- Landers Company provided information on beginning and ending work in process inventory for May, including units and costs.
- Equivalent units schedules and cost per equivalent unit calculations were provided for both FIFO and weighted average methods.
- Costs were assigned to completed units and ending inventory using FIFO and weighted average.
- Landers Company provided information on beginning and ending work in process inventory for May, including units and costs.
- Equivalent units schedules and cost per equivalent unit calculations were provided for both FIFO and weighted average methods.
- Costs were assigned to completed units and ending inventory using FIFO and weighted average.
- Landers Company provided information on beginning and ending work in process inventory for May, including units and costs.
- Equivalent units schedules and cost per equivalent unit calculations were provided for both FIFO and weighted average methods.
- Costs were assigned to completed units and ending inventory using FIFO and weighted average.
- Landers Company provided information on beginning and ending work in process inventory for May, including units and costs.
- Equivalent units schedules and cost per equivalent unit calculations were provided for both FIFO and weighted average methods.
- Costs were assigned to completed units and ending inventory using FIFO and weighted average.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses cost flow assumptions and inventory costing methods for multiple companies using process costing. It covers calculating equivalent units and assigning costs to production and inventory under both FIFO and weighted average cost flow assumptions.
The two cost flow assumptions discussed are FIFO (first-in, first-out) and weighted average.
To calculate equivalent units under both cost flow assumptions, you determine beginning work in process, units started and completed during the period, abnormal spoilage/losses, and ending work in process. You then calculate equivalent units for each component (usually material and conversion costs).
Landers Company
Landers Company has the following information available for May:
Beginning Work in Process Inventory
(25% complete as to conversion) 10,000 units Started 120,000 units Ending Work in Process Inventory
(30% complete as to conversion) 30,000 units
Beginning Work in Process Inventory Costs:
Material $ 2,100
Conversion 2,030
Current Period Costs:
Material $ 33,000
Conversion 109,695
All material is added at the start of production and all products completed are transferred out. 1. Refer to Landers Company. Prepare an equivalent units schedule using the (a) FIFO and (b) weighted average method. ANS: (a) FIFO (b) Weighted Average Mat. CC Mat. CC BWIP 0 7,500
S & C 90,000 90,000 TO 100,000 100,000 EWIP 30,000 9,000 EI 30,000 9,000 EUP 120,000 106,500 EUP 130,000 109,000
2. Refer to Landers Company. Prepare a schedule showing the computation for cost per equivalent unit assuming the (a) FIFO and (b) weighted average method. (a) FIFO (b) Weighted Average Mat. CC Mat. CC Costs $33,000 $109,695 $ 35,100 $111,725 Eq Units 120,000 106,500 130,000 109,000 $.275/eq unit $ 1.03/eq unit $ .27/eq unit $ 1.025/eq unit Total cost/eq. unit $ 1.305/eq unit $ 1.295/eq unit 3. Refer to Landers Company. Prepare a schedule showing the assignment of costs assuming the (a) FIFO and (b) weighted average method. (a) FIFO
Beginning Work in Process $ 4,130 To complete (7,500 x $1.03) = 7,725
$ 11,855
Started and Completed
90,000 x $1.305 = 117,450 Total costs transferred out $129,305
Ending Work in Process
30,000 x $ .275 = $ 8,250 9,000 x $1.03 = 9,270
$ 17,520
Total costs accounted for $146,825 (b) Weighted Average
Completed
100,000 x $1.295 = $129,500 Ending Work in Process
30,000 x $ .27 = $ 8,100 9,000 x $1.025 = 9,225
$ 17,325 Total costs accounted for $146,825 4. The Sweet Temptations Company has two processing departments, Cooking and Packaging. Ingredients are placed into production at the beginning of the process in Cooking, where they are formed into various shapes. When finished, they are transferred into Packaging, where the candy is placed into heart and tuxedo boxes and covered with foil. All material added in Packaging is considered as one material for convenience. Since the boxes contain a variety of candies, they are considered partially complete until filled with the appropriate assortment. The following information relates to the two departments for February 20X7: Cooking Department:
Beginning WIP (30% complete as to conversion) 4,500 units Units started this period 15,000 units Ending WIP (60% complete as to conversion) 2,400 units Packaging Department:
Beginning WIP (90% complete as to material, 80% complete as to conversion) 1,000 units Units started during period ?
Ending WIP (80% complete as to material and 80% complete as to conversion) 500 units
a. Determine equivalent units of production for both departments using the weighted average method. b. Determine equivalent units of production for both departments using the FIFO method.
a. Cooking Department Materials Conversion Costs Transferred Out 17,100 17,100 Ending Work in Process 2,400 1,440 TOTAL EUP 19,500 18,540
Packaging Department Transferred In Materials. Conversion Costs Transferred Out 17,600 17,600 17,600 Ending Work in Process 500 400 400 TOTAL EUP 18,100 18,000 18,000
b. Cooking Department Materials Conversion Costs
Beginning Work in Process 0 3,150
Transferred from Cooking 12,600 12,600
Ending Work in Process 2,400 1,440
TOTAL EUP 15,000 17,190
Packaging Department Transferred In Materials Conversion Costs Beginning Work in Process 0 100 200 Transferred from Cooking 16,600 16,600 16,600 Ending Work in Process 500 400 400 TOTAL EUP 17,100 17,100 17,200
5. The following costs were accumulated by Department 2 of Hughes Company during April:
Cost Transferred from Dept. 1
Material
Conversion Costs
Total Beginning Inventory $ 17,050 $ 5,450 $ 22,500 Current Period Cost 184,000 $ 34,000 104,000 322,000
Materials are not added in Department 2 until the very end of processing Department 2.
Required: Compute the cost of units completed and the value of ending WIP for: a. Weighted average inventory assumption Dept 1 MAT CC Complete 20,000 20,000 20,000 Eq-End WIP 5,000 0 2,000 EP-WA 25,000 20,000 22,000
End WIP Dept 1 = 5,000 units x $8.00 = $40,000 CC = 2,000 units x $5.00 = 10,000
$50,000
COGM = $344,500 - $50,000 = $294,500
6. The formula for a chemical compound requires one pound of Chemical X and one pound of Chemical Y. In the simplest sense, one pound of Chemical X is processed in Department A and transferred to Department B for further processing where one pound of Chemical Y is added when the process is 50 percent complete. When the processing is complete in Department B, the finished compound is transferred to finished goods. The process is continuous, operating 24 hours a day.
Normal spoilage occurs in Department A. Five percent of material is lost in the first few seconds of processing. No spoilage occurs in Department B.
The following data are available for the month of August 20X6:
Dept. A Dept. B Units in process, August 1 8,000 10,000 Stage of completion of beginning inventory 3/4 3/10 Units started or transferred in 50,000 ? Units transferred out 46,500 ? Units in process, August 31 ? ? Stage of completion of ending inventory 1/3 1/5 Units of Chemical Y added in Department B 44,500
ANS: a. c. Materials Conversion Costs PD Mat CC
46,500 46,500 44,500 44,500 44,500
9,000 3,000 12,000 0 2,400
(8,000) (6,000) (10,000) 0 (3,000)
47,500 43,500 46,500 44,500 43,900
b. Since the material in the second department goes in at the 50 percent point and the ending WIP inventory is only at the 20 percent point, units complete is the same as the equivalents of material 44,500, given that units started plus units in beginning WIP are equal to units complete plus ending WIP 10,000 + 46,500 - 44,500 = 12,000 units in ending WIP.
7. Quigley Company manufactures a specialized product. Department 2 adds new material to the units received from Department 1 at the end of process. A normal loss occurs early in processing. Production and cost data for Department 2 for the month of September are as follows: Production record (in units):
In process, September 1-75% complete for processing cost 4,000 Received from Department 1 20,000 Completed and transferred to finished goods 16,000 Lost in processing (normal) 2,000 In process, September 30-2/3 complete for process cost 6,000
Cost Record:
Work in process inventory, September 1:
Preceding department cost $ 620 Processing cost 2,000 $2,620 Cost from preceding department in September 1,800 Material cost for September 4,800 Processing cost for September 10,200
Equivalent production TI Material Conv. cost Units complete 16,000 16,000 16,000 + Equiv. ending WIP 6,000 0 4,000 = Equiv. prod. average 22,000 16,000 20,000 - Equiv. begin. WIP (4,000) 0 (3,000) = Equiv. prod. FIFO 18,000 16,000 17,000
Unit Cost Average Unit Cost FIFO TI = $620 + 1,800 TI = $1,800 22,000 = $0.11 18,000 = $0.10
Mat = $4,800 Mat = $4,800
16,000 = $0.30 16,000 = $0.30
CC = $2,000 + 10,200 CC = $10,200
20,000 = $0.61 17,000 = $0.60
End. WIP-WA End. WIP-FIFO PD 6,000 x $0.11 = $ 660.00 6,000 x $0.10 = $ 600.00 CC 4,000 x $0.61 = 2,440.00 4,000 x $0.60 = 2,400.00
$3,100.00 $3,000.00
Cost of Goods Complete WA FIFO $19,420 - 3,100 = $16,320.00 $19,420 - 3,000 = $16,420.00
8. Copperfield Manufacturing employs a weighted average process costing system for its products. One product passes through three departments (Molding, Assembly, and Finishing) during production. The following activity took place in the Finishing Department during April 20x6.
Units in beginning inventory 4,200 Units transferred in from Assembly 42,000 Units spoiled 2,100 Good units transferred out 33,600
The costs per equivalent unit of production for each cost failure area as follows: Cost of prior departments $5.00 Raw material 1.00 Conversion 3.00 Total cost per EUP $9.00
Raw material is added at the beginning of the Finishing process without changing the number of units being processed. Work in process inventory was 40 percent complete as to conversion on April 30. All spoilage was discovered at final inspection. Of the total units spoiled, 1,680 were within normal limits. a.
TI Mat CC Complete 33,600 33,600 33,600 + Equiv WIP 10,500 10,500 4,200 + Normal Sp 1,680 1,680 1,680 + Abnor Sp 420 420 420
46,200 46,200 39,900
b. 33,600 x $9 $302,400 TC = 46,200 x $5 $231,000 1,680 x $9 15,120 46,200 x $1 46,200
$317,520 39,900 x $3 119,700
$396,900 c. 10,500 x $5 $52,500 10,500 x $1 10,500 4,200 x $3 12,600
$75,600
COGM = $396,900 - 75,600 - 3,780 = $317,520 d. $5 = $18,900 + X 46,200 X = $231,000 - 18,900 = $212,100
e. ABN = 420 x $9 = $3,780 420 x $9 = $3,780 9. Ashcroft Industries manufactures wood furniture. In the Lamination Department, varnish is added when the goods are 60 percent complete as to overhead. The units that are spoiled during processing are found upon inspection at the end of production. Spoilage is considered discrete.
Production Data for May 20X8 Beginning inventory (80% complete as to labor, 70% complete as to overhead) 1,000 units Transferred in during month 7,450 units Ending inventory (40% complete as to labor, 20% complete as to overhead) 1,500 units Normal spoilage (found during final quality inspection) 100 units Abnormal spoilage-found at 30% completion of direct labor and 15% of conversion; the sanding machine was misaligned and scarred the chairs 200 units All other units were transferred to finished goods
Cost Data for May 20X8
Beginning work in process inventory:
Prior department costs $7,510 Varnish 950 Direct labor 2,194 Overhead 5,522 $ 16,176 Current period costs:
Prior department costs $68,540 Varnish 7,015 Direct labor 23,000 Overhead 56,782 155,337
Total costs to account for $171,513 TI MAT DL MOH Complete 6,650 6,650 6,650 6,650 + end 1,500 0 600 300 + normal 100 100 100 100 + abnormal 200 0 60 30
8,450 6,750 7,410 7,080 Unit Cost
End WIP DL 600 x $3.40 = $ 2,040 MOH 300 x $8.80 = 2,640 TI 1,500 x $9.00 = 13,500
$18,180
Abnormal Loss 60 x $3.40 = $ 204 DL 30 x $8.80 = 264 MOH 200 x $9.00 = 1,800 TI $ 2,268
COGM = $171,513 - 18,180 - 2,268 = $151,065
10. Consider the following data for a cooking department for the month of January: Physical Units Work in process, beginning inventory* 11,000 Started during current period 74,000 To account for 85,000 Good units completed and transferred out during current period:
From beginning work in process 11,000 Started and completed 50,000 Good units completed 61,000 Spoiled units 8,000 Work in process, ending inventory~ 16,000 Accounted for 85,000
*Direct material, 100% complete; conversion costs, 25% complete ~Direct material, 100% complete; conversion costs, 75% complete Inspection occurs when production is 100 percent completed. Normal spoilage is 11 percent of good units completed and transferred out during the current period.
The following cost data are available: Work in process, beginning inventory:
Direct material $220,000 Conversion costs 30,000 $ 250,000 Costs added during current period:
Direct material 1,480,000 Conversion costs 942,000 Costs to account for $2,672,000
Normal Sp = 11% x 61,000 = 6,710 units FIFO Abnormal Sp = 8,000 - 6,710 = 1,290 units Mat CC Mat = $1,480,000 = $22.00
67,290 Complete 61,000 61,000
+ End 16,000 12,000
+ Ab Sp 1,290 1,290 CC = $942,000 = 13.17 - Ave 78,290 74,290
71,540 $35.17 - Beg (11,000) (2,750)
FIFO 67,290 71,540
WIP
Material 16,000 x $22.00 $352,000
CC 12,000 x $13.17 158,040
$510,040
Loss = 1,290 x $35.17 45,369
COGM = $2,672,000 - 510,040 - 45,369 = $2,116,591
11. Lumberton Industries has two departments. Department 1 uses FIFO costing and Department 2 uses weighted average. Units are introduced into the process in Department 1 (this is the only material added in Department 1). Spoilage occurs continuously through the department and normal spoilage should not exceed 10 percent of the units started. Department 2 adds material (packaging) at the 75 percent completion point; this material does not cause an increase in the number of units being processed. A quality control inspection takes place when the goods are 80 percent complete. Spoilage should not exceed 5 percent of the units transferred in from Department 1.
The following production cost data are applicable for operations for August 20X7: Department 1 Production Data
Beginning inventory (65% complete) 1,000 Units started 25,000 Units completed 22,000 Units in ending inventory (40% complete) 2,800
Department 1 Cost Data
Beginning inventory:
Material $ 1,550 Conversion 2,300 $ 3,850 Current period:
Material $38,080 Conversion 78,645 116,725 Total costs to account for $120,575
Department 2 Production Data Beginning inventory (90% complete) 8,000 Units transferred in 22,000 Units completed 24,000 Units in ending inventory (20% complete) 4,500 Department 2 Cost Data
Beginning inventory:
Transferred in $40,800 Material 24,000 Conversion 4,320 $ 69,120* Current period:
Transferred in $113,700 Material` 53,775 Conversion 11,079 178,554 Total costs to account for $247,674
*This may not be the same amount determined for Department 1; ignore any difference and use this figure. a. 1 Mat CC Mat = $38,080 = $ 1.60
23,800 Complete 22,000 22,000
+ End WIP 2,800 1,120 (2,800 x 4) CC = $78,645 = $ 3.50
24,800 23,120
22,470
- Beg WIP (1,000) (650) (1,000 x .65) End WIP = 2,800 x $1.60 = $ 4,480
23,800 22,470
1,120 x $3.50 3.920
$ 8,400 COGM = $120,575 - 8,400 $112,175
b. 2 TI Mat CC Mat = $ 77,775 = $ $3.05
25,500 Complete 24,000 24,000 24,000
+ End WIP 4,500 0 900 CC = $ 15,399 = $ $0.59 + Normal 1,100 1,120 880
26,100
+ Abnormal 400 400 320
30,000 25,500 26,100
TI = $154,500 = $ 5.15
30,000 End WIP
Abn Loss
4,500 x $5.15 $23,175 400 x $3.05 $1,220 900 x $0.59 531 320 x $0.59 189
$23,706 400 x $5.15 2,060
$3,469
COGM = $247,674 - 23,706 - 3,469 = $220,499
12. Orange Company manufactures a single product. All material is added at the beginning of the process.
Costs Material Conversion Total Beginning inventory $ 30,000 $ 3,600 $ 33,600 Current period 885,120 335,088 1,220,208 Total costs $915,120 $338,688 $1,253,808
UNITS
Beginning inventory (30% complete- conversion) 6,000 units Started 180,000 units Completed 152,000 units Ending inventory (70% complete-conversion) 20,000 units Normal spoilage 4,800 units
ANS: Mat CC Units Complete 152,000 152,000
+ Equivalents Ending WIP 20,000 14,000
+ Abnormal Loss 9,200 5,520 (9,200 x .6) = Equivalent Production-WA 181,200 171,520
= Equivalent Begin WIP (6,000) (1,800)
= Equivalent Production-FIFO 175,200 169,720
Unit Costs: WA FIFO Mat $915,120 = $5.05 Mat $885,120 = $5.05 181,200 175,200
CC $338,688 = $1.97 CC $335,088 = $1.97 171,520 169,720
Ending WIP
Material 20,000 x $5.05 $101,000 CC 14,000 x $1.97 27,580
$128,580
Abnormal Spoilage
Material 9,200 x $5.05 $ 46,460 CC 5,520 x $1.97 10,874
$ 57,334 Cost of Good Transferred 1,253,808 - 128,580 - 57,334 = $1,067,894 13. Delightful Yogurt Company produces yogurt in two departments-Mixing and Finishing. In Mixing, all ingredients except fruit are added at the start of production. In Finishing, fruit is added and then the mixture is placed into containers. Adding the fruit to the basic yogurt mixture increases the volume transferred in by the number of gallons of fruit added. Any spoilage that occurs is in the Finishing Department. Spoilage is detected just before the yogurt is placed into containers or at the 98 percent completion point. All spoilage is abnormal. Finishing Department BWIP (100% fruit, 0% container, 30% CC) 5,000 gallons Gallons transferred in 5,500
BWIP Costs: Transferred In $ 9,700 Fruit 10,500 CC 15,000 Current Costs: Transferred In 12,400 Fruit 54,000 Containers 11,000 CC 98,000 Total Costs $ 210,600 ANS: TI Fruit Container CC Transferred Out 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 EWIP 1,700 1,700 0 1,020 Abnormal Spoilage 1,000 1,000 0 980
11,700 11,700 9,000 11,000 Costs: TI Fruit Container CC BWIP $ 9,700 $10,500 $ 0 $ 15,000 Current 12,400 54,000 11,000 98,000
$22,100 $64,500 $11,000 $113,000 EUP 11,700 11,700 9,000 11,000 Per unit $1.89 $5.51 $1.22 $10.27
Cost Assignment: EWIP
1,700 x $1.89 = $ 3,213 1,700 x $5.51 = 9,367 1,020 x $10.27 = 10,475 $ 23,055 Spoilage
1,000 x $1.89 = $ 1,890 1,000 x $5.51 = 5,510 980 x $10.27 = 10,065 17,465 Transferred Out
$210,600 - 23,055 - 17,465 = 170,080
Total accounted for $210,600
Hocking Company The following information is available for Hocking Company for March 20X8. All materials are added at the start of production.
Beginning Work in Process: (80% complete) 8,000 units Started 35,000 units Normal spoilage (continuous) 6,000 units Abnormal spoilage 2,500 units Ending Work in Process: (55% complete) 15,000 units Transferred out 19,500 units
Beginning Work in Process Costs:
Material $ 14,000
Conversion 45,000
Current Costs:
Material 50,000
Conversion 175,000
Total Costs $ 284,000
FIFOMETHOD ANS: BI 8,000 + Started 35,000 = Accountable for 43,000 Hocking Company Cost Report March 31, 20X8
Material CC BWIP 8,000 0 1,600 S & C 11,500 11,500 11,500 EWIP 15,000 15,000 8,250 Norm 6,000 0 0 Abnorm. 2,500 2,500 Acctd. For 43,000 29,000 23,850
15,000 x $1.72 = $ 25,800 8,250 x $7.34 = 60,555 $ 86,355 Abnormal Spoilage
2,500 x $9.06 = 22,650 Cost Transferred Out
$284,000 - 86,355 - 22,650 = 174,995
Total costs accounted for $ 284,000
WEIGHTEDAVE ANS: Hocking Company Cost Report March 31, 20X8 Material CC Transferred Out 19,500 19,500 19,500 Ending Work In Process 15,000 15,000 8,250 Normal Spoilage 6,000 0 0 Abnormal Spoilage 2,500 2,500 2,500 Accounted For 43,000 37,000 30,250