Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 123 views

    Evaluation Form Project Proposal - Sudharshan - Version 3

    Uploaded by

    avizzzy7
    This document evaluates Vinod Sudharshan's individual project proposal. It rates different aspects of the proposal on a scale from poor to excellent. Overall, the evaluator found the proposal to be sufficient, with a few minor issues. The proposal provided a clear description of the problem and research questions. The approach and goals were also appropriate. However, the structure was a bit unusual and some references needed to cite original sources instead of URLs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation Form Project Proposal - Sudharshan - Version 3

    Uploaded by

    avizzzy7
    123 views2 pages
    This document evaluates Vinod Sudharshan's individual project proposal. It rates different aspects of the proposal on a scale from poor to excellent. Overall, the evaluator found the proposal to be sufficient, with a few minor issues. The proposal provided a clear description of the problem and research questions. The approach and goals were also appropriate. However, the structure was a bit unusual and some references needed to cite original sources instead of URLs.

    Original Description:

    Evaluated

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document evaluates Vinod Sudharshan's individual project proposal. It rates different aspects of the proposal on a scale from poor to excellent. Overall, the evaluator found the proposal to be sufficient, with a few minor issues. The proposal provided a clear description of the problem and research questions. The approach and goals were also appropriate. However, the structure was a bit unusual and some references needed to cite original sources instead of URLs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    123 views2 pages

    Evaluation Form Project Proposal - Sudharshan - Version 3

    Uploaded by

    avizzzy7
    This document evaluates Vinod Sudharshan's individual project proposal. It rates different aspects of the proposal on a scale from poor to excellent. Overall, the evaluator found the proposal to be sufficient, with a few minor issues. The proposal provided a clear description of the problem and research questions. The approach and goals were also appropriate. However, the structure was a bit unusual and some references needed to cite original sources instead of URLs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Evaluation form project proposal individual project

    Student name: Vinod Sudharshan


    Decision: sufficient
    General comments: .

    P = poor, I = Insufficient, S = Sufficient, G = Good, E = Excellent
    1. Company P I S G E
    - There is enough IT or math expertise available in the
    company.
    - The company offers a suitable work environment.
    - The company is trustworthy.

    2. Project level P I S G E
    - The difficulty of the project matches the
    requirements of the individual project.
    - Completing the project within the given timeframe
    is realistic.
    - The topic and type of the project are relevant for
    the program.
    The project now includes analysis of language
    identification algorithms, which is a sufficient
    mathematical component.
    3. Document quality P I S G E
    - The plan has a logical structure.
    - Language is unambiguous and easy to read.
    - Correct use of spelling and grammar.
    - Layout is appropriate.
    - Figures and tables are used appropriately.
    - References are in accordance with APA style.

    It is a very readable and elaborate proposal. The
    structure is a bit unusual: most of the problem
    description is in the theoretical background. For the
    references the original journal/conference
    publications should be used instead of the URLs.
    4. Context description P I S G E
    - All relevant aspects of the context are described.
    - No irrelevant information is included.



    5. Problem formulation P I S G E
    - All relevant aspects pertaining to the problem
    analysis are described.
    - Research questions match the problem analysis.
    - Research questions are formulated SMART.
    - Subquestions cover the main question and are not
    superfluous.
    Clear description. Relevant and well-formulated
    research questions. Small detail: the last
    subquestion needs a main verb.
    5. Project goals P I S G E
    - The expected outcomes/products are clearly
    described.
    - The project goals logically follow from the problem
    formulation.
    - It is defined when the project is successful.
    - The scope of the project is indicated.

    6. Approach P I S G E
    - The methodology, sources, and technology for each
    subquestion are adequately described.
    - Choices for methodologies, sources, and
    technologies are motivated.
    - Methodologies are appropriate for answering the
    subquestions.
    - Technologies are adequate given the context and
    problem.
    - Sources are relevant and of high enough level
    Approach is appropriate.
    7. Planning P I S G E
    - Planning consists of activities rather than products.
    - Planning is at the right level of detail.
    - Planning is realistic.
    - Planning contains all milestones.
    - Steps in the planning match the approach.

    You might also like