Bulletin 2895 Protein Blotting Guide

A Guide to Transfer and Detection
Third Edition
About This Manual
This reference manual provides information on the fundamentals of protein transfer and
detection chemistries. It is also a guide to the methods, equipment, and reagents used
in protein blotting experiments, and offers troubleshooting tips and technical advice.
As a researcher using the blotting technique, you know that each research objective,
experimental approach, and protein sample can be different. Your equipment, sample,
antibody, and detection chemistries all can impact your results. The goal of this manual is to
provide you with a broad understanding of the variables you face when blotting, and how
best to work with each of them to achieve the optimal results.
A History of Leadership and Quality

A pioneer in the design and manufacture of western blotting apparatus with 30 years of
experience, Bio-Rad is considered the industry leader in providing high-quality, durable, and
powerful blotting equipment.
Bio-Rad offers superior products and expert technical service. Our goal is to support
your research with the necessary tools and materials to optimize the analysis of complex
protein samples.
Meeting Your Blotting Needs

Turn to Bio-Rad for:
• Gel-blotting equipment for an array of gel sizes
• Microfiltration devices
• Multiple-sample screening devices
• Membranes for every binding requirement
• Protein standards
• Blotting buffers, reagents, and background removal kits
• Colorimetric and chemiluminescent detection reagents
• Total protein stains
• Secondary antibodies and antibody conjugates
For detailed protocols on the use of any of the products mentioned in this guide, please refer to
their instruction manuals, available in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format at discover.bio-rad.com
Protein Blotting Guide 1

Table of Contents Protein Blotting
Introduction to Protein Blotting 7 Power Conditions for Electrophoretic Transfers . . . . .21

Useful Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Joule Heating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Chapter 1 Transfer Other Factors Affecting Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Relationship Between Power Settings and
Transfer Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Transfer Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 High-Intensity Field Transfers
Electrophoretic Transfer
Standard Field Transfers
The Principle of Electrophoretic Transfer
Selecting Power Supply Settings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Types of Electrophoretic Transfer
Transfers Under Constant Voltage
Microfiltration (Dot-Blotting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Transfers Under Constant Current
Transfers Under Constant Power
Blotting Systems and Power Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Transfer Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
General Guidelines for Transfer Buffers
Tank Blotting Apparatus and Transfer Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
Semi-Dry Blotting Apparatus
Microfiltration Apparatus
Power Supplies for Electrophoretic Transfers . . . . . . .15 Chapter 3 Performing the Transfer
Electrophoretic Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25

Chapter 2 Membranes, Buffers, and
Power Conditions Performing a Tank Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Preparing the Transfer Buffer, Gels, and
Membrane Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Tank Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Nitrocellulose and Supported Nitrocellulose . . . . . . . .17 Assembling the Gel and Membrane Sandwich . . . . . .26
Polyvinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) Membrane . . . . . . . .18 Performing the Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Blotting Filter Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Performing a Semi-Dry Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27

Preparing the Transfer Buffer and Gels . . . . . . . . . . .27
Membrane/Filter Paper Sandwiches . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Assembling the Gel and Membrane Sandwich . . . . . .28
Performing the Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Transfer Buffer Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19

General Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Microfiltration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
A Note About SDS and Alcohol Application of the Vacuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Towbin and Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen Buffers Proper Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
(Tris/Glycine Buffers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Flow Valve — Extended Incubations . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
CAPS Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Flow Valve — Gentle Vacuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
Discontinuous Tris-CAPS Buffer System
(Semi-Dry Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Filtering or Centrifugation of Samples . . . . . . . . . . . .29
Dunn Carbonate Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Air Bubbles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
Alternative Buffer Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Membrane Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29

Chapter 4 Detection Gel Cassette Pattern Transferred to Blot

Poor Binding to the Membrane — Nitrocellulose
Detection Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 Poor Binding to the Membrane — PVDF

Blotting Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55
Missing Bands
Protein Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Molecular Weight Assignments for Natural
Prestained Standards for Western Blotting . . . . . . . . .33
(Nonrecombinant) Prestained Standards Differ
Recombinant Prestained Standards From Lot to Lot
Natural Prestained SDS-PAGE Standards A Protein’s Molecular Weight Differs From
Unstained Standards for Western Blotting . . . . . . . . .35 Expected Molecular Weight
Variation in Mobility Between Recombinant and
Natural Prestained Standards of the Same
Total Protein Staining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 Molecular Weight
Anionic Dyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Microfiltration Blotting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
Colloidal Gold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Leakage or Cross-Well Contamination
Biotinylation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Uneven Filtration or No Filtration
Fluorescence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Halos Around the Wells
Immunological Detection Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57

Blocking Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 Immunological Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
Antibody Incubations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 Overall High Background
Primary Antibodies Nonspecific Reactions Between Bound Proteins
and Probes
Species-Specific Secondary Antibodies
No Reaction or Weak Signal
Antibody-Specific Ligands
Tests for Monitoring Reagent Activity
Washes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Multiscreen Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
Detection Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Leakage or Cross-Well Contamination
Colorimetric Detection
Bubbles Trapped Within the Channels
Chemiluminescent Detection
Halos Around the Wells
Other Detection Methods
Total Protein Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
Imaging — Documentation and Analysis Methods . . .48
Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain —
Luminescent Detection
High Background
Fluorescent, Chemifluorescent, and
Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain —
Low Sensitivity
Autoradiography
Biotin-Blot™ Total Protein Detection —
Screening Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 High Background
Biotin-Blot Total Protein Detection —
No Reaction or Weak Color Development
Anionic Dyes — High Background
Chapter 5 Troubleshooting
Anionic Dyes — Low Sensitivity
Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Electrophoretic Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Poor Electrophoretic Transfer
Swirls or Missing Patterns; Diffuse Transfers
4 Protein Blotting Guide

Appendices
Transfer Buffer Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62
Detection Buffer Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63

General Detection Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63
Total Protein Staining Buffers and Solutions . . . . . . . .64
Substrate Buffers and Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
Assay Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66

Immun-Blot® Assay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66
Total Protein Detection Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Trademarks and Legal Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
Ordering Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74

Introduction Protein Blotting
Overview of protein Proteins

blotting methods. Dark Electrophoretically Protein Sample Sample Matrix
colors indicate the transfer Separated in a Gel in Free Solution
phase, light colors indicate
the detection phase.
Electrophoretic Microfiltration Transfer Method

Transfer (Dot-Blotting)
Membranes
Reagents Conditions
Power Conditions
Immunological Total Protein

Detection Detection
Detection/Identification
Imaging

Introduction Protein Blotting
Introduction to Protein Blotting

Protein blotting, the transfer of proteins to solid-phase membrane supports, has become a
powerful and popular technique for the visualization and identification of proteins. When bound
to membranes, proteins are readily accessible for immunological or biochemical analyses,
quantitative staining, or demonstration of protein-protein or protein-ligand interactions.
Protein blotting involves two major phases: transfer and detection (see overview opposite).
Transfer
The transfer step involves moving the proteins from a solution or gel and immobilizing them
on a synthetic membrane support (blot). Transfer may be performed by direct application or
dot-blotting of proteins that are in solution, or by electrophoretic transfer of proteins from a
gel to a membrane. In performing a protein transfer, the researcher must choose the
appropriate method, apparatus, membrane, buffer, and transfer conditions.
Detection
Detection entails probing the membrane with either a total protein stain or primary antibodies
specific to the protein(s) of interest and subsequent visualization of the labeled proteins.
Detection involves a number of steps and the selection of the appropriate method, reagents,
and imaging equipment.
The most commonly used protein blotting technique, western blotting (immunoblotting), was
developed as a result of the need to probe for proteins that were inaccessible to antibodies
while in polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting procedures involve the transfer of proteins that
have been separated by gel electrophoresis onto a membrane, followed by immunological
detection of these proteins. Western blotting combines the resolution of gel electrophoresis
with the specificity of immunoassays, allowing individual proteins in mixtures to be identified
and analyzed. Since the development of immunoblotting techniques, other probing and
detection techniques have been developed for functional protein characterization.
Many applications and methods for protein blotting have been previously reviewed (Beisiegel
1986, Bers and Garfin 1985, Carr and Scott 1992, Crisp and Dunn 1994, Dunn 1994, 1999,
Egger and Bienz 1994, Garfin and Bers 1989, Gershoni 1985, 1987, 1988, Gershoni and
Palade 1983, Gooderham 1984, Harper, et al. 1990, Kurien and Scofield 2003, Tovey and
Baldo 1987, Wisdom 1994). This manual summarizes the most commonly used techniques,
provides information about the wide selection of blotting apparatus and detection reagents
available from Bio-Rad, and offers troubleshooting tips and technical advice.

Chapter 1
Transfer
Transfer
The initial step in any blotting experiment is the transfer of proteins from a solution or gel
and immobilization of those proteins on a solid membrane support. Immobilization of proteins
on a membrane makes the proteins accessible to probes for specific proteins and enables
quantitative detection.
This chapter reviews the options that are available for blotting instruments and power
supplies. Chapter 2 describes the various membranes, transfer buffers, and power conditions
that may be used for transfer. Chapter 3 provides an overview of the steps and workflow
involved in performing protein transfer. Subsequent processing of the protein blots for
detection and identification is discussed in Chapter 4.
Proteins
Electrophoretically Protein Sample
Sample Matrix
Separated in a Gel in Free Solution
Electrophoretic Microfiltration
Transfer (Dot-Blotting)
Transfer Method
Tank Transfer Semi-Dry Transfer
Mini Criterion™ Trans-Blot® Trans-Blot® Trans-Blot Bio-Dot® Bio-Dot SF

Trans-Blot® Products
Blotter Cell Plus Cell SD Cell Apparatus Apparatus
Cell
Fig. 1.1. Protein transfer

systems.
Transfer Methods
Proteins can be transferred to membranes by a number of methods. The most common are
electrophoretic transfer and microfiltration (dot-blotting). Although diffusion or capillary blotting
methods may also be used to transfer proteins from gels, generally electrophoretic transfer is
used to transfer proteins following electrophoretic separation by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) or by native PAGE — whereas microfiltration is used to transfer
proteins that are in solution (Figure 1.1). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins is fast, efficient,
and preserves the high-resolution separation of proteins by PAGE. Microfiltration is particularly
useful to determine working conditions for a new blotting assay or in any other situation
where the resolving power of gel electrophoresis is not needed.

Chapter 1 Transfer
Cathode Electrophoretic Transfer between the electrodes play a major role in

– governing the rate of elution of the proteins
Filter paper Electrophoretic methods are used to elute
proteins from gels and transfer them to from the gel. There are practical limits on
Gel membranes. Electrophoretic transfer is the field strength, however, due to the
Membrane most widely used blotting method because production of heat during transfer.
Filter paper
of its speed and precision in replicating the The heat generated during a transfer
pattern of separated proteins from a gel to (Joule heating) is proportional to the power
Anode
+ a membrane. consumed by the electrical elements (P),
which is equal to the product of the current
Fig. 1.2. Gel and membrane The Principle of Electrophoretic (I) and voltage (V).
setup for electrophoretic Transfer
transfer.
In an electrophoretic transfer, the membrane P = I x V = I2 x R
and protein-containing gel are placed Joule heating increases temperature and
together with filter paper between two decreases resistance of the transfer buffer.
electrodes (Figure 1.2). Proteins migrate to Such changes in resistance may lead to
the membrane following a current (I) that is inconsistent field strength and transfer, or
generated by applying a voltage (V) across may cause the transfer buffer to lose its
the electrodes, following Ohm’s law: buffering capacity. In addition, excessive
V=IxR heat may cause the gel to deteriorate and
stick to the membrane. The major limitation
where R is the resistance generated by the of any electrophoretic transfer method is the
materials placed between the electrodes ability of the chamber to dissipate heat.
(that is, the transfer buffer, gel, membrane,
and filter papers). Types of Electrophoretic Transfer
The electric field strength (V/cm) that is There are two main types of electrophoretic
generated between the electrodes is the blotting apparatus and transfer procedures:
driving force for electrophoretic transfer. tank, or wet transfer, where gels and
Though a number of other factors, including membranes are submerged under transfer
the size, shape, and charge of the protein buffer in tanks, and semi-dry transfer, where
and the pH, viscosity, and ionic strength of gels and membranes are sandwiched
the transfer buffer and gel %T may influence between buffer-wetted filter papers that are
the elution of particular proteins from gels, in direct contact with flat-plate electrodes.
both the applied voltage and the distance The two types of transfer systems are
compared in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1. Comparison of electrophoretic protein transfer systems.
Tank Blotting Semi-Dry Blotting

Flexibility Flexible voltage settings, blotting times, and cooling Dedicated to rapid transfer with minimal transfer buffer,
requirements; flexible electrode positions without cooling
(Trans-Blot and Trans-Blot Plus cells)
Quantitative vs. Quantitative transfer of low molecular weight proteins possible Some low molecular weight molecules will be transferred
qualitative results under conditions that allow efficient binding to the membrane through the membrane without binding quantitatively
Molecular weight Broad molecular weight range Variable transfer efficiencies for proteins >120 kD (may be
range improved with discontinuous buffer system); low molecular
weight proteins may be transferred through membrane
Transfer time Extended transfer (up to 24 hr) possible without buffer Rapid transfers; extended transfers not possible due to buffer
depletion; rapid transfers (15–60 min) obtained under depletion
high-intensity conditions
Temperature control Specific temperature regulation with cooling coil and Temperature regulation by external cooling is not possible
refrigerated water recirculator; permits transfers at low
temperatures (4–10°C), for example, native enzyme transfers
Buffer capacity Up to 10–12 L (Trans-Blot Plus cell) or as little as 450 ml Minimal, ~250 ml per experiment; reduced cost of reagents
(Mini Trans-Blot cell); length of blotting time not restricted and experiment time
by limited buffer capacity

Transfer Chapter 1
Tank Blotting Tank transfer systems are recommended for

In tank transfer systems, the gel and most routine protein work, for efficient and
membrane sandwich is entirely submerged quantitative protein transfers, and for
under transfer buffer within a buffer tank. transfers of proteins of all sizes.
A nonconducting cassette holds the
membrane in close contact with the gel and Semi-Dry Blotting
the cassette assembly is placed in the tank In a semi-dry transfer, the gel and membrane
between the electrodes, transverse to the are sandwiched between two stacks of filter
electrical field, and submerged under paper and are in direct contact with plate
conducting transfer buffer (Burnette 1981, electrodes (Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen
Gershoni et al. 1985, Towbin et al. 1979). 1986, Kyhse-Andersen 1984, Tovey and
Although large volumes of buffer in the tank Baldo 1987). The term “semi-dry” refers to
dissipate the heat generated during transfer the limited amount of buffer, which is
and provide the conducting capacity for confined to the two stacks of filter paper.
extended transfer conditions, additional In semi-dry systems, the distance between
cooling mechanisms are offered by the the electrodes is limited only by the thickness
various tank blotter systems. of the gel/membrane sandwich. As a result,
Tank transfer systems contain the following high electric field strengths and high-intensity
elements: blotting conditions are achieved. Under semi-
dry conditions, some small proteins may be
• Buffer tank and lid — The buffer tank and driven through the membrane in response to
lid combine to fully enclose the inner the high field strengths. Moreover, because
chamber during electrophoresis. On the low buffer capacity limits run times, some
inside, the tank has slots for placement of large proteins may be poorly transferred. Use
the electrode cards, gel holder cassettes, of a discontinuous buffer system (see
and the cooling element. Ports on the lid Chapter 2) may enhance semi-dry transfer of
allow connection points for the electrodes high molecular weight proteins (>80 kD). As
• Gel holder cassette — The gel and semi-dry transfers require considerably less
membrane sandwich is held together buffer and are easier to set up than the tank
between two fiber pads and filter paper method, laboratories performing large
sheets and placed into the tank within a numbers of blots often favor them.
gel holder cassette. Cassettes are made
of nonconducting material and are Microfiltration (Dot-Blotting)
designed to permit unimpeded flow of Simple, bulk transfer of proteins that are in
current and buffer through the gel and solution may be achieved by manual
membrane sandwich application (dotting) to a membrane from a
pipet or syringe, or by vacuum-assisted
• Electrodes — Tank transfer systems microfiltration. Manual dot-blotting with a
use either plate or wire electrode cards. pipet or syringe is generally used for small
Plate electrodes offer greater field sample volumes. Microfiltration devices, on
strength than wire electrodes, but wire the other hand, enable application of larger
electrodes may be more economical and volumes, multiple assays with different
generate less heat probes, and quick, reproducible screening
• Cooling mechanism — Cooling systems of a large number of samples.
consist of an in ice block, a sealed ice Microfiltration facilitates the determination of
unit, or a cooling coil that is coupled to an working conditions for a new blotting assay
external cooling mechanism. These and is a convenient method in any other
cooling systems prevent temperature situation where the resolving power of gel
fluctuations and overheating during high- electrophoresis is not needed.
intensity, extended, or native protein
transfers

Chapter 1 Transfer
Blotting Systems and Power Supplies
Transfer Apparatus both standard and high-intensity blotting

The transfer of proteins to a membrane options. The Trans-Blot cell accommodates
support is accomplished by electrophoresis three gel holder cassettes, each with a
(tank or semi-dry blotting) for gels and by 16 x 20 cm blotting area. Standard field
microfiltration (dot-blotting) for proteins in transfers are performed with the electrodes
solution. placed 8 cm apart; with this arrangement,
all three of the gel holder cassettes may be
Tank Blotting Apparatus used simultaneously. High-intensity transfers
Tank transfer systems offer flexibility in are performed with the electrodes placed
choosing voltage settings, blotting times, 4 cm apart, with a single gel holder cassette
and cooling options. Tank transfer systems between them. Temperature regulation can
provide efficient and quantitative protein be achieved by using the super cooling coil
transfers over a broad molecular weight (included) and a refrigerated water
range. The tank transfer systems offered by recirculator (purchased separately).
Bio-Rad are described below, and their
Trans-Blot Plus Cell
specifications are summarized in Table 1.2.
The Trans-Blot Plus cell (Figure 1.4) is
Trans-Blot Cell designed to provide efficient transfers of
The Trans-Blot cell (Figure 1.3) offers a protein from large format (28 x 26.5 cm)
choice of plate or wire electrodes and gels. The Trans-Blot Plus has the capacity
variable placement of the electrodes for to transfer three large format gels or
multiple smaller format gels simultaneously
1 in as little as 15–30 min. Each gel holder
5 cassette is constructed of a durable
material that, along with an effective
clamping mechanism, ensures tight,
2 uniform contact between the gel and
membrane across the entire blotting area.
A detachable hinge mechanism in the
cassette virtually eliminates shifting of gel
4 sandwiches during assembly. Plate
electrodes provide a strong and uniform
3 electrical field and are movable — one, two,
or three gel cassettes can be placed in the
Fig. 1.3. The Trans-Blot cell.
1, buffer tank and lid; 2, gel holder
cassette and fiber pads; 3, wire 1
electrodes; 4, plate electrodes;
5, super cooling coil.
4
2
Fig. 1.4. The Trans-Blot Plus
cell. 1, buffer tank and lid; 2, gel
holder cassette and fiber pads;
3, plate electrodes; 4, super
cooling coil.

Transfer Chapter 1
tank with the minimum electrode distance 1

Fig. 1.5. The Mini Trans-Blot
between them, increasing the field strength cell. 1, buffer tank and lid; 2, gel
and efficiency of transfer. A cooling coil 4 holder cassette; 3, electrode
assembly; 4, Bio-Ice™ cooling unit.
coupled to a refrigerated water recirculator
provides effective temperature regulation,
ensuring effective and reproducible transfers
even during high-intensity, high-power
applications. 3
2
Mini Trans-Blot Cell and Fig. 1.6. The Criterion blotter.

Criterion Blotter 1, buffer tank and lid; 2, assembly
tray with roller, fiber pads, blotting
The Mini Trans-Blot cell and the Criterion filter paper, and gel holder
blotter accommodate smaller gels for rapid, cassettes; 3, wire electrodes; 4,
1 plate electrodes; 5, sealed ice
high-quality blotting. The Mini Trans-Blot cell
block; 6, optional cooling coil.
(Figure 1.5) can transfer up to two mini gels
6
(10 x 7.5 cm) in an hour and is available
either as a complete apparatus, or as a
module that uses the buffer tank and lid of
the Mini-PROTEAN® 3 cell for operation.
5
The Criterion blotter (Figure 1.6) can transfer
up to two Criterion gels (15 x 9.4 cm) or
four mini gels in 30–60 min. A self-
contained Bio-Ice cooling unit absorbs the 2
heat generated during transfer in the Mini 3
4
Trans-Blot cell, and the Criterion blotter
uses a sealed ice block or optional cooling
coil to regulate temperature during transfer.
Table 1.2. Specifications for tank blotting cells.
Trans-Blot Trans-Blot Plus Mini Trans-Blot Criterion Blotter

Blotting area Standard: 16 x 20 cm Extra large: 28 x 26.5 cm Mini: 10 x 7.5 cm Midi: 15 x 9.4 cm
Number of 1 for high-intensity transfer, 3 2 2
cassettes 2 with cooling, 3 without cooling
Buffer requirements 2.5 L 10–12 L 450 ml 1.3 L
Electrode distance Flexible; 2 positions: Flexible; 3 positions: 4 cm 4.3 cm
4 and 8 cm 4, 7, and 10 cm
Electrode materials Platinum-coated titanium anode Platinum-coated titanium Platinum wire Platinum-coated titanium anode
and stainless-steel cathode plates anode and stainless-steel and stainless-steel cathode plates
or platinum wire cathode plates or platinum wire
Transfer time Standard: 2–5 hr (wire electrodes), Standard: 16 hr (overnight) 1 hr 0.5–1 hr (wire electrodes)
1–2 hr (plate electrodes)
High-intensity: 1–2 hr (wire electrodes), High-intensity: 0.25–1 hr 0.5 hr (plate electrodes)
0.5–1 hr plate electrodes
Cooling Super cooling coil Super cooling coil Bio-Ice cooling unit Sealed ice block
or optional Criterion
blotter cooling coil
Dimensions 18 x 9.5 x 24 cm 30 x 17.3 x 39.4 cm 12 x 16 x 18 cm 21.8 x 11.8 x 15 cm
(W x L x H)

Chapter 1 Transfer
Semi-Dry Blotting Apparatus

Semi-dry transfers allow fast, efficient, economical blotting without a buffer tank or gel cassettes.
1
Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Cell
2 The Trans-Blot SD semi-dry cell (Figure 1.7) performs high-intensity electrophoretic transfers
quickly and efficiently without requiring external cooling. Most mini gel transfers are
accomplished in less than 30 minutes. Plate electrodes and a unique single-step locking
system designed for the Trans-Blot SD cell make assembly easy and ensure uniform contact
across the entire electrode surface. See Table 1.3 for detailed specifications.
3 Table 1.3. Trans-Blot SD semi-dry cell specifications.

Maximum gel size (W x L) 24 x 16 cm
Gel capacity Two PROTEAN® II gel sandwiches, stacked and separated by dialysis membrane;
Fig. 1.7. The Trans-Blot SD four Mini-PROTEAN 3 gels side by side; three Criterion gels side by side
cell. 1, lid; 2, cathode plate;
Buffer requirement ~200 ml
3, anode plate.
Electrode dimensions 25 x 18 cm
Electrode distance Determined by thickness of the gel sandwich and filter paper stack
Electrode materials Platinum-coated titanium anode and stainless-steel cathode
Cooling N/A
Dimensions (W x L x H) 37 x 24 x 11 cm
Microfiltration Apparatus
1
Microfiltration units allow use of easy, reproducible methods for binding proteins in solution
onto membranes.
Bio-Dot® and Bio-Dot SF Apparatus

The Bio-Dot and the Bio-Dot SF (slot-format) microfiltration units (Figure 1.8) provide
reproducible binding of proteins in solution onto membranes. Samples are loaded into the
wells of the templates and proteins are trapped on the membrane by filtration using either
vacuum or gravity flow. Once samples are loaded, incubations, wash steps, and detection
may all be performed without removing the membrane from the unit.
2
The 96-well Bio-Dot apparatus performs traditional dot-blot comparisons while the 48-well
Bio-Dot SF apparatus focuses the applied samples into thin lines instead of circles (Figure
1.9). This slot format makes it easier to use a densitometer for quantitation. The Bio-Dot and
Bio-Dot SF sample templates are interchangeable; each uses the same microfiltration
manifold. Each apparatus is available as an independent unit, containing both the
microfiltration manifold and the sample template, and also as a modular template without the
Fig.1.8. Microfiltration
apparatus. 1, Bio-Dot
manifold base.
microfiltration unit; 2, Bio-Dot SF
microfiltration unit.
Fig. 1.9. Multiple sample comparisons are
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
simplified with the Bio-Dot and Bio-Dot SF
microfiltration units. A and B, antigen (human
A
transferrin) applied to nitrocellulose in each row of the
Bio-Dot apparatus. 1, 100 ng; 2, 50 ng; 3, 25 ng; 4,
10 ng; 5, 5 ng; 6, 2.5 ng; 7, 1 ng; 8, 0.5 ng; 9, 0.25 ng;
B 10, 1% BSA in TBS. C and D, antigen applied to each
row of the Bio-Dot SF apparatus. 1, 100 ng; 2, 50 ng; 3,
10 ng; 4, 5 ng; 5, 1 ng; 6, 0.1 ng. The membranes were
C incubated with rabbit anti-human transferrin. In A and C,
Bio-Rad’s goat anti-rabbit gold conjugate and gold
enhancement kit were used to visualize the antigen. In B
D and D, Bio-Rad’s goat anti-rabbit AP conjugate and the
color development reagents BCIP and NBT were used
1 2 3 4 5 6 to visualize the antigen.

Transfer Chapter 1
The Bio-Dot and Bio-Dot SF units may be easily sterilized by autoclaving or by washing in
alcohol or sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The units feature a unique, patented sealing gasket that
eliminates lateral leakage and possible cross-contamination between wells. Both sample
templates are spaced similarly to microplates so that samples can be applied with a standard
or multichannel pipet. Specifications for the Bio-Dot units are listed in Table 1.4.
Table 1.4. Bio-Dot apparatus specifications.
Bio-Dot Bio-Dot SF
Sample format 96-well, 8 x 12 format 48-slot, 6 x 8 format
Well size 3 mm diameter 7 x 0.75 mm
Sample volume 50–600 µl 50–500 µl
Membrane size (W x L) 9 x 12 cm 9 x 12 cm
Autoclavability Yes Yes
Power Supplies for Electrophoretic Transfers

Electrophoretic transfer cells require high currents that not all power supplies are equipped
to deliver. Table 1.5 compares the two Bio-Rad power supplies (Figure 1.10) that
accommodate the needs of electrophoretic transfer systems.
PowerPac™ HC Power Supply

The PowerPac HC (high current) power supply, with a 250 V, 3.0 A, 300 W output, is capable
of driving all transfer cells to their maximum performance. The PowerPac HC has replaced
the 200 V, 2.0 A PowerPac™ 200 power supply and offers high power output and the
flexibility of choosing transfer under constant voltage, constant current, or constant power
settings. The PowerPac HC also offers highly regulated voltage settings, fine adjustment of
current limits, and a convenient pause function. Safety features include overload/short circuit
detection, automatic crossover, arc and ground leak detection, programmable multistep
Fig. 1.10. Power supplies.
methods, and a programmable timer. PowerPac HC (top) and PowerPac
Universal (bottom) power supplies.
PowerPac™ Universal Power Supply
The PowerPac Universal power supply is for researchers demanding a power supply capable
of performing the broadest range of applications possible. With 500 V, 2.5 A, 500 W output,
the PowerPac Universal is designed to drive all of the most common electrophoretic
applications, with the exception of high-voltage applications such as isoelectric focusing and
DNA sequencing. Like the PowerPac HC, the PowerPac Universal provides the choice of
transfer under constant voltage, constant current, or constant power settings with all of the
other features listed above. In addition, the PowerPac Universal stores up to nine methods,
each with up to nine steps, and is equipped to enable wireless transfer of run data and
protocols for instrument validation for regulatory purposes (for example, installation
qualification and operational qualification, or IQ/OQ).
Table 1.5. PowerPac HC and PowerPac Universal power supply specifications.

PowerPac HC PowerPac Universal
Voltage 5–250 V 5–500 V
Current 0.01–3.0 A 0.01–2.5 A
Power 1–300 W 1–500 W

Chapter 2
Membranes, Buffers, and Power Conditions
Membranes, Buffers, and

Power Conditions
Selecting the appropriate membrane, transfer buffer, and power conditions is critical to
successful protein transfer. The size and charge of the proteins, the transfer method, and the
binding properties of the membrane must all be considered. This chapter provides technical
information and advice for selecting among the various conditions that are available for protein
transfer. Subsequent processing of the transferred proteins for detection and identification is
discussed in Chapter 4.
Membrane Selection
Though nitrocellulose was once the only Nitrocellulose and
choice for protein blotting, advances in Supported Nitrocellulose
membrane chemistries have made a variety Nitrocellulose was one of the first membranes
of membrane types available, each offering used for western blotting and is still a popular
key attributes to suit particular experimental membrane for this procedure. Protein binding
conditions. The physical properties and to nitrocellulose is instantaneous, nearly
performance characteristics of a membrane irreversible, and quantitative up to 80 to
should be evaluated when selecting the 100 µg/cm 2. Nitrocellulose is easily wetted in
appropriate transfer conditions (Table 2.1). water or transfer buffer and is compatible with
Membranes are commonly available in two a wide range of protein detection systems.
pore sizes: the 0.45 µm pore size Supported nitrocellulose is an inert support
membranes are recommended for most structure with nitrocellulose applied to it.
analytical blotting experiments, while the The support structure gives the membrane
0.2 µm pore size membranes are most increased strength and resilience.
suitable for transfer of low molecular weight Supported nitrocellulose can withstand
(<15,000) proteins that might move through reprobing and autoclaving (121°C) and
larger membrane pores. retains the ease of wetting and protein
binding features of nitrocellulose.
Table 2.1. Guide to protein blotting membranes.
Binding
Capacity
Membrane Pore Size (µg/cm2) Notes
Nitrocellulose 0.45 µm 80–100 General-purpose protein blotting membrane
0.2 µm
Supported 0.45 µm 80–100 Pure nitrocellulose cast on an inert synthetic
nitrocellulose 0.2 µm support; increased strength for easier handling
and for reprobing
Sequi-Blot PVDF 0.2 µm 170–200 High mechanical strength and chemical stability;
used for protein sequencing
Immun-Blot PVDF 0.2 µm 150–160 High mechanical strength and chemical stability;
recommended for western blotting

Chapter 2 Membranes, Buffers, and Power Conditions
Polyvinylidene Difluoride Sequi-Blot™ PVDF for

Protein Sequencing
(PVDF) Membrane
Originally named Bio-Rad PVDF membrane,
PVDF membrane is an ideal support for
Sequi-Blot PVDF membrane withstands
N-terminal sequencing, amino acid analysis,
the conditions of N-terminal sequencing
and immunoassay of blotted proteins. PVDF
while providing the binding capacity to
retains proteins during exposure to acidic or
sequence even low-abundance samples.
basic conditions and in the presence of
See Figure 2.1.
organic solvents. Greater protein retention
during sequencing manipulations enhances Immun-Blot® PVDF for
the likelihood of obtaining information from Western Blotting
rare, low-abundance proteins by increased Immun-Blot PVDF membrane is ideal for
initial coupling and higher repetitive yields. In chemiluminescent and colorimetric western
addition, PVDF membrane exhibits better blots because it retains target protein but
binding efficiency of electroblotted material resists nonspecific protein binding that
in the presence of SDS in the transfer buffer. can obscure high-sensitivity detection.
PVDF membrane must be wetted in 100% Immun-Blot PVDF has a strong binding
methanol prior to use but may be used with capacity of 150–160 µg/cm 2 (roughly twice
a transfer buffer that contains no methanol. that of nitrocellulose), will not crack or tear
in common handling, and holds up under
Bio-Rad offers PVDF membrane specifically
repeated stripping and reprobing.
designed for protein sequencing and for
immunodetection. Both are available in
precut sheets, rolls, and sandwich formats.
Cathode
Fig. 2.1. Superior retention
of proteins by Bio-Rad’s
Sequi-Blot PVDF membrane. Gel holder
Protein samples were blotted to
PVDF membrane support Fiber pad
(diagrammed on left) using Towbin Filter paper
buffer containing 0.1% SDS. Gel
Membrane A, the membrane sheet
closest to the gel; membrane B, a PVDF membrane A
second sheet of membrane layered PVDF membrane B
behind the first. Filter paper
Fiber pad
Sequi-Blot PVDF Sequi-Blot PVDF
Gel holder
Membrane A Membrane B
Anode
Blotting Filter Paper

Blotting filter paper, made of 100% cotton available in a wide range of convenient sizes
fiber, provides a uniform flow of buffer to eliminate waste and save time (Table 2.2).
through the gel. This paper contains no Extra thick absorbent filter paper is
additives that might interfere with the recommended for semi-dry transfers
transfer process. Precut filter paper is because of its additional fluid capacity.

Membranes, Buffers, and Power Conditions Chapter 2
Table 2.2. Guide to precut membranes and filter paper.
Electrophoretic
Blotting Apparatus Precut Membranes Precut Blot Filter Papers
Trans-Blot® cell 13.5 x 16.5 cm 15 x 20 cm
Trans-Blot® Plus cell 26.5 x 28 cm 26.5 x 28 cm
Trans-Blot SD cell 7 x 8.4 cm 15 x 15 cm (extra thick)
11.5 x 16 cm
15 x 15 cm
15 x 9.2 cm
20 x 20 cm
Mini Trans-Blot® cell 7 x 8.4 cm 7.5 x 10 cm
Criterion™ blotter 8.5 x 13.5 cm 9.5 x 15.2 cm
Bio-Dot® apparatus 9 x 12 cm N/A
Bio-Dot SF apparatus 9 x 12 cm 11.3 x 7.7 cm
Membrane/Filter Paper Sandwiches

Precut and preassembled sandwiches (nitrocellulose or PVDF) and two sheets
save time and effort during western blot of 100% cotton fiber thick filter paper are
preparation. In Bio-Rad’s membrane preassembled into a blotting membrane/
sandwiches, a precut membrane filter paper sandwich.
Transfer Buffer Selection

Different gel types and blotting applications Transfer buffers contain a conductive,
call for different transfer buffers (Tables 2.3 strong buffering agent (for example, Tris,
and 2.4), but in general, transfer buffer must CAPS, or carbonate) in order to maintain
enable both effective elution of proteins from the conductivity and pH of the system
the gel matrix and binding of the protein to during transfer. In addition, alcohol (for
the membrane. The choice of buffer will example, methanol or ethanol) may be
depend on the type of gel and membrane included in the transfer buffer to promote
being used as well as the physical binding of proteins to membranes, and SDS
characteristics of the protein of interest. may be added to promote elution of
proteins from gels.
Table 2.3. General guidelines on transfer buffer and membrane selection by gel type.
Gel Type Transfer Buffer Membrane Notes

SDS-PAGE Towbin, with or without SDS, CAPS, Nitrocellulose or supported Tank blotting or semi-dry blotting
carbonate, Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF
Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE Towbin, CAPS Nitrocellulose or supported Tank blotting recommended; needs
nitrocellulose, 0.2 µm, or PVDF high-capacity, small-pore-size membrane;
pH of buffer may be critical
Two-dimensional gel Towbin, with or without SDS, CAPS, Nitrocellulose or supported Tank blotting or semi-dry blotting
carbonate, Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF
Native, nondenaturing Depends on pH of gel buffer Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, Specific temperature regulation may be
and pI of protein of interest or PVDF needed to maintain activity
Acid urea 0.7% acetic acid Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm Use acid-gel transfer protocol
(membrane toward cathode)
Isoelectric focusing gel 0.7% acetic acid Nitrocellulose or supported Use acid-gel transfer protocol
nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF (membrane toward cathode)

Table 2.4. General guidelines on transfer buffer and membrane selection by application.
Special Applications Transfer Buffer Membrane Notes

Protein sequencing Towbin,* CAPS Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting recommended
High molecular Towbin with SDS Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting recommended; needs
weight proteins high-capacity, small-pore-size membrane;
pH of buffer may be critical
Small proteins and Towbin, CAPS Nitrocellulose, 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting recommended;
peptides pH of buffer may be critical
Basic proteins (pI >9) CAPS, carbonate, Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting or semi-dry blotting
run in denaturing gels Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen
Basic proteins (pI >9) 0.7% acetic acid Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting recommended
run in native or
nondenaturing gels
Glycoproteins Towbin, with or without SDS, CAPS, Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting or semi-dry blotting
carbonate, Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen
Proteoglycans Towbin, Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen Nitrocellulose, 0.45 or 0.2 µm, or PVDF Tank blotting or semi-dry blotting
* Towbin buffer may be used for protein sequencing but extra care must be exercised to rinse Tris and glycine from the membrane after transfer.
General Recommendations Alcohol (methanol or ethanol), on the other

Regardless of which transfer buffer is hand, removes the SDS from SDS-protein
selected, transfer buffer should never be complexes and improves the binding of
used more than once, since the buffer will protein to nitrocellulose membrane, but has
likely lose its capacity to maintain a stable some negative effects on the gel itself.
pH during transfer. Similarly, diluting transfer Alcohol may cause a reduction in pore size,
buffers is not advised, since this will precipitation of some proteins, and some
decrease their buffering capacity. Lastly, basic proteins to become positively charged
adjusting the pH of transfer buffers when or neutral. All of these factors will affect
not indicated will result in increased buffer blotting efficiency.
conductivity, manifested by higher initial Note: Only high-quality, analytical grade methanol should
current output and decreased resistance. be used in transfer buffer; impure methanol can cause
increased transfer buffer conductivity and poor transfer.
Recipes for all of the buffers described in
this section are provided in the Appendix. Towbin and Bjerrum and
Schafer-Nielsen Buffers
A Note About SDS and Alcohol (Tris/Glycine Buffers)
SDS and alcohol play opposing roles in a The most common transfers are from
transfer. SDS-PAGE gels using the buffer systems
SDS in the gel and in the SDS-protein originally described by Towbin (1979).
complexes promotes elution of the protein Standard Towbin buffer contains 25 mM
from the gel but inhibits binding of the Tris, pH 8.3, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v)
protein to membranes. In cases where methanol and, occasionally, 0.025–0.1%
certain proteins are difficult to elute from the (w/v) SDS. A buffer similar in composition to
gel, SDS may be added to the transfer buffer the standard Towbin buffer is the Bjerrum
to improve transfer. SDS in the transfer buffer and Schafer-Nielsen buffer (48 mM Tris, pH
decreases the binding efficiency of protein to 9.2, 39 mM glycine, 20% methanol), which
nitrocellulose membrane; PVDF membrane was developed for use in semi-dry
can be substituted for nitrocellulose when applications.
SDS is used in the transfer buffer. Addition of
SDS will increase the relative current, power,
and heating during transfer, and may also
affect the antigenicity of some proteins.

CAPS Buffer Dunn Carbonate Buffer

CAPS-based transfer buffers (10 mM CAPS, In some cases, using a carbonate buffer
pH 11, 10% methanol) may be preferable for (10 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.9,
transfers of high molecular weight proteins 20% methanol) may produce higher
(for example, >50 kD) and in cases where efficiency transfers and improve the ability
the glycine component of Towbin buffer may of antibodies to recognize and bind to
interfere with downstream protein proteins. Carbonate buffer has also been
sequencing applications. recommended for the transfer of basic
proteins (Garfin and Bers 1989).
Discontinuous Tris-CAPS
Buffer System Alternative Buffer Conditions
(Semi-Dry Transfers) The mobility of proteins during electrophoretic
A unique feature of semi-dry blotting is the transfer from native gels will depend on the
ability to use two different buffers during size and pI of the protein of interest relative to
transfer, known as a discontinuous buffer the pH of the buffer used.
system. This is possible because in a semi- • If the pI of the protein is greater than the
dry transfer, the buffer reservoirs are the pH of the transfer buffer, the protein will
filter paper on either side of the gel, which carry a positive charge and will migrate
are independent. In a discontinuous system, toward the negative electrode
methanol is included in the buffer on the
membrane (anode) side of the blot • If the pI of the protein is close to the pH of
assembly and SDS is used on the gel the transfer buffer, the migration of the
(cathode) side, taking advantage of the protein out of the gel will be decreased. A
positive effects of each buffer component. more basic or acidic buffer should be used
to increase protein mobility
A discontinuous buffer system using a
Tris-CAPS buffer can greatly increase the Proteins in native gels as well as acidic and
efficiency of protein transfer by semi-dry neutral proteins require buffers that do not
blotting. This system uses 60 mM Tris, contain methanol. Gels for isoelectric
40 mM CAPS, pH 9.6, plus 15% methanol focusing, native PAGE, and those containing
in the filter paper on the anode side and basic proteins or acid-urea may be
0.1% SDS on the cathode side. transferred in 0.7% acetic acid. When using
Concentrated, premixed anode and acetic acid for transfer, the proteins will be
cathode buffers are available for purchase. positively charged, so the membrane should
For more information about the use of a be placed on the cathode side of the gel.
discontinuous buffer system in semi-dry
transfer, request bulletin 2134.
Power Conditions for Electrophoretic Transfers

The optimal condition for electrophoretic between the electrodes is minimized.
transfer is to run at the highest electric field Though rapid blotting experiments may
strength (V/cm) possible within the heat seem most convenient, a number of factors
dissipation capabilities of the system; that is, must be considered when choosing the
for most proteins, the most rapid transfer appropriate power conditions for a given
occurs under conditions where the applied electrophoretic transfer.
voltage (V) is maximized and the distance

Useful Equations Other Factors Affecting

Two basic electrical equations are important Transfer
in electrophoresis. The first is Ohm’s law, The following variables will also change
which relates the applied voltage (V), with the resistance of the transfer system and will,
current (I) and resistance (R) of the system: therefore, also affect transfer efficiency and
V=IxR current and voltage readings:
The applied voltage and current are • Alterations to buffer makeup; that is,
determined by the user and the power addition of SDS or changes in ion
supply settings; the resistance is inherent concentration due to addition of acid or
in the system. base to adjust the pH of a buffer
The second equation, the power equation, • Gel pH, ionic strength, and percentage of
describes the power (P) used by a system, acrylamide, especially if the gel has not
which is proportional to the voltage (V), been properly equilibrated
current (I), and resistance of the system (R). • Number of gels (current increases slightly
P=IxV= I2 xR= V2/R as the number of gels increases)
Understanding the relationships between • Volume of buffer (current increases when

power, voltage, current, resistance, and heat volume increases)
is central to understanding the factors that • Transfer temperature (current increases
influence the efficiency and efficacy of transfer. when temperature increases)
Joule Heating Relationship Between Power

The power that is dissipated is also Settings and Transfer Times
equivalent to the amount of heat, known as In theory, increasing the power input and
Joule heating, generated by the system. duration of an electrophoretic transfer results
According to the power equation, the in the transfer of more protein out of a gel.
amount of Joule heating that occurs However, in practice, initial test runs should
depends on the conductivity of the transfer be used to evaluate transfer efficiency at
buffer used, the magnitude of the applied various field strengths (by modulating both
field, and the total resistance within the power input and, if applicable, interelectrode
transfer system. distance) and transfer times for each set of
During the course of an electrophoretic proteins of interest. The optimum transfer
transfer, the transfer buffer is warmed as a conditions will actually vary according to a
result of Joule heating. Consequently, its number of factors, including the size, charge,
resistance drops. Such heating and changes and electrophoretic mobility of the protein,
in resistance may lead to inconsistent field the type of transfer buffer used, and the type
strength and transfer, may cause the of transfer system being used.
transfer buffer to lose its buffering capacity,
or may cause the gel to melt and stick to High-Intensity Field Transfers
the membrane. As their name suggests, high-intensity field
transfers use high-strength electrical fields
Under normal running conditions, the that are generated by increased voltage
transfer buffer absorbs most of the heat that and closer positioning of electrodes. High-
is generated. During extended transfer intensity transfers generally require less than
periods or high-power conditions, active 5 hr to complete. Though high-intensity
buffer cooling is required to prevent transfers often produce satisfactory transfer
uncontrolled temperature increases.

of proteins in less time, in some cases the Selecting Power

high electric field strength may cause small Supply Settings
proteins to be transferred too quickly and Power supplies that are used for
through the membrane. In addition, high electrophoresis hold one parameter constant
molecular weight proteins, and other proteins (either voltage, current, or power). The
that are difficult to transfer, may not have PowerPac™ HC and PowerPac™ Universal
sufficient time to be transferred completely. power supplies also have an automatic
Since more heat is generated in high-intensity crossover capability that allows the power
filed transfers than in standard field transfers, supply to switch over to a variable parameter
a cooling device may be needed. if a set output limit is reached. This helps
prevent damage to the transfer cell.
Standard Field Transfers
These transfers require less power input and During transfer, if the resistance in the system
more time to complete; they are generally decreases as a result of Joule heating, the
run overnight. Standard transfers often consequences are different and depend on
produce more complete, quantitative transfer which parameter is held constant.
of proteins across a broad molecular weight
range; the slower transfer conditions allow Transfers Under Constant Voltage
large proteins sufficient time to move through If the voltage is held constant throughout a
the gel matrix while the lower intensity allows transfer, the current in most transfer systems
smaller proteins to remain attached to the will increase as the resistance drops due to
membrane after transfer. heating (the exception is most semi-dry
systems, where current will actually drop as
Tank transfer systems offer the capacity for a result of buffer depletion). Therefore, the
both high-intensity and standard-field overall power will increase during transfer and
transfers. Increased buffering capacity and more heating will occur. Despite the increased
additional cooling mechanisms enable risk of heating, a constant voltage ensures
longer transfer times than are feasible with that field strength will remain constant,
semi-dry transfers. Some tank transfer providing the most efficient transfer possible.
systems offer flexible electrode positions Use of the cooling elements available with the
that, when combined with variable voltages, various tank blotting systems should prevent
provide a choice of high-intensity, rapid problems with heating.
transfer or longer, more quantitative transfer
over a broad range of molecular weights. Transfers Under Constant Current
Semi-dry transfers, on the other hand, are If the current is held constant during a run,
necessarily rapid and of high intensity. In a a decrease in resistance will result in a
semi-dry transfer system, the distance decrease in voltage and power. Though
between electrodes is determined only by heating will be minimized, proteins will be
the thickness of the gel-membrane transferred more slowly due to decreased
sandwich and buffering and cooling field strength.
capacity is limited to the buffer in the filter
paper. As a result, the field strength is Transfers Under Constant Power
maximized in semi-dry systems, and the If the power is held constant during a
limited buffering and cooling capacity transfer, changes in resistance will result
restricts the transfer time. Though power in increases in current, but to a lesser
conditions may be varied with the power degree than when voltage is held constant.
supply, semi-dry transfers often operate Constant power is an alternative to
best within a narrow range of settings. constant current for regulating heat
production during transfer.

General Guidelines for Transfer Buffers and

Transfer Conditions
Different transfer apparatus, when used with different buffers, will require different power
settings. Tables 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7 provide general guidelines for the voltage and current settings
recommended for selected buffer systems. Transfer times will need to be increased for gradient
gels and may need to be decreased for low molecular weight proteins. The values presented
below are guidelines — transfer conditions should be optimized for every transfer application.
Cooling is generally required for all high-intensity transfers (except for the Trans-Blot SD) and
is recommended for long, unsupervised runs.
Table 2.5. Guide to power settings for SDS-PAGE gels (Towbin buffer).
Standard (Overnight) High-Intensity

Trans-Blot cell
Plate electrodes 10 V/100 mA, 16 hr 50–100 V/700–1,600 mA, 30–60 min
Wire electrodes 30 V/100 mA, 16 hr 100–200 V/300–800 mA, 30 min–4 hr
Trans-Blot Plus cell 30 V/0.5 A, 16 hr 100 V/1,500 mA, 60 min
Mini Trans-Blot cell 30 V/90 mA, 16 hr 100 V/350 mA, 60 min
Criterion blotter
Plate electrodes 10 V/50–80 mA, 16 hr 100 V/750–1,000 mA, 30 min
Wire electrodes 10 V/30–40 mA, 16 hr 100 V/380–500 mA, 60 min
Trans-Blot SD cell N/A Mini gels: 10–15 V/5.5 mA/cm2, 10–30 min
Large gels: 15–25 V/3 mA/cm2, 30–60 min
Table 2.6. Guide to power settings for native gels (Towbin buffer, no methanol).

Trans-Blot cell
Plate electrodes 10 V/100 mA, 16 hr 50–100 V/700–1,500 mA, 30–60 min
Wire electrodes 30 V/100 mA, 16 hr 100–200 V/300–800 mA, 30 min–4 hr
Trans-Blot Plus cell 10–30 V/0.15–0.5 A, 16 hr 100–130 V/1.7–2.3 A, 15–60 min
Mini Trans-Blot cell 30 V/90 mA, 16 hr 100 V/350 mA, 1 hr
Criterion blotter
Plate electrodes 10 V/50 mA, 16 hr 100 V/830–1,000 mA, 30 min
Wire electrodes 10 V/50 mA, 12 hr 100 V/530–600 mA, 30 min
Table 2.7. Guide to power settings for isoelectric focusing gels, native gels, basic proteins, and
acid-urea gels (0.7% acetic acid).

Trans-Blot cell
Plate electrodes 15 V/200 mA, 16 hr 30-60 V/600–1,000 mA, 30–60 min
Wire electrodes 30 V/200 mA, 16 hr 100-150 V/550–850 mA, 30 min–4 hr
Trans-Blot Plus cell 10–30 V/ 0.15–0.55 A, 16 hr 100–125 V/1.9–2.4 A, 15–60 min
Mini Trans-Blot cell 30 V/10 mA, 16 hr 100 V/350 mA, 1 hr
Criterion blotter
Plate electrodes 10 V/50 mA, 16 hr 100 V/980–1,200 mA, 30 min
Wire electrodes 10 V/50 mA, 16 hr 100 V/500–800 mA, 30 min

Chapter 3
Performing the Transfer

This chapter provides an overview of the steps and protocols involved in performing protein
transfer. General advice for ensuring optimal results is also given. Detailed protocols and
advice for each apparatus and transfer method are available in the relevant product instruction
manuals. Information about choices of membranes, transfer buffers, and power settings was
discussed in Chapter 2. Methods for protein detection are discussed in Chapter 4.
Overall, the procedures and principles for semi-dry and tank transfers are the same. Gels and
membranes must be prewet and equilibrated with transfer buffer and the gel/membrane
sandwich must be placed into the transfer apparatus in the correct orientation to ensure
transfer of proteins to the membrane.
Performing a Tank Transfer
Preparing the Transfer Buffer, Gels, and Tank Assembly

1. Prepare the transfer buffer in amounts that will suffice for gel equilibration, sandwich
assembly, and electrophoresis. See the instruction manual for your particular tank transfer
system for guidelines. See the Appendix at the end of this manual for buffer formulations.
• Use only high-quality, analytical grade methanol. Impure methanol can cause increased
transfer buffer conductivity and poor transfer
• Reusing the transfer buffer is not advised, since the buffer will likely lose its ability to
maintain a stable pH during transfer. Diluting transfer buffers below their recommended
levels is also not advised, since this will decrease their buffering capacity
• Do not adjust the pH of transfer buffers unless this is specifically indicated. Adjusting
the pH of transfer buffers when not indicated will result in increased buffer conductivity,
manifested by higher initial current output and decreased resistance
• Increased SDS in the transfer buffer leads to increased protein transfer from the gel,
but decreased binding of the protein to nitrocellulose membrane. PVDF membrane can
be substituted for nitrocellulose when SDS is used in the transfer buffer
• Addition of SDS will increase the relative current, power, and heating during transfer,
and may also affect antigenicity of some proteins
• Increased methanol in the transfer buffer leads to decreased protein transfer from the
gel and increased binding of the protein to nitrocellulose membrane

Chapter 3 Performing the Transfer
2. Rinse gels briefly in ddH2O and equilibrate for 15 min in transfer buffer.
• All gels should be equilibrated in transfer buffer to remove contaminating electrophoresis
buffer salts. If salts are not removed, they will increase the conductivity of the transfer
buffer and the amount of heat generated during the transfer. Also, gels will shrink or
swell to various degrees in the transfer buffer depending on the acrylamide percentage
and the buffer composition. Equilibration allows the gel to adjust to its final size prior to
electrophoretic transfer. Equilibration is not necessary when the same buffer is used for
both electrophoresis and transfer (for example, native gel transfers)
3. Place the transfer tank onto a magnetic stirplate and assemble the transfer tank with the
anode and cathode cards in the correct position and orientation.
4. Add enough transfer buffer to the tank to fill it approximately halfway, add a stirbar, and
begin stirring.
• The transfer buffer should be stirred during the course of all tank transfers. This will
help to maintain uniform conductivity and temperature during electrophoretic transfer.
Failure to properly control transfer buffer temperature results in poor transfer and poses
a potential safety hazard
5. If needed, set up the cooling system for the tank transfer system. Follow instructions in
the instruction manual.
• Electrophoretic transfer entails large power loads and, consequently, heat generation.
The tanks are effective thermal insulators and limit the efficient dissipation of heat.
Therefore, placing blotting cells in a coldroom is not an adequate means of controlling
transfer buffer temperature. The use of additional cooling devices, such as the cooling
coil or Bio-Ice™ units, is required for high-intensity field transfers and is recommended
for long unsupervised runs
Fig. 3.1. Transfer assembly

Assembling the Gel and Membrane Sandwich
for a tank transfer system Each gel sandwich will contain the gel and membrane sandwiched between pieces of blot
(Trans-Blot cell). The cassette (1) absorbent filter paper (Figure 3.1). To prevent contamination, always wear gloves when
holds the gel (2) and membrane (3)
while fiber pads and filter paper (4) handling the gels, membranes, and filter paper.
on both sides provide complete
contact within the gel sandwich.
Optional gel/cassette assembly trays are available for the Criterion™ blotter and Trans-Blot®
The gel cassette is inserted Plus cell (see Ordering Information). These trays are large enough to accommodate the gel
vertically in the buffer tank (5). holder cassette during sandwich assembly.
3 6. For each gel, cut one piece of membrane and two pieces of filter paper to the dimensions
4
2
of the gel. Precut membranes and filter papers are available (see Ordering Information).
4 7. Equilibrate the membranes in transfer buffer.
• Membranes must be thoroughly wetted in transfer buffer prior to assembly of the gel
1
and membrane sandwich. Nitrocellulose membranes may be wetted directly with
transfer buffer, while PVDF membranes must be thoroughly soaked in 100% methanol
before being soaked in transfer buffer
8. Place a fiber pad on top of the black side of the cassette, submerged in buffer. Push on
the fiber pad with gloved fingertips to thoroughly wet the pad.
9. Place a piece of filter paper on top of the fiber pad (it should be wetted immediately).
10. Gently place the preequilibrated gel on top of the filter paper. Run a wet, gloved finger
across the gel to remove any air bubbles that may be trapped underneath the gel.
5

Performing the Transfer Chapter 3
11. Carefully place the preequilibrated membrane on top of the gel. Make sure the membrane
is correctly positioned as it touches the gel. To avoid ghost prints and other artifacts, do
not move the membrane after it is positioned. Use the roller to remove any air bubbles
and to ensure proper contact between the gel and membrane.
12. Wet a second piece of filter paper in transfer buffer and place it on top of the membrane.
13. Soak a fiber pad in transfer buffer and place it on top of the filter paper.
14. Once the cassette is closed and locked, insert it into the tank with the latch side up.
Make sure the black cassette plate faces the black electrode plate.

15. Add transfer buffer to the tank until the buffer level reaches the fill line.
16. Place the lid on top of the cell, making sure that the color-coded cables on the lid are
attached to the electrode cards of the same color. Reversing the orientation of the cables
will cause irreversible damage to the plate electrodes.
17. Connect the cables to the power supply and begin the run. See Chapter 2 and the
instruction manual for suggested run times with various buffers.
• Initial test runs should be used to evaluate the transfer efficiency at various field
strengths (V/cm), staying within the recommended guidelines of each instrument.
Transfers under high power should be monitored carefully and cooling used when
indicated
• An initial test run should be performed to determine the time required for complete
transfer. Times vary from 15 min to overnight and depend on many factors, including
the power setting, the size and shape of the protein, etc.
18. Upon completion of the run, remove the cassettes and disassemble the gel and
membrane sandwich. Rinse the membrane briefly in ddH2O to ensure that no residual gel
pieces or sample adhere to the membrane.
Performing a Semi-Dry Transfer
Preparing the Transfer Buffer and Gels

1. Prepare the transfer buffer in amounts that will suffice for gel equilibration, sandwich
assembly, and electrophoresis. See the Appendix for buffer formulations.
2. Rinse gels briefly in ddH2O and equilibrate for 15 min in transfer buffer.
• All gels should be equilibrated in transfer buffer to remove contaminating electrophoresis
buffer salts. If salts are not removed, they will increase the conductivity of the transfer
buffer and the amount of heat generated during the transfer. Also, gels will shrink or
swell to various degrees in the transfer buffer depending on the acrylamide percentage
and the buffer composition. Equilibration allows the gel to adjust to its final size prior to
electrophoretic transfer. Equilibration is not necessary when the same buffer is used for
both electrophoresis and transfer (for example, native gel transfers)

Chapter 3 Performing the Transfer
Assembling the Gel and Membrane Sandwich

1
Each gel sandwich will contain the gel and membrane sandwiched between one to three
pieces of blot absorbent filter paper (Figure 3.2).
• If extra thick filter paper is used, only one sheet on each side will be necessary
2
• If thick or thin filter paper is used, two or three sheets on each side of the gel must be
used, respectively
3 The amount of filter paper used for semi-dry transfers is important because the filter paper
4 serves as the only reservoir for the transfer buffer. To prevent contamination, always wear
5 gloves when handling the gels, membranes, and filter paper.
6
3. For each gel, cut one piece of membrane and two to six pieces of filter paper to the
7 dimensions of the gel. Precut membranes and filter papers are available (see Ordering
Information).
8
4. Soak the filter paper in transfer buffer.
5. Equilibrate the membranes in transfer buffer.
• Membranes must be thoroughly wetted in transfer buffer prior to assembly of the gel
and membrane sandwich. Nitrocellulose membranes may be wetted directly with
9 transfer buffer, while PVDF membrane must be thoroughly soaked in 100% methanol
before being soaked in transfer buffer
Fig. 3.2. Transfer assembly for 6. Remove the safety cover and stainless-steel cathode assembly.
the Trans-Blot SD semi-dry
transfer system. 7. Place a presoaked sheet of extra thick filter paper onto the platinum anode. Roll a pipet
1. Safety lid
2. Cathode assembly with latches
or roller over the surface of the filter paper (like a rolling pin) to push out all air bubbles. If
3. Filter paper thick or thin filter paper is used instead, repeat with one or two more sheets of buffer-
4. Gel soaked paper.
5. Membrane
6. Filter paper 8. Carefully place the presoaked membrane on top of the filter paper. Roll out all air bubbles.
7. Spring-loaded anode platform
mounted on four guideposts 9. Gently place the preequilibrated gel on top of the membrane, aligning the gel on the
8. Power cables center of the membrane. Transfer will be incomplete if any portion of the gel is outside of
9. Base
the membrane. The membrane and filter paper should be cut to the same size as the gel.
Remove all air bubbles.
• To avoid ghost prints and other artifacts, do not move the membrane and/or gel after it
is positioned. Use the roller to remove any air bubbles and to ensure proper contact
between the gel and membrane
10. Wet a second piece of presoaked extra thick filter paper on top of the membrane. Roll a
pipet or roller over the surface of the filter paper to push out all air bubbles. If thick or thin
filter paper is used instead, repeat with one or two more sheets of buffer-soaked paper.
Wipe up any excess buffer around the gel/membrane sandwich to prevent current leaks.
11. Carefully place the cathode onto the stack.
12. Place the safety cover back onto the unit.

13. Connect the cables to the power supply and begin the run. See Chapter 2 and the
instruction manual for suggested run times with various buffers.
14. Upon completion of the run, remove the cathode assembly and disassemble the gel and
membrane sandwich. Rinse the membrane briefly in ddH2O to ensure that no residual gel
pieces or sample adhere to the membrane.

Performing the Transfer Chapter 3
Microfiltration
Microfiltration with the Bio-Dot® and Bio-Dot SF involves presoaking the transfer membrane
as described, assembly of the transfer apparatus, application of the vacuum, and application
of the sample. Detailed protocols are provided in the Bio-Dot and Bio-Dot SF instruction
manuals. Some advice for microfiltration transfers is provided below.
Application of the Vacuum

Apply the vacuum only until solutions are removed from the sample wells, then adjust the
flow valve so that the unit is exposed only to atmospheric pressure and disconnect the
vacuum. For best sample binding, the entire sample should be filtered by gravity flow
without vacuum.
During the assay, do not leave the unit with the vacuum on. This may dehydrate the
membrane and may cause halos around the wells.
Proper Drainage
Proper positioning of the flow valve relative to the level of the apparatus is important for
proper drainage. The speed of drainage is determined by the difference in hydrostatic
pressure between the fluid in the sample wells and the opening of the flow valve that is
exposed to the atmosphere. When the flow valve is positioned below the sample wells,
proper drainage may be achieved.
Flow Valve — Extended Incubations

If a prolonged or overnight incubation is desired, adjust the flow valve so that the vacuum
manifold is closed off from both the vacuum source and atmosphere before applying the
samples. In this configuration, solutions will remain in the sample wells with less than a 10%
loss of volume during extended incubations.
Flow Valve — Gentle Vacuum

To apply a gentle vacuum to the apparatus, adjust the flow valve so that it is open to the
atmosphere, the vacuum source, and the vacuum manifold while the vacuum is on. Then,
use a finger to cover the valve port that is exposed to the atmosphere. The pressure of your
finger on the valve will regulate the amount of vacuum reaching the manifold.
Filtering or Centrifugation of Samples

For best results, filter or centrifuge samples to remove particulate matter that might restrict
the flow of solutions through the membrane.
Air Bubbles
Air bubbles trapped in the wells will prevent the sample from binding to the membrane. Air
bubbles may be removed by gently pipeting the solution up and down.
Membrane Removal
The best method for removing the membrane from the Bio-Dot units is to leave the vacuum on
while loosening the screws and removing the sample template. Then, turn off the vacuum and
remove the membrane.

Chapter 4
Detection
Detection
Detection Methods
Once proteins have been transferred to a membrane, they can be visualized using a variety
of specialized detection reagents (Figure 4.1). Protein standards are useful for monitoring
transfer efficiency of the experiment and serve as molecular weight markers for calibration of
blot patterns. Total protein stains allow visualization of the protein pattern on the blot and
immunological detection methods, employing antibody or ligand conjugates, allow
visualization of specific proteins of interest. This chapter reviews the various protein
standards, total protein stains, and immunological detection methods available.
Fig. 4.1. Protein detection

systems.
Immunological Total Protein
Detection Detection
Anionic Dyes Biotinylation Colloidal Gold Fluorescence
Amido Black or Optional

Biotin-Blot™ SYPRO Ruby
Coomassie Blue Enhancement
Kit Protein Blot Stain
R-250 Reagents
500 ng 50 ng 100 pg–1 ng 2–8 ng
Color
Chemiluminescence Other
Development
HRP AP HRP AP
Immun-Star™ Immun-Star Amplified Immun-Blot® Immun-Blot Immun-Blot

Opti-4CN DAB
HRP AP Opti-4CN™ HRP (4CN) AP Amplified AP
1–3 pg 10 pg 5 pg 100 pg 500 pg 500 pg 100 pg 10 pg
Immunogold
Autoradiography Bioluminescence Chemifluorescence Fluorescence
Labeling

Chapter 4 Detection
Protein Standards
Protein standards are mixtures of well-characterized or recombinant proteins and are
routinely used in electrophoresis and blotting applications. Protein standards:
• Provide a reference for determining the molecular weight of proteins identified by antibody
or ligand probes
• Are useful for monitoring transfer efficiency
• Serve as controls to ensure proper location of transferred bands in repetitive screening

experiments
Protein standards are available as either prestained, unstained, or biotinylated sets of

purified or recombinant proteins. In general, prestained standards allow easy and direct
visualization of their separation during electrophoresis and of their transfer to membranes.
Though prestained standards can also be used for estimation of molecular weight of
separated proteins, unstained or biotinylated standards are recommended for the most
accurate molecular weight determination. Applications of Bio-Rad’s blotting standards are
summarized in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1. Blotting standard selection guide.
Product Name Application Comparative Information

Prestained Standards
Precision Plus Protein • Molecular weight estimation • Sharpest prestained bands
dual color standards • Assessing transfer efficiency • Best for molecular weight estimation
• Monitoring electrophoretic separation • 2 colors plus reference bands
• Load-and-go format; no dilution
• Recombinant
all blue standards • Assessing transfer efficiency • Best for molecular weight estimation
• Monitoring electrophoretic separation • Blue bands plus reference bands
• Recombinant
Kaleidoscope™ standards • Assessing transfer efficiency • Best for molecular weight estimation
• Monitoring electrophoretic separation • 5 bright colors for easy band identification
• Recombinant
Kaleidoscope prestained • Assessing transfer efficiency • Individually colored proteins
standards • Monitoring electrophoretic separation • Prestained bands
• Available in broad molecular weight and polypeptide ranges
• Each lot individually calibrated (molecular weight will vary between lots)
Prestained SDS-PAGE • Assessing transfer efficiency • Economical
standards • Monitoring electrophoretic separation • Available in low, high, and broad molecular weight ranges
• Prestained all blue bands
• Each lot individually calibrated (molecular weight will vary between lots)
Unstained Standards
Precision Plus Protein • Molecular weight determination on blots • Integral Strep-tag sequence allows detection of standards
unstained standards along with antigen of interest (2-step detection)
• Sharpest unstained bands
• 10-band, well-spaced ladder
Biotinylated standards • Molecular weight determination on blots • Simultaneous detection with immunostained antigens
• Available in low, high, and broad molecular weight ranges
SDS-PAGE • Molecular weight determination on blots • Separate detection required using a total protein stain
unstained standards such as colloidal gold, Amido Black, or Ponceau S
• Available in low, high, and broad molecular weight ranges

Detection Chapter 4
250 kD 250 kD 250 kD Fig. 4.2. Bio-Rad’s selection of

210 kD 113 kD
216 kD prestained blotting standards.
150 150 150 92 Bio-Rad’s prestained standards are
125 36.4 kD available in low, high, and broad
100 100 100 208 kD 132
75 75 75 101 26.6 molecular weight ranges.
52.9
78
50 50 50
56.2 126 16
37 37 37 35.4
97 45.7 8.4
35.8
25 25 25 32.5
29 29
20 20 20 3.8
15 15 15 21
18.4
10 10 6.9 7.6
10 21.5 48
Precision Plus Precision Plus Precision Plus Prestained Prestained Prestained Kaleidoscope Kaleidoscope
Protein Protein Protein SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE Prestained Polypeptide
Kaleidoscope Dual Color All Blue Standards, Standards, Standards, Standards,* Standards*
Standards Standards Standards Broad Range* Low Range* High Range* Broad Range*
Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog #
161-0375 161-0374 161-0373 161-0318 161-0305 161-0309 161-0324 161-0325
* MW may vary from lot to lot
Prestained Standards for estimations of molecular weights on western

Western Blotting blots. Figure 4.2 and Table 4.2 summarize
Bio-Rad provides both recombinant and Bio-Rad’s prestained standards.
natural prestained standards. The ability to
visualize prestained standards during Recombinant Prestained Standards
electrophoresis makes them ideal for Advances in molecular biology and genetic
monitoring protein separation during gel engineering have led to the development
electrophoresis. The ease in transferring to of recombinant protein standards for
the blot also make them popular for electrophoresis. With recombinant
monitoring transfer efficiency and the technology, specific attributes, such as
general location of antigens in repetitive evenly spaced molecular weights or
screening assays (Tsang et al. 1984). This, customization of proteins with affinity tags
combined with recent improvements made for easy detection, may be designed and
in their design and manufacture, has made engineered into sets of protein standards.
prestained standards an excellent choice for Bio-Rad’s recombinant standards are in the
Precision Plus Protein standards family.
Table 4.2. Composition and molecular weights (in kD) of prestained standards.
A, recombinant prestained standards; B, natural prestained standards.
A B
Precision Plus Kaleidoscope Kaleidoscope
Protein Standards Prestained Polypeptide Prestained Prestained Prestained
Family* Standards** Standards** High Range** Low Range** Broad Range** Protein
250 202 – 205 – 208 Myosin
150 133 – 118 – 115 -Galactosidase
100 – – – 107 – Phosphorylase b
75 71 – 85 76 79.5 BSA
50 – – 47 52 49.5 Ovalbumin
37 41.8 38.6 – 36.8 34.8 Carbonic anhydrase
25 30.6 25 – 27.2 28.3 Soybean trypsin
20 inhibitor
15 17.8 16.3 – 19 20.4 Lysozyme
10 6.9 7.8 – – 7.2 Aprotinin

– 3.4 – – – Insulin
* The molecular weights for the Precision Plus Protein family do not vary from lot to lot.
** The molecular weights for the natural prestained standards are from a representative lot of standards; they will vary from lot to lot.

Chapter 4 Detection
Precision Plus Protein Prestained Natural Prestained SDS-PAGE

Fig. 4.3. Exceptional linearity
Standards Standards
of Precision Plus Protein™
standards. The standard curve Precision Plus Protein prestained standards Natural molecular weight standards are
was generated by plotting the log are a blend of ten recombinant proteins and
molecular weight (MW) versus the
blended from naturally occurring proteins,
migration distance (Rf) of each provide a ten-band, broad range molecular often providing a familiar band pattern.
protein standard band through an weight ladder (10–250 kD) with single (all Although very effective for monitoring gel
SDS-PAGE gel. Precision Plus
Protein Kaleidoscope standards
blue), dual (dual color), or multicolored separation and transfer efficiency, they have
showed r2 = 0.996, demonstrating (Kaleidoscope) protein bands (Figure 4.2). an inherent variability in the amount and
a very linear standard curve. The colors allow easy band referencing and location of dye that covalently binds to the
blot orientation. Because the proteins in the protein. This may produce broader bands
2.5
Precision Plus Protein standards are than seen in recombinant prestained
2.0
recombinant, and the staining technology is standards or in unstained standards,
log MW
1.5 optimized, their molecular weight does not making them less desirable for molecular
1.0 vary from lot to lot. Dye labeling can be weight estimations.
0.5 controlled more effectively, delivering
0.0 homogeneous staining and tight, sharp Kaleidoscope Standards
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
bands. All Precision Plus Protein prestained Kaleidoscope prestained standards contain
Rf individually colored proteins that allow
standards (all blue, dual color, Kaleidoscope)
deliver the most linear (r2 >0.995) standard instant band recognition on western blots or
curve available for prestained standards gels. The molecular weights of the proteins
(Figure 4.3). As a result, these standards may in each lot are calibrated against unstained
be used for highly accurate estimation of SDS-PAGE standards. The Kaleidoscope
molecular weight across a broad size range. standards are available in broad or low
molecular weight (polypeptide) formulations;
polypeptide standards are designed for use
with Tricine gels when resolving small
proteins and peptides.
Fig. 4.4. Bio-Rad’s unstained
Prestained SDS-PAGE Standards
and biotinylated protein
blotting standards. The Naturally occurring prestained SDS-PAGE
biotinylated standards were standards are available in specific size
detected with avidin-AP and
BCIP/NBT color development ranges: low, high, and broad.
reagents.
200 kD
250 kD 200 kD
97.4 kD 200 kD
200 kD
150 66.2 97.4 kD 200 kD 97.4 kD
116.3
66.2 97.4 66.2 200 kD
116.3 26.6 kD
100 97.4 116.3 116.3 116.3
45 45 97.4 45
66.2
66.2 97.4 17.0 97.4 66.2 116.3
75
14.4 31 97.4
50 31 45
45 45
31 66.2 66.2
6.5
37 66.2 31 21.5
31 21.5 31
3.5 21.5
25 1.4
21.5 14.4 14.4 45
20 21.5 21.5 6.5
14.4 14.4
15 14.4
6.5 45 45
10 6.5
14.4
Precision Plus Unstained SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE Polypeptide Silver Stain Silver Stain SDS-PAGE Biotinylated Biotinylated Biotinylated
Protein SDS-PAGE Standards, Standards, SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE Standards, SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE SDS-PAGE
Unstained Standards, Low Range High Range Standards Standards, Standards, SYPRO Standards, Standards, Standards,
Standards Broad Range Low Range High Range Orange, Broad Range Low Range High Range
Broad Range
Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog # Catalog #
161-0363 161-0317 161-0304 161-0303 161-0328 161-0314 161-0315 161-0332 161-0319 161-0306 161-0311

Detection Chapter 4
Table 4.3. Composition and molecular weights (in kD) of unstained standards.
A, recombinant unstained standards; B, natural unstained standards.
A B
Precision Plus
Protein Unstained SDS-PAGE and Biotinylated Standards
Standards Low Range High Range Broad Range Protein
250 – 200 200 Myosin
150 – 116.25 116.25 -Galactosidase
100 97.4 97.4 97.4 Phosphorylase b
75 66.2 66.2 66.2 BSA
50 45 45 45 Ovalbumin
37 31 – 31 Carbonic anhydrase
25 21.5 – 21.5 Soybean trypsin
20 inhibitor
15 14.4 – 14.4 Lysozyme
10 – – 6.5 Aprotinin
Unstained Standards for Individual

Precision Fig. 4.5. Overview of the
Western Blotting Plus Protein StrepTactin detection
standard system.
Bio-Rad provides recombinant, natural, and
with integrated
biotinylated unstained standards. Since Strep-tag
unstained standards contain only the protein sequence
Add
itself, they do not exhibit the variability in StrepTactin-AP
molecular weight that is often seen with or -HRP
conjugate StrepTactin
prestained standards. Therefore, unstained conjugate
standards, biotinylated standards, or binds
Strep-tag
standards with an affinity tag for blot sequence
detection deliver almost 100% molecular
weight accuracy across a linear curve and
are recommended for the most accurate Add substrate
molecular weight determinations for gels Colorless
or blots. Figure 4.4 and Table 4.3 substrate
summarize the composition and molecular comes in
contact with
weights of Bio-Rad’s unstained standards. StrepTactin-AP
or -HRP
Precision Plus Protein Unstained conjugate
Standards Substrate
converted
Precision Plus Protein unstained standards
to colored Standard band
provide a recombinant ten-band, broad compound is visualized by
range molecular weight ladder (10–250 kD). AP or HRP
These standards contain an affinity enzymatic
conversion of
Strep-tag peptide that displays an intrinsic substrate to
binding affinity towards StrepTactin, a colored
compound
genetically modified form of streptavidin. It is
the high-affinity binding of the Strep-tag
sequence to StrepTactin that allows
convenient and simultaneous detection of
both proteins and standards on western
blots (Figure 4.5) using either colorimetric or
chemiluminescent methods.

Chapter 4 Detection
E Biotinylated Standards Unstained SDS-PAGE Standards

E E
E Biotinylated protein standards have been The protein markers used for SDS-PAGE
E
developed specifically for accurate molecular gels form very tight bands that transfer
weight determinations in blotting applications reproducibly to membranes. Molecular
(Della-Penna et al. 1986). These proteins weight determination with these proteins,
Standards lane
have been treated with a limited amount of however, may require cutting the lane of
Sample lane biotin. Since biotin is a relatively small standards from the membrane and using a
Antigen molecule, the mobilities of the standard separate total protein stain for identification.
Biotin proteins in SDS-PAGE gels are not altered. After visualization, the cut strip must be
Avidin The biotinylated proteins form sharp, tight realigned with the probed membrane. If
Antibodies
E
bands with well-defined molecular weights anionic dye is used to stain the strip of
HRP or AP (enzyme)
and are processed simultaneously with the standards, the dye solvent may shrink
immunostained antigens. Therefore, they nitrocellulose membrane, making it necessary
Fig. 4.6. Detection of
biotinylated standards. provide fast, accurate, reproducible to measure Rf values and calculate molecular
Following transfer and addition of determinations of antigen molecular weights weight information. Alternatively, the entire
antigen-specific primary antibody,
avidin-HRP or avidin-AP is added to directly on the membrane. Bio-Rad’s blot may be stained with a washable anionic
the conjugated secondary antibody biotinylated standards are available in three total protein dye like Ponceau S (see Anionic
solution and applied to the
molecular weight ranges. Dyes, below) and the positions of the
membrane. Avidin binds to the
biotinylated standards while the standards on the blot marked with a pencil.
secondary antibody binds to the
Biotinylated standards are easily detected
SDS-PAGE standards are available in three
primary antibody. The standards using avidin or streptavidin conjugated with
and the protein of interest are molecular weight ranges.
horseradish peroxidase (avidin-HRP) or
detected simultaneously using the
appropriate color development alkaline phosphatase (avidin-AP) (Figure 4.6).
reagent system.
Total Protein Staining

Total protein staining of a membrane exact location of a specific antigen in
provides a visual image of the complete relation to other proteins is determined by
protein pattern. This information is required comparing two blotted membranes, one of
for the full characterization of specific which has been probed with an antibody
antigens detected in a complex protein and the other stained for total protein. Table
mixture. Since SDS-PAGE gels shrink during 4.4 compares the advantages and
staining procedures, comparison of an disadvantages of several total protein
immunologically probed membrane to a staining techniques.
stained gel is not practical. Instead, the
Table 4.4. Comparison of total protein staining methods.
Method Sensitivity Advantages Disadvantages

Anionic dyes 100–1,000 ng Inexpensive, rapid Low sensitivity; shrinks membrane
Colloidal gold 1 ng Very sensitive, rapid; optional enhancement Expensive
(enhanced) (10–100 pg) increases detection sensitivity
Biotinylation 50 ng Sensitive assay Results fade with time
Fluorescence 2–8 ng Mass spectrometry compatible UV fluorescence detection system
required

Detection Chapter 4
Anionic Dyes Colloidal Gold

The first techniques developed for total An alternative to anionic dyes that provides
protein staining of blotted membranes used detection sensitivities that rival those of
the same anionic dyes commonly used for immunological detection methods is
staining proteins in polyacrylamide gels. colloidal gold (Moeremans et al. 1987,
Dyes that became popular for detecting Rohringer and Holden 1985). When a
proteins bound to membranes include solution of colloidal gold particles is
Amido Black (Towbin et al. 1979), incubated with proteins bound to a
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Burnette nitrocellulose or PVDF membrane, the gold
1981), Ponceau S, and Fast Green FCF binds to the proteins through electrostatic
(Reinhart and Malamud 1982). Of the adsorption. The resulting gold-protein
anionic dyes used, Amido Black and complex produces a transient, reddish-pink
Ponceau S are the best choices because color due to the optical properties of
they destain rapidly in distilled water or low colloidal gold. This gold-protein interaction is
concentrations of methanol and produce the basis for total protein staining with
very little background staining. Coomassie colloidal gold as well as for specific,
Brilliant Blue gives high background immunogold detection (see Immunogold
staining, even after long destaining Detection below).
procedures. Fast Green is not tightly bound
Silver enhancement of the colloidal gold
to the proteins, so the dye can be easily
signal produces a stable, dark brown
removed after visualization to allow
reaction product and enhances sensitivity
subsequent immunological probing.
down to 10 pg of protein. The method of
These dyes are easy to prepare and they silver enhancement makes use of the fact
stain proteins quickly, but they are relatively that gold particles can reduce silver ions in
insensitive when compared to immunological solution; this reduction leads to deposition of
detection assays. The stains that require the silver on top of the gold and the effective
alcohol-containing solutions (for example, growth of the metallic particle. Since
Amido Black, Coomassie Brilliant Blue, Fast methanol is not required, colloidal gold with
Green FCF) for solubility can shrink silver enhancement has the advantage over
nitrocellulose membranes, making direct the anionic dyes of not shrinking the
comparison of an immunologically detected membrane during staining. Exact
antigen to the total protein on the stained comparisons between membranes stained
membrane difficult. Amido Black 10B and for total protein and membranes used for
Coomassie Blue R-250 are available from immunological detection are possible.
Bio-Rad.
Bio-Rad’s colloidal gold total protein stain is
provided ready to use with an optional gold
enhancement kit. Alternatively, the colloidal
gold stain and silver enhancement kit are
available as components of the enhanced
colloidal gold total protein detection kit.

Chapter 4 Detection
Biotinylation Fluorescence
Bio-Rad’s Biotin-Blot total protein detection Fluorescent protein stains like SYPRO Ruby,
kit provides a sensitive total protein detection SYPRO Red, SYPRO Orange, and Deep
method that takes advantage of the high- Purple provide highly sensitive detection of
affinity binding of avidin to biotin. This proteins on blots as well as in gels. SYPRO
method uses NHS-biotin to biotinylate all Ruby protein blot stain allows detection as
proteins on the membrane surface, followed low as 2–8 ng. After staining, target proteins
by incubations with an avidin-horseradish can be detected by colorimetric or
peroxidase (avidin-HRP) conjugate and the chemiluminescent immunodetection
HRP color-development reagent to detect methods, or analyzed by microsequencing or
the biotinylated proteins. The assay is 10–50 mass spectrometry with no interference from
times more sensitive than the anionic stains, the protein stain.
and does not require methanol. Exact
comparison of the immunologically detected
membranes and membranes stained for
total protein is possible.
Immunological Detection Systems

Transfer Immunological detection systems are used fluorescent compound or gold particles, or
▼ to identify specific proteins blotted to conjugated to an enzyme like AP or HRP.
Block unbound membrane sites membranes. Though there are numerous For many years, radiolabeled secondary
▼ systems available for immunological antibodies were the method of choice for
Incubate wth primary antibody detection, the basic procedure for these detection, but newer methods have evolved
▼ assays varies very little. that are less hazardous and easier to use
Wash
than radioactivity, yet maintain the same
▼ The basic steps for immunological detection
degree of sensitivity. Available detection
Incubate wth conjugated of a specific protein in a blot are
secondary antibody or ligand methods now include — in addition to
summarized in Figure 4.7. After the proteins
▼ autoradiography of radiolabeled probes —
have been transferred to the membrane, the
Wash colorimetric, chemiluminescent,
membrane is blocked, incubated with a
▼ bioluminescent, chemifluorescent,
Develop signal based on color or
primary antibody, washed, incubated with a
fluorescent, and immunogold detection.
chemiluminescence secondary antibody, and washed again. The
▼ primary antibody is specific for the protein of
Documentation and analysis interest, and the secondary antibody enables
of results
its detection (Figure 4.8). The secondary
antibody can be radiolabeled, labeled with a
Fig. 4.7. Basic immunological
detection procedure.

Detection Chapter 4
Blocking Reagents (HRP), and an enzyme-substrate reaction is S
Following transfer, unoccupied binding sites part of the detection process (Figure 4.8). 4
P
on the membranes must be blocked to
Antibody incubations are generally carried
prevent nonspecific binding of probes; 3
out in antibody buffer containing Tris-
failure to adequately saturate the membrane
buffered saline with Tween (TTBS) and a
can lead to high background, since many
blocking reagent. Various formulations of
probes are also proteins, and can also bind
antibody buffer are provided in the Appendix
to the membrane. 2
of this manual.
A variety of blocking reagents are available, 1
including gelatin, nonfat milk, and bovine Primary Antibodies
serum albumin (BSA), which are compared The primary antibody recognizes and binds
in Table 4.5. It is often useful to optimize to the target antigen on the membrane. For
Fig 4.8. Specific enzymatic
the detection system for minimal incubations with primary antibody, the entire detection of membrane-bound
background with no loss of signal by blot must be covered with antibody- antigens. 1, gelatin blocks
unoccupied sites on the
testing several blocking agents. The type of containing solution. The appropriate membrane; 2, primary antibody to
membrane will also affect the selection of concentration or dilution (titer) of the primary a specific antigen is incubated with
blocker. Formulations for the different antibody must be determined empirically for the membrane; 3, a blotting grade
antibody-enzyme conjugate is
blocking solutions are available in the each new lot of primary antibody. added to bind to the primary
Appendix of this manual. antibody; 4, substrate reagent is
The optimal antibody concentration is then added to the blot. The enzyme
usually considered to be the greatest catalyzes the substrate (S) to form
Antibody Incubations dilution of antibody still resulting in a strong
a detectable product (P) at the site
of the antigen-antibody complex.
An antibody is a protein that is synthesized positive signal without background or
by an animal in response to exposure to a nonspecific reactions. Generally, when
foreign substance, or antigen. Antibodies serum or tissue culture supernatants are the
(also called immunoglobulins) have specific source of primary antibody, a 1:100–
affinity for the antigens that elicited their 1:1,000 dilution of the primary antibody in
synthesis. buffer is used. Chromatographically purified
A typical experimental system utilizes two monospecific antibodies may be used at
layers of antibody in the detection procedure. dilutions of 1:500–1:10,000, and a
The primary antibody is directed against the 1:1,000–1:100,000 dilution may be used
target antigen; the antigen may be a ligand when ascites fluid is the source of antibody.
on a protein, the protein itself, a specific The Mini-PROTEAN® II multiscreen
epitope on a protein, or a carbohydrate apparatus and mini incubation trays
group. The secondary antibody is specific described at the end of this chapter are
for the primary antibody; it is usually useful tools for determining antibody titer.
conjugated to an enzyme such as alkaline
phosphatase (AP) or horseradish peroxidase
Table 4.5. Comparison of blocking reagents.
Blocking Membrane Recommended

Reagent Compatibility Concentration Notes
Gelatin Nitrocellulose 1–3% Requires heat to solubilize
Nonfat dry milk, Nitrocellulose, PVDF 0.5–5% PVDF requires higher concentrations of
BLOTTO, blotting- nonfat milk than nitrocellulose
grade blocker
BSA Nitrocellulose, PVDF 1–5% PVDF requires higher concentrations of
BSA than nitrocellulose
Tween 20 Nitrocellulose 0.05–0.3% May strip some proteins from the blot

Chapter 4 Detection
Species-Specific Secondary against an unrelated species; for example,

Antibodies human IgG for anti-rabbit and anti-mouse
Blotting-grade species-specific secondary antibodies, and bovine IgG for anti-human
antibodies are the detection reagents of reagents, to remove antibodies that are not
choice. Secondary antibodies are specific specific for the species of interest. Because
for the isotype (class) and the species of the blotting grade antibodies are directed to
primary antibody (for instance, a goat anti- both heavy and light chains of the IgG
rabbit secondary antibody is an antibody molecules, the reagents can be used to
generated in goat for detection of a rabbit identify IgM- and IgA-class antibodies as
primary antibody). Secondary antibodies well as all subtypes of IgG antibodies.
bind to multiple sites on primary antibodies
Secondary antibodies are generally used at
to increase detection sensitivity.
dilutions of ~1:3,000.
Secondary antibodies can be labeled and
detected in a variety of ways. The antibody Antibody-Specific Ligands
can be linked to a fluorescent compound or Protein A and protein G are bacterial cell
to gold particles, but most commonly the surface proteins that bind to the Fc regions
antibody is conjugated to an enzyme, such of immunoglobulin molecules (Akerstrom et
as HRP or AP. If the secondary antibody is al. 1985, Boyle and Reis 1987, Goding
biotinylated, biotin-avidin-HRP or -AP 1978, Langone 1982). The advantage of
complexes can be formed. Addition of a using protein A or protein G is their ability to
suitable enzyme substrate results in bind to antibodies of many different species
production of a colored precipitate or (Table 4.6). This is often desirable for
fluorescent or chemiluminescent laboratories using antibody probes from
product through oxidation (by HRP) or many different species or using one of the
dephosphorylation (by AP). less common primary antibody systems in
their experiments; that is, rat, goat, or
Since the purity of the reagents is critical to
guinea pig. In addition, these reagents only
the success of the experiment, sera must
bind to antibody molecules; this can reduce
be affinity purified to obtain only those
the background from nonspecific binding of
antibodies directed against the particular
antibodies to membrane-bound proteins
IgG. Otherwise, background staining and
when a low-titer, poorly purified second
false positive reactions due to nonspecific
antibody is used. The major limitation of
antibody binding may occur. The purified
protein A and protein G conjugates is their
antibody solution should be cross-adsorbed
Table 4.6. Immunoglobulin-binding specificities of protein A and protein G.
Immunoglobulin Protein A Protein G Immunoglobulin Protein A Protein G

Human IgG1 ●● ●● Pig IgG ● ●●
Human IgG2 ●● ●● Rabbit IgG ●● ●●
Human IgG3 — ●● Bovine IgG1 — ●●
Human IgG4 ●● ●● Bovine IgG2 ●● ●●
Mouse IgG1 ● ● Sheep IgG1 — ●●
Mouse IgG2a ●● ●● Sheep IgG2 ● ●●
Mouse IgG2b ●● ●● Goat IgG1 ● ●●
Mouse IgG3 ●● ●● Goat IgG2 ●● ●●
Rat IgG1 ● ● Horse IgG(ab) ● ●●
Rat IgG2a — ●● Horse IgG(c) ● ●●
Rat IgG2b ●● ● Horse IgG(t) — ●
Rat IgG2c ●● ●● Dog IgG ●● ●
●● = Strong binding ● = Weak binding — = No binding

Detection Chapter 4
lower sensitivity. Because only one ligand molecule binds to each Target protein
antibody, the enhancement of a multiple-binding detection system,
such as a species-specific polyclonal antibody, is lost. Generally, the Primary antibody
species-specific antibody is 10–50 times more sensitive than the
Secondary antibody
ligand reagent when the same detection system is used.
Enzyme conjugate
Washes Substrate
Between the two antibody incubations and prior to detection, the A. Colorimetric detection
Product
blot must be washed to remove excess antibody to prevent
Label (radiolabel or fluorophore)
nonspecific binding. Though the washing solutions and times may
vary, depending on the antibodies and detection systems used, Emitted light or radiation
washes generally utilize tris-buffered saline (TBS) or TBS with Precipitate

additional detergent (Tween 20; TTBS). Note that the addition of
detergent may inhibit certain detection reactions — see the
Fig. 4.9. Mechanisms of
instruction manuals for details. Wash buffer formulations are detection chemistries.
described in the Appendix of this manual. In each method of western blot
detection, a detectable signal is
B. Chemiluminescence
generated following binding of an
Detection Methods antibody specific for the protein of
interest. In colorimetric detection
Blotted proteins are generally detected using secondary antibodies (A), the signal is a colored
that are labeled with radioisotopes or colloidal gold, or conjugated precipitate. In chemiluminescent (B)
and bioluminescent (C) detection,
to fluorophores, biotin, or an enzyme like HRP or AP. Early blotting
the reaction itself emits light.
systems used 125I-labeled reagents similar to those used in Chemiluminescent and
radioimmunoassay. These systems provide sensitive results, but bioluminescent detection are
distinguished by the source of the
the special handling and disposal problems of 125I reagents have substrate. In chemifluorescent
discouraged continued use of this technique. Instead, a number of detection (D), the product is
C. Bioluminescence fluorescent. Fluorescent detection,
enzyme systems and detection reagents evolved (Figure 4.9 and autoradiography, and immunogold
Table 4.7). detection record the signal
generated by a labeled secondary
By far, the most commonly used detection methods use secondary antibody. In fluorescent detection,
the antibody is labeled with a
antibodies conjugated to HRP or AP. With these systems, when the
fluorophore, while in auto-
enzyme substrate is added, either a colored precipitate is deposited radiography, it is labeled with a
on the blot (colorimetric detection) or a chemiluminescent or radioactive isotope (E). In
immunogold detection (F), the
fluorescent product is formed (chemiluminescent and chemi- secondary antibody is labeled with
fluorescent detection) and the light signal is captured on film or with gold, and signal is generally
D. Chemifluorescence enhanced by silver precipitation.
a CCD or fluorescence imager.
Enzymes such as AP and HRP convert several substrates to a
colored precipitate. As the precipitate accumulates on the blot, a
colored signal develops that is visible on the blot (Figure 4.9A). The
enzyme reaction can be monitored and stopped when the desired
signal over background is produced. Colorimetric detection is easier E. Fluorescence/
to use than any film-based detection method, which must be autoradiography
developed by trial and error, and uses costly materials such as X-ray
film and darkroom chemicals. Au
Colorimetric detection is typically considered a medium-sensitivity

method, compared to radioactive or chemiluminescent detection.
F. Immungold detection

Chapter 4 Detection
Table 4.7. Comparison of detection reagent systems.
HRP AP
Sensitivity 500 pg (4CN and DAB) 100 pg (Immun-Blot®)
1–3 pg (Immun-Star™ HRP) 10 pg (Immun-Star AP)
10 pg (Immun-Blot amplified AP)
Substrates 4CN — purple BCIP/NBT — purple
DAB — brown CDP-Star — emits light
Luminol — emits light
Comparative cost Least expensive More expensive
Stability of stored blots Poor for 4CN and DAB Good
Good for Immun-Star kits
Restrictions Azide inhibits peroxidase Endogenous phosphatase
activity activity also detected
However, Bio-Rad has colorimetric systems sensitive as AP colorimetric detection

that offer very high sensitivity equal to systems. Fading of blots upon exposure to
detection by chemiluminescence (Table 4.8). light, inhibition of HRP activity by azide,
and nonspecific color precipitation are
Colorimetric HRP Systems
additional limitations of HRP colorimetric
Colorimetric HRP systems were the first detection systems.
enzyme-conjugates used for immunological
detection of blotted proteins. The advantage Opti-4CN Substrate and Detection Kits
of HRP systems was that both the enzyme Colorimetric HRP detection with 4CN
conjugate and colorimetric detection presents very low background and a
substrates were economical. The most detection sensitivity of about 500 pg of
common color substrates for HRP are antigen. Bio-Rad’s Opti-4CN kit improves
4-chloro-1-naphthol (4CN) (Hawkes et al. this detection sensitivity to 100 pg.
1982) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) Opti-4CN is available as a premixed
(Tsang et al. 1985) (Figure 4.10). HRP substrate kit or combined with an HRP-
colorimetric detection systems are not as conjugated antibody in a detection kit.
Table 4.8. Colorimetric detection systems.
Detection Detection
Method Substrate Sensitivity Signal Color Product Options Advantages Disadvantages
Colorimetric HRP 4CN 500 pg Purple • Dry powder, liquid • Fast color development, • Results fade over time;
substrate, Immun-Blot kits low cost, low background azide inhibits
enzyme activity
DAB 500 pg Brown • Dry powder • Fast color development, • More safety
low background precautions than for
other substrates
• Azide inhibits
enzyme activity
Opti-4CN 100 pg Purple • Liquid substrate, • High sensitivity, nonfading • More expensive
Opti-4CN kit color, low background than 4CN
Amplified 5 pg Purple • Amplified Opti-4CN kit • Best sensitivity available; • More steps than
Opti-4CN no extra materials (such unamplified protocol
as X-ray film) needed
Colorimetric AP BCIP/NBT 100 pg Purple • Dry powder, liquid • Stable storage of data • Detects endogenous
substrate, Immun-Blot kits phosphatase activity
Amplified 10 pg Purple • Amplified AP • High sensitivity • More steps than
BCIP/NBT Immun-Blot kit unamplified protocol

Detection Chapter 4
DAB 4CN
HRP + H2O2 Fig. 4.10. Colorimetric
OH detection options with HRP.
DAB and 4CN are commonly used
HRP–O chromogenic substrates for HRP. In
the presence of H2O2, HRP
••
H2N NH2 catalyzes the oxidation of the
substrate into a product that is
visible on a blot. Left, reaction with
H2N NH2 DAB; right, reaction with 4CN.
–1e– CI
HRP + H2O2
HN+
• ••
NH + HRP–O + H2O
H2N NH2 H2O

–1e– Quinone iminium cation radical O
HN+
•
NH
Polymerization to complex
brown precipitate
Insoluble purple
H2N NH2 product
n
H CI
Amplified Opti-4CN Substrate and Detection Kits Premixed and Individual HRP
Amplified Opti-4CN substrate and detection Colorimetric Substrates
kits are based on proprietary HRP-activated Premixed enzyme substrate kits and
amplification reagents from Bio-Rad. These development reagents, including powdered
kits allow colorimetric detection to 5 pg, 4CN and DAB color development reagents,
which is comparable to or even exceeds the are also available. The premixed kits are
sensitivity that is achieved with radiometric convenient and reliable and reduce
or chemiluminescence systems, without the exposure to hazardous reagents used in the
cost or time involved in darkroom color development of protein blots.
development of blots.
Immun-Blot HRP Assay Kits

Immun-Blot assay kits provide the reagents
required to perform standard HRP/4CN
colorimetric detection on western blots with
the added convenience of premixed buffers
and enzyme substrates.

Chapter 4 Detection
Colorimetric AP Systems Immun-Blot AP Assay Kits

Colorimetric AP systems use soluble The Immun-Blot AP assay kits provide the
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate essential reagents to perform colorimetric
(BCIP) and Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) as detection on western blots with the added
substrates to produce a stable reaction convenience of premixed buffers and
product that will not fade (Figure 4.11). AP enzyme substrates. All kit components are
can be easily inactivated by exposure to individually quality-control tested in blotting
acidic solutions. Multiple probing of the applications. Included in each kit is an
same membrane with alternative antibody instruction manual with a thoroughly tested
probes is easily performed using substrates protocol and troubleshooting guide that
that produce different colors, such as blue simplifies immunological detection.
and red (Blake et al. 1984, Turner 1983).
Immun-Blot Amplified AP Kit
Increased sensitivity in western blot
experiments can be achieved by utilizing an
BCIP
Fig. 4.11. AP colorimetric amplified AP procedure (Bayer and Wilchek
development. In the colorimetric ONa
1980, Chaiet and Wolf 1964, Guesdon et al.
system, AP catalyzes the substrates
BCIP and NBT to produce a colored O P ONa 1979, Hsu et al. 1981). This detection
precipitate visualizing the protein system begins by using a biotinylated
on a western blot. First the CI O
dephosphorylation of BCIP by AP
secondary antibody. Relying on the specific
Br
occurs, yielding a bromochloro binding properties of biotin and avidin, a
indoxyl intermediate. The indoxyl is complex of streptavidin and biotinylated AP
then oxidized by NBT to produce an
indigoid dye (purple precipitate). The N is then added to the membrane. Because
H
NBT is also reduced by the indoxyl, streptavidin will bind more than one
opening the tetrazole ring to AP + H2O
produce an insoluble diformazan
molecule of biotin, the initial site of the
(blue precipitate). The combination primary antibody-to-antigen binding is
of the indigoid dye of the BCIP and
the insoluble formazan of the NBT
forms a purple-blue colored – OPO32–
precipitate.
CI O NBT
Br
+ N N +
N N
2 H
+ C C
H N N
N N N
BC indoxyl intermediate H
O O
–O +
N N
+
O–
CI O O
O
Br H
N
N Br
H
O
Indigoid dye CI
(purple precipitate)
N N
N N
H C C H
N N
N N
O O
–O +
N N
+
O–
O Insoluble diformazan O
(blue precipitate)

Detection Chapter 4
effectively converted into multiple AP Chemiluminescent Detection

S 3
binding sites available for color development Chemiluminescence is a chemical reaction
(Figure 4.12). Color development is in which a chemical substrate is catalyzed P
performed using conventional AP by an enzyme, such as AP or HRP, and
substrates, as discussed previously. The produces detectable light as a by-product
Immun-Blot amplified AP kit increases the (Figures 4.9B, 4.13, and 4.14A). The light 1 2
detection sensitivity of colorimetric western signal can be captured on X-ray film, or by
blotting to ≥10 pg of protein. a charge-coupled device (CCD) imager such
as the VersaDoc™ and ChemiDoc™ systems.
Premixed and Individual AP
Colorimetric Substrates
This technology is easily adapted to existing
Premixed enzyme substrate kits are western blotting procedures because
convenient and reliable and reduce chemiluminescence uses enzyme-
exposure to hazardous reagents. conjugated antibodies for the activation of
the light signal. The blocking and wash Fig. 4.12. Immun-Blot amplified
AP kit.
methods are familiar procedures.
1. Biotinylated secondary antibody
binds to primary antibody.
2. Complex of streptavidin and
CDP-Star Luminol
biotinylated-AP binds to biotin of
O O NH2 O secondary antibody.
O CH3 3. Multiple APs are available to
convert substrate (S) to colored
NH precipitate (P).
CI OPO3Na2
NH
AP + H2O CI O
HRP + H2O2
– OPO32–
O O
O CH3 NH2 O–
CI
O– N
O Peroxy
O intermediate
N
CI
O–
O
O CH3 *
O Fig. 4.13. Chemiluminescent
+ O– NH2 * detection. The secondary

antibody is linked to an enzyme,
CI
COO– which catalyzes a reaction leading
Product in to light emission. Left, CDP-Star or
excited state another 1,2-dioxetane AP substrate
CI
is dephosphorylated by AP,
Product in excited state COO– resulting in formation of an excited-
state anion that emits light. Right,
luminol oxidized by HRP in the
presence of H2O2 leads to
Light formation of a 3-aminophthalate
Light emission dianion and the release of light.

Chapter 4 Detection
Table 4.9. Chemiluminescence detection systems.
Detection
Detection Method Substrate Sensitivity Product Options Advantages Disadvantages
Chemiluminescent HRP Luminol 1–3 pg • Conjugates • Short (30 sec) exposure • Azide inhibits enzyme activity
• HRP substrate • Signal duration 6–8 hr
• Immun-Blot kits • Compatible with PVDF
and nitrocellulose
• Working solution stable for
24 hr at room temperature
Chemiluminescent AP CDP-Star 10 pg • Conjugates • 30 sec to 5 min exposure • Endogenous phosphatase

• AP substrate • Signal continues for 24 hr activity may lead to
• Immun-Blot kits after activation false positives
• Blot can be reactivated
A film exposure. Detection of protein down to

Fig. 4.14. Detection of CDK7 1 2 3 4 5 6
and Precision Plus Protein™ low picogram amounts is typical of these
unstained standards using the systems. This is more sensitive than most
Immun-Star HRP chemi-
luminescent detection kit.
colorimetric systems, and approximately
A, proteins and 0.5 µl of standards equal to radioisotopic detection. The
(lane 1) and a dilution series of a detection sensitivity is dependent on the
HeLa cell lysate (lanes 2–6) were
electrophoresed on a 4–20% affinity of the protein, primary antibody, and
Criterion™ gel and transferred to secondary antibody and can vary from one
a nitrocellulose membrane. The
optimal amount of standards to
sample to another.
load on the blot was first
determined using a dilution series. Safety is another advantage of chemi-
The blot was probed with an luminescent detection. It does not have
antibody specific for human CDK7
followed by an HRP-conjugated
the disadvantages related to isotope
secondary antibody and detection, such as exposure of personnel
StrepTactin-HRP conjugate. After a B to radiation, high disposal costs, and
2 min incubation in the Immun-Star 1 2 3 4 5 6
HRP detection solution, the blot environmental concerns.
was exposed to film for 5 sec.
B, proteins from an identical gel, Immun-Star Chemiluminescent
except with 10 µl of standards, were Western Blotting Kits
stained with Bio-Safe™ Coomassie
stain (catalog #161-0786) to Immun-Star kits include either CDP-Star
visualize total protein. substrate, which is activated by AP, or
luminol, which is activated by HRP. The
Immun-Star kits produce a strong signal on
either nitrocellulose or PVDF. The light signal
generated with Immun-Star kits not only
gives a fast exposure, but also lasts for as
long as 24 hr (Immun-Star AP kit) after initial
activation of the blot. These blots can also be
reactivated with fresh substrate, even weeks
The advantages of chemiluminescent after the signal has been depleted (Figure
western blotting over other methods are its 4.14). They can also be stripped and
speed and sensitivity (Table 4.9). This reprobed multiple times.
method is perfect for CCD imaging, which
avoids the slow film step. Exposure times
with average blots are usually 30 sec to 5
min. This is a large improvement over 125I
systems, which can require up to 48 hr for

Detection Chapter 4
De-Expose™ Background Remover Chemifluorescence Before After

for X-Ray Film Chemifluorescence is the enzymatic
De-Expose background remover allows conversion of a substrate to a fluorescent
removal of background from overexposed product. Fluorogenic compounds
X-ray film. It can be used for film-based (nonfluorescent or weakly fluorescent
chemiluminescent detection as well as in substances that can be converted to
any application that uses X-ray film fluorescent products) are available to use
exposure. De-Expose background remover with a wide variety of enzymes, including AP
can fix background problems regardless of and HRP. The enzyme cleaves a phosphate
cause, whether overexposure of film, group from a fluorogenic substrate to yield a
insufficient or incorrect blocking solution, highly fluorescent product (Figure 4.9D). The
contaminated transfer buffer, impure fluorescence can be detected using a
antibodies, or incorrect antibody or probe fluorescence imager such as the Molecular
dilution. The kit also removes speckles and Imager FX™ Pro Plus system or VersaDoc™
corrects the intensity of overloaded bands system and quantitated using Quantity One® Overloaded bands
(Figure 4.15). software. Chemifluorescence can provide a
stable fluorescent reaction product, so that Before After
Other Detection Methods blots can be scanned at a convenient time.
Bioluminescence The method is compatible with standard
Bioluminescence is the natural phenomenon stripping and reprobing procedures.
of light emission by many organisms.
Fluorescence
Bioluminescent systems differ in the structure
and function of enzymes and cofactors In fluorescent detection (Figure 4.9E), the
involved in the process as well as the secondary antibody is labeled with a
mechanism of the light-generating reactions. fluorophore such as fluorescein (FITC),
Texas Red, rhodamine (TRITC), or
Bioluminescence is also used as a detection R-phycoerythrin. The main advantage of
method for proteins and nucleic acids on a fluorescent detection is that it can provide a
membrane. Bioluminescent detection 10-fold greater linear dynamic range with
involves incubation of the membrane (with only 2- to 4-fold reduced sensitivity over
bound antigen-antibody-enzyme complex) in chemiluminescent detection. Fluorescent Overexposed film
a bioluminogenic substrate and simultaneous western blot detection can therefore provide
measurement of emitted light (Figure 4.9C). better linearity and better quantitation within
The substrate involved in this detection Figure 4.15. Before and after
the detection limits. Fluorescent detection images demonstrate the
system is a luciferin-based derivative. Light also allows multiplexing. Multiplexing with effectiveness of De-Expose
detection is performed using a photon- different colored fluorophores allows background remover.
counting camera and the blotted proteins simultaneous detection of several target
are visualized as bright spots. proteins on the same blot.
This technique is similar to chemi- Autoradiography
luminescence in its sensitivity and speed of The gamma-emitting radioisotope 125I can
detection but it is not widely used and few be used to label the –NH2 group of lysines
bioluminogenic substrates are commercially in immunoglobulins for radiometric antigen
available. PVDF is the preferred membrane detection. Direct immunological detection
for bioluminescent detection because (using labeled secondary antibodies) of as
nitrocellulose membranes may contain little as 1 pg of dotted immunoglobulin is
substances that inhibit luciferase activity. possible with high specific activity 125I
probes. Radiolabeled blots can be detected
using X-ray film, a method known as
autoradiography (Figure 4.9E).

Chapter 4 Detection
Immunogold Labeling Luminescent Detection

Immunogold detection methods utilize gold- For chemiluminescent detection methods,
labeled secondary antibodies for antigen CCD imaging is the easiest, most accurate,
detection. Because this method has and rapid method. Traditionally, the chemi-
relatively low sensitivity and the signal is not luminescent signal from blots has been
permanent, silver enhancement methods detected by X-ray film. The popularity of
similar to those described above for chemiluminescence has led to development
colloidal gold total protein stains were of special films with enhanced sensitivity
developed as a means of enhancing the to the blue wavelengths of light emitted by
signal. With silver enhancement, a stable the chemiluminescent substrates. Film
dark brown signal with little background is is a sensitive medium to capture the
produced on the blot (Figure 4.9F), and chemiluminescent signal but suffers from a
sensitivity is increased 10-fold, equivalent to sigmoidal response to light that has a narrow
colorimetric AP detection and several times linear region, which limits its dynamic range.
more sensitive than autoradiography. To gather information from a blot, which
has both intense and weak signals, it is
Imaging — Documentation necessary to perform multiple exposures to
and Analysis Methods produce data for all samples in the linear
Several methods are employed for the range of the film. A process termed
documentation of western blotting results: preflashing can improve linearity, but this
X-ray film or digital charge-coupled device requires extra equipment and effort.
(CCD) camera imaging for luminescent Additionally, quantitation of data collected
signals, CCD or laser-based imaging by exposure to film requires digitization
systems for the capture and documentation (that is, scanning of X-ray film with a
of fluorescent and colorimetric signals, and densitometer).
X-ray film or phosphor imagers for
radiolabeled samples (Table 4.10).
Table 4.10. Comparison of western blot documentation and analysis methods.
Laser-Based
Film Densitometry CCDs Systems
Exposure Time
Dynamic range 1.8 3.0 2–4.8 4.8
(orders of magnitude)
Linear response through- No Yes Yes Yes
out dynamic range
Cost Initial investment Initial investment Initial investment Initial investment
of processor plus of densitometer of imaging system of imaging system
recurring consumable
expenses
Detection Method
Bioluminescent No No Yes No
Chemiluminescent Yes No Yes No
Chemifluorescent No No Yes Yes
Fluorescent No No Yes Yes
Colorimetric No Yes Yes Yes
Autoradiography Yes No No Yes
Detection System N/A GS-800™ ChemiDoc XRS Molecular
or VersaDoc Imager FX
4000/5000 Pro Plus

Detection Chapter 4
A CCD camera is capable of capturing data Another advantage of fluorescent and

with a linear response over a broad dynamic chemifluorescent detection is that CCD
range. The linear dynamic range of CCD and laser-based detection limits generally
systems is 2–4.8 orders of magnitude, far exceed the dynamic ranges of the
depending on the bit depth of the system. fluorescent assays currently used for protein
CCD systems also offer convenience by detection.
providing a digital record of experiments for
Colorimetric samples can be easily recorded
data analysis, sharing, and archiving, and by
and analyzed with a densitometer such as
eliminating the need to continually purchase
the GS-800 calibrated densitometer.
consumables for film development. Another
The densitometer provides a digital record
advantage of the CCD camera is its ability
of the blot, excellent resolution, reproducible
to approach the limit of signal detection in a
results, and accurate quantitation. The
relatively short time. For example, the
GS-800 also uses red-, green-, and blue-
VersaDoc 5000 imaging system can reach
color CCD technology to greatly improve
the limit of detection of a given experiment
the detection of a wide range of colorimetric
in less than one minute. For the same
detection reagents.
experiment, Kodak Bio-Max film requires
about 30 min to reach the same limit of
Autoradiography
detection.
To detect the commonly used radioisotopes,
35S, 32P, 33P, 12C, and 125I, the most widely
Fluorescent, Chemifluorescent, and
used method is autoradiography on X-ray
film. Autoradiography provides a good
Fluorescent, chemifluorescent, and
combination of sensitivity and resolution
colorimetric detection all benefit from
without a large investment. For direct
the advantages of digital imaging —
autoradiography without intensifying screens
convenience, digital records of experiments,
or scintillators, the response of the film is
sensitive limit of detection, and wide
linear only within a range of 1–2 orders of
dynamic range. Fluorescent and
magnitude. When intensifying screens or
chemifluorescent signals can be detected
fluorographic scintillators are used to
with a wide range of imaging systems
increase sensitivity, the response of the film
including both CCD and laser-based
is nonlinear, but it can easily be made linear
technologies. For example, the VersaDoc
by preexposing the film to a flash of light.
and Molecular Imager FX Pro Plus systems
Phosphor imagers, such as Bio-Rad’s
can be used similarly to detect fluorescent
Molecular Imager FX Pro Plus multiimager,
and chemifluorescent signals. The decision
offer an alternative to film detection
to use one type of technology over another
methods. The initial investment in
will depend on budget and requirements for
instrumentation offers increased sensitivity
limit of detection and resolution. CCD
and dynamic range compared to X-ray film,
systems are generally less expensive than
and exposure times are 10 to 20 times
laser-based systems. While the dynamic
shorter than those for film. The ability to
range of CCD imaging systems varies from
accurately quantitate data is also much
2 to 4.8 orders of magnitude, laser-based
greater with storage phosphor screens
systems do not provide a choice of dynamic
because the linear dynamic range of
ranges but do provide the widest dynamic
phosphor imagers is significantly greater,
range (4.8 orders of magnitude) available.
4.8 orders of magnitude, enabling accurate
The resolution of CCD and laser-based
quantitation and the elimination of
systems is similar, with the finest resolution
overexposure and saturated signals.
settings generally being 50 µm or less.

Chapter 4 Detection
Table 4.11. Multiscreen apparatus specifications.
Membrane size (W x L) 8 x 7 cm
Number of sample templates 2
Channels per template 20
Sample volume per channel 200–600 µl
Dimensions (W x L x H) 27 x 11 x 6 cm
Screening Apparatus Mini-PROTEAN® II Multiscreen Apparatus

In some experiments, protein blots need When proteins are resolved by SDS-PAGE
Fig. 4.16. Mini incubation tray. and blotted onto a membrane for analysis,
to be screened for a number of different
antigens or under a number of different the Mini-PROTEAN II multiscreen apparatus
conditions. Mini incubation trays allow simplifies the screening process. Instead of
screening of individual strips that have been being cut into individual strips for incubation,
cut from blots. The Mini-PROTEAN® II the entire blot is simply clamped into the
multiscreen apparatus allows screening of a multiscreen unit for assay. Two separate,
single blot with up to 40 different antibodies detachable sample templates allow up to
or sera without cutting the blot into 40 different antibody or serum samples to
individual strips. be screened. The unique molded gasket
ensures a leakproof seal, preventing cross-
Mini Incubation Trays contamination between samples (Table 4.11
Mini incubation trays allow safe, simple, and Figure 4.17).
and economical screening of different
antigens on protein blot strips. Each tray
Fig. 4.17. Multiscreen
has eight 10.5 cm x 5 mm channels to
apparatus. accommodate strips cut from a particular
protein blot. Because the trays are
disposable, the potential contamination
associated with washing reusable trays is
eliminated. Unique ribs in the tray lids
combine with the overall design of the
sample channels to ensure that no cross-
contamination occurs (Figure 4.16).

Chapter 5
Troubleshooting
Troubleshooting
Transfer Detection
Electrophoretic Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Immunological Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Poor Electrophoretic Transfer Overall High Background
Swirls or Missing Patterns; Diffuse Transfers Nonspecific Reactions Between Bound Proteins and Probes
Gel Cassette Pattern Transferred to Blot No Reaction or Weak Signal
Poor Binding to the Membrane — Nitrocellulose Tests for Monitoring Reagent Activity
Poor Binding to the Membrane — PVDF
Multiscreen Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Blotting Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Leakage or Cross-Well Contamination
Missing Bands Bubbles Trapped Within the Channels
Molecular Weight Assignments for Natural (Nonrecombinant) Prestained Halos Around the Wells
Standards Differ From Lot to Lot
A Protein’s Molecular Weight Differs From Expected Molecular Weight
Variation in Mobility Between Recombinant and Natural Prestained Total Protein Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Standards of the Same Molecular Weight Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain — High Background
Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain — Low Sensitivity
Biotin-Blot™ Total Protein Detection — High Background
Microfiltration Blotting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Biotin-Blot Total Protein Detection — No Reaction or Weak Color
Development
Uneven Filtration or No Filtration

Transfer
Poor Electrophoretic Transfer
1. Transfer time was too short.
• Increase the transfer time (thicker gels require longer transfer time)
2. Power conditions were inappropriate.
• Always check the current at the beginning of the run. The current may be too low for a
particular voltage setting. If the buffer is prepared improperly, the conductivity may be
too low, and not enough power will be delivered to the cell. See the power guidelines
for specific applications in Chapter 2
• Remake the buffer or increase the voltage
• Try the high-intensity blotting option
• Make sure the power supply being used has a high current limit. If an incorrect power
supply is used, it is possible to not reach the set voltage if the current of the power
supply is at its maximum limit
3. Proteins were transferred through the membrane.
• If the power conditions are set too high, or the transfer run too long, proteins may be
transferred through the membrane and into the filter paper. See “Poor Binding to the
Membrane” for hints on how to improve binding
4. Proteins moved in the wrong direction.
• The gel/membrane sandwich may have been assembled in the wrong order or the
cassette inserted in the tank in the wrong orientation. Check the polarity of the
connections to the power supply
5. The detection system is not working or is not sensitive enough.
• Include proper positive and negative control antigen lanes to test for kit sensitivity;
consult kit manual
• Stain the gel after transfer with a total protein stain such as Coomassie Blue, Bio-Safe™
Coomassie, or SYPRO Ruby to make sure that proteins have left the gel
6. The charge-to-mass ratio is incorrect (native transfers).
• Try a more basic or acidic transfer buffer to increase protein mobility. Proteins near their
isoelectric points will be transferred poorly (buffer pH should be 2 pH units higher or
lower than the pI of the protein of interest for optimal transfer efficiency)
7. Protein precipitated in the gel.
• Use SDS in the transfer buffer. SDS can increase transfer efficiency, but note that it can
also reduce binding efficiency to nitrocellulose and affect reactivity of some proteins
with antibodies
• Reduce or eliminate the amount of alcohol in the transfer buffer
8. Methanol in the transfer buffer is restricting elution.
• Reducing the amount of methanol results in increased transfer efficiency of proteins
from the gel, but it also decreases binding to nitrocellulose membranes; 20% methanol
is generally optimal for protein binding
9. The power supply circuit is inoperative, or an inappropriate power supply was used.
• Check the fuse and make sure the voltage and current output of the power supply
match the needs of the blotting instrument
• Check the output capacity of the power supply

Troubleshooting Chapter 5
10. The gel percentage was too high.

• Reduce %T (total monomer) or %C (crosslinker). Using 5%C (with bis-acrylamide as
the crosslinker) will produce the smallest pore size gel. Decreasing this concentration
will increase the pore size and increase transfer efficiency
Swirls or Missing Patterns; Diffuse Transfers
1. Contact between the membrane and the gel was poor. Air bubbles or excess buffer
remain between the blot and gel.
• Carefully move the roller over the membrane in both directions until air bubbles or
excess buffer are removed from between gel and membrane, and complete contact
is established
• Use thicker filter paper in the gel/membrane sandwich
• Replace the fiber pads. Pads will compress and degrade with time, and will not hold
the membrane to the gel
2. Power conditions were inappropriate.
• Always check the current at the beginning of the run. The current may be too high for a
particular voltage setting. If the buffer is prepared improperly, the conductivity may be
too high, resulting in excessive power delivered to the cell and overheating. See the
power guidelines for specific applications in Chapter 2
3. The membrane was not properly wetted or had dried out.
• White spots on the nitrocellulose membrane indicate dry areas where protein will not
bind. If wetting does not occur immediately by immersion of the sheet in transfer buffer,
heat distilled water until just under the boiling point, and soak the membrane until
completely wet. Equilibrate in transfer buffer until ready for use
• Because of the hydrophobic nature of PVDF, the membrane must be prewet in
methanol prior to equilibration in aqueous transfer buffer. Follow the directions in the
product insert
4. Poor gel electrophoresis.
• Artifacts of electrophoresis may occur as a result of poor gel polymerization,
inappropriate running conditions, contaminated buffers, sample overload, etc. Consult
your electrophoresis manual for more details
Gel Cassette Pattern Transferred to Blot
1. Contaminated or thin fiber pads were used.
• Replace the fiber pads, or thoroughly clean the contaminated pads
2. Excessive amounts of protein were loaded on the gel, or too much SDS was used in the
transfer buffer. Proteins can pass through the membrane without binding, and recirculate
through the tank blotting system.
• Reduce the amount of protein on the gel, and the SDS in the transfer buffer. Add a
second sheet of membrane to bind excess protein
3. The transfer buffer was contaminated.
• Make fresh solutions
Poor Binding to the Membrane — Nitrocellulose
1. The methanol concentration in the transfer buffer was not optimal.
• Make sure the buffer contains the proper amount of methanol — 20% is generally
optimal for protein binding
2. Proteins passed through the nitrocellulose.
• Use PVDF or 0.2 µm nitrocellulose (smaller pore size). Decrease the voltage if using the
high-intensity option

• Place an additional piece of nitrocellulose membrane in the gel sandwich and analyze
this added piece for evidence of proteins that may have been transferred completely
through the first piece
3. Proteins with molecular weight <15,000 may show decreased binding to 0.45 µm
nitrocellulose, or may be washed from the membrane during assays.
• Use PVDF or nylon membrane, which have higher binding capacities
• Use 0.2 µm nitrocellulose
• Use Tween 20 detergent in the wash and antibody incubation steps. Reduce or
eliminate the more stringent washing conditions
4. SDS in the transfer buffer reduces the binding efficiency of proteins.
• Reduce or eliminate the SDS from the transfer buffer
5. The membrane was not completely wet.
• White spots on the membrane indicate dry areas where protein will not bind. If wetting
does not occur immediately on immersion of the sheet in transfer buffer, heat distilled
water until just under the boiling point, and soak the membrane until it is completely
wet. Equilibrate in transfer buffer until ready for use
is established
Poor Binding to the Membrane — PVDF
1. The membrane was not completely wet.
• Because of the hydrophobic nature of PVDF, the membrane must be completely
soaked in methanol prior to equilibration in aqueous transfer buffer. Follow the
directions in the product insert
2. The membrane was allowed to dry during handling.
• A completely wet membrane has a gray, translucent appearance. A membrane that
has been allowed to dry will show white spots. Since proteins will not bind to the dry
spots, rewet the membrane with methanol and reequilibrate in transfer buffer
3. Proteins passed through the membrane.
• Decrease the voltage if transferring under high-intensity conditions
• Place a second piece of PVDF membrane in the gel sandwich and analyze this piece
for evidence of proteins that may have been transferred completely through the first
membrane
• Reduce transfer time
4. SDS in the transfer buffer reduces the binding efficiency of proteins.
• Reduce or eliminate the SDS from the transfer buffer
is established

Blotting Standards
Missing Bands
1. Transfer was incomplete.
• See “Poor Electrophoretic Transfer” for suggestions on how to enhance transfer
efficiency
2. Gel used can only resolve part of the molecular weight range of the standard used.
• Use the standard with the appropriate molecular weight range for protein of interest gel
concentration
3. Detection was poor using biotinylated standards.
• See “No Reaction or Weak Signal” for suggestions on how to enhance detection
Molecular Weight Assignments for Natural (Nonrecombinant) Prestained
Standards Differ From Lot to Lot
1. Addition of the dye causes proteins to migrate differently from their true molecular weight,
and their apparent molecular weight can vary by as much as 10%.
• The molecular weights of the standards in each lot of prestained and Kaleidoscope™
standards are calibrated against Bio-Rad’s Precision Plus Protein™ unstained
standards. The lot-specific molecular weight information is included in every vial to
roughly estimate the molecular weight of sample proteins
A Protein’s Molecular Weight Differs From Expected Molecular Weight
1. The protein is posttranslationally modified.
• Posttranslational modifications of natural proteins, such as the addition of
carbohydrate units, phosphorylation, and hydroxylation, will alter both the mass and
the mobility of proteins
2. The protein contains an unusual proportion of basic or acidic amino acids.
• The primary amino acid composition may affect a protein’s mobility. A protein with a
large number of basic amino acids residues such as lysine, arginine, or histidine
(including His tags or patches) will migrate at a higher apparent molecular weight than
anticipated, compared to a recombinant protein of the same molecular weight. For
instance, lysozyme, a protein containing many lysine residues, will migrate more slowly
than other proteins of the same molecular weight. Conversely, proteins with a net
negative charge due to the presence of glutamate or aspartate residues will migrate
more quickly, resulting in a lower apparent molecular weight
3. Previous estimates of the molecular weight of the protein were made using a different
standard.
• Due to differences in protein composition between standards, the r2 values for two
standards will not be identical. Using different standards to estimate the molecular
weight of an unknown protein at different times, or to compare one protein to another,
can produce different results. Once an unknown protein is calibrated to a particular
protein standard, the same standard should be used for all subsequent molecular
weight estimations

Variation in Mobility Between Recombinant and Natural Prestained Standards

of the Same Molecular Weight
1. The amino acid composition of the protein standards is different.
• Due to differences in protein composition between standards, the r2 values for two
standards will not be identical. Using different standards to estimate the molecular
weight of an unknown protein at different times, or to compare one protein to another,
will lead to different conclusions. Once an unknown protein is calibrated to a particular
protein standard, that standard should be used for molecular weight estimation
• In order to most accurately determine molecular weight, mass spectrometry should be
used to confirm molecular weight estimation by gel analysis. This is a common, high-
technology application that gives the precise molecular weight of any protein
Microfiltration Blotting
1. The instrument was assembled incorrectly.
• The screws must be retightened under vacuum following initial assembly to form a
proper seal
2. The membrane was not rehydrated after assembly.
• Rehydrate the membrane prior to loading samples. Apply vacuum only until solutions
are removed from the sample wells, then disconnect the vacuum
Uneven Filtration or No Filtration
1. The membrane became clogged with particulates.
• Centrifuge samples or filter solutions prior to application to remove particulates
2. The flow valve was positioned higher than the apparatus.
• The flow valve must be lower than the level of the sample wells or drainage will
not occur
3. Bubbles obstructed the flow of liquid.
• Use a needle to carefully break any bubbles, being careful not to puncture the
membrane
• Pipet liquid up and down to displace the bubbles
4. Improper blocking or antibody buffers were used.
• Gelatin clogs the membrane; BSA or Tween 20 can be substituted for gelatin in the
detection procedure
5. Fluid pressure was not uniform.
• Seal off unused wells or add solution to unused wells
2. Too much protein was loaded, overloading the capacity of the membrane.
• Determine optimal loading conditions by performing serial dilutions of samples
3. The blocking step was too short.
• Make sure blocking step is as long as the longest incubation period
4. Loading volume was too low.
• The meniscus contacted the center of the well causing uneven distribution of protein
sample. The minimum loading volume is 100 µl

Detection
Immunological Detection
Overall High Background
1. Blocking was incomplete.
• Match the blocker to the membrane. For example, PVDF membranes require more
extensive blocking, usually with nonfat milk
• Increase the concentration or blocking time as necessary
• The blocker must be a pure protein. The blocker may be contaminated with material
that binds probes nonspecifically
2. Insufficient wash protocols were used.
• Increase the number, duration, or stringency of the washes. Include progressively
stronger detergents in the washes; for example, SDS is stronger than Nonidet P-40
(NP-40), which is stronger than Tween 20. Also, include Tween 20 in the antibody
dilution buffers to reduce nonspecific binding
3. The blot was left in the substrate too long.
• Remove the blot from the substrate solution when the signal-to-noise level is acceptable.
Do not overdevelop. Stop the reaction immediately by immersing the blot in ddH2O
4. Contamination occurred during electrophoresis or transfer.
• Discard and remake the gel and transfer solutions
• Replace or thoroughly clean contaminated fiber pads if a tank blotter was used
transfer buffer. Proteins can pass through the membrane without binding and recirculate
through a tank blotting system.
• Reduce the amount of protein on the gel or SDS in the transfer buffer. Add a second
sheet of membrane to bind excess protein
6. The primary or secondary antibody was too concentrated.
• Increase the dilution of the antibodies. Perform a dot-blot experiment to optimize the
working concentrations
7. The incubation trays were contaminated.
• Clean the trays or use disposable trays
Nonspecific Reactions Between Bound Proteins and Probes
1. The primary or secondary antibody is contaminated with nonspecific IgG or with IgG
cross-reactive between species.
• Use purified IgG primary antibody fractions and affinity-purified blotting-grade
secondary antibody
2. Monoclonal antibodies may have reacted nonspecifically with SDS-denatured proteins.
• Compare the binding of other monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
• Blot native proteins as a comparison
3. Nonspecific interactions are occurring due to ionic associations. For example, avidin,
a glycosylated protein, may bind to more acidic proteins on blots.
• Increase the ionic strength of the incubation buffers. Increase the number, duration,
or stringency of the washes. Include progressively stronger detergents in the washes;
for example, SDS is stronger than Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), which is stronger than Tween
20. Include Tween 20 in the antibody dilution buffers to reduce nonspecific binding

No Reaction or Weak Signal

1. The sample load was insufficient.
• Increase the amount of protein applied
• Concentrate the sample prior to loading
• Use a more sensitive assay system
2. Antigen binding to the membrane was insufficient.
• Stain the gel after transfer or use prestained or Kaleidoscope standards to assess
transfer efficiency. See the previous section for suggestions on improving transfer-
related problems
3. Antigen denaturation occurred during electrophoresis or transfer.
• Antibodies, especially monoclonals, may not recognize denatured antigens
• Electrophorese and transfer proteins under native conditions. Use the super cooling
coil and a refrigerated recirculating bath to transfer heat-sensitive proteins
4. The primary or secondary antibody was inactive or nonsaturating.
• Store the reagents at recommended conditions. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles,
bacterial contamination, and heat inactivation
• Detergents may affect the binding of some antibodies. Eliminate them from the assay,
except for the wash after blocking
• If the antibody titer is too low, optimize the concentration using a dot-blot experiment
• Increase the antibody incubation times
5. The enzyme conjugate was inactive or nonsaturating.
• Test the reagent for activity (see below)
• Store the reagents at recommended conditions. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles,
bacterial contamination, and heat inactivation
• Sodium azide is a potent inhibitor of horseradish peroxidase. Use thimerosal as a
bacteriostat
• Undistilled water may cause inactivation of the enzyme. Use only distilled,
deionized water
• If the conjugate concentration is too low, optimize using a dot-blot experiment
6. The color development reagent was inactive.
• Test the reagent for activity (see below) and remake if necessary
Tests for Monitoring Reagent Activity
1. Test the activity of the color development solution.
• Combine 1.0 ml of the color development solution with 10 µl of full-strength secondary
antibody conjugate. The color reaction should occur immediately. If color fails to
develop within a few minutes, the color development solution is inactive. Make up a
fresh working solution and repeat the color development assay
2. Test the activity of the conjugate solution.
• Combine 1.0 ml of the color development solution tested above and 1.0 ml of the
1:3,000 dilution conjugate solution. A light-blue tinge should develop within 15 min.
• If color fails to develop within 25 min, the conjugate solution is suspect. Repeat the
procedure with a freshly prepared dilution of conjugate
3. Test the activity of the first antibody solution.
• Use an ELISA, RID, Ouchterlony immunodiffusion, or precipitation test to determine
reactivity of the antibody with the antigen. If possible, repeat the assay procedure with
a more concentrated primary antibody solution

Multiscreen Apparatus
1. The instrument was assembled incorrectly.
• Tighten the screws using a diagonal crossing pattern to ensure uniform pressure on
the membrane surface. Do not overtighten, because this will cause the channels to cut
into the membrane
2. The sample template has warped and can no longer provide a proper seal. (Heating the
apparatus to >50°C will warp the acrylic plates.)
Bubbles Trapped Within the Channels
1. Tilt the instrument backwards during sample application to help bubbles rise to the top.
• Slow and careful delivery of reagent also prevents trapping bubbles inside the channels
2. Too much protein was loaded, overloading the capacity of the membrane.
• Determine optimal loading conditions by performing serial dilutions of samples
3. The blocking step was too short.
• Make sure blocking step is as long as the longest incubation period
Total Protein Detection

Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain — High Background
1. The blocking step was insufficient or was omitted.
• Block with 0.3% Tween 20 in TBS, using 3 washes of 20 min each
2. Contamination of the membrane occurred at a previous step; electrophoresis or transfer.
• Discard and remake the gel and transfer solutions
• Replace or thoroughly clean contaminated fiber pads if a tank blotter was used
4. The colloidal gold stain solution was contaminated.
• The stain is a reusable reagent. Be sure to use a separate, clean plastic container to
store previously used reagent in the refrigerator. Discard any reagent that has a viscous
sediment at the bottom of the bottle. If the solution is no longer a dark burgundy but a
light blue, the stain has been contaminated with buffer salts. Buffer salts will react with
the gold sol causing nonspecific precipitation of the reagent onto the membrane.
Discard this solution
Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain — Low Sensitivity
1. The incubation time was insufficient.
• Increase the incubation time for detection of low-level signals. Overnight incubation is
possible, although background staining can increase
• See “Poor Electrophoretic Transfer” for suggestions on how to enhance transfer
efficiency

3. The stain was exhausted, as evidenced by the loss of the dark burgundy color and
longer staining times.
• Discard the reagent
4. Buffer salt contamination has occurred; the solution is light blue instead of dark burgundy.
• Discard the reagent
5. The sample load was too low for the reagent to detect.
• Use the gold enhancement kit for detection as sensitive as 10 pg of protein per band
Biotin-Blot™ Total Protein Detection — High Background
1. The membrane was left in the color development solution too long.
• Remove the membrane from the color development solution when the signal is
apparent and no background has developed. Transfer the blot to distilled water
immediately to stop development
Biotin-Blot Total Protein Detection — No Reaction or Weak Color
Development
• See “Poor Electrophoretic Transfer” for suggestions on how to enhance
transfer efficiency
2. The sample load was too low for the reagents to detect.
• Increase the amount of protein loaded on the gel
3. The NHS-biotin solution was inactive.
• NHS-biotin hydrolyzes in aqueous solutions. Equilibrate the reagent vial to room
temperature before opening to prevent condensation of water inside the container. To
prevent contamination, use a sterile syringe to remove reagent
• Add the NHS-biotin reagent to the borate-Tween solution just prior to use
4. Amine-containing buffer salts competed for the biotinylation reagents.
• Wash the membrane thoroughly in borate-Tween to remove any residual buffer salts
from electrophoresis and transfer
5. The avidin-HRP conjugate was inactive.
• Follow the reagent activity test procedures to determine whether reagent is inactive
6. The color development solution was inactive.
• Follow the reagent activity test procedures to determine whether reagent is inactive
1. Destaining was insufficient.
• Increase the number and duration of washes with the destaining solution
2. The dye solution was too concentrated.
• Remake the solution
1. Anionic dye stains do not detect protein bands below ~100 ng.
• Use a more sensitive stain such as the colloidal gold stain or the Biotin-Blot protein
detection kit
• Increase the sample load to achieve a similar staining intensity to that of the anionic
dye stains

Protein Blotting Appendices
Appendices
Transfer Buffer Formulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Detection Buffer Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

General Detection Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Total Protein Staining Buffers and Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Substrate Buffers and Solutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Assay Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Immun-Blot® Assay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Total Protein Detection Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Trademarks and Legal Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Ordering Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

Appendices Transfer Buffer Formulations
Transfer Buffer Formulations

The following buffers are recommended for use with all of Bio-Rad’s electrophoretic transfer cells. Care should be taken when preparing these buffers because
incorrect formulation can result in a current that exceeds the recommended conditions.
Note: Do not add acid or base to adjust the pH of the following buffers unless indicated. Addition of acid or base may change the ionic strength and conductivity
of the buffer.
Only reagent-grade or electrophoresis-grade chemicals and deionized water should be used when preparing transfer buffers. If needed, methanol should be
added last to prevent buffer precipitation problems. The formulas listed provide a total volume of 1 L.
Towbin buffer 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol (pH 8.3)
Dissolve 3.03 g Tris base and 14.4 g glycine in 500 ml deionized H2O; add 200 ml of methanol; adjust volume to 1 L
with deionized H2O.
Note: the pH will range from pH 8.1 to 8.5 depending on the quality of the Tris, glycine, methanol, and deionized H2O.
Towbin buffer with SDS 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol (v/v), 0.025–0.1% SDS (pH 8.3)
Add 2.5 to 10 ml of 10% SDS to 1 L of buffer prepared above.
Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen buffer 48 mM Tris, 39 mM glycine, 20% methanol (pH 9.2)
Dissolve 5.82 g Tris base and 2.93 g glycine in 500 ml deionized H2O; add 200 ml methanol; adjust volume to 1 L with
deionized H2O.
Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen 48 mM Tris, 39 mM glycine, 20% methanol, 1.3 mM SDS (pH 9.2)
buffer with SDS Add 0.0375 g SDS (or 3.75 ml of 10% SDS) to 1 L of buffer prepared above.
CAPS buffer 10 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid, 10% methanol (pH 11.0)

Dissolve 2.21 g CAPS in 500 ml deionized H2O; add 100 ml methanol; adjust volume to 1 L with deionized H2O.
Measure the pH; it may need to be adjusted with NaOH.
Dunn carbonate buffer 10 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM NaCO3, 20% methanol (pH 9.9)

Dissolve 0.84 g NaHCO3 and 0.318 g NaCO3 (anhydrous) in 500 ml deionized H2O; add 200 ml methanol; adjust
volume to 1 L with deionized H2O.
0.7% Acetic acid Add 7 ml of glacial acetic acid to 1 L with deionized H2O.

Detection Buffer Formulations Appendices
Detection Buffer Formulations
General Detection Buffers

Tris-buffered saline (TBS) 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl (pH 7.5)
Dissolve 4.84 g Tris base and 58.48 g NaCl in 1.5 L deionized H2O; adjust pH to 7.5 with HCl;
adjust volume to 2 L with deionized H2O.
TTBS wash solution 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 7.5)
Add 0.5 ml Tween 20 to 1 L TBS.
Wash solution for chemiluminescence 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (pH 7.5)
Add 1 ml Tween 20 to 1 L TBS.
Citrate-buffered saline (CBS) 20 mM citrate, 500 mM NaCl (pH 5.5)

Included in Immun-Blot® protein G kits.
TCBS wash solution 20 mM citrate, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 5.5)
Add 0.5 ml Tween 20 to 1 L CBS.
Blocking solution 3% gelatin-TBS

Add 3.0 g gelatin to 100 ml TBS. Heat to 50°C; stir to dissolve.
or
1% BSA-TBS
Add 1.0 g BSA to 100 ml TBS; stir to dissolve.
or
5% nonfat milk-TBS
Add 5.0 g nonfat dry milk to 100 ml TBS; stir to dissolve.
Note: Gelatin will clog the membrane and cut off the vacuum flow of the microfiltration units; an alternative blocking
solution and antibody buffer must be used with the Bio-Dot® or Bio-Dot SF apparatus.
Blocking solution 2% nonfat milk-TBS

for chemiluminescence (general) Add 0.2 g of nonfat dry milk to 10 ml TBS; stir to dissolve.
Note: This blocker is not recommended for avidin-biotin systems.
Antibody buffer 1% gelatin-TTBS

Add 2.0 g gelatin to 200 ml TTBS. Heat to 50°C; stir to dissolve.
or
1% BSA-TTBS
Add 2.0 g BSA to 200 ml TTBS; stir to dissolve.
or
5% nonfat milk-TTBS
Add 10.0 g nonfat dry milk to 200 ml TTBS; stir to dissolve.
Note: Gelatin will clog the membrane and cut off the vacuum flow of the microfiltration units; an alternative blocking
solution and antibody buffer must be used with the Bio-Dot or Bio-Dot SF apparatus.
Antibody buffer 0.2% nonfat milk-TTBS

for chemiluminescence Add 0.4 g nonfat milk to 200 ml TTBS; stir to dissolve.
(Immun-Star™ AP only)
Antibody buffer 1% gelatin-TCBS

for protein G-HRP Add 1.0 g gelatin to 100 ml TCBS. Heat to 50°C; stir to dissolve.
Primary antibody solution Dilute the primary antibody to the appropriate titer in 100 ml antibody buffer.
Secondary antibody solution Dilute the secondary antibody conjugate at 1:3,000 by mixing 33 µl antibody conjugate in 100 ml antibody buffer.
Protein G-HRP Mix 33 µl protein G conjugate solution in 100 ml 1% gelatin in TCBS.

conjugate solution
Streptavidin-biotinylated Add 33 µl of streptavidin to 100 ml TTBS. Add 33 µl of biotinylated AP to this solution.

AP complex Allow the complex to incubate 1–3 hr at room temperature before use.

Appendices Detection Buffer Formulations
Total Protein Staining Buffers and Solutions

Colloidal Gold
High-Tween TTBS 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.3% Tween 20 (pH 7.5)
for colloidal gold Add 3 ml Tween 20 to 1 L of TBS.
total protein stain
Citrate buffer for 0.2 M citrate (pH 3.7)

colloidal gold staining Dissolve 27.0 g citric acid and 22.0 g sodium citrate in 1 L deionized H2O.
If the pH of the buffer is above 4.0, remake the solution; do not adjust pH.
Enhancement solution for Dissolve 0.85 g hydroquinone in 90 ml citrate buffer.

colloidal gold staining Dissolve 0.11 g silver lactate in 10 ml deionized H2O. Protect this solution from light.
Mix the two solutions together.
Fixing solution for Add 10 ml fixing solution concentrate to 90 ml deionized H2O.

colloidal gold staining
Other Stains
Borate-Tween solution (BT) 0.05 M Na2B4O7•10 H2O, 0.2% Tween 20, pH 9.3
for Biotin-Blot™ detection Dissolve 38.14 g Na2B4O7•10 H2O in 1.9 L deionized H2O. Add 4 ml Tween 20; adjust volume to 2 L with deionized H2O.
Amido Black For nitrocellulose membrane blots:

staining solution Dissolve 0.5% (w/v) Amido Black in 40% methanol or 25% isopropanol, 10% acetic acid.
For PVDF membrane blots:

Dissolve 0.1% Amido Black in 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid.
Amido Black 25% isopropyl alcohol, 10% acetic acid

destain solution Mix 650 ml deionized H2O, 250 ml isopropyl alcohol, and 100 ml glacial acetic acid.
or
40% methanol, 10% acetic acid (for PVDF membrane)
Mix 500 ml deionized H2O, 400 ml methanol, and 100 ml glacial acetic acid.
Coomassie Blue R-250 0.1% Coomassie Blue R-250, 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid
staining solution Dissolve 1 g Coomassie Blue R-250 in 500 ml deionized H2O, 400 ml methanol, 100 ml acetic acid.
Coomassie Blue R-250 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid

destain solution Mix 400 ml methanol, 100 ml acetic acid, and 500 ml H2O.
Ponceau S staining solution 0.2% Ponceau S and 3% TCA

Dissolve 2 g Ponceau S with 30 g trichloracetic acid (TCA) and 30 g sulfosalicylic acid in 80 ml of water.
Ponceau S destain solution 1% acetic acid

Mix 5 ml acetic acid up to 500 ml with water.
Alternative: wash in PBS.
Substrate Buffers and Solutions

HRP Substrate Buffers
4-(chloro-1-naphthol) Dissolve 60 mg 4CN in 20 ml methanol; protect this solution from light. Mix 600 µl 3% hydrogen peroxide into 100 ml
substrate solution (4CN) TBS (see above). Mix the two solutions together. Use immediately. Alternatively, use HRP conjugate substrate solution
in kit format.
HRP conjugate substrate solution Dissolve the contents of the premixed color development buffer in deionized H2O to a final volume of 1 L. Add 600 µl
(kit format) color reagent B to 100 ml color development buffer. Add 20 ml HRP color reagent A to this solution. Use immediately.
Diaminobenzidine (DAB) Dissolve 50 mg DAB in 100 ml TBS (see above). Add 100 µl 3% hydrogen peroxide. Use immediately.
AP Substrate Buffers
AP color development 0.1 M Tris, 0.5 mM MgCl2 (pH 9.5)
buffer Dissolve 0.233 g MgCl2•H2O and 12.1 g Tris base in 800 ml deionized H2O. Adjust pH to 9.5 with HCl; adjust volume to
1 L with deionized H2O.
5-bromo-4-chloroindolyl Prepare 1.0 ml 70% dimethylformamide (DMF) by mixing 0.7 ml DMF with 0.3 ml deionized H2O.
phosphate/Nitroblue Dissolve 30 mg NBT in the 70% DMF. Dissolve 15 mg BCIP in 1.0 ml DMF. Add both solutions to 100 ml AP
Tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) color development buffer (see above). Use immediately. Alternatively, use AP conjugate substrate solution in kit format.
Use AP conjugate substrate kit.

Detection Buffer Formulations Appendices
AP conjugate substrate solution Dissolve the contents of the premixed color development buffer in deionized H2O to a final volume of 1 L. Add 1.0 ml
(kit format) AP color development reagent A and 1.0 ml AP color development reagent B to 100 ml color development buffer. This
solution can be stored overnight, but prompt use is recommended.
Immun-Star AP substrate solution For nitrocellulose membrane blots:

(kit format) Add 500 µl of the enhancer reagent to 10 ml of Immun-Star chemiluminescent substrate. This solution can be stored at
4°C for up to one week.
For PVDF membrane blots:

Immun-Star AP generates a very fast light signal on PVDF membrane; therefore, the use of an enhancer is not
necessary. Use 10 ml chemiluminescent substrate per 200 cm2. The substrate is provided ready to use.
Immun-Star HRP substrate solution For nitrocellulose and PVDF membrane blots:
(kit format) A 1:1 mixture of luminol/enhancer to peroxide buffer is recommended.
(12 ml of solution is sufficient for one 8.5 x 13.5 cm Criterion™ blot.)

Appendices Assay Procedures
Assay Procedures
The following is a generalized protocol for colorimetric immunological detection with the Immun-Blot HRP and AP kits. Notes on how this general procedure is
modified for other detection systems are provided below. Consult the instruction manual for the particular assay you are using for complete instructions.
Immun-Blot Assay
Consult the Immun-Blot assay kit manual for complete instructions.
1. Wash Following transfer or protein application, wash the membrane for 5–10 min in TBS.
2. Block Incubate the membrane for 30 min to 1 hr in blocking solution.
3. Wash Wash the membrane twice in TTBS, 5–10 min per wash.
4. Primary antibody Incubate the membrane for 1–2 hr in the primary antibody solution.
6. Conjugate Incubate the membrane for 30 min to 2 hr in the enzyme conjugate solution.
8. Final wash Wash the membrane in TBS to remove the Tween 20 from the membrane surface prior to color development.
9. Signal development Incubate the membrane for 5–30 min, depending on the detection method, in the color development/substrate solution.
10. Stop Immerse the membrane for 10 min in deionized H2O to stop color development. Change the water at least once
during this time to remove residual color development solution.
11. Read, dry, store Take photographs while the membrane is wet to enhance the color. Dry membrane on filter paper and store between
sheets of polyester. See procedural notes for chemiluminescent signal development.
Note for Protein G-HRP Detection

Follow steps 1–4 above. For step 5 (wash), use TCBS instead of TTBS and then continue with steps 6–11.
Notes for Amplified Opti-4CN Detection

Follow steps 1–8 above. Then:
• Incubate membrane in diluted BAR for 10 min
• Wash the membrane 2–4 times in 20% DMSO/PBST for 5 min each time
• Wash 1–2 times in PBST for 5 min. each time
• Incubate the membrane and diluted streptavidin-HRP for 30 min
• Wash the membrane twice in PBST for 5 min each time
Continue with steps 9–11.
Notes for Amplified AP Detection

Follow steps 1–5 above. Then:
• Incubate the membrane for 1–2 hr in biotinylated secondary antibody solution
• While the blot is incubating in the biotinylated antibody solution, prepare the streptavidin-biotinylated AP complex. Allow the complex to form for 1 hr at room
temperature
• Wash the membrane twice in TTBS, 5–10 min per wash
• Incubate the membrane for 1–2 hr in the streptavidin complex solution
Continue with steps 7–11.

Assay Procedures Appendices
Notes for Chemiluminescent Detection

Follow steps 1–8 on previous page, except the wash steps 5 and 7 need to be more thorough. Wash the membrane 6 times for 10 min each with strong agitation
and a large volume of buffer to reduce background. Then:
• Incubate the membrane for 3–5 min in the chemiluminescent substrate solution
• Drain excess liquid from the blot and seal the membrane in a bag
• Expose the blot to X-ray film (for example, Kodak XAR or BioMax) or instant photographic film, such as Polaroid Type 667 or 612. Typical exposure times are
30 sec to 5 min. Develop the film according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Alternatively, an imager such as the Bio-Rad VersaDoc™ or ChemiDoc™ system
can be used.
Total Protein Detection Procedures

Amido Black, Coomassie Blue R-250, or Ponceau S
1. Stain Incubate for 1–2 min in the staining solution.
2. Destain Destain in destain solution until the background clears.
3. Wash Rinse in TBS or deionized H2O before drying.
Colloidal Gold Total Protein Stain

Consult the Bio-Rad enhanced colloidal gold total protein detection kit manual for complete instructions.
1. Wash Following transfer or protein application, wash the membrane 3 times for 20 min in high-Tween TBS.
2. Water rinse Rinse for 2 min in deionized H2O to remove interfering buffer salts.
3. Stain Incubate in colloidal gold stain. Incubation times will vary with the concentration of protein present on the membrane. Most bands will
be visible in 1–2 hr. If increased sensitivity is required, continue the assay using the gold enhancement procedure.
Biotin-Blot Total Protein Detection Procedure

Consult the Biotin-Blot total protein detection kit manual for complete assay instructions.
1. Wash Following transfer or protein application, wash the membrane 3 times for 10 min in BT solution to remove interfering
amine compounds.
2. Biotinylation Place the membrane in a suitable container with 100 ml fresh BT solution. Add 200 µl NHS-biotin. Incubate for 15 min.
3. Wash Wash twice in BT solution for 5 min.
4. Wash Wash twice in TTBS for 5 min.
5. Conjugate Incubate the membrane for 1–2 hr in the avidin-HRP solution.
7. Final wash Wash the membrane in TBS to remove the Tween 20 from the membrane surface prior to color development.
8. Signal development Incubate the membrane for 5–30 min in an HRP color development/substrate solution.
9. Stop Immerse the membrane for 10 min in deionized H2O to stop color development. Change the water at least once during this time to
remove residual color development solution.

Appendices Glossary
Glossary
4-Chloro-1-naphthol (4CN) a color development reagent used with horseradish peroxidase (HRP), which
produces an insoluble purple reaction product at the site of an enzyme-
antibody complex
5-Bromo-4-chloro- a color development reagent used with alkaline phosphatase (AP), which in
indolyl phosphate (BCIP) the presence of NBT produces an insoluble purple reaction product at the site
of the enzyme-antibody complex
Alkaline phosphatase (AP) an enzyme used as a detection reagent, usually conjugated to a secondary
antibody probe
Amido Black 10B an anionic dye used in the total protein detection of blots
Amplified AP kit a highly sensitive detection kit that utilizes a streptavidin-biotin system
Anionic dye a negatively charged compound used as a stain; used in blotting to stain
proteins immobilized on membranes such as nitrocellulose or PVDF
Antibody an immunoglobulin; a protein produced in response to an antigen, which

specifically binds the portion of the antigen that initiated its production
Antigen any molecule that specifically binds with an antibody
Assay an analysis of the quantity or characteristics of a substance
Avidin a glycoprotein found in egg white that binds biotin with high specificity
Background nonspecific signal or noise that can interfere with the interpretation of valid
signals
Bio-Dot® apparatus a microfiltration device, used in the immobilization of proteins in free solution
onto a membrane; samples are loaded onto a 96-well template and filtered
through the membrane by gravity or vacuum flow
Bio-Dot SF apparatus a microfiltration device, used in the immobilization of proteins in free solution
onto a membrane; sample are loaded onto a 48-slot template and filtered
through the membrane by gravity or vacuum flow
Bio-Ice™ unit a cooling unit used in the Mini Trans-Blot® cell
Biotin a small molecule that binds specifically to avidin or streptavidin
Biotin-Blot kit
™ a total protein staining kit; utilizes biotinylation of the proteins on a membrane
and the subsequent detection by avidin-HRP and 4CN
Biotinylated standards a mixture of proteins used as molecular weight markers, which have been
treated to incorporate a limited number of biotin molecules. Because the
relatively small biotin molecule does not appreciably alter the standard
proteins’ mobility in SDS-PAGE, accurate determination of antigen molecular
weights directly on the membrane is possible
Bjerrum and Schafer- a commonly used transfer buffer (48 mM Tris, 39 mM glycine, 20% methanol,
Nielsen buffer pH 9.2)
Blocking reagent a protein used to saturate unoccupied binding sites on a blot to prevent
nonspecific binding of antibody or protein probes to the membrane
Blot immobilization of proteins or other molecules onto a membrane; or, the

membrane that has the molecules adsorbed onto its surface
BLOTTO a formulation of nonfat milk used to block nonspecific binding of proteins to

membranes
CDP-Star a reagent used in chemiluminescent blot detection with AP conjugated

antibodies
ChemiDoc™ systems CCD camera-based imaging systems for visualization and documentation of
fluorescent, chemifluorescent, and colorimetric samples
Chemiluminescence the emission of light due to a chemical reaction; used in the specific detection
of blotted molecules

Glossary Appendices
Colloidal gold a stabilized sol of gold particles; used as a blot detection reagent when
conjugated to antibodies or ligands. It produces a rose-red color on the
membrane at the site of deposition
Color development reagent an enzyme substrate used in blotting to visualize the location of an enzyme-
antibody complex
Colorimetric detection detection of molecules of interest by formation of a colored product
Conjugate an enzyme-antibody compound used in blotting
Coomassie Blue an anionic dye used in the total protein staining of gels and blots
Criterion™ blotter a tank blotting apparatus, made specifically to transfer Criterion gels
Diaminobenzidine (DAB) a color development reagent used with HRP and other peroxidases, which
produces an insoluble brown reaction product at the site of the peroxidase-
antibody complex
Dot blot the direct application of proteins in free solution to a membrane
Dunn buffer a commonly used transfer buffer (10 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM Na2CO3,

20% methanol, pH 9.9)
Electrophoretic blotting the use of the driving force of an electric field to move proteins from gels to
membranes
Enhanced colloidal gold a procedure for amplification of detection sensitivity, where silver is deposited
onto gold particles on a membrane after colloidal gold staining; the resulting
black color increases the visibility of lightly stained positive signals
Enzyme conjugate an enzyme covalently attached to another protein; in blotting, usually an

antibody
Fiber pad a pad used in the Trans-Blot®, Mini Trans-Blot, and Criterion blotter cassettes
that helps hold the gel and membrane sandwich in place
Filter paper cotton fiber paper used in blotting applications and gel drying
Gelatin a protein commonly used as a blocking reagent in western blotting

procedures
High-intensity transfer a higher-power option available in the Trans-Blot cell and Criterion blotter,
accomplished by moving the electrodes closer together, from 8 cm to 4 cm apart
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) an enzyme used in the specific detection of molecules on blots, usually
conjugated to a secondary antibody probe
Immunoassay a test for a substance by its reactivity with an antibody
Immunoblotting blot detection by antibody binding
Immunodetection detection of a molecule by its binding to an antibody
Kaleidoscope™ standards a mixture of molecular weight marker proteins from Bio-Rad that have
covalently attached dyes of various colors, which make the bands visible
during electrophoresis and transfer; when used to assess the transfer
efficiency of proteins onto the membrane, the individually colored bands allow
unambiguous identification of the standard proteins
Ligand a molecule that binds another in a complex
Membrane an immobilizing support medium used in blotting, generally in the form of a

sheet that has high affinity for biological molecules; for example, nitrocellulose
or PVDF
Membrane/filter paper blotting membrane and filter paper precut for a specific gel size
sandwiches
Microfiltration blotting the use of a microfiltration device, such as the Bio-Dot apparatus, to
immobilize protein in free solution onto a membrane
Mini Trans-Blot cell a tank blotting apparatus, made specifically to transfer Ready Gel® and
Mini-PROTEAN® gels; part of the modular Mini-PROTEAN line of products

Appendices Glossary
Multiscreen apparatus an instrument that allows the screening of two blots with up to 40 different
antibody samples
Native PAGE a version of PAGE that retains native protein configuration, performed in
absence of SDS and other denaturing agents
NHS-biotin N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin, a reagent that biotinylates proteins
Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) a color development reagent used with AP, which with BCIP produces an
insoluble purple reaction product at the site of the AP-antibody complex
Nitrocellulose a general-purpose blotting membrane
Nonenzymatic probe a molecule used in blot detection that does not involve an enzyme-catalyzed
reaction; for example, a radioactive, chemiluminescent, or colloidal gold-
labeled molecule
Nonfat dry milk a material used in solution as a blocking reagent for western blots
Nonspecific binding the interaction between bound proteins and probes that is not a result of a
specific reaction; results in spurious signals on the membrane
PAGE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, a common method of separating proteins
Polyvinylidene difluoride a membrane used in protein blotting, which has high chemical resistance,
(PVDF) membrane tensile strength, binding, and retentive capacity, making it ideal for use in
protein sequencing
PowerPac™ Bio-Rad’s brand of power supplies

power supplies
Power supply an instrument that provides the electric power to drive electrophoresis and
electrophoretic blotting experiments
Precision Plus recombinant protein standards used in blotting and electrophoretic applications;
Protein™ standards available in all blue, unstained, dual color, and Kaleidoscope formats
Primary antibody an antibody that binds a molecule of interest
Prestained standards a mixture of molecular weight marker proteins that have covalently attached
dye molecules, which render the bands visible during electrophoresis and
transfer; used to assess the transfer efficiency of proteins onto the membrane
Probe a molecule used to specifically identify another one
Protein A a protein derived from Staphylococcus aureus that binds a wide range of
immunoglobulins from various species
Protein G a protein derived from Streptococcus that binds a wide range of

immunoglobulins from various species, and has a wider range of binding
capabilities than protein A
SDS-PAGE the separation of molecules by molecular weight in a polyacrylamide gel

matrix in the presence of a denaturing detergent, sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)
Secondary antibody an antibody that binds a primary antibody; used to facilitate detection
Semi-dry blotting the use of a semi-dry blotting apparatus, which consists of two horizontally
oriented plate electrodes. The gel and membrane sandwich is positioned
between them with buffer-soaked filter paper on either side of the sandwich
serving as buffer reservoirs
Signal-to-noise ratio the relative difference in detection level between the specific and background
signals
StrepTactin a genetically engineered form of streptavidin, used with the Precision Plus
Protein unstained standards for detection
Strep-tag sequence an amino acid sequence that can be used to tag a protein, enabling its
detection by StrepTactin binding; this sequence is present in Precision Plus
Protein unstained standards
Streptavidin a protein that binds biotin with high affinity; generally regarded as superior to
avidin because it is not glycosylated

Glossary Appendices
Substrate a substance that is reacted upon by an enzyme; for example, a color

development reagent
Super cooling coil an optional accessory of the Trans-Blot cell, which can be attached to a
refrigerated water recirculator to cool the buffer during high-intensity transfers
Supported nitrocellulose a high-tensile-strength blotting membrane; nitrocellulose that has been cast
on an inert high-strength support
Tank blotting the use of a tank blotting apparatus, which consists of a tank of buffer with
vertically oriented platinum wire or plate electrodes; the gel and membrane are
held in place between the electrodes by a porous cassette
Total protein stain a reagent that binds nonspecifically to proteins; used to detect the entire
protein pattern on a blot or gel
Towbin buffer a common protein blotting transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 192 mM
glycine, 20% methanol)
Trans-Blot® cell a tank-blotting apparatus for large and mini gels
Trans-Blot Plus cell

® a tank blotting apparatus for very large gels
Trans-Blot SD cell a semi-dry blotting apparatus for large and mini gels
Transfer the immobilization of proteins or other molecules onto a membrane by

electrophoretic or passive means
Tween 20 a nonionic detergent; used in blot detection procedures as a blocking reagent

or added to wash buffers to minimize nonspecific binding and background
VersaDoc™ system a CCD camera-based imaging system
Western blotting the immobilization of proteins onto a membrane, and the subsequent
detection by protein-specific binding and detection reagents

Appendices References
References
Akerstrom B et al., Protein G: a powerful tool for binding Gershoni JM, Protein blotting: a tool for the analytical
and detection of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, biochemist, pp 141–175 in Chrambach A et al. (eds)
J Immunol 135, 2589–2592 (1985) Advances in Electrophoresis, Vol 1, VCH, Weinheim,
Germany (1987)
Bayer EA and Wilchek M, The use of the avidin-biotin
complex as a tool in molecular biology, Methods Gershoni JM, Protein blotting: a manual, Methods
Biochem Anal 26, 1–45 (1980) Biochem Anal 33, 1–58 (1988)
Beisiegel U, Protein blotting, Electrophoresis 7, Gershoni JM and Palade GE, Protein blotting: principles
1–18 (1986) and applications, Anal Biochem 131, 1–15 (1983)
Bers G and Garfin D, Protein and nucleic acid blotting Gershoni JM et al., Protein blotting in uniform or gradient
and immunobiochemical detection, Biotechniques 3, electric fields, Anal Biochem 144, 32–40 (1985)
276–288 (1985)
Goding JW, Use of staphylococcal protein A as an
Bjerrum OJ and Schafer-Nielsen C, Buffer systems and immunological reagent, J Immunol Methods 20,
transfer parameters for semidry electroblotting with a 241–253 (1978)
horizontal apparatus, pp 315–327 in Dunn MJ (ed)
Electrophoresis ’86: proceedings of the fifth meeting of Gooderham K, Transfer techniques in protein blotting,
the International Electrophoresis Society, VCH, Methods Mol Biol 1, 165–178 (1984)
Weinheim, Germany (1986) Guesdon J-L et al., The use of avidin-biotin interaction in
Blake MS et al., A rapid, sensitive method for detection immunoenzymatic techniques, J Histochem Cytochem
of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-antibody on 27, 1131–1139 (1979)
Western blots, Anal Biochem 136, 175–179 (1984) Harper DR et al., Protein blotting: ten years on, J Virol
Boyle MDP and Reis KJ, Bacterial Fc receptors, Methods 30, 25–39 (1990)
Biotechnology 5, 697–703 (1987) Hawkes R et al., A dot-immunobinding assay for
Burnette WN, “Western blotting”: electrophoretic transfer monoclonal and other antibodies, Anal Biochem 119,
of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide 142–147 (1982)
gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic Hsu SM et al., Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex
detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A, (ABC) in immuno-peroxidase techniques: a comparison
Anal Biochem 112, 195–203 (1981) between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures,
Carr DW and Scott JD, Blotting and band-shifting: J Histochem Cytochem 29, 577–580 (1981)
techniques for studying protein-protein interactions, Kurien BT and Scofield RH, Protein blotting: a review,
Trends Biochem Sci 17, 246–249 (1992) J Immunol Methods 274, 1–15 (2003)
Chaiet L and Wolf FJ, The properties of streptavidin, Kyhse-Andersen J, Electroblotting of multiple gels: a
a biotin-binding protein produced by Streptomyces, simple apparatus without buffer tank for rapid transfer of
Arch Biochem Biophys 106, 1–5 (1964) proteins from polyacrylamide to nitrocellulose, J Biochem
Crisp SJ and Dunn MJ, Detection of proteins on protein Biophys Methods 10, 203–209 (1984)
blots using chemiluminescent systems, Methods Mol Biol Langone JJ, Use of labeled protein A in quantitative
32, 233–237 (1994) immunochemical analysis of antigens and antibodies,
Della-Penna D et al., Biotinylated proteins as molecular J Immunol Methods 51, 3–22 (1982)
weight standards on Western blots, Anal Biochem 152, Moeremans M et al., The use of colloidal metal particles
329–332 (1986) in protein blotting, Electrophoresis 8, 403–409 (1987)
Dunn MJ, Detection of proteins on blots using the avidin- Reinhart MP and Malamud D, Protein transfer from
biotin system, Methods Mol Biol 32, 227–232 (1994) isoelectric focusing gels: the native blot, Anal Biochem
Dunn MJ, Detection of total proteins on western blots 123, 229–235 (1982)
of 2-D polyacrylamide gels, Methods Mol Biol 112, Rohringer R and Holden DW, Protein blotting: detection
319–329 (1999) of proteins with colloidal gold, and of glycoproteins and
Egger D and Bienz K, Protein (western) blotting, Mol lectins with biotin-conjugated and enzyme probes, Anal
Biotechnol 1, 289–305 (1994) Biochem 144, 118–127 (1985)
Garfin DE and Bers G, Basic aspects of protein blotting, Tovey ER and Baldo BA, Comparison of semi-dry and
pp 5–41 in Baldo BA et al. (eds) Protein Blotting. conventional tank-buffer electrotransfer of proteins from
Methodology, Research and Diagnostic Applications, polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose membranes,
Karger, Basel (1989) Electrophoresis 8, 384–387 (1987)
Gershoni JM, Protein blotting: developments and Tovey ER and Baldo BA, Characterisation of allergens by
perspectives, Trends Biochem Sci 10, 103–106 (1985) protein blotting, Electrophoresis 8, 452–463 (1987)

Trademarks and Legal Notices Appendices
Towbin H et al., Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from Turner BM, The use of alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated
polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure second antibody for the visualization of
and some applications, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76, electrophoretically separated proteins recognized by
4350–4354 (1979) monoclonal antibodies, J Immunol Methods 63, 1–6
(1983)
Tsang VC et al., Calibration of prestained protein
molecular weight standards for use in the “Western” or Wisdom GB, Protein blotting, Methods Mol Biol 32,
enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot techniques, 207–213 (1994)
Anal Biochem 143, 304–307 (1984)
Tsang VC et al., Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer

blot (EITB), pp 389–414 in Ngo TT and Lenhoff HM (eds)
Enzyme-Mediated Immunoassay, Plenum Press, New
York (1985)
Trademarks and Legal Notices

The following trademarks used in this guide are the property of Bio-Rad Laboratories:
Bio-Dot® De-Expose™ Opti-4CN™ Quantity One®

Bio-Ice™ GS-800™ PowerPac™ Ready Gel®
Bio-Rad® Immun-Blot® PowerPac™ Basic Sequi-Blot™
Bio-Safe™ Immun-Star™ PowerPac™ Universal Trans-Blot®
Biotin-Blot™ Kaleidoscope™ Precision Plus Protein™ Trans-Blot® Plus
ChemiDoc ™ Mini-PROTEAN ® Precision Protein™ VersaDoc™
ChemiDoc™ XRS Mini Trans-Blot® PROTEAN®
Criterion™ Molecular Imager PROTEAN® Plus
FX™ Pro Plus
Acrobat is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. BioMax and Kodak are trademarks of Eastman Kodak Co.
CDP-Star is a trademark of Tropix, Inc. Coomassie is a trademark of BASF Aktiengesellschaft. Nonidet is a trademark of
Shell International Petroleum Co. Polaroid is a trademark of Polaroid Corporation. StrepTactin and Strep-tag are
trademarks of Institut für Bioanalytik GmbH. Strep-tag technology for western blot detection is covered by U.S. patent
5,506,121 and by UK patent 2,272,698. StrepTactin is covered by German patent application P 19641876.3. Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc. is licensed by Institut für Bioanalytik GmbH to sell this product for research use only. SYPRO and
Texas Red are trademarks of Molecular Probes, Inc. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. is licensed by Molecular Probes, Inc. to
sell SYPRO products for research use only, under US patent 5,616,502. Tween is a trademark of ICI Americas, Inc.

Appendices Ordering Information
Ordering Information
Electrophoretic Transfer Cells 170-3989 Mini Trans-Blot Cell and PowerPac Basic Power Supply
170-3836 Mini Trans-Blot Cell and PowerPac HC Power Supply
Catalog # Description 165-3323 Mini-PROTEAN 3 Cell, Mini Trans-Blot Module, and
Trans-Blot Cells and Systems PowerPac Basic Power Supply
170-3939 Trans-Blot Cell With Plate Electrodes and Super Cooling Coil, 165-3324 Mini-PROTEAN 3 Module, Mini Trans-Blot Module, and
includes 2 gel holder cassettes, buffer tank, lid with power PowerPac Basic Power Supply
cables, 4 fiber pads, 1 pack precut blot absorbent filter paper Mini Trans-Blot Cell Accessories
170-3853 Trans-Blot Cell With Plate Electrodes, Super Cooling Coil, and 170-3931 Mini Gel Holder Cassette
PowerPac HC Power Supply 170-3932 Mini Trans-Blot Filter Paper (Thick), 7.5 x 10 cm, 50 sheets
170-3946 Trans-Blot Cell With Plate Electrodes,* includes 2 gel holder 170-3933 Fiber Pads, 8 x 11 cm, 4
cassettes, buffer tank, lid with power cables, 4 fiber pads, 170-3934 Bio-Ice Cooling Unit
1 pack precut blot absorbent filter paper 800-2105 Central Core Assembly, for Mini Trans-Blot cell
170-3850 Trans-Blot Cell With Plate Electrodes and PowerPac HC
Power Supply Criterion Blotters and Systems
170-3910 Trans-Blot Cell With Wire Electrodes, includes 2 gel holder 170-4070 Criterion Blotter With Plate Electrodes, includes cell
cassettes, buffer tank, lid with power cables, 4 fiber pads, assembled with plate electrodes, lid with cables, 2 Criterion
1 pack precut blot absorbent filter paper gel holder cassettes, 4 fiber pads, 1 pack precut blot
170-3825 Trans-Blot Cell With Wire Electrodes and PowerPac HC absorbent filter paper, gel/blot assembly tray, roller, sealed
Power Supply ice block, instructions
170-4071 Criterion Blotter With Wire Electrodes, includes cell
Trans-Blot Cell Accessories assembled with wire electrodes, lid with cables, 2 Criterion
170-3914 Fiber Pads, 15.5 x 20.5 cm, 6 gel holder cassettes, 4 fiber pads, 1 pack precut blot
170-3956 Trans-Blot Thick Blot Paper, 15 x 20 cm, 25 sheets absorbent filter paper, gel/blot assembly tray, roller, sealed
170-3960 Extra Thick Blot Paper, 15 x 20 cm, 30 sheets ice block, instructions
170-3943 Trans-Blot Platinum Anode Plate Electrode 165-6024 Criterion Cell/Plate Blot System, includes Criterion cell and
170-3944 Trans-Blot Stainless Steel Cathode Plate Electrode Criterion blotter with plate electrodes
170-3945 Trans-Blot Plate Electrode Pair, platinum anode and 165-6025 Criterion Cell/Wire Blot System, includes Criterion cell and
stainless steel cathode Criterion blotter with wire electrodes
170-3920 Trans-Blot Standard Wire Electrode Card, cathode 170-3872 Criterion Blotter With Plate Electrodes and PowerPac HC
170-3921 Trans-Blot Standard Wire Electrode Card, anode Power Supply
170-3912 Super Cooling Coil,* required for all high-intensity transfers 170-3874 Criterion Blotter With Wire Electrodes and PowerPac HC
170-3913 Gel Holder Cassette, includes 2 fiber pads Power Supply
170-3922 Trans-Blot Cell Buffer Tank
170-3923 Trans-Blot Cell Lid With Cables Criterion Blotter Accessories
170-4076 Optional Criterion Blotter Cooling Coil
Trans-Blot Plus Cell and Systems 170-4080 Criterion Gel Holder Cassette
170-3990 Trans-Blot Plus Cell With Plate Electrodes and Super 170-4081 Criterion Blotter Platinum Anode Plate Electrode
Cooling Coil, includes 3 gel holder cassettes, buffer tank, 170-4082 Criterion Blotter Stainless-Steel Cathode Plate Electrode
lid with power cables, 6 fiber pads, 1 pack blot absorbent 170-4083 Criterion Blotter Wire Electrode Card, anode
filter paper (26.5 x 28 cm, 30 sheets), roller, stirbar 170-4084 Criterion Blotter Wire Electrode Card, cathode
170-3991 Trans-Blot Plus Cell With Plate Electrodes, Super Cooling 170-4085 Criterion Blotter Filter Paper, 9.5 x 15.2 cm, 50 sheets
Coil, and PowerPac HC Power Supply 170-4086 Criterion Blotter Fiber Pads, 9.5 x 15.2 cm, 4
170-3992 Trans-Blot Plus Cell With Plate Electrodes, Super Cooling 170-4087 Sealed Ice Block, 2
Coil, and PowerPac Universal Power Supply 170-4089 Criterion Gel/Blot Assembly Tray
Trans-Blot Plus Cell Accessories 165-1279 Roller
170-3994 Trans-Blot Plus Gel/Cassette Assembly Tray 170-4077 Criterion Blotter Buffer Tank
170-3995 Fiber Pads, 27 x 28.5 cm, 2 170-4079 Criterion Blotter Lid With Cables
170-3996 Trans-Blot Plus Filter Paper, 26.5 x 28 cm, 60 sheets Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Cell and Systems
170-3997 Stirbar 170-3940 Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell,
170-3998 Trans-Blot Plus Roller, 6" wide includes Trans-Blot SD transfer cell, Trans-Blot SD agarose
170-3999 Trans-Blot Plus Gel Holder Cassette With Clamps gel support frame, extra thick blot paper, instructions
170-4990 Trans-Blot Plus Super Cooling Coil 170-3848 Trans-Blot SD Cell and PowerPac HC Power Supply
170-4991 Trans-Blot Plus Platinum Anode Plate Electrode 170-3849 Trans-Blot SD Cell and PowerPac Universal Power Supply
170-4992 Trans-Blot Plus Stainless-Steel Cathode Plate Electrode
170-4995 Trans-Blot Plus Cell Buffer Tank Trans-Blot SD Cell Accessories
170-4996 Trans-Blot Plus Cell Lid With Cables 170-3947 Cathode Plate, stainless-steel upper electrode
170-4997 Gel Holder Cassette Clamps, set of 3 170-3942 Anode Plate, platinum-coated lower electrode
170-3966 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for Mini-PROTEAN 3 or Ready Gel®
Mini Trans-Blot Cell and Systems precast gels, 7 x 8.4 cm, 60 sheets
170-3930 Mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell, includes 2 gel 170-3967 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for Criterion gels, 8 x 13.5 cm,
holder cassettes, 4 fiber pads, modular electrode assembly, 60 sheets
Bio-Ice cooling unit, lower buffer tank, lid with cables, 1 170-3968 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for PROTEAN® II xi gels, 14 x 16 cm,
pack precut blot absorbent filter paper (thick), instructions 30 sheets
170-3935 Mini Trans-Blot Module, without lower buffer tank and lid 170-3969 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for PROTEAN II XL gels, 18 x 18.5 cm,
30 sheets
* Trans-Blot cells require a super cooling coil for high-intensity transfers; the super cooling coil is recommended for all applications using plate electrodes.

Ordering Information Appendices
Microfiltration Apparatus Supported Nitrocellulose Membrane (0.2 µm)

162-0097 Supported Nitrocellulose Membrane, 30 cm x 3 m, 1 roll
Catalog # Description 162-0096 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 15 x 15 cm, 10 sheets
Bio-Dot Apparatus and Systems 162-0095 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets
170-3938 Bio-Dot Microfiltration System, includes Bio-Dot and 162-0253 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 26.5 x 28 cm,
Bio-Dot SF templates, vacuum manifold base, gasket 10 sheets
support plate, gasket
170-6545 Bio-Dot Apparatus, includes Bio-Dot sample template, PVDF Membranes
vacuum manifold base, gasket support plate, gasket Catalog # Description
170-6547 Bio-Dot Module, without vacuum manifold base, for
conversion of Bio-Dot SF to Bio-Dot apparatus Sequi-Blot PVDF Membrane
170-6542 Bio-Dot SF Apparatus, includes Bio-Dot SF sample 162-0184 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membrane, 24 cm x 3.3 m, 1 roll
template, vacuum manifold base, gasket support plate, 162-0182 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 10 sheets
gasket, filter paper 162-0185 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 3 sheets
170-6543 Bio-Dot SF Module, without vacuum manifold base, 162-0181 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membranes, 15 x 15 cm, 10 sheets
for conversion of Bio-Dot to Bio-Dot SF apparatus 162-0180 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membranes, 10 x 15 cm, 10 sheets
162-0186 Sequi-Blot PVDF Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets
Bio-Dot System Accessories 162-0236 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm,
170-6546 Bio-Dot Gaskets, 3 20 pack
170-6544 Bio-Dot SF Gaskets, 2 162-0237 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm,
162-0161 Bio-Dot/Bio-Dot SF Filter Paper, 11.3 x 7.7 cm, 60 sheets 50 pack
162-0216 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
Power Supplies 20 pack
Catalog # Description 162-0217 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
164-5052 PowerPac HC Power Supply 50 pack
164-5070 PowerPac Universal Power Supply Immun-Blot PVDF Membrane
162-0177 Immun-Blot PVDF Membrane, 26 cm x 3.3 m, 1 roll
Nitrocellulose Membranes 162-0176 Immun-Blot PVDF Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 10 sheets
Catalog # Description 162-0175 Immun-Blot PVDF Membranes, 10 x 15 cm, 10 sheets
162-0174 Immun-Blot PVDF Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets
Nitrocellulose Membrane (0.45 µm) 162-0238 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm,
162-0115 Nitrocellulose Membrane, 30 cm x 3.5 m, 1 roll 20 pack
162-0113 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 5 sheets 162-0239 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm,
162-0116 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 15 x 15 cm, 10 sheets 50 pack
162-0114 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 15 x 9.2 cm, 10 sheets 162-0218 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0148 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 11.5 x 16 cm, 10 sheets 20 pack
162-0117 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 9 x 12 cm, 10 sheets 162-0219 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0145 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets 50 pack
162-0251 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 26.5 x 28 cm, 10 sheets
162-0234 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, Blotting Membrane/Filter Paper Sandwiches
20 pack
162-0235 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, Catalog # Description
50 pack Ready Gel Membrane/Filter Paper Sandwiches
162-0214 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm, 162-0212 0.2 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
20 pack 20 pack
162-0215 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm, 162-0213 0.2 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
50 pack 50 pack
Nitrocellulose Membrane (0.2 µm) 162-0214 0.45 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0112 Nitrocellulose Membrane, 30 cm x 3.5 m, 1 roll 20 pack
162-0150 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 5 sheets 162-0215 0.45 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0147 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 13.5 x 16.5 cm, 10 sheets 50 pack
162-0146 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets 162-0218 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0252 Nitrocellulose Membranes, 26.5 x 28 cm, 10 sheets 20 pack
162-0232 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 162-0219 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
20 pack 50 pack
162-0233 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 162-0216 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
50 pack 20 pack
162-0212 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm, 20 pack 162-0217 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm,
162-0213 Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 7 x 8.5 cm, 50 pack 50 pack
Supported Nitrocellulose Membrane (0.45 µm)

162-0094 Supported Nitrocellulose Membrane, 30 cm x 3 m, 1 roll
162-0093 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 20 x 20 cm, 10 sheets
162-0090 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 7 x 8.4 cm, 10 sheets
162-0254 Supported Nitrocellulose Membranes, 26.5 x 28 cm,
10 sheets

Appendices Ordering Information
Criterion Membrane/Filter Paper Sandwiches Blot Transfer and Processing Buffers

162-0232 0.2 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 161-0778 10x Tris/CAPS, 1 L
20 pack 161-0774 20x SSC, 1 L
162-0233 0.2 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 161-0775 20x SSC, 5 L cube
50 pack 161-0780 10x Phosphate Buffered Saline, 1 L
162-0234 0.45 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 170-6435 10x Tris Buffered Saline, 1 L
20 pack Detergents/Blocking Reagents
162-0235 0.45 µm Nitrocellulose/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 170-6537 Gelatin, EIA grade, 200 g
50 pack 170-6404 Blotting-Grade Blocker, nonfat dry milk, 300 g
162-0238 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 170-6531 Tween 20, EIA grade, 100 ml
20 pack 161-0781 10% Tween 20, 1 L
162-0239 Immun-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 161-0418 SDS Solution, 20% (w/v), 1 L
50 pack 161-0783 1x Phosphate Buffered Saline With 1% Casein, 1 L
162-0236 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, 161-0782 1x Tris Buffered Saline With 1% Casein, 1 L
20 pack
162-0237 Sequi-Blot PVDF/Filter Paper Sandwiches, 8.5 x 13.5 cm, Blotting Standards
50 pack
Catalog # Description
Blot Absorbent Filter Paper Unstained Standards
Catalog # Description 161-0304 SDS-PAGE Standards, low range, 200 µl
161-0303 SDS-PAGE Standards, high range, 200 µl
170-3932 Mini Trans-Blot Filter Paper (Thick), 7.5 x 10 cm, 50 sheets 161-0317 SDS-PAGE Standards, broad range, 200 µl
170-3966 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for Mini-PROTEAN 3 or Ready Gel 161-0326 SDS-PAGE Standards, polypeptide, 200 µl
precast gels, 7 x 8.4 cm, 60 sheets 161-0363 Precision Plus Protein Unstained Standards, 1,000 µl
170-4085 Criterion Blotter Filter Paper, 9.5 x 15.2 cm, 50 sheets
170-3967 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for Criterion gels, 8 x 13.5 cm, Blotting Standards and Conjugates
60 sheets 161-0306 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards, low range, 250 µl
170-3959 Extra Thick Blot Paper, 15 x 15 cm, 30 sheets 161-0307 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, low range, avidin-HRP
170-3968 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for PROTEAN II xi gels, 14 x 16 cm, 161-0308 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, low range, avidin-AP
30 sheets 161-0311 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards, high range, 250 µl
170-3956 Trans-Blot Thick Filter Paper, 15 x 20 cm, 25 sheets 161-0312 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, high range,
170-3969 Extra Thick Blot Paper, for PROTEAN II XL gels, 18 x 18.5 cm, avidin-HRP
30 sheets 161-0313 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, high range,
170-3960 Extra Thick Blot Paper, 15 x 20 cm, 30 sheets avidin-AP
170-3996 Trans-Blot Plus Filter Paper, 26.5 x 28 cm, 60 sheets 161-0319 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards, broad range, 250 µl
162-0161 Bio-Dot/Bio-Dot SF Filter Paper, 11.3 x 77 cm, 60 sheets 161-0321 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, broad range,
avidin-HRP
Buffer Reagents 161-0322 Biotinylated SDS-PAGE Standards Kit, broad range,
avidin-AP
Catalog # Description 161-0380 Precision Protein™ StrepTactin-HRP Conjugate, 300 µl
Electrophoresis Buffer Reagents 161-0382 Precision Protein StrepTactin-AP Conjugate, 300 µl
161-0710 2-Mercaptoethanol, 25 ml Prestained Standards
161-0750 Boric Acid, 500 g 161-0305 Prestained SDS-PAGE Standards, low range, 500 µl
161-0751 Boric Acid,1 kg 161-0309 Prestained SDS-PAGE Standards, high range, 500 µl
161-0707 Citric Acid, 100 g 161-0318 Prestained SDS-PAGE Standards, broad range, 500 µl
161-0610 Dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 g 161-0324 Kaleidoscope Prestained Standards, broad range, 500 µl
161-0611 DTT, 5 g 161-0325 Kaleidoscope Polypeptide Standards, 500 µl
163-2101 Tributylphosphine (TBP), 200 mM, 0.6 ml 161-0373 Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standards, 500 µl
163-2109 Iodoacetamide, 30 g 161-0374 Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standards, 500 µl
161-0728 EDTA, 100 g 161-0375 Precision Plus Protein Kaleidoscope Standards, 500 µl
161-0729 EDTA, 500 g
161-0717 Glycine, 250 g Detection Reagents
161-0718 Glycine, 1 kg
161-0724 Glycine, 2 kg Catalog # Description
161-0720 Sucrose, 1 kg Total Protein Stains and Components
161-0712 Tricine, 100 g 161-0402 Amido Black 10B, 25 g
161-0713 Tricine, 500 g 161-0400 Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, 10 g
161-0716 Tris, 500 g 170-6517 Enhanced Colloidal Gold Total Protein Detection Kit,
161-0719 Tris, 1 kg includes colloidal gold total protein stain, Tris, Tween 20,
161-0730 Urea, 250 g gold enhancement kit, instructions
161-0731 Urea, 1 kg 170-6512 Biotin-Blot Total Protein Detection Kit, includes NHS-biotin,
avidin-HRP, Tween 20, Tris, HRP color development
Premixed Buffers reagent (4CN), instructions
Catalog # Description 170-3127 SYPRO Ruby Protein Blot Stain, 200 ml
Electrophoresis Buffers
161-0732 10x Tris/Glycine/SDS, 1 L
161-0772 10x Tris/Glycine/SDS, 5 L cube
161-0734 10x Tris/Glycine, 1 L
161-0771 10x Tris/Glycine, 5 L

Ordering Information Appendices
Immun-Blot AP Colorimetric Assay Kits Immun-Star HRP Chemiluminescent Assay Kits

170-6460 Immun-Blot AP Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Assay Kit 170-5040 Immun-Star HRP Substrate, 500 ml
170-6461 Immun-Blot AP Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Assay Kit 170-5041 Immun-Star HRP Substrate, 100 ml
170-6462 Immun-Blot AP Goat Anti-Human IgG (H + L) Assay Kit 170-5042 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Rabbit-HRP Detection Reagents,
170-6412 Immun-Blot Amplified AP Assay Kit include substrate, antibody, 500 ml
Immun-Blot amplified AP kit includes 0.5 ml biotinylated antibody, 0.5 ml 170-5043 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Mouse-HRP Detection Reagents,
streptavidin, 0.5 ml biotinylated AP, premixed Tris-buffered saline, nonfat milk, include substrate, antibody, 500 ml
Tween 20, and AP conjugate substrate kit. Immun-Blot AP kits include 0.5 ml 170-5045 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Rabbit-HRP Detection Kit, includes
antibody conjugate, premixed Tris-buffered saline, Tween 20, gelatin, and complete reagents, 500 ml
substrate kit. 170-5044 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Mouse-HRP Detection Kit, includes
Blotting-Grade AP Conjugates complete reagents, 500 ml
170-6533 Avidin-AP, 1 ml 170-5046 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Rabbit-HRP Conjugate, 2 ml
170-3554 Streptavidin-AP, 0.5 ml 170-5047 Immun-Star Goat Anti-Mouse-HRP Conjugate, 2 ml
170-6518 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG-AP, 1 ml 500 ml kits are sufficent for 4,000 cm2 of membrane; 100 ml kits are
170-6520 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG-AP, 1 ml sufficent for 800 cm2 of membrane
170-6521 Goat Anti-Human IgG-AP, 1 ml
Detection Accessories
Immun-Blot HRP Colorimetric Assay Kits
170-6463 Immun-Blot HRP Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Assay Kit Catalog # Description
170-6464 Immun-Blot HRP Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Assay Kit Mini Incubation Trays
170-6465 Immun-Blot HRP Goat Anti-Human IgG (H + L) Assay Kit 170-3902 Mini Incubation Trays, 20
170-6466 Immun-Blot Protein A Assay Kit 170-3903 Mini Incubation Trays, 100
170-6467 Immun-Blot Protein G Assay Kit Mini-PROTEAN II Multiscreen Apparatus
170-8235 Opti-4CN Substrate Kit 170-4017 Mini-PROTEAN II Multiscreen Apparatus, includes 2
170-8237 Opti-4CN Goat Anti-Mouse Detection Kit sample templates, 2 gaskets, base plate
170-8236 Opti-4CN Goat Anti-Rabbit Detection Kit 170-4018 Multiscreen Gaskets, 2
170-8238 Amplified Opti-4CN Substrate Kit
170-8240 Amplified Opti-4CN Goat Anti-Mouse Detection Kit Background Remover
170-8239 Amplified Opti-4CN Goat Anti-Rabbit Detection Kit 170-5020 De-Expose Background Remover, 250 ml, 10x
Immun-Blot HRP kits include 0.5 ml antibody conjugate, premixed Tris-
buffered saline, Tween 20, gelatin, and substrate kit. Documentation Systems
Blotting-Grade HRP Conjugates Catalog # Description
170-6515 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP, 2 ml 170-7980 GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer, PC
170-6516 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG-HRP, 2 ml 170-7981 GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer, Mac
172-1050 Goat Anti-Human IgG-HRP, 2 ml 170-8070 ChemiDoc XRS System, PC
170-6522 Protein A-HRP, 1 ml 170-8071 ChemiDoc XRS System, Mac
170-6425 Protein G-HRP, 1 ml 170-8140 VersaDoc 4000 Imaging System, PC
170-6528 Avidin-HRP, 2 ml 170-8141 VersaDoc 4000 Imaging System, Mac
Blotting Substrate Reagents 170-8050 VersaDoc 5000 Imaging System, PC
170-6431 HRP Conjugate Substrate Kit, contains premixed 4CN and 170-8151 VersaDoc 5000 Imaging System, Mac
hydrogen peroxide solutions, color development buffer; 170-7850 Molecular Imager FX Pro Plus MultiImager System, PC
prepares 1 L of color development solution 170-7851 Molecular Imager FX Pro Plus MultiImager System, Mac
170-6432 AP Conjugate Substrate Kit, contains premixed BCIP and
NBT solutions, color development buffer; prepares 1 L of
color development solution
170-6534 HRP Color Development Reagent, 4CN, 5 g
170-6535 HRP Color Development Reagent, DAB, 5 g
170-6539 AP Color Development Reagent, BCIP, 300 mg
170-6532 AP Color Development Reagent, NBT, 600 mg
170-6401 Biotinylated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L), 1 ml
170-6403 Blotting-Grade Biotinylated AP, 1 ml
170-6408 Blotting-Grade Streptavidin, 1 mg
170-6529 NHS-Biotin, 4 ml
Immun-Star AP Chemiluminescent Assay Kits
170-5010 Immun-Star AP Goat Anti-Mouse Detection Kit, includes
substrate, enhancer, antibody
170-5011 Immun-Star AP Goat Anti-Rabbit Detection Kit, includes
substrate, enhancer, antibody
170-5012 Immun-Star AP Substrate Pack, includes substrate, enhancer
170-5013 Immun-Star AP Goat Anti-Mouse Intro Kit, includes
complete reagents for 8 mini blots
170-5014 Immun-Star AP Goat Anti-Rabbit Intro Kit, includes
complete reagents for 8 mini blots
170-5018 Immun-Star AP Substrate
170-5015 Blotting Reagents Pack, includes TBS, Tween 20, blocker
All items except intro kits cover 2,500 cm2 membrane. For complete blotting
kits, add the blotting reagents pack to the detection kits. The intro kits
provide a low-cost trial of the assay.

Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc.
Life Science Web site www.bio-rad.com USA (800) 4BIORAD Australia 02 9914 2800 Austria (01)-877 89 01 Belgium 09-385 55 11 Brazil 55 21 2527 3454
Canada (905) 712-2771 China (86-21) 63052255 Czech Republic + 420 2 41 43 05 32 Denmark 44 52 10 00 Finland 09 804 22 00
Group France 01 47 95 69 65 Germany 089 318 84-0 Hong Kong 852-2789-3300 Hungary 36 1 455 8800 India (91-124)-6398112/113/114, 6450092/93
Israel 03 951 4127 Italy 39 02 216091 Japan 03-5811-6270 Korea 82-2-3473-4460 Latin America 305-894-5950 Mexico 55-52-00-05-20
The Netherlands 0318-540666 New Zealand 64 9 415 2280 Norway 23 38 41 30 Poland + 48 22 331 99 99 Portugal 351-21-472-7700
Russia 7 095 721 1404 Singapore 65-6415 3188 South Africa 00 27 11 4428508 Spain 34 91 590 5200 Sweden 08 555 12700
Switzerland 061 717-9555 Taiwan (8862) 2578-7189/2578-7241 United Kingdom 020 8328 2000
P/N 411-0188 Bulletin 2895 US/EG Rev A 02-661 0504 Sig 1103

Bulletin 2895 Protein Blotting Guide

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bulletin 2895 Protein Blotting Guide

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bulletin 2895 Protein Blotting Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Guide to Transfer and Detection

A History of Leadership and Quality

Meeting Your Blotting Needs

Protein Blotting Guide 1

Introduction to Protein Blotting 7 Power Conditions for Electrophoretic Transfers . . . . .21

Electrophoretic Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25

Blotting Filter Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Performing a Semi-Dry Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27

Transfer Buffer Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19

Dunn Carbonate Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Air Bubbles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29

Alternative Buffer Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Membrane Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29

Protein Blotting Guide 3

Chapter 4 Detection Gel Cassette Pattern Transferred to Blot

Detection Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 Poor Binding to the Membrane — PVDF

Immunological Detection Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57

4 Protein Blotting Guide

Transfer Buffer Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62

Detection Buffer Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63

Assay Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66

Trademarks and Legal Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73

Ordering Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74

Protein Blotting Guide 5

Overview of protein Proteins

Electrophoretic Microfiltration Transfer Method

Immunological Total Protein

6 Protein Blotting Guide

Introduction to Protein Blotting

Protein Blotting Guide 7

Tank Transfer Semi-Dry Transfer

Mini Criterion™ Trans-Blot® Trans-Blot® Trans-Blot Bio-Dot® Bio-Dot SF

Fig. 1.1. Protein transfer

Protein Blotting Guide 9

Cathode Electrophoretic Transfer between the electrodes play a major role in

Table 1.1. Comparison of electrophoretic protein transfer systems.

Tank Blotting Semi-Dry Blotting

10 Protein Blotting Guide

Tank Blotting Tank transfer systems are recommended for

Protein Blotting Guide 11

Blotting Systems and Power Supplies

Transfer Apparatus both standard and high-intensity blotting

12 Protein Blotting Guide

tank with the minimum electrode distance 1

Mini Trans-Blot Cell and Fig. 1.6. The Criterion blotter.

Table 1.2. Specifications for tank blotting cells.

Trans-Blot Trans-Blot Plus Mini Trans-Blot Criterion Blotter

Protein Blotting Guide 13

Semi-Dry Blotting Apparatus

3 Table 1.3. Trans-Blot SD semi-dry cell specifications.

Bio-Dot® and Bio-Dot SF Apparatus

14 Protein Blotting Guide

Table 1.4. Bio-Dot apparatus specifications.

Power Supplies for Electrophoretic Transfers

PowerPac™ HC Power Supply

Table 1.5. PowerPac HC and PowerPac Universal power supply specifications.

Protein Blotting Guide 15

Membranes, Buffers, and

Table 2.1. Guide to protein blotting membranes.

Protein Blotting Guide 17

Polyvinylidene Difluoride Sequi-Blot™ PVDF for

Blotting Filter Paper