Sacco
Sacco
11
assets and average institutional asset size. Credit unions exist in a wide range of sizes
ranging from volunteer operations with a handful of members in assets and hundreds of
thousands of members.
According to The Sacco Supervision Report from SASRA (2011), the Sacco sub-sectors
in the country forms a significant part of the cooperative movement in Kenya. These
cooperatives are comprised two major groups of bodies, Financial Cooperatives and NonFinancial Cooperatives. Financial Cooperatives comprise of Savings & Credit
Cooperative Societies while and Non-Financial Cooperatives comprise of housing,
transport, produce marketing and investment cooperatives.
The original legal framework for Saccos in Kenya was provided by the Co-operative
Societies Act of 1966 which gave Government extended powers to get involved in the day
to day management of co-operatives. The act was amended in 1997 removing much of the
control from the government through the Commissioner of Co-operatives under the Cooperative Societies Act 1997. This Act was enacted to provide a policy framework for cooperative development in Kenya therefore delineating these co-operatives from the
control of the Government by necessitating the withdrawal of state control over the
cooperative movement. The aim was to make co-operative societies autonomous, selfreliant, self-controlled and commercially viable institutions. The role of the government
was redefined from one that sought to control co-operative development, to one that now
seeks to regulate and facilitate their autonomy. This allowed the co-operatives to compete
with other private enterprises (Republic of Kenya, 1997a). The 1997 Act was amended in
2004 through the Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act of 2004 which was enacted to
re-enforce state regulation of the co-operative movement through the office of the
Commissioner for Co-operatives Development.
Even though Saccos have a great impact on the economy, they were not incorporated in
the formal financial sector. The government found it necessary to recognize the potential
that is in Saccos and thus came up with a specific legislation which would provide
regulations and standards unique to new Sacco business. Sacco Societies Act, 2008 which
provided for the establishment of SASRA was introduced and it ushered in prudential
regulations to promote and maintain financial soundness of Saccos. SASRA is a SemiAutonomous Government Agency under the line ministry and is a creation of the Sacco
Societies Act 2008. It was inaugurated in 2009 and was charged with the prime
responsibility of licensing and supervising deposit taking Sacco Societies in Kenya.
(Republic of Kenya,2008b).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The enactment of the SACCO Act of 2008 established SASRA as a legal authority to
regulate the sector and subsequently the Kenya government introduced regulations on
SACCOS through SASRA in the same year. Since the enactment of these regulations,
there has been increased empirical attention on the effect of the regulations on the
financial performance of SACCOS in the country (Kioko, 2010). However, empirical
studies have clearly avoided looking at specific aspects of these regulations particularly
their effects on financial performance of the Saccos. This study, therefore will seek to
establish the effect of SACCOS compliance to SASRA regulations on financial
performance of Deposit Taking Saccos (DTS) in Kenya.
1.4.2
Specific Objectives
This study will benefit various stakeholders including the government of Kenya, current
and potential investors, members of Saccos and other financial institutions. The policy
makers will obtain knowledge of the cooperative movements dynamics and thus obtain
guidance from this study in designing appropriate practices that will regulate the
stakeholders in the Saccos in Kenya. The researcher anticipates findings of the study will
also help DTS in Kenya in discovering new and better techniques of improving and
running their operations in order to improve their financial performance. The government
through the line ministry can use this study to educate those Saccos that have not
complied about the importance of being regulated.
Competence- Having skills, traits and knowledge required for a person to be effective in a
job. In this study, competence will be measured in terms of the skills to implement the
requirements of SASRA.
Compliance- Conforming to a rule, such as a specification, standard or law. Regulatory
compliance describes the goal that corporations or public agencies aspire to achieve in their
efforts to ensure that personnel are aware of and take steps to comply with the regulations. In
this study compliance means ability of DTS to integrate and follow regulations laid down by
SASRA.
Corporate Governance
Corporate governance is a system or set of mechanisms by which an organization is directed
and controlled in order to reach its mission and objectives. In this study, corporate
governance will be measured in terms of existence and implementation of the code of
conduct of board of Directors and The Fit and Proper Test.
Financial Performance
The achievement of quantified objectives. In this study financial performance will be
measured in terms of profitability.
Quality- Fitness for purpose. In this study quality means degree of independence of board of
directors, their qualifications and experience.
Regulation- Proposition underlying systems theory that maintains that underlying the
behaviour of systems is constrained and shaped by interaction with other systems. In this
study, regulation means the rules that have been put and which DTS are expected to adhere
to.
The Fit and Proper Test- The Fit and Proper Test form is issued by SASRA. Board of
Directors are required to provide information about their experience, skills, membership to
professional bodies, their source of wealth and other personal details.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This chapter will provide the reader with important facts, theories and models in order to
increase the understanding of the area under investigation. The chapter will also identify what
other authors have found out in the area of rebranding.
2.2 History of The Cooperative Movement
The cooperative movement began in Europe in the 19th century, primarily in England and
France, although the Shore Porters Society claims to be one of the worlds first cooperatives,
being established in Aberdeen in 1498. The first consumer cooperative was founded on March
14th, 1761 in a barely furnished cottage in Fen wide, East Ayshire. By 1830, there were several
hundreds cooperatives. Some were initially successful but most cooperatives founded in the early
19th century failed by 1840. It was not until 1844 when the Rochdale Society of
EquitablePioneers established the Rochdale Principles on which they ran their cooperative that
the basis for development and growth of the modern cooperative movement was established.
2.3 SACCOS in Kenya
The history of the co-operative movement in Kenya dates back to 1908 when European settlers in the Rift
Valley started the Lumbwa Farmers Co-operative Society to market milk. By the early 1960s there were
600
primary
co-operative
societies
in
the
country.
After independence, the new government came up with the Societies Act Cap. 490 of the laws of Kenya
and used co-operatives as a strategy for mobilizing financial capital for acquiring the former white
highlands and re-settling many of its people evicted during the struggle for independence.
Between 1931 and 1970, a period of 40 years, the co-operative movement was dominated by marketing cooperative societies all of which acted as Marketing Channels for 100per cent unprocessed primary
agricultural
produce.
From the 1970s, a government policy decision compelled employers to deduct and remit both members
contributions as well as loan repayments through regular check off on the payroll. This was the birth of
Savings
and
Credit
Co-operatives
Societies
(SACCO)
as
we
know
them
today.