Velazquez v. Tulin - Document No. 2
Velazquez v. Tulin - Document No. 2
Velazquez v. Tulin - Document No. 2
2
Case 8:05-cv-01344-SCB-TBM Document 2 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 1 of 3
JUAN E. VELAZQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
________________________________
ORDER
Jackson County, Florida, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against his privately-
retained attorney. Included with the complaint was a copy of the contract Plaintiff
Velazquez signed when he retained Attorney Tulin to represent him in his state criminal
case. Plaintiff was charged with trafficking in cocaine, conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, and
violation of parole.
In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that counsel "did not keep his agreement under the
constitutions and laws which led me to correct the problem he caused for me." He also
contends that his attorney violated Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment rights because Plaintiff has
Plaintiff seeks to have the fees he paid the attorney returned "since I had to do my
own case that I paid him for." He also seeks $300,000 for all the pain and suffering he [the
attorney] "caused me that will remain in my mind for the rest of my life."
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 8:05-cv-01344-SCB-TBM Document 2 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION
A review of the file demonstrates that, for the following reasons, the complaint must
In any § 1983 action, the initial inquiry must focus on whether the two essential
Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981), overruled on other grounds by Daniels v.
Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330-31 (1986); Tillman v. Coley, 886 F.2d 317, 319 (11th Cir.),
reh'g denied en banc, 893 F.2d 346 (11th Cir. 1989); Barfield v. Brierton, 883 F.2d 923, 934
(11th Cir. 1989); Cornelius v. Town of Highland Lake, Alabama, 880 F.2d 348, 352 (11th
Cir.), reh'g denied en banc, 887 F.2d 1093 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, Spears v.
Cornelius, 494 U.S. 1066 (1990) overruled on other grounds by White v. Lemacks, 183
F.3d 1253, 1259 (1999) citing Collins v. City of Harker Heights, 503 U.S. 115 (1992).
Plaintiff fails to meet the elements described above. First, Plaintiff has not shown
that his attorney was acting under color of state law. A public defender does not act under
defendant in a criminal proceeding Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981). Likewise
a lawyer representing a private client in criminal proceedings cannot at the same time
represent the State, Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992), and does not act under
-2-
Case 8:05-cv-01344-SCB-TBM Document 2 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 3 of 3
2. That Plaintiff is assessed the $250.00 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send a
copy of this order to Inmate Accounting 1711 Mahan Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32308
Juan E. Velazquez
-3-