Very Best of WAR

The Evil of Violence Conversation
What is a Critic?
Gary Raymond explores the nature
of arts criticism in a letter
addressed to the future
Cerith Mathias looks at

the Wales Window of
Birmingham, Alabama
Steph Power talks

to WNOs David
Pountney
Wales Arts Review
The Very Best of

Wales Arts Review
Volume 1
The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1
Wales Arts
Review
Contents
Senior Editor
Gary Raymond
Managing Editor
Phil Morris
Design Editor
Up Front
Gary Raymond
Dean Lewis
Fiction Editor
A Letter Addressed to the Future:

What is a Critic?
The Birth of a Nation: DW Griffiths Distortion of History and Its

Legacy by Phil Morris
The Poet and the Public Intellectual by Dylan Moore
11
Wales, the Artist and Society: The Legacy of Beca

by Sara Rhoslyn Moore
13
The Deep Sigh: Meditations Upon Haiku by Paul Chambers
15
A Tribute to Dannie Abse: Goodbye, Twentieth Century

by Adam Somerset
16
Occupy Gezi: The Cultural Impact by James Lloyd
21
Oh, Newport, My Lionheart: 30 years of Music and Nightlife in the

City of Cider and Steel by Craig Austin
Craig Austin
26
Dylan Thomas: The Industry of Tragedy and the Antithetical Mask

by Gary Raymond
Laura Wainwright
30
The Landscapes of Language by Trey McCain
33
From Olympia to the Valleys: What Riot Grrrl did and didnt do for
me by Rhian E Jones
37
Almost like a world on its own': Wales Arts Review goes to Festival
No.6 by John Lavin
40
To the Detriment of Us All: The Untouched Legacy of Arthur

Koestler and George Orwell by Gary Raymond
43
Against the Evil of Violence The Wales Window of Alabama

by Cerith Mathias
The Brouhers by
46
Deeds Not Words by Ben Glover
Ric Bower.
49
David Pountney : Schoenberg, Verdi and Issues of Faith

by Steph Power
PDF Designer
54
In Conversation with Gruff Rhys by Sarah King
56
Dark Room by Anna Metcalfe
60
Halloween Special: Like Water Through Fingers

by Carly Holmes
John Lavin
Music Editor
Features
Steph Power
Web Editor
Ben Glover
Associate Editors
Cerith Mathias
All banners
designed by Dean
Lewis, except Dark
Room by Anna
Metcalfe, which
was taken from
Ben Glover
A Letter Addressed to the Future: What is a Critic?
by Gary Raymond
n the final episode of Julian Barnes 1989 book, The
History of the World in 10 Chapters, titled The
Dream, the protagonist finds himself in a Heaven, his
every desire catered for by a dedicated celestial personal
assistant. Perhaps predictably, the protagonist spends
some time working his way through the fantasies his time
on earth would not or could not accommodate. He sleeps
with women, those whom he had known and those further
beyond his reach. He takes the opportunity to meet his
heroes, and then to encounter historys giants. After what
must be aeons in this timeless domain, he turns to his
assistant and declares that he is bored; he has done
everything he could ever have wanted to do, and much
more besides. He has climbed every mountain and sailed
every sea. Whats next? His assistant takes him to a
heavenly cleric to answer this question. His options are
two: he can either cease to exist (he isnt so sure of this
pathway) or he can read every book ever written. The
people who read books, he is told, are the ones who tend
to last the longest in Heaven. The protagonist asks what
happens after that? Well, says the cleric, once you have
spent the ages reading every book ever written, then you
get to spend even longer discussing those books with the
others who have lasted that long. You can take forever
arguing about books, he is told.
It is perhaps worth thinking of this parable whenever the
question that sits atop this essay makes it into a conversation. The consumers of literature inherit the Kingdom of
Heaven, or at least inhabit its pubs and coffee dens.
If art, if writing literature, is talking to yourself, then
criticism is a conversation with whomever you like; your
best friend, your greatest enemy, the girl you never got or
the girl youre grateful to have ended up with. Ive never
met a writer Ive liked whose top-of-the-list conversation
topic is their own work. We swirl around books, around
plays and paintings, in them and out of them, as writers.
And we never write anything that impresses us more than
something somebody else has written. We always want to
write the story that another person has nabbed and nailed.
Every writer fell in love with art before they wrote their first
sentence, before they decided it was literature for them.
The great critics of art and culture are almost always
practitioners first and foremost, and all the best practitioners are consumers of the art of others before they are
drawn to the blank page themselves. In short, we are all
readers, be it of books or images or soundscapes, and it is
never satisfying to keep these experiences to ourselves. If
we read to know we are not alone, as CS Lewis famously
said, then we write for similar reasons, and we write criticism because it is the next step on from discursiveness; it
is the purest form of debate, crystallised passion.
Critics are not journalists, (although they are often
mistaken for journalists by artists, the public, and, often, by
actual journalists). Critics are not outsiders, they are not
those who cannot; they are the artists, the thinkers, who
trawl through the embers while the firestarters are asleep.
Criticism is a conversation, and the places where criticism
is published are the dark oaky pubs, the bohemian coffee
houses, the late night wine-singed debates around the
dinner tables; they are the places that host the best conversations you have ever had, ever wanted to have, or one
day hope to.
Criticism, that label we give the speech of the engaged
artisan committed to paper, is simply an extension of the
purest connection that we, as humans, have with our
creative processes. When Jean Genet was locked in his
French prison he began to collect small pieces of brown
scrap paper, on which he wrote, in pencil, the whole of Our
Lady of the Flowers, one of the greatest novels of the
twentieth century. He did so because of the need to do so,
the need to be part of the eternal conversation. When a
prison guard found the writings he burned them. Genet
started again, and recreated the novel, knowing it would
never be read, never be published, and would no doubt be
burned again. (It was published in 1951 and duly banned).
What is the need to have this conversation with the page?
Is it obsessional? Is it insanity? Or is it the thing that keeps
us sane? The eternal conversation, whatever, is the thing.
Critics have had a hand in changing things just as the
artists have. Susan Sontag is as important to photography
for her 1977 book On Photography as any of the great
photo journalists who preceded it. John Bergers Ways of
Seeing changed not only the way people look at paintings,
but altered the way art is taught in universities. Kenneth
Tynan and Harold Hobson, rival theatre critics
at The Observer and Sunday Times respectively, found an
unlikely union of outlook when they marked the profound
genius of Waiting for Godot for a confused and disgruntled
public when Becketts masterpiece came to London in
1955. The reviews changed theatre, they made the world
realise that Beckett was a major figure, and Beckett, as we
all know, changed everything.
Tynan, who rarely wrote about his craft as a critic, did
once write a response to the publication of a collection of
essays by American critic Theodore L Shaw (author of
such companionable titles as War on Critics and The
Hypocrisy of Criticism). Tynan, arguably the finest theatre its current health. It is refilling its veins with some potent
stuff. There is a rumble, the type most commonly associatcritic of the twentieth century, wrote,
ed with the coming of a storm; the filing cabinet rattling
What counts is not their [critics] opinion, but the art moments before the earthquake. The arts in Wales are
with which it is expressed. They differ from the about to enter an unprecedented era of creative excelnovelist only in that they take as their subject- lence, a seismic movement that will provide a significant
matter life rehearsed, instead of life unrehearsed. platform that is visible way beyond the borders Wales has
The subtlest and best-informed of men will still be held on to so dearly for so long. It cannot happen without
a bad critic if his style is bad. It is irrelevant whether criticism and criticism of the highest calibre. It cannot
his opinion is right or wrong: I learn more from happen without passion, intellectualism, elitism. It will not
George Bernard Shaw when he is wrong than I do happen with star ratings (a fishing line designed specifically to catch the smallest fish), advertorials or soft porn in the
from Clement Strong when he is right.
margins. Great criticism is as important as the art that
inspires it and the Critic is the writer who cannot give up the
And here is the weight behind the blade:conversation.
Wales is a country filled with talent; with serious-minded
The true critic cares little for the here and now. The
last thing he bothers about is the man who will practitioners of the arts. And the country is too small for us
read him first. His real rendezvous is with posterity. all to crawl over one another doffing our caps as we pass
on Eschers stairwell. May we have permission from whoHis review is a letter addressed to the future.
ever is in charge to respectfully move on from Dylan
In Iron in the Soul, a novel in which the main character is Thomas? May we take the opportunity to perhaps introan artist and critic, Sartre wrote that the business of a critic duce this great country to the outside world as a place not
is to know what other men have thought. This may seem filled with sombre preachers and drunken cherubs? We
obvious, but it is true on many levels. An art critic, he have the talent. But it can only be achieved with that critical
writes, is not paid to spend his time worrying about the culture as a part of it. We need to fire the canons, we need
imperfect colour-sense of wild grass. I suppose there are to shed these puerile ideas of good and bad and anmany other imperfections to consider. Any art can only be nounce to the world that Welsh art its literature, its
truly valued if it is evaluated. I was asked on a radio show theatre, its painting and sculpting and circuses and music
recently, Isnt everybody a critic? Well of course every- and cinema it is a conversation youll want to join in with.
Spinoza said that mans duty, when surveying the world,
bodys a critic. But not everybody is a Critic.
So what is a Critic? A Critic is insatiable. A Critic is the was neither to laugh nor to weep, but to understand. Now
most generous of egoists. A Critic is elitist but welcoming is the time to nail that above the doorway.
A Critic is an investor into a culture. As artists we invest
with it. A Critic takes things seriously, sometimes too-seriously, but also has a broad sense of humour, always in the culture of Wales, not latch onto it; we are working to
cocked. A Critic is just as ready to raise their arms as they build it, to brighten it, and to make other nations envious
are their nose. A Critic is often yearning for that moment of of us. We are part of the global community now. Wales
profundity. The Critic, after all, is doing this in the hope of may have had a difficult time in recognising this, having
enlightenment, in the hope of becoming a better person. spent so long splitting its energies between introspection
The same reason why anybody else experiences art. and hating the English. If I may use a personal example
When New York art critic Clement Greenberg said, Art to make a point: I have never felt particularly Welsh. It is
criticism is about the most ungrateful form of elevated my blood, part of my ancestry, but culturally it has never
writing I know of, he was not being self-effacing, but was been under my skin. Blame it a little on being born and
displaying all of the above traits. A Critic can be ungrateful, brought up in Newport, the town treated as the child neiabrasive, vindictive, snappy, cold, isolated, bloated, flag- ther parent wanted in the divorce. Blame it on whatever
waving, attention-seeking, cruel, perverse, rabble-rousing you like. But in the last two years I have not only begun to
and many other ugly things; but to be unengaged is No feel Welsh, but it is the first time I have ever recognised
Mans Land. To be ill-informed, under-informed, lazy, is the myself as having any identity outside of my personality.
wilderness with no end. To play at being a Critic does The emblematic reason for this is my editorship of Wales
nobody any good, least of all the player. So well-crafted Arts Review. It is culture that makes a country and Wales
wrongness is worthy, whereas piffle is a waste of every- Arts Review has introduced me to mine. It has helped me
realise that Welsh art is art just like anywhere else: hubodys time.
In Wales at the moment, we are at the verge of some- man, stained with the colours of the culture it sprouts out
thing. The arts are awakening. And history shows us that from. I now realise that Wales is a part of the world I travthese things do not happen without a vibrant critical culture elled when young and continue to explore now less
being a part of it. What cannot be part of the conversation young. Wales is not sombre preachers and drunken cheris the trend for regurgitated press releases, fan bits, and (a ubs, and Tolstoy and Tennessee Williams and Beckett
new word for me) advertorials commercial promotions and Alban Berg are as much ours as they are anyone
structured and coloured to masquerade as the words of a elses. Wales is a remarkable country; embattled always,
genuinely impressed journalist. We are, of course, in an but beautiful always too. At its heart are music and poetry
era of squeezed middles and pushed down tops, but these and socialism the most important things the human
are mere excuses when sterner stuff is needed. A Critic creature has ever mined from the cosmos. The eternal
conversation is the thing, and you are mistaken if you
does not exist to help ticket sales.
Does Wales have a strong history of cultural criticism? I dont think Wales deserves a part in it.
dont know; Im not a historian of such things. But I do know
The Birth of a Nation: DW Griffiths Distortion of History and its Legacy

by Phil Morris
here is very little to recommend Peter Bogdanovichs muddled comedy-drama Nickelodeon (1976)
except for a late scene in which Leo Harrigan, a
silent-era film-maker played by Ryan ONeal, attends the
premiere of The Clansman to be retitled weeks later
as The Birth of a Nation directed by D.W. Griffith. We see
the audience of 1915 sat open-mouthed in awe of the
cinematic spectacle, breaking into rounds of rapturous applause at Griffiths bravura set-pieces. Gunfire from the
wings of the Clunes auditorium provide sound effects for
panoramic battle scenes. The screening is interrupted at
one point by an actor costumed in Ku Klux Klan regalia
riding a horse at full gallop over a treadmill, to the giddy
delight of the audience in thrall to the narratives epic
sweep. The film ends, and almost everyone rises to noisily
acclaim what they have just seen. Harrigan, however, remains seated, silent and immobile. The experience has
pulverised him. He is not depressed by the racist politics
of The Birth of a Nation, but by a realisation that he will
never make a film that is as powerfully dramatic or, even
if he could, that Griffith had got there first as the originator
of a new cinematic form. That image of a crushed, stonefaced Harrigan attests to the historical significance of Griffiths masterpiece, which helped to found Hollywood and
change cinema forever.
Charlie Chaplin once described D.W. Griffith as the
teacher of us all, and while his reputation as the father of
film is not entirely deserved as it would be to overlook the
innovations of Georges Melies, Thomas Ince and Allan
Dwan to name but a few rival directors but it can be
justifiably asserted that Griffith was the first director to
deploy the techniques of the close-up, montage and crosscut editing to such emotive effect at the service of a featurelength narrative. In a History of Narrative Film (2004) film,
historian David A. Cook states:
In the brief span of six years, between directing his
first one-reeler in 1908 and The Birth of a Nation in
1914, Griffith established the narrative language of
cinema as we know it today,
Like
Cervantes
Don
Quixote
or
Beethovens Eroica Symphony, The Birth of a Nation is a
paradigm shift in a nascent art form that is so influential it
comes to define the form itself, foreshadowing its possibilities and outlining its potential scope. Griffiths film is also,
irredeemably, a contemptible piece of racist propaganda.
From as early as the writings of Russian formalists Sergei

Eisenstein and Lev Kuleshov in the nineteen-twenties, it
has been a trope of film criticism to regard Griffiths mastery
of technique and formalist innovations as qualities that can
be regarded as distinct from the content of his films. In
America this attitude also had its proponents, as Griffiths
manipulation in The Birth of a Nation of the racist fears of
his audience, particularly their anxieties regarding miscegenation, became increasingly problematic for film historians
and theorists as the history of the twentieth-century unfolded. As Scott Simon observes in his The Films of D.W.
Griffith (1993):
His sentimentalisms have also been enough to turn
many devotees into thoroughgoing formalists savouring his growing mastery in rhythmic editing and
compositional style.
Yet such attempts to assess Griffiths filmmaking technique, as something to be considered as separate from his
ideology, were to misunderstand his work profoundly. Griffiths innovations, deployed throughout The Birth of a Nation, were the means by which his racist message could be
more deeply embedded within the darker recesses of the
American collective unconscious. His cinematic technique
was developed to serve his ideology and not simply as an
aesthetic approach to be taken unquestioningly on its own
terms. The uncomfortable truth, which must be acknowledged at the outset of any discussion of The Birth of a
Nation, is that no artist, especially not one as crucial to his
medium as Griffith, can be thought of as having created an
aesthetic that functions independently of their political and
cultural values. Both aspects of an artists work develop in
symbiosis.
The Birth of a Nation mirrors the dichotomy at the heart of
Wagners Ring Cycle, in that it combines aesthetic beauty
with ugly politics. Like Wagner, Griffith was a nationalist
whose ideals were rooted in bogus notions of racial purity
and an agrarian, pre-industrial past steeped in a chivalric
innocence. Both men were artistic innovators who were
ahead of their time, yet in their work they were also looking
to recover a past that never existed. For Griffith, the growing
industrial and technological power of the twentieth-century
was not attributable to its ingenuity and vast natural resources, but to the innate qualities of its folk a people
always in danger of losing its soul to progress and modernity.
*
David Wark Llewelyn Griffith, as his full name suggests,

was of Welsh descent. He was born in 1875 and raised on
a farm in Kentucky. His father, Jacob Roaring Jake Griffith,
had been a Lieutenant-Colonel in the Confederate army,
both wounded and decorated during the Civil War. David
Griffith received little formal education, but, as a boy, he
was told stories of the war and the antebellum south by his
father, and devoured the popular literature of his day. We
can attribute Griffiths racism to the prevailing attitudes of
the Jim Crow south, as embodied by his father, and his
populist story-telling instincts to his childhood reading; but
are any traces of his Welsh connections discernible in his
work? No reference is made to the European ancestry of
the white characters in The Birth of a Nation. It is ostensibly
a story about American identities. Yet there are parallels
that can be drawn between cultural attitudes regarding the
past that are to be found, to
this day, in the American
south and Wales.
Southerners and the
Welsh have similarly maintained deeply ambivalent
relationships with the nation
states within which they
have
been
historically
subsumed. For both Wales
and the Deep South the
claim of nationhood has
been a cultural construct
though in no sense invalid
for being so that has been
a point of resistance
against
harsh
political
realities. Both peoples were
burdened throughout the
last century with a pained
sense of having lost their
birth-right
to
selfdetermination, and often
seemed to revel in the selfpity of the lost cause one
that was always doomed to
fail but which nevertheless
was prosecuted with a glorious, even poetic, dash and
spirit. There is something in
Griffiths evocation of a bucolic, agrarian antebellum
south, in his depiction of a
glorious-in-defeat Confederacy, and in his celebration of the rebel spirit of
southerners
reasserted
during Reconstruction; that
speaks not only of a southern view of American history, but
also of how the Welsh regard their past. Of course, the
majority of southerners, and Welsh, no longer cling to such
backward-looking notions of their national identities, yet
there are many, in both cultures, who remain steadfast in
their sense of a historical betrayal of a former folk innocence stampeded by industrialisation, colonialism and the
centralising of power within the nation state. That is not to
say that there were no injustices perpetrated on the south,
or Wales, at different points in their histories; rather that a
nurtured sense of past injustices is not a sound basis for
national or cultural self-identification.
Griffiths The Birth of a Nation is based on two Thomas

Dixon novels, The Leopards Spots (1902) and The
Clansman (1905). The film was first shown as The
Clansman in Los Angeles on February 8th 1915, but by the
time the film received its east-coast premiere at the Liberty
Theatre, New York, on March 3rd it had been retitled by
Griffith himself, reportedly at Dixons suggestion. The film
comprises two halves. The first part deals with the outbreak
of the Civil War and concludes with the surrender of Robert
E. Lee at Appomatox Courthouse. The second part concerns the period of Reconstruction, particularly the temporary post-war acquisition of political power by former slaves
and its ramifications. The films narrative is refracted, almost entirely, through the experiences of two families who
are related to each other the Stonemans from the north
and the Camerons from the south. The outbreak of civil war
in part one disrupts a happy
family get-together and
scuppers the chance of romance between cousins
Ben Cameron and Elsie
Stoneman (played by the
incomparable Lilian Gish).
In the second half the cousins are reunited in marriage
as the family, and the nation, finally reunites and
heals.
The obvious message of
both Dixons book and Griffiths film adaptation is that
the root causes of the civil
war lie not with the iniquities
of the slave trade, nor with
northern plans to centralise
power within the federal
government, but with the
political machinations of abolitionists and the mere
presence of black slaves in
America. One of the chief
villains of the film is radical
leader Congressman Austin Stoneman, who is clearly based on the former
House of Representatives
leader Thaddeus Stevens.
In Griffiths film, the sole
motivation
for
Stoneman/Stevens in aiding the anti-slavery cause is
his sexual desire for his ambitious and manipulative
mulatto house maid a
slur on the real-life Lydia Hamilton Smith. Throughout Griffiths film the calumny of the lustful negro is reified and
reimagined. In one devastating scene, the Camerons
youngest daughter Little Sister is pursued through a pine
wood by Gus, a black soldier of the occupying federal army.
He intends to rape her but rather than submit to him, the girl
commits suicide by throwing herself from a cliff top. The
would-be rapist Gus is later lynched for this crime by the Ku
Klux Klan.
The climax of the film comes with another attempted rape,
this time of Elsie by a black Lieutenant-Governor, personally appointed by Stoneman/Stevens. Griffith frequently and
disturbingly elides black sexuality with black political power
so that the enfranchisement of former slaves is presented

as an inevitable precursor to miscegenation. The sexual
mores and political aspirations of whites, with the single
exception of Stoneman/Stevens, are presented in the film
as pure as the white of a Klansmans robe. One of the final,
terrible images of the film shows black voters being terrified
from entering temporary election booths by mounted and
hooded Ku Klux Klan. It is one of the most potent depictions
of fascism to be found anywhere in cinema.
Which returns us to the question of whether we can, or
should, separate Griffiths formidable cinematic technique
from the racist ideology of The Birth of a Nation. A close
analysis of the films text reveals that the former is always
in service of the latter. In our age of computer generated
collapsing stars and fire-breathing dragons it is easy to forget
that the greatest special effect
the cinema possesses is the
close-up the directors ultimate
tool of control through which he
can intensely focus the gaze of
the audience on a single visual
detail. Griffith pioneered the
close-up because he fully understood the power of semiotics before the term was invented. The
close-up enabled him to weave
within his films a lexicography of
symbols, each conjuring a range
of conscious and unconscious
associations that produce the binary extremes of fear and innocence, despair and hope,
cynicism and idealism that are
the stock-in-trade oversimplifications of the ideologue.
Griffiths use of cross-cut editing brought a thrilling dynamism
to cinema. In early filmmaking
the camera remained rather static, simply recording whatever
was going on in front of its lens, very often in single takes.
The cross-cut edit, as pioneered by Griffith, moved the
action along, built suspense and stirred excitement. As film
critic James Agee observed at the time:
among others. Perhaps a tip of the hat from one mastermanipulator to another?
Contemporary reaction to The Birth of a Nation in America
was divided, to say the least. The NAACP tried to get it
banned because of its inflammatory stereotyping. When
riots broke out in Boston, Philadelphia and other major U.S.
cities following screenings of the film, the cities of Chicago,
Denver, Kansas City, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh and St. Louis
all refused to allow the film to open. Despite, or perhaps
because of the controversy, the film was a huge commercial
success. Its box office records would only be eclipsed by
another civil war epic, with its own questionable racial
politics, Gone with the Wind (1939). While some critics,
such as Agee, saluted Griffiths technical achievements and
creative ambition, there were
others who rejected its crude
racism. Frances Hackett, writing
in the New Republic, argued that
Thomas Dixon had merely displaced his own malignity onto the
Negro.
A
New
York
Globe editorial thundered that
the film was an insult to the legacy of George Washington.
The most controversial review
of the film, however, came from
President Woodrow Wilson who,
following a White House screening of the film, reportedly described the film as like writing
history with lightning. And my
only regret is that it is all so terribly true. The line is possibly
apocryphal, and a Presidential
aide quickly dashed off a letter to
the NAACP denying Wilsons remarks. Yet although we cannot
be certain as to whether the
president offered such a sympathetic judgement on The Birth of
a Nation, one of the films intertitles features a quote from Wilsons A History of the American People, in which he wrote that during reconstruction, In
the villages [of the south] the negroes were the officeholders, men who knew nothing of the uses of authority, except
its insolences.
To watch [Griffiths] work is like being witness to the

*
beginning of melody, or the first conscious use of
the lever or the wheel; the emergence, coordinaThe lessons of The Birth of a Nation are sharply relevant
tion, and first eloquence of language; the birth of an
art: and to realize that this is all the work of one man. to our current moment. Our culture is one that is becoming
defined by technological advances that offer us the thrills of
Yet Griffiths cross-cut editing does not operate simply as spectacle whilst masking the ideological underpinnings of
a means of pacing the film, or providing it with pulsating cultural product in a haze of unthinking wonderment. In the
rhythm it also enables him to manipulate the sympathies West we face a range of complex political and social quesof his audience, perhaps against their better judgement. tions posed by the effects of globalisation, capitalist exploiTake, for instance, the penultimate scene of the film in tation and mass-migration that are being defined as
which the Stoneman-Cameron family is besieged inside a questions of race by lazy media organisations unable to
log-cabin by a crazed gang of black federal soldiers intent respond with nuance and insight in a climate of 24-hour
on murdering them. This siege, complete with swooning rolling news coverage that cannot settle in fear of losing
women fearing rape, is cross cut with a cavalry charge of viewers. Griffiths work is a warning to us all of the dangers
Ku Klux Klan members racing to rescue them. These Klan of using innovative technical media as the messenger of the
members are presented more like the Teutonic knights of comfy old canards of a reassuringly innocent, though entiremedieval legend than the paramilitary racist thugs history ly mythical, past. The crucial question the film poses for us
knows them to be. Griffiths cinematic innovations also now is this Are we so different from that audience of 1915,
included commissioning a full-length score to accompany do we applaud the notional progress of technological adhis silent masterpiece featuring the music of Wagner vance at the expense of forgetting our own histories?
The Poet and the Public Intellectual

by Dylan Moore
riting matters. But also, it matters in Wales, and matters
now. Being that our country is
in the very early stages of nation building, I do not think there can ever be a
more important time for writers to be
vocal in shaping public discourse in
creative and positive ways.
However, in order to allow us to see
ourselves and our teacup storms with
a wide-angle lens let us begin far away
from Wales. Pankaj Mishras new book
From the Ruins of Empire traces The
Revolt Against the West and the Remaking of Asia not by repeating the
deeds of the continents major players
of the mid twentieth century Gandhi
and Mao but through the writings of
the intellectuals who prefigured them.
Liang Qichao, a Chinese man who
visited America in the hope that it
would provide inspiration for his homeland to break with Confucianism, ended up concluding that inequality and
political corruption was no blueprint for
a future society. Tellingly, he references Rousseau.
No longer will I tell a tale of pretty
dreams, he wrote, the Chinese people
for now must accept authoritarian rule;
they cannot enjoy freedom. It was a
chilling prophecy of the Mao Zedong
era. No wonder: Liang was an influence on Mao. But more encouragingly
for those of us who value freedom,
Liang did not see authoritarianism as
the long-term goal. In a few decades,
Liang maintained, the Chinese people
should be given Rousseau to read.
And Jean-Jacques Rousseau is, in
Western terms, the key name here.
What I would like to maintain is that
the intellectual, the thinker she or he
that I would call the Writer (deliberate
capitalisation) not only plays an important role in society, but is an agent
of and catalyst for social change. Let

us begin by following through the example of Rousseau. If we agree that
the French Revolution along with the
contemporaneous Industrial Revolution in England ushered in European
modernity, we must agree that thinkers
were its precursors. The masses may
have stormed the Bastille, but they did
so with new ideas in their heads. Before and since, in Europe and across
the world, revolution and other, more
gradual, social change is fuelled by a
heady cocktail of social conditions and
ideology.
First come ideas, then words, then
deeds. Always in that order. Where
action precedes thought, we stand on
the edge of chaos and oblivion. And
so: before the mob, Rousseau. Before
the American revolution, Paine. Long
before Lenin, Marx. Long before the
suffragettes, Wollstonecraft; before
Gandhi and Dr King, Thoreau. The late
twentieth centurys civil rights liberation
struggles were not only the result of a
softening of societal attitudes, but the
actualisation of decades, centuries,
millennia of theory.
In Wales, we must whatever we
might think of the man or his views
acknowledge the importance of Saunders Lewis. Like public intellectuals in
other parts of the world, Lewis doubled
as writer and political activist. His twin
legacy is the struggle to keep the
Welsh language alive and the very
concept of Wales as a political entity.
Both have been normalised. In his
1962 radio lecture Tynged yr Iaith
The Fate of the Language, Lewis maintained that Restoring the Welsh language in Wales is nothing less than a
revolution. It is only through revolutionary means that we can succeed. The
writers incendiary remarks were the
catalyst for the formation of Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg, and the start of a
period of direct-action agitation to enhance the status of the Welsh language. Lewis was nominated for the
1970 Nobel Prize for Literature not,
perhaps, for the quality of his writing
but for the impact of his thought.
And the Nobel Prize, often recognised as the ultimate accolade a Writer
can receive, is particularly relevant to
my own argument. In the words of
Alfred Nobels will, the Prize should be
awarded in the field of literature for
the most outstanding work in an ideal
direction. The Swedish Academy seek
to reward lasting literary merit but also
idealisk, a particular brand of idealism
that champions human rights on a
grand scale. The Prize rewards writing, but above and beyond writing, it
rewards the Writer as symbol.
Most societies give rise to small
groups of thinkers who become precursors to change. Sometimes the flow of
history leaves these groups as marginal figures, condemned to the shadows.
The Welsh Outlook is a case in point.
You may well not have heard of it. The
magazine was formed in the home of
David Davies, grandson of Llandinam
the industrialist and brother of Gwen
and Margaret, whose collection of 260
paintings graces the National Museum
of Wales. With a readership of just a
couple of thousand, the magazines
centrality to the development of Welsh
nationalism taking it away from narrow religious and linguistic identity politics to engage with internationalism
and modernity is, when viewed in the
international context to which it aspired, a footnote to a bigger picture
somewhere else. Even the dates of its
publication the magazine ran from
1914 to 1933 are redolent of far more
pressing issues in Wales and a grander narrative elsewhere.

But at other times, history comes
calling. The Writer engaged in quiet,
committed intellectual activity must
be ready to stand and be counted, not
just in print but in life. I am thinking here
of Orwell joining the International Brigades, Albert Camus role as editor of
Combat, the French Resistance paper.
More recently, I am thinking about the
fatwa issued against Salman Rushdie
and Orhan Pamuks denunciation of
Turkeys genocide-denial. I am also
thinking of writers who through their
works have undoubtedly affected the
way we think about the world. Sigmund
Freud. Edward Said. Frantz Fanon.
If Wales does not have, at present,
equivalents to these kinds of writers
political, prophetic, wide-ranging
maybe it is because, for the moment,
history is happening elsewhere. Owen
Sheers Resistance, considered in this
light, is an odd first novel; it imagines a
context, because a Nazi occupation of
the Olchon valley allows us to consider
our own types of community under
such pressure. It is, the novel argues,
under such pressure that we find out
who we really are. Patrick McGuinness The Last Hundred Days, set in
Romania, has a similar thrust. Whether
the displacement happens through
time or space, much contemporary
Welsh writing gives the impression that
relevant backdrops for the big sociopolitical and moral questions lie elsewhere.
*
It is no accident that the preeminent
writers of any given era are often inextricably linked with the history of the
period. In the 1980s, as the worlds
geopolitical plates rubbed up against
each other along the Iron Curtain, it
was no surprise that many of the decades most important writers were
from Central and Eastern Europe. Indeed, two of those to whom I would
draw particular attention were born just
seven years and a hundred miles apart
in what was then Czechoslovakia.
Vaclav Havel, who died late 2011,
was the embodiment of the public intellectual. A playwright, poet and essayist, Havel was also a dissident who
became a political prisoner and then,
when freedom came, was elected
President. The ultimate Writer-statesman, Havel was widely accepted at
home and abroad as possessing an
uncommon moral authority to rule, in
addition to his popular triumph at the
ballot box. At the time of his death he
was Chair of the Human Rights Foundation, yet another indication of the
deep connection between the Writers
concern with the human condition and
the activists concern with the humans
conditions.
And it was Havels compatriot Milan
Kundera, in The Art of the Novel (1986)
who made a distinction between a Writer (my capitalisation) and a novelist.
Kundera: The writer has original ideas
and a unique voice. He can employ
any form (including that of the novel)
and because everything he writes
bears the mark of his thoughts, carried
by his voice, it is part of his work. Into
this category, Kundera who has long
been exiled to France places Rousseau, Goethe, Chateaubriand, Gide,
Camus, Malraux. On the other hand,
[t]he novelist does not attach so much
importance to his ideas. He is an explorer, busy feeling his way to unveil an
unknown aspect of existence. He is not
fascinated not by his voice, but by a
form he is after, seeking to make it his
own, and it is only the forms that can
meet the demands of his dreams that
become part of his works. Examples
he gives here include Fielding, Sterne,
Flaubert, Proust, Faulkner and Celine.
Aside from the point Kundera makes
explicitly, I think there is also something of importance in the fact he uses
the singular work in relation to the
Writer and the plural works when discussing novelists. To take the given
authors, Tom Jones, Tristram Shandy,
Madame Bovary, A la recherch du
temps perdu, The Sound and the Fury
and Journey to the End of the Night are
each singular works of art, self-contained infinities. By contrast, the bestknown works of the Writers mentioned
are part of a wider schema. The Outsider, for example, is best read is
intended to be read alongside The
Myth of Sisyphus. Rousseaus Discourse on the Origin of Inequality is
inseparable from On the Social Contract. In short, it might be said that the
novelist is concerned with the Work,
the Writer with the Body of Work that
expresses an Idea.
I believe Kunderas is a vital distinction, and very useful to an understanding of the Writers position here in
Wales. It may help us to understand
what we have had to celebrate in the
past and what we have traditionally
lacked. Better still, it can point a direction for the future.
I have already discussed Saunders
Lewis, who very clearly fits Kunderas
criteria for a Writer. His work is clearly
underpinned by a voice and a set of
ideas. Bertrand Russell and Raymond
Williams also clearly fit the profile of

forward thinking, outward looking
Welshmen whose primary emphasis is
on the propagation and furtherance of
ideas. Like Lewis, Russell went to prison because of his commitment to ideals he was a conscientious objector
in World War I; also like Lewis, he was
nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature. Unlike Lewis, he won.
The 1950 prize was awarded to Russell in recognition of his varied and
significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom
of thought. Note again the emphasis
on varied writings rather than a specific monolithic work of art, and again the
emphasis on the Writer as champion of
humanity and freedom.
But the vast majority of front-rank
Welsh writers have been from the other side of Kunderas divide. They have
been novelists. Or, even more often,
poets. In a previous essay, I made
mention of Dylan Thomas writing
shed. This rather odd tourist attraction
with its perfectly preserved pictures
and paraphernalia, discarded manuscripts filling the wastepaper basket
and littering the floor, has come to form
the abiding image of the writer here in
Wales. First, he is solitary; second, he
is melancholy, a tortured genius
searching for le mot juste, maer gair
cywir. Third, he is a he. Fourth and
this is my main point he is the very
opposite of a public intellectual, the
very idea of which has always been
treated with suspicion in Britain as a
whole. The Welsh Writers I have discussed Saunders Lewis, Raymond
Williams and Bertrand Russell are all
widely seen as European thinkers.
In a previous essay I also addressed
the question of how the particular writers we have had in Wales who might
be considered world-class is for debate. Dylan Thomas status is not so
much as our greatest writer but as the
most well-known. He has been cast in
bronze, a Welshman, a drunkard and
a lover of the human race, especially of
women, the paradigmatic Welsh writer. An icon.
There are numerous reasons why not
so much Thomas or his writing but the
image of Thomas and his lifestyle has
become a burden to subsequent generations of Welsh writers to reach an
international audience. As a country of
three million people we have already
had our fair share of internationally
famous writers, i.e. one. When Bill Clinton stood on a stage in Hay-on-Wye
and pronounced that youre lucky, you
Welsh, to have [Dylan Thomas] as

your poet, he used the singular.
In the eyes of the world, we have had
our poet; there is no longer room for
anybody else. In the same way that
you might as an educated person be
able to name one Burmese politician,
one Icelandic popstar and one Slovene
philosopher, around the world the likelihood is that an educated person could
probably name at a push one
Welsh poet. A useful analogy here
would be with Jamaica. The Caribbean
island is comparable with Wales in
terms of both its population and its
disproportionate number of notables.
At London 2012, the world recordbreaking sprint relay team demonstrated the islands wealth of talent. And yet
our desire for icons means Usain Bolt
is the Jamaican sprinter. Even the very
best Welsh writers are, it has seemed,
forever condemned to being the Yohan
Blake to Dylan Thomas Bolt, the Jimmy Cliff to Dylan Thomas Bob Marley.
My argument for the importance of
the Writer is concerned with the role
rather than the individuals who find
themselves cast as such through what
Orwell called some demon whom one
can neither resist nor understand. For
me, the Writer is defined not by his or
her particularities iconic or exceptional or otherwise but by the way in
which through the specifics of his or
her writing he or she connects us to the
general. The Writer, in the sense I am
defining him or her, is a conduit for the
spirit of the age. Somehow, through
some means unbeknownst even to him
or herself, the Writer rides the zeitgeist
like a wild pony. The Writer provides a
vital link to the past and a prescient

glimpse of the future even when contextualizing the present.
What is noticeable in all of my examples, within Wales and without, is the
time lapse involved. Whether from The
Communist Manifesto to the Russian
Revolution or Tynged yr Iaith to the
Welsh Language Act 1993, there is
usually at least a generations gap between the genesis of an idea and the
recognition of its fruition or even an
acceptance of its validity. What seems
controversial, outrageous or revolutionary at first can seem like common
sense decades later.
This is not to say writers are always
right, or even ahead of the game; very
often the opposite proves to be the
case. And it must surely be noted that,
as in this case, the argument for Writerly importance is most often put forward
by writers. But it is no accident that
dictators and oppressors first target the
intelligentsia. Writers represent freedom; even in situations where they
have not been politically active in the
most direct sense, the potential they
have to undermine lies makes them
dangerous.
If I use Orwell as a leaning post once
more, it is because his skill was to write
in the plainest English what many
would have said in terms that ordinary
people would find off-putting. I write
because there is some lie that I want to
expose, he wrote, effectively ending
any future attempts to explain the impulse any better than that. If I cite Eastern Europe under communism again, it
is because the particularities of that
period show us something universal
about the relationship between freedom and oppression; samizdat literature the hand-to-hand passing
around of outlawed, sensitive material
shows us the power and importance
of the written word. It finds contemporary echoes in the twittering soundtrack to the Arab Spring, events linked
through journalistic shorthand to those
of Prague 1968.
The first casualties of totalitarianism
are the minds that would oppose it.
The last decade has encouraged lots
of talk about winning hearts and
minds. Hearts are easy to deal with;
dictators and terrorists, by definition,
are unconcerned with hearts. Minds,
however, are dangerous. You can
break bodies, but some of historys
most inspiring stories show that you
cannot change minds quite so easily.
Writers, of course, deal in the currency
of the mind.
Dai Smith has called Wales a young
country not afraid to remember what it
might yet become. And at the end of a
week where Leanne Wood used her
first conference speech as leader of
the party founded by Saunders Lewis
to outline an idealistic vision of a Welsh
New Deal, it would be worth remembering that while we will build the nation together nurses, teachers,
carpenters, mechanics, shop assistants, bar staff, rugby players, theatre
directors, social workers, even politicians for a clear vision of where we
might go, we are also going to need not
only novelists and poets, but Writers
with a capital W.
10
Wales, the Artist and Society: The Legacy of Beca

by Sara Rhoslyn Moore
o you think of 1977

as the year Welsh
art was revolutionized? You ought
to. At the National Eisteddfod that year, in Wrexham,
the late artist Paul Davies
staged a protest as a performance piece. There was
a prevailing lack of recognition for political art works in
Wales and he intended to
change this. It led him to
found a group of artists who
became known as The BECA Group.
The name was inspired by
the Merched Beca or Beccas Daughters, the Rebecca Rioters of 1839-43.
Merchaid Beca would destroy toll gates that were put
on Welsh roads by the English as a means of charging
yet more taxes on already
struggling farmers. This unfair taxation affected mid
and south Wales agricultural communities in particular
as they were already in dire
poverty at this time due to
poor harvests.
Merchaid Beca intended to
change this. Although they
are referred to as Merched
Daughters, they were in
fact men dressed as women, mostly farmers. In an
early example of performance protest, they wore the
traditional Welsh Lady costume, blackened their faces
with soot to maintain anonymity and stealthily left
their families, riding out on
horseback into the night.
The name Rebecca was

taken from an obscure
verse in the Bible, with
which Wales non-conformist communities would have
nevertheless been extremely familiar:
And they blessed
Rebekah and said
unto her, Thou art
our sister, be thou
the mother of thousands of millions,
and let thy seed
possess the gate of
those which hate
them.
Genesis
24:60
One act of gate-breaking
by the rioters included a protester acting as an old lady
a mother who talks to her
children the rioters.
Something blocks the mothers way; she is old and cannot see well. Her children
are concerned; nothing
should restrict their mother.
They offer to move it for her,
she feels the object and realises its a gate put there to
stop her. The children, offended, offer to break it
down, but Rebekah has
faith and looks to see if it
can be opened; to her horror
it has been locked and bolted to which the children insist: it must be brought
down, mother; you and your
children must be able to
pass to which she replies:
Off with it then my children.
It becomes clear here that
for the rioters, Rebekah is a

mother symbol; the mother
of the land -and the people
of the land are her children.
Paul Davies performance
/protest at the 1977 National
Eisteddfod not only echoed
the theatricality of the Rebecca Riots, but also symbolically recalled another
injustice with deep resonances, particularly in the
Welsh-speaking community. Davis held a railway
sleeper above his head in
the grounds of the Eisteddfod. Inscribed on the sleeper
were the initials WN, a reference to the punishments
given to pupils when Welsh
was spoken in schools in
the wake of the 1847 education report that became
known, notoriously, as The
Treachery of the Blue
Books. The same WN initials were worn on a board
hung around the childs
neck: Welsh Not.
To parade these initials at
the National Eisteddfod of
all places in Wales took
courage and confidence; it
was action certain to attract
attention and shock both the
public and the Eisteddfod
officials. The Beca Group
members Paul, Peter, Ivor
and Tim Davies, Iwan Bala
and Peter Telfer, all renowned Fine Artists in their
own right, formed as Welsh
artists were struggling to get
their works exhibited within
the galleries of Wales. This
applied particularly to art in-
spired by political issues, as

suppose to pictorial art. This
was totally barbaric to the
Artists, but also to the people of Wales and other visitors. Political art teaches the
viewer of the issues Wales
have faced or are facing.
The performance was a
success. The organisers of
the National Eisteddfod, the
Arts Council of Wales,
changed their dated view on
Welsh art. Now the Eisteddfod actually encourages art
of a political nature by rewarding artists with an Ivor
Davies Award for art that
conveys the spirit of activism in the struggle for language, culture and politics.
The legacy of BECA is secure.
But if this was a revolution
in Welsh art, how could we
have not known about it before? Now that we have
learnt about this exciting,
inspiring and confident Art
Group, you may be feeling
inquisitive. Want to learn
more? Unfortunately but not
surprisingly there is a lack of
information on the Beca
Group. As a nation, we
struggle to possess our success. Here, the BECA
Group have changed the
way visual art is thought of
in Wales, but what about all
those who didnt or couldnt
go to the Eisteddfod that
year, or like myself werent
even born. The people of
Wales shouldnt be living life
oblivious to the rare occa-
11
sions where there have actually been positives in our

history.
Artists create to deliver a
message, to get it out there,
at the Eisteddfod and beyond. There is nothing clever in making art hard for
people to access. The BECA Group, Arts Council and
the Eisteddfod had a responsibility in making the
nation know about this. People at Eisteddfodau are less
in need of being made
aware of such issues; its
the people who do not attend the Eisteddfodau who
are the most in need of
these eye openers. Is it just
snobbery to only show
themselves at Eisteddfodau? To be truly political, art
needs to take to the streets.
Wales as a nation has
been fighting for the survival
of the Welsh language
throughout its history, and
yet we struggle to communicate in that very language.
Why?
Throughout Wales there
are many dialects. Slang differs not only between North
and South but from village
to village; then there are
those who through higher
education or via their parents learnt the proper
Welsh. Many of us drift
through life not really knowing about our own past, let
alone our future as a nation.
The main reason for this is
most likely to be the fact that
there isnt one thing the
whole of Wales watches,
listens to or reads. The English have much influence on
the Welsh language due to
this. Could art be the answer in uniting us together?
Id like to think so.
The advantage of fine art
is that there is no official
person standing there telling
you what to think and feel. It
doesnt tell you anything; it
makes you ask questions:
the most importance question being, what is the artist
trying to say? This is instantly thought provoking. When
we look at art we think in the
language we speak so there
is no intimidation for the
viewer; art lets you make
sense of it the best way it

suits you, and relate the
subjects to your own life experience, making it easier to
digest. This results in a
deeper level of understanding, and when you understand something, you gain
confidence. Unlike music,
film, or books, which all use
words or tone to encourage
a particular thought or feeling, fine art is respectful of
its viewer. It does not tell
you what to think; it merely
encourages you to think,
opening the mind. Art can
help Wales to break down
communication barriers or
the so-called cliques we
seem to have in Wales and
the Welsh scene.
The legacy of the Beca
Group lives on as the voice
for Welsh art. Whether the
political artist of today is
aware of the BECA Groups
actions or not they are most
definitely responsible for
created a strong and confident climate for these artists; they have secured a
future for the politicisation of
Welsh art. Welsh artists
such as Bedwyr Williams,
who will be representing
Wales at the Venice Biennale 2013, and Carwyn
Evans, who won the gold
medal at the National Eisteddfod 2012, have definitely got the BECA Group
to thank for the opportuni-
ti as rebellious during the 60s

and 70s, being one of, if not
the first in the UK to use
explosives as part of his artwork. He was the winner of
the 2002 Gold Medal for
Fine Art at the National Eisteddfod and received an
MBE in the New Years Honours List 2007, has exhibited in over sixty solo
exhibitions and his work can
be found in collections all
over the world. Iwan Bala,
Artist, writer and philosopher, is a crucial figure in
the Welsh arts and cultural
scene. Winner of the Owain
Glyndwr medal in 1998 for
his contribution to the arts in
Wales. He has exhibited internationally along with private collections across the
UK, winner of the Gold Medes leading to their own suc- al for Fine Art in 1997 and a
founder member of The Artcessful careers.
The success of the BECA ists Project.
Tim Davies work consists
Group is no surprise when
looking at the members of film, found imagery and
subsequent achievements: sculpture. Winner of the
The late Paul Davies 2003 medal for fine art, he
founded the BECA Group also represented Wales in
during the 1970s and his the 2011 Venice Biennale.
image at the Welsh Not And finally, Peter Telfer, a
performance is the most filmmaker based near Maiconic image of contempo- chynlleth who runs a televirary Welsh art. The issues sion production company by
that caused concern for the name of Pixel Foundry
Davies were history, identity and occasionally still takes
and the condition of the en- photographs. He has many
vironment of his land. Dav- photographs of inspirational
ies wanted to teach and artists such as Paul Davies
inspire people of the issues on Culture Colony, a websurrounding Wales and site which is specifically for
hoped to stimulate a move- Welsh artists or artists living
ment. In his efforts to do this in Wales. The project was
he involved everyone from immensely influenced by
students, the unemployed, Paul Davies, and the creator
to the disabled and children. of the website likes to think
Davies created maps of of the site as a map of
Wales in a variety of differ- Wales Davies would be
ent mediums and was said proud of.
I will bring this essay to an
to have drawn a map of
Wales a day. Peter Davies, end with the inciting and
brother of Paul, is an artist, comforting words of Tim
lecturer, and curator, who Davies, asked about the
has worked across the current disparate state of
world. He was the director of the group. They display the
Cardiff Bay Art Trust and spirit of these artists and the
also Head of Visual Arts and power of art:spiritually
Crafts for the Arts Council of were still together if the
need arises well galvanize
Wales.
Ivor Davies, is associated together again. The spirit of
with a stimulating variety of Beca lasts fundamentally as
styles but is most recog- a political conscience which
nized as a history painter. can be easily stirred.
Davies could be described
12
The Deep Sigh: Meditations Upon Haiku

by Paul Chambers
here is a traditional Andalucan expression on the a historical survey, it is enough to say that this is not, nor
has it ever really been, the case.
nature of poetry, which translates roughly as
For me, a great haiku carries the feel of the sigh of the
Spanish poem, both in feeling and in form. By its nature it
The sigh told to the tongue;
is brief, yet it carries within it a tremendous depth it is a
go and search for words
vision of the world reflected in a single drop of dew. It is a
to say what I can say.
deep sigh, the life and death of a momentary experience,
Though not a haiku itself, to my mind there is perhaps no an expression of life distilled to its purest form.
A haiku is not an expression of a writers feelings about
greater expression of the spirit of the form than this simple
a given subject or experience; it is, in fact, the experience
folkloric poem.
Before my own immersion in haiku, I had experimented itself. When writing a haiku, the poet is instructed to leave
with different forms and styles of poetry, developing a not a hairs breadth between him or herself and the subject.
better understanding of my approach to the craft. I came to Take as an example, this poem by Basho, the first haiku I
realise that I could usually muster two or three lines that remember reading and, perhaps, the haiku which retains
were maybe worth something, but would then find myself the most profound impact on me
attempting to expand those lines into what I perceived to
reeds cut for thatching
be a proper poem of proper length. What I actually ended
the stumps now stand forgotten
up doing was distorting the original experience into a series
sprinkled with soft snow
of ugly riddles, finding shallow, symbolist alternatives to
express what I had already expressed in the moment of
There is no need for anything else. There is nothing
initial inspiration.
Needless to say, a growing awareness of this process grand or ornate. Great haiku cultivates its images in such
lent itself to a feeling of incompetence and, for some time, a way that they mean nothing beyond themselves, and at
a reluctance to write anything again. Then I discovered the same time express so much that it is not possible to
haiku, through Jack Kerouacs Book of Haikus. I had not catch their final meaning. There is no room for I feel this
ever really read haiku very seriously, but there was some- way about or this is what I thought when it is the
thing in the form, something in the attitude, that resonated sharing of experience; not to express what you felt, but to
offer the moment that caused you to feel. Take another
deeply with me.
I realised that the moments of inspiration that had given astonishing example by Basho
way to those poor offerings for so long, were actually all I
needed there was no need to embellish each moment
the first snow
with pale literary imitations of itself.
the leaves of the daffodils
When I read Kerouacs
are just bending
Early morning yellow flowers
The reader has to be absorbed into haiku as into nature,
Thinking about
to lose himself or herself in its depth. There are very clear
The drunkards of Mexico
demands on the reader, yet if one can enter this depth then
I was struck with the understanding that, in that moment, the experience is all the more beautiful beautiful because
the moment was enough. I felt all of the romance, the mad, the moment, caught and fixed, is one, and falls into eternity.
Indeed, the impact of reeds cut for thatching is evident in
tragic beauty of the thought, the purity of the expression,
the simplicity and humble brevity of the form, the mystery a poem I wrote in response, years after first experiencing it
lying deep in the contrasts of the poems parts. Kerouacs as a reader, which is being published in the autumn issue
determination, I will find the right words, and they will be of Acorn haiku journal
simple, was a revelation.
rusted rail track
Haiku is a familiar form yet perhaps most ideas or
fading slowly
preconceptions of the form carry the impressions of very
early snow
strict technical rules and requirements, syllable counts,
cutting words and nature references. Without entering into
13
Inevitably, my first efforts at haiku were poor, usually no

more than an imitation or a Zen gimmick. Yet, with time,
and with studying the work of the great haiku masters, I
found myself more and more open to the reception of the
haiku moment. Though strongly identified as a form of
nature poetry, there are a vast number of urban haiku in
existence, and it was the urban landscape that first informed my first published poems, the very first appearing
in Presence haiku journal
pigeons mating
dark water trapped
in the grout lines
As my craft developed, the technical awareness of the
power of each individual word, and even the space between the words, became more apparent. Take, for instance, the unnatural break and the double-meaning of the
word still at the end of the second line in this poem,
published by Chrysanthemum haiku journal
winter sky
the dead childs clothes still
hanging on the line
The challenge of the brevity of the form, of the succinct
nature of the expression, becomes more organic the more
you work at it. For me, it has become an almost natural
form of expression. Having been a student of film, Eisensteins theory of editing, of contrasts and juxtapositions of
images and expressions, has had a strong effect on my
thinking about poetry. Along with my experience as a script
writer and script editor, refining the brevity and clarity of
style at work in film screenplays, I suppose I had already
harnessed two essential technical elements of the form.
The greatest thrill I have had in publishing haiku thus far
is the appearance of my work in Modern Haiku, the longest
running and most prestigious English-language haiku journal in the world, and in Bottle Rockets haiku journal, which
has published work by Beat Generation heroes of mine
such as Lawrence Ferlinghetti and Gregory Corso.
A sequence of poems published in Bottle
Rockets illustrates one of the most well-known of haiku
traditions, the seasonal reference
ment within these traditions to strengthen the sharing of the

haiku moment in this instance, to use empathetic expressions of the natural world to root the poem in time and
space and convey the experience of life more deeply.
To my mind, there is a common tendency to hold
imagination as the greatest gift of vision. While there is
undoubtedly much mileage in this, it is my own belief that
the greatest gift of vision is, in fact, insight not the gift that
adds a picture, no matter how true, to the fact, but that
which pierces through the fact and discovers the meaning
hidden in its heart; that which breaks through the crust of
the outward event to its core of spiritual reality.
As well as our acquisitive faculties, those which go out to
seek the truth, we have others, the nature of which is
receptive they are there to receive such truth as may
come to us, and both are essential to our knowledge of the
truth. If you go out to meet the truth, with intense insight,
the truth will come to meet you. If you do this, the rest will
come, and that is the process of revelation. It is by precisely this process that one becomes attuned to the perception
and cultivation of the haiku moment.
The reading and writing of haiku is always a process of
searching. It is endless, infinite. It is offering up mortality to
the light of the infinite, and falling infinitely deep inside all
that is mortal. On his deathbed, Basho composed this, his
final poem, and a work which perhaps best encapsulates
the most profound elements at work in a great haiku. In its
greatest moments, is the deep sigh of life
falling sick on a journey
over withered fields
dreams wander on
summer dusk
girls chalk their shadows
on the new tar
field of dead grass
the wind
loses its breath
sun in the ribs
of the old pier
ebb tide
a donkey tethered
to a tractor tyre
dead sunflowers
One of the stigmas surrounding haiku is that there is
some strict imposition of rules and requirements suffocating the natural expression of a poet. Clearly these haiku
are all set in summer, yet only one actually names the
season itself. Working within the tradition established by
haiku masters, it is clear that you can utilise and experiThe Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1
14
A Tribute to Dannie Abse: Goodbye, Twentieth Century

by Adam Somerset
he 2011 edition of Goodbye,

Twentieth Century re-publishes Dannie Abses earlier autobiographical writing as part of
the Library of Wales imprint. Abse took
his place alongside authors such as
Arthur Machen, Emyr Humphreys and
Raymond Williams. For the re-issue, a
third section, Entering the Twenty-first
Century, was written.
This third part, sixty-seven pages, is
the life in old age. Its inevitable centre
is the calamity of bereavement. It
came brutally in the form of an instant
late night car collision. The couple had
been returning from a Porthcawl dinner with Robert Minhinnick and wife.
As both doctor and poet Abse knows
the ways of the body and the small
consolation of words. He quotes Doctor Johnson: Grief is a kind of idleness. He spurns the suggestion of
counselling and begins a journal. I cry,
therefore I am is its first entry.
This last part opens with another tale
from lifes winter. An exhausting lecture tour in America sends him to Londons Royal Free Hospital, the doctor
in him knowing the right word: angioplasty. Old age brings acclaim for
late work, the pleasure of old friends
and comrades and the curious bustle
of the literary life. He looks deep for
meaning into the life he has made. The
claims he once found for the nobility of

poetry, those of Shelley and Eliot, no
longer carry much weight, hollow
post-Auschwitz and Hiroshima.
A galaxy of poets gather to celebrate
his
eightieth
birthday.
The
Presence wins the Wales Book of the
Year Award for all the comically bungled ceremony. After a lecture given
by Jan Morris a fan tells him how much
he has enjoyed the biography of Philip
Larkin, not that he has written one.
Sombrely, brother Leo dies: He can
rightly be termed Britains top reformer
of the twentieth century, having inspired nine Private Members Acts. All
have been designed to heal troubled
personal relationships eschewed by
more timorous politicians.
Goodbye, Twentieth Century is a
work of prose that is suffused with
poets and poetry. For his first script for
television Abse stands beside the Thomas grave in Laugharne. In front of a
bust he sees an astonishingly wild
and haunted Dylan head staring into
space, his tie awry, a cigarette drooping between his lips. The dead, he
says, can sometimes come alive for a
moment. He says he has learnt much
from Rilke, particularly his Book of
Hours. He remembers the first poem
that he ever learnt by heart. It was
done voluntarily and John Cornfords
Huesca moves me still, its piquant directness, its sad music, its
silence between the quatrains
The influence of the poet spills
over into the prose. On arriving in
the great metropolis: It takes a
long time to like Londons secret
ways, her modesty London disappears down smoky evenings,
resenting your familiarity. In
Llandaff Cathedral he sees the
niches filled with gold-plated
wreaths of wild flowers. He is reminded that Welsh has dozens of
flowers that are named in honour
of the Virgin. He honeymoons at
Ogmore, that lark-high, seaside
village which overlooked the crinkling, silver-paper shine of the estuary below.
With the poetry comes the literary life. In a restaurant he finds
himself sitting between Freddie
Ayer and William Coldstream. In a
gloomy 1944 London he goes to a
lecture by Edmund Blunden and
offers him his own poems. He is in
the audience to see Stephen
Spender jump to his feet and denounce Emanuel Litvinoff for insulting
Eliot.
He inhabits that great migr centre,
the Cosmo in St Johns Wood and
meets Elias Canetti. On a flight out of
Heathrow a security guard is puzzled
to find that Ted Hughes travels with
the tooth of a tiger in his pocket. In the
grandeur of Princeton he is confidently
told he obviously cannot be famous. If
youre famous, you havent got time to
spend on students. As often the writer
has to suffer the perception that the
fruits of the imagination are the life
undiluted. In the case of Ash on an Old
Mans Sleeve even the publisher connives, promoting it as plain autobiography.
Abses age of poetry pre-dates that
in which the poet is by default part of
the promotional package. Poetry
readings, he writes, used to be deadly dull. Until the 1960s too many poets
mumbled or read at 100mph or chose
poems that were entirely unsuitable for
public recital. Roy Campbell appears
for a reading visibly drunk. Abses own
rising public profile raises press attention. The Poetry Society is gripped by
feuding. A few lines of conversation
with a Royal is gruesomely inflated
and misrepresented by Londons
evening paper.
15
Poetry does not pay. When Blunden

commends the first verse, father is on
hand to comment: He cant be much
of a critic. Besides you should be studying medicine hard, not wasting time
composing poems. From childhood
the young Abse has been aware of
the processions of the unemployed
and the TB that was rife in the valleys.
The medical life dips in and out of the
book. The nervous beginner finds that
symptoms are vague in description
this funny feeling I get here, doctor,
moves from place to place. The diseases presented rarely match the descriptions in the textbooks.
Briefly in obstetrics he witnesses the
most astonishing smile that follows
birth. He cites a French medical proverb to the effect that there are no
diseases, only sick people. The sick

people he sees are sufferers from TB,
bronchiectasis,
sarcoidosis,
lung
cysts, Hodgkins Disease. He goes
back to Robert Kochs discovery of the
tubercle bacillus and overhears a patient saying TB, doctor? That stands
for totally buggered, doesnt it?
Goodbye, Twentieth Century is history, and history weaves in and out of
its long length. The London he inhabits
is thickened with exiles. He describes
the refugees in their single rooms with
sputtering gas fire, heavy furniture,
frayed carpet, a photograph of a vanished relative, and their cafes, the
Cosmo, the Dorice, the Glass Hosue
and the Swiss. They are the tiniest
fraction of those who have survived; a
cloud of dread hangs heavy over them.
He recalls the terrible fear when the

V1 rockets engine dies and the interval before the explosion elsewhere
that means normal life may resume.
He has a mild National Service at a
mass radiography unit in Carrington.
Whats kind of station is it? he asks
an airman. Shit-hole, is the reply. And
the medical service? F***in ridiculous. Decades on he is on a charity
panel with a forceful young MP. The
Chair turns to him to field a question
about Auden. Before he can utter a
word the MP has her word in: When I
was at Oxford with Auden she kicks
off. The panel co-member is the formidable member for Finchley.
Goodbye, Twentieth Century is a
long, rich and satisfying read, its place
in the Library of Wales well-earned.
Occupy Gezi: The Cultural Impact

by James Lloyd
am sitting drinking tea with friends
in the Cafe Grand Boulevard in the
Beyolu district of Istanbul. It is
evening and the place is busier than
usual. We are sat so close together all
our knees are touching.
Cafe Grand Boulevard is located in
a courtyard of theHazzopuloPasaj.In
the Nineteenth-century this area had
been the domain of Ottoman Greeks,
Armenians and Jews, and had been
known since the middle-ages as Pera
(Across in Greek) until the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923.
Hazzopulo
Pasaj
(literally
Passage Hazzopulo) is a testament
to its former Greek denizens. Built in
1871 by the Istanbul Greek Hacopulo
Family
and
restored
in
2002,
Hazzopulo
is
one
of
manyPasajstoflanktheindomitable
stiklal Avenue. A humble entrance
belies an elegant Ottoman-era structure which along with the teahouse
and charming cobbled courtyard is
comprised of second-hand bookshops, jewellery and handbag stores,

tattoo and piercing studios. In the daytime, sunlight cut by the grape leaves
that adorn its inner sanctum lend it an
enchanted quality. At night people sit
on the tiny Turkish stools they call
tabure, huddled together like penguins, talking until the early hours.
Following the local municipalitys
seemingly abrupt decision in July 2011
under a directive named table operations (masa operasyonlar in Turk
ish) to remove all outdoor furniture
from outside of street cafes and
restaurants, Cafe Grand Boulevard is
oneoftheveryfewplacesinBeyolu
where you can sit outside to eat and
drink.
One of our group, Kaan, works as an
architect for a local firm and lists the
table operations on the finger of his
hand as one of the several decisions
that has fuelled public resentment towards Turkeys ruling AK Parti, partic-
ularly its leader, Prime Minister Recep

TayyipErdoan.
However, it was the events of the
Friday before, 31 May, that have motivated him and thousands others to
involve themselves in the movement
that has become known as Occupy
Gezi.
Kaan tells us about watching the
events unfold at home via Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, and from
friends texting him pictures and video
footage of police entering the park,
setting fire to the tents of protesters
camped there, using their batons to
beat them and then indiscriminately
spraying and firing canisters into
mounting crowds aghast at their unmerited brutality. Another of our group,
an archaeologist named Aya, describes the demolition of the historic
Emek Cinema Theater in order to build
a shopping mall (the theatre and its
original reliefs are to be restored and
refitted on the fourth floor).
16
For me, this is the one that stands

out. If the Occupy Gezi movement had
a most obvious predecessor, a close
warning of what was to come, the
demonstration held in April to save
Turkeys oldest theatre was it.
Among the Emek protesters and
those signing a petition against its
demolition were the guests of this
yearsstanbulInternationalFilmFes
tival, namely, directors Costa-Gavras,
Mike Newell, Marco Becchis and Jan
Ole Gerster. Taking this into account it
seemed incredible that police would
exercise indiscriminate force against a
peaceful protest, including the use of
pepper spray and water cannons.
While Id heard about the demolition,
I knew nothing about the Emek Cinema Theaters considerable history; its
design and interior, the lives it had
cultivated, its role in the personal histories of countless people; and when I
looked at photographs of the Emek, it
fostered in me that strange nostalgia a
person feels when encountering
something that youve never known
a letter in Akkadian written on a clay
tablet or a restored film of London in
1927 a sensation akin to dj vu; a
feeling that emanates from our innate
collective memory, the psychic residue
of our ancestors. This why culture, and
heritage, matters: they connect us to
the past and future.
Opening its doors in 1924, the Angel
Cinema(MelekSinemasinTurkish),
as it was then known, was frequently
regarded as one of the most beautiful
cinemas in Europe. It formed part of
the Cercle dOrient, a listed art deco
building designed by Levantine
architect Alexandre Vallaury in 1884.
The theatres interior was a mix of
baroque and rococo artistic styles; two
Art Nouveau angels on either side of
the screen inspired its name.
I understood as best I could the
frustrations of the protesters, actors,
filmmakers, but also the Emeks place
in the collective memory of Istanbul,
not only as a monument to Turkish
culture, but as a emblem of Ataturks
transformation of the old OttomanTurkish state into a European-styled
secular republic, thus cultivating a

more cosmopolitan outlook. The
Guardian was one of the few international newspapers to report on its
demolition, noting that:
all due respect, Im asking the

prime minister, the guarantor
of stanbuls cultural integrity,
to intervene to save the theatre and not let commerce outweigh culture.
Since 1958, the cinema has

been publicly owned and has
provided the backdrop for
small, courageous revolts: the
first big public 1 May celebrations after the military coup of
1980 took place there, it
housed left-wing concerts and
did not shy away from screening Martin Scorseses The
Last Temptation of Christ
while religious groups protested outside.
It is difficult to build a culture without

a heritage. And these two events taken together the table operations
and the demolition of the Emek Cinema Theater can be seen as prime
examples of the AK Partis wrecking
ball effect on the public sphere, what
the latter sees as a prioritising of commerce over culture. With the proposed
redevelopment of Gezi Park and Taksim being seen as another hijacking of
another civic domain in the interests of
private capitalism, people are asking
The Emek demonstration turned where is this path leading to?
violent. Pepper gas and water can*
nons were used. By its end four people
had been detained, including distinKaan receives a phone call, and from
guished film critic, Berke Gl, while
Atila Dorsay, Turkeys most respected his face we could tell it was bad news.
film scholar, later announced he was His friends house used on the previto retire. In an article entitled, Time to ous weekend to escape being teargassed had been burgled. The telesay farewell, Dorsay wrote:
vision, cigarettes and alcohol had
This theatre had a value for been taken. In many ways it is a relief
the cultural structure it carried to discover that it wasnt some altercaand the historic reservoir and tion with the police.
Since Sunday their presence around
lifestyle it represented. Today
there is nothing called Emek. Taksim, Istiklal and Gezi Park had
We could not manage to ex- abated, so much so that I would not
plain its symbolic and real val- see a single officer for the next five
days, highly unusual in Istanbul.
ue.
Whether this had anything to do with
The overzealous reaction of the Kaans friend being burgled or not I
police and the demolition were criti- dont know, but the demonstration
cised further by director Costa-Gavras against perceived state oppression
and Erdoans drift towards autocinalettertoPMErdoan:
ratism had also provided an opportuniThe violence that followed the ty for unnecessary vandalism.
We all leave the cafe together and
peaceful [protest] should not
cast a shadow over the main separate on Istiklal. The opportunity to
cause of this gathering [] A cash in on the spirit of Occupy Gezi is
major cinema, a cultural cen- in full swing. Bottles and cans of Efes
tre, should not be destroyed. in wooden boxes filled with crushed
Its like eradicating the memo- ice, hawkers line up fake pairs of trainry of the past, and an impor- ers outside Adidas and Nike stores
tant place for the future. It heavily vandalised during the weekwould be a mistake; politically, end; swimming goggles, snorkling and
socially and artistically. With surgical masks along with lemons and
17
anticids are being sold in case of another gas attack. Above all though is
the Turkish flag and the image of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
Occupy Gezi is a tactile movement,
people are scratching their protest on
the skin of the city. The protest is
everywhere. Not only in the cafes,
streets and bars. Its written on the
walls, paint-sprayed on the roads and
pavements, in the metro stations; leaflets have been printed and are being
handed out, stencils of penguins have
been designed and are sprayed on
walls during the worst of police violence CNN Turk instead chose to air a
documentary on penguins all kinds
of flags are being flown, pots and pans
hit by woman hanging out of apartment blocks, lights flashing on and off
against their windows, endless whistling; and the chanting Tayyip Istifa
(Resign Tayyip [Erdoan]) and Her
yer Taksim, her yer direni! (Every
where is Taksim, the resistance is everywhere!) all this amid the aroma of
roasted chestnuts and a faint whiff of
teargas.
For several days we had all been
awake until the early hours, some of
us until the sun came up, keeping a
close eye on the Twitter accounts and
hashtags we had, through a process of
trial and error, come to rely upon.
Needless to say our bullshit detectors
have been fine-tuned over the past
twelve days.
Much has been said of the instant
gratification impulse Twenty-first century society and culture has seemingly
fostered next day delivery services,
television programmes and films can
be streamed within a few seconds
(that is, if you have a fast internet
connection, in which case most people
wont bother), likewise for the music
we download; instant credit and
tanned skin, wait a minute Ill Google
it.
Speculation in situations such Gezi
is natural of course, as is the mix of
scepticism and hyperbole feeding it.
Walking home that night I realised that
wed all been guilty of over-thinking,
trying to explain away Occupy Gezi,
reduce it to a series of symbols, when
the fact remained that we were still too
close to the events to make sense of
them. Focus on the here and now,
keep the protesters uppermost in your
mind, communicate what is happening
here without hope or despair. This is
the conclusion I came to. We had
spent much of the day in contact with
various protesters, through acquaintances, social media and by texting.
Eventually the requests came through,
what kinds of items they required and

we took a bag of supplies with us,
mostly personal hygiene products.
It is not my intent to portray the
protesters camped at Gezi Park itself
as saints I dont believe that is how
they see themselves or how they wish
to be seen. However, I have nothing
but admiration for their courage in the
face of police brutality, pacifist commitment in protecting the park for themselves and future generations, and
creative approach to organising and
arranging the park into cooperative.
Their altruism has been overwhelming. Its fair to say I have never witnessed anything like Occupy Gezi; the
same goes for the many Turks I have
spoken to. I feel privileged. Of the
many examples I could give of the
protesters energy and inventiveness,
I think the Gezi Park Library and the
Museum of the Revolution (where
they continue to collect pieces which
embody the first weekend of violence
following the gung-ho offensive by the
police) stand out as examples of their
long-term goals and the ideas feeding
into them.
Each time I have visited Gezi there
has been some new addition to the
culture and spirit of the park produced
by a kind of electromagnetivity between the people predominately
young, but supported by professional
creative types, the middle classes, and
a massive female presence (most of
those I have spoken to have been
women). Gezi has brought together
men and women of all ages, Muslims
and non-believers, Kurds and Alevis,
and people of all classes. The park
has a childrens workshop area, the
paintings made there are strewn from
tree to tree on lines of twine (one of
them of a police Panzer using its water
cannon against stickmen protesters).
There are yoga classes, Gezi Park TV
station a reaction no doubt to Turkeys news channels ignoring the
plight of the protesters in the face of
the excessive force used by the police
and an Activist Cinema Club.
If this sounds ideal its because it
really is for now. As mentioned, there
are many different ideologies at work,
especially at Taksim Square. You
could easily create a glossary in book
form based on the amount of slogans
communicated by members from almost every sphere of Turkish politics
there are secularists, nationalists, leftists, and anarchists.
It would be incredibly difficult to
establish a political party that would
encapsulate Occupy Gezi. Not only
that, but the spread of protests to a
reported seventy cities around Turkey

whose concerns would differ to varying degrees. In short, there is no onesize-fits-all ideology.
Nonetheless, we should not dismiss
the solidarity the mix of groups have
demonstrated in what is surely a goal
that unites all at Taksim Square and
Gezi Park ensuring that both remain
an autonomous space where the public can express themselves both singularly and collectively.
Diversity as opposed to homogeneity, democracy as opposed to autocracy, culture as opposed to consumption
this is a message a majority of those
protesting can agree on.
*
Incompatibility defines Istanbul, especially in terms of culture. The city
hasinthelastdecade,sinceErdoan
came to power, become increasingly
internationalised. This has had repercussions both good and bad. Istanbul
74, an arts and culture organisation
founded in 2009 by Demet MftogluEseli and Alphan Eseli, initiated the
Istanbul International Arts & Culture
Festival and international fashion and
cultural celebration, Istancool, which
has attracted attendees such as the
late Gore Vidal, Zoe Cassavetes and
Zaha Hadid; there is the Istanbul Modern and Sultan Selim IIIs Tophane-i
Amire (Tophane Amoury) has been
converted into an exhibition centre for
the arts. But what has been described
as bloodless internationalism, that is,
of emulating the west, has resulted in
the unchecked construction projects
that have resulted in the destruction of
historic buildings and turned parts of
the Istanbul into a nondescript conurbation of behemoth shopping malls
and unimaginative glass skyscrapers.
While Erdoan rightly dismisses a
small minority of the protesters as vandals I witnessed some teenagers
wearing Guy Fawkes masks being
reprimanded by a large party of Occupy Gezi protesters for damaging a
public bus it can be said that in spite
of the various restoration projects he
and his party have instigated (albeit
somewhat negligently) the largescale
vandalism enacted on Istanbul as a
result of his partys neo-liberal policies
are of far greater consequence.
It is also the creeping Islamisation
instigatedbyErdoanthathavemade
people suspicious of his long term
aims. These have of course informed
the protest. However, Occupy Gezi is
not a campaign against Islam regardless of the gulf that remains between
18
religious and secular parties in Turkey.

Neither can Erdoans reshaping of
Turkish society and culture restrict
freedom of speech and pass laws
without public consultation (or even
that of his own party). The producers
of Behzat , a TV crime and detective
series set in Ankara, and featuring a
morally ambiguous police officer,
were put under pressure to stop production as the show contained material
considered
contradictory
to
traditional Turkish family values. When
fans of the series complained the government backed down and instead
imposed a series of huge fines through
the state-controlled Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTK). Scriptwriters were forced to make the
eponymous protagonist of the show
marry his live-in girlfriend, conversations between characters were heavily
censored as were scenes that involved alcohol. Speaking of which, the
proposed alcohol restrictions have
now been ratified and the sale of alcohol between 10pm 6am is prohibited
(the ban does not extend to cafes,
bars and restaurants, but will also apply to the open sale and consumption
of alcohol in parks, gardens, open
spaces, highways, picnic areas, historical ruins and the interior of all vehicles). When you consider alcohol
restrictions in the UK or Sweden, the
Turkish ban seems compliant. However, critics argue that there was no real
call for the ban as Turkey has the
lowest alcohol consumption in Europe
at 1.5 litres per capita.
Lastyear,whenErdoansyoungest
daughter walked out of Young Osman,
a play based on the youthful, reforming sultan, Osman II, at the Ankara
State Theatre, claiming she had been
insulted by an actor, the PM threatened to withdraw state support from
Turkeys theatres. Among several others,Erdoanhasalsolookedtointro
duce restrictions to the timing of
abortions and public displays of affection. However, these moral and cultural intrusions by the state cannot be
said to not impinge on the lifestyles of
an excusively secular contingent.
Edorgans decision to build a third
bridge over the Bosphorus, naming it
after Sultan Selim I nicknamed Selim the Grim following a massacre of
Turkeys Alevi population (a sect of
Shia Islam with aspects of Sufism who
espouse mystic poetry, music and
dance) in the Fifteen-century is seen
as a provocation to Turkeys existing
largest minority. Liberal and Anticapitalist Muslims (Antikapitalist Mslmanlar) advocating pluralism are also
affected by government policies,
hence their involvement (albeit to a
lesser extent than the main body of
secular protesters) in Occupy Gezi.
At Gezi Park I saw a banner held
aloft by two head-scarfed women
which read, the trees bow down before God. A quote from the Quran.
Another banner displays a line
from My Name is Red by Turkeys
Nobel Prize winning author, Orhan
Pamuk, I dont want to be a tree, I
want to be its meaning.
While there are pictures of John

Lennon and Yoko Ono along with
messages of non-violence, its encouraging to the see that a majority of the
content used to symbolise the multifarious concerns of the protesters are
mostly Turkish or of their own heritage
and culture. In other words, they are
not relying on western counter-cultural
figures.
Close to a group of practising musicians sat on the edge of a flower bed,
I stop by a wishing tree from which
post-it notes of different colours loll
from its branches, a wish scribbled on
each one. I recognise a name written
onapinknote,NzmHikmet,aTurk
ish poet and revolutionary. I cannot
translate the rest and ask my someone
to help. It reads, To live! Like a tree,
alone and free, and like a forest in
brotherhood / this is our longing.
*
Jay
Weissberg,
a
film
critic
with Variety, wrote in her LRB blog
that, Several people I spoke to at the
[Istanbul Film] festival said the programme of demolition is part of the
Erdoangovernmentslongtermgoal
of eliminating Turkeys multiethnic Ottoman identity. I had wondered
ifErdoanspolicieswereinsomeway
a resurfacing of the Islamic building
blocks that made Istanbul the capital
of the Ottoman Empire following the
ruthless secularisation of Turkey by
Ataturk. When Atila Dorsay wrote of
the historic reservoir and lifestyle the
19
Emek Cinema Theatre represented, of

its symbolic and real value, and
moreover when director Costas-Gravas wrote that it was like eradicating
the memory of the past, they were
right, but couldnt the same be said for
the cultural amnesia Turkey suffered
as a result of Ataturks own singlemindedness?
In establishing the Turkish Republic
from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire,
Ataturk expurgated the countrys Islamic elements by eradicating Arabic
script and adopting a new Turkish alphabet (modified Latin form). He introduced European dress codes, laws
and calender, including the controversial ban of women wearing headscarves if working in the public sector.
Such a bouleversement resulted, according to Esma Kurklu, a screenwriter
for the satirical TV show Heberler, in a
kind of schizophrenia. In an article for
The Wall Street Journal by novelist
Lawrence Osborne, she says, The
country is moving back to its Ottoman
subconscious. This in no way means
a return to a theocracy based
on rigid notions of hierarchy and order,
with a sultan exercising absolute
power. As Zeynep Fadillioglu the first
woman in history to design a mosque:
the Sakirin in Istanbul says in Osbornes article:
Urban elitism was always the
problem in this country. Istanbul is not a bridge between
East and Westits a bridge
between two versions of the
East. The secular Kemalist
elite lorded it over everyone
else, and that could not go on.
So the Islamic element had to

be admitted into the picture
eventually. Its an inevitable
process [] But we have
evolved too far to become
some kind of Islamic state
now. Its too late. Look around
youWhat we are seeing, really, is the inevitable converging of two Turkish societies:
rural, Muslim Anatolia and
elite, intellectual, secular
IstanbulItll be a bit tense for
a while.
The Ottoman Empire under Sultan
Mahmud II had understood the need to
modernise. He heeded the technological superiority of Europe and instigated the various reforms that resulted in
the burfication of Ottoman education
and ultimately the Decree of Tanzimat
(1839).
Before now the two Turkish societies
were kept separate. One had been
stunted in its need to modernise by the
fall of the Ottoman Empire, the second
relegated it to museums in London
and other cities and imposed, as mentioned, a kind of cultural amnesia on
the people of Turkey.
Critics say Ataturk went too far with
his reforms, that they are outdated and
overly nationalistic. After ten years in
power perhaps the same might be said
ofErdoan,onlyfromtheoppositeend
of the spectrum. The PM has said that
the redevelopment of Taksim and Gezi
Park will include a rebuilding of the
Ottoman-replica Barracks that once
stood there, and that this is a matter of
having a respect for history. Nonetheless, it is a misreading reading of his-
tory he claims to respect it is guided

by the greedy development of commercial capitalism.
*
In 1544, two Syrian merchants introduced coffee to Istanbul and thereafter
coffee houses became very popular
around commercial areas of the city.
They were frequented first of all by
men who advocated a love of high
culture, enjoyed chess, read books
and wrote poetry. Coffeehouse culture
become more popular and widespread, and acted as an escape from
the social hierarchy of the time, with
people of varying demographics coming together for the first time under the
same roof. Clubs and associations
were formed, information, ideas, gossip and rumours exchanged, which
posed a threat to established social
and political order. As vehicles for political debate and mobilization, attempts
were
madeto
shut
coffeehouses down all over the Ottoman Empire. This top down approach
failed as ruling order failed to modernise and provide an adequate space for
the public sphere.
Can the same parallel be made with
Erdoanandhistableoperations?
In his attempts to restrict people from
expressing themselves both singular
and collectively in the public space, to
engage sufficiently in the public
sphere, and by limiting the information
made available to them by state-influenced newspapers and television, it
would seem then that culture has
moved into the virtual domain of Twitter.
Want to advertise on our new site?

Contact Managing Editor
phil@walesartsreview.org
To get our ad sales package
20
Oh, Newport, My Lionheart: 30 years of Music and Nightlife in the City of Cider
and Steel
by Craig Austin
Let the bombs rain down on London and Bristol. But
most of all, on dirty little Newport Nazi propagandist,
William Joyce, Lord Haw-Haw.
Somebody, in FHM I think, wrote that it was one of the
Top 50 best nights out in the world, ever. So to me, thats
a pretty good night out, isnt it? a TJs punter reminisces about the period when Newport threatened to become
the new Seattle.
ewport is a town that wears its city status as
uneasily as the awkward looking man who is
handed a tie by the sniffy matre d of a fancy
upmarket restaurant. It is not in the business of
slavishly following fashion or the latest metropolitan trends
and moreover it will instinctively mistrust and be wary of
you if it senses that you might possibly be one of those
people. Newport will hug you to its manly tattooed bosom,
it will buy you a pint, and let you cadge a fag off it, but it will
also rough you up, try and cop off with your girlfriend, and
will always, always, take the piss out of you. It is the city in
which Joe Strummer dug graves, it is the city that dragged
Morrissey from its stage, the city that almost killed Paul
Wellers solo career stone dead, and it is the unlikely
setting of an organic mid-90s music scene that pogo-ed its
way across the Atlantic from the newsprint sheets of the
South Wales Argus to the glossy pages of Rolling Stone in
what seemed like a matter of months.
A contemporary outsiders view of the city, its culture, and
its people has in all likelihood been shaped via the ruthlessly unscrupulous camera lens of the interloper; its most
recent national exposure having been Channel 4s craven
and exploitative schlock-fest Bouncers, and the shamelessly opportunistic and geographically inaccurate
global internet phenomenon, Newport State of Mind. By
way of contrast, this writers experience of the city, its
music and its nightlife, is one underpinned by a redolent
sense of both affection and gratitude. At an early age,
Newport emboldened me with a purpose of spirit, an entrenched sense of belonging and camaraderie, and a
weapons-grade bullshit detector that works as effectively
now as the day it was first bestowed upon me. It is the
place where, under age, I first managed to negotiate my
way past the doors of a nightclub, where I first tasted the

heady toxic blast of an American cigarette and, as the
fickle finger of fate would have it, where I first met the
stripy-stockinged goth girl from Blaenau Gwent whom I
would one day marry. And it all happened here, here in
Newport.
Despite its prevailing folklore, Newport was never my
Seattle, nor my New York, though I did spend the entirety
of my childhood in the leaden concrete new town of Cwmbran, its de facto New Jersey. To me, Newport was always
Las Vegas, or perhaps most fittingly, Atlantic City .A shimmering, steamy blue-collar haven of exoticism and sin, its
bright golden lights smeared with the stubborn late-night
stains of blood, sweat and curry sauce. And loud: Newport
was loud. A sea of heaving pubs, clubs, and coruscatingly
tinny jukeboxes that tore at your eardrums and your heartstrings in equal measures, its glamorous jumble of dry ice,
neon lights and Marlboro smoke a tantalising beacon of
wanton desire and boundless possibility. And Cardiff?
Cardiff was rubbish. A blandly unimaginative live music
scene of formulaic jazz-funk and soulless AOR rock bands
that routinely prized joylessly earnest musicianship over
either maverick inspiration or ragged individuality. Cardiff
may aspire to be a world city now but in the 1980s it quite
happily aspired to be Level 42. Newport, in stark contrast,
would never have set its sights so unpardonably low,
Newport being a place that wouldnt have even allowed
Level 42 into its tinny nicotine-stained jukeboxes. In
thought and in deed, Newport only ever aspired to be The
Clash. To quote the one-time Newport art college attendee
and council gravedigger who would later reinvent himself
as the bands now legendary agitprop vocalist: Like trousers, like mind. And Newport is a city that does not wear
flares.
The Newport music scene to which I was initially and
hypnotically drawn, was unapologetically tribal in its makeup, a gloriously rag-bag collective of the artistic, the creative, and the terminally disaffected; a standalone community of goths, glam metallers, and a puritanical military wing
of what constituted the post-punk scene of that era. Writ
through it all though was an underlying leitmotif of working
class peacockery, a manner of dressing that harks back to
the late 1940s and which differentiates between those who
21
undertake jobs grounded in drudgery and repetition, and

those whose working lives are either more moneyed or
more personally fulfilling. At its core is the simple premise
that the working class love to glam up for a night out (and
more importantly, are good at it), and the middle class who
dont (and arent).
In any event, the South Wales of this period was still
licking its wounds from the monumental kicking it had only
recently taken from the Conservative government of the
day, and whilst the NUMs death or glory strike of 84/85
had been massively supported by the politically motivated
bands and promoters of that era who had arranged benefit
gigs and solidarity fundraisers for the entirety of the struggle, the miners, and by association South Wales, had
nevertheless woken up to a defeat that was utterly devastating and one that at the time it looked unlikely to ever
recover from. The parallels between the working class
experience of South Wales and the more industrialised
regions of the USA were plain to see and it therefore felt
entirely natural that the politicised punks of the early 1980s
gravitated towards their similarly motivated musical peers
on the other side of the pond. For where Thatcher implemented monetarism as a ruthless political weapon in the
UK, the devastating realities of Reaganomics were having
an equally crushing impact upon the traditional heavy
industries of the US. In the documentary film, American
Hardcore, Vic Bondi of Articles of Faith sums up Hardcores response to the Reagan era: Everyone was saying
it was Morning in America, someone had to say its
fucking midnight!
Dean Lewis, an active member of Newports alternative
punk scene of the 1980s (and now the Design Editor of this
very publication), recalls the period with much affection,
and with it the hugely influential impact of Cheap Sweaty
Fun, the organisers and promoters of many of that scenes
now seminal shows: Cheap Sweaty Fun really grew from
the point at which they booked Husker Du to play the Stow
Hill Labour Club, though at the time people were really
worried that they were going to lose money from it. It was
500 to book the band, which really was a lot of money in
those days, but Husker Du records were selling in huge
numbers in Newport at the time, mainly through Simon
Phillips Rockaway Records.
Rockaway played a pivotal role within the scene, being
the primary means of obtaining imported US vinyl for a
demanding Newport customer base that employed the
most creative and resourceful means of getting its hands
on these precious artefacts, as Dean recalls: American
shops and fans would be after British punk and skinhead
records they just couldnt get over there, and given that the
most effective way of bypassing customs regulations was
to mark a consignment as a gift, thats what wed do.
Because of that, a huge amount of transatlantic exchange
took place, of records and of ideas, and it always helped
that Rockaway always had the most desirable stock because of its relationship with record labels like SST.
As his relationship with the people in and around Rockaway grew, Dean became more and more involved with
Cheap Sweaty Fun and reflects upon the massive impact
that that initial Husker Du gig had upon Newport:
think that the fire limit on the Labour Club was

three hundred but we probably had about five
hundred in there. It was the hottest, sweatiest night
imaginable and Husker Du were just stuck in the
corner. Speaking to them afterwards they loved
the gig but they were more than a little bit intimidated by the experience because it was so rammed,
people were so close. We took it in turns to go
down the front to keep people off the monitors, but
the nature of our gigs was that they were always
physical but no-one ever tolerated anybody who
might turn up just to cause trouble.
It was a scene that at its core operated from a fundamental place of equality, inclusion and fairness. We never,
ever had a guest list, Dean makes clear, still with an
evident degree of pride.
Everyone paid to get in, including the people who
were putting on the shows, and wed always muck
in and help people out, financially or otherwise, if
they needed it. Wed travel a lot to see bands too,
and in big numbers. Hitch-hiking mainly, and it was
often the case that at a motorway service station
or some other stop-off youd bump into other people from Newport who were travelling to see a
different band.
The Butthole Surfers was another pivotal US band that
the Newport punk scene claimed as their own. When the
Buttholes played they had one of the most bizarre riders Id
ever seen, Dean recalls.
When you read about the kinds of excess demanded by Led Zep and the like, the Buttholes rider was
something entirely different. It was the first time
theyd played Newport, again at Stow Hill Labour
Club, and they asked for a hundred wooden pegs,
three old ladies dresses, some red and green food
dye, some safety pins, and a dozen condoms. So
people went round Newports shops picking this
stuff up, and when Gibby, their singer, took to the
stage he was wearing all three of these dresses at
the same time with all one hundred wooden pegs
in his hair. As a visual thing, it was fantastic. The
condoms had been filled with the food colouring
and pinned to the dresses and whilst it looked
really good it was really unnerving at the same
time. He stripped off the dresses and broke the
condoms so he was covered in the food colouring.
It had poured into his boots and at one point he
took off one boot and drunk from it, real schlockhorror stuff. It was a brilliant gig, loads of people
there, but the committee of Stow Hill Labour Club
were not happy the next day. The green and red
dye had soaked into their sprung wooden dance
floor and had refused to come out and although we
thought we were going to be banned from putting
any more gigs on there it became fairly clear that
the money they were making from our shows was
the one thing keeping the Labour Club going. We
were keeping it afloat.
It was due to be the first date of their first proper

British tour, but in reality they ended up playing a
It wasnt all thrills, spills and food colouring though, and
secret gig in London the night before. And though
wed been concerned that the gig might end up Dean makes no effort to conceal an almost wilful absence
losing money when it came to the night itself it was of professionalism that resulted in the inadvertent sabolike Ah fuck, please dont let anyone else in! I tage of one of the scenes potentially biggest paydays:
22
When I first get involved with Disorganisation, a

different promoters but still very much part of the
same scene, they were really struggling to sustain
things financially, even the benefits they were
putting on, which were in support of the NUM
initially and then Ethiopian famine relief after that.
They were putting on three anarcho bands on the
same bill which was all very well but never likely to
attract a big crowd. I encouraged them to put on a
more varied bill, to put on more local bands. By
that time wed got to know a band from Cardiff
called No Choice and through them we also got
introduced to a band from Hull called Threaction.
No Choice approached us about a three-band tour
involving them, Threaction, and another band, also
from Hull, called The Housemartins who they suggested should headline. A suggestion I stomped
all over. I didnt think you could have a band like
The Housemartins headlining one of our gigs, not
based on the type of music that the people who
came to our shows liked. So I told them that we
wouldnt be booking the Housemartins as headliners because they were shit!
I ask Dean how much The Housemartins were asking for
to be the headline act. Fifty quid! he laughs. I told them
they could play but there was no way they would be
headlining. So in the end they didnt play. And though I
cant now remember who we eventually booked in their
place I do know that by the time the date that The Housemartins should have played came around, the date upon
which they should have been playing the Stow Hill Labour
Club for fifty quid, they were number two in the charts with
Happy Hour. The proper charts! He laughs again, pondering the tragicomic outcome of his actions: What a twat!
Most tellingly however, Dean is keenly driven to share
what he believes to be the true legacy of that scene, and
the impact that it had upon the hearts and minds of those
that it touched:
All the people that I knew that were involved in that
mid-80s punk/American Hardcore movement, go
find them now and Id estimate that the vast majority of us are either working in education, particularly alternative education, or health, particularly
mental health. Theres an empathy there that
comes from the way we all treated each other
when we put those gigs on, and looking after
youngsters at those gigs too.You had some really
young kids who came to those shows, but you
knew that at any gig in Newport as soon as somebody went down on the floor there were at least
three of four pairs of hands waiting to drag them
back up again. Thats just the way it was.
The eventual closure of Stow Hill Labour Club saw
Cheap Sweaty Fun move its ramshackle charabanc to, at
first Newport Centres Riverside suite, and latterly TJs
nightclub in Clarence Place, a venue of legendary civic
pride and forever the spiritual home of the citys alternative
nightlife scene. Other venues and hangouts came and
went, most notably Brahms & Liszt, a decadent
sleaze/glam hybrid of Weimar Berlin, Studio 54 and the
Blitz club. A bar/club/hideaway that succeeded in creating
a subculture all of its own and whose certificate would
surely be R18 should a warts-and-all big-screen biopic
ever be filmed about its most theatrical and notorious

clientle. Its soundtrack is already in the public domain
however. It is performed by Soft Cell and is titled Non-Stop
Erotic Cabaret.
It is the musical and inspirational legacy of TJs, however,
that towers above everything else in the city, even now,
over three years after its untimely closure. And in discussing the legacy of TJs it is impossible to do so without
focusing upon the ungovernable spirit of the man who put
the J into its name. John Sicolo, both in reputation and
physique, was an uncompromising giant of Newport, a city
whose traditional qualities he most uncannily embodied.
Melody Maker writer David Bennun, who was once
dragged to the club by inebriated members of the 60ft
Dolls, remembers him as a terrifying hybrid of Tom Jones
and The Incredible Hulk. An Italo-Welsh seaman of no
fixed temperament, Sicolo assumed the default father
figure role of a scene, and a whole swathe of like-minded
bands, that in the mid 1990s briefly threatened to take on
the world with an attitude and swagger inherited from its
punk rock predecessors.
Formerly El Siecos, TJs, or latterly, The Legendary
TJs, a term coined by the equally iconic John Peel, it
acted as the scenes default HQ, its CBGBs, a venue
whose medieval toilet facilities it irrefutably shared with its
South Wales counterpart. Peel didnt actually visit the club
until almost a decade after he first began to eulogise it, but
by the time that he did the self-mythologising legend of
Newport being the new Seattle had already taken hold.
Sicolo himself was not immune to the allure of self-mythology, a very Newport trait in itself. It was allegedly he who
put about the (ultimately false) rumour that it was at TJs
where Kurt Cobain had proposed to Courtney Love. It is
true that Cobain and Love had been at the venue. Hole
played more than one show there, Sicolo had cooked for
them (as he did for many of the clubs headline bands), and
they had indeed spent the night in the flat above the venue.
Subsequently, Sicolo had allegedly threatened to cut up
the sheets under which they had slept and sell them off to
gullible internet punters, another Newport rumour that it
would be nice to think had more than a threadbare basis in
fact. When The Guardian, The Times, and most
notably Rolling Stone started to visit, and write about, the
city with an agenda that reeked of a next big thing skeetshoot however it climaxed in a fleeting golden period of
alt-pop paradise that its keenest foot-soldiers still reminisce about with dewy-eyed, broken-veined, nostalgia to
this day.
Aside from the mad rush of global media fascination, this
period also saw Cerys Matthews Catatonia shoot the
promo film for their breakthrough hit Mulder and Scully at
the club, and culminated in James Dean Bradfield of the
then all-conquering Manic Street Preachers ruminating
onstage at the Newport Centre about the time when he
was randomly set upon by strangers in a nearby branch of
McDonalds, his jaw broken in several places. I didnt
understand those people at the time, he mused, but I do
now. Whilst Newports Pillgwenlly Library was the original
inspiration for the line about libraries giving us power in A
Design for Life, the bands signature treatise on class
consciousness and the Welsh working class experience, it
is equally and undeniably true that Newport is a city that
revels in its reputation as a place where We dont talk
about love / We only want to get drunk.
Antonia Edwards, a devotee of TJs in its twilight years,
remembers John Sicolo with undiluted affection:
23
Theres a lovely photo of us both taken in around

2008 (Right). It was one of the last times I ever
went to TJs and one of the last times I ever saw
John before he passed away.
If Im honest I was only fourteen or fifteen when I

first used to go there. I used to go out with an older
boy from school who DJd there and other friends
of mine had got into Newports alternative scene,
we were classed as moshers, and so TJs was
obviously the place youd go to. Because of my
age I had to sneak out and make up all sorts of lies
to get there though. I used to climb out of our study
window, pick up my nu-rock boots that Id left
outside, run down the drive, up over the hill, and
into the taxi that would be waiting for me there.
Either that or Id go to friends houses on a Friday
night and wed all make up stories for our respective parents about where we were supposed to be.
It was a timeless generational ruse that only worked for
a limited period however.
Its possible that it is the legacy of the citys punk scene,

through all of its various guises and generations, that
singles out a Newport audience as being anything but a
passive one. This writers first experience of a live show in
the city ended in Morrissey, then of The Smiths, a band in
the throes of its The Queen Is Dead imperial phase, being
dragged from the stage of the Newport Centre by a throng
of Ringland Ruffians. He was not to return, and whilst the
delicate Stretford flower recuperated in the A&E department of the Royal Gwent Hospital the remainder of an
increasingly frustrated audience responded to this perceived indignity by commencing the wholesale dismantling
of the venue with undisguised rage. The bands live sound
engineer Grant Showbiz took to the stage to apologise on
behalf of the band and promptly received a bottle in the
face for his troubles. He was also taken to hospital, the
police called, and six people eventually arrested. The
Smiths were never to play either Newport or Wales again.
Tony Fletcher, in his much-lauded biography of the
band, There is a Light that Never Goes, seeks to encapsulate the incident in terms of the intrinsic parallel pride of
both the band and the city:
Newport was a tough Welsh city rapidly losing its
dock and ironworks jobs, and Smiths fans were
always excitable by nature but this (over)reaction
(arguably on both sides) seemed to represent a
breach in the long-standing trust between group
and audience.
A similar incident occurred in Preston only a matter of

days later, an incident exacerbated by the wilful misreportMy mum would turn up at the club on a number of ing of The Smiths Newport experience according to the
occasions looking for me, which was fairly embar- bands virtuoso guitarist, Johnny Marr:
rassing. And to make it worse, John would occaIt started at Newport where Morrissey, through
sionally give me a rollicking. He probably
nothing more sinister than over enthusiasm, got
suspected I was underage but I dont think he ever
dragged into the crowd. He was shaken, a bit
cottoned on to quite how underage I was. I rememconcussed, and had a bump the size of an egg on
ber that one of the nights my mum turned up there
the side of his head. There was no way he could
was a Guns N Roses tribute band on and even
have carried on. That all happened about three
after shed spoken with John and both of them had
quarters of the way through the set, with maybe
given me a dressing down she ended up staying
four songs left to go. The following day,
regardless and she ended up having a great time.
though, The Sun reports that in the middle of the
first song, at the point where Morrissey holds up
John was great. He looked out for all of us and I
the Queen Is Dead banner, he was attacked by
had so much respect for him. From the age of
outraged royalists. Can you imagine it? Royalists
fourteen or fifteen right up to twenty-one that place
in Newport!
was my life. It was such a happy place. I make it
sound like a cult, which it wasnt, but it did feel like
The equally forthright Paul Weller who, according to his
one big happy family. We all cared about each
other. We all looked out for each other, but ulti- long-serving drummer Steve White, was on his arse on a
mately it was all about the music, always about the business level at the point he sought to kick-start his
music. Bands saw it as an important part of the faltering solo career from the ashes of The Style Council in
scene too and even when bigger bands like Ma- 1991 also encountered the beery gallows humour of a
chine Head would play places like Newport Centre Newport audience during a criminally undersold show,
it was always TJs that theyd gravitate to for their again at Newport Centre:
after-show parties.
Oh God, yeah. He sort of walked onstage and he
said, Its like a fucking morgue in ere. And they
Johns untimely death hit Antonia hard, but she is keen
all started chanting: Its like a fucking morgue in
to remember both him and his club in only the most positive
yer! Its like a fucking morgue in yer!
of terms.
24
At the same time, White is equally keen to make clear

but the love was there, and this experience, most recently recalled by White in the documentary film Paul
Weller: Into Tomorrow, has not prevented Weller from
returning to the same venue to play before (a significantly
bigger) Newport audience since.
Whilst a Newport audience of 1986 may well have seen
itself as a victim of the dismantling of heavy industry, and
the career and life opportunities that this inevitably constrained, the Newport of 2013 finds itself in equally challenging straits, if for radically different reasons. The city
has, by any estimation, been especially cruelly impacted
by the seemingly interminable effect of the global financial
crisis. Testament to this is the ghostly trail of abandoned
shops and premises that litter its traditional shopping
streets, the desolate craters that constitute capitalisms
global bombsites and the joyless consequence of the
on-going Americanisation of our city centres, the siphoning
off of its businesses to identikit out-of-town Lego-parks, the
dreary suburbanisation of our complicit existences.
The citys nightlife has not been immune to this onslaught
with further additions to the unremitting litany of pubs and
club closures occurring on an all too frequent
basis. Newport is a place thats never been averse to a pint
and a fight however, and the fight to preserve the right for
the citys revellers to continue to down that pint has been
taken up by a number of its most spirited licensees. When
I speak with Sam Dabb, manager of Newports most creative and inspirational live music venues, Le Pub, I am
struck by her resilience, her sense of purpose, and her
steely civic pride. Having once been one of its resident DJs
during the venues early years (albeit on a very loose
contract best described as a drink as you play arrangement) it is a venue that is especially dear to me, holding
some of my finest memories of what constitutes a truly
splendid night out in the indefatigable city of cider and
steel. Despite recently being shortlisted for the NMEs Best
Small Venue award its 20+ year existence was only recently at very real threat of closure. Le Pub, and its defiant
landlady I simply wasnt having it fought a valiant and
high-profile campaign in support of the venue that demonstrated not just the love that Newport has for Le Pub, but
also the esteem that it is held in by the alternative community at large. Kids in Glass Houses did a benefit show for
us, Sam says, and we had a lot of support on Twitter
through tweets and retweets by some really massive,
massive bands, they were all behind the campaign.
With a successful battle fought and won, and a new
five-year lease in place, Le Pub nevertheless remains
almost the sole source of live contemporary rocknroll in
the city. As such, it has assumed even more of an important cultural role and become even more of a rallying point
for the live music scene at large; even more so since the
closure of the still deserted TJs. Yeah, were the only one
left in many ways, Sam continues. The Murenger is still a
lovely pub and a lot of the alternative crowd still drink there,
but theres no music in there and so hardly qualifies as a
music venue. It says a lot for the Murenger and Rob (Rob
Jones, its ebullient landlord) that it still manages to attract
those people and be classed as a kind of alternative music
venue. Its all down to Rob whos a brilliant landlord.
I ask Sam if with a greater focus of influence comes an
even greater sense of responsibility to the scene, and to
Newport: Yeah definitely. If we go, then Newport goes, it
would be absolutely screwed as far as live music is concerned.
Sam is anything but a defeatist though and she has

begun to observe some welcome chinks of light:
The spirit, the Newport spirit, is still there and thats
great to see. I see new rehearsal rooms opening
up and because everything is cyclical it would be
nice to think that were coming out of the worst
period and into a new productive phase. Theres
no money from record labels to fund things anymore so bands need to work so much harder to
achieve things, and because of that they need
more support than they might previously have
needed.
There does appear to be a kindred sense of community
within the scene, a sense of bonding that comes with
constantly needing to surf the same choppy waves of
adversity. Less choice has driven an urban brotherhood
that has seen Le Pub embark upon numerous ventures
that has seen it partner with both its longest-standing
independent record store, Diverse Music, and the citys
current stellar commercial success story, the Tiny Rebel
Brewery. The ever-present allure of Cardiff remains a real
problem for Newports pubs and clubs however, in the
same way that it does for much of its daytime traders.
No-one drinks in the same place for the whole of a night
anymore, Sam explains,
and because were the only pub of its kind in
Newport, people end up trailing off into Cardiff,
simply because theres nowhere else similar to go.
Weve taken on a booking agent to deal with much
bigger bands though so Im looking forward to
what we might be putting on in the future. Hes
booked a load of great bands already and so Im
very excited about that. We need to be positive.
Just look at Tiny Rebel; they met the targets of
their initial five-year business plan in less than half
of that time. Weve got an independent skate store,
and where most places dont even have one independent record shop, weve got two. A lot of people put a lot of negative spin on Newport but its
actually a great place.
Both her resilience to succeed and her faith in the future is
utterly unwavering:
Keep fighting us and well just fight back even
harder.
When the going gets tough, the vultures start swarming,
and whilst the negative short-term reputational impact of
Channel 4s Bouncers did little for the perception of either
the city or its night-time offering, the flagrant transparency
of what amounted to little more than opportunistic povertyporn by a once-progressive broadcaster was the real ignominy of the piece.
For Goldie Lookin Chain however who, along with
Skindred, constitute one the two genuine breakout acts
that Newport has produced in the last decade, the global
internet phenomenon of Newport State of Mind was a lot
harder to take. Though filmed in and around Newport (by
day-tripping English people, no less), and though much
adored by many of its citizens, the band took understandable exception to what was by most estimations a flagrant
steal of their parochially gonzo take on both hip-hop and
the decadent underground pleasures of the city itself. Their
25
almost immediate response Newport State of Mind (Youre

Not from Newport) is a magnificently resplendent rebuttal
of the venture, and an exemplary illustration of righteous
get your tanks off my lawn indignation. Its sublime kiss-off
of a chorus Youre not from Newport / I bet youve never
been there either / Ill bet you a fiver achieves so much
more than this writer is capable of in succinctly encapsulating the age-old urban principle of declaring that whilst its
OK for us to disparage our city, its people, and its pubs,
woe betide the opportunistic interloper who seeks to play
by the same rules, who seeks to cash in his gravy and
chips without first having concluded his sticky-carpeted
tour of duty. For like all those who hold the Peoples
Republic of Newport dear, the GLC acknowledge the degree to which it would be a capital crime to allow a city that
was once perceived to be an unofficial cultural satellite of
Minneapolis to be latterly viewed as merely a disorderly
and unbecoming subsidiary of Cardiff, to see what was
once the new Seattle mutate into the new Detroit. Because, as historical experience has taught us, without the
requisite investment of thought, attention, and deed that its
proud heritage and rich history surely deserves that could
all happen here, here in Newport.
Dylan Thomas: The Industry of Tragedy and the Antithetical Mask

by Gary Raymond
n December 8th 1953, almost exactly a month after
the death of Dylan Thomas, Christopher Isherwood opened his diary to
commit to posterity his encounters
with the controversial Welsh poet.
Stephen Spender had asked Isherwood to write a piece about Thomas,
but Isherwood noted that my memories were unsuitable for an obituary
notice But Id better record them
here, before they get too vague.
Isherwood, who lived in Los Angeles
and had done since fleeing with Auden
England and the War in 1939, had
rescued Thomas from the indifferent
treatment of the English faculty at
UCLA one April morning in 1950. Thomas and Isherwood had not met before, and Thomas, as was so often the
case, was stuck, having been given
only the number for a bus on how to
reach the venue. Isherwood picked
Thomas up from the morning desolation of the bar at the Biltmore Hotel
and drove him to the university where
he was to give an afternoon reading.
The impression he made on me was,
Isherwood wrote, primarily, of struggle. He seemed to be right in the midst

of his life not off on one side looking
at it.
Thomas had started the day with
drink, he drank some more during a pit
stop at Isherwoods house in the Valley, and then continued drinking at
lunch as the guest of the English faculty. Isherwood remembers the bogus,
oily, sanctimonious academics at
UCLA treating Thomas with contemptible prissiness. Attracted to
the dangerousness in his verse, they
were turned off by Thomas performance in person, his lewdness and casual frequent deployment of the
four-letter word; Its the attitude of the
small boy, wrote Isherwood, who
would love (he thinks) to have the
roaring tigers leap into the room out of
his picture books, but who doesnt
want to be afraid of them if they appear.
Thomas got drunk before the reading, but read beautifully Isherwood
was extremely impressed (elsewhere
in his diary, many many years later, he
watches Gielgud and Edith Evans re-
cite some poems at a cocktail party in

Hollywood and notes that they sounded like amateurs compared to Dylan
Thomas). When the reading was over,
the two of them escaped, Thomas now
in excitable mood at the prospect of
the entertainment Isherwood had lined
up for him.
Thomas had wanted to meet a Hollywood actress any Hollywood actress
and his idol, Charlie Chaplin, and
Isherwood had used his connections
for the two of them to have dinner at a
restaurant with Chaplin and Shelley
Winters. The meeting was either a
disaster or a slapstick farce, depending on which way you look at it. Isherwood, ever the gentleman, tends to
give Thomas, of whom he was clearly
personally fond, the benefit of the
doubt. But the facts remain that Thomas insulted Chaplin (enough for the
auteur to mention it in his autobiography), before wrestling Shelley Winters
to the floor over the back of her chair
whilst trying to grab her breasts (Winters took it in very good humour, apparently). Later on, when the party
moved on to a bar on Sunset Boule-
26
vard, and everything became even

more muddled with booze, Thomas
tried to fight a screenwriter who had
been talking to Isherwood, taking a run
up to him like a cartoon bull. Thomas
was, famously, as quick to dive into a
brawl as he was useless in the fight.
He was repelled with great ease and
ran into the night. Isherwood did not
see him again until a chance encounter at the Chelsea Hotel in New York
almost two years later.
And so, it seems, was a somewhat
typical encounter with Dylan Thomas.
And as is often the case, the confluent
themes of such stories involved his
drinking, his inexcusable behaviour
when drunk, and the genuine warmth
the memoirist feels for and sees in the
man. That his legend has been built
just as much upon these traits as it has
on his work is irrefutable; that his legend would be less had his public story
been different is also quite probable.
The truth is that no twentieth century
writer has a posthumous reputation of
such standing that is so dependent on
their behavioural legend like Thomas
even writers such as Plath and
Woolf, whose disintegrations have attracted an industry of comment, have
their biographies subsumed by
their oeuvre rather than competing
with it.
But here lies the inescapable truth of
Thomas his most vital creation was
not in his work, but it was in his persona. The Dylan that Thomas created
was what allowed him to be the poet
on the page that he needed to be, it
facilitated the mining of his poetical
gift: a perversion of what Yeats called
the antithetical self.
Yeats wrote in A Vision of the two
poles of the self, the primary, that
which is reasonable and moral, and
the antithetical, that which is our inner
world of desire and imagination. The
antithetical self is familiar to the writer
of fiction, it is the business of the day;
but Thomas utilised an antithetical self
in order to survive, not only economically, hired out as a performing monkey to the bourgeoisie, but in order
that he could live in desperate loyalty
to the poetic truth that he committed to
paper. In more ways than one, it was
his antithetical self, that which created
his
legend,
that
allowed
his primary self to write.
That this creation also proved his
downfall is his most powerful claim to
be the patron saint of the industry of
tragedy.
The prejudices, embellishments and
Chinese whispers that have gone into
the sculpting of Thomas legend are a

predictable offshoot of the life he first
needed to live, and then became
trapped by. It is extremely difficult to
find any reminiscences of Thomas
from his contemporaries the people
who first built his legend that are
wholly reliable; which is why Isherwood one of the twentieth centurys
finest diarists; compassionate, humorous, honest is such a good place to
start when looking.
Even biographers of Thomas, such
as Constantine Fitzgibbon, are unreliable in their purporting of the Thomas
legend, so in thrall as they so often are
to their own ego and place in the developing narrative of legend-making
that they elevate their own prejudices.
In Fitzgibbons case, an aggressive
anti-communist, it is clearly difficult for
him to hide his disdain of figures such
as the King of Bohemia and sometime affiliate of the anarchist movement, Augustus John, whose recorded
reminiscences of his long-time friendship with Thomas (it was John who
introduced Dylan to Caitlin) may not
always be flattering, but they are at
least disinterested in the moulding of
any legend at all. (Check out passing
jibes from Fitzgibbon when writing
about John who, in those pre-war
years, promised to become a great
painter. That he failed fully to keep this
promise was due above all to his extravagant tastes). Fitzgibbon takes
similar snide shots at anybody else
who did not find Thomas as entertaining as they were supposed to.
Fitzgibbon instead decides to align
Thomas with the oddly correlative figure of Theodore Roethke, the big,
womanising, alcoholic, German American poet, who likewise died prematurely (a heart attack at 55) due to his
excessive lifestyle. (That Roethke, often referred to as the greatest American poet of the twentieth century, has
not been subjected to the same canonisation as Thomas perhaps lies in
Americas lack of need for yet
another Hell Raising writer).
Roethke himself remembered Thomas, whom he knew and drank with
for a relatively brief period in Los Angeles, as one of the great ones, there
can be no doubt about that. And he
drank his own blood, ate his own marrow, to get at some of that material.
They are powerful, passionate words,
from one great poet to another, and in
a small way, they elevate the writer of
them as much as they do the eulogised. Nobody doubts the kineticism of
the well from which Thomas drew his
poetics, but here at work are the subtle

cogs of myth-making. To champion
greatness can create an exalted, esoteric pool in which recognised and
recogniser swim together.
This is the starkest evidence that
Thomas no longer belongs to himself,
he belongs to that industry of tragedy;
and it is an important part of the artists
code, the thing that makes the world
go round. (Thomas would no doubt be
over the moon to see how he was
adopted by the literati in his death as
a totemic figure of artistic sacrifice.)
Figures like Thomas are integral to the
standing of the artistic community
the danger, the mysticism, the otherness. That so many people recognised the potential of Thomas the
Legend and that so many chipped in to
consolidate it after his death, is proof
enough that the lucrative offshoot was
cultural as well as fiscal. In poetry
particularly, from Byron to Wordsworth
through Clare and Swinburne to
Pound and Plath, reputation for eccentricity and danger is priceless when
viewed as sincere. Mix that with an
early death, and a poetic destiny that
somehow matches a writer of verse
with an otherworldly essence, and you
have an irresistible legend, one that
reaches way beyond the readers of
poems.
When writing the lives of Thomas
friends and acquaintances, literary biographers have likewise been quick to
use just the two dimensions of Thomas to draw something out of their
own subject, often contributing to the
skewed public character of Thomas
himself. Arthur Koestlers biographer
Michael Scammell noted the attraction
between the two fabled drinking partners as a shared disregard for bourgeois politesse. Their eyes met
across a crowded room and mischievousness sparked.
But Koestler was a brawler, a reactionary, a former vagabond who used
to argue down Sartre and de Beauvoir
into states of turpitude; Koestler was
an intellectual giant whose oxygen
was tearing strips off people in public
drunken debate. Thomas was a very
different creature indeed, although in
his own way just as complex. To bind
the two with their puerile scoffing adds
colour to Koestler, but adds more
monochrome to the picture of Thomas
as parochial clown. Whereas Koestler
was once described as a noble goblin, Thomas is most often referred to
in later years as puffy. There is always a condescending tone, even
from his acolytes, in many accounts of
27
encounters with the bumpkin Thomas;

perhaps if he had ever learned to land
a punch, like Koestler or the fearsome
Roy Campbell often did (the three of
them making Soho their drunken playground during the War), Thomas may
have been written about quite differently.
But it was the certainly more placid
and decidedly more circumspect
Stephen Spender who Thomas first
encountered in London. Spender, in
his Paris Review interview of 1980,
which is bulbous with delicious anecdotes about his encounters with the
likes of Yeats, Hemingway and Woolf,
recounts his first meeting with Thomas. They have lunch in a pub in
Soho, Thomas, Spender, and a friend
of Spenders, invited along
to ensure awkward silences were broken up. And
the friend is needed, as
Thomas is nervous and
pale and largely silent.
This is the Thomas before
he
was
the
hired
entertainment de rigueur of
the socialite scene.
Spender pulls back to an
overview of his relationship
with Thomas; he tells how,
many years later, Thomas
wrote him a very warm letter thanking him for the
hospitality Spender had
shown him when he first
came to London. And then
Spender says: He certainly said extremely mean
things about me behind my
back, of that Im quite sure.
I dont hold that against
him. It was just his style.
We all enjoy doing things
like that.
Here we see the melee
into which Thomas was
flung in the days and
months and years following that initial quiet lunch
with Spender on arrival.
The biting gladiatorial
throng, so well embodied
in the legends of the Bloomsbury Set,
was in full flow, and Thomas was going to have to step up if he was to
stand out. He certainly did that, as the
story goes, by becoming more and
more rambunctious and unpredictable, more shocking, the bumpkin Byron.
But was Thomas malleable to a
scene, rather than stuck in one, or was
he just ignorant and nave? How calculated was this mask? His personal
loyalties certainly seemed reactive,

and not formed with one eye on the
shifting winds. For example, Roy
Campbell was persona non-grata with
the
Bloomsbury
Set
after
his Georgiad lampooned the main figures, (that he was also prone to brawling, jumping on stage and swiping at
Stephen Spender at a poetry recital,
and throwing Jacob Epstein around a
bar, probably didnt help either). But
when Generals Franco and Mola
came up from Morocco in 1936 and
sparked the Spanish Revolution,
Campbell, a staunch Catholic, came
out on the side of the brutal and murderous Nationalists, contrary to most
intellectual opinion in England at the
time.
Thomas, it seemed, ignored both the

school yard spats and the rather more
serious political standpoints of Campbell, and continued friendships on both
sides of the divide. Campbell, many
years later, wrote about his appreciation for Thomas lack of politicking in
these matters; but one must consider
Thomas loyalty to Campbell as perhaps being somewhat lacking in principle rather than smacking of it.
Perhaps it was the loyalty of a friend,
to stand by a supporter of fascism; or

perhaps when John Malcolm Brinnin
commented that Thomas socialism
seemed a pose, and half-hearted,
something simply expected from his
Welshness, he was hitting the nail
firmly on the head. Thomas, in the
end, was ignorant of the politics, and
he just sided with his drinking buddy.
Of course, Campbell and Thomas
(and Koestler) had more in common
than just alcoholism: they were always
broke. Money, or lack of, is another
heavy colour to Thomas story, and
was the strongest compulsion in the
creation of his public character.
It is worth noting here something of
the character of the people who created the legend of Dylan Thomas. They
were often those unfurled from the rarefied
cloisters of Oxbridge,
which further accounts
for the condescending
tone to which Thomas
the person is often subjected in print. It also accounts for the tincture of
vulgarity in Thomas portrait which goes beyond
reaction to his brazen
lewdness. Someone like
Stephen Spender, who
although hardly English
aristocracy, came from a
more entitled world than
Cwmdonkin Drive, commented on how Thomas
was rather obsessed by
money ever the viewpoint of one who had
rarely needed for it when
looking to someone who
was perpetually struggling to feed his wife and
children.
Thomas worked hard
to make ends meet, to
put food on the table.
Perhaps his refusal to do
any work to which he
was not physically or intellectually suited would
be lambasted in certain
circles (especially in todays economically myopic censorious political climate), but in hindsight it is difficult to
criticise his simple wish to feed his
children using his talents, especially
as they were so widely appreciated.
Thomas predicament, and his
stresses, is displayed in painful poignancy in a brief correspondence with
Graham Greene in 1947. Greene is an
influential figure in the British film industry at this point, and Thomas tries
28
to impress upon him an old script he

had written about Edinburgh grave
robbers Burke and Hare. The note
soon degenerates into a begging letter. Michael Redgrave has shown interest in playing in it, he writes, before
a ham-handed segue into a plea regarding his infant sons medical bills
and the writs that keep falling on the
welcome mat. It is painful to read.
Thomas wrote an uncountable
number of such letters throughout his
life.
What we see here is the reality of
Thomas existence, and the strain it
put on him. He was certainly not alone
in his penury as an artist, but there
was money to be made, one way or
the other, in poetry during the thirties
and forties, its just Thomas could not
find a way into the middle-class hold.
But he had something he had been
inadvertently developing that he knew
he could mine: his public personality,
the antithetical mask.
And so as the legend began, it is
quite remarkable how quickly Thomas
grew to look at his new role, and the
demands of it, as a curse.
Novelist and poet Rayner Heppenstall recalls one evening drinking with
Thomas (Thomas downing some local
Cornish moonshine), when Thomas
breathlessly held court for quite some
time before stopping and declaring
rather sadly, Somebodys boring me.
And I think its me.
Already, the man trapped.
After his death, this very real need
was turned into a romantic tragedy by
Thomas contemporaries. Karl Shappiro wrote in 1955, Thomas was the
first modern romantic poet you could
put your finger on, the first whose
journeys and itineraries became part
of his own mythology, the first who
offered himself up as a public sacrifice.
A sacrifice?! To the gods of poetry,
no less!? A cursory reading of Thomas own letters shows clearly a man
just trying to feed his kids. But Shapiro
subscribes to an idea integral to Thomas legend when he goes on to write:
How much did Thomas subscribe to
official Symbolism? How much did
he love death as his major symbol? As
much as any poet I know in the English language. These factions have a
claim on Thomas which we cannot
fully contradict.
But Thomas was not obsessed with
symbols of death, because in some
ethereal poetic bubble he could see
his destiny in his posthumous legend.
The compulsions of Thomas were far
more earthbound, far more serious
than intellectual legacy or celestial

aesthetic vocation. It can be put quite
simply: it was Thomas refusal to dig
ditches for a living, because of his
unquestioning belief in loyalty to his
gifts, that meant he had to become a
performing monkey for socialites and
literati in order to feed his children; his
alcoholism gained legitimacy not only
as Dutch courage, but as part of his
act, and his alcoholism gave him nothing in the tank when pneumonia came,
and the pneumonia killed him.
And it was in death that Thomas was
moved effortlessly, without his say so,
from performing monkey to patron
saint of the ever-vibrant industry of
tragedy. For many years after, publications traded on the memories of and
encounters with the Hell Raiser and
Genius Dylan Thomas. That Isherwood never published his reflection on
Thomas
(until
the
publication
of Diaries, that is, in 1996), adds much
weight to the accuracy of it. Many
other writers, even those who had
always been so opposed to Thomas
and his work, were happy to add to his
legend.
Kingsley Amis, who never quite
came to terms with either Thomas
work or his fame, on news of Thomas
death wrote to Philip Larkin, I dont
grieve for him as a voice for ever silenced, in fact that part of it is pretty
much all right with me.
That Amis thought this is important
because it differs in tone from what he
published on the subject, for The
Spectator in 1957.
There are two accounts from Amis,
a private one and a published one, of
his meeting with Dylan Thomas at one
of Thomas readings at Swansea University when Amis was just 28. The
Spectator account is softer, much
more sympathetic, although the bare
bones of the story remain the same.
The Thomas of The Spectator article
certainly appears to be a trapped public figure. We are introduced to the
Thomas of the tragic myth, he is beleaguered and battered, drunk and
isolated, pecked at by a hanger-on,
Thomas too good natured to ever
turn someone away. Amis concludes
that, contrary to his own previously
held conception, that Thomas attitude was the product of nothing more
self-aware or self-regarding than shyness. Whether true or not, Amis is
contributing to the legend of Thomas,
as one who moved about us with the
black cloud of his own tragic, poetic
destiny overhead, a destiny now fulfilled.
In private, Amis was cutting of Thomas performance, it being filled with

ragged epigrams topped up with
some impressionistic stuff about
America [and] a backlash of dutiful
impropriety. And the poems he spoke
out with his mouth: ooh corks! He
fucked up two of Audens things
from Another Time In the pub afterwards, the more intelligent students
sneered at him gently, and he perceived this. Amis prejudice against
Thomas work informs his rhetoric, just
as his awareness of the industry of
tragedy informs the tone of his piece
for The Spectator; and so the significance of the pieces lies not in the truth
of Thomas character, but in the rigidity of the construction of his legend.
Of his work, Amis was as damning
as he had always been. He once wrote
to Larkin, I just wish hed GROW UP,
and made overt reference to what he
saw as Thomas dressing up a trite
idea in language designed to prevent
people from seeing how trite it is.
Whether Amis is right or not about the
poem in question (he does not name it
in the letter) is perhaps beside the
point; what Amis alludes to here is the
art of showmanship, of showbiz, of
populism.
What Amis claims is that Thomas is
not what he is held up to be. Perhaps
Amis, in his staunch opposition, saw a
central truth to Thomas, even if not for
the right reasons. Is it possible that
Thomas popularity then and now is
due in part to the public being wooed
by the idea of complexity, the garb of
intellectualism, when in fact there is
little profound going on? Add to that
the fact that Thomas legend is attractive in ways that his work is not the
industry of tragedy is and always has
been more alluring than the business
of poetry, even when the two are bedfellows.
Significantly, what Kinglsey Amis
identifies as showmanship he does
not associate with charlatanism. He
explicitly rejects the idea, in private,
that Thomas is a fake, but rather, a
second rate GK Chesterton you
know: frothing at the mouth with piss.
It is no wonder that, from all of this,
a simple, billboard-friendly, and utterly
vaporous idea of the man has
emerged; it is Thomas own creation
after all, one that became so potent it
continues to outlive his primary self.
This essay is taken from the new

collection Encounters with Dylan from
the Hmm Foundation.
29
The Landscapes of Language: A Mississippian in Wales

by Trey McCain
Trey McCain is an American writer,
videographer and language scholar,
raised in Mississippi and currently
residing in New Braunfels, Texas. His
language studies at the University of
Mississippi placed him in Paris where
he developed a strong interest in minority languages and language rights
movements. A cultural exchange visit
to North Wales as part of his degree
sparked a continuing love affair with
Wales and the Welsh language.
*
y best days start on the
street, before the rest of the
house begins to stir. Occasionally I run, but I prefer to slip on
sandals and walk with a pair of bright
pink headphones, lifted from my wifes
bedside table. The dogs bark and often howl as I stroll by, in what I imagine
to be xenophobic fits of rage, while I
avoid eye contact with other early risers. Im practicing my Welsh aloud,
and here in the heart of Texas, it
doesnt do to stick out on the street.
Of course, I have a difficult time
blending in without furrowing my brow
and muttering under my breath. My
red mop of morning hair and matching
beard set me apart in the Texas hill
country and my native Mississippi. My
hair attracted attention from an early
age when my mother would tow me
through the supermarket through what
seemed to be hoards of envious grannies, each with their grasping handful.
It was a surprise for my parents, both
dark brunettes, but then there were a
few cousins on either side with auburn
locks, and didnt Grandma Lille Bell
have red hair? In North Mississippi, its
not uncommon at all to have a redheaded baby, sparking conversations
that sound the depths of family history
and Scotch-Irish heritage.
Like much of Appalachia, of which
Northeast Mississippi constitutes the
final, rolling end, people hearken back
to indefinite Irish and Scottish ancestry
to explain complexions, hair colour

and bad tempers. And while imaginations make leaps that missing census
records encourage, there is some truth
in these folk genealogies. Names like
Carlisle, Carroll, Monaghan and Murphy are plentiful throughout the region,
not to mention my own, McCain.
Speech patterns reveal similar links
with the distant past and the British
Isles. A friends grandmother just a
couple of counties north still calls
boots brogans. Her family has lived in
the area for several generations.
These influences, reinforced by elements of pop culture and historical
narratives, coalesced to form my own
vague, Scotch-Irish identification. So
much so that in 2006, the summer
after my first year at university, I
signed up for a cultural exchange programme that would take me backpacking across Ireland. I had enjoyed my
first year, but I was leaning toward
concentrating in language and wanted
more than the basic French and Spanish offered. So I explored other languages on my own, including Gaelic
and Irish Gaelic. I had heard of summer programmes for students abroad,
and when I learned that backpacking
in Galway was an option, I jumped at
the chance. Too late, it would seem.
When I had news of my application, all
of the places in Ireland were taken. So
were the spots in Scotland, my second
choice. I had been assigned to Wales,
though I barely remembered ticking
the box, much less where it was on the
map.
*
We landed in Manchester Airport at
around 9am. Once collected, we piled
onto a coach and headed for Wales. I
remember pressing my face against
the window, looking at the roundabouts and the cars in the left lane. As
we neared our destination, the mountains and the coastline appeared,
meeting with the suddenness I could
later only describe as Welsh. Our first
stop in an effort to keep us awake

and fight jet lag was Conwy Castle.
At the time, I had no comparable
experience by which to measure that
day, since I had seldom travelled outside of my corner of the South. The
mountains held me in Mississippi wonderment. The breaking waves on
rocky beaches and cliff sides defied
Floridian expectations. The abundance of sheer rock had me grasping
back to the stony faces of Tishomingo
County, my states highest point. The
tide was low when we crossed the
bridge into Conwy, revealing the hulls
of sloops and motorboats, but the sight
that held our gaze was the castle itself,
looming over the shrunken river and
the encircled city, a picturesque scene
to our American minds. That afternoon
we explored turrets, powder keeps
and the walls of the city. By the
evening we were exhausted, ready to
collapse into whatever bunk would
take us to the castle now towering in
our dreams.
Our first week was general orientationatacamponPenLln.Wehadan
introduction to the Welsh language
that included a visit to a Welsh chapel
one Sunday morning. All week long we
had practiced unfamiliar words at the
hands of a patient teacher, managing
to comfortably bid bore da and Be
ydy dy enw di? Chapel was one of our
first opportunities to try our Welsh. We
stumbled over the words in the hymnal, but enjoyed ourselves amid the
rousing chorus the parishioners gave.
The pastor even paused every few
lines in his sermon to give us a synopsis in English in a thick, North Walian
accent. There were so many friendly
faces as we filed out at midday. People were genuinely delighted to hear
their language in our loud American
voices, no matter the forgotten mutations and poorly rolled rs. This first
foray into Welsh in the wild set the
stage for similar encounters all summer long.
30
I remained in North Wales until the

end of July, living in Bangor, but often
visiting Caernarfon, Ynys Mon and
Llandudno. The weather was warm
and sunny that summer, and we spent
many days on walking paths or driving
through the mountains. I didnt make
the effort to speak Welsh every day,
and hindsight has led me to regret
those missed opportunities. However,
Welsh sought me out all the same
during my stay, typically in small moments with people I would characterize as warm and friendly. Ive tried to
keep up with one friend from Penygroes, a kindred wit who taught me to
recite to other speakers, Mae fy marf
yn ogoneddus (my beard is magnificent). That summer was such an important time in my life. It was over
much too soon.
*
Returning home was difficult. My perspective of the world had shifted, while
my friends and family lacked the experiences to make the same leap. One
socio-political behemoth that surfaced
again and again while in Wales was
the Iraq War. Before Wales, I hadnt
given much thought to the necessity
and the justification of the war. Tough
questions abroad led me to examine
the validity of American exceptionalism, the value of nationalism and the
nature of faith in the patriotic and
church-laden South. But these questions were rarely welcome at home. I
found solace in sharing my experiences with some of the students from my
programme. As the year progressed, a
handful of us decided to return to
Wales the following summer.
I had kept up with one student
regularly throughout the year. Amelia
and I had shared several conversations late at night that continued when
we reunited in Wales. The summer
was busy for me, as I spent a couple
of weeks visiting Paris and Brussels as
part of my programme. Amelia and I
stayed in touch by e-mail and enjoyed
the moments we had together in Bangor when our schedules overlapped.
At the end of our time in Wales, we
began dating; we married just two
years later. Today we are able to say
we spent our first day together traipsing around a castle in North Wales. It
makes for an excellent, one-upper story.
Returning for a second summer
deepened the changes that had begun
during the first. Our time with the
Welsh led us to value small, quiet acts
that underscored the importance of
self-expression and choice. Welsh history and literature offer their own com-
pelling narratives of adversity, but the

people of Wales made it personal.
National stories of economic hardships and social struggles took the
form of family histories in the mouths
of Welsh speakers. Beginning a conversation with bore da or sut mae
became both memorial and pledge.
Through these small words, we could
celebrate the perseverance of the
Welsh language and laud the efforts to
promote its growth. The pleasure we
had in travelling abroad had transformed to something much more profound. Simple novelty was replaced
with a deep affection for Wales.
When I returned to university in the
fall, I was disappointed to find a dearth
of Celtic language classes. Courses
kept me from devoting significant time
to Welsh, but my experiences in Wales
still informed my studies. Studying language variation in American English
once again revealed the importance of
choice in speech, which prompted me
to examine my attitude towards language closer to home. Southern
American English (SAE), that is to say
English in the South-eastern portion of
the United States, and African American Vernacular English (AAVE) are
often disparaged as lazy and backwards, compared to more prestigious
standards of English in America.
Wales taught me first-hand the importance of linguistic identity and the way
in which how we speak conveys more
meaning than the sum total of our
words. When I applied these values to
the way my people spoke, I realised an
injustice in which I had been complicit.
*
National opinion and popular rhetoric
in the U.S. often create a South defined solely by its shortcomings,
namely cronyism, latent racism, weak
education systems and moral whitewashing. In the eyes of mainstream
culture, we are often reduced to ignorant, uneducated hicks who barely
speak English. Sadly, the variation in
our speech is often the yardstick by
which the content of our character is
measured. These narratives even affect perceptions we hold of ourselves.
We read between the lines, learn we
shouldnt sound different and carry
negative connotations with the way we
speak. The urge to reconcile our
speech reminded me of the impact of
the Welsh Blue Books and subsequent
efforts to reclaim the language. Wales
began to teach me about the South.
Wales and the South are similar on
various fronts. Both regions are rural
and traditionally agricultural, with a
history of economic depression that
has left us with unstable growth.

Weve been slower to modernise due
to our scattered populations. Change
comes slowly to some towns and villages, many of which look and feel the
same as they did decades ago. People
carry long memories of conflicts long
past; some grudges are justified, others are obsessions better left forgotten.
Their histories are not wholly analogous, due in part to their difference in
age and political structure. Wales is
distinct from the rest of the UK by
nature of its shared culture and language, historically if not always literally
nowadays. The South is distinct from
the rest of the U.S. by the shared
legacy of slavery and the war for it. It
has no exclusive claim to either, but
both endure in our collective consciousness and they continue to bear
influence on the structure of our society and culture. Modern politics in
Wales and the South are not entirely
comparable, but streaks of independence run through them both. Central
governance has been criticised in favour of more local control and accountability. This balance between
state and federal authority has always
been present in the U.S., but many
Southerners put increased importance
on local control, in part due to the
legacy of Reconstruction. Likewise,
many in Wales have celebrated increased devolution with calls for increased autonomy.
Both regions suffer from marginalisation at the hands of mainstream culture. In a strange twist of irony, the
complementary stigma to a backwards
Wales and the ignorant South is a
romanticised version of both, each
presented in a bucolic bubble. Idyllic
scenes of unpopulated landscapes
and quaint residents with a twinkle in
their eye and a penchant for good
manners permeate national discourse.
Look no further than Hollywood to find
idealised versions of both Wales and
the South, in nearly the same breath.
The film version of Gone with the
Wind (1939) remains the prototypical
story of the Old South, covering its
zenith, fall and reconstruction through
the eyes of a woman who only wants
to keep her family together, regain the
high living and status she lost and
render everything as it once was.
Three years later, How Green Was My
Valley (1941) debuted to similar success. The credits open with a rousing
chorus of Welsh singers and the reflections of an aged Huw Morgan, who
vows he will always remember his
valley as it once was, full of the voices
of his family and friends.
31
These two films are cut from the

same cloth, pitting a family against the
turns of time, the pangs of unrequited
love and the snipping gossip of their
community. Though both films deserve praise for aspects of their production, they compress complicated
societies and complex questions to a
two-dimensional approach. Tara,
painted in vivid Technicolor, offers a
monochromatic view of plantation life,
where the slaves are content to work
till quittin time and the young men
only worry about the glory of war and
wooing the women, who are themselves backbiting harpies jockeying for
good marriages and happiness. The
families in Cwm Rhondda are similarly
disposed of most worries, content to
labour in the collieries from which they
issue in song every day, if theyre not
thronging around a flowing firkin.
When anything unsettling arises at
work, in chapel or at home, the boys
pop off to America or someone storms
out of a room and everyone is eventually laughing and singing again. Well,
at least till the end. Though the overall
tone of both films emotes sadness,
loss and more than a touch of hiraeth,
the final thought in each clings to an
idealised past that does not and never
did exist.
One unsettling thread that runs
through both films is the way in which
variation in speech is used to mark the
qualities in characters. Rhett Butler,
though he comes from Charleston,
does not sound in the least Southern.
His opening lines in Gone with Wind
warn the hot-headed plantation owners and their sons against war with the
North. He continues to disparage the
values created within the film in a running commentary that nearly devolves
into asides. He recognizes an historic
moment as the South crashes around
them, providing the audience with a
character through which to project
their own omniscience. Melanie
Wilkes offers a similar role largely void
of Southern speech markers who reflects kindness, genuine affection and
unwillingness to speak ill of anyone, in
contrast to Scarlett, the belles at
Twelve Oaks and the gossiping ladies
in town. These two characters demonstrate laudable qualities in language
distinct from the rest of the group and
the South. The effect is subtle, but it
reinforces prejudices already ingrained subconsciously in speakers.
Mr. Gruffydd provides a similar character in How Green was My
Valley with his resonant, American
voice (I am conflating the difference
between speaking Welsh and speak-
ing English with a Welsh accent for the

purpose of this comparison). He explains to young Huw in unwavering
certainty the various difficulties of life
in the valley. At the head of the church
he lambasts the deacons and congregation in righteous anger. The effect
becomes even more pronounced
when contrasted with the heavily
Welsh-accented snivelling of Deacon
Parry and nattering among the village
hens. The pastors voice never condescends; that is left to the English
schoolteacher along with the rich colliery owner and his son, providing
Gruffydd with unmitigated access to
the moral framework of the film. The
results of these precise shades of
character portrayal create negative associations with variations of English
outside of the accepted, national norm.
*
These two-dimensional depictions of
Wales and the South cannot stand the
test of time, so long as we dig deeper
for the multitude of narratives that underpin our societies and reject the watered-down simplifications that belies
their inherent richness. We must stand
firm against language prejudice in its
myriad forms and fight against the
division it creates within our own communities. We must also resist the
temptation to reach back to a glorious
past, to a Wild Wales or to the Old
South. Exploring a culture different
and yet similar to my own allowed me
to see my surroundings in a new light.
The connection of these two regions
may seem odd, but Im not the only
Southerner to build an affinity for
Wales.
Eris Culpepper, a friend and fellow
Welsh learner from Meridian, Mississippi, first visited Wales in 1989 while
serving in the U.S. Air Force at Woodbridge in Suffolk. He found similarities
between rural North Wales and his
own home; life for his family in the
1950s resembled 19th century living
standards. They couldnt afford a tractor, so my father would borrow the
neighbours mule to do the ploughing.
He described his return to Wales some
ten years later whilst revisiting
Blaenau Ffestiniog: It was like I had
been gone five minutes. Nothing had
changed but everyone was so kind
and friendly, they replied to me in
Welsh and never asked where I was
from.
He bought a Welsh learners book
before leaving during his initial visit
and began learning in earnest several
years later after seeing credits that
included Euros Lyn, which offered a
clue into the shrouded origins of his
own name. He works now as an actor

and faithfully keeps up with Rownd a
Rownd, Pobol y Cwm and many other
S4C programmes featuring Welsh talent. He has legitimate aspirations of
his own to act in Wales someday; just
last year he won third place in storytelling at the Eisteddfod in Denbighshire.
Jeremy Schirmer came to Welsh by
way of studying Irish. In Welsh he
found greater access to both language
materials and artists who perform
modern styles of music, like the Cowbois Rhos Botwnnog, whose Americana style appeals to his tastes. Last
December he began learning through
audio courses from Say Something in
Welsh, a popular resource to learners
the world over, including nearly everyone I know learning Welsh this side of
the Atlantic. Jeremy also listens
to C2 on BBC Radio Cymru and picks
a few Welsh tunes himself on the banjo, guitar and mandolin. Though he
lives in eastern Texas, he shares
strong ties to Louisiana and has
French heritage. He naturally speaks
a little Cajun French himself, and relates the efforts to increase the Welsh
language to the state of Louisiana
French, which is undergoing its own
small revival. To reclaim what we
have lost, we have to learn to use the
language, it has to be integral, he
says, citing the growth of immersion
schools, tourism in his home state and
the growing number of musicians using the language outside of purely traditional music.
There are many more Welsh learners scattered across the South, from
Central Texas to South Carolina.
Many are learning because of their
heritage, while others find the language itself compelling enough to
study. Some were stirred by the signs
they saw during their holiday in Wales.
Others made replica castles in school
and found the Welsh flag a most appropriate banner. Their stories encourage me, especially when I hear
statements aimed at belittling the
Welsh language as a relic of the past
unworthy of the future.
We recognize that the world would be
a dimmer place without Welsh culture
and the Welsh language. Without
Welsh I would understand far less
about the richness of the South our
literature, our food and our complicated identity. For my part, Wales has
created a way to show that mutual
respect empowers people and
strengthens our communities.
32
From Olympia to the Valleys: What Riot Grrrl did and didnt do for me
by Rhian E Jones
ith riot grrrl now approaching the status of a heritage industry, not to mention Courtney Loves current incarnation as the post-grunge Norma
Desmond, it can be hard to recall that both of them helped
me find my feminist footing on the slippery rocks of a 90s
girlhood. This is a roundabout remembrance of how it
happened.
I.
The arts have long been a space for radical expression
by women, even if the extent of that radicalism has often
gone under-acknowledged. In 1915, the author and
journalist Dorothy Richardson produced Pointed Roofs,
credited as the first English stream of consciousness novel, using an innovative prose style which she saw as
necessary for the expression of female experience. Virginia Woolf observed that Richardson has invented, or, if she
has not invented, developed and applied to her own uses,
a sentence which we might call the psychological sentence
of the feminine gender. If Richardsons challenge to linguistic convention in her writing has musical counterparts,
one of them is the new, raw and female sound made
possible by post-punk. Punk removed barriers of precedent and technical expertise to engagement in music,
enabling trips into less-charted musical and lyrical territory.
But it was in the subsequent voyage of discovery that was
post-punk that punks revolutionary potential really bore
fruit, and the untried, experimental nature of post-punk
music was particularly suited to women.
Accepting a works artistic value doesnt automatically
mean that youll enjoy it, of course. It took me a long time
to appreciate both experimental literature and post-punk in
practice as well as in theory. One of the most acclaimed of
post-punk bands were the Raincoats, a London-bred collective based around the partnership of Gina Birch and
Ana Da Silva, but on my first listen, at the age of thirteen
or so, their hesitant, eerie, self-effacing, gentle and looseknit stylings were something I had no patience for and no
sympathy with. It wasnt until a couple of years later that,
intrigued by Kurt Cobains fanboying of the band, I gave
the Raincoats a second chance, or at least a second listen.
This time around, I could discern something I could identify
with, something that was tangled up with the altered terri-
tory of adolescence. Moreover, I realised that the Raincoats had sounded so off-puttingly alien to me at first
because they were their tentative, unfamiliar steps towards music had been a groundbreaking way of doing
things.
Sure, women had been singers and musicians before
now, and I had been awed and enthralled by punk, prepunk and proto-punk women from Ma Rainey to Gaye
Advert, but even Patti Smith had been reliant on male
instrumentalists and male-defined musical styles (in addition to her almost exclusively male role models) to back up
her creative ambition. By contrast, the Raincoats self-titled
debut was described as the first womens rock album, its
deconstruction of traditional forms pioneering an arresting
and persuasive form of rock without the cock. The Raincoats music and lyrics mapped a landscape previously
alien to mainstream rock; a female-centred one of selfconsciousness, self-doubt, embarrassment and anxiety, its
borders defined by the pressure to conform aesthetically
and cosmetically as well as by family, society and biology.
Punks preoccupation with mundane daily routine bus
rides, shopping, boredom is rendered with drab watercolour realism rather than the gritty outlaw glamour with which
The Clash tended to sculpt their cityscapes.
Postpunk was full of such subtly subversive manoeuvres
as female musicians attempted to realise a self-consciously radical sound dealing with emotions embarrassment,
awkwardness, anxiety infrequently expressed in contemporary rock. Post-punks concern with the politicisation of
the personal, and with identifying and promoting authenticity rather than cultural and media stereotypes, lent itself to
exploration from a feminine and feminist angle, resulting in
lyrics which demystified and deconstructed conventional
femininity, love, sex and romance, and which analysed
social and cultural pressures on women, or the tensions of
personal relationships, in implicitly political ways. The Slits
made skanky, shadowy dub-punk hymns to sex and shoplifting, identified mainstream femininity as a profit-driven
invention in Typical Girls, and scathingly dismissed its
attendant angst and insecurities. The stinging lyrics of the
Bush Tetras Too Many Creeps conflated love, romance
and consumerism, ultimately rejecting the whole package
as the fruitless result of shopping around only to find
nothing thats worth the cost. There was an obvious
33
prototype here for riot grrrls alarms and anxieties: the ments nerve-centres and unable to practically engage, I
struggle to occupy public space with confidence rather listened and I read.
than fear, the revelation that falling in love can be more
At the end of the 90s, the Spice Girls water-down
baffling nausea than fairytale bliss, the terrifying tricks that
version of Girl Power had me questioning whethbiology and psychology can play.
er there was a place for real independent women
While there are cons as well as pros to what Greil Marcus
in mainstream pop culture, not to mention the
called post-punks spontaneous amateurism a lot of
effectiveness of the early-90s riot grrrl movement
post-punk music sounds like it was more entertaining to
in the face of this blatant co-option of our terminolmake than it is to listen to its difficult to deny its interest
ogy.
and importance as a form of self-expression, especially by
those more usually found in the audience than on the
Tobi Vail, Bikini Kill/Jigsaw
stage. The musical legacy of post-punk, with its acceleration of the female self-expression which punk initiated,
In political terms, riot grrrl in the UK felt more aligned with
remained deeply embedded in underground and alternathe self-consciously alternative and oppositional left of the
tive music, occasionally rising to break the surface.
80s, which made it feel increasingly out of place as alterThe whole climate changed in the 80s music native culture in the 90s succumbed to a celebratory,
reverted back to being a careerist option But we conformist complacence. The major-label hijacking of the
were amazed that there was this void, with no one girl power slogan was grimly predictable, and so was the
taking up the baton. There was a ten-year gap until hostility that riot grrrl in its undiluted form had initially faced
non-traditional music and art has a long history of rejecriot grrrl and Elastica came along.
tion as incoherent and amateur. In 90s Britain, riot grrrl
- Viv Albertine, guitarist/vocalist, The Slits was to some extent a casualty of the post-Oasis critical
dismissal of experimental music as the preserve of affectThe early-90s eruption of riot grrrl bore all the musical ed middle-class art-school cliques, inferior to more welland political hallmarks of female post-punk, continuing worn and familiar forms of artistic expression. Arguing that
both its experimentalist and deconstructionist approach to bland and basic music is inherently superior, by dint of its
form, and its mocking and subverting of conventional fem- appeal to a less pretentious man-in-the-street demoinine looks, dress and behaviour. In terms of women in graphic, is of course a damaging class-essentialist line
bands, the manufactured mainstream of the late 1980s which implies that the ordinary working-class music fan is
was obviously a barren ground for post-punks experimen- incapable of engaging with anything more challenging, and
talist legacy, and I had little inkling of the alternative or which further implies that there can be no emotional,
underground until my adolescence, which was why it took psychological or political depth to straightforward, simple
the 90s to introduce me to the 70s. Riot grrrl was the other music. No matter how loudly and frequently made, neither
shoe dropping, the lower jaw meeting the upper to snap charge should stick.
Where riot grrrl was open to more valid criticism and
shut on the vacant, rapacious maw of the decade between.
challenge, however, was where it subscribed to an unexamined liberal feminism which took little account of other
II.
axes of privilege and oppression. For all that I read of riot
Like many foreign phenomena, riot grrrl seemed to land grrrls in Leeds, Manchester, London and Brighton, I rein the Valleys slightly after the fact and almost entirely in ceived it as an intrinsically US concept, especially in its
the abstract which was just as well, seeing as how the college-age personalised and confessional third-wave
90s NME would inevitably have dubbed any Welsh equiv- feminism, and this led me to regard it with a certain degree
reservation.
As
has
been
shown
in
alent something like Riot Grllll. According to retrospective of
mythology, the US-spawned movement was propelled into several retrospectives on the movement, its largely white
popular consciousness in Britain by Huggy Bears 1993 and middle-class makeup meant that exclusionary tendenperformance of Her Jazz and subsequent disruption of an cies albeit often unspoken and subconscious adhered
episode of The Word something I only dimly recollect, to it in spite of its inclusionary rhetoric. In the book Girls
though I do remember the acres of newsprint it generated. Make Media, Mary Celeste Kearney observes:
Radicalising existing UK indie subcultures, riot grrrl continThe gender deviance displayed by riot grrrls is a
ued post-punks emphasis on demystifying music, not
privilege to which only middle-class white girls
merely through forming bands but also through actively
have access. Indeed, the gender (and generationmaking physical space for girls at gigs and questioning
al) trouble celebrated within riot grrrl may be the
gender norms and power dynamics within music and wider
primary reason for its lack of appeal to poor female
society.
youths and girls of colour, whose performance of
Despite riot grrrls understandable and justified antipathy
gender and generation are structured quite differto mainstream media, with its well-documented tendency
ently as a result of their disenfranchised status
to sensationalise, misrepresent and exploit, the fact that I
was able to experience the movement at all, in my isolated
and alienated pre-internet adolescence, was due to the I grew up a feminist as well as a socialist. The two things
90s weekly music press. For a brief and brilliant moment, were intertwined for me in, for instance, the legacy of
across its pages, as well as those of the associated fan- 1980s miners support groups through which Valleys womzines and communiqus I subsequently acquired, there en, while on the one hand supporting what might be seen
raged a range of women who made me feel that, as a as a macho and patriarchal industrial culture, had on the
teenage girl, the validity and logic of my involvement with other hand gradually challenged the chauvinism in which it
music was never in question. Separated from the move- could be steeped. In doing so, their focus had been on
material rather than abstract issues. Riot grrrls emphasis
34
on questioning and disrupting conventional ideas of femininity scrawling SLUT or UGLY on exposed skin, reclaiming or subverting sexually derogatory terms and
identities was something I accepted and experimented
with on a theoretical level, but, as a pathologically underconfident small-town teenage girl, I felt entirely unable to
practice it.
As anyone whos ever over-listened to the Manics You
Love Us will know, antagonism can be life-affirming, and
sometimes deliberately adopting a confrontationally extraordinary look, defiantly dressing ridiculous, can be a
perverse form of self-defence. By the same token, though,
it is at least a gamble, at most a risk, depending on its
context, and those who adopt it cannot really bargain for its
varying receptions. The lack of everyday space in which to
aesthetically experiment was partly why the gigs I did
manage to attend as a teenager, and for which I spent
whole days ritually preparing, attained such value as safe
subcultural spaces where one could dress up and act out
something that riot grrrl actively emphasised even
though the same gigs could also be confrontational flashpoints (See, for instance, the polarised accounts of Huggy
Bear and their 1993 gig at TJs in Newport in Craig Austins
zine Cocksucker Blues (February, 1993).
Mimi Thi Nguyen, in her counter-history of riot grrrl, writes
that certain forms of rebellion performed by women can
look different when race, class or sexuality is brought into
play:
For instance, women of color wondered out loud
for whom writing slut across their stomachs operated as reclamations of sexual agency against
feminine passivity, where racisms had already
inscribed such terms onto some bodies, and poor
or criminal-class women argued that feminists
slumming in the sex industry (through stripping,
for the most part) as a confrontational act implied
that other women in this or other tiers of the industry were otherwise conceding to patriarchy.
While the criticisms quoted above were more directly
relevant to US riot grrrl than its UK manifestation, the limits
that could be placed on riot grrrls radicalism by a lack of
attention to race, class, and other dimensions of female
experience, have an obvious resonance with recent debates on the need for an intersectional approach to feminism. As a working-class teenage girl, I felt that I was
missing out by being unable to practically engage with
contemporary riot grrrl, but I wonder whether practically
engaging might only have brought its own set of frustrations, whether I would have found myself feeling more a
part of the problem than the solution.
Yes, riot grrrls performative slut aesthetic could be
useful to women wanting to escape or overthrow an oppressive set of good-girl expectations but these expectations are often race- and class-dependent. If your class
already leads external observers to stereotype you with a
lack of respectability, a certain availability, a certain easiness then the deliberate adoption of that same identity
is not straightforwardly empowering or liberating. To further complicate matters, this identity ran counter to the
imposed notions of working-class respectability with which
I grew up, and reclaiming or even challenging it would have
taken more balls than I possessed in my teens. It was also
a difficult role to inhabit temporarily without becoming
obliged to occupy it permanently; it was difficult to convey
that one was in fact merely performing a slut role there
was, as my insufferable teenage self would have delighted

in putting it, no distinction between the signifiers and the
signified. You were what you wore. This was of course one
of the very notions that riot grrrl was attempting to combat
but, if you dont have the luxury of stepping in and out of
your chosen role, then seeing others do so, no matter how
politically praiseworthy their intentions, can feel like watching them take a holiday in other peoples misery.
Frequently, as a teenager, my body didnt seem to
operate in the same context or circumstances as my brain,
and, while I gratefully escaped into the realm of abstract
theory, theory remained an awkward fit with my lived
experience. Out of context, and outside the teenage bedroom, the idea of applying my lipstick with the back of my
hand and prowling my post-industrial shopping-centre in
ripped tights and a babydoll nightdress in order to Subvert
the Ubiquity of the Heteropatriarchal Gaze might well have
been boundary-pushing, but as a unilateral move, without
access to practical collective solidarity, it would primarily
have felt ludicrous. In any case, the Olympia thrift-store
Kinderwhore trappings I coveted were not yet so recuperated and commodified as to be available from my local
branch of New Look. (There was in fact a building in my
town called The Olympia, which, with suitable bathos, had
been for some years a disused cinema and then a discount
carpet showroom.)
Despite its practical limitations and occasional lack of
nuance, though, what I read of riot grrrl as a small-town
teenager made complete sense intellectually. Riot grrrls
performative ways of challenging feminine convention
were to me a new strategy of dealing with an intrusive
and proscriptive external gaze. Riot grrrl enhanced the
idea of musical idols as aspirational, as escapist, as inhabitants of an age yet to come where the identities they
presented could be an individual choice rather than something externally and judgementally imposed. And it introduced me to a self-sexualisation which could be
aggressive and confrontational rather than pliantly submissive. Riot grrrl was not the bulletproof, unfaultable realisation of punks political potential, but merely a tentative step
on the way, and it is to the credit of the movements more
recent subcultural offspring local queer and feminist
bands, clubnights, zines and festivals that they seem to
be taking greater account of intersectional correctives.
III.
A good songs a good song. Thats my politics.
Please dont slice PJ[harvey] in halfher assimilationist compromise has done more for us than 30
grrrls banging on a pot and spoon.
Courtney Love, Hole
Live Through This, my first and favourite Hole album,
climactically staggers and collapses into half-smothered
giggles with Rock Star, an arch burlesque of riot grrrl as
just another collective enforcing homogeneity (We look
the same, we talk the same), little different from the
petty tyrannies of high-school. Courtney Love, a riot grrrl
refusenik with a mutually antagonistic relationship with the
official movement, is of course not beyond criticism of her
own music and politics. Nevertheless, her band spoke to
my teenage self far more directly than the Raincoats did,
in music, lyrics and delivery that were fiercely expressive,
raging towards articulacy in a manner that sometimes
came off, sometimes didnt, but which always triumphed
35
through the power of suggestion and impression. Courtneys lyrical preoccupation with petal-stripping, in particular, seemed to exemplify a determination to peel away the
decorative superficial to get to an ugly but authentic heart
of the matter the real, beyond fake, inside the pretty.
Courtneys music, like other aspects of her politics and
presentation, rubbed up against riot-grrrls concern with
anatomising female neurosis and breaching the
personal/political divide, expressing what it found as a
cathartic, exhilarating blend of rage and revel.
Like Patti Smith and her phallocentric pantheon (Rimbaud, Dylan, Morrison, Richards), Courtneys significant
idols and inspirations McCulloch, Cope, Curtis were
mostly male, but her attachment to traditional forms of
macho rock songwriting was undercut by her entire approach to it, in particular the confessional outpouring of her
lyrics. She drew on tropes considered irredeemably girly
diary entries, fairytales, dolls and babydolls, plumpness
and satin pumps, petals and candy and mixed them up
with the gritty, grisly business of actually being a woman,
the raw, bloody meat and the mindfucking. I had to work at
getting the Raincoats, and to a lesser extent at getting
riot grrrl, finally managing to interpret the former through
the latter. My getting Courtney, however, felt instinctive,
automatic, even if I didnt quite know why, and even if it
was due to the familiarity of the artistic territory on which
she operated. Even if you view the electric guitar as a
hopelessly compromised phallic instrument, theres surely
a subversive thrill to be had from seeing it in female hands.
Moreover, Courtneys attempts to navigate the perilous
waters of Doing It Like a Dude uncovered the existence of
undercurrents which still make it difficult to do so. Unlike
the acknowledged performativity of riot grrrl, Courtney did
not seem to be permitted to escape her bad-girl role,
appeared unable to shrug off her costume after any given
performance. She was constantly reviled or ridiculed for
behaviour and attitudes which got, and still get, her male
contemporaries praised and indulged. Her relationship
with Kurt Cobain exemplified these inequalities, seeing her
automatically dismissed as a golddigger, a groupie, a
modern Yoko. Her position and prominence was repeatedly explained with reference to her easy sexuality or manipulative harpy qualities rather than her talent regardless
of Holes early commercial outpacing of Nirvana or the
artistic equivalence between her band and his.
The clichd debauchery of Axl Rose or Steven Tyler was

accepted and even lauded as a necessary part of their
appeal, but in Courtney it was judged unseemly and irresponsible. Equally, the respect accorded a contemporary
like the Manics Richey Edwards, the mourning for his lost
genius, was something for which I could not imagine a
female equivalent self-harm, alcoholism and anorexia in
a male rock star was proof of tortured sensibility too delicate for this world, while in a female rock star it was just a
lurid spectacle. There was a ghoulish and lascivious edge
to public concern over Courtney as there was, years on,
over Britney Spears and Amy Winehouse which was and
is seldom present in attitudes to their male counterparts.
Her unrepentant behaviour, and her own critique of criticism rather than bowing beneath its barrage, dragged
these double standards into the spotlight where they could
be openly examined.
Back in my 90s adolescence, it is testament to riot grrrls
unpredictable trajectory in the UK that it happened to
inspire Sunderland pop-aspirational indie band Kenickie.
Explicitly influenced by Courtney Love, they, like her, succeeded in extending the attitudes and lessons of the movement beyond its initial target demographic. If Courtney
veered between resignation to and revelling in her badgirl role, Kenickie refused to grant the good-girl/bad-girl
dichotomy the dignity of recognition. Through their glamorous, defiantly regional aesthetic animal print, glitter,
lashings of lipstick and towering heels and their sleek,
fierce paeans to the complexities of female independence,
Kenickie demonstrated riot grrrls wider potential, much as
riot grrrl itself had intensified the aftershocks of punk.
Kenickies music and image offered me a more familiar
and accessible way of valorising the feminine, or, to paraphrase their song Come Out 2Nite, of becoming what you
can. Drawing, like Courtney, on an aggressive femininity
and a brash, ambitious and unapologetic kind of glamour,
their look called to mind the trappings of working-class
nights out: the meticulously, ritually constructed approximation of excitement, luxury and sophistication as an
age-old reaction to being surrounded by drabness and
mundanity. In doing so, it also evoked the escapist and
empowering potential of that process. This, ultimately, was
the kind of riot grrrl that struck the strongest chord with me
its radicalism muted in some respects, perhaps, but
amplified in others.
On Sale Now.
Wales Arts Reviews A Fiction Map

of Wales.
Editor: John Lavin with a foreword by
Ali Anwar
36
Almost like a world on its own': Wales Arts Review goes to Festival No.6
by John Lavin
Festival No 6, Portmeirion, 13th 15th September, 2013
Number Two: Quite a beautiful place, really, isnt it? Almost like a world on its own.
Number Six: I shall miss it when Im gone.
Number Two: Oh, it will grow on you.
- The Arrival, The Prisoner
y grandparents first visited Portmeirion in the
1950s, when on a holiday in nearby Criccieth
they stumbled upon it by accident, suddenly
looming out at them from across the bay. This was before
Portmeirion was to be made famous by the cult sixties TV
series The Prisoner and so you can imagine their surprise
and even bewilderment at coming across an Arts and
Crafts/Italianate style village surrounded by trees, while on
holiday in North Wales. My grandmother always said it
struck her as a magical place from that day on and in truth
it must have been a little like walking through a wardrobe
and finding oneself in Narnia such is the unapologetic
atmosphere of magic realism that defines the Village and
its surroundings. Holidays with their son, my father, duly
followed and in turn my own parents were to take me to
Portmeirion several times when I was a child, although
sadly I never visited with my grandparents. Couple this with
a teenage obsession with The Prisoner and you may see
why I was particularly keen to attend the second incarnation of Festival No 6, having been unable to attend last
years praise-heaped affair.
Wales Arts Review (or at least this member of Wales Arts
Review) began the long, diagonal journey northwards under both a literal and a metaphorical cloud. The literal cloud
being the deeply unpromising black-purple, puffy-eyed sky,
the metaphorical cloud being the presence of far too much
residue of whisky pumping around my bloodstream. While
this may sound like the stuff of music journalism clich it
was, in fact, brought about through no fault of my own but
rather through the coincidental and unexpected twin-visit
of both an old friend and my partners Canada-based
brother. Alas, much like in the scene from North by
Northwest, whereby Martin Landau makes Cary Grant
down a whole bottle of spirits, this turn of events served to
metaphorically hold me down and, while forcing my mouth
open, send an inordinately large amount of Isle of Jura
gushing into my unsuspecting liver.
In any case, at least I wasnt driving, and despite this and

the mad-for-sadness-seeming skies, things were set much
more on the right track by a wonderful lunch at The Felin
Fach Griffin outside Brecon, a pub which we discovered
upon entering had recently won no less an accolade than
the Good Pub Guides Inn of the Year 2013. Something of
a result you might very well say. A bloodstream-cleansing
combination of butter-roasted Bryn Derw chicken served in
a light, pea, spinach and tarragon broth, washed down by
a fantastic pint of Otley ale (my Wales Arts Review co
conspirator, Craig Austin, meanwhile partaking of the most
vast and sensational-looking Ploughmans that I have ever
enviously eyeballed), set the tone for a festival weekend
which was notable for the presence of some genuinely
delicious food and drink in place of those more-usually-tobe-expected twin stars of festival hospitality: insipid lager
and meat-based products that contravene even the most
basic of animal welfare standards.
But more about such supposedly un-rock-n-roll topics as
vodka, cucumber and elderflower cocktails served alongside scallops with celeriac puree and Old Spot lardons
later. It is now time perhaps to describe the first musical
highpoint of the festival, the very wonderful Neon Neon.
Festival No 6 no doubt partly in recognition of the sweet
madness involved in hosting a three day festival in the
middle of September on the North West coast of Wales
has large tents in place of main stages, which was something of a relief when taking into account the extremely
variable weather which characterised the weekend. The
main stage/tent in particular proved to be an excellent
venue in terms of sound and atmosphere. An enclosed
setting was also the ideal environment for Gruff and Boom
Bip to bring a stripped back Praxis Makes Perfect to No 6.
The theatrical level of the performance was considerably
toned down from the Cardiff/ London performances earlier
this year and at times didnt really consist of much more
than Gruff holding up placards saying things like Diolch.
Indeed all in all it reminded me more of seeing them on
the Stainless Style tour. But this is no bad thing for a
festival and the band were clearly on form, from the pop
perfection of Praxis track Dr Zhivago (with its flippant take
on Stalinist censorship: Cold war dictator/ I once believed
but now I cant accept you/ How you treated Pasternak/
You know you really upset me!), to the sleazy, electropop
perfection of early single, I Lust U.
37
The main stages/tents were in a field above the Village

and after securing ourselves a pint of Snowdonia Ale from
the pricey but certainly good quality real ale tent, we
descended into the world that is forever inseparable from
Patrick McGoohans surreal indictment of totalitarianism,
democracy, state-sanctioned espionage and mind control.
And do you know what? It was better than I could have
expected. The Village lit at night by lanterns and flares and
marked by mime artists and unusual processions was truly
a thing to behold. Having only ever visited in daylight
before it was a thrill in itself to see the place by night but to
see it thriving with people, and colourful, decadent, happy
people at that, the Village came to life in a way that just isnt
possible when you are wondering around as a tourist. I
wouldnt want to go so far as to say that it felt like
actually being in The Prisoner, but a tiny little bit it did, no
question.
Even though the biggest bands played in the tents there
is a case for saying that the events to truly treasure during
the festival were the ones that took place in the Village,
whether it be at the Caught by the River stage located
appropriately by the waters edge, in the Town Hall (where
we saw a promising French
Canadian singer called Caracol), the Stage in the Woods,
or in the main piazza itself. It
was here that every night the
Brythoniaid Male Voice Choir
sang a selection of songs
ranging from Youll Never
Walk Alone to A Design for
Life. The kind of thing, really,
that might not ordinarily be
the Wales Arts Review cup of
tea but in this setting and
with the natural acoustics of
the piazza it was not to put
too fine a point on
it, magical. (Hell, they even
made by Insurrection by
Muse sound good!)
The evening ended with a
return to the main arena to
catch the end of inexplicable
headline act James Blake.
While by no means a moribund artist, Blakes brand of
XX-meets-Boards of Canada electronica really felt far too
dull and coffee table-lite for a headline act, his impressive
but strangely unmoving vocals meaning that the evening
ended on a slightly non-plussed note (while a full-on National Theatre of Wales production of Praxis would surely
have brought the house down).
Day two for your friends at Wales Arts Review began in
the Heavenly films cinema hut, which was happily located
next to a really quite reasonably priced cocktail stall. And
so with our vodka, cucumber and elderflower cocktails to
hand we set about analysing the Saint Etienne/ Paul Kelly
tribute to the Royal Festival Hall, This is Tomorrow. A
rarely seen and therefore preposterously neglected little
film it charted the story of the Festival of Britain and how its
modernist, Utopian-stylings were immediately dismantled
by the second Churchill government, before going behind
the scenes of the Festival Halls recent refurbishment. Set
to some of the most gorgeous music Saint Etienne have
made in years Stepford Wives-style-flutes aplenty, always a good thing on a St Et track and filmed in a style
that can only be described as a pretty overt homage to A

Bout de Souffle the film is a tiny, undiscovered gem that
is surely worth checking out on the new BFI/Saint Etienne
boxset.
This was followed by a short and jolly Q&A with Saint
Etienne themselves, wherein they revealed that the genesis of their filmmaking came about both as a result mainly
of the advances (i.e. cheapness and ease) in digital technology, combined with the huge promotional video budgets
of the 90s. Instead of making another Hes On The Phone
type video they made the sumptuous featurelength, Finisterre instead.
After this genuinely stimulating and thought-provoking
event we ventured back into the arena to catch a
little London Grammar and partake of the aforementioned
scallops with celeriac puree and Old Spot lardons. London
Grammar split the Wales Arts Review consensus somewhat; Craig Austin considered them deeply uninspiring
while I myself found them frustratingly Florence Welch-like,
but not without promise. The piano-led music was atmospheric, the lyrics sufficiently arresting, but the problem
really was in singer Hannah Reids Florence-like yodelling,
which frankly is annoying enough when Florence herself does it,
never mind somebody
who appears to have
just stumbled out of a
philosophy seminar at
Sussex University. Having said that when it
does work, as on a song
like Wasting My Young
Years, there is a certain
amount of chemistry and
poise that suggests their
success may not be a
flash in the pan.
Having partaken of
said scallops, Wales
Arts Review took it upon
itself to have a wander
by the beautiful, Manicsinspiring
Portmeirion
beach, having caught
too little of John Cooper
Clarke to give a properly
critical perspective. Some white wine later we found ourselves in a state of Beatlemania-like excitement, queuing
up for a viewing of Lawrence of Belgravia (which was to be
followed by a Q&A with reclusive genius Lawrence himself!) in the salubrious settings of the town hall. Unfortunately, it became clear, having talked to some people
behind us who appeared to be related to Daughter, the
nascent band who it transpired we were actually queuing
up to see, that bad luck had once again befallen Lawrence
and the film had been moved to the tiny Heavenly Films
cinema hut in which we had watched This is
Tomorrow earlier that day.
As we had already seen this superlatives-are-really-notenough film before and Lawrence himself appeared to be
a no-show, we decamped to catch My Bloody
Valentine in the main arena. Playing several songs from
their astonishing comeback album mbv, they were, on the
one hand, a magnificent live band, but on the other hand
they were also, without question, unpleasantly and quite
frankly, absurdly loud. By the time of the famous holocaust
38
section of You Made Me Realise I was feeling queasy and

thinking for the umpteenth time about my ears and possible
deafness. I really wasnt thinking about the music and this
seems somewhat self-defeating to me. Of more concern
was the presence of a number of children in the tent for
MBV, standing around with their parents and looking deeply unhappy and in some cases actually crying. One
particularly irresponsible mother was even trying to make
her son wave his hands in the air to stop him crying. Wave
your hands in the air? To My Bloody Valentine?
The next day began with sideways rain and anxious
tweets suggesting Apocalypse Portmeirion would be the
likely title of this article. However, the combination of having thank God! elected to stay in self-catering accommodation outside of the festival rather than camp, (it is
possible to stay in some of the beautiful houses in Portmeirion but booking needs to be extremely early for
this), Wales Arts Review were, in truth, not feeling so very
bad. The hasty purchase of some cheap wellies and the
fact that Portmeirions famously protected climate turned
out not to be a figment of their brochure writers mind but
actual truth, meant that by the time we had drunk our first
vodka, cucumber and elderflower cocktail the sun was
quite literally shining. Emboldened we took a tour of the
woodlands raves, home on the Sunday to some rather
poorly looking middle aged MDMA casualties, magnificent
viewpoints and of course Portmeirions famous dog cemetery (the woodland grove with the swivelling statue heads
that features in The Prisoner, somehow alluding us).
Next up was the always beguiling Caitlin Moran, who
delighted in reminding us all about her censor-baiting
tweets regarding the merits of Benedict Cumberbatchs
glowering deductive mannerisms and his ideal Sherlockspindly physique. This, along with some more delectable
Snowdonia ale, was followed by a fairly tiresome and
self-congratulatory
conversation
between
Guy
Garvey and Stuart Maconie about lyric writing. If you like
Elbows lyrics then this was the thing for you. If you dont
I dont then Garveys choices of favourite lyrics at least
served to act as an indicator as to why his own lyrics are
so lightweight and pseudo-profound.
On a day which was unquestionably the best day for
music, we made our way with some excitement to
see Johnny Marr, whose festival performances this summer seem to have already passed into legend. And so it
came to pass. His first song, Generate! Generate! from
the new album was good enough as it was, his band
having built up some rare form and Marr himself looking
like he had been zoomed in from one of those classic
Smiths TOTP appearances. But next up he played Stop
Me If You Think That Youve Heard This One Before and
everything changed. My eyes welled up and there were
genuine shivers down my spine for one thing. Being too
young to have ever seen The Smiths live and having been
enormously unimpressed with Morrisseys solo rockabilly
butchery of tracks like Shoplifters and There is a
Light, this really did feel like that moment when you hear
a song you love for the first time, performed by the person
who wrote it. And in this case it was a rejuvenated Johnny
Marr and he was playing a song, (and indeed songs), that
I have loved, and which have meant a great deal to me, for
over half my life. By the time those glowing opening chords
of There is a Light rang out with the same soulfulness
and ease with which they must have rang out on the day
Marr composed them and when, indeed, Marr sang those
lyrics with the kind of understanding that no one save Moz
himself has ever managed you were left in little doubt that
you had witnessed something truly special.
Perhaps owing to this and to the fact that due to being
timetabled at the same time as Chic they were playing to
a practically empty tent, These New Puritans, seemed a
little dour, while their intensity was muddied somewhat by
sound problems which were no fault of their own. For all
that there is still no one else making music quite like them
in the UK right now and towering versions of Attack Music
with its appropriate references to September and the
utterly fantastic, DJ Shadow-goes-contemporary-classical,
Organ Eternal, served to turn things around.
Wales Arts Review caught the end of Chic and have to
admit to bellowing the phrase fall into my arms and tremble like a flowaaah in a no doubt annoyingly loud manner. But, of course, so was everybody else. The tent
was rammed for Chic and without a doubt they were as
completely fantastic as people have been saying all year.
Good Times, We Are Family, the aforementioned Lets
Dance all delivered with a joy and enthusiasm that along
with Johnny Marrs glistening, Irish folk guitar riffs served
to turn the close to the weekend into a wild and celebratory
affair.
All in all it might have seemed like a hard act for
the Manics to follow but of course these days they have a
Nile Rodgers-like armoury of instant classics in their repertoire that could, frankly, have stretched long into the night.
This was underlined by the way they nonchalantly wandered on stage and broke straight into a magnificent version of Motorcycle Emptiness. Now, I will confess to not
having seen the Manics live for some years, not perhaps
since their rather by-numbers Glastonbury headline performance in 1999, (and even to have gone off them somewhat between then and the devastating renaissance
that Journal for Plague Lovers represented some ten years
later), but here, truly was a performance of such power and
confidence that I felt instant regret of the kind that you feel
when you meet a dear old friend you havent seen in years
and instantly hit it off again.
Because the setting was Portmeirion and because
Portmeirion Beach was the setting for the cover of fifteenyear-old-birthday album, This Is My Truth, Tell Me Yours
the record, which I have to say, made me fall out of love
with the Manics they elected to play several songs from
it. This could have been quite a bit of a negative for me but
because MSP were playing with such verve and confidence it actually served to reinvigorate and highlight the
craftsmanship involved in those songs. And with the exception of TIMTTMYs one true moment of genius, Ready
for Drowning, about the submerged Welsh village of Treweryn, they stuck to the singles like Tsunami and The
Everlasting, which were always pretty good live anyway.
It must be a good Manics gig if they only play one Holy
Bible track and you still have a fantastic time, but nevertheless Revol was still the evenings undoubted highlight,
preceded as it was by a touching and appropriate eulogy
to Richey Edwards, from an emotional and pleasingly
drunk-sounding Wire (Manics gigs are always at their best,
in my opinion, if Nickys drunk an expletive laden tirade
against Michael Gove bears this out).
And so, with the sound of several thousand recession hit
people bellowing and we are not allowed to spend the
magical, surreal, high-quality-beverage-and-food-providing, quite possibly unbetterable Festival No 6, drew to a
close. Be seeing you next year. Mines a vodka, cucumber
and elderflower cocktail.
39
To the Detriment of Us All: The Untouched Legacy of Arthur Koestler and

George Orwell
by Gary Raymond
y August of 1945, Arthur Koestler had already completed many journeys; indeed, you
could say he had lived many lives. His travails and explorations had taken in vast geographical extremes, from his native Hungary,
to his time in the Communist Party of Germany where he
was a vociferous and passionate young intellectual. He
had been to the North Pole, where he tasted his first dram
of fame as the sole reporter on the Graf Zeppelin Arctic
expedition of 1931, and he had a stint with the French
Foreign Legion in North Africa his only route to escape
inevitable execution at the hands of the Vichy. He had
experienced, first hand, the most significant political and
philosophical movements in Europe and its edges, from
Zionism in Palestine to Stalinism in Russia. And in August
1945 his quest for Utopia brought him and his later wife,
Mamaine, to Wales. Koestler and Mamain would spend
three years in the cottage of Bwlch Ocyn, a secluded
farmhouse that belonged to Clough Williams-Ellis, the
builder of the Italianate coastal town of Portmerion, situated just a short drive from the other side of the Vale of
Ffestiniog.
Koestler was already famous by this point, not only for his
novel, Darkness at Noon (1940), (an epochal condemnation of Stalinism and the Lefts apologias of it), but also for
his reportage, and for the intellectual rigour in his essays
such as The Yogi and the Commissar. Koestler was a
man who pushed himself to the centre of things, who
gorged himself on argument, who enraged friend and foe
alike with his caustic, uncompromising, fierce, intellectual
ideas for humankinds progress. His journeys had seen
him move from Zionist to anti-Zionist, from Communist to
anti-Communist, and from existentialist to mystic. His journey, in fact, was a search for a pure society, a broad
democratic socialism, a civilisation built upon justice and
compassion. Koestler was a significant figure in the intellectual circles of every city he inhabited, an urban, explosive presence amidst the pock-marked concrete, low
ceilings and smoke-filled air of Europes coffee houses. He
was one of Sartre and de Beauvoirs many third wheels; he
had travelled Soviet Russia with Langston Hughes, establishing writers forums in Hughes digs in Ashkhabad; he
had helped Malraux refine his definition of the intellectual
as anti-Manichean, a man of subtleties, interested in

absolute truth and in the complexity of things. Koestler
was a fundamental driving force in almost every significant
intellectual political movement of the thirties and forties.
It is striking then, in his long and intriguing life story, that
at his intellectual peak, in the aftermath of the sensation
that was Darkness at Noon, he left the vibrant intellectual
culture of 1940s London to set up home in a drastically
remote cottage in North Wales. But this corner of Wales
was perhaps not quite so remote as might first appear, and
Koestlers motives may not have been quite so abstruse.
This corner of Wales had its own intellectual circle, and it
was most sympathetic to Koestlers mindset at the time, or
so he thought. Clough Williams-Ellis wife, Amabel, for
instance, was Lytton Stracheys niece, and a former communist, like Koestler, and around the Williams-Ellis
swarmed the likes of Rupert Crawshay-Williams, Michael
Polanyi, English PEN president Storm Jameson and, most
significantly, Bertrand Russell, who lived just a few miles
up the road from the Koestler cottage.
But Koestler had another motive for the seclusion, even
if the seclusion was not an honestly intellectual one. Within
months of moving to Bwlch Ocyn he had lured a likeminded trail-blazer, a political intellectual democratic socialist, who was also terminally disillusioned with (and
disgusted by) the institutionalised claptrap of the international comintern. George Orwell was perhaps the ally
Koestler had been looking for all along.
*
It was in reference to Koestler that Orwell famously wrote,
Nowadays, over increasing areas of the earth, one is
imprisoned not for what one does but for what one is, or,
more exactly, for what one is suspected of being. What
Orwell had witnessed and experienced in Spain during the
civil war, the things that had driven him away from the
established Left, Koestler had experienced at an increased
intensity.
Koestler had been imprisoned many times by the time he
moved to Bwlch Ocyn, and not only by the traditional
enemies of the Left. Koestler was an intellectual warrior not
a martial one, and he had always been petrified of physical
40
harm. Whilst working under accreditation as a foreign

journalist, trying to cover the Catholic-military uprising in
Spain, he eventually found himself not only on the side
getting beaten, but in the unforgiving and paranoid embrace of Francos forces. It was his time in the prisoner of
war camp in Seville, under constant threat of execution,
which sculpted his writing into the darkly powerful prose we
now know him for. He also later spent time at the infamous
French political prison camp of Le Vernet, and in 1940,
being a person of note and a suspected revolutionary
communist, he had been imprisoned in Londons Pentonville almost from the moment he set foot on British soil after
escaping the Nazi shadow. On each occasion he had been
charged with no crime. Darkness at Noon was a culmination of his own traumatic experiences in solitary confinement at the hands of Franco, and his witness to the early
days of Stalins show trials.
Darkness at Noon is a masterpiece; George Steiner said
it was one of the few books that may have changed
history. Orwell reviewed it in The New Statesman in 1941:
Brilliant as this book is as a novel, and a piece of
brilliant literature, it is probably most valuable as
an interpretation of the Moscow confessions by
someone with an inner knowledge of totalitarian
methods. What was frightening about these trials
was not the fact that they happened for obviously
such things are necessary in a totalitarian society
but the eagerness of Western intellectuals to
justify them.
Darkness at Noon was cannon fire when the intellectual
company that Koestler had been used to keeping Sartre,
Camus, de Beauvoir were still pontificating through candlelight and smoke rings. Not only was the threat of prison
and torture very real to him (whilst in Francos prison in
Seville his cell was in close proximity to the execution yard
where he could hear the shattering volley of the firing
squad blast out thirty to forty times a day for the months he
was there) but he had first-hand experience of the consequences of his beliefs. Whilst others turned a blind eye to
the inherent paradoxical untruth of Stalinism, Koestler was
compelled to blow the lid off it. It was everything he was
about. As his biographer Michael Scammell notes, Koestlers quest for enlightenment was not some arid, abstract
sort of search, but a deep instinctual urge which started
early in his life and continued to the end of his days. The
quest, as Scammell goes on to assert convincingly, was
the point.
Orwells lauding of Darkness at Noon in The New
Statesman was to be the first public utterance of the
essence of his own 1984, and the seed of Winston Smith
can be seen in the broken, corrupted, empty protagonist
of Rubashov. Koestler was just thirty-six when the review
was written, a life of astounding drama and variety already
behind him.
In 1945, with the war at its end and Koestler now a
member of the English literati, commonly terrorising Soho
with his drinking partners Roy Campbell and Dylan Thomas, one may be forgiven for thinking a time of reflection
might have been on his mind. But Europe had, in many
ways, only been saved from the extraordinary awfulness of
Hilters fascism at this point. Totalitarianism, the target of
both Koestler and Orwell, continued to flourish in its grey
solemnity, and would do so in Francos Spain until 1977, in
Salazaars Portugal until 1968, and Stalins Russia long
after the Communist despots death in 1953. In many ways
Orwells concerns with totalitarianism were both spurred on

by Koestlers work, and, apart from Koestler, came from a
similar place. Orwell, too, had witnessed the unpleasant
reality of imperial rule, albeit as disillusioned voyeur, during
his time in Burma, and like Koestler, had spent some time
as a vagabond in the cities of Europe.
Like Koestler, Orwell had lost his faith in communist
socialism in Spain in the thirties when faced with the reality
of the brutality and in-fighting in the civil war between the
factions of the Left. Orwell, hypersensitive to such infractions on the clarity of his ideology, did not need imprisonment and torture to turn his stomach or his mind. Koestler
might not have done either, but nonetheless Orwell saw in
Koestler the grace of god. Orwell, however, was a pragmatist, unlike the quixotic Hungarian, and their personal relationship, inevitable as it was the moment Koestler settled
himself in Britain, was never smooth. Koestler was notoriously difficult company, and Orwell had a reputation for
cutting to the heart of the matter. But so closely linked were
the two men in philosophy, and so activistic in nature, it is
perhaps surprising that they did not collaborate when in
such close proximity, as Koestler had done with the leading
intellectuals of every city he had made a home in. But if a
joining of forces had not occurred to Orwell, or if it had at
least not appealed to him, it had and did to Koestler, and
his move to Bwlch Ocyn was the first step in his plan to
create something from these combined forces.
Just a month before Koestler and Mamaine took on the
cottage; Orwell had become vice-chairman of the Freedom
Defence Committee, a civil liberties group that included
Bertrand Russell, Koestlers new neighbour, and other
notaries among its sponsors. The point of the committee
was to oppose the increasingly Communist-dominated
leftist groups in London and on the continent. But soon into
the life of the committee, Orwell, perhaps sensing the
aromas he had smelled as rot in Spain, began to feel the
focus of the group too narrow, and too in sway to the whims
of its anarchist chairman, Herbert Read. Koestler heard
word of Orwells disillusionment with the Committee and
invited him to Bwlch Ocyn to spend Christmas. It may not
have been as enticing a proposition for Orwell had Koestler
not already thought ahead. Staying with Koestler and
Mamaine was Mamaines sister, Celia, with whom Orwell
had recently met in London and with whom he had fallen in
love. Koestler was fully aware of this and suspected that
Orwell would drop everything to come to the remote and
slate-bleak setting in the hope of wooing Celia, and he did.
But Koestler was only interested in a proposition of his
own; the founding of a separate leftist committee that
would neither be in thrall to the cliques, skirmishes and
myopia of either the Communists nor the Anarchists.
Over the Christmas of 1945, Koestler and Orwell talked
at length in their armchairs, pipe smoke mingling with the
open fire, their faces half lit by the orange glow, about the
foundation of a successor to the League for the Rights of
Man. Their vision of the future was bleak, coloured by their
justified perception that totalitarianism and despotism were
becoming held up by the intelligentsia, (especially in Britain, Orwell pointed out), as methodologies worthy of admiration. Orwell believed the situation called for not only
political action, but a redefinition of democracy itself. Koestler knew that to establish the Committee that he wanted
and that Europe needed he would need both the intellectual involvement of Orwell and the endorsement of Bertrand Russell, who was the figurehead and undisputed
heavyweight of British progressives at that time.
41
Orwell and Koestler were not men easily adjusted to the centre-point to a real movement. Unfortunately, enlistment
intimacies of friendship; Orwell was famously stubborn and was slow and riddled with counter-arguments. Some felt
enforced a strict discipline on himself and Koestler was the manifesto was too anti-Russian, others felt it was too
equally stubborn, and his reputation for being a prickly abstract in its ideals. Russell, the most important ally on the
character often undersold his pugnaciousness somewhat. list, felt that the world was on the brink of apocalyptic war,
But it seems the two, who had been developing a friend- (Truman had dropped the bomb in August 1945), and
ship-of-sorts built from mutual admiration for a few years wanted to turn the committee into an opportunity for a
when both in London, did become close during the few conference to discuss avoidance of global nuclear annihiweeks in Bwlch Ocyn, taking long walks together and lation. This was Russells condition, and Koestler and
sharing many intimate thoughts and ambitions. But conver- Orwell reluctantly agreed and began to set up the confersation, ushered by Koestler, always returned to the forma- ence in the Vale of Ffestiniog.
It was to be peopled with extremely significant political
tion of a committee. Orwell became as equally enthusiastic
as Koestler, and after many days and nights debating the philosophers, such as Victor Gollancz, Michael Foot, Edstate of the Left across Europe, and the poisonous influ- mund White, Andre Malraux, Manes Sperber, and the
ence of Stalinism in progressive democratic socialism, editors of Polemic, a leading theoretical journal of the time.
The conference, the starting
Orwell agreed to put his full
point for the committee, was
attention into the formation and
never to proceed, however. The
success of the committee.
reasons are an exemplar of the
Back in London, Orwell spent
best and the worst of Koestler.
a week writing a fiery manifesIt was his energy that had
to. He sent it back to Koestler
brought all of these figures toin Bwlch Ocyn. It opened with
gether, and it was his temper
the assertion that, while liberty
that pushed everything apart.
without social security is valueHe fell out, in a matter of weeks,
less, it has been forgotten that
with the editors of Polemic,
without liberty there can be no
whose collaboration was intesecurity. Orwell was congral to the success of the movecerned with the very fabric of
ment (even if only from an
democracy and the ties beadministrative point of view),
tween the governing classes
and then fell out with Russell
and the people over whom
A carnival of voices in independent
after insulting his wife during a
they governed. He and Koespublishing
row over the wording of the
tler intended to redefine demanifesto. Russells wife wrote
mocracy, to reach downward
to Koestler later, saying, is it
as well as outward, and to opreally necessary, among people
pose
the
infringements
who have the best will in the
against the rights and the digworld to like you, to be so comnity of man. It was an attempt
bative?
at a pure vision that was neiIn truth, as Scammell points
ther corrupted by the evils and
out in his essential biography of
grabbing of the Right, nor by
Koestler, he and Bertrand Rusthe corruptions of the Left, but
sell were simply too alike to
saw a better world for all
work together. It was the fulcrum and tragedy of the Orwellthrough liberty. It was a new direction for politics.
Orwell has often confused commentators who would like Koestler union that it depended entirely on the endorseto position him (and often claim him) as a champion of the ment of the third.
With his plans in tatters, Koestlers life in the cottage
Left or the Right. But he was never been more clear than
in the manifesto he wrote for Koestler. He was not only became one of domestic drudgery, bickering with Maneither Left nor Right, but the mere suggestion that we maine, and generally feeling ostracised and frustrated.
should think of him (or Koestler) in these terms is wilfully Both Koestler and Orwell were drawn through their lives to
missing the importance of his ideas. As global politics finds opportunities such as the one that Koestler manipulated
ever more grim and cynical ways to fail the populations during that Christmas at Bwlch Ocyn socialism was the
from which it first grew, the deconstruction of left and right life-blood of both men, and was the candlelight by which
is the only viable progressive philosophy. Orwell and Koes- they wrote books such as Scum of the Earth, Darkness at
tler not only professed this, but they ended up prophesying Noon, Animal Farm and 1984. Orwell, of course, died
the necessity of their own ideas. And it is the most Orwelli- tragically young, of tuberculosis; Koestler died in 1983, in
an of all his legacies. Koestler, the firebrand, urged Orwell, a suicide pact with his wife Cynthia, after being diagnosed
infested the man with enthusiasm and vigour, to create a with terminal cancer. Both men left legacies the outer
template, a map, for the way out of the suffocating institu- reaches of which stretch so far it is almost difficult to
tional corruptions of our time. The way is through liberty, comprehend. Their respective Great Works changed the
not through the admiration for totalitarian methods, as perception of our modern world. But perhaps their greatest
legacy is in the venture that never took off, the one moment
Orwell wrote.
Koestler was impressed by the verve and accuracy with when they joined forces, and through Koestlers energy
which Orwell had taken up his idea. His plan to lure Orwell and rhetoric, and Orwells intellectual vigour, they drafted
to Bwlch Ocyn seemed to have worked without a glitch. a manifesto that signposted a new political causeway; one
The next step was to recruit others to the committee, to that, to the detriment of the western world, has still yet to
widen support and make Orwells manifesto a palpable be explored.
42
Against the Evil of Violence The Wales Window of Alabama

by Cerith Mathias
he sky looms low, heavy with
dark cloud as I step from the car
into the humidity of a deserted
parking lot. The hot air crackles with
the promise of a downpour; often the
fare, or so Im told, of a mid-September morning here in Birmingham, the
largest of Alabamas cities. The streets
are unexpectedly empty, an almost
eerie quiet reverberating from the
gleaming-grey pavements. A befitting
first glimpse, perhaps, of where, this
year, the painful events of the past are
being ushered to the forefront of the
present.
The street on which I am standing
was at the heart of the Civil Rights
Movement of 1960s America; the concrete underfoot once pounded by the
soles of marching children and baton
wielding police officers. Dr Martin
Luther Kings calls for non-violent protest in what he dubbed the most segregated city in the US were met on
this very corner with water cannons
and the snarling jaws of police dogs.
And in the Baptist Church, here on
Birminghams 16th Street, the lives of
four young girls were snuffed out by a
racist bomb attack.
The horrific events of that day would
prove a turning point in American history and the actions of one Welsh artist
and a campaigning newspaper editor
forever linked Wales with the struggle
tobeFreein63.
The morning of September 15th,
1963 began much like the day of my
visit.
It was a typical Sunday morning at
my household, recalls William Bell,
who was 11. Now Birminghams Mayor, he is the fourth African American to
hold the office in the city, something
unimaginable at that time.
It was a dreary day, not really a

sunshine day but overcast my mother woke everyone up for breakfast
then we began the process of getting
ready for church.
As his family was about the leave the
house, he remembers a loud noise
that was like nothing that wed heard
before it was a strange noise. Everything seemed to get quiet and the
world seemed to stop.
Moments earlier, on the other side of
town, as her friends came to the end
of their Sunday school class, 15 yearold Carolyn McKinstry answered the
ringing telephone of the 16th St Baptist
Church.
Three minutes said a male voice
before hanging up.
McKinstry reportedly replaced the
phone receiver in its cradle and made
her way into the next room. Shed
taken around 15 steps when, at exactly 10.22 am, a bomb exploded near
the church basement, tearing violently
through the large stone building, destroying its steps, shattering its windows and spilling rubble and glass out
into the street. The face of Jesus in the
churchs main stained glass window
was blown clean out.
Jim Lowe, who was 11 years old,
was with his classmates in a room
three doors down from where the
bomb had been planted. He knew all
four girls who perished.
I remember a loud deafening noise
and seeing glass flying out of the windows he tells me.
My ears were ringing and I could
hear muffled voices yelling and
screaming I had no idea what was
happening.
Inside the church were nearly two
hundred congregants, mostly all children, attending Sunday school.
Around 23 were injured. Four were

killed instantly. The bodies of 14 yearolds Carole Robertson, Addie Mae
Collins and Cynthia Wesley, along
with 11 year-old Denise McNair were
found huddled together under the
twisted debris.
I dont remember how I got to and
from church that day says Lowe, who
is now the Bishop of the Guiding Light
Church in Birmingham.
The one event seems to have overwhelmed everything else.
Racially motivated bombings were
not extraordinary at that time, with
nearly fifty unsolved incidents taking
place from the late 1940s through to
the mid-1960s earning the city the
nickname Bombingham. This, however, was the first to result in the loss
of life.
The months leading up to September
15th had been tumultuous. The
church, at the centre of Birminghams
black community, was the headquarters of the local civil rights movement.
In May that year, it had become the
organising centre of the childrens crusade, a campaign that produced the
Birmingham Accord, which sanctioned, amongst other things, the desegregation of lunch counters, public
bathrooms, fitting rooms and drinking
fountains.
Martin Luther King proclaimed the
walls of segregation will crumble in
Birmingham and they will crumble
soon.
On August 28th 1963, just a fortnight
before the 16th Street bombing, King
shared his dream with over 200,000
people who had marched on Washington. Tension rippled through Birminghams streets.
Alabamas high profile, outspoken
pro-segregation Governor, George
43
Wallace stood firm in his prejudice,

telling The New York Times in order to
stop integration, the state needed a
few first class funerals.
A week later, a small splinter group
of the Ku Klux Klan, the Cahaba Boys,
enacted Wallaces rhetoric by planting
a box of dynamite beneath the steps of
the 16th Street Baptist Church; its detonation forever slashing a deep, ugly
scar on Birminghams timeline. Despite the biggest FBI operation since
the pursuit of bank robber John Dillinger in the 1930s,
it would take another forty years before the bombers
were brought to
justice.
The tragedy altered forever the
course of the civil
rights movement,
according to many,
acting as a catalyst
for the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and the
Voting Rights Act of
1965.
They became
martyrs,
Bishop
Lowe
explains.
Their deaths started a movement for
change that could
not be stopped
That explosion ignited
an
even
greater explosion
an explosive movement that changed
the heart of a nation.
America was not
alone in her revulsion. Across the Atlantic, in the small
Carmarthenshire village of Llansteffan, news of the injustice was met with
indignation by Welsh-based artist
John Petts.
In a series of interviews, archived by
the Imperial War Museum, the artist,
who died in 1991, recalled hearing the
news on the radio.
Naturally as a father I was horrified
by the death of the children. As a
craftsman I was horrified at the
smashing of all those windows, and I
thought to myself: my word, what can
we do about this?
Petts contacted David Cole, the
editor of The Western Mail suggesting
a fundraising campaign to replace the
churchs main stained glass window
as a gift from the people of Wales.

A national gesture of goodwill.
The following day, the paper
launched the campaign with the headline Alabama: Chance for Wales to
Show the Way. More than 3,000 people donated no more than half a crown
each, as per Petts stipulation. Within
days the 500 target had been
reached, with the fund closing at 900.
Photographs were shown of children both black and white in the Cardiff Docks area queuing up at
The Western Mail offices handing over

their pocket money, Petts recalled.
And within a short while the fund
was closed and I found myself flown
over to Alabama They had never
heard of Wales, had no idea where it
was, but they very quickly were told
something of the little country Wales.
Petts bold design for what has
become known as The Wales Window
depicts a black Jesus a suffering
figure in a crucified gesture, with one
hand flung wide in protest, the other in
acceptance.
Written underneath are the words
You Do it to Me, inspired by the words
of Jesus in Matthew 25:40:
Inasmuch as ye have done it
unto one of the least of these
my brethren, ye have done it

unto me.
Back in the Birmingham of today
its the result of that gesture of fellowship that Im here to see.
The 16th Street Baptist Church is an
imposing building. It stands broad and
solid occupying the corner of
6th Avenue North and 16th Street.
Walking up its stone staircase, it is
difficult to marry the structure before
me with the images of devastation
from fifty years
ago. Opening the
heavy
wooden
doors Im met by
the churchs custodian,
Richard
Young, along with
the clatter and chitter-chatter of cleaners and workmen.
Only a few days
previously
the
church was host to
a ceremony commemorating
the
events of 1963, a
service so well attended,
Young
says, that it was
packed out. We
even had a screen
over in the park opposite, because so
many people wanted to come and be
a part of it.
Richard Young is
a lifetime member
of
the
church,
which he tells me
has an active congregation of almost
two and a half thousand. Though his
own personal history is deeply interwoven with that of 16th Street he has
his own seat for Sunday services,
which he jokes that no one can sit in if
Im not here, he however narrowly
missed that terrible, terrible day.
The afternoon before the bombing,
Young left Birmingham for college,
enrolling in the historic Tuskegee Institute, located around two hours drive
south of the city.
I couldnt believe what had happened, he says of hearing the news:
One of the girls lived around the
corner from my family we were
friends. It hurt me. A lot of people were
very upset; there was a lot of hurt for a
long time.
I follow Young down to the basement, watching as he runs his hand
44
along the wall as we walk, patting the

smooth white plaster gently every now
and again. We enter a large room filled
will folding chairs and tables, still used
for Sunday school classes. At the
back, behind a small partition, are
some of the objects rescued from the
church following the blast; a clock
stopped at exactly 10.22 am, the telephone answered by McKinstry along
with framed pictures of the events of
the civil rights movement. On the wall,
hangs a yellowing copy of The Western Mail from 1964, complete with
Petts charcoal designs for the window. In a glass case underneath sit
four stones painted with the names of
the four girls.
We move back upstairs to the main
hall, a bright, light-filled room, where
row upon row of wooden pews sink
comfortably into the pile of a deep red
carpet. A balcony with further seating
hangs overhead. Young raises his
eyes, and nods upwards towards the
centre balcony. There in a dazzling
haze of purples and blues stands The
Wales Window.
Chuckling at my reaction, Young
says Yep, its a beauty all right.
More vibrant and intricate than any
photo could ever do justice, Petts window is truly breathtaking. Above the
figure of Jesus, arms outstretched,
curves a rainbow constructed of tiny
pieces of blue, purple and pink glass
representing racial unity. The daylight
streams through, making kaleidoscopic patterns on the carpet.
What does Richard Young know of
the story behind the window I wonder?
I remember that the children in
Wales wanted to give the pennies they
had to us, he says.
And the window was a symbol here
of their love for us when we were
suffering. It really means a lot to the
church.
Many events are taking place in
Birmingham throughout the year to
mark the 50th anniversary of that fateful day. The weeks preceding my visit
have been especially busy. In addition
to the service at the 16th Street Baptist
Church, prayer meetings, and talks
have also been held. A website Kids
in Birmingham 1963 has been established as a platform for all; white and
black, who were children at the time to
share their experiences. And a further
piece of art commemorating the lives
lost has been unveiled in the city.
Sculptor Elizabeth MacQueens Four
Spirits - life-size statues of the four
little girls stand in the gateway of
Kelly Ingram Park, directly opposite

the Baptist Church.
MacQueen, herself from Mountain
Brook, just outside Birmingham, was
14 at the time of the bombing, the
same age as three of the girls who died.
It bored a hole in my psyche for
justice, she tells me.
MacQueens artwork depicts the
girls playing and reading all four are
engrossed in an activity of some sort,
bringing the statues very much to life.
While researching her design, she became close with Carolyn McKinstry,
who had been talking with the girls in
the churchs basement, immediately
before going to answer the telephone.
They were all friends and I saw
them talking together and getting
ready for their service upstairs, MacQueen says.
Carolyn told me Addie Mae was
tying the bow on the dress of Denise
Carole was a Girl Scout, so I have her
saying Come on yall we are late!
Cynthia was the child of teachers, she
loved reading.
Indeed, Cynthia Wesley, the only
one of the four statues who is seated,
is depicted reading WB Yeats The
Stolen Child.
I wanted a quote that was original
if possible states MacQueen:
It took me nights and nights. I
looked at so many quotes,
including Ralph Ellison, Maya
Angelou on and on into the
nights. Eventually someone
sent me The Stolen Child and
I wept. That was it.
Elizabeth MacQueens statues are

not the only ones that inhabit Kelly
Ingram Park. The small square of
green has its own difficult story to tell;
often the location of police water cannons and vicious attack dogs used
against civil rights campaigners.
These events are also immortalised in
stone here, as is another martyr of the
movement, The Rev Dr Martin Luther
King. In the shadow of the 16th Street
Baptist Church, he stands at a distance, but directly behind the four girls,
a watchful parent presiding over innocents at play.
Walking amongst the shrubbery and
sculpture, as the first fat drops of rain,
overdue from the morning, start to fall,
the value of art in not only recording
and honouring events like those of
September 15th 1963, but of also
healing the pain caused, is incredibly
apparent.
In my work, I have fought and
shouted aloud against the evil of violence especially with the Alabama
window, John Petts once told a reporter.
From my conversations with the
people affected those who survived
and lived through those events Petts
voice has been heard loud and clear.
The people of Wales showed they
cared in a tangible way, even if people
here did not, says Bishop Jim Lowe.
That impression upon me as a
young child was very important to help
me eradicate the belief that hatred
against me and my people was not as
widespread as I had been led to believe.
45
Deeds Not Words Remembering Womens Suffrage

by Ben Glover
We deny the right of any portion of the species to decide
for another what is and what is not their proper
sphere. The proper sphere for all human beings is the
largest and highest which they are able to attain to.
- Harriet Taylor Mill
he notion of female enfranchisement, and more
latterly gender equality, is a relatively new concept
in political and cultural discourse. For millennia a
womans role and place in society has, more often than
not, been defined by her relationship to men as a wife,
mother or daughter, but never as an equal, that is independent or free. Even great female historic figures, such as
Elizabeth I (The Virgin Queen) or Cleopatra, are significantly defined through their relationships, or lack thereof,
with men. Through religious dogma and cultural norms, the
role of women in society has not developed for much of our
history, it is certainly true that women have mostly fulfilled
the role of domestic slave; destined from birth to undertake
a position in society that was always subservient to man.
From Genesis 3:16 assertion that Unto the woman He
said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception.
In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire
shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee to
considerably more modern forms of discrimination (witness
the current conversations concerning the limits of women
in politics, music and comedy), the insistence that this is a
mans world is undoubtedly true.
However, it was during the age of revolutions (the
French, American and Industrial) that the seeds of possibly
one of the most significant cultural advancements were
planted.
The
publication,
in
1792,
of
Mary
Wollstonecrafts A Vindication of the Rights of
Woman began the slow process of debate and dispute that
challenged a contemporary society that cherished tradition
and innate cultural conservatism over equality and reason.
The arguments that Wollstonecraft outlines, that men are
not naturally superior to women and lack of education is
the only difference between the genders, were easily dismissed by a patriarchal society. But as the new century
developed the arguments grew in volume: Jane Austen
and the Bront family started to describe polite society
from an often unheard female perspective; women began
to enter the industrial workforce; and institutional education
reform was also introduced. Throughout the massive upheaval of the nineteenth century the fight for political representation was constantly being waged, the horrendous
inequality between rich and poor was only heightened by
the newly established industries and forms of commerce.
The clamour for parliamentary representation from many
sections of society became deafening.
The first significant attempt at forming a national organisation to lobby for the enfranchisement of women was
started in 1867. Lydia Becker, founder of National Society
for Womens Suffrage, developed many of Mary Wollstonecrafts assertions on education and gender equality
and won a surprising victory for womens suffrage in the
Isle of Man, by securing the right to vote for women in the
1881 election to the House of Keys. However, this small
victory had little impact on the plight of womens suffrage
on the mainland of Britain. Despite the support of many
radical Liberal MPs, such as John Stuart Mill, the momentum of the suffrage movement was beginning to stall. The
lack of any progression in the suffrage cause forced a split,
in 1903, in the ranks of the National Union of Womens
Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) a small minority, including
Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst, believed that the
constitutional approach to claiming the vote for women,
undertaken by NUWSS, was too passive and ultimately
ineffective. The formation of Womens Social and Political
Union (WSPU) was a bold and militant step in claiming
victory for female enfranchisement. By 1913, WSPU had
come to dominate polite conversation and newspaper
headlines in the stifling orthodoxy of Edwardian Britain.
The upbringing of Hannah Mitchell was a fairly typical
existence for a woman in the Victorian era. Born in 1872,
Mitchell was denied a formal education by her parents and
expected to assist her mother in supporting the male
members of her family disillusioned with the prospect of
eternal domestic slavery and marital servitude, she ran
away from home at the age of fourteen to Bolton in search
of employment. After witnessing her mother driven to furious outbursts of anger and despair by the monotonous
drudgery of housework, Mitchell quickly became radicalised by first socialism and then the Suffrage Movement.
However, unlike many of her WSPU colleagues, including
the Pankhursts and Margaret Haig Mackworth who were
born into relatively comfortable economic surroundings,
46
Mitchell knew only too well the struggles and indignity of

being poor and female. In her autobiography, The Hard
Way Up, Mitchell honestly details many aspects of an
average womans life that led her to believe that militant
suffrage was the most efficient way to secure the vote.
From the sheer barbarism of child birth to the subjugation
of marriage, she became vehemently resentful of the inequality of the sexes, and embittered at the freedom and
opportunities afforded to men. She noted:
Perhaps if I had really understood myself, as I did
later, I should not have marries. I soon realised
that married life, as men understand it, calls for a
degree of self-abnegation on the part of women
which is impossible for me. I needed solitude, time
for study and the opportunity for a wider life.
It was not just the traditional role of women that drew so
many to the militancy of the WSPU. Working conditions
and employment opportunities for women in the pre-war
Britain were limited at best and non-existent at worst.
Annie Kenney, one of the most indefatigable members of
the WSPU, had started work at a local cotton mill at the age
of ten years-old to help her parents (and eleven siblings)
survive the crushing economic reality of so many of Britains working poor. For many working class women there
were limited employment opportunities available in the
mills, mines and in domestic service, but little chance of
any progression from general hard labourer. However, for
the women of the established lower middle classes the
options were fewer; teacher, Poor Law Guardian, wife and
mother. The glass ceiling was so restrictive, in terms of
employment, that it would have been more accurately
described as a glass cage. The suffocatingly limited employment opportunities combined with the lower wages for
women, for instance Kenney would have been paid up to
fifty percent less than a man who did a similar job, meant
that many women felt the constitutional approach of the
NUWSS, although valid, would not produce the required
results. Sadly the correspondents of a man in Twickenham
to his local newspaper typified the indignation felt by many
people towards the Suffrage Movement:
It is a pity that women, especially married women,
cannot find sufficient domestic duties to keep them
from such acts as these, and helping to lower the
opinion of the British woman in the eyes of other
nations.
Dr Martin Luther King once pronounced a riot is the
language of the unheard, and whilst the Suffragettes never
rioted, the actions undertaken by the WSPU were these
women shouting to be understood. Political and civic institutions were failing women employers exploited them,
husbands could beat them and a society ignored them
yet it was only men that had proper recourse against the
vagaries of a conservative society. Emmeline Pankhurst
identified that women suffered in society because their
experiences and opinions were never understood in Parliament (a Parliament run by men, voted for by men and
which produced laws designed for men). If the lawmakers
do not understand the issues faced by a section of people,
how can they produce a law to help them? It was clear, to
the WSPU at least, to attain an equitable Britain, for both
sexes, that women must be free to vote. Emmeline Pankhurst noted that:
It is perfectly evident to any logical mind that when

you have got the vote, by the proper use of the
vote in sufficient numbers, by combination, you
can get out of any legislature whatever you want,
or, if you cannot get it, you send them about their
business and choose other people who will be
more attentive to you demands.
However, Parliament was reluctant to change. It was

through both ideological stubbornness and political pragmatism, that the Womens Franchise Bill and the Conciliation Bills did not pass the reading stages. Even though
many Liberals in the government supported the idea of
womens suffrage they still voted against these Bills because they believed that it would gift the Conservative
Party one million more votes considering that the Liberal
Party lost the popular vote in the December 1910 general
election by over one hundred thousand votes, they still
controlling majority in Parliament (thanks to our wonderful
first-past-the-post voting system) it was a risk that the
Prime Minister HH Asquith was unwilling to take. This
failure of Parliament was the final insult to the Suffragettes
and, as the prospect of a global conflict darkened the
horizon, the WSPU stepped up their campaign.
The images of Emily Wilding Davison being struck by
the horse of King George V, Anmer at the Epsom Derby,
whilst she attempted to grab the bridle in 1913, is still as
47
shocking and poignant today as it has ever been. This

desperate act of rebellion is in itself worthy of commemoration, the ultimate sacrifice given for what today we take as
a mundane democratic right. However, there were many
more women, in 1913, which yielded their rights, health
and freedoms in order to secure a better, more equitable,
future. Many Suffragettes, including Kenney, Pankhurst
and Haig Mackworth, were imprisoned in 1913, as the
WSPU undertook a campaign of window smashing, arson,
pillar box burning, bombing public buildings and more
general acts of civil disobedience. Under the green, white
and purple banner that proclaimed Deeds Not Words, the
Home Office, Kew Gardens, David Lloyd Georges house
in Walton-on-the-Hill and the Tower of London all became
legitimate targets for the Suffragettes anger. The justification for this increase in militancy was made by Emmelines
daughter, Christabel Pankhurst, while in Paris avoiding
prosecution in Britain, she opined [t]he fact that the miners
are going to get legislation because they have made themselves a nuisance is a direct incitement to women to
endeavour to obtain a similar privilege.
It is noticeable
that none of
these
attacks
against property,
firstly public but
latterly private,
were intended to
physically harm
any person, instead they were a
clear message to
Parliament that
voting rights for
women was a
non-negotiable
demand. The obvious
consequence of these
defiant acts was
the incarceration
of many leading
members of the
WSPU in some of
the worst jails in
Britain. The suffragette leadership, including the Pankhursts, knew the publicity value of women being imprisoned for their campaign was significant; to highlight this
even further, and to protest at the truly appalling conditions
that inmates were subjected to, many suffragettes began a
hunger strike. Though technically not illegal, the government realised the public relations disaster if it allowed any
one of the suffragettes to die in prison while on hunger
strike so it initiated a policy of force feeding to ensure that
the prisoners were healthy enough to serve their sentences. However, the forcible feeding of women in prison
became the perfect metaphor for the suffrage movement;
women, keep against their will, subjugated by men and
who had no control over their own destiny, not even death.
The Liberal Governments response to this escalation in
hunger striking was the introduction of the Prisoners (Temporary Discharge for Ill Health) Act 1913 or more commonly known as the Cat and Mouse Act. It was believed that by
letting the suffragettes (the mice) to go on hunger strike
and then releasing them on license when they became
weak and malnourished, only to re-arrest them once their
condition had improved, was preferable to the negative

publicity that surrounded the forcible feeding procedure.
Also the government thought that there could be a secondary benefit in keeping the suffragettes as weak and frail as
possible as the women would less likely to be undertaking
any nefarious activities while on license. However, what
was designed as a discreet method to deal with the suffragette problem became genuinely counter-productive, as it
undermined the governments moral authority and developed into the embodiment of the movements struggle in
the publics consciousness. But as the time passed, it was
the untimely death of Emily Davison at Tattenham Corner
that will always symbolise the sacrifices made for the
suffragette movement and democracy in Britain as a
whole. In life she was a nuisance, but in death she became
a martyr.
So, why is it so important to commemorate this hundredth anniversary? Is it just to pay tribute to the sacrifices
made by Emily Davison and her colleagues in making our
society more equitable and democratic? There, of course,
should be a significant element of remembrance in this
commemoration,
but it also gives
us a chance to
put in perspective
the
challenges
that still face us.
The women fighting for the vote a
hundred
years
ago,
werent
fighting for an abstract notion of
civic involvement
or
democratic
idealism they
saw the vote as
an instrument to
improve the lives
of all women in
Britain; who, for
too long, had
been ignored and
abused by a
deeply conservative and patriarchal society. Many issues that blighted the
lives of women in Edwardian and Victorian Britain are still
in existence today; the glass ceiling and limited employment opportunities, the projection of a stereotypical role of
women in society, pay inequality and the representation of
women in our civic institutions.
Although there has been significant improvement in
many of these areas, there is compelling evidence that
suggests that we still have a long road to travel to reach a
truly equitable society. Currently women earn on average
fifteen percent less than their male counterparts. In Parliament women make up less than a quarter of all MPs. The
justice system is only now beginning to realise that attacks
against women, including rape, are not brought upon themselves. There is a complete lack of female representation
in the boardroom of Britains companies, one survey suggesting less than one fifth of all boardroom members is a
woman. The victories of the suffrage movement were hard
won, but there are many battles ahead if we are going to
ensure a fair society for everyone, regardless of gender,
race or economic heritage.
48
David Pountney in Conversation: Schoenberg, Verdi and Issues of Faith

by Steph Power
elsh National Opera continue

their themed seasons this
summer with new productions
of Schoenbergs epic, unfinished
masterpiece Moses und Aron and the
opera that heralded the onset of Verdis creative maturity: Nabucco. The
heading is faith , so, of course, it is a
contentious one, with clear contemporary resonances.
On the eve of the eagerly
anticipated Moses und Aron first
night at Cardiffs Wales Millennium
Centre (24 May), Wales Arts Review is
proud to publish the latest conversation between WNO Artistic Director
and CEO David Pountney and Steph
Power. Here they explore various aspects of faith in relation to Moses und
Aron and Schoenberg himself, but also in relation to Verdi and the twinning
of the two operas.
Moses und Aron is directed by Jossi
Wieler and Sergio Morabito, conducted by WNO Music Director Lothar
Koenigs, and features Sir John Tomlinson as Moses. Nabucco is directed
by Rudolf Frey and conducted by Xian
Zhang and opens at the WMC on 31
May.
David Pountney is also directing a
double bill, The Fall of the House of
Usher , at WNO this summer under
the British Firsts heading. The programme will comprise the UK
premire of a new version of
Debussys La Chute de la Maison
Usher by Robert Orledge, and the
world stage premire of Usher
House by Gordon Getty. It will open,
again at the WMC, on 13 June.
*
But I found this production in Stuttgart

which I thought was very intelligent
and interesting, and which actually
doesnt use anything except the chorus. It was an ideal solution for us and
made it possible to even think of doing
the piece. Interestingly enough, if Id
programmed it in two years time we
would not be doing it; that is to say you
wont see anything like this again in
the next five years because of the way
the funding situation is developing. So,
opportunistically, I seized the right moDavid
Pountney:
And
its ment before anyone could notice that
nearly fifty years since it was staged at this was basically impossible!
Covent Garden, in 1965! I looked out
my old programme of it the other day. Well, I salute you! Whats your view
of the operas subject?
Ive even got it here actually.
Steph Power: This summer will be a
particularly enticing season at
Welsh National Opera. I wonder if
we might talk about the faith
theme, especially in regard to the
Schoenberg? Moses may have
been in the desert for forty days,
but
its
nearly
forty
years
since Moses und Aron was performed in the UK it was 1976 when
Deutsche Oper am Rhein took it to
Edinburgh!
To me its an extraordinary opera

an opera about ideas as much as
anything and an interesting contrast and yet complement to the
Verdi. How did the faith season
come about?
Like all these things it was a mixture of
serendipity and of fitting a rationale
behind it. When I first came to Welsh
National Opera, Lothar [WNO Music
Director, Lothar Koenigs] flagged up
his interest in doing Moses und
Aron and I thought this was a sufficiently mad project to be taken quite
seriously! I had to find somewhere a
production that we could actually manage with our resources here; I did one
myself in Munich about six or seven
years ago, and theres no way that that
could have been put on at WNO because it used the full resources of that
company, with dancers and extras and
God knows what. Because obviously
you can go in that direction.
I actually have a rather controversial

view about Moses. First of all, I think
Moses is completely wrong. And I
think its behoven to every intelligent,
liberal intellectual person to resist and
defy Moses with every ounce of your
body and soul and mind and intellect!
Because I think his prescriptive insistence that he knows the answer to
whatever your faith might be is something quite horrific. And of course, to
some extent, the same could be said
of Schoenberg too theyre a pair of
arrogant bastards really! We have this
rather sentimental idea that youre
supposed to admire or like the people
you write about or put on theatre
about. Actually I dont think thats true
at all, its a rather nave view. So it
doesnt belittle my respect for the originality of what Schoenberg achieved
or, indeed, even possibly what Moses
was trying to say. I just dont like being
told by anybody that this is the only
49
way to do it. And both men are, to Jews. Its a period in which the cult of
nationalist violence of a self-help
some extent, guilty of that.
vigilantism was widespread; with the
The interesting thing about Moses und Nazis of course, but with others as
Aron is that, because it was left unfin- well. For example, the Sokol moveished by Schoenberg, were allowed to ment in the Czech lands was a moveget away with a pseudo-tragic view of ment of physical fitness and health,
the piece because it ends up with Mo- and those people went around beating
ses in despair saying, O word, o word up Germans in the Sudetenland
that I lack. So we think, oh gosh poor which was part of the reason for the
chap, hes struggling with this and so Germans protesting that they were
on. But of course that was not what being mistreated. And sometimes they
Schoenberg had in mind; that was the were; it was not the case that the
ending in doubt of the second act. In Germans were always the aggressors
the third act, lets not forget, Moses in this period. And Schoenberg really
orders the murder of his brother embraces this idea of vigilante nationAron. [Schoenberg wrote the libretto alism on behalf of the Jews. Well, you
for Act 3 but never set it to music could say that if everybody else is
despite his oft-stated intention to do getting fit and punching noses then
so. Sometimes its performed as a youd better be armed in the same kind
spoken text following Act 2, though not of way! But its interesting that he did
by WNO in this production.] So he advocate Jewish participation in such
becomes a murderer actually and he a movement.
then leads a march and I use that
word advisedly of the Israeli people I wonder if, from what youre sayinto the promised land. So Moses is a ing, and regarding the issue of imviolent fundamentalist. To me he be- age and representation of the
longs up there with all these nutters divine, theres an interesting subversion in the opera of the Nazis
capturing schoolgirls in Nigeria!
conflation of Judaism and modernBut do you think that Schoenberg ism? Whether in some sense Schbecause Ive pondered this myself oenberg actually accepted that
is actually more sympathetic to Ar- equation but turned it on its head to
on in the piece than has often been show, contra the idol-worshipping
painted? Or, to put it another way, Nazis, that its the worship of imis there at least room for Schoen- ages that causes degeneracy not
berg to show any doubt of Moses? modernist values that do.
Perhaps it would be a self-doubt in
part, as the parallel between Moses Yes, thats his view. It seems to me an
and Schoenberg is obvious; Sch- untenable view that image and repreoenberg too struggled to deliver a sentation necessarily leads to degenmessage, so to speak, in serial- eracy, but thats Moses view.
ism, and he became a sort of pariah
figure for many beyond his own And to an extent Schoenbergs?
circle. Indeed, as far as the Nazis That is, if one views serialism as a
were concerned, he was a symbol step away from representationalism
and towards pure abstraction as
of degeneracy.
some have argued, and as some
Sympathy towards Aron is not some- later serialists tried to do?
thing that I have perceived. It is of
course true that Aron has more beau- Is it? I dont think so. Serialism in itself
tiful music but thats part of the way in is only really a technique to decide
which hes characterised by Schoen- which notes to write down. If you want
berg. Its very instructive, in terms of to represent a storm, or a cow mooing
Schoenberg and Moses intentions, to as Richard Strauss might have done,
go back to the play that Schoenberg theres nothing to stop you doing that
within a 12-tone structure.
wrote prior to writing the opera.
Der Biblische Weg? [1926-7]
Yes. In the play there is a single character called Max Aruns who is obviously Moses and Aron in one person
and who is essentially a Zionist. Actually, what the play is partly advocating
is a kind of nationalist cult of physical
fitness and aggression on behalf of the
really say that serialism of itself rules

out or is in conflict with representation
of non-musical ideas.
No, I agree. But that charge, if you
like, of abstraction even of mathematical obsession has pursued
Schoenberg with regard to his 12tone works; even though he said of
serialism apropos Moses und
Aron as it happens that you use
the method, but compose as before. Is there something here too
about Moses being a response
to Parsifal? Im thinking about Wagners attempts to represent the divine in that last opera: it seems
interesting that, in Moses, Schoenberg uses serialism the method
he devised to organise pitch material in the wake of the breakdown of
tonality from Wagner on to argue
for a taboo on images of the divine?
If that makes sense?!
It does but I dont get it. Surely, just to
back track to what else Schoenberg
said, he found himself using language
that today we would identify immediately as being fascist language. He
said I think I have found a musical
system that will guarantee the supremacy of German music. Firstly, its interesting that he saw himself as a
German composer which he was.
Hes basically implying that what was
laid down by Bach had ensured the
supremacy of German music for three
centuries, but that what was laid down
by Arnold was going to ensure that
supremacy for the next three centuries! In which prediction hes thankfully
been proven to have been entirely
wrong!
But its so fascinating that he would
even think of the concept of supremacy in musical terms that that would
even
occur
to
him
as
an
idea. Vorherrschaft is the German
word [literally pre-dominance, supremacy] and of course now its a word that
nobody would use because it was totally tainted by the Nazis. But he used
it and, even more importantly, he
thought it.
So, theres an irony here for SchNo indeed, as Berg did, and Henze oenberg, in terms of the taboo on
divine images that Moses tries to
and many others.
instil; because Schoenberg himself
Yes. Im sure you could point to lots of has not only taken the legacy of a
moments in the score of Moses und basically representational aesthetic
Aron where hes choosing a particular on board, but he sees himself as in
colour in order to emphasise a point in the vanguard of working for it to
the story, which is a kind of represen- endure?
tationalism. So I dont think you could
50
I suppose the point is that Moses, like

Schoenberg, is a visionary who comes
up with a new idea. But, ultimately,
Moses is going to be prepared to murder the person who might compromise
this idea which is quite a frightening
thought!
It is!
Going back to the point that you made
about Aron it would be very interesting to know how much this read to
people at the time, in the early 1930s
but of course the concept of the
demagogue became one of the catastrophic legacies of the Nazis. Because thats the reason why, after the
Second World War, the whole idea of
writing anything popular became
anathema; the taste of the people was
associated with demagoguery. It was
considered that if you pandered to the
tastes of the people you were actually
going down a fascist path. And I dont
know the extent to which Schoenberg
identified Aron as a type of Goebbels.
The propagandist.
much to try and popularise Verdi as
The propagandist. But hes certainly a freedom figure.
playing that role isnt he?
Yes. Va pensiero [the famous Chorus
Yes indeed.
of the Hebrews in Nabucco] was more
or less adopted by the fascists as a
Of course, that really led to the whole second national anthem in Italy.
catastrophe of post-war modernism,
which led music off into a complete Going back to Moses und Aron,
cul-de-sac for half a century, out of what does it mean to stage an opera
which were just emerging, with some that is effectively about at least in
part the impossibility of images?
relief!
Is that part of the challenge of
putting it on? Although it seems to
Blinking in the light, perhaps!
me that, despite Moses anguish at
and with a substantially alienated lacking the words to deliver his
public! Anyway, thats just speculation message, Schoenberg did find the
words that is, in those two acts at
really.
least, he managed to get something
But what an interesting contrast to written and staged and voiced.
Verdis Nabucco, which embraces
the popular with Verdi himself in Yes and surely Aron would point out
his day being so beloved of so that Moses despair was just as much
many people, in stark contrast to an image as his own fluency and abiliSchoenbergs later experience. Of ty to demonstrate.
course last years bicentenary of
Verdi and Wagner led many to re- And the Voice from the Burning
examine notions of a difference in Bush is a hugely dramatic image.
sensibility between Italian and German opera, but it seems to me that, Exactly. As is Moses gesture of breakwith Moses und Aron and Nabucco, ing the tablets of stone. Thats showits there and writ particularly large! manship too! And later, in the
uncomposed third act, you could point
to the execution of Aron as a very
Its colossal!
powerful image pour encourager les
And its ironic too, given our con- autres!
versation, that Mussolini did so
So the opera is actually full of contradictions, right from the start.

Fundamentally, yes.
That in itself is interesting in terms
of the spirals of contradiction and
paradox that religious fundamentalists rely so much upon. Interesting
that no such thing happens in the
Verdi! Theres far more clear cut
good and bad in Nabucco, with resolution thereof though hes still
tackling very knotty issues at some
level.
Yes and theres also the issue that
fundamentalism, or your view of it,
depends on which side youre looking
at it. For instance, Zaccaria happens
to be the person who is able to lead his
people a bit like the Polish Pope
[John Paul II]. But actually, if the Polish
Pope had not had to lead the Poles to
freedom from the communists, he
would probably have been seen as a
rather grumpy, right-wing religious fundamentalist! He acquires heroic status
because of the situation that he was in,
but actually, in terms of doctrine, he
was quite a hardliner in fact. If you talk
about his views on abortion, or womens right to decide whether to have
children or not, he comes over as a
much less sympathetic figure than if
you talk about his resistance to communism or to Soviet power and so on.
51
Completely!
I think if you met Zaccaria on another
piece of territory, in another narrative,
you might find that he was just as
unpleasant as any other such figure.
whole of Europe in the 19th century,

which is the issue of national identification right up to the point where the
King of Egypt feels he has to commission an opera in order to establish the
fact that Egypt is a grown-up nation; to
have the opera tell the story! [The then
Khedive of Egypt, Ismail Pasha, later
commissioned Verdi to write Aida.]
Which applies all over Eastern Europe
too of course.
So that issue of leadership becomes one, again, of representation

even of propaganda. Theres
something about the tantrum that
Moses has in the opera when he
I wonder if there is a faith aspect
smashes the tablets.
in Nabucco that happens to resoAlso an image of course, as weve said. nate with Schoenberg personally
which is the issue of religious conExactly. For me thats one of the version? [Schoenberg converted to
most shockingly revealing parts of Lutheranism as a young man and
the piece for what happens in that then back to Judaism upon having
moment to Moses absolute mis- to flee Germany pre-war.] At least,
sion to impart Gods Word? Some- your twinning of the two operas has
how the personal ego asserts itself got me thinking about that. Converwhen the chips are down and sion is very powerful in the Verdi
thats very revealing about the na- within that context of nationhood
ture of leadership and the will to and imperialism and subjugation;
the idea that one side in a conflict
power.
only really knows it has won when
Yes. I guess the one thing that you the other side accepts its God.
could
say
in
criticism
of
putting Nabucco under a title of faith Right. Yes, it goes together with impeis that Im not sure in the end that faith rialism, with insisting that everybody
is the subject of Nabucco. Its as much thinks like you do. So its a decidedly
another of Verdis family dramas isnt illiberal agenda. Which is part of why I
have problems with Moses himself,
it?
because I feel that those are all things
that people should decide for themIndeed.
selves.
And its got another of Verdis very
powerful father-daughter conflicts or Moses is a very angry man somesituations [as in Rigoletto for instance, how, as depicted in the opera. Hes
most famously], with Abigail discover- angry with God for wanting him to
ing that shes illegitimate and blaming be His mouthpiece. He knows he
her father for that which drives her to cant do it, but approaches Aron
with extremely bad grace and imdo all kinds of monstrous things.
mediately starts disagreeing with
Nabucco has also been painted as the way Aron wants to set about the
a very political opera in the sense task. So its not a straightforward
that the oppressed Hebrews are of- case of Moses loves God, Aron
ten taken as a metaphor for the loves the people and neer the twain
Italian people under the subjection shall meet, but all those very huof Austria. But I wonder how much man emotions of anger and despair
thats in retrospect; how far Verdi are very much part of the opera.
really was in his day a figure directly
associated
with And I suppose jealousy too. I think
the Risorgimento, and whether the Moses is quite jealous of Arons abilioperas story is more to do with his ties and plausibility.
being a brilliant dramatist?
Yes that contrast between
Oh I think he knew perfectly well that Moses Sprechstimme [or sungthat would pull the right strings. He speech] and Arons eloquent bel
was a good theatre man and I think he canto is very powerful. And its inknew what was going to stir peoples teresting that God, through the choemotions and that was a very power- rus at the beginning, as the Voice
ful topic, even without it necessarily from the Burning Bush, uses both
being identified with Garibaldi or Sprechstimme and song.
the Risorgimento specifically. The opera is part of a big subject for the Right.
The chorus has a tremendously

powerful role in the opera and its
very hard!
And theyre doing very well I think, too.
Thats really the point of doing it here
at WNO to showcase the WNO Chorus.
Yes, I see that. Nabucco too is famous for its choruses including,
of course, Va pensiero. Another
thing common to both operas in a
way, seen in part through the
chorus/crowd scenes, is the notion
of cultural destruction. In the Verdi,
theres the destruction of the Hebrew temple, and then of the statue
of Baal another image.
Your saying that reminds me that you
can see, in relation to Verdis life and
career,
how
relatively
primitive Nabucco is. Because there is
no music for the destruction of Baal.
No! It slips through doesnt it, without being set by him.
Yes. And so Im reminded of the fact
that the attitude of the composer to a
scenic event in Nabucco is the same
as it was for Handel. When, in Xerxes,
the bridge across the Hellespont collapses, theres no music. Maybe the
harpsichord does a kind of rumble or
something but there is nothing otherwise; the composer didnt see it as his
job to depict that kind of thing.
In Nabucco, Verdi hasnt quite noticed
yet that the grand opra has emerged
in Paris, where people are beginning
to compose all kinds of scenic effects:
moonlight and thunderstorms.
Representing the image in music
even!
Yes! And later on of course, with Verdi,
when you think how he deals with the
opening of Otello for example, he gets
right in there. But he was writing in a
different world in Nabucco.
And from that point of view also, its
an interesting opera to twin
with Moses because of the simultaneous dryness and yet huge expressivity that Schoenberg puts
into that piece. He really goes for it
with the Golden Calf music. I take it
youre not going to have people
running through fires in that scene,
as he writes in the score?!
52
No no! But Im not sure I should give

away the solution to all that! The fact
that Jossi Wieler and Sergio Morabito
in Stuttgart came up with a rather intelligent way of dealing with that scene
was what made it possible for us to do
the production!
No, dont give it away! On the surface you look at those massive forces that Schoenberg employs and
you think, this is epic opera, but its
an opera as much about one mans
inner torment as it is epic on a
grand scale like the Verdi. But
again, the Verdi is also, as you say,
a very personal drama.
Well you can see that as a parallel.
Moses is about two brothers and a lot
of the driving force of at least one side
of the story in Nabucco are the two
sisters and their very hostile relationship to one another.
Yes. Schoenberg seems to me to
have been actually very interested
in human relationships and the difficulties of, I suppose, being in the
world. But he was caught in a bind
because, on a personal level, he
craved love and acceptance, but as
a true modernist artist, he didnt
want either!
I think he wanted to be admired.
Yes perhaps not loved. Revered.
piece is one of extreme simplicity you

could say. Hes a tremendously nice
man and very knowledgeable about
opera. But I rather floored him the
other day by saying that his piece was
in the tradition of Dargomyzhsky. Hed
never heard of Dargomyzhsky, which
is fair enough most people havent.
You think so even in Moses und But what Dargomyzhsky did I dont
know whether youve heard of DargoAron?
myzhsky?
I think there is a kind of intellectual
arrogance which is saying, if you cant Yes I have, he was a Russian comdemonstrate utter mastery of an over- poser, but carry on!
complexity, youre not really qualified.
I dont think you can necessarily point He created this idea of permanent
to a bar in Moses und Aron and say recitative really. That is, that the funclook, you could have written that a lot tion of the music was simply to illumisimpler and got the same effect. But nate the text and only under
you can say that of the music of a lot exceptional moments should the music rise up and say something on its
of his followers.
own. And of course this technique was
very influential on all the RussianOh yes, thats very true!
Russian composers. By that I mean
And so he established something obviously not on Tchaikovsky, whos
and maybe he shouldnt be blamed for the opposite; the non-Russian comwhat less talented people did after- poser. But on Mussorgsky in particuwards but he established a kind of lar. This was very influential, and
rule of thumb that complexity was im- established this whole pattern of concentrating on the speech and reservportant.
ing outright musical expression for
Perhaps theres an arrogance in his very significant moments. And thats
using just one note-row as a basis for basically what the Getty does. Its just
the whole opera in the way he did? In a very nuanced, careful handling of the
the sense of look how I can write all of text. Whereas the Debussy of course
this music out of twelve notes ar- immediately gets into a sort of wallowranged just so? At any rate, thats ing hot tub of misty perfumes and bath
potentially rather fundamentalist in it- oils! So thats an interesting contrast
as well!
self isnt it?
scenic word]; just the right, pithy way
to bring a situation clearly onto the
stage. But Schoenberg sets off what I
think was a disastrous tendency in
20th century culture, of cultivating
complexity very often for its own
sake.
Revered, yes. Theres another dreadful quote from him isnt there? Some- It is, yes. But of course Bach would
thing like all art should be created have done the same.
cold.
Perhaps without the self-conAnd yet his music wasnt created sciousness?
cold. At least, I dont think so!
Yes, without the self-consciousness.
It isnt cold necessarily, but it may
have been created cold or the proc- Well thanks for talking with me Davess may have been so. Theres anoth- id. I suspect Id better let you go
er strange thing that is interesting to because youve got a rehearsal!
look at between the two pieces: I dont
think its any insult to Verdi to say that Yes I have. I cant remember whether
he actually cultivates simplicity. I think Im rehearsing the simple piece or the
thats very often what he meant by his complex piece! Because thats quite
concept of parola scenica [literally, the an interesting contrast too! Gettys
Yes it would be! I gather youre doing a new version of the Debussy by
Robert Orledge?
Well, its a version Robert Orledge did
five years ago or so. We premired it
in Bregenz [an opera festival in Austria
where David is Intendant], which is
how I know it.
Well, I look forward to it, as well as
to the Schoenberg and the Verdi.
Thanks again for talking with me.
Thank you its important to have
serious discussion!
53
In Conversation with Gruff Rhys

by Sarah King
stand quietly at the door and listen to the sound check. Voices
calling out, snippets of melody and
song, a laugh, feedback rising to a
distorted pitch and brought back down
again.
Gruff Rhys is in Acapela, a small
converted chapel in Pentyrch, getting
ready for the first of a series of gigs
across Wales this spring and summer
to promote his new multimedia
project, American Interior.
American Interior, a highly ambitious
concept comprising a record, a film, a
book, an app, and personal performances, chronicles the journey of John
Evans from his hometown Waunfawr
across the Atlantic ocean to Baltimore.
And his long walk along the Missouri
river in search of a lost tribe of Welsh
speaking first nation Americans.
Gruffs tour manager passes me at
the door and as he rushes past he
says five minuteshe wont be long
now.
Thats fine, I answer, there is no
rush.
Im meeting Gruff before the concert
tonight to talk about his new project.
Half an hour later we are sat upstairs
in a small room. Bottles of water, iPad
on the table and a deep sigh and smile
from Gruff as he sits down. He apologises for keeping me waiting, I apologise for taking up his time when hes
obviously busy. He is charming, relaxed, intelligent, an attentive listener
and an astute and deliberate speaker.
*
I ask him about the origins of the like. Which was fine for most of the
journey, but when we came to New
project.
Orleans they presumed it was a vooGruff Rhys: Well, it was based around doo fetish. So that completely
an investigative concert tour in Ameri- changed the nature of this doll. We
ca, following the path taken by John were persisting that it was not a vooEvans between 1782 and 1789. We doo fetish, it was just a representation
toured along his journey. I had done a of a distant relative, and they said yes,
previous investigative concert tour thats what a voodoo fetish is. A reprewith my friend Dylan Goch directing sentation of a relative. You must build
the film. A film called Separado! And him a shrine, give it cards and food
then, about eight years ago, we found and sing to it. So that meant had to
a
film
by
Gwyneth
Williams build a shrine for it. We took it back to
called Madog, that deals with the Ma- North Wales and we had a voodoo
dog myth. John Evans was following ceremony in Waunfawr on top of a
the mythical tribe of Madogus, de- mountain. Im sure he would be horriscended from Madog the mythical fied. The real John Evans would have
Welsh prince. And the story of John been very religious. He lived at the
Evans was featured a little bit in this beginning of a huge protestant reforwider documentary from the 1970s. So mation in Europe. He came from a
wed seen this documentary and that very religious, Methodist family, but he
was inspiring for me, and Dylan as was very pragmatic. He was a baptist
well, and I went to see a booking agent within three weeks of arriving in Amerin America three years ago. Asked him ica, and then there is no mention of
to plot a tour along the journey. So we religion again in his correspondences.
were following the journey of someone And he got to experience the ceremonies of some of the tribes of the Misfollowing someone elses journey.
souri. He would have experienced the
Sarah King: Was the destination at Buffalo dance and the okipa, where
the end of the journey different than people hang themselves by hooks
what you thought you would find? from the ceiling.
Absolutely, and we were willing for that
to happen as well. For example, we
created an avatar of John Williams,
one metre tall, and for most of the
journey he was just a visual aid. John
Evans existed before visual surveillance, so we have no idea what he
looked like. We created this approximation of what he may have looked
Did you see the story as a metaphor

for a larger Welsh issue?
Yes, there are contradictions as well,
in that he was escaping colonisation.
There was also a class struggle. It was
the time of the French Revolution and
the American Revolution. Iolo Morgannwg who was his mentor, and people
54
like John Rhys, were radicals. They

wanted to live in a land free of the
monarchy and the ruling classes and
they thought they could creative this
new Wales based on the values of the
American Revolution in the region
where the lost tribe of Madogus existed. I mean they were completely deluded, and by attempting to colonise
someone elses land they were contradicting themselves. Would it not have
been better to start a revolution in
Wales? All that energy John Evans
spent walking 4000 miles looking for a
lost tribe and start a new Wales. I
mean, he had a good look. Would that
energy have been better spent starting
a revolution in Wales? Except people
at that time were putting all their energy into establishing religion. Organising themselves outside The Church of
England. Which is political in a way,
but now we are in a post-religious era,
maybe we would rather they have put
their energy into a political revolution.
This story seems to have started
out as a story about looking for
Welshness, but also became about
other minority cultures and languages.
Yes, I think its very profound to see
the physical manifestation of what the
end of a language looks like. I met the
last speaker of a language that was
being spoken when John Evans travelled through. At that time they were
still practising their ceremonies and
were close to the height of their civilisation. Although they had already suffered from smallpox at this point, he
met the Omaha tribe at the very height
of their civilisation and lived with them.
Its obviously slightly disingenuous
comparing the Welsh experience to
people that have gone through near
genocide. Im not comparing it, but
there are lots of similarities between
what happened to the people in
Wales, and what happened in America.
Does that make you worry for the
Welsh language?
Well, yeah. The mood in the reservations was incredible. They have some
sovereignty, and some control over
education so they can learn about their
own culture. The age of assimilation is
over. They have their own sort of pop
culture ad pow-wows, and it was very
inspiring to see that. It was also interesting to see how lucky we are in
Wales, and what an amazing opportunity we have to keep the language and
grow the language. But its only going
to be an opportunity for a short period strategy of booking agents is to have

you go to cities where lots of people
of time.
live, so large groups of people can
Its very interesting to be in this build- gather at your concerts and make lots
ing in Pentyrch. If you walk around the of money for the promoters etc. I was
cemetery its very obvious that not just looking for ways to change the
long ago everyone here was Welsh- way I tour and maybe have a new
speaking, and this whole village was sense of purpose for touring that was
Welsh-speaking until the 1960s when beyond commerce. Touring can be
the city reached the village. Its almost vacuous if its just fulfilling someone
unimaginable now, this close to Car- having sat in an office filling in the tour
diff, and such a short time ago. It without any input from the artist. You
shows how easily the language can are basically at the behest of someone
just disappear from the remaining elses whim. You dont really get anyheartlands if it happened so quickly thing back from it. Its usually a wonderful experience but I was trying to
here.
think of touring in a way that was solvIs that part of the reason you chose ing something. But then my love of
music is naive, rather than conceptual.
to make the album bilingual?
Well, it shows the contradictions in me
as well. I use the English language,
and I love American pop culture. At the
time I was writing the songs, I was
portraying the story to American audiences. I was doing a tour and was
travelling through America, and telling
the story to people who were completely ignorant about Wales, and often my music, and definitely John
Evans. I had to explain everything, so
I wrote a lot of the songs in English
because I was in the moment, and in
the journey. But now, taking everything in, I probably would have recorded an album about John Evans in the
Welsh language. It seems strange to
record it in English language, but thats
what I did.
Tonight, its just you on the stage.

Do you enjoy the live gigs? Are they
important to you ?
I was thinking recently about the disconnect between songwriting and recording, and then having to create a
spectacle, a live spectacle, without it
being related in any way. Unless you
are the artisan folk musician.
Its a different part. They are maybe
how I make some kind of living, so in
that sense I am the artisan. Going
back to the naive state. Singing melodic songs. Enjoy it? Maybe like being in
a car driving fast
*
Downstairs, in the bar, 180 people

Did going to art school inspire the
idea of the concept album? The no- are milling around. A hum of voices.
tion of a bigger vision rather than Excitement and anticipation. The concert was sold out in less than 2 hours.
being intuitive?
We take our seats in the chapel, the
Im not sure how it has manifested lights are dim, and Gruff makes his
itself, because I am a big fan of music, way to the pulpit in a black suit, wearand making music, and I have been ing the wolf hat, and carrying the John
trying to write songs most of my life. As Evans doll, that along with the black,
a musician Im a figurative songwriter, white and purple colour scheme that
but having gone through that process runs throughout all the multimedia
maybe I am not interested in authen- platforms, have become the visual
ticity, and through that I have come branding of the concept. John Evans
across ideas that the whole self image is placed on top of the pulpit, and the
can be a construct. It doesnt have to hat is placed under as the guitar
be genuine or touched by the hand of comes on.
He has his hands full, and the show
the artisan. Im not the greatest musician, but I can create anything, use is an impressive feat of multitasking.
any sound. I mean, Im just speculat- Playing, singing, controlling effects
ing herewhy I take it to certain plac- and loops, storytelling, managing a
es. Maybe Im comfortable in ideas slide show and keeping the audience
in the palm of his hand with warmth
Do you see yourself as a conceptu- and wit.
He switches naturally between
al artist?
Welsh and English in song and in tellWell, the tour was conceptual, and ing the story of John Evans. A story
people take conceptual arcs in art. The told with humour and a feeling of laisThe Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1
55
sez-faire calm amid all the activity. The

connection with the audience is easy.
Gruff is on home turf and his audience
laps up every joke and exchange.
Technical hitches are dealt with wit,
and become running jokes throughout
the 90minute set, and the small room
creates a familiarity and intimacy that
would have been impossible in a larger venue.
He opens with Honey All Over, and
the set is a mix of solo back catalogue
like Gyrru Gyrru Gyrru, Sensations in
the Dark, Shark Ridden Waters,
Gwn Mi Wn and songs from the new
album including the title track, Iolo
and 100 unread messages. Halfway
through the set the hauntingly beautiful Walk into the Wilderness cuts
through the jest and humour to remind

us that behind the tales of adventure
lies a story of hope, oppression, belief,
endurance and tragedy. A 22 year old
man, inspired by the age of enlightenment, mythological tales of Prince Madog having discovered America and
left behind Welsh-speaking descendants and a wish for freedom from English imperialism. Encouraged by
intellectuals like Iolo Morgannwg, who
himself wimped out of the expedition
last minute, John Evans set out on a
suicide mission that not only resulted
in the inevitable realisation that there
was no such tribe in America, but led
to his eventual death aged just 29.
Gruff delivers a thought provoking
and inspiring experience that sits in
the borderlands between music and

art, reality and myth, comedy and tragedy.
As the concert ends the audience
make their way back into the still warm
spring evening. Walking through the
graveyard
surrounding
Acapela,
smoking their post-sensory experience cigarettes, laughing, comparing
notes. Hopefully with a reminder of the
fragility and vulnerability of the Welsh
language and culture, and maybe a
lesson that the way ahead is to be
brave and follow in John Evans footsteps by moving forward, exploring
and not accepting a situation as inevitable.
Dark Room
by Anna Metcalfe
very year, when the plum tree had lost its
leaves, my father, would take a photograph.
From the moment the air turned cool, we
would keep a close eye on it, watching the
shades of green become a spectrum of gold.
And then, the colours shedding, a thickening
blanket over the roots, we would wait for the last leaf to
drop.
Some years looking out of the window we would
wake to find the tree suddenly bare, the remaining few
leaves having fallen in the night.
At other times, the last leaves would struggle on through
the morning but, later in the day, when one of us would go
back to check, they would be gone. Then, there were the
handful of more memorable occasions when, upon looking
out of the window that of his bedroom or the dining room
below either he or I or both of us together would catch
the last leaf as it came fluttering down to the ground,
watching it curl and flip through the air, before resting
weightless on the grass or skipping away on the cusp of a
breeze.
Its time, he would say, and fetch his camera.
At that time of year, it was not quite winter-cold, but the
seasons were shifting. Fewer clouds gathered overhead.
The daylight sharpened and the materials of the garden
the stone path, the greenhouse, the antique table, the iron
work chairs and the plum tree itself appeared in greater

definition. The residual warmth of summer evaporated.
He was particular about the photographs. His practice
was consistent. He would stand with both feet on the path
with his back to the dining room window, so close that he
was almost leaning against the glass. At the centre of the
frame was the point where the largest branches diverged
from the trunk. This meant that, although the garden was
not particularly large, the table and chairs, the flowerbeds
and the greenhouse remained out of shot. The plum tree
stood near the back of the garden which gave way to corn
fields, ash blond plants that stood tall and firm. A dip in the
land meant the scattered houses beyond remained invisible. In this way, the photographs made it appear as though
the tree were the only marker on the horizon for miles
around.
I would stand by his side and wait for the click, followed
by the familiar winding of the film. He only ever took one
shot. If the weather was bad, my father would make me
watch through the dining room window. I would kneel on
the deep wooden sill, looking at him through the central
pane. At this distance, my mind became active. It was my
mothers tree, a memorial planted shortly after she died.
That was all I knew. We seldom talked of her which meant
that I seldom gave her much thought.
56
My father developed the photographs himself in the

basement the only part of the process in which I was not
involved. The images were large, ten by twelve inches,
black and white. He mounted them on pieces of black
sugar paper cut to size to give a narrow frame. When he
had finished, he would come to show me his work and I
would nod my approval, commenting on the particulars: the
position of the clouds, the blur of a breeze, the quality of
the light. Each one was dated, numbered and stored in a
heavy wooden box that he kept in the cupboard under the
stairs.
I was often alone. Sometimes, if I was bored, I would
take them out to look at, arranging them in patterns on the
carpet or sorting them into piles. The few friends I had lived
in the next village and, while on summer days I was glad to
make the journey on my bike, when autumn closed in my
father became anxious and I chose not to anguish him
further by straying out of doors. In any case, I liked to be
there, in the house, reordering the pictures, always looking
for the most pleasing arrangement.
It would be easy to imagine that the photographs are all
alike. The plum tree did not grow a great deal over the
years and, as far as was possible, its shape was maintained by frequent pruning. Even so, while certain of the
photographs bore close resemblance to one another, others differed so wildly that, had the backdrop not been so
consistent had the fields been dug up for housing, say,
or the farmer chosen to plant a new crop it would be
easy to say that these were different plum trees from
different lands. A certain kind of evening light made one
image pale and over-bright, the sun burning a hole in part
of the trunk. In another, the wind had torn through the
upper branches and made them blur.
There are a number of ways to categorise the photographs. From the position of the sun and the quality of the
light, it is possible to identify those taken in the morning,
the afternoon and at sunset. Some skies were dull, some
gave way to an occasional cloud, and others stretched
away smoothly, disturbed only by the grain of the lens. But
when I was in my teens, I preferred the simplest method:
to make two piles, one for before and one for after the storm.
In the winter between the tenth and the eleventh
photographs I was ten there was a night of crazed
winds, lashing rain and forked lightning. Disturbed by the
commotion, I ran into my fathers room and we lay in bed
holding onto one another. We didnt think of the tree until
the morning. The largest branch, and others leading off
from it, on the right side of the tree (as viewed from the
photographers stance) had split and fallen. We stood at
the dining room window, looking out at the rupture where
the branches had torn. The two largest branches had been
wrenched apart at the trunk, a jagged tear in the bark. The
felled branch lay broken on the lawn. In the pictures that
followed the storm you could chart small changes in the
tree. The branches on the left sunk lower as it began to
lean, losing its balance, slowly giving up on the sun.
There were other events, other exceptions. Of the
thirty-two pictures he took, only one the eighteenth was
in colour.
Why, when the others are black and white? I had said.
I looked forward to the developed picture and this move
away from tradition set me on edge.
Because when I took it the sky was so grey, he said.
Alone, the picture could pose as monochrome. It was
only when it was placed among the others that its particular
subtlety and warmth of tone became evident. My father
held it against the photograph from the previous year.
It was a stupid thing to do, he said. I made a mistake.

*
Shortly after my eighteenth birthday, I enrolled to study
architectural design at the University of Valencia, leaving
my father alone in the house. He had encouraged me, then
resigned himself to the change. It was summer, a month or
two before term began, and I had little thought for autumn.
When the days of September ran out and the heat endured
no change in the leaves, dry and brittle as ever an
uneasiness crept in. Every few days, I would phone home
and enquire about the tree.
A few more have gone, he would say. One or two
fallen, I think. Though its early yet I sensed his irritation at
my absence and made an effort to talk of other things. Until
one November afternoon, he said: Theyve all gone, I took
the picture.
In Valencia, autumn was never cool. When it finally
arrived, the air was only a little altered and the light the
same. Trees were slow to lose their leaves and many
never did. Instead, the habit of Valencian leaves was to
grow limp and hang, undead, waiting for a cold that would
not come. When I went home for the winter holidays that
year we did not talk about the photograph Id missed, the
first in almost twenty years.
In my third year abroad, I decided to go home for the
photograph. I called a few weeks ahead and had a long
conversation with my father regarding the precise timing of
my trip and over which days I would have the best chance
of catching the plum tree as it lost its last leaves. He kept
careful records of his work and, looking at the dates of the
photographs, he concluded that the most opportune window was between the fourteenth and the twenty-second of
November. I made my arrangements accordingly.
When I arrived back it was the fourteenth. Eight leaves
remained on the tree. The next day there were six, then
five. On the fourth, fifth and sixth days there were three.
After a week had gone by, only two leaves remained and
on November twenty-second the day of my departure
there was one leaf left. I had packed my bags the night
before and my train to the airport was at half past one. We
would need to leave the house at twelve. By the time we
finished breakfast it was nine. There was a three hour
window.
Still one, still one, my father said, looking out of the
dining room window. Then, when the last of the coffee had
been drunk, he said: I know what to do.
You cant take the picture with the leaf still there, I said.
Of course not, said my father.
I followed him out the back door. Instead of assuming
his usual position on the path, he kept on walking towards
the tree. He reached up and before I could stop him he had
the last leaf in his hand. It was stubborn and it took a hard
tug to free it from its branch. He stuffed the leaf into the
back pocket of his jeans and moved away from the tree,
the camera slung around his neck. He took the picture, the
twenty-first in the sequence. The ritual was broken, the
archive contaminated.
He had ignored his own rules. I felt ashamed that he
had done this for my sake, because I no longer lived there,
because we were both getting older, and who knew how
many photographs were left? My coming home at all like
that, right in the middle of term, was already an anachronism in our story.
When I graduated from Valencia, I got an apprenticeship in New York. My father was thrilled, and for the first
57
time since I had left home, I sensed that we had come to

some kind of understanding. I no longer had to ask about
the tree; when autumn arrived he told me all about it and
when he said that the photograph had been taken he
described the sky and the light and the movement of the air
so well that I could picture it perfectly in my mind. There
were one or two years when I went home, though I was
never there to see the last leaf fall, but just being there at
that time of year was enough.
Then, I met Laura. An American and a dancer, lively,
always laughing, with a large and close-knit family up state;
a heritage utterly removed from the quiet, almost silent,
world of my childhood. We went to art galleries. She took
me to the opera. I showed her my projects, she took me to
rehearsal. When she walked, there was a slight turn-out in
her feet.
The spring before the very last picture was taken, Laura
and I got engaged. The same April, I took her home to
meet my father. The plum tree was in full bloom. We sat
beneath it, drinking prosecco and laughing like children.
Laura charmed him; she seemed to have an effect on his
character: he became playful, gracious, even stylish. He
took great pride in the way he served us dinner and in the
mornings he laid on lavish breakfasts, with pastries, fruits,
breads and jams the likes of which I had never seen him
buy before. We stayed a full week, during which time
neither my father nor myself made any mention of the
catalogue of photographs under the stairs. I remember
having wanted to ask him if he continued to honour the
tradition, but something whether a sense of embarrassment or ritualistic sanctity, I dont know prevented me
and I kept quiet.
He died the following winter. A heart attack. Aged 62. It
was quick, without pain, they said. I went back alone
Laura had a Broadway show at that time and made the
arrangements for the funeral. She would arrive in time for
that. I called the vicar and asked him to make an announcement. The local newspaper was informed. When
the day of the funeral came, the church was packed, pews
crammed, people standing at the back. Even more turned
up for the wake at the Drifters Inn, the other side of the
village.
I had no idea he had so many friends, I said. When I
was a boy he had very few visitors. In fact, he had never
exhibited much need of other company at all. But it seemed
that once I left he became an active member of the community. He mowed the lawn of the cemetery and volunteered at the local school. He had even, someone told me,
led a photography workshop at the village hall.
Laura went back to New York while I stayed on for a few
more weeks. There was no good reason to hold onto the
house. I called an estate agent. It was sold within two
months. A few bits of furniture, pieces of my mothers
jewellery he had kept and other items I had loved or that
seemed important somehow, were shipped to New York;
among them, of course, were the photographs.
*
They remained in their box on a low shelf in my study for
many years. Whenever I looked at it, I told myself I was
keeping them there for their protection, so they would not
fade. In the end, it was Laura who unearthed them. She
was pregnant at the time and, unable to dance, had set her
mind on clearing out the house. It was more than a decade
since he had died.
I was in the kitchen when she came to find me:
Did you take these? she said, holding up an image in

each hand. Where did you find a tree like that in New York?
She was oddly suspicious, as though I might have been
sneaking out taking pictures of trees behind her back.
You know that tree, I said. Youve seen it. Its the plum
tree in my fathers garden.
She looked blank.
You sat beneath it once to toast our engagement, I said.
But it looks so different, said Laura looking at one of
the pictures from before the storm.
I know, but thats the one.
Did you take them? she said.
No, he did.
Well, she said, calmer, theyre lovely. You should do
something with them. Put them up.
In the house?
If you like, or in your office, or in a gallery somewhere.
I laughed. Let me think, I said.
At that time I was working for a firm on the Upper West
Side. I made models of the cities of the future, the ones that
my child would come to know. On the ground floor of the
building was a printing office, run by a woman called Lin.
She was softly spoken, almost to the point of inaudible, as
though the incessant back-and-forth noise of the printers
and copiers had dulled her over the years.
I need a favour, I said. I showed her the pictures. She
looked at them with curiosity but made no comment. I
asked for ten copies of each. She raised an eyebrow. Is
that too much? I asked.
She shook her head. Come back in three days.
When I went back, she handed me the images, all three
hundred and twenty of them, plus the thirty originals, in a
cardboard box. I reached for my wallet and took out a few
notes.
No need, she said.
Are you sure?
I made an extra copy of this one, she said. It was the
one in colour. Im going to put it in my kitchen, she said. It
looks like a tree from my grandfathers garden.
In Japan?
I know, she said, but it does.
And the others?
I know, theyre all the same. But this one looks more like
the one I remember than the rest.
I set to work. On the back of each print I placed a sticker
with the date of capture and numbered them in sequence.
I hung one set of copies across three walls of my study at
home. I knew that the light in the room was uneven and
that some of the pictures would fade faster than others. But
now that there were so many copies, it was hard to imagine
a time when they would all be faded. They would outlive
me, at least. When all the pictures were arranged, I stood
before them, looking carefully. When I stopped at one,
perhaps the fourth or the fifth, a warmth crept over my
shoulders, radiating from the memory of the way the dining
room window almost touched my fathers back. I felt the
stone path beneath my feet and the change of the air
against my cheeks. Though I had never taken a single
photograph in that house, I felt the weight and the coolness
of the camera in my hands and the presence of a young
boy at my side, watching and waiting for the click of the big
black button, the winding of the film, the tap on the shoulder that meant it was time to go back inside.
Laura gave birth to a girl, a long-limbed little thing with
a shock of fair hair. We named her Carla, after Carla
Fracci. She couldnt take her eyes off us, when we were
working or cooking or sitting down at the end of the day to
58
listen to music. It was as if she were watching over us, and

not the other way round. When she was very small, I used
to carry her into my study. I held her to my chest so that her
head poked over my shoulder. I walked her slowly from
one photograph to the next, moving with my back to the
frames, so that Carla could get the best view. I pictured
each image as she arrived at it, her breathing soft and
steady in my ear.
When she was old enough I gave her a set of copies.
Just as I had done, she liked to reorder and reorganise the
images, dividing them up, placing them in grids or columns
or zig zags across the floor.
At school, her subject was art and she came home,
night after night, with some new painting or drawing rolled
up under her arm. At sixteen, she went to art school. At
eighteen she decided to go professional, living at home,
saving money for her first show. She was friends with the
right people. She had Lauras quiet confidence. I never
doubted she would succeed. We gave her the dining room
to use as a studio, taking our meals at the kitchen table.
For two whole years she wouldnt show us a thing.
In that time, I learned that the old house was no longer
there. The family who had bought it sold it on to developers, who had simply waited for the right time to build. They
razed it to the ground and, presumably, the plum tree with
it. I was suddenly aware that there were no photographs of
anything else. My father had not documented my childhood
the way most parents do, the way we had with Carla. There
were no pictures of our Christmases, our outings to the
city, my football matches or school plays, though he had
attended them all. There was only the plum tree, thirty two
versions of it, and all more or less the same. Soon after, I
took the photographs down and replaced them with bits of
Carlas work. I left them in their frames and piled them into
a box.
When Carla was twenty, and I was as old as my father

had been when he died, she unveiled the project. It could
not be done at home, she said, so she hired a cheap space
in Brooklyn, a room with no windows about fifteen feet
square and painted white. When she ushered us in, it was
pitch black. She held some manner of remote control in her
hand. She clicked a button and the room filled with light,
which cast peculiar shadows on the wall.
The back wall was filled with miniature spotlights and
each light was fitted with a lens from which the shadows
were generated. As my eyes adjusted, I began to recognise the shapes on the wall as images of the plum tree. I
counted the lights. Thirty two lenses for thirty two photographs. I looked more closely at the projections, identifying
the tree before the storm and after it, the pictures with clear
skies, with dark skies with clouds. The shadows were all
different sizes, the images magnified to different degrees
and tilted to fall upon different parts of the room. In the
middle of one wall, something strange caught my eye. I
walked towards it. The tone of the shadow was faintly blue,
and the sky not quite clean.
The one in colour, I said.
Carla nodded.
She handed me the remote control. There were thirty
two buttons.
How did you do this? I said.
Magic.
How long can we stay?
As long as you like.
I took them on a tour of the room. I told them about the
storm, the years I had missed, the years I returned. We
clicked the lights on and off, all three of us, and adjusted
the angles, moving the images from ceiling to walls to floor,
in order to find the most pleasing arrangement.
The Lonely Crowd is a new magazine devoted to the short story,

founded by John Lavin of Wales Arts Review and The Lampeter
Review. Its primary desire is to create a new space in which the
short story form can flourish.
Find them at http://thelonelycrowd.org/
59
Halloween Special: Like Water Through Fingers

by Carly Holmes
nd youre here again and they still cant see
you. But they wont even look, when I point
they dont turn their heads and so how can
they expect to. Stubborn is what they are.
They refuse to fit their hands around mine
and let me steer our cupped palms through
you, to feel you spill like water through our fingers, they tell
me not to touch. And when I plead and then I grab at them
they press me back in my chair and tell me to calm
down, be quiet, stop getting so aggressive.
And then you fade again and its just me and them. Its
easier for us all, when youre gone. They study my face and
nod at each other and let me eat my dinner with the others.
Ive thought about pretending youre gone when youre not,
wrapping you around me and wearing you like a shawl,
knotted tight over my heart, but as soon as youre here I
shine with it, with you, and I start to twitch and reach to pull
you close. I cant help myself. And then they know youre
here again and they stiffen and sigh, straighten up and put
their cigarettes out. Im starting to become a nuisance.
If I could stand I would, and dance with you like we used
to. It wouldnt be as easy as back then, when you used to
hold me pressed against your chest as if I might float away,
and youd slip your palms down past where my spine flares
out to flesh, and flirt them there, and smile at me. Do you
remember how you used to do that? Now it would be more
tentative, even ludicrous. Me with my absent legs trailing
nails and panic through the murk of what you are, terrified
youd drop me. Maybe Id slide down you like a waterfall,
cascade over your torso, the rush of your thighs, and
collapse in the froth of your faint, almost-there feet. And Id
flail around on the floor until someone came and lifted me
back into my chair and told me to stop crying.
But what if that didnt happen? What if we could hold
ourselves, and each other, in that place before skin breaks
the surface of liquid and disappears below it? When I fill the
sink in the bathroom and rest my hand on the water theres
a moment when its solid against my flesh. Its weight pushes back at me, all those molecules tight and gathered and
thrusting, I can feel them. But then the tremble begins in my
arms and forces my hand down through that moment, and
its ruined and I have to empty the sink and start again.
They dont let me do that too often. They bang on the
door and if I dont answer at once then they barge in. Ive
told them that one of these days theyll interrupt me in the

middle of something theyd rather not witness, but we both
know theyve seen it all and theres nothing that could
embarrass them anymore. Its the water theyre concerned
about. The waste. I sometimes think I must be personally
responsible for the thirst of millions, the way they go on
about it. They call it an obsession and ask me how many
times Ive filled and emptied the sink today. Last week I was
resting my face on the waters surface, trying to see if I
could hold myself still enough to dance cheek to cheek with
you and one of them came in and pulled me up by the hair
and shouted for help. They didnt understand when I tried
to explain. They wouldnt leave me alone after that, not for
days.
And youre here again and I think Im close to getting it
right, that balance between us, that skating on water, so
that we can touch without merging. Its enough that youre
here though, I dont mind if I never get it right, but Im
practising anyway, Im practising every day. When youre
here and you smile at me the way you do its enough.
They think they can help me get over you as if youre
some kind of obstacle, a fallen branch on the ground in front
of me that, with their support, I can scramble over. I have to
talk to a lady who comes in twice a week. Ive never seen
her legs, shes always sat behind her desk and when I
knock on the door she doesnt get up to let me in, she just
calls out. Maybe she thinks shes being kind, or respectful,
but it just seems rude. I have to wheel myself in and twist to
shut the door behind me without tipping myself out of the
chair and she just sits and watches or writes things in her
notebook. Youre never with me when she is. Even when I
close my eyes and wish so hard to have you here again, for
her to see you, you stay away.
We go through the same things each time and I wonder
if shes as bored as I am. She asks how often Ive seen you.
She asks whether youve changed. Whether you speak. In
our last session she told me to explain why you dont look
the way you looked when I last saw you. She said that, if
you were really real, youd be suspended in the moment of
death, swollen and blue, and thats what Id see. I asked her
if she was an expert on the paranormal but she just smiled
and gave me two books on grief to read and one on PTSD
then wrote something in her notebook. I dont think she likes
me at all.
60
The other people who stay here told me theyve seen you
too. Twice in the kitchen and once in the garden. I wanted
to hit them. Why would you be doing that, giving yourself to
them when you never even knew them? I think theyre lying
just to get attention but then Im scared that theyre telling
the truth. It annoys the staff though. They call it group
hysteria and glare at me as if its my fault, like Im doing this
on purpose just to create problems. They say when I leave
here things will settle down, because Ill take you with me
and there wont be any more of these fantasies. But what if
theyre wrong and you dont come with me? What if you
stay here and they wont let me come back to see you? All
thats a long way off though, because I heard them saying
that I couldnt be trusted by myself, away from here, until
Id accepted what had happened and stopped trying to
drown myself in the sink. So I dont need to worry about it
for a while.
And youre here again and Im just going to sit by the
window with you beside me and watch the afternoon filter
through you, and well smile at each other and its a perfect
way to spend my time. I love the way the sun turns you
dusty, like candlelight through a crystal-thick glass of brandy. I could sit here with you forever and never move, never
want to move because youre here again, and its only when
I look away or someone speaks to me, thats when you go.
So if they leave me alone I can concentrate just on us and
youll stay, for a while at least. I just need to concentrate.
I wish she hadnt said that, about the last time I saw you.
She didnt need to say that when its in my head all the time
anyway. The swollen and blue. Youre here right now
though and thats all that matters. The other time, the last
time, I dont want to think about that. Id rather have no legs
and the way it is now than have my legs and the way it was
then, the last time I saw you.
Crushed. I knew they were crushed beneath the steering
column. The car was reared over me and I wanted to move
but I couldnt move and so I sat there, propped like a doll on
a shelf, safe and strapped in, and I watched as your feet
jerked and tapped on the cars bonnet, almost close enough
to touch if I leaned through the shattered windscreen, but I
couldnt raise a hand to touch you and you drowned without
a struggle in six inches of water. Six inches of water. And I
sat with you through the night as we sank deeper into the
ditch and I watched you and said your name and my legs
got colder and colder but your feet stopped jerking and then
you didnt move at all. Six inches of water. They kept saying
that afterwards, as if it were so slight an amount, so ridiculous a death, we would all find it funny. Theyd chopped my
legs off by then.
So I sat with you through that night and stared at the
soles of your shoes and remembered the first time we
danced together, and it was the first time we loved and
meant it, and thats it really. Thats what we are.
But youre here again and youre smiling and Im so close
now, Im practising so often, soon well be able to dance
together, properly. Until then Ill just keep reaching out to
you, and thats enough to make me happy, its enough for
now, to stroke my hands over you and feel you spill like
water through my fingers.
61

Very Best of WAR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Very Best of WAR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Very Best of WAR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Evil of Violence Conversation

Cerith Mathias looks at

Steph Power talks

Wales Arts Review

The Very Best of

A Letter Addressed to the Future:

The Birth of a Nation: DW Griffiths Distortion of History and Its

The Poet and the Public Intellectual by Dylan Moore

Wales, the Artist and Society: The Legacy of Beca

The Deep Sigh: Meditations Upon Haiku by Paul Chambers

A Tribute to Dannie Abse: Goodbye, Twentieth Century

Occupy Gezi: The Cultural Impact by James Lloyd

Oh, Newport, My Lionheart: 30 years of Music and Nightlife in the

Dylan Thomas: The Industry of Tragedy and the Antithetical Mask

The Landscapes of Language by Trey McCain

To the Detriment of Us All: The Untouched Legacy of Arthur

Against the Evil of Violence The Wales Window of Alabama

Deeds Not Words by Ben Glover

David Pountney : Schoenberg, Verdi and Issues of Faith

In Conversation with Gruff Rhys by Sarah King

Dark Room by Anna Metcalfe

Halloween Special: Like Water Through Fingers

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

A Letter Addressed to the Future: What is a Critic?

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

The Birth of a Nation: DW Griffiths Distortion of History and its Legacy

From as early as the writings of Russian formalists Sergei

David Wark Llewelyn Griffith, as his full name suggests,

Griffiths The Birth of a Nation is based on two Thomas

so that the enfranchisement of former slaves is presented

To watch [Griffiths] work is like being witness to the

The Poet and the Public Intellectual

of and catalyst for social change. Let

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

pressing issues in Wales and a grander narrative elsewhere.

Williams also clearly fit the profile of

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

Welsh, to have [Dylan Thomas] as

vital link to the past and a prescient

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

Wales, the Artist and Society: The Legacy of Beca

o you think of 1977

The name Rebecca was

for the rioters, Rebekah is a

spired by political issues, as

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

sions where there have actually been positives in our

sense of it the best way it

ti as rebellious during the 60s

The Deep Sigh: Meditations Upon Haiku

Inevitably, my first efforts at haiku were poor, usually no

ment within these traditions to strengthen the sharing of the

A Tribute to Dannie Abse: Goodbye, Twentieth Century

he 2011 edition of Goodbye,

claims he once found for the nobility of

The Very Best of the Wales Arts Review: Volume 1

Poetry does not pay. When Blunden

diseases, only sick people. The sick

He recalls the terrible fear when the