Turner, Gonzalez, and Wood

Faculty of Color in Academe: What 20 Years of Literature Tells Us
Caroline Sotello Viernes Turner

Arizona State University
Juan Carlos Gonzalez
University of MissouriKansas City
J. Luke Wood
Arizona State University
To better prepare students for an increasingly diverse society, campuses across the
country remain engaged in efforts to diversify the racial and ethnic makeup of their
faculties. However, faculty of color remain seriously underrepresented, making up 17%
of total full-time faculty. In the past 20 years, more than 300 authors have addressed the
status and experience of faculty of color in academe. From 1988 to 2007, there was a
continued rise in publications addressing the issue of the low representation of faculty
of color. This article presents a literature review and synthesis of 252 publications, with
the goal of informing scholars and practitioners of the current state of the eld. Themes
emerging from these publications and an interpretive model through which ndings can
be viewed are presented. The analysis, with a focus on the departmental, institutional,
and national contexts, documents supports, challenges, and recommendations to ad-
dress barriers and build on successes within these 3 contexts. The authors hope that this
article informs researchers and practitioners as they continue their work to understand
and promote the increased representation of faculty of color.
Keywords: faculty diversity, faculty of color, minority faculty, literature review, higher education
The increasing demographic diversity in the
U.S. population begun in the past century con-
tinues into this century. The new millennium
also brings a heightened awareness of the im-
portance of global and national understanding
of cross-cultural perspectives. Such trends and
transitions contribute to the shaping of Ameri-
can higher education. Efforts toward faculty
racial and ethnic diversity are fueled by the
increasing diversity of the student body (Cook
& Cordova, 2006; Cora-Bramble, 2006), com-
pelling arguments about the need to prepare all
students for a diverse society (Antonio, 2002;
C. A. Stanley, 2006; Umbach, 2006), continu-
ing evidence that a diverse faculty is important
to the success of a diverse student body (Hage-
dorn, Chi, Cepeda, & McLain (2007), evidence
that a diverse faculty assists in the recruitment
of students of color to higher education (Alger
& Carrasco, 1997; Antonio, 2000), and the con-
tributions of diverse faculties to the engagement
of new scholarship (Alger, 1999; Christian-
Smith & Kellor, 1999; A. M. Padilla, 1994;
Turner, 2000; Urrieta & Mendez Benav dez,
2007) and approaches to teaching (Antonio,
2000; M. Garcia, 2000; Pineda, 1998; Turner,
2000; Umbach, 2006; Vargas, 2002).
To better prepare students for an increasingly
diverse society, campuses across the country are
engaged in efforts to diversify the racial and
ethnic makeup of their faculties. These efforts
are perhaps the least successful of campus di-
versity initiatives as faculty of color remain
underrepresented and their achievements in the
academy almost invisible. According to The
Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac
Caroline Sotello Viernes Turner and J. Luke Wood, Di-
vision of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Ari-
zona State University; Juan Carlos Gonzalez, Division of
Urban Leadership and Policy Studies in Education, Univer-
sity of MissouriKansas City.
We thank Dr. Sharleen Chock for her assistance in the
initial analysis for this article. We also want to express our
appreciation to the editor and reviewers of the Journal of
Diversity in Higher Education who read and commented on
drafts of this article.
Correspondence concerning this article should be ad-
dressed to Caroline Sotello Viernes Turner, Division of
Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, College of Ed-
ucation, Arizona State University, Farmer 120, P. O. Box
872411, Tempe, AZ 85287-2411. E-mail: caroline.
turner@asu.edu
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education Copyright 2008 by the National Association of Diversity Ofcers in Higher Education
2008, Vol. 1, No. 3, 139168 1938-8926/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0012837
139
(Number of Full-Time Faculty Members,
20072008), in 2005 faculty of color made up
only 17% of total full-time faculty, with 7.5%
Asian, 5.5% Black, 3.5% Hispanic, and 0.5%
American Indian. When gures reported for the
full professor rank are examined, we see that
fewer than 12% of full professors in the United
States were people of color: 6.5% Asian, 3%
Black, 2% Hispanic, and 0.3% American In-
dian. For female faculty of color, the numbers
are even more dismal: In 2005, only 1% of full
professors were Black, 1% Asian, 0.6% His-
panic, and 0.1% American Indian.
According to Bland, Meurer, and Maldonado
(1995) and Patterson, Thorne, Canam, and Jill-
ings (2001), literature analyses and syntheses
are important as a means of periodically bring-
ing coherence to a research area, contributing
new knowledge revealed by integrating single
studies, and informing scholars and practitio-
ners of the state of the eld. From 1988 to 2007,
more than 300 scholars published 211 studies
and produced 41 doctoral dissertations related
to the underrepresentation of faculty of color.
We found it inspirational that so many scholars
have written about issues pertaining to faculty
of color in the past 2 decades. This article
reviews and synthesizes these studies with the
goal of informing scholars and practitioners of the
current state of the eld. During this process, we
developed an interpretive framework to present
common elements across publications.
We hope that this analysis will highlight crit-
ical information for practitioners and research-
ers as they attempt to further understand the
departmental, institutional, and national pro-
cesses to create, attract, and sustain a diverse
professoriate.
Method
Our search for and collection of academic
resources related to faculty of color began in
2005. We began collecting, annotating, and syn-
Figure 1. Supports () and challenges (-) within and across departmental, institutional, and
national contexts.
Table 1
Review of Literature Related to Faculty of Color, by Type of Publication, in 5-Year Increments
5-year increment Journal articles Dissertations Books Reports Book chapters Total
20032007 86 15 9 9 5 124
19982002 25 11 15 6 7 64
19931997 12 14 8 9 4 47
19881992 7 1 2 3 4 17
Total 130 41 34 27 20 252
140 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

thesizing resources from various academic da-
tabases for the years spanning 1988 to 2005.
This produced more than 160 resources, includ-
ing books, journal articles, book chapters, con-
ference papers, Web sites, and videotapes. In
2007, searches for new material that had been
written about faculty of color from 2004 to 2007
produced about 117 new references.
As a result of the plethora of publication and
resource types included in both the 2005 and the
2007 searches and because of space constraints,
we decided to focus our analysis on journal
articles, books, dissertations, reports, and book
chapters, eliminating conference papers, video
resources, and Web sites. Even then, we had
252 pieces of literature to include in our analy-
sis. Table 1 shows our search results in 5-year
increments.
Google Scholar (accessible at http://www
.scholar.google.com), a comprehensive aca-
demic search engine, was our major source for
identifying, collecting, and checking references.
This search engine is able to perform exhaustive
searches of all academic workfrom the easy-
to-nd academic articles to the hard-to-locate
book chapters. According to Google Scholar
(2007), articles in the academic search engine
are sorted the way researchers do, weighing
the full text of each article, the author, the
publication in which the article appears, and
how often the piece has been cited in other
scholarly literature. Supplementary article and
report searches were conducted through (a) Ed-
ucation Resources Information Center (ERIC),
(b) Blackwell Synergy, (c) Journal Storage (JS-
TOR), (d) Informaworld, (e) the Wilson Index,
(f) Ebscohost Electronic Journal Service, (g)
Wiley Interscience, (h) Project Muse, (i) the
Springer Collection, (j) Questia Online Librar-
ies, (k) Galegroup, (l) PsycINFO, and (m) the
Sage Publications Collection. Dissertation
searches were performed through Proquest Dig-
ital Dissertations. Additional book resources
were identied through the Missouri Education
and Research Libraries Information Network
(MERLIN) and through the Arizona State Uni-
versity, Tempe, Campus Library Catalog. Our
search keywords encompassed the following
terms: African American faculty, Black faculty,
Native American faculty, Indian faculty, Indig-
enous faculty, Asian faculty, Asian American
faculty, Hispanic faculty, Latino faculty, Latina
Figure 2. Recommendations for departmental, institutional, and national contexts.
Table 2
Love for Teaching
Hill-Brisbane & Dingus (2007) C. A. Stanley (2007a) Turner & Myers (2000)
Turner (2003)
141 FACULTY OF COLOR IN ACADEME
faculty, Chicano faculty, Chicana faculty,
women of color faculty, underrepresented mi-
nority faculty, and minority faculty.
After all references were collected and anno-
tated, we began our analysis. All resources were
reviewed with attention to their (a) research
purpose, (b) research questions, (c) methodol-
ogy, (d) theoretical framework, (e) ndings, (f)
recommendations, and (g) conclusions. We then
identied emerging themes from the literature
individually and cross-checked them in a team
discussion. Then, themes were distilled and pic-
torially depicted using Inspiration (Inspiration,
2007), a software program used to develop,
map, and organize themes in a visual treelike
format. This analytical process produced about
230 tree branches, with each branch represent-
ing a different idea found in the literature about
the experience of faculty of color. Inside each
tree branch, each author and year of publication
were included, so as to thicken the branches of
the issues most addressed in the literature. The
complete analysis is too complex to show here.
A conceptualization of it is shown in Figures 1
and 2.
Framework for Analysis
Publications by more than 300 scholars, in-
cluding 252 journal articles, dissertations, re-
ports, books, and book chapters, are analyzed
here. Figure 1 captures the richness of the
themes emerging from this extant literature.
Factors that positively (represented with a plus
sign) or negatively (represented with a minus
sign) affected the workplace experience of fac-
ulty of color are pictured here from three con-
texts: (a) the departmental, (b) the institutional,
and (c) the national. In Figure 1, when boxes cut
across various contexts, this means that faculty
of color were affected positively or negatively
across contexts. Although elements in the de-
partmental context, where working relation-
ships among peers are most intense, are critical
to the work life experience of faculty of color,
as explicated in the literature included in this
study, the importance of a positive and welcom-
ing institutional and national context cannot be
denied. The national context is made up of
professional organizations and journals that are
receptive to the research of the individual fac-
Table 3
/ - Service
Aguirre (2005) Gregory (2001) Skachkova (2007)
Aguirre & Martinez (1993) Hamlet (1999) E. Smith (1992)
Aleman & Renn (2002) Hill-Brisbane & Dingus (2007) C. A. Stanley (2007a)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) W. J. Johnson (1996) Takara (2006)
Arnold (2006) Jones (2002) Tierney & Rhoads (1993)
Baez (2002) Loder et al. (2007) Tomlinson (2006)
Bensimon et al. (2000) McKenzie (2002) Turner et al. (1996)
Bradley (2005) Moule (2005) Turner & Myers (2000)
Brayboy (2003) Niemann (1999) Urrieta & Mendez Benavidez (2007)
Brown et al. (2007) Niemann (2003) Valladares (2007)
Chesler et al. (2005) A. M. Padilla (1994) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Cowan (2006) Rains (1995) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Samano (2007) Wong & Bainer (1991
Table 4
Research
Aguirre (2005) M. Garc a (2000) D. G. Smith et al. (2004)
Aguirre et al. (1993) Gregory (2001) C. A. Stanley (2007a, 2007b)
Benjamin (1997) Hamlet (1999) Takara (2006)
Bradley (2005) Louis (2007) Thompson & Dey (1998)
De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) Niemann (2003) Turner (2002a)
Delgado Bernal & Villalpando (2002) Pepion (1993) Turner & Myers (2000)
Fenelon (2003) Rendon (2000) B. N. Williams & Williams (2006)
142 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

ulty member, the off-campus climate, and the
legal landscape, including the impact of chal-
lenges to afrmative action on the experience of
faculty of color. According to the literature,
elements such as lack of diversity cut across the
departmental and institutional contexts, and
mentorship crosses all contexts: national, insti-
tutional, and departmental.
Emerging Themes: Supports and
Challenges
In this section, themes identied across pub-
lications are listed below within departmental,
institutional, and national contexts. Paragraphs
briey describing the various themes introduce
each subsection. Words italicized within a para-
graph denote themes that are listed within each
introductory paragraph along with the relevant
references where elaboration on the theme can
be found. At least three references had to cite
the factor listed to be included in Figure 1.
Tables 210 relate to the framework presented
in Figure 1. References for publications docu-
menting each theme are presented alphabeti-
cally in three columns, starting from the top left
and ending on the bottom right.
Departmental Context
Within the departmental context, faculty of
color love of teaching was noted as a primary
reason for their persistence in academe. How-
ever, undervaluation of their research interests,
approaches, and theoretical frameworks and
challenges to their credentials and intellect in
the classroom contribute to their dissatisfaction
with their professorial roles. In addition, isola-
tion, perceived biases in the hiring process,
unrealistic expectations of doing their work and
being representatives of their racial/ethnic
group, and accent discrimination are noted neg-
atives described in the literature. Although ser-
vice can be detrimental to faculty of color as
they progress toward tenure and promotion, it
can also be what provides inspiration and pas-
sion as they fulll their desire to serve in re-
sponse to the needs of their communities. In
fact, according to Baez (2000), service may set
the stage for a critical agency that resists and
redenes academic structures that hinder fac-
ulty success (p. 363).
Bridging Departmental and Institutional
Contexts
Several themes described within the depart-
mental context were also noted within an insti-
tutional context. Although we know that profes-
sional networks, colleagues, and allies can exist
in all three contexts pictured here, the literature
reviewed spoke about these factors primarily
within the departmental and institutional con-
text. These factors, coupled with the presence of
Table 5
Job Satisfaction
Aguirre (2000) Kauper (1991) E. Smith (1992)
Astin et al. (1997) Laden & Hagedorn (2000) D. G. Smith et al. (2004)
Blackburn & Lawrence (1995) Morell-Thon (1998) Tack & Patitu (1992)
Chused (1988) Niemann (2003) Thompson & Dey (1998)
Flowers (2005) Niemann & Dovidio (2005) Turner & Myers (2000)
Holcomb-McCoy & Addison-Bradley (2005) Olivas (1988) Van Ummersen (2005)
Isaac & Boyer (2007) Peterson-Hickey (1998) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Jones (2002) Ponjuan (2005) Witt (1990)
Rains (1995)
Table 6
Teaching Challenges
Aguirre (2000, 2005) Johnsrud & Sadao (1998) Sampaio (2006)
Bradley (2005) Kauper (1991) Skachkova (2007)
Brayboy (2003) Marbley (2007) G. Smith & Anderson (2005)
Hassouneh (2006) Saavedra & Saavedra (2007) C. A. Stanley (2006)
Hendrix (2007)
student diversity, faculty research/teaching/
professional development support programs, a
political understanding of the importance of
sharing accomplishments with those who
might provide departmental and institutional
opportunities for advancement, and a support-
ive administration contribute to the creation
of a positive departmental and institutional
work environment. However, lack of campus
student/faculty diversity and being the token
person of color coupled with a perceived lack
of departmental/institutional effort to recruit,
hire, and retain faculty of color contribute
negatively to the experience of faculty of
color. In addition, the literature widely docu-
ments the negative, interlocking workplace
Table 7
Isolation and Marginalization
Aguirre (2000, 2005) Ginorio (1995) Rendon (1996)
Aguirre & Martinez (1993) C. M. Gonzalez (2002) Reyes (2005)
Aleman & Renn (2002) M. C. Gonzalez (1995) Sadao (2003)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Hamlet (1999) J. W. Smith & Calasanti (2005)
Awe (2001) Hune (1998) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Baez (2003) Hune & Chan (1997) Takara (2006)
Benjamin (1997) K. W. Jackson (1991) Thompson & Dey (1998)
Brayboy (2003) Jacobs et al. (2002) Tomlinson (2006)
Burden et al. (2005) B. J. Johnson & Pichon (2007) Townsend-Johnson (2006)
Carmen (1999) Maher & Tetreault (2007) Turner (2002b, 2003)
Chused (1988) McKenzie (2002) Turner et al. (1996)
Clark (2006) Moses (1989) Turner & Myers (1997, 2000)
Cowan (2006) Niemann (1999) TuSmith & Reddy (2002)
Cuadraz (1992) R. V. Padilla & Chavez Chavez (1995) Valladares (2007)
De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) Pollard (2006) Van Ummersen (2005)
Essien (2003) Rains (1995) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Wong & Bainer (1991
Table 8
Bias in Hiring
Aleman & Renn (2002) Delgado-Romero et al. (2007) Owino (2000)
Brayboy (2003) W. J. Johnson (1996, D. R. Johnson, 2006) Reyes & R os (2005)
Brown et al. (2007) Johnston (1997) Slater (1999)
Chapman (2001) Kayes (2006) D. G. Smith (2000)
Chesler et al. (2005) Maturana (2005) D. G. Smith et al. (2004)
Chused (1988) Mickelson & Oliver (1991) C. A. Stanley (2006)
Clark (2006) Niemann (1999) Tuitt et al. (2007)
De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) Olivas (1988) Turner & Myers (2000)
Table 9
Unjust Work Expectations
Aguirre & Martinez (1993) Johnsrud & Sadao (1998) A. M. Padilla (1994)
Baez (2000, 2002) Jones (2002) Porter (2007)
Bensimon et al. (2000) Loder et al. (2007) Rains (1995)
Bradley (2005) McLean (2007) Samano (2007)
Brayboy (2003) R. Mitchell & Rosiek (2006) Sampaio (2006
Table 10
Language/Accent Discrimination
Aleman & Renn (2002) McLean (2007) Saavedra & Saavedra (2007)
Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Nevarez & Borunda (2004) Turner & Myers (2000
144 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

effects of racism, classism, and sexism. (See
Tables 1120.)
National Context
In a national context, the processes of hiring
and retaining faculty of color are inuenced by
the legal landscape, notably national debates on
afrmative action and its application. Often,
failure to systematically implement afrmative
action policies is described as a contributing
factor to the underrepresentation of minority
faculty. The Supreme Court ruling in Grutter v.
Bollinger (2003) provides the most recent judi-
cial addition to the afrmative action debate. In
this case, the court ruled that maintaining diver-
sity in postsecondary institutions among stu-
dents was a compelling interest for using race as
a factor in university admissions. The court
cited the need to prepare students for an increas-
ingly diverse global society as a cause (in part)
of this decision. Although this case was specic
to the usage of diversity in student admissions
processes, many elements of the decisions lend
support to the faculty diversity legal debate
(Springer, 2002, pp. 5). Thus, this case has
begun to shift the sentiment of some scholars
who see this decision as an important step to-
Table 11
Networks
Baez (1997) J. C. Gonzalez (2007a, 2007b) A. M. Padilla (1994)
Essien (2003) Hill-Brisbane & Dingus (2007) Turner & Myers (2000)
Frierson (1990) Lasalle (1995)
Table 12
Student Diversity
Antonio (2003) Frierson (1990) Guiffrida (2005)
Table 13
Colleagues/Allies
Baez (1997) Hill-Brisbane & Dingus (2007) C. A. Stanley (2006)
Buttner et al. (2007) Marbley (2007) Turner & Myers (2000
Frierson (1990) A. M. Padilla (1994)
Table 14
Support Programs
Daley et al. (2006) Moradi & Neimeyer (2005) Segura (2003)
Gooden et al. (1994) R. V. Padilla & Chavez Chavez (1995) D. G. Smith et al. (2004)
Kosoko-Lasaki et al. (2006) Piercy et al. (2005) Soto-Greene et al. (2005)
Medina & Luna (2000) Segovia (1994) Waitzkin et al. (2006)
Yager et al. (2007)
Table 15
Political Involvement
De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) McKenzie (2002) R. V. Padilla & Chavez Chavez (1995)
C. Gonzalez (2007)
Table 16
Supportive Administrative Leadership
Buttner et al. (2007) Marbley (2007) C. A. Stanley (2006)
C. Gonzalez (2007) Morris (2000) C. A. Stanley & Lincoln (2005)
MacLachlan (2006) Samano (2007)
ward enacting policies that aid faculty diversi-
cation efforts. However, others have expressed
fear that the programs and policies they cur-
rently have in place to support faculty diversity
will cause their institution to be vulnerable to
lawsuits. On the basis of marked increases in
the number of publications regarding faculty of
color since the Grutter decision, the ruling may
have contributed to an increase of articles re-
garding faculty of color in academe (see Table
1). Another national theme that emerged from
the literature was research as an outlet for fac-
ulty of color. Scholars described the challenges
faculty of color face because of the illegitimi-
zation of their research and methodologies in
academic culture, scholarly journals, disciplin-
ary associations, professional networks, and
funding entities. For example, Stanley (2007b),
in her article When Counter Narratives Meet
Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-
Review Process, described her experiences with
the editorial review process and called on journal
editors and reviewers to examine their roles as
disciplinary gatekeepers and to break the cycle of
master narratives in educational research in the
editorial review process (p. 14). Additionally,
national studies of salary inequities focus on the
effect of pay on the representation of diverse fac-
ulty and variance in salary by race, ethnicity, and
institutional type. (See Tables 2123.)
Table 17
Lack of Diversity
Aguirre (2000) Hune (1998) Olivas (1988)
Aleman & Renn (2002) Hune & Chan (1997) Opp & Gosetti (2002)
Alger et al. (2000) Hurtado et al. (1999) Owino (2000)
Antonio (2003) J. F. L. Jackson & Phelps (2004) Peoples (2004)
Arnold (2006) Jacobs et al. (2002) Perna (2003)
Benjamin (1997) Kirkpatrick (2001) Perna et al. (2007)
Beutel & Nelson (2006) Knowles & Harleston (1997) Ponjuan (2005)
Bradley (2005) Lindsay (1991) Rai & Critzer (2000)
Chesler et al. (2005) Maher & Tetreault (2007) Reyes & R os (2005)
Cole & Barber (2003) MacLachlan (2006) E. Smith (1992)
Cook & Cordova (2006) Maturana (2005) P. W. Smith et al. (2002)
Carnes et al. (2005) Milem & Astin (1993) C. A. Stanley (2007a)
Cora-Bramble (2006) Millett & Nettles (2006) Takara (2006)
Cowan (2006) Mitchell & Lassiter (2006) Thompson & Dey (1998)
Essien (2003) Moody (1988) Tierney & Rhoads (1993)
Fenelon (2003) Myers & Turner (2001, 2004) Turner et al. (2002)
Frierson (1990) Nelson et al. (2007) Turner & Myers (1997)
J. C. Gonzalez (2007b) Nevarez & Borunda (2004) TuSmith & Reddy (2002)
Gregory (2001) Niemann (2003) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Greiner & Girardi (2007) Nieves-Squires (1991) Witt (1990)
Holland (1995) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Table 18
Lack of Recruitment/Retention
Adams & Bargerhuff (2005) K. Johnson (2003)
Aguirre (2000) Kayes (2006) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Aleman & Renn (2002) Maher & Tetreault (2007) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Alex-Assenoh et al. (2005) Marbley (2007) Subervi & Cantrell (2007)
Carmen (1999) Mickelson & Oliver (1991) Tierney & Rhoads (1993)
Clark (2006) Morris (2000) Townsend-Johnson (2006)
Cora-Bramble (2006) Moss (2000) Turner (2003)
Cowan (2006) Nelson et al. (2007) Turner et al. (1996)
Cross (1994) Niemann (1999) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Daley et al. (2006) Opp & Smith (1994) TuSmith & Reddy (2002)
Delgado-Romero et al. (2007) Price et al. (2005) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Hall (2006) Pura (1993) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
146 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

Bridging Departmental, Institutional, and
National Contexts
Across departmental, institutional, and na-
tional settings, the literature identies major
barriers to the tenure and promotion of faculty
of color, such as negative student evaluations,
undervaluation of research, and unwritten rules
and policies regarding the tenure process. Con-
versely, the integration of policies that recog-
Table 19
Isms (Race/Ethnicity, Class, Gender, Sexual Orientation)
Aguirre (2000) Ginorio (1995) Olivas (1988)
Aguirre et al. (1993) C. M. Gonzalez (2002) R. V. Padilla & Chavez Chavez (1995)
Akins (1997) J. C. Gonzalez (2007b) Rai & Critzer (2000)
Aleman & Renn (2002) Gregory (1995, 2001) Saavedra & Saavedra (2007)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Gumataotao-Lowe (1995) Slater (1999)
Arnold (2006) Hall (2006) P. W. Smith et al. (2002)
Baez (1997) Hamlet (1999) Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Benjamin (1997) Harris (2007) Stein (1994)
Bower (2002) Holcomb-McCoy & Addison-Bradley (2005) Takara (2006)
Bradley (2005) Horton (2000) Tomlinson (2006)
Brayboy (2003) Hune (1998) Turner (2002b, 2003)
Brown et al. (2007) Hurtado et al. (1999) Turner & Myers (1997, 2000)
Carmen (1999) K. W. Jackson (1991) TuSmith & Reddy (2002)
Carr et al. (2007) Jacobs et al. (2002) Valladares (2007)
Chesler et al. (2005) W. J. Johnson (1996) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Cuadraz (1993) K. Johnson (2003) Wheeler (1996)
Delgado-Romero et al. (2007) Johnsrud & Sadao (1998) Witt (1990)
De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) Mickelson & Oliver (1991) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Essien (2003) Niemann (1999, 2003) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Fenelon (2003)
A. Garc a (2005)
Table 20
Tokenism
Aguirre (2000) De la luz Reyes & Halcon (1988) Niemann (2003)
Aguirre et al. (1993) Fairbanks (2005) Rains (1995)
Aleman & Renn (2002) C. M. Gonzalez (2002) Samano (2007)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Segura (2003)
Bradley (2005) Marbley (2007) Skachkova (2007)
Brayboy (2003) Medina & Luna (2000) Takara (2006)
Chused (1988) Niemann (1999) Turner & Myers (2000)
Table 21
Legal Landscape/Afrmative Action
Aleman & Renn (2002) Hamlet (1999) Slater (1999)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Jacobs et al. (2002) E. Smith (1992)
Alger (1999, 2000) Maher & Tetreault (2007) P. W. Smith et al. (2002)
Ashraf & Shabbir (2006) Maturana (2005) Springer (2004)
Baez (2002) Myers & Turner (2001) Takara (2006)
Basri et al. (2007) Nevarez & Borunda (2004) Tomlinson (2006)
Blackshire-Belay (1998) Niemann (1999, 2003) Turner et al. (1996)
Brown et al. (2007) Niemann & Dovidio (2005) Turner (2003)
Chesler et al. (2005) Peoples (2004) Turner & Myers (1997)
Cowan (2006) Rai & Critzer (2000) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Delgado-Romero et al. (2007) Sanchez (2007) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Skachkova (2007) Witt (1990)
nize contributions to diversity is an important
step toward rethinking standards for hiring and
tenure and promotion processes. For example,
in 2004, the University of California system
adopted Academic Personnel Policy No. 210
(Section II: Appointment and Promotion,
2002), which states that teaching, research,
professional and public service contributions
that promote diversity and equal opportunity are
to be encouraged and given recognition in the
evaluation of the candidates qualications (p.
4) for appointment and promotion. This policy,
which was revised and placed into effect in
2005, can serve as a model for other institutions
seeking to place value on faculty contributions
to diversity efforts when determining hiring,
tenure, and promotion decisions. On one hand,
faculty who were not successful in the tenure
process often lacked mentorship to aid their
incorporation into academia. On the other hand,
scholarship on successful faculty revealed that
mentorship was a critical support to their pro-
fessional success. The historical literature on
faculty of color indicates that underrepresenta-
tion, segregation, and exclusion are still preva-
lent in the educational system. These concerns,
coupled with pipeline issues and pervasive
myths in the recruitment and hiring process,
maintain a lack of diversity in the professoriate.
(See Tables 2428.)
Although campus climate is a major factor
noted in the literature on faculty of color (Ale-
man & Renn, 2002; Bradley, 2005; Ginorio,
1995; Guang-Lea & Louis, 2006; Holcomb-
McCoy & Addison-Bradley, 2005; Horton,
2000; Hurtado, Milem, Clayton-Pedersen, &
Allen, 1999; Jacobs, Cintron, & Canton, 2002;
Niemann, 2003; Niemann & Dovidio, 2005;
Piercy et al., 2005; Price et al., 2005; Ponjuan,
2005; Stanley, 2006; Whetsel-Ribeau, 2007), it
is not included as a separate category in Fig-
ure 1. Our reasoning is that campus climate is
Table 22
Research Outlets
Aleman & Renn (2002) Moule (2005) Stanley (2007b)
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) A. M. Padilla (1994) Turner (2000)
Louis (2007) Reyes & R os (2005) Turner & Myers (2000)
Table 23
Salary Inequities
Aleman & Renn (2002) Renzulli et al. (2006) Witt (1990)
Myers & Turner (2001) Toutkoushian et al. (2007)
Table 24
Tenure/Promotion
Aleman & Renn (2002) Hune & Chan (1997) Sampaio (2006)
Akins (1997) Jacobs et al. (2002) Slater (1999)
Baez (1997, 2002) C. Johnson (2001) P. A. Smith & Shoho (2007)
Basri et al. (2007) B. J. Johnson & Harvey (2002) Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Bensimon & Tierney (1996) Jones (2001, 2002) Thompson & Dey (1998)
Blackshire-Belay (1998) Laden & Hagedorn (2000) Tierney & Rhoads (1993)
Brown et al. (2007) Maher & Tetreault (2007) Townsend-Johnson (2006)
Chesler et al. (2005) Marbley (2007) Turner et al. (1996)
Cowan (2006) Morell-Thon (1998) Turner & Myers (2000)
Fenelon (2003) Niemann (1999, 2003) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Gregory (2001) Pepion (1993) TuSmith & Reddy (2002)
Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Perez (2001) Valladares (2007)
Harris (2007) Perna (2003) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Hassouneh (2006) Perna et al. (2007) Witt (1990)
Hendricks (1996) Ponjuan (2005) B. N. Williams & Williams (2006)
Hendrix (2007) Rai & Critzer (2000) Wong & Bainer (1991)
148 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

an all-encompassing term that includes many of
the supports and challenges already addressed
in our model.
Emerging Themes: Recommendations
Figure 2 represents the major recommenda-
tions derived from the literature that address
challenges presented in Figure 1. Similar to
Figure 1, Figure 2 differentiates among three
contextsdepartmental, institutional, and na-
tional. Some recommendations are pictured as
cutting across multiple contexts because they
are applicable in each of them. For example, as
in Figure 1, in Figure 2, a recommendation that
cuts across all three contexts is promote men-
toring programs.
Themes identied across publications are
listed below within departmental, institutional,
and national contexts. Listed after each theme
are the references in which elaboration on the
theme can be found. At least three references
had to cite the factor listed for it to be included
here.
Departmental Context Recommendations
Although most recommendations noted in the
literature cited here applied to the departmental
context, they were not exclusive to this context.
According to the literature, departments need to
diversify their processes for how they judged
faculty pre- and post-tenure. The literature de-
scribed new and/or alternative ways of thinking,
teaching, writing, and just being an academic
brought to higher education by current faculty
of color. Their new approaches to research,
teaching, and service are, in many cases, in
conict with traditional approaches leading to
poor evaluations and lack of publications. This
Table 25
Mentorship
Alex-Assenoh et al. (2005) Gregory (2001) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Arnold (2006) Hendricks (1996) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Barnett et al. (2003) Holland (1995) Tierney & Rhoads (1993)
Blackshire-Belay (1998) Johnsrud (1994) Turner et al. (1996)
Burden et al. (2005) Kosoko-Lasaki et al. (2006) Turner & Thompson (1993)
Chesler et al. (2005) Lewellen-Williams et al. (2006) Turner & Myers (1997)
Daley et al. (2006) Millett & Nettles (2006) Turner & Myers (2000)
Dixon-Reeves (2003) Moss (2000) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Frierson (1990) Nelson et al. (2007) Waitzkin et al. (2006)
A. Garc a (2000) Nevarez & Borunda (2004) D. A. Williams & Williams (2006)
C. M. Gonzalez (2002) A. M. Padilla (1994) Yager et al. (2007)
Peterson-Hickey (1998)
Table 26
Pipeline Issues
Aleman & Renn (2002) B. J. Johnson & Pichon (2007) Nelson et al. (2007)
Chesler et al. (2005) Jordan (2006) P. W. Smith et al. (2002)
Cross (1994) Lindsay (1991) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Hernandez & Davis (2001) Moody (1988) Turner & Myers (1997, 2000)
Jacobs et al. (2002) Myers & Turner (2001, 2004) Turner & Taylor (2002)
K. Johnson (2003)
Table 27
Historical Legacy of Exclusion
Aguirre et al. (1993) W. J. Johnson (1996) Slater (1999)
Castellanos & Jones (2003) Lindsay (1991) E. Smith (1992)
Chesler et al. (2005) Maher & Tetreault (2007) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Gregory (2001) Moody (2004) Weems (2003)
Hurtado et al. (1999) Rai & Critzer (2000)
means that in a publish or perish environment
based on traditional ways of knowing, many
faculty of color may be at a disadvantage (see
Table 29). Second, as the faculty diversies and
brings to the academy different ways of know-
ing, it is important that they are given the op-
portunity for individual expressionauthentic
and spiritual. The literature in this area is grow-
ing and indicates the need for departments to
recognize the underlying messages conveyed to
faculty of color that devalue their research and
writing in an oppressive fashion (see Table 30).
For example, Louis (2007) urged scholars to
accept, as legitimate ways of knowing, knowl-
edge systems that do not necessarily conform to
Western academic standards. Additionally, de-
partments should recognize that some scholars
may believe that the spiritual aspect of life is as
important to the search for knowledge as is the
physical (p. 134).
Institutional Context Recommendations
D. A. Williams and Wade-Golden (2006) de-
ned chief diversity ofcers (CDOs) as the
face of diversity efforts [that] carry formal
administrative titles like vice provost, vice
chancellor, associate provost, vice president, as-
sistant provost, dean, or special assistant to the
president for multicultural, international, equity,
diversity, and inclusion (p. 1). Furthermore,
D. A. Williams and Wade-Golden (2007) stated
that todays CDOs are often seen as change
agents who are appointed to create an environ-
ment that is inclusive and supportive of all
members of the institution in order to maximize
both human and institutional capital (p. iii). As
institutions begin to recognize the importance
of the role of the CDO to diversifying the fac-
ulty, it is critical to understand that although
they may be centrally responsible, they should
not be solely responsible for this important
work. As the roles of CDOs increase and be-
come more dened, it is important that that they
continue their work to institutionalize diversity
goals and to promote strong campus leadership
that advocates for faculty diversication (see
Tables 31 and 32). The following citations
present work in support of the types of institu-
tional factors important to the goal of increasing
the racial and ethnic representation of faculty of
color.
Departmental and Institutional Contexts
Recommendations
The literature reviewed in this study under-
scores the importance of having departmental
and institutional plans that systematically pro-
mote progress toward the goal of diversifying
the faculty. Part of the plan should also include
training to increase knowledge and sensitivity
of all campus staff, faculty, and higher level
administrators on issues facing faculty of color
in the workplace. The alignment of diversity
efforts at both levels of the organization is crit-
ical for progress to take place. In addition, the
literature suggests that increasing the campus
Table 28
Myths
Assensoh (2003) Kayes (2006) D. G. Smith et al. (1996)
Chapman (2001) Maturana (2005) C. A. Stanley (2007a)
Cho (2002) Morris (2000) Townsend-Johnson (2006)
Hune (1998) Peoples (2004) Turner et al. (1996)
K. Johnson (2003) Pura (1993) Turner & Myers (2000)
D. R. Johnson (2006) D. G. Smith (2000) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Table 29
Establish More Inclusive Standards for Judging Faculty Yearly Performance
Bensimon & Tierney (1996) Louis (2007) Rains (1995)
Bensimon et al. (2000) Moule (2005) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a, 2007b)
Cooper & Stevens (2002) Pepion (1993) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Hayden (1997) Perez (2001) Urrieta & Mendez Benav dez (2007)
Jones (2002)
150 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

presence of students and faculty of color may
lead to a synergy that supports the retention and
development of both groups as well as attracting
others. A more diverse environment has the
potential to alleviate isolation for people of
color on campus. As colleges and universities
become diverse, it will also be important for
students, staff, faculty, and administrators to be
provided with training on the issues faced by
faculty of color. Another recommendation
emerging from this study, which can build
scholarly community at the departmental and
institutional levels, is deliberate efforts to pro-
vide opportunities for collegial networking and
cross-disciplinary collaborations (see Tables
3336).
National Context Recommendations
To achieve success in the recruitment and
retention of faculty of color, communities of
color and institutions of higher education must
create relationships with one another, recogniz-
ing the importance of increased faculty racial
and ethnic diversity and working in collabora-
tion to achieve this goal. With regard to the
hiring of Latino faculty, C. Gonzalez (2007)
stated that the Hispanic community must es-
tablish a strong working relationship with insti-
tutions of higher learning and use power in a
measured and sustained way (p. 159) to en-
courage faculty diversication. Likewise, insti-
tutions must establish and maintain connections
to diverse communities in support of the service
and incorporation needs of faculty of color.
Additionally, institutions must begin to address
and reduce salary inequities between majority
and minority faculties. (See Tables 37 and 38.)
Pay inequities invalidate and devalue the con-
tributions of diverse faculties and increase the
likelihood that they will reject position offers or
leave institutions early. Furthermore, disparities
in the allocation of research space, graduate
student research support, and funding for con-
ference participation must be viewed as an ex-
tension of salary inequity issues. These funding
inequities should be addressed for incoming and
current faculty of color through policies that
promote equity.
Departmental, Institutional, and National
Contexts Recommendations
Recommendations cutting across all three
contexts include the critical need for research
support for faculty of color, particularly for
nontenured faculty (see Table 39). Support can
come from departmental, institutional, or na-
tional sources, including federal, state, profes-
sional organization, and foundation funding.
However, although research support can be in
the form of funding, it may also include oppor-
tunities to participate in nationwide workshops
and seminars designed to assist junior faculty of
color in the grant-getting and publication pro-
cesses. The best of these programs would em-
phasize collaborative and not hierarchical pro-
fessional socialization. Having mentors along
their career path is a leading factor contributing
to the growth and development of faculty of
color. Because mentorship is so critical, pro-
grams providing opportunities for mentorship
Table 30
Provide Opportunities for Authentic and Spiritual Expression
Astin & Astin (1999) Jones (2000) Rendon (2000)
Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Louis (2007) C. A. Stanley (2007b)
Hall (2006)
Table 31
Institutionalize Diversity Goals
Alicea-Lugo (1998) Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Sanchez (2007)
Brayboy (2003) Harvey & Valadez (1994) Samano (2007)
Chapman (2001) W. J. Johnson (1996) C. A. Stanley (2007b)
Colby & Foote (1995) Johnston (1997) Tack & Patitu (1992)
Cowan (2006) Maturana (2005)
should be made available at the departmental,
institutional, and national levels. Such connec-
tions within all contexts, including internation-
ally, play an important role in the development
of faculty and in the promotion and tenure pro-
cess. In addition, having different rubrics for
evaluating tenure and promotion worthiness are
mentioned in the literature. For example, value
should be placed, during tenure and promotion
evaluations, on contributions to diversity efforts
and for faculty outreach to diverse on-campus
communities, off-campus local communities,
and diverse national communities. Also, emerg-
ing from the literature are recommendations to
promote policies supportive of a diverse faculty
(see Table 40). Included among these factors
are the need to level the eld with regard to
inequitable pay for faculty of color and women
employed in minority-serving institutions when
compared with salaries paid in predominantly
White institutions. Renzulli, Grant, and Kathu-
ria (2006) referred to this phenomenon as eco-
nomic subordination (p. 507). Overarching
policies that create multilevel pathways to the
professoriate and continue to support careers are
also reported as important for implementation
across contexts. Finally, practices that promote
the building of scholarly and collaborative com-
munities as opposed to individualism and com-
petitiveness are recommended. (See Tables 41
and 42.)
Spanning 2 Decades: Methodological
Approaches and the Study of Faculty of
Color
Between 1988 and 2007, a number of publi-
cations on faculty of color were conceptual in
nature. In addition, a cursory analysis of empir-
ical research conducted during this time frame
revealed the preferred usage of the following
research methodologies: (a) interviews, (b) sur-
veys and questionnaires, (c) large data sets, and
(d) a combination of multiple qualitative meth-
ods (document analysis, interviews, and obser-
vations). An examination of the preferred re-
search methodologies used during this period
(divided into 5-year periods) is provided, as
well as some citations relevant to these ap-
proaches.
Between 1988 and 1992, the preferred data
collection approaches to the study of faculty of
color in academe appeared to be surveys and
questionnaires (Chused, 1988; Nieves-Squires,
Table 32
Promote Strong Leadership for Diversity
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Maturana (2005) C. A. Stanley & Lincoln (2005)
Arnold (2006) Opp & Gosetti (2002) Toutkoushian et al. (2007)
Buttner et al. (2007) Price et al. (2005) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Fox (2005) Samano (2007) Wong & Bainer (1991)
MacLachlan (2006) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Table 33
Establish Recruitment/Hiring/Retention Plans
Alger (1999) Hayden (1997) Opp & Smith (1994)
Bowser et al. (1993) Johnston (1997) Peoples (2004)
Chapman (2001) Jones (2001) Peterson-Hickey (1998)
Colby & Foote (1995) Kauper (1991) Plata (1996)
Chused (1988) Kayes (2006) Pura (1993)
Clark-Louque (1996) Kirkpatrick (2001) Samano (2007)
Cooper & Stevens (2002) Light (1994) C. A. Stanley (2007a)
Cross & Slater (2002) Mickelson & Oliver (1991) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Delgado-Romero et al. (2007) Moody (1988) Stein (1994)
C. Gonzalez (2007)
J. C. Gonzalez (2007a) Moreno et al. (2006) Tippeconnic & McKinney (2003)
Granger (1993) Morris (2000) Turner (2002a)
Harvey & Valadez (1994) Moss (2000) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Opp & Gosetti (2002)
152 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

1991; E. Smith, 1992) and (to a lesser extent)
interviewssometimes used in conjunction
with other methods (Kauper, 1991; Nieves-
Squires, 1991). Various forms of data collection
were used by other researchers, such as auto-
ethnographic narratives (Cuadraz, 1992), histor-
ical analysis (Lindsay, 1991), and the usage of
large data sets (Mickelson & Oliver, 1991).
From 1993 to 1997, the primary data collec-
tion methods used were surveys (Aguirre, Mar-
tinez, & Hernandez, 1993; Clark-Louque, 1996;
Hendricks, 1996; Holland, 1995; Johnston,
1997), interviews (Baez, 1997; Cuadraz, 1993;
D. R. Johnson, 1996; Knowles & Harleston,
1997; Lasalle, 1995; Turner & Thompson,
1993), and some combination of qualitative
methods (i.e., archival and document analysis in
conjunction with interviews and/or observa-
tions; Hayden, 1997; Pepion, 1993; Pura, 1993;
Rains, 1995). Also used to a lesser degree were
historical analysis (Gregory, 1995) and the anal-
ysis of large data sets (Akins, 1997; Milem &
Astin, 1993).
From 1988 to 2002, the use of interviews as
the primary form of data collection appeared to
be preferred (Astin & Astin, 1999; Baez, 2000;
Carmen, 1999; Morell-Thon, 1998; Peterson-
Hickey, 1998; Perez, 2001; Turner, 2002b).
However, interviews were often combined with
observations (Gonzalez, 2002; C. Johnson,
2001; Morris, 2000; Thomas & Hollenshead,
2001) and large data set analyses (Myers &
Turner, 2001; Turner & Myers, 2000). Also, the
use of large data sets seemed to increase during
this period (Antonio, 2002; Opp & Gosetti,
2002; Owino, 2000; Thompson & Dey, 1998).
Additional publications indicate the continued
use of surveys and questionnaires (Awe, 2001;
Chapman, 2001; Hernandez & Davis, 2001),
narratives (Jacobs, Cintron, & Canton, 2002;
Medina & Luna, 2000), and historical analysis
(Gregory, 2001).
Publications from 2003 to 2007 illustrate that
researchers used interviews (Burden, Harrison,
& Hodge, 2005; Carr, Palepu, Szalacha, Ca-
swell, & Inui, 2007; J. C. Gonzalez, 2007a,
2007b; McLean, 2007; Skachkova, 2007; Ur-
rieta & Mendez Benav dez, 2007; B. N. Wil-
liams & Williams, 2006), analysis of large data
sets (Ashraf & Shabbir, 2006; Isaac & Boyer,
2007; Perna, 2003; Perna, Gerald, Baum, &
Milem, 2007; Porter, 2007; Toutkoushian, Bel-
las, & Moore, 2007), and surveys and question-
naires (Hagedorn, Chi, Cepeda, & McLain,
2007; Holcomb-McCoy & Addison-Bradley,
2005; Stanley, 2007a, 2007b; Subervi &
Cantrell, 2007; Umbach, 2006). Also, historical
research approaches (Weems, 2003) and narra-
tive data analysis (Samano, 2007; Stanley,
2006) were used during this period (although to
a lesser degree). Authors also published studies
that used a combination of qualitative research
methods (interviews, observations, and docu-
ment analysis; Hill-Brisbane & Dingus, 2007).
Table 43 shows a fairly consistent use by
researchers of similar methodological ap-
proaches to examine the status of faculty of
color throughout the 20-year time period.
Table 34
Diversify Student Body/Faculty
Adams & Bargerhuff (2005) Frierson (1990) Morris (2000)
Alex-Assensoh (2003) C. Gonzalez (2007)
J. C. Gonzalez (2007a)
Myers & Turner (2001)
Antonio (2002, 2003) Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Price et al. (2005)
Barnett et al. (2003) Kauper (1991) Pura (1993)
Fox (2005) Kirkpatrick (2001) Sanchez (2007)
Table 35
Provide Training on Faculty-of-Color Issues
Adams & Bargerhuff (2005) Plata (1996) Whetsel-Ribeau (2007)
Peoples (2004) Samano (2007) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Pineda (1998) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a)
Spanning 2 Decades: Issues Examined in
the Study of Faculty of Color
Findings from our examination of publica-
tions included in this study (i.e., journal articles,
dissertations, books, reports, and book chapters)
document that the total number of publications
on faculty of color has visibly increased over
each 5-year period examined (19881992,
19931997, 19982002, and 20032007). The
largest total publication increase occurred dur-
ing the 20032007 period (see Table 1). This
increase may be linked to the 2003 Grutter v.
Bollinger Supreme Court decision, although
there is no evidence to prove this link. In gen-
eral, most of the publications during the time
periods examined were journal articles, except
from 1993 to 1997 when more dissertations
were produced.
Several publications on faculty of color from
1988 to 1992 focused on the intersection of race
and ethnicity and gender (Chused, 1988;
Cuadraz, 1992; Lindsay, 1991; Moses, 1989;
Nieves-Squires, 1991; Tack & Patitu, 1992;
Witt, 1990). Also heavily researched was the
lack of diversity in the academy (Frierson,
1990; Lindsay, 1991; C. D. Moody, 1988; Oli-
vas, 1988; E. Smith, 1992) and job satisfaction
(Chused, 1988; Tack & Patitu, 1992; Turner &
Myers, 2000; Witt, 1990). During this time
span, some publications focused on faculty of
color career decisions (Kauper, 1991) and oc-
cupational stress (E. Smith, 1992).
Scholarly publications from 1993 to 1997
focused on (a) the socialization process for fac-
ulty of color (Bensimon & Tierney, 1996; La-
salle, 1995; Tierney & Rhoads, 1993; Turner &
Thompson, 1993); (b) lack of faculty diversity
(Benjamin, 1997; Holland, 1995; Milem & As-
tin, 1993; Tierney & Rhoads, 1993); (c) strate-
gies for faculty racial/ethnic diversication
(Colby & Foote, 1995; Knowles & Harleston,
1997; Light, 1994; Opp & Smith, 1994; Plata,
1996; Pura, 1993; D. G. Smith, Wolf, & Busen-
berg, 1996); (d) isms (with regard to race/
ethnicity, class, gender, and sexual orientation;
Aguirre et al., 1993; Akins, 1997; Ginorio,
1995; W. J. Johnson, 1996); (e) tenure and
promotion issues (Akins, 1997; Pepion, 1993;
Tierney & Rhoads, 1993); and (f) isolation and
marginalization in the academy (Aguirre &
Martinez, 1993; Benjamin, 1997; Hune & Chan,
1997; Padilla & Chavez Chavez, 1995; Rendon,
1996). Additionally, literature demonstrating
the importance of faculty and academic admin-
istrator mentorship in support of the retention of
faculty of color and the attraction of students to
faculty careers was addressed (Holland, 1995;
Johnsrud, 1994; Padilla, 1994; Segovia, 1994;
Wheeler, 1996).
From 1998 to 2002, there was a continuation
of literature documenting the intersection of
race/ethnicity and gender among faculty (Agu-
irre, 2000; Aleman & Renn, 2002; Moss, 2000;
Opp & Gosetti, 2002; Owino, 2000; Perna,
2003; Rai & Critzer, 2000; Turner, 2000,
2002b). This literature was accompanied by
publications on specic female faculty of color
groups such as African American women
Table 36
Provide Opportunities for Collegial Networks and Collaborations
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Gregory (2001) Plata (1996)
Baez (1997) W. J. Johnson (1996) Stein (1994)
Bowser et al. (1993) B. J. Johnson & Harvey (2002) Thomas & Hollenshead (2001)
Butner et al. (2000) MacLachlan (2006) Turner & Myers (1997)
Essien (2003) Moses (1989) Valladares (2007)
A. M. Padilla (1994) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Table 37
Provide Connections to Diverse Community
C. Gonzalez (2007)
J. C. Gonzalez (2007a, 2007b) Samano (2007) Urrieta & Mendez Benav dez (2007)
K. P. Gonzalez & Padilla (2007) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Gregory (2001) Turner & Thompson (1993)
154 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

(Hamlet, 1999; McKenzie, 2002; Thomas &
Hollenshead, 2001), Latinas (Alicea-Lugo,
1998; Medina & Luna, 2000), and Asian
women (Hune, 1998). Some publications on
African American male faculty were also evi-
dent during this period (Jones, 2000, 2002).
During this time frame, research on faculty of
color also focused on (a) stress and coping
(Butner, Burley, & Marbley, 2000; Thomas &
Hollenshead, 2001; Thompson & Dey, 1998),
(b) job satisfaction (Laden & Hagedorn, 2000;
Morell-Thon, 1998), (c) myths (Cho, 2002;
D. G. Smith, 2000), (d) different ways of know-
ing (A. W. Astin & Astin, 1999; Rendon, 2000),
(e) service (Baez, 2000; Hamlet, 1999; McKen-
zie, 2002; Turner & Myers, 2000), (f) lack of
diversity in the academy (Aguirre, 2000; Hune,
1998; Owino, 2000; Thompson & Dey, 1998),
(g) recruitment and retention concerns (Carmen,
1999; Morris, 2000; Moss, 2000; Niemann,
1999), (h) isms (with regard to race/ethnicity,
class, gender, and sexual orientation; Gonzalez,
2002; Horton, 2000; Rai & Critzer, 2000;
Slater, 1999), (i) tokenism (Aguirre, 2000; Me-
dina & Luna, 2000; Niemann, 1999), (j) bias in
hiring (Chapman, 2001; Slater, 1999; D. G.
Smith, 2000), (k) tenure and promotion issues
(Blackshire-Belay 998; Niemann, 1999; Tu-
Smith & Reddy, 2002), (l) isolation and mar-
ginalization (Aleman & Renn, 2002; Awe,
2001; Hamlet, 1999), and (m) afrmative action
and legal issues (Alexander-Snow & Johnson,
1999; Alger, 1999; Turner & Taylor, 2002).
Additionally, two guidebooks specic to the
recruitment and retention of faculty of color
emerged, one that focused on the search com-
mittee process (Turner, 2002a) and the other
designed to aid faculty of color to succeed in the
academy (M. Garc a, 2000).
From 2003 to 2007, emergent issues from the
published literature reected an interest in fac-
ulty of color and (a) their unique scholarly con-
tributions (Fenelon, 2003; Louis, 2007; Tippe-
connic & McKinney, 2003; Urrieta & Mendez
Benav dez, 2007), (b) their perceptions of
teaching and use of critical and alternative ped-
agogy (Hassouneh, 2006; McLean, 2007;
Saavedra & Saavedra, 2007; Sampaio, 2006; G.
Smith & Anderson, 2005), (c) job satisfaction
(Flowers, 2005; Holcomb-McCoy & Addison-
Bradley, 2005; Isaac & Boyer, 2007; Niemann
& Dovidio, 2005; Ponjuan, 2005), (d) resiliency
(Cora-Bramble, 2006; J. C. Gonzalez, 2007a,
2007b), (e) lack of diverse faculty representa-
tion (Essien, 2003; Fenelon, 2003; Myers &
Turner, 2004; Ponjuan, 2005), (f) service (Brad-
ley, 2005; Brayboy, 2003; Skachkova, 2007;
Urrieta & Mendez Benavidez, 2007), (g) re-
cruitment and retention concerns (Clark, 2006;
K. Johnson, 2003; Kayes, 2006; Turner, 2003),
(h) isms (with regard to race/ethnicity, class,
gender, and sexual orientation; Holcomb & Ad-
dison-Bradley, 2005; Stanley, 2007a; Valla-
dares, 2007), (i) tokenism (Bradley, 2005; Fair-
banks, 2005; Samano, 2007; Segura, 2003), (j)
bias in hiring (Maturana, 2005; Reyes & R os,
2005; Stanley, 2006), (k) tenure and promotion
issues (Cowan, 2006; Perna, 2003; Sampaio,
2006), (l) isolation and marginalization (B. J.
Johnson & Pichon, 2007; Reyes, 2005; Tomlin-
son, 2006; Townsend-Johnson, 2006), and (m)
afrmative action and legal issues (Ashraf &
Shabbir, 2006; Springer, 2004; Takara, 2006).
The predominant research emphasis during
this time frame was scholarship on mentoring
(Alex-Assenoh et al., 2005; Barnett, Gibson, &
Black, 2003; Dixon-Reeves, 2003; Kosoko-
Lasaki, Sonnino, & Voytko, 2006; Lewellen-
Table 38
Reduce Salary Inequities
Myers & Turner (2001) Renzulli et al. (2006) Toutkoushian et al. (2007)
Table 39
Provide Research Support
Alex-Assenoh et al. (2005) J. C. Gonzalez (2007a, 2007b) Turner (2003)
Bradley (2005) Louis (2007) Turner & Myers (1997, 2000)
Dixon-Reeves (2003) C. A. Stanley (2006) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Fox (2005) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Williams et al., 2006; C. A. Stanley & Lincoln,
2005; J. M. Stanley, Capers, & Berlin, 2007;
Waitzkin, Yager, Parker, & Duran, 2006;
Yager, Waitzkin, Parker, & Duran, 2007). Ad-
ditionally, two interrelated elds experienced a
growth in scholarly attention: (a) research on
faculty and graduates of color in the science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics
elds (MacLachlan, 2006; Millett & Nettles,
2006; Nelson, Brammer, & Rhoads, 2007) and
(b) literature on faculty of color in the health
elds (Burden et al., 2005; Carnes, Handels-
man, & Sheridan, 2005; Carr et al., 2007; Da-
ley, Wingard, & Reznik, 2006; D. A. Mitchell
& Lassiter, 2006; Soto-Greene, Sanchez, Chur-
rango, & Salas-Lopez, 2005; Yager, Waitzkin,
Parker, & Duran, 2007).
Table 44 indicates that some issues emerging
from the published literature examined in this
study appeared to remain somewhat constant,
whereas others were added over different time
periods. Scholarly interest in the intersection of
gender with racial/ethnic diversity among the
faculty, mentorship, job satisfaction, isms (with
regard to race/ethnicity, class, gender, and sex-
ual orientation), tenure and promotion, isolation
and marginalization, and lack of diversity in the
academy appear to hold researchers attention
over the 20-year span. Additions that stood out
during 19982002 are respect for different
ways of knowing and myths surrounding con-
cerns related to the recruitment and retention of
faculty of color. Additional issues receiving at-
tention from 2003 to 2007 are scholarly contri-
butions made by a diverse professoriate, resil-
iency, and experiences of faculty of color in
science, technology, engineering, mathematics,
and health elds.
Further Research
Further work is needed to capture insights
from other sources. Even though we compiled
and analyzed a comprehensive list of publica-
tions for this article, as stated earlier conference
papers, videotapes, and Web sites, although
identied, were excluded in the analysis pro-
vided here. It is also likely that we have not
captured all existing publications on this sub-
ject. However, the works presented here likely
represent the major themes on faculty diversity
to be captured in journal articles, books, disser-
tations, reports, and book chapters written over
the past 20 years.
However, our analysis has identied major
gaps in the literature. First, most publications
located and examined here focus on faculty of
color within public 4-year university settings.
Table 40
Promote Policies Supportive of a Diverse Faculty
Adams & Bargerhuff (2005) J. C. Gonzalez (2007a) Renzulli et al. (2006)
Arnold (2006) Granger (1993) Samano (2007)
Astin (1992) Guang-Lea & Louis (2006) Stanley (2007a)
Bowser et al. (1993) W. J. Johnson (1996) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Bradley (2005) Moody (1988) Vasquez et al. (2006)
Chapman (2001) Niemann (1999) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Fox (2005)
Table 41
Promote Mentoring Programs
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Kosoko-Lasaki et al. (2006) J. M. Stanley et al. (2007)
Alex-Assenoh et al. (2005) Lewellen-Williams et al. (2006) C. A. Stanley & Lincoln (2005)
Arnold (2006) Moss (2000) Stein (1994)
Barnett et al. (2003) A. M. Padilla (1994) Tippeconnic & McKinney (2003)
Bradley (2005) Piercy et al. (2005) Turner & Myers (1997)
Dixon-Reeves (2003) Samano (2007) Waitzkin et al. (2006)
W. J. Johnson (1996) Soto-Greene et al. (2005) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Johnsrud (1994) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a) Yager et al. (2007)
Kirkpatrick (2001)
156 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

As a result, more work examining faculty of
color within community college, technical col-
lege, private college, for-prot college, minority-
serving institutions, and faith-based campus en-
vironments needs to be conducted. Second,
there is almost nothing written on issues related
to faculty of color and the intersection of race/
ethnicity and sexual orientation. Delgado-
Romero, Manlove, Manlove, and Hernandez
(2007) stated that one aspect of Latino/a fac-
ulty experience that is virtually absent from the
research literature is the experience of Latino/a
lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (L-
LGBT) faculty (p. 43). Third, most of the
literature analyzed here underscores the value of
mentoring within departmental, institutional,
and national contexts. Further work on the im-
portance of such connections within an interna-
tional context can be undertaken as these col-
leagues are critical to faculty development as
well as in the promotion and tenure process. In
fact, more comparative studies on faculty of
color within a global context would be a wel-
come addition to the extant literature. Fourth,
although our study showed that the literature, in
general, reected emerging themes across insti-
tutional types and racial/ethnic afliation, more
work needs to be done to examine sets of issues
that are unique or specic to various racial/
ethnic groups and to faculty women of color.
For example, Turner and Myers (2000) began to
identify themes that are specic to faculty by
racial/ethnic afliation and gender. Fifth, al-
though several themes, such as mentorship,
have been shown to support the recruitment and
retention of faculty of color, more work needs
to be done on how such factors can be imple-
mented nationwide to contribute to the resolu-
tion of the critical problem examined in this
article. Finally, empirical research needs to be
conducted on the critical, emerging institutional
role of the executive-level campus diversity of-
cer, the CDO, and his or her impact on diver-
sifying the faculty.
Implications
This review and synthesis of extant literature
on faculty of color has implications for policy-
makers, administrators, faculty, and graduate
students. In essence, this analysis highlights the
complexity of the faculty of color experience in
higher education by providing an integration of
single studies conducted over an extensive time
period and by presenting themes derived from
these studies. In addition, the literature col-
lected for this study addresses supports, chal-
lenges, and recommendations that cut across
departmental, institutional, and national con-
texts. Those involved in making policies and
decisions may nd this analysis useful in un-
derstanding the interrelated factors affecting
faculty of color hiring and persistence. For ex-
ample, transcending context and time frame,
Table 42
Establish More Inclusive Standards for Tenure and Promotion
Alexander-Snow & Johnson (1999) Jones (2002) C. A. Stanley (2006, 2007a, 2007b)
Bensimon & Tierney (1996) Moule (2005) Turner & Taylor (2002)
Bensimon et al. (2000) Pepion (1993) Louis (2007)
Cooper & Stevens (2002) Perez (2001) Urrieta & Mendez Benav dez (2007)
Fenelon (2003) Rains (1995) Wong & Bainer (1991)
Hayden (1997)
Table 43
Methodological Approaches and the Study of Faculty of Color
5-year increment Methodological approach
19881992 Interviews, surveys/questionnaires
19931997 Interviews, multiple qualitative methods,
a
surveys/questionnaires
19982002 Interviews, surveys/questionnaires, large data set(s), observations/interviews
20032007 Interviews, surveys/questionnaires, large data set(s)
a
Multiple qualitative methods: archival/document analysis combined with the usage of interviews and/or observations.
mentoring is a factor described in the literature
as critical to the persistence of faculty of color.
In conclusion, challenges afford opportuni-
ties. All involved in higher education have an
opportunity to support others as they encounter
the challenges presented in this article. Accord-
ing to our analysis, these challenges remain
over time and appear to be pervasive in the
social fabric of the academy. We must dissipate
these barriers by helping faculty, staff, and stu-
dents understand the nature of the barriers
across contexts, as discussed in the literature,
that impede the progress of potential and current
faculty of color. By understanding challenges,
supports, and recommendations described
across single studies, there is an opportunity to
develop strategies applicable in the contexts
described here (departmental, institutional, and
national) that can contribute to the creation of a
more welcoming and afrming academic envi-
ronment for faculty of color.
References
Asterisks denote references included in the litera-
ture review/synthesis.
Adams, K., & Bargerhuff, M. E. (2005). Dialogue
and action: Addressing recruitment of diverse fac-
ulty in one Midwestern universitys college of
education and human services. Education, 125,
539545.
Aguirre, A. (2000). Women and minority faculty in
the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention,
and academic culture. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educa-
tion Report, 27(6).
Aguirre, A. (2005). The personal narrative as aca-
demic storytelling: A Chicanos search for pres-
ence and voice in academe. International Journal
of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 147163.
Aguirre, A., & Martinez, R. O. (1993). Chicanos in
higher education: Issues and dilemmas for the 21st
century (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report
No. 3). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Higher Education, George Washington University,
in cooperation with the Association for the Study
of Higher Education.
Aguirre, A., Martinez, R., & Hernandez, A. (1993).
Majority and minority faculty perceptions in aca-
deme. Research in Higher Education, 34, 371
385.
Akins, D. (1997). The economics of tenure: Under-
standing the effects of ethnicity, status and disci-
pline on faculty attitude, workload and productiv-
ity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
of Southern California.
Aleman, A. M. M., & Renn, K. A. (Eds.). (2002).
Women in higher education: An encyclopedia.
Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Alexander-Snow, M., & Johnson, B. J. (1999). Per-
spectives from faculty of color. In R. J. Menges
(Ed.), Faculty in new jobs: A guide to settling in,
becoming established, and building institutional
support (pp. 88117). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Alex-Assensoh, Y. (2003). Race in the academy:
Moving beyond diversity and toward the incorpo-
ration of faculty of color in predominately white
colleges and universities. Journal of Black Stud-
ies, 34, 1227.
Alex-Assenoh, Y. M., Givens, T., Golden, K.,
Hutchings, V. L., Wallace, S. L., & Whitby, K. J.
(2005). Mentoring and African-American political
scientists. Political Science and Politics, 38, 283
285.
Alger, J. R. (1999). When color-blind is color-
bland: Ensuring faculty diversity in higher educa-
tion. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 10, 191204.
Table 44
Emerging Issues
5-year increment Emerging issues
19881992 Intersection of gender, lack of diversity, job satisfaction
19931997 Socialization process, strategies for diversication, mentorship, lack of diversity, isms, tenure &
promotion, isolation/marginalization
19982002 Intersection of gender, different ways of knowing, stress & coping, job satisfaction, myths, service
Lack of diversity, recruitment & retention, isms, tokenism, bias in hiring, tenure & promotion,
isolation/marginalization, afrmative action/legal issues
20032007 Scholarly contributions, teaching & pedagogy, job satisfaction, resiliency, mentorship, STEM
elds
Health elds, service, lack of diversity, recruitment & retention, isms, tokenism
Bias in hiring, isolation/marginalization, tenure & promotion
Afrmative action/legal issues
158 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

Alger, J. R. (2000). How to recruit and promote
minority faculty: Start by playing fair. Black Issues
in Higher Education, 17, 160163.
Alger, J. R., & Carrasco, G. P. (1997, August). The
role of faculty in achieving and retaining a diverse
student population. Paper presented at the
AACRAO Policy Summit, Denver, CO.
Alger, J. R., Chapa, J., Gudeman, R. H., Marin, P.,
Maruyama, G., Milem, J. F., et al. (2000). Does
diversity make a difference? Three research stud-
ies on diversity in college classrooms. Washing-
ton, DC: American Council on Education & the
American Association of University Professors.
Alicea-Lugo, B. (1998). Salsa y adobo: Latino/
Latina contributions to theological education.
Union Seminary Quarterly Review, 52, 129144.
Antonio, A. L. (2000). Faculty of color and scholar-
ship transformed: New arguments for diversifying
faculty. Diverse Digest, 3(2), 67.
Antonio, A. L. (2002). Faculty of color reconsid-
ered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship.
Journal of Higher Education, 73, 582602.
Antonio, A. L. (2003). Diverse student bodies, di-
verse faculties: The success or failure of ambitions
to diversify faculty can depend on the diversity of
student bodies. Academe, 89(6). Retrieved Janu-
ary 6, 2008, from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/
pubsres/academe/2003/ND/Feat/anto.htm?PF1
Arnold, J. (2006). Moving beyond access: Institu-
tionalizing best practices for the inclusion of un-
derrepresented faculty and administrators. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ashraf, J., & Shabbir, T. (2006). Are there racial
differences in faculty salaries? Journal of Econom-
ics and Finance, 30, 306316.
Assensoh, A. B. (2003). Trouble in the promised
land: African American studies programs and the
challenges of incorporation. Journal of Black Stud-
ies, 34, 5262.
Astin, A. W. (1992). The unrealized potential of
American higher education. Innovative Higher Ed-
ucation, 17, 95114.
Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (1999). Meaning and
spirituality in the lives of college faculty: A study
of values, authenticity, and stress. Los Angeles:
University of California, Higher Education Re-
search Institute.
Astin, H. S., Antonio, a. l., Cress, C. M., & Astin,
A. W. (1997). Race and ethnicity in the American
professoriate, 19951996. Los Angeles: Univer-
sity of California, Higher Education Research In-
stitute.
Awe, C. (2001). The socialization of junior tenure-
track faculty members in research universities.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
Illinois, UrbanaChampaign.
Baez, B. (1997). How faculty of color construct the
promotion and tenure process. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of
color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe.
Higher Education, 39, 363391.
Baez, B. (2002). Afrmative action, hate speech,
and tenure: Narratives about race, law, and the
academy. Independence, KY: Routledge Falmer.
Baez, B. (2003). Outsiders within? Academe, 89(4).
Retrieved January 6, 2008, from http://www.aaup
.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2003/JA/Feat/baez
.htm
Barnett, E., Gibson, M., & Black, P. (2003). Proac-
tive steps to successfully recruit, retain, and men-
tor minority educators: Issues in education. Jour-
nal of Early Education and Family Review, 10(3),
1828.
Basri, G., Boechat, M. I., Island, E., Ledesma, M.,
Oakley, J., Pitts, L., et al. (2007). Study group on
university diversity: Overview report to the re-
gents. Oakland: Ofce of the President, University
of California. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/2007/
diversityreport0907.pdf
Benjamin, L. (Ed.). (1997). Black women in the
academy: Promises and perils. Gainesville: Uni-
versity Press of Florida.
Bensimon, E. M., & Tierney, W. G. (1996). Pro-
motion and tenure: Community and socialization
in academe. Albany: State University of New York
Press.
Bensimon, E. M., Ward, K., & Sanders, K. (2000).
The department chairs role in developing new
faculty into teachers and scholars. Boston: Anker.
Beutel, A. M., & Nelson, D. J. (2006). The gender
and race-ethnicity of faculty in top social science
research departments. Social Science Journal, 43,
111125.
Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty
at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Bal-
timore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Blackshire-Belay, C. (1998). Under attack: The sta-
tus of minority faculty members in the academy.
Academe, 84(4), 3036.
Bland, C. J., Meurer, L., & Maldonado, G. (1995). A
systematic approach to conducting a non-statistical
meta-analysis of research literature. Academic
Medicine, 70, 642653.
Bower, B. L. (2002). Campus life for faculty of
color: Still strangers after all these years? New
Directions for Community Colleges, 118, 7988.
Bowser, B. P., Auletta, G. S., & Jones, T. (1993).
Confronting diversity issues on campus. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage
Bradley, C. (2005). The career experiences of Afri-
can American women faculty: Implications for
counselor education programs. College Student
Journal, 39, 518527.
Brayboy, B. M. J. (2003). The implementation of
diversity in predominantly White colleges and uni-
versities. Journal of Black Studies, 34, 7286.
Brown, O. G., Hinton, K. G., & Howard-Hamilton,
M. (Eds.). (2007). Unleashing suppressed voices
on college campuses: Diversity issues in higher
education. New York: Peter Lang.
Burden, J. W., Harrison, L., & Hodge, S. R. (2005).
Perceptions of African American faculty in kine-
siology-based programs at predominantly White
American institutions of higher education. Re-
search Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 224
237.
Butner, B. K., Burley, H., & Marbley, A. F. (2000).
Coping with the unexpected: Black faculty at pre-
dominantly White institutions. Journal of Black
Studies, 30, 453462.
Buttner, E., Holly, L., Kevin, B., & Billings-Harris,
L. (2007). Impact of leader racial attitude on rat-
ings of causes and solutions for an employee of
color shortage. Journal of Business Ethics, 73,
129144.
Carmen, F. (1999). In their own voice: The experi-
ences of counselor educators of color in academe.
New Mexico.
Carnes, M., Handelsman, J., & Sheridan, J. (2005).
Diversity in academic medicine: The stages of
change model. Journal of Womens Health, 14,
471475.
Carr, P. L., Palepu, A., Szalacha, L., Caswell, C., &
Inui, T. (2007). Flying below the radar: A qual-
itative study of minority experience and manage-
ment of discrimination in academic medicine.
Medical Education, 41, 601609.
Castellanos, J., & Jones, L. (Eds.). (2003). The
majority in the minority: Expanding the represen-
tation of Latina/o faculty, administrators and stu-
dents in higher education. Herndon, VA: Stylus.
Chapman, B. G. (2001). Minority faculty recruit-
ment in community colleges: Commitment, atti-
tudes, beliefs, and perceptions of chief academic
ofcers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Texas at Austin.
Chesler, M. A., Lewis, A., & Crowfoot, J. (2005).
Challenging racism in higher education: Promot-
ing justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleeld.
Cho, S. (2002). Confronting the myths: Asian Pa-
cic American faculty in higher education. In
C. S. V. Turner, A. L. Antonio, M. Garc a, B.
Laden, A. Nora, & C. Presley (Eds.), Racial &
ethnic diversity in higher education (2nd ed.; pp.
169184). Boston: Pearson Custom.
Christian-Smith, L. K., & Kellor, K. S. (Eds.).
(1999). Everyday knowledge and uncommon
truths: Women of the academy. Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Chused, R. H. (1988). The hiring and retention of
minorities and women on American law school
faculties. University of Pennsylvania Law Review,
137, 537569.
Clark, R. L. (2006). Recruitment and retention of
faculty of color in Oklahoma. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Clark-Louque, A. R. (1996). The participation of
minorities in higher education. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, Pepperdine University.
Colby, A., & Foote, E. (1995). Creating and main-
taining a diverse faculty (ERIC Document Repro-
duction Service No. Ed. 386 261). Los Angeles:
ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges.
Retrieved January 6, 2008, from http://www
.ericdigests.org/19962/diverse.html
Cole, S., & Barber, E. G. (2003). Increasing faculty
diversity: The occupational choices of high-
achieving minority students. Cambridge, MA: Har-
vard University Press.
Cook, B. J., & Cordova, D. I. (2006). Minorities in
higher education 2006: Twenty-second annual sta-
tus report. Washington, DC: American Council on
Education.
Cooper, J. E., & Stevens, D. D. (Eds.). (2002).
Tenure in the sacred grove: Issues and strategies
for women and minority faculty. Albany: State
University of New York Press.
Cora-Bramble, D. (2006). Minority faculty recruit-
ment, retention and advancement: Applications of
a resilience-based theoretical framework. Journal
of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17,
251255.
Cowan, L. Y. (2006). An examination of policies
and programs used to increase ethnic and racial
diversity among faculty at research universities.
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Cross, T. (1994). Black faculty at Harvard: Does the
pipeline defense hold water? Journal of Blacks in
Cross, T., & Slater, R. (2002). A short list of col-
leges and universities that are taking measures to
increase their number of Black faculty. Journal of
Blacks in Higher Education, 36, 99103.
Cuadraz, G. H. (1992). Experiences of multiple
marginality: A case of Chicana scholarship
women. Journal of the Association of Mexican
American Educators, Inc, 12, 3143.
Cuadraz, G. H. (1993). Meritocracy (un)chal-
lenged: The making of a Chicano and Chicana
professoriate and professional class. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of California,
Berkeley.
Daley, S., Wingard, D. L., & Reznik, V. (2006).
Improving the retention of underrepresented mi-
160 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

nority faculty in academic medicine. Journal of the
National Medical Association, 98, 14351440.
De la luz Reyes, M., & Halcon, J. J. (1988). Racism
in academia: The old wolf revisited. Harvard Ed-
ucation Review, 58, 299314.
Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). The
apartheid of knowledge in the academy: The strug-
gle over legitimate knowledge for faculty of
color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35, 169
180.
Delgado-Romero, E. A., Manlove, A. N., Manlove,
J. D., & Hernandez, C. A. (2007). Controversial
issues in the recruitment and retention of Latino/a
faculty. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6,
3451.
Dixon-Reeves, R. (2003). Mentoring as a precursor
to incorporation: An assessment of the mentoring
experience of recently minted Ph.D.s. Journal of
Black Studies, 34, 1227.
Essien, V. (2003). Visible and invisible barriers to
the incorporation of faculty of color in predomi-
nantly White law schools. Journal of Black Stud-
ies, 34, 6371.
Fairbanks, A. R. (2005). Walking in two worlds:
Making professional transitions between native
and non-native worlds. Unpublished doctoral dis-
sertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Fenelon, J. (2003). Race, research, and tenure: In-
stitutional credibility and the incorporation of Af-
rican, Latino, and American Indian faculty. Jour-
nal of Black Studies, 34, 87100.
Flowers, L. A. (2005). Job satisfaction differentials
among African American faculty at 2-year and
4-year institutions. Community College Journal of
Research and Practice, 29, 317328.
Fox, M. J. T. (2005). Voices from within: Native
American faculty and staff on campus. New Direc-
tions for Student Services, 109(1), 4959.
Frierson, Jr., H. T. (1990). The situation of Black
educational researchers: Continuation of a crisis.
Educational Researcher, 19(2), 1217.
Garc a, A. (2005). Counter stories of race and gen-
der: Situating experiences of Latinas in the acad-
emy. Latino Studies, 3, 261273.
Garc a, M. (Ed.). (2000). Succeeding in an aca-
demic career: A guide for faculty of color. West-
port, CT: Greenwood Press.
Ginorio, A. B. (1995). Warming the climate for
women in academic science. Washington, DC: As-
sociation of American Colleges & Universities.
Gonzalez, C. M. (2002). The Latina/o faculty: A
perilous journey to the ivory tower in higher edu-
cation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona
State University, Tempe.
Gonzalez, C. (2007). Building sustainable power:
Latino scholars and academic leadership positions
at U.S. institutions of higher learning. Journal of
Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 157162.
Gonzalez, J. C. (2007a). Expanding our thinking of
resiliency from K-12 to higher education: Resolute
experiences of academic Latinas. In D. M. Davis
(Ed.), Resiliency reconsidered: Policy implications
of the resiliency movement (pp. 103122). Char-
lotte, NC: Information Age.
Gonzalez, J. C. (2007b). Surviving the doctorate
and thriving as faculty: Latina junior faculty re-
ecting on their doctoral studies experiences. Eq-
uity & Excellence in Education, 40, 291300.
Gonzalez, K. P., & Padilla, R. V. (2007). Doing the
public good: Latina/o scholars engage civic par-
ticipation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Gonzalez, M. C. (1995). In search of the voice I
always had. In R. V. Padilla & R. Chavez Chavez
(Eds.), The leaning ivory tower: Latino professors
in American universities (pp. 7790). Albany:
State University of New York Press.
Gooden, J. S., Leary, P. A., & Childress, R. B.
(1994). Initiating minorities into the professoriate:
One schools model. Innovative Higher Educa-
tion, 18, 243253.
Google Scholar. (2007). About Google Scholar. Ac-
cessed on January 7, 2008, from http://scholar
.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html
Granger, M. W. (1993). A review of the literature
on the status of women and minorities in higher
education. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 121
135.
Gregory, S. (1995). Black women in the academy:
The secrets to success and achievement. New
York: University Press of America.
Gregory, S. T. (2001). Black faculty women in the
academy: History, status, and future. Journal of
Negro Education, 70, 124138.
Greiner, K., & Girardi, A. G. (2007). Student and
faculty ethnic diversity report (Eric Reproduction
Document Number 495714). Des Moines, IA:
Iowa College Student Aid Commission. Retrieved
December 23, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
ERICDocs/data/ ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/
0000019b/80/28/03/f9.pdf
Grutter v. Bollinger. (2003). 539 U.S. 306.
Guang-Lea, L., & Louis, J. (2006). Successful mul-
ticultural campus: Free from prejudice toward mi-
nority professors. Multicultural Education, 14(1),
2730.
Guiffrida, D. (2005). Othermothering as a frame-
work for understanding African American stu-
dents denitions of student-centered faculty.
Journal of Higher Education, 76, 701723. Re-
trieved January 6, 2008, from https://dspace.lib
.rochester.edu/retrieve/7328/ bs0.pdf
Gumataotao-Lowe, C. S. N. (1995). Institutional
racism in higher education: Perceptions of people
of color. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Washington.
Hagedorn, L. S., Chi, W. Y., Cepeda, R. M., &
McLain, M. (2007). An investigation of critical
mass: The role of Latino representation in the
success of urban community college students. Re-
search in Higher Education, 4, 7391.
Hall, D. M. (2006). Keeping hope alive: Retention
of faculty of color at traditionally White four-year
colleges and universities. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Illinois State University.
Hamlet, J. D. (1999). Giving the sistuhs their due:
The lived experiences of African American
women in academia. In T. McDonald & T. Ford-
Ahmed (Eds.), Nature of a sistuh: Black womens
lived experiences in contemporary culture (pp. 11
26). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Harris, T. M. (2007). Black feminist thought and
cultural contracts: Understanding the intersection
and negotiation of racial, gendered, and profes-
sional identities in the academy. New Directions
for Teaching and Learning, 110, 5564.
Harvey, W. B., & Valadez, J. (Eds.). (1994). Cre-
ating and maintaining a diverse faculty [Special
issue]. New Directions for Community Colleges,
22(3). Retrieved January 6, 2008, from http://
www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/
content_storage_01/0000019b/80/13/72/82.pdf
Hassouneh, D. (2006). Anti-racist pedagogy: Chal-
lenges faced by faculty of color in predominantly
White schools of nursing. Journal of Nursing Ed-
ucation, 45, 255262.
Hayden, R. E. (1997). Faculty afrmative action: A
case study of underrepresented faculty at the Uni-
versity of California, Irvine. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Hendricks, F. M. (1996). Career experiences of
Black women faculty at research I universities.
MissouriColumbia.
Hendrix, K. G. (2007). She must be trippin: The
secret of disrespect from students of color toward
faculty of color. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning, 110, 8596.
Hernandez, E. I., & Davis, K. G. (2001). The na-
tional survey of Hispanic theological education.
Journal of Hispanic/Latino Theology, 8, 3758.
Hill-Brisbane, D. A., & Dingus, J. E. (2007). Black
women teacher educators: Creating enduring af-
riographies as leaders and change makers. Advanc-
ing Women in Leadership, 22(1). Retrieved De-
cember 30, 2007, from http://www.advancing-
women.com/awl/winter2007/Hill.htm
Holcomb-McCoy, C., & Addison-Bradley, C.
(2005). African American counselor educators
job satisfaction and perceptions of departmental
racial climate. Counselor Education and Supervi-
sion, 45(1), 215.
Holland, G. (1995). The effects of mentoring expe-
riences on the retention of African-American fac-
ulty at four-yeur colleges and universities. Unpub-
lished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State Univer-
sity.
Horton, H. W. (2000). Perspectives on the current
status of the racial climate relative to students,
staff, and faculty of color at predominantly White
colleges/universities in America. Equity & Excel-
lence in Education, 33(3), 3537.
Hune, S. (1998). Asian Pacic American women in
higher education: Claiming visibility and voice.
Washington, DC: Association of American Col-
leges & Universities.
Hune, S., & Chan, K. S. (1997). Special focus:
Asian Pacic American demographic and educa-
tional trends: Fifteenth annual status report.
Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Hurtado, S., Milem, J., Clayton-Pedersen, A., &
Allen, W. (1999). Enacting diverse learning envi-
ronments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic
diversity in higher education (ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 268). Washington, DC:
George Washington University, School of Educa-
tion & Human Development.
Inspiration Software. (2007). Available at http://
www.inspiration.com/
Isaac, E. P., & Boyer, P. G. (2007). Voices of urban
and rural community college minority faculty: Sat-
isfaction and opinions. Community College Jour-
nal of Research and Practice, 31, 359369.
Jackson, J. F. L., & Phelps, L. A. (2004). Diversity in
the two-year college academic workforce. New
Directions for Community Colleges, 127, 7988.
Jackson, K. W. (1991). Black faculty in academia.
In P. G. Altbach & K. Lomotey (Eds.), The racial
crisis in American higher education (pp. 135
148). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Jacobs, L., Cintron, J., & Canton, C. E. (2002). The
politics of survival in academia: Narratives of
inequity, resilience, and success. Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littleeld.
Johnson, B. J., & Harvey, W. (2002). The social-
ization of Black college faculty: Implications for
policy and practice. Review of Higher Educa-
tion, 25, 297314.
Johnson, B. J., & Pichon, H. (2007). The status of
African American faculty in the academy: Where
do we go from here? In J. F. L. Jackson (Ed.)
Strengthening the African American educational
pipeline: Informing research, policy, and practice
(pp. 97114). Albany: State University of New
York Press.
Johnson, C. (2001). The tenure process and ve
minority faculty members. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of NebraskaLincoln.
Johnson, D. R. (2006). The hiring process: The
Black experience in a community college search
committee. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Texas at Austin.
162 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

Johnson, K. (2003). Encouraging the heart: How
three University of California institutions re-
sponded to minority faculty recruitment after the
implementation of Proposition 209. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University.
Johnson, W. J. (1996). A qualitative study of the
factors affecting the recruitment and retention of
African American faculty in Minnesota community
colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus.
Johnsrud, L. K. (1994). Enabling the success of
junior faculty women through mentoring. In M. A.
Wunsch (Ed.), Mentoring revisited: Making an
impact on individuals and institutions (pp. 5364).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Johnsrud, L. K., & Sadao, K. C. (1998). The com-
mon experience of otherness: Ethnic and racial
minority faculty. Review of Higher Education, 21,
315342.
Johnston, G. H. (1997). Piercing together the mo-
saic called diversity: One community colleges
on-going experience with hiring a more diverse
faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer-
sity of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
Jones, L. (Ed.). (2000). Brothers of the academy:
Up and coming Black scholars earning our way in
higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Jones, L. (Ed.). (2001). Retaining African Ameri-
cans in higher education: Challenging paradigms
for retaining students, faculty and administrators.
Herndon, VA: Stylus.
Jones, L. (Ed.). (2002). Making it on broken prom-
ises: African American male scholars confront the
culture of higher education. Herndon, VA: Stylus.
Jordan, D. (2006). Sisters in science: Conversations
with Black women scientists about race, gender,
and their passion for science. West Lafayette, IN:
Purdue University Press.
Kauper, M. W. (1991). Factors which inuence the
career decisions of minority faculty at a predom-
inately White liberal arts institution: A case study.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana Univer-
sity Bloomington.
Kayes, P. E. (2006). New paradigms for diversify-
ing faculty and staff in higher education: Uncov-
ering cultural biases in the search and hiring pro-
cess. Multicultural Education, 14, 6569.
Kirkpatrick, L. (2001). Multicultural strategies for
community colleges: Expanding faculty diversity.
Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse for Com-
munity Colleges.
Knowles, M. F., & Harleston, B. W. (1997). Achiev-
ing diversity in the professoriate: Challenges and
opportunities. Washington, DC: American Council
on Education.
Kosoko-Lasaki, O., Sonnino, R. E., & Voytko,
M. L. (2006). Mentoring for women and underrep-
resented minority faculty and students: Experience
at two institutions of higher education. Journal of
the National Medical Association, 98, 14491459.
Laden, B. V., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Job satis-
faction among faculty of color in academe: Indi-
vidual survivors or institutional transformers? New
Directions for Institutional Research, 27(1), 57
66.
Lasalle, L. A. (1995). Racing the professoriate: The
socialization of faculty of color. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University,
State College.
Lewellen-Williams, C., Johnson, V. A., Deloney,
L. A., Thomas, B. R., Goyol, A., & Henry-
Tillman, R. (2006). The pod: A new model for
mentoring underrepresented minority faculty. Ac-
ademic Medicine, 81, 275279.
Light, P. (1994). Not like us: Removing the bar-
riers to recruiting minority faculty. Journal of Pol-
icy Analysis and Management, 13, 164180.
Lindsay, B. (1991). Public and higher education
policies inuencing African-American women. In
G. P. Kelly, & S. Slaughter (Eds.), Womens
higher education in comparative perspective (pp.
85102). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Loder, T. L., Sims, M. J., Collins, L., Brooks, M.,
Voltz, D., Calhoun, C., & Coker, A. D. (2007). On
becoming and being faculty-leaders in urban edu-
cation and also being African-American . . . Seems
promising. Advancing Women in Leadership On-
line Journal, 22(1). Retrieved January 8, 2008,
from http://www.advancingwomen.com/awl/
winter2007/Loder.htm
Louis, R. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices
from the margin: Using indigenous methodologies
in geographic research. Geographic Research, 45,
130139.
MacLachlan, A. J. (2006). Developing graduate stu-
dents of color for the professoriate in science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).
Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Edu-
cation. Retrieved December 24, 2007, from http://
eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content
_storage_01/0000019b/80/29/de/c7.pdf
Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. T. (2007). Privi-
lege and diversity in the academy. New York:
Routledge.
Marbley, A. F. (2007). Finding my voice: An Afri-
can-American female professor at a predominantly
White university. Advancing Women in Leader-
ship Online Journal, 22. Retrieved January 11,
2008, from http://ww.advancingwomen.com/awl/
winter2007/ nding_my_voice.htm
Maturana, I. M. (2005). Factors in the search pro-
cess that contribute to the recruitment and hiring
of faculty of color. Unpublished doctoral disserta-
tion, University of Massachusetts at Boston.
McKenzie, M. M. (2002). Labor above and beyond
the call: A Black woman scholar in the academy.
In S. Harley & The Black Women and Work
Collective (Eds.), Sister circle: Black women and
work (pp. 231253). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press.
McLean, C. A. (2007). Establishing credibility in
the multicultural classroom: When the instructor
speaks with an accent. New Directions for Teach-
ing and Learning, 110, 1524.
Medina, C., & Luna, G. (2000). Narratives from
Latina professors in higher education. Anthropol-
ogy & Education Quarterly, 31, 4766.
Mickelson, R. A., & Oliver, M. L. (1991). Making
the short list: Black candidates and the faculty
recruitment process. In P. A. Altbach & K. Lo-
motey (Eds.), The racial crisis in American higher
education (pp. 149166). Albany: State University
of New York Press.
Milem, J. F., & Astin, H. S. (1993). The changing
composition of the faculty: What does it really
mean for diversity? Change, 25(2), 2127.
Millett, C. M., & Nettles, M. T. (2006). Expanding
and cultivating the Hispanic STEM doctoral work-
force: Research on doctoral student experiences.
Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 5, 258
287.
Mitchell, D. A., & Lassiter, S. (2006). Addressing
health care disparities and increasing workforce
diversity: The next step for the dental, medical,
and public health professions. American Journal of
Public Health, 96, 20932097.
Mitchell, R., & Rosiek, J. (2006). Professor as em-
bodied racial signier: A case study of the signif-
icance of race in a university classroom. Review of
Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 28,
395409.
Moody, C. D. (1988). Strategies for improving the
representation of minority faculty in research uni-
versities. Peabody Journal of Education, 66(1),
7790.
Moody, J. (2004). Faculty diversity: Problems and
solutions. New York: Routledge.
Moradi, B., & Neimeyer, G. J. (2005). Diversity in
the ivory White tower: A longitudinal look at
faculty race/ethnicity in counseling psychology ac-
ademic training programs. Counseling Psycholo-
gist, 33, 655675.
Morell-Thon, C. (1998). Job satisfaction of His-
panic faculty in higher education. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
Moreno, J. F., Smith, D. G., Clayton-Pedersen,
A. R., Parker, S., & Teraguchi, D. H. (2006). The
revolving door for underrepresented minority fac-
ulty in higher education: An analysis from the
campus diversity initiative. Washington, DC: As-
sociation of American Colleges & Universities.
Morris, C. A. (2000). Strategies for recruitment and
retention of faculty of color in community colleges.
Texas at Austin.
Moses, Y. T. (1989). Black women in academe:
Issues and strategies. Washington, DC: Associa-
tion of American Colleges & Universities.
Moss, L. E. T. (2000). Recruitment, retention, and
mentoring of female and minority faculty in higher
education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ar-
kansas State University.
Moule, J. (2005). Implementing a social justice per-
spective in teacher education: Invisible burden for
faculty of color. Teacher Education Quarterly,
32(4), 2342.
Myers, S. L., Jr., & Turner, C. S. V. (2001). Afr-
mative action retrenchment and labor market out-
comes for African-American faculty. In B. Lind-
say & M. J. Justiz (Eds.), The quest for equity in
higher education: Toward new paradigms in an
evolving afrmative action era (pp. 6398). Al-
bany: State University of New York Press.
Myers, S. L., Jr., & Turner, C. S. V. (2004). The
effects of Ph.D. supply on minority faculty repre-
sentation. American Economic Review, 94, 296
301.
Nelson, D. J., Brammer, C. N., & Rhoads, H.
(2007). A national analysis of minorities in science
and engineering faculties at research universities.
Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Re-
trieved January 10, 2008, from http://cheminfo
.chem.ou.edu/djn/diversity/Faculty_Tables
_FY07/07Report.pdf
Nevarez, C., & Borunda, R. (2004). Faculty of
color: Contesting the last frontier. Sacramento,
CA: Serna Center. Retrieved December 3, 2007,
from http://www.csus.edu/sernacenter/assets/
scholar_reports/nevarez_borunda.pdf
Niemann, Y. F. (1999). The making of a token: A
case study of stereotype threat, stigma, racism, and
tokenism in academe. Frontiers: A Journal of
Women Studies, 20, 111134.
Niemann, Y. F. (2003). The psychology of token-
ism: Psychosocial realities of faculty of color. In
G. Bernal., J. E. Trimble, A. K. Burlew, & F. T. L.
Leong (Eds.), Handbook of racial and ethnic mi-
nority psychology (pp. 100118). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (2005). Afrma-
tive action and job satisfaction: Understanding un-
derlying processes. Journal of Social Issues, 61,
507523.
Nieves-Squires, S. (1991). Hispanic women: Mak-
ing their presence on campus less tenuous. Wash-
ington, DC: Association of American Colleges and
Universities.
Number of full-time faculty members by sex, rank,
and racial and ethnic group, fall 2005. (2007
2008). In Chronicle of higher education: The
200708 almanac (Vol. 54, p. 24). Retrieved Jan-
164 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

uary 9, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/
almanac/2007/nation/0102402.htm
Olivas, M. A. (1988). Latino faculty at the border:
Increasing numbers key to more Hispanic access.
Change, 20(3), 69.
Opp, R. D., & Gosetti, P. P. (2002). Women full-
time faculty of color in 2-year colleges: A trend
and predictive analysis. Community College Jour-
nal of Research and Practice, 26, 609627.
Opp, R., & Smith, A. (1994). Effective strategies for
enhancing minority faculty recruitment. Commu-
nity College Journal of Research and Practice, 18,
147163.
Owino, A. Z. (2000). An investigation of the hiring
trends of women and minority faculty in institu-
tions of higher learning. Unpublished doctoral dis-
sertation, Pennsylvania State University, State
College.
Padilla, A. M. (1994). Ethnic minority scholars,
research, and mentoring: Current and future issues.
Educational Researcher, 23(4), 2427.
Padilla, R. V., & Chavez Chavez, R. (1995). The
leaning ivory tower: Latino professors in Ameri-
can universities. Albany: State University of New
York Press.
Patterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings,
C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health re-
search: A practical guide to meta-analysis and
meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peoples, III, R. (2004). Recruitment of minority
faculty: A comparison of attitudes, beliefs, percep-
tions, commitments, and strategies of Texas ad-
ministrators in selected community colleges. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, Baylor University.
Pepion, K. (1993). Ideologies of excellence: Issues
in the evaluation, promotion, and tenure of minor-
ity faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Arizona.
Perez, E. T. (2001). Negotiating tenure and promo-
tion: An examination of legitimate scholarship
productions, academic ambassadors and institu-
tional dislocation of Latina/o professors in the
midwest. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-
versity of Nebraska.
Perna, L. W. (2003). The status of women and
minorities among community college faculty. Re-
search in Higher Education, 44, 205240.
Perna, L., Gerald, D., Baum, E., & Milem, J. (2007).
The status of equity for Black faculty and admin-
istrators in public higher education in the south.
Research in Higher Education, 48, 193228.
Peterson-Hickey, M. M. (1998). American Indian
faculty experiences: Culture as a challenge and
source of strength. Unpublished doctoral disserta-
tion, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Cam-
pus.
Piercy, F., Giddings, V., Allen, K., Dixon, B.,
Meszaros, P., & Joest, K. (2005). Improving cam-
pus climate to support faculty diversity and reten-
tion: A pilot program for new faculty. Innovative
Higher Education, 30(1), 5366.
Pineda, A. M. (1998). The place of Hispanic theol-
ogy in a theological curriculum. In P. Casarella &
R. Gomez (Eds.), El cuerpo de Cristo: The His-
panic presence in the U.S. Catholic Church (pp.
134154). New York: Crossroads.
Plata, M. (1996). Retaining ethnic minority faculty
at institutions of higher education. Journal of In-
structional Psychology, 23, 221227.
Pollard, D. S. (2006). Women of color and research.
In D. S. Pollard & O. M. Welch (Eds.), From
center to margins: The importance of self-
denition in research (pp. 720). Albany: State
University of New York Press.
Ponjuan, L. (2005). Understanding the work lives of
faculty of color: Job satisfaction, perception of
climate, and intention to leave. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Porter, S. R. (2007). A closer look at faculty service:
What affects participation on committees? Journal
of Higher Education, 78, 523541.
Price, E. G., Gozu, A., Kern, D. E., Power, N. R.,
Wand, G. S., Golden, S., & Cooper, L. A. (2005).
The role of cultural diversity climate in recruit-
ment, promotion, and retention of faculty in aca-
demic medicine. Journal of General Internal Med-
icine, 20, 565571.
Pura, R. L. (1993). An analysis of the minority
faculty recruitment strategies at a community col-
lege in an urban environment: A case study. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, University of
Texas at Austin.
Rai, K. B., & Critzer, J. W. (2000). Afrmative
action and the university: Race, ethnicity, and gen-
der in higher education employment. Lincoln: Uni-
versity of Nebraska Press.
Rains, F. V. (1995). Views from within: Women
faculty of color in a research university. Unpub-
lished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University
Bloomington.
Rendon, L. (1996). From the barrio to the academy:
Revelations of a Mexican American scholarship
girl. In C. S. V. Turner, M. Garc a, A. Nora, &
L. I. Rendon (Eds.), Racial & ethnic diversity in
higher education (pp. 281287). Boston: Pearson.
Rendon, L. I. (2000). Academics of the heart: Main-
taining body, soul, and spirit. In M. Garc a (Ed.),
Succeeding in an academic career: A guide for
faculty of color (pp. 141154). Westport, CT:
Greenwood Press.
Renzulli, L. A., Grant, L., & Kathuria, S. (2006).
Race, gender, and the wage gap: Comparing fac-
ulty salaries in predominantly White and histori-
cally Black colleges and universities. Gender and
Society, 20, 491510.
Reyes, X. A. (2005). Dissonance in the academy:
Reections of a Latina professor. Latino Stud-
ies, 3, 274279.
Reyes, X. A., & R os, D. I. (2005). Dialoguing the
Latina experiences in higher education. Journal of
Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 377391.
Saavedra, D. E., & Saavedra, M. L. (2007). Women
of color teaching students of color: Creating an
effective classroom climate through caring, chal-
lenging, and consulting. New Directions for
Teaching and Learning, 110, 7383.
Sadao, K. C. (2003). Living in two worlds: Success
and the bicultural faculty of color. Review of
Samano, M. L. (2007). Respecting ones abilities,
or (post) colonial tokenism?: Narrative testimo-
nios of faculty of color working in predominantly
White community colleges. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Oregon State University. Retrieved
January 6, 2008, from http://ir.library.oregonstate
.edu/dspace/bitstream/1957/5011/1/Samano
_Dissertation.pdf
Sampaio, A. (2006). Women of color teaching po-
litical science: Examining the intersections of race,
gender, and course material in the classroom. Po-
litical Science and Politics, 39, 917922.
Sanchez, R. M. (2007). Best practices for recruiting
and hiring a diverse workforce: Appendix d-
diversity and position descriptions. Pullman, WA:
Washington State University, Center for Human
Rights. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://
www. chr. wsu. edu/Content/Documents/chr/
best%20practices%20booklet%20907%20(2).pdf
Section II: Appointment and promotion. (2002). In
University of California academic personnel man-
ual (pp. APM 200APM 420). Oakland: Univer-
sity of California, Human Resources. Retrieved
January 8, 2008, from http://www.ucop.edu/
acadadv/acadpers/apm/apm-210.pdf
Segovia, F. F. (1994). Theological education and
scholarship as struggle: The life of racial/ethnic
minorities in the profession. Journal of Hispanic/
Latino Theology, 2(2), 525.
Segura, D. A. (2003). Navigating between two
worlds: The labyrinth of Chicana intellectual pro-
duction in the academy. Journal of Black Stud-
ies, 34, 2851.
Skachkova, P. (2007). Academic careers of immi-
grant women professors in the U.S. Higher Edu-
cation, 53, 697738.
Slater, R. B. (1999). The rst Black faculty mem-
bers at the nations highest-ranked universities.
Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 22, 97
106.
Smith, D. G. (2000). How to diversify the faculty.
Academe, 86(5), 4852. Retrieved January 6,
2008, from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/
academe/2000/SO/Feat/smit.htm?PF1
Smith, D. G., Turner, C. S. V., Ose-Ko, N., &
Richards, S. (2004). Interrupting the usual: Suc-
cessful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. Jour-
nal of Higher Education, 75, 133160.
Smith, D. G., Wolf, L. E., & Busenberg, B. E.
(1996). Achieving faculty diversity: Debunking the
myths. Washington, DC: Association of American
Colleges & Universities.
Smith, E. (1992). A comparative study of occupa-
tion stress in African American and White univer-
sity faculty. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Smith, G., & Anderson, K. J. (2005). Students
ratings of professors: The teaching style contin-
gency for Latino/a professors. Journal of Latinos
and Education, 4, 115136.
Smith, J. W., & Calasanti, T. (2005). The inuences
of gender, race and ethnicity on workplace expe-
riences of institutional and social isolation: An
exploratory study of university faculty. Sociologi-
cal Spectrum, 25, 307334.
Smith, P. A., & Shoho, A. R. (2007). Higher edu-
cation trust, rank and race: A conceptual and em-
pirical analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 32,
125138.
Smith, P. W., Altbach, P. G., & Lomotey, K. (Eds.).
(2002). The racial crisis in American higher edu-
cation: Continuing challenges for the twenty-rst
century. Albany: State University of New York
Press.
Soto-Greene, M. L., Sanchez, J., Churrango, J., &
Salas-Lopez, D. (2005). Latino faculty develop-
ment in U.S. medical schools: A Hispanic center of
excellence perspective. Journal of Hispanic
Springer, A. (2002). How to diversify faculty: The
current legal landscape. Washington, DC: Amer-
ican Association of University Professors.
Springer, A. D. (2004). Legal Watch: Faculty diver-
sity in a brave new world. Academe, 90(4). Re-
trieved January 6, 2008, from http://www.aaup
.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JA/Col/lw
.htm?PF1
Stanley, C. A. (2006). Coloring the academic land-
scape: Faculty of color breaking the silence in
predominantly White colleges and universities.
American Educational Research Journal, 43, 701
736.
Stanley, C. A. (Ed.). (2007a). Faculty of color:
Teaching in predominantly White colleges and
universities. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Stanley, C. A. (2007b). When counter narratives
meet master narratives in the journal editorial-
review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1),
1424.
Stanley, C. A., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Cross-race
faculty mentoring. Change, 37(2), 4450.
Stanley, J. M., Capers, C. F., & Berlin, L. E. (2007).
Changing the face of nursing faculty: Minority
166 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

faculty recruitment and retention. Journal of Pro-
fessional Nursing, 23, 253261.
Stein, W. (1994). The survival of American Indian
faculty: Thought and action. National Education
Association Higher Education Journal, 10, 101
114.
Subervi, F., & Cantrell, T. H. (2007). Assessing
efforts and policies related to the recruitment and
retention of minority faculty at accredited and non-
accredited journalism and mass communication
programs. Journalism and Mass Communication
Educator, 62(1), 2746.
Tack, M., & Patitu, C. L. (1992). Faculty job sat-
isfaction: Women and minorities in peril (ASHE-
ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washing-
ton, DC: George Washington University, School
of Education & Human Development.
Takara, K. W. (2006). A view from the academic
edge: One Black woman who is dancing as fast as
she can. Du Bois Review, 3, 463470.
Thomas, G. D., & Hollenshead, C. (2001). Resisting
from the margins: The coping strategies of Black
women and other women of color faculty members
at a research university. Journal of Negro Educa-
tion, 70, 166175.
Thompson, C. J., & Dey, E. L. (1998). Pushed to the
margins: Sources of stress for African American
college and university faculty. Journal of Higher
Education, 69, 324345.
Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Faculty
socialization as cultural process: A mirror of in-
stitutional commitment (ASHE-ERIC Higher Edu-
cation Report No. 93 6). Washington, DC:
George Washington University, School of Educa-
tion & Human Development.
Tippeconnic, III, J. W., & McKinney, S. (2003).
Native faculty: Scholarship and development. In
M. K. P. Ah Nee-Benham & W. J. Stein (Eds.),
The renaissance of American Indian higher edu-
cation: Capturing the dream (pp. 241256). Mah-
wah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tomlinson, L. L. (2006). Listening to faculty of
color: Diverse experiences on a predominately
White campus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Illinois State University.
Toutkoushian, R. K., Bellas, M. L., & Moore, J. V.
(2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and
marital status on faculty salaries. Journal of
Townsend-Johnson, L. (2006). African-American
women faculty teaching at institutions of higher-
learning in the Pacic Northwest: Challenges, di-
lemmas, and sustainability. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Oregon State University.
Tuitt, F. A., Sagaria, M. D., & Turner, C. S. V.
(2007). Signals and strategies in hiring faculty of
color. Higher Education Handbook of Theory and
Research, 22, 497535.
Turner, C. S. V. (2000). New faces, new knowl-
edge: As women and minorities join the faculty,
they bring intellectual diversity in pedagogy and in
scholarship. Academe, 86(5), 3437.
Turner, C. S. V. (2002a). Diversifying the faculty: A
guidebook for search committees (2nd ed.). Wash-
ington, DC: Association of American Colleges &
Universities.
Turner, C. S. V. (2002b). Women of color in aca-
deme: Living with multiple marginality. Journal of
Turner, C. S. V. (2003). Incorporation and margin-
alization in the academy: From border toward cen-
ter for faculty of color? Journal of Black Stud-
ies, 34, 112125.
Turner, C. S. V. (2006, September 29). Before start-
ing a faculty search, take a good look at the search
committee. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp.
B32, B34.
Turner, C. S. V., Antonio, A. L., Garc a, M., Laden,
B. V., Nora, A., & Presley, C. L. (Eds.). (2002).
Racial & ethnic diversity in higher education (2nd
ed.). Boston: Pearson Custom.
Turner, C. S. V., Garc a, M., Nora, A., & Rendon,
L. I. (Eds.). (1996). Racial & ethnic diversity in
higher education. Needham Heights, MA: Simon
& Schuster Custom.
Turner, C. S. V., & Myers, S. L., Jr. (1997). Faculty
diversity and afrmative action. In M. Garc a
(Ed.), Afrmative actions testament of hope:
Strategies for a new era in higher education (pp.
131148). Albany: State University of New York
Press.
Turner, C. S. V., & Myers, S. L., Jr. (2000). Faculty
of color in academe: Bittersweet success. Boston:
Allyn & Bacon.
Turner, C. S. V., & Taylor, D. V. (2002). Keeping
our faculties: Addressing the recruitment and re-
tention of faculty of color (Position paper). Min-
neapolis: University of Minnesota, Ofce of the
Associate Vice President for Multicultural & Ac-
ademic Affairs. Retrieved January 6, 2008, from
http://www.oma.umn.edu/kof/pdf/kofposition.pdf
Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Social-
ization experiences of minority and majority
women doctoral students: Implications for faculty
recruitment and retention. Review of Higher Edu-
cation, 16, 355370.
TuSmith, B., & Reddy, M. T. (Eds.). (2002). Race
in the college classroom: Pedagogy and politics.
Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Umbach, P. D. (2006). The contribution of faculty of
color to undergraduate education. Research in
Urrieta, L. Jr., & Mendez Benav dez, L. (2007).
Community commitment and activist scholarship:
Chicana/o professors and the practice of con-
sciousness. Journal of Hispanic Higher Educa-
tion, 6, 222236.
Valladares, S. E. (2007). Challenges in the tenure
process: The experiences of faculty of color who
conduct social science, race-based academic
work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer-
sity of California, Los Angeles.
Van Ummersen, C. A. (2005). No talent left behind.
Change, 37(6), 2631.
Vargas, L. (Ed.). (2002). Women faculty of color in
the White classroom: Narratives on the pedagog-
ical implications of teacher diversity. New York:
Peter Lang.
Vasquez, M. J. T., Lott, B., Garc a-Vasquez, E.,
Grant, S. K., Iwamasa, G. Y., Molina, L., et al.
(2006). Personal reections: Barriers and strate-
gies in increasing diversity in psychology. Ameri-
can Psychologist, 61, 157172.
Waitzkin, H., Yager, J., Parker, T., & Duran, B.
(2006). Mentoring partnerships for minority fac-
ulty and graduate students in mental health ser-
vices research. Academic Psychiatry, 30, 205217.
Weems, R. E., Jr. (2003). The incorporation of
Black faculty at predominantly White institutions:
A historical and contemporary perspective. Jour-
nal of Black Studies, 34, 101111.
Wheeler, B. G. (1996). True and false: The rst in a
series of reports from a study of theological school
faculty. Auburn Studies. Retrieved January 6,
2008, from http://www.auburnsem.org/study/
publications_details.asp?nsectionid2&pageid
3&pubid4
Whetsel-Ribeau, P. (2007). Retention of faculty of
color as it relates to their perceptions of the aca-
demic climate at four-year predominately White
public universities in Ohio. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Bowling Green State University.
Williams, B. N., & Williams, S. M. (2006). Percep-
tions of African American male junior faculty on
promotion and tenure: Implications for community
building and social capital. Teachers College
Record, 108, 287315.
Williams, D. A., & Wade-Golden, K. C. (2006, April
18). What is a chief diversity ofcer? Inside
Higher Ed. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from
http://www.insidehighered.com/workplace/2006/
04/18/williams
Williams, D. A., & Wade-Golden, K. C. (2007). The
chief diversity ofcer: A primer for college and
university presidents. Washington, DC: American
Council on Education.
Witt, S. L. (1990). The pursuit of race and gender
equity in American academe. New York: Praeger.
Wong, T. M., & Bainer, D. (1991). Ethnic-minority
faculty in evangelical Christian colleges: Models
in search of an identity. In D. J. Lee., A. L.
Nieves., & H. L. Allen (Eds.), Ethnic-minorities
and evangelical Christian colleges (pp. 239258).
Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Yager, J., Waitzkin, H., Parker, T., & Duran, B.
(2007). Educating, training, and mentoring minor-
ity faculty and other trainees in mental health
services research. Academic Psychiatry, 31, 146
151.
Received February 21, 2008
Revision received May 21, 2008
Accepted May 21, 2008
168 TURNER, GONZA
LEZ, AND WOOD

Turner, Gonzalez, and Wood

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Turner, Gonzalez, and Wood

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Turner, Gonzalez, and Wood

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Faculty of Color in Academe: What 20 Years of Literature Tells Us

Caroline Sotello Viernes Turner

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

LEZ, AND WOOD

You might also like