Brief Envir e
Brief Envir e
Brief Envir e
Current WTO rules provide significant scope to protect the environment and
tackle climate change while keeping trade open
Sustainable development and the protection and preservation of the environment are
fundamental goals of the WTO, as recognized in the preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement
that established the organization.
The WTO promotes more open trade with a view to achieving sustainable development. It
also provides WTO members with the flexibility they need to pursue environmental and
health objectives. The WTO makes a distinction between trade measures with a genuine
environmental goal and measures that are intended as disguised restrictions and applied in
an unjustifiable and arbitrary manner.
Allowing trade restrictions for environmental reasons ... only under certain
conditions
The main objective of the WTO is to foster international trade and open markets but WTO
rules permit members to take trade-restricting measures to protect their environment under
specific conditions. The WTO is not an environment agency.
Two fundamental principles govern international trade: national treatment and most-favoured
nation (MFN):
National treatment means any policy measure taken by a WTO member should
apply in the same way whether the good is imported or produced domestically.
Provided they are similar products, imports should not be treated less favourably
than domestic goods.
MFN means that any trade measure taken by a member should be applied in a nondiscriminatory manner to all other WTO members.
What are similar products? WTO case law uses four criteria to define the term 'similar':
the product's physical properties, the product's end-use, consumers' tastes and habits, the
product's tariff classification.
The WTO rule book permits governments to restrict trade when the objective is to protect the
environment. The legality of such restrictive measures depends on a number of conditions,
including whether they constitute justifiable discrimination. These measures should not
constitute disguised protectionism.
Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade lists exceptions to open trade,
among them the protection of the environment. WTO jurisprudence has regularly reaffirmed
members' right to determine their own environmental objectives. If there are potential
conflicts between international trade and the protection of the environment, WTO
agreements permit exceptions to general trade principles.
Every member is free to determine its appropriate level of protection but must do so in a
coherent manner. If a country bans the importing of asbestos from one country, for example,
it must ban asbestos imports from all countries, as well as banning domestic sales.
Countries may also use technical environmental standards or sanitary and phytosanitary
measures when pursuing their environmental objectives. They may, for instance, impose
labelling requirements on a certain category of products.
These technical standards could constitute an unfair obstacle to trade if they are applied in a
discriminatory manner or if they create unnecessary obstacles to trade. The WTO
encourages governments to apply international standards where they exist.
It is essential for WTO members to be informed of changes in national policies and to
examine whether they are justified. Any draft technical or sanitary standard should be
notified to the WTO.
There is a wider range of WTO rules relevant to climate change. Rules on subsidies may
apply if countries are financing the development of environmentally friendly technologies and
renewable energy. Intellectual property rules could also be relevant in the development and
transfer of climate-friendly technologies and know-how.
The details of how that footprint would be calculated in an increasingly globalised market,
where products are manufactured in a number of different countries, is also part of the
debate.
Global problems like climate change require global solutions which must be based on the
well-known environmental principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" this
means taking into account different levels of responsibility in emissions.
Conclusion of Doha Round could lead to more open market for environmental
goods/services and more coherence between trade and environment
As part of the Doha mandate, WTO members agreed to negotiate greater market opening in
environmental goods and services, the relationship between WTO rules and trade
obligations set out in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) and the exchange of
information between those institutions. Agreement in these areas would undoubtedly help
address climate change.
Fisheries subsidies
Reducing fisheries subsidies is also part of the Doha mandate and could significantly reduce
overfishing. Members agreed to eliminate subsidies that distort trade and seriously
undermine the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks. Members are currently discussing how
this reduction could be defined and applied. An agreement would constitute a triple-win for
trade, environment and development, which is at the centre of this negotiation.