The document contains a model solution to questions from a CAPEX answer sheet test. It includes responses to multiple choice and open-ended questions relating to investment proposals, discounted cash flow analysis, and capital budgeting decisions. Calculations are shown for net present value and internal rate of return to support the recommendation for a proposed waste processing project.
The document contains a model solution to questions from a CAPEX answer sheet test. It includes responses to multiple choice and open-ended questions relating to investment proposals, discounted cash flow analysis, and capital budgeting decisions. Calculations are shown for net present value and internal rate of return to support the recommendation for a proposed waste processing project.
The document contains a model solution to questions from a CAPEX answer sheet test. It includes responses to multiple choice and open-ended questions relating to investment proposals, discounted cash flow analysis, and capital budgeting decisions. Calculations are shown for net present value and internal rate of return to support the recommendation for a proposed waste processing project.
The document contains a model solution to questions from a CAPEX answer sheet test. It includes responses to multiple choice and open-ended questions relating to investment proposals, discounted cash flow analysis, and capital budgeting decisions. Calculations are shown for net present value and internal rate of return to support the recommendation for a proposed waste processing project.
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
CAPEX Answer Sheet (Test Number I)
Your Full Name Roll No
MODEL SOLUTION Answer to question number 1 Question No. The Question Your Response 1 (a) The arrangement between M/s Cash Crazy Limited and M/s Money Provider Limited (as mentioned in the question) is commonly called INVOICE DISCOUNTIN !RR!NEMENT 1 (b) Please mention the e!act name o" the means o" #ro$ect "inance that the concerned com#any is contem#lating resorting to ISSUE OF CONVERTI"LE DE"ENTURES 1 (c) %uch a #henomenon (as mentioned in the question) may arise i" the concerned division had ta&en a #articular action during the year '(1)* +ou need to mention , what action- DILUTED #i.e. $ispose$ o%%& UN'RODUCTIVE !SSETS DURIN YE!R ()*+ 1 (d) First Question .ad the com#any com#uted the /00 in the instant case and had ta&en the decision to re$ect this investment #ro#osal would you have su##orted their decision- Explain with adequate reasons. YES The /00 measure would be a reliable measure in this case (no interim cash "lows)* The /00 1 2 3 (in this case) is less than investor4s e!#ected return o" 53 (as a##licable in this case) and hence the #ro#osal may be re$ected Se,on$ Question 2hat may be commented about the actual 6P7 o" this investment o#tion- Explain with adequate reasons. DEFINITELY NE!TIVE 8##lying 23 as hurdle rate 6P7 1 (* Thus i" 53 was a##lied as the hurdle rate (as a##licable) 6P7 would have been negative in the instant case (5 9 2 , given)* Answer to question number 2 The Compute$ N'V #in Rs La-hs& . !s Re/uire$ 'ositi0e 1 Ne2ati0e 33 #!ppro4& 'OSITIVE %u##orting 2or&ings (in res#ect o" answer to question no ') , given below Computation of Operatin Cash Inf!ows from the propose" waste pro#essin business Details Year * Year ( Year + %ales )'( ):( ;'( 8ttributable Material Cost <( =( >( 2age Cost ?( :< 1(( @verhead Cost (0elevant Portion @nly) =( >( 11( Ae#reciation Charges <( ); '' /nterest Charges 1: 1' ? Total 5!#enditure ';: '>1 )': PBT =' :> >' (Ta! C ;(3) ('>) ()?) ()=) P8T ;) <) << 8dd Bac& Ae#reciation <( ); '' Operatin Cash Inf!ows $% &' '' Computation of In#rementa! Cash (!ows ) As per the i*en #ase fa#ts+ Details Year ) Year * Year ( Year + @#erating Cash /n"lows (as com#uted above) >) := == Loss o" 0ent 0ecei#ts (Ta! 8d$usted) (?) (?) (?) /nvestment in 2or&ing Ca#ital (/nventories) ('() ()<) Com#ensation #ayable to the Contractor ()() Contractor4s charges saved (Ta! 8d$usted) )( )( )( 0e#ayment o" Loan Princi#al (<() (<() (<() %alvage 7alue o" the Machine '( Ta! %hield on Loss o" %ale o" Machine 1( Total /ncremental Cash Dlows (<() )' ?1 :1 AD C 1<3 (Eiven) 1*(( (*:= (*=? (*?? Present 7alue (P7) (<() ': ;? <) NP, - '' (Positi*e) Note 8) 2A7 o" the machine at the end o" ) years 1 1<( , (<( F ); F '') 1 ;;* %alvage 7alue 1 '(* There"ore loss on sale o" machine 1 ;; , '( 1 0s '; La&hs* Ta! shield on such loss on sale o" machine 1 ';G ;(3 1 1( la&hs (a##ro!) B) 8ll "igures (given above) had been rounded o"" to the nearest la&h C) 8##ortioned general "actory overhead e!#enses are in the nature o" irrelevant cost in this case*