Etoposide Jurnal
Etoposide Jurnal
Etoposide Jurnal
1t1
2t2
where
1
and
2
are the viscosities of the test and the
standard liquids,
1
and
2
are the densities of the liquids, and
t
1
and t
2
are the respective ow times in seconds.
The low viscosity of the developed microemulsion
ensures ease of syringeability as well as ease of mixing with
intravenous uids with minimum mechanical agitation.
pH Measurement
The pH of formulation measured regularly over a period
of 10 days showed that the pH of the formulation was in an
acceptable range for intravenous administration. For etopo-
side, pH plays a pivotal role in the drug stability. The pH for
stability of etoposide was found to be pH 5.4 which is
considered optimum to prevent the degradation of drug
(11). Due to constant pH, the drug content (Table IV) was
found to be in acceptable limits over a period of 3 months.
Compatibility Assessment with Different Injectable Diluents
As prescribed, etoposide for injection needs to be diluted
for administration by intravenous infusion in either 5%
dextrose injection or 0.9% sodium chloride injection to
produce a solution containing 200 to 400 g (0.2 to 0.4 mg)
of etoposide per milliliter. This is essential to prevent
hypotension, a side effect of the drug. As shown in Tables V
and VI, the diluted solution was stable for sufcient time
enabling slow intravenous infusion of etoposide in concentra-
tion range up to 1 mg/ml for 1.5 and 2 h in 0.9% sodiumchloride
injection and 5% dextrose injection, respectively. However, it
should be noted that at the recommended concentration of
0.4 mg/ ml, there was absence of drug precipitation for 3 h in
0.9% sodium chloride injection and 5% dextrose injection,
respectively. This clearly reects the superiority of the devel-
oped formulation over the existing etoposide injection which
reports drug precipitation as its limitations.
In Vitro Erythrocyte Toxicity Study
Colloidal drug carrier systems serve to minimize the side
effects of drugs used for parenteral applications. Side effects
often result from the destruction of corpuscles of blood or
tissue cells at the site of injection and these may be reduced
by incorporating the drug in the colloidal carriers (e.g.,
microemulsions). To corroborate this statement, the hemo-
lytic activity was done for estimating the membrane damage
caused by formulation in vivo. Since phospholipid and PEG-
400 are known for their relative non-toxic nature, they were
not considered for this study (2). However, the samples tested
for erythrocyte toxicity; developed microemulsion, Capmul
MCM andTween-80 showed considerably less hemolytic
activity (Table VII). This study indicated the safety of the
developed microemulsion for parenteral administration.
Test for Sterility
Sterility is one of the prerequisites for the parenteral
preparations. However, at extreme temperatures, phase
separation may occur but the microemulsions spontaneously
return to their initial state when brought back to normal
temperature and on adequate mixing. As it is established,
microemulsions can be sterilized by autoclaving (12); the
developed microemulsion was sterilized by autoclaving at
121C and 15 psi for 15 min. Although there was phase
separation after autoclaving, after shaking it gave a homoge-
neous microemulsion. The sterility testing of this sterile
microemulsion showed absence of microbial growth indicat-
ing the effectiveness of autoclaving. Furthermore, this was
attested by the stability of the developed microemulsion over
a period of 3 months (Table IV).
Table V. Compatibility of Microemulsion with 0.9% Sodium
Chloride Injection
Conc. of drug mg/mL
Time in hours
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0.2 C C C C C C
0.4 C C C C C C
0.6 C C C C C C
0.8 C C C C C P
1 C C C P
C clear, P precipitation
Table VI. Compatibility of Microemulsion with 5% Dextrose
Injection
Conc. of drug mg/mL
Time in hours
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0.2 C C C C C C
0.4 C C C C C C
0.6 C C C C C C
0.8 C C C C C P
1 C C C C P P
C clear, P precipitation
Table VII. Comparative Hemolysis after 1 Hour Incubation Period
Component % Hemolysis after 1 hour of incubation
Capmul MCM 0.16
Tween 80 0.05
Microemulsion 0.15
TritonX 100 6.69
830 Jain, Fernandes and Patravale
CONCLUSION
The parenteral phospholipid-based microemulsion was
successfully developed with particle size less than 100 nm.
The developed formulation was amenable to sterilization by
autoclaving and was found to be robust to dilution with
intravenous uids. The in vitro erythrocyte toxicity study
demonstrated the safety and acceptability of the formulation
for parenteral administration.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the University Grant Com-
mission (New Delhi, India) for providing nancial support for
this project. The authors are also thankful to Degussa and
Abitec Corp. USA for providing the gift samples of oils,
surfactants, and cosurfactants.
REFERENCES
1. (2000) Physicians desk reference, 54th edition. Medical Eco-
nomics Company, Inc. Montvale, New Jersey, pp. 888889
2. Strickley RG. Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable
formulations. Pharm Res. 2004;21:20130.
3. Darwish IA, Florence AT, Saleh AM. Effects of hydrotropic
agents on the solubility, precipitation, and protein binding of
etoposide. J Pharm Sci. 1989;78:57781.
4. Date AA, Nagarsenker MS. Parenteral microemulsions: an
overview. Int J Pharm. 2008;355:1930.
5. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ (eds) (2003) Handbook of
pharmaceutical excipients, 4th edition. Pharmaceutical Press,
London/American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington
6. Panaggio A, Rhodes CT, Worthen LR. The possible use of
autoclaving microemulsion for sterilization. Drug Dev Ind
Pharm. 1979;5:16973.
7. Prince LM. In: Prince LM, editor. Microemulsions: theory and
practice. London: Academic; 1977. p. 120.
8. Attwood D. Microemulsions. In: Kreuter J, editor. Colloidal drug
delivery systems, vol. 66. NewYork: Marcel Dekker; 1994. p. 3171.
9. Block LH. Pharmaceutical emulsions and microemulsions. In:
Lieberman HA, Rieger MM, editors. Pharmaceutical dosage forms:
disperse systems, vol. 2. NewYork: Marcel Dekker; 1996. p. 47109.
10. Bock TK, Muller BW. A novel assay to determine the hemolytic
activity of drugs incorporated in colloidal carriers systems.
Pharm Res. 1994;11:58991.
11. Tian L, He H, Tang X. Stability and degradation kinetics of
etoposide-loaded parenteral lipid emulsion. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96
(7):171928.
12. Panaggio A, Rhodes CT, Worthen LR. The possible use of
autoclaving microemulsion for sterilization. Drug Dev Ind
Pharm. 1979;5:16973.
831 Formulation Development of Parenteral Phospholipid-based Microemulsion of Etoposide