Root Locus Design

1
Root Locus Design

M. Sami Fadali
Professor of Electrical Engineering
University of Nevada
2
Outline
PI control system design.
PD control system design.
PID control system design.
3
Block Diagram

Plant

Plant

Cascade Compensation
Feedback Compensation
Compensator
Compensator
E(s) C(s)
C(s)
R(s)
R(s)
4
PI Control
Add integral control to improve steady-state
error, (increases type number one) worse
transient response or instability.
Add a proportional control controller has pole
at origin and zero.
Cascade compensation: integral term in feedback
path is equivalent to a differentiator in the
forward path.
c p

p

p
5
PI Design Procedure
1. Design a proportional controller to meet the
transient response specifications, i.e. place
the dominant closed-loop system poles at a
desired location
cI n d
2. Add a PI controller with a zero at
n
/10
3. Tune the gain of the system to move the
closed-loop pole closer to
cI
.
4. Check the time response and modify the
design until it is acceptable.
6
Example: PI Design
Design a controller for the system for
percentage overshoot less than 5% and zero
steady-state error due to step.
7
Step 1: Proportional Control
Design proportional control to meet transient response
specifications.
Percentage overshoot less than 5%
2 2
c.l. characteristic polynomial
2 2
n n
2
Equate coefficients
n
2
8
Root Locus for PI Example
9
Step 2: Add PI Compensator
c p
n
For this example, an easier design
canceling the pole at 3 may be superior.
10
RL for PI Compensated System
11
Time Response for PI Example
12
Increase gain for faster response
13
PD Control
Can be used in cascade or feedback control.
Zero pulls RL to left: improves the transient
response.
Transfer Function of PD Controller
c p d d
p
d
14
PD Design
Obtain the desired dominant pair from the
design specifications.
Angle of PD controller
c cI
Compensator
d
c
n

c

s
cl

a
d
15
PD Design Procedure
1. Calculate angle[ L( s
cl
) ] using a
calculator or MATLAB
scl=-zeta*wn+j*wd;
theta= piangle(evalfr(g, scl) )
2. Calculate the zero location using
d
c
n
a=wd/tan(thetac)+zeta*wn
16
PD Design Procedure (cont.)
3. Calculate the new loop gain function including
the compensator then calculate the gain
(magnitude condition) with a calculator or
L = g*tf( [1, a],1)
K = 1/abs( evalfr( L, scl) )
4. Check the time response of the PD compensated
system and modify the design to meet the
desired specifications if necessary.
17
Example
Design a P-controller for % OS < 10%
Design a PD controller to reduce
s
to 1 s.
18
P-Control
Percentage overshoot less than 10%
2 2
Find the intersection of constant line with the root
locus using the angle condition by trial and error.
The intersection is easy to find with MATLAB.
19
Root Locus for P-Control
PD Design
20
Reduce
s
to 1 s
s
n
n
n
Find the c.l. pole location
d n
2
cI
Angle of PD controller
c cI
21
PD Controller
Compensator zero
d
c
n
Loop gain
c
s+2.4
s s+4 s+6
Calculate the gain
cI
cI
Simulation results show that the system is too slow
22
Modified PD Design
We need to speed up the time response.
1. Move zero closer to the j-axis.
2. Increase the gain.
c
cI
c cI cI
23
Compensated Root Locus
24
Step Response K = 38.8
25
Step Response K = 70
26
PID Control
c p

d p
2
n n
2
n
d
d
n
2

d
Procedure
1- Design a PD controller to meet the transient
response specifications.
2- Add a PI controller to meet the steady-state
specifications without appreciably affecting the
transient response.
zeros can be
complex conjugate
27
Example: PID Design
Design a PID controller for the system to meet
the PD specifications (
s
with zero steady-state error due to ramp.
PID Design
PD specifications met with earlier PD design
P
PI design
cI
n
Combine for PID
PI
s+2 s+0.4
s
28
29
Root Locus with PID
30
PID Design with K = 38
31
PID with K=70, zero at 0.2
PD Design: Pole-Zero Cancellation
Cancel pole with PD zero.
Do not cancel RHP poles.
Do not cancel pole at origin.
Cancel closest real pole to the j-axis.
Imperfect implementation: almost cancel.
32
RHP Pole
Zeros do not change the response due to the
ICs.
Imperfect cancellation: RHP closed-loop pole.
Example
Form of complete step response
0 1
t
2
-6t
33
Example
For the closed-loop system with unity
feedback, design a controller to reduce the
percentage overshoot to less than 5% and
the settling time to less than 1.5 second.
34
Root Locus: Uncompensated
With 10 included in MATLAB transfer function
35
Root Locus
Real Axis
I
m
a
g
in
a
r
y

A
x
is
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
System: g
Gain: 1
Pole: -0.348 + 1.21i
Damping: 0.276
Overshoot (%): 40.5
Frequency (rad/sec): 1.26
Step Response
Uncompensated closed-loop system
36
Step Response
Time (sec)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
System: untitled1
Settling Time (sec): 11.1
System: untitled1
Peak amplitude: 1.39
Overshoot (%): 39.3
At time (sec): 2.69
>> step(feedback(g,1))
Design
Cancel pole at 1 with a zero
P
Choose K for (gives <5% overshoot)
10 not included in compensator gain.
37
Equating Coefficients
Loop gain
P
C.l. characteristic polynomial
2 2
n n
2
n
2
38
Root Locus
39
Root Locus
Real Axis
I
m
a
g
i
n
a
r
y

A
x
i
s
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
System: l
Gain: 1.83
Pole: -3 + 3.05i
Damping: 0.701
Overshoot (%): 4.55
Frequency (rad/sec): 4.28
n
Design Algorithm
Transient
response OK?
SS Error
OK?
Stop Add PI
Add PD
SS Error
OK?
Stop Add PI
40
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No

Root Locus Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Root Locus Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Root Locus Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

Root Locus Design

You might also like