Characterization of The Ring Pack Lubricant and Its Environment
Characterization of The Ring Pack Lubricant and Its Environment
Characterization of The Ring Pack Lubricant and Its Environment
J02094
110
The engines used for both the top ring groove sampling technique and on-piston pressure measurements
were modified by the fitting of a mechanical linkage
from the big-end bearing to the crankcase. This allowed
oil sampling tubes or signal cables to be supported, thus
maximizing the robustness of the system. This system
has been successfully run in excess of 100 hours between
rebuilds.
3 RING PACK ENVIRONMENT STUDIES
f = 4.8
velocity viscosity
J(pressure
x ring height
x
to
and
The ring pack environment is
instrument- The use Of linkages and remote
systems do allow a variety of data to be acquired from a
range of on-piston sensors, e.g. pressure, temperature
and proximity sensors. The results of such instrumentation exercises can be found in the literature [for
example references (3)to (6)].
However. acauiring such data is usually a time consuming and
task, and accordiigly such data
are often only recorded for a few key engine conditions. At an early stage in the Dresent studies. it was
decided to make extensive use $ theoretical modelling
to examine various aspects of piston ring pack performance in parallel with experimental studies. In addition, the model predictions would be used to aid
experimental design and the results of the experimental
programme used both to validate the models (or indicate where improvement was needed) and to provide
more detailed data on the actual conditions within the
ring pack of an operating engine.
.~
lift
Instrumentation of a piston for both inter-ring gas pressure and axial ring motion for all compression rings
would provide the definitive experiment for the verification of the ring pack gas flow and ring lift models.
However, this has not yet been achieved.-Nevertheless,
some preliminary measurements of top groove pressure
and of top ring lift have been obtained.
Figure 3 compares the predicted inter-ring pressures
with the top ring groove pressure recorded using a
piston-mounted piezoelectric transducer for the engine
operating at lo00 r/min, no load. Also indicated are the
crank angles at which the top ring is predicted to lift
and fall. The top ring groove pressure shows a discontinuity in the vicinity of the predicted top ring lift event,
with the groove pressure rising to close to the predicted
second land pressure. This would be the expected result
111
Combustion
always open
(b)
Fig. 2 (a) Schematic of simple orifice-volume model used for gas flow and
ring pack pressure modelling
(b) Simple force balance for prediction of axial ring lift
if the top ring had lifted; that is when not lifted the top
ring groove pressure is equal to the combustion
chamber pressure and when lifted it becomes equal to
the second land pressure. Thus, this pressure trace is
indirect evidence of top ring lift occurring close to the
predicted crank angle.
Direct evidence of piston ring lift has been obtained
via the installation of inductive proximity sensors in the
lower flank of the top ring groove. Sensors were
installed both close to the thrust and close to the antithrust sides of the piston to allow the detection of nonaxisymmetric ring lift (ring tilt). Figure 4 compares the
112
50
Top ring
40-
30 -
20 -
-400
-200
200
400
113
i
j
I Experinha1 r
7
I
;
Thrust face
!-
- - - - i Anti-thrust faceI
i
deg
With ring tilt observed
.---
1-L
Induction
(b)
r--1
I
l
1
1
i
i
+Thrustface
_ _ _ -Anti-thrust
face
i
- - - - - - - --J
I
1
-1
I
:
Firing
Crank angle
Predicted ring
lift patterns
deg
1 : 1 (Bl)
Base case
No second
ring lift
2 : 1 (B2)
1 : 2.5 (B3)
ti
I14
0.2
W Experimental
0.15
1: 1
2: 1
1:2.5
Ring gap area ratio (top: second ring)
and blowby as
1 : 2.5
> 2 : 1 > 1 :1
0 Reverse blowby
Oil consumption
1 : 1 (Bl)
2 : 1 (B2)
1 : 2.5 (B3)
0.109
0.146
0.173
0.083
0.22
0.015
1:1
2:1
1:2.5
Ring gap area ratio (top: second ring)
greater levels of deposits lower down the pistons, as predicted from the simple mechanistic models and in
accordance with previous observations (9).
1:l
2:l
1:2.5
10
68.12
8
93.11
4
195.27
32.58
0
0
0
27.6
3.09
0.2
0
25.36
9.21
0
0
5.56
0.83
4.1
0.66
0
14.46
1.08
0.16
Land 2
Land 3
Land 4
115
reactor.
2. Oil on the liner is substantially fresher than that on
the piston surfaces as most of the liner is exposed to
sump oil via the action of cooling jets, splashing, etc.,
during the stroke and so can be regarded as an
extension of the sump.
3. Oil transport between the liner and piston is solely
via transport in the gas stream (mist).
4. Oil loss from the ring pack is solely via transport in
gas flows either (a) back to the sump or (b) to the
combustion chamber as oil consumption.
Figure 7 shows this reformulated model schematically.
Using these gas transport models the oil consumption
and oil returned to the sump can be estimated by
making an assumption about the quantity of oil carried
in the gas stream. Measurements of the gas-oil ratio
from top ring groove sampling (see below) experiments
suggest an oil loading of 0.5-1 per cent by weight. Thus,
using 0.5 and 1 per cent oil loadings for the engine operating at 1200 r/min, 180 N m (10 bar b.m.e.p.), this
approach predicts 80-150 pg/cycle of oil returned to the
crankcase and an oil consumption of 40-80 pg/cycle. If
the thickness of the oil films on the piston and ring surOil mist contribution
to oil consumption
t
200-300 C
Downscraping
-80-120C
Refreshment
of liner oil as film
is exposed to sump
oil on each stroke
Sump
116
Sampling orifice
(in top ring groove)
Linkage
Fixed pivot
h??
10 bar
14 bar
1200
9.7
21.4
94
179
13.9
30.4
129
224
124
88
220
96
8-20 g/h
(approx. 0.15-0.3%
of fuel
consumption)
3 hours
0.1-0.2 g/h
0.4 per cent
sulphur gas oil
2oo
1.4
167.8
...........................
....................................................
1 ...........................
...................................................
1.2
...................
...........................
0.8
-50
14 bar b.m.e.p.
10 bar b.m.e.p.
Fresh oil
117
_ ....................................................................................
-37
............................................
0.6
...........................................
0.4
...................................................
0.2
.....................
SHPDO
UDEO
20
100
..............................
80
....................
16.9
.......
15
....................
ss
60
10
40
5
20
SHPDO
UDEO
...........................
..............................................
SHPDO
UDEO
SHPDO
b.m.e.p.
UDEO
10 bar
14 bar
25
76
20
118
in filling in understanding of the lubricant degradation mechanisms within the ring pack. However,
even though this understanding is still only at a rudimentary level, it allows discrimination between oils
of differing quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
831282,1983.
Ting, L. L.. and Mayer, J. E. Piston ring lubrication and cylinder
bore wear analysis-PI 1 : theory. ASME paper 73-Iub-25,1973.
Ruddy, B. L., Dowson, D. and Economou, P. N. The prediction of
gas pressures within the ring pack of large bore diesels. J . Mech.
Enana Sci.. 1981.23.295-304.
9 B&ht, P J. Relationship between oil consumption, deposit formation and piston ring motion for single cylinder diesel engines.
SAE paper 920089,1992.
10 DeFarro-Barros, A. and Dyson, A. Piston ring friction rig measurements. J . Inst. Petrol., 1960,46(433), 1-18.
11 Beaubien, S. J. and Cattaneo, A. G.Piston lubrication phenomena
in a motored glass cylinder engine. SAE J., 1946,54,6C-67.
12 Dykes, P. de K. An investigation into the mechanism of oil loss
vast pistons. Proc. Instn Mech. Enars. 1957,171,413-426.
13 Mcdeehan, J. Effect of piston deposits, fuel sulphur and lubricant
viscosity on DE oil consumption and bore polishing. SAE paper
831721,1983.
14 Inow, T., Maeda, Y., Takeda, M. and Nakada, M. Study of tran-
1989.
15 Furuhama, S. and H b ,M. Some factors on engine oil consumption through a piston. Proceedings of JSLE International
Tribology Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 8-10 July 1985.
16 Lux,J. P. and Hoult, D. P. Lubricant film thickness measurements
in a diesel engine piston ring zone. Lubric. Engng, 1991, 47, 353-
364.
17 Baily, B. K. and Ariga, S. On-line diesel engine oil consumption
measurement. SAE paper 902113,1990.
18 Miyachika, M. An analytical evaluation method for lubrication oil
consumption. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, 1991, UH (Dl),
31-39.
19 Yatsutomi, S., Maeda, Y. and Maeda, T. Kinetic approach to