Best Practice Approach
Best Practice Approach
Best Practice Approach
around the world. Companies/organizations must both defends their domestic markets from
foreign competitor and broaden their scope to encompass global markets. In order to reach the
goal of organizations/companies HRM play the important role to run the business and make the
good business environment to create smoothly work and also compete with the other to gain
competitive advantage by expansion to the global area/broaden, integration of cultures & values,
got and received the feedback from the consumers to develop the product and service, training
staff many time and encourage getting high competencies. To succeed in the global marketplace,
the challenge for all business is to understand culture and invest in human resources.
The term human resource management was being used by Peter Drucker
and others in North America as early as the 1950s without any special
meaning, and usually simply as another label for personnel management or
personnel administration. By the 1980s, however, HRM had come to mean a
radically different philosophy and approach to the management of people at
work (Storey, 1989; pp45) with an emphasis on performance, workers
commitment, an rewards based on individual or team contribution, differing
significantly in all of these from the corresponding aspects of traditional
personnel management. One of the main characteristics of HRM is the
devolution of many aspects of people management from specialists directly
to line managers. HRM itself has been called the discovery of personnel
management by chief executives. So line managers over the past ten years
or so have frequently been confronted with HRM decisions and activities in
their day-to-day business in a way that was not the case previously.
http://www.researchersworld.com/vol4/vol4_issue1_1/Paper_09.pdf
The best practice approach suffers from a series of limitations. Firstly, when
implementing best practice standards organizations run risk of introducing
mutually prohibitive combinations like team working and compensation
based on individual performance resulting in a deterioration of employee
collaboration through overexaggerated competition (Delery 1998 in Redman
and Wilkinson 2009). Secondly, high commitment management systems are
generally a complex undertaking requiring large inputs of planning and top
level management commitment. Thirdly, critics like Milkovich and Newman
(2002) argue that best practice HR lacks direct linkages with organizational
strategies and is minted by the belief that outstanding high performing
human resources will influence strategy. By making HR policy precede
corporate strategy an organization risks prescribing standardized sets of
"one size fits all" best practice approaches which will not support the
particular needs of employees and be detrimental to overall strategic
objectives (Maloney and Morris 2005). Fourthly, discussions with regard to
the appropriate choice of best practice measures resulting from an
insufficient research methodology and theoretical definition exist
(Marchington and Grugulis 2000 in Redman and Wilkinson 2009).