AF301 Group Project - Revised
AF301 Group Project - Revised
AF301 Group Project - Revised
This assignment will be undertaken in groups of 4 or 5 students from the same tutorial group.
You may discuss the questions with other groups. However, you must write your own answer with
careful regard to academic honesty.
Learning
Objectives
This project addresses course learning objectives L7, L8 and L9 in the Course
Outline.
Weight
On-line submission (Moodle drop box) by 8:00 am Monday in the week of your
presentation. If your similarity index exceeds 15%, you must revise your
assignment and reduce the similarity index before submitting the final version
for grading.
Peerrefereed
Journal
Articles
You can perform an on-line search using ProQuest or another search engine
accessible through the USP Library website.
Word Limit
Consult the USP Library Information Desk if you need assistance with using on-line
search engines. However, they will not find the articles for you.
If your paper exceeds the word limit, check that all your content is relevant, avoid
repetition of the same ideas and paraphrase lengthy quotes.
Style Guide
Referencing
Follow the APA referencing system. Consult FBE Student Learning Support if you
need assistance with this.
You may only use three direct quotations in your project.
Assessment
Policy
Refer to Pages 10 to 14 in the Course Outline, paying close attention to the sections
on plagiarism, academic dishonesty and submission of assignments.
Projects Topics
The following topics will be assigned by tutors on a random basis.
1.
Presentation Week
Week 9
2.
Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
5.
Week 13
Page 2 of 5
Table of Contents
Declaration
Abstract
1.
Introduction
2.
Literature Review
3.
Theoretical
Framework
4.
Design
5.
Results and
Analysis
6.
Conclusion
i.
References
ii.
Appendices
Contents
Project Title, Members Names, Tutorial Day, Time and Tutors
Name
Generated from Word
Originality of the Paper
Summarise the paper in about 250 words
Include 5-8 keywords
a) Explain the objective of your research e.g. To identify how
NGOs account for Aid Funding from international donors
b) Briefly discuss why this research is important or significant
c) Outline the paper format (in the last paragraph)
a) Summarise main papers in your area of research
b) Clearly outline the findings of previous studies; and new or
different issues/approach in your paper
Explain what theory youve used and how it helps to answer the
research question.
Dont explain the entire theory
Apply the theory when analyzing your results
a) Outline your research site/organization etc.
b) Explain your research methods e.g. Who did you interview?
Why did you choose them?
Summarise your results and explain the significance.
Where possible, use tables and graphs but avoid lengthy
quotes
Use your results to clearly answer the research question
Include limitations of the research and suggestions for
further research
a) 5-8 journal articles (mostly Accounting)
b) 1-3 books, including text books (mostly Accounting)
c) 2-3 newspaper articles, (mostly from the USP region). This is
optional
a) May include interview/survey questions
b) Include a list of tasks undertaken by each group member
and time spent
Page 3 of 5
Pages
1
1
1
1-2
2-3
6-8
1-2
Grading
Papers will be graded according to the following rubric. Attach a copy to your print-out only (do not include a copy with your on-line submission).
Grade
Range
CONTENT (4 marks)
ANALYSIS (4 marks)
PRESENTATION (2 marks)
78-100%
64-77%
50-63%
40-49%
0-39%
Evidence includes
Evidence includes
Evidence includes
grammatical correctness
consistency with the style guide
accuracy of referencing
general neatness of presentation
Range
Insight
78-100%
The presentation provides deep insight to The presentation demonstrates excellent All aspects of the presentation are
the topic
evidence of thought and creativity
communicated clearly in fluent English
64-77%
The presentation provides strong insight The presentation demonstrates strong Most aspects of the presentation are
to the topic
evidence of thought and creativity
communicated clearly in fluent English
50-63%
The presentation provides basic insight to The presentation demonstrates basic Key aspects of the presentation are
the topic
evidence of thought and creativity
communicated clearly in fluent English
40-49%
The presentation provides limited insight The presentation demonstrates limited Overall, the presentation lacks clear
to the topic
evidence of thought and creativity
communication OR fluent English
0-39%
The presentation provides superficial The presentation demonstrates weak Overall, the presentation lacks clearly
insight to the topic
evidence of thought and creativity
communication AND fluent English
Evidence includes
Evidence includes
Evidence includes
well-structured presentation
Page 5 of 5