Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Pediatric Health 2011 Report Brief

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

REPORTBRIEF APRIL 2011

For more information visit www.iom.edu/childqualitymeasures

Child and Adolescent


Health and Health Care
Quality
Measuring What Matters

Health and health care quality measures can provide valuable information
about the health status of children and adolescents, as well as the outcomes
associated with medical care, policy, and social programs. These measures
are especially useful in monitoring general health and health care trends as
well as identifying disparities among disadvantaged populations. Despite the
fact that the U.S. government currently supports hundreds of data sets and
measures through federal surveys and administrative data systems, the United
States lacks robust national- and state-level information about the health status or health care quality of children and adolescents, particularly in areas
that could provide guidance to policy makers and health care providers.
In the Childrens Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009,
Congress directed the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the National Research
Council (NRC) to evaluate the state of efforts to measure child and adolescent
health and the quality of their health care services. The IOM and the NRC
formed the Committee on Pediatric Health and Health Care Quality Measures,
which reviewed hundreds of population surveys, such as census records and
health surveys, and administrative data sets, such as those based on payment
and health records.

The Nature, Scope, and Quality of Existing Data Sources


Currently, there is no single data source that can provide valid and reliable
indicators about the health and health care quality of children and adolescents. Policy makers and researchers therefore must examine data from a
variety of federal and state data sources to get a clear picture of child and

Currently, there is no single data


source that can provide valid and
reliable indicators about the health
and health care quality of children
and adolescents.

adolescent health and the quality of health care


they receive. The committee concludes that a
lack of standardization in key areassuch as race
and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, primary
language spoken at home, and parental English
proficiencylimits the ability of those who use
data to identify, monitor, and address persistent
health and health care quality disparities among
children and adolescents. Measurement in these
areas is especially important given the growing
ethnic and racial diversity of children and adolescents and the increasing number of children who
live in poverty. The U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) should provide leadership to standardize data in key areas, including
developing precise definitions and utilizing consistent data collection methods.

developing measures for children and adolescents.


This approach to measurement will focus on the
needs of the whole child as opposed to individual clinical concerns and will better address the
distinct needs of younger populations, including
their unique patterns of morbidity and mortality,
their dependent status, and their developmental
stages. Measuring transitions of care between
primary care and specialty care also is important,
especially for children with special health care
needs.

Methodological Areas that Deserve


Attention
The committee endorses the use of innovative
measurement practices that can adapt to changing conditions, changing populations, and opportunities for health improvement. This will require
efforts that track key child and adolescent populations over time to ensure that groups with the
greatest risk for poor outcomes are included in
the relevant data sources. To facilitate innovation in measurement, the strengths and limitations of different surveys need to become more
transparent.
In some cases, HHS can link or aggregate
multiple data sourcesconnecting one database
to another, for exampleand therefore reduce the
burden of data collection on individual states, providers, health plans, and households. Longitudinal
studies, which include multiple observations for
the same children/families over time, also would
enrich the quality of indicators. And the capture
of electronic data offers opportunities to enhance
future measurement activity. Such efforts need to
offer protections for privacy and confidentiality.
They also have the potential to capture important state-level policy and community-level characteristics and enable analysis of the variability
and impact of coverage, eligibility, and payment
policies.

Gaps in Measurement Areas


Research shows that physical and social environments (for example, safe neighborhoods or
crowded housing), personal health behaviors, and
social relationships (for example, parent-child
attachment) influence the health status of children and adolescents and their use of health care
services. These contextual factors have significant
effects on the short- and long-term health outcomes of children and adolescents, yet information about them often is lacking in existing data
sets.
Another significant gap is the general absence
of information about the content and quality of
preventive services that are used by children and
adolescents. This information is especially relevant because screening and early interventions
may mitigate serious health disorders later in life.
A life-course approach to measurement is
one new strategy to closing the gaps in measuring
child and adolescent health and health care quality. This approach, which considers how events at
each stage of life influence subsequent health and
health care quality, is particularly important in

500 Fifth Street, NW


Washington, DC 20001
TEL 202.334.2352
FAX 202.334.1412

A life-course approach to measurement is one key strategy to


closing the gaps in measuring child
and adolescent health and health
care quality. This approach, which
considers how events at each stage
of life influence subsequent health
and health care quality, is particularly important in developing measures for children and adolescents.

A Stepwise Approach

3. Create new measures and data sources in


priority areas

The committee recommends a stepwise approach


(see Figure 1) for improving data sources and measures of health and health care quality for children and adolescents. This approach is designed
to stimulate and support collaborative efforts
among federal and state agencies and key stakeholder groups through the following five steps:

4. Improve methods for data collection, reporting, and analysis


5. Improve public and private capacities to use
and report data
This stepwise approach is necessarily continuous and calls for the evaluation of the measurement system itself for transparency, accessibility, timeliness, quality, and feasibility. The entire
approach will be informed by private initiatives
as well as governmentsponsored efforts. This
approach is meant to align existing and future
efforts to measure health and health care qual-

1. Set shared health and health care quality


goals for children and adolescents in the
United States
2. Develop annual reports and standardized
measures for existing data sets of health and
health care quality that can be collected and
used to assess progress toward those goals

Figure 1: A Stepwise Approach to Measuring Health and Health Care Quality for Children and Adolescents

2. Develop annual
reports and
standardized
measures based on
existing data sets

1. Set shared
health and
health care
quality goals

3. Create new
measures and
data sources

Measuring the Performance


of the Measurement System
Transparency
Accessibility
Timeliness
Quality
Feasibility

5. Improve public
and private
capacity to use
and report data

SOURCE: Committee on Pediatric Health and Health Care Quality Measures, 2011

4. Improve data
collection,
reporting, and
analysis

Committee on Pediatric Health and Health Care Quality


Measures
Gordon H. DeFriese (Chair)
Cecil G. Sheps Center for
Health Service Research,
University of North Carolina
Paula A. Braveman
Center on Social Disparities in
Health, University of California,
San Francisco
Claire D. Brindis
R. Lee Institute for Health
Policy Studies, University of
California, San Francisco
Barbara J. Burns
Services Effectiveness
Research Program, Department
of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University
School of Medicine
Glenn Flores
Department of Pediatrics,
University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center
Gary L. Freed
Department of Pediatrics,
University of Michigan Health
Systems
Deborah A. Gross
Department of Acute and
Chronic Care, School of
Nursing, The Johns Hopkins
University

Charles J. Homer
National Initiative for Childrens
Healthcare Quality
Kevin B. Johnson
Department of Biomedical
Informatics and Department of
Pediatrics, Vanderbilt
University School of Medicine

ity for children and adolescents. Some improvements to measurement can be made immediately
under the leadership of the Secretary of HHS; others require longer-term consensus-building efforts
among multiple federal agencies.

Genevieve Kenney
The Urban Institute

Conclusion

Marie C. McCormick
Department of Society,
Human Development and
Health, School of Public Health,
Harvard University

Improving health outcomes for children and adolescents is essential to achieving a healthy future
for the nation. A life-course approach to the measurement of health and health care quality, with
new emphasis on the social and behavioral determinants of health and monitoring disparities in health
and health care quality, will deepen understanding
of key opportunities to achieve these outcomes. f

Kathryn M. McDonald
Center for Primary Care and
Outcomes Research, Stanford
University School of Medicine
Michael J. OGrady
Health Policy and Evaluation
Department, National Opinion
Research Corporation at the
University of Chicago
Alan R. Weil
National Academy for State
Health Policy
Alan M. Zaslavsky
Department of Health Care
Policy, Harvard Medical School

Maxine Hayes
State of Washington,
Department of Health

Study Staff
Rosemary Chalk
Study Director

Wendy Keenan
Program Associate

Patti Simon
Program Officer

Julienne Palbusa
Research Assistant

Chelsea Bodnar
Fellow (January to April 2010)

Pamella Atayi
Senior Program Assistant

Yeonwoo Lebovitz
Research Associate (from
November 2010)

Study Sponsors
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

500 Fifth Street, NW


Washington, DC 20001
TEL 202.334.2352
FAX 202.334.1412
Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

You might also like