Xauque
Xauque
Xauque
Tenses are forms of a verb that show the time, continuance or completion of an action or a state
that is expressed in connection with the moment at which a statement is made about it.
The near future expresses what is going to take place or what the subject is going to do in the
nottoodistant future. In some instances, the present tense is used to imply a near future event
or action. In other instances, the verb aller (to go) is used to speak about something that will
happen soon.
The future tense expresses what will happen or what the subject will do at some time in
the future. The future tense is also used after conjunctions of time to refer to future
actions.
@t
English tenses on iPhones + iPads (free)Download our free app on the App
Store.
English tenses on iPhones + iPads (paid) 50% discount for schools on the App
Store.
2. It describes the idea that an action will happen in the normal course of events. It
refers to routine activities, not intentions, decisions or plans.
I'll be writing to you again. (I always write to you, so I'll do it again, as usual.)
They'll be leaving on Friday. You can join them. (They normally leave on Fridays.)
Everybody will be working on a computer sooner or later. (If nothing special happens.)
Note
We can also use present tenses for future. But they have a different meaning from the
future tense. Compare the following examples of sentences.
We are going to the cinema next weekend. (We have already arranged it. We know the
time and place and probably have the tickets.)
We'll be going to the cinema next weekend. (We have not arranged anything and,
probably, we do not even know which film we want to see. We only say how we will
spend the weekend.)
I am seeing Susan tomorrow. (I have some reason. Susan and I have arranged the time
and place.)
I'll be seeing Susan tomorrow. (Susan is my classmate and because I will go to school
tomorrow, I will see her as usual.)
Note:
In the following examples the first ones express intentions, while in the second ones
there is no intention, they express routine activities.
Bill won't play football tomorrow. (The fact is that Bill cannot play or does not want to
play for some reason.)
Bill won't be playing football tomorrow. (Bill will not play, because it will be Friday and
he never plays on Fridays.)
I'll call Mimi tonight. I'll ask her. (I will do it because I need to talk to her.)
I'll be calling Mimi tonight. I can ask her. (I call her every night, that is why I will call
her tonight too.)
Remember:
In some cases we can use several forms. But each of them will have a slightly different
meaning.
I'll be meeting Jim next week. (I meet Jim every week and it will be the same next
week.)
I'll meet Jim next week. (I intend to meet Jim next week or I suppose that I will meet
him.)
I'm going to meet Jim next week. (I decided to meet Jim some time ago and now I am
expressing my intention.)
I'm meeting Jim next week. (We have arranged the time and place because we have
some reason to meet. We use the present continuous.)
It will rain, I'm afraid. (I assume it will rain, it is my opinion. But who knows!)
It's going to rain. (I am sure it will rain because I can see the dark clouds in the sky. My
opinion is based on clear evidence.)
I am meeting is more definite than I am going to meet and I will meet is the least
definite.
Our tips
BACK TO ALL TENSES ONLINE + PDF Online and PDF exercises and
grammar rules with examples.
We use the present continuous to talk about things that we have already arranged to do
in the future.
I'm seeing Julie at 5 and then I'm having dinner with Simon.
In many situations when we talk about future plans we can use either the present
continuous or the 'going to' future. However, when we use the present continuous, there
is more of a suggestion that an arrangement has already been made.
We use the present simple to talk about events in the future which are 'timetabled'. We
can also use the present continuous to talk about these.
Simple Future
Simple Future has two different forms in English: "will" and "be going to." Although
the two forms can sometimes be used interchangeably, they often express two very
different meanings. These different meanings might seem too abstract at first, but with
time and practice, the differences will become clear. Both "will" and "be going to" refer
to a specific time in the future.
FORM Will
[will + verb]
Examples:
FORM Be Going To
"Will" often suggests that a speaker will do something voluntarily. A voluntary action is
one the speaker offers to do for someone else. Often, we use "will" to respond to
someone else's complaint or request for help. We also use "will" when we request that
someone help us or volunteer to do something for us. Similarly, we use "will not" or
"won't" when we refuse to voluntarily do something.
Examples:
"Be going to" expresses that something is a plan. It expresses the idea that a person
intends to do something in the future. It does not matter whether the plan is realistic or
not.
Examples:
Both "will" and "be going to" can express the idea of a general prediction about the
future. Predictions are guesses about what might happen in the future. In "prediction"
sentences, the subject usually has little control over the future and therefore USES 1-3
do not apply. In the following examples, there is no difference in meaning.
Examples:
IMPORTANT
In the Simple Future, it is not always clear which USE the speaker has in mind. Often,
there is more than one way to interpret a sentence's meaning.
No Future in Time Clauses
Like all future forms, the Simple Future cannot be used in clauses beginning with time
expressions such as: when, while, before, after, by the time, as soon as, if, unless, etc.
Instead of Simple Future, Simple Present is used.
Examples:
When you will arrive tonight, we will go out for dinner. Not Correct
ADVERB PLACEMENT
The examples below show the placement for grammar adverbs such as: always, only,
never, ever, still, just, etc.
Examples:
ACTIVE / PASSIVE
Examples:
FORMAO:
It israining. (Estchovendo.)
I'm just thinking in another way to do it better. (S estou pensando em uma outra
maneira de fazer melhor.)
2. Forma Negativa:
A Forma Negativa do Presente Contnuo forma-se acrescentando notaps o presente
simples do verbo to be. Veja os exemplos abaixo:
I'm notasking help. (No estou pedindo ajuda.)
He is nottalking to you. (= He isn't talking to you.)
(Ele no est falando com voc.)
You are notworking. (= You aren't working.)
(Voc no est trabalhando.)
FORMA NEGATIVA: SUJEITO + PRESENTE SIMPLES DO VERBO TO BE +
NOT + GERNDIO DO VERBO PRINCIPAL
3. Forma Interrogativa:
Na Forma Interrogativa do Presente Contnuo o sujeito se posiciona entre o presente
simples do verbo to be e o gerndio do verbo principal. Observe os exemplos abaixo:
Am I being inopportune? (Estou sendo inoportuno?)
Is she having dinner? (Ela estjantando?)
What is he doing? (O que ele est fazendo?)
What are they watching? (O queelesestoassistindo?)
Where are you going (to)? (Para onde voc vai?)
It israining. (Estchovendo.)
I'm just thinking in another way to do it better. (S estou pensando em uma outra
maneira de fazer melhor.)
2. Forma Negativa:
A Forma Negativa do Presente Contnuo forma-se acrescentando notaps o presente
simples do verbo to be. Veja os exemplos abaixo:
I'm notasking help. (No estou pedindo ajuda.)
He is nottalking to you. (= He isn't talking to you.)
(Ele no est falando com voc.)
You are notworking. (= You aren't working.)
(Voc no est trabalhando.)
FORMA NEGATIVA: SUJEITO + PRESENTE SIMPLES DO VERBO TO BE +
NOT + GERNDIO DO VERBO PRINCIPAL
3. Forma Interrogativa:
Na Forma Interrogativa do Presente Contnuo o sujeito se posiciona entre o presente
simples do verbo to be e o gerndio do verbo principal. Observe os exemplos abaixo:
Am I being inopportune? (Estou sendo inoportuno?)
Is she having dinner? (Ela estjantando?)
What is he doing? (O que ele est fazendo?)
What are they watching? (O queelesestoassistindo?)
Where are you going (to)? (Para onde voc vai?)
Going-to future
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
English grammar
Adjectives
Adverbs
Articles
Clauses
Compounds
Conditionals
Conjunctions
Determiners
Gender
Idiom
Interjections
Inversion
Nouns
Pronouns
Phrases
Plurals
Possessives
Prepositions
Verbs
o
Auxiliaries, contractions
Irregular verbs
Modal verbs
Passive voice
Phrasal verbs
Subjunctive
Verb usage
Grammar disputes
Constructions analogous to the English going-to future are found in some other
languages, including French and Spanish.
Contents
1Origin
2Formation
3Usage
o
3.1The be + to construction
7See also
8References
9External links
Origin
The going-to future originated by the extension of the spatial sense of the verb go to a
temporal sense (a common change the same phenomenon can be seen in the
preposition before). The original construction involved physical movement with an
intention, such as "I am going [outside] to harvest the crop." The location later became
unnecessary, and the expression was reinterpreted to represent a near future.
The colloquial form gonna, and the other variations of it as mentioned in the following
section, result from a relaxed pronunciation of going to. These forms can provide a
distinction between the spatial and temporal senses of the expression: "I'm gonna swim"
clearly carries the temporal meaning of futurity, as opposed to the spatial meaning of
"I'm going [in order] to swim".
Formation
The going-to future construction consists of the subject, a form of the copula verbbe, the
word going, and the to-infinitive of the main verb. (An alternative description is that it
uses the verb go in the progressive aspect, most commonly in present progressive form,
serving as an auxiliary verb and having the to-infinitive phrase as its complement.) It
can be put into question and negative forms according to the normal rules of English
grammar. Some examples:
The boys are going to fight. (subject the boys + copula are + going +
to-infinitive to fight)
I'm going to try the wine. (subject I + copula am + going + toinfinitive phrase to try the wine)
He's not going to make it. (negative form, copula negated with the
addition of not)
Aren't they (more formal: Are they not) going to wear coats?
(negative interrogative form)
We were going to tell you earlier. (past form of the going-to future,
formed with the past copula were)
Usage
The going-to future is one of several constructions used in English to refer to future
events (see Future tense: English). The basic form of the going-to construction is in fact
in the present tense; it is often used when the speaker wishes to draw a connection
between present events, situations, or intentions and expected future events or
situations, i.e. to express the present relevance of the future occurrence.[2] It may
therefore be described as expressing prospective aspect, in the same way that the present
perfect (which refers to the present relevance of past occurrences) is said to express
retrospective (or perfect) aspect.
There is no clear delineation between contexts where going to is used and those where
other forms of future expression (such as the will/shall future, or the ordinary present
tense) are used. Different forms are often interchangeable. Some general points of usage
are listed below.
The ordinary present tense can be used to refer to the future when
the context (or time adverbs) indicate futurity, and the reference is to
some planned action: "We are painting the house tomorrow" (this
could also be expressed with "... going to paint ..."). It is usually the
present progressive that is used, as in the preceding example, but the
simple present can also be used, particularly for precisely scheduled
events: "My train leaves at 4.15." (See also the obligatory use of
present tense with future meaning in some dependent clauses.)
The will future is often used for announcing a decision at the time
when it is made, while going to is more likely for a plan already in
existence: compare "All right, I'll help her" and "Yes, I'm going to help
her".
The be + to construction
English has a construction formed by part of the copulabe followed by to and the bare
infinitive of the main verb (i.e. the copula followed by the to-infinitive). This is similar
in form to the going-to future, with the omission of the word going. In the be + to
construction only finite, indicative (or past subjunctive) forms of the copula can appear
that is, the copula used cannot be be itself, but one of the forms am, is, are, was, were
(possibly contracted in some cases).
The meaning of this construction is to indicate that something is expected to happen at a
future time (usually in the near future), as a result of either some duty (deontic
modality) or some set plan. For example:
In headline language the copula may be omitted, e.g. "Prime Minister to visit West
Bank".
Compared with the will future, the be + to construction may be less expressive of a
prediction, and more of the existence of a plan or duty. Thus "John will go ..." implies a
belief on the speaker's part that this will occur, while "John is to go ..." implies
knowledge on the speaker's part that there exists a plan or obligation entailing such an
occurrence (the latter statement will not be falsified if John ends up not going). The be
+ to construction may therefore resemble a renarrative mood in some ways.
When was or were is used as the copula, the plan or duty is placed in past time (and
quite often implies that it was not carried out). It may also be used simply as a way of
expressing "future in the past" (see the following section). For example:
I was to visit my aunt, but I missed the train. (past plan, not in fact
fulfilled)
This was the battle at which they were finally to triumph. (future in
the past, also: they would finally triumph)
When the verb in such a clause is were, it can be inverted and the conjunction if
dropped: "Were he to speak, ..." For details of these constructions, see English
conditional sentences.
A number of possible such uses of the going-to construction are given below.
Future relative to past time: the past tense of the copula is used. This
may express past intention, as in the example above, or past
prediction, as in "It was going to rain".
Similar adaptation of some other future constructions is also possible. The future will or
shall can be put into the past by replacement with would or should (see future in the
past). The phrase to be about to can be put into various tense and other forms, analogous
to those of to be going to as described above. The construction am to etc. is normally
restricted to simple finite forms of the copula, namely the present indicative ("I am to do
it"), the past indicative ("I was to do it"), and the past subjunctive ("if I were to do it" or
"were I to do it"; these last have somewhat different implications, as described at
English conditional sentences).
The future perfect continuous tense is formed with the future perfect tense of the
verb to be (shall/will have been) + a present participle (verb + -ing), as follow:
Example: My uncle will have been working in Antarctica for exactly ten years next
Sunday.
Example: At noon tomorrow, my aunt will have been driving a hearse for fifteen years.
a) By the time the bus arrives, we will have been waiting for more than thirty minutes.
b) We will have been waiting for more than thirty minutes by the time the bus arrives,
Time clause: by the time the bus arrives
Main clause: we will have been waiting for more than thirty minutes
A comma is placed at the end of a time clause when the time clause comes
The future perfect tense is formed by using the simple future tense of the verb to have
(will have) + the past participle of the main verb. It is used for an action which will
have finished by some future time or date as mentioned:
Statement: She will have sewn the patch on her jeans by nine o'clock
Question: Will the people have put out the fire by the time the firemen arrive?
Example: I will have saved about one million dollars by the year 2090.
to show that an action will be completed before another takes place in the future.
Example: The fire will have burnt the building to the ground by the time the firemen
arrive.
Example: The special offer buy two, get one free will have finished by midday
tomorrow.
Example: If you don't hurry up, we will have eaten all the food when you get to the
table.
with time clause. The future perfect tense may come either before or after the
time clause.
a) On April 1st, she will have been here for six months.
b) She will have been here for six months on April 1st.
c) We will have waited for more than thirty minutes by the time the bus arrives,
Time clauses: On April 1st/by the time the bus arrives
Main clauses: She will have been here for six months/We will have waited for more
than thirty minutes
A comma is placed at the end of a time clause when the time clause comes before the
main clause as in (a).
The future perfect tense and the future perfect continuous tense
a) When Joan competes in the marathon next week, she will have trained for nine
months.
b) When Joan competes in the marathon next week, she will have been training for
nine months.
Both (a) and (b) have the same meaning.
Conclusion
Historians spend a lot of time thinking about the past. Should they also ponder the
future? World History for Us All explores the past at some very large scales. By doing
so, it shows the existence of some very large trends. Some trends are so large that they
will surely persist far into the future. This makes it tempting to try to peek into the
future as well as the past, for we know that these trends will not change overnight. What
might happen to humanity and its earthly environment in Big Era Ten or beyond? The
very large trends should give us some clues.
Some processes, however, reflect large trends that are not so unpredictable. They can be
detected by historians and may have enough momentum to persist some way into the
future. For example, historians have argued that the alliance system created in the years
before World War I made a war extremely likely, even if no one could predict the event
that would precipitate it. Another example is population growth. It is impossible to
predict each birth or death. But it is possible to determine average birth and death rates
with great accuracy. And, using these statistics, specialists in population growth can
predict with considerable confidence how large populations will be in the future. So, if
you want to predict, the first thing to do is to be clear about the type of process you are
discussing, and how predictable it is. Specialists in predictionand you can find them
at race tracks and on stock exchanges aiming to make moneybegin by trying to be
clear about the degree of predictability of the processes they are studying. They
calculate the odds and study the form.
Reference
Fabricius-Hansen, "Tense", in the Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics, 2nd ed., 2006
Bernard Comrie, Aspect, 1976:6: "the semantic concept of time reference
(absolute or relative), ... may be grammaticalised