Traded As: Industry Founded Founder Headquarters Area Served Key People
Traded As: Industry Founded Founder Headquarters Area Served Key People
Traded As: Industry Founded Founder Headquarters Area Served Key People
Industry
Founded
Founder
Headquarters
Area served
Key people
Products
Revenue
Operating
income
Profit
Total assets
Total equity
Number of
employees
Divisions
Subsidiaries
Website
NSE: LT
BSE: 500510
BSE SENSEX Constituent
Conglomerate
Mumbai, Maharastra, India (1938)
Sren Kristian Toubro
Henning Holck-Larsen
L&T House, Ballard Estate,
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
India, Middle East, East Asia and
Southeast Asia
K. Venkataramanan (CEO & MD)
A. M. Naik (Executive Chairman)
Construction
Heavy equipment
Electrical equipment
Power
Shipbuilding
Financial services
IT Services
US$ 15 Billion (2015)[1]
US$ 1.07 Billion (2014)[1]
US$ 952.638 Million (2013)[1]
US$ 26.188 Billion (2013)[1]
US$ 6.6818 Billion (2013)[1]
84,027 (Mar 2014)[2]
Technology, engineering,
construction, manufacturing
L&T Infotech, L&T Mutual Fund,
www.larsentoubro.com
6 We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company
pursuant to the rules prescribed by the central government for the maintenance of cost records
under section 148(1) of the Companies Act 2013 in respect of all its manufacturing and
construction activities and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and
records have been made and maintained. The contents of these accounts and records have not
been examined by us.
7 (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the
Company examined by us in our opinion the Company is generally regular in depositing
undisputed statutory dues including provident fund employees state insurance income-tax
sales-tax wealth tax service tax duty of customs duty of excise value added tax cess and other
material statutory dues as applicable with the appropriate authorities .According to the
information and explanations given to us there were no undisputed amounts payable in
respect of provident fund employees state insurance income-taxs ales-tax wealth tax service
tax duty of customs duty of excise cess and other statutory dues outstanding as at 31 March
2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the
Company examined by us the particulars of income-tax sales-tax wealth tax service tax duty
of custom duty of excise value added tax or cess as at 31 March 2015 which have not been
deposited on account of a dispute pending are as under:
Amount
Name of
Nature of the disputed dues
the statute
Central
Sales Tax
Act Local
Sales Tax
Acts and
Works
Contract
Tax Act
Period to
which the
Rs.
amount
crore*
relates
Forum where
disputes are
pending
1991-92
1995-96
1997-98
1999-2000
to 2005-06
Supreme Court
1986-87 to
2011-12
High Court
3.20
1987-88 to
1991-92
1994-95 to
2011-12
Sales Tax
Tribunal
Non-submission of forms
13.92
1.73
2008-09
1995-96
1997-98
2001-02 to
2004-05
2006-07 to
2012-13
1997-98
1999-2000
2001-02
2003-04 to
2011-12
1991-92
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1997-98
1999-2000
to 2013-14
1991-92
1992-93
1996-97 to
2005-06 and
2008-09
1994-95 to
2014-15
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Additional
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Joint
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Deputy
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Assistant
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Commercial
Tax Officer
0.27
1997-98
Supreme Court
565.06
1991-92
2001-02 to
2011-12
CESTAT
1.76
2006-07
2008-09 to Commissioner
2012-13 and (Appeals)
2014-15
42.48
2003-04
High Court
2005-06 and
2006-07
2004-05 to
2010-11
CESTAT
2007-08 to
2012-13
ITAT
2005-06
Commissioner
(Appeals)
the Company has in place an adequate internal financialcontrols system over financial
reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls.An audit also includes evaluating
the appropriateness of the accounting policies used andthe reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by the Companys Directors aswell as evaluating the overall presentation of
the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate toprovide a
basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanationsgiven to us
the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information requiredby the Act in the
manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with theaccounting principles
generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Companyas at 31 March 2015 and its
profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
1 As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2015 ("theOrder") issued by the
central government of India in terms of sub-section (11) ofsection 143 of the Act we give in
the Annexure a statement on the matters specified inparagraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2 As required by section 143 (3) of the Act we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the bestof our
knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by theCompany
so far as it appears from our examination of those books.
(c) The balance sheet the statement of profit and loss and the cash flow statementdealt with
by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
(d) In our opinion the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with theAccounting
Standards specified under section 133 of the Act read with rule 7 of theCompanies
(Accounts) Rules 2014.
(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31March
2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors none of the directors isdisqualified as on 31
March 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of section164 (2) of the Act.
(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report inaccordance with
rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules 2014 in our opinionand to the best of
our information and according to the explanations given to us: i. TheCompany has disclosed
the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in itsfinancial statements refer
notes I note (II) in Q(16) and Q(17) to the financialstatements; ii. The Company has made
provision as required under the applicable law oraccounting standards for material
foreseeable losses if any on long-term contractsincluding derivative contracts refer notes
C(II) D(IV) and Q(7)(a) to thefinancial statements; and iii. There has been no delay in
transferring amounts required tobe transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund
by the Company.
Contract
Tax Act
Period to
which the
Rs.
amount
crore*
relates
Forum where
disputes are
pending
1991-92
1995-96
1997-98
1999-2000
to 2005-06
Supreme Court
1986-87 to
2011-12
High Court
3.20
1987-88 to
1991-92
1994-95 to
Sales Tax
Tribunal
Non-submission of forms
13.92
1.73
The Central
Excise Act Dispute of excise duty on site mix
0.27
1944
concrete and PSC grinder
Service
Demand of excise duty on site
fabricated steel structures export rebate
Tax under
disallowance valuation disputes excise
Finance Act
565.06
duty on concrete mix made at site non1994
maintenance of separate records and
other matters
Disallowance of cenvat credit excise
1.76
duty refund short payment of service
tax excise duty on concrete mix made
at site service tax rate dispute and other
2011-12
2008-09
1995-96
1997-98
2001-02 to
2004-05
2006-07 to
2012-13
1997-98
1999-2000
2001-02
2003-04 to
2011-12
1991-92
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1997-98
1999-2000
to 2013-14
1991-92
1992-93
1996-97 to
2005-06 and
2008-09
1994-95 to
2014-15
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Additional
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Joint
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Deputy
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Assistant
Commissioner
(Appeals)
Commercial
Tax Officer
1997-98
Supreme Court
1991-92
2001-02 to
2011-12
CESTAT
2006-07
Commissioner
2008-09 to (Appeals)
2012-13 and
2014-15
matters
Export rebate claim service tax on
commercial construction services
service tax liability against rate change
and penalty imposed for wrong
availment of cenvat credit
Demand of service tax including
penalty interest on lump-sum turnkey
jobs demand of penalty on late
payment of service tax and other
matters
Assessment under section 143(3) read
Income-tax with section 144C(13) and demand of
Act 1961
tax deducted at source on bank
guarantee charges and internet charges
Dispute regarding tax deducted at
source at lower rates
42.48
2003-04
2005-06 and High Court
2006-07
15.24
2004-05 to
2010-11
CESTAT
454.90
2007-08 to
2012-13
ITAT
0.05
2005-06
Commissioner
(Appeals)
MILIND P. PHADKE
Partner
Membership No.33013
Balance sheet