Convergence With Accounting Standards: Compiled by CA Saurabh Patni
Convergence With Accounting Standards: Compiled by CA Saurabh Patni
Convergence With Accounting Standards: Compiled by CA Saurabh Patni
Introduction
On 14 January 2011, ICAI posted on its website near-final exposure
drafts (near-final ED) of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)
converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
On 25 February 2011, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) notified
the near-final ED of Ind AS after making certain amendments (notified
Ind AS). However, MCAs press release states that the date of
implementation of the Ind AS will be notified at a later date which was
previously expected to be 1 April 2011. The press release further
states that Ind AS will be implemented in a phased manner only after
various issues including tax related issues are resolved to ensure that
the convergence is achieved smoothly for the stakeholders.
Phase 1
Transition
date April
1, 2011
Phase 2
Transition
date April
1, 2013
NIFTY50
SENSEX30
Companies whose shares or other securities listed on
stock exchanges outside India
Companies (listed or unlisted) with networth in excess
of INR.1,000 crores
Companies (listed or unlisted) with networth in excess
of INR.500 crores but less than INR.1,000 crores
Phase 3
Transition
date April
1, 2014
Presentation of comparatives
A company may, however, voluntarily choose to report comparative
period figures (i.e. for the year ending March 31, 2011 in case of
Phase 1 entities) as per the converged accounting standards by
inserting an additional column in the financial statements. The
opening balance sheet (and therefore transition adjustments) for
companies in such a case shall be as at April 1, 2010.
Option to present comparatives voluntarily (2010 2011)
Opening balance sheet shall be prepared as at April 1, 2011 (i.e.
Phase 1 entities) and the financial statements for the year ending
March 31, 2012 shall be in accordance with the converged
accounting standards; but comparative period figures (i.e. for the year
ending March 31, 2011) shall those reported as per the nonconverged accounting standards.
Option to choose the IFRS vs. Indian converged accounting
standards
Companies shall need to follow the converged accounting standards
and not IFRS as issued by IASB.
Date for determination of eligibility
The date for the determination of applicability criteria of the
converged standards would be March 31, 2011 for banks and NBFCs
and March 31, 2009 for other companies (other than insurance
companies)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Key IFRS
differences
7.
8.
29.
30.
31.
32.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
33.
34.
35.
2.
3.
4.
Ind AS requirement
Ind AS 1 allows only
the single statement
approach. So entities
can not follow two
statements approach
IFRS requirement
With regard to preparation of
Statement of profit and loss, IAS
1 provides an option either to
follow the single statement
approach or to follow the two
statement approach.
Ind AS 1 requires the IAS 1 requires preparation of a
statement of changes Statement of changes in equity
in equity to be shown as a separate statement.
as a part of the balance
sheet.
Ind AS 1 requires only Paragraph 99 of IAS 1 requires
nature-wise
an entity to present an analysis of
classification
of expenses recognized in profit or
expenses.
loss using a classification based
on either their nature or their
function within the entity.
Ind AS 1 does not IAS 1 contains implmentation
include implementation guidance.
guidance
because
various
enactments
have
prescribed
formats, e.g., Schedule
VI to the Companies
Act, 1956.
Ind AS 2 Inventories
SR No.
1.
Ind AS requirement
Paragraph 38 of IAS 2 dealing with
recognition of inventories as an
expense based on function-wise
classification, has been deleted keeping
in view the fact that
option provided in IAS 1 to present an
analysis of expenses recognised in
profit or loss using a classification
based on their function within the equity
has been
removed and IndAS 1 requires only
nature -wise classification of expenses.
IFRS requirement
IAS 2 allows recognition
of inventories as an
expense
based
on
function-wise
classification.
2.
Ind AS requirement
IndAS 7 does not provide
such an option and requires these item
to be classified as item of financing
activity
and
investing
activity,
respectively.
IFRS requirement
In case of other than
financial entities, IAS 7
gives an option to
classify the interest paid
and
interest
and
dividends received as
item of operating cash
flows.
IndAS 7 requires it to be classified as a IAS 7 gives an option to
part of financing activity only.
classify the dividend
paid as an item of
operating activity.
Ind AS requirement
IFRS requirement
This has been dealt with under IndAS IAS 11 does not deal
11, since it has been kept out of the with accounting for
scope tofIndAS 18, Revenue.
construction contracts
in respect of real estate
developers.
IND AS 17 Leases
S R No.
1.
Ind AS requirement
Relevant paragraphs of IAS 17
dealing with measurement of the
land and buildings elements when
the lessees interest in both land
and buildings is classified as an
investment property in accordance
with Ind AS 40 Investment Property
if the fair value model is adopted
and paragraph 19 of IAS 17 dealing
with property interest held under an
operating Lease as an investment
property, if the definition of
investment property is otherwise
met and fair value model is applied,
have been deleted, since Ind AS
40, Investment Property, prohibits
the use of fair value model.
IFRS Requirement
Both cost and fair
value
option
are
prescribed
for
investment
property
under Ind AS 40, for
which corresponding
guidance is given
under IAS 17
IND AS 18 Revenue
IND AS Requirement
SR No.
1.
IFRIC 15 has not been included in
Ind AS 18 to scope out agreements
in relation to construction of real
estate and to include the same in Ind
AS 11, Construction Contracts.
IFRS Requirement
The same requirement
forms part of IFRIC 15
based on principles of
IAS 18.
Regulatory updates :
Representations for deferral of April 1, 2011 timeline:
Delay in issuance of the final standards and final regulatory
amendments
Need for preparatory time (12 months 24 months) after
issuance
Expected changes in IFRS
Lack of clarity on taxation
U.S. and Japan have more extended timelines