Assignment On Various Global Index With Respect To United States
Assignment On Various Global Index With Respect To United States
Assignment On Various Global Index With Respect To United States
SUBMITTED BY:
AKANKSHA BHATNAGAR
PGDM (2014-16)
SECTION- B
ROLL NO. 22/003
BASIC REQUIREMENTS: This sub-index measures the degree to which the environment
enables factors of production (e.g. raw materials, physical and human capital) to participate
in the economic marketplace. The pillars within this sub-index are: macroeconomic
stability, the efficiency of private and public institutions, infrastructure, health and primary
education. The GCI recognizes these categories as the key contributors to development for
countries with GDP per capita less than $2,000, calculated at PPP.
The GCI ranks countries according to their overall performance and also provides scores by subindex, pillars, and variables.
YEAR
2010-2011 (OUT
OF 139)
2011-12 (OUT OF
142)
2012-13 (OUT OF
144)
2013-14 (OUT OF
148)
2014-15 (OUT OF
144)
SUBINDEX
OVERALL INDEX BASIC REQUIREMENTS EFFICIENCY ENHANCERS INNOVATION & SOPHISTICATION FACTORS
RANK SCORE RANK SCORE RANK
SCORE
RANK
SCORE
4
5.43
32
5.21
5.46
5.53
5.43
36
5.21
5.49
5.46
5.47
33
5.12
5.63
5.42
5.48
36
5.12
5.66
5.43
5.54
33
5.15
5.71
5.54
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
OVERALL INDEX
RANK
OVERALL INDEX
SCORE
The United States continues the decline that began in 2009-10, falling two more places to 4th
position. While many structural features that make its economy extremely productive, a number of
escalating weaknesses have lowered the US ranking over the past two years. There are some
weaknesses in particular areas that have deepened since our last assessment. The evaluation of
institutions has continued to decline, falling from 34th to 40th this year. The public does not
demonstrate strong trust of politicians (54th), and the business community remains concerned about
the governments ability to maintain arms-length relationships with the private sector (55th) and
considers that the government spends its resources relatively wastefully (68th). A lack of
macroeconomic stability continues to be the United States greatest area of weakness.
Also in 2012-13, the downfall continues because of the same reasons.
But in 2013-14, the United States goes up in the ranking and continues to raise its ranking in the
year 2014-15 and regains the 3rd position on the back of improvements in a number of areas,
including some aspects of the institutional framework (up from 35th to 30th), and more positive
perceptions regarding business sophistication (from 6th to 4th) and innovation (from 7th to 5th). As
it recovers from the crisis, the United States can build on the many structural features that make its
economy extremely productive. US companies are highly sophisticated and innovative, and they are
supported by an excellent university system that collaborates admirably with the business sector in
R&D. Combined with flexible labor markets and the scale opportunities afforded by the sheer size
of its domestic economythe largest in the world by farthese qualities make the United States
very competitive.
Within the five major areas, there are 24 components in the index. Many of those components are
themselves made up of several sub-components. In total, the index comprises 42 distinct variables.
Each component and sub-component is placed on a scale from 0 to 10 that reflects the distribution
of the underlying data. When subcomponents are present, the sub-component ratings are averaged
to derive the component rating. The component ratings within each area are then averaged to derive
ratings for each of the five areas. In turn, the five area ratings are averaged to derive the summary
rating for each country. The following section provides an overview of the five major areas.
1. Size of Government
A. Government consumption
B. Transfers and subsidies
C. Government enterprises and investment
D. Top marginal tax rate
(i) Top marginal income tax rate
(ii) Top marginal income and payroll tax rate
3. Sound Money
A. Money growth
B. Standard deviation of inflation
C. Inflation: most recent year
D. Freedom to own foreign currency bank accounts
5. Regulation
A. Credit market regulations
(i) Ownership of banks
(ii) Private sector credit
(iii) Interest rate controls/negative real interest rates
LEGAL
SYSTEM
&PROPERTY
RIGHTS
SOUND
MONEY
FREEDOM TO
TRADE
INTERNATIONALLY
REGULATIONS
OVERALL
RATINGS
(RANK)
7.50 (21)
7.3 (24)
9.69 (2)
9.6 (11)
7.57 (26)
7.0 (48)
7.89 (16)
7.6 (27)
7.81 (10)
7.60 (10)
7.14 (28)
9.68 (7)
7.46 (57)
7.76 (31)
7.0 (30)
9.3 (37)
7.7 (43)
7.9 (28)
7.69 (18)
7.73
(17)
7.0 (28)
9.3 (41)
7.7 (40)
8.1 (21)
7.81 (12)
SIZE OF
GOVT.
7.13
2008 (43)
2009 6.5 (65)
6.43
2010 (73)
7.75
7.7
7.65
7.6
7.55
7.5
7.45
1
Throughout most of the period from 1980 to 2000, the United States ranked as the worlds third
freest economy, behind Hong Kong and Singapore. The rating of the United States in 2000 was
8.65, second only to Hong Kong. By 2005, the US rating had slipped to 8.20 and its ranking fallen
to 9th. The slide has continued. The United States placed 15th in 2010 and 16th in 2011 before
rebounding slightly to 14th in 2012. The 7.81 chain linked rating of the United States in 2012 is
more than 8/10 of a point lower than the 2000 rating.
While US ratings and rankings have fallen in all five areas of the EFW index, the reductions have
been largest in the Legal System and Protection of Property Rights (Area 2), Freedom to Trade
Internationally (Area 4), and Regulation (Area 5). The plunge in Area 2 has been huge. In 2000, the
9.23 rating of the United States was the 9th highest in the world. But by 2012, the area rating had
plummeted to 6.99, placing it 36th worldwide. The increased use of eminent domain to transfer
property to powerful political interests, the ramifications of the wars on terrorism and drugs, and the
violation of the property rights of bondholders in the auto-bailout case have weakened the tradition
of strong adherence to the rule of law in United States. The expanded use of regulation in the
United States has resulted in sharp rating reductions for components such as independence of the
judiciary, impartiality of the courts, and regulatory favoritism.
This implies that, unless policies undermining economic freedom are reversed, the future annual
growth of the US economy will be only about half its historic average of 3%.