Biocon
Biocon
drug in India
About Biocon:
Situation Analysis:
First Mover
Advantage
No competition
during entry for
multiple
indications after
successful phase
2 results
Simultaneous
Launch with
generics
Sales
representatives
would get more
face time with
doctors (helped by
the generics)
Selling generics
would give a
revenue base with
which they can go
after multiple
indications
Launch
generics before
BIOMAb
Launching
generics before
BIOMAb would
allow the
company to
strengthen the
sales capabilities
before launching
BIOMAb
Threats
Absence of phase
3 results would
put the credibility
under question
No prior
experience in
selling and
marketing
oncology drugs
First mover
advantage no
longer available
Stiff competition
from Erbitux
Price Analysis
25,000,000
25,000,000
1000
2000
250
500
150
300
275
550
325
76,923
650
38,462
25,000,000
2500
625
375
688
813
30,769
Price Analysis:
1. Price that is affordable yet meets corporate objective.
2. Pricing decision based on treatment cycles. BIOMAb had advantage
over Erbitux but due to the phase 2 trials (limited trial data).
3. Low price can put off the prospective doctors.
Channel Analysis:
1. BIOMAb can be sold directly to doctors or through traditional pharma
channels
2. Low volume shipment anticipated.
3. The drug would require refrigeration (little value to local pharmacy)
and conventional rationale states that the manufacturer use the direct
channel.
4. Using direct channel would cut out the channel margins and add
significant benefit to the customer but would also rule out the
involvement of doctors.
Promotion Analysis:
1. Initial product would target oncologists and specialists. Customers
would not second guess a doctors recommendation
2. Along with selling the product, they would offer support and
information to the patients and family.
3. Involve celebrities to endorse the product.