Summary of Important Us Gaap:: Under US GAAP, The Financial Statements Include The
Summary of Important Us Gaap:: Under US GAAP, The Financial Statements Include The
Summary of Important Us Gaap:: Under US GAAP, The Financial Statements Include The
the
transaction
involves
a specified
number of similar or essentially
similar actions, an equal amount of revenue should be recognized when each
action
is
performed.
If
the
transaction
involves
a specified
number of dissimilar or unique actions,
3. The completed performance method should be used to recognize revenue
when completing the final action is so critical that the entire transaction
would be considered incomplete without it.
4. The collection method is used to recognize revenue when there is significant
uncertainty regarding the collection of revenue.
5. Revenue should not be recognized until cash is collected. The matching
principle requires that expenses be matched to revenues .In other words,
revenues should be recognized in the same period as their associated
expenses. If expenses are expected to be recovered from future revenues,
then those expenses should be deferred.
Three major categories of costs result from service transactions: Initial direct
costs are incurred to negotiate and obtain a service agreement. They include costs
such as commissions, credit investigation, processing fees, legal fees, etc. They do
not include indirect costs such as rent and other administrative costs.
In case of Sale of Goods, revenue is recognized, when delivery has happened,
property in good has passed from Seller to Buyer and there is no chance of Return
of good sold or any claim
1. Sales with buy Back agreements: No sale is recognized when a company sells
a product in one accounting period and agrees to buy it back in the next
accounting period at a set price which includes not only the cost of inventory
but also related holding costs. While the legal title may transfer in such a
transaction, the economic substance of the transaction is to leave the risk with
the seller, and hence no sale is recognized
2. Sales where right of return exists: When a company experiences a high rate of
return, it may be necessary to delay reporting sales until the right of return
has substantially expired. The right of return may either be specified in a
contract or it may be a customary business practice involving guaranteed
sales or consignments. Three methods are generally used to record sales
when the right of return exists. First, the company may decide not to record
any sale until the right of return has substantially expired. Second, the
company may record the sale and estimated future returns. Finally, the
company may record the sale and account for returns as they occur. According
to FASB Statement No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of Return
Exists, the company may recognize revenue at the time of sale only if all of
the following six conditions are satisfied: 1. The price is fixed or determinable
at the date of sale.2. The obligation of the buyer to pay the seller is not
contingent on resale of the product, or the buyer has paid the seller.3. Theft or
other damage to the product would not affect the buyers obligation to the
seller.4. The product being acquired by the buyer for resale has economic
substance apart from that provided by the seller.5. Seller does not have
significant future obligations to assist directly in the resale of the product by
the buyer. 6. Future returns can be reasonably estimated.
Footnote disclosure for inventory includes the valuation basis method, inventory
categorization by major type, unusual losses, and inventory pledged or
collateralized.
FASB Statement Number 49 (Accounting for Product Financing Arrangements)
states that a financing arrangement may be entered into for the sale and
repurchase of inventory. Such an arrangement is reported as a borrowing, not a
sale. In many situations, the product is kept on the companys (sponsors)
premises. In addition, a sponsor may guarantee the debt of the other company.
Typically, most of the financed product is ultimately used or sold by the sponsor.
However, in some instances, minimal amounts of the product may be sold by the
financing entity to other parties. The company that provides financing to the
sponsor is typically a creditor, non business entity, or trust. In a few cases, the
financing entity may have been set up solely to furnish financing to the sponsor.
The sponsor should footnote the terms of the product financing arrangement.
6. Fixed assets: GAAP for the accounting, reporting, and disclosures associated
with fixed assets are included in the American Institute of CPAs Accounting
Principles Board Opinion Number 6 dealing with depreciation, Accounting Principles
Board Opinion Number 12, paragraphs 4 and 5 (Disclosure of Depreciable Assets
and Depreciation), American Institute of CPAs Accounting Research Bulletin
Number 43, chapter 9A (Depreciation and High Costs), and Emerging Issues Task
Force Consensus Summary Number 8911 (Allocation of Purchase
Price to Assets to be sold).
Fixed Assets are to be stated at cost of acquisition less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided based on estimated useful lives of the assets and no
depreciation rate are provided in US GAAP. Cost of improvements that substantially
extend the useful lives of assets can be capitalized. Repairs and maintenance
expenses are to be charged to revenue when incurred. In case of sale or disposal of
an asset, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from
consolidated financial statement.
Revaluation: US GAAP prohibits upward revaluations except for a discovery on a
natural resource, in a business combination accounted for under the purchase
method, or in a quasi reorganization. If a natural resource is discovered on land,
such as oil or coal, the appraised value is charged to the land account and then
depleted using the units of production method.
Self-constructed assets are recorded at the incremental or direct costs to build
(material, labor, and variable overhead) assuming idle capacity. Fixed overhead is
excluded unless it increases because of the construction effort. However, selfconstructed assets should not be recorded at an amount in excess of the outside
cost.
A donated fixed asset should be recorded at its fair market value by debiting fixed
assets and crediting contribution revenue4A FASB Statement Number
116 (Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made). The Donor
should recognize an expense for the fair market value of the donated asset. The
difference between the book value and fair market value
Under this method, the investor treats the investment as if it were a consolidated
subsidiary and includes its proportionate share in the profit or loss profit as part
of carrying value of investments. For example, say ABC limited holds 30% in XYZ
Limited at an initial cost of US$ 1,000,000 and has significant control, over XYZ
Limited. If XYZs annual Profit is US$ 200,000 and dividend declared is US$
50,000 . The carrying value of investment shall be 1,000,000+30% of 200,00030% of 50,000 ( 1,000,000+60,000-15,000=US$ 1,045,000)
APB Opinion no 18 also provides that a) cost of Investments to include brokerage
charges b) No adjustment for temporary declines, but in case of permanent
decline, loss is debited and the value of investment is reduced c) Share in profit is
determined afar subtracting Cumulative preferred dividend, whether declared or
not d)
The equity method is to be used if :
1. An investor owns between 20 and 50% of the investees voting common
stock.
2. The investor owns less than 20% of the investees voting common stock
but has effective control (significant influence).
3. The investor owns in excess of 50% of the investees voting common
stock, but a negating factor exists, preventing consolidation.
4. There is a joint venture. A joint venture is an entity that is owned, operated,
and jointly managed by a common group of investors. Other accounting
aspects exist.
Significant influence may be indicated by a number of factors, including
substantial inter company transactions, exchanges of executives between
investor and investee, investors significant input in the investees decisionmaking process, investors representation on the investees Board of directors,
investees dependence on investor (e.g., operational, technological, or
financial support), and substantial ownership of the investee by investor
relative to other widely disbursed shareholder interests. Under FASB
Interpretation Number 35, if there is a standstill agreement stipulating that
either the investor has relinquished major rights as a stockholder or that
significant influence does not exist, it may indicate that the equity method is
not appropriate. Interpretation Number 35 also may preclude the equity method
if the investor attempts unsuccessfully to obtaining representation on the
investees board of directors.
The equity method basically uses the consolidation approach to results of
investees accounts by eliminating inter company profits and losses. Such profits
and losses are eliminated by reducing the investment balance and the equity
earnings in investee for the investors share of the unrealized inter company profits
and losses. Investee capital transactions affecting the investor are treated as in
consolidation. The investee is treated as if it were a consolidated subsidiary.
If the investors share of the investees losses exceeds the carrying value of the
investment account, the equity method should be discontinued at the zero
amount. Thereafter, the investor should not record additional losses unless it has
guaranteed the investees debts or is otherwise committed to provide additional
financial support to the investee, or immediate profitability is forthcoming. If the
investee later shows net income, the investor can reinstate using the equity
method only after its share of profit equals the share of unrecorded losses when
the equity method was suspended.
If ownership falls below 20%, or if the investor loses effective control over the
investee, the investor should stop recording the investees earnings. The equity
method is discontinued, but the balance in the investment account is retained. The
investors will then follow SFAS for regular investment . If the investor increases its
ownership in the investee to 20% or more (e.g., 30%), the equity method should
be used for current and future years. The effect of using the equity method instead
of the market value method on previous years at the old percentage (e.g., 10%)
should be recognized as a retroactive adjustment to retained earnings and other
affected accounts (e.g., investment in investee).The retroactive adjustment on the
investment, earnings, and retained earnings should be applied in a similar way as
a step-by- step acquisition of a subsidiary.
If the investor sells the investees stock, a realized gain or loss is recognized for
the difference between the selling price and carrying value of the investment in
investee account at the time of sale. The realized gain or loss appears in the
investors income statement.
The investor must disclose the following information in the footnotes, in separate
schedules, or parenthetically:
1. Statement that the equity method is being used
2. Identification of investee along with percent owned
3. Quoted market price of investees stock
4. Investors accounting policies
5. Significant subsequent events between the date and issuance of the
financial statements
6. Reason for not using the equity method even though the investor owned
20% or more of the investees common stock
7. Reason why the equity method was used even though the investor owned
less than 20% of the investees common stock
8. Summarized financial information as to assets, liabilities, and earnings of
significant investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
9. Significant realized and unrealized gains and losses applying to the
subsidiarys portfolio taking place between the dates of the financial
statements of the parent and subsidiary
Thus , we find that there are 3 treatment for Investments:
1. Normal investment upto 20% and no control- SFAS 115
2. Investment between 20% to 50% with significant control - SFAS , APB 18
3. Investment > 50% and majority control- SFAS 94
9. Consolidation : SFAS 94 mandates that the Financial statement of all
Subsidiary should be Consolidated when the parent owns more than 50% of
the voting common stock of the subsidiary , to report as one economic unit the
financial position and operating performance of a parent and its majority-owned
subsidiaries.
11. Goodwill & Intangible Assets ( SFAS 142 ) : Goodwill represents cost of
acquired business in excess of the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible
net assets purchased. Goodwill should be tested for impairment on an annual basis
relying on a number of factors including operational results, business plans and
future cash flow. Goodwill should also be tested between annual tests, if there is an
extraordinary event that is more likely than not to reduce to fair value of Goodwill.
Recoverability of goodwill should be tested using a two-step process. The first step
involves comparison of fair value of the entity with the carrying value and the
excess of book value over the fair value is recorded as impairment loss. If the
carrying value is excess then the second step is followed. Under the second step
the fair value and book value (carrying value) of goodwill itself is tested. The
excess of book value over the fair value is recorded as impairment loss
12. REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ( SFAS 130) : SFAS No 130
requires companies to report comprehensive income and its components in a
complete set of financial statements (including investment companies, but not non
profit entities). Comprehensive income refers to the change in equity (net asset)
arising from either transactions or other occurrences with non owners. Investments
and withdrawals by owners are excluded Comprehensive income consists of two
components: net income and other comprehensive income which includes: Foreign
currency items, including translation gains and losses, gains and losses on foreign
currency transactions designated as hedges of net investment in a foreign entity
Holding losses or gains on available-for-sale securities , excess of additional
pension liability over unamortized (unrecognized) prior service cost , Changes in
market value of a futures contract that is a hedge of an asset reported as fair
values
There are 3 options of reporting other comprehensive income and its components
as follows:1. Below the net income figure in the income statement, or 2. In a
separate statement of comprehensive income starting with net income. FASB
Statement Number 130 encourages reporting under options 1 and 2 .The 3 rd option
is in a statement of changes in equity as long as such statement is presented as a
primary financial statement. Options 1 and 2 are termed income-statement-type
formats, while option 3 is termed a statement-of-changes-in-equity format.
In the stockholders equity section in Balance Sheet, accumulated other
comprehensive income is presented as one amount for all items or listed for each
component separately. The elements of other comprehensive income for the year
may be presented on either a net of tax basis or on a before tax basis, with one
amount for the tax effect of all the items of other comprehensive income.
A reclassification adjustment may be needed so as not to double count items
reported in net income for the current year which have also been taken into
account as part of other comprehensive income in a prior year. An example is the
realized gain on an available-for-sale security sold in the current year when an
unrealized (holding) gain was also included in other
comprehensive income in a prior year. Besides an available-for-sale security,
reclassification adjustments may apply to foreign currency translation. However,
reclassification adjustments do not apply to the account excess of additional
pension liability over unamortized prior service cost (minimum pension liability
adjustment).The reclassification adjustment associated with
foreign exchange translation only applies to translation gains and losses realized
from the sale or liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity. The presentation of
reclassification adjustments may be shown with other comprehensive income or in
a footnote. The reclassification adjustment
may be presented on a gross or net basis (except the minimum pension liability
adjustment must be shown on a net basis).
13. Research and Development Costs ( SFAS 2) : Research is defined as
testing to search for a new product, service, technique, or process. Research may
also be undertaken to improve already existing products or services. Development
is defined as translating the research into a design for a new product or process
and also encompass improvements made to existing products or processes.
SFAS 2 (Accounting for Research and Development Costs) requires the expensing
of research and development costs as incurred. Equipment, facilities, materials,
and intangibles (e.g., patents) bought that have alternative future benefit in R&D
activities are capitalized. Any resulting depreciation or amortization expense on
such assets is presented as an R&D expense. R. &D costs are presented separately
within income from continuing operations. When research is performed under
contract for a fee from a third party, a receivable is charged. When there is no
future alternative use, the costs must be immediately expensed. R&D costs include
employee salaries directly tied to R&D efforts, and directly allocable indirect costs
for R&D efforts. If a group of assets is bought, proper allocation should be made to
those applicable to R&D activities. As per FASB Interpretation Number
4 (Applicability of FASB Statement Number 2 to Business Combinations Accounted
for by the Purchase Method), in a business combination accounted for under the
purchase method, acquired R&D assets should be based on their fair market value.
If payments are made to others to undertake R&D efforts on the companys behalf,
R&D expense is charged. FASB Statement Number 2 is not applicable to the
extractive (e.g., mining) or regulated industries.
14. Impairment of Long Lived Assets ( FASB Statement Number 121
-Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of) - A long-lived asset is deemed impaired if the total
(undiscounted) estimated cash flows from using it are less than the book value of
the asset. Future cash flows applicable to environmental exist costs that have
been accrued for the asset should not be included in determining the undiscounted
anticipated future cash flows in applying the asset impairment test.
In determining if asset impairment exists, the assets book value should include
any associated goodwill. An impairment may be due to such reasons as
1. A major change in how the asset is used
2. A decline in the market value of the fixed asset
3. Excess construction costs relative to estimated amounts
If this recoverability test for asset impairment is met, an impairment loss must be
calculated as the excess of the assets book value over its fair market value. Fair
value is the amount at which the asset could be bought or sold between willing
written up or down in future periods as long as the write-up is not greater than the
carrying amount of the asset before the impairment. Such losses or gains are
reported as a component of income from continuing operations.
15. Loan Impairment FASB Statement Number 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, is the primary authoritative guideline for recognizing
impaired loans . A loan is a contractual right to receive cash either on demand or
at a fixed or determinable date. Loans include accounts receivable and notes only
if their term is longer than one year. If it is probable (likely to occur) that some or
all of the principal or interest will not be collected, then the loan is considered
impaired. Any loss on an impaired loan should be recognized immediately by
debiting bad debt expense and crediting the valuation allowance. Creditors may
exercise their judgment and use their normal review procedures in determining the
probability of collection. If a loan is considered impaired, the loss is the difference
between the investment in loan and the present value of the future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate. The investment in loan will
generally be the principal and the accrued interest. Future cash flows should be
determined using reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections. The
discount rate will generally be the effective interest used at the time the loan was
originally made. As a practical matter, the loans value may be determined using
the market price of the loan, if available. The loans value may also be determined
using the fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell, if the loan is
collateralized and the collateral is expected to be the sole source of repayment.
16. Stock Options/ ESOP ( SFAS 123,148) : Under US GAAP stock option plans
may be accounted for by either the intrinsic value method or the fair value
method. SFAS 123 encourages adoption of the fair value method and will
become mandatory from 1.4.2006
Intrinsic Method : In this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date
of grant only if current market price ( CMP ) of underlying stock exceeds option
exercise price . The difference between CMP and Exercise price (total
compensation expense) is allocated over the vesting ( the time between the date
of grant and the vesting date or compensatory or service period) . The intrinsic
method is so termed because the computation is not based on data derived from
external circumstances. If an employee chooses not to exercise a stock option,
previously recognized compensation expense is not negated or adjusted.
Fair Value method: Under this method, Compensation expense is taken as
equivalent to fair value of options at the grant date which is computed by using an
option-pricing model that considers several factors. Compensation expense is
recognized over the period between the date of grant and the vesting date, in a
manner similar to the intrinsic value method.
A popular option pricing model is Black- Scholes Model which computes the
present value of hypothetical instruments. Assumptions include freely trading of
Options, and the total return rate (considering the change in price plus dividends)
may be determined based on a continuous compounding over the life of the
option. Under SFAS 123, the life of the option is the anticipated time period until
the option is exercised rather than the contractual term The Black-Scholes model
was formulated based on European-style options exercisable only at expiration.
However, most employee stock options are American-style and are exercisable at
any time during the life of the option once vesting has occurred. The Black-Scholes
model uses the volatility anticipated for the options life.
Example 1: On January 1, 2005, ABC Limited granted stock options to its senior
executives to
purchase 100,000 shares of U$ 5 par value common stock at an exercise price of
$20 per share exercisable any time after December 31, 2009. The current market
price of the stock is $30.
Under the Black-Scholes option price model, fair value of the option plan is
estimated as $800,000. hence the fair value i.e. US$ 800,000 will be deemed as
compensation expense and will be recognized evenly over this period (200052009).
Scenario
Journal Entries
Grant of stock Date of GrantJanuary 1, 2005
option plan
No entry is to be made on date of Grant
December 31, 2005
Compensation Expense($800,000/4) 200,000
Paid-in-capital
options
200,000
December 31, 20062008
Compensation Expense ($800,000/4) 200,000
Paid-in-capital
options
200,000
stock
stock
All
Stock Cash ($20 [exercise price] 100,000 shares)
2,000,000
options
are
Paid-in-capital stock options
800,000
exercised
by
the employees
Common stock ($ 5 100,000
at
the shares)
500,000
beginning
of
Paid-in-capital in excess of
the
exercise par
2,300,000
period
( Paid-in-capital in excess of par is the balancing figure and
is, of course a stockholders equity account) T
If
the
stock
options
were Paid-in-capital stock options
800,000
not
exercised Paid-in-capital from expired stock options
800,000
because
the
market
price
did not exceed
the
exercise
price during the
exercise
period,
If an employee forfeits a stock option because he or she leaves the employer and
fails to satisfy the service requirement, then the recorded compensation expense
and paid-in-capital stock option should be adjusted (as a change in accounting
estimate) to account for the forfeiture.
SFAS 148 require that Provisions of SFAS 123 shall be transitory in nature and
companies may continue to use intrinsic value method for Stock Options.
However ,SFAS 148 requires that companies should disclose the effect on net
income and earning per share , if Fair value method was used. In case of Infosys
Limited ( FY ended March, 2005) which deploys Intrinsic method of Accounting,
disclosure as per SFAS 148 led to a further loss of US$ 57 Million
17. EARNINGS PER SHARE ( SFAS 128) : All public companies ( excluding Non
public entities ) are required to state earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the
income statement, either basic or basic and diluted EPS depending on simple or
complex capital structure, if the capital structure is complex (it includes potentially
dilutive securities), then presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share
is mandated.
Basic EPS is derived by dividing the net income (less declared preferred dividends
on non cumulative preferred stock) available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. On the other hand, if
the preferred stock is cumulative, then the dividends are subtracted even if they
are not declared in the current year. The weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding is determined by multiplying the number of shares issued and
outstanding for any time period by a fraction, the numerator being the Basic
earnings per share and diluted earnings per share (if required) for income from
continuing operations and net income must be disclosed on the face of the income
statement. In addition, the earnings per share effects associated with the disposal
of a business segment, extraordinary gains or losses, and the cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle must be presented either on the face of the
income statement or notes thereto.
Diluted EPS: In case of convertible securities, if converted method is used whereby
it is assumed that the dilutive convertible security is converted into common stock
at the beginning of the period or date of issue, if later. Interest expense(net of tax)
, Any dividend on convertible preferred stock on must be added back to net
income to result in an adjusted net income Correspondingly, the number of
common shares the convertible securities are convertible into (or their weightedaverage effect if conversion to common stock actually took place during the year)
must also be added to the weighted-average outstanding common shares in the
denominator.
In the case of dilutive stock options, stock warrants, or their equivalent, the
treasury stock method is used. Under this approach, there is a presumption that
the option or warrant was exercised at the beginning of the period, or date of
grant, if later. The assumed proceeds received from the
exercise of the option or warrant are assumed to be used to buy treasury stock at
the average market price for the period. However, exercise is presumed to occur
only if the average market price of the underlying shares during the period is
greater than the exercise price of the option or warrant.
A reconciliation is required of the numerators and denominators for basic and
diluted earnings per share. Disclosure is also mandated for the impact of preferred
dividends in arriving at income available to common stockholders. In addition, the
earnings per share effects associated with the disposal of a business segment,
extraordinary gains or losses, and the cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle must be presented either on the face of the income statement or notes
thereto.
18. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES FOR ALL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (SFAS
107): This GAAP requires disclosures of fair value of Financial Instruments in the
body of the financial statements or in the footnotes.
Financial instrument is defined as cash (including currencies of other countries),
evidence of an ownership interest in another company (e.g., common or preferred
stock), or a contract that both. Thus conventional assets and liabilities (e.g.
accounts and notes receivable, accounts and notes payable, investment inequity
and debt securities, and bonds payable) are deemed to be financial instruments.
The definition also encompasses many derivative contracts, e.g. options, swaps,
caps, and futures
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument
could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in
a liquidation sale. Quoted market prices are best to use, if available. Financial
instruments can be transacted in following types of markets:
1. Exchange markets, for listed stocks, bonds, options, and certain futures
contracts.
2. Dealer markets, e.g., the NASDAQ or other over-the-counter markets, are the
major exchanges for more thinly traded securities. Dealer markets also exist for
commercial loans, asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities, and
municipal securities. In most cases, quotations on this market properly reflect
fair value. However, if evidence exists to the contrary, then the company may
opt for another indicator of fair value, such as an internally developed model.
Market quotations for dealer markets are usually in the form of bid and ask
prices. Fair value determination should take into account the size of an issue
and its possible dilutive effect on price of the financial instrument. Note: The
basis used for a price quote should be disclosed.
3. Principal-to-principal markets in principal-to-principal transactions, transactions
occur independently, with no intermediary and basically no public information
available to approximate market price, e.g., an interest rate swap.
4. Brokered markets, in which intermediaries match buyers and sellers but do not
trade for their own accounts, usually provide less reliable information as to
price. The broker is aware of the prices bid and asked by the parties, but each
participant is usually unaware of the other partys price requests. Prices of
completed transactions may be available in some cases. If more than one
quoted price for a financial instrument is available, then use the one in the
most active market. When possible, get more than one quotation when quoted
prices vary widely in the market. The company may want to disclose additional
information about the fair value of a financial instrument, e.g. if the fair value
of long-term debt is below its carrying value. In this case, the company may
want to provide the reasons and whether the debt could be settled at the lower
amount.
For financial institutions, loans receivable may be a major financial instrument. If
market prices are available (e.g., securities backed by residential mortgages may
be a proxy for valuing residential mortgages), then they should be used to arrive at
fair value. If no quoted market price exists for a category of loans, particularly fixed
rate loans, then an approximation may be based on:
1. market prices of similar traded loans (similarity may be in the forms of terms,
interest rates, maturity dates, and credit scoring),
2. current prices for similar loans that the company has originated and sold, or
3. Valuations derived from loan pricing services. Fair value of a loan may be
determined by using the present value of future cash flows, using a risk-adjusted
discount rate.
Disclosure includes the methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value. The
fair value amounts disclosed should be cross-referenced to carrying value amounts
presented in the balance sheet. The disclosures should distinguish between
financial instruments held or issued for trading purposes and other than
trading. Fair values of non-derivative instruments should not be adjusted against
derivative instruments unless netting is permitted as per FASB Interpretation
Number 39 (Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts). If it is not
practical to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument, then information
relevant to estimating fair value should be disclosed, including the financial
instruments carrying value, maturity, and interest rate. The reasons why it is not
determinable should also be provided.
19. Hedge Accounting (SFAS 133) : SFAS 133 mandates that All qualifying
financial derivatives have to stated on the balance sheet at their fair value
( marked to market ) and Changes in the fair value of derivatives must be
recognized in the financial statements as part of comprehensive income (not as
part of the income statement).
Changes in value of all other derivatives are marked to market recognized as
income. Currently the instruments covered by Hedge Accounting are Interest rate
Cap floor Collars, Interest ate and currency Swaps, financial Future contracts,
Options to Purchase securities, Swaptions and Commodities and excluded are
financial Guarantees, Forward Contracts with no net settlements, Mortgage Based
Security, Adjustable Rate Loan, and Variable Annuity Contracts.
There are three types of qualified hedges discussed in FASB Statement Number
133: fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and foreign currency hedges. Simply
stated, a fair value hedge is protection against adverse changes in the value of an
existing asset, liability or unrecognized firm commitment. A cash flow
hedge protects against changes in the value of future cash flowsfor instance
interest payments on fixed rate debt, if the company is concerned about falling
interest rates and the fact that would not be able to renegotiate the terms of the
debt to capitalize on lower rates. A foreign currency hedgeprotects against adverse
movement of exchange rates impacting any foreign currency exposurewhich, for
instance, can involve either fair value or cash flow hedges in foreign currency or a
net investment in a foreign business activity, e.g., concern over the impact that a
devaluation of a foreign currency would have on the companys investment in an
overseas subsidiary. In all of these three hedges, a hedge effectiveness test must
be met in order to achieve hedge accounting.
Foreign Exchange forward contract taken from Bank, to mitigate the risk of
changes in foreign exchange rates do not qualify for Hedge Accounting under SFA
133.
20 Cash Flow statement ( SFAS 95) : A statement of cash flows , prepared in
conformity with GAAP is required to be annexed as part of a full set of financial
statements. The statement should present cash flows from operating, investing,
and financing activities. The statement must be included in both annual ( for 3
financial years) and interim financial statements ( for 2 periods- current and
previous year) . It should include a reconciliation of beginning and ending cash and
cash equivalents and should match with the totals presented in the balance sheet.
Separate disclosure must be made of non cash investing and financing
transactions.
Cash flow statement may be prepared by direct method or indirect method, but it
must
include
a reconciliation
of
net
income
to
cash
flow
from
operations whichever method is deployed.
Under the direct method, the operating section presents gross cash receipts and
gross cash payments from operating activities, with a reconciliation of net income
to cash flow from operations in a separate schedule accompanying the statement
of cash flows. The cash flow from operations derived in this separate schedule
must agree with the cash flow from operations in the
Operating section of the statement of cash flows.
Under the indirect method, gross cash receipts and gross cash payments from
operating activities are not presented. Instead, only the reconciliation of net
income to cash flow from operations may be presented . The reconciliation is done
by adding back non cash expenses to and deducting non cash revenues from net
income. Examples of these adjustments include adding back depreciation and
depletion expense, amortization expense on intangibles, pension expense arising
from a deferred pension liability, bad debts, accrued warranty expense, tax
expense arising from a deferred tax liability, loss on a fixed asset, compensation
expense arising from an employee stock option plan; and deducting the
amortization of deferred revenue, amortization of bond premium, tax expense
arising from a deferred tax asset, the gain on a fixed asset, pension expense
associated with a deferred pension asset, unrealized gains on trading securities,
and income from investments under the equity method.
Irrespective of whether the direct method or the indirect method is used, there
must be separate disclosure of income taxes and interest paid during the year as
supplementary information. The effect of exchange rate change on cash should
also be shown separately as a separate line item to derive the total cash and cash
equivalent. While SFAS 95 prefers Direct Method, most of the Companies prefer
Indirect method due to its simplicity.
21. Segmental reporting ( SFAS 131) : SFAS 131 mandates information about
operating segments and related disclosures about products and services,
geographical areas and major customers. Segmental reporting aids in evaluating a
companys financial statements by revealing growth prospects, including earning
potential, areas of risk, and financial problems. It facilitates the appraisal of both
historical performance and expected future performance.
The amount reported for each segment should be based on what is used by the
Chief operating decision maker in formulating a determination as to how
much resources to assign to a segment and how to appraise the performance of
that segment. The term chief operating decision maker may apply to the chief
executive officer or chief operating officer or to a group of executives. The term
of chief operating decision maker may apply to a function and not necessarily to a
specific person(s).This is a management approach rather than an industry
approach in identifying segments. The segments are based on the companys
organizational structure, revenue sources, nature of activities, existence of
responsible managers, and information presented to the Board
of Directors. Revenues, gains, expenses, losses, and assets should only be
allocated to a segment if the chief operating decision maker considers doing so in
measuring a segments earnings for purposes of making a financial or operating
decision.
The same is true with regard to allocating to segments eliminations and
adjustments applying to the companys general-purpose financial statements. Any
allocation of financial items to a segment should be rationally based. In measuring
a segments earnings or assets, the following should be disclosed for explanatory
purposes:
1. Measurement or valuation basis used
2. Differences in measurements used for the general-purpose financial
statements relative to the financial information of the segment
3. A change in measurement method relative to prior years
4. A symmetrical allocation, meaning an allocation of depreciation or
amortization to a segment without a related allocation to the associated
assets
Segmental information is required in annual financial statements. Some segmental
disclosures are required in interim financial statements. Segmental information is
not required for non-consolidated subsidiaries or investees accounted for under the
equity method. An operating segment is a distinct revenue-producing component
of the business for which internal financial data are produced. Expenses
are Disclosures should be in both dollars and percentages.
A reportable segment is determined by :
1. Grouping by industry line
2. Identifiable products or services
3. Significant segments to the company in the entirety
4. If any one of the following exist, a segment must be reported upon:
5. Revenue, including unaffiliated and inter segment sales or transfers, is 10%
or more of total revenue of all operating segments.
Comparison
There are significant differences between Indian GAAP and US GAAP. US GAAP stipulate
Some of these major differences between US GAAP and Indian GAAP which give
rise to differences in profit are highlighted hereunder:
1.
2.
Group . Savvy promoters hive off their loss making divisions into separate
subsidiaries, so that financial statement of their Flagship Company looks
attractive .Under US GAAP (SFAS 94),Consolidation of results of Subsidiary
Companies is mandatory , hence eliminating material, inter company
transaction and giving a true picture of the operations and Profitability of
the various majority owned Business of the Group.
5.
6.
7.
provided in Companies Act. Thus , an Indian Company can get away with
providing with lesser depreciation , if the same is in compliance to
Companies Act 1956. Contrary to this, under the US GAAP , depreciation
has to be provided over the estimated useful life of the asset, thus making
the Accounting more realistic and providing sufficient funds for replacement
when the asset becomes obsolete and fully worn out.
8.
Foreign currency transactions: Under Indian GAAP(AS11) Forex
transactions ( Monetary items ) are recorded at the rate prevalent on the
transaction date .Year end foreign currency assets and liabilities ( Non
Monetary Items) are re-stated at the closing exchange rates. Exchange rate
differences arising on payments or realizations and restatements at closing
exchange
rates
are
treated
as
Profit
/loss
in the
income
statement. Exchange fluctuations on liabilities incurred for fixed assets
can be capitalized. Under US GAAP (SFAS 52), Gains and losses on foreign
currency transactions are generally included in determining net income for
the period in which exchange rates change unless the transaction hedges a
foreign currency commitment or a net investment in a foreign entity .
Capitalization of exchange fluctuation arising from foreign liabilities
incurred for acquiring fixed assets does not exist. Translation adjustments
are not included in determining net income for the period but are disclosed
and accumulated in a separate component of consolidated equity until sale
or until complete or substantially complete liquidation of the net
investment in the foreign entity takes place . US GAAP also permits use of
Average monthly Exchange rate for Translation of Revenue, expenses and
Cash flow items, whereas under Indian GAAP, the closing exchange rate for
the Transaction date is to be taken for translation purposes.
9.
Expenditure during Construction Period: As per the Indian GAAP
(Guidance note on Treatment of expenditure during construction period' ) ,
all incidental expenditure on Construction of Assets during Project
stage are accumulated and allocated to the cost of asset on completion of
the project. Contrary to this, under the US GAAP (SFAS 7) ,
such expenditure are divided into two heads direct and indirect. While,
Direct expenditure is accumulated and allocated to the cost of asset,
indirect expenditure are charged to revenue.
10. Research and Development expenditure: Indian GAAP ( AS
8) requires research and development expenditure to be charged to profit
and loss account, except equipment and machinery which are capitalized
and depreciated. Under US GAAP ( SFAS 2) , all R&D costs are expenses
except intangible assets purchased from others and Tangible assets that
have alternative future uses which are capitalised and depreciated or
amortised as R&D Expense. Under US GAAP, R&D expenditure incurred on
software development are expensed until technical feasibility is established
( SOP 81.1) . R&D Cost and software development cost incurred under
contractual arrangement are treated as cost of revenue.
11. Revaluation reserve : Under Indian GAAP, if an enterprise needs to
revalue its asset due to increase in cost of replacement and provide higher
charge to provide for such increased cost of replacement, then the Asset
can be revalued upward and the unrealised gain on such revaluation can be
credited to Revaluation Reserve ( Guidance note no 57). The incremental
depreciation arising out of higher book value may be adjusted against the