Porter's Five Forces: A Model For Industry Analysis

Porter's Five Forces
‘
A MODEL FOR INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
Michael Porter provided a framework that models an industry as being influenced

by five forces. The strategic business manager seeking to develop an edge over
rival firms can use this model to better understand the industry context in which
the firm operates.
Diagram of Porter's 5 Forces
Threat of New Entrants
Industry
Competitors
Bargaining Power of Bargaining Power of
Suppliers Buyers
Rivalry among
existing firms
Threat of Substitute Products
The strongest competitive force or forces determine the profitability of an industry

and so are of greatest importance in strategy formulation.
Threat of Entry
New entrants to an industry bring new capacity, the desire to gain market share,
and often substantial resources. Companies diversifying through acquisition into
the industry from other markets often leverage this resources to cause a shape
up, as Philip Morris did with Miller beer.
The seriousness of the threat of entry depends on the barriers present and on
the reaction from existing competitors that the entrants can expect.
There are six major sources of barriers to entry :
1. Economies of Scale. These economies deter entry by forcing the

aspirant either to come in on a large scale or to accept a cost
disadvantage. Scale economies in production, research, marketing and
service are probably the key barriers to entry in the mainframe computer
industry, as Xerox and GE sadly discovered.
2. Product Differentiation. Brand identification creates a barrier by forcing

entrants to spend heavily to overcome customer loyalty. Advertising,
customer service, being first in the industry, and product differences are
among the factors fostering brand identification. It is perhaps the most
important entry barrier in soft drinks, over the counter drugs, cosmetics,
investment banking, and public accounting. To create high fences around
their business, brewers couple brand identification with economies of
scale in production, distributing, and marketing.
3. Capital Requirements. The need to visit large financial resources in

order to compete creates a barrier to entry, particularly if the capital is
required for unrecoverable expenditures in up front advertising or R&D.
Capital is necessary not only for fixed facilities but also for customer
credit, inventories, and absorbing start up losses.
4. Cost Disadvantages Independent of Size. Entrenched companies may

have cost advantages not available to potential rivals, no matter what their
size and attainable economies of scale. These advantages can stem from
the effects of the learning curve, proprietary technology, access to the
best raw materials sources, assets purchased at preinflation prices,
government subsidies, or favourable location.
5. Access to Distribution channels. The new boy on the block must, of

course, secure distribution of his product or service. A new food product,
for example, must displace others from the supermarket shelf via price
breaks, promotions, intense selling efforts, or some other means. The
more limited the wholesale or retail channels are and the more that
existing competitors have these tied up, obviously the tougher that entry
into the industry will be.
6. Government Policy. The government can limit or even foreclose entry to

industries with such controls as license requirements and limits on access
to raw materials. Regulated industries like trucking, liquor retailing, and
fright forwarding are noticeable examples: more subtle government
restrictions operate in fields like ski-area development and coal mining.
The government also can play a major indirect role by affecting entry
barriers through controls such as air and water pollution standards and
safety solutions.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Suppliers can exert bargaining power on participants in an industry by
raising prices or reducing the quality of purchased goods and services.
Powerful suppliers can thereby squeeze profitability out of an industry unable
to recover cost increases in its own prices.
1. It is dominated by a few companies and is more concentrated than the

industry it sells to.
2. Its product is unique or at least differentiated, or if it has build up switching
costs. Switching costs are fixed costs buyers face in changing suppliers.
3. It is not obliged to contend with other products for sale to the industry. For
instance, the competition between the steel companies and the aluminium
companies to sell to the can industry checks the power of each supplier.
4. It poses a credible threat of integrating forward into the industrys business.
5. The industry is not an important customer of the supplier group.
Bargaining Power of Buyers

Customers can likewise can force down prices, demand higher quality or more
service, and play competitors off against each other all the expense of industry
profits.
1. It is concentrated or purchases in low volumes. Large volume buyers are

particularly potent forces if heavy fixed costs characterize the industry as
they do in metal containers, corn refining, and bulk chemicals, for example
which raise the stakes to keep capacity filled.
2. The product it purchases from the industry are standard and
undifferentiated. The buyers, sure that they can always find alternative
suppliers, may play one company against another, as they do in
aluminium extrusion.
3. The product it purchases from the industry form a component of its
product and represent a significant fraction of its costs. The buyers are
likely to shop for a favourable price and purchases selectively.
4. It earns low profits, which create great incentive to lower its purchasing
costs.
5. The industry product does not save the buyer money.
6. The buyers pose a credible threat of integrating backward to make the
industry product.
7. Most of these sources of buyer power can be attributed to consumers as a
group as well as to industrial and commercial buyers: only a modification
of the frame of reference is necessary.
Threat of Substitute Products

By placing a cealing on prices it can charge, substitute product or services limit
the potential of an industry. Unless it can upgrade the quality of the product or
differentiate somehow, the industry will suffer in earnings and possibility in
growth.
Manifestly, the more attractive the price performance trade off offered by
substitute products, the firmer the lid placed on the industries pront potential.
Substitutes not only limit profits in normal times, they also reduce the bonanza
an industry can reap in boom times. Substitute products that deserve the most
attention strategically are those that
a. are subject to trends improving their price performance trade off with the
industry product
b. are produced by industries earning high profits. Substitute often come
rapidly into play if some development increases competition in their
industries and cause price reduction or performance improvement.
Jockeying for Position
Rivalry among existing competitors takes the familiar form of jockeying for
position using tactics like price competition, product introduction, and
advertising slugfests. Intense rivalry is related to the presence of a number of
factors;
1. Competitors are numerous or are roughly equal in size and power. In

many U.S. industries in recent years foreign contenders, of course, have
become part of the competitive picture.
2. Industry growth is slow, participating fights for market share that involves
expansion minded members.
3. The product or service lacks differentiation or switching costs, which lock
in buyers and protect one combatant from raids on its customers by
another.
4. Fixed costs are high or the product is perishable, creating short temptation
to cut prices.
5. Capacity is normally augmented in large increments. Such additions, as in
the chlorine and vinyl chloride business, disrupt the industries supply
demand balance the often lead to periods of overcapacity and price
cutting.
6. Exit barriers are high. Exit barriers, like very specialized assets or
managements loyalty to a particular business, keep companies
competing even though they may be earning low or even negative returns
on investment.
7. The rivals are diverse in strategies, origins, and “personalities” they have
different ideas about how to compete and continually run head on into
each other in the process.

Porter's Five Forces: A Model For Industry Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Porter's Five Forces: A Model For Industry Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Porter's Five Forces: A Model For Industry Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Porter's Five Forces

Michael Porter provided a framework that models an industry as being influenced

Diagram of Porter's 5 Forces

Threat of New Entrants

Threat of Substitute Products

The strongest competitive force or forces determine the profitability of an industry

There are six major sources of barriers to entry :

1. Economies of Scale. These economies deter entry by forcing the

2. Product Differentiation. Brand identification creates a barrier by forcing

3. Capital Requirements. The need to visit large financial resources in

4. Cost Disadvantages Independent of Size. Entrenched companies may

5. Access to Distribution channels. The new boy on the block must, of

6. Government Policy. The government can limit or even foreclose entry to

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

1. It is dominated by a few companies and is more concentrated than the

Bargaining Power of Buyers

1. It is concentrated or purchases in low volumes. Large volume buyers are

Threat of Substitute Products

1. Competitors are numerous or are roughly equal in size and power. In

You might also like