Postnatal Glucose Homeostasis in Late-Preterm and Term Infants

Committee on Fetus and Newborn

Pediatrics 2011;127;575; originally published online February 28, 2011;
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3851

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/575.full.html

PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly

publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned,
published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point
Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright 2011 by the American Academy
of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

Guidance for the Clinician in
Rendering Pediatric Care

Clinical ReportPostnatal Glucose Homeostasis in

Late-Preterm and Term Infants
David H. Adamkin, MD and COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND
NEWBORN

abstract

KEY WORDS
newborn, glucose, neonatal hypoglycemia, late-preterm infant

This report provides a practical guide and algorithm for the screening
and subsequent management of neonatal hypoglycemia. Current evidence does not support a specific concentration of glucose that can
discriminate normal from abnormal or can potentially result in acute
or chronic irreversible neurologic damage. Early identification of the
at-risk infant and institution of prophylactic measures to prevent neonatal hypoglycemia are recommended as a pragmatic approach despite the absence of a consistent definition of hypoglycemia in the
literature. Pediatrics 2011;127:575579

ABBREVIATIONS
NHneonatal hypoglycemia
D10Wdextrose 10% in water
This document is copyrighted and is property of the American
Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors
have filed conflict of interest statements with the American
Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through
a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American
Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any
commercial involvement in the development of the content of
this publication.
The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive
course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care.
Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be
appropriate.

www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2010-3851
doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3851
All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics
automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed,
revised, or retired at or before that time.
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
Copyright 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

INTRODUCTION
This clinical report provides a practical guide for the screening and
subsequent management of neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) in at-risk latepreterm (34 3667 weeks gestational age) and term infants. An expert
panel convened by the National Institutes of Health in 2008 concluded
that there has been no substantial evidence-based progress in defining
what constitutes clinically important NH, particularly regarding how it
relates to brain injury, and that monitoring for, preventing, and treating NH remain largely empirical.1 In addition, the simultaneous occurrence of other medical conditions that are associated with brain injury,
such as hypoxia-ischemia or infection, could alone, or in concert with
NH, adversely affect the brain.25 For these reasons, this report does
not identify any specific value or range of plasma glucose concentrations that potentially could result in brain injury. Instead, it is a pragmatic approach to a controversial issue for which evidence is lacking
but guidance is needed.
BACKGROUND
Blood glucose concentrations as low as 30 mg/dL are common in
healthy neonates by 1 to 2 hours after birth; these low concentrations,
seen in all mammalian newborns, usually are transient, asymptomatic,
and considered to be part of normal adaptation to postnatal life.6 8
Most neonates compensate for physiologic hypoglycemia by producing alternative fuels including ketone bodies, which are released from
fat.
Clinically significant NH reflects an imbalance between supply and use
of glucose and alternative fuels and may result from a multitude of
disturbed regulatory mechanisms. A rational definition of NH must
account for the fact that acute symptoms and long-term neurologic
sequelae occur within a continuum of low plasma glucose values of
varied duration and severity.

PEDIATRICS Volume 127, Number 3, March 2011

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

575

The authors of several literature reviews have concluded that there is not
a specific plasma glucose concentration or duration of hypoglycemia that
can predict permanent neurologic injury in high-risk infants.3,9,10 Data that
have linked plasma glucose concentration with adverse long-term neurologic
outcomes are confounded by variable
definitions of hypoglycemia and its duration (seldom reported), the omission of control groups, the possible inclusion of infants with confounding
conditions, and the small number of
asymptomatic infants who were followed.3,11,12 In addition, there is no single concentration or range of plasma
glucose concentrations that is associated with clinical signs. Therefore,
there is no consensus regarding when
screening should be performed and
which concentration of glucose requires therapeutic intervention in the
asymptomatic infant. The generally
adopted plasma glucose concentration that defines NH for all infants
(!47 mg/dL) is without rigorous scientific justification.1,3,4,9,12

WHICH INFANTS TO SCREEN

Because plasma glucose homeostasis
requires glucogenesis and ketogenesis to maintain normal rates of fuel
use,13 NH most commonly occurs in infants with impaired glucogenesis
and/or ketogenesis,14,15 which may occur with excessive insulin production,
altered counterregulatory hormone
production, an inadequate substrate
supply,1416 or a disorder of fatty acid
oxidation.15 NH occurs most commonly
in infants who are small for gestational age, infants born to mothers
who have diabetes, and late-preterm
infants. It remains controversial
whether otherwise normal infants
who are large for gestational age are
at risk of NH, largely because it is difficult to exclude maternal diabetes or
maternal hyperglycemia (prediabe576

FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

FIGURE 1

Screening for and management of postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm (LPT 34 3667
weeks) and term small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants and infants who were born to mothers with
diabetes (IDM)/large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. LPT and SGA (screen 0 24 hours), IDM and LGA
!34 weeks (screen 0 12 hours). IV indicates intravenous.

tes) with standard glucose-tolerance

tests.
A large number of additional maternal
and fetal conditions may also place infants at risk of NH. Clinical signs are
common with these conditions, and it
is likely that patients with such a condition are already being monitored
and that plasma glucose analyses are
being performed.13,17 Therefore, for
practicality, at risk in the management approach outlined in Fig 1 includes only infants who are small for
gestational age, infants who are large
for gestational age, infants who were
born to mothers who have diabetes,
and late-preterm infants. Routine
screening and monitoring of blood glucose concentration is not needed in
healthy term newborn infants after an
entirely normal pregnancy and delivery. Blood glucose concentration
should only be measured in term infants who have clinical manifestations
or who are known to be at risk. Plasma
or blood glucose concentration should
be measured as soon as possible (min-

utes, not hours) in any infant who manifests clinical signs (see Clinical
Signs) compatible with a low blood
glucose concentration (ie, the symptomatic infant).
Breastfed term infants have lower concentrations of plasma glucose but
higher concentrations of ketone bodies
than do formula-fed infants.13,17 It is postulated that breastfed infants tolerate
lower plasma glucose concentrations
without any clinical manifestations or sequelae of NH because of the increased
ketone concentrations.8,1214

WHEN TO SCREEN
Neonatal glucose concentrations decrease after birth, to as low as 30
mg/dL during the first 1 to 2 hours after birth, and then increase to higher
and relatively more stable concentrations, generally above 45 mg/dL by 12
hours after birth.6,7 Data on the optimal
timing and intervals for glucose
screening are limited. It is controversial whether to screen the asymptomatic at-risk infant for NH during this

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

normal physiologic nadir. No studies

have demonstrated harm from a few
hours of asymptomatic hypoglycemia
during this normal postnatal period
of establishing physiologic glucose
homeostasis.9
Infants born to mothers with diabetes
may develop asymptomatic NH as early
as 1 hour after birth18 and usually by 12
hours of age.18 In contrast, infants who
are large for gestational age or small
for gestational age may develop low
plasma glucose concentrations at as
early as 3 hours of age,19 and these
infants may be at risk of NH for up to 10
days after birth.20 Therefore, at-risk infants should be screened for NH with a
frequency and duration related to risk
factors specific to the individual infant.5 Screening the asymptomatic atrisk infant can be performed within
the first hours of birth and continued
through multiple feed-fast cycles. Latepreterm infants and infants who are
small for gestational age should be fed
every 2 to 3 hours and screened before
each feeding for at least the first 24
hours. After 24 hours, repeated
screening before feedings should be
continued if plasma glucose concentrations remain lower than 45 mg/dL.

LABORATORY DATA

glucose analyzers can be used if the

test is performed carefully and the clinician is aware of the limited accuracy
of these devices. Rapid measurement
methods available at the bedside include the handheld reflectance colorimeter and electrode methods. The
blood sample is usually obtained from
a warmed heel.
Test-strip results demonstrate a reasonable correlation with actual
plasma glucose concentrations, but
the variation from the actual level may
be as much as 10 to 20 mg/dL.2427 Unfortunately, this variation is greatest
at low glucose concentrations. There is
no point-of-care method that is sufficiently reliable and accurate in the low
range of blood glucose to allow it to be
used as the sole method for screening
for NH.

weak or high-pitched cry, floppiness or

lethargy, poor feeding, and eye-rolling.
It is important to screen for other possible underlying disorders (eg, infection) as well as hypoglycemia. Such
signs usually subside quickly with normalization of glucose supply and
plasma concentration.9,13 Coma and
seizures may occur with prolonged NH
(plasma or blood glucose concentrations lower than 10 mg/dL range) and
repetitive hypoglycemia. The more serious signs (eg, seizure activity) usually occur late in severe and protracted cases of hypoglycemia and are
not easily or rapidly reversed with glucose replacement and normalization
of plasma glucose concentrations.2830
Development of clinical signs may be
ameliorated by the presence of alternative substrates.31

Because of limitations with rapid

bedside methods, the blood or plasma
glucose concentration must be confirmed by laboratory testing ordered
stat. A long delay in processing the
specimen can result in a falsely low
concentration as erythrocytes in the
sample metabolize the glucose in the
plasma. This problem can be avoided
by transporting the blood in tubes that
contain a glycolytic inhibitor such as
fluoride.

Because avoidance and treatment of

cerebral energy deficiency is the principal concern, greatest attention
should be paid to neurologic signs. To
attribute signs and symptoms to NH,
Cornblath et al12 have suggested that
the Whipple triad be fulfilled: (1) a low
blood glucose concentration; (2) signs
consistent with NH; and (3) resolution
of signs and symptoms after restoring
blood glucose concentrations to normal values.12

When NH is suspected, the plasma or

blood glucose concentration must be
determined immediately by using one
of the laboratory enzymatic methods
(eg, glucose oxidase, hexokinase, or
dehydrogenase method). Plasma
blood glucose values tend to be approximately 10% to 18% higher than
whole-blood values because of the
higher water content of plasma.21,22

Screening of the at-risk infant for NH and

institution of prophylactic measures to
prevent prolonged or symptomatic NH is
a reasonable goal. Treatment of suspected NH should not be postponed
while waiting for laboratory confirmation. However, there is no evidence to
show that such rapid treatment will mitigate neurologic sequelae.

Although a laboratory determination is

the most accurate method of measuring the glucose concentration, the results may not be available quickly
enough for rapid diagnosis of NH,
which thereby delays the initiation of
treatment.23 Bedside reagent test-strip

CLINICAL SIGNS

PEDIATRICS Volume 127, Number 3, March 2011

The clinical signs of NH are not specific

and include a wide range of local or
generalized manifestations that are
common in sick neonates.12,13,17 These
signs include jitteriness, cyanosis, seizures, apneic episodes, tachypnea,

MANAGEMENT
Any approach to management needs to
account for the overall metabolic and
physiologic status of the infant and
should not unnecessarily disrupt the
mother-infant relationship and breastfeeding. The definition of a plasma glucose concentration at which intervention is indicated needs to be tailored to
the clinical situation and the particular
characteristics of a given infant. For
example, further investigation and immediate intravenous glucose treatment might be instituted for an infant
with clinical signs and a plasma glucose concentration of less than 40 mg/

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

577

dL, whereas an at-risk but asymptomatic term formula-fed infant may only
require an increased frequency of
feeding and would receive intravenous
glucose only if the glucose values decreased to less than 25 mg/dL (birth to
4 hours of age) or 35 mg/dL (4 24
hours of age).32 Follow-up glucose concentrations and clinical evaluation
must always be obtained to ensure
that postnatal glucose homeostasis is
achieved and maintained.
Because severe, prolonged, symptomatic hypoglycemia may result in neuronal injury,27,28,32 prompt intervention is
necessary for infants who manifest
clinical signs and symptoms. A reasonable (although arbitrary) cutoff for
treating symptomatic infants is 40 mg/
dL. This value is higher than the physiologic nadir and higher than concentrations usually associated with
clinical signs. A plasma sample for a
laboratory glucose determination
needs to be obtained just before giving
an intravenous minibolus of glucose
(200 mg of glucose per kg, 2 mL/kg dextrose 10% in water [D10W], intravenously) and/or starting a continuous
infusion of glucose (D10W at 80 100
mL/kg per day). A reasonable goal is to
maintain plasma glucose concentrations in symptomatic infants between
40 and 50 mg/dL.
Figure 1 is a guideline for the screening and management of NH in latepreterm infants and term infants who
were born to mothers with diabetes,
small for gestational age, or large for
gestational age. In developing a pragmatic approach to the asymptomatic
at-risk infant during the first 24 hours
after birth, mode of feeding, risk factors, and hours of age were considered. This strategy is based on the following observations from Cornblath
and Ichord13: (1) almost all infants with
proven symptomatic NH during the
first hours of life have plasma glucose
concentrations lower than 20 to 25
578

FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

mg/dL; (2) persistent or recurrent NH

syndromes present with equally low
plasma glucose concentrations; and
(3) little or no evidence exists to indicate that asymptomatic NH at any concentration of plasma glucose in the
first days of life results in any adverse
sequelae in growth or neurologic
development.13
Figure 1 is divided into 2 time periods
(birth to 4 hours and 4 12 hours) and
accounts for the changing values of
glucose that occur over the first 12
hours after birth. The recommended
values for intervention are intended to
provide a margin of safety over concentrations of glucose associated with
clinical signs. The intervention recommendations also provide a range of
values over which the clinician can decide to refeed or provide intravenous
glucose. The target glucose concentration is greater than 45 mg/dL before
each feeding. At-risk infants should be
fed by 1 hour of age and screened 30
minutes after the feeding. This recommendation is consistent with that of
the World Health Organization. Gavage
feeding may be considered in infants
who are not nippling well. Glucose
screening should continue until 12
hours of age for infants born to mothers with diabetes and those who are
large for gestational age and maintain
plasma glucose concentrations of
greater than 40 mg/dL. Late-preterm
infants and infants who are small for
gestational age require glucose monitoring for at least 24 hours after birth,
because they may be more vulnerable
to low glucose concentrations, especially if regular feedings or intravenous fluids are not yet established.20 If
inadequate postnatal glucose homeostasis is documented, the clinician
must be certain that the infant can
maintain normal plasma glucose concentrations on a routine diet for a reasonably extended period (through at
least 3 feed-fast periods) before dis-

charge. It is recommended that the atrisk asymptomatic infant who has glucose concentrations of less than 25
mg/dL (birth to 4 hours of age) or less
than 35 mg/dL (4 24 hours of age) be
refed and that the glucose value be rechecked 1 hour after refeeding. Subsequent concentrations lower than 25
mg/dL, or lower than 35 mg/dL, respectively, after attempts to refeed, necessitate treatment with intravenous glucose. Persistent hypoglycemia can be
treated with a minibolus (200 mg/kg [2
mL/kg] D10W) and/or intravenous infusion of D10W at 5 to 8 mg/kg per minute,
80 to 100 mL/kg per day; the goal is to
achieve a plasma glucose concentration of 40 to 50 mg/dL (higher concentrations will only stimulate further insulin secretion). If it is not possible to
maintain blood glucose concentrations of greater than 45 mg/dL after 24
hours of using this rate of glucose infusion, consideration should be given
to the possibility of hyperinsulinemic
hypoglycemia, which is the most common cause of severe persistent hypoglycemia in the newborn period. A
blood sample should be sent for measurement of insulin along with a glucose concentration at the time when a
bedside blood glucose concentration
is less than 40 mg/dL, and an endocrinologist should be consulted.

SUMMARY
Current evidence does not support a
specific concentration of glucose that
can discriminate euglycemia from hypoglycemia or can predict that acute
or chronic irreversible neurologic
damage will result. Therefore, similar
to the Canadian Paediatric Society
guidelines, a significantly low concentration of glucose in plasma should be
reliably established and treated to restore glucose values to a normal physiologic range.5 Recognizing infants at
risk of disturbances in postnatal glucose homeostasis and providing a
margin of safety by early measures to

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

prevent (feeding) and treat (feeding

and intravenous glucose infusion) low
concentrations are primary goals.
Follow-up glucose measurements are
always indicated to be sure an infant
can maintain normal glucose concentrations over several feed-fast cycles.
This will also permit recognition of infants with persistent hyperinsulinemic
hypoglycemia and infants with fatty
acid oxidation disorders.

LEAD AUTHOR

Kristi L. Watterberg, MD

David H. Adamkin, MD

LIAISONS

COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN,

2009 2010

Capt Wanda Denise Barfield, MD, MPH

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
William H. Barth Jr, MD American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Ann L. Jefferies, MD
Rosalie O. Mainous, PhD, RNC, NNP National
Association of Neonatal Nurses
Tonse N. K. Raju, MD, DCH National Institutes
of Health

Lu-Ann Papile, MD, Chairperson

David H. Adamkin, MD
Jill E. Baley, MD
Vinod K. Bhutani, MD
Waldemar A. Carlo, MD
Praveen Kumar, MD
Richard A. Polin, MD
Rosemarie C. Tan, MD, PhD
Kasper S. Wang, MD

STAFF
Jim Couto, MA

REFERENCES
1. Hay W Jr, Raju TK, Higgins RD, Kalhan SC,
Devaskar SU. Knowledge gaps and research
needs for understanding and treating neonatal hypoglycemia: workshop report from
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development. J Pediatr. 2009;155(5):612 617
2. Adamkin DH. Update on neonatal hypoglycemia. Arch Perinat Med. 2005;11(3):1315
3. Sinclair JC. Approaches to definition of neonatal hypoglycemia. Acta Paediatr Jpn.
1997;39(suppl 1):S17S20
4. McGowan JE. Commentary, neonatal hypoglycemia. Fifty years later, the questions remain the same. Neoreviews. 2004;5(9):
e363 e364
5. Canadian Paediatric Society. Screening
guidelines for newborns at risk for low
blood glucose. Paediatr Child Health. 2004;
9(10):723729
6. Srinivasan G, Pildes RS, Cattamanchi G,
Voora S, Lilien LD. Plasma glucose values in
normal neonates: a new look. J Pediatr.
1986;109(1):114 117
7. Heck LJ, Erenberg A. Serum glucose levels
in term neonates during the first 48 hours
of life. J Pediatr. 1987;110(1):119 122
8. Hoseth E, Joergensen A, Ebbesen F, Moeller M.
Blood glucose levels in a population of
healthy, breast fed, term infants of appropriate size for gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83(2):F117F119
9. Rozance PJ, Hay W. Hypoglycemia in newborn
infants: features associated with adverse outcomes. Biol Neonate. 2006;90(2):74 86
10. Sinclair JC, Steer PA. Neonatal hypoglycemia and subsequent neurodevelopment: a
critique of follow-up studies. Presented at:
CIBA Foundation discussion meeting: Hypoglycemia in Infancy; October 17, 1989; London, England
11. Boluyt N, van Kempen A, Offringa M. Neurodevelopment after neonatal hypoglycemia:

PEDIATRICS Volume 127, Number 3, March 2011

a systematic review and design of an optimal future study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):

22312243
12. Cornblath M, Hawdon JM, Williams AF, et al.
Controversies regarding definition of neonatal hypoglycemia: suggested operational
thresholds. Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):
11411145
13. Cornblath M, Ichord R. Hypoglycemia in the
neonate. Semin Perinatol. 2000;24(2):
136 149
14. Hawdon JM, Ward Platt MP, Aynsley-Green A.
Patterns of metabolic adaptation for preterm and term infants in the first neonatal
week. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67(4 spec No.):
357365
15. Kalhan S, Parmimi P. Gluconeogenesis in
the fetus and neonate. Semin Perinatol.
2000;24(2):94 106
16. Swenne I, Ewald U, Gustafsson J, Sandberg
F, Ostenson C. Inter-relationship between
serum concentrations of glucose, glucagon
and insulin during the first two days of life
in healthy newborns. Acta Paediatr. 1994;
83(9):915919
17. Williams AF. Hypoglycaemia of the newborn:
a review. Bull World Health Organ. 1997;
75(3):261290
18. Agrawal RK, Lui K, Gupta JM. Neonatal hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers. J
Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36(4):354 356
19. Holtrop PC. The frequency of hypoglycemia
in full-term large and small for gestational
age newborns. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10(2):
150 154
20. Hume R, McGeechan A, Burchell A. Failure to
detect preterm infants at risk of hypoglycemia before discharge. J Pediatr. 1999;
134(4):499 502
21. Burrin JM, Alberti KGMM. What is blood
glucose: can it be measured? Diabet Med.
1990;7(3):199 206

22. Aynsley-Green A. Glucose: a fuel for thought!

J Paediatr Child Health. 1991;27(1):2130
23. Cornblath M, Schwartz R. Hypoglycemia in
the neonate. J Pediatr Endocrinol. 1993;
6(2):113129
24. Altimier L, Roberts W. One Touch II hospital
system for neonates: correlation with serum glucose values. Neonatal Netw. 1996;
15(2):1518
25. Giep TN, Hall RT, Harris K, Barrick B, Smith S. Evaluation of neonatal whole blood versus plasma
glucose concentration by ion-selective electrode
technology and comparison with two whole
blood chromogen test strip methods. J Perinatol. 1996;16(4):244249
26. Maisels MJ, Lee C. Chemstrip glucose test
strips: correlation with true glucose values
less than 80 mg/dL. Crit Care Med. 1983;
11(4):293295
27. Hussain K, Sharief N. The inaccuracy of venous and capillary blood glucose measurement using reagent strips in the newborn
period and the effect of haematocrit. Early
Hum Dev. 2000;57(2):111121
28. de Lonlay P, Touati G, Robert JJ, Saudubray
JM. Persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7(1):95100
29. Meissner T, Brune W, Mayatepek E. Persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia of
infancy: therapy, clinical outcome and mutational analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 1997;
156(10):754 757
30. Menni F, deLonlay P, Sevin C, et al. Neurologic outcomes of 90 neonates and infants
with persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Pediatrics. 2001;107(3):476 479
31. Adam PA, Raiha N, Rahiala EL, Kekomaki M.
Oxidation of glucose and D-B-OH-butyrate by
the early human fetal brain. Acta Paediatr
Scand. 1975;64(1):1724
32. Kalhan S, Peter-Wohl S. Hypoglycemia: what
is it for the neonate? Am J Perinatol. 2000;
17(1):1118

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014

579

Postnatal Glucose Homeostasis in Late-Preterm and Term Infants

Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Pediatrics 2011;127;575; originally published online February 28, 2011;
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3851
Updated Information &
Services

including high resolution figures, can be found at:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/575.full.ht
ml

References

This article cites 31 articles, 6 of which can be accessed free

at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/575.full.ht
ml#ref-list-1

Citations

This article has been cited by 19 HighWire-hosted articles:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/575.full.ht
ml#related-urls

Post-Publication
Peer Reviews (P3Rs)

2 P3Rs have been posted to this article

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/127/3/575

Subspecialty Collections

This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in

the following collection(s):
Committee on Fetus & Newborn
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/committee
_on_fetus__newborn

Permissions & Licensing

Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,

tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xht
ml

Reprints

Information about ordering reprints can be found online:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly

publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published,
and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk
Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All
rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on July 14, 2014