease the conviction of those who undertake it and for this reason the
Dutch feared it as a potential source of political unrest. From 1825,
therefore, they tried to discourage pilgrims by requiring them to obtain a
passport and to pay a tax of ƒ110. They also encouraged the local tradi-
tion that seven pilgrimages to Demak, site of the first Muslim state on
Java, were equivalent to one to Mecca. The tax, however, was abolished
in 1852, and numbers began to increase, raising Dutch fears and leading
to increasing surveillance of those making the haj. Until the early 20th
century, most pilgrimages were arranged by so-called pilgrim sheikhs,
who organized tickets, accommodation, and often finance for the jour-
ney. From 1922, however, the haj came under state control under the so-
called Pelgrimsordonnantie, which regulated shipping, passports, vacci-
nation, quarantine, and the welfare of Dutch subjects in Arabia. In
1926–1927, 52,412 pilgrims traveled from the Netherlands Indies to Ara-
bia, the largest group from any country.
After independence the government maintained tight control over the
haj for similar reasons and also to preserve Indonesia’s foreign exchange
and to prevent people from selling rice lands to finance the pilgrimage.
Under the New Order, the Suharto government removed the subsidy to
those undertaking the haj and in 1969 forbade pilgrims from using any
programs except those organized by the government. In 1989 the num-
ber of pilgrims was 57,903, and this number increased to 205,000 by
2001. President Suharto made the haj in 1991, and in the 1990s many
government officials also undertook the pilgrimage as Islam became an
acceptable part of the political scene. [0627, 0637, 0641, 0983]
influence in the area, with the Ternate sultan drawing his major support
from Christians in the north, while the Tidore sultan’s basis of support
was largely among Muslims in the center and south.
In the early 1990s as Muslims made political gains in Jakarta, tension
arose between the religious communities in Halmahera. When the gov-
ernment of B. J. Habibie created a new province of north Maluku con-
flict was renewed, fueled by competing claims to the proceeds of a local
gold mine between Muslims and Christians allied with the two sultans.
At the end of 1999 violence broke out in northern Halmahera, with at
least 907 people killed by early January 2000. [0026, 0570, 0781, 1341]
HAMZAH FANSURI (fl. late 16th century?). Poet born in the west Suma-
tran camphor port of Barus (also called Fansur). He lived for a time in
Ayudhya in Siam and may have joined the mystic Islamic Wujudiyyah
sect there. He also spent time in Baghdad. His poems, especially “Sharab
al-ashiqin” (The Lovers’ Beverage), were highly regarded in the court of
Iskandar Muda but were later strongly criticized by Nuruddin Raniri
as heretical.
political goals such as the recovery of West Irian (Papua) and on 26 July
1956 he resigned as vice president (effective 1 December). Many saw him
as a possible focus for opposition to Sukarno and to Guided Democracy,
but he was unwilling to join openly with the dissidents, being always re-
luctant to break the unity of the Republic.
Under the New Order he initially became an advisor to Suharto, but
the president thwarted his plans to create a new political party (Partai
Demokrasi Islam Indonesia), and during his final years Hatta became in-
creasingly critical of the new government, lending his name to various
movements that were trying to change its political path, including the
Sawito affair and the Petition of Fifty, though he did not live long
enough to see the latter presented to the government.
Hatta’s ideology was complex. Though strongly influenced by both Is-
lam and Marxism, and immensely knowledgeable of both, he was sus-
picious of Islamic radicalism and opposed communism. He wished to
promote a moral capitalist economy in which prosperity could be
achieved without exploitation, and he saw cooperatives as a path to this
goal. He was willing to accept extensive foreign investment in the ad-
vanced sectors of the economy but was especially hostile to smaller Chi-
nese businesses, which he saw as exploitative. [0613, 0661, 0643, 0849,
0869, 0875, 0884]
HEALTH. The early history of health and disease in the Indonesian archi-
pelago is difficult to reconstruct because of generally vague descriptions
of ailments. It seems likely that diseases such as malaria, dysentery, and
hookworm have long been established in the region, while bubonic
plague, cholera, influenza, smallpox, and syphilis are more recent in-
troductions. Beri-beri is a product of recent technological change. Dur-
ing the 18th century Batavia especially had a reputation for unhealthi-
ness, and during the Napoleonic Wars Governor-General P. G. van
Overstraten suggested that in the event of attack, Dutch forces should
weaken the enemy by letting them capture Batavia and thus contract the
diseases occurring there. (See also PIG.)
Epidemic diseases that struck the workforce and the armed forces
first drew the attention of colonial authorities, and the earliest public
health care was in the form of smallpox vaccination and the treatment to
sufferers of syphilis. Batavia became a major center for research into
tropical diseases. In 1910 a Civil Medical Service was established sepa-
HEIHO • 173
rate from that of the military, and from 1925 the Dienst voor Volksge-
zondheid (Public Health Service) conducted major campaigns emphasiz-
ing public hygiene (drainage, sanitation, and so on). Nonetheless, in
1938 the colonial government provided only 116 hospitals, with 17,976
beds, for the entire colony. A further 38,122 beds were provided by pri-
vate, often mission-based, hospitals, which created unease in Muslim
communities who, often correctly, saw provision of medical care as an
attempt at conversion.
The earliest official medical training was of smallpox vaccinators and
midwives from circa 1817. In 1857 midwifery training was abandoned,
but from 1849 a school for paramedical dokter Djawa (Javanese doctors)
was attached to the hospital in Batavia. A full European-style medical
course was offered from 1875, and in 1898 the School tot Opleiding van
Inlandsche Artsen (STOVIA, School for the Training of Native Doctors)
was founded. The Nederlandsch-Indische Artsenschool (NIAS, Nether-
lands Indies Doctors’ School) was established in Surabaya in 1913 and
a medical college (Geneeskundige Hogeschool) in Batavia in 1927. (See
also EDUCATION.)
The need for an extensive system of health care for the villages of In-
donesia was realized from the time of independence, and a public health
education program was launched in 1954. These early efforts, however,
were hampered by lack of personnel and by poor coordination between
government departments. One of the major aims of the New Order gov-
ernment was to provide universal basic health services, an important as-
pect of which was an innovative family planning program. In 1968 a
new plan was developed for village health centers or Pusat Kesehatan
Masyarakat (Puskesmas, Centers for Society’s Health), and since the
1970s these have played a central role in bringing health care to most In-
donesians. In the late 1980s the government launched a control plan to
limit the spread of HIV/AIDS, and in April 2003 it declared the severe
acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) a national epidemic threat. [0576,
1197–1206, 1420]
(Peta) and Giyugun, the Heiho trained no Indonesian officers, but their
forces numbered 25,000 by the end of the war and provided many troops
of the postwar Republican army. [0661, 0663]
HONGI (“fleet”) RAIDS. Named for the war canoes, or kora-kora, of east-
ern Indonesia but referring generally to Dutch naval operations in the
17th century to destroy spice plantations in Maluku outside their areas
of control in order to ensure their own monopoly of the lucrative trade.
See also DUTCH EAST INDIES COMPANY. [0491, 0565]
Belo. When East Timor achieved its independence, he was appointed the
country’s foreign minister.
ranking officers and civilians could be held responsible for crimes com-
mitted by their subordinates. The maximum sentence was a prison term
of 25 years. In February 2002 international prosecutors indicted 17 pro-
Jakarta militiamen and Indonesian students for crimes against humanity
allegedly committed in East Timor in 1999, including a leader of the
youth wing of the Partai Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan (PDI-P).
In June the government charged pro-Jakarta militia leader Eurico Guter-
res and six others with crimes against humanity for violence that killed
more than 1,000 people in East Timor during its 1999 independence ref-
erendum. Ten of the Indonesian security officers tried for crimes against
humanity in these killings were acquitted by the Indonesian human rights
court—six of them in August and four more in December 2002. Two
civilians, both from East Timor, were found guilty of related charges.
The military was also opposed to investigations into the Trisakti incident
and the shooting of student protesters in May 1998.
In February 2003 the United Nations indicted General Wiranto, six
other military officers, and a civilian for crimes against humanity during
the independence vote in East Timor in 1999, but the Indonesian gov-
ernment refused to carry out the arrests. The following month a special
human rights court in Jakarta sentenced Brigadier General Noer Muis,
Indonesia’s last commander in East Timor, to five years in jail for not
preventing the attacks. Previously the court had acquitted 12 defendants
and sentenced two lower-ranking officers and two civilians to jail sen-
tences. See also UNITED STATES, RELATIONS WITH. [0748, 0760]
HUNTING. This was an important source of food for many peoples of the
archipelago, though vegetables, both cultivated and collected, were al-
ways a more important source of protein and starch. In areas of intensive
rice cultivation, the purpose of hunting was principally to protect crops
and human and animal lives, rather than for food. Tigers were hunted for
use in public fights, elephants for ivory, and rhinoceros for their horns
and bezoar stones. Hunting was also a popular sport of the European
community in the late colonial period. See also CONSERVATION,
NATURE.
–I–
and the 11th-century raids of the Cholas on Srivijaya were the only sig-
nificant military excursions across the Bay of Bengal.
It is clear, nonetheless, that most influence was exercised by Brah-
mans (most Sanskrit vocabulary in Indonesian languages is religious,
and there is no sign of an Indian-influenced traders’ pidgin), while the
courts of local rulers were the major channel for Indian influence. The
growth of trade with India and China from early in the Christian era
must have significantly changed that distribution of power and wealth in
local societies. Rulers saw in Hindu-Buddhist cosmology a means of ex-
alting their own positions (see KEDIRI; MATARAM; SAILEN-
DRAS). As adopted in Indonesia, Hinduism and Buddhism argued for
an analogy between the state and the cosmos, the ruler analogous to the
supreme god, and often a temporary incarnation (avatar) of a Hindu de-
ity. From this followed the construction of palaces (kraton) that physi-
cally resembled the cosmos and the entrenchment of the ruler’s right to
demand corvée labor from his subjects. Scholars have differed over the
extent to which Indian cultural influence reached beyond the court. J. C.
Van Leur argued that it was never more than a “thin and flaking glaze”
over powerful indigenous traditions, but more recent scholars have held
that influence went rather deeper and that “culturally Southeast Asia be-
came nearly as ‘Indian’ as parts of India” (I. W. Mabbett). (See also
MEGALITHS.)
Hindu-Buddhist Indonesia maintained close cultural contact with India,
especially through the Buddhist monastery at Nalanda in Bihar, where a
Sailendra ruler of Java helped to endow a monastery and which received
many pilgrims from Srivijaya. The use of the zero, though an Indian in-
vention, is recorded earlier in Java (732) than in India itself (870).
The early Indonesian nationalist movement was inspired to some ex-
tent by the successes of the older Indian movement. Partai Indonesia
(Partindo) in particular adopted the principle of swadeshi (use of locally
made products) at its foundation in 1931, and a few figures were im-
pressed by Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence, but on the whole direct
influence was sparse. See also MAHABHARATA; RAMAYANA;
WRITING SYSTEMS. [0518, 0521, 0539, 0540, 0543, 0544]
INDONESIA (from Greek indos, India, and nesos, island). The fixing of a
clear terminology for the region now called Indonesia has been bedev-
iled by changing political realities and changing understandings of the
186 • “INDONESIA RAYA”
INSULINDE (from Latin insula, island, Inde, India). Poetic term for the
Indonesian archipelago, coined by Multatuli in Max Havelaar in 1860.
The name was adopted in 1913 for remnants of the Indische Partij and
was displaced in poetic usage (except in French) by Nusantara. See also
INDONESIA. [0887]
IRIAN. The word Irian, derived from a Biak phrase meaning “shimmering
land,” can be used for the whole of the island of New Guinea or, up to
2001, for its western, Indonesian portion, covering the province of
Papua, formerly Irian Jaya (“Victorious Irian”), the territory of West
New Guinea under the Dutch.
IRON. Traditionally imported from China and the Ryukyus and mined and
locally smelted in West Sumatra, West Kalimantan, Bangka, Belitung,
and Central Sulawesi, iron was used for the manufacture of agricultural
and fishing tools, household goods, and weapons. Iron exports may have
been the basis of the economy of Luwu in Sulawesi. It was exported from
Kalimantan and Sulawesi to Majapahit in the 14th century, but from the
late 18th century imports from outside the archipelago dominated the
market. Dutch plans for a steel industry in Central Sulawesi in 1917 were
abandoned, though a small-scale industry was established in the Banjar-
masin area in the 1920s. See also INDUSTRIALIZATION. [0576, 1272]
among traditionalists and modernists, and the Partai Sarekat Islam In-
donesia (PSII), the successor of the Sarekat Islam, never joined it. Soon
after independence was achieved, the Nahdlatul Ulama split from it, be-
coming a party in its own right, and in 1961 Sukarno outlawed the
Masjum and arrested several leaders.
After allying with Muslim organizations in 1965–1966 in destruction
of the Communist Party (Partai Komunis Indonesia), Suharto through-
out the 1970s and 1980s sought to depoliticize Islam, amalgamating all
the Muslim parties within the Partai Persatuan Pembangunan (PPP)
in 1973. The government also aroused strong opposition from Muslim
groups in that year when it unsuccessfully attempted to introduce a mar-
riage law that Muslims considered to be contrary to Islamic principles of
marriage. Not allowed to assume a Muslim name, and in the 1977 elec-
tions being denied its traditional campaign symbol of the ka’bah, the PPP
could only in a very limited sense be described as a Muslim party. In
1984 all organizations, including religious bodies, had to adopt the Pan-
casila as their sole foundation. Denied any legal political expression,
some Muslims turned to fundamentalism and militancy (see PALEM-
BANG; WHITE PAPER), while others, associated previously with
Masjumi and with the Persatuan Islam (Persis), turned to social and ed-
ucational activities tied particularly to the Dewan Dakwah Islamiyah In-
donesia (DDII, Indonesian Islamic Preaching Council), an association
established by former Masjumi leaders in 1967 that had contacts with
and some funding from Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries.
From the mid-1980s the government began to court middle-class Mus-
lims, a policy reflected especially in the establishment of Ikatan Cen-
dekiawan Muslimin Indonesia (ICMI) as an acceptable mouthpiece for
these members of the Muslim community. At the same time the Suharto
regime supported religious education, the building of mosques, and the
implementation of Islamic law in matters concerning family and marriage.
After Suharto’s resignation, in the 1999 elections parties were estab-
lished representing every shade of Islamic teaching. The Partai Ke-
bangkitan Bangsa (PKB) and Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN), headed
by the two best-known Muslim leaders, Abdurrachman Wahid and
Amien Rais, explicitly appealed to consituencies wider than their Is-
lamic base. They came in third and fifth respectively (Partai Persatuan
Pembangunan [PPP] was fourth) in the election behind the nondenomi-
national Partai Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan (PDI-P) and
Golkar. Although PKB head Abdurrachman Wahid held the presidency
for the first two years after the elections, in general the splitting of the
ISLAMIC LAW • 199
–J–
JAMBI. Along with Srivijaya, Jambi emerged as a minor trading and raid-
ing state on the Strait of Melaka in the fifth century and after (see
PIRACY). It became subordinate to Srivijaya in 683, but after the fall of
JAPAN, HISTORICAL LINKS WITH • 203
Srivijaya in the early 11th century, Jambi briefly rose to replace it as the
dominant power on the strait. It was never able to establish the same de-
gree of hegemony and was raided in circa 1275 by King Kertanegara of
Singasari, thereafter remaining under Javanese suzerainty until it was
incorporated into the Minangkabau kingdom of Adityavarman, though
it was later also subject to Palembang.
In the 17th century, an independent sultanate rose once again, based
on the pepper trade, over which it fought a protracted war with Riau-
Johor (see RIAU). Sultan Muhammad Fahruddin recognized Dutch sov-
ereignty in 1834, but the rebellion of a later sultan, Ratu Taha Saifuddin,
lasted until 1904. The post of sultan was left empty after 1901. From the
late 19th century Jambi became an important area of Dutch rubber es-
tates, and it is today Indonesia’s largest rubber producer. [0439, 0543,
0546, 0547, 0550, 0840]
and from the 1930s Japanese shipping carried a major part of the cargoes
in eastern Indonesia. Japanese firms were involved in fishing and silk in-
dustries in Minahasa in the 20th century.
In July 1941, with the consolidation of Japanese power in China, the
Netherlands Indies followed the United States in banning exports of oil,
tin, rubber, and other strategic materials to Japan. Japan had previously
tried to pressure the colonial government to guarantee these supplies by
threatening to “liberate” the colony. The Netherlands declared war on
Japan on 8 December 1941, after Pearl Harbor, and Japanese forces be-
gan landing in Borneo in January 1942. The fall of the British naval base
in Singapore and the Allied defeat in the battle of the Java Sea was fol-
lowed by Japanese landings on Sumatra in February 1942 and on Java
the following month. Dutch forces on Java surrendered on 8 March and
on Sumatra on 27 March. See also JAPANESE OCCUPATION OF IN-
DONESIA. [0594, 0637, 0638, 0774]
single donor in 1989, with $1.4 billion. Japan’s economic power, how-
ever, continued to cause friction. In 1987 Indonesia began a protracted
dispute with Japan over the allocation of production from the Asahan alu-
minum refinery. Nevertheless, in the early 1990s Japan was the destina-
tion of more than 50 percent of Indonesia’s exports and the single largest
foreign investor and most important donor of development assistance to
Indonesia. After the financial collapse of the late 1990s, Japan’s leader-
ship role in Southeast Asia’s economies declined drastically, though it re-
mained the top aid donor to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN) and the largest donor to Indonesia in the Consultative Group
on Indonesia (CGI). [0446, 0736, 0846, 1131, 1137, 1147]
positions during the occupation than they had ever held under the Dutch.
The military training of Indonesians in the Heiho, Pembela Tanah Air
(Peta), and Giyugun provided a core of experience valuable in the later
war of independence. And the prominence of Sukarno and Mohammad
Hatta within the PUTERA and Jawa Hokokai helped to confirm their po-
litical preeminence in the postwar period.
Japan’s long-term political intentions for Indonesia were not clear.
There is evidence that they intended to incorporate Sumatra and East In-
donesia into the Japanese empire, while Java, with less economic and
strategic importance, might well ultimately have been granted autonomy.
On 7 September 1944, however, with Japan’s deteriorating military situ-
ation, the Japanese Prime Minister Kuniaki Koiso announced vague
plans for granting independence to an Indonesian state embracing the
whole of the former Netherlands East Indies. The 25th Army on Suma-
tra objected to the island being included in these plans until the final
weeks of the occupation, when it allowed representatives to be included
on a Committee to Prepare for Indonesian Independence (Panitia Persi-
apan Kemerdekaan Indonesia, PPKI), which was established on 7 Au-
gust 1945, succeeding the Badan Penyelidik Usaha Persiapan Ke-
merdekaan (BPUPKI) set up the previous March. Nothing had been
done to implement the independence plans when Japan surrendered on
15 August. See also JAPAN, RELATIONS WITH; SUCCESSION.
[0644, 0653, 0657, 0659, 0661, 0663, 0667, 0670, 0671. 0675, 0677,
0680, 0846]
JAVA (Jawa). The most densely populated of the major Indonesian islands,
and politically and economically central to the archipelago since the 13th
century. For statistical purposes it is generally combined with Madura,
but historically it is useful to distinguish from the Javanese lands of the
central and eastern part of the island, not just Madura but also the Sun-
danese regions of West Java (see SUNDA).
JAVA • 207
from outside Java, but it was the nationalist influence on the Javanese
masses that most worried the colonial authorities. By 1930, 70 percent of
the population of the Netherlands Indies lived on Java.
Java-Madura was administratively separated from the rest of the archi-
pelago at the start of the Japanese occupation in 1942, and as the war pro-
gressed it became increasingly isolated economically. With both exports
and imports severely hampered, the people of the island suffered greatly.
During the national Revolution, Java formed, with Sumatra, the
heartland of the Indonesian Republic and although the Dutch had occu-
pied the entire island by the end of 1948, widespread guerrilla resistance
made their position untenable. From the 1950s Java became even more
the center of politics, and fears of Javanization were among the factors
leading to regional rebellions such as the PRRI/Permesta rebellion,
though part of Outer Island hostility was reserved for the non-Javanese
capital, Jakarta. Despite efforts by the Dutch and postindependence
governments through transmigration programs, Java still constituted
around 59 percent of Indonesia’s total population in 2000. [0345, 0524,
0532, 0557, 0575, 1228, 1239]
JAVA MAN. A skull cap and wisdom tooth about 500,000 years old, found
in Trinil (East Java) by Eugène Dubois in 1891, has been identified as
that of Pithecanthropus (now Homo) erectus. This was the first human
fossil find outside Europe, and it led to speculation that Java had been
the “Garden of Eden.” It is now believed, however, that humans (H. erec-
tus) arrived a million years ago or earlier, thus predating Peking Man.
These early inhabitants appear to have been displaced by later migra-
tions. See also PREHISTORY.
–K–
KAKAWIN. Classic Javanese poetic form, mostly long and divided into
four-line verses with a fixed number of letter groups per line.
KALIMANTAN. Used to denote both the island of Borneo and, as here, its
southern, Indonesian portion, approximately 73 percent of its area, with a
population of about 11.3 million in 2000. Most Indonesians believe the
name signifies Kali Intan, “River of Diamonds,” (kali intan, i.e., the Bar-
ito in southeast Kalimantan), though it probably derives from “land of
raw sago” (lamanta). Kalimantan has no active volcanoes, and its topog-
raphy is dominated by a low central mountain spine running roughly
northeast-southwest from which a number of rivers—the Kapuas, Sam-
bas, Barito, and Mahakam—flow, often through swampy coastal plains,
to the sea. Most of the island is below 200 meters in elevation. The dozens
of indigenous ethnic groups, the most numerous of them generally called
Iban or Dayaks, were pushed from the coastal regions in early times by
Malay peoples, who established a series of small states such as Kutai at
or near the mouths of rivers. These states, most notably Pontianak and
Banjarmasin, provided reprovisioning facilities for interregional trade,
acted as outlets for produce from the interior (rattan, dragon’s blood,
birds’ nests, gold, and resins), and generally engaged in piracy, as did
states on the Strait of Melaka (see SRIVIJAYA). Usually, however, they
remained subordinate to one or the other dominant regional power (Sriv-
ijaya, Kediri, Majapahit, Melaka, Banten). The coastal states converted
to Islam around the 16th century. During the 18th century there was ex-
tensive settlement by Bugis from southern Sulawesi in coastal regions.
Through Banten, the Dutch inherited a nominal interest in western
Kalimantan and put trading posts at Sambas and Sukadana in the early
17th century. These, however, were soon evacuated. In the late 18th and
early 19th century the Dutch established greater control in Pontianak,
Sambas, and Mempawah to forestall possible British annexation and to
restrict what they saw as piracy. From 1790 to 1820 large numbers of
Chinese came to gold fields between the Kapuas and Sambas Rivers,
where some later settled as farmers (see also KONGSI WARS). Dutch
control in Banjarmasin was not established until the 19th century. From
1938 the Dutch portion of the island was ruled as a gouvernement (see
DECENTRALIZATION). Oil, discovered on the east coast in the late
19th century, transformed that region economically, making it a major
target of the Japanese invasion in 1942. The Dutch divided Kalimantan
KARTINI, RADEN AJENG • 213
into two residencies: (1) South and East Borneo and (2) West Borneo
(Westerafdeeling). During the national Revolution, they briefly toyed
with the idea of creating a federal state of Borneo on the island, but even-
tually declared a number of smaller states (see FEDERALISM). The is-
land became a single province at the time of independence, but in 1957
it was divided again, this time into three provinces: South, East, and Cen-
tral Kalimantan.
During Indonesia’s Confrontation with Malaysia, Indonesian troops
fought British Commonwealth forces along the border with Sarawak. Af-
ter 1965 the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) briefly organized guerrilla
resistance in West Kalimantan. Many local Chinese communities, sus-
pected of involvement with the rebels, were expelled by the government.
After 1967 East Kalimantan became a major logging region (see
FORESTRY) and the island has been an important transmigration set-
tlement site, with immigrants arriving from Java and Madura during the
1970s and 1980s, while large numbers of Bugis pepper farmers came to
East Kalimantan from the 1960s on. Widespread deforestation and the oil
palm plantations that replaced much of the native forests were among the
reasons contributing to the enormous fires that destroyed about 3.2 million
hectares (ha) of forest areas of East Kalimantan in 1982–1983 and swept
through much of the island in 1997. Following the 1997 fires, Dayak
tribesmen in West Kalimantan began attacking Madurese settlements, re-
asserting their claim to their ancestral lands. About 450 Madurese were
killed, and thousands fled. Attacks against the Madurese by both Malays
and Dayaks followed the fall of Suharto, with most of the Madurese mi-
grants fleeing Kalimantan and seeking asylum in Sulawesi and Madura.
Under the decentralization law of 2001, Kalimantan was divided into four
provinces: West, South, Central, and East Kalimantan. [0118, 0264, 0329,
0788, 0795, 0805, 0811, 0812, 1048, 1058, 1158, 1378]
KARYAWAN (from karya, task, and -wan, person). A term coined in the
1960s to describe all employees of a firm or office, including manage-
ment. It was used as an alternative to the word buruh (worker, laborer)
to avoid the implication that workers might have interests separate from
those of management. See also LABOR; LABOR UNIONS. [0430]
KENPEITAI • 215
KERBAU. Water buffalo (Bubalis bubalis; not to be confused with the ban-
teng). Kerbau were introduced to Indonesia after 1000 B.C., probably
from India via Thailand. They quickly took on great importance as draft
animals and sources of milk, becoming a measure of wealth and, by ex-
tension, a symbol of power. Buffalo and tiger fights were a common en-
tertainment on Java, and buffalo fights occasionally replaced battles; ac-
cording to legend, the Minangkabau averted certain defeat in battle with
Javanese by proposing a buffalo fight. Against the Javanese buffalo they
sent a thirsty calf with knives tied to its head, which gored the Javanese
beast while the calf nuzzled for milk. Individual buffalo can be identified
by distinctive hair whorls, which are sometimes believed also to reflect
individual character. [1154]
senting graduates. In the early 1970s KAMI split between those who
were absorbed into the government establishment and those who became
increasingly critical of New Order policies. In 1973 the progovernment
group became the core of the new Komité Nasional Pemuda Indonesia
(KNPI). See also STUDENTS. [0727]
formation of the army. In many cases, the authority of the KNI was exer-
cised mainly through a small Working Committee (Badan Pekerja).
Though put together in a very ad hoc manner, KNIs generally represented
most political streams in their regions and, depending on the capacity of
their members, were often key political decision-making bodies during the
first years of the Revolution until their role was somewhat taken over by
the regional defense councils (Dewan Pertahanan Daerah). See also DE-
WAN PERTAHANAN NASIONAL. [0643, 0661, 0674, 0681]
KOMODO. With a few neighboring islets, the only habitat of the Komodo
“dragon” or monitor, Varanus komodoensis, of which approximately
1,600 remain. A nature reserve was declared there in 1966 and a national
park in 1980. In 1995 the Komodo National Park, which comprises Ko-
modo and Rinca Islands and the surrounding seas, became a United Na-
tions heritage site, but the park fell into disrepair, with the number of vis-
itors declining by two thirds from the 36,000 in 1996. In 2002 the largest
environmental group in the United States, The Nature Conservancy
(TNC), proposed that Jakarta cede responsibility for the park for 25
years to a private company, Putri Naga Komodo, owned by TNC and a
Malaysian businessman, Feisol Hashim, which would invest about $2
million a year in the park, or about 100 times its current budget. [0078,
1155]
The KNIL carried out the conquest of indigenous states in the Outer
Islands in the 19th and early 20th century, but its primary role was the
maintenance of internal security and order (rust en orde) (see HEUTSZ,
J. B. VAN). KNIL troops thus were most heavily concentrated on Java
and in Aceh and North Sumatra. From 1917 male European residents of
the colony were subject to conscription for service in the militia and
landstrom (home guard) for the defense of the colony, but in the 20th
century the authorities relied increasingly on the British naval base in
Singapore for their defense. The KNIL capitulated to Japanese forces at
Kalijati in West Java on 9 March 1942, and much of the European com-
ponent of the army spent the rest of the war in prisoner of war camps.
KNIL soldiers who had escaped to Australia played a small role in the
reconquest of eastern Indonesia in 1944–1945.
The postwar KNIL under General S. H. Spoor (1902–1949) recovered
rapidly and took part with the Dutch army (Koninklijke Landmacht, KL)
in the “Police Actions” to crush the Indonesian Republic. In 1948 the
KNIL comprised 15,500 Europeans and 50,500 non-Europeans. It was
formally abolished on 26 July 1950, its troops being transferred to the
KL, transferred to the Indonesian army (APRIS), or demobilized. Troops
to be demobilized were entitled to be discharged at a place of their own
choosing, and around 4,000 Ambonese requested demobilization in Am-
bon, where they would have been able to join the uprising of the Re-
publik Maluku Selatan (RMS) against the Republic. To avoid this, they
were unilaterally transferred to the KL and “repatriated” with their fam-
ilies to the Netherlands in 1951 for demobilization. [0479, 0642, 1421]
KRETEK. The mixing of addictive drugs, such as betel and opium, with
other substances was already widespread in the archipelago before the
arrival of tobacco, but by the 1930s tobacco and clove cigarettes known
as kretek (perhaps onomatopoeic from the crackling sound they make as
they burn) had become especially common. Initially a cottage industry,
production of kretek came largely into Chinese hands in the 1950s and
expanded greatly at the expense of conventional cigarettes (rokok putih)
after 1968, partly with the help of a differential tariff that disadvantaged
non-kretek brands. The largest firm, Gudang Garam, based in Kediri and
with 41 percent of national production in 1981, had an annual budget
KUTAI • 225
four times that of East Java province. In the late 1980s a group headed
by Suharto’s son, Tommy Suharto, set up a clove monopoly that caused
great losses to kretek farmers and producers, until the president was
forced by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to end the monopoly.
See also SUHARTO FAMILY. [0406, 0761]
warriors from Wajo’ in Sulawesi conquered the area in 1726 and a pro-
longed period of Bugis settlement followed.
The Dutch exerted formal control over Kutai from 1844 when they
signed a treaty with the sultan. But their control was primarily aimed at
stopping the threat of British expansion. Sultan Mohammad Sulaiman
(r. 1845–1899) was able to lease out his lands for coal exploitation and
plantation purposes to English traders and other merchants. He never-
theless was obliged under terms of the treaty to provide the Dutch with
men, gunpowder, and ships to prosecute their wars. The sultan signed a
further treaty with the Dutch in 1873, and coal and oil extraction began
in 1882. His successor, Sultan Alimuddin, was effectively appointed by
the Dutch and signed new treaties with them that further restricted his
power, transferring much of the governance of the sultanate to an aristo-
cratic bureaucracy. The oil wells in the region were a target of the Japan-
ese invasion in 1942 and an Australian counterinvasion in July 1945.
The sultanate of Kutai was abolished in 1960. By 1958 it had become
part of the province of East Kalimantan, which emerged as the leading
timber exporter in Indonesia in the late 1960s. See FORESTRY. [0812]
KYAI. Javanese title of respect for learned men, now confined to specialists
in Islamic learning. See also ISLAM. [1336, 1383]
–L–
thorities finding the Chinese politically and socially more amenable than
Indonesians. In the early 19th century labor was still scarce enough for
the colonial authorities to introduce strict regulations on travel and resi-
dence by Indonesians, and even in 1880 the plantations of East Suma-
tra still needed the state-enforced Coolie Ordinance to keep workers in
place. In the early 20th century a scarcity of skilled labor enabled the
emergence of labor unions, especially on Java, while after indepen-
dence unions drew strength from their association with political parties.
In 1921 the Dutch established a Kantoor van de Arbeid (Labor Office),
which collected information on labor conditions and drafted labor laws.
On the whole, however, the steadily growing abundance of labor weak-
ened the bargaining position of workers.
The implications of rising population for agricultural labor have been
discussed extensively. The Agricultural Involution thesis of American
anthropologist Clifford Geertz suggested that there was little true em-
ployment of labor in the Javanese countryside; rather, a complex system
of lease, lease-back, sale, and sharecropping ensured that all had some
right to land and that income was based on that right rather than on a
strict calculation of wage for service. Fields were thus planted, tended,
and harvested in a cooperative way designed to ensure the welfare of all
members of the community. More recent research has cast doubt on
whether this system was ever as extensive as Geertz seemed to imply,
and most observers now see, in any case, a trend away from diffuse land
rights and toward a distinct class of wage-earning agricultural laborers,
whose bargaining position is severely weakened by the abundance of ru-
ral labor.
After independence, the weakness of labor’s position was increased by
the growing role played by the military in the economy and the identifi-
cation of the strongest labor union during the Sukarno period, Sentral
Organisasi Buruh Seluruh Indonesia (SOBSI), with the Partai Komunis
Indonesia (PKI). The institutional arrangement of state–labor relations
in the New Order period has been viewed by some observers as “a legacy
of the struggles between the army and the Left prior to the mid-1960s.”
After the fall of international oil prices, the Suharto regime adopted a
more export-led industrialization strategy based in large part on the
growth of a low-wage, labor-intensive manufacturing sector, employing
large numbers of female workers. Manufacturing zones grew up around
major cities, especially in Java, and this was one reason for a change in
the status of workers of the period. Although unemployment was offi-
cially put at 2.2 percent in 1987, most observers believed the figure to be
228 • LABOR UNIONS
much higher than this, perhaps 11 million out of a workforce of 67.5 mil-
lion, though extensive underemployment makes reliable estimates im-
possible. An industrial working class began to develop during the late
1980s, leading to a growth in militancy among some sectors of the labor
force and a notable increase in the number of strikes. (According to gov-
ernment statistics, about 350 strikes occurred in Indonesia in 1996, com-
pared to just 19 in 1989.) Although the government responded in large
part through repression, they also implemented a policy in the early
1990s of raising the minimum wage annually, so that by 1997 it was al-
most three times that in 1990.
Suharto’s resignation led to a rise in the number of labor unions and to
a further increase in wages so that in November 2001 the minimum wage
was raised in Jakarta by 38 percent to nearly US$60 a month. Under the
decentralization law the provincial governments, not the labor ministry,
had authority to set local minimum wages, so this rise was not followed
throughout the country. (Some provincial governments, however, ex-
ceeded Jakarta’s rate of increase, East Kalimantan declaring a 66 per-
cent increase for 2002.) Economic research groups and companies com-
plained that raising the minimum wage would only result in more
unemployment, which stood at the end of 2003 at 42.7 million workers,
10.8 million of them fully unemployed and 31.9 million in the disguised
unemployment category. The labor movement, however, which was be-
coming increasingly assertive after the change from Suharto’s authori-
tarian rule, held out not only for higher wages but also for healthier
working conditions and freedom of association for Indonesia’s workers.
The minimum wage continued to rise, so that in January 2004 it was
US$79.3 per month in Jakarta, a 6.3 percent increase over the previous
year. [0295, 0320, 0334, 0421–0437, 0595, 0748, 1321]
LABOR UNIONS. Rising demand for skilled and semiskilled labor in the
growing cities and in the colonial sugar industry dramatically strength-
ened the position of workers in the colony in the early 20th century,
leading first to a large number of small-scale strikes in the first decade
of the century and then to the formation of labor unions. European gov-
ernment employees were unionized earliest (1905), followed by railway
workers in the Vereeniging van Spoor-en Tramweg Personeel (VSTP,
Union of Rail and Tramway Personnel) in 1908 and the European postal
and pawnshop workers in 1912 and 1913. Since the program of these
unions often included preservation of the favorable treatment of Euro-
pean employees over Indonesians, indigenous workers soon began to
LABOR UNIONS • 229
form their own unions, especially in the pawnshop service and the rail-
ways, where the VSTP had come under Indonesian domination by 1918.
There were few unions among ethnic Chinese or amongst the employ-
ees of smaller private firms. The Sarekat Islam (SI) and the Partai Ko-
munis Indonesia (PKI) were both active in organizing unions, though
their organizers often found themselves torn between promoting the spe-
cific interests of the workers and supporting the broader program of the
political movement.
By 1920 there was no longer a critical shortage of skilled labor; em-
ployers became less tolerant of what they regarded as agitation and they
began resisting union claims and, in some cases, dismissing union lead-
ers. Major strikes broke out in the railway service in 1920 and 1923, in
the pawnshops in 1921, and in the ports in 1925, all of them unsuccess-
ful. Although unions claimed large memberships, union discipline in-
cluding the payment of membership fees was hard to enforce. By 1932
there were 132 unions registered in the colony with a total of 82,860
members.
Banned during the Japanese occupation, labor unions emerged in the
hundreds during the Revolution, often completely taking over the man-
agement of factories and plantations. Many were affiliated through the
labor federations Barisan Buruh Indonesia (BBI) and Sentral Organisasi
Buruh Seluruh Indonesia (SOBSI) with the PKI, and in 1948 when the
Mohammad Hatta government began attempting to reassert managerial
control, in order to gain control of agricultural and industrial products,
political and class antagonisms coincided. A bitter strike in a state textile
factory at Delanggu in Central Java in May, in particular, contributed to
the tensions that produced the Madiun Affair. During the 1950s and
1960s left-wing control of trade unions diminished with the establish-
ment of more conservative trade union federations, such as Sentral Or-
ganisasi Karyawan Seluruh Indonesia (SOKSI). From 1957 severe lim-
its were placed on the right to strike, strikes being prohibited in essential
industries (including communications, development projects, the tourist
industry, and government corporations) in 1963, and unions in general
became vehicles for the mobilization of support for political parties,
rather than purely industrial organizations.
Under the New Order, the government rejected the idea that unions are
institutions for defending worker interests against management and gov-
ernment, and argued instead that they are corporatist bodies for coordinat-
ing the workers’ role in an essentially cooperative venture with manage-
ment. The Basic Manpower Law of 1969 acknowledged the right of
230 • LABOR UNIONS
workers to form unions and to strike, but the principle of Pancasila Indus-
trial Relations (Hubungan Industri Pancasila) laid down in 1974 specifically
denied that workers may have interests distinct from those of business and
industry as a whole. Organizationally, too, unions were brought under close
control. On 20 February 1973 all unions except Korps Pegawai Republik
Indonesia (Korpri) were required to join the Federasi Buruh Seluruh In-
donesia (FBSI, All-Indonesian Workers’ Federation). Peasant organizations
followed on 26 April with the formation of the Himpunan Kerukunan Tani
Indonesia (HKTI, Association of Indonesian Peasant Leagues) and the
Himpunan Nelayan Seluruh Indonesia (HNSI, All-Indonesia Fishermen’s
Association) in September 1973. Each of these organizations became in
turn a member of Golkar. Subsequently, there was a major restructuring of
unions into 21 largely industry-based (“vertical”) organizations with ap-
pointed officials, replacing the former occupation-based (“horizontal”) as-
sociations. In November 1985 this process was completed with the trans-
formation of the FBSI into the Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia (SPSI,
All-Indonesia Workers’ Union), which was even more hierarchical and eas-
ily controlled than its predecessor.
Ten years later a further restructuring took place, with the formation of
the Federasi Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia (FSPSI, All-Indonesia
Workers’ United Federation), an apparent response to the growth of la-
bor unrest and strikes in the early 1990s. It was hoped that this new fed-
eration could prevent the growth of independent organizations outside
the control of government. A few independent unions had formed in the
early 1990s, including the short-lived Serikat Buruh Merdeka Seti-
akawan (Solidarity Independent Labor Union) and Muchtar Pakpa-
han’s Serikat Buruh Sejahtera Indonesia (SBSI, Indonesian Prosperous
Workers’ Union). The more radical Pusat Perjuangan Buruh Indonesia
(PPBI, Indonesian Workers’ Struggle Center) linked to the Partai
Rakyat Demokratik (PRD) was suppressed after the 27 July 1996 riots
in Jakarta. In early 1998 Ikatan Cendekiawan Muslim Indonesia
(ICMI) established a union called the Persaudaraan Pekerja Muslim In-
donesia (PPMI, Indonesian Muslim Workers’ Brotherhood).
After the fall of Suharto a number of local and national labor groups
came into existence, many with strong ties to nongovernmental organi-
zations (NGOs). They were successful in winning better wages and con-
ditions for workers in several industries, but their future influence re-
mained unclear, particularly with the renewed strengthening of the
military and security apparatus under Megawati Sukarnoputri. See also
LEGAL AID. [0425, 0430, 0436, 0612]
LAMPUNG • 231
LAND. For much of human history, land was relatively abundant in the ar-
chipelago. Although the effort involved in clearing it for agriculture in-
evitably gave it value, and religious beliefs may have invested it with
spiritual significance, land scarcity was not a major problem and control
of labor and trade seem to have been more important sources of politi-
cal power. Land may have been held collectively within communities,
but individual rights also seem to have been respected. Forest lands and
land not in active cultivation seem to have been more freely at the dis-
posal of rulers, and the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) allocated
to private individuals large tracts of freehold land on the northern coast
of Java (see PARTICULIERE LANDERIJEN). The growth of popu-
lation and the rise of commercial production of crops, however, put an
end to this abundance and from at least 1800, control of land was one of
the major issues in politics, first on Java and later on other islands.
During the brief British interregnum, Thomas Stamford Raffles
deemed all land on Java to be government property and on this basis be-
gan to charge peasant farmers a land rent. Under the Cultivation Sys-
tem, however, collective control of land was emphasized, the village re-
ceiving the right (beschikkingsrecht) to allocate and reallocate land to its
members, villagers being required in turn to devote one fifth of their land
to crops for the government. Land rights, thus, were something of a bur-
den, and the complicated land tenure arrangements described by, among
others, Clifford Geertz as an aspect of “agricultural involution” were at
least in part an attempt by landowners to shed the taxation burden. Cor-
respondingly, Europeans were expected not to have land rights, and even
leasehold of land by Europeans was banned from 1836 to 1853; even af-
ter a slight liberalization of regulations in 1856, little land came into Eu-
ropean hands.
Major changes took place with the introduction of the so-called Lib-
eral Policy in 1870. In that year a colonial government Domeinverklar-
ing declared all “waste” land, that is land that was not actively and per-
manently cultivated, on Java and Madura to be government property.
Traditional activities such as wood collecting were deemed to represent
usufruct rights but not ownership, though the extent to which the state
could override traditional use was a topic of continued debate. Also in
1870 the Agrarian Law allowed a form of lease called erfpacht for up
to 75 years, while continuing to ban the sale of land by indigenes to non-
LAND • 233
where large numbers of people have been resident for years on what is
technically government or private land and are thus subject to expulsion
at short notice and with meager compensation; and in outlying regions
where indigenous rights over land for purposes such as hunting and
gathering have been disregarded in the acquisition of land for transmi-
gration sites. See also LEGAL AID. [0335, 0337, 0338, 0372, 0595]
land reform program, further weakening the hand of the small landhold-
ers via-à-vis the government. Land was expropriated for large-scale de-
velopment often after bloody clashes with landholders, who received lit-
tle if any compensation. In 1978 a Joint Ministerial Interim Report on
agrarian reform tried to reaffirm the importance of the law and urged a
redistribution of land and more equitable rural relations, but none of
these recommendations were carried out. In the final years of the
Suharto regime, land reform courts were abolished and legal limitations
on landholding gave way to commercial interests.
After the fall of Suharto, there were moves to implement comprehen-
sive land reform measures. The National Land Agency and the post of
minister of agrarian affairs were abolished, and in October 1999 a draft
regulation was accepted in the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat
(MPR) asserting that agrarian reform had to be based on recognition of
cultural diversity and associated resource rights, including the control,
exploitation, and management of land through a pluralist tenure system
taking into account local adat law. [0337, 0338, 0954]
LAND RENT (landrente). From the late 18th century a number of re-
formers, such as Dirk van Hogendorp and H. W. Muntinghe, sought
ways of streamlining Dutch rule of Java by bypassing the entrenched po-
sition of the bupati as prime agents of the colonial government and
bringing peasants into the money economy as a market for European
manufactured goods. They proposed to achieve this by creating, among
other things, a direct taxation relationship with the peasantry, and to do
so they suggested recognizing peasants’ land rights, which could then be
taxed. Thomas Stamford Raffles first introduced land rent in Kedu and
Banten in 1812 and it was gradually extended, but, because of the need
to obtain surveys of landholding, the whole of Java (excluding the
Vorstenlanden and particuliere landerijen) was not covered until 1872,
while a unified system of assessment based on fairly accurate surveys
was established only between 1907 and 1921. Land rent was also levied
in Bali, Lombok, and South Sulawesi. Land rent provided nearly half
the revenue of the colonial government in 1867, but this proportion had
sunk to 10 percent by 1928. After independence, land rent was formally
abolished, though it seems still to have been collected in many regions.
In 1959 it was replaced with an agricultural produce tax (pajak hasil
bumi), and the proceeds were allotted to local (kabupaten) authorities. In
1965 it was renamed Iuran Pembangunan Daerah (Ipeda, Regional De-
velopment Tax). [0392, 0588]
236 • LANGE, MADS JOHANSEN
LASKAR JIHAD. This group was founded in early 2000 in central Java
and headed by Ja’far Umar Thalib, a religious leader of Yemenese an-
cestry who fought against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Its stated agenda was to wipe out Christians in Maluku and central Su-
lawesi, and establish an Islamic state. Although Thalib reportedly met
with Osama bin Laden, there was no concrete evidence of links between
al Qaeda and the Laskar Jihad.
238 • LASYKAR
LAW. The early legal systems of Indonesia are difficult to reconstruct since
these were amongst the first institutions affected by the successive waves
of Indian, Muslim, and European juridical thinking. Codified adat law
represents an attempt by Dutch scholars to record the traditional legal
thinking of the archipelago, but this attempt was affected inevitably by
Dutch political conceptions. The idea of civil actions between private in-
dividuals was not well developed. Punishment commonly included mon-
etary fines, enslavement, torture, and death (reserved for treason, lèse-
majesté, murder, and theft) but rarely imprisonment or beating. Islamic
law (syariah; see LAW, ISLAMIC), introduced in some regions from
the 13th century, greatly clarified commercial and personal law and
added whipping and amputation to the catalog of acceptable punish-
ments.
When the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) arrived in Indonesia in
the 17th century, it had little interest in territorial jurisdiction except as far
LAW • 239
as was necessary for its commercial purposes, and it therefore left non-Eu-
ropeans as far as possible under the authority of their traditional rulers.
Within VOC territories, European law applied to all. Law for VOC posses-
sions was codified first under Governor-General Anthony van Diemen in
1650, when Joan Maetsuyker compiled the Bataviaasche Statuten; these re-
mained the basis of European law in the colony until 1848 (see also
DUTCH IN INDONESIA; NETHERLANDS, CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDONESIA). Courts to administer Dutch law
were established in Batavia in 1629 and Maluku in 1651. In 1747, how-
ever, as it acquired more territory (see MATARAM), the company decided
to retain native law for its indigenous subjects outside the cities and estab-
lished inlandsche rechtsbanken or landraden to apply native law on the
northern coast of Java. Chinese and other nonindigenous minorities were
subject to the same courts, though legal issues within each community were
often left to Dutch-appointed community chiefs.
In the 19th century, with the introduction of direct Dutch rule, this plu-
ralistic system was formalized with the specification of legal racial cate-
gories for Dutch subjects in the Indies (see RACE). In 1824 adat law
was declared applicable to all natives (including those in the cities). In
1848, with the adoption of a new Dutch constitution, the Bataviaasche
Statuten were abolished and a large part of metropolitan Dutch law was
declared applicable to Europeans in the colony. From 1919 sections of
this law (excluding family law) were also applied to foreign orientals,
though they continued to be administered through native courts. Not un-
til the late 19th century, however, was a major program to codify adat
carried out. At the close of the colonial period, the legal system was di-
vided into native (“inheemse”) and government jurisdictions, which co-
incided generally though not always with the distinction between di-
rectly ruled territories and zelfbesturen. Native rulers, aristocrats, and
their families were not subject to civil legal action except with permis-
sion of the governor-general. In 1918 the various branches of criminal
law in the colony were united in a new criminal code, the Wetboek van
Strafwet (now Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana, KUHP), but this
was never actually implemented for Indonesians and in 1941 it was sup-
plemented by a separate criminal code for natives, the Herzien Inlandsch
Reglement (HIR, Revised Native Regulations). Islamic courts (priester-
raden) were established on Java and Madura in 1882 to administer Mus-
lim marriage and family law.
The 1945, 1949, and 1950 Constitutions of the Indonesian Republic
all validated Dutch colonial law insofar as it did not conflict with other
240 • LAW, ISLAMIC
LAW, ISLAMIC (syariah). Prior to the coming of the Dutch, Islamic jus-
tice was administered in the archipelago in a variety of ways. By the
early 17th century there were Islamic courts in Aceh and Banten and
probably in other of the Islamic states. Among the Javanese, the
penghulu was responsible for administering Islamic justice. Under a
Dutch law of the 1830s, any decisions by the Islamic courts had to be rat-
ified by the civil courts. This changed in 1882 when a Royal Decree for-
mally chartered a system of Islamic tribunals called “Priests’ Councils”
(priesterraden) operating alongside regular courts in Java and Madura.
In 1937 a series of regulations was passed setting up Islamic appeals
courts in Java, Madura, and Kalimantan and transferring authority over
inheritance from Islamic to civil courts.
After independence, the 1951 law on judicial organization and proce-
dure provided the foundation for the establishment of a nationwide sys-
tem of Islamic courts, and in 1957 a regulation was passed authorizing
establishment of Islamic courts everywhere in the Outer Islands where
they did not already exist, with their competence including inheritance as
well as marriage and divorce cases. Under the New Order, in the early
1970s the government attempted to transfer laws governing marriage to
the civil courts, thus weakening the Islamic courts and marginalizing Is-
lamic doctrine, but these efforts failed and the 1974 Marriage Act re-
tained the role of the Islamic courts. The 1989 Religious Judicature Act
provided a uniform designation for Islamic courts throughout the coun-
LEMBAGA KEBUDAYAAN RAKYAT • 241
try, placing their organization under the minister of religion and defining
their powers over marriage, inheritance, and charitable foundations. See
also ISLAMIC STATE; SUPREME COURT. [1080, 1081, 1085, 1089,
1094, 1097]
the East or Portuguese Indies) was read widely in western Europe and
stimulated formation of both the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC)
and the English East India Company. He argued especially that poor
Portuguese relations with Asian peoples gave other European countries
an opportunity to compete in the markets there, and he identified Java as
a suitable base for Dutch operations. [0081]
–M–
MADURA. Island off the northeast coast of Java, generally united with it
for statistical purposes. Dry, relatively infertile, and suffering regularly
from famine, it was ruled by Majapahit until 1466, when a revolt under
Kyai Demung founded Sumenep (Bangkalan) as an independent state.
Islam was established in the early 16th century (c. 1528) and the three
sultanates of Sumenep, Pamekasan, and Madura became trading powers,
though the island was best known for salt production and military forces.
Sultan Agung of Mataram conquered Madura in 1623, installing the
Cakraningrat dynasty as his vassals. In 1671, however, the Madurese
prince Trunojoyo rebelled, conquered the island, captured the court of
Amangkurat I of Mataram, and was only beaten back from the mainland
after the intervention of Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) troops.
MAHKAMAH MILITER LUAR BIASA • 249
During this time, many Madurese settled in eastern Java. The company
was able to conquer the eastern part of Madura in 1705, and the Mataram
ruler ceded the remainder in 1740, though not until 1745 was Dutch con-
trol firmly in place, the company placing restrictions on the rulers’ for-
eign relations and demanding tribute in the form of cash, cotton, co-
conut oil, and troops. Madurese barisan (formed 1831) were an
important element in the colonial armed forces until the early 20th cen-
tury (see NATIVE TROOPS). In the 19th century, although the Cakran-
ingrats remained the dominant family, their status was steadily eroded as
they lost taxation rights; in 1813 Thomas Stamford Raffles introduced
a government salt monopoly, which was largely farmed out to wealthy
Chinese entrepreneurs (see PACHT). In 1885 the Dutch introduced di-
rect rule, the sultans being demoted to the rank of bupati. A later mem-
ber of the family was employed by the Dutch to head the Negara
Madura, formed on 21 January 1948, as part of the proposed postwar In-
donesian federation (see FEDERALISM). [0008, 1265]
lim affairs. The Japanese in the event declined to deal with the MIAI, in-
stead creating on Java the Masjumi. [0648]
name was changed to Ujung Pandang, but it was changed back to Makas-
sar after Suharto’s fall. [0508, 0549, 0574, 0660, 0786, 0787, 0831, 1246]
may have been one of the factors limiting state formation and the growth
of complex societies in the region. Cinchona bark was recognized from
the late 18th century as offering relief and sometimes cure, and its ex-
tensive cultivation on Java helped to make the tropics habitable. The
connection between the disease and the bites of various species of the
mosquito Anopheles was discovered only in 1898, and from 1924 a Cen-
tral Malaria Bureau of the colonial government began eradication pro-
grams, both by water management and by use of insecticides. Extensive
spraying with DDT began in 1951. See also HEALTH. [1204]
On 1 August 2002 a new Malaysian law went into effect calling for the
imprisonment and caning of all illegal workers, which led to the depor-
tation and exodus of thousands of Indonesian migrant workers (some es-
timates as high as 400,000). [0478, 1027, 1120, 1319]
tuguese, Spanish, and Dutch competed with each other and with local
powers for control (see also DUTCH EAST INDIES COMPANY;
HONGI RAIDS). Extensive Christianization took place in the region. It
was the center of the strongest opposition to the Republic’s imposition of
authority after the transfer of sovereignty from the Dutch (see REPUB-
LIK MALUKU SELATAN).
After Suharto’s resignation in 1998, Maluku became a center of in-
terethnic and interreligious violence. From January 1999 there was fight-
ing in Ambon and southern areas of Maluku, and after the establishment
in October 1999 of a new province in North Maluku (which encompasses
Halmahera and the surrounding islands, including Ternate and Tidore
[see map 12] and also the Sula archipelago to the southeast), fighting
spread to that area. The North Maluku provincial government estimated
that over 2,000 people died over the next five months, and in Maluku as
a whole more than 5,000 people were killed between 1999 and 2002. In-
ternal displacement was estimated at between 123,000 and 370,000.
Many refugees began returning in mid-2001, but a large proportion of
the Christians decided not to go back, the largest group (approximately
30,000—mostly from Ternate, Tidore, and southern Halmahera) being in
refugee camps in northern Sulawesi. In February 2002 Christian and
Muslim leaders from the Moluccan Islands signed a peace accord in
Makassar (Malino II) agreeing to surrender their weapons, but two
months later violence again broke out with at least 12 people killed. On
29 April the military asked for martial law to be imposed on Maluku.
[0079, 0650, 0781, 0967, 1221]
the kingdom together with 10,000 reals as his share of proceeds from the
VOC lease on the north coast. He established his court in Yogyakarta
and was founder of the present dynasty. See also HAMENGKUBU-
WONO IX.
their sole basic principle (see AZAS TUNGGAL), restricted their access
to foreign funds, and gave legal grounds for closer government control.
After the passing of this law, a clearer distinction emerged between ormas
and orsos (organisasi sosial, social organizations), which were con-
structed as foundations without public membership and were thus free of
some of the formal restrictions placed on ormas.
MATARAM. Name of two states on Java and one on Lombok. The early
state on Java was brought to prominence by the Hindu ruler Pu Sanjaya
(732–c. 760), who is generally credited with establishing Hindu notions
of god-kingship on the island (see HINDUISM; INDIA, HISTORI-
CAL LINKS WITH). He erected a lingga (phallic monument) on the
Dieng plateau, the Javanese center for the worship of Siva, and claimed
a special personal relationship with Hindu gods and with his ancestors.
His successors built the temple of Prambanan and struggled for power
in central Java with the Sailendras. In the early 10th century, King Sin-
dok shifted his capital to East Java for reasons still unclear.
The Javanese sultanate of Mataram emerged in the 1570s under Kyai
Gede Pamanahan (? –c. 1584) in the vicinity of modern Surakarta. It
began major expansion under his son and heir Panembahan Senapati In-
alaga (r. 1584–1601), who defeated Pajang and pushed his control to the
northern coast and into the Madiun valley. Senapati fought Surabaya
and established his kraton at Kuta Gede, near modern Yogyakarta. His
successor Panembahan Seda-ing Krapyak (r. ca 1601–1613) allowed the
Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) a trading post at Japara on the
north coast. Sultan Agung, the greatest of Mataram’s rulers, defeated
Madura (1624) and Surabaya (1625), thus establishing hegemony over
most of central and eastern Java. In 1628 and 1629 he tried unsuccess-
fully to drive the Dutch from Batavia. The latter part of his reign was oc-
cupied with campaigns against rebellious vassals in Giri (1636) and Bal-
ambangan (1636–1640).
Agung’s son and successor Sunan Amangkurat (Mangkurat) I (r.
1646–1677) lost control of the north coast and faced a major uprising by
266 • MATOAYA, KARAENG
the Madurese Trunojoyo. After Amangkurat was driven from his own
court by Trunojoyo, the VOC intervened on Mataram’s behalf to defeat
Trunojoyo (1678–1679) and establish Amangkurat’s son Amangkurat II
(r. 1677–1703) on the throne, with his court at Kartasura. The following
decades were a time of cultural flowering but political disorder. In the
First War of Javanese Succession (1704–1705), Amangkurat II was de-
posed by his uncle Pakubuwono I, who ceded Cirebon, Priangan, and
half of Madura to the VOC. A Second War of Succession broke out on
Pakubuwono’s death in 1719, lasting until 1723, when Amangkurat IV
was installed on the throne with VOC help. In 1740 the revolt of the Chi-
nese in Batavia spread along Java’s north coast and was joined by
Pakubuwono II. In a series of complicated maneuvers, however, he at-
tempted to deal with the Dutch, was deposed by his followers, and was
restored to power by the Dutch in 1743, establishing his court at
Surakarta (Solo) and ceding the entire north coast of Java and all territo-
ries east of Pasuruan to the VOC. A Third War of Succession broke out
in 1746, when the king’s brother Mangkubumi revolted. Pakubuwono II
meanwhile ceded the remains of his kingdom to the VOC and promptly
died in 1749. Mangkubumi was declared sultan by his followers in 1749,
taking the name Hamengkubuwono, while the Dutch installed Pakubu-
wono’s son as Pakubuwono III. The rebellion ended with the partition of
Mataram into distinct kingdoms of Yogyakarta and Surakarta under the
treaty of Giyanti. For a list of rulers of Mataram, see APPENDIX C. See
also MAP 3. [0572, 0578, 0581]
MEDIA. Prior to the New Order, all newspapers had to be affiliated with
a political party or mass organization. This regulation was annulled in
1966, leading to a depoliticization of the media, with its emphasis shift-
ing to popular culture and economic development. Economic growth and
concomitant social changes in the 1970s shaped the development of
films, magazines, and pop music. A publishing boom developed in the
1970s and 1980s when new newspapers and popular novels flourished,
together with glossy magazines directed to specific social groups and in-
terests. Popular music found a wide market among young people. In the
film industry, a levy was introduced on foreign films in 1967 with the
money used to finance Indonesian productions, which thus increased in
number. Radio had long been a popular medium in Indonesia, and a state
television service had been established in 1962, which expanded greatly
in the late 1970s after the launching of Indonesia’s Palapa satellite. State-
owned Televisi Republik Indonesia (TVRI) was a monopoly until 1989
when the government licensed five private television channels to com-
pete with it. In the later years of the Suharto regime, members and as-
sociates of the Suharto family acquired control of several of the grow-
ing media conglomerates, especially in the commercial television sector
but also in the print media. Through these ties and through the govern-
ment’s control of licensing and its selective closure of outlets that aired
dissenting views, the regime was able to maintain control over the range
of public discourse. See also CENSORSHIP. [0730, 0761, 0763]
continuous protests when the Soerjadi slate was allowed to compete. She
did not direct her supporters to boycott the elections, but did ask them
not to vote for PDI and said she herself would not vote. She played no
direct role in the events leading up to the overthrow of Suharto, but in the
first free post-Suharto elections in 1999 the new party that she had
formed (the Partai Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan [PDI-P]) out-
voted all the other parties, gaining 153 seats in the parliament. Never-
theless, Megawati lacked the political skills of her rivals and was out-
maneuvered by Abdurrachman Wahid in the parliament, so that he was
elected president. To placate the outrage of her followers, he nominated
her as vice president. Initially the position was largely ceremonial, ex-
cept that she was charged with responsibility for the eastern half of In-
donesia, a task in which she did not excel.
As dissatisfaction with Wahid’s presidency grew, he was compelled to
grant Megawati greater powers, and after his impeachment she was
unanimously elected to replace him as president on 23 July 2001. She
does not seem to have acquired an interest in politics but holds to a few
strong beliefs, largely mirroring those of her father—particularly main-
tenance of a unitary state and moving harshly against any secessionist
movements. Like him, she appears to mistrust the political force of Is-
lam, but nevertheless chose Hamzah Haz, the leader of the Partai Per-
satuan Pembangunan (PPP), as her vice president in an attempt to ap-
peal to Muslim opinion. She also follows Sukarno in her desire to pursue
a neutral foreign policy, and at least until the Bali bombing of October
2002, she tried to resist pressures particularly from the United States to
pursue an aggressive policy against suspected Islamic terrorists. Subse-
quently she did cooperate in the “war on terrorism,” searching out and
arresting a number of suspects in the Bali bombing, but she opposed any
war on Iraq without United Nations sanction. She differs from Sukarno
in her closeness to the military and her willingness to grant them stronger
powers than they enjoyed under either B. J. Habibie or Abdurrachman
Wahid, as she shares with army leaders an overriding concern for In-
donesian unity. In the economic field after coming to office in July 2001,
Megawati cut fuel subsidies and passed a budget keeping spending in
check. As her tenure lengthened, she displayed an increasingly conser-
vative bent, expanding the powers of the military to crack down on
protest demonstrations, initially opposing the Majelis Per-
musyawaratan Rakyat (MPR)’s proposal for direct election of the
president, and choosing to pursue a military solution to the rebellion in
Aceh. [0725, 0867, 0882, 0964]
270 • MELAKA
MELAKA (Malacca). Port city on the peninsular coast of the Melaka Strait,
founded in circa 1400 by Parameswara, a prince of Palembang. In the tra-
dition of Srivijaya, with which it claimed a dynastic connection, and
Jambi, Melaka attracted traders by virtue of its strategic position, its ser-
vicing facilities, and its regularized taxation, becoming the most powerful
state on the strait in the 15th century. It competed with Siam for control of
the Malay Peninsula and established outposts in Sumatra, especially in
Siak. From 1400 to 1430 it received several visits from the Chinese ad-
miral Zheng He and worked closely with the Ming rulers of China to sup-
press piracy and to keep trade flowing smoothly. Its commercial orienta-
tion later turned westward, and it became a major entrepôt for the flow of
goods from the archipelago to India and the West. It also moved into pep-
per production and trade for the Indian market and in 1436 adopted Islam.
Melaka’s wealth, described in glowing terms by Tomé Pires, contin-
ued to come principally from its entrepôt role and made it in many re-
spects a model for later sultanates in the region. Wealth also made it a
prime target for the Portuguese, who captured it in 1511 with a force of
1,200 men and 18 ships (see also UPAS). Much of Melaka’s trade then
went to Aceh and Banten, and the city was attacked repeatedly by Aceh
and by Riau, where descendants of the Melaka sultans had reestablished
their kingdom. Melaka fell to a combined Dutch-Riau force in 1641, but
under Dutch rule the city declined further as the Dutch East Indies
Company (VOC) directed trade as much as possible to Batavia. British
forces seized Melaka in 1795 during the Napoleonic Wars, but it was re-
stored to the Dutch in 1818. The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 placed it
definitively under Britain’s rule as part of a general tidying up of colo-
nial borders in the region. [0543, 0556, 0571]
up since then. Prior to the economic downturn of 1997, the most impor-
tant of these were Pertamina and Badan Urusan Logistik (Bulog). In
1974 active duty officers were forbidden to engage directly in business,
but this regulation was enforced only sporadically. The army’s holding
company Yayasan Kartika Eka Paksi (YKEP) had 11 subsidiaries and 22
affiliated companies, including logging and plywood operations, a bank,
a pharmaceutical company, and a small airline. These enterprises were
severely hurt by the Asian financial crisis, and in 2001 an outside audit
revealed that only two of the 38 enterprises then under YKEP were gen-
erating profits. Although the government increased the military budget
from Rp 7.7 trillion in 2001 to Rp 13 trillion in 2002, this amount still
fell far short of its needs. Most of its budgetary shortfalls were met by
payoffs from provincial governments and increasing military involve-
ment in drug smuggling (it was reportedly disagreements over shares in
this that led to the September 2002 clash near Medan with the police),
protection rackets, illegal mining and logging, fuel smuggling, gam-
bling, and prostitution. See also CUKONG. [0313, 0373, 0727, 0731]
19th century Minahasa became a major recruitment area for the Konin-
klijk Nederlands-Indisch Leger (KNIL). The presence of missionary
schools led to a relatively high level of education and of fluency in Dutch
in the region. Government education also expanded in the 1880s, and
many people left the region to find employment elsewhere, especially as
teachers and in other government services, so that along with the Am-
bonese, Menadonese (the colonial-era term for Minahasa Christians)
gained a reputation as indigenous agents of Dutch rule. A Perserikatan
Minahassa (Minahasa Association) was established in 1910 by G. S. S. J.
Ratulangi (1890–1949), but it argued for promotion of trade and indus-
try in the region rather than for independence.
The Revolution brought deep divisions to Minahasa, with Ratulangi
espousing the unitarian doctrine and being appointed as the Republic’s
governor for Sulawesi (Celebes), while another party formed in March
1946 campaigned for the integration of Minahasa into the Dutch state as
the 12th province. One of the most effective Republican military organ-
izations was the Minahasan militia Kebaktian Rakjat Indonesia Sulawesi
(KRIS, Loyalty of the Indonesian People from Sulawesi), which in-
ducted Minahasans of all political shades into the Republican struggle.
In the latter part of the revolutionary period, a Minahasa organization,
the Komité Ketatanegaraan Minahasa (Minahasa Constitutional Com-
mittee), was formed that opposed the increasingly pro-Republican Ne-
gara Indonesia Timor (NIT) and argued against the region’s inclusion
in independent Indonesia.
In the 1950s, in opposition to the central government’s attempts to im-
pose a monopoly over copra purchase and marketing, the region became
a major center of smuggling. An unsuccessful attempt by the central gov-
ernment in 1956 to close the port of Manado was among the causes of
the Permesta revolt, which became part of the PRRI/Permesta rebel-
lion. From 1958 the Minahasans were the only group offering serious re-
sistance to the central government. [0028, 0100, 0450, 0802, 0823]
prevalent in Tanah Datar, and the more democratic Bodi Caniago tradition,
which was followed mostly in Agam and Limapuluh Kota. The first histor-
ical record of the Minangkabau appears in 1347 when inscriptions indicate
that Adityavarman, a prince of mixed Javanese-Sumatran parentage, threw
off allegiance to Majapahit and ruled the gold-rich regions of Tanah Datar
until at least 1375. The Minangkabau were traditionally organized not in
kingdoms but into largely autonomous villages (nagari), themselves feder-
ations of kinship groups. Gold mines in the Tanah Datar area were the prin-
cipal economic base of Minangkabau communities and up to the 17th cen-
tury the area was the main gold producer on the archipelago. A Dutch East
Indies Company (VOC) post was established on the coast under the treaty
of Painan (1663).
Islam reached the region in the 16th century, spreading first through
Islamic schools (surau). Christine Dobbin argues that economic change
in the late 18th century stimulated the dramatic growth of Islam. Gold
production declined; production of cinnamon, coffee, gambier, and salt
expanded; and Minangkabau men became increasingly involved in long-
distance trade with the outside world. Islam offered not only a means for
creating a trading diaspora, whose members helped each other with
credit and commercial information, but also gave a platform for a polit-
ical challenge to the old order. This challenge took the form of the so-
called Paderis, a modernist Muslim movement following Wahhabi prin-
ciples, which sought to purify Islam in West Sumatra from accretions
deriving from adat practices. Many Paderi opponents fled the highlands
and sought assistance from the Dutch, whose presence hitherto had been
largely confined to the coastal trading ports. The Dutch began military
actions against the Paderi in 1821 and sporadic warfare continued until
they defeated the Paderi forces and exiled their leader, Imam Bonjol,
in 1837.
The Dutch directed much of their administration to controlling and
monopolizing coffee production through the cultivation system, and the
Minangkabau region became a major coffee producing and exporting
area. With the relaxation of the monopoly and forced cultivation in the
early 20th century, the Minangkabau moved extensively into private pro-
duction of coffee, copra, and rubber. Anticolonial uprisings took place
in 1908 and 1927 (see also PARTAI KOMUNIS INDONESIA), and
many Minangkabau leaders (e.g., Mohammad Hatta, Sutan Sjahrir,
Muhammad Yamin, and Tan Malaka) assumed prominent leadership
roles in the nationalist movement. Strongly loyal to the Indonesian Re-
public during the Revolution, West Sumatra was the seat of the Pemer-
MINING • 277
there were indications that his advice was still heeded. [0031, 0680,
0733, 0972]
MURTOPO, ALI (1924–1984). Murtopo was born in Blora in 1924 the son
of a batik trader in an impoverished priyayi family. Toward the end of the
Japanese occupation, he joined the Hizbullah, becoming a company
commander when it was absorbed into the Indonesian army. He served in
Ahmad Yani’s Banteng Raiders unit of the Diponegoro division in 1952,
becoming deputy chief of the Diponegoro’s territorial and political affairs
branch in 1957. He followed Suharto into army intelligence headquar-
ters and from there into the West Irian (Papua) campaign and Komando
Cadangan Strategis Angkatan Darat (Kostrad). During the West Irian
campaign in the early 1960s, Murtopo developed a new combat intelli-
gence unit that became Operasi Khusus (Opsus). As head of Opsus he
opened secret contacts with Malaysian officials in August–September
1964, and in November he went to Bangkok for secret negotiations aimed
at limiting and eventually ending Confrontation. He also established
contacts with former PRRI/Permesta rebels and with them organized
massive regional smuggling in rubber and other commodities. He spent
much of this period outside Indonesia arranging emergency funding for
Suharto from Chinese business sources in Singapore, Hong Kong, and
Taiwan. In 1969, as head of Opsus, he was deeply involved in persuading
(largely through arrests and bribes) leaders in West Irian to opt for In-
donesia. He became one of Suharto’s closest advisors (SPRI) and deputy
head of Badan Koordinasi Intelijen Negara (Bakin).
Murtopo was closely tied with a group of Catholic intellectuals of Chi-
nese descent who cooperated with him in the early postcoup period, and
he sponsored and headed their think tank, the Centre for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS). He was closely involved in directing the
success achieved by Golkar in the first New Order elections in 1971,
and in the amalgamation of the political parties immediately afterward.
In October 1974 Suharto put him in charge of negotiations with Portugal
over East Timor, and he took control of the Operasi Komodo (Komodo
Operation), which was closely involved in fomenting the civil war in the
region that eventually led to Indonesia’s invasion of East Timor in De-
cember 1975. Murtopo remained until his death one of Suharto’s closest
advisers. [0031, 0736, 0845]
MUSSO (or Moeso) (1897–1948). One of the major leaders of the Partai
Komunis Indonesia (PKI) until killed by Republican forces after the
Madiun Affair. He was born in the residency of Kediri and attended
teacher training school in Batavia. Musso lived for a while in Surabaya
at the boarding house run by the wife of Umar Said Tjokroaminoto,
with whom he became close and where he met Sukarno. A leading fig-
ure in the PKI when it broke off from the Sarekat Islam (SI), Musso was
arrested by the Dutch over the Afdeling B affair. After his release he be-
came active especially in the PKI’s relations with labor. He was proba-
bly present at the Prambanan meetings where the party decided to mount
the 1926–1927 uprising, but was in Moscow seeking Comintern support
for the revolt during the planning period. He was in Singapore when the
revolt broke out and was briefly arrested by the British authorities, but
then released and allowed to return to the Soviet Union. Musso returned
briefly to Indonesia in 1935, where he established the so-called Illegal
PKI. He finally returned to Yogyakarta in August 1948, where he
headed a new coalition of communist and leftist forces under the PKI and
posed a direct challenge to the Sukarno-Hatta leadership. When the Ma-
diun rebellion broke out in September 1948, he was on a tour of central
Java with other leaders, including Amir Sjarifuddin, but he came out
in support of the rebellion and publicly challenged the people to choose
between him and Sukarno. The rebellion was soon put down and Musso
284 • MUSYAWARAH
fled to the countryside, where he was captured and killed at the end of
October 1948. [0478, 0661, 0683, 0684]
–N–
not coin the term Nasakom until the late 1950s. Sukarno argued that re-
ligious belief, communism, and nationalism were not fundamentally in-
compatible ideologies but aspects of a concern for spirituality, social jus-
tice, and national self-respect that all Indonesians shared. His refusal to
accept the division between these ideologies contributed to his success as
a uniting national leader.
In installing Guided Democracy in 1957–1959, Sukarno renewed his
stress on the fundamental unity of the various ideological streams within
Indonesia, and Nasakom became the grounds for including the Partai
Komunis Indonesia (PKI) in a broad range of government institutions
from 1960 and including a few far left members in the cabinet from
1962. Opinions differ on whether “Nasakomization” meant the “domes-
tication” of the PKI within the state or whether it was a step in the di-
rection of a communist takeover, but in the latter years of Guided De-
mocracy, Nasakom was closely associated with the Left in general; the
Right appealed rather to the principle of Pancasila, which emphasized
belief in God and made no reference to communism. After the victory of
the Right and the banning of the PKI in 1965, Sukarno tried briefly to re-
vive Nasakom as Nasasos, with sosialisme in place of communism. See
also MARXISM. [0859, 0934]
cal elite, trained for employment in company and government offices un-
der the Liberal and Ethical Policies or as professionals (physicians,
lawyers, engineers, and the like). The fact that this nationalism was In-
donesian and not more regionally based owed much to colonial admin-
istrative and education policies. It was also probably indebted to the Is-
lamic religious ties and trading connections among many groups in the
archipelago. Although the Netherlands Indies was in some senses a
patchwork of distinct administrations and legal systems (see LAW;
NETHERLANDS, CONSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH
INDONESIA; ZELFBESTUREN), the palace of the governor-general
in Batavia remained the unequivocal seat of power in the colony and the
principal focus of nationalist action.
The pergerakan included some hundreds of organizations, but it has
been customary to identify the following main lines of development.
Budi Utomo (founded 1908), with its emphasis on progress, represented
a first awakening of protonationalist consciousness, though the focus of
the organization was Javanese and elitist rather than Indonesian and pop-
ular. The Indische Partij, dominated by Indo-Europeans, was the first to
demand full independence for the Indies, but it aimed otherwise to pre-
serve many of the structures of colonial society. Sarekat Islam (SI) (es-
tablished in 1912) was the first Indonesia-wide mass party but faced in-
superable problems of working out both a common political program and
a plan of action. By the early 1920s it had split, with its strongest faction
organizing the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI). The PKI, however,
was suppressed by the Dutch after its unsuccessful rebellions in
1926–1927, and the center of the nationalist stage was then taken by the
so-called secular or radical nationalists, who emphasized a common In-
donesian identity irrespective of religion, race, or class. Partai Nasional
Indonesia (PNI), Pendidikan Nasional Indonesia (PNI Baru), and
Partai Indonesia (Partindo) and leaders such as Sukarno, Moham-
mad Hatta, and Sutan Sjahrir were only briefly able to operate before
a final decade of Dutch repression restricted political freedom to rela-
tively moderate cooperative parties, notably Partai Indonesia Raya
(Parindra) and Gerakan Rakyat Indonesia (Gerindo). Only during
the Japanese occupation were the radical nationalists able to resume
leadership of the pergerakan.
Some scholars have argued that this general view is misleading be-
cause it gives the eventual victors (the radical nationalists) a more cen-
tral role than they in fact played, and that more “moderate” and regional
organizations such as the Pakempalan Kawula Ngayogyakarta and
290 • NATIONALISM
sively by the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) under a charter from
the Netherlands States General. On rare occasions, the Dutch govern-
ment itself dispatched one or more commissioners-general to the East
to act on its behalf, but for the most part it left the company with un-
trammeled freedom of action in the region. The company’s possessions,
however, were not thought of as strictly sovereign, since they derived
neither from older ideas of divine appointment nor from newer ideas of
popular assent. In practice, moreover, under the racially based legal or-
der (see RACE) in VOC territories, the company exercised much less
than full sovereign power. Even in 1795, when the Batavian Republic
took over the assets of the VOC, it seems to have regarded them as pri-
marily commercial rather than territorial and sovereign, though by that
time the company was already the dominant power on Java.
From 1795 to 1815, the constitutional relationship remained confused
and often vague. Until 1800, States General ruled formally through the
VOC. When the company’s charter lapsed in 1800, the colony came un-
der direct rule, but the Napoleonic Wars and later British occupation of
Java made this of little significance. A Ministry of Colonies was formed
in 1806, though it was often united with other departments, especially
that of the navy, until 1842. From 1815 to 1848 the Ministry of Colonies,
and thus the colony itself, was directly under the authority of the Dutch
king, who used his position and shareholding in the Nederlandsche
Handel Maatschappij (NHM) to make a considerable personal fortune.
In the late 1820s the post of commissioner-general, as representative of
the Dutch government, was first united with that of governor-general,
as agent of the Ministry of Colonies, and then abandoned.
In the 20th century the Netherlands Indies gradually developed as a
state distinct from the Netherlands. In 1903 the colonial treasury was
separated from that of the Netherlands, and in 1913 the colonial govern-
ment received the right to contract public loans. The colonial govern-
ment established quasi-diplomatic representation in Arabia (in connec-
tion with Muslim pilgrimage, see HAJ). Governors-General J. B. van
Heutsz (1904–1909), A. W. F. Idenburg (1909–1916), and J. P. G. van
Limburg Stirum (1916–1921) increasingly defended what they saw as
Indies interests (which were not necessarily the interests of the indige-
nous population) against those of the metropolis. The establishment of
the Volksraad in 1918 gave a quasi-democratic weight to those Indies
government actions that it supported. In 1922 the colony became for-
mally a rijksdeel on a notionally equal footing with the Netherlands in
the Dutch Constitution, though remaining under the Ministry of
296 • NETHERLANDS, RELATIONS WITH
two countries warmed slightly over succeeding years, and Queen Beat-
rice became the first Dutch monarch to visit Indonesia in September
1995, the 50th anniversary of the country’s independence. [0695, 1138,
1143, 1146]
NEW ORDER (Orde Baru, Orba). General term for the political system in
force after the accession of Suharto to power in 1966 (see SUPERSE-
MAR) until his fall in May 1998. It was first used to refer to the so-called
New Order coalition of army, students, intellectuals, and Muslims op-
posed to Sukarno and the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI). The term
soon came to imply a sharp contrast with the so-called Old Order (Orde
Lama, Orla) of Sukarno, especially in government policies. The New Or-
der abandoned Indonesia’s Confrontation with Malaysia as well as the
Jakarta–Peking axis (see FOREIGN POLICY), opened the country to
foreign investment, suppressed the PKI, purged both state and society of
left-wing influence (see MASSACRES OF 1965–1966), and abandoned
the rhetoric of popular democracy. Indonesia became strongly anticom-
munist (especially anti-Chinese) in its foreign policy, promoted economic
stabilization based on political stability, and emphasized the suppression
of allegedly particularist interests in the cause of development.
Many authors have suggested, however, that the contrast between the
Old and New Orders may not be as sharp as first appeared. They point in
NEWSPAPERS • 299
again during the Revolution and the early 1950s; a national survey in
1954 recorded 105 dailies, though many of these were closer in style to
political pamphlets than to conventional newspapers. During the 1950s
and early 1960s the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) newspaper Har-
ian Rakjat had the largest circulation, followed by Pedoman (Partai
Sosialis Indonesia [PSI]), Suluh Indonesia (Partai Nasional Indonesia
[PNI]), and Abadi (Masjumi), with Indonesia Raya under Mochtar Lu-
bis a major investigatory paper. From the mid-1950s, however, and es-
pecially after the declaration of martial law in 1957, increasing restric-
tions were placed on the press, causing circulation and numbers to drop.
When Suharto came to power, his government closed about a quarter
of Indonesia’s 160 or so newspapers because of their alleged communist
links. Thereafter the remaining newspapers enjoyed a period of relative
freedom, though any questioning of the official version of the events in
September–October 1965 was forbidden. In 1974, however, in the after-
math of the Malari incident, 12 newspapers were closed down, includ-
ing Mochtar Lubis’s Indonesia Raya, and he and several other leading
journalists were arrested; as a result, the press became more cautious.
Any challenge to the Suharto government usually resulted in printing
bans; for example, after the student protests of 1977–1978 seven Jakarta
papers were temporarily banned, and after they published criticisms from
the members of the Petition of Fifty, newspapers were forbidden from
printing the members’ pictures or their comments. From July 1978 the
government began a program known as koran masuk desa (newspapers
enter the village), under which free copies of the armed forces newspa-
pers Angkatan Bersenjata and Berita Yudha were distributed to villages
throughout the country, but these were replaced in December 1979 by a
new series of 27 weekly newspapers and magazines published by the
government especially for distribution to the villages. In 1980 all news-
papers were restricted to 12 pages in length.
Newspaper publication flourished during the 1980s, dominated in
Jakarta by the dailies Kompas and Suara Pembaruan, and the weekly
Tempo, joined in 1985 by the financial daily Bisnis Indonesia, financed
by Liem Sioe Liong’s business interests. These groups in the capital
competed also in publishing regional newspapers, alongside the Jawa
Pos group in Surabaya and the Jakarta daily Media Indonesia. For ex-
ample, the Kompas group collaborated with such regional newspapers as
Sriwijaya Pos in Palembang, Serambi Indonesia in Aceh, Berita Na-
sional in Yogyakarta, and Mandala in Bandung. The Suharto govern-
ment maintained control over the press, however, by various forms of
NUSATENGGARA • 301
NIAS. Island off the west coast of Sumatra, known especially for what
was once seen as its surviving megalithic culture, associated with an-
cestor worship, though this receded greatly when missionary activity be-
gan in the late 19th century. Precolonial society was strictly divided into
three classes: aristocrats, farmers, and slaves.
NICKEL. Formerly obtained both from meteorites and from mines in cen-
tral Sulawesi (see LUWU). A large mine was opened at Soroako in south-
east Sulawesi by the Canadian firm International Nickel in 1978. The
state mining firm Aneka Tambang has been mining nickel on Pulau Gebe
off Halmahera since 1978. See also METALWORKING. [0413, 0416]
–O–
oil industry from that time and launched a number of joint ventures with
the colonial government (see also STATE ENTERPRISES), a signifi-
cant part of the production was in the hands of the Nederlandsche Kolo-
niale Petroleum Maatschappij, a subsidiary of the American Standard Oil
Company.
Although production began on Java, fields there were soon overshad-
owed by those of Sumatra, which produced a light grade of oil, and, even
more important, those of East Kalimantan, which produced a heavy
grade suitable in some cases for direct use as ship’s fuel. The Netherlands
Indies fields were especially important to Japan, and it was an embargo
on oil supplies from the colony to Japan that, among other things,
prompted the Japanese to invade the region in 1941–1942. The wells of
East Kalimantan were a major target, though considerable damage was
done to them by Dutch scorched-earth tactics before the Japanese arrival.
They were also among the first areas seized by the Allies on their return
to the archipelago in 1945.
Oil from Cepu in Java was an important source of fuel for the In-
donesian Republic during the Revolution, and the south Sumatra fields
were contested by the Republic and the Dutch. The American compa-
nies Stanvac and Caltex as well as Japanese firms took important
shares of postwar production, but all foreign companies were under
pressure to distribute a larger share of the profits to Indonesia. Indone-
sia joined the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
in 1962, and foreign companies increasingly operated as production-
sharing agents of the three state oil firms, all under army control: Per-
mina, headed by Ibnu Sutowo and based in the south Sumatra fields;
Permigan (formerly Nglobo Oil Mining) in Central Java and eastern In-
donesia, controlled by the army’s Diponegoro Division; and Pertamin
(formerly Permindo), formerly a BPM-government joint venture. Oil
was a major, though insufficient, source of state income under the
Guided Economy.
Production-sharing agreements continued and expanded under the
New Order. The state companies merged in 1968 to form Pertamina,
which rode a wave of enormous profits, with new oil discoveries and a
dramatic increase in oil prices, until its debt crisis in 1975. In 1977 the
United States replaced Japan as Indonesia’s largest customer. The de-
cline of oil prices in 1982 and 1986 imposed severe budget restrictions.
The government responded by attempting to diversify Indonesia’s ex-
ports, so that oil and liquefied natural gas fell from 73 percent of In-
donesia’s exports in 1984 to 51.7 percent in 1987.
304 • OIL PALM
OIL PALM (Elaeis guineensis, Arecaceae). Originally from Africa, the oil
palm first appeared in Indonesia as an ornamental tree in 1848. The first
commercial plantation was established on Java in 1859, but oil palm did
not become a major crop until the laying out of extensive estates in East
Sumatra from 1911. Not until the Suharto regime, however, did oil
palm plantations begin to replace the forests in many parts of Sumatra
and Kalimantan. Suharto sanctioned the conversion of large areas of
Kalimantan and coastal Sumatra from native vegetation to oil palm plan-
tations, aiming to make Indonesia the world’s largest palm oil producer.
According to some estimates, the land affected could be measured in
millions of hectares. Land clearing was carried out during severe drought
conditions, and this was one of the major causes of the fires that swept
through both islands in 1997. Many of the plantations were developed on
a sensitive peat soil base that, when burned, loosed large carbon emis-
sions into the air. By 2001 Indonesia and Malaysia accounted for more
than 80 percent of global palm oil output, and in that year Indonesia low-
ered its export tax from 5 percent to 3 percent. See also FORESTRY.
[0316, 0331, 0332, 0765]
–P–
PACHT (revenue farm, pl. pachten). One of the most common sources of
state revenue before the 20th century. The state typically sold or granted
rights over a particular sector of the economy to a private entrepreneur,
who was then at liberty to extract what he could from it and to enforce
his rights with his own private police force. Pachten were commonly
granted for the running of toll houses, pawnshops, and gambling dens;
the sale of opium and salt; the collection of land, market, and poll tax;
308 • PADANG
PALEMBANG. City and state on the Musi River in south Sumatra. Proba-
bly the capital of the kingdom of Srivijaya, Palembang lost its importance
after the Chola raids of 1025 and fell into the hands of the Chinese pirate
Liang Danming (see PIRACY; ZHENG HE). A new sultanate of Palem-
bang became a major exporter of pepper in the 16th century, but it de-
clined and fell subject to Riau in 1659. Palembang reemerged in the 18th
century after the discovery of tin on Bangka and Belitung in 1709, and
from 1722 monopoly contracts for tin mining provided the sultanate’s
310 • PAMONG PRAJA
PANJI STORIES. Cycle of stories derived from East Java and based on
the adventures of Prince Panji in search of his bride, a princess of Daha
(Kediri), who disappeared mysteriously on their wedding night. [0159]
PANTUN. Malay verse form in four lines rhyming a-b-a-b. Typically the
first couplet contains a cryptic allusion to the second, which may take the
form of a proverb or message.
PAPER. Produced on Java from at least 1200, using the inner bark of the
paper mulberry Broussonetia papyrifera (Moraceae). It was probably a
development from earlier felted cloth under the influence of Chinese pa-
PAPUA • 313
per technology and was used mainly for painting and wrapping, lontar
leaves being the preferred writing surface. Lontar, however, was not
suited to the writing of Arabic curves and dots, and the use of paper grew
from the 14th century with the spread of Islam. In the 17th century, pa-
per was an important item of trade for the European companies, and the
Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) established a paper mill in
Batavia. See also WRITING SYSTEMS.
PAPUA. The territory of West New Guinea under the Dutch, and thereafter
called Irian Barat (West Irian), a term that was abandoned in 1972 as im-
plying possibly territorial claims on the eastern part of the island and re-
placed with the official name Irian Jaya. Indigenous separatists on the is-
land preferred the term Papua, or West Papua, derived from the
Portuguese papuas, said to be from a local word meaning “curly hair,”
and in 2001 the Indonesian government under President Abdurrachman
Wahid named the province Papua. The indigenous population in 2000
numbered 2.2 million, speaking 200 distinct languages.
The island was settled by Melanesians around perhaps 20,000 B.C.
Archeological evidence of increased erosion and charcoal deposits sug-
gests that extensive agriculture began in 7000 B.C. Domestic pigs,
which are not native to the island, were present from 6000 B.C., and by
4000 B.C. a strong economy based on tropical tubers such as taro was in
place, enabling the Melanesians to resist the later Austronesians, though
some Papuan tribes came to speak Austronesian languages (see MI-
GRATIONS). Bronze tools were in use by 1000 B.C., and irrigation
ditches in the highlands date from at least the first century A.D.
The island had little contact with western Indonesia until the 20th
century, though there is evidence of trade with Majapahit. In the early
17th century the Portuguese Luis Vaez de Torres discovered acciden-
tally that the island was separate from Australia. Offshore islands and
some coastal regions were claimed by the sultan of Tidore, and the
Dutch claim rested on their conquest of Tidore. During the 19th cen-
tury, repeated European expeditions mapped the coastline and investi-
gated the natural history of the island, but a Dutch settlement at Lobo
in 1828 was abandoned in 1836 because of cost overruns and debilitat-
ing disease, and permanent occupation was not restored until 1896
when the Netherlands feared expansionism by Australia on the island.
The border between Dutch, Australian, and German holdings was fixed
at 141°E in 1875. Much of the coastal region was “explored” in the
1920s, and a penal settlement for Indonesian nationalists and those
314 • PAPUA
Under the Suharto regime, the economy of the province was trans-
formed by the expansion of forest exploitation, by a massive Freeport
gold and copper mine, by the arrival of Javanese settlers under the
transmigration program, and by the immigration of Bugis smallholders.
Christian and, to a lesser extent, Muslim missionary activities were ex-
tensive, and Indonesian officials encouraged tribespeople to abandon
their traditional dress and customs.
Resentment over government cultural and economic policies and over
the domination of government posts by non-Papuans had led in 1965 to
the founding of the Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM), which con-
ducted sporadic guerrilla war against government forces. Indonesian mil-
itary operations along the border with Papua New Guinea (PNG) were
a source of friction between the two countries, especially as Papuan
refugees from Irian crossed the border into PNG.
With the fall of Suharto, hopes for independence were reignited and
the “morning star” flag was raised throughout the region in July 1998.
The military quickly responded, killing or wounding hundreds of
Papuans. President B. J. Habibie, however, was more conciliatory,
meeting with a hundred Papuans on 26 February 1999 and listening to
their grievances. On 1 December, thousands raised the Papuan flag and
leading members of the community called on the provincial parliament
to convey their demand for independence to the central government.
Habibie’s successor as president, Abdurrachman Wahid, held public
talks with Papuan leaders, agreeing to their flying the “morning star” flag
alongside, but below, that of Indonesia, and using the name Papua in-
stead of Irian Jaya. At a National Congress held in Jayapura at the end of
May 2000, representatives from throughout Papua outlined plans for
achieving independence.
Since 1999, a number of militia groups have arisen in the region, the
two main ones being the Papua Taskforce (Satuan Tugas Papua/Satgas
Papua), led until his death by Theys Eluay, which supports independence;
and the Red and White Taskforce (Satgas Merah Putih, SMP), which sup-
ports continuation of Indonesian rule. A third group, the National Liber-
ation Army (Tentera Pembebasan Nasional, TPN), was believed to be af-
filiated with the armed opposition group, the OPM. Tensions rose
between those advocating independence and their opponents after Wahid
gave Megawati Sukarnoputri, then vice president, responsibility for
government relations with eastern Indonesia. Following the example of
her father, Sukarno, Megawati strongly opposed Papuan independence
and allowed the military to conduct a much more aggressive campaign to
316 • PAPUA NEW GUINEA, RELATIONS WITH
that they not vote for the PDI. Soerjadi and his supporters in the PDI ran a
lackluster campaign, facing demonstrations from Megawati’s supporters at
all their rallies. In the May elections, the party received only 3.5 million
votes and was allotted only 11 seats in the parliament. At the PDI party
congress in 1997, Budi Hardjono replaced Soerjadi as party chairman.
Megawati’s split from the party and formation of her Partai
Demokrasi Indonesia—Perjuangan (PDI-P) gutted the PDI’s support.
In the post-Suharto general election of 1999, the PDI only succeeded in
gaining 655,049 votes and 2 seats in parliament. [0736, 0760, 1010]
creasing its vote at future elections, the party was at first unhappy with
Sukarno’s proposals for a Guided Democracy. Facing full-scale sup-
pression by the army, however, if it did not accede, the PKI became an
enthusiastic supporter of the president, offering him the popular backing
that he needed to balance the growing power of the army. In return the
party received considerable freedom to operate on Java, building its
membership to perhaps 3 million by 1965; affiliated organizations such
as the Barisan Tani Indonesia (BTI) accounted for many millions more.
Through its cultural affiliate, Lembaga Kebudayaan Rakyat (Lekra), it
attempted to establish Marxist discourse as orthodoxy in cultural affairs.
And under the principles of Nasakom, it was given an increasing say in
legislative and other official bodies. It was never, however, given impor-
tant executive functions, and Donald Hindley has argued that the party,
for all its apparent strength, was in fact “domesticated”—implicated in a
regime that failed to implement social reforms and that was losing con-
trol of the economy, but denied access to the levers of power.
When the party attempted, moreover, a program of direct action
(aksi sepihak) in rural Java to implement land reform laws in late
1963, it was swiftly curbed. The party remained generally aloof from
the Sino-Soviet split, but in the mid-1960s swung somewhat to China,
following Indonesian foreign policy. Opinions are still deeply divided
on whether and to what extent the party was involved in the Gestapu
coup of 1965, but the outcome of the affair was fatal to it. Within
weeks, the army had begun to detain PKI cadres and to oversee the
killing of party members and supporters (see MASSACRES OF
1965–1966). The party was formally banned on 12 March 1966. Sur-
viving members attempted to begin guerrilla resistance in Blitar (East
Java) and in West Kalimantan (see PONTIANAK), and a PKI analy-
sis of its mistakes, called Otokritik, was prepared, but these movements
were crushed by 1968, leaving the party represented primarily by scat-
tered exile communities, the most prominent being the so-called PKI
Delegation in China led by Jusuf Ajitorop.
In the closing years of the Suharto regime, the Indonesian govern-
ment showed continuing concern over the alleged existence of PKI ele-
ments in Indonesian society, and a number of acts of sabotage were at-
tributed unconvincingly to the party. After the fall of Suharto, President
Abdurrachman Wahid sought to loosen restrictions on the party, but
these attempts were combated by the army and Islamic political figures,
and the party remained an outcast in Indonesian society. [0621, 0667,
0674, 0683, 0695, 0798, 0836, 0858, 0904, 0917, 0921, 0931, 0991,
0992, 0994, 0997]
324 • PARTAI KRISTEN INDONESIA
PASAI (Samudra). This state in northern Sumatra was based near modern
Lhokseumawe. After converting to Islam at the end of the 13th century,
Pasai became the major port of the Strait of Melaka, maintaining diplo-
matic contacts with China, India, and Siam. It exported pepper, oil
(from seeps close to the surface), and perhaps silk. It was visited by
Marco Polo in 1292 and Ibn Battuta in 1355 and was raided by Ma-
japahit in the 1360s. In the late 15th century it was increasingly eclipsed
by Melaka and by Aceh, which conquered it in 1524.
The term pasisir has also been applied particularly to the culture of
this coastal region, suggesting an alternative Javanese cultural tradition
to that of the courts of the interior. This culture is identified as interna-
tionally minded (many rulers of pasisir states were not Javanese), com-
mercially oriented, and culturally eclectic. The batik of this region, for
instance, shows considerable Chinese and European influence. [1371]
PASUNDAN. Official prewar name for the colonial province of West Java
and the name commonly used for the political party Paguyuban Pasun-
PAWNSHOPS • 333
dan. On 24 April 1948 the Dutch sponsored a federal state called Pasun-
dan in the territories they controlled in West Java, led by the former bu-
pati of Bandung, R. A. A. M. Wiranatakusumah, in an attempt to exploit
Sundanese fears of Javanese domination (see FEDERALISM). After the
second Dutch “Police Action,” however, the West Java state largely dis-
integrated, under pressure not only of the forces of the Republic’s return-
ing Siliwangi division but also of the Darul Islam (DI). In late 1949,
leaders of the state toyed briefly with the idea of seeking full indepen-
dence as an Islamic state on the model of Pakistan, perhaps with backing
of the DI, and also negotiated with the Dutch adventurer R. P. P. West-
erling for armed backing. After Westerling’s abortive putsch in Bandung
and Jakarta in January 1950, Pasundan was discredited, and it was dis-
solved on 9 February 1950. [0661, 0674, 1146]
PAWNSHOPS. The right to run pawnshops was farmed, like other state
revenue sources (see PACHT), until 1903 when a government pawnshop
service was created for Java and Madura. The service operated to some
extent in the Outer Islands, but most of the 457 government pawnshops
334 • PEARLING
They were given, however, relatively little time to put these ideas into
practice since both were arrested and exiled in February 1934 to Boven
Digul and then to Banda. [0613, 0661, 0865, 0875, 0915]
PEPPER (Piper nigrum Piperaceae). Properly not the fleshy hollow fruit
of various Capsicum species (chili peppers) but the small hard berries of
a woody vine. Whereas the sirih, P. betle, leaves of which are used in the
chewing of betel, is probably native to the archipelago, true pepper was
introduced from India, probably as early as 100 B.C. Commercial pro-
duction was well established on Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Java by the
14th century. Pedir and Pasai in northern Sumatra were the earliest
states to depend heavily on the pepper trade, followed in the 16th cen-
tury by Aceh and Banten. Indiscriminate clearing of forest for pepper
production in this era created large areas of alang-alang in Sumatra and
Kalimantan. At the end of the 16th century, Banten produced 25,000
bags of pepper a year and all male inhabitants were obliged to maintain
500 pepper plants and to deliver the produce to the sultan at a fixed price.
Pepper was traded especially to the West, becoming a major target of
Portuguese and, from the late 16th century, Dutch commercial expan-
sion in the archipelago. The Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) at-
tempted to enforce monopoly contracts in pepper ports as they had done
in Maluku with cloves and nutmeg but were relatively unsuccessful due
to the wide distribution of the plant and the relative ease with which it
can be cultivated. From the18th century, China’s market for pepper grew
while Europe’s declined. Production on Java had largely ceased by the
end of the 18th century. Although pepper production in North Sumatra
increased in the 19th century and Chinese immigrants became important
growers, the center of the trade shifted to Penang and Singapore. [0331]
van Leur and John Smail, in particular, have criticized it for the promi-
nence it gives to the European role in Indonesian history and have argued
for an “autonomous” (Smail’s term) approach concentrating on the ex-
periences of Indonesians rather than of their European rulers. Indonesian
historians have often used the notion of successive generations in peri-
odizing. [0502, 0504, 0505, 0521]
grounds that it divided Islam and because it was Western and humanist
in origin. It was active in establishing Muslim schools and was strongest
in West Java. Its leaders included Mohammad Natsir. In 1939 it joined
the Majelis Islam A’laa Indonesia (MIAI). [1023]
managing the country’s oil and gas development, Pertamina was In-
donesia’s sole state oil company, responsible for managing concessions
and production-sharing agreements but little involved in production it-
self. Oil was already an important source of discretionary funds for
Suharto’s government early in the New Order, but the sudden increase
in oil prices in 1973 gave Pertamina under its president-director Ibnu Su-
towo (1914–2001) enormous wealth that was funneled, along with bor-
rowed funds, into a wide range of development projects and economic
ventures, including an air service, Pelita, telecommunications, real es-
tate, and the P. T. Krakatau Steel works in Cilegon, West Java. Sutowo
was close to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies
(CSIS) think tank, which promoted import substitution industrializa-
tion rather than comparative advantage trading, and his freewheeling
style attracted admiration from economic nationalists and condemnation
from the so-called technocrats of Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan
Nasional (Bappenas). An investigation in 1970 criticized Pertamina
sharply for loose auditing, for failure to pass on profits to the govern-
ment, and for the luxurious lifestyle of its senior executives.
In March 1975 Pertamina was unable to meet payment on some short-
term debts and a Bappenas investigation under J. B. Sumarlin revealed a
huge debt problem (US$10.5 billion), brought about by corruption, op-
timism, incompetence, and waste. Sutowo was dismissed from his post
in 1976 and replaced by General Piet Haryono. Pertamina’s activities
outside the oil business were curtailed and an austerity policy was intro-
duced, so that the firm was solvent once more by 1978. In 1980 the In-
donesian government took legal action in Singapore to try to recover al-
legedly corrupt income from the estate of the former Pertamina
employee H. Tahir. But Pertamina retained its power because it was a
critical source of capital for Suharto’s family and cronies, giving some
of the president’s children their start in business through lucrative deals
that included exclusive distribution contracts. It was estimated that in
two years in the mid-1990s, Pertamina lost nearly $5 billion due to inef-
ficiency and corruption.
After Suharto’s fall, the government made an effort to break up Perta-
mina’s oil monopoly, with the B. J. Habibie administration failing in an
attempt in 1999 to place major foreign oil firms directly under the Min-
istry of Mines and Energy. In June 2000 the ministry tried again, draw-
ing up legislation to break Pertamina’s monopoly by handing the control
of production-sharing contracts to an agency created under the office of
the president. In October 2001 the legislature passed an Oil and Gas Act,
342 • PESANTREN
between the Muslim Moro rebels in Mindanao and Sulu and radical Mus-
lims in Indonesia, and between Christian communities in Minahasa and
the northern Philippines. But during the PRRI/Permesta rebellion,
American and rebel pilots made use of bases in the Philippines to bomb
sites in eastern Indonesia, raising tensions between the two countries.
The two did, however, cooperate in 1963 in initial opposition to the es-
tablishment of Malaysia and in attempting to realize Philippine Presi-
dent Diosdado Macapagal’s concept of Maphilindo, an effort that failed
though it contributed to the later formation of the Association of South-
east Asian Nations (ASEAN). As another archipelagic nation, the
Philippines has strongly supported Indonesia’s archipelagic concept,
but has been in dispute with Indonesia over jurisdiction over seas around
the Indonesian island of Miangas, off Mindanao, known by the Filipinos
as Las Palmas. [0833, 1106]
PIG (Sus scrofa). Until the 20th century, it is difficult to distinguish ac-
counts of the introduced domestic pig from those of indigenous warty
pigs (S. verrucosus of Java, S. barbatus on Kalimantan and Sumatra,
and S. celebensis on Sulawesi). It seems likely, however, that S. celeben-
sis was the first species to be domesticated and was taken by people to
Timor and that the pigs of Papua are a stable hybrid of S. celebensis and
S. scrofa developed between 8000 and 4000 B.C. Wild pigs were an im-
portant food source for most peoples until the arrival of Islam, and Dou-
glas Miles has shown that the adoption of Islam among Dayaks has had
significant nutritional effects. Feral and warty pigs are widespread in the
archipelago and seem to do best where human cultivation provides abun-
dant accessible food. Since the early 1970s, the introduction of the pig
tapeworm Taenia solium into Papua has had serious health conse-
quences. See also TIGER. [1154]
POLICE. Until the 20th century, police tasks in the Netherlands Indies were
primarily the responsibility of local authorities. Indonesian officials com-
manded their own local police squads under a variety of names, the offi-
cers of Chinese communities were in charge of policing their own peo-
ple, and policing functions in the European community lay largely with
the civil bureaucracy itself, while all policing forces were backed ulti-
mately by the colonial army (see KONINKLIJK NEDERLANDSCH
INDISCH LEGER; LAW; MARÉCHAUSSÉE; NATIVE TROOPS).
Some centralization of policing was achieved with the creation of mobile
“armed police” (gewapende politie) in 1897, but it was only after the es-
tablishment of the Office of the Attorney-General (Procureur-Generaal)
that central control of the police emerged. The police force nonetheless re-
mained divided into distinct rural police (veldpolitie, who absorbed the
gewapende politie in 1920), urban police (stadspolitie), and political
(Politiek Inlichtingen Dienst) sections.
The Japanese (1942–1945) dismissed some senior staff from the
Dutch period and handed political surveillance to the Kenpeitai, but oth-
erwise preserved and strengthened the police force. During the Revolu-
tion (1945–1949), the police were at first formally under the control of
the Internal Affairs ministry but shifted in July 1946 to the Prime Minis-
ter’s Office. Much of the police force, however, was dispersed by social
revolutions, and a multitude of local police forces emerged, generally at-
tached to regional armed forces, regular and irregular. Dual control by
Internal Affairs and the prime minister was established in 1950, but in
1962 the police were formally militarized and placed under the authority
of the armed forces commander.
After the fall of Suharto, tensions rose between the police and armed
forces particularly over the violence in Maluku and other regions, and
moves began in 1999 to separate the police from the army and place
them under civilian control, a division that formally went into effect in
April 1999 but was not completed until early 2001. The effectiveness of
the 190,000-strong police force was hindered by its insufficient numbers
and lack of training, and there was dissatisfaction among younger offi-
cers with police chief Surojo Bimantoro. However, when President Ab-
durrachman Wahid attempted to dismiss Bimantoro in June 2001 and
ordered the deputy chief to assume command, 100 top police officers de-
fied him and were instrumental in Wahid’s downfall the following
month. The police were expected to have a better relationship with Pres-
POLITICAL CULTURE • 347
(VOC) withdrew its presence in 1791 but the Dutch returned in 1818, in-
stalling a resident to ensure closer control of affairs.
Several thousand, a majority of them Chinese but also including the
sultan and most of his family, were killed by the Japanese between 1943
and 1945, leaving a younger son, Hamid Algadrie, to reign as Hamid II.
He was persuaded by the Dutch to head a federal state of West Borneo
(Kalimantan Barat), founded on 11 May 1947 (see FEDERALISM),
and became a major figure in Dutch attempts to influence the constitu-
tional and political shape of postwar Indonesia. He was implicated in a
failed coup d’état on 22 January 1950 by R. P. P. Westerling and was
jailed. The Negara Kalimantan Barat was dissolved on 4 April 1950.
During Confrontation, West Kalimantan was an important base for In-
donesian infiltration into the Malaysian state of Sarawak, partly con-
ducted by the ethnic Chinese Pasukan Gerilya Rakyat Serawak (PGRS,
Sarawak People’s Guerrilla Movement). After the change of regime, the
New Order forces used the issue in 1967 to encourage anti-Chinese ac-
tions especially by the Dayak community, with the local military com-
mander alleging that all Chinese were supporters of Communist China
and the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI). Most of the Chinese (a re-
ported 50,000–80,000) fled the interior, together with many immigrants
from Madura and Java.
During the 1970s and 1980s large numbers especially of Madurese ar-
rived in the Pontianak region under the transmigration program, and by
the late 1990s they were estimated to constitute between 2 and 3 percent
of West Kalimantan’s population. During the downturn in the economy in
1997, Madurese became the major target of Dayak violence. Tribesmen at-
tacked their settlements northwest of the town, killing about 450 and forc-
ing about 20,000 to flee, attacks that were renewed in 1999 in other regions
of West Kalimantan. See also KONGSI WARS. [0002, 0607, 1048]
POPULATION. Indonesia’s first full census was taken in 1930 and gave
the country a population of 60.7 million. Population figures before this
date are based on partial surveys and guesswork with varying degrees of
inspiration; consequently, they yield often widely varying results.
Demographers have given greatest attention to Java because of the is-
land’s greater density of population. Early scholars, extrapolating back-
ward from the 19th-century estimates, assumed that Java’s population in
early times was between 1 and 3 million. The scope of irrigation works,
monument construction, and political organization on the island, how-
ever, suggests perhaps a fairly steady population of around 10 million
PORTS • 351
from about the 10th century. Thomas Stamford Raffles surveyed Java’s
population in 1815 at 4.6 million, but this is certainly an underestimate:
those responsible for reporting population were already long accustomed
to underreporting population in order to minimize taxation. From 1815
to 1865, Java’s population probably grew at around 1 percent per year,
and then at around 1.2 percent until the end of the 19th century, reaching
30 million in 1900. Although Dutch authorities and many later re-
searchers attributed this growth to Malthusian factors such as increased
health care and the absence of war, economic changes seem also to have
been important, specifically the expansion of rice cultivation and the im-
provement of rice technology, together with the opening of employment
opportunities on commercial estates. Paul Alexander has argued that the
heavy labor demands made on women under the Cultivation System
reduced the period of breastfeeding and thus also the period of postpar-
tum infertility. From 1900 population grew at an average of 1.4 percent
per year (though there was probably little growth in the 1940s). From
1961 to 1971, the rate was about 2 percent. Until 1900 most of the other
islands, except Bali, were relatively sparsely populated, but population
has grown dramatically in North Sumatra, Lampung, South Sulawesi,
and Minahasa, especially as a result of immigration, transmigration,
and the shift to intensive agriculture.
Until about the end of the 18th century, population was a valuable po-
litical resource for rulers and there was no question of population control
as policy, though women were able to space children by prolonging
breastfeeding to 2–3 years and abortion by massage and herbs was ap-
parently common. In the early 19th century, however, Raffles raised the
prospect of overpopulation on Java, and since then the topic has seldom
been off the political agenda. Transmigration was the first solution pro-
posed, but from the 1970s more emphasis was put on family planning.
Fertility rates declined in the period 1967–1985 from an average of 5.5
births per woman to an average of 3.3, due to the increased availability
of contraceptives, awareness of the costs of educating children, and the
availability of other consumption options. The total population of
Indonesia grew from 147.5 million in 1980 to 206.3 million in 2000,
but the rate of population increase declined from 1.97 percent in the
1980–1990 decade to 1.49 percent in the decade between 1990 and 2000.
[0069, 0075, 0295, 0479, 1311–1324]
PORTS. Lying mostly outside the cyclonic zone, many Indonesian ports
were traditionally little more than roadsteads, ships anchoring offshore to
352 • PORTUGUESE IN INDONESIA
takeover, inciting rioting so that his forces had the excuse for a crack-
down. Removed by Wiranto on 21 May 1998 and assigned to the Staff
College in Bandung, he was brought before a military tribunal charged
with involvement in kidnappings and torture of political activists. He
was dismissed from the military, and the tribunal recommended further
investigation into his role in the mid-May riots. Prabowo left the country
for extended travel abroad, spending most of his time in Jordan, ostensi-
bly looking after his family’s business interests. Apparently he also vis-
ited Kupang, meeting with West Timor militia leaders, including Enrico
Guterres, shortly before the murder of United Nations representatives
there.
the prize. His books were banned throughout the Suharto era, and re-
mained technically so even after Suharto’s fall. Still controversial,
Pramoedya himself remained bitter, refusing to accept an apology of-
fered by President Abudurrachman Wahid in 2000. See also CUL-
TURE, DEBATE ON THE ROLE OF. [0221, 0227, 0234, 0250–0257]
win more than 50 percent of the votes cast, and if this were not achieved
on the first ballot, there would be a second round. The president can be
dismissed by the MPR at any time, as happened to Sukarno, and can also
be impeached, as was Abdurrachman Wahid in 2001. The president ap-
points and dismisses ministers and cooperates with the Dewan Perwaki-
lan Rakyat (DPR) in the passing of legislation and the state budget,
though she or he can also make extensive use of presidential decrees
(Keputusan Presiden, Keppres) and government regulations (Peraturan
Pemerintah, PP), which do not require legislative ratification. See also
VICE PRESIDENT. [1100]
thorities and so facilitating the system of indirect rule (see BUPATI; IN-
LANDSCH BESTUUR). This tended to widen the apparent gap between
Javanese village culture (see ABANGAN; DESA) and that of the courts.
Especially after 1966, the New Order government has encouraged tra-
ditional priyayi values as a way of bolstering corporatism in the bureau-
cracy (see KORPS PEGAWAI REPUBLIK INDONESIA). Priyayi
cultural forms, expressed especially in weddings, are now commonplace
among village elites. See also ALIRAN; PAMONG PRAJA. [0485, 0572,
0636, 1244]
Bali
Bangka-Belitung
360 • PRRI/PERMESTA REBELLION
Banten
Bengkulu
Gorontalo
Jambi
West, Central, and East Java (3)
West, South, Central, and East Kalimantan (4)
Lampung
Maluku and North Maluku (2)
West and East Nusatenggara (2)
Papua (whose name had been changed from Irian Jaya)
Riau
South, Central, Southeast, and North Sulawesi (4)
West, South, and North Sumatra (3)
There were also two special regions (Aceh and Yogyakarta) and one
special district (Greater Jakarta). Proposals for further divisions included
splitting the Riau Islands from the mainland of Riau province (which was
enacted in 2003) and separating Flores, together with the nearby island
of Lembata, from the province of East Nusatenggara. The government
proposal to split Papua into three provinces was strongly condemned by
the Papuan people but was formally enacted in August 2003 with the es-
tablishment of the provinces of Central and West Irian Jaya. See MAP
12. [0359, 0661, 0944, 0948, 0950]
–R–
RAAD VAN INDIË (Council of the Indies). Senior council for Indies af-
fairs, generally with the task of advising the governor-general on mat-
ters of state. [0032, 0045, 0638]
elections, a further legal distinction was made between Dutch citizens and
Dutch subjects (Nederlands onderdaan, niet Nederlander). All formal
racial distinctions were abolished by the Indonesian constitution of 1945
(but see ASLI), though discimination against Indonesian citizens of for-
eign descent (warganegara Indonesia keturunan asing), especially Chi-
nese, continues in a number of respects. See also INDO-EUROPEANS.
RADIO. The first radio station in the Netherlands Indies was established in
Sabang in 1911 for naval communications; amateur broadcasts began
soon after and the first commercial station, the Bataviase Radio
Vereeniging, started broadcasting in 1925. The official Nederlandsch-
Indische Radio Omroep Maatschappij (NIROM) began in 1934. The first
indigenous radio station, Perikatan Perkumpulan Radio Ketimuran (Fed-
eration of Asian Radio Associations), was permitted in 1937 but could
only broadcast on cultural and social affairs. During the Japanese occu-
pation, radios were used widely for propaganda in the villages, and fig-
ures such as Sukarno received unprecedented national coverage as a re-
sult. A national station, Radio Republik Indonesia (RRI), was founded in
August 1945. Like television and cassettes, broadcasts from this national
station have provided the government with a powerful tool for projecting
its message and spreading a national culture. Local stations have also
proliferated and been active in promoting regional music, languages,
and culture, but throughout the Suharto regime none of the hundreds of
private radio stations were allowed to carry their own news broadcasts.
After the fall of Suharto, requirements on broadcasters were eased and
radio journalists were free to report critically. See also CENSORSHIP;
MEDIA. [0154, 0622, 0761, 1300, 1301]
RAMAYANA. Epic story derived from India and set down in Old Javanese
as the Ramayana Kakawin by Yogaswari, probably in the 10th century.
Reliefs depicting the story decorate the Hindu temples of Prambanan
and Panataran in Java and many temples in Bali. The story is presented
in wayang kulit, wayang golek, and wayang wong, though the celebrated
moonlight performances at Prambanan are a recent innovation. As with
the Mahabharata, episodes from the Ramayana are often used as alle-
gories of contemporary events.
In the story, Prince Rama, his wife Sita, and his brother Laksamana are
exiled from their father’s kingdom of Ayodhya. As they wander in the
forest, Sita is kidnapped by the demon king, Rawana, who takes her to
his palace in Alengka (Sri Lanka). With the help of a white monkey,
REFORMASI • 367
Indonesia without risk. During the violence in Ambon that followed the
fall of Suharto, the remnant RMS organization in the Netherlands was
allegedly sending financial aid to Protestant relatives in Maluku. De-
spite army claims that they had unearthed RMS weapons caches and
training camps, however, it was unlikely that the RMS organization in
Ambon had revived and was again seeking a separation from Indonesia.
Nevertheless, there was growing disillusionment with Jakarta and some
support for the earlier aims of the RMS. As many as 129 separatist sup-
porters were arrested in April 2003 for actions connected with celebrat-
ing the 53rd anniversary of the declaration of the RMS. See also
KONINKLIJK NEDERLANDSCH INDISCH LEGER. [0782, 0967]
RICE (Oryza sativa Poaceae). Wild rice occurs naturally in mainland South-
east Asia, and it was cultivated there perhaps as early as 6000 B.C. It ap-
pears, however, to have entered the archipelago much later, the earliest
known cultivation being at Ulu Leang in Sulawesi around 3500 B.C., prob-
ably because the early varieties were highly sensitive to climatic change
(see MIGRATIONS). It was probably a staple food of Srivijaya but does
not appear on the reliefs of Borobudur, suggesting that other staples, per-
haps including millet, were in use. Rice was certainly well established by
the mid-13th century, but even as late as the 19th century it had not reached
its current status of preferred food for most of the people of the archipelago.
In the late 18th and early 19th century, the colonial government sponsored
a major expansion of wet-rice agriculture, with the expansion of irrigation
and the clearing of land, and in 1905 it began a sustained program to breed
improved varieties. Increasing rice production was also a major aim of the
Japanese occupation government in World War II.
It was initially hoped that production would increase with independence,
and Java actually exported rice to India in 1946, but in the 1950s and 1960s
376 • ROADS
production failed to keep pace with population growth and imports in-
creased, despite the introduction of new varieties developed in the Philip-
pines by the International Rice Research Institute. Promotion of rice pro-
duction became a major program of the New Order, and self-sufficiency
by 1973 was an aim of the first five-year plan (see RENCANA PEM-
BANGUNAN LIMA TAHUN). But outbreaks of wereng (brown plant
hopper) pest appeared in the 1974–1975 season, devastating the rice crop,
and by the late 1970s Indonesia was importing up to one third of the world’s
traded rice. Nevertheless, the introduction of high-yielding varieties, with
their attendant shorter growing cycles and heavy application of fertilizers,
herbicides, and pesticides, helped achieve a rapid increase in rice produc-
tion after 1978. In November 1985 President Suharto announced that rice
self-sufficiency had been achieved. Subsequently, however, rice production
markedly slowed, with its output growing by only 2.5 percent per year be-
tween 1986 and 1995. The drought of 1991 led the government to suspend
its prohibition on rice imports, and a further serious drought in 1997 forced
it to begin again importing rice. After the fall of Suharto, rice production
continued to decline, with figures for 2001 4.45 percent less than those for
2000, due mainly to a decline both in the area harvested and in productiv-
ity. The government estimated that production in 2002 would be 48.65 mil-
lion tons, or a further decline of 1.89 percent. See also AGRICULTURAL
INVOLUTION. [0055, 0295, 0296, 0319, 0331, 0332, 0333, 0341, 0345,
0346, 0353, 0730]
were completed in the 1980s (though some sections need major upgrad-
ing), and highways across Kalimantan and Papua were constructed in
the late Suharto period. The fact that Indonesia drives on the left-hand
side of the road (unlike the Dutch) is attributed (perhaps apocryphally)
to the English colonial official Thomas Stamford Raffles. See also
RAILWAYS. [0060, 0357, 0367, 0372, 0977]
ROTI. Island near Timor whose people are noted especially for their ex-
tensive use of the lontar palm for food and manufacture. The Dutch
378 • ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE
East Indies Company (VOC) signed a treaty with local rulers in 1662
in order to obtain a supply base and a possible refuge in its operations in
the region. Extensive conversion to Christianity took place in the 18th
century, and during the 19th century the Dutch encouraged Christian
Rotinese to settle around Kupang on Timor to create a buffer zone
against the Timorese. Rotinese also moved extensively into administra-
tive posts. [0029, 1220]
pact on rubber markets until 1960. In 1980 Indonesia signed a further in-
ternational rubber agreement intended to stabilize prices. After the out-
break of AIDS, the rubber industry benefited considerably from the in-
creased demand for rubber gloves and condoms. On 1 January 1989,
Indonesia banned the export of some categories of raw rubber to promote
domestic processing. Falling rubber prices at the turn of the century led
Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia to form a Tripartite Rubber Corpo-
ration in 2002 in an effort to limit supply and so raise prices. Almost im-
mediately, however, rubber prices began to rise, climbing in 2003 to a
seven-year high, with the annual average price of 85¢ per lb on the Sin-
gapore commodity exchange in 2003, up from 47¢ in 2001. [0316, 0317,
0324, 0331, 0332, 0817, 1118, 1170]
–S–
SALT. As an essential for life, salt was manufactured from seawater from very
early times along the coasts of Indonesia and from mineral sources in a few
inland regions; in Grobogan in Central Java, salty mud volcanoes are
tapped, while the Dani in Papua extract it by soaking palm and banana
leaves in saltwater seeps, drying and burning them. The southern coastal re-
gions of Madura and north coast of East Java, however, have long been the
main areas of salt production, local rulers traditionally farming out pachten
to Chinese businessmen. In 1813 Thomas Stamford Raffles established a
382 • SAMA RASA SAMA RATA
SAMA RASA SAMA RATA (lit., “same feeling, same level”). Term coined
by Mas Marco Kartodikromo (?–1932) in 1918 to express the egalitarian
element in nationalist thought. It was modern socialist in its inspiration
but reflected traditional ideas of a “golden age” of justice and prosperity.
See also JOYOBOYO. [0632]
Japara and Banten, and in the same period a great many Scandinavians
served as officials and soldiers with the Dutch East Indies Company
(VOC). The great Swedish botanist Carl Linné (Linnaeus, 1701–1778)
worked with Indies plants in Leiden in 1735–1737 and was the first to
cultivate a banana tree to fruit in northern Europe. A number of his stu-
dents, notably Pehr Osbeck (1725–1805), Carl Peter Thunberg
(1743–1832), and Clas Fredrick Hornstedt, made important botanical
collections on Java, in some cases with the cooperation of the Swedish
East India Company. See also LANGE, M. J.
century and the first half of the 19th century, Semarang was the seat of
the governor of Java’s Northeast Coast, becoming economically the most
important town in central Java and its major center for trade. In 1870 the
Dutch dug a canal connecting it to the sea so that large trading ships
could carry their goods directly to the town. In the late colonial period,
as the headquarters of the railway and tram workers’ union, it became an
important center of the left wing of the Sarekat Islam (SI) under Se-
maun, with 20,000 members in 1917.
At the end of the Japanese occupation in October 1945, it was the
site of bitter conflict between Japanese, Republicans, and British for
control of the town, which left perhaps more than 2,000 Japanese and In-
donesians dead. The Dutch occupied Semarang during their first “Police
Action” of July 1947. [0484, 0632, 0643]
major source of food, but from the 17th century were drawn into limited
trade with the Dutch and other Europeans. Coastal communities began
to convert to Christianity and Islam in this period. The island was
drawn into the Dutch sphere of influence by its proximity to Ambon, but
until the 19th century Dutch involvement was limited to periodic hongi
patrols. After independence, the jungles of Seram became a last refuge
for guerrillas of the Republik Maluku Selatan (RMS). [0025, 0607]
SHIPPING. From early times until the 17th century, there was a large in-
digenous shipping industry in the Indonesian archipelago. Vessels of up
to 500 metric tons were built of teak and sailed the trade routes of the
region. The term “junk,” later used for Chinese vessels, derives from the
Javanese jong. After the 17th century the size of locally built vessels,
generally called prau (perahu), declined to 100 metric tons or less.
In 1825 a steam ship called the van der Capellan was built in
Surabaya to provide a regular government-funded postal service from
Java to other islands, but in 1864–1865 the mail contract was awarded
to a private British-owned firm, the Netherlands Indies Steam Naviga-
tion Co. The NISN had a virtual monopoly of interisland shipping until
SHIPPING • 389
four years, but the terms for buying or leasing these boats were so oner-
ous (including the need to be already operating three other vessels) that
few people were able to take advantage of the import relaxation. [0076,
0463, 0464, 0615]
SIAK (Siak Sri Indrapura). Not to be confused with Indrapura, this dynasty
in Sumatra was founded in 1718 by Raja Kecil (or Kecik), a Minangk-
abau who revolted against Sultan Abdul Jalil Riayat Syah of Riau and es-
tablished a polity on Sumatra’s east coast, independent of Johor. In the
18th century Siak became a powerful regional state, controlling the sul-
tanates of Deli, Langkat, and Serdang. Control over timber allowed the
Siak elite to gain benefits from their trading partners in Melaka or Penang
and to persuade the Dutch to allow them direct access to the rice and salt
trade from Java without compensating the Dutch East Indies Company
(VOC). The Dutch signed a political contract with the sultan in 1858, on
the strength of which they seized control of these northern dependencies.
The last sultan, Ismail, was forced to abdicate in 1864. [0441, 0778]
SILIWANGI. Reputed first king of Pajajaran, his name was later applied
to the West Java division of the Indonesian army, formed in May 1946.
Shaped by its first commander, A. H. Nasution, the Siliwangi was the
most Westernized and conventional division of the army during the Rev-
olution. It was unable to prevent the Dutch from overrunning much of
West Java in the first “Police Action” in 1947, and after the signing of the
Renville Agreement 22,000 Siliwangi troops were ordered to retreat
from guerrilla strongholds in West Java to Republican Central Java.
There, they became a major pillar of the Mohammad Hatta government
and took part in the suppression of the Madiun Affair, with many of their
officers being sent to head units in other parts of Republican territory.
SINGAPORE • 391
ment; he returned to Jakarta under an amnesty in 1961 but was jailed un-
til Suharto came to power. Initially a supporter of the New Order, he
grew unhappy with its policies toward Islam, particularly its attempts to
control the haj, and also with the extent of corruption in the govern-
ment. In 1980 he signed the Petition of Fifty and in 1983 he published
an open letter to Suharto protesting the government order that all or-
ganizations accept the Pancasila as their sole foundation. [0661, 0686,
0695, 1040]
Indies with a number of slave children. One of these children was inoc-
ulated there with the vaccine and the surgeon carried out successive in-
oculations of the other children during the voyage, so that the vaccine
reached Java live. A similar technique was initially used to spread the
vaccine through the colony, until the development of air-dried vaccine.
Colonial officials estimated that 25 percent of the population of Java
was vaccinated by 1835. Production of vaccine from cattle began in
1884 at a Parc Vaccinogène, which merged in 1895 with the Pasteur In-
stitute. Although never compulsory, vaccination was a condition of en-
try to lower schools. In 1968, the World Health Organization launched a
mass vaccination program in Indonesia. The last recorded case of the dis-
ease in the archipelago was in 1972. [0576]
SOUTH EAST ASIA LEAGUE. The first initiative for regional coopera-
tion between the independent states of Southeast Asia, the league was
founded in Bangkok in 1947 and brought together representatives of
Burma, Indonesia, Siam (Thailand), and Vietnam. Its aim was to pro-
mote the decolonization of Southeast Asia (and, in Thailand’s case, to re-
sist British encroachment on its sovereignty). It seems to have been an
initiative especially of the Thai Prime Minister Pridi Panomyong and dis-
appeared after his fall and that of Amir Sjarifuddin. See also FOREIGN
POLICY.
SOYA BEAN • 397
SOYA BEAN (Glycine max Fabaceae, kedele). Seed crop probably from
northeast Asia, which reached Indonesia via India. It is a major polow-
ijo crop and is used to prepare a number of important foods. Tahu (tofu,
bean curd) is made by grinding the beans and heating them in water to
precipitate casein, which is then pressed into cakes; tempe is made by in-
oculating parboiled beans with the fungus Aspergillus oryzae; and kecap
398 • SPAIN, HISTORICAL LINKS WITH
were often unable to take charge of the factories they nominally con-
trolled as these were in the hands of the workers or of lasykar or army
groups. More successful was the semigovernmental Banking and Trading
Corporation (BTC) of Sumitro Djojohadikusumo, which traded produce
to Singapore and the United States.
After 1950, successive governments were determined to establish a
significant publicly owned sector in the economy. Railways and the
Java Bank were nationalized, and the Bank Industri Negara helped fi-
nance new state corporations in the fields of shipping, air services (see
GARUDA), textiles, cement, glass, automobile, and hardboard manu-
facture. In 1956, a state trading corporation, USINDO, was formed to
handle the export of goods from these factories. With the nationaliza-
tion of Dutch enterprises in December 1957, the state sector expanded
dramatically. In April 1958, nationalized Dutch trading firms were reor-
ganized into six new state trading corporations with a joint monopoly on
the import of many commodities, including rice and textiles. Fifty-five
percent of profits from these firms were owed to the state, but proceeds
were generally disappointing due to corruption and deterioration of in-
frastructure. A central authority, the Badan Pimpinan Umum, was placed
in charge of state enterprises in 1960.
Under the New Order, this extensive state presence in the economy
was preserved, despite Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia
(IGGI) preferences for private ownership, partly because of a lack of do-
mestic capital to take them over, partly because they were an important
source of income and a useful tool for state intervention in the economy.
The largest state enterprises in the 1980s were Pertamina; the tin firm
PN Timah; PN Aneka Tambang, which conducts general mining opera-
tions; and Perhutani (formerly Inhutani), the state forestry corporation.
Public utilities, of course, are also state enterprises, as are the largest
banks and two major manufacturing firms, PT Krakatau Steel and the
fertilizer producer PT Pusri.
In 1986, influenced by analyses reporting that 92 of the 189 state enter-
prises were economically unsound, President Suharto announced plans
for privatization. From 1989, state enterprises were permitted to sell 20
percent of their shares to the public, but progress was slow and by 1994
only the cement manufacturer P. T. Semen Gresik was listed on the Jakarta
Stock Exchange. See also INDONESIANIZATION. [0311, 0351, 0695]
bitrary one, but most scholars regard true states as having emerged in the
archipelago only as part of the adoption and transformation of Indian,
and later Islamic and Western, political ideas. Thus the earliest states in
the western archipelago (“Ho-lo-tan,” “Kan-t’o-li,” and Kutai) were
culturally Indian in at least some respects and were probably stimulated
at least in part by the emergence of trade between Indonesia and India
around the fifth century.
Information on these early states allows us to say that they consisted
of court bureaucracies that rested on carefully constructed networks of
alliances with regional power holders (see BUPATI), but the relative
strength of court and “feudal” lords is hard to judge, even apart from the
fact that it must have varied significantly over time. The longevity of a
state such as Srivijaya and the internal organization required by the Ja-
vanese states that constructed Borobudur and Prambanan suggest a
significant degree of institutionalization, but other evidence suggests
highly personalized rule and the distinction between king, vassal, and
bandit leader seems to have been a fluid one (see BANDITRY;
PIRACY). In contrast, the strong bureaucratic structure of the Dutch
East Indies Company (VOC) gave it an organizational coherence and
resilience that enabled it ultimately to subdue the entire archipelago. See
also SUCCESSION. [0529, 0716]
The 1997 financial crisis sparked a drastic downturn in the stock mar-
ket as investors sold their stock to buy foreign currencies, a move that
accelerated after the government floated the rupiah on 14 August. In the
subsequent five months, stock market prices shrank at one point to half
their previous value. [0353, 0385]
STUW, DE (The Push). Political journal published from 1930 by the Asso-
ciation for the Furtherance of the Social and Political Development of the
Netherlands Indies, usually called the Stuw-group. Most of its members
were government officials or academics, and most had been influenced by
Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje at Leiden University. Their association
was primarily a study and discussion group, though it argued generally for
the creation of an Indies commonwealth (see SUCCESSION). The group
was largely disbanded by 1933, partly because it appeared to be damag-
ing the careers of its younger members in the conservative political cli-
mate of the day. Several of its members, however, gained influential po-
sitions in the postwar colonial administration, notably H. J. van Mook as
lieutenant governor-general and J. H. A. Logemann and J. A. Jonkman as
404 • SUBANDRIO
minister for colonies. They had little success, however, in pushing the
Dutch government toward greater concessions to Indonesian national-
ism, and their often paternalistic ideas on cultural and economic develop-
ment antagonized Indonesian nationalists. [0620, 1146]
nial military journal that published an article critical of the quality of Ja-
vanese soldiers. These haatzaai-artikelen were used in 1984 to convict
the dissident H. R. Dharsono. Lèse-majesté regulations of the colonial
era have also been retained by independent Indonesia (with substitution
of president and vice president for queen and governor-general) and
were used against the authors of the 1978 White Book. Finally, the 1963
Law on Subversion, which bans both the arousing of “hostility, distur-
bances or anxiety among the population or broad sections of society” and
the undermining of Pancasila or the Garis Besar Haluan Negara
(GBHN), was used against Sawito Kartowibowo and against the al-
leged plotters behind the Malari riots. See also MAHKAMAH
MILITER LUAR BIASA. [0635, 0923]
SUCCESSION. The idea that the colony of the Netherlands Indies should
be succeeded by some sort of independent state emerged in the early 20th
century. Proponents initially envisaged gradual decolonization, perhaps
via an increase in the powers of the Volksraad, toward a commonwealth
arrangement along British lines, with Indonesia being essentially self-
governing but deferring to the Netherlands on matters of common inter-
est (see STUW, DE). The idea of full independence became a part of the
platform of the nationalist movement in the 1920s, though the exact
mechanism of succession was not spelled out. Nationalists did not agree
at first on whether the colony should gain independence as a whole or in
a number of ethnically based states (see NATIONALISM). By the
1920s, there was general agreement that the successor state should en-
compass the entire Netherlands Indies.
Succession by Japanese military rule was sanctioned in interna-
tional law by the formal surrender of Dutch forces on 8 March 1942,
but was called into question by the establishment of a Netherlands In-
dies government-in-exile in Australia under H. J. van Mook and the
fact that the Dutch still held the town of Merauke in the southeastern
corner of West New Guinea (see PAPUA).
Japan surrendered on 14 August 1945, and the Indonesian Republic
was declared on 17 August. The Republic based its claim to succession
on the right of national self-determination, on the argument that Dutch
sovereignty had ceased with the Dutch loss of the colony in 1942 and on
the initially slender international recognition it received from other coun-
tries. The Linggajati Agreement of November 1946 and the Renville
Agreement of January 1948 gave the Republic vague “de facto” recog-
nition by the Dutch, but this was withdrawn in the “Police Actions” of
406 • SUDHARMONO
July 1947 and December 1948. The Republic received full recognition
from Egypt and Syria in 1947.
Under van Mook, the postwar Netherlands Indies government recog-
nized the inevitable end of colonialism but sought to push the colony’s suc-
cessor state in the direction of a multiracial paternalistic meritocracy. In the
latter part of the Revolution, this took the form of a federation (see FED-
ERALISM). On 9 March 1948, the colonial government was renamed the
Provisional Federal Government (Voorlopige Federale Regeering) and the
term Netherlands Indies was replaced in the Dutch Constitution by In-
donesië. On 3 November the post of governor-general was replaced with
that of high commissioner of the Crown. On 27 December 1949 sover-
eignty over the Netherlands Indies was transferred to the Republik In-
donesia Serikat (Federal Republic of Indonesia, usually translated as Re-
public of the United States of Indonesia). West New Guinea, however, was
retained by the Dutch, partly on grounds of the ethnic dissimilarity be-
tween the Papuans and other Indonesians, partly on the grounds that Dutch
sovereignty over the territory was stronger by virtue of the permanent
Dutch presence in Merauke. West New Guinea (West Irian, Papua) was
handed by the Dutch in 1962 to United Nations administration, which in
turn handed it to Indonesia in 1963. The incorporation of the territory into
Indonesia was ratified by an “Act of Free Choice” in 1968.
The issue of succession dominated the last years of both the Sukarno
and Suharto regimes, as neither president was willing to institute an or-
derly method for the transfer of power after his resignation or death. Al-
though under the Constitution the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat
(MPR) was responsible for electing the president, under neither the Old
nor the New Order was it believed that the parliament could act inde-
pendently of the will of the president himself. The bloody initiation of
the Suharto presidency had led to questions as to its legitimacy, and
Suharto was always eager to stress the legality of the handover of power
from Sukarno through the Supersemar. Suharto’s unwillingness to indi-
cate a possible successor led to great uncertainty during the early 1990s
and contributed to the chaos that followed his May 1998 resignation. In
the post-Suharto period, the issue of succession has been clarified
through the measures passed by the MPR whereby a president can only
serve two five-year terms and is now elected by the population as a
whole and not by maneuvering within the parliament. [0751, 0940, 0970]
ginning of the New Order, Suharto appointed him as his private secre-
tary for general affairs. He then became state secretary in 1973 and
chairman of Golkar in 1983. Sudharmono attempted to make Golkar
into a real political party by lessening its dependence on the executive.
Both as state secretary and head of Golkar, he also weakened the mili-
tary’s influence by helping a group of indigenous businessmen gain
greater access to government projects and state funding, undermining the
army’s financial strength. The army leadership responded by placing
military representatives in some two thirds of Golkar’s provincial chair-
manships and spreading rumors that Sudharmono had communist links.
The army’s campaign against him ensured that he was replaced as leader
of Golkar, but it was unable to prevent Suharto from appointing him as
his vice president in March 1988, where he served until 1993. [0748,
0751]
keting system. In 1975 plans were announced to phase out the renting of
land for large sugar plantations, but despite some progress, the industry
remained inefficient, absorbing 20 percent of total agricultural credits for
only 3 percent of the total value of agricultural output.
In order to boost rice production it was proposed that sugar cane cul-
tivation should be moved from Java, which in 1988 produced 83 percent
of the country’s sugar. No basic change was made in the government’s
policies, however, although there was some expansion outside Java, par-
ticularly to Lampung. [0552, 0603, 0617, 0730, 1249]
serve out his term of office, but the escalating demonstrations and the de-
fection of both his vice president and General Wiranto, chief of the
armed forces, left him with no alternative. He resigned on 21 May,
handing over power to Vice President Habibie. See also CULTURE; IN-
TELLIGENCE SERVICES; POLITICAL SUBVERSION; SUMITRO
DJOJOHADIKUSUMO. [0719, 0729, 0845, 0878, 0976]
alleged that Sukarno was not the author of the Pancasila, while in 1987 de-
tractors circulated false rumors of vast sums he had corruptly secured that
were held in foreign bank accounts. But he remained one of the most potent
symbols in Indonesian politics. His memory was used especially by the
Partai Demokrasi Indonesia (PDI) that claimed to be his heir in its con-
cern for the less well off, and the continued widespread loyalty to him was
largely responsible for the rise of his daughter, Megawati Sukarnoputri,
to lead the PDI and ultimately become president. [0643, 0725, 0844, 0850,
0851, 0859, 0881, 0934–0936]
and the Makassarese kingdom of Gowa (Goa) arose in the 13th century
among a scattering of perhaps 50 small states, variously Hindu and ani-
mist. Gowa and its sister port Tallo accepted Islam in 1605 and, now
commonly known as Makassar, soon became influential beyond the
peninsula in Kalimantan and Sumbawa. In 1660, however, Makassar
was captured by the Dutch in alliance with Arung Palakka of Bone.
The rest of the island meanwhile remained largely under small tribes,
most notably the Toraja of the central mountains, though the kingdom
of Bolaäng Mongondouw on the northern peninsula flourished briefly
until it was subjected by the Maluku kingdom of Ternate, which also
dominated the gulf of Tomini (see GORONTALO). The entire island
was claimed by the Dutch in 1846 and was ruled loosely by the gover-
nor of Celebes en Onderhoorigheden (Sulawesi and dependencies), but
Dutch control in the interior was not felt until the late 19th century.
After the Japanese occupation, the island was reoccupied by Aus-
tralian troops, who were instrumental in suppressing the initial attempt
by local nationalists to join the Indonesian republic. Thereafter, Sulawesi
was a linchpin in Dutch plans for federalism in Indonesia and Makassar
was the capital of the short-lived Negara Indonesia Timur (NIT). After
the dissolution of the NIT in 1950, Sulawesi was the site of rebellions
against the central authorities by both the Darul Islam (DI) and the Per-
mesta (Piagam Perjuangan Semesta Alam). (See PRRI/PERMESTA
REBELLION.) Under the New Order, nickel mining expanded on the
southeastern peninsula, and parts of the island were an important desti-
nation for Balinese transmigration settlements.
After Suharto’s fall, interreligious violence first broke out in Poso,
Central Sulawesi, on 24 December 1998, and flared and subsided over
the subsequent years. Although Christians and Muslims reached a peace
deal in December 2001, surrendering hundreds of weapons to the police,
violence soon resumed. It was estimated that in the district of Poso at
least 500 people were killed, about 80,000 forced to flee, and 10,000
buildings destroyed. The Muslim side was reinforced by about 500
members of Laskar Jihad from Java. Christian refugees fled mostly to
the nearby town of Tentena and Muslims fled to Palu, the provincial cap-
ital. A respite in the sporadic violence occurred between December 2002
and May 2003, but during the last three months of the year shootings and
bombings upsurged, especially in the Poso area. [0161, 0549, 0786,
0787, 0831, 1227, 1254, 1327, 1376, 1396]
tra. In the latter part of the Revolution, the Dutch attempted to establish
federal states in East and South Sumatra, but these were abolished in
1950.
After the transfer of sovereignty, Sumatra was divided into three
provinces: North, Central, and South Sumatra. Resentment in much of
the island grew during the 1950s. A revolt broke out in Aceh from 1953
to 1957, southern Sumatra had become a major destination for settlers
under the transmigration program, while in North Sumatra the govern-
ment insisted on removing squatters from foreign-controlled plantation
lands occupied during the Revolution. Sumatrans also felt that their is-
land was generating most of Indonesia’s wealth while getting little in re-
turn. Dissatisfaction over Jakarta’s allocation of income earned by
Sumatra’s exports was among the reasons for regional movements led by
local military commanders emerging in Padang, Medan, and Palem-
bang. These developed into the PRRI/Permesta rebellion in February
1958, when military and civilian leaders proclaimed a revolutionary gov-
ernment with its center in West Sumatra.
After the rebellion was suppressed in 1961, military forces on the is-
land were largely under Javanese leadership until the closing years of the
New Order. The Suharto government accelerated the transmigration
policy, particularly to the Lampung area of South Sumatra. Also, large
areas of the island were converted from native vegetation to oil palm
plantations, with huge tracts of forest being destroyed. Land clearing
was carried out, often during severe drought conditions, and this was one
of the major causes of the fires that swept across the region in 1997–1978
and during subsequent years. [0077, 0124, 0284, 0291, 0569, 0775,1179,
1187, 1240]
SUNDA. Though its boundaries are hard to define precisely, Sunda refers
generally to the western third of the island of Java, dominated by the
Sundanese people, though much of the northern coast is now not Sun-
danese. One of the earliest historical states in the archipelago, Taru-
manegara, had its center near modern Bogor, and the region was ap-
parently dominated by Srivijaya in the late seventh century, but little
SUPREME COURT • 419
government strengthened its grip over the judiciary during Guided De-
mocracy, by reducing the judiciary’s salaries and defining its powers
more narrowly.
Under the New Order, the judiciary strove to retain its autonomy,
but the government successfully ensured its institutional loyalty
through the political appointments of Supreme Court leaders and
strengthening the powers of these leaders within the Court. The strug-
gle to change the Supreme Court and the judiciary continued to focus
on the separation of powers doctrine, with the government increasingly
after 1970 replacing the Supreme Court in controlling judiciary per-
sonnel management. Also after 1970, constitutional review was seen as
requiring a special constitutional authority, so the possibilities of judi-
cial review were restricted. In 1985 Law no. 14 categorized the
Supreme Court’s tasks into four functions: judicial, advisory, regula-
tory, and administrative, the principal one being the judicial function,
which refers to dispute settlement (cassation). These functions are pri-
marily directed toward ensuring a uniform application of the law in the
lower courts. At the same time the workload of the Court increased,
and by the early 1990s it faced a backlog of more than 20,000 unde-
cided cases. The burden of this caseload meant that the Court was un-
able to supervise the lower courts effectively, and the lack of control
led to a larger number of irregularities and indirectly to a lowering of
professional standards among the judges.
After the fall of Suharto, President Abdurrachman Wahid at-
tempted to reform the Supreme Court by replacing 17 of its judges with
new figures not touched by corruption. Without a more widespread re-
form of the institution and a correction of the abuses in the legal system,
however, this move seemed unlikely to have a major effect on the
Supreme Court’s effective operation. This was recognized in the amend-
ments to the 1945 Constitution passed in August 2002, when parliament
approved the establishment of a Constitutional Court to be set up by Au-
gust 2003 separate from the Supreme Court to decide a range of disputes
with the authority to try cases at the first and final level, as well as re-
view laws against the Constitution. A Commission of Judiciary was also
established to propose candidates for appointments to the Supreme
Court. [0989, 1095, 1096, 1098]
portant port in the 15th century under Raden Rahmat or Sunan Ngampel,
but was first subject to Demak, then briefly independent, and finally in
1625 conquered by Mataram. It was seized by the Dutch East Indies
Company (VOC) in 1743. Herman Willem Daendels established a
naval base there. Under Dutch rule it became the major city of East Java,
the principal commercial center for eastern Indonesia, and headquarters
of the Dutch navy in the east. It was heavily bombed by the Allies dur-
ing World War II and was the scene of fierce fighting between Indone-
sian nationalist forces and British Indian troops in November 1945. 11
November is celebrated as Heroes’ Day in its honor. [0652, 0789]
SURINAM, JAVANESE IN. Toward the end of the 19th century, Dutch
concern over the growth of population in Java and a desire to limit the
number of contract laborers from British India on plantations in the Dutch
South American colony of Surinam led to the recruitment of Javanese for
422 • SUTARJO PETITION
work there. Between 1891 and 1939, 32,976 Javanese entered the colony,
usually on five-year contracts. Some 7,684 of these were repatriated before
World War II and about 1,000 in 1954, the remainder settling in the colony.
In 1962 the Javanese population was 43,000.
(“Als ik eens Nederlander was,” 1913) was a classic turning of the argu-
ments of European liberalism against colonialism. Exiled to Holland
1913–1919, he became interested in educational philosophy and in
1922, taking the name Ki Hajar Dewantoro, founded the Taman Siswa
school system. In 1943 he briefly joined the leadership of the Japanese-
sponsored mass organization Putera, but soon withdrew to concentrate
on educational matters. He remained close to Sukarno, and his ideas on
the governance of Taman Siswa schools were one of the elements con-
tributing to the philosophy of Guided Democracy. See also NATION-
ALISM.
–T –
tapol, however, were noted as such on their identity cards and were
barred from a number of political and social activities. See also
MAHKAMAH MILITER LUAR BIASA.
fertilizers, but not on farmers’ products), and reforming the income tax
laws. As a result of these reforms, nonoil income tax revenue increased
markedly, with 59 percent of government expenditures being funded by
this revenue in 1996 compared with only 24.7 percent prior to the re-
forms. Government revenue from income tax rose from Rp 12.5 billion
in 1992–1993 to Rp 55 billion in 1999–2000, with revenue from VAT ris-
ing from Rp 10.7 billion to Rp 33 billion in the same period. (This rise,
however, would have been more than offset by the fall in the exchange
rate of the rupiah during the financial crisis.) In effect from 1 January
2001, the finance ministry imposed a new tax structure for individual and
corporate taxpayers, with five different rates, ranging from 5 to 35 per-
cent, the highest rate being applied to those with an annual income of
more than Rp 200 million (US$22,700). See also GAMBLING;
PERDIKAN VILLAGES; TOBACCO. [0053, 0376, 0380, 0386, 0399]
TEA (Camellia sinensis Theaceae). Chinese in origin, tea was first grown
in Indonesia at the instigation of Governor-General Joannes Camphuys
in 1690. Extensive cultivation began in 1825 and was continued under
the Cultivation System, though never with much profit, and the gov-
ernment monopoly on production was lifted in 1865. After 1870 there
was a massive expansion of private tea plantations in mountainous areas
of West Java and later in North Sumatra. The industry suffered badly in
the Depression, especially because of the British Imperial Preference
scheme, but by 1940 a total of 213,000 hectares (ha) was under tea pro-
duction, about one third of it by smallholders, and tea was the Indies’
second export earner after rubber. Extensive clearing of plantations dur-
ing the Japanese occupation greatly reduced the planted areas (now
125,000 ha), and the industry was further hampered by the Darul Islam
(DI) rebellion in West Java. Dutch plantations were nationalized in 1957,
and a combination of disease, lack of investment and replanting, and
poor agricultural practices has meant that Indonesian tea tends to be of
lesser quality than fine teas from India and Sri Lanka, though it has high
production volume and commands about 8 percent of the world market.
In the 1970s, commercially bottled sweet tea (teh botol) gained an im-
portant share of the soft drink market. [0316, 0331, 0332]
used for the construction of ships in precolonial times and was extensively
grown by the Netherlands Indies forestry service in Central and East Java.
Under the Suharto regime, these major teak plantations (in Cepu, Kebon-
hardjo, Kendal, Lawu, and Madiun) were managed by the state-owned Pe-
rum Perhutani (State Forestry Corporation). They received certification
from the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in 1998, a certification that
was withdrawn in October 2001 for four of the five plantations because
long-term sustainability of the plantation resources was at serious risk and
Perhutani had failed to crack down on illegal logging. [1148]
TELEGRAPH. The first telegraph lines in Indonesia were laid in 1857 be-
tween Batavia and Buitenzorg (Bogor) and were briefly restricted to gov-
ernment use. An undersea cable between Batavia and Singapore was laid
in 1859 and the first lines on Sumatra in 1866. A link with Australia was
established via Banyuwangi in 1871. In 1905 the German-Dutch Tele-
graph Co. of Cologne completed a cable link to Yap in the German Pacific
territories, linking the colony with Europe via Siberia and the United
States, a line independent of British colonies and British firms. In 1905
the colonial government purchased a cable ship to establish undersea con-
nections throughout the archipelago. See also PALAPA.
TIN. Rich alluvial tin (cassiterite) deposits are found in Indonesia on the is-
lands of Bangka and Belitung, geologically an extension of the Malay
Peninsula, which was a major early source of tin for the production of
bronze (see COPPER). Small amounts of tin were exported to China
from the 13th century. Large-scale extraction was begun on Bangka in
1710 by the Sultan of Palembang. Mining was undertaken by Chinese,
organized in kongsi, who contracted with the sultan to pay for the right
to extract tin from defined areas. This system was taken over by the
Dutch in 1823, the government supplying advances of rice, oil, and
money and contracting to buy tin at a price fixed in advance according
to the expected productivity of the soil.
Mechanization of the mining began in the early 20th century, and in
1927 the so-called Bangka Tinwinning was established as a state enter-
prise of the colonial government; after World War II, operations were
taken over by a private firm, the Gemeenschappelijke Mijnbouw Billi-
ton, which was nationalized in 1953. Mining began on Belitung in 1850
and by 1860 was in the hands of a private company, the Billiton-
Maatschappij. Actual extraction of the tin, however, was done by Chi-
nese kongsi. Large-scale offshore mining using dredges began in 1966.
In the early 1990s many of the mines began to be closed, and mining
phased out as world prices made it unprofitable to mine the tin reserves.
The state-owned company PT Tambang Timah began producing low-
lead tin in 1992 to meet the more stringent import requirements of the
United States and Europe. [0411, 0801]
TOTOK. Colonial-era term for anyone recently arrived in the Indies or,
more generally and in contrast to peranakan, to unacculturated immi-
grant communities. See also CHINESE IN INDONESIA.
The route was in fact a complex of trade routes in which most com-
modities traveled only part of the total distance and typically passed re-
peatedly from one trader to another at the entrepôt ports that dotted the
coastline. Until the 10th century, commerce in Indonesian waters was
primarily in Indonesian hands, and Southeast Asians controlled most of
the shipping north to China. Indian merchants, on the other hand, domi-
nated trade in the Bay of Bengal, though the absence of Indian vocabu-
lary derived from trade in Indonesian languages suggests that they did
not penetrate far. The rhythm of this trade was seasonal, following the
changing pattern of the monsoons.
The principal goods of this trade are fairly well known. Cotton cloth
from India and silk and porcelain from China were major imports, while
the archipelago exported a more varied range of spices, minerals, and
forest products. The organization of the trade is less well understood. It
has commonly been suggested that most traders were “peddlers” operat-
ing as individuals with small capital and carrying small quantities of rel-
atively high-value goods between entrepôts. There is a good deal of evi-
dence, however, that local rulers were involved not only in taxing and
plundering trade (see PIRACY) but also in large-scale commercial en-
terprises.
It is fairly clear that the arrival of the Portuguese in Indonesia in the
16th century brought little change to the pattern of trade. The Portuguese
strength lay primarily in their naval power and their consequent ability
to seize ports such as Melaka and to extract customs duties from pass-
ing merchants. The European trading companies, however, have gener-
ally been seen as a major organizational innovation, partly because their
capital reserves enabled them to outlast local competitors in difficult
markets, partly because their bureaucratic structures made them less de-
pendent on the will and ability of single individuals. The Dutch East In-
dies Company (VOC), however, also relied to a considerable extent on
armed force to hold its dominant position in the trade of the archipelago.
The rise of the European trading companies changed the balance of po-
litical power in the archipelago, impoverishing the former merchant
princes of the coastal states and strengthening the hand of the feudal
elites of the interior.
In the early years of independence, the Republic attempted to counter
Dutch domination of the import-export trade by establishing the Central
Trading Company in 1948 to export agricultural products, and in 1956 it
established the USINDO to export factory products and import raw mate-
rials. Until the 1960s Indonesia’s primary exports were rubber, oil, tin,
436 • TRADE
copra, coffee, sugar, tobacco, and coffee (in that order), with rubber pro-
viding nearly 50 percent of export earnings in the early 1950s. Oil in-
creasingly assumed the primary role, and in 1965 oil and rubber con-
tributed almost 70 percent of Indonesia’s export earnings. During the early
years of the New Order, the volume of exports grew rapidly with oil and
associated products making up more than 80 percent of Indonesia’s export
earnings at the peak of the oil boom. This changed with the collapse of oil
prices in the mid-1980s, after which the government attempted to diversify
Indonesia’s exports (see ECONOMY). Oil and liquefied natural gas,
which had constituted 73 percent of the total value of Indonesian exports
in 1984, formed only 51.7 percent in January–September 1987, with agri-
cultural, industrial, and mining exports making up the remaining 48.3 per-
cent. By 1993 nonenergy exports—notably plywood, textiles, garments,
and shoes—had risen to 76 percent of total export earnings. Between 1987
and 1996, there was a surge in low-skill, labor-intensive manufactured ex-
ports.
The late 1960s was a time of economic liberalism in the field of trade
policy, but import bans began to appear again in the early 1970s acceler-
ating after the Malari demonstrations of 1974. Trade restrictions were
expanded in the late 1970s and further tightened through the early 1980s,
when increasing numbers of nontariff barriers were imposed in the form
of restrictive import licensing bans and quotas. Under pressure from the
technocrats and international lending institutions, however, in 1986 im-
port liberalization measures were instituted, including an across-the-
board tariff reduction, and in October of that year the first reform pack-
age was introduced, followed by others in 1988, 1990, and 1991 that
transformed Indonesian industry, making it internationally competitive.
The government initiated further tariff reductions in 1995, and this series
of trade liberalization measures culminated in June 1996 when it was an-
nounced that tariffs would be cut on 1,497 items, simplifying trade pro-
cedures and offering more flexibility for foreign manufacturers. This
brought the average tariffs in Indonesia down to around 15 percent. But
the growing cronyism of the regime meant that many businesses owned
by those close to Suharto were unaffected by these reforms. Between
1970 and 1997, Indonesia’s trade as a percentage of gross domestic prod-
uct (GDP) rose from 28 percent to 56 percent.
Between 1966 and the 1990s, there was a major shift in Indonesia’s
trading relationships from North America and Europe toward Japan and
other East Asian nations, with a growing volume of trade among the As-
sociation of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). At the peak of the oil
TRANSMIGRATION • 437
TRAVEL. To protect its trading monopoly, the Dutch East Indies Com-
pany (VOC) banned from its possessions all Europeans not in its ser-
vice. After the fall of the company, various more liberal regulations were
introduced, but under the Cultivation System the old restrictions were
largely restored before being lifted in stages between 1861 and 1911 (on
Java and Madura; 1916 in the Outer Islands) when Europeans became
free to trade and reside anywhere in the archipelago, subject only to the
exorbitante rechten of the governors-general. Formal restrictions on the
travel of Indonesians began only in 1816, with the introduction of a pass
system intended to keep the labor force in place. Passes were abolished
in 1863 and liberalization of travel regulations continued, a pace or two
behind that for Europeans, until 1914 (on Java; 1918 in the Outer Is-
lands), when travel and residence throughout the archipelago was virtu-
ally unrestricted. Chinese and other “foreign orientals” (see RACE)
were regulated separately but in a similar way to Indonesians, being sub-
ject to pass laws from 1816 to 1863 and being required from 1835 to
1919 to live in so-called wijken (districts) or Chinatowns. Current regu-
lations require Indonesians to obtain a surat jalan for long or inter-
provincial journeys. In November 1982, a so-called fiscal fee was intro-
duced to discourage overseas travel by Indonesians. In 1989 Indonesia
announced it would abolish the requirement that citizens leaving the
country obtain exit permits. See also LINSCHOTEN, J. H. VAN;
MARCO POLO; PIRES, TOMÉ; ROADS; SHIPPING; TOURISM.
[1078, 1100]
TURTLE • 439
TURMERIC. Spice prepared from the ends of the root fibers of Curcuma
domestica (Zingiberaceae), valued both for its bright yellow color and its
flavor. Originally exported from Southeast Asia to China and India, it
soon came to be cultivated in both places. [0527]
TURTLE. The shell of the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) has been
exported from Indonesia to China for at least two millennia. Turtle eggs are
a source of food for some communities in eastern Indonesia. [1154]
440 • UJUNG KULON
–U–
UNITED NATIONS (UN). From its inception in 1945, the United Nations
took an active interest in decolonization and was drawn into the Indonesian-
Dutch dispute in July 1947, when India and Australia raised the Dutch
first “Police Action” in the Security Council. The UN responded in Octo-
ber 1947 by appointing a so-called Good Offices Commission, consisting
of Australia, Belgium, and the United States, to facilitate a settlement. This
commission presided over the Renville Agreement of January 1948. At the
beginning of 1949, after the second “Police Action,” the Security Council
demanded the full transfer of sovereignty to Indonesia by mid-1950.
Indonesia joined the UN on 26–29 September 1950 and was able to
use UN good offices again in the early 1960s in the transfer of West Irian
(Papua) from Dutch rule, when the UN acted as intermediary in receiv-
ing the territory from the Dutch in 1962 and handing it to Indonesia on 1
May 1963. Although thereafter a UN Temporary Executive Authority
(UNTEA) was still acting as the overseer for the Act of Free Choice that
was to be held in five years’ time to determine the wishes of the Papuan
people, on 2 January 1965 Sukarno indignantly pulled Indonesia out of
the international body. This was when Malaysia became a temporary
member of the Security Council (see CONFRONTATION). Indonesia
then tried to organize an alternative UN in the form of a Conference of
the New Emerging Forces (Conefo), but this had made little headway by
the time Sukarno lost power. Indonesia rejoined the UN in September
1966.
In November 1975, Portugal formally requested UN help in solving its
East Timor problem, and on 12 December the General Assembly passed
a motion calling on Indonesia to withdraw. On 22 December 1975 and
22 April 1976, the Security Council condemned the Indonesian invasion
of East Timor and again instructed it to withdraw; Indonesia ignored this
instruction, as well as annual motions of condemnation passed by the
General Assembly from 1975 to 1982.
After Suharto’s resignation, Jakarta finally proposed granting a spe-
cial status to East Timor, and UN-brokered talks began in late 1998 be-
tween Portuguese and Indonesian representatives, focusing on a plan for
“autonomy with special status” for East Timor. The UN supervised a ref-
erendum on independence on 31 August 1999, but it left security in the
hands of the Indonesians rather than introducing a UN peacekeeping
force. When it became clear that a vast majority of the voters had opted
for independence, Indonesia-supported militias went on a rampage,
killing hundreds of civilians (including UN staff members). Indonesia
declared martial law and tried to retain control, but finally yielded to
442 • UNITED STATES, HISTORICAL LINKS WITH
UPAS (Antiaris toxicaria Urticaceae, ipoh). Tree that produces a highly poi-
sonous sap, formerly smeared, sometimes in conjunction with locally pro-
duced strychnine, on darts and arrows for hunting and on swords and dag-
gers for warfare. It was extensively used in the defense of Melaka against
the Portuguese in 1511. The tree became the subject of a widespread sci-
entific myth initiated by Rumphius, which held that its fumes would rap-
idly kill any living thing, plant or animal, within a radius of several meters
or more. The legend probably derived originally from efforts by producers
of the poison to discourage closer investigation of its origins. [1148, 1189]
–V –
Front (NLF) mission in Jakarta. At the request of the United States, In-
donesian troops were posted in South Vietnam as part of the International
Commission of Control and Supervision under the Paris Accord of 1972.
Following Vietnam’s reunification in 1975, refugees from Vietnam
began to arrive in large numbers in Indonesia’s Natuna archipelago, and
between 1977 and 1981 the Indonesian camp on Pulau Galang received
over 65,000 refugees for processing and transit to third countries. There
was domestic concern over the high proportion of Vietnamese Chinese
among the refugees, and none were accepted for permanent settlement.
Indonesia joined the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
condemnation of Vietnam’s 1979 invasion of Cambodia, upholding the
“Democratic Kampuchea” seat in the United Nations, but it consistently
sought compromise over the issue. It believed that Vietnam had no hege-
monic ambitions beyond Indochina and that its isolation dangerously in-
creased the scope for great power (especially Chinese) intervention in the
region. ASEAN appointed Jakarta to act as mediator in Vietnam’s con-
flict with Cambodia, and Indonesia played a major role in reaching an
acceptable solution. In March 1989 an Indonesian private bank, Summa
Bank, announced plans to join the Saigon Industrial and Commercial
Bank in the Indochina Bank, Vietnam’s first banking joint venture. Af-
ter Vietnam became the seventh member of ASEAN in July 1995 politi-
cal relations further eased, but Vietnam remained a major economic
competitor to Indonesia in the low-income segment of the export market.
See also SOVIET UNION, RELATIONS WITH. [1125, 1144]
VORSTENLANDEN. The princely states of Central Java, that is, the Sul-
tanate of Yogyakarta, the Kasunanan (Sunanate) of Surakarta, and the
lesser Pakualaman and Mangkunegaran. Descendants of the divided
kingdom of Mataram, these were the only indirectly ruled part of the is-
land in the latter colonial period and were thus exempt from many of the
colonial regulations applied to other areas. The Cultivation System, for
instance, was not introduced in the Vorstenlanden, and large privately
owned plantations developed there rather earlier than elsewhere. The au-
thority of the Vorstenland rulers was limited to Javanese within their do-
mains. Europeans and others were the administrative and legal responsi-
bility of Dutch residents.
–W–
WALI SONGO (Nine Saints). Said to have converted Java to Islam in the
16th century, their individual careers, which were not especially con-
nected, are shrouded in legend, but several appear to have been non-
Javanese and to have studied in Melaka. The first Muslim state on Java,
Demak, is said to have been founded by Sunan Gunungjati (?–1570).
fauna and flora between the west, where typical Eurasiatic species such as
tigers, rhinoceros, monkeys, and oaks were found, and the east of the ar-
chipelago, where marsupials, megapodes (mound-building birds), and eu-
calypts were common. It is now known that the former were characteristic
of the old northern supercontinent of Laurasia, while the latter derive from
the southern supercontinent of Gondwana, though present biological dis-
tribution does not exactly reflect the geological origin of the islands (see
CONTINENTAL DRIFT). The line that Wallace drew between Bali and
Lombok and between Sulawesi and Kalimantan separating these two
zones has been called Wallace’s line. Wallace himself, however, recog-
nized the existence of a transition zone, and it is now more common to re-
fer to this distinct zone, covering roughly Sulawesi, Maluku, and
Nusatenggara, as Wallacea. See also PREHISTORY; SUNDA SHELF.
[0100, 1186, 1192]
became common in the archipelago from the 17th century, but whether
they were an older phenomenon is hard to tell. A major consequence of
the Dutch presence was the gradual disarming of the indigenous popu-
lation, so that Java, for instance, once known as a land of warriors,
gained a reputation for exceptional peace.
During the Revolution there was relatively little battlefield combat
between Republican and Dutch forces in view of the overwhelming
Dutch superiority in weaponry. The Republic’s greatest successes were
in guerrilla warfare (see GERILYA) carried out by both regular and ir-
regular troops. After independence this pattern continued. Government
troops could overwhelm any dissident forces through their superior
weaponry, and rebel opposition (whether by forces of the PRRI/Perme-
sta rebellion, Darul Islam, or antigovernment movements in Aceh, East
Timor, or Papua) was generally conducted only through small-scale
guerrilla operations. See also DEFENSE POLICY; KONINKLIJK NED-
ERLANDSCH INDISCH LEGER; WEAPONS. [0576]
have tended also to shift around behind the dalang and gamelan to watch
the finely painted puppets themselves.
Wayang golek is also performed by a dalang with a gamelan orches-
tra, and there are currently three major variants: Wayang golek papak
(flat wayang golek), which recount local legends of West Java and are
usually performed in the central plains of West Java; wayang golek
purwa, whose stories are usually derived from those of wayang kulit and
are usually performed in the Sundanese highlands; and wayang golek
Menak, now rarely performed, which are connected with the Kebumen
area and recount Islamic history and legend.
Wayang kulit generally presents episodes from the Mahabharata and
Ramayana, but within this framework the dalang has enormous scope
for improvisation. The so-called Nine Walis used wayang kulit to spread
Islam on Java (it is said that the distorted shape of the characters was
adopted to satisfy the Islamic prohibition on the representation of hu-
mans), and prewar nationalists, communists, and postindependence gov-
ernments have all seen it as a tool for spreading information and ideas
rapidly to the rural population of Java. Suharto used it in legitimizing
his rule and popularizing its objectives, but especially in the closing
years of his regime his opponents also chose to express their opposition
through wayang plays. [0008, 0017, 0132, 0140, 0153, 0163, 0169,
0170, 0181, 0182]
WERENG. General name for various flying insects of the families Ci-
cadelidae and Delphacidae (Order Hemiptera) occurring in plague pro-
portions in Java since 1969 and transmitting major viral diseases of rice.
Their spread is closely related to the Green Revolution, under which
more susceptible rice varieties were introduced, overuse of pesticides di-
minished the bird and other predator populations, and the number of
crops per year was increased so that the life cycle of the wereng was
never disrupted by lack of food. The plague was checked briefly after
1976 by the introduction of new resistant rice varieties, but within a
decade the wereng had adapted and by 1986 wereng were said to be re-
WHITE BOOK • 453
–Y –
–Z–
GOVERNORS-GENERAL
463
464 • APPENDIX A
ENGLISH INTERREGNUM
COMMISSIONERS-GENERAL
GOVERNORS-GENERAL
LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS-GENERAL
Paulus van der Helm (dir. gen.) 29 July 1806–10 December 1807
Jacob Jan Cambier 10 December 1807–8 January 1808
No minister
467
468 • APPENDIX B
KOLONIËN (COLONIES)
KOLONIËN (COLONIES)
KEY TO PARTIES
KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS
NOTE
ACEH
473
474 • APPENDIX C
Bugis Dynasty
1727 Ala’ad-din Ahmad Syah
1735 Ala’ad-din Johan Syah
1764 Badr ad-din Johan Syah
1765 Mahmud Syah (restored)
1769 Mahmud Syah
1773 Sulaiman Syah (Udahna Lela)
1773 Mahmud Syah (restored)
1781 Ala’ad-din Jauhar al-Alam
1795 Ala’ad-din Jauhar al-Alam
1823 Muhammad Syah
1838 Sulaiman
1857 Ali Ala’ad-din Mansur Syah (Ibrahim)
1870 Mahmud Syah
1874 Muhammad Daud Syah
MATARAM
SURAKARTA
YOGYAKARTA
477
478 • APPENDIX D
NOTE
Sukarnoerg cabinets based principally on Susan Finch and Daniel S. Lev, comps.,
Republic of Indonesia Cabinets 1945–1965 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Mod-
ern Indonesia Project, 1965).
1. Republik Indonesia Serikat (Republic of the United States of Indonesia).
Appendix E
Republic of Indonesia Officeholders
PRESIDENTS
Vice Presidents
Mohammad Hatta 18 August 1945–1 December 1956
Hamengkubuwono IX 27 March 1968–23 March 1978
Adam Malik 23 March 1978–12 March 1983
Umar Wirahadikusumah 12 March 1983–11 March 1988
Sudharmono 11 March 1988–17 March 1993
Try Sutrisno 17 March 1993–14 March 1998
B. J. Habibie 14 March 1998–19 May 1998
Megawati Sukarnoputri 26 October 1999–23 July 2001
Hamzah Haz 23 July 2001–present
PRIME MINISTERS
479
480 • APPENDIX E
Republik Indonesia
Mohammad Natsir (Masjumi) 6 September 1950–27 April 1951
Sukiman Wiryosanjoyo 27 April 1951–3 April 1952
(Masjumi)
Wilopo (PNI) 3 April 1952–1 August 1953
Ali Sastroamijoyo (PNI) 1 August 1953–12 August 1955
Burhanuddin Harahap 12 August 1955–26 March 1956
(Masjumi)
Ali Sastroamijoyo (PNI) 26 March 1956–9 April 1957
Juanda Kartawijaya 9 April 1957–9 July 1959
Juanda Kartawijaya1 9 July 1959–7 November 1963
Sukarno 9 July 1959–12 March 1967
Subandrio (1st deputy 13 November 1963–18 March 1966
prime minister)
Johannes Leimena 13 November 1963–30 March 1966
(2nd deputy PM)
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA OFFICEHOLDERS • 481
FOREIGN MINISTERS
Republik Indonesia
Mohammad Roem (Masjumi) 6 September 1950–27 April 1951
Ahmad Subarjo (Masjumi) 27 April 1951–3 April 1952
Wilopo (PNI, ad interim) 3 April 1952–29 April 1952
482 • APPENDIX E
Republik Indonesia
Assaat 6 September 1950–27 April 1951
Iskaq Cokroadisuryo (PNI) 27 April 1951–3 April 1952
Mohamad Roem (Masjumi) 3 April 1952–1 August 1953
Hazairin (PIR) 1 August 1953–23 October 1954
Haji Zainul Arifin (NU) 23 October 1954–19 November 1954
Sunaryo (NU) 19 November 1954–12 August 1955
Sunaryo (NU) 12 August 1955–19 January 1956
R. P. Suroso (Parindra) 19 January 1956–26 March 1956
Sunaryo (NU) 26 March 1956–9 April 1957
Sanusi Harjadinata (PNI) 9 April 1957–9 July 1959
Ipik Gandamana 9 July 1959–6 March 1962
Saharjo 6 March 1962–13 November 1963
Ipik Gandamana 13 November 1963–2 September 1964
Sumarno 2 September 1964–18 March 1966
Basuki Rahmat 30 March 1966–9 January 1969
Amir Machmud 23 January 1969–28 March 1973
Suparjo Rustam 28 March 1973–21 March 1988
Rudini 21 March 1988–17 March 1993
M. Yogie Memet 17 March 1993–22 May 1998
Syarwan Hamid 22 May 1998–26 October 1999
Surjadi Soedirdja 29 October 1999–9 August 2001
Hari Sabarno 9 August 2001–present
MINISTERS OF DEFENSE
Republik Indonesia
Abdul Halim (ad interim) 6 September 1950–17 August 1950
Mohammad Natsir 17 December 1950–27 April 1951
(Masjumi, ad interim)
Sewaka (PIR) 9 May 1951–3 April 1952
Hamengku Buwono IX 3 April 1952–2 June 1953
Wilopo (PNI) 2 June 1953–1 August 1953
Iwa Kusumasumantri 1 August 1953–13 July 1955
(Persatuan Progresif)
Burhanuddin Harahap 12 August 1955–26 March 1956
(Masjumi)
Ali Sastroamijoyo 26 March 1956–9 April 1957
(PNI, ad interim)
Juanda Kartawijaya 9 April 1957–9 July 1959
Abdul Haris Nasution 9 July 1959–24 February 1966
M. Sarbini 24 February 1966–29 March 1973
Maraden Panggabean 28 March 1973–17 April 1978
Andi Mohammad Yusuf 17 April 1978–28 March 1983
S. Poniman 28 March 1983–21 March 1988
L. B. (Benny) Murdani 21 March 1988–21 March 1993
Edi Sudrajat 21 March 1993–14 March 1998
Wiranto 22 March 1998–26 October 1999
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA OFFICEHOLDERS • 485
The formal title of the army’s most senior commanding officer was pan-
glima (1945–1949), Kepala staf (chief of staff, 1949–1960), menteri/Kepala
staf (minister/chief of staff, 1960–1963), menteripanglima (1963–1967), pan-
glima (1967–1969), and Kepala staf (1969–present).
KOPKAMTIB COMMANDERS
KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS
NOTE
1. Although Juanda’s formal position from 9 July 1959 was that of first minister
(Menteri Pertama), rather than prime minister (Perdana Menteri), with Sukarno
holding the posts of president and prime minister concurrently, he was effectively
prime minister, that is, head of the cabinet, until his death on 7 November 1963.
Appendix F
Parliamentary Strengths and Electoral
Performance of the Parties, 1945–1999
Party Seats
PNI 45
Masjumi 60
Partai Sosialis 35
489
490 • APPENDIX F
Partai Buruh 35
PKI 35
PARKINDO 8
Partai Katolik 4
Workers* 40
Peasants* 40
Sumatra 50
Borneo 8
Sulawesi 10
Maluku 5
Sunda Kecil 5
Chinese 7
Arabs 3
Europeans 3
Origins
1. Members of RIS Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat
A. Representing the Republic of Indonesia 50
B. Representing states and territories of the RIS
other than the Republic of Indonesia and
Pasundan 79
C. Representatives for Pasundan appointed
by the Republic of Indonesia 19
2. Members of the RIS Senate 29
3. Members of the Working Committee of the
Republic of Indonesia KNIP 46
4. Members of the Dewan Pertimbangan
Agung of the Republic of Indonesia 13
Affiliation
Party Seats (% of DPR, total 232)
Masjumi 49 (21%)
PNI 36 (16%)
PARLIAMENTARY STRENGTHS AND ELECTORAL PERFORMANCE • 491
PSI 17 (7.3%)
PIR 17
PKI 13 (5.6%)
Fraksi Demokrasi 13
PRN 10
Partai Katolik 9 (3.9%)
PARINDRA 8
Partai Buruh 7
PARKINDO 5 (2.2%)
PSII 5
Murba 4 (1.7%)
Front Buruh 4
Fraksi Kedaulatan Rakyat 4
Serikat Kerakyatan Indonesia 3
Golongan Tani (peasants) 2
No formal affiliation 26
PNI 9,070,218
Masjumi 7,789,619
NU 6,989,333
PKI 6,232,512
PSII 1,059,922
PARKINDO 988,810
Partai Katolik 748,591
PSI 695,932
IPKI 544,803
PERTI 465,359
PRN 220,652
Partai Buruh 332,047
Murba 248,633
PARLIAMENTARY STRENGTHS AND ELECTORAL PERFORMANCE • 493
PNI 44
PKI 30
Partai Katolik 5
PSII 5
PARKINDO 6
494 • APPENDIX F
Murba 1
NU 36
PERTI 2
Army (functional group) 15
Navy 7
Air force 7
Police 5
Workers 26
Peasants 25
Islamic teachers 24
Youth 9
Women 8
Intellectuals and teachers 5
Total 283
NOTES
499
500 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
print and online. The weekly Far Eastern Economic Review carries brief
mentions of most major events in Indonesia, but it increasingly emphasizes
economic news over that in the political sphere and emphasizes East over
Southeast Asia. The Asian Wall Street Journal, International Herald Tri-
bune, New York Times, Washington Post, Sydney Morning Herald, and the
Dutch-language NRC Handelsblad occasionally publish accounts of In-
donesian developments when they affect the interests of the United States,
Australia, or the Netherlands.
At the end of the bibliography, there is a list of journals that frequently
carry articles concerning recent developments in Indonesia as well as the
most recent scholarship on all fields of study. On economic matters, the
Bulletin of Indoensian Economic Studies (BIES) is the most useful and it
also publishes a quarterly economic survey. The journal Indonesia pub-
lishes frequent updates on officeholders in the military, Inside Indonesia
focuses on contemporary issues, and Asian Survey publishes an annual
roundup of political events in its January or February issue.
Both Excerpta Indonesica (EI) and the Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS)
are essential tools for keeping in touch with recent academic research. EI ap-
pears twice a year and provides abstracts of recent articles on Indonesia in the
social sciences and humanities. Its e-mail address is kitlvpress@kitlv.nl. BAS
now appears online. Details for accessing the database (which covers
1971–present) for organizations subscribing to BAS Online can be obtained
from www.hti.umich.edu/b/bas/. Inquiries for individual subscriptions can be
sent to abeard@aasianst.org.
As already indicated in the reader’s note, all bibliographical entries are
numbered, and these numbers appear at the end of entries in the dictionary
to guide readers to the relevant sources.
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTENTS
GENERAL
Bibliographies 504
Reference Works 505
Statistical Abstracts 506
Travel and Tourism 507
Guidebooks 508
CULTURE
Archeology 509
Architecture 510
Arts 510
Literary Studies 514
Works of Literature 515
Language and Linguistics 516
ECONOMY
General 518
Agriculture 519
Development 521
Finance 523
Industry 524
Labor 525
Trade 526
Transport and Communications 528
HISTORY
General Histories 528
Historiography 529
To 1400 530
1400–1800 532
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 503
1800–1942 534
1942–1949 537
1950–1966 540
Suharto Era (1967–1998) 541
Post-Suharto Era (1998–2003) 543
Regional 544
Biography and Autobiography 547
POLITICS
General 550
Political Thought 551
Political Writings 552
Policy Issues 552
Government Institutions 554
Political Parties 555
Elections 556
Islam and Politics 557
Racial and Minority Issues 558
Law 560
International Relations 561
SCIENCE
Biology 564
Geography, Geology, and Ecology 565
History of Science 566
Public Health and Medicine 567
SOCIETY
Anthropology 567
Education 571
Media and the Press 572
Population 573
Religion 573
Sociology 576
Women 577
CURRENT MEDIA
Journals 580
Internet Resources 582
504 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
GENERAL
Bibliographies
[0001] ASEAN: A Bibliography. Singapore: ISEAS, 1984.
[0002] Avé, Jan B., Victor T. King, and Joke G. W. de Wit. West-Kalimantan: A Bib-
liography. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1983.
[0003] Baal, J. van, K. W. Galis, and R. M. Koentjaraningrat. West-Irian: A Bibli-
ography. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1984.
[0004] Boland, B. J., and I. Farjon. Islam in Indonesia: A Bibliographic Survey.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1983.
[0005] Carey, Peter, and Mason C. Hoadley. The Archive of Yogyakarta, Vol. II:
Documents Relating to Economic and Agrarian Affairs. New York: OUP, 2000.
[0006] Char Lan Hiang. Southeast Asian Research Tools: Indonesia. Honolulu: Uni-
versity of Hawai’i Southeast Asian Studies Program, 1979.
[0007] Coolhaas, W. Ph. A Critical Survey of Studies on Dutch Colonial History,
2nd. ed. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1980.
[0008] Farjon, I. Madura and Surrounding Islands: An Annotated Bibliography
1860–1942. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1980.
[0009] Florida, Nancy. Javanese Literature in Surakarta Manuscripts, Volume 1: In-
troduction and Manuscripts of the Karaton Surakarta. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
Southeast Asia Program, 1993.
[0010] ———. Javanese Literature in Surakarta Manuscripts, Volume 2: Manu-
scripts of the Mangkunagaran Palace. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Pro-
gram, 2000.
[0011] Groenendael, Victoria M. Clara van. Wayang Theatre in Indonesia: An An-
notated bibliography. Leiden, the Netherlands: KITLV, 1987.
[0012] Hicks, George L., and Geoffrey McNicoll. The Indonesian Economy
1950–1965: A Bibliography. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast
Asian Studies, 1967.
[0013] Jacobs, M., and T. J. J. de Boo. Conservation Literature on Indonesia: Se-
lected Annotated Bibliography. Leiden, the Netherlands: Rijksherbarium, 1982.
[0014] Jaquet, F. G. P. Sources for the History of Asian and Oceania in the Nether-
lands, 2 vols. Munich: K. G. Saur, 1982–1983.
[0015] Johnson, Donald Clay. Index to Southeast Asian Journals: A Guide to Arti-
cles, Book Reviews and Composite Works, 2 vols. Boston: Hall, 1977–1982.
[0016] Kemp, H. C. Annotated Bibliography of Bibliographies on Indonesia. Lei-
den, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1990.
[0017] Kennedy, Raymond. Bibliography of Indonesian Peoples and Cultures, 2nd
ed. New Haven Conn: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, 1962.
[0018] Klooster, H. A. J. Bibliography of the Indonesian Revolution: Publications
from 1942 to 1994. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1997.
[0019] Koentjaraningrat. Anthropology in Indonesia: A Bibliographical Review.
Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1975.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 505
Reference Works
[0031] Apa dan Siapa: sejumlah orang Indonesia, 1981–1982; 1983–1984;
1985–1986. Jakarta: Grafiti, 1981, 1983, 1986.
[0032] Encyclopaedie van Nederlandsch-Indië, 4 vols. and 4 suppls. The Hague:
Martinus Nijhoff, 1917–1939.
[0033] Ensiklopedi Indonesia, 7 vols. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru-van Hoeve, 1980–1984.
[0034] Ensiklopedi Indonesia supplemen, vols. 1 and 2. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru-van
Hoeve, 1986–1990.
[0035] Orang Indonesia jang terkemoeka di Djawa. [Jakarta]: Gunseikanbu, 2604
(i.e., 1944).
[0036] The Indonesian Military Leaders: Biographical and Other Background
Data, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sritua Arief, 1978.
[0037] Who’s Who in the Indonesian Military. Jakarta: Sritua Arief, 1977.
[0038] Boomgard, P., ed. The Colonial Past: Dutch Sources on Indonesian History.
Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute, 1991.
[0039] Bruinessen, Martin van. Kitab kuning, pesantren dan tarekat: tradisi-tradisi
Islam di Indonesia. Bandung, Indonesia: Mizan, 1995.
506 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0040] Crawfurd, John. A Descriptive Dictionary of the Indian Islands and Adjacent
Countries. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1971.
[0041] Cribb, Robert. Historical Atlas of Indonesia. Honolulu: University of
Hawai’i Press, 2000.
[0042] Day, Tony, and Will Derks, eds. Encompassing Knowledge: Indigenous En-
cyclopedias from Ninth-Century Java to Twentieth-Century Riau. BKI, special is-
sue, 155, no. 3 (1999).
[0043] Drooglever, P. J., M. J. B. Schouten, and Mona Lohanda. Guide to the
Archives on Relations between the Netherlands and Indonesia, 1945–1963. The
Hague: Institute of Netherlands History, 1999.
[0044] Gibb, H. A. R., and J. H. Kramers. Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1953
[0045] Gonggryp, G. F. E. Geillustreerde encyclopedie van Nederlandsch-Indie.
Leiden, The Netherlands: Leidsche Uitgeversmaatschappij, 1934.
[0046] Ikhwan, Abdul Halim, et al. Ensiklopedi Haji and umrah. Jakarta: PT Raja
Grafindo Persada, 2002.
[0047] Parsidi, Agata. Kamus akronim, inisialisme dan singkatan. Jakarta: Grafiti
Pers, 1992.
[0048] Pompe, S. “A Short Review of Doctoral Theses on the Netherlands-Indies
Accepted at the Faculty of Law of Leiden University in the Period 1850–1940.”
Indonesia 56 (October 1993): 67–98.
[0049] Roeder, O. G. Who’s Who in Indonesia, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Gunung Agung,
1971, 1980.
[0050] Suryadinata, Leo. Eminent Indonesian Chinese: Biographical Sketches. Sin-
gapore: ISEAS, 1978.
[0051] The Liang Gie, and Andrian The. Ensiklopedi ilmu-ilmu. Yogyakarta, In-
donesia: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2001.
Statistical Abstracts
Changing Economy in Indonesia, published by the Royal Tropical Institute, Ams-
terdam
[0052] 1. Creutzberg, Piet. Indonesia’s Export Crops, 1816–1940. 1975.
[0053] 2. ———. Public Finance, 1816–1939. 1976.
[0054] 3. ———. Expenditure on Fixed Assets. 1977.
[0055] 4. ———. Rice Prices. 1978.
[0056] 5. ———. National Income. 1979.
[0057] 6. Van Laanen, J. Th. M. Money and Banking, 1816–1940. 1980.
[0058] 7. Altes, W. Korthals. Balance of Payments, 1822–1939. 1987.
[0059] 8. Segers, W. I. A. M. Manufacturing Industry, 1870–1942. 1987.
[0060] 9. Knaap, Gerrit J. Transport, 1819–1940. 1989.
[0061] 10. Boomgaard, P., and J. L.van Zanden. Food Crops and Arable Lands, Java
1815–1942. 1990.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 507
Guidebooks
[0103] Cochrane, Janet. The National Parks and Other Wild Places of Indonesia.
London: New Holland, 2000.
[0104] Cockell, Charles. The Expeditions to Indonesia Handbook. Hailsham, East
Sussex, UK: CSC Expeditionary Publications, 1994.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 509
CULTURE
Archeology
[0112] Dumarçay, Jacques. “Le Candi Badut.” Archipel 63 (2002): 7–14.
[0113] Gomez, Luis O., and Hiram W. Woodward. Barabudur: History and Signif-
icance of a Buddhist Monument. Berkeley, Calif.: Asian Humanities Press, 1981.
[0114] Harkantiningsih, Naniek. “Le site de Léran à Gresik, Java-Est: étude
archéologique préliminaire.” Archipel 63 (2002): 17–26.
[0115] Kalus, Ludvik, and Claude Guillot. “La Jérusalem javanaise et sa mosqué al-
Aqsâ: texte de fondation de la mosquée de Kudus datée 956/1549.” Archipel 63
(2002): 27–56.
[0116] Krom, N. J. Barabadur: Archaeological Description, 2 vols. The Hague: Ni-
jhoff, 1927.
[0117] Manguin, Pierre-Yves. “Etude Sumatranaises 1. Palembang et Sriwijaya: an-
ciennes hypotheses, recherches nouvelles (Palembang ouest).” BEFEO 76 (1987).
[0118] McKinnon, E. Edwards. “Buddhism and the pre-Islamic archaeology of
Kutei in the Mahakam Valley of East Kalimantan.” In Studies in Southeast Asian
Art: Essays in Honor of Stanley J. O’Connor, edited by Nora Taylor, 217–40.
[0196]
[0119] ———. “Ceramic Recoveries (Surface Finds) at Lambara, Aceh.” Journal of
East-West Maritime Relations 2 (1992).
[0120] ———. “The Sambas Hoard: Bronze Drums and Gold Ornaments Found in
Kalimantan in 1991.” JMBRAS 67, no. 1 (1994): 9–28.
[0121] Miksic, John N. “Evolving Archaeological Perspectives on Southeast Asia,
1970–95.” JSEAS 26, no. 1 (March 1995): 46–62.
[0122] Simangjuntak, Truman. “New Light on the Prehistory of the Southern
Mountains of Java.” In Indo-Pacific Prehistory, ed. Peter Bellwood et al. Can-
berra: Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, ANU, 2001.
[0123] Stutterheim, W. F. Studies in Indonesian Archaeology. The Hague: Nijhoff,
1956.
510 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Architecture
[0125] Dumarçay, Jacques. The House in South-East Asia. Singapore: OUP, 1987.
[0126] Keeler, Ward. Symbolic Dimensions of the Javanese House. Clayton, Victo-
ria, Australia: Monash University Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, 1983.
[0127] Kusno, Abidin. Behind the Postcolonial: Architecture, Urban Space, and Po-
litical Cultures in Indonesia. London: Routledge, 2000.
[0128] Macrae, Graeme, and Samuel Parker. “Would the Real Undagi Please Stand
Up? On the Social Location of Balinese Architectural Knowledge.” BKI 158, no.
2 (2002): 253–81.
[0129] Prijotomo, Josef. Ideas and Forms of Javanese Architecture. Yogyakarta, In-
donesia: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1984.
[0130] Volkman, Toby Alice, and Charles Zerner. “Tourism and Architectural De-
sign in the Toraja Highlands.” Mimar 25 (September 1987): 20–25.
[0131] Wijaya, Made. Architecture of Bali: A Source Book of Traditional and Mod-
ern Forms. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2002.
Arts
[0132] Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. Mythology and the Tolerance of the Javanese.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1965.
[0133] Barbier, Jean Paul. Indonesian Primitive Art: Indonesia, Malaysia, the
Philippines. Dallas, Tex.: Dallas Museum of Art, 1984.
[0134] Barendregt, Bart. “The Sound of ‘Longing for Home’: Redefining a Sense
of Community through Minang Popular Music.” BKI 158, no. 3 (2002):
411–50.
[0135] Becker, Judith. Traditional Music in Modern Java: Gamelan in a Changing
Society. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1980.
[0136] Bernet Kempers. Ancient Indonesian Art. Amsterdam: van der Peet, 1959.
[0137] Bodrogi, Tibor. Art of Indonesia. London: Academy Editions, 1973.
[0138] Brakel-Papenhuyzen. “Javanese Talèdhèk and Chinese Tayuban.” BKI 151,
no. 4 (1995): 545–69.
[0139] Brakel-Papenhuyzen, and Wim van Zan, eds. “Performing Arts in Southeast
Asia.” BKI, special issue, 151, no. 4 (1995).
[0140] Brandon, James R. On Thrones of Gold: Three Javanese Shadow Plays.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University. Press, 1970.
[0141] Causey, Andrew. “The Folder in the Drawer of the Sky Blue Lemari: A Toba
Batak Carver’s Secrets.” Crossroads 14, no. 1 (2000): 1–34.
[0142] Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. History of Indian and Indonesian Art. New
York: Dover, 1965.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 511
[0143] Draeger, Donn. Weapons and Fighting Arts of the Indonesian Archipelago.
Rutland, Vt.: Tuttle, 1972.
[0144] Elliott, Inger McCabe. Batik: Fabled Cloth of Java. Harmondsworth, UK:
Viking, 1985.
[0145] Feinstein, Alan. “Modern Javanese Theatre and the Politics of Culture: A
Case Study of Teater Gapit.” BKI 151, no. 4 (1995): 617–38.
[0146] Fontein, Jan. The Sculpture of Indonesia. Washington, D.C.: National
Gallery of Art, 1990.
[0147] Forshee, Jill. Between the Folds: Stories of Cloth, Lives and Travels from
Sumba. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001.
[0148] Foulcher, Keith. “Rivai Apin and the Modernist Aesthetic in Indonesian Po-
etry.” BKI 157, no. 4 (2001): 771–97.
[0149] Frederick, William H. “Rhoma Irama and the Dangdut Style: Aspects of Con-
temporary Indonesian Popular Culture.” Indonesia 34 (October 1982): 102–30.
[0150] George, Kenneth M., and Mamannoor. AD Pirous, Vision, Faith, and a Journey
in Indonesian Art, 1955–2002. Bandung, Indonesia: Yayasan Serambi Pirous, 2002.
[0151] Gittinger, Mattiebelle. Splendid Symbols: Textiles and Tradition in Indone-
sia, rev. ed. Singapore: OUP, 1990.
[0152] ———, ed. To Speak with Cloth: Studies in Indonesian Textiles. Los Ange-
les: Museum of Cultural History, University of California, 1989.
[0153] Groenendael, Victoria M. Clara van. The Dalang behind the Wayang: The
Role of the Surakarta and Yogyakarta Dalang in Indonesian-Javanese Society.
Leiden: KITLV, 1985.
[0154] Hatley, Barbara. “Cultural Expression.” In Indonesia’s New Order: The
Dynamics of Socio-Economic Transformation, edited by Hal Hill, 216–66.
[0730]
[0155] Heins, E. Bibliography of Javanese Gamelan 1923–1990. Basel, Switzer-
land: Amadeus Verlag, 1990.
[0156] Hellman, Jôrgen. “The Double Edge of Cultural Politics: Revitalizing
Longser Theater in West Java, Indonesia.” Crossroads 14, no. 2(2000): 79–99.
[0157] Herbst, Edward. Voices in Bali: Energies and Perceptions in Vocal Music
and Dance Theater. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1997.
[0158] Hobart, Angela. “The Enlightened Prince Sutasoma: Transformations of a
Buddhist Story.” Indonesia 49 (April 1990): 75–102.
[0159] Holt, Claire. Art in Indonesia: Continuities and Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cor-
nell University Press, 1967.
[0160] ———. Dance Quest in Celebes. Paris: Archives Internationales de la Dance,
1939.
[0161] Hood, Mantle. “Bronze Drum” and (with others) “Indonesia.” In The New
Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, edited by Stanley Sadie. London:
Macmillan, 1980.
[0162] Hooker, Virginia Matheson. “Expression: Creativity Despite Constraint.” In
Indonesia beyond Suharto: Polity, Economy, Society, Transition, edited by Don-
ald K. Emmerson, 262–91. [0761]
512 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0163] Irvine, David. Leather Gods and Wooden Heroes: Java’s Classical Wayang.
Singapore: Times Editions, 1996.
[0164] Jessup, Helen I. Court Arts of Indonesia: Continuities and Change. New
York: Asia Society Galleries, 1990.
[0165] Jones, A. M. Africa and Indonesia: The Evidence of the Xylophone and
Other Musical and Cultural Factors, 2nd ed. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.
[0166] Kartomi, Margaret J. “Change in Manggarai Music and Ritual in the Twen-
tieth Century.”RIMA 35, no. 2 (summer 2001): 61–98.
[0167] ———. “Is Maluku Still Musicological Terra Incognita? An Overview of the
Music-Cultures of the Province of Maluku.” JSEAS 25, no. 1 (March 1994):
141–71.
[0168] ———, ed. Studies in Indonesian Music. Clayton, Victoria, Australia:
Monash University Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, 1978.
[0169] Kats, J. De wajang poerwa: een vorm van Javaans toneel, 2nd ed. Leiden,
the Netherlands: KITLV, 1984.
[0170] Keeler, Ward. Javanese Shadow Plays, Javanese Selves. Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University. Press, 1987.
[0171] ———. “Release from Kala’s Grip: Ritual Use of Shadow Plays in Java and
Bali.” Indonesia 54 (Octoher 1992): 1–26.
[0172] Kévonian, Kéram. “Raden Saleh, peintre de Mariam Haroutunian.” Archipel
62 (2001): 91–126.
[0173] Kitley, Philip. “Ornamentation and Originality: Involution in Javanese
Batik.” Indonesia 53 (April 1992): 1–20.
[0174] Kunst, Jaap. Hindu-Javanese Musical Instruments, 2nd ed. The Hague: Ni-
jhoff, 1968.
[0175] ———. Music in Java: Its History, Its Theory, and Its Technique. The Hague:
Nijhoff, 1973.
[0176] ———. Music in New Guinea: Three Studies. Leiden, the Netherlands:
KITLV, 1967.
[0177] Lindsay, Jennifer. Javanese Gamelan. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1979.
[0178] McGowan, Kaja. “Maritime Travelers and Tillers of the Soil: Reading the
Landscape(s) of Batur.” In Studies in Southeast Asian Art, edited by Nora A. Tay-
lor, 32–48. [0196]
[0179] McPhee, Colin. Music in Bali. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press,
1966.
[0180] Morgan, Stephanie, and Laurie Jo Sears, eds. Aesthetic Tradition and Cul-
tural Transition in Java and Bali. Madison: University of Wisconsin Center for
Southeast Asian Studies, 1984.
[0181] Mrázek, Jan. “Javanese Wayang Kulit in the Times of Comedy: Clown
Scenes, Innovation, and the Performance’s Being in the Present World.” Parts 1
and 2. Indonesia 68 (October 1999): 38–128; 69 (April 2000): 107–72.
[0182] ———. “More than a Picture: The Instrumental Quality of the Shadow
Puppet” In Studies in Southeast Asian Art, edited by Nora A. Taylor, 49–73.
[0196]
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 513
Literary Studies
[0206] Ajidarma, Seno Gumira. “Fiction, Journalism, History: A Process of Self-Cor-
rection.” Translated by Michael H. Bodden. Indonesia 68 (October 1999): 164–71.
[0207] Arps, Bernard, Sirtjo Koolhof, and Henk Maier. Traditionele en moderne
poëzie van Indonesië. Leiden: Instituut Indonesische Cursussen, 1994.
[0208] Aveling, Harry, ed. Secrets Need Words: Indonesian Poetry, 1966–1998.
Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 2001.
[0209] Beekman, E. M. “The Passatist: Louis Couperus’s Interpretation of Dutch
Colonialism.” Indonesia 37 (April 1984): 59–76.
[0210] ———. Troubled Pleasures: Dutch Colonial Literature from the East Indies,
1600–1950. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
[0211] Bodden, Michael H. “Seno Gumira Ajidarma and Fictional Resistance of an
Authoritarian State in Indonesia.” Indonesia 68 (October 1999): 153–56.
[0212] ———. “Utopia and the Shadow of Nationalism: The Plays of Sanusi Pane
1928–1940.” BKI 153, no. 3 (1997): 332–55.
[0213] ———. “Woman as Nation in Mangunwijaya’s Durga Umayi.” Indonesia 62
(October 1996): 54–82.
[0214] Clark, Marshall. “Shadow Boxing: Indonesian Writers and the Ramayana in
the New Order.” Indonesia 72 (October 2001): 159–87.
[0215] Clerkx, Lily E., and Wim F. Wertheim. Living in Deli: Its Society as Imaged
in Colonial Fiction. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1991.
[0216] Florida, Nancy K. “Reading the Unread in Traditional Javanese Literature.”
Indonesia 44 (October 1987): 1–16.
[0217] ———. Writing the Past, Inscribing the Future. Durham, N.C.: Duke Uni-
versity Press, 1995.
[0218] Foulcher, Keith. “Perceptions of Modernity and the Sense of the Past: In-
donesian Poetry in the 1920s.” Indonesia 23 (April 1977): 39–58.
[0219] ———. Pujangga Baru: Literature and Nationalism in Indonesia,
1933–1942. Bedford Park, South Australia: Flinders University Asian Studies
Monograph no. 2, 1980.
[0220] Foulcher, Keith, and Tony Day, eds. Clearing a Space: Postcolonial Read-
ings of Modern Indonesian Literature. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2002.
[0221] Heinschke, Martina. “Between Gelanggang and Lekra: Pramoedya’s Devel-
oping Literary Concepts.” Indonesia 61 (April 1996): 145–69.
[0222] Hellwig, Tineke. In the Shadow of Change: Images of Women in Indonesian
Literature. Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Monograph no.
35, 1994.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 515
[0223] ———. “Scandals, Homicide in Batavia and Indo Identity: Literary Repre-
sentations of Indies Society.” Archipel 63 (2002): 153–72.
[0224] Kato, Tsuyoshi. “Images of Colonial Cities in Early Indonesian Novels.” In
Southeast Asia over Three Generations: Essays Presented to B. R. O’G. Ander-
son, edited by James T. Siegel and Audrey R. Kahin. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell South-
east Asia Program, 2003.
[0225] Maier, Henk M. J. “Chairil Anwar’s Heritage: The Fear of Stultification: An-
other Side of Modern Indonesian Literature.” Indonesia 43 (April 1987): 1–29.
[0226] Marrison, Geoffrey E. “Modern Balinese: A Regional Literature of Indone-
sia.” BKI 143, no. 4 (1987): 468–98.
[0227] Pramoedya Ananta Toer and His Work. Indonesia, special issue, 61 (April
1996).
[0228] Raffel, Burton. The Development of Modern Indonesian Poetry. Albany:
State University of New York Press, 1967.
[0229] Rafferty, Ellen. “The New Tradition of Putu Wijaya.” Indonesia 49 (April
1990): 103–16.
[0230] Richardson, Vanessa. “An Analysis of Culture, Gender and Power in the
Films Niji Ronggeng and Roro Mendut.” RIMA 28, no. 2 (1994): 37–52.
[0231] Rosidi, Ajip. Sejarah sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1988.
[0232] Sears, Laurie J. Shadows of Empire: Colonial Discourse and Javanese Tales.
Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1996.
[0233] Soedarsono. Wayang Wong: The State Ritual Dance Drama in the Court of
Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University. Press, 1990.
[0234] Teeuw, A. Modern Indonesian Literature, 2 vols., 2nd and 3rd eds. The
Hague: Nijhoff, 1979–1986.
[0235] ———. Pramoedya Ananta Toer: De verbeelding van Indonesië. Breda, The
Netherlands: De Geus, 1993.
[0236] Tiwon, Sylvia. Breaking the Spell: Colonialism and Literary Renaissance in
Indonesia. Leiden, The Netherlands: Department of Languages and Cultures of
Southeast Asia and Oceania, University of Leiden, 1999.
[0237] Weix, G. G. “Gapit Theater: New Javanese Plays on Tradition.” Indonesia
60 (October 1995): 17–41.
[0238] Zoetmulder, P. J. Kalangwan: A Survey of Old Javanese Literature. The
Hague: Nijhoff, 1974.
Works of Literature
[0239] Achdiat K. Mihardja. Atheis. St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia: University of
Queensland Press, 1972.
[0240] Ajidarma, Seno Gumira. Jazz, Parfum dan insiden. Yogyakarta, Indonesia:
Yayasan Bentang Budaya, 1996.
[0241] ———. Eyewitness. Sidney: ETT Imprint, 1995. Originally published as
Saksi Mata (Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Bentang Budaya, 1994).
516 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0242] Aveling, Harry, ed. From Surabaya to Armageddon [short stories]. Singa-
pore: Heinemann, 1976.
[0243] Conrad, Joseph. Lord Jim. Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1900. Reprint, Boston:
Allen and Unwin, 1988.
[0244] Foulcher, Keith, and Tony Day. Postcolonial Readings of Modern Indone-
sian Literature. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2002.
[0245] Hamka. Merantau ke Deli, 6th printing. Jakarta: Djajamurni, 1966.
[0246] Hill, David T., ed. Beyond the Horizon: Short Stories from Contemporary In-
donesia. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash Asia Institute, 1998.
[0247] Lubis, Mochtar. A Road with No End. Translated by Anthony H. Johns. Lon-
don: Hutchinson, 1968.
[0248] Nieuwenhuys, Robert. Mirror of the Indies. Amherst: University of Massa-
chusetts Press, 1982.
[0249] Pane, Armijn. Shackles [Belenggu]. Translated by John H. McGlynn.
Jakarta: Lontar Foundation, 1988.
[0250] Pramoedya Ananta Toer. Child of All Nations. Ringwood, Victoria, Aus-
tralia: Penguin, 1984. Originally published as Anak semua bangsa (Holland:
Manus Amici, 1981).
[0251] ———. House of Glass. Ringwood, Victoria, Australia: Penguin, 1992. Orig-
inally published as Rumah Kaca (Jakarta: Hasta Mitra, 1988).
[0252] ———. Jejak Langkah (Footsteps). Jakarta: Hasta Mitra, 1985.
[0253] ———. The Mute’s Soliloquy. Translated by Willem Samuels. New York:
Hyperion East, 1999. Originally published as Nyanyi sunyi seorang bisu (Jakarta:
Lentera, 1995).
[0254] ———. Tales from Djakarta: Caricatures of Circumstances and Their Hu-
man Beings. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1999. Originally pub-
lished as Tjerita dari Djakarta: sekumpulan karikatur keadaan dan manusia
(Jakarta: Penerbit Grafica, 1957).
[0255] ———. This Earth of Mankind. Ringwood, Victoria, Australia: Penguin,
1982. Originally published as Bumi Manusia (Melaka, Malaysia: Wira Karya,
1981).
[0256] ———. Tjerita dari Blora. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1952.
[0257] ———, ed. Haji Mukti. Hikayat Siti Mariah. Jakarta: Hasta Mitra, 1987.
[0258] Rendra, W. S. The Struggle of the Naga Tribe. St. Lucia, Queensland, Aus-
tralia: University of Queensland Press, 1979.
[0259] Székely-Lulofs, Madelon. Doekoen. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2001.
[0260] Utami, Ayu. Saman. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 1998.
[0262] Anwar, Khaidir. Indonesian: The Development and Use of a National Lan-
guage. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1980.
[0263] Artawa, I Ketut. Ergativity and Balinese Syntax, 3 vols. Jakarta: Badan
Penyelenggara Seri NUSA, 1998.
[0264] Cense, A. A., and E. M. Uhlenbeck. Critical Survey of Studies on the Lan-
guages of Borneo. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1958.
[0265] Echols, John M., and Hassan Shadily. An English-Indonesian Dictionary.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975.
[0266] ———. An Indonesian-English Dictionary, 3rd ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Uni-
versity Press, 1989.
[0267] Errington, J. Joseph. “Continuity and Change in Indonesian Language De-
velopment.” JAS 45, no. 2 (1986): 329–53.
[0268] ———. “His Master’s Voice: Listening to Power’s Dialect in Suharto’s In-
donesia.” Crossroads 15, no. 1 (2002): 1–8.
[0269] ———. Shifting Languages: Javanese Indonesian Interaction and Identity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[0270] ———. Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Eti-
quette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.
[0271] Grijns, C. D. “Indonesian Terminology and Globalism.” Archipel 58 (1999):
47–71.
[0272] Hoffman, John. “A Foreign Investment: Indies Malay to 1901.” Indonesia
27 (April 1979): 65–92.
[0273] Labrousse, Pierre. “La traversée des années 90 par les calembours (plese-
tan).” Archipel 64 (2002): 39–58.
[0274] MacKnight, C. C., and I. A. Caldwell. “Variation in Bugis Mansucripts.”
Archipel 61 (2001): 139–54.
[0275] Maier, H. M. J. “From Heteroglossia to Polyglossia: The Creation of Malay
and Dutch in the Indies.” Indonesia 56 (October 1993): 38–65.
[0276] Minda, D. van, and J. J. Tjia. “Between Perfect and Perfective: The Mean-
ing and Function of Ambonese Malay Su and Sudah.” BKI 158, no. 3 (2002):
283–303.
[0277] Oetomo, Dédé. “The Chinese of Indonesia and the Development of the In-
donesian Language.” Indonesia, special issue (1991): 53–66.
[0278] Poerwadaminta, W. J. S. Kamus umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka, 1976.
[0279] Rahardja, Prathama, and Henri Chambert-Loir. Kamus bahasa prokem.
Jakarta: Grafiti, 1990.
[0280] Sarumpaet, J. P. Modern Usage in Bahasa Indonesia. Melbourne: Pitman, 1980.
[0281] Teeuw, A. A Critical Survey of Studies on Malay and Bahasa Indonesia. The
Hague: Nijhoff, 1961.
[0282] Tuuk, H. N. van der. A Grammar of Toba-Batak. Leiden, The Netherlands:
KITLV, 1971.
[0283] Uhlenbeck, E. M. A Critical Survey of Studies on the Languages of Java and
Madura. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1964.
518 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
ECONOMY
General
[0288] Anrooij, F. van, et al. Between People and Statistics: Essays on Modern In-
donesian History. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1979.
[0289] Arndt, H. W., and Hal Hill, eds. Southeast Asia’s Economic Crisis: Origins,
Lessons and the Way Forward. Singapore: ISEAS, 1999.
[0290] Azis, Iwan J. The Indonesian Economy and Policy Dynamics in the 1990s.
Washington, D.C.: United States-Indonesia Society, 1997.
[0291 Bastin, J. S. The Native Policies of Sir Stamford Raffles in Java and Sumatra:
An Economic Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1957.
[0292] Boeke, J. H. The Evolution of the Netherlands Indies Economy. New York:
Institute of Pacific Relations, 1946.
[0293] Booth, Anne. The Indonesian Economy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth
Centuries: A History of Missed Opportunities. London: Macmillan, 1998.
[0294] ———, ed. The Oil Boom and After: Indonesian Economic Policy and Per-
formance in the Soeharto Era. Singapore: OUP, 1992.
[0295] Booth, Anne, and Peter McCawley, eds. The Indonesian Economy during the
Suharto Era. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1981.
[0296] Far Eastern Economic Review. Asia 2002 Yearbook. Hong Kong: Review
Publishing, 2001.
[0297] Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. “Anti-Corruption Strategies in Indonesia.” BIES
37, no. 1 (April 2001).
[0298] Hatta, Mohammad. The Cooperative Movement in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell University Press, 1957.
[0299] Higgins, Benjamin. “The Dualistic Theory of Underdeveloped Areas.” Eco-
nomic Development and Cultural Change 4 (1956): 99–115.
[0300] Hill, Hal. “The Economy.” In Indonesia’s New Order, edited by Hal Hill,
54–122. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1994. [0730]
[0301] ———. The Indonesian Economy in Crisis: Causes, Consequences and
Lessons. Singapore: ISEAS, 1999.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 519
[0302] ———. The Indonesian Economy since 1966: Southeast Asia’s Emerging Gi-
ant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[0303] Hollinger, William C. Economic Policy under President Soeharto: Indone-
sia’s Twenty-Five Year Record, Background paper no. 2. Washington, D.C.:
United States-Indonesia Society, 1996.
[0304] Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Practice.
The Hague: van Hoeve, 1966.
[0305] Lewis, Blane D. “The New Indonesian Equalisation Transfer.” BIES 37, no.
3 (December 2001).
[0306] Lindblad, J. Th. New Challenges in the Modern Economic History of In-
donesia. Leiden, the Netherlands: PRIS, 1993.
[0307] ———, ed. Historical Foundations of a National Economy in Indonesia,
1890s–1990s. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences,
North Holland, 1996.
[0308] Maddison, Angus, and Gé Prince, eds. Economic Growth in Indonesia
1820–1940. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1989.
[0309] Onderzoek vaar de mindere welvaart der inlandsche bevolking op Java en
Madoera, 12 parts in 45 vols. Batavia (Jakarta): Kolff, 1904–1911.
[0310] Palmer, Ingrid. The Indonesian Economy since 1965: A Case Study of Polit-
ical Economy. London: Frank Cass, 1978.
[0311] Pangestu, Mari. The Role of the Private Sector: Deregulation and Privatiza-
tion. Jakarta: CSIS, 1990.
[0312] Papanek, Gustav F., ed. The Indonesian Economy. New York: Praeger,
1980.
[0313] Robison, Richard. Indonesia: The Rise of Capital. Sydney: Allen and Un-
win, 1986.
[0314] Sato, Yuri. “The Salim Group in Indonesia: The Development and Behavior
of the Largest Conglomerate in Southeast Asia.” The Developing Economies 31,
no. 4 (December 1993).
[0315] Sutter, John O. Indonesianisasi: Politics in a Changing Economy,
1940–1955, 4 vols. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1959.
Agriculture
[0316] Allen, G. C., and Audrey G. Donnithorne. Western Enterprise in Indonesia
and Malaya. London: Allen and Unwin, 1957.
[0317] Bauer, P. T. The Rubber Industry: A Study in Competition and Monopoly.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1948.
[0318] Boomgard, P., and J. L. Van Zanden. Changing Economy in Indonesia, vol.
10: Food Crops and Arable Lands, Java 1815–1942. Amsterdam: The Royal
Tropical Institute, 1990.
[0319] Booth, Anne. Agricultural Development in Indonesia. Sydney: Allen and
Unwin, 1988.
520 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0338] Lucas, Anton, and Carol Warren. “Agrarian Reform in the Era of Refor-
masi.” In Indonesia in Transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis, edited
by Chris Manning and Peter van Diemen, 220–38. [0765]
[0339] Marks, Stephen. “NTT Sandalwood: Roots of Disaster.” BIES 38, no. 2 (Au-
gust 2002): 223–40.
[0340] McStocker, Robert. “The Indonesian Coffee Industry.” BIES 23 (April
1987): 40–69.
[0341] Pearson, Scott, Walter Falcon, Paul Heytens, Eric Monke, and Rosamond
Naylor. Rice Policy in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.
[0342] Peluso, Nancy Lee. “Networking in the Commons: A Tragedy for Rattan?”
Indonesia 35 (April 1983): 94–108.
[0343] Rao, Y. S., et al., eds. Community Forestry: Socio-Economic Aspects.
Bangkok: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 1985.
[0344] Ruddle, Kenneth, et al. Palm Sago: A Tropical Starch for Marginal Lands.
Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1978.
[0345] Setten van der Meer, N. C. van. Sawah Cultivation in Ancient Java: Aspects
of Development during the Indo-Javanese Period 5th to 15th Century. Canberra:
ANU Press, 1979.
[0346] Svensson, Thommy. Contractions and Expansions: Agrarian Change in
Java since 1830. Gothenburg, Sweden: Historical-Anthropological Project,
Gothenburg University, 1985.
[0347] Taylor, Norman. Cinchona in Java: The Story of Quinine. New York: Green-
berg, [1945].
[0348] Thee Kian Wie. Plantation Agriculture and Export Growth: An Economic
History of East Sumatra, 1863–1942. Jakarta: LEKNAS-LIPI, 1977.
[0349] White, Benjamin. “‘Agricultural Involution’ and Its Critics: Twenty Years
After.” BCAS 15, no. 2 (1983): 18–31.
Development
[0350] Ananta, Aris, ed. The Indonesian Crisis: A Human Development Perspective.
Singapore: ISEAS, 2002.
[0351] Aswicahyono, Haryo, and Mari Pangestu. “Indonesia’s Recovery: Exports and
Regaining Competitiveness.” Developing Economies 38, no. 4 (2000): 454–89.
[0352] Barlow, Colin, and Thee Kian Wie. The North Sumatra Regional Economy:
Growth with Unbalanced Development. Singapore: ISEAS, 1988.
[0353] Booth, Anne. “Development: Achievement and Weakness.” In Indonesia be-
yond Suharto, edited by Donald K. Emmerson, 109–35. [0761]
[0354] ———. “Poverty and Inequality in the Soeharto Era: An Assessment.”BIES
36, no. 1 (April 2000): 73–104.
522 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Finance
[0374] Alamsyah, Halim, Charles Joseph, Juda Agung, and Doddy Zulverdy. “To-
wards Implementation of Inflation Targeting in Indonesia.” BIES 37, no. 3 (De-
cember 2001).
[0375] Ascher, William. “From Oil to Timber: The Political Economy of Off-
Budget Development Financing in Indonesia.” Indonesia 65 (April 1998):
37–62.
[0376] Asher, Mukul G., and Anne Booth. Indirect Taxation in ASEAN. Singapore:
ISEAS, 1983.
[0377] Azis, Iwan J. “The Nonlinear General Equilibrium Impact of the Financial
Crisis and the Downfall of Manufacturing.” Developing Economies 38, no. 4
(2000): 518–46.
[0378] Boediono. “The International Monetary Fund Support Program in Indone-
sia: Comparing Implementation under Three Presidents.” BIES 38, no. 3 (De-
cember 2002).
[0379] Boomgaard, Peter. “Buitenzorg in 1805: The Role of Money and Credit in a
Colonial Frontier Society.” MAS 20, no. 1 (1986): 33–58.
[0380] Booth, Anne. “The Burden of Taxation in Colonial Indonesia in the 20th
Century.” JSEAS 2, no. 1 (1980): 91–109.
[0381] Charlesworth, Harold C. A Banking System in Transition: The Origin, Con-
cept and Growth of the Indonesian Banking System. Jakarta: New Nusantara,
1959.
[0382] Djiwandono, J. Soedradjad. “Bank Indonesia and the Recent Crisis.” BIES
36, no. 1 (April 2000): 47–72.
[0383] Editors. “For the Sake of Debt Management: How Was Presidential Decree
No. 39/1991 Drafted?” Indonesia 54 (October 1992): 149–91.
[0384] Grenville, Stephen. “Monetary Policy and the Exchange Rate during the Cri-
sis.” BIES 36, no. 2 (August 2000).
[0385] Habir, Ahmad D. “Conglomerates: All in the Family?” In Indonesia beyond
Suharto, edited by Donald K. Emmerson, 168–202. [0761]
[0386] Heij, Gitta. “The 1981–83 Income Tax Reform Process: Who Pulled the
Strings?” BIES 37, no. 2 (August 2001): 233–51.
[0387] Hill, Hal. The Indonesian Economy in Crisis: Causes, Consequences and
Lessons. Singapore: ISEAS, 1999.
[0388] Kenward, Lloyd R. “Assessing Vulnerability to Financial Crisis: Evidence
from Indonesia.” BIES 35, no. 3 (December 1999).
[0389] Linnan, David K. “Insolvency Reform and the Indonesiana Financial Cri-
sis.” BIES 35, no. 2 (August 1999): 107–37.
[0390] McLeod, Ross. “Crisis-Driven Changes to the Banking Laws and Regula-
tions.” BIES 35, no. 2 (August 1999): 147–54.
[0391] Mevius, Johan. Catalogue of Paper Money of the V.O.C. Netherlands East
Indies and Indonesia from 1782–1981. Vriezenveen, The Netherlands: Mevius
Numisbooks, 1981.
524 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0392] Niel, Robert van. “The Function of Land Rent under the Cultivation System
in Java.” JAS 23, no. 3 (1964): 357–76.
[0393] Paauw, Douglas. Financing Economic Development: The Indonesian Case.
Glencoe, N.Y.: Free Press, 1960.
[0394] Redway, Jake. “An Assessment of the Asset Management Company Model
in the Reform of Indonesia’s Banking Sector.” BIES 38, no. 2 (1964): 241–50.
[0395] Shah, A. et al. Inter-Governmental Fiscal Relations in Indonesia. Washing-
ton, D.C.: World Bank, 1994.
[0396] Sharma, Shalendra D. “The Indonesian Financial Crisis: From Banking
Crisis to Financial Sector Reforms, 1997–2000.” Indonesia 71 (April 2001):
79–110.
[0397] Silver, Christopher, Iwan J. Azis, and Larry Schroeder. “Intergovernmen-
tal Transfers and Decentralisation in Indonesia.” BIES 37, no. 3 (2001):
345–62.
[0398] Wicks, Robert S. Money, Markets, and Trade in Early Southeast Asia: The
Development of Indigenous Monetary Systems to AD 1400. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
Southeast Asia Program, 1992.
[0399] Winters, Jeffrey A. Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian
State. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Industry
[0400] Aden, Jean. “Entrepreneurship and Protection in the Indonesian Oil Service
Industry.” In Southeast Asian Capitalists, edited by Ruth McVey, 89–101. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1992.
[0401] Apkindo. Directory of the Plywood Industry in Indonesia. Jakarta: Apkindo,
1985.
[0402] Aswicahyono, Haryo, M. Chatib Basri, and Hal Hill. “How Not to Indus-
tralise? Indonesia’s Automotive Industry.” BIES 36, no. 1 (April 2000):
209–41.
[0403] Bailey, Connor. “The Political Economy of Marine Fisheries Development
in Indonesia.” Indonesia 46 (October 1988): 25–38.
[0404] Barr, Christopher M. “Bob Hasan, the Rise of Apkindo, and the Shifting Dy-
namics of Control in Indonesia’s Timber Section.” Indonesia 65 (April 1998):
1–36.
[0405] Bartlett, Anderson G., et al. Pertamina: Indonesian National Oil. Jakarta:
Amerasian, 1972.
[0406] Castles, Lance. Religion, Politics and Economic Behavior in Java: The
Kudus Cigarette Industry. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asia
Studies, 1967.
[0407] Erwiza. Miners, Managers and the State: A Socio-Political History of the
Ombilin Coal-Mines, West Sumatra, 1892–1996. Singapore: Singapore Univer-
sity Press, 2003.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 525
Labor
[0421] Blussé, Leonard. “Labour Takes Root: Mobilisation and Immobilisation of
Javanese Rural Society under the Cultivation System.” Itinerario 7, no. 1 (1984):
77–117.
[0422] Chandra, Siddharth. “The Role of Female Industrial Labor in the Late Colo-
nial Netherlands Indies.” Indonesia 74 (October 2002): 103–36.
[0423] Hadiz, Vedi R. “Mirroring the Past or Reflecting the Future? Class and Re-
ligious Pluralism in Indonesian Labor.” In The Politics of Multiculturalism, ed-
ited by Robert W. Hefner, 268–90. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001.
526 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Trade
[0438] Alexander, Jennifer. Trade, Traders and Trading in Rural Java. Singapore:
OUP, 1987.
[0439] Andaya, Barbara. “The Cloth Trade in Jambi and Palembang Society during
the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” Indonesia 48 (October 1989): 26–46.
[0440] Andaya, Leonard Y. “The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the
‘Batak.’” BKI 158, no. 3 (2002): 367–409.
[0441] Barnard, Timothy P. “The Timber Trade in Pre-Modern Siak.” Indonesia 65
(April 1998): 86–96.
[0442] Barrichello, R. R., and F. R. Flatters. “Trade Policy Reform in Indonesia.”
In Reforming Economic Systems in Developing Countries, edited by D. H.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 527
HISTORY
General Histories
[0471] Aveling, Harry, ed. The Development of Indonesian Society: From the Com-
ing of Islam to the Present Day. St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia: University of
Queensland Press, 1979.
[0472] Benda, Harry J. Continuity and Change in Southeast Asia: Collected Jour-
nal Articles. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1972.
[0473] Bourchier, David, and John Legge, eds. Democracy in Indonesia 1950s and
1990s. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Papers on Southeast Asia,
1994.
[0474] Cribb, Robert, and C. Brown. Modern Indonesia: A History since 1945. Lon-
don: Longman, 1995.
[0475] Dahm, Bernhard. History of Indonesia in the Twentieth Century. London:
Praeger, 1971.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 529
Historiography
[0494] Abidin, Andi Zainal. “Notes on the Lontara’ as Historical Sources.” Indone-
sia 12 (April 1974): 159–72.
530 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
To 1400
[0506] Bellwood, Peter. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, rev. ed.
Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1997.
[0507] Bosch, F. D. K. Selected Studies in Indonesian Archaeology. Leiden, the
Netherlands: KITLV, 1961.
[0508] Bougas, Wayne A. “Bantayan: An Early Makassarese Kingdom 1200–1600
AD.” Archipel 55 (1998): 83–123.
[0509] Buchari. “Sri Maharaja Mapanji Garasakan: A New Evidence on the Prob-
lem of Airlangga’s Partition of His Kingdom.” Madjalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sastra In-
donesia 4, no. 1–2 (1968): 1–26.
[0510] Casparis, J. G. de. Prasasti Indonesia: Selected Inscriptions from the 7th to
the 9th Centuries A.D. Bandung, Indonesia: Masa Baru, 1956.
[0511] Christie, Jan Wisseman. “Raja and Rama: The Classical State in Early Java.”
In Centers, Symbols, and Hierarchies: Essays on the Classical States of South-
east Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies Mono-
graph Series no. 26, 1983.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 531
[0533] Smith, R. B., and W. Watson, eds. Early South East Asia: Essays in Archae-
ology, History and Historical Geography. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1979.
[0534] Soemantri, Hildawati. The Terracotta Art of Majapahit. Jakarta: Ceramic
Society of Indonesia, 1997.
[0535] Soepomo, S. “The Image of Majapahit in Later Javanese Indonesian Writ-
ing.” In Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia, edited by Anthony Reid and
David Marr. Singapore: Heinemann(Asia)/ASAA, 1979.
[0536] Stutterheim, W. “The Meaning of the Hindu-Javanese Candi.” Journal of the
American Oriental Society 51 (1931): 1–31.
[0537] Verin, Pierre. The History of Civilisation in North Madagascar. Rotterdam,
the Netherlands: Balkema, 1986.
[0538] Wheatley, Paul. The Golden Khersonese: Studies in the Historical Geogra-
phy of the Malay Peninsula before A.D. 1500. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Univer-
sity of Malaya Press, 1961.
[0539] ———. Nagara and Commandery: Origins of the Southeast Asian Urban
Traditions. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography, 1983.
[0540] ———. “Satyanrta in Suvarnadvipa: From Reciprocity to Redistribution in
Ancient Southeast Asia.” In Ancient Civilization and Trade, edited by Jeremy A
Sabloff and C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico
Press, 1975.
[0541] Wisseman, Jan. “Markets and Trade in Pre-Majapahit Java.” In Economic
Exchange and Social Interaction in Southeast Asia, edited by Karl L. Hutterer.
Ann Arbor: South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, 1977.
[0542] Wolters, O. W. Early Indonesian Commerce: A Study of the Origins of Sriv-
ijaya. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
[0543] ———. The Fall of Srivijaya in Malay History. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
OUP, 1970.
[0544] ———. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives, rev. ed.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program/ISEAS, 1999.
[0545] ———. “Restudying Some Chinese Writings on Sriwijaya.” Indonesia 42
(October 1986): 1–41.
1400–1800
[0546] Andaya, Barbara W. “Cash Cropping and Upstream-Downstream Tensions:
The Case of Jambi in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In Southeast
Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Anthony Reid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Uni-
versity Press, 1993.
[0547] ———. To Live as Brothers: Southeast Sumatra in the Seventeenth and Eigh-
teenth Centuries. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1993.
[0548] Andaya, Leonard Y. “Cultural State Formation in Eastern Indonesia.” In
Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Anthony Reid. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell University. Press, 1993.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 533
[0569] Marsden, William. The History of Sumatra. Oxford in Asia reprint. Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1966.
[0570] Masinambow, E. K. M., ed. Halmahera dan Raja Ampat sebagai kesatuan
majemuk. Jakarta: Leknas, 1987.
[0571] Meilinck-Roelofsz, M. A. P. Asian Trade and European Influence in the In-
donesian Archipelago between 1500 and about 1630. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1962.
[0572] Moertono, Soemarsaid. State and Statecraft in Old Java: A Study of the
Later Mataram Period, 16th to 19th century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern In-
donesia Project, 1974.
[0573] Noorduyn, J. “Majapahit in the Fifteenth Century.” BKI 134, nos. 2–3
(1976): 207–74.
[0574] ———. “Makasar and the Islamization of Bima.” BKI 143, nos. 2–3 (1987):
312–42.
[0575] Raffles, Thomas Stamford. The History of Java, 2 vols. London: John Mur-
ray, 1817. Reprint, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1965.
[0576] Reid, Anthony. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680, 2 vols.
New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988, 1993.
[0577] Ricklefs, M. C. Jogjakarta under Sultan Mangkubumi 1749–1792: A History
of the Division of Java. London: OUP, 1974.
[0578] ———. Modern Javanese Historical Tradition: A Study of an Original Kar-
tasura Chronicle and Related Materials. London: School of Oriental and African
Studies, 1978.
[0579] ———. The Seen and Unseen Worlds in Java, 1726–1749: History, Litera-
ture and Islam in the Court of PakubuwanaII. Honolulu: ASAA with Allen and
Unwin and University of Hawai’i Press, 1998.
[0580] ———. War, Culture and Economy in Java 1677–1726: Asian and European
Imperialism in the early Kartasura Period. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1993.
[0581] Robson, S. O. “Java at the Crossroads: Aspects of Javanese Cultural History
in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries.” BKI 137 (1981): 259–92.
[0582] Schrieke, B. J. O. Indonesian Sociological Studies, 2 vols. The Hague: van
Hoeve, 1955.
[0583] Tarling, Nicholas. Anglo-Dutch Rivalry in the Malay World 1780–1824.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
[0584] Taylor, Jean Gelman. The Social World of Batavia: European and Eurasian
in Dutch Asia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.
1800–1942
[0585] Abeyasekere, Susan. Jakarta: A History. Singapore: OUP, 1987.
[0586] ———. One Hand Clapping: Indonesian Nationalists and the Dutch,
1939–1942. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University, Centre of Southeast
Asian Studies, 1976.
[0587] ———. “The Soetardjo Petition.” Indonesia 15 (April 1973): 81–108.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 535
[0588] Bastin, J. S. Raffles’ Ideas on the Land Rent System in Java and the Macken-
zie Land Tenure System. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1954.
[0589] Baudet, H., and I. J. Brugmans, eds. Balans van beleid: terugblik op de laat-
ste halve eeuw van Nederlandsch-Indie. Assen, The Netherlands: van Gorcum,
1961.
[0590] Benda, Harry J. “Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje and the Foundations of Dutch
Islamic Policy in Indonesia.” Journal of Modern History 30 (1958): 338–47.
[0591] ———. “The Pattern of Administrative Reforms in the Closing Years of
Dutch Rule in Indonesia.” JAS 25 (1966): 589–605.
[0592] ———. “Peasant Movements in Colonial Southeast Asia.” Asian Studies 3
(1965): 420–34.
[0593] Blumberger, J. Th. Petrus. De nationalistische beweging in Nederlandsch-
Indië. Haarlem, The Netherlands: Tjeenk Willink, 1931, 1987.
[0594] Booth, Anne. “Japanese Import Penetration and Dutch Response: Some As-
pects of Economic Policy Making in Colonial Indonesia.” In International Com-
mercial Rivalry in Southeast Asia in the Interwar Period, edited by Sugiyama
Shinya and Milagros Guerrero, 134–64. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Center for In-
ternational and Area Studies, 1994.
[0595] Breman, Jan. Control of Land and Labour in Colonial Java: A Case Study
of Agrarian Crisis and Reform in the Region of Cirebon during the First Decades
of the 20th Century. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1983.
[0596] ———. The Village in Nineteenth Century Java and the Colonial State. Rot-
terdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University, Comparative Asian Studies Pro-
gramme, 1980.
[0597] Carey, Peter. “Waiting for the ‘Just King’: The Agrarian World of South-cen-
tral Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War.” MAS 20, no. 1 (1986): 59–137.
[0598] ———, ed. The British in Java 1811–1816: A Javanese Account. Oxford: Ox-
ford University Press, 1992.
[0599] Chandra, Siddharth. “What the Numbers Really Tell Us about the Decline of
the Opium Regie.” Indonesia 70 (October 2000): 101–23.
[0600] Cribb, Robert, ed. The Late Colonial State in Indonesia: Political and Eco-
nomic Foundations of the Netherlands Indies, 1880–1942. Leiden, The Nether-
lands: KITLV, 1994.
[0601] Day, Clive. The Policy and Administration of the Dutch in Java. New York:
Macmillan, 1904.
[0602] Drooglever, P. J. Vaderlandse Club: totoks en de Indische politiek. Franeker,
The Netherlands: T. Wever, 1980.
[0603] Elson, R. E. Javanese Peasants and the Colonial Sugar Industry: Impact and
Change in an East Java Residency. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1984.
[0604] Fasseur, C. De Indologen: Ambtenaren voor de Oost 1825–1950. Amster-
dam: Bakker, 1993.
[0605] ———. The Politics of Colonial Exploitation: Java, the Dutch and the Culti-
vation System. Edited and translated by R. E. Elson and Ary Kraal. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell Studies on Southeast Asia, 1992.
536 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0626] Niel, Robert van. The Emergence of the Modern Indonesian Elite. The
Hague: van Hoeve, 1960.
[0627] Noer, Deliar. The Modernist Muslim Movement in Indonesia 1900–1942.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1973.
[0628] Poeze, Harry, ed. Politiek-politioneele overzichten van Nederlandsch-Indië.
Deel I 1927–1928; deel II 1929–1930; deel III 1931–1934, deel IV 1935–1941,
1994. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, 1983, 1989.
[0629] Resink, G. J. Indonesia’s History between the Myths: Essays in Legal His-
tory and Historical Theory. The Hague: van Hoeve, 1968.
[0630] Rush, James R. “Social Control and Influence in Nineteenth Century Indone-
sia: Opium Farms and the Chinese of Java.” Indonesia 35 (April 1983): 53–64.
[0631] Rutherford, Danilyn. “Fashioning the Ridiculous: Furnivall’s Leviathan and
Dutch Imperialism in New Guinea.” In Southeast Asia over Three Generations:
Essays Presented to B. R. O’G. Anderson, edited by James T. Siegel and Audrey
R. Kahin, 27–46. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 2003.
[0632] Shiraishi, Takashi. An Age in Motion: Popular Radicalism in Java,
1912–1926. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990.
[0633] ———. “A New Regime of Order: The Origins of Modern Surveillance Pol-
itics in Indonesia.” In Southeast Asia over Three Generations: Essays Presented
to B. R. O’G. Anderson, edited by James T. Siegel and Audrey R. Kahin, 47–74.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 2003.
[0634] ———. “The Phantom World of Digoel.” Indonesia 61 (April 1996): 93–118.
[0635] ———. “Policing the Phantom Underground.” Indonesia. 63 (April 1997): 1–46.
[0636] Sutherland, Heather. The Making of a Bureaucratic Elite: The Colonial
Transformation of the Javanese Priyayi. Singapore: Heinemann, 1979.
[0637] Tagliacozzo, Eric. “Kettle on a Slow Boil: Batavia’s Threat Perceptions in
the Indies’ Outer Islands.” JSEAS. 31, no. 1 (April 1996): 70–100.
[0638] Vandenbosch, Amry. The Dutch East Indies: Its Government, Problems and
Politics, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942.
[0639] Veur, Paul W. van der. “Cultural Aspects of the Eurasian Community in In-
donesian Colonial Society.” Indonesia 6 (1968): 38–53.
[0640] Wilson, Greta O. Regents, Reformers, and Revolutionaries: Indonesian
Voices of Colonial Days: Selected Historical Readings 1899–1949. Honolulu:
University of Hawai’i Press, 1978.
[0641] Witlox, Marcel. “Met gewaar voor lijf en goed: Mekkagangers uit Neder-
lands-Indië in de 19de Eeuw.” In Islamitische Pelgrimstochten, edited by Willy
Jansen and Huub de Jonge. Muiderberg, the Netherlands: Coutinho, 1991.
[0642] Zwitzer, H. L., and C. A. Heshusius. Het KNIL, 1830–1950: een terugblik.
The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij, 1977.
1942–1949
[0643] Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. Java in a Time of Revolution: Occupation and
Resistance, 1944–1946. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. Press, 1972.
538 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0644] ———. Some Aspects of Indonesian Politics under the Japanese Occupation,
1944–1945. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1961.
[0645] Anderson, David Charles. “The Military Aspects of the Madiun Affair.” In-
donesia 21 (April 1976): 1–64.
[0646] Aziz, M. A. Japan’s Colonialism and Indonesia. The Hague: Nijhoff,
1955.
[0647] Bahar, Saafroedin, and Nannie Hudawati, eds. Risalah sidang Badan Penye-
lidik Usaha-usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (BPUPKI); Panitia Persi-
apan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI). Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara RI, 1998.
[0648] Benda, Harry J. The Crescent and the Rising Sun: Indonesian Islam under
the Japanese Occupation, 1942–1945. The Hague: van Hoeve, 1958.
[0649] Benda, Harry J., et al. Japanese Military Administration in Indonesia: Se-
lected Documents. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1965.
[0650] Coast, John. Recruit to Revolution: Adventure and Politics in Indonesia.
London: Christophers, 1952.
[0651] Elsbree, Willard H. Japan’s Role in Southeast Asian Nationalist Movements.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953.
[0652] Frederick, William H. Visions and Heat: The Making of the Indonesian Rev-
olution. Athens: Ohio University. Press, 1988.
[0653] Friend, Theodore. The Blue-Eyed Enemy: Japan against the West in Java
and Luzon, 1942–1945. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988.
[0654] Fusayama, Takao. A Japanese Memoir of Sumatra, 1945–1946. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1993.
[0655] Han Bing Siong. “Sukarno-Hatta versus the Pemuda in the First Months af-
ter the Surrender of Japan (August–November 1945).” BKI 156, no. 2 (2000):
233–73.
[0656] Harvey, Barbara S. “Diplomacy and Armed Struggle in the Indonesian Na-
tional Revolution: Choice and Constraint in a Comparative Perspective.” In Mak-
ing Indonesia, edited by Daniel S. Lev and Ruth T. McVey, 66–80. [0900]
[0657] Hatta, Mohammad. The Putera Reports: Problems in Indonesian-Japan-
ese War-Time Cooperation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project,
1971.
[0658] Heidhues, Mary Somers. “When We Were Young: The Exile of the Repub-
lic’s Leaders in Bangka, 1949.” In Making Indonesia, edited by Daniel S. Lev
and Ruth T. McVey, 81–95. [0900]
[0659] Jong, L. de. Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereld Oorlog,
deel 11: Nederlands Indië. The Hague: Staats-uitgeverij, 1984.
[0660] Kahin, Audrey R., ed. Regional Dynamics of the Indonesian Revolution:
Unity from Diversity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1985.
[0661] Kahin, George McTurnan. Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press/Southeast Asia Program, 1952. Reprint, Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press/Southeast Asia Program, 2003.
[0662] ———. “Sukarno’s Proclamation of Indonesian Independence.” Indonesia 69
(April 2000): 1–3.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 539
[0685] Wehl, David. The Birth of Indonesia. London: Rowell and Sons, 1948.
[0686] Zed, Mestika. Somewhere in the Jungle: Pemerintah Darurat Republik In-
donesia: sebuah mata rantai sejarah yang terlupakan. Jakarta: Grafiti, 1997.
1950–1966
[0689] Anderson, Ben. “How Did the Generals Die?” Indonesia 43 (April 1987):
109–34.
[0690] Anderson, Benedict R., and Ruth T. McVey. A Preliminary Analysis of the
October 1, 1965, Coup in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Pro-
ject, 1971.
[0691] Cribb, Robert, ed. The Indonesian Killings of 1965–1966: Studies from Java
and Bali. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Centre of Southeast
Asian Studies, 1990.
[0692] Crouch, Harold. “Another Look at the Indonesian Coup.” Indonesia 15
(April 1973): 1–20.
[0693] Dijk, C. van. Rebellion under the Banner of Islam: The Darul Islam in In-
donesia. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981.
[0694] Federspiel, Howard M. “The Military and Islam in Sukarno’s Indonesia.”
Pacific Affairs 46, no. 3 (1973): 407–20.
[0695] Feith, Herbert. The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1970.
[0696] ———. “The Dynamics of Guided Democracy.” In Indonesia, ed. Ruth
T. McVey. [0482]
[0697] Ghoshal, Baladas. Indonesian Politics, 1955–1959: The Emergence of
Guided Democracy. Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi, 1982.
[0698] Hanna, Willard A. Bung Karno’s Indonesia. New York: AUFS, 1960.
[0699] Harvey, Barbara S. Permesta: Half a Rebellion. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Mod-
ern Indonesia Project, 1977.
[0700] Hindley, Donald. “Alirans and the Fall of the Old Order.” Indonesia 9 (April
1970): 23–66.
[0701] Hong Liu. “Constructing a China Metaphor: Sukarno’s Perception of the
PRC and Indonesia’s Political Transformation.” JSEAS. 28, no. 1 (March 1997):
27–46.
[0702] Hughes, John. Indonesian upheaval. New York: Fawcett, 1967.
[0703] Jay, Robert R. Religon and Politics in Rural Central Java. New Haven,
Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1963.
[0704] Kahin, George McT. “Indonesia.” In Major Governments of Asia, 2nd ed.,
edited by George McT. Kahin. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. Press, 1963.
[0705] Legge, J. D. Central Authority and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: A Study
in Local Administration 1950–1960. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1961.
[0706] Lev, Daniel S. The Transition to Guided Democracy: Indonesian Politics,
1957–1959. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1966.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 541
[0727] Crouch, Harold. The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
University Press, 1978.
[0728] Emmerson, Donald K. “Invisible Indonesia.” Foreign Affairs 66 (winter
1987–1988): 368–87.
[0729] Feith, Herbert. “Suharto’s Search for a Political Format.” Indonesia 6 (Oc-
tober 1968): 88–103.
[0730] Hill, Hal, ed. Indonesia’s New Order: The Dynamics of Socio-Economic
Transformation. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1994.
[0731] Honna, Jun. “Military Ideology in Response to Democratic Pressure during
the Late Suharto Era: Political and Institutional Contexts.” Indonesia 67 (April
1999): 77–126.
[0732] Hooker, Virginia. Culture and Society in New Order Indonesia. Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1995.
[0733] Jenkins, David. Suharto and His Generals: Indonesian Military Politics
1975–1983. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1984.
[0734] Kroef, Justus M. van der. “‘Petrus’ Patterns of Prophylactic Murder in In-
donesia.” Asian Survey 25, no. 7 (1985): 745–59.
[0735] Liddle, R. William. “Suharto’s Indonesia: Personal Rule and Political Insti-
tutions.” Pacific Affairs 58, no. 1 (1985): 68–90.
[0736] McDonald, Hamish. Suharto’s Indonesia. Melbourne: Fontana, 1980.
[0737] McLeod, Ross. “Soeharto’s Indonesia: A Better Class of Corruption.”
Agenda 7, no. 2 (2000): 99–112.
[0738] Mortimer, Rex, ed. Showcase State: The Illusion of Indonesia’s “Acceler-
ated Modernisation.” Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1973.
[0739] Oey Hong Lee, ed. Indonesia after the 1971 Elections. London: OUP,
1974.
[0740] Pabottingi, Mochtar. “Indonesia: Historicizing the New Order’s Legitimacy
Dilemma.” In Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Au-
thority, edited by Muthiah Alagappa, 224–56. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univer-
sity Press, 1995.
[0741] Polomka, Peter. Indonesia since Sukarno. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin,
1971.
[0742] Raillon, François. Les étudients indonésiens et l’Orde Nouveau: politique et
idéologie du Mahasiswa Indonesia (1966–1974). Paris: Editions de la Maison
des sciences de l’Homme, 1984.
[0743] Ryter, Loren. “Pemuda Pancasila: The Last Loyalist Free Men of Suharto’s
Order?” Indonesia 66 (October 1998): 45–73.
[0744] Saltford, John. “United Nations Involvement with the Act of Self-Determination
in West Irian (Indonesian West New Guinea), 1968–1969.” Indonesia 69 (April
2000): 71–92.
[0745] Sato, Yuri. “The Development of Business Groups in Indonesia: 1967–1989.”
In Approaching Suharto’s Indonesia from the Margins, edited by Takashi Shi-
raishi, 101–53. [0749]
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 543
[0746] Schiller, Jim, and Barbara Martin-Schiller, eds. Imagining Indonesia: Cul-
tural Politics and Political Culture. Athens: Ohio University Center for Interna-
tional Studies, 1997.
[0747] Schulte Nordholt, N. G. State-Citizen Relations in Suharto’s Indonesia:
Kawula-Gusti. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University, Comparative
Asian Studies Programme, 1987.
[0748] Schwarz, Adam. A Nation in Waiting. Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1994.
[0749] Shiraishi, Takashi. Approaching Suharto’s Indonesia from the Margins.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1994.
[0750] Thee Kian Wie. “Reflections on the New Order ‘Miracle.’” In Indonesia To-
day: Challenges of History, edited by Grayson Lloyd and Shannon Smith,
163–80. Singapore: ISEAS, 2001. [0763]
[0751] Vatikiotis, Michael R. J. Indonesian Politics under Suharto: Order, Devel-
opment and Pressure for Change. London: Routledge, 1993.
[0752] Watson, C. W. State and Society in Indonesia: Three Papers. Canterbury,
UK: University of Kent, Centre of South-East Asian Studies, 1987.
Post-Suharto (1998–2003)
[0753] Alisjahbana, Armida A., and Chris Manning. “Survey of Recent Develop-
ments.” BIES. 38, no. 3 (2002): 277–305.
[0754] Amnesty International. Indonesia: Impunity and Human Rights Violations in
Papua. London: Amnesty International, April 2002.
[0755] ———. Indonesia: Impunity Persists in Papua as Militia Groups Take Root.
London: Amnesty International, September 2000.
[0756] Baker, Richard W., M. Hadi Soesastro, J. Kristiadi, and Douglas E. Ramage,
eds. Indonesia: The Challenge of Change. Leiden, the Netherlands: KITLV, 1999.
[0757] Bambunan, Tulus, and Budi Santosa, eds. Indonesia: The Challenge of
Change. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, [1998].
[0758] Budiman, Arief, et al., eds. Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indonesia.
Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash Asia Institute, 1999.
[0759] Dick, Howard. “Survey of Recent Developments.” BIES 37, no. 1 (2001):
7–41.
[0760] Dijk, Kees van. A Country in Despair: Indonesia between 1997 and 2000.
Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2001.
[0761] Emmerson, Donald K., ed. Indonesia beyond Suharto: Polity, Economy, So-
ciety, Transition. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1999.
[0762] Feillard, Andrée. “Indonesian Traditionalist Islam’s Troubled Experience
with Democracy (1999–2001).” Archipel 64 (2002): 117–44.
[0763] Lloyd, Grayson, and Shannon Smith, eds. Indonesia Today: Challenges of
History. Singapore: ISEAS, 2001.
[0764] Malley, Michael S. “Indonesia in 2001: Restoring Stability in Jakarta.”
Asian Survey 42, no. 1 (2002): 124–32.
544 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0765] Manning, Chris, and Peter van Diermen. Indonesia in Transition: Social As-
pects of Reformasi and Crisis. London: Zed Books, 2000.
[0766] Peluso, Nancy Lee, and Michael Watts. Violent Environments. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell University Press, 2001.
[0767] Raillon, François. “De la reformasi à la restauration? Quand le passé sert à
relire le présent.” Archipel 64 (2002): 59–80.
[0768] ———. “Indonésie 2000: le statusquo.” Archipel 61 (2001): 155–78.
[0769] Schwarz, Adam, and Jonathan Paris, eds. The Politics of Post-Suharto In-
donesia. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1999.
[0770] Selo Soemardjan, ed. Kisah perjuangan reformasi. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan,
1999.
[0771] Smith, Anthony L., ed. Gus Dur and the Indonesian Economy. Singapore:
ISEAS, 2001.
[0772] Strassler, Karen. “Currency and Fingerprints: Authentic Reproductions and
Political Communication in Indonesia’s ‘Reform Era.’” Indonesia 70 (October
2000): 71–82.
[0773] Wessel, Ingrid, and Gerogia Wimhoefer, eds. Violence in Indonesia. Ham-
burg, Germany: Abera, 2001.
Regional
[0774] Andaya, Barbara Watson. “From Rum to Tokyo: The Search for Anticolonial
Allies by the Rulers of Riau, 1899–1914.” Indonesia 24 (October 1977): 123–56.
[0775] ———. “Upstreams and Downstreams in Early Modern Sumatra.” Historian
57 (1995): 537–52.
[0776] Andaya, Leonard Y. “Unravelling Minangkabau Ethnicity.” Itinerario 24,
no. 1 (2000): 20–43.
[0777] Aspinall, Edward. “Sovereignty, the Successor State, and Universal Human
Rights: History and the International Structuring of Acehenese Nationalism.” In-
donesia 72 (April 2002): 1–24.
[0778] Barnard, Timothy P. “Texts, Raja Ismail and Violence: Siak and the Trans-
formation of Malay Identity in the Eighteenth Century.” JSEAS 32, no. 3 (2001):
331–42.
[0779] Barnes, R. H. “Alliance and Warfare in an Eastern Indonesian Principality: Ké-
dang in the Last Half of the Nineteenth Century.” BKI 157, no. 2 (2001): 271–311.
[0780] Bastin, John. The British in West Sumatra (1685–1825). Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia: University of Malaya Press, 1965.
[0781] Bertrand, Jacques. “Legacies of the Authoritiarian Past: Religious Violence
in Indonesia’s Moluccan Islands.” Pacific Affairs 75, no. 1 (spring 2002): 57–85.
[0782] Bouman, J. C., et al. The South Moluccas: Rebellious Province or Occupied
State. Leiden, The Netherlands: Sijthoff 1960.
[0783] Bowen, John R. Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900–1989.
New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1991.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 545
[0784] Chauvel, Richard. Nationalists, Soldiers and Separatists: The Ambonese Is-
lands from Colonialism to Revolt. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1990.
[0785] Chou, Cynthia, and Will Derks. Riau in Transition. BKI, special issue, 153,
no. 4 (1997).
[0786] Cummings, William. “The Dynamics of Resistance and Emulation in
Makassarese History.” JSEAS 32, no. 3 (2001): 423–35.
[0787] ———. Making Blood White: Historical Transformations in Early Modern
Makassar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2002.
[0788] Davidson, Jamie S., and Douglas Kammen. “Indonesia’s Unknown War and
the Lineages of Violence in West Kalimantan.” Indonesia 73 (April 2002):
53–87.
[0789] Dick, H. W. Surabaya, City of Work: A Socioeconomic History, 1900–2000.
Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002.
[0790] Dobbin, Christine. “Islamic Fervour as a Manifestation of Regional Person-
ality in Colonial Indonesia: The Kamang Area, West Sumatra, 1803–1908.”
Archipel 56 (1998): 295–308.
[0791] ———. Islamic Revivalism in a Changing Economy: Central Sumatra,
1764–1847. London: Curzon, 1983.
[0792] Drakard, Jane. A Kingdom of Words: Language and Power in Sumatra. Se-
langor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia: OUP, 1999.
[0793] ———. A Malay Frontier: Unity and Duality in a Sumatran Kingdom. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell Studies on Southeast Asia, 1990.
[0794] Ebing, Ewald, and Youetta de Jager, eds. Leadership and Social Mobility in
a Southeast Asian Society: Minahassa, 1677–1983. Leiden, The Netherlands:
KITLV Press, 1998.
[0795] Eghenter, Christina. “Towards a Causal History of a Trade Scenario in the In-
terior of East Kalimantan, Indonesia, 1900–1999.” BKI 157, no. 4 (2001): 739–69.
[0796] Geertz, Clifford. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali.
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980.
[0797] Graves, Elizabeth E. The Minangkabau Response to Dutch Colonial Rule in
the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1981.
[0798] Hadler, Jeffrey Alan. “Places Like Home: Islam, Matriliny, and the History
of Family in Minangkabau.” Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 2000.
[0799] Hainsworth, Paul, and Stephen McCloskey. The East Timor Question: The
Struggle for Independence from Indonesia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.
[0800] Hefner, Robert W. The Political Economy of Mountain Java: An Interpretive
History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
[0801] Heidhues, Mary Somers. Bangka Tin and Mentok Pepper: Chinese Settle-
ment on an Indonesian Island. Singapore: ISEAS, 1991.
[0802] Henley, David E. F. Nationalism and Regionalism in a Colonial Context:
Minahasa in the Dutch East Indies. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1996.
[0803] Het drama van de Asmat-Papuas. Leiden, The Netherlands: INDOC, 1982.
[0804] Hirosue, Masashi. “The Batak Millenarian Response to the Colonial Order.”
JSEAS 25, no. 2 (September 1994): 331–43.
546 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0825] ———. “The Mads Lange Connection: A Danish Trader on Bali in the Mid-
dle of the Nineteenth Century: Broker and Buffer.” Indonesia 32 (October 1981):
16–47.
[0826] ———. The Spell of Power: A History of Balinese Politics 1650–1940. Lei-
den, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1996.
[0827] Sjamsuddin, Nazaruddin. The Republican Revolt: A Study of the Acehnese
Rebellion. Singapore: ISEAS, 1985.
[0828] Smail, John R. W. “The Military Politics of North Sumatra: December
1956–October 1957.” Indonesia 6 (October 1968): 128–87.
[0829] Spyer, Patricia. The Memory of Trade: Modernity’s Entanglements on an
Eastern Indonesian Island. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000.
[0830] Stoler, Ann Laura. Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra’s Plantation
Belt 1870–1979. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1985.
[0831] Sutherland, Heather. “Power and Politics in South Sulawesi, 1860–1880.”
RIMA 17, nos. 1–2 (1983): 161–207.
[0832] Vickers, Adrian. Bali: A Paradise Created. Ringwood, Victoria, Australia:
Penguin, 1989.
[0833] Warren, James F. The Sulu Zone 1768–1898: The Dynamics of External
Trade, Slavery and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian Mar-
itime State. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1981.
[0834] Watson, C. W. Kerinci: Two Historical Studies. Canterbury, UK: University
of Kent, 1984.
[0835] Webb, R. A. F. Paul. Palms and the Cross: Socio-Economic Development in
Nusatenggara, 1930–1975. Townsville, Queensland, Australia: James Cook Uni-
versity, 1986.
[0836] Williams, Michael C. Sickle and Crescent: The Communist Revolt of 1926 in
Banten. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1982.
[0837] Woelders, M. O. Het Sultanaat Palembang, 1811–1825. The Hague: Nijhoff,
1975.
[0838] Young, Ken. Islamic Peasants and the State: The 1908 Anti-Tax Rebellion in
West Sumatra. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Southeast Asia Studies Monograph Se-
ries no. 40, 1994.
[0839] Zed, Mestika. Kepialangan, politik dan revolusi: Palembang 1900–1950.
Jakarta: LP3S, 2003.
[0840] Znoj, Heinzpeter. “Sons versus Nephews: A Highland Jambi Alliance at War
with the British East India Company, ca. 1800.” Indonesia 65 (April 1998): 97–121.
[0885] Taylor, Jean Stewart. “Raden Ajeng Kartini.” Signs 1, no. 3 (1976): 639–61.
[0886] Tjokropranolo. Panglima besar TNI: Jenderal Soedirman: pemimpin pendo-
brak terakhir penjajahan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Surya Persindo, 1992.
[0887] Veur, Paul W. van der. “E. F. E. Douwes Dekker: Evangelist for Indonesian
Political Nationalism.” JAS 17 (1958): 551–66.
[0888] ———, ed. Towards a Glorious Indonesia: Reminiscences and Observa-
tions of Dr. Soetomo. Athens: Ohio University: Center for International Studies,
1987.
[0889] Yani, Amelia. Profil seorang prajurit TNI. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1988.
POLITICS
General
[0890] Alisjahbana, S. Takdir. Indonesia: Cultural and Social Revolution. Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1966.
[0891] Anderson, Benedict. “The Languages of Indonesian Politics.” Indonesia 1
(April 1966): 89–116.
[0892] ———. The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the
World. London: Verso, 1998.
[0893] Anderson, Benedict, and Audrey Kahin, eds. Interpreting Indonesian Poli-
tics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate, 1964–1981. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
Modern Indonesia Project, 1982.
[0894] Budiman, Arief, ed. State and Civil Society in Indonesia. Clayton, Victoria,
Australia: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, 1990.
[0895] Dick, Howard. “The Rise of a Middle Class and the Changing Concept of
Equity in Indonesia: An Interpretation.” Indonesia 39 (April 1985): 71–92.
[0896] Emmerson, Donald K. Indonesia’s Elite: Political Culture and Cultural Pol-
itics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1976.
[0897] Holt, Claire, et al., eds. Culture and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cor-
nell University Press, 1972.
[0898] Jackson, Karl D., and Lucian W. Pye, eds. Political Power and Communica-
tions in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
[0899] Lev, Daniel S. “Intermediate Classes and Change in Indonesia: Some Initial
Reflections.” In The Politics of Middle Class Indonesia, edited by Richard Tan-
ter and Kenneth Young. [0905]
[0900] Lev, Daniel S., and Ruth T, McVey, eds. Making Indonesia: Essays on Mod-
ern Indonesia in Honor of George McT. Kahin. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Studies on
Southeast Asia, 1996.
[0901] Liddle, R. William. Ethnicity, Party and National Integration: An Indonesian
Case Study. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1970.
[0902] ———. Leadership and Culture in Indonesian Politics. Sydney: Allen and
Unwin, 1996.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 551
[0903] ———, ed. Political Participation in Modern Indonesia. New Haven, Conn.:
Yale University Southeast Asian Studies, 1973.
[0904] Mortimer, Rex. “Class, Social Cleavage and Indonesian Communism.” In-
donesia 8 (October 1969): 1–20.
[0905] Tanter, Richard, and Kenneth Young, eds. The Politics of Middle Class In-
donesia. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Centre of Southeast
Asian Studies, 1990.
[0906] Willner, Ann Ruth. The Neotraditional Accommodation to Political Inde-
pendence: The Case of Indonesia. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Center of
International Studies, 1966.
Political Thought
[0907] Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and
Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.
[0908] ———. “Indonesian Nationalism Today and in the Future.” Indonesia 67
(April 1999): 1–11.
[0909] ———. Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990.
[0910] Bonneff. Marcel. “La crise indonésienne et l’imaginaire politique javanais.”
Archipel 64 (2002): 3–37.
[0911] Bourchier, David. “Conservative Political Ideology in Indonesia: A Fourth
Wave?” In Indonesia Today, edited by Grayson Lloyd and Shannon Smith,
112–25. [0763]
[0912] Cribb, Robert. “The Indonesian Marxist Tradition.” In Marxism in Asia, ed-
ited by Colin Mackerras and Nick Knight. London: Croom Helm, 1985.
[0913] Feith, Herbert, and Lance Castles, eds. Indonesian Political Thinking
1945–1965. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1970.
[0914] Heryanto, Ariel. “The Development of ‘development.’” Indonesia 46 (Octo-
ber 1988): 1–24.
[0915] Legge, J. D. “Daulat Ra’jat and the Ideas of the Pendidikan Nasional In-
donesia.” Indonesia 31 (April 1981): 151–69.
[0916] ———. Intellectuals and Nationalism in Indonesia: A Study of the Following
Recruited by Sutan Sjahrir in Occupation Java. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern In-
donesia Project, 1988.
[0917] McVey, Ruth T. “The Wayang Controversy in Indonesian communism.” In
Context, Meaning and Power in Southeast Asia, edited by Mark Hobart and
Robert H. Taylor. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1986.
[0918] Mintz, Jeanne S. Mohammed, Marx and Marhaen: The Roots of Indonesian
Socialism. New York: Praeger, 1965.
[0919] Philpott, Simon. Rethinking Indonesia: Postcolonial Theory, Authoriarian-
ism, and Identity. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.
[0920] Soediman, Kartohadiprodjo. Beberapa pikiran sekitar Pantja Sila. Bandung,
Indonesia: Alumni, 1970.
552 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Political Writings
[0922] Aidit, D. N. The Selected Works of D.N. Aidit. Washington, D.C.: Joint Pub-
lications Research Service, 1959.
[0923] Akhmadi, Heri. Breaking the Chains of Oppression of the Indonesian People:
Defense Statement at His Trial on Charges of Insulting the Head of State, Ban-
dung, June 7–10, 1979. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1981.
[0924] Bonneff, Marcel, et al., eds. Pantjasila: trente années de débats politiques en
Indoneésie. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1980.
[0925] Federspiel, Howard M., trans. “Islam and Nationalism.” Indonesia 24 (Oc-
tober 1977): 39–85.
[0926] Lubis, Mochtar. The Indonesian Dilemma. Singapore: Graham Brash, 1983.
[0927] Madjid, Nurcholis. “Islam in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities.”
Mizan 1, no. 3 (1984): 71–85.
[0928] Murtopo, Ali. The Acceleration and Modernization of 25 Years’ Develop-
ment. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 1973.
[0929] Natsir, M. Capita selecta. The Hague: W. van Hoeve, [1954].
[0930] Notosusanto, Nugroho. The National Struggle and the Armed Forces of In-
donesia. Jakarta: Centre for Armed Forces History, 1975.
[0931] Semaoen. “An Early Account of the Independence Movement.” Indonesia 1
(April 1966): 46–75.
[0932] Sjahrir, Sutan. Our Struggle. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Pro-
ject, 1968.
[0933] ———. Out of Exile. New York: John Day, 1949.
[0934] Soekarno. Nationalism, Islam and Marxism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern
Indonesia Project, 1970.
[0935] Sukarno. Towards Freedom and the Dignity of Man. Jakarta: Department of
Foreign Affairs, 1961.
[0936] ———. Under the Banner of Revolution (Dibawah bendera revolusi), vol. 1.
Jakarta: Publication Committee, 1966/1959.
Policy Issues
[0937] Alm, James, Robert H. Aten, and Roy Bahl. “Can Indonesia Decentralise
Successfully? Plans, Problems and Prospects.” BIES 37, no. 1 (April 2001):
83–102.
[0938] Aspinall, Edward. “Modernity, History and Ethnicity: Indonesian and
Acehnese Nationalism in Conflict.” RIMA 36, no. 1 (2002): 3–33.
[0939] Aziz, Iwan J. “Intergovernmental Transfers and Decentralization in Indone-
sia.” BIES 37, no. 3 (2001): 345–62.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 553
[0940] Bertrand, Jacques. “False Starts, Succession Crises, and Regime Transition:
Flirting with Openness in Indonesia.” Pacific Affairs 69, no. 3 (fall 1996):
319–40.
[0941] Carey, Peter, and G. Carter Bentley, eds. East Timor at the Crossroads: The
Forging of a Nation. London: Cassell, 1995.
[0942] Columbijn, Freek, and J. Thomas Lindblad, eds. Roots of Violence in In-
donesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 2002.
[0943] Cribb, Robert. The Politics of Environmental Protection in Indonesia. Clayton,
Victoria, Australia: Monash University Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, 1988.
[0944] Dake, Christine. National Integration in Indonesia: Patterns and Policies.
Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1989.
[0945] Dormeier-freire, Alexandre, and Jean-Luc Maurer. “Le dilemme de la dé-
centralisation en Indonésie.” Archipel 64 (2002): 255–87.
[0946] Harvey, Barbara S. The Future of Indonesia as a Unitary State: Separatism
and Decentralization. Alexandria, Va.: CNA Corporation, 2002.
[0947] Kingsbury, D., and H. Aveling. Autonomy and Disintegration in Indonesia.
London: Routledge, 2002.
[0948] Legge, J. D. Central Authority and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: A Study
of Local Administration 1950–1960. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1961.
[0949] Mahfud M. D., Moh. “Amandemen UUD 1945 dalam perspektif demokrasi
dan civil society.” Civility 1, no. 2 (2001–2002): 5–27.
[0950] Maryanov, Gerald S. Decentralization in Indonesia as a Political Problem.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1958.
[0951] McCawley, Peter. “Some Consequences of the Pertamina Crisis in Indone-
sia.” JSEAS 9, no. 1 (1978): 1–27.
[0952] McRae, Dave. “A Discourse on Separatists.” Indonesia 74 (October 2002):
37–58.
[0953] McWilliam, A. “From Lord of the Earth to Village Head: Adapting to the
Nation-State in West Timor.” BKI 155 (1999): 121–44.
[0954] Mortimer, Rex. The Indonesian Communist Party and Land Reform. Clay-
ton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Papers on Southeast Asia, 1972.
[0955] Otten, Mariël. Transmigrasi, Myths and Realities: Indonesian Resettlement
Policy, 1965–1985. Copenhagen: International Workshop for Indigenous Affairs,
1986.
[0956] Pabotinggi, Mochtar. “Indonesia: Historicizing the New Order’s Legitimacy
Dilemma.” In Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Au-
thority, edited by Muthiah Alagappa. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press,
1995, 224–56.
[0957] Ramage, Douglas E. Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideol-
ogy of Tolerance. London: Routledge, 1995.
[0958] Resosudarmo, Budy R. “Indonesia’s Clean Air Program.” BIES 38, no. 3
(December 2002): 343–65.
[0959] Robinson, Geoffrey. “People’s War: Militias in East Timor and Indonesia.”
South East Asia Research 9, no. 3 (2001): 271–318.
554 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Government Institutions
[0968] Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. Negotiating and Consolidating Democratic Civilian
Control of the Indonesian Military. Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Center, 2001.
[0969] Barker, Joshua. “State of Fear: Controlling the Criminal Contagion in
Suharto’s New Order.” Indonesia 66 (October 1998): 7–44.
[0970] Choesin, Vasta Charmandiva. “The Indonesian Vice-Presidency: Problems
in Leadership Succession.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 11, no. 2 (September
1989): 138–59.
[0971] Crawford, Gordon, and Yulius P. Hermawan. “Whose Agenda? Partnership
and International Assistance to Democratization and Governance Reform in In-
donesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24, no. 2 (August 2002): 203–29.
[0972] “Current Data on the Indonesian Military Elite.” Regularly published in In-
donesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
[0973] Evans, Brian, III. “The Influence of the United States Army on the Devel-
opment of the Indonesian Army (1954–1964).” Indonesia 47 (April 1989):
25–48.
[0974] Kammen, Douglas, and Siddharth Chandra. A Tour of Duty: Changing Pat-
terns of Military Politics in Indonesia in the 1990s. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern
Indonesia Project, 1999.
[0975] Kristiadik, J. “Profesionalisme TNI di tengah transisi politik.” Antropologi
Indonesia 25, no. 4 (2001): 19–40.
[0976] Liddle, R. William. “Soeharto’s Indonesia: Personal Rule and Political In-
stitutions.” Pacific Affairs 58, no. 1 (spring 1985): 68–90.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 555
[0977] MacAndrews, Colin, ed. Central Government and Local Development in In-
donesia. Singapore: OUP, 1986.
[0978] MacDougall, John A. “Patterns of Military Control in the Indonesian Higher
Central Bureaucracy.” Indonesia 33 (April 1982): 89–121.
[0979] Magenda, Burhan Djabir. “Dinamika hubungan eksekutif-legislatif di In-
donesia.” Civility 1, no. 1 (2001): 5–30.
[0980] McVey, Ruth. “Building Behemoth: Indonesian Constructions of the Nation-
State.” In Making Indonesia, edited by Daniel S. Lev and Ruth T. McVey, 11–25.
[0900]
[0981] ———. “The Post-Revolutionary Transformation of the Indonesian
Army.” Parts 1 and 2. Indonesia 11 (April 1971): 131–76; 13 (April 1972):
147–82.
[0982] Nasution, Adnan Buyung. The Aspiration for Constitutional Government in
Indonesia: A Socio-Legal Study of the Indonesian Konstituante, 1956–1959. The
Hague: CIP-Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1992.
[0983] Noer, Deliar. The Administration of Islam in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
Modern Indonesia Project, 1978.
[0984] Risalah perundingan 1956–1959, 17 vols. Jakarta: State Printing House for
the Secretariat of the Konstituante, n.d.
[0985] Robison, Richard. “Indonesia: Tensions in State and Regime,” In Southeast
Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy and Capitalism, edited by
Kevin Hewison, Richard Robison, and Garry Rodan. St. Leonards, New South
Wales, Australia: Allen and Unwin, 1993, 39–74.
[0986] Rohdewohld, Rainer. Public Administrtation in Indonesia. Melbourne:
Monash University, 1995.
[0987] Said, Salim. Genesis of Power: General Sudirman and the Indonesian Mili-
tary in Politics 1945–1949. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1992.
[0988] Shiraishi, Takashi, “Rewiring the Indonesian State.” In Making Indonesia,
edited by Daniel S. Lev and Ruth T. McVey, 164–79. [0900]
[0989] Staff, CSIS. “Indonesia’s New Constitution: A Peaceful Reform.” Indone-
sian Quarterly 30, no. 3 (2002): 252–62.
[0990] Tjondronegoro, Sediono M. P. Social Organization and Planned Develop-
ment in Rural Java. Singapore: OUP, 1984.
Political Parties
[0991] Brackman, Arnold. Indonesian Communism: A History. New York: Praeger,
1963.
[0992] Dake, Antonie C. A. In the Spirit of the Red Banteng: Indonesian Commu-
nists between Moscow and Peking. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
[0993] Farram, Stevem. “Revolution, Religion and Magic: The PKI in West Timor,
1924–1966.” BKI 158, no. 1 (2002): 21–48.
556 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Elections
[1004] Antlov, Hans, and Sven Cederroth. Elections in Indonesia. London: Curzon
Press, 2001.
[1005] Crouch, Harold. “The Army, the Parties and the Elections.” Indonesia 11
(April 1971): 177–92.
[1006] Feith, Herbert. The Indonesian Elections of 1955. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Mod-
ern Indonesia Project, 1957.
[1007] Kammen, Douglas. “Pilkades, Democracy, Elections and Village Protest in In-
donesia.” In Southeast Asia over Three Generations: Essays Presented to B. R. O’G.
Anderson, edited by James T. Siegel and Audrey R. Kahin, 303–29. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 2003.
[1008] King, Dwight, trans. “White Book” on the 1992 General Election in In-
donesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1994.
[1009] Pemberton, John. “Notes on the 1982 General Election in Solo.” Indonesia
41 (April 1986): 1–22.
[1010] Pompe, Sebastiaan. De Indonesische Algemene Verkiezingen 1999. Leiden,
the Netherlands: KITLV, 1999.
[1011] Steijlen, Fridus. “Sutiyoso’s Re-Election as Governor of Jakarta.” BKI 158,
no. 4 (2002): 513–27.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 557
[1012] Suryadinata, Leo. Political Parties and the 1982 General Election in In-
donesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 1982.
[1013] Ward, Ken. The 1971 Election in Indonesia: An East Java Case Study. Clay-
ton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Centre of Southeast Asia Studies, 1974.
[1014] Weatherbee, Donald E. “Indonesia: Electoral Politics in a Newly Emerging
Democracy.” In How Asia Votes, edited by John Fuh-sheng and David Newman,
255–81. New York: Chatham House (Seven Bridges Press), 2002.
[1015] Young, Dwight Y. “The Conduct of the 1999 Election in Sleman, D. I. Yo-
gyakarta: A Case Study (with Voting Results).” Asian Studies Review 25, no. 4
(2001): 479–97.
[1046] Goss, Andrew. “From Tong-Tong to Tempo Doeloe: Eurasian Memory Work
and the Bracketing of Dutch Colonial History, 1957–1961.” Indonesia 70 (Octo-
ber 2000): 9–36.
[1047] Hefner, Robert W., ed. The Politics of Multiculturalism: Pluralism and Cit-
izenship in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i
Press, 2001.
[1048] Heidhues, Mary Somers. Golddiggers, Farmers and Traders in the “Chinese
Districts” of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia
Program, 2003.
[1049] ———. “Indonesia.” In The Encyclopedia of the Chinese Overseas, edited by
Lynn Pan, 151–68. Singapore: Chinese Heritage Centre, 1998.
[1050] “Indonesia.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 8. Jerusalem: Macmillan,
1971.
[1051] Jonge, Huub de. “Discord and Solidarity among the Arabs in the Netherlands
East Indies, 1900–1942.” Indonesia 55 (April 1993): 73–90.
[1052] Kumar, Ann L. “Islam, the Chinese, and Indonesian Historiography—A Re-
view Article.” JAS 46, no. 3 (1987): 603–16.
[1053] Kwee Tek Hoay. The Origins of the Modern Chinese Movement in Indone-
sia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1969.
[1054] Lohanda, Mona. The Kapitan Cina of Batavia, 1837–1942: A History of Chi-
nese Establishment. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1996.
[1055] Mackie, J. A. C., ed. The Chinese in Indonesia. Melbourne: Nelson, 1976.
[1056] Mackie, Jamie. “Towkays and Tycoons: The Chinese in Indonesian Eco-
nomic Life in the 1920s and 1980s.” Indonesia, special issue (1991): 83–96.
[1057] Mobini-Kesheh, Natalie. The Hadrami Awakening: Community and Identity
in the Netherlands East Indies, 1900–1942. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Studies on
Southeast Asia, 1999.
[1058] Peluso, Nancy Lee, and Emily Harwell. “Territory, Custom, and the Cultural
Politics of Ethnic War in West Kalimantan, Indonesia.” In Violent Environments,
edited by Nancy Lee Peluso and Michael Watts. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Press, 2001.
[1059] Post, Peter. “The Kwik Hoo Tong Trading Society of Semarang, Java: A Chi-
nese Business Network in Late Colonial Asia.” JSEAS 33, no. 2 (June 2002):
279–98.
[1060] Rush, James. “Placing the Chinese in Java on the Eve of the Twentieth Cen-
tury.” Indonesia, special issue (1991): 13–24.
[1061] ———. “Social Control and Influence in Nineteenth Century Indonesia:
Opium Farms and the Chinese of Java.” Indonesia 35 (April 1983): 53–64.
[1062] Salmon, Claudine, and Denys Lombard. “Islam and Chineseness.” Indone-
sia 57 (April 1994): 115–31.
[1063] Somers, Mary F. Peranakan Chinese Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca N.Y.: Cor-
nell Modern Indonesia Project, 1964.
[1064] Suryadinata, Leo. Pribumi Indonesians, the Chinese Minority and China: A
Study of Perceptions and Policies, 2nd ed. Singapore: ISEAS, 1986.
560 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1065] ———, ed. Political Thinking of the Indonesian Chinese, 1900–1995. Singa-
pore: Singapore University Press, 1997.
[1066] Tan, Mély G. “The Social and Cultural Dimensions of the Role of Ethnic
Chinese in Indonesian Society.” Indonesia, special issue (1991): 113–25.
[1067] The, B. A. M., and J. Schijf. “The Chinese Doctors in the Dutch East Indies:
Social Mobility among an Ethnic Trading Minority in a Colonial Society.” In-
donesia 53 (April 1992): 33–50.
[1068] Twang Peck Yang. The Chinese Business Elite in Indonesia and the Transi-
tion to Independence 1940–1950. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1998.
[1069] Vuldy, Chantal. “La communauté Arabe de Pekalongan.” Archipel 30
(1985): 95–119.
[1070] Wibowo, I., ed. Harga yang harus dibayar: sketsa pergaulatan etnis Cina di
Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2000.
[1071] ———, ed. “Masalah Cina,” retrospeksi dan rekontekstualisasi. Jakarta:
Gramedia, 1999.
[1072] Williams, Lea E. Overseas Chinese Nationalism: The Genesis of the Pan-
Chinese Movement in Indonesia, 1900–1916. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960.
[1073] Willmott, Donald E. The Chinese of Semarang: A Changing Minority Com-
munity in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1960.
[1074] ———. The National Status of the Chinese in Indonesia, 1900–1958. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1961.
Law
[1075] Adatrechtbundels, 45 vols. Leiden, the Netherlands: KITLV, 1910–1955.
[1076] Ball, John. Indonesian Legal History 1602–1848. Sydney: Oughtershaw,
1982.
[1077] Benda-Beckman, Keebet von. The Broken Stairway to Consensus: Village
Justice and State Courts in Minangkabau. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris,
1984.
[1078] Brokx, Wouter. Het recht tot wonen en tot reizen in Nederlandsch-Indië.
‘sHertogenbosch, The Netherlands: Teulings, 1925.
[1079] Burns, Peter. “The Post Priok Trials: Religious Principles and Legal Issues.”
Indonesia 47 (April 1989): 61–88.
[1080] Cammack, Mark. “Indonesia’s 1989 Religious Judicature Act: Islamization
of Indonesia or Indonesianization of Islam?” Indonesia 63 (April 1997):
143–68.
[1081] ———. “Islamic Law in Indonesia’s New Order.” The International and
Comparative Law Quarterly 38 (1989): 53–70.
[1082] Haar, Bernard ter. Adat Law in Indonesia. New York: Institute of Pacific Re-
lations, 1948.
[1083] Holleman, J. F. Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian adat law: selections from
Het adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1981.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 561
International Relations
[1101] Acharya, Amitav. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia:
ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge, 2001.
[1102] Anak Agung Gde Agung, Ide. Twenty Years of Indonesian Foreign Policy,
1945–1965. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
562 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1103] Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. Indonesia in ASEAN: Foreign Policy and Regional-
ism. Singapore: ISEAS, 1994.
[1104] Arora, B. D. Indian-Indonesian Relations, 1961–1980. New Delhi: Asian
Educational Services, 1981.
[1105] Bone, Robert C. The Dynamics of the Western New Guinea (Irian Barat)
Problem. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1958.
[1106] Bootsma, N. A. Buren in de koloniale tijd: de Philippijnen onder
Amerikaans bewind en de Nederlandse, Indische en Indonesische reacties
daarop, 1898–1942. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1986.
[1107] Brown, Colin, ed. Indonesia: Dealing with a Neighbour. Sydney: Allen and
Unwin, 1996.
[1108] Buchholz, Hans. Law of the Sea Zones in the Pacific Ocean. Singapore:
ISEAS, 1987.
[1109] Bunnell, Frederick. “American ‘Low Posture’ Policy toward Indonesia in the
Months Leading up to the 1965 ‘Coup.’” Indonesia 50 (October 1990): 29–60.
[1110] Cheah Boon Keng. “The Japanese Occupation of Malaysia, 1941–1945:
Ibrahim Yaacob and the Struggle for Indonesia Raya.” Indonesia 28 (October
1979): 85–121.
[1111] Conboy, Kenneth, and James Morrison. Feet to the Fire: CIA Covert Opera-
tions in Indonesia, 1957–1958. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press, 1999.
[1112] Dorling, Philip, ed. Diplomasi: Australia and Indonesia’s Independence:
Documents 1947. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994.
[1113] Efimova, L. M. “New Evidence on the Establishment of Soviet-Indonesian
Diplomatic Relations (1949–53).” Indonesia and the Malay World 29, no. 85
(2001): 215–33.
[1114] Eldridge, Philip. Australia and Indonesia: The Politics of Aid and Develop-
ment since 1966. Canberra: ANU Development Studies Centre, 1979.
[1115] Gardner, Paul F. Shared Hopes: Separate Fears: Fifty Years of U.S.-Indonesian
Relations. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997.
[1116] George, Margaret. Australia and the Indonesian Revolution. Melbourne:
Melbourne University Press, 1980.
[1117] Gouda, Frances, with Thijs Brocades Zaalberg. American Visions of the
Netherlands East Indies/Indonesia: US Foreign Policy and Indonesian National-
ism, 1920–1949. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.
[1118] Gould, James W. Americans in Sumatra. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1961.
[1119] Jones, Howard P. Indonesia: The Possible Dream. New York: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, 1971.
[1120] Jones, Matthew. Conflict and Confrontation in South East Asia 1961–65.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[1121] Kahin, Audrey R., and George McT. Kahin. Subversion as Foreign Policy:
The Secret Eisenhower and Dulles Debacle in Indonesia. New York: New Press,
1995.
[1122] Kahin, George McT. The Asian-African Conference, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1956.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 563
[1123] Leifer, Michael. Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.
[1124] Lijphart, Arend. The Trauma of Decolonization: The Dutch and West New
Guinea. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University. Press, 1966.
[1125] Macintyre, Andrew J. “Interpreting Indonesian Foreign Policy: The Case of
Kampuchea, 1979–1986.” Asian Survey 27, no. 5 (1987): 515–34.
[1126] Mackie, J. A. C. Konfrontasi: The Indonesia-Malaysia Dispute, 1963–1966.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: OUP, 1974.
[1127] MacMahon, Robert J. Colonialism and Cold War: The United States and the
Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1945–49. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Press, 1981.
[1128] McVey, Ruth T. The Soviet View of the Indonesian Revolution. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1957.
[1129] Meijer, Hans. Den Haag-Djakarta: de Nederlands-Indonesische betrekkin-
gen 1950–1962. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Spectrum, 1994.
[1130] Mozingo, David. Chinese Policy toward Indonesia, 1959–1967. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell University Press, 1976.
[1131] Nishihara, Masashi. The Japanese and Sukarno’s Indonesia: Tokyo-Jakarta
Relations, 1951–1961. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1976.
[1132] Otterspeer, Willem, ed. Leiden Oriental Connections, 1850–1940. Leiden,
the Netherlands: Brill, 1989.
[1133] Philpott, S. “Fear of the Dark: Indonesia and the Australian National Imag-
ination.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 55, no. 3 (2001): 371–88.
[1134] Platje, Wies. “Dutch Sigint and the Conflict with Indonesia, 1950–62.” In
Secrets of Signals Intelligence during the Cold War and Beyond, edited by
Matthew M. Aid and Cees Wiebes, 285–312. London: Frank Cass. 2001.
[1135] Poeze, Harry A. In het land van de overheerser I: Indonesiêrs in Nederland
1600–1950. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1986.
[1136] Posthumus, G. A. “The Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia.” BIES 8,
no. 2 (1972): 55–66.
[1137] Rix, Alan G. “The Mitsugoro Project: Japanese Aid Policy and Indonesia,”
Pacific Affairs 52, no. 1 (1979): 43–63.
[1138] Schulte Nordholt, Nico G. “Dutch-Indonesian Relations Forty Years after the
Transfer of Sovereignty: Some Critical Remarks.” Internationale Spectator 43,
no. 11 (1989): 654–61.
[1139] Sukma, Rizal. Indonesia and China—The Politics of a Troubled Relation-
ship. London: Routledge, 1999.
[1140] Tanter, Richard, Mark Selden, and Stephen R. Shalom, eds. Bitter Flowers,
Sweet Flowers: East Timor, Indonesia, and the World Community. Lanham, Md.:
Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
[1141] Taylor, Alastair M. Indonesian Independence and the United Nations. Lon-
don: Stevens, 1960.
[1142] Uphoff, Elisabeth. Intellectual Property and US Relations with Indonesia,
Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Pro-
gram, 1991.
564 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
SCIENCE
Biology
[1148] Backer, C. A., and R. C. Bakhuizen van den Brink: Flora of Java [Sper-
matophytes only], 3 vols. Groningen, The Netherlands: Noordhof, 1963–1968.
[1149] Bakels, Jet. Het verbond met de tijger: visies op mensenetende dieren in Ker-
inci, Sumatra. Leiden, The Netherlands: Research School of Asian African and
Amerindian Studies, 2000.
[1150] Balen, S. (Bas) van, and Roy H. Dennis. “Birds of the Danau Senarum Na-
tional Park.” Borneo Research Bulletin 31 (2000): 336–60.
[1151] Barlow, H. S. An Introduction to the Moths of South East Asia. Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia: Malayan Nature Society, 1982.
[1152] Carcasson, R. H. A Field Guide to the Coral Reef Fishes of the Indian and
West Pacific Oceans. London: Collins, 1977.
[1153] Hinton, A.G. Shells of New Guinea and the Central Indo-Pacific. Brisbane,
Australia: Jacaranda, 1977.
[1154] Hoogerwerf, A. Udjung Kulon: The Land of the Last Javan Rhinoceros. Lei-
den, The Netherlands: Brill, 1970.
[1155] Lutz, Richard, Marie Lutz, and Dick Lutz. Komodo, the Living Dragon, 2nd
ed. N.p.: Dimi Press, 1996.
[1156] MacKinnon, John. A Field Guide to the Birds of Java and Bali. Yogyakarta,
Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1988.
[1157] Payne, Junaidi, Charles M. France, and Karen Phillipps. A Field Guide to the
Mammals of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: Sabah Society and WWF
Malaysia, 1985.
[1158] Russon, Anne E. “Declining Orangutan Populations in and around the Danau
Sentarum National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Borneo Research Bulletin
31 (2000): 372–84.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 565
[1159] Smythies, B. E. “The Bornean Province.” In The Birds of Borneo. Kota Kin-
abalu, Malaysia: Natural History Publications, 1999.
[1160] Steenis, C. G. G. J. van. The Mountain Flora of Java. Leiden, The Nether-
lands: Brill, 1972.
[1161 Tsukada, Etsuzo, ed. Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands, 2 vols.
Tokyo: Plapac, 1982.
[1162] Weber, Max, and L. F. de Beaufort. The Fishes of the Indo-Australian Arch-
ipelago. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 1953.
[1163] White, C. M. N., and Murray D. Bruce. The Birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi, the
Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia): An Annotated Checklist. Lon-
don: British Ornithologists’ Union, 1986. Includes an excellent bibliography.
History of Science
[1188] Baas, Pieter. “De VOC in Flora’s Lulsthoven.” In Kennis en Compagnie, ed-
ited by Leonard Blussé and Ilonka Ooms, 124–37. Amsterdam: Balans, 2002.
[1189] Beekman, E. M. The Poison Tree: Selected Writings of Rumphius on the Nat-
ural History of the Indies. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.
[1190] Bergh, Gert D. van den, John de Vos, and Paul Y. Sondaar. “The Late Qua-
ternary Palaeography of Mammal Evolution in the Indonesian Archipelago.” In
Quaternary Environmental Change in the Indonesian Region, edited by R. A. C.
Dam and S. van der Kars, 385–408. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2001.
[1191] Boomgaard, P., F. Colombijn, and D. Henley, eds. Paper Landscapes: Ex-
plorations in the Environmental History of Indonesia. Leiden, The Netherlands:
KITLV, 1998.
[1192] Daws, Gavom, and Marty Fujita. Archipelago: The Islands of Indonesia from
the Nineteenth Century Discoveries of Alfred Russell Wallace to the Fate of the
Forests and Reefs in the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1999.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 567
SOCIETY
Anthropology
[1207] Abdullah, Taufik. “Adat and Islam: An Examination of Conflict in Mi-
nangkabau.” Indonesia 2 (October 1966): 1–24.
568 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1230] Heider, Karl G. Grand Valley Dani: Peaceful Warriors, 3rd rev. ed.: Harcourt
Brace, 1997.
[1231] Hobart, Mark. After Culture: Anthropology as Radical Metaphysical Cri-
tique. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Duta Wacana University Press, 2000.
[1232] ———. “Lances Greased with Pork Fat: Imagining Difference in Bali.” In Imag-
ined Differences, edited by Günther Schlee. Munster, Germany: Lit Verlag, 2002.
[1233] Hoskins, Janet. The Play of Time: Kodi Perspectives on Calendars, History
and Exchange. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
[1234] Just, Peter. Dou Donggo Justice: Conflict and Morality in an Indonesian So-
ciety. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
[1235] Kahn, Joel S. Constituting the Minangkabau: Peasants, Culture, and Moder-
nity in Colonial Indonesia. Providence, R.I.: Oxford: Berg, 1993.
[1236] ———. Minangkabau Social Formations: Indonesian Peasants and the
World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[1237] Kato, Tsuyoshi. Matriliny and Migration: Evolving Minangkabau Traditions
in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1982.
[1238] Kipp, Rita Smith. Dissociated Identities: Ethnicity, Religion, and Class in an
Indonesian Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.
[1239] Koentjaraningrat. Javanese Culture. Singapore: OUP, 1985.
[1240] Loeb, Edwin M. Sumatra: Its History and People. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
OUP, 1972.
[1241] Molnar, Andrea Katalin. Grandchildren of the Ga’e Ancestorys: Social Or-
ganization and Cosmology among the Hoga Sara of Flores. Leiden, The Nether-
lands: KITLV, 2001.
[1242] Mulder, Niels. Mysticism and Everyday Life in Contemporary Indonesia: Cul-
tural Persistence and Change, 2nd ed. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1980.
[1243] Padoch, C., and N. L. Peluso, eds. Borneo in Transition: People, Forests,
Conservation and Development. New York: OUP, 1996.
[1244] Palmer, Leslie H. Social Status and Power in Java. London: Athlone, 1960.
[1245] Pelras, Christian. The Bugis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
[1246] ———. “Patron-Client Ties among the Bugis and Makassarese of South Su-
lawesi.” BKI 156, no. 3 (2000): 393–432.
[1247] Peluso, Nancy L. Rich Forests, Poor People. Berkeley: University of Cali-
fornia Press, 1992.
[1248] Pemberton, John. On the Subject of “Java.” Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Press, 1994.
[1249] ———. “The Specter of Coincidence.” In Southeast Asia over Three Gener-
ations: Essays Presented to B.R.O’G. Anderson, edited by James T. Siegel and
Audrey R. Kahin, 75–89. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 2003.
[1250] Pollmann, Tessel. “Margaret Mead’s Balinese: The Fitting Symbols of the
American Dream.” Indonesia 49 (April 1990): 1–36.
[1251] Probojo, Lany. “Between Modernity and Tradition: ‘Local Islam’ in Tidore,
North Maluku, the Ongoing Struggle of the State and the Traditional Elites.”
Antropologi Indonesia 24, no. 63 (2000): 33–44.
570 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1252] Rutherford, Danilyn. Raiding the Land of the Foreigners: The Limits of the
Nation on an Indonesian Frontier. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University. Press,
2002.
[1253] Sanday, Peggy Reeves. Women at the Center: Life in a Modern Matriarchy.
Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2002.
[1254] Schrauwers, Albert. Colonial “Reformation” in the Highlands of Central
Sulawesi, Indonesia, 1892–1995. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
[1255] Schulte Nordholt, H. G. The Political System of the Atoni of Timor. Leiden,
The Netherlands: KITLV, 1971.
[1256] Shiraishi, Saya. “Silakan masuk, silakan duduk: Reflections in a Sitting
Room in Java.” Indonesia 41 (April 1986): 86–130.
[1257] Siegel, James T. Fetish, Recognition, Revolution. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 1997.
[1258] ———. The Rope of God. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
[1259] ———. Shadow and Sound. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1979.
[1260] Singarimbun, Masri. Kinship, Descent and Alliance among the Karo Batak.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
[1261] Snouck Hurgronje, C. The Acehnese, 2 vols. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill,
1906.
[1262] Steedly, Mary Margaret. Hanging without a Rope: Narrative Experience in
Colonial and Post-Colonial Karoland. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press, 1993.
[1263] Thomas, Lynn L., and Franz von Benda Beckmann, eds. Change and Con-
tinuity in Minangkabau: Local, Regional and Historical Perspectives on West
Sumatra. Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1985.
[1264] Tol, Roger, Kees van Dijk, and Greg Acciaioli. Authority and Enterprise
among the Peoples of South Sulawesi. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2000.
[1265] Touwen-Bousma, C. Staat, Islam en locale leiders in West Madura, Indone-
sië. Kampen, The Netherlands: Mondiss, 1988.
[1266] Traube, Elizabeth G. Cosmology and Social Life: Ritual Exchange among
the Mambai of East Timor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
[1267] Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginal-
ity in an Out-of-the-Way Place. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press,
1993.
[1268] Tule, Philipus. “Religious Conflicts and a Culture of Tolerance: Paving the
Way for Reconciliation in Indonesia.” Antropologi Indonesia 24, no. 63 (2000):
92–108.
[1269] Volkman, Toby A. Feast of Honor: Ritual and Change in the Toraja High-
lands. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985.
[1270] Waterson, Roxana. “Holding Back the Mountain: Historical Imagination and
the Future of Toraja-Bugis Relations.” Antropologi Indonesia 24, no. 63 (2000):
65–81.
[1271] Wouden, F. A. E. van. Types of Social Structure in Eastern Indonesia. Lei-
den, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1968.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 571
[1272] Zerner, Charles. “Signs of the Spirits, Signature of the Earth: Iron Forging
in Tana Toraja.” Indonesia 31 (April 1981): 89–112.
Education
[1273] Abdullah, Taufik. Schools and Politics: The Kaum Muda Movements in
West Sumatra, 1927–1933. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project,
1971.
[1274] Jones, Gavin W. “Religion and Education in Indonesia.” Indonesia 22 (Oc-
tober 1976): 19–56.
[1275] Jones, Gavin W., and Peter Hagul. “Schooling in Indonesia: Crisis-Related
and Longer-Term Issues.” BIES 37, no. 2 (2001): 207–31.
[1276] Jones, Sidney. “Arabic Instruction and Literacy in Javanese Muslim
Schools.” Prisma 21 (1981): 71–80.
[1277] Kartini, R. A. “Educate the Javanese.” Translated and edited by Jean Taylor.
Indonesia 17 (April 1974): 83–98.
[1278] Kroeskamp, H. Early Schoolmasters in a Developing Country: A History of
Experiments in 19th Century Indonesia. Assen, The Netherlands: van Gorcum,
1974.
[1279] Lee Kam Hing. “The Taman Siswa in Post-War Indonesia.” Indonesia 25
(April 1978): 41–59.
[1280] Oey-Gardiner, Mayling. “Challenging the Indonesian Education System:
Basic Education for the New Millenium.” BIES 36, no. 3 (December 2000).
[1281] Parker, Lynette. “The Quality of Schooling in a Balinese Village.” Indone-
sia 54 (October 1992): 95–116.
[1282] Peringatan 55 tahun Diniyah Putri Padangpanjang. Jakarta: Ghalia Indone-
sia, 1978.
[1283] Raharjo, M. Dawam. “The Life of Santri Youth: A View from the Pesantren
Window at Pabelan.” Sojourn 1, no. 1 (1986): 32–56.
[1284] Rodgers, Susan. “Compromise and Contestation in Colonial Sumatra: An
1873 Mandailing Schoolbook on the ‘Wonders of the West.’” BKI 158, no. 3
(2002): 479–512.
[1285] Skoufias, Emmanuel. “Parental Education and Child Nutrition in Indone-
sia.” BIES 35, no. 1 (April 1999): 99–119.
[1286] Suryadinata, Leo. “Indonesian Chinese Education: Past and Present.” In-
donesia 14 (1972): 49–72.
[1287] Taylor, Jean. “Education, Colonialism, and Feminism: An Indonesian Case
Study.” In Education and the Colonial Experience, edited by Philip G. Altbach
and Gail P. Kelly. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1984.
[1288] Tsuchiya, Kenji. Democracy and Leadership: The Rise of the Taman Siswa
Movement in Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1987.
[1289] Veur, Paul W. van der. Education and Social Change in Colonial Indonesia.
Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1969.
572 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Population
[1311] Boomgaard, Peter. Children of the Colonial State: Population Growth and
Economic Development in Java, 1795–1880. Amsterdam: CASA, 1989.
[1312] ———. Population Trends, 1795–1942. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute,
1991.
[1313] Dorléans, Bernard. “Problèmes d’aménagement urbain et spéculation fon-
cière à Jakarta.” Archipel 46 (1993): 219–41.
[1314] Gooszen, Hans. A Demographic History of the Indonesian Archipelago,
1880–1942. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 1999.
[1315] Hirschman, Charles. “Population and Society in Twentieth-Century South-
east Asia.” JSEAS 25, no. 2 (September 1994): 381–416.
[1316] Hugo, Graeme. “The Impact of the Crisis on Internal Population Movement
in Indonesia.” BIES 36, no. 2 (August 2000).
[1317] Hugo, Graeme J., et al. The Demographic Dimension in Indonesian Devel-
opment. Singapore: OUP, 1987.
[1318] Hull, Terence H. “First Results from the 2000 Population Census.” BIES 37,
no. 1 (2001): 103–11.
[1319] Jones, Sidney. Making Money off Migrants: The Indonesian Exodus to
Malaysia. Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia: University of Wollongong
Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies, 2000.
[1320] McNicoll, Geoffrey, and Masri Singarimbun. Fertility Decline in Indonesia:
Analysis and Interpretation. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University
Press, 1986.
[1321] Spaan, Ernst. Labour Circulation and Socioeconomic Transformation: The Case
of East Java, Indonesia. The Hague: Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, 1999.
[1322] Swasono, Sri-Edi, and Masri Singarimbun, eds. Sepuluh windhu transmi-
grasi di Indonesia, 1905–1985. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 1985.
[1323] Tan, Mely G., and Budi Soeradji. Ethnicity and Fertility in Indonesia. Sin-
gapore: ISEAS, 1986.
[1324] Widjojo Nitisastro. Population Trends in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
University Press, 1970.
Religion
[1325] Abaza, Mona. Indonesian Students in Cairo: Islamic Education, Perceptions
and Exchanges. Paris: Association Archipel, 1994.
574 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1326] Abdullah, Taufik, and Sharon Siddique, eds. Islam and Society in Southeast
Asia. Singapore: ISEAS, 1986.
[1327] Acciaioli, Greg. “Grounds of Conflict, Idioms of Harmony: Custom, Reli-
gion, and Nationalism in Violence Avoidance at the Lindu Plain, Central Su-
lawesi.” Indonesia 72 (October 2001): 81–114.
[1328] Aqsha, Darul, Dick van der Meij, and Johan Hendrik Meuleman. Islam in In-
donesia: A Survey of Events and Developments from 1988 to March 1993.
Jakarta: Indonesia–Netherlands Cooperation in Islamic Studies, 1995.
[1329] Boland, B. J. The Struggle of Islam in Modern Indonesia. Leiden, The
Netherlands: KITLV, 1971.
[1330] Boone, Guus. “Modernism and Mission: The Influence of Dutch Modern
Theology on Missionary Practice in the East Indies in the Nineteenth Century.”
In Missions and Missionaries, edited by Pieter N. Holtrop and Hugh McLeod,
112–26. Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell Press, 2000.
[1331] Bowen, John. “A Modernist Muslim Poetic: Irony and Social Critique in
Gayo Islamic verse.” JAS 52, no. 3 (August 1993): 629–46.
[1332] Bräuchier, Birgit. “Cyberidentities at War: Religion, Identity, and the Inter-
net in the Moluccan Conflict.” Indonesia 75 (April 2003): 123–51.
[1333] Bruinessen, Martin van. “Shari’a Court, Tarekat and Pesantren: Religious In-
stitutions in the Banten Sultanate.” Archipel 50 (1995): 165–72.
[1334] Castles, Lance. “Notes on the Islamic School at Gontor.” Indonesia 1 (April
1966): 30–45.
[1335] Coppel, Charles A. “The Origins of Confucianism as an Organized Religion
in Java, 1900–1923.” JSEAS 12, no. 1 (1981): 179–95.
[1336] Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. The Pesantren Tradition: The Role of the Kyai in the
Maintenance of Traditional Islam in Java. Tempe: Arizona State University Pro-
gram for Southeast Asian Studies, 1999.
[1337] Dijk, Kees van. “Dakwah and Indigenous Culture: The Dissemination of Is-
lam.” BKI 154, no. 2 (1998): 218–35.
[1338] Federspiel, Howard M. Popular Indonesian Literature of the Qur’an. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1994.
[1339] Geertz, Clifford. Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and
Indonesia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
[1340] ———. The Religion of Java. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.
[1341] Haire, James. The Character and Theological Structure of the Church in
Halmahera, Indonesia, 1941–1979. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter D. Lang,
1981.
[1342] Hasbullah, Moeflich. “Cultural Presentation of the Muslim Middle Class in
Contemporary Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 7, no. 2 (2000): 1–53.
[1343] Hefner, Robert W. “Islamizing Java? Religion and Politics in Rural East
Java.” JAS 46, no. 3 (August 1987): 533–54.
[1344] ———. “Print Islam: Mass Media and Ideological Rivalries among Indone-
sian Muslims.” Indonesia 64 (October 1997): 77–103.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 575
[1345] Hooykaas, C. Agama Tirtha: Five Studies in Hindu Balinese Religion. Am-
sterdam: North Holland Publishing, 1964.
[1346] Howell, Julia Day. “Sufism and the Indonesian Islamic Revival.” JAS 60, no.
3 (August 2001): 701–30.
[1347] Howell, Julia Day, M. A. Subandi, and Peter L. Nelson. “New Faces of In-
donesian Sufism: A Demographic Profile of Tarekat Qodiriyyah-Naqsyabandiyyah,
Pesantren Suryala, in the 1990s.” RIMA 35, no. 2 (summer 2001): 33–59.
[1348] Ibrahim Ahmad, et al., compilers. Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia. Sin-
gapore: ISEAS, 1985.
[1349] Ichwan, Moch Nur. “Differing Responses to an Ahmadi Translation and
Exegesis: The Holy Qur’ân in Egypt and Indonesia.” Archipel 62 (2001):
143–61.
[1350] Johns, A. H. “Sufism as a Category in Indonesian Literature and History.”
JSEAS 2, no. 2 (1961): 10–23.
[1351] Jones, Sidney. “The Contraction and Expansion of the ‘Umat’ and the Role
of the Nahdatul Ulama.” Indonesia 38 (October 1984): 1–20.
[1352] ———. “The Javanese Pesantren: Between Elite and Peasantry.” In Reshap-
ing Local Worlds: Formal Education and Cultural Change in Rural Southeast
Asia, edited by Charles F. Keyes, 19–41. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University.
Southeast Asian Studies, 1989.
[1353] Kipp, Rita Smith, and Susan Rodgers, eds. Indonesian Religions in Transi-
tion. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1987.
[1354] Madinier, Rémy. “Du temps des chameaux à celui du béton radioactif: les
nouveaux usages islamistes du passé.” Archipel 64 (2002): 145–61.
[1355] Madjid, Nurcholish, Islam, kemodernan dan keindonesiaan. Jakarta:
Yayasan Paramadina, 1987.
[1356] ———. Tradisi Islam: peran dan fungsinya dalam pembangunan di Indone-
sia. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1997.
[1357] Mulder, Niels. “Aliran kebatinan as an expression of the Javanese world-
view.” JSEAS 1, no. 2 (1970): 105–14.
[1358] Nakamura, Mitsuo. The Crescent Arises over the Banyan Tree: A Study of
the Muhammadiyah Movement in a Central Javanese Town. Yogyakarta, Indone-
sia: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1983.
[1359] Nieuwenhuijze, C. A. O. van. Aspects of Islam in Post-Colonial Indonesia:
Five Essays. The Hague: van Hoeve, 1958.
[1360] O’Connor, Stanley J. “Metallurgy and Immortality at Candi Sukuh, Central
Java.” Indonesia 39 (April 1985): 52–70.
[1361] Peacock, James L. Purifying the Faith: The Muhammadiyah Movement in
Indonesian Islam. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings, 1978.
[1362] Rais, M. Amien. Islam di Indonesia: suatu ikhtiar mengaca diri. Jakarta: Ra-
jawali, 1989.
[1363] Reid, Anthony J. S. “Nineteenth Century Pan-Islam in Indonesia and
Malaysia.” JAS 26, no. 2 (1967): 267–83.
576 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Sociology
[1376] Aragon, Lorraine V. “Communal Violence in Poso, Central Sulawesi: Where
People Eat Fish and Fish Eat People.” Indonesia 72 (October 2001): 45–79.
[1377] Burger, D. H. Structural Changes in Javanese Society: The Supra-Village
Sphere. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program, 1956.
[1378] Claus, Wolfgang, Hans-Dieter Evers, and Solvay Gerke. “The Formation of
a Peasant Society: Javanese Transmigrants in East Kalimantan.” Indonesia 46
(October 1988): 78–90.
[1379] Collins, Elizabeth Fuller. “Multinational Capital, New Order ‘Development’
and Democratization in South Sumatra.” Indonesia 71 (April 2001): 111–34.
[1380] Columbijn, Freek. Patches of Padang: The History of an Indonesian Town in
the Twentieth Century and the Use of Urban Space. Leiden, The Netherlands: Re-
search School CNWS, 1994.
[1381] ———. “The Politics of Indonesian Football.” Archipel 59 (2000): 171–200.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 577
[1382] Connor, Linda, and Adrian Vickers. “Crisis, Citizenship, and Cosmopoli-
tanism: Living in a Local and Global Risk Society in Bali.” Indonesia 75 (April
2003): 153–80.
[1383] Geertz, Clifford. “The Javanese Kiyai: The Changing Role of a Cultural
Broker.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 2 (1960): 228–50.
[1384] Grijns, Kees, and Peter J. M. Nas. Jakarta-Batavia: Socio Cultural Essays.
Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV, 2000.
[1385] Jellinek, Lea. The Wheel of Fortune: The History of a Poor Community in
Jakarta. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1991.
[1386] Kato, Tsuyoshi. “Different Fields, Similar Locusts: Adat Communities and
the Village Law of 1979 in Indonesia.” Indonesia 47 (April 1989): 89–114.
[1387] Koentjaraningrat, R. M., ed. Villages in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
University. Press, 1967.
[1388] Nas, Peter J. M., ed. The Indonesian City: Studies in Urban Development
and Planning. Leiden, the Netherlands: KITLV, 1986.
[1389] Rotge, Vincent L. Rural-Urban Integration in Java: Consequences for Re-
gional Development and Employment. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000.
[1390] Selo Soemardjan. Social Changes in Jogjakarta. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Uni-
versity Press, 1962.
[1391] Shiraishi, Saya. Young Heroes: The Indonesian Family in Politics. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell Studies on Southeast Asia, 1997.
[1392] Siegel, James T. Solo in the New Order: Language and Hierarchy in an In-
donesian City. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986.
[1393] Speyer, Patricia. “Fire without Smoke and Other Phantoms of Ambon’s Vi-
olence: Media Effects, Agency, and the Work of Imagination.” Indonesia 74 (Oc-
tober 2002): 37–58.
[1394] Sumarto, Sudarno, Asep Suryahadi, and Wenefrida Idyanti. “Designs and
Implementation of Indonesian Social Safety Net Programs.” Developing
Economies 40, no. 1 (2002): 3–31.
[1395] Vel, Jacqueline A. C. “Tribal Battle in a Remote Island: Crisis and Violence
in Sumba (Eastern Indonesia).” Indonesia 72 (October 2001): 140–58.
[1396] Volkman, Toby Alice et al., eds. Sulawesi: The Celebes. Hong Kong:
Periplus Editions, 2000.
[1397] Wallach, Jeremy. “Exploring Class, Nation, and Xenocentrism in Indonesian
Cassette Retail Outlets.” Indonesia 74 (October 2002): 79–102.
[1398] Wertheim, W. F. East-West Parallels: Sociological Approaches to Modern
Asia. The Hague: van Hoeve, 1964.
Women
[1399] Adeney, Frances. Christian Women in Indonesia: A Narrative Study of Gen-
der and Religion. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2003.
578 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1400] Blackburn, Susan, and Sharon Bessell. “Marriageable Age: Political Debates
on Early Marriage in Twentieth-Century Indonesia.” Indonesia 63 (April 1997):
107–41.
[1401] Blackwood, Evelyn. Webs of Power: Women, Kin and Community in a Suma-
tran Village. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
[1402] Blussé, Leonard. Retour Amoy: Anny Tan—een vrouwenleven in Indonesië,
Nederland en China. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Balans, 2000.
[1403] Brenner, Suzanne A. The Domestication of Desire: Women, Wealth and
Modernity in Java. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[1404] ———. “On the Public Intimacy of the New Order: Images of Women in the
Popular Indonesian Print Media.” Indonesia 67 (April 1999): 13–37.
[1405] Budianto, Melani. “Plural Identities: Indonesian Women’s Redefinition of
Democracy in the Post-Reformasi Era.” RIMA 36, no. 1 (2002): 35–50.
[1406] Butt, Leslie. “‘An Epidemic of Runaway Wives’: Discourses by Dani Men
on Sex and Marriage in Highlands Irian Jaya, Indonesia.” Crossroads 15, no. 1
(2002): 55–87.
[1407] Clancy-Smith, Julia, and Frances Gouda, eds. Domesticating the Empire:
Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism. Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia, 1998.
[1408] Dzuhayatin, Siti Ruhaini. “Gender and Pluralism in Indonesia.” In The Pol-
itics of Multiculturalism, edited by Robert W. Hefner, 253–67. Honolulu: Uni-
versity of Hawai’i Press, 2001.
[1409] Gouda, Frances. “Good Mothers, Medeas, or Jezebels: Feminine Imagery
in Colonial and Anticolonial Rhetoric in the Dutch East Indies, 1900–1942.”
In Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and
Dutch Colonialism, edited by Julia Clancy-Smith and Frances Gouda, 236–54.
[1407]
[1410] Hellwig, Tineke. “A Double Murder in Batavia: Representations of Gender
and Race in the Indies.” RIMA 35, no. 2 (summer 2001): 1–32.
[1411] Hull, Terence H., Endang Sulistyaningshi, and Gavin W. Jones. Prostitution
in Indonesia: Its History and Evolution. Canberra: Research School of Social
Sciences, ANU, 1995.
[1412] Jones, Gavin W., ed. Women in the Urban and Industrial Workforce: South-
east and East Asia. Canberra: ANU, 1984.
[1413] Kipp, Rita Smith. “Emancipating Each Other: Dutch Colonial Missionaries’
Encounter with Karo Women in Sumatra, 1900–1942.” In Domesticating the
Empire, edited by Julia Clancy-Smith and Frances Gouda, 211–35. [1407]
[1414] Koning, Juliette, Marleen Nolten, Janet Rodenburg, and Ratna Saptari, eds.
Women and Households in Indonesia: Cultural Notions and Social Practices.
Richmond, Surrey, UK: Curzon, 2000.
[1415] Locher-Scholten, Elsbeth. “So Close and Yet So Far: The Ambivalence of
Dutch Colonial Rhetoric on Javanese Servants in Indonesia, 1900–1942.” In Do-
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 579
CURRENT MEDIA
Journals
Antropologi Indonesia, Jurusan Antropologi, FISIP, Universitas Indonesia, Depok,
Java Barat, Indonesia.
Archipel, Bureau 732, EHESS, 54 Bd Raspail, 75006 Paris, France.
ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (Economic Re-
search Unit), Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Pasir Panjang, Singapore 119614.
Asian Affairs, Royal Society for Asian Affairs, 2 Belgrave Square, London SW1X
8PJ, United Kingdom.
Asian Perspectives (archeology), University of Hawai’i Press, 2840 Kolowalu St.,
Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Asian Survey, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Australian Journal of International Affairs, Australian Institute of International Af-
fairs, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, KITLV, Postbus 9515, 2300 RA Lei-
den, Netherlands.
Borneo Research Bulletin, IEAS, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Sama-
rahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Research School of Pacific Studies, Aus-
tralian National University, GPO Box 4 Canberra Act 2601, Australia.
Contemporary Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Heng Mui Keng
Terrace, Pasir Panjang, Singapore 119614.
Critical Asian Studies [formerly Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars], c/o BCAS,
3693 South Bay Bluffs Drive, Cedar, MI 49621-9434, USA.
Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Center for
Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.
Cultural Survival Quarterly, Cultural Survival Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo, Japan.
Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan
Masyarakat, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Indonesia, Kotak Pos 295, Jakarta
10001, Indonesia.
Far Eastern Economic Review, GPO Box 160, Hong Kong.
Flora Malesiana Bulletin, Rijksherbarium, Postbus 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, Nether-
lands.
Gatra, Gedung Gatra, Jl. Kalibata Timur IV, No. 15, Jakarta 12740, Indonesia.
Indische Letteren, c/o Reggie Baay, Praam 27, 2377 BW Oude Wetering, Nether-
lands.
Indonesia, Southeast Asia Program Publications, 640 Stewart Avenue, Ithaca, NY
14850, USA.
Indonesia: An Analysis of Economic and Political Trends, Economist Intelligence
Unit, 40 Duke Street, London, W1A 1DW, United Kingdom.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 581
Indonesia and the Malay World [successor to Indonesia Circle], School of Oriental
& African Studies, Univ. of London, Thornhaugh St., Russell Square, London
WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom.
Indonesia: Feiten en Meningen, Postbus 4098, 1009 AB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Indonesian Quarterly, CSIS, Yayasan Proklamasi, Jl Tanah Abang III/27, Jakarta
Pusat, Indonesia.
Inside Indonesia, PO Box 1326, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
Itinerario, Centre for the History of European Expansion, Faculty of the School of
Humanities, University of Leiden, Postbus 9515, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands.
Journal of Asian History, Otto Harrassowitz, Postfach 2929, D-6200 Wiesbaden 1,
West Germany; Goodbody Hall, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Journal of Asian Studies, AAS, 1 Lane Hall, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
48109, USA.
Journal of Contemporary Asia, PO Box 592, Manila, Philippines 1099.
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 130M Jalan Thamby
Abdullah, Brickfields, 50470 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (succeeded Journal of Southeast Asian History),
c/o Department of History, National University of Singapore, 11 Arts Link, Sin-
gapore 117570.
Kyoto Review [online]: http://kyotoreview.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Masyarakat Indonesia, Biro Pemasyarakatan IPTEK, LIPI, Widya Graha, Jl Jend.
Gatot Subroto 10, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge University Press, Edinburgh Building, Shafts-
bury Rd, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom.
Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada.
Panji, Jalan Kemang Selatan Raya, No. 111H, Jakarta 12730, Indonesia.
Populasi: bulletin penelitian dan kebijaksaan kependudukan, Pusat Penelitian
Kependuduukan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Review of Indonesian and Malayan Affairs, Department of Southeast Asian Studies,
University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Sojourn, Journal on Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies, Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Pasir Panjang, Singapore 119614.
Southeast Asia Research (SOAS), Turpin Distr. Services, Blackhorse Road, Letch-
worth, Herts SG6 1HN, United Kingdom.
Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Heng Mui Keng Ter-
race. Pasir Panjang, Singapore 119614.
Southeast Asian Studies, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto Univ., 46 Shi-
moadachi-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan.
Studia Islamika, IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tapol: The Indonesian Human Rights Campaign, 111 Northwood Rd., Thornton
Heath, Surrey CR7 8HW, United Kingdom.
Tempo, Gedung Tempo, Jalan Proklamasi No. 72, Jakarta 10320, Indonesia.
Tijdschrift voor geschiedenis, Van Gorcum, Groningen, The Netherlands.
582 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Internet Resources
General
Biro Pusat Statistik: www.bps.go.id. The most useful website for recent statistical
data.
International Crisis Group: www.crisisweb.org. The International Crisis Group pub-
lishes occasional briefings on Indonesia that are both reliable and informative.
www.Laksamana.net. The best source for up-to-date English digests of current po-
litical and economic events in Indonesia.
www.gtzsfdm.or.id. A useful website that gives the most recent news on the course
of decentralization.
www.store.eiu.com. The Economic Intelligence Unit’s regular economic updates
and country profiles.
Environment
The following two websites cover environmental developments in the region and
are perhaps the most useful websites on this subject.
Lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia (LEI): www.lei.or.id
Down to Earth: http://dte.gn.apc.org
Human Rights
Amnesty International (AI): www.amnesty.org. AI provides frequent reports on a
variety of issues affecting human rights in Indonesia. A list of these publications
and their e-mail releases can be accessed via their website.
About the Authors
Audrey Kahin received her Ph.D. in Southeast Asian History from Cornell
University in 1979. From 1978 to 1995 she was managing editor of South-
east Asia publications at Cornell and coeditor, then editor, of the journal In-
donesia. She is editor and contributor of Regional Dynamics of the Indone-
sian Revolution (1985), author of Rebellion to Integration (1999) and (with
George McT. Kahin) Subversion as Foreign Policy (1995). Most recently
she edited, with James T. Siegel, Southeast Asia over Three Generations
(2003). She is currently working on problems of integration in Indonesia
and a biography of the former Islamic political leader Mohammad Natsir.
583