A Quantitative Test of Jones NTC Beaming Theory Using CLUSTER Constellation
A Quantitative Test of Jones NTC Beaming Theory Using CLUSTER Constellation
A Quantitative Test of Jones NTC Beaming Theory Using CLUSTER Constellation
Annales
Geophysicae
Received: 29 March 2006 Revised: 8 January 2007 Accepted: 13 February 2007 Published: 29 March 2007
Introduction
824
Frequency (kHz)
50
40
06:55:02
07:00:36
07:05:21
07:10:10
07:14:53
dB
80
0
60
50
60
0
40
40
0
30
20
20
0
10
22
UT 06:35
R(Re) 4.49
Lat() -11.67
06:45
4.42
-5.68
06:55
4.38
0.46
07:05
4.35
6.70
07:15
4.33
13.01
MLT(h) 10.77
L
4.61
10.83
4.41
10.89
4.31
10.96
4.34
11.04
4.50
Fig. 1. Spectrograms of natural emissions observed on 26 September 2003 by the WHISPER instrument on board C3 satellite. Top:
Frequency/time positions of intensity maxima in the 4080 kHz
band. The lower maxima were suppressed (see text). Bottom:
Frequency/time spectrogram in the 280 kHz frequency band. The
white line indicates the position of local plasma frequency, and the
bar above the spectrogram shows the status of each spectrum (white:
data gap; black: clean spectrum; green: saturated spectrum).
1980). Thereafter the strong density gradient at the plasmapause causes these two ordinary mode waves, initially at the
local plasma frequency and propagating nearly parallel and
anti-parallel to the magnetic field, to be refracted outwards
to form two beams located symmetrically with respect to
the magnetic equator in the plane through the source containing the density gradient and the magnetic field. As they
propagate to regions of lower density the inclination angle
of these beams with respect to the magnetic equatorial approaches:
r
= atan Fce Fpe ,
(1)
where Fce (electron cyclotron frequency) and Fpe (electron
plasma frequency) are defined at the source.
Such a quantitative property is extremely useful because
it allows us to link a given NTC observation (position of the
observatory and frequency of the wave) to the locus of the positions of candidate sources, thus remotely sensing the topology of active regions. Promoting the linear radio window
theory, Jones (1983) developed the remote sensing approach,
and even treated the problem of sources in movement. As
long as the derived source positions and movement are realistic and in particular when the results agree with source
localisation derived from directivity measurements, the observations have supported the radio window conversion theory (see Jones et al., 1987, for a claim of validation of the
theory). However, other experimental observations suggest
that the simple single source two beams picture is too
Ann. Geophys., 25, 823831, 2007
2
2.1
Observations
CLUSTER constellation and data
Derived quantities
825
Frequency (kHz)
80
Whisper C3 26/09/2003
Modulation (%)
100.00
80.00
60
60.00
40.00
20.00
40
(a) Modulation in XY GSE plane
0.00
80
ak angle (deg)
180
154
60
108
72
40
36
6:35
6:45
6:55
7:05
7:15 UT
1998; Decreau et al., 2004). Figure 2 presents the frequency/time evolution of the two parameters which are derived from this process. The upper panel (a) displays the
modulation index m (ratio of modulated to total power) and
the lower panel (b) the directivity angle ak (angle between X
GSE axis and ray path direction, projected onto the XY GSE
plane, where GSE refers to the geocentric solar ecliptic system). Occurrences of the high modulation index (m>73%,
indicated by orange arrows) are visible on both sides of the
equator, between 57 and 62 kHz in the Southern Hemisphere
and between 57 and 77 kHz in the Northern Hemisphere.
They present a stratified structure, like the frequency peaks
in Fig. 1. The frequencies of the lines of the high modulation index correspond to those peaks in the spectral power.
Note that the frequency/time occurrence of a high modulation index does not correspond to any well-delimited region
with specific ak angles in Fig. 2b. In other words, the source
of the less modulated emissions appears to be located in the
same general direction as the source of the highly modulated
emission.
When more than one satellite is available, the projections
onto the spin planes of the various ray paths can be used
to estimate source positions by triangulation (Gough, 1982;
Decreau et al., 2004). If the source is stable with time, a single spacecraft can provide the information using ray paths at
different times (Morgan and Gurnett, 1991). Only a 2-D picture of directivity can be achieved from such measurements
in the XY GSE plane, as from CLUSTER. Figure 3 displays
the orbits of C2 and C4 projected into this plane. The source
directions for the emission at 70 kHz are drawn (in blue)
from C4 in the Southern Hemisphere and (in red) from C2
in the Northern Hemisphere. The other spacecraft provide
Ann. Geophys., 25, 823831, 2007
826
70 kHz
61.2 kHz
10
C1
C2
C3
C4
-5
Magnetic
-10
latitude (deg)
0
3
3.1
The first approach we have followed is to test the simple configuration proposed by Jones (1981), summarized in Sect. 1
and sketched in Fig. 4. The hypotheses used are:
Ann. Geophys., 25, 823831, 2007
10 20 0
20
40
Amplitude (10-7 Vrms.Hz-1/2)
A radio window is located in the equatorial plane of a dipolar magnetic field, in a smooth radial density gradient; and it
radiates two narrow beams inclined symmetrically with respect to the equatorial plane, at an angle satisfying Eq. (1).
A second important constraint, which we will call here
condition (2), is that the two principal ray paths are located
in the plane containing the local magnetic field B and the
density gradient vector N at the source. Actually, it is in
the frame of this second constraint that Eq. (1) is derived.
A third hypothesis is that N is along the local radial axis,
so that the ray paths are in the magnetic meridian plane, with
B being aligned along the Z axis.
Fourthly, the spacecraft making the observations are assumed to travel in this meridian.
The panels on the right of Fig. 4 display the electric field
amplitude at two frequencies, as determined on all four satellites, as a function of latitude in the solar magnetic (SM)
system, which is close to the simple dipole geometry of
the theory. At 70 kHz each satellite observed two maxima, one in each hemisphere, and a minimum near the magnetic equator. The amplitude peaks are almost equidistant
in magnetic latitude (3.94 0.5 ) from the magnetic equator
and, to a first approximation, the satellites really do observe
two beams symmetrically placed with respect to the equator.
Note that the amplitude seen by C3 has been capped above
2108 Vrms . Hz1/2 , to take account of amplifier saturation when C3 encounters intense electrostatic emission (as in
Fig. 1).
As indicated in Fig. 4, C1 is the first satellite of the constellation to cross the beams, while C4 is the last. The four
amplitude profiles are very similar, which indicates that the
structure did not evolve significantly between their observation by C1 and by C4, that is, a time delay of about 3.5 min.
The latitudinal width of the beam at half intensity, 5 , is
larger than the 2.25 latitudinal separation between C1 and
www.ann-geophys.net/25/823/2007/
827
Jones (1982) generalized the remote sensing approach by expressing a visibility equation defining the loci in MLT and
radial position of equatorial sources which would illuminate,
at the centre of their beam, a spacecraft at a given position.
This visibility equation incorporates the beaming condition
of Eq. (1) and the condition (2), but conditions (3) and (4)
are partially relaxed: the density gradient N at the source,
no longer necessarily in the meridian plane, remains coplanar with the satellite-source line and the magnetic field at the
source. The top two panels of Fig. 5 display such visibility
contours, which are the loci of source positions in the equatorial plane which have the CLUSTER satellites at the centre
of their 70 kHz beam, respectively, in the Northern (Fig. 5a)
and Southern (Fig. 5b) Hemispheres. The four visibility contours are almost identical, as expected for such small interspacecraft separations. The green cross represents the position of C3 projected onto the equatorial plane, and the dashed
black line the magnetic meridian plane at that position. The
source plane determined by direction finding at times of peak
amplitude can be used to locate the source on the visibility contour; unfortunately, near peak amplitude the directivity determination is relatively poor (5 ) and provides only
mediocre directional information. Nevertheless, the results
indicate that the sources are not in the meridian plane of the
spacecraft (10.9 MLT), but at a later local time (11.2 MLT)
for northern beam, and at an earlier one (10.8 MLT) for
southern beam, strongly suggesting the existence of two separate sources. This may be compared with Fig. 5d, which
shows latitude and longitude of C3 and C4 (which hide, respectively, C2 and C1) when these spacecraft were illuminated by NTC beams. The magnetic field vector measured
at the equator is shown as an orange arrow. The split of the
beams between two different local time sectors corroborates
their split into two different hemispheres; there is no overlapping in MLT range, and none in latitudinal range. The
Ann. Geophys., 25, 823831, 2007
828
YSM
YSM
(a)
(b)
XSM
XSM
YSM
(c)
(d)
XSM
829
The practical conclusion is that the source positions constrained by the two beaming conditions of the NTC radio window theory are compatible with our observations
(at 70 kHz, in this particular case), provided that multiple
sources are being seen on curved plasmapause surface and
located slightly above the equator.
4
830
3. Beaming
The two periods of signal intensification on opposite sides of the equator correspond to the satellites
crossing two spatial structures, that is, two NTC
beams bounded by either latitudinal or local time
boundaries,
at higher frequencies the observed NTC emission
showed clear, smooth enhancements on both sides
of the equator, but at lower frequencies more complicated variations (three or more signal intensifications) were observed south of the equator,
when the constellation is near the centre of one
of the beam structures, specific detailed spectral
signatures are observed simultaneously by all four
spacecraft.
4. Directivity
Directivity angles measured in the spin plane of
each spacecraft were, like the signal intensity,
mainly controlled by the position of observation
(relative to the stable beam structures), rather
than by the time of observation,
globally (over the entire frequency range) directivity angles varied gradually but significantly with
spacecraft position, in such a way that ray paths
point to a single apparent source region. We noted,
however, that when crossing the equatorial plane,
directivity angles changed by 20 , indicating a
global change of behaviour from south to north,
modulation indices confirmed the presence of narrow band frequency structures and that each of the
two (Southern and Northern) large-scale structures
exhibit different detailed features.
The implications of these observed properties as a test of the
radio window beaming theory can be summarized as follows:
1. At frequencies high enough for the double peak configuration to be clear, latitudinal beaming increases with decreasing frequency, as expected. The equatorial source
position derived quantitatively in the frame of the simple sketch of Jones beaming theory (equatorial source
and source-satellite line in the meridian plane) does not
match the position derived from triangulation.
2. The assumption of a single longitudinal beaming angle
from a single point source does not fit the observed directivity pattern. Compatibility with the radio window
theory would require at least a scenario with the source
region being an ensemble of small sources distributed
over an undulating plasmapause surface, hence widely
opening the longitudinal beaming angle.
Ann. Geophys., 25, 823831, 2007
3. Our refined estimation of source positions is compatible with triangulation results. We conclude that radio
window theory for NTC generation is compatible with
quantitative observed beaming properties.
This does not close the debate over which generation mechanism produces NTC radio emissions. The complex experimental context described above, as well as instrument limitations, do not allow us to constrain the source position within
a sufficiently small volume of space for the test to be conclusive. The radio window theory is as yet neither validated
nor invalidated. Further event studies, using different configurations of the CLUSTER constellation, may possibly provide more of a conclusive test. In addition, other points of
the radio-window theory, such as its efficiency, need to be
discussed, and other generation mechanisms also need to be
tested against the Cluster data.
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the teams at ESOC
(Darmstadt), JSOC and Sheffield (UK) for their constant support
of CLUSTER operations.
Topical Editor I. A. Daglis thanks M. P. Gough and O. Santolik
for their help in evaluating this paper.
References
Barbosa, D. D.: Low-level VLF and LF radio emissions observed
at earth and Jupiter, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 316334,
1982.
Bersntein, I. B.: Waves in a plasma in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev.,
109, 1021, 1958.
Budden, K. G.: The theory of the radio window in the ionosphere
and magnetosphere, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 42, 287198, 1980.
Carpenter D. L. and Anderson R. R.: An ISEE/Whistler model of
equatorial electron density in the magnetosphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 10971108, 1992.
Christiansen, P. J., Etcheto, J., Ronmark, K., and Stenflo, L.: Upper
hybrid turbulence as a source of nonthermal continuum radiation,
Geophys. Res. Lett, 11, 139142, 1984.
Calvert, W.: DE-1 measurements of AKR wave directions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 381384, 1985.
Darrouzet, F., Decreau, P. M. E., De Keyser, J., Masson, A., Gallagher, D. L., Santolik, O., Sandel, B. R., Trotignon, J.-G.,
Rauch, J.-L., La Guirriec, E., Canu, P. Sedgemore, F., Andre, M.,
and Lemaire, J. F.: Density structures inside the plasmasphere:
Cluster observations, Ann. Geophys., 22, 25772585, 2004 .
Decreau, P. M. E., Fergeau, P., Krasnoselskikh, V., Le Guirriec,
E., Leveque, M., Martin, P., Randriamboarison, O., Rauch, J.
L., Sene, F. X., Seran, H. C., Trotignon, J. G., Canu, P., Cornilleau, N., de Feraudy, H., Alleyne, H., Yearby, K., Mogensen,
P. B., Gustafsson, G., Andre, M., Gurnett, D. C., Darrouzet, F.,
Lemaire, J., Harvey, C. C., Travnicek, P., and Whisper experimenters: Early results from Whisper instrument on Cluster: an
overview, Ann. Geophys., 19, 12411258, 2001,
http://www.ann-geophys.net/19/1241/2001/.
Decreau, P. M. E., C. Ducoin, C., Le Rouzic, G., Randriamboarison, O., Rauch, J. L., Trotignon, J., G., Vallieres, X., Canu, P.,
Darrouzet, F., Gough, M. P., Buckley, A. M., and Carrozi, T. D.:
www.ann-geophys.net/25/823/2007/
www.ann-geophys.net/25/823/2007/
831