Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:164168

DOI: 10.1159/000350253
Published online: March 21, 2013

2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

16620631/13/00710164$38.00/0
www.karger.com/crg

This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the
online version of the article only. Distribution for non-commercial purposes only.

Diverticular Choledochal Cyst with a

Large Impacted Stone Masquerading
as Mirizzis Syndrome
Soon Oh Hwang a Tae Hoon Lee a Sang Ho Bae b Dong Jae Han a
Han Min Lee a Sang-Heum Parka Chang Ho Kimb Sun-Joo Kima
Departments of a Internal Medicine and b General Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University
College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

Key Words
Choledochal cyst Mirizzis syndrome Cholangitis
Abstract
Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the biliary tract manifested by cystic dilatation
of the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts. Choledochal cyst is not rare in far-East Asian
countries. Type II choledochal cysts account for 2% of all such cysts. They are true diverticula
of the extrahepatic bile duct and communicate with the bile duct through a narrow stalk. This
condition is associated with significant complications, such as ductal strictures, stone formation, cholangitis, rupture and secondary biliary cirrhosis. We describe a case of a huge
impacted stone in a diverticular choledochal cyst which masqueraded as an unusual cystic
duct stone causing Mirizzis syndrome.

Introduction

Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the biliary tract manifested by cystic
dilatation of the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts. Choledochal cysts are rare, and
their incidence is higher in Asian than Western countries [1, 2]. The majority of them are
diagnosed during the first decade of life, but around 20% are not diagnosed until adulthood
[3]. Presentation of choledochal cysts in adults differs from their presentation in children in
the way that these are more commonly associated with hepatobiliary pathology, such as
cholangitis, cystolithiasis, pancreatitis, pancreatic duct abnormalities and malignancy. The
widely accepted classification system for choledochal cysts, which was devised by Todani et
al. [4], is based on cholangiographic morphology, location and number of intrahepatic and
Tae Hoon Lee, MD, PhD
Department of Internal Medicine
Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine
Digestive Disease Center, Soon Chun Hyang University Cheonan Hospital
16-31 Soonchunhyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 330-721 (Republic of Korea)
E-Mail thlee9@schmc.ac.kr

165

Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:164168

DOI: 10.1159/000350253

2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

www.karger.com/crg

Hwang et al.: Diverticular Choledochal Cyst with a Large Impacted Stone

Masquerading as Mirizzis Syndrome

extrahepatic bile duct cysts. Type II choledochal cyst is a very rare true congenital diverticulum of the extrahepatic bile duct and a potential precursor of cholangiocarcinoma [3, 57].
Cystolithiasis and cholecystolithiasis are the most frequent conditions, occurring in 70% of
adults with choledochal cysts [3]. However, the frequency of these conditions according to
the type of choledochal cyst has not been estimated. Impacted stones are extremely rare in
type II choledochal cysts and, to our knowledge, have not been reported in the English language literature.
We describe the unusual case of a huge impacted stone in a diverticular choledochal cyst
which masqueraded as an unusual cystic duct stone causing Mirizzis syndrome. The diagnosis in this case was confirmed by laparoscopic exploration.
Case Report

A 24-year-old male presented with recurrent abdominal pain that had started to worsen
2 months previously. He had no relevant family or past medical history. On admission, his
vital signs were stable. Physical examination revealed slight tenderness in the epigastric area
with no sign of peritoneal irritation. Biochemical investigations yielded the following findings: white blood cell count 6,300/mm3, serum glucose 93 mg/dl, total bilirubin 1.1 mg/dl,
aspartate aminotransferase 28 IU/l, alanine aminotransferase 13 IU/l, alkaline phosphatase
61 IU/l, gamma-glutamyltransferase 28 IU/l, amylase 115 IU/l, lipase 45 U/l, alpha-fetoprotein 2.07 ng/ml, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 23.68 U/ml, carcinoembryonic antigen 4.05 ng/
ml and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein 0.3 mg/l.
Abdominal computed tomography showed a large stone in the common bile duct (CBD)
with no marked upstream duct dilatation, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrated the same stone at the same level with compression of the CBD,
suggesting Mirizzis syndrome. The location of the impacted stone was suspected to be the
cystic duct rather than the CBD, which could cause compression of the CBD (fig. 1a). Subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed that the large impacted stone was located in the central CBD. Injected contrast filled the dilated upstream
cystic duct and CBD at the same time and demonstrated that the large stone was laterally
compressing the CBD (fig. 1b). This finding strongly suggested that an impacted stone in the
cystic duct of the gallbladder had caused Mirizzis syndrome. Selective CBD cannulation was
difficult due to the narrowing caused by extrinsic compression and variation in the common
pathway of the CBD. However, the gallbladder was not distended and laboratory findings
revealed no obstructive pattern typically seen in Mirizzis syndrome. Following the insertion
of a 7-Fr plastic stent (Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, N.C., USA) into the CBD, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was planned.
Laparoscopic operative findings showed that the gallbladder was atrophic; thus, the surgeon planned to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to remove the impacted stone
via CBD exploration. Intraoperatively, the stone in the CBD was considered to be impacted
due to the atrophic gallbladder. However, following removal of the gallbladder and the large
impacted stone, surgical exploration revealed a bulging cystic lesion and the surgeon could
not find the plastic stent inserted previously in the CBD (fig. 2). Thus, the surgery was converted to laparotomy, which revealed that the saccular dilated cystic lesion with a large
impacted stone was a diverticular choledochal cyst. The type II choledochal cyst was excised
and choledochoduodenostomy was performed. The final diagnosis was confirmed histologically, the specimen showing chronic inflammatory infiltration without dysplasia and denuded epithelium (fig. 3).

166

Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:164168

DOI: 10.1159/000350253

2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

www.karger.com/crg

Hwang et al.: Diverticular Choledochal Cyst with a Large Impacted Stone

Masquerading as Mirizzis Syndrome

Discussion

The estimated incidence of choledochal cysts in Western countries has ranged from
1/100,000 to 1/150,000 individuals. However, the incidence is higher in Asia, and these
cysts occur more frequently in females (male:female ratio 1:4) [1, 2]. Type II choledochal
cysts appear as diverticula of the CBD, with some cases closely resembling gallbladder
duplication and others resembling rudimentary diverticular structures. Complications of
choledochal cysts in adults include cholecystitis, recurrent cholangitis, biliary stricture, choledocholithiasis, recurrent acute pancreatitis and malignant transformation to cholangiocarcinoma [13]. Although abdominal pain is the most common presenting symptom in adults
[3, 4, 8], most patients have nonspecific clinical symptoms [1, 4, 8, 9]. Choledocholithiasis is a
common complication of choledochal cysts [2], but a diverticular choledochal cyst with an
impacted stone causing diagnostic confusion is extremely rare and difficult to differentiate
using imaging modalities, as described in our case.
ERCP has been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of choledochal cysts and
associated anomalies [10, 11]. Recently, MRCP has replaced ERCP for the assessment of
many pancreaticobiliary diseases. MRCP allows visualization of the biliary and pancreatic
ducts noninvasively and without contrast injection [11, 12]. Delineation of the precise anatomy of the pancreaticobiliary system is critical for optimal surgical management. Choledochal cyst types can be defined more accurately by MRCP than by ERCP [12]. However, the
initial use of MRCP and ERCP in the present case led us to suspect that the patient had an
unusual impacted cystic duct stone causing Mirizzis syndrome. A large stone may be impacted at a low insertion point in a cystic lesion, which would not be captured by the basket
in ERCP.
Currently, optimal treatment of a choledochal cyst is likely to involve complete excision
of the extrahepatic bile duct, cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy [8]. In the
present case, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was first attempted based on radiologic and
ERCP findings, but the surgery was converted to laparotomy due to unusual anatomic findings, including gallbladder atrophy above the level of the choledochal cyst, and failure to
locate the previously inserted plastic stent. These findings eventually led to the diagnosis of
a diverticular choledochal cyst with an impacted stone.
In summary, we experienced the very unusual case of a diverticular choledochal cyst
with a huge impacted stone which masqueraded as a cystic duct stone causing Mirizzis
syndrome. The diagnosis was made via surgical exploration. In this case, preoperative
diagnosis and treatment planning were difficult due to the limitations of imaging studies,
including ERCP.
Disclosure Statement

All authors disclose no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

167

Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:164168

DOI: 10.1159/000350253

2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

www.karger.com/crg

Hwang et al.: Diverticular Choledochal Cyst with a Large Impacted Stone

Masquerading as Mirizzis Syndrome

References
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Park DH, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al: Can MRCP replace the diagnostic role of ERCP for patients with choledochal
cysts? Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:360366.
Misra SP, Gulati P, Thorat VK, Vij JC, Anand BS: Pancreaticobiliary ductal union in biliary diseases. An
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study. Gastroenterology 1989;96:907912.
Weyant MJ, Maluccio MA, Bertagnolli MM, Daly JM: Choledochal cysts in adults: a report of two cases and
review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:25802583.
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K: Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative
procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg
1977;134:263269.
Flanigan DP: Biliary carcinoma associated with biliary cysts. Cancer 1977;40:880883.
Song HK, Kim MH, Myung SJ, et al: Choledochal cyst associated the with anomalous union of
pancreaticobiliary duct (AUPBD) has a more grave clinical course than choledochal cyst alone. Korean J
Intern Med 1999;14:18.
Todani T, Tabuchi K, Watanabe Y, Kobayashi T: Carcinoma arising in the wall of congenital bile duct cysts.
Cancer 1979;44:11341141.
Wiseman K, Buczkowski AK, Chung SW, et al: Epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of
choledochal cysts in adults in an urban environment. Am J Surg 2005;189:527531.
Visser BC, Suh I, Way LW, Kang SM: Congenital choledochal cysts in adults. Arch Surg 2004;139:855862.
Liu YB, Wang JW, Devkota KR, et al: Congenital choledochal cysts in adults: twenty-five-year experience.
Chin Med J 2007;120:14041407.
Lee HK, Park SJ, Yi BH, et al: Imaging features of adult choledochal cysts: a pictorial review. Korean J Radiol
2009;10:7180.
Lenriot JP, Gigot JF, Sgol P, Fagniez PL, Fingerhut A, Adloff M: Bile duct cysts in adults: a multi-institutional
retrospective study. French Associations for Surgical Research. Ann Surg 1998;228:159166.

Fig. 1. a A 2.5-cm-sized heterogeneous SI lesion on the lateral side of the CBD which compressed the duct.
b A huge lesion filled the middle level of the CBD and was suspected to be a portion of the cystic duct or
gallbladder.

168

Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:164168

DOI: 10.1159/000350253

2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

www.karger.com/crg

Hwang et al.: Diverticular Choledochal Cyst with a Large Impacted Stone

Masquerading as Mirizzis Syndrome

Fig. 2. a Laparoscopic view showing an atrophic gallbladder (arrow) and a bulging cystic portion with
suspected impacted stones. b Following gallbladder removal, the cystic dilatation was incised to remove
the impacted stone. Note the removed black stones and exposed choledochal cyst (arrow).

Fig. 3. Pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of a true choledochal cyst with no malignant
change (H&E stain, 100).