Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views16 pages

Module II: Relativity and Electrodynamics: Lecture 3: Relativistic Energy and Momentum

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 16

Module II: Relativity and Electrodynamics

Lecture 3: Relativistic energy and momentum

Amol Dighe
TIFR, Mumbai

Outline

Defining momentum in special relativity

Defining relativistic energy

Coming up...

Defining momentum in special relativity

Defining relativistic energy

Desirable properties of relativistic momentum

In the non-relativistic world, momentum is simply given by


~p = m~u, where ~u is the velocity of the object. This does not work
with relativity (as will be seen in the following example), and we
have to go for a generalization of this.

We look for a generalized definition of momentum of the form


~p(~u) = M(u)~u ,

with

lim M(u) = m ,

u0

(1)

where m is the mass of the particle. Note that we have still kept
certain desirable properties of momentum:
(i) ~p is in the same direction as ~u.
(ii) The function M(u) depends only on the magnitude of ~u, and
is independent of its direction. This corresponds to isotropy of
space.

Elastic collision of same masses and speeds


I

Consider the elastic collision of two objects A and B of the same


mass m, moving towards each other with speed v . They undergo
an elastic collision such that each of them gets deflected through
an angle , without any change in the speeds. Let us call A and
B after collision by C and D, respectively, for convenience.

The momenta of A, B, C, D are then


~pA = M(v )(v , 0, 0) ,
~pB = M(v )(v , 0, 0) ,

~pC = M(v )(v cos , v sin , 0) ,


~pD = M(v )(v cos , v sin , 0) .

Clearly, momentum conservation holds here.

Elastic collision in the frame of a stationary mass

Let us now see the above collision in the frame S which is


moving with a speed v along x direction. In this frame, B is
initially stationary.

Momenta in the S frame

Since we know how velocities transform under frame change,


and since ~p is a function only of the velocities, we can write
down the momenta of the particles in frame S as


2v
~p0A = M(uA )
,
0,
0
,
1 + v 2 /c 2
~p0B = (0, 0, 0) ,


v sin
v + v cos
0
~pC = M(uC )
,
,0 ,
1 + v 2 cos /c 2 v (1 + v 2 cos /c 2 )


v v cos
v sin
0
~pD = M(uD )
,
,0
1 v 2 cos /c 2 v (1 v 2 cos /c 2 )
p
where uA = 2v /(1 + v 2 /c 2 ) and v = 1/ 1 v 2 /c 2 .

Momentum conservation should hold in S too !


I

Momentum conservation in y direction gives


M(uC )

v sin
v sin
= M(uD )
.
v (1 + v 2 cos /c 2 )
v (1 v 2 cos /c 2 )

This leads to

1 + v 2 cos /c 2
M(uC )
=
.
M(uD )
1 v 2 cos /c 2

Now go to the limit of glancing collision, i.e.


=0,

uC = uA ,

uD = 0 .

In this limit, the above relation yields


M(uA )
1 + v 2 /c 2
1
=
=q
,
M(0)
1 v 2 /c 2
1 uA2 /c 2

(2)

the last equality uses uA = 2v /(1 + v 2 /c 2 ).


I

Using M(0) = m, we have


q
M(uA ) = m/ 1 uA2 = uA m .

(3)

Relativistic momentum and force


I

The relativistic momentum is thus


~p = m ~u .

(4)

This definition is the only one possible which allows


conservation of momentum to be valid in all frames. Clearly the
non-relativistic definition ~p = m~u is not valid at large velocities.

The relativistic force would naturally be defined as the rate of


change of momentum:
~
~F = d p = d (m ~u) .
dt
dt

(5)

Note that ~F 6= m~a, and ~F 6= m~a either. Indeed in general, force


need not even be in the same direction as acceleration.
Problem
Find the conditions under which ~F and ~a can be parallel

Coming up...

Defining momentum in special relativity

Defining relativistic energy

Kinetic energy

Given the momentum ~p, it is possible to define the kinetic energy


of a particle as the work done on it while increasing its speed
from 0 to u, in a linear motion.
Z
d
d ~p
d ~x = (m ~u) ~udt
KE =
dt
dt
KE = mc 2 ( 1) .
(6)

Note that we are still far from saying that the total energy is
mc 2 and the rest mass energy is mc 2 . We only have an
expression for the kinetic energy, and no interpretation.

Energy conservation in nuclear decay


The following argument is a variation on Einsteins original one in his
E = mc 2 paper:
Does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content ?,
Annalen der Physik 18. (1905) 639-641
I

Consider a nucleus with mass mi at rest decaying to another


one with mass mf and two photons leaving in opposite directions
with energy E/2 each. The conservation of energy gives
Ei = Ef + E ,
where Ei and Ef are the rest energies of the nuclei. Both are at
rest by conservation of momentum.

The same decay in another frame


I

Now look at the same decay in a frame where the nucleus is


moving with speed v and the two photons are emitted along (or
opposite) the line of motion.

The energy carried by the photons in this frame is


E10 = (E/2)(1 ) and E20 = (E/2)(1 + ), the total photon
energy thus being E 0 = E. The conservation of energy now
gives
Ei0 = Ef0 + E ,
where Ei0 and Ef0 are total energies of the two nuclei.

Postulation of rest mass energy


I

The total energy is rest energy plus kinetic energy, i.e.


Ei0 = Ei + mi c 2 ( 1) ,

Ef0 = Ef + mf c 2 ( 1) .

Combining the above equation with energy conservation


relations gives
mi c 2 mf c 2 = E .

(7)

This may be interpreted as the nuclei having rest energies


equal to mi c 2 and mf c 2 , respectively, and the difference being
emitted as photons.

This is thus the postulation of rest energy of a particle equal to


mc 2 , which needs to be confirmed by experiments involving
radioactive decays: emitted energy and masses of nuclei. The
experiments have confirmed this, and hence we have
Erest = mc 2
.

Total relativistic energy

The total energy of a relativistic particle is


E = Erest + KE = mc 2 .

This can also be written as


q
E = |~p|2 c 2 + m2 c 4 ,
a relation that will appear frequently in the rest of the course.

(8)

(9)

Take-home message from this lecture

Relativistic momentum can be uniquely defined using the


requirement that conservation of momentum should hold in all
frames

Force need not be parallel to accelaration

Kinetic energy can be determined from momentum, but the rest


mass energy can only be postulated; the identification E = mc 2
needs experimental input.

You might also like