Ict Strategy Action Plan

Page 1
Queensland Government ICT strategy 201317 action plan

Table of contents
Ministers foreword. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Executive summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Section A: Accountability in Queensland Government ICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Section B: Action plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Objective 1: Efective digital services for our clients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Strategic focus area 1: Improving customer experience of government services . . . . . . . 18
Strategic focus area 2: Digital economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Strategic focus area 3: Information management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Strategic focus area 4: Open data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Strategic focus area 5: Information security and privacy of individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Strategic focus area 6: Digital archiving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Objective 2: Ef cient digital services for government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Strategic focus area 7: Contestability and ICT strategic sourcing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Strategic focus area 8: ICT as-a-service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Strategic focus area 9: ICT innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Strategic focus area 10: Signifcant and at-risk ICT asset stabilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Objective 3: Transformed and capable workforce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Strategic focus area 11: A capable and competent workforce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Strategic focus area 12: Portfolio, program and project management . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Glossary of terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Attachment 1: Links and inter-dependencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Page 2
Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts
The vision is for a transformed public
service that is focused on improving
services for Queenslanders by better use
and analysis of government data, and by
using modern, cost-ef cient technology.
Page 3
Ministers foreword
The Newman Government has taken decisive action to transform the way the
Queensland Government not only invests in, but also manages ICT.
On 5 July 2013, I launched the Queensland Government ICT Strategy. This
strategy envisions a public sector working more efectively with business to
deliver the best possible service, at the best possible price, to Queensland
taxpayers.
The strategy includes clear objectives and details key initiatives for guiding
ICT reform across government.
The Queensland Government ICT Action Plan is designed to accompany
the strategy. It sets out how we will achieve our vision of a modern ICT
environment that is supported by best practice project management
principles.
It establishes a new management framework and puts in place specifc
initiatives to ensure the security of at-risk systems.
We will be putting more rigour around the way we govern and report on
programs and projects, giving Queenslanders faith in the way government
invests in ICT.
This will be managed through a highly visible public-facing ICT Dashboard.
Queenslanders can rest assured that our new approach will be open and
accountable, while ofering them the services they expect, delivered in ways
that are convenient for them.
We will ensure ICT supports quality front-line services, as well as promoting
more information sharing across the sector and with our customers.
Were also streamlining our procurement processes to make it easier for
small to medium enterprises (SMEs) to work with government. This means
that Queenslands local ICT sector will have an improved capacity to bid for
government ICT contracts.
As the plan is implemented, there will be a shif from ICT being owned and
operated in-house.
We have addressed fndings from the ICT Audit 2012, Queensland Health
Payroll System Commission of Inquiry and the Queensland Commission of
Audit.
There has been signifcant consultation with all government departments and
key industry stakeholders in developing this approach.
We have listened and we will continue to listen and learn from industry as we
go about this enormous job of ICT renewal.
The strategy and action plan will be reviewed regularly to ensure our direction
continues to meet the needs of Queensland.
My commitment to reform and to improving the way the public service
operates is unequivocal.
The Honourable Ian Walker MP
Minister for Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts
Page 4
Executive summary
This plan provides clear direction on the actions required to achieve
the outcomes of the Queensland Government ICT strategy 201317 (the
ICT strategy). These actions and outcomes will drive ICT reform in the
Queensland Government.
The strategy describes a future state for government ICT that represents
a major shif from traditional and wasteful methods of accessing and
delivering government ICT to a modern, more ef cient state where ICT
as-a-service is the default option. It focuses directly on better enabling
government departments to deliver front-line services to Queenslanders.
While the ICT strategy and this action plan deliver the transformation of
government ICT, the more important result is to improve the communitys
interactions with government.
Key drivers for action
The need to transform the way we access and deliver ICT is supported by
key external drivers including the Queensland Commission of Audit Report
2013, the ICT Audit 2012 and more recently, the Queensland Health Payroll
System Commission of Inquiry Report.
Among the most signifcant of the fndings is that as well as focusing
on making the transition to a sustainable ICT services environment,
government needs to manage program and project risk to a much higher
standard than ever before. The potential for these programs and projects
to be set up for success needs to be optimised by establishing strong
governance arrangements, and by providing a transparent approach to
reporting performance to the public.
To deliver this, there is a need to focus our risk management approach on
resolving the root causes of inadequate program and project governance,
poor investment decision making and flawed planning processes.
Ef cient and accountable governance is therefore at the core of the
ICT renewal process and the key to achieving this is to remove system
complexity, to simplify business process where possible and to take a one-
government approach to investment in ICT.
It is essential that public confdence in the way government manages ICT
investment is restored, and so change must not only be achieved, it must
be seen to have been achieved by the community.
A new approach to governing ICT investment
A new management framework contained within the strategy puts strict
risk management arrangements in place. The way government manages
signifcant ICT investments will change substantially. For example,
Ministerial endorsement will be required before funds for ICT programs
and projects are allocated and once they are initiated, the progress of
programs and projects will be made visible to the community through an
ICT dashboard that can be accessed by anyone using a web browser of
their choice.
Page 5
The status of signifcant and at-risk ICT investments will be regularly
reported by departments through the Directors-General Council and then
through the Minister, Department of Science, Information Technology,
Innovation and the Arts (DSITIA) to Cabinet, as will the status of risk and
progress against the ICT renewal agenda.
The Minister DSITIA is accountable for the management of the
governments current and future ICT investment portfolio, for returning
the states ICT assets to a stable and well-managed state, and for ensuring
ongoing transparent and visible governance of ICT.
Other ministers will work directly with departmental Directors-General
who will be directly accountable for delivering ICT renewal and for strong,
efective, risk management of systems under their control.
Engaging with industry
The actions will also drive a new form of engagement with industry at
all levels and with other jurisdictions as the transition from government
ownership of major ICT assets to an as-a-service environment creates
opportunities. This in turn generates economic benefts for the state,
supports the growth of our four-pillar economy and enhances our ability to
seamlessly operate across government boundaries.
Implementing the actions in this plan will contribute to business,
providing commercial opportunities through open access and use of non-
critical government data in more timely and ef cient ways, and taking a
fresh approach to industry and government partnerships.
Small to medium enterprises (SMEs)
Small to medium-sized businesses are an integral part of Queenslands
economic and social fabric, with the potential to provide innovative and
flexible solutions for government. This plan creates the conditions to
enable them to access government business more efectively than ever
before. A set of guidelines will be implemented into the early market
engagement process to make sure that SMEs are given the opportunity
to provide better value for money options for government through the
tendering process.
The guidelines and other actions will ensure that:
At least one responding SME capable of delivering will automatically be
short listed in the evaluation of ICT ofers.
Government Information Technology Conditions (GITC) are simplifed
for SMEs.
Signifcant contracts will be unbundled where appropriate to minimise
risks to government, improve value for money and harness innovative
solutions. This means that SMEs can align their capability to stages of
a project and be competitive through the process.
Major consortiums cannot change sub-contracting arrangements
relating to SMEs without the governments express approval.
Government can directly engage SMEs in the provision of innovative
solutions up to $500,000, which demonstrates value for Queensland in
addressing government priorities.
Page 6
Objective 1: Efective digital services for our clients
Objective 2: Ef cient digital services for government
Objective 3: Transformed and capable workforce
2013 2017
6 strategic focus areas
37 actions
28 actions
13 actions
Workforce planning
In addition to the need for invigorated working relationships with industry,
the scale of the change required over the life of the strategy means that
there is an ongoing need to focus on developing our people, and on
changing our thinking in terms of the way government sources capability.
A detailed workforce planning approach will be defned to drive the
cultural change necessary to ensure a customer-focused staf with skills
and confdence to deliver ICT services in a transformed and unfamiliar
environment.
Supporting this cultural change ofers further opportunities for
partnerships with the private sector, as well as the research and education
sectors, to provide capability that is not available in government.
The plan seeks to develop a competent and capable workforce, and
will work directly with tertiary and professional institutions to establish
appropriate development programs, to help meet the governments needs
well into the future.
Supporting direction of government
The plan is structured to support the four-pillar economy under three clear
and simple objectives:
efective digital services for our clients
ef cient digital services for government
transformed and capable workforce.
Twelve focus areas were identifed in consultation with industry and
departments as the key areas that require attention to deliver these
objectives.
Page 7
The actions identifed within each of the focus areas defne how the
future state will be realised through incremental change and achievable
deliverables. These actions are underpinned by a number of supporting
initiatives and projects which will ultimately be reported through the
governments ICT dashboard.
Priority actions
Immediate action is being taken to stabilise ICT systems currently in use
and at the same time, to lay the foundations for progress to the future
state described in the ICT strategy.
Stabilising systems currently in use and addressing their risk profle will
require a coordinated investment efort paired with an enabling process
for working across agencies. These requirements will form part of an initial
stabilisation program.
Foundation projects will also be initiated to either enable migration of
existing systems to the desired future state, or to remove barriers to them
doing so according to their priority and to governments and the relevant
departments ability to fund them.
Key challenges for the execution of this action plan are the management
of initiatives that have inter-relationships and associated delivery
timeframes.
Attachment 1 illustrates the complexity of many initiatives that are
dependent on the outcome or input of another initiative within tight
timeframes.
To meet these challenges, it is proposed that the Queensland Government
take a program management approach. This will allow for the:
identifcation and realisation of benefts across initiatives
coordination of initiative deliverables to schedule
management and planning of risks associated with organisational
change, tight timeframes, resourcing constraints (human, fnancial,
facilities) and stakeholder expectations.
To remove red tape and ensure timely delivery, agile methodology will be
applied whenever possible to ensure that business outcomes rather than
process remain the focus of ICT and ICT-enabled programs and projects.
The action plan outlines activities required to realise the ICT strategy.
This does not assume or imply that all of the listed actions have obtained
funding approval. It is expected that funding approval would be subject
to the approval of rigorous business cases and due consideration by the
Page 8
Section A: Accountability in Queensland Government ICT
Overview
Good governance is critical to the transformation of ICT in Queensland
Government. It refers to the structure, accountabilities, responsibilities,
policies and processes for decision making that will be implemented to
deliver this plan, and ensures that programs and projects are established
and managed in such a way as to optimise their chances of success.
Accountability for the outcomes of government programs and
projects must be clear. Accordingly, this plan establishes single point
accountability for future ICT investment and for delivering transformation
related to the ICT strategy action plan the Director-General DSITIA,
and also for agency-led ICT risk management and initiatives each
departments Director-General.
There is also single point of responsibility for governing the successful
delivery of this plan the Director-General DSITIA.
In this context, it is the Director-General DSITIAs responsibility to
establish the governance arrangements to assure, report and manage
the risk associated with the signifcant and at-risk ICT assets and the
transformational programs and projects across the sector.
The Director-General DSITIA is supported by the Queensland Government
ICT Renewal Program.
Scope
Major ICT programs and projects
Standard portfolio management criteria, including duration and return on
investment, governance, delivery and benefts management experience,
are applied to all ICT programs and projects. Major ICT programs and
projects are those that are of signifcant size, risk, complexity, duration or
cost and will require assurance to ensure that they remain on track
*
.
These programs and projects may deliver systemic, organisation-wide,
multi-departmental or whole-of-government change that enable the
delivery of the action plan or of a departments strategic plan.
These programs and projects will:
require funding to be approved or
can be funded by the accountable Director-General but due to
the complexity and risk the Director-General has determined that
additional assurance provided by the Directors-General Council is
warranted.
* Major ICT programs and projects are identifed by using the rules for selection and prioritisation established in the management
framework.
Page 9
Signifcant ICT assets and at-risk ICT assets
Standard portfolio management criteria, including business value, impact
on service delivery, technical conditions and anticipated life, are applied
to all ICT assets.
Signifcant ICT assets represent the greatest risk to reputation, continuous
service delivery, workplace health and safety and investment integrity.
At-risk ICT assets are also signifcant ICT assets and the risks they
represent are likely to become signifcant issues in the immediate future.
Signifcant ICT assets are of high business value. At-risk assets are of high
business value and in poor technical condition, requiring immediate action
to mitigate the risk
*
.
Structure
The diagram shows the governance arrangements supporting delivery of
the strategy and for managing current risk, as approved by Cabinet in
July 2013.
Cabinet
Minister for Science,
Information Technology,
Innovation and the Arts
Directors-General Council
(strategic invesment/
risk decision making)
Departments
(agency CIOs responsible
for delivering/managing
at agency level)
Ministerial ICT
Engagement Group
Director-General DSITIA
(for major and at-risk
ICT investments)
ICT reform agenda and
signifcant and at-risk
investments
* Signifcant ICT assets and at-risk ICT assets are identifed by using the rules for selection and prioritisation established in the
management framework.
Queensland Government
Chief Information Of cer
(advice)
Page 10
Accountability and responsibility
Minister for Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts
The Minister DSITIA is accountable for the management of the
governments current and future ICT investment portfolio, for returning
Queenslands ICT assets to a stable and well-managed state, and for
ensuring ongoing transparent and visible governance of ICT.
The Ministers ICT-related responsibilities include:
ensuring that ICT risk management frameworks and processes are
embedded across government
regularly reporting on the level of current ICT risk to government
implementing the ICT renewal agenda across government in support of
public sector reform
setting government-wide ICT policy direction
approving signifcant or high-risk ICT investment business cases, and
those with signifcant ICT components, prior to their submission to
government.
Other ministers
In terms of ICT risk management and renewal portfolio, ministers are
accountable for:
implementing and supporting the ICT renewal agenda
ensuring efective risk management over ICT investments in their
departments
ensuring that the Minister DSITIA endorses departmental ICT
investments assessed as signifcant or high risk.
Responsibilities of the Directors-General Council
The Director-General DSITIA co-sponsors the Directors-General Council
to assist in ensuring appropriate consideration of the ICT agenda and
its integration into the broader whole-of-government agenda. He is
the accountable of cer for government-wide ICT risk management and
for delivering the governments ICT renewal agenda. The council is
responsible for:
providing guidance on the inclusion of signifcant ICT initiatives and
at-risk ICT activities in the Queensland Government ICT portfolio, under
their scrutiny
advising the Director-General DSITIA on agency ICT-risk profles and
mitigation strategies
advising the Director-General DSITIA on new initiative funding
proposals, their benefts and risks
reporting on the status of ICT renewal across government.
The Director-General DSITIA will take advice from the Directors-General
Council to assist satisfying his accountability for delivering the ICT reform
agenda and to support the Minister DSITIA.
Page 11
The Director-General DSITIA is responsible for:
reporting on ICT risk-mitigation status, as assessed by departments, to
the Minister DSITIA on a quarterly basis
recommending to the Minister the approval or otherwise of all proposed
initiatives that have been categorised as signifcant or at-risk
ensuring enabling policies are followed and refned as required to
deliver on the governments transformation agenda outlined in the
strategy
managing the assurance (i.e. gating) and approval processes for
signifcant and at-risk projects and strategic investments
ensuring the contestability framework is properly applied to ICT
services
considering whole-of-government business cases for as-a-service
initiatives
providing ICT portfolio assessment reports to the Directors-General
Council for the councils advice
providing ICT performance reports to the Directors-General Council for
the councils advice.
The Director-General DSITIA is accountable for:
delivering the ICT renewal agenda as co-sponsor of the
delivering the ICT risk management framework, processes and policies
for implementation in all agencies
delivering ICT renewal in DSITIA
reviewing agency performance to ensure that the government
portfolio remains on course to deliver the desired strategic investment
objectives
delivering an ICT program and project assurance framework for
departments.
Budget-sector department Director-General accountability
delivering ICT reform to support business transformation and
government-wide ICT renewal
ICT risk management in their individual departments
providing accurate and reliable reporting on signifcant and at-risk
programs and projects, and at-risk ICT assets to the Directors-General
Council
implementing a reporting mechanism that is consistent with the
standard portfolio, program and project management methods.
The Queensland Government Chief Information Of cer is accountable for:
ensuring the alignment of the Queensland Government ICT strategy
201317, ICT policy and procedures with the Queensland Government
priorities
Page 12
ensuring that whole-of-government ICT service delivery is enabled
through the establishment of policies to drive a value for money and a
contemporary ICT as-a-service approach throughout the Queensland
Government
ensuring the correct application of the assurance (i.e. gating) and
approval processes for signifcant and at-risk projects and strategic
investments
identifying and advising on emerging trends and issues in service
delivery models and in digital and other emerging technologies to
enable better, more innovative business solutions/service outcomes.
Departmental chief information of cers
Departmental chief information of cers are accountable to their Director-
General. They are responsible for delivering:
ICT business-as-usual operations
ICT renewal in support of departmental business transformation
ICT risk assessment, and reporting on mitigation of that risk to their
Director-General
delivering reportable data to support the sustainability of the
Queensland Government ICT dashboard
delivering ICT change into their department as directed by the council
and agreed to by their Director-General.
Ministerial ICT Engagement Group
The Minister DSITIA has established an engagement group. The groups
key role is to provide the Minister with frank advice about matters
including, but not limited to, proposed policy directions, capability,
industry maturity, and quality of service.
Ongoing industry engagement will continue at of cer level with industry
associations and by direct engagement with companies.
Note: the ICT Engagement Group, industry and research-based groups
are not a formal part of the control and risk management structure for
government ICT.
Decision support to the Director-General DSITIA and the
The ICT asset holding of government is large and complex, as is the
renewal program being initiated through the plan. The collection analysis
and reporting on the combined portfolio requires ongoing management
to enable the council to provide appropriate advice and for the Director-
General DSITIA to make fully-informed decisions. Decision support
arrangements are outlined below.
Signifcant and at-risk ICT assets
ICT assets will be assessed across the sector using a consistent set of
criteria to evaluate the business value of the ICT asset. The criteria will
assess the degree to which the asset supports evidence-based investment
decisions, the breadth of use across business areas, and the impact of
system performance on services and on the community.
Page 13
Business value will be assessed along with the technical quality of the ICT
asset.
Applying the criteria will enable the assessment of the asset in terms of
its technical condition, anticipated life, ease of use and maintenance.
Assessing alignment with enterprise architecture and with departmental
strategies will establish whether the skills and capability to maintain the
asset are available and appropriate.
ICT assets that are identifed as high risk, that is, those with high-business
value but low-technical quality, will be subject to high-priority risk
mitigation.
Where the scope of a new initiative requires major changes and
development of technology to realise the intended investment objectives
and benefts, then investment options will be assessed across the sector.
The criteria will enable assessment of the benefts versus cost ratio, the
impact on community and fscal outcomes, evidence of enhanced service
delivery and collaborative arrangements with the ICT industry. The return
on investment will be compared with the funding likelihood and delivery
and governance experience of available resources
*
.
Programs and projects to address high-risk ICT assets will be established
with priority. Programs and projects that will signifcantly improve
government service delivery for modest investment will also be initiated
with priority.
New and innovative approaches and technology initiatives will also be
considered so that higher risk and cost initiatives that have the potential
to deliver exponential benefts to Queenslanders are included in the
plan. These initiatives will be undertaken under the strictest governance
arrangements to ensure that risk is mitigated as far as possible.
Reportable ICT assets and initiatives
Departmental Directors-General will be required to report on assets that
have been assessed as signifcant or at-risk.
All Directors-General will ensure that the value of their ICT systems are
assessed against the technical quality of their ICT assets to identify those
assets that represent the greatest risk to reputation, continuous service
delivery, workplace health and safety and investment integrity.
These assets are defned as signifcant ICT assets and will require ongoing
risk mitigation by the relevant department and the efectiveness of that
risk mitigation is subject to ongoing reporting to the Directors-General
Council to ensure they are appropriately maintained.
The Directors-General Council will assess and prioritise the signifcant and
at-risk ICT assets across the sector and will advise the Director-General
DSITIA on those requiring priority mitigation.
* For detailed information on assessing ICT assets, refer to the Queensland Government ICT management framework.
Page 14
New ICT programs and projects (initiatives) will also be subject to
assessment of their complexity and strategic importance to determine if
they require scrutiny by the Directors-General Council.
A range of minimum criteria to be considered include cost, alignment with
government policy, impact on service delivery, organisational and cultural
impact, benefts to be delivered, complexity, security and stakeholder
engagement.
The programs approved by the Directors-General Council will be delivered
in accordance with the Queensland Governments program and project
management methodologies. Benefts, risk and change management
frameworks are embedded in these methodologies. Greater scrutiny will
be placed on assurance and gated review over programs and projects.
Application of methodology and accountability of responsible of cers
For critical programs and projects experienced project managers, and in
certain cases program directors, will be sourced from the market according
to standards to be defned through a process for industry registration and
pre-qualifcation (see focus area 2 reference 2.06).
While this will provide greater expertise in the delivery of programs and
projects, accountability for outcomes is clearly set with senior responsible
owners
*
, in line with application of the Queensland Government
methodologies.
To that end, all departments will be required to apply those methodologies
which include but are not exclusive to those referred to in this action plan,
for all programs and projects.
Gateway review and assurance
For critical programs and projects, representing the highest level of risk to
the government, independent gated assurance reviews undertaken by an
external contractor will apply. For lower-risk programs and projects that
are in-scope for reporting to the Directors-General Council, independent
gated assurance reviews will also apply, but these may be undertaken by
either external or internal to government gateway reviewers.
Programs that are in scope for reporting to the Directors-General Council
will be subject to gated assurance reviews in line with the United
Kingdoms Of ce of Government Commerce model for gateway review best
practice.
A gateway review is a short, independent review of a program or project
undertaken at key decision points in the program or projects lifecycle.
Reviews are undertaken to identify opportunities that improve program or
project delivery to ensure the best possible outcome. The benefts lie in
the review team bringing a fresh perspective to identify risks and issues
facing the program or project, thereby avoiding unnecessary costs.
* The single individual with overall responsibility for ensuring that a project or program meets its objectives and delivers the
projected benefts (OGC model).
Page 15
The review is undertaken on behalf of the person accountable for the
success of the program or project. The review team comprises a mix of
government and private sector individuals who have expertise in the
relevant professional felds and issues facing the program or project. The
review is conducted in a spirit of cooperation and collaboration between
the review team and the project team.
Consistent application of gateway assurance processes will support the
successful delivery of ICT initiatives and services that involve the use
or deployment of ICT across the Queensland Government. Assurance
undertaken as part of a formal lifecycle of a project or program will
typically include six assurance gates that interact with an initiative at
key decision points as it progresses towards completion. These decision
points can include key milestones, decision-making points or the release
of funding.
Elements of the gateway review process:
Gate Description
0: Strategic assessment This gate is a program-level-only review which investigates the direction and
planned outcomes of the program, together with the progress of its projects.
This review is repeated throughout the lifecycle of a program, with typical
reviews occurring in start-up, between tranches through delivery and at
closing.
There may be one or two reviews in the start-up stage with multiple reviews
expected to occur during delivery.
1: Business justifcation This gate confrms that the project is achievable and likely to deliver what is
required and analyses evidence captured in the initial, multi-option, business
case and its supported plans and strategies.
2: Delivery strategy This review examines the refned, single option, business case (and its
supporting strategies and plans) for evidence of the proposed approach for
the delivery of the project, value for money and potential for success. Gate 2
occurs before any procurement commitments are made.
3: Investment decision This gate examines the full business case and procurement plans from
an investment perspective and the supporting project documentation for
evidence of sound implementation planning. It confrms the recommended
investment decision is appropriate before awarding contracts.
4: Readiness for service This review validates that the project/solution is ready to make the transition
to operational service. This is a key review for the agency overall and provides
assurance that the solution itself and the various business and operational
areas are ready for implementation of the service. The review takes place afer
all testing has been completed and before roll out or release into production.
5: Operations review and benefts
realisation
This review checks and confrms that the operational service is running
efectively and that the benefts set out in the business case are being
achieved.
This review may be repeated a number of times dependent on the benefts
realisation period. The reports for this review would be provided to the
business area and the program management of ce and in some cases not the
project board, as the project board may have been disbanded by this stage.
The successful transition through gates 0 to 3 should also be the flag for
the release of appropriate funding for the next stage of every program and
project. In addition, the successful passage through gate 5 should also flag
potential fnancial adjustments as the return on investment is realised.
Where appropriate, external assurance will also be undertaken to bolster and
support the results from internal reviews to increase confdence levels for
those making decisions at gates.
Page 16
I like to know that government
has things in hand to keep
their systems and the
information secure.
There are opportunities
for government workers
to learn new skills.
I want my government to
think outside the box and
apply innovative thinking
when theyre looking
at improving the way
government works.
I understand the government is
focusing attention on important
ICT systems. Im positive that
their condition will be managed to
prevent interruptions to services
for me and my family.
My business can only
become more proftable
if I use ICT to reach my
customers.
Making a diference to Queenslanders through the
implementation of the ICT strategy
I want the government to get the
best value for its ICT and it should
look at all options when buying ICT
services.
Its good to know
my personal
information will be
protected.
I want a hassle-free way
to deal with government
whenever and wherever
I want to even
from my mobile.
Citizen
Business
Page 17
Section B: Action plan
Strategic focus areas
Objective
Focus
area
no.
Focus area
Efective digital services
for our clients
1 Improving customer experience of
government services
2 Digital economy
3 Information management
4 Open data
5 Information security and privacy of
individuals
6 Digital archiving
Ef cient digital services
for government
7 Contestability and ICT strategic sourcing
8 ICT as-a-service
9 ICT innovation
10 Signifcant and at-risk ICT asset
stabilisation
Transformed and capable
workforce
11 A responsive and competent workforce
12 Portfolio, program and project
management competency
Page 18
Strategic focus area 1: Improving customer
experience of government services
NOW
Limited sharing of information
between government and the
community
The growing demand to simplify access to government services has
never been more apparent. As customer expectations and their use
of technology continues to change dramatically the Queensland
Government needs to rethink how it delivers services. This requires
actively listening to customers and understanding their experiences and
then providing information and services in ways that suit them.
In order to improve customer experience a two pronged approach will
be undertaken, focusing on both direct digital access to services for the
community and utilising digital to provide front-line staf with better
access to information and tools.
Actions and associated projects will focus on:
the development of digitally enabled service delivery channels
embedding a customer-centric approach into all future system design
and improvement
implementing new whole-of-government multi-channel capabilities
and service transition to digital platforms
enabling customers to access the services they want online
better real time access to the right information for front-line staf to
improve service quality and fulflment.
Increased availability of online services
New technology is used by front-line government staf to
deliver better, more ef cient services
Government services are accessible in new ways
Government information silos are broken down and
information is used to inform improvement
FUTURE:
Information sharing, access and increased interoperability
drives productivity across the Queensland public sector
At a glance
I want a hassle-free way to deal
with government whenever and
wherever I want to even from
my mobile.
I like being able to tell
government my ideas
from home.
Page 19
Strategic focus area 1: Improving customer experience of
government services
Business drivers
The Queensland Government is committed to delivering a one-stop-
shop approach for customers. Based on international best practice,
customer research and an analysis of current service provision, several
opportunities have been identifed that will enable government to meet
customer requirements and at the same time deliver productivity benefts
for government. Opportunities include:
signifcantly improving the availability of digital services and through
increased take up of these services online, delivering more with less
better collaboration between government agencies in the provision
of information and services and the reuse of shared online tools
reducing cost and time to delivery
reduced duplication in the way customer information is gathered and
processed reducing inef ciency, confusion and frustration.
The ICT Audit also identifed that a collaborative and shared approach
to address the issues of the current aged and fragmented approach to
systems, architecture and information was required.
Investment objectives
Primarily ICT investment is required to support and enable the delivery of
improved services, information and customer experience. This includes:
consistent user experience across all channels
increasing the use of digital across all channels
ICT support to meet customer needs and expectations (i.e. 24/7)
collaborative and shared approach to information and service provision
including reduced duplication
quality and current information delivered to resolve customer enquiries
at frst point of contact.
Business benefts
Simplifed and streamlined processes, delivering more for less
Improved customer satisfaction and ef cient government
Reduced duplication of efort through consolidation of channels and
solutions
Reduced service delivery costs through channel migration
Higher levels of front-line productivity through access to information
required to fulfl service needs.
Page 20
Contributing initiatives
ACTION and description Outcome
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Access to government services largely remains through traditional channels ofen still fragmented across
agencies limiting seamless self-service opportunities
[1.01] ACTION: Finalise Queensland Government
plans for a One Stop Shop and establish a whole-
of-government channel management strategy to
deliver One Stop Shop outcomes.
This will build upon the existing capabilities across
government and focus on a digital-frst approach
which reinforces a single website experience
through a franchise approach, along with the one
number for Queensland Government (13QGOV).
Sets policy direction.
Provides agencies with the
framework to develop new digital
services and extend existing services
to multi-channel service delivery.
Deliver consistent ICT enterprise
architecture and standards to enable
interoperability for One Stop Shop
outcomes.
December
2013
June
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Government departments will develop a clear plan and road map to increase the use of digital channels and
transition services to an online environment
[1.02] ACTION: Each agency will develop a digital
channel strategy, which includes a road map
to transition services into the One Stop Shop
environment.
Digital service road maps will provide a clear and
defnitive plan for each agency to transition into
a One Stop Shop environment with a digital-frst
focus.
All government departments will
have established plans in place to
be reviewed by the One Stop Shop
chief executive of cers council and
published on the ICT portal.
Outcome KPI is 100% information
online by June 2014 and 80%
transactional services online by June
2015.
September
2014
DSITIA,
departmental
Directors-
General
Challenge: Service delivery must not be fragmented. It should be focused on the end user Queenslanders
[1.03] ACTION: Embed community-centric principles
in planning, design, reporting, and continuous
service improvement.
A program will be developed to ensure the customer
experience is at the centre including strategies
to listen to the customer, undertake user centred
design, report on performance and aggregate data.
The community will be at the centre
of future government service delivery
strategies.
June
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Community members expectations of online access need to be met so that they dont have to provide multiple
departments with the same information
[1.04] ACTION: Develop and pilot new service
oferings to improve the customer experience and
reduce duplication.
Develop and pilot new service oferings to improve
the customer experience and reduce duplication,
including:
tell us once
click to chat
social media
one place for all feedback and complaints.
This initiative will focus on the sharing of certain
information across government agencies to
reduce duplication and frustration when accessing
government services. Click to chat and social
media trials will encourage community members to
interact online in new ways.
The community will have an
improved experience online with the
June
2014
DSITIA
Page 21
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Shared tools are required to support online service delivery and reduce duplication of investment
[1.05] ACTION: Develop and pilot key tools for
simplifed authentication of identity and for
transaction tracking.
Develop and pilot key tools:
single user authentication capability which can
be used by all agencies
whole-of-government people and services
directory
whole-of-government enquiry tracking
capability.
Community members wishing to
do business online with multiple
departments will be able to log on
with a single user ID, simplifying
access and use. This will be achieved
through a user opt in approach
and will draw on experience in the
Department of Education, Training
and Employment (DETE).
The new directory will allow
customers to be easily and
seamlessly referred to the right
place.
A business case will be fnalised
to allow government to make an
informed decision on opportunities
and options for enquiry tracking.
June
2014
DSITIA support
from DETE,
DTESB
Challenge: Customer experience of interactions with government can be enhanced through better use of digital services
[1.06] ACTION: Explore and document opportunities
for improved customer experience and enhanced
service delivery through new technology and new
partnerships:
upgrade technology support for 13QGOV
through an industry partnership
plan for digital enhancement to face-to-face
service delivery, i.e. trial video conferencing
with industry partners
innovate and collaborate on cross sectoral
partnerships to enhance customer outcomes.
Digital capability underpins all
service delivery channels and
innovation and use of emerging
technologies will continue to
enhance the customer experience
and deliver ef ciencies to
government.
August
2015
DSITIA
Queensland Commission of Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 1: nil
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 1: nil
Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry recommendations relevant to focus area 1: nil
Page 22
Strategic focus area 2: Digital economy
NOW
Constrained economic
opportunities to implement
digitally-enabled community
services to build
The Queensland Commission of Audit identifed the need for immediate
fscal repair to restore Queenslands fnancial strength and the states
AAA credit rating. Whilst cost containment forms a major element of
fnancial reform, the Commission also noted that Queensland can no
longer rely on traditional drivers of economic growth such as mining and
population growth.
A successful digital economy will play an important role in securing
Queenslands economic future. The development of new ICT industries
and markets within Queensland and across the globe will help the state
develop new streams of revenue and further economic prosperity into
the future.
In order to cultivate and develop a stronger digital economy in
Queensland a clear plan to tackle the big issues is required. This
includes challenging established norms and developing stronger
partnerships between government and industry. Whilst digital education
will remain a focus, traditional approaches will be expanded upon to
assist new business getting of the ground whilst assisting established
organisations to grow.
To achieve the desired future state, actions supporting the digital
economy will focus on:
developing the enablers to support digital growth (infrastructure,
skills, open data, industry support)
attracting new ICT business to Queensland
ensuring SMEs are aforded opportunities to grow business through
partnerships and local engagement
making it easier to do business with Queensland Government
sharing commercialisation opportunities with industry
professionalising the Queensland ICT industry
providing better access to tools and education to ensure Queensland
businesses thrive in the digital age.
Identify options to
professionalise the
Queensland ICT industry
Increase digital maturity
across the business sector
Identify opportunities
to improve digital
infrastructure to attract
new business and open
new global markets
Launch the Queensland
Government digital
economy strategy
FUTURE:
Increased development and uptake of digital serice drives
Queenslands digital economy
At a glance
Its good to see opportunities
being provided for small to
medium-sized business. My
business can become more
proftable if I use ICT to reach my
customers.
Page 23
Strategic focus area 2: Digital economy
Business drivers
There is a need to ensure Queenslands productivity increases both in
the public and private sectors to improve the states competitiveness
and international standing. Being competitive will also improve the
wellbeing (social and economic) and provide career opportunities for all
Queenslanders, ultimately growing the economy.
The digital economy will:
create the conditions in which business can thrive by providing the
right tools and opportunities
make it easier for local industry to do business with government,
reducing costs and increasing productivity in both the public and
private sectors
enable online participation by Queensland households to the
national broadband network to improve access to health, education,
government services and job opportunities
develop new innovative service delivery mechanisms (government and
non-government) for Queensland and beyond
enable health and aged-care services for remote and rural patients
through online access to physicians
develop innovative and flexible education services to extend online
learning resources to households and businesses
easier access for the majority of Queenslanders to choose to access
government through the internet and other digital services.
Business benefts
Realising the investment objectives will:
increase business growth potential through greater online reach to
customers
increase access to digital tools to improve business decision making
improve the productivity potential of Queensland businesses through
online activities and engagement
increase the percentage of households and businesses using online
opportunities and services
increase remote access to health specialists for people in remote, rural
and outer metropolitan Queensland
increase the connectivity of schools, TAFEs, higher education
institutions and universities to develop online education services
increase the number of Queensland workers with tele-working
capability
increase service parity between households and businesses in major
cities with those in remote areas
reduce government and business operating costs through faster online
channel interaction for information and transactions.
Page 24
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: There is a need for a more coordinated approach for all Queenslanders to beneft from the digital economy
[2.01] ACTION: Develop the Queensland digital
economy strategy.
Develop and release a Queensland digital
economy draf strategy for discussion, identifying
opportunities and challenges for all Queenslanders
to beneft from the digital economy.
Release the Queensland
Governments digital economy draf
strategy for consultation.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Unclear measures of how Queensland businesses and government are equipped to participate in digital markets
in an online environment
[2.02] ACTION: Digital capability maturity
assessment and benchmarking program.
The maturity program will help Queensland
businesses and government gain insight into how
to better use digital services to enhance business
growth and digital productivity through improved
skills in digital business management.
Increase in the number of businesses
selling online.
Increase in the digital maturity
capability of Queensland businesses
and government.
June
2014
DSITIA, DTESB
Challenge: Limitations in telecommunications infrastructure and digital literacy for some Queenslanders creates a digital
divide limiting their access to government and commercial services
[2.03] ACTION: Develop proposals to improve the
digital literacy and broadband connectivity of the
community and businesses.
Establish programs with local councils and
key government agencies to encourage digital
engagement and broadband connectivity through
the delivery of their respective services.
Increased connectivity to cheaper
and faster telecommunications
services will close the digital divide
particularly for regional and remote
Queenslanders and those less
digitally engaged.
December
2014
DSITIA, DTESB
Challenge: Small to medium enterprises (SMEs) should have opportunities to start up and grow within Queensland
[2.04] ACTION: Deliver the SME ICT policy.
Maximise opportunities for SMEs to successfully
tender for government business.
A new SME ICT policy will be embedded into the
ICT procurement reform agenda to ensure that
SME involvement is considered on all government
procurement activities.
Removing red tape will enable SMEs to compete
more efectively for government business.
Guidelines for government departments will
ensure that SMEs are properly considered in all ICT
procurement activities.
Wherever possible high value contracts are
broken into manageable and identifable projects
to minimise risks to government and maximise
opportunities for SMEs.
Local industry and SMEs will
be provided with signifcant
opportunities to present the market
with innovative cost-efective
solutions on contracts of all sizes.
Local industry growth is expected
as a result of more opportunities
for SMEs particularly in providing
innovative solutions to meet
Queensland Government service
delivery challenges.
A higher rate of SME access to
government business opportunities.
Government departments consider
and, where appropriate, test local
SME capability for all suitable ICT
procurement.
A higher rate of SME participation
across a wider range of ICT
contracted services.
Better value for money, flexibility
and improved levels of innovation.
July
2014
November
2013
DSITIA, DHPW
Page 25
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: A less restrictive approach towards commercialisation of intellectual property will allow growth of local industry
[2.05] ACTION: Review commercialisation of ICT
intellectual property (IP).
A review will be undertaken into governments
role in commercialising IP associated with joint
ICT initiatives to identify alternative approaches to
better sharing of jointly-developed ideas between
government and industry. The fndings of the
report will make recommendations to the Directors-
General Council.
The review will deliver clear
recommendations to transform
the reuse of IP to ensure that
local industry are provided the
opportunity to commercialise jointly-
developed capabilities.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Registration and prequalifcation of industry skills and capabilities consumes signifcant resources
[2.06] ACTION: Queensland ICT industry
registration and pre-qualifcation options.
A jointly-developed options paper will be
developed by the Queensland Government and
major ICT industry groups to consider how to
make registration and recognition of skills and
capabilities an easier process.
The paper will examine standards of conduct and
qualifcation requirements to ensure standards of
performance and service are maintained to make
the Queensland industry the best in the country.
An approach and plan to
professionalise the ICT industry
will result in increased levels of
accountability of ICT services
providers, provide assurance that
industry providers meet minimum
levels of competency, and drive self
regulation for poor performance or
unethical behaviour.
December
2013
DSITIA, DHPW
Challenge: Seniors have limited access, and in some cases limited skills, in the use of digital technologies
[2.07] ACTION: Develop and implement the digital
access and skills for seniors program.
The digital access program will be developed in
close cooperation with the non-government sector
providing seniors with access to computers and the
internet, and the skills to leverage digital services.
Increase in seniors using online
methods.
December
2013
DCCSDS
Challenge: Digital education opportunities are limited
[2.08] ACTION: Develop and implement digital
education sector program.
Providing schools, teachers and students with
access to educational content.
Increase awareness for teachers
of contemporary digital education
theory. Research-driven curriculum
includes digital business
management practice. Improved
ability for students to access
education via digital means.
September
2014
DETE
Challenge: Access to digital services in remote and regional Queensland is limited, generating inequities in access to
services across the state
[2.09] ACTION: Develop and implement remote
access programs.
The remote access program will allow regional
and remote communities access to online health
specialists, legal services, educational and other
community services.
Increase in remote communities
using online services.
September
2014
QH
Page 26
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: The need to improve digital awareness and education in Indigenous communities
[2.10] ACTION: Conduct digital education and
awareness education in Indigenous communities.
Indigenous communications program assisting
Indigenous people to gain digital skills and increase
participation of Indigenous communities in the
digital economy.
Increase in the number of businesses
owned by Indigenous people and run
using online methods.
September
2014
DETE
Page 27
Strategic focus area 3: Information management
NOW
Limited sharing of information
between government
departments and community
The increasing volume of information afecting government departments
has become an impediment to governments traditional service delivery
model. Focused information management provides government with
an opportunity to address the problems associated with managing
increasing volumes of information and to take advantage of the
opportunities better access to information ofers.
Improving information management in government requires initiatives
that strengthen cooperation and information sharing across
departments as well as supports the move towards more transparent
government by making more information available to the public.
Focus of actions and associated investments:
Making information more easily accessible and visible across
departments enables Queensland Government and the community to
derive greater value from its information.
Ensuring that records across the sector are consistently reviewed,
appraised, managed, disposed of and archived meets legislative
requirements.
Improving governments ability to manage knowledge gained
through its activities and interactions with the community ensures a
consistent approach to information exchange across government.
Making sure that lessons learned through both success and failure
can be used as precedents or models for subsequent actions and
ongoing improvement.
Ensuring that appropriate information exchange systems supports
executive decision making.
FUTURE:
Information sharing, access and increased interoperability
drives productivity across the Queensland public sector
Develop an Information Management Blueprint for government
Increase the accessibility and visibility of information across
departments
Increase consistency in the management of information across
the sector
At a glance
I like the idea that information is
easily shared across departments so
that I only need to ask once and get
a better service.
Its good to know that
government decision-makers
have access to up-to-date and
reliable information.
Page 28
Strategic focus area 3: Information management
Business drivers
Government relies on ef cient access to the right information to
support decision making, to meet operational needs and as evidence of
compliance with legislation and policy requirements. Information across
the Queensland Government is not shared readily or efectively between
departments, with other jurisdictions or with the public. This results in
duplication and excessive costs to create and manage information and
data. Inability to access and reuse data reduces public confdence in the
governments transparency, accountability and ability to deliver services.
The growth of industry is also stifled due to the lack of information to
inform strategic decisions.
Investment objectives include:
increasing information interoperability and sharing of information
across departments to streamline services
making information easily accessible and visible across departments,
enabling Queensland Government to derive greater value from its
information
ensuring management information systems support executive decision
making
ensuring records across the sector are consistently reviewed,
appraised, managed, disposed and archived
capturing how government has acted to ensure matters are handled
consistently and can be used as precedents or models for subsequent
actions
ensuring records are retained to meet legislative and regulatory
requirements.
Business benefts
The anticipated benefts from information management include:
improved access to information to support decision making
improved time to retrieve data, analyse and draw conclusions to
facilitate decision making
increased understanding of the economic value of information and
information sharing
enhanced capability to share information
enhanced collaboration between government, businesses and the
community
improved comparative benchmarking enabling greater accountability
and transparency of government services
improved public confdence in the Queensland Governments ability to
deliver services
reduced operational and capital costs associated with managing and
storing duplicated data
reduced costs to deliver services.
Page 29
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Government departments traditionally focus on the technologies associated with information management
instead of efectively managing the information available to them
[3.01] ACTION: Deliver the Queensland
Government Information Management Blueprint for
consideration by the Queensland Government.
Managing information in contrast to managing
technologies requires a new direction for
government. The government needs an information
management blueprint that departments can use
to guide their participation in the new information
age.
The blueprint will include options for management
information systems (MIS) and form the basis for
information management program plans across
departments.
The Information Management
Blueprint will describe the
future information management
environment for government.
Departments will be able to evaluate
how far away from that environment
they are and what steps are required
to align themselves more closely to a
new set of information management
expectations.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Government needs to establish arrangements that support efective information exchange across departments.
Those arrangements need to take account of information exchange requirements in a multi-vendor, as-a-service
environment
[3.02] ACTION: Revise the Queensland Government
Information Architecture.
The current information management environment
is characterised by barriers, real or perceived,
which impede efective information exchange.
The fragmentation this causes may be exacerbated
as agencies move to new as-a-service arrangements
with multiple vendors, and potentially using
diferent cloud providers.
The information architecture will
establish a concise set of policies
and standards to enable structuring
of an information architecture for the
future.
The architecture will provide the
means by which information systems
can openly share information in
pursuit of improved operational
outcomes.
March
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Government departments are experiencing exponential growth in the volume of information they collect and use
[3.03] ACTION: Develop information quality
framework.
Collecting, processing and storing the large
volumes of information government acquires is
consuming disproportionate internal resources.
The government will develop an information quality
and value assessment framework that will assist
departments in deciding how to maximise the value
of its information while minimising its costs.
This will be aligned with the reviewed government
recordkeeping policy framework.
An endorsed information quality
and value assessment framework
that departments can reference
to manage their information in a
consistent way across government
will act to standardise the way
data is categorised and managed
to provide valuable information to
decision makers.
Improved focus on analytics rather
than on collection and storage of
data will improve the quality of
decision making.
Compliance with legislative
obligations under the Public Records
Act 2002.
February
2014
DSITIA
Page 30
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Government departments are unable to freely share decision making information due to legislative and policy
barriers, either real or perceived
[3.04] ACTION: Review of the policy and legislative
framework in support of the Information
Management Blueprint and a revised Queensland
Government Information Architecture.
Certain policy and legislative provisions have
been cited as barriers to information exchange,
potentially impacting on the health and safety of
Queenslanders.
As well, the sheer volume of ICT policy and
procedural content makes it dif cult to identify
the authority for sharing information to assist in
operational procurement decision making.
A full review of the legislative, policy
and procedural requirements relating
to ICT investment (procurement)
and information management will
be designed to reduce red tape and
simplify ICT procurement processes,
and to simplify the way in which
information may be exchanged
across and between agencies.
July
2014
DSITIA, DPC
Challenge: Government must develop the capabilities required to seamlessly exchange information needed to support
front-line services
[3.05] ACTION: Develop a pilot of the Queensland
Government information exchange process.
Government will establish a pilot program to test
the preferred future state for information exchange.
The pilot will implement and test the business
processes, change management and technology
enablers that will make the new information
environment possible.
The pilot will establish a reliable
and modular information exchange
environment, and processes that
can be applied across the multiple
of business models government
departments operate.
March
2014
DSITIA, pilot
agencies
support
Challenge: Secure access to government information across government departments requires improvement
[3.06] ACTION: Pilot a single federated public
service identity.
Secure access to information across government
is reliant upon a common identifer for all public
services staf. The identity pilot will be conducted in
partnership with established industry providers and
will assess the business benefts and feasibility of a
single government identity.
The pilot will include early market engagement to
confrm the viability and approach and will inform
the one-government project.
Community information will be kept
safe by ensuring that only the right
people can access the right level
of information to fulfl community
needs. Better access to information
systems in diferent departments will
be possible.
This will improve interoperability
between departments and the
community.
June
2014
DSITIA, pilot
agencies
support
Challenge: Government needs to establish functional ways to share information, inform policy development and consult
with public service of cers
[3.07] ACTION: Launch the Queensland Government
enterprise social network.
A government-wide capability for social media
interaction for public service of cers will be
established.
This will enable public service
of cers to collaborate and interact
using social media, and will improve
informal information sharing across
departmental boundaries.
March
2014
DSITIA
Page 31
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: The sheer quantity of data collected across government can no longer be organised and assessed using
conventional practices
[3.08] ACTION: Pilot a whole-of-government
information search capability.
Government requires a new approach to
understanding how to manage the ever-increasing
volume of data and how to ensure that high-quality
decision-making information is created from that
data.
Government will run a pilot to
understand how decision making
can be improved through better
analysis of data, using contemporary
processes and technology.
October
2014
DSITIA
Queensland Commission of Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 3: 58
Page 32
Strategic focus area 4: Open data
NOW
Limited government data and
information is available to the
public
On 9 October 2012, the Premier announced an open data revolution
for the Queensland Government with the aim of releasing as much
government data as possible.
Data is becoming a major currency for modern society. The open release
of data will help deliver the Queensland Governments commitment to
open and transparent government as well as to drive innovation, growth
and job creation by the private sector to directly beneft individual
Queenslanders.
Actions and associated projects focused on delivering on the
Queensland Government open data principles:
Government data will be available for open use.
We will make government data openly available under flexible
licences, allowing for reuse by the public including by business,
researchers and individuals.
Government data will be available free.
We will make government data available free in future, except if the
charge is statutory or cost recovery has a clear net beneft for the
Queensland community and has been approved by Cabinet.
Government data will be in accessible formats and easy to fnd.
We will make government data easily discoverable through
data.qld.gov.au in accessible formats that promote its reuse.
Government data will be released within set standards and
accountabilities.
We will make government data available in a timely and relevant
manner unless it is restricted for reasons of privacy, public safety,
security, commercial confdentiality or compliance with the law. Each
department will be accountable for the release of data in accordance
with set standards.
FUTURE:
Data is easily accessible, visible and available for reuse by the
public, business, researchers and individuals
Open data portal features ongoing release of data
Data released in a reusable format
Public data release schedule
At a glance
Having a range of government
data at my fngertips will help
my business be more responsive
to my customers.
I like being able to
see that government is
doing the right thing.
Page 33
Strategic focus area 4: Open data
Business drivers
Government relies on ef cient access to the right information to support
decision making, to meet operational needs, and as evidence of compliance
with legislative and policy requirements. Information across the Queensland
Government is not shared readily or efectively between departments, with
other jurisdictions or with the public. This results in data duplication and
excessive costs to create and manage data. Inability to access and reuse data
reduces public confdence in the governments transparency, accountability
and ability to deliver services. The growth of industry is also stifled due to the
lack of information to inform strategic decisions.
Information is easily accessible and visible across departments enabling
Queensland Government to derive greater value from its information.
Under flexible licences, information is easily accessible, visible and
available for reuse by the public, including businesses, researchers and
individuals.
Information is free to the public (except if the charge is statutory or cost
recovery has a clear net beneft for the Queensland community and has
been approved by Cabinet).
Information is in accessible formats and easy to fnd through
www.data.qld.gov.au.
Information is made available in a timely and relevant manner, unless it
is restricted for reasons of privacy, public safety, security, commercial
confdentiality or compliance with the law.
To nurture and accelerate innovation in the state of Queensland and
deliver economic benefts to the community.
Business benefts
The anticipated benefts from open data include:
improved access to information to support decision making
improved time to retrieve data, analyse and draw conclusions to facilitate
decision making
increased understanding of the value of information and information
sharing
enhanced capability to share information
enhanced collaboration between government, businesses and the
community
improved comparative benchmarking enabling greater accountability and
transparency of government services
improved public confdence in the Queensland Governments ability to
deliver services
improved ease of entry for service providers enabling economic growth
reduced costs to deliver services.
Page 34
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Access to information is limited
[4.01] ACTION: Release data through central open
data portal.
Open data portal to provide central access to
Queensland Government data consistently
published in reusable formats.
Data is easily accessible, visible and available
for reuse by the public, business, researchers
and individuals. Data to be published in a format
that can be widely used and value added with the
majority of in-scope Queensland Government data
published.
Allow the public to easily fnd
Queensland Government data from
one central location.
March
2014
DPC, DSITIA
Challenge: Improved public awareness of what Queensland Government data exists and when it will be released
[4.02] ACTION: Release open data strategies.
Open data strategies released by departments and
statutory authorities.
Setting out how the release of data will be
managed, in particular:
which datasets each department owns, and the
schedule for their release
how each department will maintain the quality
of its data
processes each department will use to
determine release and be responsive to
Queenslanders changing data needs.
A clear road map for the future
release of data set out for end users.
December
2013
DPC, DSITIA
Challenge: Data in its raw format is dif cult to visualise and interpret
[4.03] ACTION: Improved visualisation of data
enabled on the open data portal.
Additional visualisation enabled for data released
in appropriate formats on the open data portal.
A more user-friendly open data
portal will allow data to be
understood more easily.
March
2014
DPC, DSITIA
Challenge: Information on grant recipients across the whole of government is dif cult to obtain and is not consistent
[4.04] ACTION: Release consistent data on grant
recipients.
The Commission of Audit found Queensland
Government grants administration and reporting
was fragmented in nature despite being the second
largest contributor to general government sector
expenses. Release of data in a consistent format on
Queensland Government grant recipients through
open data will increase transparency.
Greater transparency regarding the
Queensland Governments grant
recipients and programs.
December
2014
DPC, DSITIA
Challenge: A coherent approach is needed for the sharing and release of data and information
[4.05] ACTION: Develop an open data program
plan and blueprint (linked to the Information
Management Blueprint).
Data is easily accessible, visible
and available for reuse by the
public, business, researchers and
individuals.
March
2014
DPC, DSITIA
Challenge: Gaining access to information can be dif cult
[4.06] ACTION: Develop and implement portals for
access to information.
Information will be published in a
format that can be widely used and
value added.
March
2014
DPC, DSITIA
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 4: 14 and 58
Page 35
Strategic focus area 5: Information security and
privacy of individuals
NOW
Information security and privacy
management largely forcus on
internal to government networks
Providing a modern, efective digital environment for the community
to interact with government requires a new approach to traditional
information security practices. While the security and privacy of
information remains a top priority, security must become an enabler
of the future state where information can be openly shared across
boundaries to realise a customer-centric approach to services.
Complex organisational structures have to date defned what
information is shared, with whom and how. A consequence of this is that
the community is forced to access government services from multiple
points and to provide personal information to diferent departments for
diferent purposes, none of which are coordinated.
At organisational levels departments encounter legislative and
structural barriers to sharing information that could improve the
communities experience as they interact with government.
The policy position articulated in the Queensland Government ICT
strategy 201317 requires departments to manage current risks to
their service delivery environments and to pursue managed services,
including cloud-based oferings as a preferred option for future
investment.
Moving to the transformed environment described will enable
government to be far more responsive to community needs than ever
before. It will also require information security risk to be managed
across all levels of interaction between government, community and
managed service providers to ensure that the individuals privacy is
properly protected, and that system resilience is maintained.
A customer-centric approach to service delivery
Data security impact assessment
Standard framework for managing data security and
protecting privacy
Data sovereignty policy endorsed
Cloud brokerage approach endorsed
FUTURE:
Information security and privacy management practices are
agile and focus on enabling community outcomes
At a glance
Its good to know my
personal information
will be protected.
I like to know that government has
things in hand to keep their systems
and the information secure.
Page 36
Strategic focus area 5: Information security and privacy of
individuals
Business drivers
Reducing the governments ICT spend drives the need for new service
delivery models such as ICT as-a-service. A key element of implementing
the ICT as-a-service strategy is that the Queensland Government utilise as
appropriate cloud-based computing and other emerging technologies.
*

While ICT as-a-service has the potential to reduce ICT costs, the strategies
also pose new threats to information security and privacy.
Security audits across government have identifed systemic information
security risks in existing systems, services and governance.
In addition, major events in Queensland such as the Commonwealth
Games to be held on the Gold Coast in 2018 and the G20 Brisbane summit
in 2014 elevate the risk and likelihood of attacks to our ICT systems,
services and information.
The investment objectives will ensure:
contract arrangements contain provisions for information security and
privacy protection
improved information security governance with greater alignment to
recognised industry standards
security practices and risk mitigation investment strategies are driven
by business needs
privacy of sensitive information is maintained whilst enabling
information interoperability
improved service delivery and cyber security for online services
the private and personal information of Queenslanders remains
confdential and secure.
Business benefts
Improved public confdence in the use of cost-efective, ef cient service
delivery models that uphold privacy and information security.
Reduced risk of security and confdentiality breaches and data
accessibility issues.
Higher levels of ef ciency and productivity through access to the right
information when and where it is needed.
* The Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013, p. 71 and April 2013, p. 33 A plan better services for
Queenslanders Queensland Government response.
Page 37
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Departments require guidance on information security and privacy implications for cloud-based and managed
services
[5.01] ACTION: Develop security and privacy
guidance, risk assessment and business impact
assessment tools to assist agencies in determining
appropriate service delivery models, based on
sensitivity of data and associated risk.
Develop a policy that addresses data sovereignty
and privacy pertaining to of-shoring of information.
Greater assurance in the privacy
of information through informed
service delivery selection.
Agencies will have a consistent
mechanism for considering
information security and the privacy
implications of service delivery
options.
Clear position and transparency on
criteria for permitting of-shoring of
information.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Government ICT contract arrangements require enhancement to better enable secure adoption of new service
delivery models
[5.02] ACTION: Revised ICT service contracts.
Information security and privacy standards will form
part of all ICT service contracts.
Develop guidance and templated contract
provisions, including service continuity, data
recovery, data migration and service exit
arrangements.
Incorporate contract provisions that permit the
demonstration of privacy and security assurance by
service providers through a range of mechanisms
(i.e. independent certifcation, penetration testing).
Information security and privacy
assurance forms part of all ICT
service acquisition and contracts.
Assurance in the continuity of
service delivery to the public while
retaining the ability to transition
between providers.
Streamlining the procurement of
services for providers that meet
recognised industry security
standards.
Business continuity is assured
through efective contract and
service performance management.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Appropriate security and availability of data handled on behalf of government by service providers needs to be
ensured
[5.03] ACTION: Assessment requirements
established.
Develop guidance and tools for mapping between
Queensland information security standards and
widely adopted industry standards to simplify
service assessment.
Services to be assessed against a standard set of
approved criteria to ensure that individual privacy
and government data security requirements are
met.
Assessments of these services shall be made
available for reuse across government.
Managed and cloud services to be subjected to
periodic review and testing.
Reuse of existing service
assessments are leveraged to
streamline service procurement pre-
qualifcation of services from third
party providers.
Information and service security
assurance is maintained.
December
2013
DSITIA
Page 38
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Information standards must be relevant and driven by business needs. They must be capable of being easily
implemented and demonstrated by both departments and service providers
[5.04] ACTION: Review standards in terms of
relevance and business ability to comply.
Adopt a standards-based information security
management framework and acceptance of
recognised industry standards.
Implement the intent of the Deloitte information
security governance review recommendations.
Work collaboratively with the Queensland Audit
Of ce in advocating for improved management of
the information security risk across Queensland
Government, supported by common standards,
training and executive involvement.
Government has greater capacity to
acquire services assessed against
established and recognised security
standards.
Improved governance of information
security and risk.
Improved security posture of the
governments information, systems
and services.
March
2014
DSITIA,
departmental
support
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 5: 56
Page 39
Strategic focus area 6: Digital archiving
NOW
Limited maturity among
government departments for
managing digital records
Government is increasingly dependent on information technology for
administering government business and delivering services to the
citizens of Queensland. Overwhelmingly, the primary evidence and
corporate memory of public administration exists in the form of digital
public records. Management of digital information for long periods
of time is a signifcant risk for government because of the enormous
volumes of content being created and retained, the rapid pace of
technological change which causes hardware and sofware to become
obsolete, the inherent fragility of digital information and the immaturity
of recordkeeping systems and processes in public authorities.
To address this issue and to meet community expectations for online
access to digital public records, a coordinated whole-of-government
approach to digital archiving will be implemented. This approach
includes encouraging industry to develop and provide services to public
authorities for preserving the authenticity and long-term accessibility
of digital public records, including establishing a trusted repository for
permanent value digital public records under the control of Queensland
State Archives.
This program will help ensure the ef ciency and accountability of public
administration and protect the rights and entitlements of Queensland
citizens by providing confdence in, and assurance of, the longevity of
the evidence base of government. It will also improve access to, and the
usability of, public records to enhance the cultural, social and economic
development of Queensland.
Establish digital archives infrastructure and services for
enabling ongoing access to permanent value public records
Ensure public authority access to digital continuity tools and
services for digital records in their custody
Enhance digital recordkeeping maturity and capabilities across
government
FUTURE:
High levels of digital recordkeeping maturity in public
authorities so that the critical digital information assets of
government are accessible to current and future generations
At a glance
Im glad future generations will
be able to fnd out about our
past through the preservation of
Queenslands photos and records.
Its important that government
records are maintained for the long
haul and that Queenslanders can
access them if they want to.
Page 40
Strategic focus area 6: Digital archiving
Business drivers
The Queensland public expect to be able to access public records online
now and into the future. There is also a legislative requirement for
management of and access to, public records. The loss of public records
is becoming increasingly likely due to technology obsolescence. In these
circumstances, it is imperative that government develop and implement a
sustainable plan for digital preservation and archives.
Digital archiving will:
preserve Queenslands vital digital information assets and the
documentary evidence of government business
ensure legal compliance with the Public Records Act 2002 and other
related legislation
preserve and enable ongoing authorised access to digital records
allow public researchers to search, view online or download digital and
non-digital archives 24/7 in a variety of formats
ensure government departments have access to enhanced standards,
tools, policies, guidance and services for the long-term management of
digital information assets
enable the transferral of permanent value digital records to the control
and custody of Queensland State Archives
establish trustworthy, reliable, secure, scalable and sustainable whole-
of-government digital preservation and access infrastructure
provide online access to archival holdings through a large scale
digitisation program for legacy records.
Business benefts
improve access to and usability of public records to enhance the
cultural, social and economic development of Queensland
reduce manual overheads associated with managing departmental
records
reduce information storage costs
increase the reliability of government digital records
increase service continuity for storing, searching and retrieving digital
records
increase digitisation of the existing archival collection, to meet client
demands for online access
increase public and other stakeholder confdence in the long-term
management of government digital records
improve digital recordkeeping maturity and capability.
Page 41
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Whilst most government information is born digital a signifcant amount of it does not stay digital, increasing
costs and reducing online access
[6.01] ACTION: Develop the born digital, stay
digital policy guide.
The policy and practice guide will assist
departments ensure that information created
in digital formats stays that way throughout its
lifecycle.
A signifcant reduction in red tape
and overheads managing records
is anticipated through the adoption
of the born digital, stay digital
approach to records management.
Records will be searchable and
easily discoverable further reducing
the costs associated with the
management of public records within
the Queensland Government.
December
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Consistent access to public records through digital means requires improvement
[6.02] ACTION: Develop a business case and
blueprint for a whole-of-government digital
archiving program.
The business case will seek funding to implement
the blueprints program of work to improve service
delivery in three key areas:
improved management of digital public records
across government
capability to preserve the permanent value
digital records of the state for the beneft of
current and future generations
increasing online accessibility of historical
government records in Queensland State
Archives custody.
Endorsed business case and
blueprint to improve service delivery
in the three key areas.
June
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: A detailed plan outlining the key deliverables of the governments digital archiving program is required
[6.03] ACTION: Develop and implement a digital
archiving program plan.
The program plan to be developed in consultation
with key stakeholders will set out the actions and
timelines for implementing a multi-year program
of work which will be undertaken in partnership
with public authorities, industry and other key
stakeholders.
Endorsed program plan.
Digital archives infrastructure and
services for long-term value public
records available.
August
2014
DSITIA
Page 42
Strategic focus area 7: Contestability and ICT
strategic sourcing
NOW
Limited government data and
information is available to the
public
The Queensland Commission of Audit recommended contestability as
a principle to be applied across all government services. In conjunction
with this is the desire for government to procure ICT as-a-service
wherever it is practical to do so.
The concept of contestability is to ensure that the government is
providing the public with the best solutions for the best possible
price. This will require changes to the way the public services could be
structured, organised and managed to be more flexible, responsive and
ef cient in supporting service delivery in todays economy.
This is a new approach for government and requires that ICT sourcing be
refned to become a key enabler of business change.
The ICT industry will be engaged to work with government to give efect
to this reform. At the same time government needs to take a more
commercial approach to its procurement processes and practices. This
change is expected to provide value for money and innovative solutions
in the way the government delivers services.
At the heart of this reform is a more commercial approach to
procurement processes, removal of barriers to industry that preclude
them from engaging with government, and improving the way
government engages with industry.
Key projects:
agile procurement
contestability framework application
procurement transformation program.
FUTURE:
Data is easily accessible, visible and available for reuse by the
public, business, researchers and individuals
Reform and simplify Queensland Government ICT procurement
Establish processes to provide departments with an
understanding of their costs and service levels
Create an ICT contestability framework and educate
departments in its use
Leverage commercial-like sourcing strategies to support
reforms
Improve departmental ICT procurement capabilities
At a glance
I know my ICT business
will be able to get more
opportunities to supply the
government.
I want the government to get the
best value for its ICT and it should
look at all options when buying
ICT services.
Page 43
Strategic focus area 7: Contestability and ICT strategic sourcing
Business drivers
Better value for money in the delivery of front-line services can be
achieved through contestability, as this will encourage more ef cient
and more innovative service delivery, whether by the public sector or the
private sector (public sector service providers should not be immune from
competitive pressures).
*
The Queensland Government will engage with the ICT industry in order
to build relationships with its various participants. The government
is planning a period of ICT reform in which innovation and suppliers
will play a critical role in transforming the way government delivers its
services. In future, ICT suppliers will need to demonstrate they can meet
our requirements and standards with competent personnel who have a
track record of providing quality ICT products and services at competitive
pricing.
Contestability in ICT services and products will:
ensure that the relative cost of ICT goods and services are tested
provide options of going to alternative providers where there is
evidence of better service to the public
provide value for money
ensure that new ICT service providers can enter the feld
provide benchmarks to ensure continual improvement in performance
discontinue the role of CITEC as a centralised provider of ICT services
within government and divest the CITEC business within two years.
Business benefts
reduce ICT service and asset costs
increase innovation and service delivery
increase the ongoing performance of the Queensland Government
increase collaboration with the private sector in sourcing innovative
and value-for-money solutions.
* The Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013.
Page 44
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: A standardised approach, framework and toolset to measure the contestability of ICT services across
government is required
[7.01] ACTION: Implement the ICT contestability
framework.
ICT contestability needs to be considered in line with
broader agency contestability approaches.
In all cases it should be the contestable business
service that drives the outcome for ICT services.
A standard application of the
the information management
contestability framework will result
in improved cost outcomes for
government.
November
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Total cost of service must be understood to undertake contestability and transition to an as-a-service
environment
[7.02] ACTION: Develop and implement a total cost-
of-service modelling method.
Contestability assessment is based on a number
of value-for-money criteria. However, it still
requires that the total cost of ICT services is known.
This is also the case for any managed service
arrangements in order to ensure that value for
money is being achieved.
Ongoing measurement of ICT costs to
ensure benefts are realised.
December
2013
DSITIA,
QTT support
Challenge: Traditional approaches to sourcing capability can be time consuming and costly
[7.03] ACTION: Develop a new ICT sourcing policy.
Establishing an efective approach to early market
engagement needs to be established to reduce
administrative overheads for agencies and industry.
Establish and implement agile procurement
methodology.
Improved early engagement will be based on
assessment and understanding of service delivery
outcomes, and using agile procurement methods.
Improved opportunities for industry,
especially SMEs to engage with
government.
Improved flexibility and reduced
time to market for government.
Better project delivery outcomes.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Lack of clarity into industry cost benchmarks creates inconsistency in assessing value for money
[7.04] ACTION: Develop private sector ICT cost
baseline database.
The information exchange program will provide
the ability for cost information to be shared across
agencies to ensure that government achieves best
value for money and that agencies are treated as
part of one government.
Improved cost outcomes through
comparison and benchmarking.
Better value for money as agencies
access arrangements that provide
best price.
Reduced red tap resulting in cost
ef ciencies for agencies.
December
2014
DSITIA.
QTT support
Challenge: Government ICT procurement planning needs to relate directly to the strategic direction of agencies, and with
the Queensland Government ICT strategy 201317
[7.05] ACTION: Develop a strategic procurement
plan for government ICT.
Developing a strategic plan that encapsulates
forward investment intent as well as current
commitments will be critical to managing moves to
as-a-service environments.
Simplifed, integrated procurement
that enables the reform of ICT as
part of the broader sector reform
processes.
February
2014
DSITIA
Page 45
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: There is a need to reduce the time and cost of doing business with government through appropriate procurement
vehicles
[7.06] ACTION: Deliver ICT procurement reform
(short term).
Existing procurement instruments and associated
policy will be updated to simplify sourcing of
solutions and capabilities from industry. The short-
term reform will drive quick wins including:
increases to minimum quote thresholds
a simple ICT contractual framework for ICT
procurements up to $1 million
early and up-front market engagement will be
embedded into all projects during business case
development.
Faster, agile and simplifed means by
which to engage in the provision of
services for contracts up to
$1 million.
Red tape will be reduced by removing
onerous processes surrounding
provision of services. SMEs will
be provided with better growth
opportunities and market signalling
for major procurement activities.
This will take place early into the
process resulting in the development
of better business cases for
government.
February
2014
DSITIA, DHPW
support
government
departments
Challenge: Revision of policies and processes to improve the ability of government to embrace industry and drive economic
reforms within the ICT sector
[7.07] ACTION: Deliver ICT procurement reform
(medium term).
A major review and transformation of the existing
Government Information Technology Conditions
(GITC) framework, associated policy and
management frameworks will be undertaken to
reflect the future sourcing needs to Queensland
Government.
Government ICT procurement
practices will be transformed to
ensure that early market engagement
and interactive procurement is the
standard for all sourcing activities
within the ICT sector.
Government departments will be
empowered to proactively work with
industry partners to solve business
problems and drive innovation.
Anticipated benefts include more
flexible commercial arrangements
supporting the move to an as-a-
service environment, increased
industry innovation, decreased
costs to government and industry,
better understanding of project
feasibility early into business cases,
and simplifcation of process and
practice across the board.
December
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: The current GITC registration process limits prequalifcation of services oferings by industry providers
[7.08] ACTION: Implement the ICT services panel
arrangement.
The implementation of the ICT services panel
arrangement will provide the means to quickly
identify and select industry partners in the
provision of service delivery outcomes.
Recognition of the services provided
by industry vendors through a
prequalifcation process will provide
a faster means by which to connect
supply and demand, resulting in a
reduction in unnecessary red tape
and time to engage industry.
March
2014
DSITIA, DHPW
Queensland Commission of Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 7: 142145, 147148, 151
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 7: 20, 22, 2531, 3940
Page 46
Strategic focus area 8: ICT as-a-service
NOW
The maintain, own and
operate ICT model followed by
government departments ofen
results in a singular focus on
technology
A clear theme in the majority of the Queensland Commission of Audit ICT
recommendations was the need to divest ownership of ICT assets and
to strategically source as-a-service options from the market. Industry
research and leading indicators support the move to as-a-service as a
viable option to decrease the cost of ICT within the government.
Making the transition to an as-a-service environment requires careful
consideration to ensure that the most appropriate as-a-service options
are selected to deliver long-term sustainability and the benefts
associated with no longer owning and operating commodity ICT.
Over recent years a number of major as-a-service oferings have matured
within the marketplace. While the cloud provides obvious opportunities
to source commodity infrastructure and sofware applications,
other services, including business process as-a-service will also be
considered when assessing the best-value options in the market.
An increased interest in public/private partnerships are also anticipated
to provide a step change opportunity to move to managed service
arrangements where government is heavily invested in ICT assets.
The transition to an as-a-service model presents a signifcant
opportunity for the Queensland Government to shif its focus from being
managers of technology to driving business innovation and developing
new digital services for the Queensland community.
FUTURE:
Departments consume ICT as-a-service for commodity
services and shif their focus to digital services thinking
Create a government strategy on adoption of cloud services
Establish policy and procurement conditions for cloud-based
environments
Pilot common cloud services to ensure value for money
Department ICT plans leverage ICT as-a-service as the primary
option while divesting itself of existing assets
At a glance
Moving to an ICT
as-a-service approach
makes sense if this
means my tax dollars
are used more wisely.
Page 47
Strategic focus area 8: ICT as-a-service
Business drivers
Queensland Government spends about $1.6 billion a year on ICT on the
acquisition, implementation, maintenance and management of ICT assets
and services.
*
The Queensland Government accepts that these costs can
be signifcantly reduced by adopting an ICT as-a-service strategy.
A key element of implementing the ICT as-a-service strategy is that the
Queensland Government utilise as appropriate cloud-based computing
and other emerging technologies.
**

ICT as-a-service will:
source ICT services, especially commoditised services, from private
providers in a contestable market where this is feasible and represents
value for money
discontinue the governments role as an owner and manager of
signifcant ICT assets and systems
divest ICT assets and systems with required ICT services to be
purchased under contractual arrangements with private providers
be managed using best practice governance arrangements to ensure
that value for money is achieved
create conditions which remove barriers for entry for local service
providers.
Business benefts
improve productivity and public value from digital services
reduce overall expenditure on ICT infrastructure and maintenance
improve organisational flexibility, agility and productivity
increase predictability in cost structures
decrease complexity in operational and support arrangements
increase commoditisation of the services available from the cloud.
* The Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013, pp. 3477.
** The Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013, p. 33.
Page 48
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Queensland Government approach to adoption of cloud is unclear
[8.01] ACTION: Launch Queensland Government
cloud strategy and approach to adopting cloud
services.
The strategy includes creating a legal framework in
support of delivering email as a commodity service.
Develop a model contract for cloud/commodity
services.
Market testing through early market engagement
for commodity cloud infrastructure services.
Departments aligning to the overall
government cloud strategy.
Queensland Government cloud
strategy endorsed.
Cloud communication and
collaboration (including email,
invitation to ofer, release to market).
A decision framework for cloud
adoption including business impact
assessment tools delivered.
November
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: ICT as-a-service business requirements needs to be supported by relevant policy and legislation
[8.02] ACTION: Develop and implement government
as-a-service policy (including cloud).
Develop relevant policy and knowledge transfer for
use by departments.
Informed decisions to leverage ICT
as-a-service where appropriate.
November
2013
DSITIA,
QTT support
Challenge: A consistent set of tools to assist departments identify, prioritise and transition into an as-a-service
environment is required
[8.03] ACTION: Develop and launch the ICT as-a-
service toolkit.
The toolkit includes:
portfolio assessment tools
decision-making framework(s)
business impact assessment.
Data sovereignty, security and
privacy policies, guidelines
endorsed.
December
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: The current ICT contracting framework lacks structure to transition into an as-a-service environment
[8.04] ACTION: Revise and redefne commercial
terms and conditions to support as-a-service
options.
Revise and redefne GITC to align with the paradigm
shif to as-a-service and specifcally cloud.
Modern framework aligned to current
vendor ofering.
Agencies leveraging cloud
arrangement.
December
2013
DSITIA, DHPW
support
Challenge: Collaboration across government is limited
[8.05] ACTION: Establish electronic communication
and collaboration (including email).
Electronic communication and collaboration
(including email) invitation to ofer released.
Establishment of various
procurement options for modern
sofware.
Electronic communication and
collaboration (including email)
invitation to ofer endorsed and
released.
October
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: The Commission of Audit recommended that government divest CITEC within the next two years
[8.06] ACTION: A plan including timeframes is
developed.
Actions to divest CITEC according to the approved
schedule are defned.
A considered approach to the
divestment of CITEC is developed.
December
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Fixed data networks have a high asset value and represent a signifcant cost to government
Page 49
Estimated
completion
Accountability
[8.07] ACTION: Develop one government, one
network business case.
Engage with the market and develop a business
case for a data network that supports the
government as a whole.
Informed decision to progress data
network as-a-service.
Early market engagement to confrm
viability and approach.
March
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Management of commodity ICT presents a signifcant cost to government
[8.08] ACTION: Establish market arrangements to
transition commodity ICT to as-a-service.
Government will access commodity ICT, i.e.
desktops, servers and storage, from the market
as-a-service thereby reducing the ongoing need for
departments to manage commodity ICT in house.
Enabling departments to purchase
commodity services as demand
requires will enable greater
flexibility, and result in reduced cost
to government.
December
2013 and
ongoing
DSITIA
Challenge: Departmental ICT asset base needs to be evaluated for the future
[8.09] ACTION: Develop department as-a-service
road maps to divest ICT systems and assets.
Agencies are to develop their plans and timeframes
to move from owning assets to an ICT-as-a-service
environment.
Implementation plans are integrated
into the departmental investment
priorities.
Implementation plans and
appropriate sourcing arrangements
established.
March
2014
DSITIA, all
departments
and shared
service
providers
accountable
for developing
their specifc
plans
Page 50
Strategic focus area 9: ICT innovation
NOW
The value of innovation and
how to promote adoption
across government is not clearly
understood
Government organisations need to think creatively about their
problems, opportunities and challenges and generate new ideas to
drive innovation across the sector. ICT innovations will improve service
delivery by enabling ideas to be rapidly developed and applied to real-
world problems.
In order to be innovative, the government will partner with academic and
industry groups to apply optimal changes to improve service delivery.
Actions and associated projects will focus on:
embedding innovative thinking and culture within Queensland
Government ICT
creating a safe environment to invest in innovation by setting clear
parameters and performance measures
testing new ideas in a fast, simple and cost-efective manner
encouraging joint innovation ventures between government and the
private sector
recognising the importance and benefts of innovation by developing
new solutions to old problems
simplifying industry engagement to facilitate collaborative
innovation between government and the private sector
embedding innovation prototyping into the Queensland Government
Portfolio Management Methodology
developing and launching a Queensland Government innovation
portal encouraging ideas and engaging both industry and
individuals.
FUTURE:
Innovation is embraced and recognised as a key enabler in
driving productivity through new ways of delivering services
Recognise innovation prototyping as a formal investment
approach
Establish the innovation portal to present problems that
require solutions
Establish innovation prototyping initiatives
Simplify partnering arrangements to engage the private sector
in innovation
At a glance
I believe encouraging
innovative thinking between
industry and the government
will mean benefts for
all of us.
I want my government to think
outside the box and apply
innovative thinking when theyre
looking at improving the way
government works.
Page 51
Strategic focus area 9: ICT innovation
Business drivers
Innovation is considered a key enabler to public sector renewal. Innovation
lies at the heart of the governments ability to respond to emerging and
growing community expectations to deliver better services. Innovation in
ICT will play an ongoing role in delivering new innovative digital services to
the community and will be a key contributor to achieving the governments
renewal objectives.
ICT innovation objectives are to:
embed innovative thinking and culture within Queensland Government
ICT
enable cost-efective digital service delivery within the Queensland
Government
formally recognise innovation prototyping within government and
defne the parameters and principles to conduct initiatives
simplify industry engagement to facilitate collaborative innovation
between government and the private sector
embed innovation prototyping into the Queensland Government
develop and launch a Queensland Government innovation portal
encouraging ideas and allowing industry to progress innovation
partnerships between the public and private sectors
establish departmental budgets to fund small innovation prototypes to
test ideas in the real world.
Business benefts
Realising investment objectives will:
increase government productivity through the development of new
service delivery mechanisms
encourage departments to foster innovation and cultivate new ideas
provide fast and simple means by which to test new ideas in a cost-
efective manner
create new service delivery methods that align with public expectations
increase productivity through the adoption of successful innovation
prototypes
leverage industry investment in innovation to beneft the public.
Page 52
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Innovation opportunities are ofen missed due to a lack of understanding of how to generate ideas and test them
in the real world
[9.01] ACTION: Develop and implement the ICT
innovation methodology.
The ICT innovation methodology will outline
how ideas are proposed, assessed, funded and
prototyped. Leveraging innovation prototyping
when defning a problem or exploring an idea will
facilitate higher-quality long-term outcomes whilst
compartmentalising investment to promote a fail
fast, fail cheap process or refnement.
Government departments will
leverage innovation consistently
by applying a common approach.
It is anticipated that enabling
innovation in the real world will be a
key driver to increased productivity
and customer satisfaction through
new ways of doing business and
delivering services.
July
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: There is no simple means to provide the context to the challenges to which government requires innovative
solutions
[9.02] ACTION: Leverage the government
innovation portal.
Government will develop and launch a Queensland
Government innovation portal to seek innovative
solutions to service delivery and renewal
challenges. The innovation portal will simplify the
progression of innovation partnerships between
public and private sector organisations.
Government ICT will leverage this portal in seeking
innovation solutions to ICT challenges.
A reliable channel for assessing government
problems and proposing solutions will lower the
cost of identifying innovative ICT. The innovation
portal will facilitate engagement of the private
sector in developing prototypes to test ideas in
reality and measure the benefts.
The government innovation portal
will provide a flexible means by
which government can quickly
engage good ideas and put them
into practice. The release of the
innovation portal will be closely
linked to stage one of the ICT
procurement reform initiative
allowing innovation prototypes
under $1 million to be progressed
under simplifed commercial
arrangements.
October
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Improved understanding and recognition of the value that innovation brings to government
[9.03] ACTION: ICT innovation launch and
education program.
The Commission of Audit acknowledged the need
for departments to deliver services in a tight fscal
environment. Contemporary management practices
embed innovative thinking into organisational
culture in order to develop new ways of improving
services and products.
The Public Service Commissions recent employee
engagement survey demonstrates both a strong
desire within government to increase innovation
and low levels of understanding among executives
of its importance to their strategic goals.
Government, industry and academia
will have a common understanding
of how to apply innovative ideas
to established challenges. The
Queensland Public Service will
understand and exploit the ICT
innovation methodology ensuring
that ICT investments are targeted
at the governments renewal
objectives.
March
2014
DSITIA
Page 53
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Government needs to balance innovative activities against risks
[9.04] ACTION: ICT innovation performance
reporting.
Government will defne parameters and principles
applicable to innovation initiatives. By formally
recognising and measuring the value of innovation
prototypes within government, departments will
be able to demonstrate their use of innovation to
improve service delivery.
Clear measures that justify the
value of innovation through the
delivery of measurable benefts will
drive further adoption and provide
transparency into how investments
deliver better services.
December
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: ICT prototyping needs to be recognised as a legitimate investment for programs and projects responsible for
driving innovation
[9.05] ACTION: Introduce provisions into the
Queensland Government Portfolio Management
Methodology to recognise ICT innovation
investment initiatives.
Government needs to increase its reliance on ICT
innovation to deliver major changes in its approach
to service delivery. The ICT Renewal Program will
embed innovation into the Queensland Government
Portfolio Management Methodology. In future this
methodology will require departments to consider
ICT innovation as an essential part of their strategic
investment processes.
The Queensland Government
will be revised to embed ICT
innovation as a critical prioritisation
factor in all ICT investment decisions.
This will link closely to ICT project
management reforms which will
apply innovation principles such as
market engagement and prototyping
very early into the establishment
of new projects. This will result in
more successful project outcomes
by moving away from the big
bang approach and focusing on
incremental delivery and refnement.
February
2014
DSITIA
Page 54
Strategic focus area 10: Signifcant and at-risk ICT
asset stabilisation
NOW
Some signifcant ICT assets have
become aged and cumbersome
to the point of posing a risk to
service delivery
Within the Queensland Government there are a signifcant number of
critical ICT assets and systems that have reached end of life and are
long overdue for replacement. The Queensland Government ICT Audit
undertaken in 2012 highlighted that a number of these ICT assets are
putting the delivery of critical government services at considerable risk.
While the stabilisation of at-risk ICT assets is of utmost priority within
this action plan, ultimately the systemic issue leading to the current
state of ICT must be a limited focus on risk and how it influences
investment priorities.
The Auditor-General of Queensland Report No. 4 for 2011 recommended
that an ICT risk management framework be established, and states that
efective ICT risk management raises the awareness of potential risks
and demonstrates a proper level of due diligence.
The robust management of risk and establishment of an ICT risk
framework will minimise and mitigate the signifcant exposure to service
delivery posed by inconsistent management of Queenslands ICT assets.
To be efective, risk management needs to pervade all levels of
Queensland Government, and be embedded in day-to-day operations.
Departments will establish mechanisms to manage the risk to their
critical business records and essential services that rely on ICT systems
and assets to ensure that mitigation strategies and implementation
plans are developed, tested and provided on request to the Directors-
General Council.
FUTURE:
Chief executive of cers actively mitigate ICT risk to avoid
failures and all signifcant systems have a lifecycle
management plan in place
Implementation of risk management plans for signifcant and
at-risk ICT assets
Investment prioritisation for at-risk ICT assets
Development of a consistent ICT risk management framework
to be applied across Queensland Government
Increased focus on business continuity to minimise the impact
of unplanned events
At a glance
I understand the government is
focusing attention on important
ICT systems. Im positive that their
condition will be managed to
prevent interruptions to services
for me and my family.
Page 55
Strategic focus area 10: Signifcant and at-risk ICT asset
stabilisation
Business drivers
The Queensland Government ICT Audit undertaken in 2012 identifed that
there are a number of systems that present a critical risk to government.
These systems are large and complex, underpin critical activities, are
typically long overdue for replacement and require urgent attention
to avoid rendering key services of government inoperable. The audit
established principles to be applied in addressing these issues, including
the one-government approach, ICT as-a-service, value and performance,
innovation and new ways, challenging the business, governance, funding
models and SMEs. These business systems identifed in the ICT Audit also
support public records which need to be managed in accordance with the
Public Records Act 2002.
Investing in better risk management practices and at-risk systems will:
prioritise those ICT assets that represent the most signifcant risk to
government service delivery
mitigate the risk to government by:
reengineering/modernising high business value poor condition
assets with priority
retiring/consolidating low business value poor condition assets
with priority
re-evaluating/repositioning assets that are in excellent technical
condition but have low business value
maintaining and evolving high business value excellent technical
condition assets to ensure that they retain their value to service
delivery
ensuring that public records are either preserved or lawfully
destroyed in accordance with the disposal provisions of the Public
Records Act 2002
developing and universally adopting a consistent approach towards
capturing, assessing, reporting and prioritising ICT risks across
government.
Business benefts
reduce the risks associated with the management of ICT systems
improve public confdence in the ability of government to deliver
services
reduce costs associated with maintaining ICT assets that do not deliver
business value
improve and streamline service delivery by focusing scarce resources
on the value-added activities
ensure transparency and accountability in the disposal of public
records supported by at-risk systems.
Page 56
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Recommendation 1 of the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry indicated that the state
should: to the extent the ICT Audit 2012 has not already done so, undertake risk assessments, contingency and succession
planning for such systems to ensure they do not present the same level of risk and urgency that LATTICE was thought to
present, and that decisions concerning them are not made in haste.
[10.01] ACTION: All departments will work with
the ICT Renewal Program and QGCIO to review
their system risk in terms of business impact. All
departments will prepare reports on their business
impacts and mitigation plans for consideration by
the Directors-General Council.
Mitigation of system risk must consider possible
business and service impact.
Review is completed for all systems
and risks identifed.
Mitigation plans in place and
reported to the Directors-General
Council.
October
2013
DSITIA, all
departments
Challenge: High and extreme ICT risks need to be prioritised within the governments ICT portfolio
[10.02] ACTION: Complete high-risk investment
prioritisation.
A single view into the mitigation strategies
associated with high-risk ICT assets will be
developed and overseen by the Directors-General
Council. Investments will be prioritised to ensure
that risks to service delivery do not evolve into
issues that impact the community.
High and extreme risks will
be ef ciently and consistently
prioritised to ensure that they are
actioned appropriately.
December
2013
DSITIA,
departments
accountable
for assessment
reporting on
agency-specifc
ICT risk
Challenge: A short-term mitigation strategy is required pending the development of longer-term investment planning
[10.03] ACTION: Develop a short-term investment
program to mitigate at-risk systems while longer-
term investment planning is undertaken.
A short-term investment program will be developed
based on the prioritisation of at-risk systems.
Longer-term investment planning will be undertaken
simultaneously to ensure the robustness of systems
utilised by Queensland Government.
Prioritised short-term investment
program developed for funding
approval.
February
2014
DSITIA, all
departments
Challenge: Decommissioning legacy ICT assets requires a means by which valuable public records can be stored and
archived
[10.04] ACTION: Develop and implement a
toolkit for managing public records when
decommissioning legacy ICT systems.
A toolkit for public records in legacy ICT systems
scheduled for decommissioning will ensure a
planned, consistent and lawful approach to the
preservation or destruction of public records.
Guidance and other resources will be developed to
ensure that public records with no ongoing value
can be disposed of legally, and those records with
ongoing value or importance are maintained by
public authorities in a way that ensures they remain
accessible and useable.
Queensland communities will
have confdence that historically
important records will not be lost
and will remain accessible and
useable.
Queensland Government will ensure
that legislative requirements for
authorised disposal of records under
the Public Records Act 2002 are met.
Commence
October
2013
DSITIA
Page 57
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Public confdence in the Queensland Governments ability to manage ICT investment and risk needs to be
restored
[10.05] ACTION: Implement Queensland
Government ICT risk management framework.
A single framework and associated tools will
provide a consistent approach to the identifcation,
analysis, reporting and prioritisation of investments
to mitigate ICT risks.
Guidance, tools and resources will be developed
and provided to assist departments in
understanding and delivering on their management
of risk obligations.
Queensland Governments increased
capability in risk management will
provide an increased capability in
value delivery to the Queensland
community.
Risks will be identifed early and
embedded into the ICT investment
portfolio of all government
departments reducing the exposure
to service delivery to the community.
October
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Increase the maturity in the development of business continuity plan
[10.06] ACTION: Departments will establish robust
business continuity and disaster recovery plans
encompassing all signifcant ICT systems, not just
those considered at-risk.
Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
must consider the business and service impact that
may flow from the occurrence of an unfavourable
event.
Plans to ensure critical government services
continue to operate during unplanned outages is
paramount to confdence in government service
delivery.
Clear business continuity plans will
ensure government services that rely
upon ICT continue to operate during
unplanned outages.
December
2013
Departmental
directors-
general,
DSITIA
support
Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry recommendations relevant to focus area 10: 1
Page 58
Strategic focus area 11: A capable and competent
workforce
NOW
Majority of staf focused on
supporting the traditional mode
of ICT operation
Governments ICT workforce has traditionally supported business
models where departments owned and operated ICT assets. Moving to
new arrangements where as-a-service models will be the default option
requires a diferent approach to capability development and workforce
planning. The development, negotiation and on-going management
of industry partners providing ICT services marks a paradigm shif
requiring a planned approach to support the associated workforce
transformation.
As the transition between models occurs, the focus on capability will be
less on the design, implementation and operation of systems and more
on the delivery of business outcomes. This will require the development
of new skills and capabilities where appropriate. In other cases, such as
project management, capability that resides in the private sector needs
to be recognised and used.
Departments delivering government services will need to rapidly mature
their capability in portfolio management to ensure alignment with
organisational and government strategy, investment decision making
and managing programs of change. It is anticipated that core skills in
leadership, communications, analytics, commercial acumen and vendor
management will be pivotal in realising the future vision for Queensland
Government ICT.
Making this transition means that workforce planning for the future
focuses on enabling reform, managing outcomesfocused programs
of change and understanding capability that may be delivered by or
in partnership with the private sector. A measured and well planned
approach towards workforce transformation and capability development
will ensure that the right people have the right skills to get the job done.
FUTURE:
Staf profles focus on enabling reform through new skills and
competencies
Capability development using government and
non-government resources
Revised skills framework to support transition to an
as-a-service environment
Development of workforce transformation plans to support
transition to as-a-service
At a glance
There are opportunities for
government workers to learn new
skills.
With the proposed changes, we can
see there will be opportunities for
both the public and private sectors
to be involved in diferent types of
roles in the future.
Page 59
Strategic focus area 11: A capable and competent workforce
Business drivers
Each public sector department needs a workforce that is skilled, ef cient
and flexible to ensure its service delivery outcomes are met.
Recommendation 125 All public sector departments develop and publish a
fve-year strategic workforce plan.
*

The investment objectives to achieve capability and new competencies
will:
ensure staf are focused on high-value business activities
ensure staf are in positions that support business strategy
ensure staf have appropriate knowledge and skills to fulfl their roles
reflect a focus on portfolio management, business analysis, strategy,
innovation and planning
reflect a focus on contract and performance management
reflect a focus on procurement, strategic sourcing and commercial
acumen.
Business benefts
facilitate the transition to an as-a-service environment
improve service delivery through access to a suitably qualifed
workforce
encourage an environment for greater innovation
improve workforce capability and morale.
* The Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013, p. 398.
Page 60
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: The level of capability in leading ICT workforce transformation and change varies across the sector
[11.01] ACTION: Implement a workforce planning
framework and skills development program.
Skills development programs to be put in
place to enable leaders to enact ICT workforce
transformation and develop the required
competencies and capabilities to support future
requirements.
Leaders and managers are
appropriately developed with
capabilities to undertake workplace
planning, transition and change
initiatives.
Communities of practice are put
in place to encourage department
workforce initiatives.
Workforce transformation and
planning initiatives are shared
through a whole-of-government
community of practice.
Departments to partner with like
departments to achieve similar
workforce planning initiatives.
January
2014
DSITIA,
PSC support
Challenge: The transition to an as-a-service environment requires careful planning to properly manage the associated
workforce transformation
[11.02] ACTION: Develop departmental workforce
transformation plans.
A planned approach towards workforce
transformation will be linked directly to the
transition to an as-a-service environment to ensure
new skills and competencies are developed to
support service delivering in partnership with
industry.
Workforce transformation planning will support
broader public service renewal initiatives in line
with contestability and other factors.
Clearly articulated workforce
transformation plans will ensure
that organisational change matters
are identifed early and properly
managed in the migration to
provision of ICT as-a-service.
March
2014
DSITIA,
PSC support
Challenge: The ICT skills framework for the information age (SFIA) currently used in government does not fully cater for the
skills and capabilities required for the future
[11.03] ACTION: Update the ICT SFIA to include
priority capability areas that reflect workforce
plans.
The existing SFIA will be updated to recognise
the skills and competencies required to support
the transition to an as-a-service environment and
will be used by departments to develop workforce
transformation plans including reskilling where
appropriate.
The ICT skills framework, tools
and processes align with the new
government service delivery vision,
enabling leaders and managers
to clearly articulate capability
requirements within workforce
transformation plans.
June
2014
DSITIA,
PSC support
Page 61
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Currently there are limited skills for roles such as vendor relationship managers, contract managers, enterprise
and solution architects and business analysts within government
[11.04] ACTION: Mobilise the supply of critical roles.
A revised ICT program will support internal skills
development whilst working with industry to
identify opportunities for the private sector to fulfl
elements of the governments ICT capability needs.
Internal skills transformation is
provided a kick start to support
timely transition to an as-a-service
environment. Private sector skills
are combined and blended within
the public services to quickly
mobilise the required resources and
capabilities to support ICT renewal.
September
2013
ongoing
DSITIA
Challenge: The high cost of ICT training limits equitable access to skills development across government
[11.05] ACTION: Identify and establish industry-
based options to leverage a common online ICT
training platform across government.
This will enable public service of cers to access
industry accredited education and training for the
development of new skills and capabilities.
Ability to access industry-accepted
learning and development to improve
career development prospects.
Government is not required to
develop learning and development
programs in house.
July
2015
DSITIA,
PSC support
Challenge: Government needs to build its future workforce taking advantage of contemporary knowledge and research
capability
[11.06] ACTION: Work with tertiary and professional
institutions to access undergraduate, post
graduate and professional programs with a view
towards growing the future workforce.
Establishing arrangements with tertiary and
professional institutions will enable government
to access and maintain contemporary skills when
growing a dynamic workforce for the future.
Networks will be established with
tertiary and professional institutions.
February
2014
DSITIA,
PSC support
Queensland Commission of Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 11: 147148, 152
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 11: 11, 5455
Page 62
Strategic focus area 12: Portfolio, program and
project management
NOW
Low levels of maturity in portfolio,
program and project management
and limited recognition of the
importance they play in delivering
successful outcomes
Practitioners and researchers agree that organisations with a stronger
capability to deliver complex outputs will lead to increased project
success, signifcant cost reductions, improved quality and a higher
rate of return on investment. Mature organisations report, monitor, and
control performance at the portfolio, program and project levels, and
learn from experience to continually improve.
The Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry clearly
recognised the impact poor project management has on outcomes
noting a depressing account of failure by many public servants ... to
adhere to established good practice as a contributing factor to the
debacle. Evidence from around the world clearly validates that maturity
in portfolio, program and project management generates substantial
costs savings and delivers increased business benefts. For these
reasons, it is clear that the sectors capability in portfolio, program and
project management must improve.
To increase the likelihood that programs and projects will deliver their
intended outcomes and benefts and to improve portfolio investment
decision making the following outcomes need to be delivered:
Better governance for investments, change programs and projects,
including an assessment of lessons learned during initiation.
Build organisation capability to deliver successful initiatives through
the establishment of an improvement program designed to grow P3M
capabilities in government.
Efective performance of senior-level decision-making supported by
experienced practitioners within projects to identify issues early and
maximise project success.
FUTURE:
Portfolio, program and project management are embedded
and all government ICT portfolios can demonstrate controlled
and value-for-money investments
Increased public sector capability and competency in portfolio
program, project management (P3M) practices
Gain control and visibility using P3M as a structured approach
to drive business strategy and achieve organisational benefts
Reform ICT project management practices to promote success
and address matters identifed by the Queensland Health
Payroll System Commission of Inquiry
At a glance
Im pleased the
government is focusing
on accountability.
I like to know governments ICT
projects will run as planned so my
taxes arent being wasted.
Page 63
Strategic focus area 12: Portfolio, program and project
management
Business drivers
In early 2012, maturity assessments in P3M were conducted in all
Queensland Government departments. The results identifed defciencies
in all aspects of P3M and recommendations were made that when
implemented, will aid in improving investment decisions across the
sector and prevent programs and projects from going of course or failing
completely.
The objectives of P3M are to:
ensure ICT investment will deliver value to the business
provide decision support to each departments governing body and at
the whole-of-government level to the Public Sector Renewal Program
and the Directors-General Council
increase capability in program and project management capability
ensure senior executives understand their roles within portfolio,
program and project governance structures
improve competency across the sector in the Queensland Government
portfolio, program and project management methodologies
invigorate senior leadership commitment to best practice portfolio,
program and project management
reform existing practices to better understand the cost and feasibility
of projects before approval to proceed.
Business benefts
increase program and project success
increase alignment of ICT projects with business objectives
reduce the number of poorly conceived projects
reduce duplication and/or overlapping projects
increase the business benefts realised using fewer resources
increase public confdence in the sectors ability to deliver value for
money.
Page 64
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: A process for establishing gateway reviews over programs and projects will provide assurance that initiatives
have been established in such a way as to optimise their chance for success
[12.01] ACTION: Implement the United Kingdoms
Of ce of Government Commerce gateway review
process.
Gateway reviews will check the health of projects
and are key points of delivery to inform continuation
to the next stage or early termination or
underperforming projects. Independent reviews will
be required for all level 3 and 4 initiatives.
Gateway reviews will provide
confdence that investments are
being managed efectively and
will remain on track to deliver the
expected benefts and achieve the
desired outcomes.
October
2013
DSITIA
Challenge: Consistent ICT investment prioritisation practices are required to improve overall visibility
[12.02] ACTION: Implement the Queensland
Government ICT Portfolio Management Framework.
The implementation of consistent portfolio
management practices is fundamental to ensuring
the departments and the Directors-General Council
can ensure that the right investments are being
made, including prioritising high-risk systems.
Programs and projects will be
undertaken through consistent
application of portfolio management
across the sector. Clear line of
sight will be established into all
ICT investments, including those
of strategic importance required to
mitigate known risks.
September
2013
ongoing
DSITIA
Challenge: The government needs to improve the application of P3M practices to reduce the risk of project failure and
address systemic issues identifed by the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry
[12.03] ACTION: Establish a Queensland
Government portfolio, program and project
management improvement initiative with the
following outputs:
Develop a roadmap to improve portfolio,
program and project management.
Conduct training, development and mentoring
initiatives for program and project managers,
including contract and vendor management
competency.
Develop mandatory minimum competency
levels and assessment of experience process for
program and project managers working on level
3 and 4 initiatives.
Develop and deliver a program targeting senior
executives and managers occupying roles on
boards at any level to raise awareness of their
responsibilities and potential liability.
Project success will be increased by
leaders, teams and team members
having the capacity, capability
and skills to succeed in delivering
complex change initiatives.
December
2014
DSITIA, all
department
CEOs support,
PSC support
Page 65
Estimated
completion
Accountability
Challenge: Current reporting to departmental information steering committees does not provide a clear line of sight into ICT
investments and risk areas. Recommendation 2 of the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry indicated
that the state should: Before the initiation by the Queensland Government of major ICT projects, specifc attention be given
to what lessons may be learned from this project for the particular project under consideration.
[12.04] ACTION: Develop and implement common
ICT portfolio reporting tools.
This will help ef ciently and accurately establish
and manage the ICT investments and risk position
of departments and allow cross referencing of
investments and risks across government. Common
portfolio reporting will provide consistent insight
at the departmental level and the Directors-General
Council. As part of establishing portfolio reporting
and investment planning, include reviews of lessons
learned from previous projects in all ICT business
cases.
A clear understanding of the
consolidated position of ICT
investments and risks will be
provided through transparent,
consistent and accurate reporting.
A process will be established to
ensure that learnings from projects
are captured in closure reports
and used to inform future project
initiation.
November
2013
DSITIA,
department
CEOs support
Challenge: ICT projects ofen cost more and take longer than originally anticipated
[12.05] ACTION: Undertake ICT project management
reform.
Existing project management practices will be
revised to incorporate contestability principles and
a consistent solution development lifecycle. Startup
and initiation and stage one gateway reviews will
require evidence supporting achievability and
accuracy before proceeding. This will be based on
two-pass process seed funding.
ICT project costs, timeframes
and achievability will be clearly
understood before major fnancial
commitments to projects.
Increased quality is anticipated
through consistent application of a
development lifecycle combined with
the governance and controls outlined
within PRINCE2.
August
2014
DSITIA
Challenge: Public visibility of the Queensland Governments ICT project portfolio is needed to improve accountability
[12.06] ACTION: Launch the Queensland
Government ICT dashboard (stage one).
The Queensland Government ICT dashboard will
provide transparent reporting on the status of all
major ICT project across the sector.
The status of all major government
ICT projects will be published to an
online dashboard on a regular basis.
August
2013
launch
November
2013 all
agencies
reporting
DSITIA, all
departments
responsible for
data provision
Challenge: Public visibility of the Queensland Governments ICT project portfolio is needed to improve accountability
[12.07] ACTION: Develop the Queensland
Government ICT dashboard (stage two).
Stage two of the ICT dashboard will incorporate
additional information, including the status of
ICT risk within the Queensland Government and
progress of mitigation activities.
Increased transparency into ICT
risks will assist in prioritising
associated investment and increase
accountability for ownership of
identifed issues.
August
2014
DSITIA, all
departments
responsible for
data provision
Queensland Commission of Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 12: 147, 151152
ICT Audit recommendations relevant to focus area 12: 3, 9, 12, 14, 16, 19, 24, 40, 54, 5658
Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry recommendations relevant to focus area 12: 13
Page 66
Glossary of terms
Beneft The measurable improvement from change or the increased utility between
the current state and the future state.
Business value Value accrued as a result of investment.
Contestability Testing the standards and costs of delivering services within government
with other providers, including the private sector to ensure the government is
obtaining best value for money.
Customer-centric A focus on satisfying customer service needs frst.
Data Streams of raw facts representing events occurring in organisations or the
physical environment before they have been organised and arranged into a
form that people can understand and use.
Digital channels/digital services Service approaches that are supported by digital technologies.
Digital economy The economy associated with the use and provision of digital services.
Gateway(s) Point(s) in a program/project lifecycle where risk-based decisions are made.
This may include go/no-go, funding release and other delivery-related
decisions.
Governance A set of management arrangements to ensure investments are well managed.
Information Data that has been shaped into a form that is meaningful and useful to human
beings.
Information security Defending information from unauthorised access, use, disclosure, disruption,
modifcation, perusal, inspection, recording or destruction.
Interoperability The capacity for business solutions to efectively work together.
LATTICE A human resources payroll system.
Mobility The ability to access the necessary information and systems to work
ef ciently away from the of ce using various devices.
Open data The government policy to release as much public data as possible, free to
anyone who wishes to use it.
Portal A website that acts as a starting point for browsing the World Wide Web.
Portfolio management A consistent and repeatable way to select, prioritise, deliver and control
investment in business as usual, programs and projects.
Privacy Privacy in Australian law is the right of natural persons to protect their
personal life from invasion and to control the flow of their personal
information.
Program and project management
Standards-based methods to manage the development and implementation
of projects and programs.
Public sector renewal process A process that has been adopted by the Queensland Government to achieve a
renewed, refocused and more ef cient public service and to realise signifcant
savings for all agencies and to drive cultural change.
Queensland Treasury and Trade project assurance framework
A guiding framework to help Queensland Government agencies apply with
consistency the processes required for efective management and delivery of
major infrastructure projects.
Page 67
Small to medium-sized enterprise
A small to medium-sized enterprise is any business employing less than 200
people, as defned by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Tele-work Using digital technologies to promote working from home or remote locations.
Acronyms
CEO Chief Executive Of cer
CIO Chief Information Of cer
DCCSDS Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services
D-G Director-General
DETE Department of Education, Training and Employment
DPC Department of the Premier and Cabinet
DSITIA Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts
DTESB Department of Tourism, Major Events, Small Business and the
Commonwealth Games
DHPW Department of Housing and Public Works
ICT Information and communication technology
ICTSS ICT Strategic Sourcing
KPI Key performance indicator
OGC Of ce of Government Commerce
OS Operating system
P3M Portfolio Program and Project Management
PRINCE2 Projects in controlled environments version 2 (project management
methodology developed by the United Kingdom Of ce of Government
Commerce)
PSC Public Service Commission
PTD Procurement Transformation Division
QAO Queensland Audit Of ce
QSA Queensland State Archives
QGCIO Queensland Government Chief Information Of cer
QH Queensland Health
QTT Queensland Treasury and Trade
SME Small to medium-sized enterprise
SQL Structured query language
SLA Service level agreement
TAFE Technical and Further Education
Page 68
Page 69
Attachment 1: Links and inter-dependencies
Objective 1: Efective digital services for our clients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Focus area 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Focus area 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Focus area 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71
Focus area 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71
Focus area 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71
Focus area 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71
Objective 2: Ef cient digital services for government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Focus area 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Focus area 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Focus area 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Focus area 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Objective 3: Transformed and capable workforce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Focus area 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Focus area 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Page 70
P
r
e

F
Y
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
3
1
4
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
3
1
4
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
4
1
5
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
4
1
5
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
u
l

2
0
1
5
o
n
w
a
r
d
s
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

1
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

2
[
1
.
0
1
]

O
n
e

S
t
o
p

S
h
o
p

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
2

|
1
.
0
3
[
1
.
0
2
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
1

|
1
.
0
3
[
1
.
0
3
]

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

c
e
n
t
r
i
c

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
1

|

1
.
0
2

|
4
.
0
6
[
1
.
0
4
]

N
e
w

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

o
f

e
r
i
n
g
s

p
i
l
o
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

2
.
0
7

|
2
.
1
0

|

3
.
0
1

|

3
.
0
2

|

3
.
0
8

|

4
.
0
5

|

5
.
0
1
[
1
.
0
5
]

S
i
m
p
l
i
f

e
d

a
u
t
h
e
n
t
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
i
l
o
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

2
.
0
8

|

3
.
0
6
[
1
.
0
6
]

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
d

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e

a
n
d

e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

4
.
0
6
[
2
.
0
1
]

Q
u
e
e
n
s
l
a
n
d

d
i
g
i
t
a
l

e
c
o
n
o
m
y

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
[
2
.
0
2
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

m
a
t
u
r
i
t
y

a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t

e
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1
[
2
.
0
3
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

l
i
t
e
r
a
c
y

a
n
d

b
r
o
a
d
b
a
n
d

c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
[
2
.
0
4
]

S
m
a
l
l

t
o

m
e
d
i
u
m

e
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e

p
o
l
i
c
y

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
4

|

7
.
0
5

|

7
.
0
6
[
2
.
0
5
]

I
C
T

i
n
t
e
l
l
e
c
t
u
a
l

p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y

r
e
v
i
e
w

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
5
[
2
.
0
6
]

I
C
T

i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y

o
p
t
i
o
n
s

p
a
p
e
r
[
2
.
0
7
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

a
c
c
e
s
s

a
n
d

s
k
i
l
l
s

f
o
r

s
e
n
i
o
r
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4
[
2
.
0
8
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

s
e
c
t
o
r

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
5
[
2
.
0
9
]

R
e
m
o
t
e

a
c
c
e
s
s

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
[
2
.
1
0
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

i
n

I
n
d
i
g
e
n
o
u
s

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4
R
e
f
e
r
s

t
o

I
C
T

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

a
c
t
i
o
n

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s

Page 71
[
3
.
0
1
]

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

b
l
u
e
p
r
i
n
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4

|

4
.
0
5

|

6
.
0
2
[
3
.
0
2
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4
[
3
.
0
3
]

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

4
.
0
3

|

4
.
0
4

|

1
2
.
0
2

|

1
2
.
0
3
[
3
.
0
4
]

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

b
l
u
e
p
r
i
n
t

a
n
d

a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e

p
o
l
i
c
y

a
n
d

l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

4
.
0
6

|

5
.
0
1
[
3
.
0
5
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e

p
r
o
c
e
s
s

p
i
l
o
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

4
.
0
6
[
3
.
0
6
]

S
i
n
g
l
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
t
e
d

p
u
b
l
i
c

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

p
i
l
o
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
5
[
3
.
0
7
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

e
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e

s
o
c
i
a
l

n
e
t
w
o
r
k

l
a
u
n
c
h
[
3
.
0
8
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

s
e
a
r
c
h

c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

p
i
l
o
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4

|

4
.
0
6

|

6
.
0
1
[
4
.
0
1
]

C
e
n
t
r
a
l

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

d
a
t
a

v
i
a

o
p
e
n

d
a
t
a

p
o
r
t
a
l
[
4
.
0
2
]

O
p
e
n

d
a
t
a

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
[
4
.
0
3
]

V
i
s
u
a
l
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

o
n

t
h
e

o
p
e
n

d
a
t
a

p
o
r
t
a
l

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
3
[
4
.
0
4
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

g
r
a
n
t

r
e
c
e
i
p
i
e
n
t
s

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

d
a
t
a

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
3
[
4
.
0
5
]

O
p
e
n

d
a
t
a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

b
l
u
e
p
r
i
n
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4

|

3
.
0
1
[
4
.
0
6
]

P
o
r
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

a
c
c
e
s
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
3

|

1
.
0
6

|

3
.
0
4

|

3
.
0
5

|

3
.
0
8
[
5
.
0
1

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

a
n
d

p
r
i
v
a
c
y

t
o
o
l
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
.
0
4

|

2
.
0
2

|

3
.
0
4

|

7
.
0
3

|

8
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
4

|

8
.
0
5

|

8
.
0
8
[
5
.
0
2
]

R
e
v
i
s
e
d

I
C
T

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
3

|

7
.
0
6

|

7
.
0
8
[
5
.
0
3
]

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
[
5
.
0
4
]

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s

r
e
v
i
e
w

a
n
d

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
[
6
.
0
1
]

B
o
r
n

d
i
g
i
t
a
l
,

s
t
a
y

d
i
g
i
t
a
l

p
o
l
i
c
y

g
u
i
d
e

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
8

|

6
.
0
2
[
6
.
0
2
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

d
i
g
i
t
a
l

a
r
c
h
i
v
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

c
a
s
e

a
n
d

b
l
u
e
p
r
i
n
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
1

|

6
.
0
1

|

6
.
0
3
[
6
.
0
3
]

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

a
r
c
h
i
v
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

p
l
a
n

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

6
.
0
2
P
r
e

F
Y
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
3
1
4
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
3
1
4
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
4
1
5
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
4
1
5
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
u
l

2
0
1
5
o
n
w
a
r
d
s
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

3
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

4
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

5
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

6
Page 72
[
7
.
0
1
]

I
C
T

c
o
n
t
e
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
2

|

7
.
0
6
[
7
.
0
2
]

T
o
t
a
l

c
o
s
t
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

m
o
d
e
l
l
i
n
g

m
e
t
h
o
d

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
1
[
7
.
0
3
]

I
C
T

s
o
u
r
c
i
n
g

p
o
l
i
c
y

a
n
d

a
g
i
l
e

p
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t

m
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1

|

5
.
0
2

|

7
.
0
5

|

7
.
0
8
[
7
.
0
4
]

I
C
T

c
o
s
t

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

2
.
0
4

|

7
.
0
7
[
7
.
0
5
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

I
C
T

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c

p
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t

p
l
a
n

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

2
.
0
4

|

2
.
0
5

|

7
.
0
3

|

7
.
0
6

[
7
.
0
6
]

I
C
T

p
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t

r
e
f
o
r
m

(
s
h
o
r
t

t
e
r
m
)

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
2

|

7
0
1

|

7
.
0
5

|

7
.
0
7
[
7
.
0
7
]

I
C
T

p
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t

r
e
f
o
r
m

(
m
e
d
i
u
m

t
e
r
m
)

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

7
.
0
4

|

7
.
0
6
[
7
.
0
8
]

I
C
T

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

p
a
n
e
l

a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
2

|

7
.
0
3
[
8
.
0
1
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

c
l
o
u
d

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

l
a
u
n
c
h

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
2

|

8
.
0
4
[
8
.
0
2
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a
s
-
a
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

p
o
l
i
c
y

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

8
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
3

|

8
.
0
5

|

8
.
0
8

|

1
2
.
0
1
[
8
.
0
3
]

I
C
T

a
s
-
a
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

t
o
o
l
k
i
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

8
.
0
2

|

8
.
0
9
[
8
.
0
4
]

A
s
-
a
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

t
e
r
m
s

a
n
d

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
1

|

1
2
.
0
1
[
8
.
0
5
]

E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
2
[
8
.
0
6
]

C
I
T
E
C

d
i
v
e
s
t
u
r
e

p
l
a
n
[
8
.
0
7
]

O
n
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
,

o
n
e

n
e
t
w
o
r
k

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

c
a
s
e
[
8
.
0
8
]

T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n

c
o
m
m
o
d
i
t
y

I
C
T

t
o

a
s
-
a
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

m
a
r
k
e
t

a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

5
.
0
1

|

8
.
0
2
[
8
.
0
9
]

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

a
s
-
a
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

r
o
a
d

m
a
p
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

8
.
0
3

|

1
1
.
0
2
[
9
.
0
1
]

I
C
T

i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

m
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
[
9
.
0
2
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

p
o
r
t
a
l
[
9
.
0
3
]

I
C
T

i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

l
a
u
n
c
h

a
n
d

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
[
9
.
0
4
]

P
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n

f
o
r

I
C
T

i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
[
9
.
0
5
]

P
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n

f
o
r

I
C
T

i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t

i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
P
r
e

F
Y
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
3
1
4
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
3
1
4
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
4
1
5
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
4
1
5
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
u
l

2
0
1
5
o
n
w
a
r
d
s
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

7
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

8
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

9
Objective 2: Ef cient digital services for our clients
R
e
f
e
r
s

t
o

I
C
T

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

a
c
t
i
o
n

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s

Page 73
[
1
0
.
0
1
]

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m

r
i
s
k

r
e
v
i
e
w

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
2

|

1
2
.
0
3

|

1
2
.
0
4
[
1
0
.
0
2
]

H
i
g
h
-
r
i
s
k

i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
[
1
0
.
0
3
]

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

a
t
-
r
i
s
k

s
y
s
t
e
m
s
[
1
0
.
0
4
]

P
u
b
l
i
c

r
e
c
o
r
d
s

t
o
o
l
k
i
t

f
o
r

a
t
-
r
i
s
k

a
n
d

l
e
g
a
c
y

I
C
T

s
y
s
t
e
m
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
1
[
1
0
.
0
5
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

I
C
T

r
i
s
k

m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
2

|

1
2
.
0
3

|

1
2
.
0
4
[
1
0
.
0
6
]

B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y

a
n
d

d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r

r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y

p
l
a
n
s

f
o
r

s
i
g
n
i
f

c
a
n
t

I
C
T

s
y
s
t
e
m
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
2

|

1
2
.
0
4
[
1
1
.
0
1
]

W
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

a
n
d

s
k
i
l
l
s

d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
1
.
0
2

|

1
2
.
0
3
[
1
1
.
0
2
]

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
a
l

w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

p
l
a
n
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

8
.
0
9

|

1
1
.
0
1

|

1
2
.
0
5
[
1
1
.
0
3
]

I
C
T

s
k
i
l
l
s

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

u
p
d
a
t
e
[
1
1
.
0
4
]

S
u
p
p
l
y

o
f

c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l

r
o
l
e
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
5
[
1
1
.
0
5
]

C
o
m
m
o
n

o
n
l
i
n
e

I
C
T

t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g

p
l
a
t
f
o
r
m

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
1
.
0
6
[
1
1
.
0
6
]

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

t
h
e

f
u
t
u
r
e

w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
1
.
0
5
[
1
2
.
0
1
]

U
K

O
G
C

g
a
t
e
w
a
y

r
e
v
i
e
w

p
r
o
c
e
s
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

8
.
0
2

|

8
.
0
4

|

1
0
.
0
1

|

1
0
.
0
4

|

1
0
.
0
5
[
1
2
.
0
2
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

I
C
T

p
o
r
t
f
o
l
i
o

m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k

(
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
s

a
l
l

o
t
h
e
r

i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
)

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
3

|

1
0
.
0
1

|

1
0
.
6
[
1
2
.
0
3
]

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

p
o
r
t
f
o
l
i
o
,

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

a
n
d

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

3
.
0
3

|

1
0
.
0
1

|

1
0
.
0
5

|

1
1
.
0
1
[
1
2
.
0
4
]

I
C
T

p
o
r
t
f
o
l
i
o

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

t
o
o
l
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
0
.
0
1

|

1
0
.
0
6
[
1
2
.
0
5
]

I
C
T

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

r
e
f
o
r
m

1
0
.
0
5

|

1
1
.
0
2

|

1
1
.
0
4
[
1
2
.
0
6
]

Q
u
e
e
n
s
l
a
n
d

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

I
C
T

d
a
s
h
b
o
a
r
d

(
s
t
a
g
e

o
n
e
)

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
7
[
1
2
.
0
7
]

Q
u
e
e
n
s
l
a
n
d

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

I
C
T

d
a
s
h
b
o
a
r
d

(
s
t
a
g
e

t
w
o
)

r
e
l
a
t
e
s

t
o

1
2
.
0
6
P
r
e

F
Y
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
3
1
4
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
3
1
4
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
3
1
4
J
u
l

Q
1
2
0
1
4
1
5
O
c
t

Q
2
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
a
n

Q
3
2
0
1
4
1
5
A
p
r

Q
4
2
0
1
4
1
5
J
u
l

2
0
1
5
o
n
w
a
r
d
s
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

1
0
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

1
1
F
o
c
u
s

a
r
e
a

1
2
R
e
f
e
r
s

t
o

I
C
T

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

a
c
t
i
o
n

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s

Page 74
Page 75
Page 76

Ict Strategy Action Plan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ict Strategy Action Plan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ict Strategy Action Plan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

Queensland Government ICT strategy 201317 action plan

You might also like