Standards of Auditing Notes

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF
AUDITING
[APPLICABLE FOR MAY 2016 & ONWARDS]

BY A. AMOGH +91 9666460051.
Amogh Ashtaputre
Amogh Ashtaputre
@amoghashtaputre
Amogh Ashtaputre
NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

COMPILED BY A. AMOGH. FEEDBACK CAN BE SENT @ aaaamogh@gmail.com. 09666460051.
THIS BOOK CONTAINS 2 PARTS:

I.
PART AFLOWCHART PRESENTATION OF SAs
II.
PART BTHEORY NOTES OF SAs

INDEX OF BOOK
PART
A.
B.
2|Page
PARTICULARS
FLOWCHART
PRESENTATION OF SA.
THEORY NOTES OF SA.
PAGE NO.
3
56
No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

By A. Amogh aaaamogh@gmail.com 09666460051.

PART A:
FLOWCHART
PRESENTATION OF
SAS.
3|Page


STANDARDS OF AUDITING (SA) ISSUED BY ICAI

1)
SA 200: Basic Principles Governing An Audit.
2)
SA 210: Terms Of Audit Engagement.
3)
SA 220: Quality Control For Audit Work
4)
SA 230: Audit Documentation.
5)
SA 240: The Auditors Responsibilities Relating To Fraud In An Audit

Financial Statements.
6)
SA 250: Consideration Of Laws And Regulations In An Audit Of Financial

Statements.
7)
SA 260: Communication With Those Charged With Governance.
8)
SA 265: Communication Deficiencies In Internal Control To Those Charged With

Governance.
9)
SA 299: Responsibility Of Joint Auditors.
10)
SA 300: Planning An Audit Of Financial Statements.
11)
SA 315: Understanding The Entity And Its Environment And Assessing The Risk Of
Material Misstatement.
12)
SA 320: Audit Materiality.
13)
SA 330: The Auditors Responses To Assessed Risks.
14)
SA 402: Audit Considerations Relating To Entities Using Service Organizations.
15)
SA 450: Evaluation Of Misstatement Identified During The Audit.
16)
SA 500: Audit Evidence.
17)
SA 501: Audit Evidence Additional Consideration For Specific Items.

i.
ii.
4|Page
Part A: Attendance At Physical Inventory Counting.

Part B: Inquiry Regarding Litigation And Claims.
Of

iii.
Part C: Valuation And Disclosure Of Long Term Investments.
iv.
Part D: Segment Information.
18)
SA 505: External Confirmations.
19)
SA 510: Initial Audit Engagements Opening Balances.
20)
SA 520: Analytical Procedures.
21)
SA 530: Audit Sampling.
22)
SA 540: Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates,

And Related Disclosures.
23)
SA 550: Related Parties.
24)
SA 560: Subsequent Events.
25)
SA 570: Going Concern.
26)
SA 580: Written Representations.
27)
SA 600: Using The Work Of Another Auditor.
28)
SA 610: Relying Upon The Work Of An Internal Auditor.
29)
SA 620: Using The Work Of An Expert.
30)
SA 700: The Auditors Report On Financial Statements.
31)
SA 705: Modifications To The Opinion In The Independent Auditors Report.
32)
SA 706: Emphasis Of Matter Paragraphs And Other Matter In The Independent

Auditors Report.
33)
SA 710: Comparatives Information.
34)
SA 720: The Auditors Responsibility In Relation To Other Information In

Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements.
5|Page


6|Page


7|Page


FORMAT OF ENGAGEMENT LETTER

Engagement Letter For The Year Ended 31/3/12.
To, Board Of Directors
Reliance Industries Limited.
We are pleased to conduct the audit of financial statements of Reliance Industries Limited
comprising of:
a.
b.
c.
Balance sheet as on March 31, 2014.

Profit and loss account for the year ended 2013 - 2014.
Cash flow statement for the year ended 2013 - 2014.
The management is responsible:

a. To prepare financial statements as per financial reporting framework
b. To maintaining books of accounts
c. To maintain internal control
d. To safe guard the assets
e. To provide all information and explanation
Our responsibility is for giving an opinion on financial statements.
1. Auditing is independent examination of financial statements, whether the firm is profit
oriented or not, whether artificial or legal form, where in such examination is
conducted to give an opinion thereon.
2. Audit is conducted as per standards on auditing applicable to the company.
3. Auditing involves obtaining sufficient and appropriate audit evidences.
4. Audit involves professional judgment and professional skepticism.
5. It also involves evaluating internal control and risk assessment
6. There are inherent limitation by auditing like complex internal control, undetected
fraud, judgmental, evidence being persuasive not conclusive,
7. The audit is carried as per the requirements of per companies act, 1956 & companies act
2013.
Our working papers may be subjected to peer review by institute of chartered accountants of
India. Our fees are chargeable Rs.5,00,000 excluding out of pocket expenses but including
incidental expenses.
If all the terms and conditions are acceptable, please sign. And send copy back to us.
Signature:
Membership number:
Firm registration number:
Date:
Place:
Client Signature:
8|Page


9|Page


10 | P a g e


11 | P a g e


12 | P a g e


13 | P a g e


14 | P a g e


15 | P a g e


16 | P a g e


17 | P a g e


18 | P a g e


19 | P a g e


20 | P a g e


21 | P a g e


22 | P a g e


23 | P a g e


24 | P a g e


25 | P a g e


26 | P a g e


27 | P a g e


28 | P a g e


29 | P a g e


30 | P a g e


31 | P a g e


32 | P a g e


33 | P a g e


34 | P a g e


35 | P a g e


36 | P a g e


37 | P a g e


38 | P a g e


39 | P a g e


40 | P a g e


41 | P a g e


42 | P a g e


43 | P a g e


44 | P a g e


45 | P a g e


46 | P a g e


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

To the Members of XYZ Limited
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of XYZ Limited (hereafter referred as
the Company), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2015, the Statement of Profit
and Loss for the year ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Companys Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the
Companies Act, 2013 (hereafter referred as the Act) with respect to the preparation of these
financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial
performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, including Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the
Act read together with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules 2014. This responsibility
include maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the
Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and
other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making
judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and
maintenance of internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the
accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and
presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on
our audit.
We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards
and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the
Act and the Rules made thereunder.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section
143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
47 | P a g e


considers internal financial control relevant to the Companys preparation of the financial
statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether
the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial
reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by the Companys Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,
the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015, and its loss for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2015 (hereafter referred as the
Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of
the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of
the Order to the extent applicable.
As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our
knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
1. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company
so far as appears from our examination of those books;
2. the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss dealt with by this Report are in agreement
with the books of account;
3. in our opinion, the aforesaid financial statement comply with the Accounting Standards
specified under section 133 of the Act, read along with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts)
Rules, 2014;
4. on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2015, and
taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March
31, 2015, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;
48 | P a g e


5. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with
Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of
our information and according to the explanations given to us:
6. the Company does not have any pending litigations which would impact its financial
position;
7. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which
there were any material foreseeable losses; and
8. there were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and
Protection Fund by the Company.
For A&A Associates
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm registration number: 010850S
per XYZ
Partner
ICAI Membership No.: 217770
Place: Hyderabad
Date: July 29, 2015
49 | P a g e


Annexure to the Independent Auditors Report

Re: XYZ Limited
The Annexure referred to paragraph 1 of our Independent Auditors Report on Other Legal and
Regulatory Requirements to the members of the Company on the financial statements for the
year ended 31 March 2015, we report that:
i.
(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including
quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable interval
and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
ii.
The Company is a service company, primarily rendering software services. Accordingly,

it does not hold any physical inventories. Thus, paragraph 3(ii) of the Order is not
applicable.
iii.
The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act.
Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iii) (a) and (b) of the Order are not applicable to
the Company and hence not commented upon.
iv.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an
adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the
nature of its business with regard to purchase of fixed assets and sale of services. The
activities of the Company do not involve purchase of inventory and the sale of goods.
We have not observed any major weakness in the internal control system during the
course of the audit.
v.
The Company has not accepted any deposits during the year and therefore paragraph
3(v) of the Order is not applicable.
vi.
The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under
section 148(1) of the Act, for any of the services rendered by the Company.
vii.
Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees state insurance,

income-tax, service tax and other statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited
with the appropriate authorities, except for delays with respect to provident fund
though the delays in deposit is not serious.
viii.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts

payable in respect of provident fund, income tax, service tax, cess and other material
statutory dues were in arrears as at March 31, 2015 for a period of more than six months
from the date they became payable.
50 | P a g e


a. According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of
income-tax, sales-tax, service tax which have not been deposited on account of
any dispute.
b. There is no amount required to be transferred to investor education and
protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder.
ix.
The Company has been registered for a period of less than five years and in our view
commenting on whether or not the accumulated losses at the end of the financial year is
fifty per cent or more of its net worth and whether it has incurred cash losses in such
financial year does not arise.
x.
The Company has not taken any loan from any financial institutions, or banks or any
debenture holders and as such paragraph 3(ix) of the Order is not applicable for the
year.
xi.
In our opinion and according to the information and the explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions.
xii.
During the year the Company has not taken any term loans, however the outstanding
term loan from directors have been applied for the purpose for which it has been
obtained.
xiii.
Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and
fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given
by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or
reported during the year.
For A&A Associates

Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm registration number: 010850S
per XYZ
Partner
ICAI Membership No.: 217770
Place: Hyderabad
Date: July 29, 2015
51 | P a g e


52 | P a g e


53 | P a g e


54 | P a g e


A. How to Answer A Practical

Question?
(Ans):- THE ANSWER SHOULD HAVE 4 FOLLOWING SUBHEADINGS:I.
FACTS OF THE CASE: content.]
[write in 2-3 lines the information given in the
II.
PROVISION OF LAW: - [write the applicable law to the Above CASE like
companies Act, banking ACT, IRDA Rules ETC]
III.
COMMENTS: - [write about the Observations made in the answer like the
Violation or non-compliance of Any SA (or) ANY SECTION of COMPANIES
ACT (or) OF ANY AS .]
IV.
CONCLUSION: - [conclude your answer by giving suitable solution or how to

rectify the problems identify in the comments paragraph above.]
B. How To Answer A SA Related

Question?
(ANS):- THE ANSWER SHOULD HAVE 5 FOLLOWING SUBHEADINGS:I.
SA NAME:- [write the SA name completely without any omissions (or) wrong
heading of SA ]
II.
SCOPE &OBJECTIVE OF SA:- [write the scope and the objective of the Above
mentioned SA in 5-6 lines (or) as required ]
III.
AUDIT PROCEDURES : [write the AUDIT PROCEDURES as given in this SA]
IV.
REPORTING ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS :- [write about how the auditor

will report on FS from above procedures and findings]
V.
OTHER INFORMATION: - [write about any other information which is present

in that SA ]
55 | P a g e


PART B:
THEORY NOTES
OF SA
56 | P a g e


CONTENTS OF PART B
A. STANDARDS ON QUALITY CONTROL (SQCS) .................................60
1. SQC 1: Quality control for firms that perform audits and reviews of historical financial
information, and other assurance and related services engagements .................................. 60
B. STANDARDS FOR AUDITS AND REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ....................................................................61
1. SA 200: Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with Standards on Auditing .................................................................................. 61
2. SA 210: Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements ............................................................... 63
3. SA 220: Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements .............................................. 63
4. SA 230: Audit Documentation .................................................................................................... 64
5. SA 240: The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial
Statements...................................................................................................................................... 64
6. 6. SA 250: Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements .. 66
7. SA 260: Communication with those Charged with Governance ........................................... 66
8. SA 265: Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to those Charged with
Governance and Management .................................................................................................... 67
9. SA 299 (AAS 12): Responsibility of Joint Auditors .................................................................. 67
10. SA 300: Planning an Audit of Financial Statements ................................................................ 68
11. SA 315: Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through
Understanding the Entity and its Environment ....................................................................... 70
12. SA 320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit .................................................... 71
13. SA 330: The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks ............................................................... 72
14. SA 402: Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organization ........... 73
15. SA 450: Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit ....................................... 73
16. SA 500: Audit Evidence ............................................................................................................... 74
17. SA 501: Audit Evidence Specific Considerations for Selected Items ................................ 75
18. 18. SA 505: External Confirmations............................................................................................ 76
57 | P a g e


19. SA 510: Initial Audit Engagements Opening Balances ........................................................ 76

20. SA 520: Analytical Procedures .................................................................................................... 77
21. SA 530: Audit Sampling............................................................................................................... 78
22. SA 540: Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and
Related Disclosures ...................................................................................................................... 80
23. SA 550: Related Parties ................................................................................................................ 81
24. SA 560: Subsequent Events ......................................................................................................... 82
25. SA 570: Going Concern ................................................................................................................ 82
26. SA 580: Written Representations ................................................................................................ 83
27. SA 600 (AAS 10): Using the work of Another Auditor ........................................................... 84
28. SA 610: Using the work of Internal Auditors ........................................................................... 84
29. SA 620: Using the Work of an Auditors Expert ...................................................................... 85
30. SA 700 (Revised): Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements (April 1,
2011) ................................................................................................................................................ 86
31. SA 705 (Issued): Modification to the opinion in the Independent Auditors Report (April
1, 2011) ............................................................................................................................................ 87
32. SA 706 (Issued): Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the
Independent Auditors Report (April 01, 2011) ....................................................................... 88
33. SA 710 (Revised): Comparative Information Corresponding Figures and Comparative
Financial Statements (April 1, 2011)........................................................................................... 88
34. SA 720: The Auditors Responsibility in Relation to Other Information in Documents
containing Audited Financial Statements ................................................................................. 89
35. SA 800: Special Considerations Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance
with Special Purpose Frameworks (April 1, 2011) ................................................................... 90
36. SA 805: Special Considerations Audits of Single Financial Statements and Specific
Elements, Accounts or Items of a Financial Statement (April 1, 2011).................................. 91
37. SA 810: Engagements to Report on Summary Financial Statements (April 1, 2011) .......... 92
58 | P a g e


C. STANDARDS ON REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS (SRES) .........................93

1. SRE 2400: Engagements to Review Financial Statements ....................................................... 93
2. SRE 2410: Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent
Auditor of the Entity .................................................................................................................... 94
D. STANDARDS ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS (SAE) OTHER

THAN AUDITS (OR) REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL
INFORMATION .............................................................................................96
1. SAE 3400 (AAS 35): The Examination of Prospective Financial Information ...................... 96
2. SAE 3402: Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organization .................................. 97
E. STANDARDS ON RELATED SERVICES (SRS)......................................99

1. SRS 4400 (AAS 32): Engagements to Perform Agreedupon Procedures Regarding
Financial Information ................................................................................................................... 99
2. SRS 4410 (AAS 31): Engagements to Compile Financial Information................................. 100
59 | P a g e


SUMMARY OF STANDARDS OF AUDITING (SA)
A. STANDARDS ON QUALITY CONTROL (SQCS)

1. SQC 1: Quality control for firms that perform audits and reviews of historical financial
information, and other assurance and related services engagements
Objective of SQC1 is to provide the firm with reasonable assurance that its personnel comply
with applicable professional standards as well as regulatory and legal requirements, and that
reports issued by the firm or engagement partner(s) are appropriate in the circumstances
Elements of System of Quality Control
1. Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm
The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to promote an internal culture
based on recognition that quality is essential in performing engagements. Such policies

and procedures should require the firms chief executive officer (or equivalent) or, if
appropriate, the firms managing partners (or equivalent), to assume ultimate
responsibility for the system of quality control
Any person or persons assigned operational responsibility for the firms quality control
system by the chief executive officer or managing board of partners should have sufficient
and appropriate experience and ability, and the necessary authority, to assume that
responsibility
2. Ethical requirements
The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable
assurance that the firm and its personnel comply with relevant ethical requirements
The firms policies and procedures should emphasize the fundamental principles, which
are reinforced in particular by (a) the leadership of the firm, (b) education and training, (c)
monitoring, and (d) a process for dealing with noncompliance
3. Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements
The acceptance and continuance of Quality Control policies are designed to provide the
firm with reasonable assurance that it will undertake or continue relationships and
engagements only where it: (a) has considered the integrity of the client and does not have
information that would lead it to conclude that the client lacks integrity; (b) is competent
to perform the engagement and has the capabilities, time and resources to do so (c) can
comply with the ethical requirements. The Firm should obtain such information as it
considers necessary before accepting an engagement with a new client; when deciding
whether to continue an existing client relationship and/or engagement; and when
60 | P a g e


considering acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client. Where issues have
been identified, and the firm decides to accept or continue the client relationship or a
specific engagement, it should document how the issues were resolved
Where the firm obtains information that would have caused it to decline an engagement if
that information had been available earlier, policies and procedures on the continuance of
the engagement and the client relationship should be considered
4. Human resources
The Firms policies and procedures should be designed to provide it with reasonable
assurance that it has sufficient personnel with the capabilities, competence, and
commitment to ethical principles necessary to perform its engagements in accordance
with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements to enable the Firm or
engagement partners to issue reports that are appropriate in the circumstances
Policies and procedures related to human resources normally address the personnel
issues like Recruitment, Performance evaluation, Capabilities, Competence, Career

development, Promotion, Compensation, the estimation of personnel needs, Engagement
performance
5. Monitoring
The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable
assurance that the policies and procedures relating to the system of quality control are
relevant, adequate, operating effectively and complied with in practice. Such policies and
procedures should include an ongoing consideration and evaluation of the firms system
of quality control, including a periodic inspection of a selection of completed
engagements. The purpose of monitoring compliance with quality control policies and
procedures is to ensure
o Adherence to professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements
o Appropriate designing and effective implementation of quality control system
o That the firms quality control policies and procedures have been appropriately
applied
B. STANDARDS FOR AUDITS AND REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL

FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1. SA 200: Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the
Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing
This Standard establishes the independent auditors overall responsibilities when conducting an
audit of financial statements in accordance with SAs
61 | P a g e


Ethical Requirements Relating to an Audit of Financial Statements The auditor should
apply the following fundamental principles of professional ethics relevant when

conducting an audit of financial statements; (a) Integrity; (b) Objectivity; (c) Professional
competence and due care; (d) Confidentiality; and (e) Professional behavior
Professional Skepticism Professional skepticism includes being alert to, for example; (a)
Audit
evidence
that
contradicts
other
audit
evidence
obtained;
(b) Information that brings into question the reliability of documents and responses to
inquiries to be used as audit evidence; (c) Conditions that may indicate possible fraud; (d)
Circumstances that suggest the need for audit procedures in addition to those required by
the SAs
Professional Judgment Professional judgment is necessary in particular regarding
decisions
about:
(a) Materiality and audit risk; (b) The nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures used
to meet the requirements of the SAs and gather audit evidence; (c) Evaluating whether
sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained, and whether more needs to be
done to achieve the objectives of the SAs and thereby, the overall objectives of the auditor;
(d) The evaluation of managements judgments in applying the entitys applicable
financial reporting framework; (e) The drawing of conclusions based on the audit
evidence obtained, for example, assessing the reasonableness of the estimates made by
management in preparing the financial statements
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence and Audit Risk To obtain reasonable assurance,
the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an
acceptably low level and thereby enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on
which to base the auditors opinion
Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Audit Evidence Audit evidence is necessary to support
the auditors opinion and report. It is cumulative in nature and is primarily obtained from audit
procedures performed during the course of the audit. Sufficiency is the measure of quantity of
audit evidence whereas appropriateness is the measure of quality of audit evidence
Audit Risk Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection risk.
The
risks
of
material
misstatement
may
exist
at
two
levels:
(a) The overall financial statement level; and (b) The assertion level for classes of transactions,
account balances, and disclosures. For a given level of audit risk, the acceptable level of
detection risk bears an inverse relationship to the assessed risks of material misstatement at the
assertion level Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with SAs The auditor shall comply with
all SAs relevant to the audit. An SA is relevant to the audit when the SA is in effect and the
circumstances addressed by the SA exist. The auditor shall have an understanding of the entire
text of an SA, including its application and other explanatory material, to understand its
objectives and to apply its requirements properly. The auditor shall not represent compliance
with SAs in the auditors report unless the auditor has complied with the requirements of this
SA and all other SAs relevant to the audit.
62 | P a g e


2. SA 210: Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements

Auditor and client should agree on terms of engagement. Agreed terms would need
to be recorded in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of contract

The form and content of audit engagement letter may vary for each client, but would
generally include reference to (a) objective and scope of the audit of financial
statements; (b) responsibilities of the auditor; (c) responsibilities of management; (d)
Identification of applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of
financial statements; and (e) Reference to the expected form and content of any
reports to be issued by the auditor and a statement that there may be circumstances in
which a report may differ from its expected form and content. Other matters as per
the circumstances should also be included
In case of recurring audits, auditor should consider whether circumstances require
the terms of engagement to be revised

Where the terms of engagement are changed, auditor and client should agree on the
new terms. If auditor is unable to agree to a change of engagement and is not

permitted to continue the original engagement, the auditor should consider
withdrawing from the engagement and determine whether there is any obligation,
either contractual or otherwise, to report the circumstances to other parties, such as
those charged with governance, owners or regulators
3. SA 220: Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements

Quality control policies and procedures should be implemented at both level of
audit firm and on individual audits

To implement quality control policies and procedures designed to ensure that all
audits are conducted in accordance with Standards of Auditing

Objectives of quality control policies to be adopted will incorporate Professional
Requirements, Skills and Competence, Assignment, Delegation, Consultation,

Acceptance and Retention of Clients, Monitoring
To be communicated to its personnel in a manner that provides reasonable assurance
that the policies and procedures are understood and implemented

To implement those quality control procedures which are, in the context of policies
and procedures of the firm, appropriate to individual audit. To consider professional

competence of assistants performing work delegated to them when deciding extent of
direction, supervision and review appropriate for each assistant. Assistants to whom
63 | P a g e


work is delegated need appropriate direction, supervision and review of audit work
performed by them
4. SA 230: Audit Documentation

Audit documentation that meets the requirements of this SA and the specific
documentation requirements of other relevant SAs provides (a) evidence of auditors

basis for a conclusion about the achievement of overall objective of audit; and (b)
evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance with SAs and
applicable legal and regulatory requirements
Audit Documentation refers to the record of audit procedures performed, relevant
audit evidence obtained, and conclusions the auditor reached. Preparing sufficient
and appropriate audit documentation on a timely basis helps to enhance the quality
of audit and facilitates effective review and evaluation of audit evidence obtained and
conclusions reached before finalizing auditors report
To document discussions of significant matters with management, those charged
with governance, and others, including the nature of significant matters discussed
and when and with whom the discussions took place
Auditor
may consider preparing and retaining a summary (Completion

Memorandum) that describes significant matters identified during the audit and how
they were addressed. SA 220 requires auditor to review audit work performed
through review of audit documentation. Standards on Quality Control (SQC) 1
require firms to establish policies and procedures for timely completion of assembly
of audit files. An appropriate time limit within which to complete the assembly of
final audit file is ordinarily not more than 60 days after the date of auditors report.
SQC 1 requires firms to establish policies and procedures for retention of engagement
documentation
Retention period for audit engagements ordinarily is no shorter than ten years from
the date of auditors report, or, if later, the date of group auditors report
5. SA 240: The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit

of Financial Statements
Auditor is concerned with fraud that causes a material misstatement in financial
statements
Two types of intentional misstatements are relevant misstatements resulting from
fraudulent financial reporting and misstatements resulting from misappropriation of

assets
Primary responsibility of prevention and detection of frauds is of the management as
well as those charged with governance. It is important that management, with

64 | P a g e


oversight of those charged with governance; place a strong emphasis on fraud

prevention which may reduce opportunities for fraud to take place and act as a
deterrent
Auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that financial statement
taken as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or
error. While auditor may be able to identify potential opportunities for fraud to be
perpetrated, it is difficult for him to determine whether misstatements in judgment
areas such as accounting estimates are caused by fraud or error
Risk of auditor not detecting a material misstatement resulting from management
fraud is greater than for employee fraud, because management is frequently in a

position to directly or indirectly manipulate accounting records, present fraudulent
financial information or override control procedures designed to prevent similar
frauds by other employees. Auditor is responsible for maintaining an attitude of
professional skepticism throughout the audit, considering the potential for
management override of controls and recognizing the fact that audit procedures that
are effective for detecting error may not be effective in detecting fraud
Auditor shall identify and assess risks of material misstatement due to fraud at
financial statement level, and at assertion level for classes of transactions, account
balances and disclosures. Auditor must make appropriate inquiries of the
management. Auditor must discuss with those charged with governance as they have
oversight responsibility for systems for accounting risk, financial control and
compliance with the law
When auditor identifies a misstatement, s/he should consider whether such a
misstatement may be indicative of fraud and if there is such an indication, s/he

should consider the implications of misstatement in relation to other aspects of the
audit, particularly the reliability of management representations
When the auditor identifies a misstatement resulting from fraud, or a suspected
fraud, s/he should consider auditors responsibility to communicate that information

to management, those charged with governance and, in some circumstances, when so
required by laws and regulations, to regulatory and enforcement authorities also
To obtain written representations from management
To document the understanding of entity and its environment and the assessment of
risks of material misstatement, responses to assessed risks of material misstatement

and communications about fraud made to management, those charged with
governance, regulators and others
65 | P a g e


6. 6. SA 250: Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of

Financial Statements
To recognize that noncompliance by entity with laws and regulations may
materially affect financial statements. It is managements responsibility to ensure that

entitys operations are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations
Auditor is not responsible for preventing noncompliance. The auditor is responsible
for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are
free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error
Risk of non detection of material misstatements is higher with regard to material
misstatements resulting from noncompliance with laws and regulations due to

various factors. To obtain a general understanding of legal and regulatory framework
applicable to the entity and how it is complying with that framework
After obtaining general understanding, auditor should perform procedures to
identify instances of noncompliance with these laws and regulations where non
compliance should be considered when preparing financial statements. Further,
auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about compliance with
those laws and regulations generally recognized by Auditor to have an effect on
determination of material amounts and disclosures in financial statements
To obtain written representations that management has disclosed all known actual or
possible noncompliance with laws and regulations whose effects should be

considered when preparing financial statements. This SA does not apply to other
assurance engagements in which auditor is specifically engaged to test and report
separately on compliance with specific laws and regulations. Whether an act
constitutes a noncompliance can be determined only by a court of law
The Standard envisages "engaging a legal advisor to assist in monitoring legal
requirements" instead of "establishing a legal department" as one of the policies to

ensure compliance with laws and regulations. The Standard, in larger entities, also
envisages existence of a separate "compliance function" in addition to internal audit
function and audit committee to supplement policies and procedures for ensuring
compliance with laws and regulations
7. SA 260: Communication with those Charged with Governance

To communicate with those charged with governance, auditors responsibilities in
relation to financial statements audit, an overview of planned scope and timing of

audit and significant findings from the audit
Such matters include: Overall scope of audit; selection of/ changes in significant
accounting policies; potential effect on financial statements of any significant risks

66 | P a g e


and exposures, such as pending litigation; adjustments to financial statements arising

out of audit that have a significant effect on entitys financial statements; material
uncertainties related to events and conditions that may cast significant doubt on
entitys ability to continue as a going concern, disagreements with management about
matters that could be significant to entitys financial statements or auditors report;
expected modifications to auditors report. Auditors should communicate matters of
governance interest on timely basis
Auditors communication may be made orally or in writing. In case of oral
communication, auditor should document their oral communications and response

thereof
8. SA 265: Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to those

Charged with Governance and Management
The objective of the auditor is to communicate appropriately to those charged with
governance and management deficiencies in internal control that the auditor has
identified during the audit and that, in the auditors professional judgment, are of
sufficient importance to merit their respective attentions
The auditor shall determine whether, on the basis of the audit work performed, the
auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in internal control. If the auditor has
identified one or more deficiencies in internal control, the auditor shall determine, on
the basis of the audit work performed, whether, individually or in combination, they
constitute significant deficiencies.
9. SA 299 (AAS 12): Responsibility of Joint Auditors
Joint auditors should, by mutual discussion, divide audit work. Division of work would
usually be in terms of audit of identifiable units or specified areas. Division of work may
be with reference to items of assets or liabilities or income or expenditure or with
reference to periods of time
If a Joint auditor comes across matters which are relevant to areas of responsibility of
other joint auditors and which deserve their attention, or which require disclosure or
discussion with, or application of judgment by, other joint auditors, he should
communicate the same to all other joint auditors in writing prior to finalization of audit
Certain areas of work, owing to their importance or owing to the nature of work
involved, would often not be divided and would have to be covered by all joint auditors
Each joint auditor is responsible only for the work allocated to them, whether or not
s/he has prepared a separate report on work performed by them
67 | P a g e


All joint auditors are jointly and severally responsible in respect of the audit work which
is not divided amongst them, for the appropriateness of decisions taken by them
concerning the nature, timing or extent of the audit procedures to be performed by any
of the joint auditors, for examining that the financial statements of the entity comply
with disclosure requirements of relevant statute, for ensuring that audit report complies
with the requirements of relevant statute and in respect of matters which are brought to
the notice of joint auditors by any one of them and on which there is an agreement
among joint auditors
Each joint auditor is entitled to assume that other joint auditors have carried out their
part of audit work in accordance with generally accepted audit procedures. Normally,
joint auditors are able to arrive at an agreed report. However, where the joint auditors
are in disagreement with regard to any matters to be covered by the report, each one of
them should express his own opinion through a separate report
10. SA 300: Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement
and developing an audit plan. The objective of auditor is to plan the audit so that it will
be performed in an effective manner
Once the overall audit strategy has been established, an audit plan can be developed to
address various matters identified in the overall audit strategy, considering the need to
achieve the audit objectives through efficient use of auditors resources
To consider various matters in developing the overall plan like: terms of engagement;
nature and timing of reports; applicable legal or statutory requirements; accounting
policies adopted by the client; identification of significant audit areas; setting of
materiality levels, etc.
To obtain a level of knowledge of clients business that will enable them to identify
events, transactions and practices that, in their judgment, may have a significant effect
on financial information. Audit plan is more detailed than overall audit strategy that
includes the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed by
engagement team members
Engagement partner and other key members of engagement team shall be involved in
planning the audit, including planning and participating in the discussion among
engagement team members so as to enhance effectiveness and efficiency of planning
process
To plan the nature, timing and extent of direction and supervision of engagement team
members and review of their work. Auditor shall document overall audit strategy, audit
68 | P a g e


plan and any significant changes made during audit engagement to the overall audit
strategy or audit plan, and reasons for such changes
Audit planning ideally commences at the conclusion of previous years audit, and along
with related programme, it should be reconsidered for modification as the audit of their
compliance and substantive procedures progress. For an initial audit, auditor may need
to expand the planning activities because the auditor does not ordinarily have previous
experience with the entity that is considered when planning recurring engagements
69 | P a g e


11. SA 315: Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material

Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and its Environment
To provide a basis for identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement at

the financial statement and assertion levels, the auditor shall perform risk assessment
procedures. Thus procedures shall include: Inquiries with management; Analytical
Procedures; Observation and Inspection
Where Auditor has performed other engagements with the entity, auditor shall consider
whether information obtained is relevant for identifying the risk of material
misstatement. If Auditor intends to use his/her previous experiences with the entity, he
shall determine whether changes have occurred since previous audit that may affect its
relevance on current audit
To obtain an understanding of the following: Industry, regulatory and other external

factors; Nature of entity; Selection and application of accounting policies; Objectives and
strategies and related business risks; Measurement and review of entitys financial
performance; Internal control
SA 315 sets out five components of Internal control: Control environment; Entitys risk
assessment process; the information system, including related business processes,
relevant to financial reporting and communication; Control activities relevant to audit;
Monitoring of controls
Usually, those controls which pertain to entitys objective of preparing financial

statements are subject to risk assessment procedures
Obtaining an understanding of entity and its environment including entitys internal

control is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and analyzing
information throughout the audit
To identify and assess risks of material misstatement at financial statement level, and at
assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures
Auditors are required to: Relate identified risks to what can go wrong at assertion level;
Consider potential magnitude of risks in the context of financial statements; Consider
the likelihood that risks could result in a material misstatement of financial statements
Documentation should cover: Discussion among engagement team; Key elements of

understanding obtained; Sources of information; Risk assessment process; the identified
and assessed risks; Significant risks evaluated; Risks evaluated for which substantive
procedures done
70 | P a g e


Auditor uses professional judgment to determine the extent of understanding required.

Auditors primary consideration is whether the understanding that has been obtained is
sufficient to meet the objective stated in the SA
12. SA 320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
SA 320 deals with the auditors responsibility to apply the concept of materiality in
planning and performing an audit of financial statements
In planning the audit, the auditor makes judgments about the size of misstatements that
will be considered material
These judgments provide a basis for:

Determining the nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures;
Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement; and
Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures
For purposes of the SAs, performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by
the auditor at less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an
appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. If applicable,
performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less
than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances
or disclosures
The auditor shall revise materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if
applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures) in the event of becoming aware of information during the audit
that would have caused the auditor to have determined a different amount (or amounts)
initially
The audit documentation shall include the following amounts and the factors
considered in their determination:
Materiality for the financial statements as a whole
If applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions,
account balances or disclosures
Performance materiality and
Any revision of above as the audit progressed
71 | P a g e


13. SA 330: The Auditors Responses to Assessed Risks
The objective is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about assessed risks of
material misstatement, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to
those risks
Auditor shall design and implement overall responses to address assessed risks of
material misstatement at financial statement level. To design and perform further audit
procedures whose nature, timing and extent are based on and are responsive to assessed
risks of material misstatement at assertion level
In designing further audit procedures to be performed, the auditor shall:

a) Consider reasons for the assessment given to risk of material misstatement at the
assertion level for each class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure
b) Obtain more persuasive audit evidence the higher the auditors assessment of
risk
When the auditor obtains audit evidence about operating effectiveness of controls
during an interim period, the auditor shall:
a) Obtain audit evidence about significant changes to those controls subsequent to the
interim period; and
b) Determine additional audit evidence to be obtained for the remaining period
Based on the audit procedures performed and audit evidence obtained, auditor shall
evaluate before conclusion of audit whether assessments of risks of material
misstatement at assertion level remain appropriate
Auditor shall conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained.
In forming an opinion, auditor shall consider all relevant audit evidence, regardless of
whether it appears to corroborate or contradict assertions in financial statements
If the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material
financial statement assertion, the auditor shall attempt to obtain further audit evidence.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, auditor shall
express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion
If Auditor plans to use audit evidence about operating effectiveness of controls obtained
in previous audits, auditor shall document conclusion reached about relying on such
controls that were tested in a previous audit
72 | P a g e


14. SA 402: Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service

Organization
This SA specifically expands on how the user auditor applies SA 315 and SA 330
The objectives of the auditor are (a) To obtain an understanding of the nature and
significance of services provided by the service organization and their effect on the user
entitys internal control relevant to the audit, sufficient to identify and assess the risks of
material misstatement; and (b) To design and perform audit procedures responsive to
those risks
The user auditor should obtain an understanding of the services provided by a service
organization, including internal control
The user auditor shall modify the opinion in the user auditors report in accordance with
SA 705 if the user auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding the services provided by the service organization relevant to the audit of the
user entitys financial statements
The user auditor shall not refer to the work of a service auditor in the user auditors
report containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so.
If such reference is required by law or regulation, the user auditors report shall indicate
that the reference does not diminish the user auditors responsibility for the audit
opinion
If reference to the work of a service auditor is relevant to an understanding of a

modification to the user auditors opinion, the user auditors report shall indicate that
such reference does not diminish the user auditors responsibility for that opinion
15. SA 450: Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit
The objective of the auditor is to evaluate the effect of identified misstatements on the
audit and the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements
To accumulate misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are
clearly trivial
To determine whether the overall audit strategy and audit plan need to be revised if the
nature of identified misstatements and the circumstances of their occurrence indicate
that other misstatements may exist that, when aggregated with misstatements
accumulated during the audit, could be material or the aggregate of misstatements
accumulated during the audit approaches materiality determined in accordance with SA
320 (Revised)
73 | P a g e


To communicate on a timely basis all misstatements accumulated during the audit with
the appropriate level of management, unless prohibited by law or regulations. To
request management to correct those misstatements
Prior to evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, the auditor shall reassess
materiality determined in accordance with SA 320, to confirm whether it remains
appropriate in the context of the entitys actual financial results
To communicate with those charged with governance uncorrected misstatements and

the effect that they, individually or in aggregate, may have on the opinion in auditors
report, unless prohibited by law or regulation. Auditors communication shall identify
material uncorrected misstatements individually. Auditor shall request correction of
uncorrected misstatements. Auditor shall also communicate with those charged with
governance the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods on the
relevant classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and the financial
statements as a whole
To request a written representation from management and, where appropriate, those

charged with governance whether they believe the effects of uncorrected misstatements
are immaterial, individually and in aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole. A
summary of such items shall be included in or attached to the written representation
The audit documentation shall include the amount below which misstatements would
be regarded as clearly trivial, all misstatements accumulated during the audit and
whether they have been corrected and the auditors conclusion as to whether
uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate, and the basis for
that conclusion
16. SA 500: Audit Evidence
Auditor is required to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to enable them to

draw reasonable conclusions on which they can base their opinion on financial
information
Auditor normally relies on evidence that is persuasive rather than conclusive in nature.
Auditor may obtain evidence on a selective basis by way of either judgmental or
statistical sampling procedures. Evidence is obtained through performance of
compliance and substantive procedures
Compliance procedures are tests designed to obtain reasonable assurance that internal
controls on which audit reliance is placed are in effect. Substantive procedures are
designed to obtain evidence as to completeness, accuracy and validity of data produced
by accounting system
74 | P a g e


Obtaining audit evidence from compliance procedures is intended to reasonably assure

the auditor in respect of assertions of existence, effectiveness and continuity. Obtaining
audit evidence from substantive procedures is intended to reasonably assure the auditor
in respect of assertions of existence, rights and obligations, occurrence, completeness,
valuation, measurement, presentation and disclosure
To test the reliability, few generalizations are useful such as external evidence is more
reliable than internal evidence, written evidence is more reliable than oral evidence and
self obtained evidence is more reliable than obtained through the entity
Auditor gains increased assurance when audit evidence obtained from different sources
is consistent. Various methods for obtaining audit evidence include inspection,
observation, inquiry and confirmation, computation and analytical review
Emphasis is to be laid on considering relevance and reliability of audit evidence

obtained during the course of audit, and focus is to be laid on designing and performing
audit procedures to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence
17. SA 501: Audit Evidence Specific Considerations for Selected

Items
This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with specific considerations by the auditor in
obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence in accordance with SA 330, SA 500
(Revised) and other relevant SAs, with respect to certain aspects of inventory, litigation
and claims involving the entity, and segment information in an audit of financial
statements
Inventories: Management ordinarily establishes procedures under which inventory is

physically counted at least once in a year to serve as a basis for preparation of financial
statements or to ascertain reliability of perpetual inventory system. When inventory is
material to financial statements, auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding its existence and condition by attendance at physical inventory
counting unless impracticable. If unable to attend physical inventory count on the date
planned due to unforeseen circumstances, auditor should take or observe some physical
counts on an alternative date and where necessary, perform alternative audit procedures
to assess whether changes in inventory between date of physical count and period end
date are correctly recorded
Litigation and Claims: The auditor shall design and perform audit procedures in order
to identify litigation and claims involving the entity which may give rise to a risk of
material misstatement, including:
(a) Inquiry of management and, where applicable, others within the entity,
including inhouse legal counsel;
(b) Reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance and
correspondence between the entity and its external legal counsel;
75 | P a g e


(c) Reviewing legal expense accounts
Segment Information: Auditor considers segment information in relation to financial

statements taken as a whole, and is not required to apply auditing procedures that
would be necessary to express an opinion on segment information standing alone. Audit
procedures regarding segment information ordinarily consist of obtaining an
understanding of the methods used by management in determining segment
information and performing analytical procedures and other audit tests appropriate in
the circumstances
18. 18. SA 505: External Confirmations
External confirmation is the process of obtaining and evaluating audit evidence through
a direct communication from a third party in response to a request for information about
a particular item
Before making use of external confirmations, auditor should consider materiality, the
assessed level of inherent and control risk, and how the evidence from other planned
audit procedures will reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level
To employ external confirmation procedures in consultation with the management.

External confirmations are mostly sought for account balances and their components but
they are not to be restricted to these items only
The use of confirmation procedures may be effective in providing sufficient appropriate

audit evidence when auditor determines higher level of assessed inherent and control
risk
The request for confirmations is to be made either at the date of financial statements or
at a date close to it. Requests are to be designed to specific audit objectives
Auditors understanding of clients arrangements and transactions with third parties is

important in determining the information to be confirmed. Auditor may use positive or
negative external confirmation requests or a combination of both
To consider whether there is any indication that external confirmations received may not
be reliable. To evaluate the conformity between results of external confirmation process
together with results from any other procedures performed. If Auditor seeks for an
external confirmation and management requests the auditor not to do so, auditor should
consider whether there are valid grounds for such a request and obtain evidence to
support validity of managements requests
19. SA 510: Initial Audit Engagements Opening Balances

76 | P a g e


In conducting an initial audit engagement, the auditor should obtain sufficient

appropriate audit evidence that closing balances of preceding period have been correctly
brought forward to current period or when appropriate, any adjustments have been
disclosed as prior period items in the current years Statement of Profit and Loss, the
opening balances do not contain misstatements that materially affect financial
statements for the current period and appropriate accounting policies are consistently
applied
To consider whether accounting policies followed in preceding period, based on which

opening balances have been arrived at, were appropriate and that those policies are
consistently applied. If the auditor concludes that the accounting policies have not been
consistently applied or properly accounted for, the auditor has to express either a
qualified or adverse opinion, as may be appropriate
Ordinarily, current auditor can place reliance on closing balances contained in financial
statements for preceding period, except when during performance of audit procedures
for current period the possibility of misstatements in opening balances is indicated
When financial statements of preceding period were not audited, auditor must adopt
other procedures such as for current assets and liabilities. Some audit evidence can
ordinarily be obtained as part of audit procedures performed during the current period
and for noncurrent assets and liabilities such as fixed assets, investments and long
term debt, the auditor could ordinarily examine records underlying the opening
balances
To evaluate matters giving rise to modifications in prior periods financial statements for
assessing the risk of material misstatement. If the prior periods financial statements
were audited by a predecessor auditor and there was a modification to the opinion, the
auditor shall evaluate the effect of the matter giving rise to the modification in assessing
the risks of material misstatement in the current periods financial statements in
accordance with SA 315
20. SA 520: Analytical Procedures
The objectives of the auditor are: (a) To obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence when
using substantive analytical procedures; and (b) To design and perform analytical
procedures near the end of audit that assist the auditor when forming an overall
conclusion as to whether the financial statements are consistent with auditors
understanding of the entity
Auditor should apply analytical procedures at overall review stages of audit as well as
while applying substantive procedures
Application of analytical procedures is based on the expectation that relationships

among data exist and continue in absence of known conditions to the contrary. Presence
77 | P a g e


of these relationships provides audit evidence as to completeness, accuracy and validity

of data produced by the accounting system. However, reliance on results of analytical
procedures will depend on auditors assessment of the risk that analytical procedures
may identify relationships as expected when, in fact, a material misstatement exists
When analytical procedures identify significant fluctuations or relationships that are

inconsistent with other relevant information or that deviate from predicted amounts, the
auditor should investigate and obtain adequate explanations and appropriate
corroborative evidence
21. SA 530: Audit Sampling
The auditor should design and select an audit sample, perform audit procedures
thereon, and evaluate sample results so as to provide sufficient appropriate audit
evidence
The objective of the auditor when using audit sampling is to provide a reasonable basis
to draw conclusions about the population from which the sample is selected
When designing an audit sample, auditor should consider the objectives of the audit
procedure and characteristics of the population when designing an audit sample. To
assist in efficient and effective design of sample, stratification may be appropriate.
Stratification is the process of dividing a population into subpopulations
When determining sample size, auditor should consider sampling risk, tolerable error,
and expected error. Tolerable error is the maximum error in population that the auditor
would be willing to accept and still conclude that the result from sample has achieved
audit objective
If Auditor expects error to be present in the population, a larger sample needs to be

examined to conclude that actual error in the population is not greater than planned
tolerable error. Auditor should select sample items in such a way that the sample can be
expected to be representative of the population
This requires that all items in the population have an opportunity of being selected.
After having carried out those audit procedures on each sample item that are
appropriate to particular audit objective, auditor should analyze any errors detected in
the sample, project the errors found in the sample to the population and reassess
sampling risk
Auditor should investigate the nature and cause of any deviations or misstatements
identified, and their possible effect on the objective of the particular audit procedure or
other areas of audit. In order to conclude that a misstatement or deviation is an anomaly,
the auditor is required to obtain a high degree of certainty that the misstatement or
deviation is not representative of the population
78 | P a g e


79 | P a g e


22. SA 540: Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value

Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures
Auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding reasonableness of

accounting estimates including fair value accounting estimate and related disclosure in
financial statements are adequate
Accounting estimate means an approximation of a monetary amount in absence of a

precise means of measurement. Determination of an accounting estimate may be simple
or complex, depending upon the nature of item. Auditor should adopt one or a
combination of following approaches in the audit of an accounting estimate:
(a) review and test process used by management to develop the estimate;
(b) use an independent estimate for comparison with that prepared by
management; or
(c) review subsequent events which confirm the estimate made
Auditor should make a final assessment of reasonableness of estimate based on auditors

knowledge of the business and whether the estimate is consistent with other audit
evidence obtained during audit. When there is a difference between auditors estimate
of the amount best supported by available audit evidence and the estimated amount
included in financial statements, auditor should consider whether the amount requires
adjustment and report accordingly
Auditor should adopt a riskbased approach to the responsibilities regarding

accounting estimates, including fair value accounting estimates and related disclosures.
A difference between the outcome of an accounting estimate and amount originally
recognized or disclosed in financial statements does not necessarily represent a
misstatement of financial statements
Auditor should review the outcome of accounting estimates included in prior period
financial statements. Auditor should obtain written representations from management
whether management believes significant assumptions used by it in making accounting
estimates are reasonable
Audit documentation should include the basis for auditors conclusions about
reasonableness of accounting estimates and their disclosure that give rise to significant
risks; and Indicators of possible management bias, if any
80 | P a g e


23. SA 550: Related Parties

This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditors responsibilities regarding related party
relationships and transactions when performing an audit of financial statements
Auditor has a responsibility to perform audit procedures to identify, assess and respond
to the risks of material misstatement arising from the entitys failure to appropriately
account for or disclose related party relationships, transactions or balances in accordance
with the framework
To perform procedures to obtain information relevant to identifying the risks of material

misstatement associated with related party relationships and transactions
The auditor shall inquire of management regarding: (a) The identity of entitys related
parties, including changes from prior period (b) The nature of relationships between the
entity and these related parties; and (c) Whether the entity entered into any transactions
with these related parties during the period and, if so, the type and purpose of the
transactions
To maintain alertness for related party information when reviewing records or

documents
To respond to the risks of material misstatement associated with related party

relationships and transactions
To Identify significant related party transactions outside the Entitys normal course of
business
To evaluate that related party transactions were conducted on terms equivalent to those
prevailing in an Arms Length Transaction
To ensure that the accounting and disclosure of identified related party relationships
and transactions are correct
To obtain written representation from management for related party transactions

Auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance significant matters
arising during the audit in connection with the entitys related parties
Auditor shall include in the audit documentation, names of identified related parties
and nature of related party relationships
81 | P a g e


24. SA 560: Subsequent Events
Subsequent events are significant events occurring between balance sheet date and the
date of auditors report. Auditor should consider effect of subsequent events on financial
statements and on auditors report. Auditor should perform procedures designed to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that all events up to the date of auditors
report that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in financial statements have been
identified
Procedures to identify events that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in financial
statements would be performed as near as practicable to the date of auditors report
When Auditor becomes aware of events which materially affect financial statements, the
auditor should consider whether such events are properly accounted for in financial
statements
When the management does not account for such events that auditor believes should be
accounted for, auditor should express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, as
appropriate
25. SA 570: Going Concern
Going concern assumption is a fundamental principle in the preparation of financial

statements. Management should assess entitys ability to continue as a going concern
even if the applicable financial reporting framework does not include an explicit
requirement
Auditor should evaluate appropriateness of managements use of going concern

assumption in preparation of financial statements and conclude whether there is a
material uncertainty about entitys ability to continue as a going concern that need to be
disclosed in financial statements
When planning and performing audit procedures and in evaluating the results thereof,
auditor should perform further audit procedures when events or conditions are
identified that cast significant doubt on the entitys ability to continue as a going
concern. Indications of risk that continuance as a going concern may be questionable
could come from financial statements, operational activities or from other sources
These may be financial indicators, operating indicators or other indicators. If, on the
presence of such indication, a question arises regarding appropriateness of going
concern assumption, auditor should gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
attempt to resolve, to the auditors satisfaction, the question regarding entitys ability to
continue in operation for foreseeable future
82 | P a g e


After procedures considered necessary have been carried out, all information required
has been obtained, and effect of any plans of management and other mitigating factors
have been considered, auditor should decide whether the question raised regarding
going concern assumption has been satisfactorily resolved
Auditor, on the basis of his/her judgment and audit evidence will report, as deemed
appropriate. In case where use of going concern assumption is appropriate but a
material uncertainty exists, then (I) if adequate disclosure is made in financial
statements, auditor should express an unmodified opinion but include an Emphasis of
Matter paragraph in the auditors report; (ii) if adequate disclosure is not made in
financial statements, auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion, as
appropriate. In case where entity will not be able to continue as a going concern, auditor
should express an adverse opinion if financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis
Auditor should communicate with those charged with governance when there are
identified events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entitys ability to
continue as a going concern
26. SA 580: Written Representations
Written representations are written statements used to corroborate the validity of the
premises, relating to managements responsibilities, on which an audit is conducted; and
other audit evidence obtained with regard to specific assertions in financial statements
Written representations in this context do not include financial statements, the assertions
therein, or supporting books and records
To request written representations from management with appropriate responsibilities

for financial statements and knowledge of matters concerned
To request management to provide a written representation that it has fulfilled its

responsibility for the preparation and presentation of financial statements as set out in
the terms of the audit engagement; and in accordance with applicable financial reporting
framework; designing, implementing and maintaining of adequate internal control
system; and completeness of information made available to the auditor
To determine relevant parties from whom general and specific written representations
are to be requested
To evaluate the reliability of written representations and in case of doubt should

reconsider the reliability of other written representations and, take appropriate action. A
management representation letter should be addressed to the auditor containing
relevant information and be appropriately dated and signed
83 | P a g e


A management representation letter should ordinarily be signed by members of

management who have primary responsibility for the entity and its financial aspects,
e.g., Managing Director, Finance Director. Auditor should disclaim an opinion on
financial statements when the requested general written representations are not
provided or are unreliable, and the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence
27. SA 600 (AAS 10): Using the work of Another Auditor

(Revised SA 600 on Special considerations Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including
the Work of Component Auditors) is under consideration of the Board)
When the principal auditor uses the work of another auditor, the principal auditor
should determine how the work of other auditor will affect the audit
Auditor should consider professional competence of other auditor in the context of

specific assignment if the other auditor is not a Chartered Accountant. Auditor should
inform other auditor of matters such as areas requiring special consideration,
procedures for identification of intercomponent transactions and significant
accounting, auditing and reporting requirements
Auditor should consider significant findings of other auditor. There should be proper
coordination and communication between the two auditors
When the principal auditor concludes that work of other auditor cannot be used and
s/he has not been able to perform sufficient additional procedures regarding financial
information of the component audited by other auditor, s/he should express a qualified
opinion or disclaimer of opinion because there is a limitation on the scope of audit
The principal auditor would not be responsible in respect of the work entrusted to other
auditors
28. SA 610: Using the work of Internal Auditors
This SA deals with the external auditors responsibilities regarding the work of internal
auditors when the external auditor has determined, in accordance with SA 315, that the
internal audit function is likely to be relevant to the audit
The objectives of the external auditor, where the entity has an internal audit function
that the external auditor has determined is likely to be relevant to the audit, are to
determine whether, and to what extent, to use specific work of the internal auditors and
if so, whether such work is adequate for the purposes of the audit
External auditor should determine whether and to what extent to use the work of the
internal auditors. In determining whether the work of the internal auditors is likely to be
84 | P a g e


adequate for purposes of the audit, the external auditor shall evaluate the objectivity of
the internal audit function, the technical competence of the internal auditors, whether
the work of the internal auditors is likely to be carried out with due professional care
and whether there is likely to be effective communication between the internal auditors
and the external auditor
In order for the external auditor to use specific work of the internal auditors, the external
auditor shall evaluate and perform audit procedures on that work to determine its
adequacy for the external auditors purposes
To determine the adequacy of specific work performed by the internal auditors for the
external auditors purposes, the external auditor shall evaluate whether the work was
performed by internal auditors having adequate technical training and proficiency, the
work was properly supervised, reviewed and documented, adequate audit evidence has
been obtained to enable the internal auditors to draw reasonable conclusions,
conclusions reached are appropriate in the circumstances and any reports prepared by
the internal auditors are consistent with the results of the work performed and any
exceptions or unusual matters disclosed by the internal auditors are properly resolved
When the external auditor uses specific work of the internal auditors, the external
auditor shall document conclusions regarding the evaluation of the adequacy of the
work of the internal auditors, and the audit procedures performed by the external
auditor on that work
29. SA 620: Using the Work of an Auditors Expert
This SA deals with the auditors responsibilities regarding the use of an individual or
organizations work in a field of expertise other than accounting or auditing, when that
work is used to assist the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence
The auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed, and that
responsibility is not reduced by the auditors use of the work of an auditors expert
The objectives of the auditor are to determine whether to use the work of an auditors
expert and if using the work of an auditors expert, to determine whether that work are
adequate for the auditors purposes
If expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing is necessary to obtain sufficient

appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall determine whether to use the work of an
auditors expert
The nature, timing and extent of the auditors procedures with respect to the
requirement of this SA will vary depending on the circumstances. In determining the
nature, timing and extent of those procedures, the auditor shall consider matters
including the nature of the matter to which that experts work relates, the risks of
85 | P a g e


material misstatement in the matter to which that experts work relates, the significance
of that experts work in the context of the audit, the auditors knowledge of and
experience with previous work performed by that expert and whether that expert is
subject to the auditors firms quality control policies and procedures
The auditor shall evaluate whether the auditors expert has the necessary competence,
capabilities and objectivity for the auditors purposes. In the case of an auditors external
expert, the evaluation of objectivity shall include inquiry regarding interests and
relationships that may create a threat to that experts objectivity
The auditor shall agree, in writing when appropriate, on the following matters with the
auditors expert:
o The nature, scope and objectives of that experts work;
o The respective roles and responsibilities of the auditor and that expert;
o The nature, timing and extent of communication between the auditor and that
expert, including the form of any report to be provided by that expert; and
o The need for the auditors expert to observe confidentiality requirements
The auditor shall evaluate the adequacy of the auditors experts work for the auditors
purposes, including:
o The relevance and reasonableness of that experts findings or conclusions, and
their consistency with other audit evidence;
o If that experts work involves use of significant assumptions and methods, the
relevance and reasonableness of those assumptions and methods in the
circumstances; and
o If that experts work involves the use of source data that is significant to that
experts work, the relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data
The auditor shall not refer to the work of an auditors expert in an auditors report
containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so. If such
reference is required by law or regulation, the auditor shall indicate in the auditors
report that the reference does not reduce the auditors responsibility for the audit
opinion
30. SA 700 (Revised): Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial

Statements (April 1, 2011)
Auditor should form an opinion on the financial statements based on an evaluation of

the conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained; and express clearly that
opinion through a written report that also describes the basis for the opinion
The auditor shall express an unmodified opinion when the auditor concludes that the
financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework
86 | P a g e


If the auditor concludes that, based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial
statements as a whole are not free from material misstatement; or is unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, the auditor shall modify the opinion in the
auditors report in accordance with SA 705
Auditors report includes basic elements such as Title, Addressee, Opening or

introductory paragraph, Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements,
Auditors Responsibility, Auditors Opinion, Other Reporting Responsibilities, Signature
of the Auditor, Date of the Auditors Report and Place of Signature. If the auditor is
required by any law or regulation to use a specific layout or wording of the auditors
report, the auditors report shall refer to SA only if the auditors report includes, at a
minimum, each of the elements prescribed in this SA
If an auditor is required to conduct an audit in accordance with the SAs issued by the
ICAI, but may additionally have complied with the International Standards on Auditing
(ISAs) in the conduct of the audit, the auditors report may refer to ISAs in addition to
the national auditing standards only if conditions specified in this SA are complied with
31. SA 705 (Issued): Modification to the opinion in the Independent

Auditors Report (April 1, 2011)
Auditor is responsible to issue an appropriate report in circumstances when, in forming

an opinion in accordance with SA 700 (Revised), the auditor concludes that a
modification to the auditors opinion on the financial statements is necessary
The objective of the auditor is to express clearly an appropriately modified opinion on

the financial statements that is necessary when the auditor concludes, based on the audit
evidence obtained, that the financial statements as a whole are not free from material
misstatement; or the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement
The auditor shall express a qualified opinion when the auditor, having obtained
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in
the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements; or the auditor
is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion,
but the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive
The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in
the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements
The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that
87 | P a g e


the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any,

could be both material and pervasive
When the auditor modifies the opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall, in
addition to the specific elements required by SA 700 (Revised), include a paragraph in
the auditors report that provides a description of the matter giving rise to the
modification
When the auditor expects to modify the opinion in the auditors report, the auditor shall
communicate with those charged with governance the circumstances that led to the
expected modification and the proposed wording of the modification
32. SA 706 (Issued): Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter

Paragraphs in the Independent Auditors Report (April 01, 2011)
The objective of the auditor, having formed an opinion on the financial statements, is to
draw users attention, when in the auditors judgment it is necessary to do so, by way of
clear additional communication in the auditors report, to a matter, although
appropriately presented or disclosed in the financial statements, that is of such
importance that it is fundamental to users understanding of the financial statements; or
as appropriate, any other matter that is relevant to users understanding of the audit, the
auditors responsibilities or the auditors report
If the matter refers to information presented or disclosed in the financial statements, the
auditor shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph (immediately after the Opinion
paragraph) in the auditors report provided the auditor has obtained sufficient
appropriate audit evidence that the matter is not materially misstated in the financial
statements
If the auditor considers it necessary to communicate a matter other than those that are
presented or disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditors judgment, is
relevant to users understanding of the audit, the auditors responsibilities or the
auditors report and this is not prohibited by law or regulation, the auditor shall do so in
a paragraph in the auditors report, with the heading "Other Matter", or other
appropriate heading
If the auditor expects to include an Emphasis of Matter or an Other Matter paragraph in

the auditors report, the auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance
regarding this expectation and the proposed wording of this paragraph
33. SA 710 (Revised): Comparative Information Corresponding

Figures and Comparative Financial Statements (April 1, 2011)
The objectives of the auditor are to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about
whether the comparative information included in the financial statements has been
presented, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements for comparative
88 | P a g e


information in the applicable financial reporting framework; and to report in accordance

with the auditors reporting responsibilities
The frameworks and methods of presentation that are referred to in this SA are
corresponding figures where amounts and other disclosures for preceding period are
included as an integral part of current period financial statements and Comparative
Financial Statements where amounts and other disclosures for preceding period are
included for comparison with financial statements of current period
Auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the comparative
information meet the requirements of relevant financial reporting framework. This
involves verifying whether accounting policies used for corresponding figures are
consistent with those of current period and whether corresponding figures agree with
amounts and other disclosures presented in prior period
If the financial statements of the prior period were audited by a predecessor auditor and
the auditor is permitted by law or regulation to refer to the predecessor auditors report
on the corresponding figures and decides to do so, the auditor shall state in an Other
Matter paragraph in the auditors report that the financial statements of the prior period
were audited by the predecessor auditor; the type of opinion expressed by the
predecessor auditor and, if the opinion was modified, the reasons therefore; and the date
of that report. When auditors report on prior period, as previously issued, included a
qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion or an adverse opinion and concerned matter
is not resolved, auditors report should also be modified regarding corresponding
figures
When prior period financial statements are not audited, incoming auditor should state
the fact in auditors report in an Other Matter paragraph
When comparative financial statements are presented, the auditors opinion shall refer
to each period for which financial statements are presented and on which an audit
opinion is expressed
34. SA 720: The Auditors Responsibility in Relation to Other

Information in Documents containing Audited Financial Statements
The objective of the auditor is to respond appropriately when documents containing

audited financial statements and auditors report thereon include other information that
could undermine the credibility of those financial statements and auditors report
The auditor is not required to give his/ her opinion on other information, not having
any responsibility of determining whether or not other information is properly stated, if
there is no separate requirement in particular circumstance of the engagement.
However, the auditor reads other information because the credibility of audited
financial statements may be undermined by material inconsistencies between audited
89 | P a g e


financial statements and other information and if found, to determine whether the
audited financial statements or other information needs to be revised
To make appropriate arrangements with management or those charged with governance

to obtain the other information prior to the date of the auditors report. If material
inconsistencies are identified prior to the date of the auditors report, and the revision of
audited financial statement is necessary and the management refuses to make the
revision, auditor is required to modify his/ her opinion. Further, if revision of other
information is necessary, and management refuses to make the revision, auditor is
required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance and also provide
paragraph in the auditors report on other matter; or withdraw from the engagement, if
permitted by laws or regulations
If material inconsistencies are identified subsequent to the date of the auditors report,
and revision of audited financial statement is necessary, the auditor is required to
perform the procedures given in SA 560, "Subsequent Events". If, on reading other
information for the purpose of identifying material inconsistencies, auditor becomes
aware of an apparent material misstatement of fact, auditor should discuss the matter
with management and if the management refuse to correct it, communicate the same to
those charged with governance and take further appropriate actions
35. SA 800: Special Considerations Audits of Financial Statements

Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (April 1,
2011)
The objective of the auditor, when applying SAs in an audit of financial statements
prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately
the special considerations that are relevant to: (a) The acceptance of the engagement; (b)
The planning and performance of that engagement; and (c) Forming an opinion and
reporting on the financial statements
In an audit of special purpose financial statements, the auditor shall obtain an

understanding of: (a) The purpose for which the financial statements are prepared; (b)
The intended users; and (c) The steps taken by management to determine that the
applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances
The auditor shall determine whether application of other SAs requires special
consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. In the case of financial statements
prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an
understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made
in the preparation of those financial statements. An interpretation is significant when
adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material
difference in the information presented in the financial statements
90 | P a g e


In the case of financial statements prepared in accordance with the provisions of a

contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial statements adequately describe
any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial statements are
based
The auditors report on special purpose financial statements shall include an Emphasis
of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditors report that the financial statements
are prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the
financial statements may not be suitable for another purpose
36. SA 805: Special Considerations Audits of Single Financial

Statements and Specific Elements, Accounts or Items of a Financial
Statement (April 1, 2011)
The objective of the auditor, when applying SAs in an audit of a single financial
statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement, is to address
appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to: (a) acceptance of the
engagement; (b) planning and performance of that engagement; and (c) Forming an
opinion and reporting on the single financial statement or on the specific element,
account or item of financial statement
SA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all SAs relevant to the audit. If the auditor is
not also engaged to audit the entitys complete set of financial statements, the auditor
shall determine whether the audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element
of those financial statements in accordance with SAs is practicable
SA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting
framework applied in the preparation of the financial statements. This shall include
whether application of the financial reporting framework will result in a presentation
that provides adequate disclosures to enable the intended users to understand the
information conveyed in the financial statement or the element, and the effect of
material transactions and events on the information conveyed in the financial statement
or the element
The auditor shall consider whether the expected form of opinion is appropriate in the
circumstances
The auditor shall apply the requirements in SA 700, adapted as necessary in the
circumstances of the engagement
If the auditor undertakes an engagement to report on a single financial statement or on a

specific element of a financial statement in conjunction with an engagement to audit the
entitys complete set of financial statements, the auditor shall express a separate opinion
for each engagement. If the opinion in the auditors report on an entitys complete set of
financial statements is modified, or that report includes an Emphasis of Matter
91 | P a g e


paragraph or an Other Matter paragraph, the auditor shall determine the effect that this
may have on the auditors report on a single financial statement or on a specific element
of those financial statements
37. SA 810: Engagements to Report on Summary Financial Statements

(April 1, 2011)
SA 810 deals with the auditors responsibilities when undertaking an engagement to

report on summary financial statements derived from financial statements audited in
accordance with SAs by that same auditor
The objectives of the auditor are to: (a) Determine whether it is appropriate to accept the
engagement to report on summary financial statements; (b) Form an opinion on the
summary financial statements based on an evaluation of the conclusions drawn from the
evidence obtained; and (c) Express clearly that opinion through a written report that also
describes the basis for that opinion
The auditor shall, ordinarily, accept an engagement to report on summary financial

statements in accordance with this SA only when the auditor has been engaged to
conduct an audit in accordance with SAs of the financial statements from which the
summary financial statements are derived
Before accepting an engagement to report on summary financial statements, the auditor

shall: (a) Determine whether the applied criteria are acceptable; (b) Obtain the
agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility
The auditor shall perform the prescribed procedures, and any other procedures that the
auditor may consider necessary, as the basis for the auditors opinion on the summary
financial statements
When the auditor has concluded that an unmodified opinion on the summary financial
statements is appropriate, the auditors opinion shall, unless otherwise required by law
or regulation, use one of the phrases enumerated in this SA
The auditors report on the summary financial statements may be dated later than the
date of the auditors report on the audited financial statements. In such cases, the
auditors report on the summary financial statements shall state that the summary
financial statements and audited financial statements do not reflect the effects of events
that occurred subsequent to the date of the auditors report on the audited financial
statements that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the audited financial
statements
If the summary financial statements are not consistent, in all material respects, with or
are not a fair summary of the audited financial statements, in accordance with the
92 | P a g e


applied criteria, and management does not agree to make the necessary changes, the
auditor shall express an adverse opinion on the summary financial statements
If the audited financial statements contain comparatives, but the summary financial
statements do not, the auditor shall determine whether such omission is reasonable in
the circumstances of the engagement
If the auditor becomes aware that the entity plans to state that the auditor has reported
on summary financial statements in a document containing the summary financial
statements, but does not plan to include the related auditors report, the auditor shall
request management to include the auditors report in the document
C. STANDARDS ON REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS (SRES)

1. SRE 2400: Engagements to Review Financial Statements
To establish standards and provide guidance on the practitioners professional

responsibilities when a practitioner, who is not the auditor of an entity, undertakes an
engagement to review financial statements and on the form and content of the report
that the practitioner issues in connection with such a review
The objective of a review of financial statements is to enable a practitioner to state

whether, on the basis of procedures which do not provide all the evidence that would be
required in an audit, anything has come to the practitioners attention that causes the
practitioner to believe that the financial statements are not prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework (negative
assurance)
The practitioner should comply with the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI
The procedures required to conduct a review of financial statements should be

determined by the practitioner having regard to the requirements of this SRE, relevant
professional bodies, legislation, regulation and, where appropriate, the terms of the
review engagement and reporting requirements
A review engagement provides a moderate level of assurance that the information

subject to review is free of material misstatement; this is expressed in the form of
negative assurance. For the purpose of expressing negative assurance in the review
report, the practitioner should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence primarily through
inquiry and analytical procedures to be able to draw conclusions
The practitioner and the client should agree on the terms of the engagement
When using work performed by another practitioner or an expert, the practitioner

should be satisfied that such work is adequate for the purposes of the review
93 | P a g e


The practitioner should document matters which are important in providing evidence to
support the review report, and evidence that the review was carried out in accordance
with this SRE
The practitioner should apply judgment in determining the specific nature, timing and
extent of review procedures. The practitioner should apply the same materiality
considerations as would be applied if an audit opinion on the financial statements were
being given
Based on the work performed, the practitioner should assess whether any information
obtained during the review indicates that the financial statements do not give a true and
fair view in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
2.
SRE 2410: Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by

the Independent Auditor of the Entity
To establish standards and provide guidance on the auditors professional

responsibilities when the auditor undertakes an engagement to review interim financial
information of an audit client, and on the form and content of the report
The auditor should comply with the ethical requirements relevant to the audit of the
annual financial statements of the entity. The auditor should implement quality control
procedures that are applicable to the individual engagement. The auditor should plan
and perform the review with an attitude of professional skepticism
The objective is to enable the auditor to express a conclusion whether, on the basis of the
review, anything has come to the auditors attention that causes the auditor to believe
that the interim financial information is not prepared, in all material respects, in
accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework
The auditor and the client should agree on the terms of the engagement
The auditor should have an understanding of the entity and its environment, including
its internal control, as it relates to the preparation of both annual and interim financial
information, sufficient to plan and conduct the engagement
The auditor should make inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters, and perform analytical and other review procedures to enable the
auditor to conclude whether, on the basis of the procedures performed, anything has
come to the auditors attention that causes the auditor to believe that the interim
financial information is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework
The auditor should obtain evidence that the interim financial information agrees or
reconciles with the underlying accounting records and should inquire whether
94 | P a g e


management has identified all events up to the date of the review report that may
require adjustment to or disclosure in the interim financial information
The auditor should inquire whether management has changed its assessment of the
entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If adequate disclosure is made in the
interim financial information, the auditor should add an emphasis of matter paragraph
to the review report to highlight a material uncertainty relating to an event or condition
that may cast significant doubt on the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If a
material uncertainty that casts significant doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a
going concern is not adequately disclosed in the interim financial information, the
auditor should express a qualified or adverse conclusion, as appropriate. The report
should include specific reference to the fact that there is such a material uncertainty
When a matter comes to the auditors attention that leads the auditor to question
whether a material adjustment should be made, the auditor should make additional
inquiries or perform other procedures to enable the auditor to express a conclusion in
the review report
The auditor should evaluate, individually and in the aggregate, whether uncorrected
misstatements that have come to the auditors attention are material to the interim
financial information
The auditor should obtain written representations from management
The auditor should read the other information that accompanies the interim financial
information to consider whether any such information is materially inconsistent with the
interim financial information. If a matter comes to the auditors attention that causes the
auditor to believe that the other information appears to include a material misstatement
of fact, the auditor should discuss the matter with the entitys management
When, as a result of performing the review of interim financial information, a matter

comes to the auditors attention that causes the auditor to believe that it is necessary to
make a material adjustment to the interim financial information, the auditor should
communicate this matter as soon as practicable to the appropriate level of management.
When, in the auditors judgment, management does not respond appropriately within a
reasonable period of time, the auditor should inform those charged with governance
The auditor should issue a written report that contains the nature, extent and results of
the review of interim financial information
The auditor should express a qualified or adverse conclusion when a matter has come to
the auditors attention that causes the auditor to believe that a material adjustment
should be made to the interim financial information for it to be prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
95 | P a g e


When the auditor is unable to complete the review, the auditor should communicate, in
writing, to the appropriate level of management and to those charged with governance
the reason why the review cannot be completed, and consider whether it is appropriate
to issue a report
The auditor should consider modifying the review report by adding a paragraph to
highlight a significant uncertainty (other than a going concern problem) that came to the
auditors attention, the resolution of which is dependent upon future events and which
may affect the interim financial information
The auditor should prepare review documentation that is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for the auditors conclusion and to provide evidence that the review was
performed in accordance with this SRE and applicable legal and regulatory
requirements
D. STANDARDS ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS (SAE) Other

than Audits (or) Reviews of Historical Financial Information
1.
SAE 3400 (AAS 35): The Examination of Prospective Financial

Information
In an engagement to examine prospective financial information, auditor should obtain

sufficient appropriate evidence as to whether:
a. managements bestestimate assumptions are not unreasonable and, in the case
of hypothetical assumptions such assumptions are consistent with the purpose of
information
b. prospective financial information is properly prepared on the basis of
assumptions
c. prospective financial information is properly presented and all material
assumptions are adequately disclosed, including whether they are bestestimate
assumptions or hypothetical assumptions
and
d. prospective financial information is prepared on a consistent basis with historical
financial statements, using appropriate accounting principles
While evidence may be available to support assumptions on which prospective financial

information is based, such evidence is itself generally futureoriented and, therefore,
speculative in nature, as distinct from evidence ordinarily available in examination of
historical financial information. Auditor is, therefore, not in a position to express an
opinion as to whether the results shown in prospective financial information will be
achieved
Auditor should:
96 | P a g e


o
o
o
o
not accept, or should withdraw from, an engagement when assumptions are

clearly unrealistic or when s/he believes that prospective financial information
will be inappropriate for its intended use
obtain a sufficient level of knowledge of business and become familiar with
entitys process to be able to evaluate whether all significant assumptions
required for preparation of prospective financial information have been
identified
consider extent to which reliance on entitys historical financial information is
justified. Auditor should consider period of time covered by prospective
financial information. Sufficient appropriate evidence supporting such
assumptions would be obtained from internal and external sources
would consider whether, when hypothetical assumptions are used, all significant
implications of such assumptions have been taken into consideration
should obtain written representations from management regarding intended use
of prospective financial information, completeness of significant management
assumptions and managements acceptance of its responsibility for prospective
financial information
should assess the presentation and disclosures in prospective financial statement
are adequate
should document matters, which are important in providing evidence to support
his/ her report on examination of prospective financial information, and
evidence that such examination was carried out in accordance with this SA
When auditor believes that presentation and disclosure of prospective financial

information is not adequate, the auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion in
the report on prospective financial information, or withdraw from engagement as
appropriate
When auditor believes that one or more significant assumptions do not provide a
reasonable basis for prospective financial information prepared on basis of bestestimate
assumptions or that one or more significant assumptions do not provide a reasonable
basis for prospective financial information given the hypothetical assumptions, the
auditor should either express an adverse opinion setting out reasons in the report on
prospective financial information, or withdraw from engagement
When examination is affected by conditions that preclude application of one or more

procedures considered necessary in the circumstances, auditor should either withdraw
from engagement or disclaim the opinion and describe the scope limitation in the report
on prospective financial information
2.
SAE 3402: Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organization

This SAE deals with assurance engagements undertaken by a professional accountant in
public practice to provide a report for use by user entities and their auditors on the
97 | P a g e


controls at a service organization that provides a service to user entities that is likely to
be relevant to user entities internal control as it relates to financial reporting
The objectives of the service auditor are: (a) To obtain reasonable assurance about
whether, in all material respects, based on suitable criteria: (i) The service organizations
description of its system fairly presents the system as designed and implemented
throughout the specified period; (ii) The controls related to the control objectives stated
in the service organizations description of its system were suitably designed throughout
the specified period; (iii) Where included in the scope of the engagement, the controls
operated effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the control objectives stated in
the service organizations description of its system were achieved throughout the
specified period; (b) To report on the matters in (a) above in accordance with the service
auditors findings
The service auditor shall comply with relevant ethical requirements, including those
pertaining to independence, relating to assurance engagements
Where this SAE requires the service auditor to inquire of, request representations from,
communicate with, or otherwise interact with the service organization, the service
auditor shall determine the appropriate person(s) within the service organizations
management or governance structure with whom to interact
If the service organization requests a change in the scope of the engagement before the
completion of the engagement, the service auditor shall be satisfied that there is a
reasonable justification for the change
The service auditor shall assess whether the service organization has used suitable
criteria in preparing the description of its system, in evaluating whether controls are
suitably designed, and, in the case of a type 2 report, in evaluating whether controls are
operating effectively
When planning and performing the engagement, the service auditor shall consider
materiality with respect to the fair presentation of the description, the suitability of the
design of controls and, in the case of a type 2 report, the operating effectiveness of
controls
The service auditor shall obtain an understanding of the service organizations system,
including controls that are included in the scope of engagement
The service auditor shall obtain and read the service organizations description of its
system, and evaluate whether those aspects of the description included in the scope of
engagement are fairly presented
The service auditor shall determine which of the controls at the service organization are
necessary to achieve the control objectives stated in the service organizations
description of its system, and shall assess whether those controls were suitably designed
98 | P a g e


If the service organization has an internal audit function, the service auditor shall obtain
an understanding of the nature of the responsibilities of the internal audit function and
of the activities performed in order to determine whether the internal audit function is
likely to be relevant to the engagement
In order for the service auditor to use specific work of the internal auditors, the service
auditor shall evaluate and perform procedures on that work to determine its adequacy
for the service auditors purposes
The service auditor shall request the service organization to provide written
representations
The service auditor shall inquire whether the service organization is aware of any events
subsequent to the period covered by the service organizations description of its system
up to the date of the service auditors assurance report that could have a significant
effect on the service auditors assurance report
The service auditors assurance report shall include the basic elements prescribed by this
SAE
E. STANDARDS ON RELATED SERVICES (SRS)

1.
SRS 4400 (AAS 32): Engagements to Perform Agreedupon

Procedures Regarding Financial Information
In an engagement to perform agreedupon procedures, auditor is engaged by client to

issue a report of factual findings, based on specified procedures performed on specified
matters of a financial statement. As the auditor simply provides a report of factual
findings of agreedupon procedures, no assurance is expressed by them in the report.
Report is restricted to those parties that have agreed to procedures to be performed since
others, unaware of reasons for the procedures, may misinterpret results
To comply with Code of Ethics, issued by ICAI
Where Auditor is not independent, a statement to that effect should be made in the
report of factual findings. Terms of engagement should be well defined so as to avoid
any misunderstandings
To plan the work so that an effective engagement will be performed and documentation
of important matters to be done which provides evidence to support the report of factual
findings
The report describes the purpose and agreedupon procedures of engagement in

sufficient detail to enable the reader to understand the nature and extent of work
99 | P a g e


performed. The report should also clearly mention that no audit or review has been
performed
2.
SRS 4410 (AAS 31): Engagements to Compile Financial Information
In such types of engagements, accountant uses accounting expertise as against auditing

expertise to collect, classify and summaries financial information
The accountant should comply with the "Code of Ethics", issued by ICAI. However,
where accountant is not independent, a statement to that effect should be made in the
accountants report. It should be ensured that there is a clear understanding between the
client and accountant regarding terms of engagement by means of an engagement letter
or such other suitable form of contract
To obtain an acknowledgement from management of its responsibility for appropriate

preparation and presentation of financial statements or other information and of its
approval of such information to be compiled
Accountant should also obtain an acknowledgement from management of its

responsibility for accuracy and completeness of underlying accounting data and
complete disclosure of all material and relevant information
To plan the work so that an effective engagement will be performed. Accountant should
obtain a general knowledge of business and operations of the entity and should be
familiar with accounting principles. Accountant should request management
representation letter covering significant information or explanations given orally on
which they consider representations are required
There are few special considerations which the accountant has to take care of i.e. s/he
should ensure that financial statements or other financial information compiled, comply
with requirements of identified financial reporting framework & where there is no
specific financial reporting framework, client may specify that accounts should be
compiled on, for example, based on requirements of Income Tax Act. If any accounting
standard is not complied with, the fact should be disclosed in the notes to account
If accountant becomes aware of any material misstatement, s/he must report this to
management or must withdraw from engagement if management doesnt act. Financial
information compiled should be approved by client before compilation report is signed
by accountant.
100 | P a g e


ACKNOWLEDEMENT
I would like to thank everyone who has inspired me to compile this book. I
would like to extend my regards to my sir, CA. Vikas Oswal who has
guided me to compile this book and make it available to my friends and
students.
Due care has been taken to make this a student friendly book and any
errors &omissions have been rectified.
Tho, if any error is found by anyone they can kindly communicate the same
to my email (or) other communication means given below.
I thank my family for supporting for writing this book.
Thank You,
A. Amogh. 17/01/2016.
Contact: 09666460051.
Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh.
Mail at aaaamogh@gmail.com
101 | P a g e


Standards of Auditing Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Standards of Auditing Notes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Standards of Auditing Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the different standards of auditing covered in the document?

What are the different standards of auditing covered in the document?

What are the key considerations for an engagement to compile financial information?

What are the key considerations for an engagement to compile financial information?

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF

[APPLICABLE FOR MAY 2016 & ONWARDS]

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

THIS BOOK CONTAINS 2 PARTS:

PART AFLOWCHART PRESENTATION OF SAs

PART BTHEORY NOTES OF SAs

No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

STANDARDS OF AUDITING (SA) ISSUED BY ICAI

SA 200: Basic Principles Governing An Audit.

SA 210: Terms Of Audit Engagement.

SA 220: Quality Control For Audit Work

SA 230: Audit Documentation.

SA 240: The Auditors Responsibilities Relating To Fraud In An Audit

SA 250: Consideration Of Laws And Regulations In An Audit Of Financial

SA 260: Communication With Those Charged With Governance.

SA 265: Communication Deficiencies In Internal Control To Those Charged With

SA 299: Responsibility Of Joint Auditors.

SA 300: Planning An Audit Of Financial Statements.

SA 320: Audit Materiality.

SA 330: The Auditors Responses To Assessed Risks.

SA 402: Audit Considerations Relating To Entities Using Service Organizations.

SA 450: Evaluation Of Misstatement Identified During The Audit.

SA 500: Audit Evidence.

SA 501: Audit Evidence Additional Consideration For Specific Items.

Part A: Attendance At Physical Inventory Counting.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

Part C: Valuation And Disclosure Of Long Term Investments.

Part D: Segment Information.

SA 505: External Confirmations.

SA 510: Initial Audit Engagements Opening Balances.

SA 520: Analytical Procedures.

SA 530: Audit Sampling.

SA 540: Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates,

SA 550: Related Parties.

SA 560: Subsequent Events.

SA 570: Going Concern.

SA 580: Written Representations.

SA 600: Using The Work Of Another Auditor.

SA 610: Relying Upon The Work Of An Internal Auditor.

SA 620: Using The Work Of An Expert.

SA 700: The Auditors Report On Financial Statements.

SA 705: Modifications To The Opinion In The Independent Auditors Report.

SA 706: Emphasis Of Matter Paragraphs And Other Matter In The Independent

SA 710: Comparatives Information.

SA 720: The Auditors Responsibility In Relation To Other Information In

No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING

No Part Of It Can Be Copied, Reproduced Or Distributed In Any Manner.

NOTES ON STANDARDS OF AUDITING