Topic Paper - Week 3: Boeing Verses Airbus
Topic Paper - Week 3: Boeing Verses Airbus
Topic Paper - Week 3: Boeing Verses Airbus
Prepared for
Dr. James. Ibe
BUSN 6120, Managerial Economics
Spring 2, 2015
Section QC
Webster University
04/05/2015
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORSHIP: I certify that I am the author. I have cited all sources from
which I used data, ideas, or words, either quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this
paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.
04/05/2015
Signature
Date
Boeing verses Airbus
Companies Background
Boeings was founded in 1910 by William Boeing who turned a shipyard into an airplane
factory in Seattle, Washington. Its now a leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and
military aircraft and is the worlds leading aerospace company. Beyond aircraft, Boeing designs
and manufactures missiles, satellites, launch vehicles and advanced information and
communication systems and provides support services to the military and commercial airlines.
At Boeing, a true corporation incorporates three main elements: the products and services, its
business practices, and its community engagement. One third of what defines Boeing as a
corporation is its fulfillment of its social obligations. Boeings website says it indeed does
have a responsibility to its stakeholders, but also to the communities in which its employees live.
Airbus was founded in 1970. Its headquarters is in Blagnac, France. Airbus roots date
back to 1967 where a consortium of European aerospace firms formed to compete with US firms
such as Boeing and McDonnell Douglas. In 1970 Airbus Industrie formed, backed by French,
German, Spanish, British government backed entities and becomes a global pioneer in
aeronautics, space and defense related services. In 2001 the consortium was merged as European
Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS). The company was rebranded as Airbus Group
on January 2, 2014. Airbus Group unites the capabilities of Airbus, Airbus Defense and Space
and Airbus Helicopters. Corporate Social Responsibility is highlighted on the Airbus Group
established there will be a 50/50 share between the two companies because both business
strategies seem to have sound logic, although Boeing seems to have done more customer
research. To stay competitive, the two companies focused on different segments of the market
hoping that the segment they predicted will be most profitable while also keeping an eye on
alternative approach just incase. Because both used sound business methodologies in making
their decisions, it is probable that each will become dominant in their predicted market segment
and that demand for each type of service will sustain profits.
Bibliography
Baye, Michael R. Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 8th Ed. Copyright 2014.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Boston, MA.
AIRBUS & BOEING A FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Airline Industry May 31, 2014 Taposh Dutta
Roy & Team
Boeing.Com - Corporate Citzenship. n.d. 1 5 2014
<http://www.boeing.com/boeing/companyoffices/aboutus/community/>.