1. The document proposes an architecture for future intelligent Earth observing satellites that can provide data to users quickly, inexpensively and reliably.
2. It envisions a system with multiple layers of satellites, including low Earth orbit satellites collecting data and geostationary satellites facilitating communication. Onboard processing would allow the satellites to work autonomously.
3. The system is designed around user needs, with different users receiving customized data and products through antennas of varying sizes. A control center would manage distribution and guide users.
1. The document proposes an architecture for future intelligent Earth observing satellites that can provide data to users quickly, inexpensively and reliably.
2. It envisions a system with multiple layers of satellites, including low Earth orbit satellites collecting data and geostationary satellites facilitating communication. Onboard processing would allow the satellites to work autonomously.
3. The system is designed around user needs, with different users receiving customized data and products through antennas of varying sizes. A control center would manage distribution and guide users.
1. The document proposes an architecture for future intelligent Earth observing satellites that can provide data to users quickly, inexpensively and reliably.
2. It envisions a system with multiple layers of satellites, including low Earth orbit satellites collecting data and geostationary satellites facilitating communication. Onboard processing would allow the satellites to work autonomously.
3. The system is designed around user needs, with different users receiving customized data and products through antennas of varying sizes. A control center would manage distribution and guide users.
1. The document proposes an architecture for future intelligent Earth observing satellites that can provide data to users quickly, inexpensively and reliably.
2. It envisions a system with multiple layers of satellites, including low Earth orbit satellites collecting data and geostationary satellites facilitating communication. Onboard processing would allow the satellites to work autonomously.
3. The system is designed around user needs, with different users receiving customized data and products through antennas of varying sizes. A control center would manage distribution and guide users.
Architecture of Future Intelligent Architecture of Future Intelligent
Earth Observing Satellites Earth Observing Satellites Dr. Guoqing Zhou October 2001 Old Dominion University NIAC Fellow Meeting To get your satellite information at anytime anywhere in the world Quickly, Inexpensively, Reliably Theend-users connect their (PC) computer to receiver and antenna for real-time downlink and display of satelliteimagery. It appears to theend-users that receiving thesat- ellitedatais as easy as selecting a TV channel. Remote control L O W D a ta R a te H I G H D a t a
R a t e U p l i n k Geostationary EOS D o w n l i n k Receiving satellite images is as easily as selecting TV channel. I. Why Did We Propose This Intelligent System? The 1 st Generation: Operational Reconnaissance (Early 1960s - 1972) CORONA, ARGON and LANYARD were the first three operational imaging satellite reconnaissance systemlaunched in the early 1960s 3 inch Focus length 322 km Flying Height Yes (70%) Stereo Panchromatic Band 82.3 Inclination Frame Film Imaging mode 556 x 556 Swath (km) 140 GSD (m) ARGON 9034A mission, launched on May, 1962, Camera: KH-5 (1972 - 1986) The 2 nd Generation: Experimental Period and Initial Application TheLandsat 1, launched on August 7, 1972, symbolized the modern era of earth remote sensing. Multiple spectral bands High spatial resolution (80m) Large area (185kmby 185km) Repeating coverage (every 18 days) Satellite image data directly in digital formfor the first time Much of the foundation of multi spectral data processing in the early 1970s by NASA, J PL, USGS, ERIM, and LARS Since 1972, Landsat TM in 1982, 1984 with 30mGSD and 7 spectral bands, until the SPOT HRV in 1986 with 10 mat Pan. band and 30 mGSD in 3 spectral bands 2 The 3 nd Generation: Wide Application and Techni que Further Developed (1986 1997) 4. Best GSD: 10 min panchromatic channel, SPOT 5. Active microwave sensor: radar imagery, ERS-1, ESA, 1991 6. Multimission platform: SPOT, PFM (PlatformMultimission) 1. Linear array push-broom imaging mode: SPOT 2. Stereo mapping capability: Off-nadir viewing stereoscopic imagery, SPOT The 4 th Generation: High-Resol ution and Hyperspectral Satellites In 1995, a conference titled Land Earth Satellite for Decade sponsored by ASPRS, and co-sponsored by the Landsat Management Team(NASA, NOAA, and USGS), NIMA, USDA, EPA, NASA Applications, and others was held on September 1995 at Tyson's Corner, Virginia. ( 1997 - ? ) More than 700 experts fromsatellite companies, value- added producers and end user communities to study anticipated applications, detect potential problems, and discuss common solutions. The result of this groundbreaking conference was that many participants thought that High-Resolution, Multi(hyper)spectral Satellite The new generation is Failed Ikonos-1 Failed QuickBird-1 Failed OrbView-4 10/18/2001 0.61 QuickBird-2 Earth Watch 2003 0.8 EROS B1/B2 USA/Isreal 12/5/2000 1.5 EROS A1 USA/Israel Late of 2001 5 NEMO USA Navy End of 2001 1 OrbView-3 ORBIMAGE 9/24/1999 1 Ikonos-2 SpaceImaging 12/24/1997 3 Early Bird Earth Watch Launch Date Best GSD (m) Name Owner 2003 1 IRS-2A (Cartosat-2) India 2003 3 CBERS-4 China/Brasil 2002 3 CBERS-3 China/Brasil 2003 2.5 ALOS J apan 2003 3mRadar Radarsat-2 Canada 2001 5 SPOT-5 France 2004 1mRadar TerraSAR Germany 2002 2.5 IRS-P5 (Cartosat-1) India Launch Date Best GSD (m) Name Owner 1960 10 1 1972 1986 1997 2010 Beyond GSD (m) CORONA Landsat-1 Spot-1 EarlyBird Future ~13 Year Cycle 12 years 14 years 11 years 13 years 100 Year History of Earth Observing Satellites 3 II. What Is the NEXT New Generation of Earth Observing Satellite Beyond 2010?! The Earth observation satellite has passed the threshold into maturity as a commercial space activity. The major features of interest have moved from Imaging mode (sensors) Spatial resolution Spectral resolution Spectral coverage Stereo capability Revisit capability Width of swath Orbital altitude On-board data processor Event-driven data coll. Multi-angle viewing High spatial/temporal resolution HS land imaging Multi-sensors/satellites Valueadded product TO Architecture of Future Intelligent Earth Observing Satellites Internet Elements of Future Earth Satellites Real-time user Ground center Antenna Professional user Mobile user Data distribution Data processing Professional user Common user Space Users Ground III. Concept Design of Future Intelligent Earth Observing Satellites 1. Usually, in space systemdesign, one starts to define and specify the satellite system. 2. In contrast, the users and their needs formthe starting point. Design Principle 4 New societal needs for information, especially mobile GIS and real-time GIS, have migrated frombasic imagery to Temporal, dynamic imagery, e.g., flood disaster Specific site, e.g., World Trade Center disaster site Update frequently on hourly to minutes basis, analogous to today's weather updates Value-added products, e.g., geo-registration, feature enhancement, radiometric intensification, DTM, orthophoto, image mosaic, fused MS and Pan scene, etc. Users Requirements A mobile user: e.g., search-and-rescue pilot in an airplane A real-time user: e.g. mobile GIS user, a portable receiver, small antenna and laptop computer A common user: e.g., farmer, at a frequency of 1-3 days A mineralogist: only hyperspectral imagery for distinguishing different metals A cartographic user: e.g., photogrammetrist, panchromatic image Some Examples: 1. Concept Design for the End-User Elements of End Users Antenna and Receiver of Intelligent Satellite Communication between various users and Ground Control Station User Software for Intelligent Satellite Data Processing Hand-held antenna and receiver for real-time and mobile users Mobile antenna for mobile users Fixed antenna for popular users, professional users or satellite receiving station Antenna and Recei ver of Intelligent Satellite: Principle: Different users will need different imagery, and different imagery will be assigned different broadcast frequency. The ground control station should Assigns various users with various receiving frequencies after payment. Communicate real-time with end-users for guidance about receiving frequencies, software use, display, etc. Communication Between Various Users and Ground Control Station 5 Directly downloaded satellite data satellite imagery TV antenna receives a signal, not direct picture and sound. The signal must be transformed by TV set into picture and sound. Similarly, the imagery is a type of special signal, which is only transformed by software which is provided by the ground control center so that real-time and common users can easily use it. User Software for Intelligent Satellite Data Processing 2. Concept Design of Space Segment Elements of Space Segment Multi-layer Satellites Networks On-Board Data Processing High-Speed Data Transmission (Crosslink, uplink and downlink) Multi-Layer Satellite Network Earth observing satellites (EOSs) Network Hundred satellites with a different sensor Low orbits Satellite groups, group-lead. Management of the member-satellites Communication with other group-leaders Communication with the geostationarysatellites Member-satellites Collection of data Data processing on-board Etc. On-board data processor, act autonomously Geostationary Satellites Network Not all EOSsare in view Communication with end-users Communication with ground control stations Further processing of data Network of An Organic Measurement System High speed optical and radio frequency links Archive facilities on the ground and on the satellite Group-leads (cross-link, uplink, and downlink) Member satellite (cross-links, uplink) This systemis specifically designed and built by support of multiple satellites and sensors Concept Design for Multi-Sensor/Satellites current leading commercial being developed Future intelligent, e.g., neural network, smart, etc. 6 All group-lead satellite and EOsmust establish and maintain a high-speed data cross-link All group lead satellite maintain uplinkingwith the geostationarysatellites. All geostationary satellite must maintain dowlinking with users and ground data processing center. High-Speed Data Cross/up/down-links (Group-lead/EOs Geostationary) Handheld wireless devices access satellite data for direct downlink The intelligent homes monitor their own internal environments by linking to atmospheric satellite data The intelligent satellites respond to environmental changes without human intervention. Satellite not only "see" users environment, but also shape users physical surroundings. High-Speed Data Cross/up/down-links (Group-lead/EOs Geostationary) Concept Design for A Type of Imaging System Simultaneously collect pan, MS, and HS (200 bands) data Push-broom linear array CCD detectors Cross-track and in-track stereo mapping capability 3. Concept Design of Ground Segment Elements of Ground Segment 1. System Operation Center (SOC) Operations center (NOC) Satellite management center (SMC) 2. Data Processing and Distribution (DPD) Data Processing and Analysis Center (DPAC) Data Distribution/Network Operation Center (DDC) 3. End-User Steers and monitors the satellite transmissions continuously Predicts the satellite ephemeris Calibrates the satellite flying parameters and the navigation message periodically Evaluates the satellites performance (health and status) Take corrective measures when necessary System Operation Center (SOC): Control Station U p l o a d
t h e
v a l u e - a d d e d
p r o d u c t s 7 Communicates with the payload and end-users to support user access Establishes network connections Provides overall network management Communicates with end-users for problemsolution, such as receiving frequency, channel, software, technical guides, etc. Provides science data filing, notification of scientists, and data distribution Network Operation Center (NOC) IV. Key Technologies The proposed configuration of FIEOS is technically feasible. Clearly, information technology and real-time information systems which tie the satellite-network together and provide a degree of access to space-based instrument data currently does NOT exist. Data collection technologies High speed digital processors Optical and RF data links Network protocols Storage technologies Data Collection Technologies Physical (Electromag.) Sensors: temperature, atmospheric gases, water vapour, wind, waves, currents, and land use Biological Sensors: freshwater, toxic chemicals and pollutants, both in waters and in soils Chemical Sensors: atmospheric particles, their size and chemistry, transport, dispersion and deposition of heavy metals Neural Network Sensor: automatic target recognition, If a sensor saw mostly trees and one small, man-made structure, the pixel showed only trees The Eyes in Space On-Board Data Processing Capabilities Data processor technology Image (signal) processor technology Software systems and algorithms High performance processing architectures Reconfigurablecomputing environments Generation of data products for direct distribution to users One of the essential capabilities provided by on board processing is autonomy 1. Platforms controlled intelligently and autonomously 2. Platforms adjust their positions in space relative to the constellation of sensors in response to collaborative data gathering 3. To operate autonomously single satellite and satellite-web 4. Decision support, planning 5. High level command protocols based on science objectives. Intelligent Platform Control 8 Network for High Data Rate Transmission A high speed wireless (optical or RF) data linking to connect satellite to satellite, or satellite to ground is required. The Weakest Links: the free space wireless cross-link of satellites and between satellite and ground. The Greatest Challenge: establishment and maintenance of a viable communication network among a constellation of satellites operating in diverse orbits. This is NOT a simple problem due to the relative velocities of the component satellites in the constellation. Data Storage and Distribution Many advanced and novel technologies Data mining Intelligent agent applications for tracking data, distributed heterogeneous frameworks (including open system interfaces and protocols) Data and/or metadata structures to support autonomous data handling Value-Added Data Production In order to make the value-added data products useful to a common user, Application software Application algorithms Dynamic searching Dynamic collection and cataloging Computational Speed of Dynamic Interaction !!!!! Problems: Prerequisite Condition of Direct Downlink DEM database Geo-data database Imagery database Attribute database Spatial database P o i n t C o m p l e x A n n o t a t i o n A r e a L i n e Unique identifier On-board image processing Satellite images Ortho mapimage DEM database Integrated Management System Integrated On-board Management System (Image, DEM and Geo-data) V. Current Development 9 Automated, on-board processing, analysis, and feature extraction using the Naval Research Laboratory's (NRL's) Optical Real-Time Adaptive Signature Identification System (ORASIS) Naval EarthMap Observer (NEMO) Realtimefeature extraction and classification with greater than 10x data reduction High-performance Imagery On-Board Processor provides greater than 2.5 gigaFLOPSof sustained computational power On-board data storage (56 gigabit) Military Application: Real-time tactical downlink of hyperspectral and products directly to the field for warfighter High data rate X-Band Downlink (150 Mbps) Low data rate S-Band Tactical Downlink (1 Mbps) Commercial satellite bus (Space Systems Loral LS- 400) PreconfiguredInterface (PCI) for secondary payloads/experiments NEMO On-Board Data Processing Capabilities A thematic on-boardclassificator for disaster warning and monitoring Radiometric and geometric on- board correction of sensor signals Geometric on-board correction of systematic alignment errors Geometric on-board correction of spacecraft attitude On-board geocodingof thematically processed data DLR BIRD Mission (Fire Monitoring) Real-time Downlink Immediate downlink of regional data Downlink of an alert message if required Store-and-forward, data downlink to low-cost payload ground stations Probais an ESA mission conceived for the purpose of demonstrating new on board technologies and the opportunities and benefits of on- board autonomy. GPS receiver Autonomous star tracker A high-performance computer A Digital Signal Processor for on- board data processing and analysis A mass memory PROBA: ESA's Autonomy And Technology Demonstration Mission MISSION OPERATIONS CONCEPT of PROBA On-board housekeeping decision-making process, i.e. failure detection, failure identification and first-level recovery actions. On-board data management: data handling, storage, and downlinks (a 1Gbit mass memory for recording, atuneable2Kbit/s to 1 Mbit/s down-link). 10 On-board resources usage power and energy usages On-board instrument commanding Planning, scheduling, resource management, navigation, and instrument pointing Downlinks of the processed data On-board science data distribution Automatic direct data distribution to different user without human involvement Minimumpossible delay MISSION OPERATIONS CONCEPT of PROBA COCONUDS (Co-ordinated Constellation of User Defined Satellites) The objective is to ascertain the practicality of a radically different, low-cost, distributed network approach to satellite earth observation. Co-ordinatedconstellation of 10 polar orbiting micro- satellites Generating low-bitratecontinuous data stream without on-board storage Four-band imagers, with 33 mresolution, and swath width of 350 km Distributed and free user community Ground stations are operated by end-users Minimumstation configuration (3.5 Mbps) Higher performance stations (typical 100 Mbps) Area of interest from2000 km radius with 2.5 mtracking dish to 400 x 400 kmwith fixed antenna For some point & shoot sensors users may uplink pointing requests European Union (Geosys, NRI, SSSL, and NLR) VI. Financial, Political, Social and Institutional Issues Reall y big bucks, literall y billi ons, are required Investment fromusers, public and private sector Government agencies always have the highest priority In fact, some of government agencies are partially on the path toward construction VII. Conclusion 11 The design of future earth observing satellites Space segment End-users segment Ground segment. On-board processing Intelligent sensor control High data rate transmission and network control Intelligent platformcontrol Information production, distribution and storage Focus on The key to this vision: Real-Time Info. System To raise awareness as to Needs Possibilities Benefits Issues Funding Goal Future 1. Further assess key issues for such a advanced system 2. Raise awareness concerning: autonomy domains and requirements for future space missions currently available mature technology verification and validation techniques for such a system current state of the art and (in-flight) autonomy demonstrations in Europe and the United states 3. Stimulate co-operation between the Space and Research Communities and small businesses to solve critical problems of fielding advanced concepts in space ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project is funded by NASA Institute of Advanced Concept (NIAC). Our warmest thanks go to all the people who were kind enough to lend us their ears (or mail) to discuss a number of topics crucial for completion of our work. For More Information gzhou@odu.edu