Effective Learning With 70-20-10 Whitepaper

Effective Learning
with 70:20:10
The new frontier for the extended enterprise
By Charles Jennings
& Jrme Wargnier
Contents
Forward.........................................................................................................................................................................................2
Key Strategic Challenges. ................................................................................................................................3
Four Strategic Challenges........................................................................................................................................................................ 4

The Changing Demands on Business..................................................................................................................................... 7
Major Learning Trends..........................................................................................................................................9
Breaking the Richness/Reach Trade-off..........................................................................................................................10

Extending within Organisational Walls: The 70:20:10 Model........................................................13
Advice for a CLO on the 70:20:10 model. ......................................................................... 22
What questions.......................................................................................................................................................................................................23
When questions. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................25
How questions.........................................................................................................................................................................................................28
How Much questions.....................................................................................................................................................................................30
CrossKnowledge Value Proposition............................................................................................... 32
Where is the change?...................................................................................................................................................................................33

Taking the best out of the 10......................................................................................................................................................34
20: the Art of building Learning Communities..................................................................................................36
70: Creating Learnscapes for everyday learning.........................................................................................38
The CrossKnowledge Methodology.......................................................................................................................................40
Engaging Managers in Training.......................................................................................................... 42
Principles..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................43
Managers involvement ............................................................................................................................................................................49
Research...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................54
Takeaways........................................................................................................................................................................... 56
Forward
1 Backup
Education?
Marc Prensky.
Educational
Technology,
Vol 48 No 1,
Jan-Feb 2008
2 Harold Jarche,
Oct 2010
Marc Prensky1 writes that too many teachers see education as preparing kids for the
past, not the future. In the same way, too many Learning and Development departments are preparing learning content for an environment of the past, not the future.
Workers in the 21st century are less and less likely to want, or need, to leave
their working environment to learn. They are increasingly demanding that their
development meshes with their work. In fact, many now realise that work is
becoming learning and learning is becoming part of work2.
This document investigates the new territories of learning such as Social, Workplace,
Informal or Experiential Learning. It is based on recognized experts works but also
on the projects we had the pleasure to lead these last years with numerous L&D
teams.
We hope it will be a source of inspiration for you and an invitation to a fascinating
and profitable journey!
Key
Strategic
Challenges
Four Strategic Challenges

The world that Human Resource Directors and Chief Learning Officers inhabit today
was unimaginable even ten years ago. Their roles have evolved from overseeing
and leading their teams in executing a suite of predominantly straightforward
transactional tasks to managing strategic functions whose importance should not
be underestimated as key contributors of value to their organisations.
HRDs and CLOs are still responsible for the essential work of attracting, recruiting,
developing and retaining high-quality staff. However most of the transactional
elements of these activities have been delegated to computer systems, outsourced,
off-shored, or reduced in scope.
The key tasks and challenges HRDs and CLOs face today are in the strategic domain.
They must still keep a weather eye on underpinning transactional processes, but the
real value of HR and Learning and Development departments lies in their strategic
contribution.
3 The RLB
Group
Research,
2006.
David Ulrich and Wayne Brockbank of the University of Michigan reported3 that 43%
of HRs value comes from the strategic contributions made by the function. They
also found that companies where HR strategy is aligned with business strategy, and
which develop HR professionals who understand their business and make strategic
contributions, can show up to a 250% increase in business performance compared
to companies with a more tactical/transactional HR functions.
In other words, a significant, even a game-changing, impact on business performance can be achieved when HR has a broader, more strategic view.
4 Building
a Learning
Culture, Josh
Bersin in Chief
Learning
Officer
Magazine, April
2008
Other studies have shown similar results. In the Learning arena, the well-respected
Bersin & Associates organisation found4 that, of all of the tasks executed by a
performance-driven Learning function, performance consulting yields the highest
business value. However, effective performance consulting only occurs when the
Learning and Development function is closely aligned with its key stakeholders and
focused on delivering against strategic priorities.
Learning and Developments value to an organisation is not a simple profit vs.
cost or ROI valuation. It is determined by how well the function helps leaders and
employees do their jobs.
The value offered by Learning and Development is delivered in four areas, and these
represent the key strategic challenges faced by all organisations.
Current & Future

Strategy
Organisational
Growth
Value
Organisational
Productivity
Transformation
Strategic Challenge 1
How does Learning and Development best
contribute to current and future strategy?
Current & Future

Strategy
Organisational
Growth
Value
Organisational
Productivity
Transformation
Most HR Directors and Chief Learning Officers focus on supporting their organisations current strategy. However research5 has shown that business leaders, the C
suite, expect them also to be working and planning how to build workforce capability
in support of future organisational strategy. The fact that this rarely happens is due
both to HRDs and CLOs lack of focus on strategic objectives, and the busy work
required to keep the wheels turning and meet immediate demands.
contribute to organisational growth?
5 The C-Level
and the Value
of Learning,
ASTD and IBM.
T&D Magazine,
October 2005
Current & Future

Strategy
Organisational
Growth
Value
Organisational
Productivity
Transformation
Organisational growth brings with it organisational change. Ideally, both HR and

Learning and Development should be firmly embedded and rapidly responsive to
growth and change initiatives. Evidence suggests this is not the case for many
6 Research
findings by
the Human
Resource
Planning
Society (HRPS)
in partnership
with the
Institute for
Corporate
Productivity
(i4cp), 2007
organisations. One survey6 found that 66% of respondents said that HR was not
responding fast enough to the strategic challenges related to profitable new
growth. With the recent economic downturn and shortage of green shoots, we
can assume that a similar percentage will agree once global growth restarts. Many
of the respondents in this survey were HR professionals themselves. The main
reasons given for this lack of response was that senior HR leaders are on the sidelines and in spot-roles such as talent acquisition rather than being deeply involved
in supporting the organisational growth process itself.
Likewise, Learning and Development is very often following rather than being part
of, or even leading, organisational growth activities. The challenge for the Learning
and Development function is how to build its own capabilities to meet organisational growth requirements. These include strategic-thinking and planning capability,
strategic planning, and high-level consultancy capabilities among others.
contribute to organisational productivity?
7 ADDIE
Analysis,
Design,
Development,
Implementation,
Evaluation
Current & Future

Strategy
Organisational
Growth
Value
Organisational
Productivity
Transformation
Many Chief Learning Officers and their teams are focused on the details of learning
inputs. The majority of a Learning and Development teams time is spent following
through a defined process for the development of learning solutions, such as the
ADDIE Model7 or similar models of learning service. However, strategic value is
delivered through unerring focus on the outputs of learning in the form of increased
individual, team and organisational performance and productivity. Focus on individual
and team productivity will impact organisational productivity.
contribute to transformation?
Current & Future

Strategy
Organisational
Growth
Value
Organisational
Productivity
Transformation
There is no greater challenge for the growing knowledge workforce today than that
of adapting to survive and thrive in the new post-industrial Internet age. New ways of
working also require new ways of learning. Learning and Development departments
need to adapt their modus operandi to meet the new challenges of developing the
capability of new waves of mobile and distributed workforces and virtual teams with
always-on connectivity, and of a new generation of entrants into the world of work
that has different expectations and different requirements.
The Changing Demands

on Business
The challenges of a world awash with information
No-one working today is unaware of the overwhelming volumes of information that
workers need to deal with. Our email inboxes are full and we find ourselves swimming
in an ocean of data. The challenge was neatly encapsulated by Eric Schmidt, CEO
of Google Inc. when he said8:
Between the birth of the world and 2003, there were five exabytes of information
created. We now create five exabytes every two days. See why its so painful to
operate in information markets?
Eric Schmidt, CEO, Google
8 Eric Schmidt,
CEO, Google
speaking at the
Atmosphere
2010
conference,
California April
2010
Of course, Schmidt is actually talking about data rather than information, so much
of this volume is, for example, financial data generated as part of transactional
processes or as data feeds into the global financial markets.
But, importantly, a significant portion of the data is UGC user generated content.
The impact that UGC is having on our working lives was dramatically described by
Andreas Weigend, former Chief Scientist at Amazon.com. Writing in the Harvard
Business Review blog in May 2009 Weigend pointed out the following fact9:
In 2009, more data will be generated by individuals than in the entire history of
mankind through 2008. Information overload is more serious than ever. What are
the implications for marketing?
Andreas Weingend, Former Chief Scientist, Amazon.com
9 Andreas
Weingend, The
Social Data
Revolution(s)
For the Learning and Development function, the key point here is not simply the
volume of information. It is the fact that most of the information that workers need
to deal with on a daily basis is unstructured and constantly changing. And the half-life
of much of the information that we deal with is getting shorter. In todays working
environment there is the need both to manage information and to find information
when we need it. Information supplied to us in a structured training or development
session months ago will often be out-of-date by the time we need to use it.
A world awash with information requires new ways of approaching employee
capability. Learning and Development professionals need to understand this and
adopt approaches that best reflect a world where almost any information can be
found and retrieved at the touch of a mouse.
The challenge here is for the Learning and Development world to move away from
too exclusive a focus on the design, development and delivery of static information
and knowledge embedded in courses, and towards a broader focus which includes
approaches that work in this dynamic information-rich world.
The challenges of new ways of working

Many workers in business enterprises are adopting totally new ways of working.
This change can easily be seen in knowledge industry sectors where people work
with their heads rather than with their hands.
The changes are profound. In many cases workers rarely use a single desk in
an office any more. Increasing numbers of employees work on the move using
mobile devices. More and more people work from hotels and cafs, on trains and
aeroplanes, and they increasingly work from home outside of traditional working
hours. They expect - and are expected - to be connected all of the time.
10 McKinsey
Report: The
Coming
Imperative for
the Knowledge
Economy
At the same time, research10 is showing that workers are dealing with more
complexity and using more tacit knowledge. All of these challenges mean that
Learning and Development professionals need to re-evaluate their traditional
approaches to building workforce capability. In other words:
New ways of working require new ways of learning
Major
Learning
Trends
A number of major developments have had a profound impact on learning in organisations over recent years. These have either opened opportunities that simply did
not exist before, or have swung the pendulum away from embedded practices and
towards the development of new business and operational models. Either way, they
have irrevocably altered the way Learning and Development professionals need to
approach the job of building workforce capability.
11 Philip Evans
& Thomas S
Wurster Blown
to Bits: How the
New Economics
of Information
Transforms
Strategy.
Harvard
Business
School Press.
(2000) ISBN
0-87584-877-X
The massive changes in telecommunications over the past 20 years, and the
rise of the Internet in particular, have changed forever our approach to Learning
and Development. Huge opportunities have been opened up by the breaking of
the richness/reach trade-off11. No longer are rich learning experiences confined to
workers who can attend classes. They can be made available across the world at
the click of a mouse.
The most significant development to impact organisational learning in the past
ten years has undoubtedly been the rise of Web 2.0 and the Social Web. This, in
turn, has opened up opportunities to develop innovative approaches to networked
and social learning. It has also increased the focus on opportunities for workforce
development through informal and workplace learning.
Breaking the Richness/

Reach Trade-off
12 ibid
In 2000 Philip Evans and Thomas Wurster of the Boston Consulting Group published
their ground-breaking book Blown to Bits12. In it they explained how the communications revolution and, particularly, the rise of the Internet were making traditional
business models redundant. New approaches, they observed, were replacing the
traditional at breakneck pace.
Prior to the communications revolution business models (and workforce development
models) were based on a trade-off between richness and reach. Suppliers (and
learning professionals) had an alternative to provide services that were rich and
lacked reach or to provide those that had reach but necessarily lacked richness
in order to obtain that reach. They offered rich face-to-face experiences or poorer
services at a distance. Often the cost of distribution of knowledge or of product
led to this trade-off having to be made.
10
In the 10 years since Evans and Wursters publication, we have seen their prediction
come true. The richness/reach trade-off is dissolving in dramatic ways across many
sectors, such as the newspaper industry, the travel industry, the auto manufacturing
and retailing industries and many parts of the retail industry. We have also witnessed
the dramatic emergence of new models, such as the demise of the Encyclopaedia
Britannica and its replacement by online services such as Wikipedia, and the rise of
Amazon.com with its impact on the book retailing industry.
Disintermediation and deconstruction of supply chains, the ease of interaction, and
the lowering of communication barriers has heralded immense change. The world
of learning and people development is far from immune to these effects. In fact,
the breaking of this richness/reach trade-off is extremely important in the context of
learning and development. We now have powerful new ways to deliver learning and,
more importantly, to connect and engage with learners without the constraints of
time and distance. And this has opened up a range of opportunities for exciting new
education and training services.
Reach
High
Richness
Low
Classroom/Workshop
Richness: high
Reach: low
Legacy Distance Learning

Richness: low
Reach: high
The traditional richness/reach trade-off is dissolving
11
Reach
High
Richness
Richness/
Reach
Trade-off
is broken
Communications
Technologies
Low
Classroom/Workshop
Richness: high
Reach: low
New World
Workplace Learning
Breaking the Richness/Reach Trade-off.

The move from classroom to the cloud
Prior to the communications revolution, rich learning experience could only be
offered through classroom-based events or workshops. However this model doesnt
scale well. Resource requirements and costs increase arithmetically with scaling.
Subsequently, organisations wishing to achieve consistency and scale using faceto-face Learning and Development approaches inevitably incurred high costs.
The alternative was to offer traditional distance education with its lower levels of
engagement and less rich learning environments.
With the developments over the past decade, this trade-off has now been thoroughly
broken. The smart use of technology and networks now allows the provision of rich
learning environments free of both time and location.
12
Extending Within
Organisational Walls:
The 70:20:10 Model
Empirical research and surveys over many years have produced data indicating
that workers learn most of what they need to know to effectively do their jobs in the
workplace rather than in the classroom.
80% or more of corporate learning is found to be informal
Peter Henchel, Executive Director, Institute for Research on Learning
This fact has significant implications for the approaches we take to learning and to
developing workforce capability.
70% of what people know about their jobs, they learn informally from the people
they work with
Education Development Center, Massachusetts (1997)
2-year study involving Boeing, Ford Electronics, Siemens, Motorola
In his 2006 book Jay Cross13, an expert on informal learning, listed a number of
surveys and research papers that confirmed this fact. Although the figures vary,
his overall finding was that approximately 80% of learning within organisations is
informal and around 20% is formal. Cross went on to question the overwhelming
focus on formal learning in light of this evidence. He argued that there is a need
for realignment of resources and focus away from purely formal learning if organisations are to utilise the most effective ways to support learning and employee
development.
Approximately 75% of the skills employees use on the job were learned informally
through discussions with co-workers, self-study, mentoring by managers and similar
methods. 25% were gained from formal training
CapitalWorks study
13 Jay Cross
Informal
Learning:
Rediscovering
the Natural
Pathways
That Inspire
Innovation and
Performance,
Pfeiffer (2006)
ISBN:
978-078798
1693
13
70:20:10
A model similar to Cross 80:20 rule has emerged from work by other researchers.
This is the 70:20:10 rule.
People learn 70% of what they know about their jobs informally
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (1996)
Loewenstein and Spletzer (Formal and Informal Training: Evidence from the NLSY)
70:20:10 has become the basis of organisational learning strategy in an increasing
number of large corporations over the last few years, including well-known brands
such as Sun Microsystems, Goldman Sachs, Nokia, Maersk, Mars, Bank of America,
Coca Cola, Microsoft, HP, Wal-Mart, Reuters, American Express, Caterpillar and
many others.
14 The CAREER
ARCHITECT
Development
Planner.
Eichinger &
Lombardo.
Lominger
(1996) ISBN:
978-09655
71210
70:20:10 has its origins in the work of Morgan McCall, Robert Eichinger and
Michael Lombardo at the Center for Creative Leadership in North Carolina in the
mid-1990s and even earlier with Alan Tough, now Emeritus Professor at Toronto
University. A book by Eichinger and Lombardo14 published in 1996 laid out the basis
for 70:20:10. In it, the authors noted:
Lessons learned by successful and effective managers are roughly:
70% from tough jobs
20% from people (mostly the boss)
10% from courses and reading
Lombardo & Eichinger. 1996
It is important to be aware that neither the 80:20 approach nor 70:20:10 are intended
as rigid models or recipes. There are reference models drawn from empirical data
and surveys. They simply validate the fact that not all learning happens in formal
learning settings, whether these are classrooms or structured digital environments
such as virtual classrooms and eLearning courses.
Learning is no longer an isolated activity that is carried out away from the everyday
world of the workplace. Work and learning are becoming intermingled, and the
70:20:10 model provides a framework for thinking outside the classes/courses/
curriculum mind-set of learning and focusing on the entire spectrum workplace,
social and formal.
14
Learn & develop

through experience
Learn & develop
through others
70%
90%
20%
Learn & develop through

structured courses &
programmes
10%
= Experiential .
learning & development
Practical Examples of 70:20:10

Organisations implementing the 70:20:10 model need to adapt it to their own
context. However the table below is an example of some development activities
that you can undertake in each category:
70 Learn & Develop Through Experience
Apply new learning in real situations
Use feedback to try a new approach to an old problem
New work and solving problems within role
Increased span of control
Increased decision making
Champion and/or manage changes
Cover for others on leave
Exposure to other departments/roles
Take part in project or working group
Coordinated role swaps or secondments
Stretch assignments
Interaction with senior management, e.g. meetings, presentations
Dayto-day research, web browsing
Leadership activities, e.g. lead a team, committee membership, executive directorships
Cross functional introductions, site/customer visits
15
Research and apply best practice

Apply standards and processes, e.g. Six Sigma
Work with consultants or internal experts
Internal/external speaking engagements
Budgeting
Interviewing
Project reviews
Community activities and volunteering
20 Learn & Develop Through Others
Informal feedback and work debriefs
Seeking advice, asking opinions, sounding out ideas
Coaching from manager/others
360 feedback
Assessments with feedback
Structured mentoring and coaching
Learning through teams/networks
External networks/contacts
Professional/Industry association involvement or active membership
Facilitated group discussion, e.g. Action Learning
10 - Learn & Develop Through Structured Courses
Courses, workshops, seminars
eLearning
Professional qualifications/ accreditation
Certification
Formal education, e.g. University, Business School
From content to action

There is an increasing emphasis on learning by doing rather than learning by
knowing. This has been driven by:
The rapidly increasing volumes of information that knowledge workers need to
deal with each day.
The fact that most of this information is unstructured.
The dynamic nature of much of the information needed - where the average half-life
of organisational information is decreasing year-on-year.
We are moving from STOCKS of knowledge to FLOWS of knowledge

John Seely Brown, November 2010
Deloitte Center for the Edge (former Chief Scientist, Xerox PARC)
16
As the pace of change and the flows of information increase, it is becoming less
possible to keep up-to-date through content-focused learning. The answer is not to
know more, but actually to know less and to be able to find the relevant information
when needed.
John Seely Brown and his co-authors describe this challenge in these terms:
To succeed now, we have to continually refresh our stocks of knowledge by participating in relevant flows of knowledge interactions that create knowledge to
transfer it across individuals. These flows occur in any social, fluid environment that
allows firms and individuals to get better faster by working with others 15
In an ever-changing world, continuous learning is the only sustainable advantage
Taking workers away from their workplace and into classrooms to learn content is
no longer a feasible solution for most purposes other than preparing them for entry
into a new role or organisation, or for change management activities.
15 The Power
of Pull. By John
Seely Brown,
John Hagel and
Lang Davidson.
2010.
Other than for these specific applications, we need to stop thinking of learning as
enabling work, or (the dominant model in the past) of learning as separate from
work. Instead we need to base our learning solutions on the principle that learning
is the work and that working is learning.
To effect these changes, the learning professionals role needs to become one of a
facilitator, curator and promoter of informal and social learning.
From storing knowledge to finding knowledge

In information-rich and dynamic working environments we are discovering that it is
better to know where to find the information we need than to try and hold it in our
heads.
Todays productivity is in the ACTIONS of people, not the information in their heads
The concept of the outboard brain is emerging. Our work may require that we
memorise and store core concepts and strategies in our heads, but we dont need
to memorise all of the additional data, information or knowledge necessary to
complete every task; we simply need a map of where to locate it.
Professor Robert Kelley who works at the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie
Mellon University, carried out a longitudinal study looking at how much information
knowledge workers needed to hold in their inboard brain in order to do their job.
17
Over a period of 20 years, his team asked knowledge workers the following
question: What percentage of the knowledge you need to do your job is stored in
your own mind?
In 1986, when the survey began, subjects responded that they felt they needed to
hold in their head at least three-quarters (75%) of the information they needed to do
their job. By 1997 this figure had dropped dramatically to between 15% and 20%.
During the intervening time the Web emerged and database technology became
much more widespread.
Primarily WHAT? learning
Primarily HOW? WHY?

And WHAT IF? learning
EXISTING
content rich
experience-poor
approach
FUTURE
experience rich
content-nd
approach
Existing content-rich learning transfer

model
Content
Content
Content
MindFind experience-rich content in the cloud

model
Content in the
Cloud
Core
Core
Traditional Learning
MindFind Learning
Focus on core skill development

(including MindFind skills) means that
structured learning plays a smaller part
in the overall learning process. Change
of focus in developing core skills through
experiential learning approaches means
a move from focus on knowledge to a
focus on action.
CORE SKILLS including:

Critical thinking skills
Communication skills
Analytical skills
MindFind skills
CORE SKILLS developed
through:
Experiential learning
Practice
Conversation
Reection
Find-Access Model of Learning Jennings & Clarke
18
When Kelley ran the research again in 2006, his subjects felt that they only needed
to keep around 8% to 10% of the information/knowledge they needed to do their
jobs in their inboard brain. The rest they could get from their outboard brain when
they needed it.
Focusing on the ability to find information and knowledge rather than needing to
store has profound implications. Traditional approaches to formal learning, which
tend to focus on content and knowledge transfer, need to be reviewed. New
approaches, such the Find-Access Model16 describe a changed focus on content
and an increased focus on find and other associated skills.
From Event to Process
16 Find Access
Model for
21st Century
Learning
Jennings &
Clarke, 2009
All of the developments described so far are part of a larger change taking place,
the migration away from learning events as the exclusive tool offered by training
and learning departments. Many 21st Century learning professionals are realising
that they need to move towards new practices and a culture of continuous learning.
Real learning can only be demonstrated by a change in behaviour. Knowledge
acquisition is not a demonstration of learning until it is put into action
This move to a model of continuous learning is inevitable. It has always been understood that real learning and capability-building occurs not as a series of events, but
over time through a series of processes through experience, through taking the
opportunity to practice, through working and conversing with others in new ways,
and through having the time to reflect on behavioural changes.
The evolution of learning from being primarily event-based to being primarily
process-driven represents one of the most profound changes in the way organisations structure and support the development of their workers.
The Rise of Learnscapes

One emerging approach to learning that incorporates both the 80:20 model and the
70:20:10 model is that of learnscapes17 or learning ecosystems. A learnscape
incorporates all the interactions, tools, relationships and elements that make up a
holistic learning environment. Learnscapes may include formal, structured learning,
but they also include informal and serendipitous learning.
17 Cross, J
(2007) and
Quinn,C.(2009).
Populating the
LearnScape:
e-Learning as
Strategy. In M.
Allen, Ed. Michael
Allens eLearning
Annual 2009.
Pfeiffer: San
Francisco
19
A learnscape is the platform where knowledge workers collaborate, solve problems,

converse, share ideas, brainstorm, learn, relate to others, talk, explain, communicate, conceptualize, tell stories, help one another, teach, serve customers, keep
up-to-date, meet one another, forge parnerships, build communities, and distribute
information. Learnscapes are where and how modern work is performed-including
workplace learning.
Cross, J, Learnscape Architecture eLearn Magazine, Aug 2008
18 Cross, J
Learnscaping:
Getting Things
Done in
Organisations
October 2008
Learnscape Architecture18 and the 80:20 and 70:20:10 models require learning
professionals to adopt a new way of thinking as well as different, and often new,
skills.
These skills are more closely aligned to facilitation and architecting learning
environments than to the traditional design, develop and deliver approach used for
traditional formal learning activities.
Traditional L&D Role
Emerging L&D Role
Build and maintain catalogues

courses, programs, curricula
Manage Wokspaces (work/learning/

environments)
Design and develop course materials

for formal, structured learning
Focus on supporting learning

experiences in the workplace
Course-centric role (with a little

coaching and ancillary activities)
Performance-centric role. Helping people

Work Smarter
Predominately classroom-based with

some structured eLearning
Many channels classroom, eLearning,

virtual labs, learning nuggets,
workplace support, etc.
Learning-focused
Performance and productivity-focused
Migrating towards new roles
From Learning to Performance

The final trend that is apparent in the changing landscape of organisational learning
is the increasing focus on the outcomes of learning rather than the process of
learning.
Clearly the process of learning needs continued focus, but the outcomes,
results and impact of the process need to be the drivers of the process rather
than the converse. Organisations are increasingly aware of the need to evaluate
learning impact, and many are moving beyond traditional finance-centric Return
on Investment (ROI) models towards more useful metrics for what is undoubtedly
20
the most important intangible asset in any organisation the performance and
potential of its workforce. Return on Expectation (ROE) is now seen as a more useful
metric and others are also emerging, such as Return on Investment in Interaction
(ROII)19, a measure of increasing productivity and value based on the principles of
Metcalfs Law of networks.
19 The Working
Smarter
Fieldbook.
Cross, Hart,
Husband,
Jarche, Jennings
& Quinn (2009)
21
Advice
for a CLO
on the
70:20:10
model
Advice for a
CLO on the
70:20:10
model
22
At our recent lectures and workshops, weve had more and more practical questions
from CLOs regarding the best way to implement the 70:20:10 model within their
organisation. We decided to gather our answers in this section and sort them into
What, When, How and How Much categories.
Why? questions are directly linked to the CLO challenges we described in the first
section of this paper. However, these may be made more complex by the addition
of new objectives or constraints such as doing more with less or addressing Gen
Ys expectations of innovation.
What Questions
What is 70:20:10 and where does it come from?
The 70:20:10 model emerged from empirical research and surveys which showed
that working adults learn most of the knowledge and skills they need to do their jobs
in the workplace, not in the classroom.
Morgan McCall and his colleagues at the Center for Creative Leadership in North
Carolina developed the 70:20:10 model in response to data they obtained that showed
successful and effective managers learned 70% of their lessons from tough jobs,
20% from other people (mainly their manager) and 10% from courses and reading.
Other individuals and organisations have built on McCalls model to refine the
70:20:10 model.
23
I know about the 10 but could you help me understand more

about the 20?
Jerome Bruner, the famous educational psychologist, once said our world is others.
The 20 refers to the learning we obtain from other people. In recent years, there
has been a lot of focus on the 20, especially with the development of Web 2.0 and
Social Learning. Social Learning is focused on the way we interact and learn from
others, whether through informal coaching, mentoring, having the right personal
network to help solve problems at work, or simply knowing the right person to ask.
Learning from others can be as simple a process as watching someone show you
how to perform a task, or it may be as complex as a full work-shadowing activity.
Would you more precisely define what the 70 part of the model is?
The 70 part of the 70:20:10 model is focused on learning by doing. Most of our
learning comes through experience and the opportunity to practice, and practice
again. If you think about how you gained mastery in almost any skill, youll realise
that it took time (experience) and practice. Probably it also involved some personal
reflection on how you were progressing.
Imagine learning a practical work skill; say touch-typing. You might go to typing
classes, and those would help you with technique, but the real learning would take
place when you practiced. Any work skill requires time and practice to achieve
results and, eventually, excellence.
How is all this related to formal and informal learning?

The 70:20:10 model fits quite nicely with the separation of learning into informal
and informal. However, definitions of formal and informal are difficult and prone
to variation. For instance, learning to ride a bicycle is mostly an informal process
(practice and experience), but it may have some formal aspect. Learning trigonometry is mostly a formal process (theory) but also involves individual practice, which
is likely to be informal.
So, dont think that you need to aim to achieve an exact ratio of 70:20:10 in your learning
provision. The exact ratio will vary from industry to industry, from organisation to organisation, and from situation to situation. Use it as a reference model, not as a recipe.
24
The younger generation seems to be more 60:35:05 than

70:20:10. What about them?
Theres no doubt that social media and the read/write Internet have predisposed
younger people, just now entering the workforce, towards the type of interactions
and tools that are used for social learning. It may be that over time the 70:20:10
model moves more that way, too with a greater emphasis on a growing 20 and a
shrinking 10. We shouldnt expect things to remain the same, not even our learning
models.
When Questions
Is there a best time to launch my companys first 70:20:10 project?
Yes. The day when youre convinced that 70:20:10 is the best way to address your
companys development needs and reduce your own L&D constraints will be the
day to start!
Nevertheless, try to avoid turbulent times, periods of critical internal change, such
as mergers, a new CEO or HRD and so on. Any other time will be OK.
You might also choose a favorable 3T mix (topic, target, and training type) to reduce
uncertainty and give you the best chance of success.
One final tip; dont rely too much on beginners luck by targeting the C-Suite with a
controversial post-merger team building process!
Are there pre-requisites for implementing a 70:20:10 approach?

Not really. But success factors do exist, such as a strong buy-in from the HRD
and ideally from the whole C-Suite, as well as structured communication about
the benefits that L&D team members and their stakeholders can expect to see.
Because the main changes will occur at their level, not at the learners level.
25
Is changing our learning culture a pre-requisite?

No, not at all. This is the same type of concern that we observed when eLearning
and collaborative learning were first introduced as learning solutions. Many organisations have found that their learning culture changes naturally as part of the process,
whatever its attributes were before the implementation of 70:20:10. Incidentally,
this change of culture is for the best! It leads your organisation to become what HR
and L&D people have been dreaming of since Peter Senge first wrote on learning
organisations.
Is technology a pre-requisite? How can I know that my HRIS is

70:20:10 compatible?
This is often the first question people ask. In our experience, focusing on technology
at the outset is not the best way to proceed. It makes the transition to 70:20:10 a
technical challenge instead of strategy for creating L&D value, and can also dramatically delay implementation. Focusing on technology first can shift your strategy from
goals to means, and can cause you to lose time, sponsors, opportunities and value.
But 70:20:10 can be understood and implemented without technical tools. It can
become part of the learning arsenal in the same way as co-coaching and workplace
training (like TWI). It could be that the only tools you require are the coffee machine
and the communication tools that you already have.
Take a step-by-step
approach to mastering the
online conversation
Collaboration
Conversation
Opinions
Pull
Push
26
However, tools will help the widespread application of 70:20:10. A vast majority of
organisations already have tools in place, such as their intranet, their mail systems
and, sometimes, collaborative tools. Our advice is to use the existing tools you have
and design the relevant step-by-step approach to implement new features as your
audience masters the first set and climbs the maturity curve of online conversation
(see graphic).
What possible resistance will I have to deal with? How shall I do?
Make a map of the stakeholders and targets involved in your project (see graphic).
Place them in a matrix and define your communication strategy accordingly.
a) Identify and engage your sponsors and champions.
b) Explain the plan, its roles and its responsibilities. Focus first on the people
involved (L&D team, managers and others), provide them with relevant information and support, and outline the expected outcomes for all stakeholders.
c) A
ddress skepticism and lack of engagement by demonstrating effectiveness via
benchmarks. Build and communicate on any quick wins you achieve within your
company.
Something to gain
Try and get them to work federatively.
Identify your advocates
Its in their interest

to collaborate
Allies
Nothing
to lose
Neutral
They have no opinion

Make sole wins and convince
them with these examples
Listen to them and take on board

their concerns and recommendations
They are hesitant about

getting involved
Waverers
Something
to lose
Opponents
Its not in their interest

to collaborate
Dont waste your time
Their power defines you Go/NoGo
Nothing to gain
Map your stakeholders and targets
27
How Questions
Do you have an implementation approach for 70:20:10 that has
proved successful? Please, say yes!
Sorry, but there isnt one. Each case is as different as the companies that want to
make the 70:20:10 principle part of their learning strategy. Your learning culture,
your L&D team, your Industry and its training priorities, to name just a few factors,
will have a significant impact on the way you should implement 70:20:10. But there
is certainly a set of questions to ask, which, if addressed, will help to optimise your
implementation.
What is your advice in terms of 3T for the first 70:20:10 approach?

Regarding the topic, pick something actionable (rather than conceptual) in the shortterm, so you have an opportunity to demonstrate and communicate the efficiency
of the approach.
The topic should also be familiar to managers, so they can be involved in the
workplace learning phase for example, by giving advice, setting and adapting
objectives to stimulate transfer, and monitoring how things are put into action.
As with any other kind of training, the ideal target is an audience that believes your
chosen topic is of clear value to them in their work. If you plan to use new collaborative tools, make sure that your employees understand their use; and anticipate
a demand for communication, support, and recognition as your project rolls out.
The training type to build on is the classic classroom-training model. But choose
a new one rather than re-engineering an existing course; it will be quicker and you
wont need to measure your first project against anything other than its own Key
Performance Indicators.
Combining these three levers will help you achieve a first quick win. After that, youll need
to be ready to respond to many more requests from enthusiastic internal customers.
28
What do we have to change in terms of instructional design?

The major change is the fact that you cant design a 70:20:10 approach as a
three-step plan, starting with 10% structured learning, moving on to 20% learner-tolearner feedback, and ending with 70% learning in workplace. You may need to mix
these elements up a little.
As with any training model, its best to start by clarifying the results you want to
see, and then listing the different ways you might achieve your instructional objectives. This is the point at which to consider collaboration and workplace learning as
helpful levers. Then, traditional design will follow including story-telling, manager
involvement, and the learning activities that best engage the target audience.
How does this impact project management?

As soon as you step away from a structured curriculum, your classical linear
planning techniques will lose part of their power and will have to be combined with
a more agile approach.
The main deliverables and milestones can be planned as usual, but you should
forecast an extra workload of between 10% and 20% to allow you to remain flexible
and available for communication and support. This ratio will decrease quickly with
your second and subsequent projects, as you become more familiar with the
process.
What new competences are required to deploy such a project?

The classical competences of an effective L&D team should work for you, but may
require an additional pinch of consultancy, communication and performance measurement.
Of course, to make the most of new tools, and to support learners, L&D practitioners need to lead by example, priming the conversations and supporting people
in using them.
29
What if I lose control of the project?

The good news is that you were never supposed to keep it! As soon as learning
migrates from the classroom to the workscape, youll find that your role begins
changing; from trainer to learning enabler. The development of the program will be
supervised by managers and, believe us, auto-regulation is very strong when you
have engaged learners and managers who believe in what youve set out to achieve.
Observe and listen. Stimulate when necessary and celebrate every success. You
may have dreamt of an organisational culture of learning, so dont panic when it
becomes a reality!
How will I know that I have achieved my implementation?

70:20:10 is more a mind-set and a set of processes than a reachable goal. As
such, it is a never-ending story. However, its an exciting journey to accompany the
development of individuals, teams and organisations. So, we wish you a safe and
enjoyable journey!
How much Questions

What type of an investment is this?
If you dont use technology beyond that already available in your organisation, budget
will not be much of a concern. Simply anticipate extra workload for instructional
design, communication (with sponsors, managers, the L&D team and learners) and
learner support.
If you wish to expand the project by adding online tools, make sure to select and
implement them appropriately and at the right time. Having an open discussion
with your IT department will pay high dividends, as will benchmarking and, possibly,
external consulting.
30
What kind of results can I expect from a 70:20:10 project? And

how will I demonstrate value creation to the stakeholders?
As mentioned earlier, you need to start the process by defining the results you aim
to achieve; lets call that business-driven learning. Such a process, will certainly
generate classical results consistent with the Kirkpatrick model: satisfaction, acquisition and retention of knowledge, change of behavior, and (mainly) business impact.
Consulting closely with operations will help you focus on business impact.
Besides, as soon as you are dealing with community, a new set of KPIs will emerge;
site traffic, quality of critical thinking and discussion, level of contribution (comments,
posts, best practices and so on).
To close the loop, if the objectives and KPIs have been set with managers, and if
you engage them in the deployment process, you will be united when the time to
measure value comes. There should be nothing to demonstrate, just a success (or
failure) to share.
Last but not least, whats in it for me?

The vast majority of L&D practitioners dream of changing their organisation into a
learning organisation. Introducing 70:20:10 is one path to achieving this outcome
by building a culture of autonomous learning, setting up new rules for development,
and ensuring managers play a role in people development.
You will also be helping people to find greater fulfillment in their work. They will be
able to perform their jobs in a more effective and balanced way, while contributing
to the wider performance of the organisation.
On top of personal achievements, such a project may also open doors to many
other professional opportunities.
31
CrossKnowledge
Value
Proposition
Advice for a
CLO on the
70:20:10
model
32
When Charles and I first met two years ago (the equivalent of decades in the
pre-Internet world), CrossKnowledge had just achieved an alchemic blend of
classroom training and eLearning. At that time we were pursuing our explorative
journey into the vast world of Web 2.0 and launching our first collaborative solutions.
Just as we published a white paper on communities20, Charles told us: Gentlemen,
youre certainly doing great with this 10% of the learning potential (referring to
the 70:20:10 model) and what youre designing for the rest is quite promising!
Something of a cold shower perhaps not surprisingly, as it was November in
London.
20
CrossKnowledge
Whitepaper: .
The Company
as Community
With Charles help, we realised that there was another frontier beyond the one
between classroom learning and eLearning. Our new challenge was to combine the
formal and informal approaches. The aim of this description of the CrossKnowledge
value proposition on Experiential Learning is to share what we discovered in the
process.
Where is the change?

As we implemented the first Web 2.0 features in learning solutions with our clients
and partners, we observed that what we were doing represented no great change
for employees. A vast majority of them, even those who used to say they would
never connect with an eLearning curriculum, had a profile on Facebook or LinkedIn
and were shopping on internet. At work, they were already sharing information via
email or internal project management tools, using CRM, and visiting blogs and wikis.
Some of them were even contributing to newsletters or collaborating in networks.
Employees were already embracing Web 2.0!
In fact the real change was for the L&D practitioners who had to rethink their
practices, and become familiar with new tools, new approaches, and even new
counterparts in their organisation (namely the IT Department). We became a
ferryman between the Push and Pull shores of training. In line with both our interests
we supported not only the growth of distance learning solutions, but also facilitated
L&Ds migration from the role of training provider to that of learning enabler.
Asking Should we make this journey? is an outdated question. Weve seen in the
previous sections of this paper the tremendous benefits of a more comprehensive
training approach, and of embedding collaboration and workplace learning. The
33
21 Jay CROSS
in Informal
Learning, 2005
important question is How can we, the L&D experts, lead the way in these new
learnscapes21?
First we need a plan. Then, well define and list the new competences, tools, content
and protocols we need to achieve our goals. CrossKnowledge has never claimed to
have all the answers but we are more than happy to share with you the practices
we have formalised with our customers, and the features we have developed to
serve them.
Taking the best out of the

10
As a pure learning and training provider for more than 10 years and the current
European leader in the distance learning industry, CrossKnowledge has experienced
all possible instructional formats. Now that blended learning has become the
touchstone, you might assume that instructional designers have mastered this
approach. Far from it.
Lets step back. Initially, there was only classroom training with one-to-many courses
and, perhaps, one-to-one coaching. Then technology gave us eLearning. Mixing
approaches we obtained the first blended learning solutions which were really very
poor indeed. They mainly involved putting online resources before and after existing
classroom courses (a sandwich approach). The main more we obtained was more
expensive.
We simply had the wrong recipe!

Fortunately, we have made tremendous progresses since those dark ages of
eLearning. We now know that designing an integrated learning solution takes real
skills and a structured approach.
This is a four-step process that involves:
Instructional design with top quality learning activities/resources.
Clever learner marketing to develop buy-in and loyalty.
An engaged network of stakeholders, namely C-Suite sponsors, HR, L&D team
and managers.
Good steerage of the project until you can demonstrate value creation.
34
Joining the dots with 70:20:10 is a very simple thing if you dont think of the blended
learning element as the 10 of the whole. In fact, it has to include the 20 and 70
in its DNA. You cant just decree that a group is a community and that it will share,
collaborate, and carry on learning in the workplace. Collaboration must begin as
soon as we create the group, with introductions prior to the structured part of the
training, online icebreakers, common activities, workshops and so on. Likewise,
the classroom training must consolidate the sense of belonging and cultivate collaborative behaviors.
Deployment must remain simple, even if the equation gets a bit more complex. The
Russian Dolls gives you a first indication of the path to be followed. You can start
out by developing courses split into 70:20:10 parts for greater effectiveness. Then
move on to richer workplace-based Learnscapes.
What you get at the end of this process is a comprehensive and effective learning
experience, a journey that leads to measurable performance improvement22.
Below is an illustration of what a Sales Performance curriculum might look like
online.
22 More
information
and actionable
practices will be
available in the
coming soon
Post The New
Frontier that will
be dedicated
to this double
blend of ILT/
Distance and
Formal/Informal.
The Call for Action Editorial written by .

a Charismatic Sponsor
The structured Blended Curriculum with 70 &
20 Steps like:
Set your Priorities (meeting with manager)
Improve & Share (workshop)
Define your Action Plan
To fill the remaining blanks we must look to the 20 part of the 70:20:10 model.
35
20: the Art of Building

Learning Communities
Not so long ago we tried turning a two-day seminar into a two-month integrated
learning experience. The results, in terms of knowledge gained and retained and
of observed behavioral change, were between 20% and 40% higher than those
achieved using classroom training alone.
Students got to know each other and had a great experience, they worked together
and shared real-life action plans and then the curriculum ended. Everyone
agreed to keep in touch and carry on sharing; a taste of holidays ending. And what
happened after these two months? The participants went back to their workplaces,
their assignments, and their objectives. The fabulous power of the group quickly
evaporated in the face of the pressure of operations! It was frustrating for sure, but
above all it was a dramatic waste of energy, and of potential for collaboration and
improved performance.
Being optimistic, we assume that most of the time when a worker needs information she asks her work neighbour in the office, Googles the question, or calls
a colleague. Most of the time, she gets the information she needs. But with more
sensitive topics, such as leaderships or lean management, employees need to be
able to draw on local expertise, shared experiences and relevant best practice.
Clearly we need to give groups more power when we build learning communities.
To achieve this CrossKnowledge has worked with practitioners and learners to
observe the way people learn and share informally, and to gather a wish list of
features for a relevant and effective community solution. Here are some typical
requests:
I need training on, or at least an explanation of, these new collaborative tools.
I want to build my personal library and development plan by tagging content and
to be advised by fellow students of relevant reading, activities or courses.
Id like to share questions and experiences with colleagues in a mutual coaching spirit.
I need to find actionable solutions to my day-to-day concerns, and I need experts
who can support me with problems that are more complex.
36
Addressing these needs cant just be a matter of widget-plugging on a collaborative

portal. So, CrossKnowledges services include:
Helping communities learn to use new collaborative features.
Organising and supervising group activities, such as icebreakers and peer assignments, before bringing groups together.
Organising reflective activities after a workshop.
Posting ideas and running minute surveys to liven up the collaborative space with
recurrent activities.
Supporting and celebrating the first, and the following collaborations, and broadcasting contributions across global networks.
Helping group experts and mentors to get out of a passive push-mode, and to
encourage more active, and more exciting, contribution from their group.
On top of coaching and services, here are a few examples of the features we can
provide to help develop a sharing culture.
Ask a question... and get an answer (peers, coach or expert)
Rate, share and contribute
37
Of course, measuring ROI gets less easy as we move further away from the
well-known paradigms of structured learning. In this new approach, we continue
to monitor satisfaction, as online conversation feeds on positive feelings and
relationships. But measuring the knowledge gain is less straightforward. However,
we can follow the number of transactions: posts, best practices formalised and
shared, questions asked, expert interventions made and so on, which gives us a
powerful set of metrics with which to measure engagement and knowledge sharing.
70: Creating Learnscapes for everyday

learning
Is it possible to optimise learning transfer to the workplace and turn the workplace
into a learning environment? In our attempts to answer this critical question we set
out to discover what our clients employees most needed, which turned out to be:
Relevant and useful information linked directly with their learning topics.
Material and support that lets them find solutions to real problems in the workplace.
Support during the implementation phase to help them turn learning into performance.
There is much work to do in order to address these needs, and the principal issues
are not actually those of content and technology. We also have to deal with issues
of change management, communication, L&D practices and manager involvement.
Information
To describe how CrossKnowledge addresses the information domain, lets take the
example of a skilled and promising manager, Elliot, who has just attended a course
on The Fundamentals of Finance, and enjoyed it. The Budget period is in October,
four months from now, with the summer break before it. If we dont want him to feel
lost when the CFO eventually knocks on his door, we need to keep him posted and
to encourage him to delve into the topic frequently over the next four months.
The CrossKnowledge proposition involves collaboration with the L&D, Communications and Finance departments to design and run a communication plan that feeds
38
Elliot with the latest company news and industry trends, newsletters, suggested
reading and business digests, to make sure that he still feels part of the process,
and to keep him up-to-date on any changes and developments.
Solutions
Employees often face challenging situations that need immediate solutions, for
example conflict within the team, or making a tough customer call. If a fire starts
in your wastepaper basket you dont wait for the fireman to put it out; you grab an
extinguisher and you use it straight away! With a problem-solving fire features like
Search Engine and Tag Cloud provide quick and easy access to solutions and best
practice. In addition a corporate Toolbox that gathers together forms, processes
and best practices is always helpful. There is no doubt that we learn better when
facing a problem than in any other circumstances; and providing this kind of help is
a powerful lever to replace Just-In-Case training with Just-in-Time Training.
Implementation
Ultimately the only thing that really matters here is whether changes in behavior
generate a positive impact on business. The old carrots-and-sticks approach is no
longer efficient in a world inhabited by purpose-seeking employees. The only way
to change the learning paradigm to migrate it towards the workplace is to find
allies and overcome resistance.
There are undoubtedly champions among the fast-trackers and you can use their
testimonies to demonstrate the power of workplace learning. Some companies
even call for volunteers to act as role models and to mentor to the following cohort
of learners. Such individuals often do great work supporting learners through the
first stages of collaboration and supervising them as they put what they have
learned into action.
But our strongest and most reliable allies will be recruited from the ranks of line
managers. This is partly because setting objectives, coaching, leading by example,
appraising and recognising achievement is part of their job, and cant be done
39
better by anyone else. But it is mainly because developing people has always been
a tremendous source of achievement and satisfaction for every genuine manager.
Nevertheless, good intentions need to be supported by the right set of skills,
such as coaching, communication, running workshops, appraising people, giving
feedback, and setting Individual Development Plans and so on.
CrossKnowledge makes all the best practices gathered over the last decade
available to L&D Teams; for example, identifying champions, communicating
success stories and coaching employees. We also provide stakeholders with the
necessary tools to take on their mission: including trainer support toolsets, manager
guides, mentoring kits, action tips, checklists, IDPs and the training courses on the
CrossKnowledge Academy.
What does it look like at the end of the process?

We have listed a lot of features and
material in presenting the portal the
way it would look like if we only were
addressing the structured learning
part of the 70:20:10 model the 10.
Are you ready now for a guided tour
with some possible add-ons?
The CrossKnowledge
Methodology
More and more of our clients are asking what CrossKnowledge offers in terms of
Experiential Learning. Mostly these enquiries come in the form of what? and how?
questions and the expectation is that we will offer up a selection of client case
studies, demonstrate some useful technical features, and highlight a few potential
pitfalls and obstacles on the path.
40
We do our best to respond to these requests, but it is also important to look at the
issues of why? and what for?, which is why we always begin our case studies with a
description of the project, its wider business context and the stakes involved.
Unfortunately, there is no fixed recipe for Experiential Learning, but there is
a sequence that is more efficient than others. The graphic opposite shows this
sequential approach, and weve found this progression to be very effective.
We always begin by defining the business-driven objectives and end by measuring
the value created at the operational level. As we are no longer moving in the world of
structured learning it is frequently necessary to reassess sub-goals and means. So
an agile approach to project management is usually helpful, iterating contingently
revisiting steps in the sequence depending on the audience reaction, the tools and
activities used and the involvement of stakeholders. Meanwhile, collaboration has
emerged as the most if not the only effective approach, with workscapes
proving especially productive.
Strategy
Context & Stakes
Stakeholders mapping
Project scope
General principles
Objectives (business driven)

Means & Constraints
Team & Methodology

Communication & Change
Consulting
Performance
Project management
Tools & Content (selection
and integration)
Instructional design
Performance (business impact)

ROE (survey, focus groups...)
ROI (TCO, usage...)
Empowerment
Deployment
41
Engaging
Managers
in Training
42
When a child falls sick his parents take him to the doctor. The doctor examines
and diagnoses the child and writes a prescription. The parents buy the drugs and
make sure the child takes them until he recovers. Few parents would challenge the
doctors diagnosis or prescription or stop the child taking the drugs, or interrupt the
treatment part-way through the course of treatment.
But when it comes to skills development, this is commonly what happens. The
recommendations made by the L&D manager are often questioned and the
programs followed loosely. However, this does not stop everyone from holding the
CLO accountable for the effectiveness of the training intervention!
This situation is counter-productive and uncomfortable for both the CLO and his or
her key stakeholders. But it often occurs in organisations with a negative attitude
towards training a result either of issues with lines of command or with perceptions
of the role and expertise of the training function. The most powerful lever to address
both these barriers to effective training is to involve management throughout the
process, from design to value measurement.
When it comes to experiential learning, what chance is there of successfully
delivering the 70:20:10 approach, in particular the workplace learning element, if
managers do not play their part?
We would like to share some of the keys to successful manager engagement that
we have discovered and formalised with our customers over the years.
Principles
Building a project collectively
It is important to determine the overall level of manager involvement required for
the success of a training program before the program proper gets under way. This
should happen up-front, while you are defining and agreeing objectives, establishing
the rules of the game, and clarifying individual responsibilities.
If this step is overlooked the L&D function can be cast in a supplier role, which puts
L&D managers into a weak position when dealing their internal customers. But if
you are clear about the time commitment you need from managers you will be in a
43
stronger position when you call on those resources during the different phases of
the training program.
Success in this early scoping phase may depend as much on the assertiveness of
L&D managers as on their expertise.
There are three reasons why securing manager buy-in is so important:
In addition to identifying specific skill requirements, managers are the ideal if not
the only people to describe the behavioral changes and operational impacts that
should be the outcome of the training. If managers help to set SMART objectives,
they are more likely to see the potential operational benefits for their own teams.
And if their input is sought on which key performance indicators to monitor, they
are more likely to share ownership of training delivery.
When managers give input on requirements, objectives and KPIs it becomes
natural for them also to define the rules of the game and the consequences of
breaking the rules. This puts managers in charge of those aspects of a training
program that naturally belong within the organisational hierarchy.
Finally, managers intimate knowledge of their teams is an invaluable source of information. And L&D manager can use information about levels of expertise observed on
the job, or about employees availability, resistance or motivation (perhaps gathered
through individual pre-course interviews) better to calibrate and define the training.
So, sharing common goals is an important way to involve managers in the early
stages of the process. Let us now look at how you can keep them involved
throughout the training program.
Drawing people into the planning phase

With SMART objectives and full brief now defined, an L&D manager will benefit greatly
from continuing to collaborate with managers during the planning phase of the program.
A managers contributions will include helping to develop the case studies, illustrative
examples and exercises that employees will need to be able to draw conceptual conclusions from concrete workplace situations. An L&D manager cannot build these without
the assistance of line managers. To be credible and engaging such materials must use
the right vocabulary and present trainees with realistic, relevant scenarios.
44
Of course a managers contribution does not preclude further analysis by the L&D
manager through questionnaires, interviews, or on the job observations. Yet involving
managers in this aspect of planning is all too often sidelined due to lack of time and/or
resources, but at a cost as it add significant credibility to the training program.
Inviting managers to participate in the definition of the deliverables is another excellent
way to collect their feedback at the outset and then to make the adjustments necessary
to head off potential criticisms further down the line.
What youve created at the end of the planning process should be the result of a
collective effort and everyone should be engaged, be contributing and be rooting for
success. If youve done this job well managers will also be willing to get actively involved
throughout the deployment provided they have the information and tools required.
Involving the entire management line

The next step is to involve the entire management line and to turn individual
managers into active supporters and relays. You can achieve this through a combination of information and motivation initiatives.
First, provide managers with a clear description of the training program and its
objectives. Dont underestimate the importance of marketing. Your goal should
be to sell the project by making the managers and their teams a promise that
is relevant to their own objectives and concerns. This information can be circulated through a number of channels internal memos, postings on the corporate
intranet, seminars, or statement by an opinion leader delivered through the
companys internal media.
Next, communicate to managers what contributions are expected of them
for example, attending meetings, active participation as trainers or tutors, or
helping to measure performance. Explain and sell each contribution requirement
individually to minimise problems and issues during the deployment phase.
Lastly, and this may be a stretch, add the incentive of financial accountability by
tying part of managers variable compensation to the delivery of training objectives. Quite a number of companies set objectives for managers tied directly to the
development of team members, and recognise and honour the results achieved, but
not many corporations back this up with a financial incentive as well.
45
An example: when the L&D manager of a large international communications agency

took over his new position he wondered why participation and subsequent deployment
of training sessions were so desperately low until he uncovered the fact that no
reference was made to staff development either in the job descriptions or the objectives of the managers. The indicators changed drastically in less than six months after
Senior Management made clarifications and set clear objectives for this.
Equipping managers to be efficient coaches

Simply having the will to develop staff is not enough; many managers feel uncomfortable when asked to prepare their teams for training, or to coach them afterwards.
For managers to be able to coach effectively you need management practices
that promote team sharing (Learning through others) and that encourage employees
to apply what they learn to daily tasks (Workplace Learning). These processes are
not particularly intuitive so specific ad hoc training may be necessary to achieve
effective outcomes. This is a sound investment and will help to ensure the ROI of
the rest of the training effort because it opens the path for optimal and sustainable
development of individual staff members.
Our experiences with our customers in this area have shown that it helps if L&D
managers communicate with managers early on:
Set up manager training on topics that staff are about to be trained on, even if
only an abridged version. Clients who do this find that it prevents breakdowns in
communication and wins the active and immediate support of management. Dont
assume that managers understand a topic check beforehand. Otherwise you
run the risk of putting managers in an embarrassing position, diminishing their
credibility, and making them resistant to the change effort.
Deliver formal briefings to managers to present the potential benefits of the

curriculum and to set expectations. This ensures that the training development
plan is reflected in the personal objectives set during annual appraisals. Look upon
this briefing as a blueprint against which trainees can later plot their progress and
share it with their managers.
You should also give managers early warning of what they will be expected to do:
Managers must be able to conduct debriefing and monitoring interviews
both at the end of each step of the training and on a regular basis throughout
the less formal phase of putting learning into action. Coaching intuitively is not
46
enough, so training managers in the fundamentals of coaching will help to prevent

mistakes in communication or objective setting.
Finally, following through the coaching logic. Managers must be able to bring
closure to the training. The trainee needs the opportunity to reflect on key
learnings, to assess progresses, and to draw the right lessons for the future.
A closing interview is a particularly important management moment and one
that contributes considerably to building up sustainable skills and motivation. It
is also an important opportunity for a manager to provide positive feedback
by acknowledging accomplishments and paying tribute to the efforts made
throughout the process.
As the training is rolled out the L&D manager must give managers tools that will
empower them to step into the coaching role:
Provide a presentation kit for communicating with teams and formally request that
managers hold a kick-off meeting with their staff. This is a popular way to ensure
that standardised information is circulated efficiently. It also has the beneficial effect
of reducing the number of trainees who attend with no expectations.
Produce and circulate good practice guides to managers. This applies the
same principles as above to the management roles involved.
As soon as the training starts make log books available for monitoring and
measuring performance. These might contain observation matrices, scorecards
linking programs implemented, and operational indicators etc. Share these with
all your stakeholders.
When managers become trainers

Asking managers to take part in the different phases of training is common practice.
Their involvement demonstrates the importance of the program and its relevance to
the companys overall strategy.
In the case of Structured Learning such contribution may range from opening
sessions to presenting case studies or moderating seminars and workshops.
When it comes to Learning Through Others a manager can contribute by adding the
discussion of potential difficulties, achievements or best practices as an agenda
item for their team meetings.
47
Finally, as far as workplace learning is concerned the most common strategy for
turning work into training is to define operational targets for each staff member
and link them directly with their development objectives for example, through
problem solving or a special assignment.
In summary, get managers using their People Development skills it will help to
create opportunities for all staff members to make progress every day.
Towards engagement 2.0

As we mentioned earlier, applying new technologies to training is a powerful way
to equip and reinforce the strategies of Learning Through Others and Workplace
Learning. Collaborative tools and search engines make it possible to share and
search for solutions and teaching content at the speed of the mouse click. However
technology changes fast. Once again, if you expect you managers to step enthusiastically into unfamiliar territory it helps if you inform them about what is expected
of them and about the approaches they can follow.
First, let us point out that while the majority of companies talk about Web 2.0 only a
minority have migrated to Learning 2.0. Amongst clients who have taken this step
we have observed managers making powerful contributions by:
Setting a clear, strong example through contribution to discussion forums and

content production. Several of our clients now consider the rate of contribution,
and the ability to share through internal networks, as key leadership qualities.
Setting up blogs, feeding wikis and moderating forums on topics of importance
to them. Such activities are usually met with initial suspicion, but later encouraged
as they demonstrate their ability to create value.
Identifying good practices within their teams and then formalising and publish
these for use by others.
Recognising and rewarding staff who contribute to the learning of others and
to team performance. Sharing is the basis of Learning Through Others, but it
only proves durable when the contributors get something from their efforts a
quid pro quo. An individuals level of sharing should be one of their performance
indicators.
48
Closing the loop

In their book The Value of Learning, dedicated to evaluating the performance of
training, Patricia and Jack Phillips identified the lack of management engagement,
and lack of management support of trainees, as the primary causes of failure.
Given the enormous annual sums companies invest in developing the skill sets of
their staff it would be very unwise to neglect such an effective lever for improving
training performance. So, managers need to get much more engaged in (as
opposed to concerned by) the training of their teams.
And while were aiming to engage management let us also target those at the
top of the organisation. Forward-thinking C-Suite executives already regard skills
development as a major strategic lever and differentiator for their organisation.
Getting them engaged in training can make a significant contribution to its effectiveness.
Managers Involvement
Now lets play with all the available bricks and build a solid experiential curriculum.
To start we need a genuine blended learning path. Not the kind that just combines
e-before, classroom training, and then e-after. The results of that approach are
disappointing uptake, unsatisfied learners, confused trainers, and higher costs.
E-learning
pre-requisites
Classroom
Training
E-learning
Post-session
Mix Learning
Happily, instructional designers have been smart and inventive enough not to stay
trapped in this depressing set-up. They have formulated new rules and sourced
new tools to enhance the performance of the blend; offering a more valuable and
pleasant learning experience, decreasing downtime and unnecessary expense,
extending reach and gaining agility. The real blend has demonstrated its value and
become the training industry standard.
49
Assess
Yourself
Core
Curriculum
Individual
Curriculum
Individual
Dev Plan
Kick-Off
Meeting
Measure your
progress
Expectations
VS Workshop
Follow Up
Meeting
Group
Contract
Workshop
Individual
Curriculum
Return on
Experience
Theme
Workshop
Theme
Workshop
Closing
Event
Real Blended Learning

While marketing and communication techniques are essential for delivering a
solution like the one shown above, we will focus instead on the managers role.
Managers have a vital contribution to make in both the 20 and the 70 parts of the
70:20:10 approach. Well explore these contributions in the following categories:
Preparation
Coaching
Supervision
Preparation
In the previous section we stressed that L&D practitioners should get managers
involved as soon as project scoping begins. Managers can help them to define
the requirements more clearly. But even though common sense tells us to define a
problem before proposing a solution, L&D departments all too often accept training
requests from operations with little more than a topic outline, a target and delivery
date. However a manager can easily describe the issues and day-to-day difficulties
that employees face and identify related practices and competences. And the more
concrete this description (think facts and figures) is, the clearer the project scope
will be.
Managers can also help to define the expected training outcomes and to determine
KPIs in terms of business impact and observable behavioral change. At the same
time the L&D practitioner can work with the manager to make an inventory of the
management contribution required and tools and support needed to deliver it. At
the end of the preparation stage you should have common objectives and a shared
action plan.
50
In our view, managers shouldnt be making any decisions during the design phase. A
manager is not an instructional expert and should not be expected to think like one.
So the L&D manager must be assertive enough to present and defend a solution
and to handle comments and input while still keeping an eye on whats at stake for
the business.
Once the curriculum is ready for launch, another type of preparation is required.
The vast majority of managers are not adequately prepared to support either formal
training or training at the workplace. L&D practitioners need to provide managers
with the right information, the right tools and even training to make sure they provide
effective support.
Coaching
Even managers who consider the HR aspect of their jobs important find increasing
operational pressures make it difficult to follow through with coaching. L&D practitioners need to be aware of this and invest in the development of managers
coaching skills. Asking more of a managers time can be tricky but its essential
given the workplace learning cannot be delivered effectively without them. So, the
more you can equip and support them for the mission, the better chance you have
of keeping them engaged. And this will enhance the performance of the whole
curriculum.
Providing managers with a set of tools they can use and share with their team can
be very powerful. Some examples are:
Curriculum presentations (e.g. handbooks, kits and concept cards)
Calendars (e.g. posters for meeting rooms and reminder mails)
Meeting materials (e.g. quizzes and debriefing questions)
Observation grids to build comprehensive feedback.
Examples of workplace activities and assignments related to the topic.
Dashboards with general and team-selected KPIs.
Specific sections in the annual appraisal form.
51
The image below shows some examples of a managers contribution to the real
blend we looked at earlier. The potential value of that contribution should be self
evident!
Overall Assessment
(Linked with Performance Management)
Scoping expected outcomes .

& Help required from manager
Assessing Assignments
Help setting priorities of IDP

(Linked with Performance Management)
Appointing Practice Leaders
& Mentors within Team
Individual assignments
Help formalising
Return on Experience
Improvement Analysis
Congratulations & Support
Workshop
Briefing
& Debriefing
Reflection & Sharing

Team Meetings
Reflection & Sharing

Team Meetings
Assess
Yourself
Core
Curriculum
Individual
Curriculum
Individual
Dev Plan
Kick-Off
Meeting
Measure your
progress
Individual
Curriculum
Expectations
VS Workshop
Follow Up
Meeting
Group
Contract
Workshop
52
Defining action
plan, Selecting
workshop
Return on
Experience
Theme
Workshop
Theme
Workshop
Closing
Event
Supervision
Supervision represents the minimum level of involvement you should expected
from managers to guarantee a payback on their investment (of budget, downtime
etc). The image below shows an ideal scheme including a long list of supervision
activities.
Link with HR Protocols
Annual appraisal, Career Review, C&B...
Attend / Run the kick-off meeting
Impact Analysis / Team Action Plan
Identify role models within the team

Set mentoring objectives
Attend / Run Closing Event

Prepare / Attend / Run
Follow-up Meeting
Present curriculum objectives and related stakes to

the team
Workshop opening
a / o closing speech
Monitor Completion
Provide instructions
Assess
Yourself
Core
Curriculum
Individual
Curriculum
Individual
Dev Plan
Kick-Off
Meeting
Monitor Completion
Measure your
progress
Team members
workshop
registration
Monitor Completion
Individual
Curriculum
Expectations
VS Workshop
Follow Up
Meeting
Group
Contract
Workshop
Return on
Experience
Theme
Workshop
Theme
Workshop
Closing
Event
Winning the enthusiastic and unreserved involvement of managers in our training

courses is a cherished dream for many L&D practitioners. However most of our
colleagues in L&D agree that manager engagement remains one of the most
challenging parts of the job. Nevertheless, we regularly see organisations make
major breakthroughs in this area, and we plan to share some of these examples in
future articles. Until then, we hope that you have found some useful insights in this
white paper and that these help you partner more effectively with managers, and
that together you can develop and deploy ever more effective learning solutions for
your organisation.
53
Research
In their 1992 research paper titled Transfer of Training, Mary Broad and John
Newstrom demonstrated that the role of the manager is vital if training is to be
effective and result in real behavioural change and performance improvement in the
workplace.
Broad and Newstrom developed a matrix from their research which indicates
that the action of the manager is the single most important factor influencing the
outcome of a training event.
They looked at the actions of the three key influencers in the training process:
Thelearner
Thetrainer
The learnersmanager
They then examined the impact of each of these influencers during three key time
intervals:
Beforetraining
Duringtraining
Aftertraining
The matrix can be represented on a grid as follows:
Before Training
During Training
After Training
Learners
manager
Trainer
Learner
The results showed that the top three influencers for making learning stick are
the actions of:
The manager prior to training
The trainer prior to training
The manager after training
54
These results are almost counter-intuitive on first view. Why, you might ask, does the
role of the learner not feature in the top three factors?
The answer is that without full manager engagement both before and following
a training event, and without the trainer liaising with the manager to ensure that
the objectives, structure and content of the training are aligned with the needs and
expectations of the manger, the training will not be effective no matter how the
learner engages with the training.
55
Takeaways
Now, at the end of this whitepaper, wed like you to take away a few thoughts that
will hopefully make the development of experiential learning in your organisation an
effective and pleasant experience for everyone involved.
Stick to the stakes

A simple truth is that you have to focus on where you are going and not how you
get there.
Youve stuck with us this far through 60 pages of methodologies, case studies
and examples. If you take only one thing out of this it is that you should focus on
the business results you want to achieve and not on the methodology you use to
achieve them.
Involve
The sponsorship of your HRD, CEO, COO, Any-C-You-Like, shows that the project
is linked with your corporate strategy and gets everyone involved from the start.
Your managers must also keep up the pressure and fuel the enthusiasm of your
audience from take off until landing.
Remember who you are talking to

If you understand your audience clearly, you will be able to offer them the most
relevant and engaging learning journey possible.
Who are they? Where are they? How do they work? What challenges do they face
every day?
How do they learn? How to they talk to each other? How do they solve problems?
Answer these and you will be well on your way.
56
Demonstrate value
Its easier to scale a success than a methodology.
What are the three KPIs that will prove beyond doubt that this effort was worthwhile?
If you are successful in demonstrating value here no one will want to return to
traditional learning.
Be convinced be convincing
As Ghandi said: Be the change you want to see in the world
No one elses job will change as much as yours for the good, and for the better.
Its your job you are the only one who can change it. Believe in the potential and
may the 70:20:10 be with you
Enjoy
Everyone who has moved from traditional to experiential learning has realised that
this opens up great opportunities for everyone involved.
Learning architect, content curator, community manager and many more: these
are all jobs that never existed before and are now offering L&D experts real career
opportunities.
Youve ventured into the new frontier: we wish you a pleasant journey.
Charles & Jrme
57
Charles Jennings
Charles Jennings is the Managing Director of Duntroon Associates, a UK-based
Learning, Performance and Productivity consultancy company.
From 2002 until the end of 2008 he was the Chief Learning Officer for Reuters
and Thomson Reuters where he had responsibility for developing learning and
performance strategy and leading the learning organisation for the firms 55,000
workforce. He is a leading thinker and practitioner in human capital development,
change management, performance improvement and learning.
Charles has deep experience in both the business and learning practitioner sides
of learning and performance. He also knows what works in the world of strategic
talent and effective performance and productivity approaches.
His career includes roles as head of the UK national centre for networked learning,
as a Professor at Southampton Business School, in senior business roles for
global companies, and as an evaluator for the European Commissions learning,
performance and eCommerce research initiatives. He also sits on steering groups
and advisory boards for national and international training and learning bodies.
Charles has an impeccable record of developing and implementing leading-edge
performance solutions spanning more than 25 years. In 2008 he was honoured
with the UK World of Learning Outstanding Contribution to the Learning Industry
award in recognition of his work on performance improvement, and just-in-time and
informal learning.
In 2006 Charles was one of six experts invited to be members of the UK Department
of Trade & Industrys Global Watch delegation to the USA on the Beyond eLearning
mission.
58
Jrme Wargnier
An expert in the fields of strategic alignment and skills development, Jrme
Wargnier who studied at the University of Dauphine, Paris, has authored numerous
articles on leadership and management skills and is a regular guest speaker at
international conferences and lecturer at the top French business school ESSEC.
Jrme Wargnier joined CrossKnowledge (European leader in the development of
leadership and management skills through new technologies), in 2005 as Director
of Customer Business Development. Jeromes vast experience in HR consultancy
work allowed him to understand the needs of todays clients and to rapidly grow
the business both in France and internationally. In 2009 he was appointed Director
of Business Consulting, the position that he currently holds. Jrme, along with his
colleagues at CrossKnowledge (including a Faculty of experts on a wide variety of
leadership and management issues), work with clients to develop modern Learning
solutions, which are both flexible and engaging, helping HR teams to deliver
development programs with immediate and practical applications in todays busy
workplace.
Prior to this, Jrme was Managing Director of DOit Group, (Management and HR
consultancy), advising clients on training, leadership coaching and recruitment
issues - delivering bespoke solutions as well as running seminars and conferences
on these topics.
Jrmes previous role was that of Associate Director at consultancy where he
oversaw the design and implementation of a broad range of consulting solutions
(projects included areas such as management, leadership, personal effectiveness,
sales negotiation and commercial strategy).
His natural talent for understanding team dynamics and individual motivation
enabled him to successfully manage large country-wide teams. In these roles,
Jrme demonstrated an aptitude for leadership and clear interest in the challenges
of Human Resources and Training which continue to motivate him in his work today.
59
60
61
This document is a publication of the CrossKnowledge company. All brand and logos, registered or otherwise, are the property of their respective holders.
This is a non-contractual document. Design: Indexel - www.indexel.com - Photos Thinkstock 2011.
www.crossknowledge.com

Effective Learning With 70-20-10 Whitepaper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Effective Learning With 70-20-10 Whitepaper

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Effective Learning With 70-20-10 Whitepaper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the major learning trends discussed in the document?

What are the major learning trends discussed in the document?

What is the 70:20:10 model and what are its components?

What is the 70:20:10 model and what are its components?

Effective Learning

Four Strategic Challenges........................................................................................................................................................................ 4

Major Learning Trends..........................................................................................................................................9

Breaking the Richness/Reach Trade-off..........................................................................................................................10

Advice for a CLO on the 70:20:10 model. ......................................................................... 22

CrossKnowledge Value Proposition............................................................................................... 32

Where is the change?...................................................................................................................................................................................33

Engaging Managers in Training.......................................................................................................... 42

Four Strategic Challenges

Current & Future

Current & Future

Current & Future

Organisational growth brings with it organisational change. Ideally, both HR and

Current & Future

Current & Future

The Changing Demands

The challenges of new ways of working

Breaking the Richness/

Legacy Distance Learning

The traditional richness/reach trade-off is dissolving

Breaking the Richness/Reach Trade-off.

Learn & develop

Learn & develop through

Practical Examples of 70:20:10

Research and apply best practice

From content to action

We are moving from STOCKS of knowledge to FLOWS of knowledge

From storing knowledge to finding knowledge

Primarily WHAT? learning

Primarily HOW? WHY?

Existing content-rich learning transfer

MindFind experience-rich content in the cloud

Focus on core skill development

CORE SKILLS including:

Find-Access Model of Learning Jennings & Clarke

From Event to Process

The Rise of Learnscapes

A learnscape is the platform where knowledge workers collaborate, solve problems,

Emerging L&D Role

Build and maintain catalogues

Manage Wokspaces (work/learning/

Design and develop course materials

Focus on supporting learning

Course-centric role (with a little

Performance-centric role. Helping people

Predominately classroom-based with

Many channels classroom, eLearning,

Performance and productivity-focused

Migrating towards new roles

From Learning to Performance

I know about the 10 but could you help me understand more

How is all this related to formal and informal learning?

The younger generation seems to be more 60:35:05 than

Are there pre-requisites for implementing a 70:20:10 approach?

Is changing our learning culture a pre-requisite?

Is technology a pre-requisite? How can I know that my HRIS is

I know about the 10 but could you help me understand more

How is all this related to formal and informal learning?

The younger generation seems to be more 60:35:05 than

Are there pre-requisites for implementing a 70:20:10 approach?

Is changing our learning culture a pre-requisite?

Is technology a pre-requisite? How can I know that my HRIS is

What is your advice in terms of 3T for the first 70:20:10 approach?

What do we have to change in terms of instructional design?

How does this impact project management?

What new competences are required to deploy such a project?

What if I lose control of the project?

How will I know that I have achieved my implementation?

What kind of results can I expect from a 70:20:10 project? And

Last but not least, whats in it for me?

Deliver formal briefings to managers to present the potential benefits of the

Setting a clear, strong example through contribution to discussion forums and