E6 91 13 01 PDF
E6 91 13 01 PDF
E6 91 13 01 PDF
Medved
Krajnovic
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Language Teaching Methodology
2.1. Historical overview of foreign language teaching (FLT) methods
2.2. The present
2.3. Content of language teaching
2.4. Teaching language skills
2.5. Syllabus design
2.6. Materials development
2.7. Language assessment
2.8. The language classroom
2.9. The language learner
2.10. Language teacher competences
3. Second Language Acquisition (SLA)
3.1. SLA: definition and goals
3.2 Historical overview of SLA research
3.3. Current research issues
3.4. The current state of SLA theories and research methods
Glossary
Bibliography
Biographical Sketches
Summary
The first part of the article focuses on language teaching. After a historical overview of
foreign language teaching methods, the key issues in language teaching are outlined. A
special section is devoted to communicative language teaching, the current approach to
foreign language teaching, and two important aspects that reflect tendencies in modern
language pedagogy: learner-centeredness and use of information technology (IT). This
is followed by sections on the content that is actually taught (e.g. pronunciation,
grammar etc.), on teaching the four foreign language skills, role and types of language
syllabi and teaching materials, and the issue of language assessment. The rest of the first
part looks at language teaching from different perspectives: those of the language
learner, the context of learning (the language classroom) and the language teacher.
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
The second part of the article is devoted to second language acquisition (SLA).
Following the definition and the goals of this new discipline within applied linguistics,
the authors offer an overview of its development throughout its relatively short history
that traces it back to the times of contrastive analysis and error analysis. The section on
current research issues offers also an insight into recent interests and foci of second
language acquisition experts. The last section focuses on SLA research methodology
and current SLA theories.
1. Introduction
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
Foreign language teaching (FLT) and second language acquisition (SLA) are two
subfields of applied linguistics that are quite different in historical and research terms.
For a large part of its long history FLT relied mostly on intuitive approaches of both
theoreticians and practitioners. Nowadays, language teaching draws heavily on insights
that are validated by the research into the teaching process in all its complexity. The
content of language teaching (e.g. vocabulary, grammar), its aims (e.g. communicative
competence), its protagonists (e.g. learners, teacher) as well as elements of the process
itself (e.g. language learning and acquisition, classroom interaction) have each
contributed to and benefited from a number of disciplines that focus, exclusively or in
part, on this imortant human activity. With a recent insistence on learner and the
learning process, FLT is slowly beginning to be informed by SLA, a discipline that
studies language learning as a uniquely human, cognitive process and can potentially
offer a better understanding of the very nature of the human mind and intelligence.
Although SLA researchers generally consider applied aspects of their research to be of
secondary importance, the revelance of their findings in such areas as age constraints,
crosslinguistics interaction, and the role of input etc. is undeniable.
It may be fair to say that FLT and SLA can contribute much to a better global
understanding of the human nature and to a further development of intercultural
communication.
2. Language teaching methodology
Language teaching methodology has gone a long way from being based on dogmatic
beliefs about the only good way of teaching to being based on insights into processes of
second language acquisition and the dynamics of the language classroom itself.
First conceptualizations of language teaching were based on teaching Latin. From the
sixteenth century onwards European vernacular languages came to be studied as foreign
languages (FLs) too. Once they became school subjects they were taught in the same
way as Latin by the grammar-translation method.
The grammar-translation method was the dominant method for many centuries and was
best exemplified by the formal teaching of the classical languages (Latin and Greek).
Language analysis, memorizing paradigms and complex grammar rules in order to be
able to read and translate literary texts and to learn to write similar texts were supposed
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
to train the mind of the student. The FL was hardly ever used in class and no language
communication skills were developed.
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
cognitive psychology a new method appeared the cognitive code learning. Rejecting
the passive recipient stance of behaviorism, proponents of the new approach insisted
that language learning implied rule governed creativity. The process of learning was
supposed to be a matter of problem solving through seeking the rules that show how the
language functions. This implied that the learner was an active participant in the process
and had control over it. Although cognitive code learning is not recognized as an
especially prominent language teaching method, it is important as a reaction to an era in
language teaching that was marked by the great impact of audio-lingualism, and as the
possible cause of another reaction the so-called alternative methods of the 1970s that
were humanistically-oriented.
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
just a system of rules but a resource for creating meaning. A distinction is made
between knowing language rules and being able to use them effectively and
appropriately in communication. This has led to the belief that the aim of FLT should be
to allow learners to be able to use the FL for communication with others. Syllabi were
proposed that suggested that the main purpose of the classroom should be to develop the
learner's communicative ability. In the beginning the insistence on meaning instead of
form ousted grammar teaching from the classroom. The early advocates of CLT
believed that focus on meaning would make possible automatic acquisition of structures
too. Later proponents of CLT came to see value in form-focused activities as well.
Second language research and, in particular, insights from studies on learning styles
suggested learner-centredness as one of the key concepts.
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
modern technology on language learning. The benefits of CALL have been looked into
in a number of studies. Investigations that have attempted to compare CALL classes
with conventional classes have not come up with significant insights because it is not
always easy to find teaching activities that could be considered as comparable variables,
since different tasks are usually done in CALL classes and conventional classes. A more
promising research avenue is reflected in studies that look into how CALL can enhance
the effects of teaching at the language and skills levels.
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
CALL has been confirmed as having a great motivational value. It enables shy learners
to practice by speaking up and not feeling anxious as they, for instance, do speechrecognition activities on the computer by themselves. Among the greatest benefits of
CALL are the opportunities learners get for immediate feedback and the fact that they
can work at their own pace and beyond the classroom. The plethora of information
available to learners on the Internet requires help from teachers in organizing learning
from it. Access to authentic materials on the Internet, opportunities to perform in
authentic tasks, e.g. through writing e-mails to key-pals, are very stimulating for FL
learners.
2.3. Content of language teaching
2.3.1. Pronunciation
Teaching pronunciation includes teaching sounds, stress and rhythm, and intonation.
Achieving the native speaker (NS) level is considered by many as not quite possible or
even desirable: some learners feel that they would be giving up their identity if they had
a NS accent. Difficulties in mastering foreign pronunciation can be attributed to sounds
that are non-existent in learners' L1, to sounds that exist in L1 but as allophones, and to
interference from L1 at the stress or intonation levels. Perception of correct
pronunciation is the first necessary step. Activities such as explanation of pronunciation
rules, imitation drills, comparison of learners' pronunciation with NSs' etc. can help
learners master native-like pronunciation. It is still an open issue whether and how
pronunciation should be taught. It is generally considered that, although pronunciation
can be picked up intuitively, it is still useful to teach it explicitly, since there is some
evidence that explicit training can improve it. Normally, the standard accent of a Fl is
taught. However, when several standards exist, social and pragmatic criteria prevail and
usually the standard is chosen according to which speakers are to be the likey
interlocutors of learners. Some aspects of pronunciation (e.g. stress and rhythm) are best
taught as part of teaching other language aspects (e.g. vocabulary). The sound-symbol
correspondence is usually mastered through learning the alphabet of the FL and, in case
of some languages, a host of extra rules about different combinations of sound-symbol
correspondences. Pronunciation error correction is considered to be necessary in case of
errors causing incomprehension.
2.3.2. Grammar
The two basic types of grammar, formal and functional, are reflected in the two
approaches to teaching grammar. Until the 1970s the formal approach prevailed
resulting in a belief that grammatical structures and lexical units should first get
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
internalised through practice and this will enable learners to communicate. During the
1970s, this bottom-up approach was replaced by a focus on language use stressed in the
newly emerged communicative approach in FLT: learners should first master the rules
of verbal interaction, that is learners should learn how to communicate first, and this
will lead to a natural development of form mastery. In contemporary FLT the two
approaches are usually combined. Within a structurally oriented approach grammar is
focused on, but is taught through communicative tasks and in a communicative way.
The initial form-focused tasks are extended to include a focus on the communicative
purpose that particular structures may serve. As a reaction from SLA researchers about
grammatical structures not being acquired linearly, modern FLT sprirals the syllabus
and learners deal with the same structure more than once and in increasingly complex
ways. Within a communicatively oriented approach, the starting point is learners'
understanding of content which, then, leads on to their being able to perform
communicative tasks. Focus on form is brought in only when there are grammar-related
problems. After the initial noticing phase learners engage in activities that focus on
particular problematic grammar points.
Other approaches to teaching grammar also exist. Input processing and consiousnessraising stimulate learners to become aware of grammatical structures through tasks that
require them to induce grammatical rules themselves through collaborative work with
other learners. In this particular approach the stress is on learner awareness of the
grammatical structure and not on producing it. In contrast, some experts insist on the
productive phase, since they believe that grammatical structures need to be internalized
through practice so that they are later available for automatic use by learners, whose
attention is left free to focus on communication. Some experts suggest that successful
mastery of grammar implies mastery of form, which is achieved through practicing at
the production level, through mastery of meaning, achieved through associative
learning, and mastery of appropriate use, which is achieved through raising sensitivity
to context. In the contemporary approach to teaching grammar feedback on accuracy of
grammatical structures used is an issue still widely debated. The options discussed
range from encouraging learners to make errors freely so that teachers correct them to
eliciting self-repair.
2.3.3. Vocabulary
In FLT, vocabulary acquisition can be assisted in direct and indirect ways. When
teachers supply word lists or semantic networks of words they employ direct ways of
teaching vocabulary. Indirect ways imply exposing learners to vocabulary in context of
texts, either oral or written. It is generally accepted now that vocabulary teaching needs
to foster and integrate different levels at which a word needs to be processed in order to
be acquired: the phonological, graphological, grammatical, and semantic levels.
Recently, the teaching of vocabulary has to a large extent been informed by vocabulary
acquisition studies. Some researchers advocate implicit learning approaches, which
imply that vocabulary is mainly acquired unconsciously or with a certain extent of
consciousness of a word being new. Others are proponents of explicit learning and
stress that learners learn vocabulary by taking an active part in the process and using
different language learning strategies, such as inferential and metacognitive strategies.
There seems to be an agreement among teaching experts that different kinds of
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
Bibliography
Brown H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 480 pp.
Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. [The book offers a good overview of FLT issues from the point of view
of basic principles of language teaching. References to research as well as practical teaching activities
abound]
Doughty C. J. And M. H. Long (eds.) (2003). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 888 pp.
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. [An excellent in-depth account of all major concerns of the second language
acquisition field]
Ellis R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition, 824 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [A
seminal book that gives an exhaustive account of relevant issues in the field second language acquisition
mainly from the research point of view]
Gass S. M. and L. Selinker (1994). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, 357 pp.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [A good introduction to second language acquisition phenomena]
Kaplan R. B. (ed.) (2002). The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 641 pp. Oxford: Oxford
University Press [Offers a comprehensive survey of current trends and future directions in FLT and
related disciplines within the field of applied linguistics]
Larsen-Freman D. and M. H. Long (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research,
398 pp. London and New York: Longman. [One of the first comprehensive surveys of the history of
second language acquisition research issues and research methodology]
Nunan D. (1998). Language Teaching Methodology, 268 pp. London: International Books Distributors
Ltd. [A good resource book on FLT based on relevant insights from linguistics, psychology and
classroom-based research]
Singleton D. and L. Ryan (2004). Language Acquisition: The Age Factor, 2nd Edition, 289 pp.
Multilingual Matters Ltd. [An excellent account of the age related issues in language learning, and their
theoretical and educational dimension]
Stern H. H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching, 582 pp. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. [A landmark book on foreign language teaching theory. Offers a highly comprehensive picture of
the field]
Ur P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and theory, 375 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press [The book presents a highly creative approach to training foreign language teachers.
LINGUISTICS - Language Teaching Methodology and Second Language Acquisition - J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic, M. Medved
Krajnovic
Integrates theory and practice in an original way. Offers thought-provoking, ready-to-use ideas for raising
awareness of the language teaching process]
Biographical Sketches
Jelena Mihaljevic Djigunovic holds a PhD in applied linguistics and works as a teacher educator at
Zagreb University. She is head of TEFL Section in Zagreb University' English Department. Her major
research interests include motivation in FL learning, learning strategies, early FL learning and FL anxiety.
Professor Mihaljevic Djigunovic has authored two books: one on the influence of affective learner factors
(Role of Affective Factors in Foreign Language Learning) and one on the effect of FL anxiety on
language learning (Foreign Language Anxiety) Besides a number of textbooks for learning English as a
FL she has published over 70 articles on the impact of individual difference variables on language
learning.
U
SA NE
M SC
PL O
E
C EO
H
AP LS
TE S
R
S
Marta Medved Krajnovic holds an MA in applied linguistics and a PhD in SLA. She is assisstant
professor in the TEFL Section of the University of Zagreb English Department. Her major research
interests include early second language acquisition in natural and institutionalized context,
psycholinguistic and educational aspects of childhood bilingualism and crosslinguistic interaction. In the
area of applied linguistics she is mainly interested in the testing and evaluation of second language
learners communicative competence.