Tocqueville argues that while freedom of the press is essential in a democracy, it can also threaten liberty. The press grants the majority power through knowledge but can also manipulate opinions with deceptive writings. This combination could override freedom. However, a decentralized American press prevents a single viewpoint and citizens interpret facts according to their own views, helping preserve freedom against the threat of tyranny of the majority.
Tocqueville argues that while freedom of the press is essential in a democracy, it can also threaten liberty. The press grants the majority power through knowledge but can also manipulate opinions with deceptive writings. This combination could override freedom. However, a decentralized American press prevents a single viewpoint and citizens interpret facts according to their own views, helping preserve freedom against the threat of tyranny of the majority.
Tocqueville argues that while freedom of the press is essential in a democracy, it can also threaten liberty. The press grants the majority power through knowledge but can also manipulate opinions with deceptive writings. This combination could override freedom. However, a decentralized American press prevents a single viewpoint and citizens interpret facts according to their own views, helping preserve freedom against the threat of tyranny of the majority.
Tocqueville argues that while freedom of the press is essential in a democracy, it can also threaten liberty. The press grants the majority power through knowledge but can also manipulate opinions with deceptive writings. This combination could override freedom. However, a decentralized American press prevents a single viewpoint and citizens interpret facts according to their own views, helping preserve freedom against the threat of tyranny of the majority.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
A Thin Line: Freedom and Despotism
In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville presents forth numerous philosophies
regarding the nature of democracy, defining the conceptual, abstract term as equality of conditions. Liberty and equality, he stresses, are fundamental components in the American political structure of society, and numerous material, tangible processes attest to this fact, such as freedom of the press. The American press grants the general public access to a tremendous amount of power through knowledge concerning Americas political and socioeconomic state, allowing people to decide for themselves their ideologies, beliefs, and stances. Thus, the majority attains a great deal of power, perhaps an excess of power. However, Tocqueville argues that the press can be just as conniving as factual, manipulating readers opinions by providing deceptive opinions. The majoritys excess of power, alongside the medias deceptively opinionated writings, makes for a lethal combination capable of overriding the very idea of freedom itself, and only a decentralized press inhibits such from occurring. Even today, countless American citizens utilize the media as an outlet for garnering information representing variable areas of interest. Tocqueville makes clear that America requires freedom of press in order to function as a democratic nation, owing to the fact that limited press equates limited power to the people, and America was founded on the premise of a sovereign population. 1 This form of sovereignty is extremely beneficial to society because readers are reliant on facts to guide them through their thought processes and actions in order to build a strong, unified, constantly-improving nation. Because it is decentralized, the American press fails to compel an entire population to follow a singular viewpoint. Each American interprets the facts according to his or her own choosing, a system prevalent even in modern
1 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 174 times. For instance, websites offer a comments section for every news article, a place where various internet-users clash with their differing opinions, despite the articles principal message or purpose. Facts are vital assets of power to their consumers, and so, freedom of the press not only guarantees freedom of the people, but a great deal of power to the people as well. Unfortunately, newspapers deliver misguiding judgments and values together with the facts, thereby presenting a threat to a democratic union. Tocqueville upholds that a majoritys power is potentially harmful to society depending on peoples actions and reactions based on read information, particularly if said information is biased. Since American media plays a decentralized role in everyday society, harm, rooted from tyranny of the majority, is narrowly avoidable. 2 For the most part, the United States prides itself on individualism, a concept parallel to freedom in terms of importance. Citizens have already formulated an entire realm of thoughts and perspectives, and therefore, they do not accept partial news as part of their system of beliefs. Most Americans also tend to maintain pragmatic, materialistic views pertaining to their individual, specific interests, thus they gate their minds from any other end of the spectrum. 3 Their obstinate nature provides fruitful in countering the presss extreme standpoints, and results in preservation of freedom and retaliation against tyranny. 4
While Tocqueville asserts that freedom of press is essential to a thriving democratic government notable for highly valuing the freedom of its populace, the press can also morph the ideal of liberty into something akin to despotism by granting the majority an excess of power. This excess of power is especially frightening when considering that false, misleading news articles bear the capacity to sway opinions and influence minds. Yet, Americans remain strong in
2 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 177 3 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 180 4 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 179 their primary convictions, because, as Tocqueville claims, the United States entails a decentralized press. There is a thin line between freedom and tyranny, and a majority is no exception to playing the tyrants role.