Philippine Skylanders, Inc. Vs NLRC Digest

[G.R. No. 127374. January 31, 2002.
]
PHILIPPINE SKYLANDERS, INC., MARILES C. ROMULO and FRANCISCO
DAKILA, petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, LABOR
ARBITER EMERSON TUMANON, PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR
UNIONS (PAFLU) SEPTEMBER (now UNIFIED PAFLU) and SERAFIN AYROSO,
respondents.
[G.R. No. 127431. January 31, 2002.]
PHILIPPINE SKYLANDERS AND WORKERS ASSOCIATION-NCW, MACARIO
CABANIAS, PEPITO RODILLAS, SHARON CASTILLO, DANILO CARBONEL,
MANUEL EDA, ROLANDO FELIX, JOCELYN FRONDA, RICARDO LUMBA,
JOSEPH MARISOL, NERISA MORTEL, TEOFILO QUIRONG, LEONARDO REYES,
MANUEL CADIENTE and HERMINIA RIOSA, petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE
ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (PAFLU) SEPTEMBER (now UNIFIED
PAFLU) and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION,
respondents.
FACTS:
Nov 1993, the Philippine Skylanders Employees Association (PSEA), a local labor union
affiliated with the Philippine Association of Free Labor Unions (PAFLU) September (PAFLU),
won in the certification election conducted among the rank and file employees of Philippine
Skylanders, Inc. (PSI). Its rival union, Philippine Skylanders Employees Association-WATU
(PSEA-WATU) immediately protested the result of the election before the Secretary of Labor.
Several months later, pending settlement of the controversy, PSEA sent PAFLU a notice of
disaffiliation citing as reason PAFLU's supposed deliberate and habitual dereliction of duty
toward its members. PSEA subsequently affiliated itself with the National Congress of Workers
(NCW), changed its name to Philippine Skylanders Employees Association - National Congress
of Workers (PSEANCW), and allowed the former officers of PSEA-PAFLU to continue
occupying their positions as elected officers PSEA-NCW.
On 17 March 1994 PSEA-NCW entered into a collective bargaining agreement with PSI which
was immediately registered with DOLE.
PAFLU Secretary General Serafin Ayroso wrote Mariles C. Romulo requesting a copy of PSI's
audited financial statement. Ayroso explained that with the dismissal of PSEA-WATU's election
protestthe time was ripe for the parties to enter into a collective bargaining agreement. PSI
through its personnel manager Francisco Dakila denied the request citing as reason PSEA's
disaffiliation from PAFLU and its subsequent affiliation with NCW. PAFLU through Serafin
Ayroso filed a complaint for unfair labor practice against PSI, its president Mariles Romulo and
personnel manager Francisco Dakila. PAFLU amended its complaint by including the elected
officers of PSEA-PAFLU as additional party respondents.
Labor Arbiter declared PSEA's disaffiliation from PAFLU invalid and held PSI, PSEA-PAFLU
and their respective officers guilty of unfair labor practice.
NLRC upheld the Decision of the Labor Arbiter and conjectured that since an election protest
questioning PSEA-PAFLU's certification as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent was pending
resolution before the Secretary of Labor, PSEA could not validly separate from PAFLU, join
another national federation and subsequently enter into a collective bargaining agreement with its
employer-company.
ISSUE/S:
WON PSEA, which is an independent and separate local union, may validly disaffiliate from
PAFLU pending the settlement of an election protest questioning its status as the sole and
exclusive bargaining agent of PSI's rank and file employees.
HELD:
YES. The pendency of an election protest involving both the mother federation and the local
union did not constitute a bar to a valid disaffiliation.
Reasoning In Liberty Cotton Mills Workers Union vs. Liberty Cotton Mills, Inc. the SC upheld
the right of local unions to separate from their mother federation on the ground that as separate
and voluntary associations, local unions do not owe their creation and existence to the national
federation to which they are affiliated but, instead, to the will of their members. The sole essence
of affiliation is to increase, by collective action, the common bargaining power of local unions
for the effective enhancement and protection of their interests.
Yet the local unions remain the basic units of association, free to serve their own interests subject
to the restraints imposed by the constitution and by-laws of the national federation, and free also
to renounce the affiliation upon the terms laid down in the agreement which brought such
affiliation into existence.
Policy considerations dictate that in weighing the claims of a local union as against those of a
national federation, those of the former must be preferred. Parenthetically though, the desires of
the mother federation to protect its locals are not altogether to be shunned. It will however be to
err greatly against the Constitution if the desires of the federation would be favored over those of
its members. If it were otherwise, instead of protection, there would be disregard and neglect of
the lowly workingmen.
Disposition Petition is granted.

Philippine Skylanders, Inc. Vs NLRC Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Philippine Skylanders, Inc. Vs NLRC Digest

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Philippine Skylanders, Inc. Vs NLRC Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

[G.R. No. 127374. January 31, 2002.

You might also like