Executive Report

Acunetix Website Audit
1 August, 2015
Developer Report
Generated by Acunetix WVS Reporter (v9.5 Build 20140505)
Scan of http://demo.testfire.net:80/
Scan details
Scan information
Start time
Finish time
Scan time
Profile
8/1/2015 9:32:48 PM
8/1/2015 9:54:17 PM
21 minutes, 29 seconds
Default
Server information
Responsive
Server banner
Server OS
Server technologies
True
Microsoft-IIS/8.0
Windows
ASP.NET
Threat level
Acunetix Threat Level 3
One or more high-severity type vulnerabilities have been discovered by the scanner. A
malicious user can exploit these vulnerabilities and compromise the backend database
and/or deface your website.
Alerts distribution
Total alerts found
72
High
12
Medium
11
Low
16
Informational
33
Knowledge base
List of file extensions
File extensions can provide information on what technologies are being used on this website.
List of file extensions detected:
- aspx => 28 file(s)
- css => 1 file(s)
- asmx => 1 file(s)
- js => 1 file(s)
- txt => 2 file(s)
- swf => 1 file(s)
- htm => 6 file(s)
- xml => 1 file(s)
- rtf => 2 file(s)
Top 10 response times
The files listed below had the slowest response times measured during the crawling process. The average response time
for this site was 499.50 ms. These files could be targetted in denial of service attacks.
1. /bank/queryxpath.aspx, response time 1264 ms
GET /bank/queryxpath.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/
Acunetix-Aspect: enabled
Acunetix-Aspect-Password: 082119f75623eb7abd7bf357698ff66c
Acunetix-Aspect-Queries: filelist;aspectalerts
Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=rx35k455p05mwieaeevyb445; amSessionId=15731163468; lang=
Host: demo.testfire.net
Connection: Keep-alive
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63
Safari/537.36
Acunetix-Product: WVS/9.0 (Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner - Free Edition)
Acunetix-Scanning-agreement: Third Party Scanning PROHIBITED
Acunetix-User-agreement: http://www.acunetix.com/wvs/disc.htm
Accept: */*
2. /default.aspx, response time 592 ms
GET /default.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/
Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=rx35k455p05mwieaeevyb445; amSessionId=15731163468
Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
3. /comment.aspx, response time 577 ms
POST /comment.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/feedback.aspx
Content-Length: 101
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
cfile=comments.txt&comments=1&email_addr=3137%20Laguna%20Street&name=scugpasj&subject=1&submit=Submit4
. /bank/ws.asmx, response time 577 ms
GET /bank/ws.asmx?op=IsValidUser HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/ws.asmx
Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
List of files with inputs
These files have at least one input (GET or POST).
- / - 5 inputs
- /search.aspx - 1 inputs
- /default.aspx - 1 inputs
- /bank/login.aspx - 1 inputs
- /bank/ws.asmx - 2 inputs
- /survey_questions.aspx - 1 inputs
- /disclaimer.htm - 1 inputs
- /comment.aspx - 1 inputs
- /subscribe.aspx - 1 inputs
List of authentication pages
This is a list of pages that require HTTP authentication.
- /bank/members
List of external hosts
These hosts were linked from this website but they were not scanned because they are not listed in the list of hosts
allowed.(Settings->Scanners settings->Scanner->List of hosts allowed).
- www.watchfire.com
- fpdownload.macromedia.com
- www.newspapersyndications.tv
- www.cert.org
- www.altoromutual.com
- www.microsoft.com
- www.netscape.com
List of email addresses
List of all email addresses found on this host.
- skipfish@example.com
Alerts summary
Blind SQL Injection
Classification
Base Score: 6.8
CVSS
- Access Vector: Network
- Access Complexity: Medium
- Authentication: None
- Confidentiality Impact: Partial
- Integrity Impact: Partial
- Availability Impact: Partial
CWE-89
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Variation
s2
Cross site scripting (verified)

Classification
Base Score: 4.4
CVSS
- Confidentiality Impact: None
- Availability Impact: None
CWE-79
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
/comment.aspx
/search.aspx
/subscribe.aspx
Variation
s1
1
1
1
Directory traversal
Classification
Base Score: 6.8
CVSS
CWE-22
CWE
Affected items
/default.aspx
Variation
s1
DOM-based cross site scripting

Classification
Base Score: 4.4
CVSS
CWE-79
CWE
Affected items
/disclaimer.htm
Variation
s1
Microsoft IIS tilde directory enumeration

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
- Access Complexity: Low
- Integrity Impact: None
CWE-20
CWE
Affected items
/
Variation
s1
5
SQL injection
Classification
Base Score: 6.8
CVSS
CWE-89
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
/subscribe.aspx
Variation
s2
1
Application error message

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
/subscribe.aspx
Variation
s2
1
Basic authentication over HTTP

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-16
CWE
Affected items
/bank/members/
Variation
s1
Directory listing
Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-538
CWE
Affected items
/bank
/pr
Variation
s1
1
6
HTML form without CSRF protection

Classification
Base Score: 2.6
CVSS
- Access Complexity: High
CWE-352
CWE
Affected items
/
/bank/login.aspx
/feedback.aspx
/subscribe.aspx
Variation
s1
1
1
1
User credentials are sent in clear text

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-310
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Variation
s1
ASP.NET debugging enabled

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-16
CWE
Affected items
/
/bank
Variation
s1
1
Clickjacking: X-Frame-Options header missing

Classification
Base Score: 6.8
CVSS
CWE-693
CWE
Affected items
Web Server
Variation
s1
Login page password-guessing attack

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-307
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Variation
s1
OPTIONS method is enabled

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
Web Server
Variation
s1
Possible sensitive directories

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
/admin
Variation
s1
Possible sensitive files

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
/test.aspx
Variation
s1
Session Cookie without HttpOnly flag set

Classification
Base Score: 0.0
CVSS
CWE-16
CWE
Affected items
/
Variation
s4
Session Cookie without Secure flag set

Classification
Base Score: 0.0
CVSS
CWE-16
CWE
Affected items
/
Variation
s5
Broken links
Classification
Base Score: 0.0
CVSS
CWE-16
CWE
Affected items
/bank/account.aspx.cs
/bank/apply.aspx.cs
/bank/bank.master
/bank/bank.master.cs
/bank/customize.aspx.cs
/bank/login.aspx.cs
/bank/logout.aspx.cs
/bank/main.aspx.cs
/bank/queryxpath.aspx.cs
/bank/transaction.aspx.cs
/bank/transfer.aspx.cs
/inside_points_of_interest.htm
Variation
s1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Email address found

Classification
Base Score: 5.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
/business_cards.htm
/cache.aspx
/callback.aspx
/files.aspx
/header.aspx
/home.aspx
/index.aspx
/info.aspx
/inside_about.htm
/inside_investor.htm
/log.aspx
/login.aspx
/orders.aspx
/robots.txt
/security.htm
/signup.aspx
Variation
s1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
GHDB: Typical login page

Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
/bank/login.aspx (825f8b5076aa7df703fc45c8fed863e5)
/bank/login.aspx.cs
/login.aspx
Variation
s1
1
1
1
Password type input with auto-complete enabled

Classification
Base Score: 0.0
CVSS
CWE-200
CWE
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Variation
s1
11
Alert details
Blind SQL Injection
Severity
High
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Blind_Sql_Injection.script)
Description
This script is possibly vulnerable to SQL Injection attacks.
SQL injection is a vulnerability that allows an attacker to alter back-end SQL statements by manipulating the user input.
An SQL injection occurs when web applications accept user input that is directly placed into a SQL statement and doesn't
properly filter out dangerous characters.
This is one of the most common application layer attacks currently being used on the Internet. Despite the fact that it is
relatively easy to protect against, there is a large number of web applications vulnerable.
Impact
An attacker may execute arbitrary SQL statements on the vulnerable system. This may compromise the integrity of your
database and/or expose sensitive information.
Depending on the back-end database in use, SQL injection vulnerabilities lead to varying levels of data/system access
for the attacker. It may be possible to not only manipulate existing queries, but to UNION in arbitrary data, use sub
selects, or append additional queries. In some cases, it may be possible to read in or write out to files, or to execute shell
commands on the underlying operating system.
Certain SQL Servers such as Microsoft SQL Server contain stored and extended procedures (database server
functions). If an attacker can obtain access to these procedures it may be possible to compromise the entire machine.
Recommendation
Your script should filter metacharacters from user input.
Check detailed information for more information about fixing this vulnerability.
References
VIDEO: SQL Injection tutorial
OWASP PHP Top 5
SQL Injection Walkthrough
OWASP Injection Flaws
Acunetix SQL Injection Attack
How to check for SQL injection vulnerabilities
Detailed information
Quote from SQL Injection Attacks by Example - http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/sql-injection.html
SQL injection mitigations
We believe that web application developers often simply do not think about "surprise inputs", but security people do
(including the bad guys), so there are three broad approaches that can be applied here.
Sanitize the input
It's absolutely vital to sanitize user inputs to insure that they do not contain dangerous codes, whether to the SQL server
or to HTML itself. One's first idea is to strip out "bad stuff", such as quotes or semicolons or escapes, but this is a
misguided attempt. Though it's easy to point out some dangerous characters, it's harder to point to all of them.
The language of the web is full of special characters and strange markup (including alternate ways of representing the
same characters), and efforts to authoritatively identify all "bad stuff" are unlikely to be successful.
Instead, rather than "remove known bad data", it's better to "remove everything but known good data": this distinction is
crucial. Since - in our example - an email address can contain only these characters:
12
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
0123456789
@.-_+
There is really no benefit in allowing characters that could not be valid, and rejecting them early - presumably with an
error message - not only helps forestall SQL Injection, but also catches mere typos early rather than stores them into the
database.
Be aware that "sanitizing the input" doesn't mean merely "remove the quotes", because even "regular" characters can be
troublesome. In an example where an integer ID value is being compared against the user input (say, a numeric PIN):
SELECT fieldlist
FROM table
WHERE id = 23 OR 1=1; -- Boom! Always matches!
In practice, however, this approach is highly limited because there are so few fields for which it's possible to outright
exclude many of the dangerous characters. For "dates" or "email addresses" or "integers" it may have merit, but for any
kind of real application, one simply cannot avoid the other mitigations.
Escape/Quotesafe the input
Even if one might be able to sanitize a phone number or email address, one cannot take this approach with a "name"
field lest one wishes to exclude the likes of Bill O'Reilly from one's application: a quote is simply a valid character for this
field.
One includes an actual single quote in an SQL string by putting two of them together, so this suggests the obvious - but
wrong! - technique of preprocessing every string to replicate the single quotes:
SELECT fieldlist
FROM customers
WHERE name = 'Bill O''Reilly'; -- works OK
However, this naive approach can be beaten because most databases support other string escape mechanisms.
MySQL, for instance, also permits \' to escape a quote, so after input of \'; DROP TABLE users; -- is "protected" by
doubling the quotes, we get:
SELECT fieldlist
FROM customers
WHERE name = '\''; DROP TABLE users; --'; -- Boom!
The expression '\'' is a complete string (containing just one single quote), and the usual SQL shenanigans follow. It
doesn't stop with backslashes either: there is Unicode, other encodings, and parsing oddities all hiding in the weeds to
trip up the application designer.
Getting quotes right is notoriously difficult, which is why many database interface languages provide a function that does
it for you. When the same internal code is used for "string quoting" and "string parsing", it's much more likely that the
process will be done properly and safely.
Some examples are the MySQL function mysql_real_escape_string() and perl DBD method $dbh->quote($value). These
methods must be used.
Use bound parameters (the PREPARE statement)
Though quotesafing is a good mechanism, we're still in the area of "considering user input as SQL", and a much better
approach exists: bound parameters, which are supported by essentially all database programming interfaces. In this
technique, an SQL statement string is created with placeholders - a question mark for each parameter - and it's compiled
("prepared", in SQL parlance) into an internal form. Later, this prepared query is "executed" with a list of parameters:
Example in perl
13
$sth = $dbh->prepare("SELECT email, userid FROM members WHERE email = ?;");

$sth->execute($email);
Thanks to Stefan Wagner, this demonstrates bound parameters in Java:
Insecure version
Statement s = connection.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery("SELECT email FROM member WHERE name = "
+ formField); // *boom*
Secure version
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT email FROM member WHERE name = ?");
ps.setString(1, formField);
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
Here, $email is the data obtained from the user's form, and it is passed as positional parameter #1 (the first question
mark), and at no point do the contents of this variable have anything to do with SQL statement parsing. Quotes,
semicolons, backslashes, SQL comment notation - none of this has any impact, because it's "just data". There simply is
nothing to subvert, so the application is be largely immune to SQL injection attacks.
There also may be some performance benefits if this prepared query is reused multiple times (it only has to be parsed
once), but this is minor compared to the enormous security benefits. This is probably the single most important step one
can take to secure a web application.
Limit database permissions and segregate users
In the case at hand, we observed just two interactions that are made not in the context of a logged-in user: "log in" and
"send me password". The web application ought to use a database connection with the most limited rights possible:
query-only access to the members table, and no access to any other table.
The effect here is that even a "successful" SQL injection attack is going to have much more limited success. Here, we'd
not have been able to do the UPDATE request that ultimately granted us access, so we'd have had to resort to other
avenues.
Once the web application determined that a set of valid credentials had been passed via the login form, it would then
switch that session to a database connection with more rights.
It should go almost without saying that sa rights should never be used for any web-based application.
Use stored procedures for database access
When the database server supports them, use stored procedures for performing access on the application's behalf,
which can eliminate SQL entirely (assuming the stored procedures themselves are written properly).
By encapsulating the rules for a certain action - query, update, delete, etc. - into a single procedure, it can be tested and
documented on a standalone basis and business rules enforced (for instance, the "add new order" procedure might
reject that order if the customer were over his credit limit).
For simple queries this might be only a minor benefit, but as the operations become more complicated (or are used in
more than one place), having a single definition for the operation means it's going to be more robust and easier to
maintain.
Note: it's always possible to write a stored procedure that itself constructs a query dynamically: this provides no
protection against SQL Injection - it's only proper binding with prepare/execute or direct SQL statements with bound
variables that provide this protection.
Isolate the webserver
Even having taken all these mitigation steps, it's nevertheless still possible to miss something and leave the server open
to compromise. One ought to design the network infrastructure to assume that the bad guy will have full administrator
access to the machine, and then attempt to limit how that can be leveraged to compromise other things.
For instance, putting the machine in a DMZ with extremely limited pinholes "inside" the network means that even getting
14
complete control of the webserver doesn't automatically grant full access to everything else. This won't stop everything,
of course, but it makes it a lot harder.
Configure error reporting
The default error reporting for some frameworks includes developer debugging information, and this cannot be shown to
outside users. Imagine how much easier a time it makes for an attacker if the full query is shown, pointing to the syntax
error involved.
This information is useful to developers, but it should be restricted - if possible - to just internal users.
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input passw was set to -1' OR 3*2*1=6 AND 000589=000589 -Tests performed:
- -1' OR 2+589-589-1=0+0+0+1 -- => TRUE
- -1' OR 3+589-589-1=0+0+0+1 -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 3*2<(0+5+589-589) -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+589-589) -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 2+1-1-1=1 AND 000589=000589 -- => TRUE
- -1' OR 000589=000589 AND 3 ... (line truncated)
Request headers
POST /bank/login.aspx HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 80
X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net:80/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=-1'%20OR%203*2*1%3d6%20AND%20000589%3d000589%20--%20&uid=1
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Type: text/html
Expires: -1
Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.0
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:07 GMT
Connection: close
Content-Length: 5297
15
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input uid was set to -1' OR 3*2*1=6 AND 000373=000373 -Tests performed:
- -1' OR 2+373-373-1=0+0+0+1 -- => TRUE
- -1' OR 3+373-373-1=0+0+0+1 -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 3*2<(0+5+373-373) -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+373-373) -- => FALSE
- -1' OR 2+1-1-1=1 AND 000373=000373 -- => TRUE
- -1' OR 000373=000373 AND 3+1 ... (line truncated)
Request headers
Content-Length: 95
X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&uid=-1'%20OR%203*2*1%3d6%20AND%20000373%3d000373%
20--%20
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Length: 136
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Expires: -1
Location: /bank/main.aspx
Set-Cookie:
amUserInfo=UserName=LTEnIE9SIDMqMioxPTYgQU5EIDAwMDM3Mz0wMDAzNzMgLS0g&Password=ZzAwZFBhJC
R3MHJE; expires=Thu, 16-Jul-2015 09:59:42 GMT; path=/
Set-Cookie: amUserId=1; path=/
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:42 GMT
16
Cross site scripting (verified)

Severity
High
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (XSS.script)
Description
This script is possibly vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.
Cross site scripting (also referred to as XSS) is a vulnerability that allows an attacker to send malicious code (usually in
the form of Javascript) to another user. Because a browser cannot know if the script should be trusted or not, it will
execute the script in the user context allowing the attacker to access any cookies or session tokens retained by the
browser.
Impact
Malicious users may inject JavaScript, VBScript, ActiveX, HTML or Flash into a vulnerable application to fool a user in
order to gather data from them. An attacker can steal the session cookie and take over the account, impersonating the
user. It is also possible to modify the content of the page presented to the user.
Recommendation
References
Acunetix Cross Site Scripting Attack
VIDEO: How Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Works
The Cross Site Scripting Faq
OWASP Cross Site Scripting
XSS Annihilation
XSS Filter Evasion Cheat Sheet
Cross site scripting
OWASP PHP Top 5
How To: Prevent Cross-Site Scripting in ASP.NET
Quote from The Cross Site Scripting FAQ - http://www.cgisecurity.com/articles/xss-faq.shtml
Introduction
Websites today are more complex than ever, containing a lot of dynamic content making the experience for the user
more enjoyable. Dynamic content is achieved through the use of web applications which can deliver different output to a
user depending on their settings and needs. Dynamic websites suffer from a threat that static websites don't, called
"Cross Site Scripting" (or XSS dubbed by other security professionals). Currently small informational tidbits about Cross
Site Scripting holes exist but none really explain them to an average person or administrator. This FAQ was written to
provide a better understanding of this emerging threat, and to give guidance on detection and prevention.
"What is Cross Site Scripting?"
Cross site scripting (also known as XSS) occurs when a web application gathers malicious data from a user. The data is
usually gathered in the form of a hyperlink which contains malicious content within it. The user will most likely click on this
link from another website, instant message, or simply just reading a web board or email message. Usually the attacker
will encode the malicious portion of the link to the site in HEX (or other encoding methods) so the request is less
suspicious looking to the user when clicked on. After the data is collected by the web application, it creates an output
page for the user containing the malicious data that was originally sent to it, but in a manner to make it appear as valid
content from the website. Many popular guestbook and forum programs allow users to submit posts with html and
javascript embedded in them. If for example I was logged in as "john" and read a message by "joe" that contained
malicious javascript in it, then it may be possible for "joe" to hijack my session just by reading his bulletin board post.
Further details on how attacks like this are accomplished via "cookie theft" are explained in detail below.
"What does XSS and CSS mean?"
Often people refer to Cross Site Scripting as CSS. There has been a lot of confusion with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
and cross site scripting. Some security people refer to Cross Site Scripting as XSS. If you hear someone say "I found a
17
XSS hole", they are talking about Cross Site Scripting for certain.
"What are the threats of Cross Site Scripting?"
Often attackers will inject JavaScript, VBScript, ActiveX, HTML, or Flash into a vulnerable application to fool a user (Read
below for further details) in order to gather data from them. Everything from account hijacking, changing of user settings,
cookie theft/poisoning, or false advertising is possible. New malicious uses are being found every day for XSS attacks.
The post below by Brett Moore brings up a good point with regard to "Denial Of Service", and potential "auto-attacking" of
hosts if a user simply reads a post on a message board.
"What can I do to protect myself as a vendor?"
This is a simple answer. Never trust user input and always filter metacharacters. This will eliminate the majority of XSS
attacks. Converting < and > to < and > is also suggested when it comes to script output. Remember XSS holes can
be damaging and costly to your business if abused. Often attackers will disclose these holes to the public, which can
erode customer and public confidence in the security and privacy of your organization's site. Filtering < and > alone will
not solve all cross site scripting attacks and it is suggested you also attempt to filter out ( and ) by translating them to
( and ), and also # and & by translating them to &#35 (#) and &#38 (&).
"What can I do to protect myself as a user?"
The easiest way to protect yourself as a user is to only follow links from the main website you wish to view. If you visit
one website and it links to CNN for example, instead of clicking on it visit CNN's main site and use its search engine to
find the content. This will probably eliminate ninety percent of the problem. Sometimes XSS can be executed
automatically when you open an email, email attachment, read a guestbook, or bulletin board post. If you plan on
opening an email, or reading a post on a public board from a person you don't know BE CAREFUL. One of the best ways
to protect yourself is to turn off Javascript in your browser settings. In IE turn your security settings to high. This can
prevent cookie theft, and in general is a safer thing to do.
"How common are XSS holes?"
Cross site scripting holes are gaining popularity among hackers as easy holes to find in large websites. Websites from
FBI.gov, CNN.com, Time.com, Ebay, Yahoo, Apple computer, Microsoft, Zdnet, Wired, and Newsbytes have all had one
form or another of XSS bugs.
Every month roughly 10-25 XSS holes are found in commercial products and advisories are published explaining the
threat.
"Does encryption protect me?"
Websites that use SSL (https) are in no way more protected than websites that are not encrypted. The web applications
work the same way as before, except the attack is taking place in an encrypted connection. People often think that
because they see the lock on their browser it means everything is secure. This just isn't the case.
"Can XSS holes allow command execution?"
XSS holes can allow Javascript insertion, which may allow for limited execution. If an attacker were to exploit a browser
flaw (browser hole) it could then be possible to execute commands on the client's side. If command execution were
possible it would only be possible on the client side. In simple terms XSS holes can be used to help exploit other holes
that may exist in your browser.
"What if I don't feel like fixing a CSS/XSS Hole?"
By not fixing an XSS hole this could allow possible user account compromise in portions of your site as they get added or
updated. Cross Site Scripting has been found in various large sites recently and have been widely publicized. Left
unrepaired, someone may discover it and publish a warning about your company. This may damage your company's
reputation, depicting it as being lax on security matters. This of course also sends the message to your clients that you
aren't dealing with every problem that arises, which turns into a trust issue. If your client doesn't trust you why would they
wish to do business with you?
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input uid was set to 1" onmouseover=prompt(931034) bad="
The input is reflected inside a tag parameter between double quotes.
18
Request headers
Content-Length: 90
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&uid=1%22%20onmouseover%3dprompt(931034)%20bad%3d%
22
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:03 GMT
/comment.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input name was set to ctuysydc'"()&%<ScRiPt >prompt(975117)</ScRiPt>
Request headers
POST /comment.aspx HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 147
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
cfile=comments.txt&comments=1&email_addr=3137%20Laguna%20Street&name=ctuysydc'%22()%26%2
5<ScRiPt%20>prompt(975117)</ScRiPt>&subject=1&submit=Submit
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:00:04 GMT
19
/search.aspx
Details
URL encoded GET input txtSearch was set to the'"()&%<ScRiPt >prompt(922589)</ScRiPt>
Request headers
GET /search.aspx?txtSearch=the'%22()%26%25<ScRiPt%20>prompt(922589)</ScRiPt> HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:58:32 GMT
/subscribe.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input txtEmail was set to sample%40email.tst<ScRiPt >prompt(966807)</ScRiPt>
The input is reflected inside a text element.
Request headers
POST /subscribe.aspx HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 83
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Subscribe&txtEmail=sample%2540email.tst<ScRiPt%20>prompt(966807)</ScRiPt>
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:37 GMT
20
Directory traversal
Severity
High
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Directory_Traversal.script)
Description
This script is possibly vulnerable to directory traversal attacks.
Directory Traversal is a vulnerability which allows attackers to access restricted directories and execute commands
outside of the web server's root directory.
Impact
By exploiting directory traversal vulnerabilities, attackers step out of the root directory and access files in other
directories. As a result, attackers might view restricted files or execute commands, leading to a full compromise of the
Web server.
Recommendation
References
Acunetix Directory Traversal Attacks
Affected items
/default.aspx
Details
URL encoded GET input content was set to ../../../../../../../../../../windows/win.ini%00.htm
File contents found: ; for 16-bit app support
Request headers
GET /default.aspx?content=../../../../../../../../../../windows/win.ini%00.htm HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:00:38 GMT
21
DOM-based cross site scripting

Severity
High
Type
Validation
Reported by module DeepScan
Description
This script is possibly vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.
Cross site scripting (also referred to as XSS) is a vulnerability that allows an attacker to send malicious code (usually in
the form of Javascript) to another user. Because a browser cannot know if the script should be trusted or not, it will
execute the script in the user context allowing the attacker to access any cookies or session tokens retained by the
browser.
While a traditional cross-site scripting vulnerability occurs on the server-side code, document object model based
cross-site scripting is a type of vulnerability which affects the script code in the client's browser.
Impact
Malicious users may inject JavaScript, VBScript, ActiveX, HTML or Flash into a vulnerable application to fool a user in
order to gather data from them. An attacker can steal the session cookie and take over the account, impersonating the
user. It is also possible to modify the content of the page presented to the user.
Recommendation
References
OWASP Cross Site Scripting
How To: Prevent Cross-Site Scripting in ASP.NET
OWASP PHP Top 5
Cross site scripting
XSS Annihilation
The Cross Site Scripting Faq
VIDEO: How Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Works
Acunetix Cross Site Scripting Attack
XSS Filter Evasion Cheat Sheet
Quote from The Cross Site Scripting FAQ - http://www.cgisecurity.com/articles/xss-faq.shtml
Introduction
Websites today are more complex than ever, containing a lot of dynamic content making the experience for the user
more enjoyable. Dynamic content is achieved through the use of web applications which can deliver different output to a
user depending on their settings and needs. Dynamic websites suffer from a threat that static websites don't, called
"Cross Site Scripting" (or XSS dubbed by other security professionals). Currently small informational tidbits about Cross
Site Scripting holes exist but none really explain them to an average person or administrator. This FAQ was written to
provide a better understanding of this emerging threat, and to give guidance on detection and prevention.
"What is Cross Site Scripting?"
Cross site scripting (also known as XSS) occurs when a web application gathers malicious data from a user. The data is
usually gathered in the form of a hyperlink which contains malicious content within it. The user will most likely click on this
link from another website, instant message, or simply just reading a web board or email message. Usually the attacker
will encode the malicious portion of the link to the site in HEX (or other encoding methods) so the request is less
suspicious looking to the user when clicked on. After the data is collected by the web application, it creates an output
page for the user containing the malicious data that was originally sent to it, but in a manner to make it appear as valid
content from the website. Many popular guestbook and forum programs allow users to submit posts with html and
javascript embedded in them. If for example I was logged in as "john" and read a message by "joe" that contained
malicious javascript in it, then it may be possible for "joe" to hijack my session just by reading his bulletin board post.
Further details on how attacks like this are accomplished via "cookie theft" are explained in detail below.
"What does XSS and CSS mean?"
22
Often people refer to Cross Site Scripting as CSS. There has been a lot of confusion with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
and cross site scripting. Some security people refer to Cross Site Scripting as XSS. If you hear someone say "I found a
XSS hole", they are talking about Cross Site Scripting for certain.
"What are the threats of Cross Site Scripting?"
Often attackers will inject JavaScript, VBScript, ActiveX, HTML, or Flash into a vulnerable application to fool a user (Read
below for further details) in order to gather data from them. Everything from account hijacking, changing of user settings,
cookie theft/poisoning, or false advertising is possible. New malicious uses are being found every day for XSS attacks.
The post below by Brett Moore brings up a good point with regard to "Denial Of Service", and potential "auto-attacking" of
hosts if a user simply reads a post on a message board.
"What can I do to protect myself as a vendor?"
This is a simple answer. Never trust user input and always filter metacharacters. This will eliminate the majority of XSS
attacks. Converting < and > to < and > is also suggested when it comes to script output. Remember XSS holes can
be damaging and costly to your business if abused. Often attackers will disclose these holes to the public, which can
erode customer and public confidence in the security and privacy of your organization's site. Filtering < and > alone will
not solve all cross site scripting attacks and it is suggested you also attempt to filter out ( and ) by translating them to
( and ), and also # and & by translating them to &#35 (#) and &#38 (&).
"What can I do to protect myself as a user?"
The easiest way to protect yourself as a user is to only follow links from the main website you wish to view. If you visit
one website and it links to CNN for example, instead of clicking on it visit CNN's main site and use its search engine to
find the content. This will probably eliminate ninety percent of the problem. Sometimes XSS can be executed
automatically when you open an email, email attachment, read a guestbook, or bulletin board post. If you plan on
opening an email, or reading a post on a public board from a person you don't know BE CAREFUL. One of the best ways
to protect yourself is to turn off Javascript in your browser settings. In IE turn your security settings to high. This can
prevent cookie theft, and in general is a safer thing to do.
"How common are XSS holes?"
Cross site scripting holes are gaining popularity among hackers as easy holes to find in large websites. Websites from
FBI.gov, CNN.com, Time.com, Ebay, Yahoo, Apple computer, Microsoft, Zdnet, Wired, and Newsbytes have all had one
form or another of XSS bugs.
Every month roughly 10-25 XSS holes are found in commercial products and advisories are published explaining the
threat.
"Does encryption protect me?"
Websites that use SSL (https) are in no way more protected than websites that are not encrypted. The web applications
work the same way as before, except the attack is taking place in an encrypted connection. People often think that
because they see the lock on their browser it means everything is secure. This just isn't the case.
"Can XSS holes allow command execution?"
XSS holes can allow Javascript insertion, which may allow for limited execution. If an attacker were to exploit a browser
flaw (browser hole) it could then be possible to execute commands on the client's side. If command execution were
possible it would only be possible on the client side. In simple terms XSS holes can be used to help exploit other holes
that may exist in your browser.
"What if I don't feel like fixing a CSS/XSS Hole?"
By not fixing an XSS hole this could allow possible user account compromise in portions of your site as they get added or
updated. Cross Site Scripting has been found in various large sites recently and have been widely publicized. Left
unrepaired, someone may discover it and publish a warning about your company. This may damage your company's
reputation, depicting it as being lax on security matters. This of course also sends the message to your clients that you
aren't dealing with every problem that arises, which turns into a trust issue. If your client doesn't trust you why would they
wish to do business with you?
Affected items
23
/disclaimer.htm
Details
Source: Location
Location:
http://demo.testfire.net/disclaimer.htm?wvstest=javascript:domxssExecutionSink(1,"<br>()locxss")url=javascript:domxss
ExecutionSink(1,"<br>()locxss")&
Execution Sink: document.write
HTML code written: javascript:domxssExecutionSink(1,"<br>()locxss")& ... Stack Trace: at
http://demo.testfire.net/disclaimer.htm?wvstest=javascript:domxssExecutionSink(1,%22%3Cbr%3E()locxss%22)url=java
script:domxssExecutionSink(1,%22%3Cbr%3E()locxss%22)&:34
24
Microsoft IIS tilde directory enumeration

Severity
High
Type
Configuration
Reported by module Scripting (IIS_Tilde_Dir_Enumeration.script)
Description
It is possible to detect short names of files and directories which have an 8.3 file naming scheme equivalent in Windows
by using some vectors in several versions of Microsoft IIS. For instance, it is possible to detect all short-names of ".aspx"
files as they have 4 letters in their extensions. This can be a major issue especially for the .Net websites which are
vulnerable to direct URL access as an attacker can find important files and folders that they are not normally visible.
Impact
Possible sensitive information disclosure.
Recommendation
Consult the "Prevention Technique(s)" section from Soroush Dalili's paper on this subject. A link to this paper is listed in
the Web references section below.
References
Windows Short (8.3) Filenames - A Security Nightmare?
Microsoft IIS Shortname Scanner PoC
Affected items
/
Details
No details are available.
Request headers
GET //*~1*/a.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/ HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:11:36 GMT
25
SQL injection
Severity
High
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Sql_Injection.script)
Description
This script is possibly vulnerable to SQL Injection attacks.
SQL injection is a vulnerability that allows an attacker to alter back-end SQL statements by manipulating the user input.
An SQL injection occurs when web applications accept user input that is directly placed into a SQL statement and doesn't
properly filter out dangerous characters.
This is one of the most common application layer attacks currently being used on the Internet. Despite the fact that it is
relatively easy to protect against, there is a large number of web applications vulnerable.
Impact
An attacker may execute arbitrary SQL statements on the vulnerable system. This may compromise the integrity of your
database and/or expose sensitive information.
Depending on the back-end database in use, SQL injection vulnerabilities lead to varying levels of data/system access
for the attacker. It may be possible to not only manipulate existing queries, but to UNION in arbitrary data, use sub
selects, or append additional queries. In some cases, it may be possible to read in or write out to files, or to execute shell
commands on the underlying operating system.
Certain SQL Servers such as Microsoft SQL Server contain stored and extended procedures (database server
functions). If an attacker can obtain access to these procedures it may be possible to compromise the entire machine.
Recommendation
Check detailed information for more information about fixing this vulnerability.
References
Acunetix SQL Injection Attack
VIDEO: SQL Injection tutorial
OWASP Injection Flaws
How to check for SQL injection vulnerabilities
SQL Injection Walkthrough
OWASP PHP Top 5
Quote from SQL Injection Attacks by Example - http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/sql-injection.html
SQL injection mitigations
We believe that web application developers often simply do not think about "surprise inputs", but security people do
(including the bad guys), so there are three broad approaches that can be applied here.
Sanitize the input
It's absolutely vital to sanitize user inputs to insure that they do not contain dangerous codes, whether to the SQL server
or to HTML itself. One's first idea is to strip out "bad stuff", such as quotes or semicolons or escapes, but this is a
misguided attempt. Though it's easy to point out some dangerous characters, it's harder to point to all of them.
The language of the web is full of special characters and strange markup (including alternate ways of representing the
same characters), and efforts to authoritatively identify all "bad stuff" are unlikely to be successful.
Instead, rather than "remove known bad data", it's better to "remove everything but known good data": this distinction is
crucial. Since - in our example - an email address can contain only these characters:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
26
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
0123456789
@.-_+
There is really no benefit in allowing characters that could not be valid, and rejecting them early - presumably with an
error message - not only helps forestall SQL Injection, but also catches mere typos early rather than stores them into the
database.
Be aware that "sanitizing the input" doesn't mean merely "remove the quotes", because even "regular" characters can be
troublesome. In an example where an integer ID value is being compared against the user input (say, a numeric PIN):
SELECT fieldlist
FROM table
WHERE id = 23 OR 1=1; -- Boom! Always matches!
In practice, however, this approach is highly limited because there are so few fields for which it's possible to outright
exclude many of the dangerous characters. For "dates" or "email addresses" or "integers" it may have merit, but for any
kind of real application, one simply cannot avoid the other mitigations.
Escape/Quotesafe the input
Even if one might be able to sanitize a phone number or email address, one cannot take this approach with a "name"
field lest one wishes to exclude the likes of Bill O'Reilly from one's application: a quote is simply a valid character for this
field.
One includes an actual single quote in an SQL string by putting two of them together, so this suggests the obvious - but
wrong! - technique of preprocessing every string to replicate the single quotes:
SELECT fieldlist
FROM customers
WHERE name = 'Bill O''Reilly'; -- works OK
However, this naive approach can be beaten because most databases support other string escape mechanisms.
MySQL, for instance, also permits \' to escape a quote, so after input of \'; DROP TABLE users; -- is "protected" by
doubling the quotes, we get:
SELECT fieldlist
FROM customers
WHERE name = '\''; DROP TABLE users; --'; -- Boom!
The expression '\'' is a complete string (containing just one single quote), and the usual SQL shenanigans follow. It
doesn't stop with backslashes either: there is Unicode, other encodings, and parsing oddities all hiding in the weeds to
trip up the application designer.
Getting quotes right is notoriously difficult, which is why many database interface languages provide a function that does
it for you. When the same internal code is used for "string quoting" and "string parsing", it's much more likely that the
process will be done properly and safely.
Some examples are the MySQL function mysql_real_escape_string() and perl DBD method $dbh->quote($value). These
methods must be used.
Use bound parameters (the PREPARE statement)
Though quotesafing is a good mechanism, we're still in the area of "considering user input as SQL", and a much better
approach exists: bound parameters, which are supported by essentially all database programming interfaces. In this
technique, an SQL statement string is created with placeholders - a question mark for each parameter - and it's compiled
("prepared", in SQL parlance) into an internal form. Later, this prepared query is "executed" with a list of parameters:
Example in perl
$sth = $dbh->prepare("SELECT email, userid FROM members WHERE email = ?;");
$sth->execute($email);
27
Thanks to Stefan Wagner, this demonstrates bound parameters in Java:

Insecure version
Statement s = connection.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery("SELECT email FROM member WHERE name = "
+ formField); // *boom*
Secure version
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT email FROM member WHERE name = ?");
ps.setString(1, formField);
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
Here, $email is the data obtained from the user's form, and it is passed as positional parameter #1 (the first question
mark), and at no point do the contents of this variable have anything to do with SQL statement parsing. Quotes,
semicolons, backslashes, SQL comment notation - none of this has any impact, because it's "just data". There simply is
nothing to subvert, so the application is be largely immune to SQL injection attacks.
There also may be some performance benefits if this prepared query is reused multiple times (it only has to be parsed
once), but this is minor compared to the enormous security benefits. This is probably the single most important step one
can take to secure a web application.
Limit database permissions and segregate users
In the case at hand, we observed just two interactions that are made not in the context of a logged-in user: "log in" and
"send me password". The web application ought to use a database connection with the most limited rights possible:
query-only access to the members table, and no access to any other table.
The effect here is that even a "successful" SQL injection attack is going to have much more limited success. Here, we'd
not have been able to do the UPDATE request that ultimately granted us access, so we'd have had to resort to other
avenues.
Once the web application determined that a set of valid credentials had been passed via the login form, it would then
switch that session to a database connection with more rights.
It should go almost without saying that sa rights should never be used for any web-based application.
Use stored procedures for database access
When the database server supports them, use stored procedures for performing access on the application's behalf,
which can eliminate SQL entirely (assuming the stored procedures themselves are written properly).
By encapsulating the rules for a certain action - query, update, delete, etc. - into a single procedure, it can be tested and
documented on a standalone basis and business rules enforced (for instance, the "add new order" procedure might
reject that order if the customer were over his credit limit).
For simple queries this might be only a minor benefit, but as the operations become more complicated (or are used in
more than one place), having a single definition for the operation means it's going to be more robust and easier to
maintain.
Note: it's always possible to write a stored procedure that itself constructs a query dynamically: this provides no
protection against SQL Injection - it's only proper binding with prepare/execute or direct SQL statements with bound
variables that provide this protection.
Isolate the webserver
Even having taken all these mitigation steps, it's nevertheless still possible to miss something and leave the server open
to compromise. One ought to design the network infrastructure to assume that the bad guy will have full administrator
access to the machine, and then attempt to limit how that can be leveraged to compromise other things.
For instance, putting the machine in a DMZ with extremely limited pinholes "inside" the network means that even getting
complete control of the webserver doesn't automatically grant full access to everything else. This won't stop everything,
of course, but it makes it a lot harder.
28
Configure error reporting

The default error reporting for some frameworks includes developer debugging information, and this cannot be shown to
outside users. Imagine how much easier a time it makes for an attacker if the full query is shown, pointing to the syntax
error involved.
This information is useful to developers, but it should be restricted - if possible - to just internal users.
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input passw was set to 1'"
Error message found: Syntax error in string in query expression
Request headers
Content-Length: 33
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=1'%22&uid=1
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:58:55 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input uid was set to 1'"
Request headers
Content-Length: 48
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
29
btnSubmit=Login&passw=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&uid=1'%22
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:08 GMT
Connection: close
/subscribe.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input txtEmail was set to 1'"
Request headers
Content-Length: 34
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Subscribe&txtEmail=1'%22
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:38 GMT
Connection: close
30
Application error message

Severity
Medium
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Error_Message.script)
Description
This page contains an error/warning message that may disclose sensitive information. The message can also contain the
location of the file that produced the unhandled exception.
This may be a false positive if the error message is found in documentation pages.
Impact
The error messages may disclose sensitive information. This information can be used to launch further attacks.
Recommendation
Review the source code for this script.
References
PHP Runtime Configuration
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input passw was set to 12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'
Error message found: System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Syntax error (missing operator) in query expression
'username = '1' AND password = '12345'"\'\")'.
Request headers
Content-Length: 63
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'&uid=1
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:58:46 GMT
Connection: close
31
/bank/login.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input uid was set to 12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'
'username = '12345'"\'\")'.
Request headers
Content-Length: 78
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&uid=12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:58:48 GMT
Connection: close
/subscribe.aspx
Details
URL encoded POST input txtEmail was set to 12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'
''12345'"\'\"'.
Request headers
Content-Length: 64
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Subscribe&txtEmail=12345'"\'\");|]*{%0d%0a<%00>%bf%27'
Response headers
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
32
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:59:06 GMT
Connection: close
33
Basic authentication over HTTP

Severity
Medium
Type
Configuration
Reported by module Scripting (Basic_Auth_Over_HTTP.script)
Description
In the context of an HTTP transaction, basic access authentication is a method for an HTTP user agent to provide a user
name and password when making a request.
This directory is protected using Basic Authentication over an HTTP connection. With Basic Authentication the user
credentials are sent as cleartext and because HTTPS is not used, they are vulnerable to packet sniffing.
Impact
User credentials are sent as cleartext and are vulnerable to packet sniffing.
Recommendation
Use Basic Authentication over an HTTPS connection.
References
Basic access authentication
Affected items
/bank/members/
Details
34
Directory listing
Severity
Medium
Type
Information
Reported by module Scripting (Directory_Listing.script)
Description
The web server is configured to display the list of files contained in this directory. This is not recommended because the
directory may contain files that are not normally exposed through links on the web site.
Impact
A user can view a list of all files from this directory possibly exposing sensitive information.
Recommendation
You should make sure the directory does not contain sensitive information or you may want to restrict directory listings
from the web server configuration.
References
Directory Listing and Information Disclosure
How to disable directory listings
- The easiest way to disable directory listing is to create an index file. The name of the index file depends on the web
server configuration. On Apache is called index.htm, index.html. On IIS is named default.asp, default.aspx, default.htm.
- On IIS directory listings are disabled by default.
- For Apache you need to edit the Apache configuration file (usually named httpd.conf) or create an .htaccess file. In the
configuration file you will have the definition of the directory. Something like
<Directory /directoryname/subdirectory>
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
...
</Directory>
To disable directory listing for that directory you need to remove the 'Indexes' option.
Affected items
/bank
Details
Pattern found: <A HREF="/">[To Parent Directory]</A>
Request headers
GET /bank/ HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Acunetix-Aspect-Password: *****
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
35
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:39 GMT
/pr
Details
Pattern found: <A HREF="/">[To Parent Directory]</A>
Request headers
GET /pr/ HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/pr/
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:41 GMT
Content-Length: 517
36
HTML form without CSRF protection

Severity
Medium
Type
Informational
Reported by module Crawler
Description
This alert may be a false positive, manual confirmation is required.
Cross-site request forgery, also known as a one-click attack or session riding and abbreviated as CSRF or XSRF, is a
type of malicious exploit of a website whereby unauthorized commands are transmitted from a user that the website
trusts.
Acunetix WVS found a HTML form with no apparent CSRF protection implemented. Consult details for more information
about the affected HTML form.
Impact
An attacker may force the users of a web application to execute actions of the attacker''s choosing. A successful CSRF
exploit can compromise end user data and operation in case of normal user. If the targeted end user is the administrator
account, this can compromise the entire web application.
Recommendation
Check if this form requires CSRF protection and implement CSRF countermeasures if necessary.
Affected items
/
Details
Form name: <empty>
Form action: http://demo.testfire.net/search.aspx
Form method: GET
Form inputs:
- txtSearch [Text]
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
37
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT

/bank/login.aspx
Details
Form name: login
Form action: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/login.aspx
Form method: POST
Form inputs:
- uid [Text]
- passw [Password]
- btnSubmit [Submit]
Request headers
GET /bank/login.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
/feedback.aspx
Details
Form name: cmt
Form action: http://demo.testfire.net/comment.aspx
Form method: POST
Form inputs:
- cfile [Hidden]
- name [Text]
- email_addr [Text]
- subject [Text]
- comments [TextArea]
- submit [Submit]
Request headers
GET /feedback.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
38

Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
/subscribe.aspx
Details
Form name: subscribe
Form action: http://demo.testfire.net/subscribe.aspx
Form method: POST
Form inputs:
- txtEmail [Text]
Request headers
GET /subscribe.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/subscribe.swf
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:40 GMT
39
User credentials are sent in clear text

Severity
Medium
Type
Configuration
Description
User credentials are transmitted over an unencrypted channel. This information should always be transferred via an
encrypted channel (HTTPS) to avoid being intercepted by malicious users.
Impact
A third party may be able to read the user credentials by intercepting an unencrypted HTTP connection.
Recommendation
Because user credentials are considered sensitive information, should always be transferred to the server over an
encrypted connection (HTTPS).
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
Form name: login
Form action: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/login.aspx
Form method: POST
Form inputs:
- uid [Text]
- passw [Password]
Request headers
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
40
ASP.NET debugging enabled

Severity
Low
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (ASP-NET_Debugging_Enabled.script)
Description
ASP.NET debugging is enabled on this application. It is recommended to disable debug mode before deploying a
production application. By default, debugging is disabled, and although debugging is frequently enabled to troubleshoot a
problem, it is also frequently not disabled again after the problem is resolved.
Impact
It may be possible to disclose sensitive information about the web sever the ASP.NET application.
Recommendation
Check References for details on how to fix this problem.
References
HOW TO: Disable Debugging for ASP.NET Applications
Affected items
/
Details
Request headers
DEBUG /acunetix_invalid_filename.aspx HTTP/1.1
Command: stop-debug
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:11:21 GMT
/bank
Details
Request headers
DEBUG /bank/acunetix_invalid_filename.aspx HTTP/1.1
Command: stop-debug
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
41

Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:11:26 GMT
42
Clickjacking: X-Frame-Options header missing

Severity
Low
Type
Configuration
Reported by module Scripting (Clickjacking_X_Frame_Options.script)
Description
Clickjacking (User Interface redress attack, UI redress attack, UI redressing) is a malicious technique of tricking a Web
user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives they are clicking on, thus potentially revealing
confidential information or taking control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous web pages.
The server didn't return an X-Frame-Options header which means that this website could be at risk of a clickjacking
attack. The X-Frame-Options HTTP response header can be used to indicate whether or not a browser should be
allowed to render a page in a <frame> or <iframe>. Sites can use this to avoid clickjacking attacks, by ensuring that their
content is not embedded into other sites.
Impact
The impact depends on the affected web application.
Recommendation
Configure your web server to include an X-Frame-Options header. Consult Web references for more information about
the possible values for this header.
References
Clickjacking
Original Clickjacking paper
The X-Frame-Options response header
Affected items
Web Server
Details
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
43
Login page password-guessing attack

Severity
Low
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Html_Authentication_Audit.script)
Description
A common threat web developers face is a password-guessing attack known as a brute force attack. A brute-force attack
is an attempt to discover a password by systematically trying every possible combination of letters, numbers, and
symbols until you discover the one correct combination that works.
This login page doesn't have any protection against password-guessing attacks (brute force attacks). It's recommended
to implement some type of account lockout after a defined number of incorrect password attempts. Consult Web
references for more information about fixing this problem.
Impact
An attacker may attempt to discover a weak password by systematically trying every possible combination of letters,
numbers, and symbols until it discovers the one correct combination that works.
Recommendation
It's recommended to implement some type of account lockout after a defined number of incorrect password attempts.
References
Blocking Brute Force Attacks
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
The scanner tested 10 invalid credentials and no account lockout was detected.
Request headers
Content-Length: 43
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=RmFCk2Qy&uid=0RRo7K98
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Set-Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=0kz1qgrv53cxgz45qoaa1hrv; path=/; HttpOnly
Set-Cookie: amSessionId=15853163765; path=/
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:58:52 GMT
44
OPTIONS method is enabled

Severity
Low
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Options_Server_Method.script)
Description
HTTP OPTIONS method is enabled on this web server. The OPTIONS method provides a list of the methods that are
supported by the web server, it represents a request for information about the communication options available on the
request/response chain identified by the Request-URI.
Impact
The OPTIONS method may expose sensitive information that may help an malicious user to prepare more advanced
attacks.
Recommendation
It's recommended to disable OPTIONS Method on the web server.
References
Testing for HTTP Methods and XST (OWASP-CM-008)
Affected items
Web Server
Details
Methods allowed: OPTIONS, TRACE, GET, HEAD, POST
Request headers
OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Allow: OPTIONS, TRACE, GET, HEAD, POST
Public: OPTIONS, TRACE, GET, HEAD, POST
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
Content-Length: 0
45
Possible sensitive directories

Severity
Low
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Possible_Sensitive_Directories.script)
Description
A possible sensitive directory has been found. This directory is not directly linked from the website.This check looks for
common sensitive resources like backup directories, database dumps, administration pages, temporary directories. Each
one of these directories could help an attacker to learn more about his target.
Impact
This directory may expose sensitive information that could help a malicious user to prepare more advanced attacks.
Recommendation
Restrict access to this directory or remove it from the website.
References
Web Server Security and Database Server Security
Affected items
/admin
Details
Request headers
GET /admin HTTP/1.1
Accept: acunetix/wvs
Range: bytes=0-99999
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http://demo.testfire.net/admin/
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:11:33 GMT
Content-Length: 154
46
Possible sensitive files

Severity
Low
Type
Validation
Reported by module Scripting (Possible_Sensitive_Files.script)
Description
A possible sensitive file has been found. This file is not directly linked from the website. This check looks for common
sensitive resources like password files, configuration files, log files, include files, statistics data, database dumps. Each
one of these files could help an attacker to learn more about his target.
Impact
This file may expose sensitive information that could help a malicious user to prepare more advanced attacks.
Recommendation
Restrict access to this file or remove it from the website.
References
Web Server Security and Database Server Security
Affected items
/test.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /test.aspx HTTP/1.1
Accept: acunetix/wvs
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 558
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:12:09 GMT
47
Session Cookie without HttpOnly flag set

Severity
Low
Type
Informational
Description
This cookie does not have the HTTPOnly flag set. When a cookie is set with the HTTPOnly flag, it instructs the browser
that the cookie can only be accessed by the server and not by client-side scripts. This is an important security protection
for session cookies.
Impact
None
Recommendation
If possible, you should set the HTTPOnly flag for this cookie.
Affected items
/
Details
Cookie name: "amSessionId"
Cookie domain: "demo.testfire.net"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "amCreditOffer"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
48

Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "amUserId"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "lang"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
49

Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
50
Session Cookie without Secure flag set

Severity
Low
Type
Informational
Description
This cookie does not have the Secure flag set. When a cookie is set with the Secure flag, it instructs the browser that the
cookie can only be accessed over secure SSL channels. This is an important security protection for session cookies.
Impact
None
Recommendation
If possible, you should set the Secure flag for this cookie.
Affected items
/
Details
Cookie name: "amUserId"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "amSessionId"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
51
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "amCreditOffer"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "lang"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
52
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
/
Details
Cookie name: "ASP.NET_SessionId"
Request headers
GET / HTTP/1.1
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT
53
Broken links
Severity
Informational
Type
Informational
Description
A broken link refers to any link that should take you to a document, image or webpage, that actually results in an error.
This page was linked from the website but it is inaccessible.
Impact
Problems navigating the site.
Recommendation
Remove the links to this file or make it accessible.
Affected items
/bank/account.aspx.cs
Details
For a complete list of URLs linking to this file, go to Site Structure > Locate and select the file (marked as "Not Found") >
select Referrers Tab from the bottom of the Information pane.
Request headers
GET /bank/account.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:44 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/apply.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/apply.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
54
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/bank.master
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/bank.master HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/bank.master.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/bank.master.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
55
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/customize.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/customize.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:44 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/login.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/login.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
56
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/logout.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/logout.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/main.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/main.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
57
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/queryxpath.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/queryxpath.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:44 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/transaction.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/transaction.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
58

Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:44 GMT
Connection: close
/bank/transfer.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/transfer.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:44 GMT
Connection: close
/inside_points_of_interest.htm
Details
Request headers
GET /inside_points_of_interest.htm HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/default.aspx
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
59
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:38 GMT
60
Email address found

Severity
Informational
Type
Informational
Reported by module Scripting (Text_Search_File.script)
Description
One or more email addresses have been found on this page. The majority of spam comes from email addresses
harvested off the internet. The spam-bots (also known as email harvesters and email extractors) are programs that scour
the internet looking for email addresses on any website they come across. Spambot programs look for strings like
myname@mydomain.com and then record any addresses found.
Impact
Email addresses posted on Web sites may attract spam.
Recommendation
Check references for details on how to solve this problem.
References
Email Address Disclosed on Website Can be Used for Spam
Affected items
/business_cards.htm
Details
Pattern found: skipfish@example.com
Request headers
GET /business_cards.htm HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Last-Modified: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:14:20 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "2a9b47b09db8d01:0"
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
Content-Length: 49
/cache.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /cache.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
61
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/callback.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /callback.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/files.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /files.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
62
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/header.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /header.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/home.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /home.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
63
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/index.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /index.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/info.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /info.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
64

Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/inside_about.htm
Details
Request headers
GET /inside_about.htm HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "c9acab5f9db8d01:0"
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
Content-Length: 49
/inside_investor.htm
Details
Request headers
GET /inside_investor.htm HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
65

Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "6bf554609db8d01:0"
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
Content-Length: 49
/log.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /log.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/login.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /login.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
66
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/orders.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /orders.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
/robots.txt
Details
Request headers
GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
67
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
ETag: "33a33b7a9db8d01:0"
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:34 GMT
Content-Length: 49
/security.htm
Details
Request headers
GET /security.htm HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "10c892339eb8d01:0"
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
Content-Length: 49
/signup.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /signup.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
68
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
69
GHDB: Typical login page

Severity
Informational
Type
Informational
Reported by module GHDB
Description
The description for this alert is contributed by the GHDB community, it may contain inappropriate language.
Category : Pages containing login portals
This is a typical login page. It has recently become a target for SQL injection. Comsec's article at
http://www.governmentsecurity.org/articles/SQLinjectionBasicTutorial.php brought this to my attention.
The Google Hacking Database (GHDB) appears courtesy of the Google Hacking community.
Impact
Not available. Check description.
Recommendation
Not available. Check description.
References
The Google Hacking Database (GHDB) community
Acunetix Google hacking
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
We found inurl:login.asp
Request headers
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
70
/bank/login.aspx (825f8b5076aa7df703fc45c8fed863e5)
Details
Request headers
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/login.aspx
Content-Length: 44
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
btnSubmit=Login&passw=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&uid=1
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:39 GMT
/bank/login.aspx.cs
Details
Request headers
GET /bank/login.aspx.cs HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:43 GMT
71
Connection: close
/login.aspx
Details
Request headers
GET /login.aspx HTTP/1.1
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 49
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:17:42 GMT
72
Password type input with auto-complete enabled

Severity
Informational
Type
Informational
Description
When a new name and password is entered in a form and the form is submitted, the browser asks if the password
should be saved.Thereafter when the form is displayed, the name and password are filled in automatically or are
completed as the name is entered. An attacker with local access could obtain the cleartext password from the browser
cache.
Impact
Possible sensitive information disclosure.
Recommendation
The password auto-complete should be disabled in sensitive applications.
To disable auto-complete, you may use a code similar to:
<INPUT TYPE="password" AUTOCOMPLETE="off">
Affected items
/bank/login.aspx
Details
Password type input named passw from form named login with action login.aspx has autocomplete enabled.
Request headers
Pragma: no-cache
Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36
Accept: */*
Response headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:36 GMT
73
Scanned items (coverage report)

Scanned 61 URLs. Found 39 vulnerable.
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/
Vulnerabilities has been identified for this URL
6 input(s) found for this URL
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
/
/
Input type
Path Fragment (suffix .aspx)
Input scheme 2
Input name
/
Input type
Input scheme 3
Input name
/
Input type
Path Fragment (suffix /)
Input scheme 4
Input name
/
Input type
Path Fragment (suffix .htm)
Input scheme 5
Input name
Host
Input type
HTTP Header
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/search.aspx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
txtSearch
Input type
URL encoded GET
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/style.css
No vulnerabilities has been identified for this URL
No input(s) found for this URL
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/default.aspx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
content
Input type
URL encoded GET
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/feedback.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/
74
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/login.aspx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
btnSubmit
passw
uid
Input type
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/ws.asmx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
op
Input scheme 2
Input name
Input type
URL encoded GET
Input type
URL encoded GET
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/members/
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/main.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/apply.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/logout.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/mozxpath.js
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/bank.master
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/login.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/20060308_bak/
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/main.aspx.cs
75
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/account.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/transfer.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/apply.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/bank.master.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/customize.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/logout.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/account.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/queryxpath.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/transfer.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/transaction.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/servererror.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/customize.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/queryxpath.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/bank/transaction.aspx.cs
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/images/
76
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/survey_questions.aspx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
step
Input type
URL encoded GET
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/robots.txt
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/subscribe.swf
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/disclaimer.htm
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
url
Input type
URL encoded GET
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/inside_points_of_interest.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/pr/
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/pr/docs.xml
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/retirement.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/comment.aspx
Inputs
Input scheme 1
Input name
cfile
comments
email_addr
name
subject
submit
Input type
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/subscribe.aspx
Inputs
77
Input scheme 1
Input name
btnSubmit
txtEmail
Input type
URL encoded POST
URL encoded POST
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/comments.txt
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/inside_about.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/inside_investor.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/business_cards.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/security.htm
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/admin/
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/test.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/cache.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/callback.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/files.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/header.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/home.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/index.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/info.aspx
78
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/log.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/login.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/orders.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/signup.aspx
URL: http://demo.testfire.net/static/
79

Executive Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Executive Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Executive Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Acunetix Website Audit

Generated by Acunetix WVS Reporter (v9.5 Build 20140505)

Acunetix Website Audit

Cross site scripting (verified)

DOM-based cross site scripting

Microsoft IIS tilde directory enumeration

Application error message

Basic authentication over HTTP

HTML form without CSRF protection

User credentials are sent in clear text

ASP.NET debugging enabled

Acunetix Website Audit

Clickjacking: X-Frame-Options header missing

Login page password-guessing attack

OPTIONS method is enabled

Possible sensitive directories

Acunetix Website Audit

Possible sensitive files

Session Cookie without HttpOnly flag set

Session Cookie without Secure flag set

Acunetix Website Audit

Email address found

Acunetix Website Audit

GHDB: Typical login page

Password type input with auto-complete enabled

Acunetix Website Audit

$sth = $dbh->prepare("SELECT email, userid FROM members WHERE email = ?;");

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

Cross site scripting (verified)

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

DOM-based cross site scripting

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

Microsoft IIS tilde directory enumeration

Acunetix Website Audit

Thanks to Stefan Wagner, this demonstrates bound parameters in Java:

Configure error reporting

Acunetix Website Audit

Application error message

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

Basic authentication over HTTP

Acunetix Website Audit

Acunetix Website Audit

HTML form without CSRF protection

Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:57:33 GMT

Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=rx35k455p05mwieaeevyb445; amSessionId=15731163468

Acunetix Website Audit

User credentials are sent in clear text

Acunetix Website Audit

ASP.NET debugging enabled

Acunetix-Scanning-agreement: Third Party Scanning PROHIBITED

Acunetix Website Audit

Clickjacking: X-Frame-Options header missing

Acunetix Website Audit

Login page password-guessing attack