Vanoxerine: Cellular Mechanism of A New Antiarrhythmic
Vanoxerine: Cellular Mechanism of A New Antiarrhythmic
Vanoxerine: Cellular Mechanism of A New Antiarrhythmic
Cellular Electrophysiology of Vanoxerine. Introduction: There remains an unmet need for safe and
effective antiarrhythmic drugs, especially for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Vanoxerine is a drug that
is free of adverse cardiac events in normal volunteers, yet is a potent blocker of the hERG (hK v 11.1) cardiac
potassium channel. Consequently ,we hypothesized that vanoxerine might also be a potent blocker of cardiac
calcium (Ca) and sodium (Na) currents, and would not affect transmural dispersion of repolarization.
Methods: The whole cell patch clamp technique was used to measure currents from cloned ion chan-
nels overexpressed in stable cell lines and single ventricular myocytes. We measured intracellular action
potentials from canine ventricular wedges and Purkinje fibers using sharp microelectrode technique.
Results: We found that vanoxerine was a potent hK v 11.1 blocker, and at submicromolar concentrations,
it blocked Ca and Na currents in a strongly frequency-dependent manner. In the canine ventricular wedge
preparation vanoxerine did not significantly affect transmural action potential waveforms, QT interval or
transmural dispersion of repolarization.
Conclusions: Vanoxerine (1) is a potent blocker of cardiac hERG, Na and Ca channels; (2) block is strongly
frequency-dependent especially for Na and Ca channels; and (3) transmural dispersion of ventricular
repolarization is unaffected. The multichannel block and repolarization uniformity resemble the effects
of amiodarone, the exemplar atrial fibrillation drug. Vanoxerine is a completely different chemical and
has none of amiodarone’s toxic effects. Vanoxerine has characteristics of a potentially effective and safe
antiarrhythmic. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 301-310, March 2010)
antiarrhythmic drug, patch clamp, vanoxerine, GBR-12909, cardiac electrophysiology, ventricular wedge, Pur-
kinje fiber action potential
A a
B a
c
TABLE 1
Patch Clamp IC 50 Values for Block of Cardiac Ion Channels by Vx∗
Vx Concentration–Response Relationship
Channel Hz Test Pulses/Minute Cell Line IC 50 (μM)
Ventricular Wedge Recordings of Action Potentials, nine ventricular wedge preparation were compared to those
Transmural ECG, and Transmural Dispersion of dofetilide and amiodarone. Figure 4 and Tables 4 and 5
of Repolarization show that Vx acts similarly to amiodarone and is distinctly
different from dofetilide in this assay. Dofetilide significantly
We used intracellular recordings from canine ventricu- increased the APD 90 and QT of all ventricular cardiomy-
lar wedge preparations to search for any proarrhythmic sig- ocytes. Vx rarely prolonged APD 90 significantly and pro-
nals in the transmural ECG and action potentials measured duced no significant changes in QT or TDR. Amiodarone
simultaneously from myocytes in the epicardium, midmy- significantly decreased APD 90 only at the highest concen-
ocardium, and endocardium. Vx’s effects on the perfused ca- tration tested in all ventricular myocytes and decreased QT
306 Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2010
TABLE 2 TABLE 3
Vx Ion Channel Block Use-Dependence Vx Modulation of Canine Purkinje Fiber AP Parametersa,∗
I Ca,L 1 30 11 ± 1 (3) 0.01 0.5 2.7 ± 1.6 1.8 ± 1.9 0.1 ± 3.7 5.9 ± 6.2
1 100 23 ± 19 (2) 1 4.3 ± 0.8 3.6 ± 1.6 0.6 ± 3.9 6.3 ± 6.5
1 300 83 ± 10 (2)∗ 2 7.5 ± 1.9 7.0 ± 2.7 0.4 ± 3.8 6.7 ± 6.5
0.3 30 10 ± 7 (2) 0.1 0.5 1.8 ± 3.3 4.9 ± 1.8 2.0 ± 5.0 −3.1 ± 14.6
0.3 100 60 ± 13 (2)∗ 1 2.7 ± 2.9 10.1 ± 2.5 2.5 ± 5.9 −2.7 ± 15.0
hNa v 1.5 3 300 5 ± 5 (2) 2 2.7 ± 3.9 0.1 ± 6.1 3.9 ± 6.4 −1.0 ± 13.4
0.3 300 70 ± 11 (2)∗ 1 0.5 −5.3 ± 5.8 2.1 ± 3.2 −0.4 ± 2.7 4.3 ± 8.5
hK v 11.1 3 10 3 ± 3 (3) 1 −5.0 ± 7.0 2.6 ± 4.5 −0.1 ± 3.2 5.5 ± 8.3
0.3 10 30 ± 8 (3)∗ 2 −4.6 ± 8.1 2.7 ± 5.5 0.7 ± 3.3 3.8 ± 7.0
∗ Statistically significant change from control (P < 0.05) using ANOVA and a Data were obtained from 3 canine Purkinje fibers. BCL = basic cycle
Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. length; APD 60 = action potential duration at 60% repolarization; and
APD 90 = at 90% repolarization; RMP = resting membrane potential;
APA = action potential amplitude.
∗
No statistically significant changes from control (P < 0.05) were observed
at 2 and 1 second BCL. Vx did not produce any phase 2 using ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
early after depolarizations, R-on-T extrasystoles or torsades
de pointes arrhythmias over the concentration range tested
(0.01–3.0 μM).
fiber APD 60 and APD 90 . Vx had no significant effect on QT
Plasma Protein Binding of Vx or TDR. Block of hNa v 1.5 and I Ca,L was strongly frequency-
dependent. Vx appears to have similar effects to amiodarone.
Protein binding for Vx was greater than 99% for both dog
Based on Vx’s use in previous clinical trials to treat Parkin-
and human plasma at all 3 concentrations tested: 0.1, 0.4, and
son’s disease and depression, its adverse effect profile is
1 μM. The results demonstrated a high propensity for Vx to
much less than amiodarone’s. The available clinical trial
bind plasma proteins. Cytochrome P450 enzymes generate
data suggests that concentrations of Vx that are effective
a single Vx metabolite in vitro, primarily due to CYP3A4
in nonclinical data are well tolerated and safe in man as
isoform activity, with lesser contributions by the CYP2C8
opposed to amiodarone’s toxic effects on pulmonary and
and CYP2E1 isoforms.21 The Vx metabolite has not been
corneal function. Vx terminated AF in a preclinical in vivo
characterized chemically or pharmacologically.
animal model.13 An ongoing clinical trial to assess oral Vx’s
efficacy as an antiarrhythmic for treatment of AF showed
Discussion promising efficacy for acute termination of AF without proar-
Using in vitro techniques we initially demonstrated that, rhythmia and significant adverse effects (unpublished obser-
unexpectedly, Vx was a potent hK v 11.1 channel blocker. vations from ChanTest Corporation).
Since previous studies in man and mammals indicated no Vernakalant is a promising antiarrhythmic for treatment
cardiovascular risk for Vx,6 we evaluated Vx’s interactions of recent-onset AF,22 but fails to terminate atrial flutter.23 Vx
with other cardiac ion channels for offsetting effects. Subse- terminated both AF and atrial flutter in the canine sterile peri-
quently, we demonstrated that Vx was also a potent blocker carditis model.13 Dronedarone (derived from amiodarone) is
of cardiac Na and Ca currents, activities that can offset another recent antiarrhythmic targeting multiple ion chan-
hK v 11.1 block, and did not significantly prolong Purkinje nels with efficacy similar to amiodarone but with reduced
toxicity,24 like Vx. However, intravenous Vx is effective at
terminating recent-onset AF in minutes,13 while dronedarone
is likely to share the delayed onset of cardioversion seen with
amiodarone.25
Relationship between Pharmacokinetics of Vx in Man
and AF/AFL Termination
Phase I clinical trials of Vx indicated no significant effects
on ECG, heart rate, or blood pressure.6 In a dose-escalation
phase I study of Vx, 4 healthy males aged 20–45 years re-
ceived 100, 200, and 300 mg oral doses of Vx.8 At the 300-mg
dose, the peak plasma concentration (C max ) of Vx ranged up
to 831 nM (mean C max was 533 ± 109 nM). This mean value
is greater than the mean plasma concentration measured at
termination of sustained AF/AFL in the canine sterile peri-
Figure 3. Effect of Vx on Purkinje fiber action potential waveforms. Super- carditis model (399 ± 69 nM, n = 19).13 No adverse cardiac
imposed records before (control) and after sequential 20 minute equilibra- events (AEs) were reported for any of the doses. No sig-
tion periods with Vx at the indicated concentrations (0.01, 0.1, and 1 μM). nificant effects on heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP)
Temperature = 37 ± 1◦ C, BCL = 2 seconds. Vx did not cause significant occurred. At the 100 and 200 mg doses there was one oc-
changes in any of the measured action potential parameters (n = 3). currence of a slight reduction in the T-wave of the ECG.
Lacerda et al. Cellular Electrophysiology of Vanoxerine 307
Figure 4. Effect of Vx on ventricular wedge action potential waveforms and transmural ECG. Transmural dispersion of repolarization was measured in the
canine ventricular wedge preparation (n = 8). Recordings from endocardial, midmyocardial and epicardial layers of the ventricular wall and the transmural
ECG are shown. The effects of Vx are similar to amiodarone and distinct from those of dofetilide, which has a proarrhythmic risk.
At the 300-mg dose all subjects had a reduction in T-wave rate, especially for Na and Ca channels, and the IC 50 values
amplitude; however, none were flat or negative. The Bazett’s for all 3 target channels became closer at fast physiological
corrected QT, QTc(B), was within the normal range (<0.47 frequencies. We believe Vx will demonstrate antiarrhythmic
seconds). efficacy because of its (1) potent block of hK v 11.1 com-
In a phase I study on relative oral bioavailability in 12 bined with strongly frequency-dependent block of cardiac
healthy men aged 22–34 years, a 100-mg single oral dose calcium and sodium currents; and (2) maintenance of TDR.
was well tolerated.10 In a 14-day repeat oral dosing phase Confirmation of Vx antiarrhythmic activity in the canine ster-
I study in 14 healthy men aged 19–33 years administered ile pericarditis model is presented in detail in a companion
doses up to 125 mg of Vx, noncardiac adverse events were paper.13
mild and generally of short duration.9 In these Phase I trials,
C max values exceeded the minimum plasma concentrations Limitations
measured at termination of AF/AFL in the canine sterile
pericarditis model. We showed that Vx was safe and effective for acute phar-
macological cardioversion of AF/AFL in an animal model,13
Preclinical Studies and initial clinical trial data show that Vx is safe for this in-
dication in man (ChanTest Corporation, unpublished data).
Vx was compared to dofetilide and amiodarone in the arte- Although the longest repeat dosing period used in Vx clin-
rially perfused canine ventricular wedge preparation. Vx was ical trials is 14 days and amiodarone pulmonary toxicity
similar to amiodarone in its small effects on action potentials typically develops over a longer period, amiodarone pul-
from the endocardial, midmyocardial, and epicardial ventric- monary toxicity can appear in a few days and in a third of
ular myocytes, transmural ECG, and TDR, and distinct from cases in weeks.28 Corneal microdeposits appear in weeks
the large changes associated with dofetilide. Increased TDR and occur in 76–100% of patients.29 We have not evaluated
is associated with proarrhythmia,19 and Vx’s lack of effect Vx’s potential to prevent AF/AFL experimentally, although
on TDR, similar to amiodarone, suggests that Vx is also not our initial experience with maintained intravenous dosing at
likely to be proarrhythmic. Independent studies with teleme- 1 mg/kg throughout the electrophysiology parameter mea-
tered conscious dogs found no adverse effects of oral Vx at surement period following termination prevented induction
doses up to 30 mg/kg.26 of AF/AFL on the following day. Stopping Vx infusion at
Predominantly, Class III hK v 11.1 blockers like sotalol and termination reduced the total dose of Vx and allowed ini-
dofetilide always carry the concern of proarrhythmia associ- tiation of sustained AF/AFL on the following experimental
ated with QT prolongation and hK v 11.1 block.27 However, days.13 Our oral dosing experiments were consistent with
other potent hK v 11.1 blockers like verapamil do not have the possibility that Vx might provide effective maintenance
a QT prolongation risk due to compensatory block of Ca therapy.30
channels at similar potency. We expected this would explain Vanoxerine is a substrate for CYP3A4, and drug interac-
the lack of QT prolongation risk for Vx, although the po- tions will need to be considered with its use.21 Metabolism
tencies at low frequencies for the Ca and Na compensatory of Vx by human liver microsomes, human hepatocytes,
currents were lower. However, Vx potency increased with and microsomes containing cDNA-expressed human P450
308
TABLE 4
Vx, Dofetilide, and Amiodarone Modulation of APD 90 in the Canine Left Ventricular Wedgea
Vx (μM) % % % % % % % % %
0.01 −0.1 ± 0.7 (7) 1.1 ± 0.7 (7) 1.4 ± 0.6 (7) 1.2 ± 1.0 (7) 1.6 ± 0.4 (7) 0.6 ± 0.8 (7) 0.7 ± 0.5 (7) 2.6 ± 0.9 (7) 2.0 ± 1.5 (7)
0.03 0.0 ± 0.8 (8) 1.1 ± 0.8 (8) 2.8 ± 0.8 (8) 1.3 ± 0.7 (8) 2.2 ± 0.5 (8) 1.5 ± 0.8 (8) 0.9 ± 0.8 (8) 3.3 ± 0.8 (8) 2.8 ± 1.2 (8)
0.1 0.5 ± 1.1 (8) 2.0 ± 1.3 (8) 3.5 ± 0.5 (8) 2.3 ± 1.2 (8) 3.5 ± 0.5 (8) 2.8 ± 1.3 (8) −0.7 ± 1.4 (8) 4.2 ± 0.6 (8) 4.5 ± 1.9 (8)
0.3 2.1 ± 0.9 (8) 3.4 ± 1.2 (8) 4.2 ± 0.8 (8) 4.0 ± 0.7 (8) 5.5 ± 1.0 (8) 5.6 ± 1.2 (8) 0.4 ± 2.0 (8) 5.2 ± 0.9 (8) 6.9 ± 1.4 (8)
1 4.2 ± 1.2 (8) 4.8 ± 1.0 (8) 5.6 ± 0.8 (8) 4.4 ± 0.7 (8) 7.0 ± 0.9 (8)∗ 7.4 ± 1.1 (8) 3.4 ± 0.6 (8) 6.4 ± 0.7 (8) 8.7 ± 1.0 (8)
3 6.1 ± 1.8 (5)∗ 6.0 ± 1.2 (5) 5.1 ± 0.7 (5) 6.0 ± 0.9 (5) 6.9 ± 1.0 (5) 7.8 ± 1.3 (5) 4.8 ± 0.6 (5) 6.8 ± 0.7 (5) 9.8 ± 1.2 (5)
Dof (μM) % % % % % % % % %
0.01 11.7 ± 2.1 (6)∗ 8.9 ± 1.3 (6)∗ 7.4 ± 0.9 (6) 10.9 ± 1.9 (6)∗ 10.5 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 8.8 ± 1.3 (6) 11.9 ± 1.5 (6) 10.5 ± 2.0 (6) 10.7 ± 2.3 (6)
0.03 14.7 ± 1.4 (6)∗ 13.5 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 15.4 ± 1.3 (6)∗ 13.4 ± 2.0 (6)∗ 15.0 ± 1.3 (6)∗ 17.3 ± 1.4 (6)∗ 13.3 ± 2.9 (6)∗ 16.1 ± 3.7 (6) 18.3 ± 1.4 (6)∗
0.1 17.8 ± 2.0 (6)∗ 17.8 ± 1.7 (6)∗ 18.3 ± 1.6 (6)∗ 17.6 ± 2.6 (6)∗ 20.7 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 22.5 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 15.3 ± 2.4 (6)∗ 20.6 ± 3.5 (6)∗ 23.4 ± 1.6 (6)∗
0.3 19.0 ± 2.0 (6)∗ 20.2 ± 2.0 (6)∗ 20.7 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 21.5 ± 2.6 (6)∗ 22.3 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 24.7 ± 1.3 (6)∗ 18.1 ± 3.0 (6)∗ 23.2 ± 2.9 (6)∗ 26.2 ± 2.4 (6)∗
1 19.9 ± 1.9 (6)∗ 23.3 ± 1.9 (6)∗ 23.4 ± 1.5 (6)∗ 21.6 ± 2.8 (6)∗ 25.1 ± 2.1 (6)∗ 29.5 ± 1.9 (6)∗ 19.8 ± 1.6 (6)∗ 24.9 ± 3.2 (6)∗ 27.0 ± 2.7 (6)∗
Amio (μM) % % % % % % % % %
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2010
0.01 1.2 ± 0.5 (4) 2.0 ± 0.8 (4) 1.8 ± 0.5 (4) 0.7 ± 0.3 (4) 0.8 ± 0.3 (4) 1.0 ± 0.9 (4) 0.0 ± 1.0 (4) 1.7 ± 0.8 (4) 0.7 ± 0.8 (4)
0.03 3.1 ± 0.7 (4) 3.1 ± 1.4 (4) 2.0 ± 0.4 (4) 0.1 ± 0.8 (4) 2.1 ± 0.5 (4) 1.9 ± 0.5 (4) −0.2 ± 0.8 (4) 2.4 ± 1.2 (4) 2.6 ± 1.0 (4)
0.1 1.2 ± 0.5 (4) 1.4 ± 0.6 (4) 2.7 ± 1.3 (4) 0.9 ± 1.0 (4) 1.9 ± 0.3 (4) 1.8 ± 0.7 (4) −1.3 ± 1.5 (4) 1.1 ± 1.0 (4) 2.2 ± 0.6 (4)
0.3 −2.1 ± 1.3 (4) −0.7 ± 1.4 (4) 0.7 ± 1.4 (4) −2.8 ± 2.3 (4) −2.6 ± 1.1 (4) −2.1 ± 1.2 (4) −4.7 ± 2.6 (4) −3.1 ± 3.7 (4) −0.9 ± 1.3 (4)
1 −2.3 ± 2.3 (4) −3.2 ± 2.7 (4) −2.8 ± 1.9 (4) −7.1 ± 4.1 (4) −5.5 ± 2.3 (4) −3.1 ± 1.6 (4) −5.8 ± 3.5 (4) −4.6 ± 4.1 (4) −2.8 ± 1.2 (4)
3 −3.9 ± 2.6 (4) −5.3 ± 3.8 (4) −4.2 ± 3.1 (4) −4.6 ± 3.7 (4) −4.9 ± 1.8 (4) −4.2 ± 2.1 (4) −9.1 ± 4.8 (4) −9.4 ± 5.4 (4) −4.3 ± 1.2 (4)
10 −6.4 ± 2.0 (4)∗ −8.9 ± 2.5 (4)∗ −10.8 ± 5.2 (4)∗ −36.0 ± 21.4 (4)∗ −13.1 ± 4.3 (4)∗ −12.0 ± 4.9 (4)∗ −9.7 ± 4.4 (4) −14.2 ± 3.9 (4) −10.6 ± 4.0 (4)∗
∗ Statistically significant change from control (P < 0.05) using ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
a Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n). Vx = vanoxerine; Dof = dofetilide; Amio = amiodarone.
Lacerda et al. Cellular Electrophysiology of Vanoxerine 309
TABLE 5
Vx, Dofetilide, and Amiodarone Modulation of the QT and TDR Intervals in the Canine Left Ventricular Wedgea
QT TDR
BCL(s) 0.5 1 2 0.5 1 2
Vx (μM) % % % % % %
0.01 0.7 ± 1.0 (6) 1.5 ± 1.4 (8) 0.8 ± 0.7 (8) 3.2 ± 13.2 (6) 1.6 ± 5.9 (7) 1.7 ± 3.2 (8)
0.03 2.4 ± 2.1 (7) 1.9 ± 1.8 (8) 1.3 ± 1.1 (8) −3.3 ± 16.6 (7) 1.6 ± 5.2 (8) 4.5 ± 3.5 (8)
0.1 3.0 ± 0.6 (7) 2.3 ± 1.6 (8) 2.8 ± 1.2 (8) 16.1 ± 16.6 (7) 3.0 ± 5.8 (8) 10.0 ± 4.4 (8)
0.3 4.8 ± 1.1 (8) 4.5 ± 1.5 (8) 5.0 ± 0.8 (8) 9.2 ± 18.2 (8) 4.4 ± 6.4 (8) 12.4 ± 3.3 (8)
1 3.6 ± 1.9 (7) 6.5 ± 0.9 (8) 7.3 ± 0.7 (8) 6.8 ± 18.2 (8) 5.5 ± 6.3 (8) 18.5 ± 3.2 (8)
3 4.1 ± 7.1 (2) 6.8 ± 1.1 (5) 6.7 ± 0.5 (5) 8.7 ± 31.3 (5) 7.0 ± 6.9 (5) 15.8 ± 4.3 (5)
Dof (μM) % % % % % %
0.01 9.2 ± 1.0 (6)∗ 10.5 ± 1.0 (6)∗ 9.2 ± 1.2 (6)∗ 20.4 ± 9.3 (6) 9.9 ± 14.6 (6) 8.8 ± 4.7 (6)
0.03 11.5 ± 0.9 (6)∗ 15.0 ± 1.2 (6)∗ 15.4 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 14.7 ± 11.6 (6) 17.0 ± 17.2 (6) 12.5 ± 4.7 (6)
0.1 16.4 ± 1.2 (6)∗ 20.5 ± 1.4 (6)∗ 20.3 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 32.2 ± 19.2 (6) 27.4 ± 18.9 (6) 23.3 ± 6.4 (6)
0.3 16.8 ± 1.2 (6)∗ 22.4 ± 0.6 (6)∗ 22.9 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 19.8 ± 15.7 (6) 30.7 ± 13.2 (6) 28.1 ± 3.1 (6)
1 18.2 ± 1.9 (6)∗ 24.8 ± 1.1 (6)∗ 28.0 ± 1.8 (6)∗ 19.9 ± 11.7 (6) 41.0 ± 14.1 (6)∗ 44.3 ± 2.6 (6)∗
Amio (μM) % % % % % %
0.01 1.1 ± 0.8 (4) 0.3 ± 0.2 (4) 1.6 ± 0.8 (4) 3.4 ± 2.6 (4) 1.3 ± 1.0 (4) 5.5 ± 2.8 (4)
0.03 1.5 ± 1.1 (4) 1.6 ± 0.5 (4) 2.3 ± 0.8 (4) 4.6 ± 5.6 (4) 5.3 ± 4.5 (4) 10.8 ± 2.2 (4)
0.1 −0.5 ± 1.6 (4) 0.4 ± 0.6 (4) 1.8 ± 1.0 (4) −1.6 ± 8.1 (4) 0.5 ± 6.4 (4) 7.5 ± 1.6 (4)
0.3 −1.1 ± 0.8 (4) −2.6 ± 1.1 (4) −2.2 ± 1.3 (4) −3.1 ± 8.6 (4) −13.3 ± 11.3 (4) 0.3 ± 5.9 (4)
1 −2.7 ± 1.1 (4) −4.5 ± 1.8 (4) −3.9 ± 2.2 (4) −1.0 ± 12.3 (4) −12.9 ± 11.4 (4) −4.1 ± 7.8 (4)
3 −2.3 ± 1.9 (4) −6.9 ± 1.5 (4)∗ −5.6 ± 2.4 (4) 0.7 ± 18.7 (4) −28.7 ± 10.6 (4) −8.4 ± 5.4 (4)
10 −6.8 ± 2.1 (2) −13.5 ± 0.3 (3)∗ −10.3 ± 2.9 (4)∗ −21.3 ± 44.4 (2) −31.2 ± 11.7 (3) −14.0 ± 8.4 (4)
∗ Statistically significant change from control (P < 0.05) using ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
a Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n).
Vx = Vanoxerine; Dof = dofetilide; Amio = amiodarone.
isoforms identified a single primary metabolite by HPLC.21 10. Ingwersen SH, Mant TG, Larsen JJ: Food intake increases the relative
The chemical identity, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and phar- oral bioavailability of vanoxerine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993;35:308-
310.
macological activity of this metabolite remain unknown. 11. Brown AM, Rampe D: Drug-induced long QT syndrome: Is HERG the
root of all evil? Pharmaceutical News 2000;7:15-20.
12. Clancy CE, Kass RS: Inherited and acquired vulnerability to ventricular
Acknowledgments: We want to thank William Giroski and Sharon
arrhythmias: Cardiac Na+ and K+ channels. Physiol Rev 2005;85:33-
Beringuel for preparation of cell cultures.
47.
13. Matsumoto N, Khrestian C, Ryu K, Lacerda A, Brown A, Waldo AL:
Vanoxerine, a new drug for terminating atrial fibrillation and flutter. J
References Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:311-319.
1. Waldo AL: A perspective on antiarrhythmic drug therapy to treat atrial 14. Lacerda A, Matsumoto N, Khrestian C, Ryu K, Yan G-X, Waldo A,
fibrillation: There remains an unmet need. Am Heart J 2006;151:771- Brown A: Effects of vanoxerine on cardiac ion channels. 7th Annual
778. NIH SBIR/STTR Conference 2005;B-5.
2. AFFIRM First Antiarrhythmic Drug Substudy Investigators: Main- 15. Kuryshev YA, Wible BA, Gudz TI, Ramirez AN, Brown AM:
tenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: An AF- KChAP/Kvbeta1.2 interactions and their effects on cardiac Kv channel
FIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J Am Coll Cardiol expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001; 281:C290-C299.
2003;42:20-29. 16. Kuryshev YA, Ficker E, Wang L, Hawryluk P, Dennis AT, Wible BA,
3. Nattel S: Drugs to promote sinus rhythm reversion and maintenance Brown AM, Kang J, Chen XL, Sawamura K, Reynolds W, Rampe D:
in atrial fibrillation–why amiodarone is better. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Pentamidine-induced long QT syndrome and block of hERG traffick-
2003;17:5-6. ing. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005;312:316-323.
4. Manios EG, Mavrakis HE, Kanoupakis EM, Kallergis EM, Dermitzaki 17. Lacerda AE, Kuryshev YA, Chen Y, Renganathan M, Eng H, Danthi SJ,
DN, Kambouraki DC, Vardas PE: Effects of amiodarone and dilti- Kramer JW, Yang T, Brown AM: Alfuzosin delays cardiac repolariza-
azem on persistent atrial fibrillation conversion and recurrence rates: tion by a novel mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008;324:427-433.
A randomized controlled study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2003;17:31– 18. Kirsch GE, Trepakova ES, Brimecombe JC, Sidach SS, Erickson HD,
39. Kochan MC, Shyjka LM, Lacerda AE, Brown AM: Variability in the
5. Giros B, el Mestikawy S, Godinot N, Zheng K, Han H, Yang-Feng T, measurement of hERG potassium channel inhibition: Effects of temper-
Caron MG: Cloning, pharmacological characterization, and chromo- ature and stimulus pattern. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2004;50:93-
some assignment of the human dopamine transporter. Mol Pharmacol 101.
1992;42:383-390. 19. Yan GX, Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C: Characteristics and distribution of
6. Preti A: Vanoxerine National Institute on Drug Abuse. Curr Opin In- M cells in arterially perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations.
vestig Drugs 2000;1:241-251. Circulation 1998;98:1921-1927.
7. Sanguinetti MC, Jurkiewicz NK: Two components of cardiac delayed 20. Yamashita N, Kaku T, Uchino T, Isomoto S, Yoshimatsu H, Ono
rectifier K+ current. Differential sensitivity to block by class III antiar- K: Short- and long-term amiodarone treatments regulate Cav3.2 low-
rhythmic agents. J Gen Physiol 1990;96:195-215. voltage-activated T-type Ca2+ channel through distinct mechanisms.
8. Sogaard U, Michalow J, Butler B, Lund LA, Ingersen SH, Skrumsager Mol Pharmacol 2006;69:1684-1691.
BK, Rafaelsen OJ: A tolerance study of single and multiple dosing of 21. Cherstniakova SA, Bi D, Fuller DR, Mojsiak JZ, Collins
the selective dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 in healthy subjects. JM, Cantilena LR: Metabolism of vanoxerine, 1-[2-[bis(4-
Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1990;5:237-251. fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine, by human
9. Ingwersen SH, Snel S, Mant TG, Edwards D: Nonlinear multiple- cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos 2001;29:1216-1220.
dose pharmacokinetics of the dopamine reuptake inhibitor vanoxerine. 22. Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C, Wyse DG, Toft E, Juul-Moller
J Pharm Sci 1993;82:1164-1166. S, Nielsen T, Rasmussen SL, Stiell IG, Coutu B, Ip JH, Pritchett EL,
310 Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2010
Camm AJ: Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fib- anticonvulsant activity in Zebrafish and rodent models of generalized
rillation: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation epilepsy but cardiac ion channel effects limit its clinical utility. Phar-
2008;117:1518-1525. macology 2007;79:250-258.
23. Pratt CM, Roy D, Juul-Moller S, Torp-Pedersen C, Toft E, Wyse DG, 27. Waldo AL, Camm AJ, deRuyter H, Freidman PL, MacNeil DJ, Pitt
Nielsen T, Rasmussen SL: Efficacy and tolerance of RSD1235 in the B, Pratt CM, Rodda BE, Schwartz PJ: Survival with oral d-sotalol
treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: Results of a phase III, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarc-
randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol tion: Rationale, design, and methods (the SWORD trial). Am J Cardiol
2006; 47:10A (Abstract). 1995;75:1023-1027.
24. Laughlin JC, Kowey PR: Dronedarone: A new treatment for 28. Goldstein I, Topilsky M, Segev D, Isakov A, Heller I: Very early onset
atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1220- of acute amiodarone pulmonary toxicity presenting with hemoptysis.
1226. Chest 1997;111:1446-1447.
25. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, Cucherat M, Kirkorian G, 29. Pollak PT: Clinical organ toxicity of antiarrhythmic compounds: Ocular
Touboul P: Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for car- and pulmonary manifestations. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:37R-45R.
dioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. J Am 30. Cakulev I, Kyungmoo R, Celeen K, Lacerda AE, Brown AM, Waldo
Coll Cardiol 2003;41:255-262. AL: Orally administered vanoxerine, a cardiac multichcannel blocker,
26. Goldsmith P, Golder Z, Hunt J, Berghmans S, Jones D, Stables JP, Mur- terminates atrial flutter and prevents its reinducibility in the canine
phree L, Howden D, Newton PE, Richards FM: GBR12909 possesses sterile pericarditis model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:38A.