ALS
ALS
ALS
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an idiopathic, fatal neurodegenerative disease of the human motor system. In
this Seminar, we summarise current concepts about the origin of the disease, what predisposes patients to develop
the disorder, and discuss why all cases of ALS are not the same. In the 150 years since Charcot originally described
ALS, painfully slow progress has been made towards answering these questions. We focus on what is known about
ALS and where research is headingfrom the small steps of extending longevity, improving therapies, undertaking
clinical trials, and compiling population registries to the overarching goals of establishing the measures that guard
against onset and finding the triggers for this neurodegenerative disorder.
Introduction
Since the 1990s, there has been growing scientific and
clinical interest in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Advances in our understanding of the glutamate
neurotransmitter system and the discovery of causal genes
linked to the development of familial ALS have stimulated
research interest, problems associated with clinical
heterogeneity have been identified, and survival in ALS is
now understood to be dependent on several factors,
including clinical presentation (phenotype), rate of disease
progression, early presence of respiratory failure, and the
nutritional status of patients.
Extending life expectancy in ALS seems to be dependent
on improving our understanding of its pathogenesis,
which will lead to the development of early and specific
diagnostic methods. There is a crucial need to formulate
therapies that not only slow disease progression, but also
deal with the secondary consequences of malnutrition
and respiratory failure. At present, no definitive diagnostic
test or biomarker for ALS exist, and neurologists rely on
only clinical criteria for diagnosis. The development of
novel biomarkers to objectively assess disease progression
holds the promise of greatly refining therapeutic trial
design and reducing trial costs. Furthermore, the power
of population registries is being increasingly recognised
as an essential adjunct to improved clinical assessment
techniques. These collaborative endeavours will inevitably
lead to a better understanding of ALS and its often
Search strategy and selection criteria
We searched Medline (1966, to December, 2009), EmBase
(1980, to December, 2009), and the Cochrane Library using
the search terms amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor
neurone disease in combination with diagnosis,
epidemiology, fronto-temporal dementia, imaging,
neurophysiology, management, and neuroprotection.
Further articles were included from reference lists, review
articles, and major textbook chapters. Abstracts and reports
from relevant meetings were also included. The final reference
list was generated on the basis of originality and relevance to
the topics covered in this Seminar. Emphasis was placed on
publications from the past 5 years, but did not exclude
commonly referenced and highly regarded older publications.
942
Seminar
Seminar
Astrocyte
Impaired
glutamate
intake
Microglia
Secretion of
toxic factors
Presynaptic
neuron
Release of
inflammatory
mediators
Mitochondrial
dysfunction
Glutamate
excitotoxicity
2K+
3Na+
Ca2+
SOD1 aggregates
Neurofilament
accumulation
Mutant SOD1
Pump
dysfunction
Dysfunction of axonal
transport systems
Increased
oxidative stress
Mutations in
TARDBP, FUS,
SOD1 genes
TARDBP/FUS
Seminar
Pathophysiological mechanisms
The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the
development of ALS seem multifactorial (figure 2), with
emerging evidence of a complex interaction between
genetic and molecular pathways.4143 ALS might be an
945
Seminar
Motor cortex
Dying
forward
hypothesis
Anterograde degeneration
mediated via glutamate
excitotoxicity
Lateral
reticular
nucleus
Excitatory
interneuron
Propriospinal
neuron
Deficiency of motor
neurotrophic factor
Inhibitory
interneuron
Dying back
hypothesis
Anterior
horn cell
Seminar
Diagnosis
Without a diagnostic test for ALS, clinicians mostly rely
on identifying the combination of UMN and LMN signs
in the same body region, with subsequent evidence of
disease progression to other regions. The El Escorial
criteria,74 revised in 1997,75 use a combination of UMN
and LMN signs to establish levels of diagnostic certainty.
Clinical trial investigators have tended to enrol patients
with either probable or definite ALS according to the
El Escorial criteria, highlighting their universality,
although inclusion of these diagnostic features as
enrolment criteria might be argued as restrictive.76
Furthermore, these criteria can have poor sensitivity,
particularly in the early stages of ALS when patients are
most likely to benefit from therapeutic intervention.77
Because of these criticisms, the criteria have been
modified to help early diagnosis78 and to optimise
levels of diagnostic certainty, important in the clinical
trial setting.79
There is often a long delay before a definitive diagnosis
is reached, partly because of the insidious onset of
symptoms, with the median time to diagnosis of about
14 months.80 Unusual clinical presentations, a low index
of suspicion, and misinterpretation of neurophysiological or neuroradiological findings are common causes
of diagnostic uncertainty.15 Unfortunately, diagnostic
delay can lead to use of inappropriate therapies, a
delay in starting appropriate pharmacological and
symptomatic therapies, and problems in dealing with
psychosocial factors.
The diagnosis of ALS is devastating for the patient and
family members, and must be handled sensitively. Patients
and family members can carry the emotional burden of an
www.thelancet.com Vol 377 March 12, 2011
Seminar
B
Surviving motor unit
Collateral sprouts from
surviving motor axon
reinnervating denervated
muscle fibres
Degenerated motor unit
Advances in neuroimaging
The greatest contribution of neuroimaging to the
diagnostic pathway in ALS so far has been the ability of
MRI to exclude alternative pathological causes. However,
the imaging discipline is evolving, and multimodal
neuroimaging has made major progress in the
confirmation that ALS is a multisystem cerebral
neurodegenerative disorder.96 The key neuroimaging
findings, some with potential as biomarkers, are
discussed in panel 3.
Seminar
Seminar
Although clinical trials of ALS have been done since the 1980s, riluzole is the only drug of
proven ecacy for treatment of this disorder. The failure of ALS clinical trials to lead to
substantial benefits has been attributed to several potential design problems at preclinical
and clinical levels:
Preclinical
Inappropriate mouse model. Until recently, the SOD1 mouse model has been the
benchmark for testing potential neuroprotectants in ALS.121 However, as SOD1
mutations account for about 2% of all ALS cases, the mouse model might have little
relevance to human sporadic disease. Furthermore, this model undergoes a series of
stereotypical changes that begin with hind limb weakness. The recent development
of mouse models with mutations in the gene encoding TDP-43 is a potential
advance in therapeutic development for ALS, providing basic scientists with a new,
perhaps more relevant, platform for studying novel therapies.122
Inappropriate timing of introducing drugs and dosing problems. Some investigators
have studied the eects of presymptomatic delivery of drugs on disease onset.123
Although this timing might contribute towards understanding the subclinical
processes that underlie motor neuron degeneration, it seems to be of little relevance
for treatment of sporadic ALS. Many preclinical studies have also examined ultra-high
doses of drugs that would probably translate into plasma concentrations far beyond
that tolerable by human patients. Some investigators have advocated that the highest
tolerable dose should not be assumed to produce the best outcome.124
Clinical
Trial design. There is increasing need for more eective screening of pharmacological
drugs during phase 2 trials because after this period of clinical development a
decision is made to proceed with confirmatory testing (ie, a phase 3 trial) or to reject
the drug as ineective. The distinction between phase 2 and phase 3 trials in ALS
becomes blurred, because providing preliminary evidence of drug ecacy in this
disease at the phase 2 level is dicult. The absence of an eective biomarker is a
major contributing reason. Therefore, the dilemma remains whether to use ecient
statistical strategies for minimising trial duration and sample size, to increase the
chance of proceeding with a phase 3 trial (ie, higher false-positive rate), or to do
phase 3 clinical trials tailored as phase 2 clinical trials (ie, higher false-negative rate).
The latter approach is perhaps one that is now rarely done, given recent advances in
statistical design.125 Investigators are also proceeding with phase 3 clinical trials, even
in the absence of preliminary evidence of ecacy in human patients.
Choice of primary endpoint. Changes in the primary endpoint establish whether a trial
will be successful. The choice of the correct primary endpoint in ALS clinical trials has
been debated. Trials that use functional scales and measures of strength as primary
endpoints have dominated the field, whereas trials mainly concerned with improved
survival of patients have been few and far between recently. The design and clinical
benefits of the former include: smaller sample size, shorter trial duration, and clinically
meaningful treatment eects. Nevertheless, measurement of survival might be the
only means of determining whether a treatment eect truly exists, given the large
extent of motor neuron loss from the time of symptom onset. For example, riluzole
has small but significant eects on the function of patients, detectable with sample
sizes far beyond that required to realise its survival benefit.
ALS=amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Seminar
Thickened saliva
Natural remedies (eg, papaya)
Ensure adequate hydration
Saline nebulisers; nebulised N-acetylcysteine
Suctioning of the mouth
Mouth care
Emotional lability
Educate patients with ALS and caregivers
Amitriptyline
Benzodiazepines
Dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidine sulfate
Depression and anxiety
Counselling
Benzodiazepines
Antidepressants
Sleep disturbance
Treat underlying problem
Respiratory review, non-invasive ventilation
Benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants
Constipation
Dietary changes (eg, increase fluid and fibre intake)
Use formulations high in bran, bulk, or fibre
Regular oral aperients (Movicol [Norgine, the Netherlands]
or suppositories).
ALS=amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Data from Andersen and colleagues81 and Miller and
colleagues.131
Seminar
Conclusions
Let us keep looking, in spite of everything. Let us keep
searching. It is indeed the best method of finding, and
perhaps thanks to our eorts, the verdict we will give
such a patient tomorrow will not be the same we must
give this man today.
Charcot (1889)
Seminar
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
953
Seminar
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
954
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Seminar
955