Exercise Muscle Fatigue Detection System Implementation Via Wireless Surface Electromyography and Empirical Mode Decomposition
Exercise Muscle Fatigue Detection System Implementation Via Wireless Surface Electromyography and Empirical Mode Decomposition
Exercise Muscle Fatigue Detection System Implementation Via Wireless Surface Electromyography and Empirical Mode Decomposition
I. INTRODUCTION
Muscle fatigue is thought of as a loss of required or
expected force and has been an attractive research issue for a
long time. The nature of muscle fatigue and its relation to
muscle activity have been studied[1]. Spectral parameters
such as the mean frequency (MNF) and the median frequency
(MF) derived from the sEMG power spectrum are widely used
to detect static and dynamic muscle contractions [2]. The
Fourier transform is one of methods used to obtain the power
spectrum of a signal. However, within the analysis window,
the signal must be stationary or exhibit a periodic frequency;
otherwise, the resulting spectrum will make little sense.
Dimitrova et al. proposed new spectral indices of muscle
fatigue (FInsmk) that perform better than the traditional MNF
and MF[3]. Wavelet-based spectra and derived spectrum
features have been used to compare the traditional power
spectrumderived MNF and MF performance for fatigue
quantification.
1001
C. EMD algorithm
The EMD algorithm used in this study comprised the
following steps [4]:
II. METHODS
xt
c (t ) r (t ) .
i 1
(1)
(2)
,
D j n
k Aj 1k g2n k
(3)
where A0[n]= x[n] and Aj[n] and Dj[n] indicate the coarse and
detailed sequences, respectively, after the jth decomposition.
The variable h[n] represents the half-band low-pass filter, and
g[n] represents the half-band high-pass filter. The original
signal is decomposed from the high-frequency component to
the low-frequency component as a combination of Aj[n] and
Dj[n]. For example, if the decomposition level is 5 (j=5), then
the original signal can be represented as:
x[n]=D1[n]+D2[n]+D3[n]+D4[n]+D5[n]+A5[n].
(4)
MF
p f df
MF
p f df
1
2
p f df
(5)
1002
x
n
i 1
x
n
i 1
x yi y
y
2
i 1
(7)
L4
L6
All
Coefficient
MF (Hz)
Raw
-0.012
0.859
269.6 (5.8)
DWT,
D1
-0.030
0.894
665.7 (14.5)
D2
-0.001
0.365
344.6 (1.4)
D3
-0.001
0.218
184.6 (1.3)
EMD
-0.049
0.865
474.0 (24.5)
-0.025
0.874
269.7 (12.4)
IMF3
-0.010
0.813
167.7 (5.1)
RAW
(n=60)
-0.0164*
(0.0144)
-0.0125*
(0.0100)
-0.0193*
(0.0154)
-0.0197*
(0.0128)
DWT
(n=60)
-0.0232*
(0.0176)
-0.0209*
(0.0157)
-0.0276*
(0.0264)
-0.0296*
(0.0153)
EMD
(n=60)
-0.0456*
(0.0356)
-0.0362*
(0.0302)
-0.0501
(0.0503)
-0.0594*
(0.0364)
III. RESULTS
Slope Hz/s
IMF2
Level
F. Statistics
MF (Hz)
L2
Coefficient
IMF1
y Ax b ,
(6)
where y is estimated as the MF, x is the time interval, A is the
regression slope and b is the bias. The greater the muscle
fatigue, the smaller the slope [20]. We also used the
correlation coefficient (R) to represent the stability of sEMG
in terms of muscle fatigue. It is well known that the MF shifts
toward lower frequencies as a muscle fatigues. Parameter R
and A were used as indexes of the muscle fatigue.
Slope Hz/s
1003
[2]
[3]
[4]
RAW
290
[5]
285
280
[6]
Hz
275
270
[7]
265
260
[8]
255
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
[9]
DWT D1
710
[10]
700
690
[11]
Hz
680
670
660
[12]
650
640
[13]
630
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
(b) Time(sec)
[14]
EMD IMF1
540
520
[15]
Hz
500
[16]
480
460
[17]
440
[18]
420
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
(c) Time(sec)
[19]
Acknowledge
[20]
1004