An Empirical Investigation of Greek Municipalities' Quality of Financial Reporting
An Empirical Investigation of Greek Municipalities' Quality of Financial Reporting
An Empirical Investigation of Greek Municipalities' Quality of Financial Reporting
Reporting
Sandra Coen
!
and "ikolaos #aimenakis
$
Correspondence address
Sandra Cohen
Lecturer of Accounting
Athens University of Economics and Business
76, Patission St.
Athens !"#$"
%reece
&e'( )$!*+!*,+!$6,,
-a.( )$!*+!*,+!$6"
E#mai'( scohen/aue0.gr
may fai' to accurate'y capture the fu'' 0readth of adherence 5ith standards 5e use
a'ternative indices that are e.pected to encapsu'ate 0oth in 8uantitative and
8ua'itative terms the e.tent of adherence to accounting standards.
RQ*: What is the informatie qualit+ of the audit reports that accompan+ the
financial statements of !ree" municipalities)
&he %ree4 centra' government has esta0'ished compu'sory revie5s 0y e.terna'
auditors of the municipa'ities; annua' financia' statements. &he audit must 0e
performed according to the %enera''y Accepted Auditing Standards, 5hich have
0een esta0'ished 0y the %ree4 7nstitute of Certified Auditors and Accountants. &he
audit opinion provides assurance that the financia' statements have 0een prepared
according to the %enera''y Accepted Accounting Princip'es of the %ree4 State and
the P1 $B*@@, and that they fair'y present the financia' position, the resu'ts of
operations, and the disposa' of surp'us or deficit of the audited firm. &he comments
presented in the audit opinion refer to materia' items and disc'ose instances 5here
genera''y accepted accounting princip'es and*or the 'a5s of the %ree4 state have
not 0een fo''o5ed. E.amp'es of such instances inc'ude the fo''o5ing( incorrect
accounting treatments or estimates, insufficient provisions, insufficient disc'osure
of materia' financia' statement information, and so on. &herefore, the audit report
p'ays an important ro'e 0y acting as a 0uffer against 'o5#8ua'ity information.
=o5ever, a necessary precondition in this F8ua'ity assurance processH is that the
audit reports provide information that assist sta4eho'ders to accurate'y eva'uate the
re'ia0i'ity of the accounting information issued 0y an entity. &hus, our aim here is
to determine 5hether the audit reports of %ree4 municipa'ities(
<a> Contain 8uantitative information re'ated to a municipa'ity;s deviations from
the accounting standards it shou'd adhere to. &his information shou'd provide
+
ade8uate input for proper adCustments to 0e made as to derive to the actua'
financia' condition and position of the entity, and
<0> Provide an audit opinion that summari6es the 8ua'ity of financia' reporting.
RQ%: Which factors exhibit an influential role on the leel of compliance with the
accrual accounting standards)
&his study a'so aims at determining the impact on the 8ua'ity of accounting
information of certain factors cited in previous studies. -or this purpose 5e
e.amine the fo''o5ing hypotheses(
=( ,unicipalit+ reliance on debt positiel+ affects its compliance with accounting
standards.
A municipa'ity that re'ies on de0t in order to finance its operations shou'd 0e
e.pected to 0e su0Cect to tight contro' 0y financia' institutions. &herefore it 5ou'd
0e restricted in app'ying standards 5ithout deviations that cou'd serious'y
inf'uence its financia' position and performance.
=+( ,unicipalit+ wealth is expected to be positiel+ associated with compliance.
9unicipa'ities that do not heavi'y re'y on government su0sidies are e.pected to 0e
4een in sho5ing their good financia' hea'th and therefore 0e more 5i''ing to
comp'y 5ith accounting standards so as not to cast dou0ts in re'ation to their true
financia' condition to a'' interested sta4eho'ders. &his 0ehavior is a'so e.pected to
0e driven 0y mayors 5ho 5ish to po'itica''y 0enefit from their municipa'ities;
good financia' hea'th.
=$( ,unicipalit+ si-e positiel+ affects its compliance with accounting standards.
$
* municipa'ity 5ith a 'arge popu'ation is e.pected to maintain an e8uiva'ent'y
'arge num0er of emp'oyees 5ho can 5or4 in preparing high 8ua'ity end#of#the#
year statements. 7n addition to that, it cou'd 0e argued that municipa'ities of a
significant si6e dra5 more attention from the press in comparison to sma''er ones
and are therefore more inc'ined to comp'y 5ith standards so as to avoid any
negative pu0'icity.
="( .xternal auditor si-e positiel+ influences the accurac+ of municipalit+/s end0
of0the0+ear statements.
&he si6e of the auditor is e.pected to e.ert a positive effect on comp'iance. Larger
audit firms are assumed to possess higher 'eve' of competence in comparison to
sma''er audit firms. 9oreover, audit firms of a significant si6e are 'ess dependent
on specific c'ients and therefore can provide more high#8ua'ity services. -ina''y, in
case of an audit fai'ure 'arger audit firms have more to 'ose than auditors of a
sma''er si6e.
=B( ,unicipalities compl+ with accounting standards more readil+ if their ma+ors
were elected with support from the ruling political part+.
&he accounting reform process is e.pected to 0e more favora0'y appreciated 0y mayors
5ho originate from the po'itica' party that governs. 7n %ree4 municipa'ities the e'ected
mayors are the driving force 0ehind the over5he'ming maCority of the proCects these
entities underta4e. Loca' government e'ections in %reece are to a great e.tent a
po'itica' arena of the maCor parties in 5hich they antagoni6e for po'itica' contro' of the
municipa'ities. &he mayors are a'most e.c'usive'y e'ected 5ith the support of the maCor
po'itica' parties that comprise the %ree4 Par'iament. 7f a mayor has chances of
retaining the support of a maCor po'itica' party he*she must sho5 active support to the
party;s agenda. &his 'eads us to assume that mayors 5ho
"
get e'ected 5ith the support of the ru'ing party 5i'' active'y see4 the success of the
reform so as to sho5 commitment to the governmenta' program. &herefore it
shou'd 0e e.pected that in such cases municipa'ities e.hi0it a higher comp'iance
5ith the accounting standards in comparison to municipa'ities 5hose mayors
0e'ong to opposition parties.
=6( ,unicipalities with long0term experience in accrual accounting will exhibit
higher compliance with accounting standards.
?e e.pect that 'oca' governments faced such a p'ethora of shortcomings 5hen they
had an accrua' accounting system insta''ed for the first time that had potentia''y
'ead them to e.hi0it deviations from accounting standards. =o5ever, it is 'i4e'y
that these pro0'ems 5ere dea't 5ith in 'ater periods than4s to the fami'iari6ation of
municipa'ities 5ith the accrua' concept. -or instance, it is possi0'e that asset
va'uations in the first 0a'ance sheet issued 0y a municipa'ity have not 0een
performed 5ith a0so'ute adherence to accounting standards due to the 'ac4 of
e.perience of the accounting personne' or the 'ac4 of the necessary data.
2everthe'ess, these difficu'ties shou'd 0e progressive'y overcome as a municipa'ity
is getting fami'iari6ed 5ith the ne5 accounting system.
Metodology
-or the purposes of our study 5e e.amined the audit reports of %ree4 municipa'ities;
end#of#the#year financia' statements for the fisca' year +!!$. &hese audit reports
contain monetary and 8ua'itative information that can 0e uti'i6ed in order to eva'uate
the degree to 5hich a municipa'ity adheres to accounting standards. Even though
according to studies conducted in the private sector <?right and ?right, @@7> auditors
do not report on every sing'e materia' misstatement, 5e
B
e.pect that the audit reports 5i'' give a good indication of the e.tent of adherence
to accounting standards. &hus, our revie5 of the audit reports 5i'' provide an
indication of the 8ua'ity of the audit 5or4 conducted on %ree4 municipa'ities;
annua' accounting statements.
&he overa'' eva'uation of the informative 8ua'ity of audit reports 5i'' 0e conducted
in para''e' 5ith the assessment of the municipa'ities; comp'iance to standardsA on
the one hand 5e 5i'' ascertain 5hether the e.terna' auditor has provided amp'e
information to 8uantify deviations from accounting princip'es, 5hi'e on the other
5e 5i'' use this data to deve'op the comp'iance indices for the municipa'ities.
Ea'ue of 9unicipa'ity e8uity
7n order to ans5er our t5o first research 8uestions that is to what extend the !ree"
municipalities hae adhered to the accounting standards set out in the #$ %1&'((
and what is the informatie qualit+ of the audit reports that accompan+ the
financial statements of !ree" municipalities 5e constructed three a'ternative
comp'iance indices.
&he first comp'iance inde. <C> attempts to 8uantify the deviations from
accounting princip'es as a percentage of the municipa'ity;s e8uity. 9ore
specifica''y, this comp'iance inde. is ca'cu'ated 0y the fo''o5ing ratio(
C=
Ea'ue of deviationsfrom accountingprincip'es
<>
&he data source for the ca'cu'ation of the FEa'ue of deviations from accounting
princip'esH is the audit report of every municipa'ity for the fisca' year +!!$. 7n order to
ca'cu'ate the va'ue of the numerator 5e a'ge0raica''y add up the va'ues of a'' amounts
that are inc'uded in the auditors; notes indicating the va'ue differences 0et5een the
resu'ting accounting num0ers provided princip'es 5ere correct'y fo''o5ed and the
reported amounts. &he FEa'ue of 9unicipa'ity e8uityH refers to the
6
reported va'ue of e8uity at the end#of#the#year +!!$. &his inde. provides
information that can 0e used to assess the degree to 5hich a municipa'ity has
misstated its financia' condition. A resu't of 6ero shou'd indicate, at 'east
theoretica''y, that the municipa'ity c'ose'y adheres to accounting standards. 7n
cases that the inde. ta4es va'ues different from 6ero, the municipa'ity e.hi0its
deviations in re'ation to the app'ication of standards. Jet, it shou'd 0e noted that the
inde. has informative po5er as regards to the 8ua'ity of a given municipa'ity
annua' financia' reports as 'ong as the auditors have identified, reported and
8uantified every materia' misstatement that e.ists in these reports. :ther5ise, a
va'ue of 6ero 5ou'd 0e nothing more 0ut the resu't of deviations from standards
8uantification fai'ure. &he importance of this comp'iance inde. can 0e i''ustrated
0y considering the conc'usion of %hicas et a'. <+!!,> in their research re'ated to the
re'evance of 8uantifia0'e audit 8ua'ifications in %ree4 7P:s. According to their
study the practice of reporting 8uantifia0'e 8ua'ifications in audit opinions is
e.pected to 0e a va'ua0'e feature in any audit setting. &hey 0ase their argument on
the fact that the amounts reported in the opinion indicate to the mar4et participants
<in our case sta4eho'ders> e.act'y ho5 much is missing from the financia'
statements <5hich is 8uantitative'y indicated in the auditor;s opinion> and not on'y
the information that something is missing.
-or the second comp'iance inde. <C+>, 5e use the num0er of audit remar4s as a pro.y
of municipa'ities; adherence to accounting standards. Even though this inde. fai's to
encapsu'ate in monetary terms the deviations from accounting standards it offers a
8ua'itative approach as to the overa'' 8ua'ity of the end#of#the#year financia'
statements. 9oreover, it summari6es not on'y the cases 5here the municipa'ity has
intentiona''y or not misstated its financia' position, 0ut it a'so inc'udes cases 5here the
municipa'ity does not operate in satisfactory terms <for e.amp'e, the auditors 5ou'd
comment on the 8ua'ity of the interna' contro' function of a municipa'ity>. 7t
7
is c'ear that a municipa'ity that is the su0Cect of a 'arge num0er of auditor
comments regarding the accuracy of its financia' reports produces 'o5#8ua'ity data
for the assessment of its performance 0y interna' and e.terna' sta4eho'ders.
=o5ever, in cases 5here the audit report contains on'y a sma'' num0er of
comments in re'ation to the re'ia0i'ity of the municipa'ity;s accounting figures, this
is a pro.y of high#8ua'ity information.
C+ K Sum of the num0er of comments <+>
&he third a'ternative inde. <C$> 5as constructed on the 0asis of the dichotomous
scoring comp'iance inde. 0ased on 7ngram <@,">. 7n particu'ar, after a carefu'
e.amination of the content of the audit reports for the fisca' year +!!$, 5e
summari6ed B distinct items#remar4s 5here auditors have identified that %ree4
municipa'ities fai'ed to adhere to accounting standards. -or every item#remar4 5e
used a dichotomous varia0'e of ! and A 5hen a municipa'ity fai'ed to comp'y 5ith
the re'evant accounting standard it 5ou'd ta4e a mar4 of 6ero 5hi'e if it comp'ied it
5ou'd ta4e a mar4 of . &he overa'' comp'iance inde. 5as ca'cu'ated for every
municipa'ity as the sum of its scores in a'' dichotomous varia0'esA a municipa'ity;s
inde. 5ou'd ta4e the va'ue of B if it adhered to a'' accounting standards. &he
items#remar4s <G to GB> that 5ere used in order to construct the comp'iance
inde. C$ are the fo''o5ing(
<G> E.istence of interna' audit function
<G+> Accurate va'uation of investments
<G$> Ca'cu'ation of provisions
<G"> Accurate va'uation of accounts receiva0'es
<GB> Proper cash account management
,
<G6> Accurate fi.ed assets va'uation
<G7> Proper operation of the dou0'e entry accounting system
<G,> Accurate va'uation of 'ia0i'ities
<G@> 7dentification of contingent 'ia0i'ities
<G!> Proper operation of computer information systems
<G> Accurate recognition of revenues
<G+> Accurate recognition of e.penses
<G$> Accurate ca'cu'ation of depreciation # amorti6ation
<G"> :peration of a cost accounting system
<GB> 9isce''aneous issues
B
C$ = R
i
<$>
i=
?here(
Gi corresponds to each one of the B aforementioned items#remar4s <iK to B>.
G
i
ta4e the va'ue of if the municipa'ity adheres to the accounting standard,
5hereas G
i
ta4es the va'ue of ! if the municipa'ity fai's to comp'y 5ith the
re'evant accounting re8uirement.
7t shou'd 0e noted ho5ever that according to Coy et a'. <+!!$> the methodo'ogy of
using dichotomous indices <such as indices C+ and C$> suffers from the 'ac4 of
@
discrimination in terms of the importance of the items it inc'udes as 5e'' as from
the ina0i'ity to 8uantify the e.tent of a misstatement. =o5ever, inde. C does not
suffer from this shortcoming.
7n order to ans5er our third research 8uestion that is which factors exhibit an
influential role on the leel of compliance with the accrual accounting standards
5e deve'oped mu'tivariate regressions that e.amine the effect of the factors that
5ere presented in the previous section on the a'ternative comp'iance indices. 7n
particu'ar, 5e used the comp'iance indices discussed a0ove as dependent varia0'es
and the fo''o5ing si. varia0'es that correspond to the hypotheses = to =6
descri0ed in the previous section as independent varia0'es in our mu'tivariate
regressions(
<> 1ong term $ebt per capita 5as used as a measure of a municipa'ity;s
dependence on e.terna' financia' institutions in order to finance its
operations. 7t is ca'cu'ated 0y dividing the 'ong#term de0t of the
municipa'ity 0y the num0er of the municipa'ity inha0itants.
<+> 2wn reenues'3otal reenues ratio 5as used as a measure of dependence
on governmenta' fundsA those municipa'ities that e.hi0it a high ratio are
not so'e'y dependent on intergovernmenta' funds in order to finance their
operations. &he nominator of this ratio is the va'ue of the tota' municipa'ity
operating revenues. &he denominator is the sum of municipa'ity operating
revenues p'us the su0sidies it receives from the centra' government. &his
measure is considered as a pro.y for 5ea'th.
<$> #opulation per square "ilometer 5as used as a pro.y of municipa'ity si6e.
7n order to ca'cu'ate this varia0'e 5e divided each municipa'ity popu'ation
0y its si6e in s8uare 4i'ometers.
+!
<"> A dichotomous varia0'e named Auditor 5as used in order to determine the
e.terna' auditor;s si6e. &hose municipa'ities that had their annua' reports
audited 0y S:L
+
that is considered one of the 0iggest audit firms in %reece
had a mar4 of 5hi'e those that 5ere not received a mar4 of !.
<B> A dichotomous varia0'e named ,a+or 5as used to indicate 5hether a
mayor is supported or not 0y the centra' government. 7n cases 5here such a
support e.isted 5e gave a mar4 of 5hi'e the remaining cases received a
mar4 of !.
<6> 7n order to test for 'earning effects 5e used a dichotomous varia0'e named
1earning .ffects that ta4es the va'ue of 5hen a municipa'ity has issued
accounting statements 0ased on the accrua' concept in previous operating
periods and ! 5hen year +!!$ 5as its first issuance year.
Statistical Results
?e o0tained through the 9inistry of 7nterior Pu0'ic Administration and
1ecentra'i6ation the annua' accounting statements of ,B %ree4 municipa'ities
issued for the fisca' year +!!$. A thorough e.amination of their corresponding
audit reports 5as conducted so as to construct the three a'ternative comp'iance
indices. &he data for the construction of the independent varia0'es that cou'd not 0e
retrieved from the financia' statements 5as o0tained through the 2ationa'
Statistica' Bureau. &he fo''o5ing ta0'e <&a0'e > summari6es some 0asic
descriptive statistics of the three a'ternative comp'iance indices(
+Insert ,a%le ! appro-imately ere.
7ndices C+ and C$ indicate that the annua' accounting statements of %ree4
municipa'ities in genera' deviate from the accounting standardsA the descriptive
+
statistics sho5 that on average the audit reports inc'ude a num0er of remar4s in re'ation
to the municipa'ities; comp'iance. =o5ever, the descriptive statistics of inde. C
indicate that the municipa'ities do not seem to have engaged in accounting practices
that resu't in materia' misstatements. A c'oser e.amination of the audit reports has 'ed
us to the conc'usion that the 'o5 va'ues of this inde. 5ere the resu't of the 'ac4 of
8uantifia0'e deviations information provided 0y e.terna' auditors. 9ore specifica''y,
even though the audit reports provide amp'e information as regards the various
accounting practices that have resu'ted in misstatements, 5e came across very fe5
cases of 8uantification of these misstatements. -or e.amp'e, it 5as o0served in many
instances that a municipa'ity had not va'ued its 'ong#term investments appropriate'y 0ut
no 8uantitative information 5as provided in the auditors; reports as to the magnitude of
this effect on the organi6ation;s e8uity. As most municipa'ities audit reports contained
notes re'ating to deviations from accounting standards 0ut fai'ed to offer any
8uantification of these deviations, the first comp'iance inde. 5as inopera0'e since its
e.p'anatory po5er 0ecame undermined 0y the 'ac4 of numerica' data. -urthermore, it
has to 0e noted that regard'ess of the severity of the deviations from the accounting
practices that 5ere identified in certain audit reports, the auditors e.pressed an
un8ua'ified
$
opinion concerning the accuracy of the respective accounting statements.
-or instance, an un8ua'ified opinion 5as issued 5hen a municipa'ity fai'ed to provide
evidence regarding the true amount of its assets or its 'ia0i'ities, or 5hen there 5as no
interna' audit function. &o ma4e matters 5orse, the same opinion 5as a'so stated even
in instances 5here the very accrua' accounting system 5as essentia''y non#e.istent
5hich meant that the accounting statements under revie5 5ere not retrieved from a
forma' accrua' system 0ut 0y adCusting cash accounting data. 2everthe'ess, this is not a
uni8ue phenomenon in the %ree4 conte.tA the private sector audits fo''o5 the same
pattern 5ith our findings 5ith one, a'0eit, maCor in terms of significance difference.
&he remar4s in the auditors; reports that accompany private sector
++
financia' statements a'so revea' the areas 5here accounting information deviates from
the accounting po'icies that come from 'egis'ation
"
0ut such deviations are a'5ays
8uantified <see a'so %hicas et a'., +!!,>. =o5ever, even though these reports 5ere
regarded as of un8ua'ified opinion in %reece, they 5ou'd 0e considered in USA and
U3 as audit 8ua'ifications <:5usu#Ansah and Leventis, +!!6>.
&he issuance of poor audit reports constitute a very interesting phenomenon since it is
indicative of either a not in depth approach 0y e.terna' auditors, or an attempt not to
disp'ease their c'ients 0y presenting data that 5ou'd serious'y undermine the re'ia0i'ity
of the accounting figures contained in annua' statements. &his cou'd a'so 0e attri0uted
to the 'ac4 of third party revie5s of the audit reports issued 0y e.terna' auditors, or 0y
the 'ac4 of sanctions for poor 8ua'ity 5or4 <1eis, Dr. and %irou., @@+>. 9oreover, this
cou'd 0e indicative of the e.terna' auditors; 'ac4 of e.pertise in pu0'ic sector
organi6ations; accounting systems. According to 3rishnan <+!!$> and Carce''o and
2agy <+!!"> the specia'i6ation of the e.terna' auditor in a certain industry significant'y
improves the 8ua'ity of the audit 5or4A 0earing in mind that the accrua' accounting
systems of %ree4 municipa'ities have on'y recent'y 0ecome operationa', it can 0e
assumed that no audit firm possesses e.tensive re'evant e.pertise. &hus it cou'd 0e
e.pected that, at 'east in the short term, the audit reports issued for %ree4
municipa'ities 5ou'd not achieve a high'y informative po5er.
Since the first comp'iance inde. 5as rendered inopera0'e due to the 'ac4 of sufficient
data, 5e concentrated our ana'ysis of the comp'iance of municipa'ities on the other t5o
indices. &he descriptive statistics <see &a0'e > c'ear'y indicate that even though
e.terna' auditors fai'ed to provide 8uantitative information concerning the
municipa'ities; adherence to accounting standards, they did not refrain from revea'ing
areas of non#comp'iance. &he fo''o5ing ta0'e <&a0'e +> sho5s the issues covered 0y the
auditors; remar4s 5here it is sho5n that va'uation issues and the
+$
non#e.istence of the interna' contro' function 5ere the most encountered issues 0y
the e.terna' auditors.
+Insert ,a%le $ appro-imately ere.
?e tested 5hether the t5o indices C+ and C$ have a negative 'inear re'ationship
B
,
5hich cou'd indicate that even though they measure different aspects of
comp'iance they are actua''y c'ose'y measuring the same phenomenon. &he
statistica' resu'ts indicate that a strong negative 'inear re'ationship actua''y e.ists
<Pearson corre'ation coefficient( #!.@$$ significant at L, Spearman corre'ation
coefficient( #!.@6@ significant at L>. Even though one cou'd argue that such a
resu't shou'd 0e e.pected since inde. C$ re'ies heavi'y on inde. C+, it has to 0e
noted that in many cases one specific audit remar4 referred to t5o or more
accounting practices that resu'ted in misstatement of its accounts. =o5ever, in
other cases, these remar4s 5ere e.c'usive'y informationa' on various aspects <such
as that a municipa'ity 5as issuing accrua' 0ased accounting statements for the first
time ever> 0earing no information regarding deviations from standards.
As regards the effect of the si. factors descri0ed in our research hypotheses on the
e.tent of comp'iance 5ith accounting standards, 5e ran t5o mu'tivariate
regressions 5here the dependent varia0'e 5as either inde. C+ or inde. C$ and
independent varia0'es 5ere the si. conte.tua' varia0'es discussed in the previous
section.
&he :LS regression resu'ts are presented in the ta0'e 0e'o5 <&a0'e $>(
+Insert ,a%le / appro-imately ere.
&he resu'ts presented in &a0'e $ indicate that among the si. varia0'es 5hich 5ere
tested for effects on a municipa'ities; comp'iance 5ith accounting standards, the
+"
municipa'ity si6e and 5ea'th, the si6e of the e.terna' auditor and the 'earning
effects 5ere the most significant in statistica' terms. 9ore specifica''y, our
hypothesis =" 5as verified since 0oth regressions e.hi0ited that a higher 'eve' of
comp'iance is positive'y re'ated 5ith the si6e of the auditor. =o5ever, our resu'ts
go against hypotheses =+, =$ and =6 since our empirica' evidence supports that
municipa'ities that are either of a considera0'e si6e, or are aff'uent, or have
ac8uired fami'iari6ation 5ith accrua' accounting end#of#the#year statements in
previous periods, did not actua''y de'iver 0etter 8ua'ity reports in year +!!$.
Possi0'e e.p'anations for this phenomenon concerning the 5ea'th and si6e of the
municipa'ities cou'd 0e that on the one hand 5ea'thy municipa'ities do not re'y on
government su0sidies to finance their operations and have therefore no pressure
from the centra' government to app'y the standards. :n the other hand, 'arger
municipa'ities are possi0'y e.periencing 0ureaucratic pro0'ems that ma4e the
adoption process more rigid in comparison to sma''er 'oca' governments 5here
there is more f'e.i0i'ity. -ina''y, the adverse'y e.pected resu't evidenced in re'ation
to the 'earning effects cou'd 0e indicative of an un5i''ingness of municipa'ities to
improve the 8ua'ity of their accounting statements throughout time. &his finding
5ou'd 0e Custified on the grounds that municipa'ities perceive accrua' accounting
as Cust a 'egitimate o0'igation they have to comp'y 5ith and they do not strive
to5ards information improvement. 9oreover, any deviations from accounting
standards that 5ou'd 0e e.cused or over'oo4ed 0y audit firms during the first year
of accrua' accounting imp'ementation 5ou'd 0e identified in audit reports in the
fo''o5ing years 5hen auditors discovered that their recommendations 5ere not
serious'y ta4en into account.
0iscussion
+B
&he present research study focused on the outcome of the accounting reform that
too4 p'ace in %ree4 municipa'ities. 9ore specifica''y, 5e e.amined the 8ua'ity of
end#of#the#year statements issued 0y these entities for the fisca' year +!!$.
9oreover, 5e tested 5hether a num0er of factors previous'y cited in the re'evant
'iterature inf'uence municipa'ities; comp'iance 5ith accounting standards. :ur
resu'ts indicate that the maCority of municipa'ities under revie5 have c'ear'y fai'ed
to provide high#8ua'ity data to their sta4eho'ders. &his finding has severe
imp'ications regarding the success of the accounting reform since the main
o0Cective 5as to provide the municipa'ities; sta4eho'ders 5ith high#8ua'ity
accounting informationA this ho5ever does not seem to have 0een accomp'ished.
&herefore, it is rationa' to assume that the other e.pected 0enefits from the reform
such as the improvement of accounta0i'ity, 5hich depends on the enhancement of
accounting information have not 0een achieved, at 'east to the desired e.tend,
either.
9oreover, our empirica' evidence cast dou0ts upon the 8ua'ity of e.terna' auditors;
assessments of 'oca' governments; end#of#the#year statements. &he e.amination 5e
conducted on the municipa'ities; audit reports revea'ed that the deviations from
accounting standards that 5ere disc'osed 0y the e.terna' auditors 5ere most'y not
8uantifiedA thus it is not possi0'e to ascertain the magnitude of these organi6ations;
attempts to distort their true financia' condition. 7n addition to that, the opinions that
5ere issued 0y e.terna' auditors regarding the re'ia0i'ity of the municipa'ities; financia'
statements 5ere in every sing'e case un8ua'ified regard'ess of the severity of certain
issues revea'ed in the reports. &hese findings c'ear'y demonstrate the strong need for
improvement of the e.terna' auditor assessmentsA the current situation 'eaves the
municipa'ities; sta4eho'ders e.posed to potentia''y 'o5#8ua'ity accounting data that
cannot 0e considered as a so'id 0asis for decision ma4ing.
+6
&he prere8uisite for the improvement of effectiveness, efficiency, economy and
accounta0i'ity in these pu0'ic sector organi6ations is the enhancement of
information that their accounting systems provide. :ur findings ho5ever revea'
that this has not 0een accomp'ished since the municipa'ities on the one hand and
their respective e.terna' auditors on the other do not seem to have fu'fi''ed their
ro'es in fu'' sca'e. :f these t5o parties ho5ever, the responsi0i'ity of the e.terna'
auditor may 0e much greaterA even if the 5indo5 dressing is management;s goa' in
order to ame'iorate the financia' performance and position of an entity, it is up to
the e.terna' auditor to ensure that sta4eho'ders cou'd accurate'y interpret this set of
data. &he case of %ree4 municipa'ities as discussed in this paper strong'y supports
the conc'usion that Dones and Pend'e0ury <+!!"> came toA that as 'ong as preparers
of financia' statements and auditors are content 5ith the under'ying accounting,
any non#comp'iance 5ith financia' reporting po'icies is an irre'evance.
As regards the factors that affect municipa'ities; comp'iance 5ith accounting standards,
this study demonstrated a re'ationship 5ith the auditor si6e, as 5e'' as 5ith the
municipa'ity si6e, 5ea'th, and previous e.perience in issuing accrua' accounting end#
of#the#year statements. 7n particu'ar, the auditor si6e 5as found to 0e positive'y re'ated
5ith comp'iance, 5hi'e municipa' si6e, 5ea'th and e.perience 5ith accrua's accounting
e.hi0ited a negative re'ationship. Larger municipa'ities are pro0a0'y e.periencing
0ureaucratic pro0'ems that inhi0it the reform process and therefore the financia' reports
produced are of 'o5 informative 8ua'ity. ?ea'thier municipa'ities cou'd have
approached the imp'ementation issue rather superficia''y since they do not heavi'y
depend on state financing and are therefore 'ess inc'ined to satisfy the centra'
government 5hich is the main source of financing for the 'ess aff'uent 'oca'
governments. 9oreover, even though the negative re'ationship concerning the accrua'
accounting e.perience reCects our initia' hypothesis, it is 5orth mentioning that the
resu'ts presented in Christiaens and Ean Peteghem <+!!7>
+7
sho5 that comp'iance f'uctuates through time. &he t5o other varia0'es 5e tested
<name'y( dependence on de0t financing and mayor support 0y the centra'
government> 5ere not found to 0e statistica''y associated 5ith comp'iance.
-ina''y, it is 5orth mentioning that even though the centra' government has
esta0'ished fines in the event that a municipa'ity fai's to adhere to the accounting
standards set out 0y P1 $B*@@, no such action has 0een ta4en. &his situation cou'd
a'so 0e another reason 5hy municipa'ities have fai'ed to fu''y adhere to accounting
standards as e.hi0ited in our statistica' resu'ts. As Berry and Daco0s <@,>
comments, the a0sence of an enforcement system is a 'eading reason of non#
comp'iance.
Conclusions
&his study contri0utes to the 'iterature of accrua' accounting reforms in pu0'ic
sector organi6ations through the e.amination of the 8ua'ity of the accrua'
accounting end#of#the#year financia' statements. 7t has 0een argued throughout the
study that these reforms can 0e considered successfu' in de'ivering high 8ua'ity
information to decision ma4ers on'y 5hen the issuing organi6ations comp'y 5ith
accounting standards and 5hen their respective e.terna' auditors provide amp'e
information concerning the e.tent of their c'ients; comp'iance. =o5ever,
e.perience on a 5or'd5ide 0asis has sho5n that accrua's accounting cannot 0e
easi'y transferred into the pu0'ic sector rea'm. Even 5hen this happens, the
transition is considered far from successfu' since the 8ua'ity of information
provided 0y the ne5 accounting systems is rather 'o5 and therefore its use for
decision ma4ing purposes shou'd 0e made 5ith caution.
&his is the case in %ree4 municipa'ities 5here the advent of accrua' accounting cannot
easi'y 0e characteri6ed as successfu' due to their ina0i'ity or un5i''ingness to
+,
fu''y adhere to the ne5 accounting standards. 9oreover, the audit reports that are
supposed to provide a re'ia0'e 0asis for sta4eho'ders to revie5 the accounting data
provided 0y the municipa'ities are a'so of 8uestiona0'e 8ua'ity. Concerning this
phenomenon it cou'd 0e e.pected that the fami'iari6ation of auditors 5ith the
municipa'ities; accounting systems 5i'' significant'y improve the current situation.
&he 8ua'ity of audit reports can 0e e.pected to improve through the esta0'ishment
of a system 5here the reports are su0Cect to third party revie5s and sanctions are
imposed to audit firms in the event they issue 'o5 8ua'ity reports. -urthermore, our
resu'ts indicate that comp'iance is affected 0y the e.terna' auditor si6e, as 5e'' as
0y the municipa'ity si6e, 5ea'th and e.perience in accrua' accounting. =o5ever,
even though these resu'ts provide interesting imp'ications, the 'o5 avai'a0i'ity of
data 0eyond the fisca' year +!!$ 'imits the a0i'ity to genera'i6e our findings. &hus,
a fo''o5 up study conducted on the municipa'ities of our samp'e cou'd provide a
usefu' perspective concerning the over#the#time effect of the varia0'es that are
e.pected to inf'uence comp'iance, as 5e'' as the 'ong#term evo'vement of the
informative 8ua'ity of municipa'ities; financia' reporting. 7n addition to that, it
5ou'd 0e interesting to further research on the 5ay shareho'ders; and
management;s perceived usefu'ness of accrua' accounting financia' reports
inf'uences %ree4 municipa'ities; adherence to accounting standards.
+@
Endnotes
&he reform 5as mandatory for a'' municipa'ities that met the criteria of more
than B,!!! citi6ens or revenues of more than .B mi''ion M.
2
&he %ree4 audit mar4et is dominated 0y a fe5 maCor firms, 5hich 5ith the
e.ception of the audit firm S:L S.A. have sho5n 'itt'e interest in entering the
mar4et of municipa' audits. &hus the municipa'ities; audits have 0een underta4en
0y either S:L S.A. or 0y sma'' audit firms.
$
&he audit reports conc'ude 0y stating that( Fta4ing into consideration our
aforementioned remar4s 5e 0e'ieve that the present financia' statements represent
the true and fair financia' position of the municipa'ityH. &his same 5ording,
according'y adCusted, is customari'y used to e.press an un8ua'ified opinion in the
private sector as 5e''.
"
7t is a customary practice in %reece for auditors to ma4e remar4s in their audit
reports in accordance 5ith the =e''enic Auditing Standards and Professiona' Ethics
<&he 7nstitute of Certified Auditors in %reece, @@@, p. ,!>.
B
?e refer to a negative re'ationship since in the comp'iance inde. C$ a
municipa'ity is considered to 0e fu''y comp'iant 5ith accounting standards 5hen it
ta4es a mar4 of B and to 0e tota''y non#comp'iant 5hen it ta4es a mar4 of !.
$!
References
Ai4en, 9. and Capitanio, C. <@@B>, FAccrua' accounting va'uations and
accounta0i'ity in government( a potentia''y pernicious unionH, Australian 4ournal
of #ublic Administration, B"<">, pp. B6"#B7B.
A''en, A. and Sanders, %.1. <@@">, F-inancia' disc'osure in US municipa'ities(
=as the %overnmenta' Accounting Standards Board made a differenceNH,
5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, !<$>, pp. 7"#@$.
Beattie, E., -earn'ey, S., and Brandt, G. <+!!!>, FBehind the audit report( A
descriptive study of discussions and negotiations 0et5een auditors and directorsH,
6nternational 4ournal of Auditing, ", pp. 77#+!+.
Bec4er, C. L., 1e-ond, 9. L., Diam0a'vo, D., and Su0ramanyam, 3. G. <@@,>,
F&he effect of audit 8ua'ity on earnings managementH, 7ontemporar+ Accounting
Research, B<>, pp. #+".
Berry, L.E. and Daco0s, -.A. <@,>, F%overnment Accounting Standards. &he
Comp'iance 7ssueH, 3he !oernment Accountants 4ournal, $!<">, pp. $!#$6.
Caccia, L. and Stecco'ini, 7. <+!!$>, FAccounting change in 7ta'ian 'oca'
governments( ?hat;s 0eyond manageria' fashionNH, 7ritical #erspecties on
Accounting, 7<+> I <$>, pp. B"#7".
Carce''o, D.E. and 2agy A.L. <+!!">, FC'ient si6e, auditor specia'i6ation and
fraudu'ent financia' reportingH, ,anagerial Auditing 4ournal, @<B>, pp. 6B#66,.
Car'in, &.9. <+!!B>, F1e0ating the impact of accrua' accounting and reporting in
the pu0'ic sectorH, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, +<$>, pp. $!@#$$6.
$
Carnegie, %.1. and ?est, B.P. <+!!$>, F=o5 5e'' does accrua' accounting fit the
pu0'ic sectorNH, Australian 4ournal of #ublic Administration, 6+<+>, pp. ,$#,6.
Chan, D.L. <+!!$>, F%overnment Accounting( An Assessment of &heory, Purposes
and StandardsH, #ublic ,one+ and ,anagement, Danuary, pp. $#+!.
Cheng, G.=. <@@+>, FAn empirica' ana'ysis of theories on factors inf'uencing State
government accounting disc'osureH, 4ournal of Accountanc+ and #ublic #olic+,
<>, pp. #"+.
Christiaens, D. <@@@>, F-inancia' reform in -'emish municipa'ities( an empirica'
investigationH, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, B<>, pp. +#"!.
Christiaens, D. <+!!!>, F-inancia' accounting reform in f'emish municipa'ities( An
empirica' study of the compara0i'ity of the annua' accountsH, 4ournal of #ublic
8udgeting, Accounting 9 5inancial ,anagement, +<+>, pp. 77#+!".
Christiaens, 3. and Ean Peteghem, E. <+!!7>, F%overnmenta' accounting reform(
evo'ution of the imp'ementation in -'emish municipa'itiesH, 5inancial
Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, +$<">, pp. $7B#$@@.
Cohen, S., 3aimena4i, E. and Oorgios, J. <+!!7>, Assessing 7& as a 4ey success
factor for accrua' accounting imp'ementation in %ree4 municipa'itiesH, 5inancial
Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, Eo'. +$, 2o. , pp. @#.
Coy, 1. and 1i.on, 3. <+!!">, F&he pu0'ic accounta0i'ity inde.( Crafting a parametric
disc'osure inde. for annua' reportsH, 8ritish Accounting Reiew, $6, pp.
7@#!6.
$+
Coy, 1., &o5er, %. and 1i.on, 3. <@@">, FPu0'ic sector reform in 2e5 Oea'and(
&he process of tertiary education annua' reports, @@!P@+H, 5inancial
Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, !<$>, pp. +B$#+6.
Coy, 1., &o5er, %. and 1i.on, 3. <@@$>, FQuantifying the 8ua'ity of tertiary
education annua' reportsH, Accounting and 5inance, $$<+>, pp. +#$!.
1eis, Dr. 1.G. and %irou., %.A. <@@+>, F1eterminants of Audit Qua'ity in the
Pu0'ic SectorH, 3he Accounting Reiew, 67<$>, pp. "6+#"7@.
-rancis, D. G., 9ayde5, E. L., and Spar4s, =. C. <@@@>, F&he ro'e of Big Si.
auditors in the credi0'e reporting of accrua'sH, Auditing: A 4ournal of #ractice and
3heor+, ,<+>, pp. 7#$B.
%hi4as, 1.C., Papada4i, A., Sioug'e, %., and Sougiannis, &. <+!!,>, F&he re'evance
of 8uantifia0'e audit 8ua'ifications in the va'uation of 7P:sH, Reiew of
Accounting :tudies. $<">.
%irou., %. <@,@>, FPo'itica' interests and governmenta' accounting disc'osureH,
4ournal of Accountanc+ and #ublic #olic+, ,<$>, pp. @@#+7.
%uthrie, D. <@@,>, FApp'ication of accrua' accounting in the Austra'ian pu0'ic
sector PGhetoric or rea'ityNH, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, "<>,
pp. #@.
=ep5orth, 2. <+!!$>, FPreconditions for successfu' imp'ementation of accrua'
accounting in centra' governmentH, #ublic ,one+ and ,anagement, Danuary, pp.
$7#"$.
=ood, C. <@@B>, F&he Rne5 pu0'ic management; in the @,!s( Eariations on a
themeH, Accounting, 2rgani-ations and :ociet+, +!<+*$>, pp. @$#!@.
$$
=o8ue, O. and 9o'', D. <+!!>, FPu0'ic sector reform. 7mp'ications for accounting,
accounta0i'ity and performance of state#o5ned entities P An Austra'ian
perspectiveH, 3he 6nternational 4ournal of #ublic :ector ,anagement, "<">, pp.
$!"#$+6.
7ngram, G.?. <@,">, HEconomic incentives and the choice of State %overnment
Accounting PracticesH, 4ournal of Accounting Research, ++<>, pp. +6#"".
7ngram, G.?. and 1eDong, 1.E. <@,7>, F&he effect of regu'ation on 'oca'
government disc'osure practicesH, 4ournal of Accounting and #ublic #olic+, 6<">,
pp. +"B#+7!.
Dones, G. and 9. Pend'e0ury <+!!">, FA theory of the pu0'ished accounts of 'oca'
authoritiesH, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, Eo'. +!, 2o $, p.p $!B#
$+B.
Dones, G. and Pend'e0ury, 9. <@@>, F&he pu0'ished accounts of 'oca' authorities,
revisitedH, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, 7<>, pp. B#$$.
3'ein, B., and Leff'er, 3. <@,>, F&he ro'e of mar4et forces in assuring
contractua' performanceH, 4ournal of #olitical .conom+, ,@<">, pp. 6BP6".
3rishnan, %.E. <+!!$>, F1oes Big 6 auditor industry e.pertise constrain earnings
managementNH, Accounting ;ori-ons, +!!$ supp'ement, pp. #6.
Laps'ey, 7. <@@@>, FAccounting and the 2e5 Pu0'ic 9anagement( 7nstrument of
Su0stantive efficiency or a rationa'ising modernityNH, 5inancial Accountabilit+
and ,anagement, B<$>I<">, pp. +!#+!7.
:5usu#Ansah, S and Leventis, S. <+!!6>, F&ime'iness of Corporate Annua'
-inancia' reporting in %reeceH, .uropean Accounting Reiew, B<+>, pp. +7$#+,7.
$"
Pettersen, 7.D. <+!!>, F7mp'ementing management accounting reforms in the
pu0'ic sector( &he difficu't Courney from intentions to effectsH, .uropean
Accounting Reiew, !<$>, pp. B6#B,.
Po5er, 9. <@@7>, 3he audit societ+: Rituals of erification, :.ford University
Press.
Go00ins, %. <+!!7>, F:0stac'es to imp'ementation of ne5 pu0'ic management in
an 7rish hospita'H, 5inancial Accountabilit+ and ,anagement, +$<>, pp. BB#7.
Go00ins, ?.A. and Austin, 3.G. <@,6>, F1isc'osure 8ua'ity in governmenta'
financia' report( An assessment of the appropriateness of a compound measureH,
4ournal of Accounting Research, +"<+>, pp. "+#"+.
Gyan, C., Stan'ey, &. and 2e'son, 9. <+!!+>, FAccounta0i'ity 1isc'osures 0y
Queens'and Loca' %overnment Counci's( @@7P@@@H, 5inancial Accountabilit+
and ,anagement, ,<$>, pp. +6#+,@.
&er Bogt, =.D. and Ean =e'den, %.D. <+!!!>, FAccounting change in 1utch
government( E.p'oring the gap 0et5een e.pectations and rea'i6ationsH,
,anagement Accounting Research, , pp. +6$#+7@.
&he 7nstitute of Certified Auditors in %reece <S:E> <@@@>, ;ellenic Auditing
:tandards And #rofessional .thics <Athens( S:E>.
&he 7nstitute of 7nterna' Auditors <+!!6>, 3he role of auditing in public sector
goernance, <A'tamonte Springs, USA>.
?right, A. and ?right, S. <@@7>, FAn e.amination of factors affecting the
decision to 5aive audit adCustmentsH, 4ournal of Accounting, Auditing and
5inance, +<>, pp. B#$6.
$B
,a%le !' 0escriptive statistics for te tree alternative compliance indices
Compliance Std1
Inde- " Minimum Ma-imum Mean 0eviation
C ,B !.!! !.B !.!!76 !.!,@
C+ ,B !.!! .!! $.7+"$ +."$@"
C$ ,B ".!! B.!! .B"!B +.!,+B
?here(
C is the ratio of <alue form deiations from accounting principles'<alue of ,unicipalit+
equit+.
C+ is the num0er of the auditor;s comments.
C$ is the overa'' comp'iance inde. that is ca'cu'ated as the sum of the B dichotomous
varia0'es that refer to the municipa'ities; comp'iance 5ith accounting practices.
$6
,a%le $' Areas of non2compliance contained in audit reports
Auditors Remark "um%er of "um%er of
municipalities municipalities tat
tat adered to failed to adere to te
te accounting accounting standard
standard
. E.istence of interna'
audit function
+. Accurate va'uation
of investments
$. Ca'cu'ation of provisions
". Accurate va'uation of
accounts receiva0'es
B. Proper cash account
management
6. Accurate fi.ed
assets va'uation
7. Proper operation of the
dou0'e entry
accounting system
,. Accurate va'uation
of 'ia0i'ities
@. 7dentification of
contingent 'ia0i'ities
!. Proper operation of
computer
information systems
. Accurate recognition
of revenues
+. Accurate recognition
of e.penses
$. Accurate ca'cu'ation of
depreciation # amorti6ation
". :peration of a cost
accounting system
B. 9isce''aneous issues
@7 <B+."$L> ,, <"7.B7L>
7 <$,.$,L> " <6.6+L>
6" <,,.6BL> + <.$BL>
"6 <+".,6L> $@ <7B."L>
6+ <,7.B7L> +$ <+."$L>
B6 <,".$+L> +@ <B.6,L>
"! <7B.6,L> "B <+".$+L>
B7 <,".,6L> +, <B."L>
66 <,@.7$L> @ <!.+7L>
76 <@B."L> @ <".,6L>
6, <@!.,L> 7 <@.@L>
7! <@.,@L> B <,.L>
6, <@!.,L> 7 <@.@L>
77 <@B.6,L> , <".$+L>
7 <6$.+"L> 6, <$6.76L>
$7
,a%le /' 3(S regression results
C+ K a ) 0 1ong term $ebt per capita ) c 2wn C$ K a ) 0 1ong term $ebt per capita ) c 2wn
reenues'3otal reenues ) d #opulation per square reenues'3otal reenues ) d #opulation per square
"ilometer ) e Auditor = f ,a+or ) g 1earning .ffects ) "ilometer ) e Auditor = f ,a+or ) g 1earning .ffects )
u u
a +.@B7SSS <"."",> +.$$SSS <+.!,+>
0 #!.!!!B67 <#!.@+> !.!!!@" <!.$6,>
c +.+,SS <+.,!> #.BB6S <#.77>
d !.!!!!,+S <.6@!> #!.!!!!,,SS <#+.!@+>
e #.",SSS <#$.!,7> !.7$"SS <+.+7@>
f #!."! <#!.@$,> !.B6 <.B,>
g !.6!S <.67!> #!.B@BS <#.@!>
G
+
!.$7 !.!
adCusted
-#Ea'ue B.7,$SSS ".7+$SSS
SSS,SS,S indicate that the resu't is statistica''y significant at the L, BL, and !L 'eve' respective'y
t#va'ues are sho5n in 0rac4ets
?here(
C+ is the num0er of the auditor;s comments.
C$ is the overa'' comp'iance inde. that is ca'cu'ated as the sum of the B dichotomous varia0'es that
refer to the municipa'ities; comp'iance 5ith accounting practices <see &a0'e +>.
1ong term $ebt per capita: &he ratio Long term de0t*Popu'ation is a measure of the de0t 0urden of
the municipa'ity.
2wn reenues'3otal reenues: &his ratio sho5s the a0i'ity of the municipa'ity to generate 5ea'th
through its o5n means.
#opulation per square "ilometer: ?e pro.y for the si6e of the municipa'ity 0y dividing the num0er
of a municipa'ity;s inha0itants to its geographica' si6e.
Auditor: &his determines the e.terna' auditor;s si6e. A va'ue of is given 5hen a municipa'ity is
audited 0y S:L S.A. P 5hich is the 'argest audit firm conducting municipa' audits P 5hi'e a va'ue of
! is given 5hen it has 0een audited 0y a sma''er audit firm.
,a+or: &his varia0'e indicates 5hether a mayor is supported or not 0y the centra' government. A
va'ue of is given 5hen a mayor has 0een e'ected 5ith the centra' government support. :ther5ise a
va'ue of ! is given.
1earning .ffects: 3his ariable sho5s 5hether the municipa'ity has issued accrua' 0ased financia'
statements prior to +!!$. A va'ue of is given 5hen it has issued statements prior to +!!$.
:ther5ise, a va'ue of ! is given.
$,
$@