Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

Introduction To Functional Analysis - Lec08

The document summarizes a lecture on functional analysis that covered Cauchy's inequality, Lebesgue measure, and properties of the Lebesgue integral. Specifically: 1) The lecture first discussed Cauchy's inequality and the parallelogram law for Hilbert spaces. It then outlined how to define Lebesgue measure using locally integrable functions and the integral. 2) Key properties of Lebesgue measure and measurable sets were proven, including that countable unions of measurable sets are measurable. 3) The relationship between characteristic functions and the sets they define was noted, and it was shown that the collection of Lebesgue measurable sets has certain closure properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

Introduction To Functional Analysis - Lec08

The document summarizes a lecture on functional analysis that covered Cauchy's inequality, Lebesgue measure, and properties of the Lebesgue integral. Specifically: 1) The lecture first discussed Cauchy's inequality and the parallelogram law for Hilbert spaces. It then outlined how to define Lebesgue measure using locally integrable functions and the integral. 2) Key properties of Lebesgue measure and measurable sets were proven, including that countable unions of measurable sets are measurable. 3) The relationship between characteristic functions and the sets they define was noted, and it was shown that the collection of Lebesgue measurable sets has certain closure properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

MIT OpenCourseWare

http://ocw.mit.edu
18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis
Spring 2009
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

46 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


Lecture 8. Tuesday, Mar 3: Cauchys inequality and Lebesgue measure
I rst discussed the denition of preHilbert and Hilbert spaces and proved
Cauchysinequalityandtheparallelogramlaw. Thiscanbefoundinallthelecture
notesandmanyotherplacessoIwillnotrepeatithere. Anothernicesourceisthe
book of G.F. Simmons, Introduction to topology and modern analysis. I like it
but I think it is out of print.
In case anyone is interested in how to dene Lebesgue measure from where we
are now and I may have time to do this later we can just use the integral as I
outlinedonTuesday. First,wedenelocallyintegrablefunctions. Thusf :RC
is locally integrable if
(8.1) F
[N,N]
=
f(x) x[N, N]
1
(R) N.
0 x if |x|> N
L
For example any continuous function on R is locally integrable.
Lemma 4. The locally integrable functions form a linear space.
Proof. Follows from the linearity of L
1
(R).
Denition 5. A set AR is measurable if its characteristic function
A
is locally
integrable. A measurable set A has nite measure if
A
L
1
(R) and then
(8.2) (A) =
N
is the Lebesgue measure of A. If A is measurable but not of nite measure then
(A) = by denition.
Weknowimmediatelythatanyinterval(a, b)ismeasurable(whetheropen,semi-
openorclosed)andhasnitemeasureifandonlyifitisboundedthenthemeasure
is ba. Some things to check:-
Proposition 13. The complement of a measurable set is measureable and any
countable union of measurable sets is measurable.
Proof. The rst part follows from the fact that the constant function 1 is locally
integrableandhence
R\A
= 1
A
islocallyintegrableifandonlyif
A
islocally
integrable.
Noticetherelationshipbetweencharacteristicfunctionsandthesetstheydene:-
(8.3)
AB
=max(
A
,
B
),
AB
=min(
A
,
B
).

If we have a sequence of sets A


n
then B
n
= A
k
is clearly an increasing
sequence of sets and
kn
(8.4)
B
n

B
, B = A
n

n
is an increasing sequence which converges pointwise (at each point it jumps to 1
somewhereandthen staysorelsestaysat 0.) Now, ifwemultiplyby
[N,N]
then
(8.5) f
n
=
[N,N]

B
n

B[N,N]
is an increasing sequence of integrable functions assuming that is that the A
k
s
are measurable with integral bounded above, by 2N. Thus by our monotonicity

theorem the limit is integrable so


B
is locally integrable and hence
n
A
n
is
measurable.

47 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009
Proposition14. The(Lebesgue)measurablesubsetsofRformacollection,M,of
thepowersetofR,includingandRwhichisclosedundercomplements,countable
unions and countable intersections.
Proof. Thecountableintersectionpropertyfollowsfromtheothersordirectlybya
similar argument to that above but with decreasing sequences.
WehavedeclaredasetAwhichismeasurablebutnotofnitemeasuretohave
innite measure for instance R is of innite measure in this sense. Since the
measure of a set is always non-negative (or undened if it isnt measurable) this
does not cause any problems and in fact Lebesgue measure is countable additive
provided we allow as a value of the measure:-
(8.6) A
n
M, nN= A
n
M and mu( A
n
) (A
n
)
n n n
with equality if A
j
A
k
= for j = k.
It is a good exercise to prove this!

48 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


Problem set 4, Due 11AM Tuesday 10 Mar.
Just to compensate for last week, I will make this problem set too short and
easy!
Problem 4.1
Let H be a normed space in which the norm satises the parallelogram law:
(8.7) u+v
2
+uv
2
=2(u
2
+v
2
) u, vH.
Show that the norm comes from a positive denite sesquilinear (i.e. Hermitian)
inner product. Big Hint:- Try
1

(8.8) (u, v) =
4
u+v
2
uv
2
+iu+iv
2
iuiv
2
!
Problem 4.2
LetH beanitedimensional(pre)Hilbertspace. So,bydenitionH hasabasis
{v
i
}
n
i=1
, meaning that any element of H can be written
(8.9) v= c
i
v
i
i
andthereisnodependencerelationbetweenthev
i
sthepresentationofv=0in
theform(8.9)isunique. ShowthatH hasanorthonormalbasis,{e
i
}
n
satisfying
i=1
(e
i
, e
j
) =
ij
(= 1 if i=j and 0 otherwise). Check that for the orthonormal basis
the coecients in (8.9) are c
i
= (v, e
i
) and that the map
(8.10) T :H v((v, e
i
))C
n
is a linear isomorphism with the properties
(8.11) (u, v) = (Tu)
i
(Tv)
i
, u
H
=Tu
C
n u, vH.
i
Why is a nite dimensional preHilbert space a Hilbert space?


49 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009
Solutions to Problem set 3
This problem set is also intended to be a guide to what will be on the in-class
testonMarch5. InparticularIwillaskyoutoprovesomeofthepropertiesofthe
Lebesgueintegral,asbelow,plusonemoreabstractproof. Recallthatequalitya.e
(almost everywhere) means equality on the complement of a set of measure zero.
Problem 3.1 If f and g L
1
(R) are Lebesgue integrable functions on the line
show that
(1) If f(x)0 a.e. then f 0.
(2) If f(x)g(x) a.e. then f g.
(3) If f is complex valued then its real part, Ref, is Lebesgue integrable and
| Ref| |f|.
(4) For a general complex-valued Lebesgue integrable function
(8.12) | f| |f|.
Hint: Youcanlookupaproofofthiseasilyenough,buttheusualtrickisto
choose[0,2)sothate
i
f = (e
i
f)0.Thenapplythepreceeding
estimate to g=e
i
f.
(5) Show that the integral is a continuous linear functional
(8.13) :L
1
(R)C.
Solution:
(1) Iff isrealandf
n
isareal-valuedabsolutelysummableseriesofstepfunc-
tions converging to f where it is absolutely convergent (if we only have a
complex-valued sequence use part (3)). Then we know that
(8.14) g
1
=|f
1
|, g
j
=|f
j
| |f
j1
|, f 1
is an absolutely convergent sequence converging to f| almost everywhere.
1
|
Itfollowsthatf
+
=
2
(|f|+f) =f,iff 0,isthelimitalmosteverywhere
of the series obtained by interlacing
1
2
g
j
and
1
2
f
j
:
1
(8.15) h
n
=
2
g
k
n= 2k1
f
k
n= 2k.
Thus f
+
is Lebesgue integrable. Moreover we know that


k k
(8.16) f
+
= lim h
k
= lim

f
j
+ f
j

k
n2k
k
|
j=1
|
j=1
where each term is a non-negative step function, so f
+
0.
(2) Apply the preceeding result to gf which is integrable and satises
(8.17) g f = (gf)0.


| |

| |


50 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009
(3) Arguing from rst principles again, if f
n
is now complex valued and an
absolutelysummableseriesofstepfunctionsconverginga.e.tof thendene

Ref
k
n= 3k2
(8.18) h
n
=

Imf
k
n= 3k1

Imf
k
n= 3k.
This series of step functions is absolutely summable and
(8.19) |h
n
(x)|< |f
n
(x)|<= h
n
(x)=Ref.
n n n
Thus Ref is integrable. Since Ref f
(8.20) Ref |f|= | Ref| |f|.
(4) For a complex-valued f proceed as suggested. Choose z C with z = 1
such that z f [0,) which is possible by the properties of complex
numbers. Then by the linearity of the integral
(8.21)
z f = (zf)= Re(zf) |zRef| |f|= | f|=z f |f|.
(where the second equality follows from the fact that the integral is equal
to its real part).
(5) We know that the integral denes a linear map
(8.22) I :L
1
(R)[f] f C
since f = g if f = g a.e. are two representatives of the same class in
L
1
(R). To say this is continuous is equivalent to it being bounded, which
follows from the preceeding estimate
(8.23) |I([f])|=| f| |f|=[f]
L
1
(Note that writing [f] instead of f L
1
(R) is correct but would normally
be considered pedantic at least after you are used to it!)
(6) I should have asked and might do on the test: What is the norm of I as
an element of the dual space of L
1
(R). It is 1 better make sure that you
can prove this.
Problem 3.2 If I R is an interval, including possibly (, a) or (a,), we
dene Lebesgue integrability of a function f : I C to mean the Lebesgue
integrability of
(8.24) f

(x) =
f(x) xI
f

:RC,
0 xR\I.
The integral of f on I is then dened to be
(8.25) f = f.

I
(1) Show that the space of such integrable functions on I is linear, denote it
L
1
(I).
(2) Show that is f is integrable on I then so is |f|.

51 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


(3) Showthatiff isintegrableonI and
I
|f|=0thenf =0a.e. inthesense
that f(x) = 0 for all xI\E where E I is of measure zero as a subset
of R.
(4) Showthatthesetofnullfunctionsasinthepreceedingquestionisalinear
space, denote it N(I).
(5) Show that
I
|f| denes a norm on L
1
(I) =L
1
(I)/N(I).
(6) Show that if f L
1
(R) then
(8.26) g(x) =
f(x) xI
g:I C,
0 xR\I
is in L
1
(R) an hence that f is integrable on I.
(7) Show that the preceeding construction gives a surjective and continuous
linear map restriction to I
(8.27) L
1
(R)L
1
(I).
(Notice that these are the quotient spaces of integrable functions modulo
equality a.e.)
Solution:
(1) If f and g are both integrable on I then setting h = f +g, h

= f

+ g,
directly from the denitions, so f +g is integrable on I if f and g are by
thelinearityofL
1
(R).Similarlyifh=cf thenh

=cf

isintegrableforany
constant c if f

is integrable. Thus L
1
(I) is linear.
(2) Again from the denition, |f

| =

h if h = |f|. Thus f integrable on I
impliesf

L
1
(R),which,asweknow,impliesthat f

1
(R).Sointurn
h

L
1
(R) where h=|f|, so |f| L

1
(I).
| | L
(3) If f L
1
(I) and

I
|f| = 0 then
R
|f

| = 0 which implies that f

= 0 on
R\E where E R is of measure zero. Now, E
I
= EI E is also of
measure zero (as a subset of a set of measure zero) and f vanishes outside
E
I
.
(4) If f, g:I C are both of measure zero in this sense thenf+g vanishes
onI\(E
f
E
g
)whereE
f
I andE
f
I areofmeasurezero. Theunion
of two setsof measure zero (inR) isof measure zero so this showsf+g is
null. The same is true of cf +dg for constant c and d, so N(I) is a linear
space.
(5) Iff L
1
(I)andg N(I)then|f+g| |f| N(I),sinceitvanisheswhere
g vanishes. Thus

(8.28)
I
|f +g|=
I
|f| f L
1
(I), gN(I).
Thus

(8.29) [f]
I
=
I
|f|
is a well-dened function on L
1
(I) = L
1
(R)/N(I) since it is constant on
equivalence classes. Now, the norm properties follow from the same prop-
erties on the whole of R.

52 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


(6) Supposef L
1
(R)andg isdenedin(8.26)abovebyrestrictiontoI.We
needtoshowthatg L
1
(R).Iff
n
isanabsolutelysummableseriesofstep
functions converging to f wherever, on R, it converges absolutely consider
f
n
(x) on I

(8.30) g
n
(x) =
0 on R\I

where I

is I made half-open if it isnt already by adding the lower end-


point (if there is one) and removing the upper end-point (if there is one).
Then g
n
is a step function (which is why we need I

). Moreover,

g
n

| |
|f
n
| so the series g
n
is absolutely summable and converges to g
n
outside
I andatallpointsinsideI wheretheseriesisabsolutelyconvergent(since
it is then the same as f
n
). Thus g is integrable, and since f

diers from g
by its values at two points, at most, it too is integrable so f is integrable
on I by denition.
(7) First we check we do have a map. Namely if f N(R) then g in (8.26) is
certainly an element of N(I). We have already seen that restriction to I
mapsL
1
(R)intoL
1
(I)andsincethisisclearlyalinearmapitdenes(8.27)
the image only depends on the equivalence class of f. It is clearly linear
and to see that it is surjective observe that if g L
1
(I) then extending it
as zero outside I gives an element of L
1
(R) and the class of this function
maps to [g] under (8.27).
Problem 3.3 Really continuing the previous one.
(1) ShowthatifI = [a, b)andf L
1
(I)thentherestrictionoff toI
x
= [x, b)
is an element of L
1
(I
x
) for all ax<b.
(2) Show that the function
(8.31) F(x) = f : [a, b)C
I
x
is continuous.
(3) Prove that the function x
1
cos(1/x) is not Lebesgue integrable on the
interval (0,1]. Hint: Think about it a bit and use what you have shown
above.
Solution:
(1) This follows from the previous question. If f L
1
([a, b)) with f

a repre-
sentativethenextendingf

aszerooutsidetheintervalgivesanelementof
L
1
(R), by dention. As an element of L
1
(R) this does not depend on the
choice of f

and then (8.27) gives the restriction to [x, b) as an element of


L
1
([x, b)). This is a linear map.
(2) Using the discussion in the preceeding question, we now that if f
n
is an
absolutely summable series converging to f

(a representative of f) where
it converges absolutely, then for any axb, we can dene
(8.32) f
n

=([a, x))f
n
, f
n

=([x, b))f
n



53 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


where ([a, b)) is the characteristic function of the interval. It follows that
f
n

converges to f([a, x)) and f


n

to f([x, b)) where they converge abso-


lutely. Thus
(8.33) f = f([x, b))= f
n

, f = f([a, x))= f
n

.
[x,b)
n
[a,x)
n
Now, for step functions, we know that f
n
= f
n

+ f
n

so
(8.34) f = f + f
[a,b) [a,x) [x,b)
as we have every right to expect. Thus it suces to show (by moving the
end point from a to a general point) that
(8.35) lim f = 0
x a
[a,x)
for any f integrable on [a, b). Thus can be seen in terms of a dening
absolutely summable sequence of step functions using the usual estimate
that
(8.36) |
[a,x)
f|
[a,x)
|
nN
f
n
|+
n>N
[a,x)
|f
n
|.
The last sum can be made small, independent of x, by choosing N large
enough. On the other hand as x a the rst integral, for xed N, tends
to zero by the denition for step functions. This proves (8.36) and hence
the continuity of F.
(3) If the function x
1
cos(1/x) were Lebesgue integrable on the interval (0,1]
(on which it is dened) then it would be integrable on [0,1) if we dene it
arbitrarily,saytobe0,at0.Thesamewouldbetrueoftheabsolutevalue
and Riemann integration shows us easily that

1
(8.37) lim x cos(1/x) dx=.
t0
t
| |
Thisiscontrarytothecontinuityoftheintegralasafunctionofthelimits
just shown.
Problem 3.4 [Harder but still doable] Suppose f L
1
(R).
(1) Show that for each tR the translates
(8.38) f
t
(x) =f(xt) :RC
are elements of L
1
(R).
(2) Show that
(8.39)
t
lim
0
|f
t
f|= 0.

ThisiscalledContinuityinthemeanforintegrablefunctions. Hint: Iwill


add one!
(3) Conclude that for each f L
1
(R) the map (it is a curve)
(8.40) Rt[f
t
]L
1
(R)
is continuous.
Solution:

54 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


(1) If f
n
is an absolutely summable series of step functions converging to f
where it converges absolutely then f
n
( t) is such a series converging to
f( t) for each t R. Thus, each of the f(xt) is Lebesgue integrable,
i.e. are elements of L
1
(R)
(2) Now, we know that if f
n
is a series converging to f as above then
(8.41) |f| |f
n
|.
n
Wecansumthersttermsandthenstarttheseriesagainandsoitfollows
that for any N,
(8.42) |f| | f
n
|+ |f
n
|.
nN n>N
Applying this to the series f
n
( t)f
n
() we nd that
(8.43) |f
t
f| | f
n
( t)f
n
()|+ |f
n
( t)f
n
()|
nN n>N
Thesecondsumhereisboundedby2 |f
n
|.Given >0wecanchoose
n>N
N so large that this sum is bounded by /2, by the absolute convergence.
So the result is reduce to proving that if |t| is small enough then
(8.44) | f
n
( t)f
n
()| /2.
nN
This however is a nite sum of step functions. So it suces to show that
(8.45) | g( t)g()| 0 as t0
for each component, i.e. a constant, c, times the characteristic function of
an interval [a, b) where it is bounded by 2|c||t|.
(3) For the curve f
t
which is a map
(8.46) Rtf
t
L
1
(R)
it follows that f
t+s
= (f
t
)
s
so we can apply the argument above to show
that for each s,
(8.47) lim f
t
f
s
= 0 = lim
s
[f
t
][f
s
]
L
1 = 0
ts
| |
t
which proves continuity of the map (8.46).
Problem 3.5 Inthelastproblemsetyoushowedthatacontinuousfunctionona
compact interval, extended to be zero outside, is Lebesgue integrable. Using this,
and the fact that step functions are dense in L
1
(R) show that the linear space of
continuous functions on R each of which vanishes outside a compact set (which
depends on the function) form a dense subset of L
1
(R).
Solution: Since we know that step functions (really of course the equivalence
classes of step functions) are dense in L
1
(R) we only need to show that any step
functionisthelimitofasequenceofcontinuousfunctionseachvanishingoutsidea

55 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


compact set, with respect to L
1
. So, it suces to prove this for the charactertistic
functionofaninterval[a, b)andthenmultiplybyconstantsandadd. Thesequence

0 x < a1/n

n(xa+ 1/n) a1/nxa


(8.48) g
n
(x) = 0 a < x < b

n(b+ 1/nx) bxb+ 1/n

0 x > b+ 1/n
is clearly continuous and vanishes outside a compact set. Since

1

b+1/n
(8.49) |g
n
([a, b))|=
a1/n
g
n
+
b
g
n
2/n
it follows that [g
n
] [([a, b))] in L
1
(R). This proves the density of continuous
functions with compact support in L
1
(R).
Problem 3.6
(1) If g : R C is bounded and continuous and f L
1
(R) show that
gf L
1
(R) and that

(8.50) gf sup g f . | |
R
| | | |
(2) SupposenowthatG C([0,1][0,1])isacontinuousfunction(IuseC(K)
todenotethecontinuousfunctionsonacompactmetricspace). Recallfrom
the preceeding discussion that we have dened L
1
([0,1]). Now, using the
rst part show that if f L
1
([0,1]) then
(8.51) F(x) = G(x, )f( )C
[0,1]
(where is the variable in which the integral is taken) is well-dened for
each x[0,1].
(3) Show that for each f L
1
([0,1]), F is a continuous function on [0,1].
(4) Show that
(8.52) L
1
([0,1])f F C([0,1])
is a bounded (i.e. continuous) linear map into the Banach space of contin-
uous functions, with supremum norm, on [0,1].
Solution:
(1) Lets rst assume that f =0 outside [1,1]. Applying a result form Prob-
lem set there exists a sequence of step functions g
n
such that for any R,
g
n
g uniformly on [0,1). By passing to a subsequence we can arrange
that sup
[1,1]
|g
n
(x)g
n1
(x)| < 2
n
. If f
n
is an absolutly summable se-
riesofstepfunctionsconverginga.e.tof wecanreplaceitbyf
n
([1,1])
as discussed above, and still have the same conclusion. Thus, from the
uniform convergence of g
n
,
n
(8.53) g
n
(x) f
k
(x) g(x)f(x) a.e. on R.
k=1

56 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009


So dene h
1
= g
1
f
1
, h
n
= g
n
(x)
n
f
k
(x)g
n1
(x)
n

1
f
k
(x). This series
k=1 k=1
of step functions converges to gf(x) almost everywhere and since
(8.54)

|h
n
| A|f
n
(x)|+ 2
n
|f
k
(x)|, |h
n
| A |f
n
|+ 2 |f
n
|<
k<n n n n
it is absolutely summable. Here A is a bound for |g
n
| independent of n.
Thus gf L
1
(R) under the assumption that f =0 outside [0,1) and
(8.55) |gf| sup|g| |f|
followsfromthelimitingargument. Nowwecanapplythisargumenttof
p
which is the restriction of p to the interval [p, p+1), for each pZ. Then
we get gf as the limit a.e. of the absolutely summable series gf
p
where
(8.55) provides the absolute summablitly since
(8.56) |gf
p
| sup|g|
[p,p+1)
|f|<.
p p
Thus, gf L
1
(R) by a theorem in class and
(8.57) |gf| sup|g| |f|.
(2) If f L
1
[(0,1]) has a representative f

then G(x, )f

(
1
([0,1)) so

) L
(8.58) F(x) = G(x, )f( )C
[0,1]
iswell-dened,sinceitisindpendentofthechoiceoff

,changingbyanull
function if f

is changed by a null function.


(3) Nowbytheuniformcontinuityofcontinuousfunctionsonacompactmetric
space such as S =[0,1][0,1] given >0 there exist >0 such that
(8.59) sup G(x, y)G(x

, y) < if xx

<.
y[0,1]
| | | |
Then if |xx

|<,

(8.60) |F(x)F(x

)|=|
[0,1]
(G(x,)G(x

,))f()| |f|.
Thus F C([0,1]) is a continuous function on [0,1]. Moreover the map
f F is linear and
(8.61) sup F sup G
[0,1]
| |
S
| |
[0,1]
||f|
which is the desired boundedness, or continuity, of the map
(8.62) I :L
1
([0,1])C([0,1]), F(f)(x) = G(x,)f(),
I(f)
sup
sup|G|f
L
1.

You might also like