Spring Constant Measurement - Static Dynamic Method
Spring Constant Measurement - Static Dynamic Method
1
where
m is the mass of the load applied ;
g is the acceleration due to gravity;
k
s
is the spring constant in the static condition ; and
e is the extension of the massless spring.
However, the spring has a finite mass, denoted by M
s
, which adds to the load, hence m in
Equation-1 is replaced by (m+M
s
), giving
k
s
=
(
...2
Equation-2 represents a straight line in which spring constant k
s
and acceleration due to
gravity g are constants. A graph of e versus (m+M
S
) is a straight with slope g/k
s
and Y-
axis intercept of (gM
S
/k
s
). Hence k
s
can be determined from the values of extension of the
spring with variation in the applied load.
Slope = g/k
...3
Y-intercept =
= M
s
x (slope of the line) 4
Figure-1: Silky spring used in this experiment
Dynamic mode
If the spring is made to oscillate by pulling the weight applied to it downward, it executes a
simple harmonic motion; the equation representing its motion is written as
...6
The angular velocity is given by:
Lab Experiments
KamalJeeth Instrumentation and Service Unit
148
Vol-11, No-2, June-2011
=
...7
Therefore, the time period of the oscillation of the spring is:
T = 2
...8
If the dynamic spring has an effective mass M
d
, then its time period is :
T = 2
...9
A graph of T
2
on the y-axis and the mass (m+M
d
) on the x-axis will result in a straight line
with:
Slope =
...10
Y-intercept =
= M
d
x (slope of the line) 11
where m: mass of the weight hanging
M
d:
effective dynamic mass
of the spring
e: extension of the spring
T: time period of oscillation
k
d:
spring constant
g: acceleration due to gravity
Apparatus used
Spring mass apparatus consisting of a very thin spring of about 5 cm (2 inch) diameter, fitted
on a stand, and a digital stop clock.
Figure-2: Spring mass apparatus
Lab Experiments
KamalJeeth Instrumentation and Service Unit
149
Vol-11, No-2, June-2011
Figure-1 shows the silky spring used in experiment. It always remains in the compressed
position because of its light weight. Each coil of the springs rests on the other hence it is fully
compressed. Figure-2 shows the spring mass apparatus used in this experiment. One can tie a
few spring coils together which act like a weight hanger. By increasing the number of turns,
the mass (m) hanging can be varied.
Experimental procedure
Figure-3: Measurement of spring length
1. The spring length is measured using a scale as shown in Figure-3, and its mass is
determined using a digital balance.
Spring length (X) =5.36cm = 0.0536m
Spring mass (M) = 46.72g = 46.72x10
-3
Kg
Mass per unit length = (M\X)=46.72x10
-3
/0.0536= 0.871Kg/m
Total number of turns in the spring =72
Hence weight per turn of the spring (m
0
) = 46.72x10
-3
/72=0.00065Kg/turn
2. About one third of the coil is separated, held together and fixed on to a stand as shown in
the Figure-4. The rest of the spring coils hang downward because of their own weight as
shown in Figure-4.
3. The length of the spring coils hanging in air is measured using a scale and extension of
the spring is calculated as
x = 14.4cm
The spring is now compressed by pushing it back and its compressed length or the
relaxed length x
o
is found as
x
0
= 3.3cm
The extension e = x-x
o
= 14.4-3.3=3.1cm = 3.1x10
-2
m
4. Now five turns (n=5) of the hanging coil are tied to form the mass as shown in Figure-2.
This tied mass forms the weight. The weight is pulled down slightly and released which
makes it to oscillate. The time period for 50 oscillations is counted using a digital stop
clock and the period of the simple harmonic oscillation is determined. The readings are
tabulated in Table-1.
Lab Experiments
KamalJeeth Instrumentation and Service Unit
150
Vol-11, No-2, June-2011
Time for 50 oscillations = 30.7 s
Hence period, T = 30.7/50 = 0.614 s.
Figure-4: Static position of the spiral spring
5. To repeat the trial, five more turns of the coil tied at the top are released and mass is
increased by tying 10 turns together, keeping the total number of coil turns hanging in air
the same.
6. Extension of the spring is calculated again and its period of oscillation is determined and
recorded in Table-1.
7. A graph is drawn taking mass of the spring along X-axis and its extension on the Y-axis
as shown in Figure-5. From the graph the slope and Y-intercepts are noted as
Slope =
=
(.)
(.)
= 8.203
k
s
=
.
.
= 1.194 N/m
The Y-intercept =
The effective mass of the spring in the static condition
M
s
=
=
.
.
=0.0136kg = 13.6g
8. A second graph showing the variation T
2
with mass is also drawn as shown in Figure-
6 from which the slope and intercept are calculated as
Slope =
.
(.)
=
.
.
= 34.18 =
Therefore, dynamic spring constant k
d
=4x3.14
2
/34.18=1.15N/m
Y-intercept = 0.38 =M
d
slope
Lab Experiments
KamalJeeth Instrumentation and Service Unit
151
Vol-11, No-2, June-2011
M
d
=
.
.
=0.0111Kg =11.1g
Table-1
No of
turns
tied
(n)
Mass
nm
0
X10
-3
(Kg)
Free
hanging
length
x (10
-2)
(m)
Relaxed
length of
the
spring
(x
0
)x10
-2
Extension
e 10
-2
(cm)
Time for 50
oscillations
(sec)
Period
T (sec)
T
2
0 0 14.4 3.0 11.42 30.7 30.9 0.61 0.38
5 3.25 17.3 3.3 14.05 34.1 34.1 0.68 0.47
10 6.50 20.2 3.5 16.67 38.2 37.9 0.76 0.58
15 9.75 23.1 3.7 19.30 41.6 41.8 0.83 0.69
20 13.0 26.4 4.0 22.33 44.7 44.8 0.90 0.80
25 16.25 30.6 4.2 26.36 48.6 48.1 0.97 0.93
30 19.5 32.0 4.6 27.38 50.8 50.5 1.01 1.03
Variation of period of oscillation and extension of the spring with mass
Figure-5: Variation of mass with extension of the spring in the static mode
Figure-6: Variation of mass with square of the period in the dynamic mode
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
(
c
m
)
x
1
0
-
2
Mass (X10
-3
Kg)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15 20 25
T
2
Mass (X10
-3
Kg)
Lab Experiments
KamalJeeth Instrumentation and Service Unit
152
Vol-11, No-2, June-2011
Results
The results obtained are tabulated in Table-2.
Table-2
Parameters Experimental
Spring constant in static mode (N/m) 1.19
Spring constant dynamic mode (N/m) 1.15
Average spring constant (N/m) 1.17
Effective mass of spring in static mode (g) 13.6
Effective mass of spring in dynamic mode (g) 11.1
Average effective mass (g) 12.3
Experimental results
Discussion
A new experiment is presented here using which basic properties of a spring are determined.
As no slotted weight is used, the weight of the spring itself acts like a hanging weight. The
spring used is very thin, or silky, hence all the turns (layers) of it is in contact with each other,
which makes it a compressed spring. The spring constant and effective mass obtained by the
static and the dynamic methods are nearly the same indicating that both the methods give
reasonably correct result.
References
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_%28device%29