Chap 017
Chap 017
Chap 017
CHAPTER 17
INVENTORY CONTROL
Review and Discussion Questions
1. Distinguish between dependent and independent demand in a McDonalds, in an integrated
manufacturer of personal copiers, and in a pharmaceutical supply house.
The key to the answer here is to consider what must be forecasted (independent demand), and,
given the forecast, what demands are thereby created for items to meet the forecasts
(dependent demand).
In a McDonalds, independent demand is the demand for various items offered for saleBig
Macs, fries, etc. The demand for Egg McMuffins, for example, needs to be forecasted. Given
the forecast, then, the demand for the number of eggs, cheese, Canadian bacon, muffins, and
containers can then be computed based on the amount needed for each Egg McMuffin.
The manufacturer of copiers is integrated, i.e., the parts, components, etc. are produced
internally. The demand for the number of copiers is independent (must be forecasted). Given
the forecast, the Bill of Materials is exploded to determine the amounts of raw materials,
components, parts, etc. that are needed (more on the BOM in chapter 16).
The pharmaceutical supply company is an extreme case where only end items are carried and
nothing is produced internally. The bill of materials is the end item and, therefore, the
independent demand (forecasted from customers) is the same as the dependent demand. One
might attempt to consider that when the demand for items occurs together, that this is similar
to a bill of materials. However, this is not a bill of materials, but rather a causal relationship
making it easier to forecast.
2. Distinguish between in-process inventory, safety stock inventory, and seasonal inventory.
In-process inventory consists of those items of materials components and partially completed
units that are currently in the production process.
Safety-stock inventory is set so that inventory is maintained to satisfy some maximum level of
demand. It could be stated that safety stock is that level of inventory between the minimum
expected demand and the desired level of demand satisfaction.
Seasonal inventory is that inventory accumulated to meet some periodic increase in demand.
3. Discuss the nature of the costs that affect inventory size.
The optimum inventory size is one that minimizes the combined total of holding cost, ordering
(or setup) cost, shortage cost, and purchase cost.
17-1
4.
17-2
Under which conditions would a plant manager elect to use a fixed-order quantity model
as opposed to a fixed-time period model? What are the disadvantages of using a fixedtime period ordering system?
Fixed-order quantity modelswhen holding costs are high (usually expensive items or high
deprecation rates), or when items are ordered from different sources.
Fixed-time period modelswhen holding costs are low (i.e., associated with low-cost items,
low-cost storage), or when several items are ordered from the same source (saves on order
placement and delivery charges).
The main disadvantage of a fixed-time period inventory system is that inventory levels must
be higher to offer the same protection against stockout as a fixed-order quantity system. It
also requires a periodic count and closer surveillance than a fixed-order quantity system. A
fixed-order quantity system can operate with a perpetual count (keeping a running log of every
time a unit is withdrawn or replaced) or through a simple two-bin or flag arrangement wherein
a reorder is placed when the safety stock is reached. This latter method requires very little
attention.
5. What two basic questions must be answered by an inventory-control decision rule?
Any inventory control model or rule must establish (1) when items should be ordered, and (2)
how many should be ordered.
6. Discuss the assumptions that are inherent in production setup cost, ordering cost, and carrying
cost. How valid are they?
Investigation of ordering and production setup cost will likely show that a single, unique cost
does not exist for each product, nor is it linearly related to the number of order (as implied in
the equations or inventory models). In the purchasing department, for example, an employee
is paid either a salary or an hourly rate for a normal work week. The cost for that employee is
sometimes divided among the number of items or orders for which he has responsibility,
resulting in an averaged or allocated cost for each order he places. However, when we
consider an inventory ordering cost based on the number or orders per year (as is done in most
inventory models), reducing the number of orders the individual places does not necessarily
decrease the net cost to the firm since his weekly pay remains the same. What happens is
really an increase in the ordering cost for each of the remaining items within his responsibility.
Nonlinearity of costs also occurs in production setups. Consider the time for making a setup
in preparation for a production run. Setup time is roughly based on an expected frequency of
making this particular product run. However, as the frequency increases, familiarity with the
setup allows some shaving of the setup time. Moreover, if the setup is repeated often, an
investment in specialized equipment or the construction of jigs may become warranted,
reducing the setup time even more.
17-3
17-4
The terms carrying or holding costs for maintaining goods in inventory include a multitude of
cost elements. To determine the nature and amounts of these costs can be a challenging feat.
Fortunately, total inventory cost curves tend to be dish shaped and can, therefore, tolerate
some error. The holding costs associated with insurance, obsolescence, and personnel who are
handling materials are extremely difficult to ascertain on an item-by-item basis, yet each
requires realistic analysis. Warehouse storage costs of an item, for example, may be based on
a ratio of its required square footage and the entire available warehouse space, but this may
not be an accurate representation since it is an allocation of cost rather than true cost. Take the
warehouse that is too large, or is used to stock products in an off season or depressed period.
Allocation based on a share of total warehouse cost will result in a high cost for storage, when,
in fact, excess storage space should create pressure for highernot lowerorder quantities.
In the simple inventory model, holding costs are based on the average inventory on hand.
Average inventory presumes that, as stock is depleted, other product lines will be moved in
to occupy the space. It may be that costs should be based on maximum inventory, especially
if these is an excess of space, or if the needs of an item are so specialized that no other
products can use the space (for example, due to environmental requirements). Each remaining
cost may be similarly challenged. Breakage, pilferage, deterioration, and insurance costs are
not constant but, rather, vary with inventory size. As the value of inventory increases,
insurance rates are lower, more refined handling procedures can be installed to reduce
breakage, some environmental control and maintenance can be used to reduce deterioration,
and better security procedures can reduce theft.
These challenges to determining true costs are not intended to discourage the use of inventory
models. The intent, rather, is to prevent the use of any model without clear knowledge of its
requirements and assumptions. Indeed, each application must consider the operating
conditions and needs of the firm. An appropriate model can then be developed in a fashion
similar to those covered in this chapter.
7. The nice thing about inventory models is that you can pull one off the shelf and apply it so
long as your cost estimates are accurate. Comment.
Unfortunately, there is no model or set of models universally applicable to all inventory
situations. As stated in the chapter several times, each situation is different and requires a
model to suit those conditions. Students frequently try to memorize specific models rather
than the process of building any inventory model. See also the answers to question 9 below.
8.
17-5
Which type of inventory system would you use in the following situations?
a. Supplying your kitchen with fresh food.
b. Obtaining a daily newspaper.
c. Buying gas for your car.
To which of these items do you impute the highest stockout cost?
(a) Supplying kitchen with foodboth a periodic model and order quantity. Generally, a
household will shop once weekly for the majority of items (periodic), then pick up items
such as bread and milk as the supply runs low (fixed quantity with reorder point).
(b) Obtaining a daily newspapera daily newspaper is obviously a periodic model. One
does not usually wait until he has finished one daily paper before buying the next days
paper.
(c) Buying gas for your cargenerally, this is a hybrid type model wherein a reorder point is
signaled when the gas indicator is low, then the tank is filled. Many people, however,
have a fixed quantity purchase when the reorder point is reached, such as put in 10
gallons or $10.00 worth. Still others (drawing upon our own experience) use a periodic
ordering system on their wifes car, such as taking it out and filling it every Sunday after
church (or in Chases case, after the football game).
The highest stockout cost for most well-fed, well-read individuals would be running out of gas
in your car. The cost could range from practically zero if one runs out in front of a gas station
to being late for an appointment or causing an accident on the highway.
9. Why is it desirable to classify items into groups, as the ABC classification does?
Using a classification scheme such as this one allows a greater portion of time to be spent in
controlling specific groups or classes or items. For the ABC grouping, greater control is
afforded those items which comprise the greatest dollar volume in usage. The result of this
classification is a reduction in the overall inventory size and, therefore, decreased costs for the
same level of satisfying inventory demands.
17-6
Problems
1. Cu = $10 - $4 = $6
Co = $4 - $1.50 = $2.50
Cu
6
.7059
C o C u 2.50 6
, NORMSINV(.7059)=0.541446
2. Cu = $125
Co = $250
Cu
125
.333
C o C u 250 125
, NORMSINV(.333)=-0.43164
3.
Qopt
2 DS
2(1000) 25
100
= 22.36 22
4. Service level P = .95, D = 5000, d = 5000/365, T = 14 days, L = 10 days, = 5 per day, and
I =150.
q d (T L) z T L I
5000
(14 10) 1.64( 24.495) 150
365
= 218.94 219
17-7
17-8
5. Service level P = .98, d = 150, T = 4 weeks, L = 3 weeks, = 30 per week, and I =500
pounds.
q d (T L) z T L I
T L (T L) 2 (4 3)(30) 2 = 79.4
From Standard normal distribution, z = 2.05
Qopt
a.
2 DS
2(25750)250
.33(10)
= 1975.23 1975
17-9
7. Service level P = .98 d = 5 per day, T = 30 days, L = 2 days, = 1 per day, and I =35.
q d (T L) z T L I
Qopt
a.
2 DS
2(10000)150
.20(10)
= 1224.74 1225 units
a.
Qopt
2 DS
2(1000)10
2
= 100 units
17-10
10.
Qopt
2 DS
2(15600)31.20
.10
= 3120 units
ss z L ,
ss 185
11. Service level P = .98, d = 100 per day, T = 10 days, L = 6 days, = 25 per day, and I =50.
q d (T L) z T L I
a.
Qopt
2 DS
2(2000)10
5
= 89.44 89
D
2000
S
(10)
89
b. Ordering cost = Q
= $224.72
Q
89
H (5)
2
c. Holding cost = 2
= $222.50
17-11
13.
Qopt
2 DS
2(13000)100
.65
= 2,000 units
L L 2 4(40) 2 = 80 units
From Standard normal distribution, z = 2.05
ss z L ,
ss 64
L 80 = .80
61000
50000
42000
15000
13000
12000
11000
10200
9900
9600
4000
3500
2900
2200
2000
1500
1200
800
750
600
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
17-12
17-13
15.
Qopt
a.
b.
2 DS
2(5000)10
.20(3) = 408.25 408 bottles
L L 2 3(30) 2 = 52 units
From Standard normal distribution, z = 1.64
16.
a.
b.
Qopt
2 DS
2(2400)5
4
= 77.46 77 sets
q d (T L) z T L I
17-14
17-15
19. Service level P = .99, d = 2000 capsules per day, T = 14 days, L = 5 days, = 800 capsules
per day, and I =25000 units.
q d (T L) z T L I
Cu
12
C C u 4 12 = .75
P= o
Demand Probability of demand
300
0.05
400
0.10
500
0.40
600
0.30
700
0.10
800
0.05
17-16
21.a.
Demand (dozen)
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
Probability
of demand
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.05
Probability of
selling nth unit
1.00
0.95
0.85
0.65
0.35
0.15
0.05
Expected number
sold
1800
1990
2160
2290
2360
2390
2400
Unsold Total
Sold (rev.) (rev.) revenue Cost Profit
$1242.00 $0.00 $1242 $882 $360
1373.10
2.90
1376
980 396
1490.40
11.60
1502 1078 424
1580.10
31.90
1612 1176 436
1628.40
69.60
1698 1274 424
1649.10 118.90 1768 1372 396
1656.00 174.00 1830 1470 360
b. The optimal number to make would be 2,400 dozen. This yields an expected profit of
$436.
c. Cu = $0.69 - $0.49 = $0.20
Co = $0.49 - $0.29 = $0.20
Cu
.20
Probability of demand
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.05
Qopt
2 DS
2(3500)50
.25(30) = 216.02 216 mufflers
17-17
17-18
24. Service level P = .98, d = 5000/365 boxes per day, T = 14 days, L = 3 days, = 10 boxes
per day, and I = 60 boxes.
q d (T L) z T L I
17-19
Qopt
2 DS
2(500)100
.20(500) = 31.62 32 refrigerators
L 10 refrigerators
From Standard normal distribution, z = 1.88
Qopt
2 DS
2(1000)20
.20(35) = 75.59 76 tires
L L 2 4(3) 2 = 6 tires
From Standard normal distribution, z = 2.05
q d (T L) z T L I
17-20
28.
Item number
5
3
4
7
9
1
8
10
6
2
Class
A
A or B
B
B
B
B or C
C
C
C
C
29.
a.
Qopt
2 DS
2(20)(365)10
.50
= 540.37 540 cans
17-21
30.Service level P = .98, d = 20 gallons per week, T = 1 week, L = 1 week, = 5 gallon per
week, and I = 25 gallons.
q d (T L) z T L I
31.
Quantity range
Less than 100 pounds
100 to 999 pounds
1,000 or more pounds
Cost (C)
$20 per pound
$19 per pound
$18 per pound
Note: EOQ =
EOQ
219 pounds
225 pounds
231 pounds
Feasible
No
Yes
No
2 DS
iC
TC Q 225,C 19 DC
D
Q
3000
225
S iC 3000(19)
40
(.25)19
Q
2
225
2
= $58,068
TC Q 1000,C 18 DC
D
Q
3000
1000
S iC 3000(18)
40
(.25)18
Q
2
1000
2
= $56,370
The best order size is 1,000 units at a cost of $18 per pound.
17-22
32.
Quantity range
Less than 2500 pounds
2500 to 4999 pounds
5,000 or more pounds
Note: EOQ =
Cost (C)
$0.82 per pound
$0.81 per pound
$0.80 per pound
EOQ
4277 pounds
4303 pounds
4330 pounds
Feasible
No
Yes
No
2 DS
iC
D
Q
S iC
Q
2
50000
4303
50000(0.81)
30
(.20)(0.81)
4303
2
$41197 .14
TC Q 4303,C 0.81 DC
D
Q
S iC
Q
2
50000
5000
50000(0.80)
30
(.20)(0.80)
5000
2
$40700.00
TC Q 5000,C 0.80 DC
The best order size is 5,000 units at a cost of $0.80 per pound.
17-23