This document discusses ancient megalithic structures found across different parts of the world, and proposes theories about their origins. It suggests that early Celtic/Druid peoples originated from the same ancestral civilization that built similar stone structures in places as far-flung as India, the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and the British Isles. Colonies from this original group may have migrated and spread megalithic architecture to these distant regions. It also proposes that Phoenician traders from Tyre and Sidon introduced some of these primeval stone structures to Britain.
This document discusses ancient megalithic structures found across different parts of the world, and proposes theories about their origins. It suggests that early Celtic/Druid peoples originated from the same ancestral civilization that built similar stone structures in places as far-flung as India, the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and the British Isles. Colonies from this original group may have migrated and spread megalithic architecture to these distant regions. It also proposes that Phoenician traders from Tyre and Sidon introduced some of these primeval stone structures to Britain.
This document discusses ancient megalithic structures found across different parts of the world, and proposes theories about their origins. It suggests that early Celtic/Druid peoples originated from the same ancestral civilization that built similar stone structures in places as far-flung as India, the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and the British Isles. Colonies from this original group may have migrated and spread megalithic architecture to these distant regions. It also proposes that Phoenician traders from Tyre and Sidon introduced some of these primeval stone structures to Britain.
This document discusses ancient megalithic structures found across different parts of the world, and proposes theories about their origins. It suggests that early Celtic/Druid peoples originated from the same ancestral civilization that built similar stone structures in places as far-flung as India, the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and the British Isles. Colonies from this original group may have migrated and spread megalithic architecture to these distant regions. It also proposes that Phoenician traders from Tyre and Sidon introduced some of these primeval stone structures to Britain.
tlonn- the forty-fifth parallel of north latitude ; that, in a similar manner, colonies advanced from the same great nation hy a southern line through Asia, peopling Syria and Africa, and arriving at last by sea through the Pillars of Hercules at Britain ; that the languages of the western world were the same, and that one system of letters viz. that of the Irish nniids pervaded the whole, was common to the British Isles and Gaul, to the inhabitants of Italy, Greece, Syria, Arabia, Persia, and Hindostan ; and that one of the two alphabets (of the same system) in which the Irish MSS. are written viz. the Beth-luis-nion came by Gaul through Britain to Ireland ; and that the other the Bobeloth came through the Straits of Gibraltar. Jacob Bryant tliinks that the works called Cyclopean were executed at a remote age by colonies of some great original nation ; the only difference between his ojjinion and tliat of Mr. Higgins being, that the latter calls them Druids, or Celts, from the time of the dispersion above alluded to. 12. Tlie unliewn stones, whose antiquity and purport is the subject of this section, are fjiind in Hindostan, where they are denominated " jjandoo koolies," and are attributed to a fabulous being named Pandoo and his sons. With a similarity of character attesting their common origin, we find them in India, on the shores of the Levant and Mediterranean, in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, in France, and on the shores of Britain from the Straits of Dover to the Land's End in Cornwall, as well as in many of the interior parts of the country. They are classed as follows:
1. The Mngle stone, pillar, or obelisk.
2. Circles of stones of ditlerent numoer and arrangement. 3. Sacrificial stones. 4. Crom- lechs and cairns. 5. Logan stones. G. Tolmen or colossal stones. 13. (1.) Single Stones. Passanes abjuiid in Scripture in which the practice of erecting single stones is recorded. The reader on tiiisj point may refer to Gen. xxviii. 18., Jurh/es, ix. C, 1 Sam vii. 12., 2 Sam. xx. 8., Joshua, xxiv. 27. Tlie single stone might be an emblem of the generative power of Nature, and thence an object of idolatry. That mentioned in the first scriptural reference, which Jacob set up in his journey to visit Laban, his uncle, and wliicli he had used for his pillow, seems, whether from the vision he had while sleeping upon it, or from some otlier cause, to have become to him an oliject of singular veneration ; for lie set it up, and poured oil upon it, and called it" Bethel" (the house of God). It is curious to observe that some (nllars in Cornwall, assumed to have been erected by the Phoe- nicians, still retain the api)ellation Bethel. At first, these stones were of no larger dimen- sion than a man could remove, as in the instance just cited, and that of the Gilgal of Joshua (/(//. iv. 20.) ; but tiiat which was set up under an oak at Sliechem (ibid. xxiv. 26.), was a great stone. And here we may notice aiiotlier singular coincitlenee, that of the Botliel in Cornwall being set up in a place which, from its iiroximiy to an oak which was near the spot, was called r?othel-ac ; the last syllable being the Saxon for an oak. It appears from the Scriptures that tliese single stones were raised on various occasions; sometimes, as in the case of Jacob's Bethel and of Samuel's Ebenezer, to commemorate instances of divine interposition; sometimes to record a covenant, as in the case of Jacob and Laban {Gen. xxxi. 48.) ; sometimes, like the Greek stekc, as sepulchral stones, as in the case of Rachel's grave (Gen. xxxvi. 20.), 1700 years B.C., according to the usual reckoning. They were occasionally, also, set up to the memory of individuals, as in the instance of Absalom's pillar and others. The pillars and altars of the patriarchs appear to have been erected in honour of the only true God, Jehovah ; but wherever the Canaanites appeared, they seem to have been the objects of idolatrous worship, and to have been dedicated to Baal or the sun, or the other false deities whose altars Moses ordered the Israelites to destroy. The similarity of pillars of single stones almost at the ojiposite sides of the earth, leaves no doubt in our mind of their being the work of a people of one common origin widely scattered ; and the hypotheses of Bryant and Higgins sufficiently account for their appearance in places so remote from each other. In consequence, says the latter writer, of some cause, no matter what, the Hive, after the dispersion, casted and sent forth its swarms. One of the largest descended, according to Genesis (x. 2.), from Gomer, went north, and then west, pressed by succeeding swarms, till it arrived at the shores of the Atlantic Ocean, and ulti- mately colonised Britain. Another branch, observes the same author, proceeded through Sarmatia southward to the Euxine (Cimmerian Bosphorus) ; another to Italy, founding the states of the Umbrii and the Cimmerii, at Cuma, near Naples. Till the time of the Romans these different lines of march, like so many sheepwalks, were without any walled cities. Some of the original tribe found their way into Greece, and between the Carpathian mountains and the Alps into Gaul, scattering a few stragglers as they passed into the beautiful valleys of the latter, where traces of them in Druidical monuments and language are occasionally found. Wherever they settled, if the conjecture is correct, they employed themselves in recovering the lost arts of their ancestors. 14. To the Canaanites of Tyre and Sidon may be chiefly attributed the introduction of these primeval works into Britain. The Tyrians, inhabiting a sinall slip of barren land, vrere essentially and necessarily a commercial peojile, and became the most expert and idvonturous sailors of antiquity. It has been supposed that the constancy of the needle to the pole, " that path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen."