Hdre 2014
Hdre 2014
Hdre 2014
2014
Title
Copy Right
Published by
First Published :
2014
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form by any
means without the prior permission by Zilla Panchayat
and Planning, Programme Monitoring and Statistics
Department, Government of Karnataka.
Lead Agency
Printed by
Photos by
Designed by
ii
MESSAGE
iii
S. R. Patil
Minister for Planning &
Statistics, IT & BT
Science & Technology
And
Bagalkot District Incharge Minister
M essage
I am happy to learn that the District Human Development Reports
(DHDRs) for all the 30 districts in the State are being placed in public
domain shortly. A painstaking and massive effort
iv
B. RAMANATHA RAI
Minister for Forest, Ecology and
Environment Department And
Dakshina Kannada District
Incharge Minister
M essage
The concept of human development does not depend solely on the improvement of
facilities such as health, education etc. or increase in per capita income. It includes open
atmosphere to get these facilities and attaining the competence of utilizing them. Therefore
eminent economists have said, Human development means extension of choices to the
people.
I am happy that the Government of Karnataka has recognized the importance of
human development and decided to bring out Human Development Report with the aim of
finding out the shortcoming and discrepancies. The reports from all the 30 district has
successfully compiled the report. This success is due to the active involvement of institutions
like Mangalore University, Justice K. S. Hedge Institute of Management, various NGOs,
experts and various department of the government.
I hope this report will contribute immensely in framing the policy with regard to
human development, in allotting financial resources for the projects and development works
in the district. I congratulate all those who are involved in the preparation of this report.
PRESIDENT
DAKSHINA KANNADA ZILLA PANCHAYAT
Ashok Nagar Post, Mangalore - 575 006
Phone : 0824 - 2220532
M essage
It is now well recognized that the mere increase in the Gross Domestic product and per capita
income cannot lead to the well being of people. The Human Development Approach of UNDP
rightly put the well -being of people at the centre of development. Recognising the critical
importance of well-being of people, Karnataka Government brought out two Human Development
Reports in 19999 and 2005. Since state level reports have not brought out disparities in various
dimensions of human development at grass root level within the districts, the Government of
Karnataka has now decided to bring out District Human Development Reports for all 30 districts in
the state. The Zilla Panchayat of Dakshina Kannada was made responsible to coordinate the task of
preparation of the Dakshina Kannada District Human Development Report. In the beginning
Mangalore University was appointed as the lead agency and subsequently, Justice K S Hegde
Institute of Management, Nitte took over as the lead agency for preparing Dakshina Kannada
District Human Development Report.
The Preparation of the Report was a huge responsibility and challenging task. Human
Development being multi- dimensional, the report adopted broad based methodology and a set of
taluk-level human development indicators for construction of seven indices to focus on inter-taluk
disparities in human development, gender inequality, child development, food security, urban
development, deprivation of Dalits and composite taluk development. The Report also discusses
meticulously various human development dimensions such as education, health, sanitation,
vi
vii
P I SREEVIDYA, I.A.S
Phone : 0824 - 2220578
Mob. : 9480862000
Fax : 0824 - 2220538
Email : ceozpmlr@kar.nic.in
Foreword
vi
my predecessor, spearheaded the initiative and coordinated the process. The Planning Department
of the ZP organized district-level and three taluk-level workshops and collobarated with the Lead
agency in compilation and validation of data from the line departments and preparation of the Reprt.
The Heads of Departments such as Education, Health and Family Welfare, Agriculture,
Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Women and Child Development, Social Welfare, Urban Local
Bodies and others provided required data and participated actively in the deliberations of Core
Committee. I would like to express my sincere thanks to all of them for their assistance and
contribution.
The research team of the Lead Agency consisting of Dr. N.S.Shetty (Lead Coordinator),
supported by Shri Vinod Dixit worked very hard with commitment in preparing this Report. Prof
Rakesh Shetty of the Institute helped in computing the indices. The Report also greatly benefited
from the intellectual advice from Dr. N.K.Thingalaya, Emeritus Professor and Dr. M. S.
Moodithaya, Registrar of Nitte University. I am profoundly grateful to them.
Special thanks are also due to Prof. Sayeegeetha Hegde of the Department of Humanities,
Nitte University, for translating the entire Report into Kannada and Sri Jagadish of Ultra Designz
for designing the Report.
Finally, I thank all those directly or indirectly involved in giving the Report its final shape. I
sincerely hope that the Report would be of great policy relevance and provide basis for preparing
district planning process from human development perspective and resource allocation by the State
Government.
vii
Lead Agency:
Coordinating Agency
Justice K. S. Hegde
Institute of Management, Nitte
Planning Department
Zilla Panchayat
Dr. N S Shetty
Emeritus Professor
Lead Co-ordinator
Dr. N K Thingalaya
Emeritus Professor
Dr. M S Moodithaya
Registrar, Nitte University
Mr. Vinod Dixit
Research Scholar
Prof. Rakesh Shetty
Asst. Professor
Justice K S Hegde
Institute of Management
Sri N R Umesh
Cheif Planning Officer
Sri P V Desai
Cheif Planning Officer
Mrs Sandhya K S
Cheif Planning Officer (I/C)
Project Appraisal & Evaluation Officer
Mr Vishwanath P Mudajji
Cheif Planning Officer
Mr. Mahesh Ambekal
Assistant Statistical Officer
Dr. Sayeegeetha
K. S. Hegde Medical Academy
Department of Humanities
Nitte University, Mangaluru
Kannada Translator
viii
CONTENTS
Part I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Part II: DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.2:
1.3:
1.4:
1.5:
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
Introduction..................................................................................................................033
Background and Brief Regional History......................................................................034
Physiographic Division of the District.........................................................................035
Land, Soil and Natural Resource Endowment .............................................................036
Demography.................................................................................................................039
Literacy .......................................................................................................................042
Agriculture and Irrigation ............................................................................................043
Industry ........................................................................................................................047
Infrastructure................................................................................................................049
Regional Perspective and Backwardness ....................................................................051
An Overview ................................................................................................................055
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
C O N T E N T S
1.1:
Introduction..................................................................................................................061
Human Development Index .........................................................................................062
Gender Inequality Index...............................................................................................066
Child Development Index ...........................................................................................067
Food Security Index .....................................................................................................069
Urban Development Index ...........................................................................................071
Composite Taluk Development Index..........................................................................072
Concluding Remarks....................................................................................................073
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Introduction..................................................................................................................079
Historical Backdrop ....................................................................................................080
Literacy Profile of the District ....................................................................................081
Primary Education ......................................................................................................083
Secondary Education...................................................................................................094
Pre University Education ............................................................................................099
ix
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
Introduction ..................................................................................................................117
Demographic Profile ....................................................................................................117
Health Status: IMR & MMR........................................................................................118
Couple Protection Issues and Family Welfare .............................................................122
Infrastructure and Health Personnel Facility .............................................................122
ANC Coverage and Anemia among Pregnant Women ................................................127
Institutional Delivery ..................................................................................................128
Immunization of Children ...........................................................................................129
Under Weight Children and BMI Ratio ....................................................................130
Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases......................................................131
Performance of Various Health Schemes.....................................................................133
Per Capita Expenditure Analysis on Health Sector......................................................135
Per Capita Expenditure Analysis on Health Sector......................................................135
Radar Analysis for Health ...........................................................................................136
Micro-Study on Health Problems in Endosulfan Sprayed Areas in DK Dist...............140
An Overview: Performance and Inadequacies of Healthcare System ........................144
Introduction..................................................................................................................149
District and Taluk Income............................................................................................149
Agriculture: Cropping Pattern, Irrigation, Livestock and Fisheries ...............................156
BPL Households, MGNREGA .....................................................................................164
Landless Households ...................................................................................................169
Employment and Unemployment ................................................................................170
Main and Marginal Workers ........................................................................................176
Work Participation Rate ...............................................................................................179
Occupation Pattern.......................................................................................................181
Child Labor ..................................................................................................................187
Radar Analysis for Living Standard.............................................................................188
Concluding Remarks....................................................................................................192
Introduction..................................................................................................................197
Introduction.................................................................................................................245
A Demographic Profile of SCs & STs .........................................................................245
Education Profile and Levels of Enrolment Drop-out Rate............................................254
Health Awareness and Institutional Delivery Rate.........................................................259
Occupational Pattern and Livelihood Opportunities....................................................260
Housing, Drinking Water Facilities and Sanitation......................................................264
Radar Analysis of Marginalized Groups ......................................................................266
Composite Dalit Development Index (CDDI) A Case Study....................................270
Concluding Remarks....................................................................................................273
C O N T E N T S
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.10
Introduction..................................................................................................................277
Local Governance Structure.........................................................................................277
Panchayat Raj Institutions: Structure and Process.........................................................278
Urban Local Bodies: Structure, Issues and Process .......................................................281
Improving Service Delivery Mechanisms:....................................................................285
Role of NGOs and Other Voluntary Groups ................................................................290
xi
10.7
10.8
Introduction..................................................................................................................301
Service Delivery Issues................................................................................................301
Water Supply and Sanitation .........................................................................................303
Solid and Liquid Waste Management............................................................................306
Concluding Remarks....................................................................................................308
Introduction..................................................................................................................313
Key Findings and Issues ..............................................................................................313
The Way Forward Strategies .........................................................................................321
Concluding Remarks ....................................................................................................329
Appendix Tables
References
xii
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.1
HDI and its Dimensions Indices of Dakshina Kannada District and the State ..............062
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Taluk-wise Gross and Net Enrolment in Primary Education: (2011 -12) .......................086
4.6
xiii
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
Full ANC Coverage and Anemia among Pregnant Women: 2011-12 .............................128
5.7
xiv
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
Rural and Urban Composition of Main and Marginal workers in the District................177
6.15
6.16
6.17
6.18
6.19
xv
6.20
6.21
6.22
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.10
7.11
7.12
7.13
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
xvi
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
9.12
9.13
9.14
10.1
10.2
11.1
11.2
11.3
xvii
Graphs
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4 Taluk-wise GER by Social Class in Primary Education Percentage ALL ......................088
4.5
4.6
4.7
Infrastructure Index............................................................................................................094
4.10
4.11
4.12
xviii
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
7.2
7.3
8.1
8.2 Type of Crime Registered Against Women in Dakshina Kannada in 2011 -12 ................235
xix
8.3
9.1
9.2
9.5 Housing for SCs and STs under various programs: 2011-12.............................................265
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
FLOW CHARTS
Chart 1.1 : Key Indicators Selected for Human Development Indices
Chart 10.1 : District Level Zilla Panchayat ..............................................................................279
Chart 10.2 : Structure of Urban Local Bodies .............................................................................284
xx
BOXES
Box 2.1 Agricultural Sector: Strengths, Constraints and Prospects.......................................................046
Box 2.2: Prospects and Constraints for Industrial Development...........................................................048
Box 2.3: South Canara District: The Cradle and Nursery of Banking....................................................050
Box 2.4: Mangaluru City A Gateway City of Karnataka....................................................................055
Box 2.5: Dakshina Kannada District: Challenging Potential for tourism ..............................................056
Box 4.1: Contribution of Christian Missionaries to Education in erstwhile South Kanara District........080
Box 4.2: Mainstreaming of Destitute Children in Education ................................................................091
Box 4.3: Mangaluru University: A Hub of Higher Education ...............................................................103
Box 4.4: Nitte Education Trust .............................................................................................................104
Box 4. 5: RUDSETTI at Ujire: A Replicable Model for Skill Development ..........................................106
Box 5.1 Comprehensive health Care: Eleventh Plan Seven Measureable Targets .................................119
Box 5.2: Karnataka State Integrated Health Policy 2004....................................................................121
Box 5.3: KMC, Mangaluru: First PPP Model in Medical Education and Health Care ...........................125
Box 6.1: Growth in Income in Dakshina Kannada District ...................................................................155
Box 6.2: Varanashi Farm: Water Conservation A Success Story.........................................................157
Box 6.3 Dairy as an Enterprise or Self-employment .............................................................................159
Box 6.4: Milk Societies led White Revolution and 'Nandini' a Brand....................................................160
Box 6.5: Government's Fishermen Welfare Schemes ...........................................................................162
Box 6.6: Problem of Migrant Workers..................................................................................................185
Box 6.7: Employment Scenario in Dakshina Kannada District: Major Highlights................................187
Box 7.1 Hosangadi GP : A Clean Village Initiative ...............................................................................213
Box 8.1: Women Employment in Beedi Rolling...................................................................................227
xxi
Box 8.2 Gender Friendly and Enabling Factors in Dakshina Kannada District .....................................232
Box 8.3: Operational Guidelines issued by RBI/NABARD for formation of SHGs..............................235
Box 8.4: Shree Gajanana Navodaya SHG, Mangaluru A success Story..............................................238
Box 8.5: Navodaya Grama Vikas Charitable Trust, Mangaluru ............................................................239
Box 9.1: Malekudiya: A Tribal Community living in Forest ................................................................252
Box 9.2: Koraga Community: Poorest of the poor ................................................................................253
Box 10.1: SKDRDP: A NGO Model for Replication ...........................................................................293
Table-2
Table-3
Table 4
Table 5
Taluk and District Level Key Human Development Indicators for HDI(2011-12) ...........................350
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
xxii
ABBREVIATIONS
AAY
AIDS
ANC
BPL
CALC
CMPCO
CBOs
CBR
CC
CDI
CDDI
CTDI
CDR
CEO
CHCs
CMR
CPO
CRZ
CSO
CSR
DC
DCDI
DDI
DES
DHDR
DHFW
D. K.
ENT
DPT
DSO
DWCD
FSI
GDI
GDP
GII
GEM
GER
GNI
GOI
GOK
GP
GDDP
GSDP
HDI
HDR
HDD
HIV
ICDS
IHDI
IMR
ITDP
KHDR
KMC
KUDCEM
KIOCL
LEB
LIC
LPCD
MCF
MCH
MDGs
MGNREGA
MMR
MRPL
MPI
MESCOM
NABARD
NDDP
NER
NGOs
NGVCT
NRHM
NSS
NSSO
OBC
xxiv
PDS
PHCs
PMGY
PNC
PPMSD
PPP$
PRI
PTG
PTR
PUC
RBI
RCH
RMSA
RRBs
RUDSETI
RTE
SCs
SEZ
SCDCCB
SDMCs
SGRY
SGSY
SHGs
SKDRDP
SLCC
SSA
SSLC
STs
TB
TMCs
TP
IT
TSC
UDI
ULBs
UN
UNDP
WHO
WPR
ZP
xxvi
Part I
Executive Summary
Income
Education
Health
Empowerment
002
Executive Summary
As the conventional development
approach measured in terms of GDP and per
capita income did not capture basic aspects of
well-being of people, the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP), in its first
Human Development Report in 1990, advocated
people-centric human development as an
alternative approach. It made the human
development as the primary goal of
development. Since people are wealth of
nations, the development should aim at creating
an enabling environment for people to lead a
long and healthy life, to acquire knowledge and
to have access to resources needed for a decent
standard of living. The Human Development
Index (HDI) was evolved as a yardstick to
measure well-being of people across countries.
As a composite index, it takes into account three
core dimensions of human development viz.
health, education and standard of living. The
UNDP 2010 HDR has made HDI broad-based
beyond three core dimensions and suggested
users to take into consideration other key human
development concerns affecting human
development.
The Government of Karnataka brought
out the first HDR in 1999 and second HDR in
2005. Recognizing the critical importance of
human development concerns at grass root level,
the State Government has decided to undertake
DHDRs in all 30 districts in the state. The main
purpose of the DHDRs is to capture all the key
dimensions affecting well-being of people at the
taluk and district levels. Accordingly, a broader
approach is adopted to take into account most of
the key factors affecting human development at
taluk level. A common conceptual and
methodological framework and uniform set of
measurable indicators with standardized
003
Findings of HDIs
The DHDR computed six different
human development related indices to provide a
comprehensive view of human development at
taluk and district levels. They are - Human
Development Index (HDI), Gender Inequality
Index (GII), Child Development Index (CDI),
Food Security Index (FSI), Urban Development
Index (UDI) and Composite Taluk Development
Index (CTDI). In addition, Composite Dalit
Development Index (CDDI) was computed to
understand the human development issues
specific to Dalits (SCs'). A set of 68 indicators to
measure three core dimensions of human
development health, education and standard of
living has been used for construction of these
indices. These indicators are selected by taking
into account demographic factors, livelihood
and employment related factors, household
assets, empowering factors, health factors
including safe drinking water supply, and
sanitation and education factors. Since SCs are
marginalized community and face distinctly
different development problems such as social
exclusion, social discrimination and
deprivation, CDDI is computed to capture
perception on human development issues
specific to Dalits (SCs) pertaining to a one
selected gram panchayat in the district. The
purpose of this index is to understand the
difference between the perception and reality in
DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT - 2014
004
Executive Summary
005
006
Executive Summary
007
Livelihood Factors
Living standard is closely linked to per
capita income, employment status, ownership of
assets and basic livelihood amenities such as
housing, safe drinking water supply, electricity
for lighting and sanitation. Dakshina Kannada
district ranks second in per capita income and
3rd in total GDP among 30 districts in the state.
During the last decade, the district, however,
witnessed lower growth compared to the state's
average. The agriculture witnessed deceleration
in growth. Industrial sector is also facing slowdown in growth in recent years. The tertiary
008
Executive Summary
Gender Issues
The women constitute slightly more than
half of the total population. Inclusive human
development is not possible unless they are
bought into mainstream on equal basis
economically, socially and politically. The
district is considered as one of the most
progressive districts in the state with regard to
women and their empowerment. The genderfriendly enabling factors such as matriarchal
system, favourable sex ratio, high literacy
amongst men and women etc have contributed
significantly to the gender development in the
district. The government schemes such as
Bhagya Laxmi Programme to provide insurance
cover for new born girl's education and marriage
009
Marginalized Section
The SCs and STs are historically,
socially and economically deprived
communities. The Central and the State
Governance Issues
Good governance means efficient and
010
Executive Summary
012
Executive Summary
Empowerment of Women:
The emancipation of women from persisting
gender bias and gender inequality can be
achieved only through empowerment of women
in all human development dimensions. The
process of empowerment involves not only
equity in access to and control over resources but
also development of functional capabilities to
access one's rights and entitlements on equal
basis. The empowerment of women has to
therefore go beyond mere capacity building to
get control over the circumstances of their lives,
but also address the problems of women's
agency, their rights and freedom and their wellbeing and self-esteem. Poverty reduction, access
to livelihood resources, capability building,
security against vulnerability and equality of
gender relations in all spheres of activities have
to be considered integral part of the gender
planning and development. The interventions
and programmes should be therefore based on
ground realities and by taking into consideration
gender differential needs and related emerging
013
014
Executive Summary
016
Part II
Dakshina Kannada District
Human Development Report
Chapter 1
Introduction
018
Introduction
Increasing Gross Domestic Products
(GDP) and per capita income were considered in
the past as primary goal of economic
development. However, the development
experience of many countries had empirically
shown that the mere GDP growth miserably
failed to reduce socio-economic deprivation of
substantial section of their population. It was
well recognized that the conventional measure
of economic growth in terms of GDP and per
capita income cannot capture the basic aspects of
human well-being. In the words of Mahabub-ulHaq, the architect of the first Human
Development Report (HDR) of United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) any
measure that values a gun several hundred times
more than a bottle of milk is bound to raise
serious questions about its relevance for human
progress (Mahabub-ul-Haq, 1995). This led to
the realization that development process is a far
more complex phenomenon than mere growth in
domestic product alone and there is a need to
reflect on the level of well-being of the people.
Since the income centric development
paradigm did not capture the various dimensions
of well-being of people, the need was felt to have
a broader people-centric approach for
development. UNDP, as an international
development agency played a pioneering role in
developing human development as an
alternative development paradigm and human
development index (HDI) as a composite
measure of human well-being. It brings out
every year HDR comprising HDIs to measure
achievements in human development in every
nation since 1990. UNDP HDRs were global
019
CHAPTER - 1
020
Introduction
Dimensions
Measurement
Indicators
Minimum
Goal post
Maximum
Goalpost
Dimension
Index
Life expectancy at
birth
20 years
83.4 years
Health Index
Mean years of
schooling
Observed
Maxima
Expected years of
schooling
Expected
Maxima
Standard of living
100
$107721
Aggregation
(Geometric Mean)
Knowledge
Education
Index
Income Index
The dimension sub-indices are computed on the basis of the following general formula:
Actual Value Minimum Value
Component Index =
Maximum Value Minimum Value
HDI is the geometric mean of the three dimensions (I health . I Education . I Income)1/3.
021
022
Introduction
Flow Chart 1.1: Key Indicators Selected for Human Development Indices
A)1.Percentage of Houses having access to modern cooking fuel
Living
Standard
Health
Education
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
-5Years)
1. Literacy Rate
2. Gross Enrolement Rate at Schools
(Primary + Upper Primary + Secondary)
023
Reproductive
Health
1.
Empowerment
2.
3.
1.
2.
Labour Market
CDI
Health
Nutrition
Education
024
Percentage of drop-out
children mainstreamed
a) Primary
b) Secondary
Introduction
Availability
1. Cropping intensity
2. Pecentage of change in net sown area over
decade (2001-11)
3. PerCapita Fodgrain production (kgs)
4. Percentage of forest cover in total geographical
area
5. Irrigation intensity
6. Percentage of area degraded (cultivable waste)
to TGA
7. Percentage of leguminous (area under pulses)
crops in gross cropped area
1.
Accessibility
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Accessibility
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
UDI
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
025
CTDI
Standard of Living
Education
Health
Health
Demographic
Education
Sanitation
Livelihood and
Employment
Water
Participation
Inclusion
Discrimination
Freedom
Standard of
living
026
Gender
Access to
Basic
facilities
Introduction
027
Introduction
029
f)
Introduction
030
Chapter 2
District Overview
032
District Overview
2.1
Introduction
CHAPTER 2
Western Ghats
033
034
District Overview
Table 2.1
Taluk-wise Geographical Area and Rainfall
Taluk/District
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
Geographical
Area
(sq.km)
Share in the
District
(Percent)
Normal Rain
Days
(Days)
Normal Annual
Rainfall
(mms)
Actual Annual
Rainfall
(mms 2012)
735
1375
923
1000
826
4859
191791
15.13
28.30
18.99
20.58
17.00
100.00
2.53
120
128
120
124
125
123
103
3833
4509
3609
4017
3593
3912
1198
3282
4046
3166
2929
2768
3238
1094
035
Graph 2.1
Taluk-wise Geographical Area in sq.km
036
District Overview
Table 2.2
Land Utilization: 20011-12
(Hectares, Figures in bracket percentage)
Taluk/District
Geographical
Forest
Area
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
Nonavailable Uncultivated
for
land
cultivation
Fallow
land
Net
cultivated
area
Gross
cropped
area
34720
71758
5069
23323
14699
957
27710
(100.00)
(7.06)
(32,50)
(20.48)
(13.34)
(38.62)
137510
49837
29976
18253
1170
38274
(100.00)
(36.24)
(21.80)
(13.28)
(0.85)
(27.83)
85385
2902
33244
20233
7439
21335
(100.00)
(3.41)
(39.04)
(23.76)
(8.74)
(25.05)
99697
27386
31101
17013
2103
22094
(100.00)
(27.47)
(31.20)
(17.06)
(2.11)
(22.16)
83031
43282
6576
11035
105
22033
(100.00)
(52.13)
(7.92)
(13.29)
(0.13)
(26.53)
477149
128476
124220
81233
11774
131446
(100.00)
(26.93)
(26.03)
(17.02)
(2.47)
(27.55)
19049836 3071833
(100.00)
(16.12)
(11.41)
(8.48)
(9.37)
45934
29647
24926
22456
157683
10404107 12873308
(54.62)
037
038
District Overview
2.5 Demography
As per 2011 census, the total population
of Dakshina Kannada district is 20.90 lakh, of
which 10.35 lakh (49.5 percent) were males and
10.55 lakh (50.5 percent) females. The
population of the district has increased by 1.92
lakh people during the decade 2001-11 and in
terms of percentage; it has registered a decadal
growth 10 percent (Table 2.3). The decadal
growth rate of population of the district has
witnessed declining trend during the last two
decades from1991 onwards. It declined from
14.6 percent to 10 percent. While the decadal
growth of population is significantly lower than
state average of 17.5 percent and 15.6 percent
during these decades, compared to neighboring
Udupi district, it is very high. The decadal
growth of population in Udupi district during
2001-11 was only 5.85 percent.
Table 2.3
Growth of Population in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
1991
(Number)
2001
(Number)
2011
(Number)
Decadal Growth
(Percent)
1991 -2001
2001 -2011
Bantwal
323005
361554
395380
19.31
9.36
Belthangady
211394
246494
266589
16.60
8.15
Mangaluru
759705
882856
994602
16.21
12.66
Puttur
237237
266072
287851
12.15
8.18
Sullia
124824
140754
145227
12.76
3.18
District
1656165
1897730
2089649
14.57
10.11
State
44977201
52850562
61095297
17.51
15.60
039
Graph 2.2
Table 2.4
Gender Composition of Population in Dakshina Kannada District
2001
Male
2011
Female
(No.)
(No.)
1024
196708
198672
1010
125206
1032
131967
134622
1020
434702
448154
1031
490797
503805
1027
Puttur
132786
133286
1004
143116
144735
1011
Sullia
70994
69760
983
72126
73101
1014
District
938434
959296
1022
1034714
1054935
1020
State(lakh)
268.99
259.52
965
309.67
301.29
973
Taluks
Male
Female
(No.)
(No.)
Bantwal
178664
182890
Belthangady
121288
Mangaluru
Sex Ratio
Source: Census 2011. Sex ratio: female population per 1000 male population.
040
Sex Ratio
District Overview
Table 2.5
Rural-Urban Population: 2011
Rural and
Taluks
Rural
Urban
Urban share
(percent)
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Rural
Urban
Bantwal
138959
140523
279482
57749
58149
115898
70.69
29.31
Belthangady
124672
127130
251802
7295
7492
14787
94.45
5.55
Mangaluru
102613
107420
210033
388184
396385
784569
21.12
78.88
Puttur
112812
114165
226977
30304
30570
60874
78.85
21.15
Sullia
62428
62841
125269
9698
10260
19958
86.26
13.74
District
541484
552079
1093563
493230
502856
996086
52.33
47.67
State(lakh)
189.30
185.40
374.69
120.37
115.89
236.26
61.37
38.63
041
2.6
Literacy
District Overview
Agriculture
Agriculture and allied activities are the
backbone of the district's rural economy, where
the majority of the population lives. In the
coastal area, fishing is the main occupation.
Agriculture and allied activities contributes 14
percent to district GDP. Agro-ecologically, the
district has three zones: coastal plain, midland
plains and Western Ghats area. During 2011-12
crop years, the net cultivated area was 131446 ha
and gross cropped area, 157683 ha. The net
cultivated area constitutes 27.5 percent of the
geographical area of the district. The cropping
intensity works out to 1.2, which is one of the
lowest in the state. The district has no major and
medium irrigation projects. Consequently,
irrigated area is 72378 ha which is mainly
through wells, tube-wells, and lift irrigation.
043
Table 2.6
Distribution Pattern of Land Holdings: 2010-11
Size of Land
Holding (ha)
0-1
12
24
4 10
Above 10
Total
Number
Percent
153155
37460
13621
4340
521
209097
73.24
17.92
6.51
2.08
0.25
100.00
Area
(ha)
58357
50800
35958
24220
9080
178415
Percent
32.71
28.47
20.15
13.58
5.09
100.00
Graph 2.3
044
District Overview
Constraints:
Predominance of small/marginal farmers and fragmented and scattered
land holdings.
Mono-crop cultivation viz. paddy, which is labour intensive and at present
yield non-viable.
High cost of cultivation, labour scarcity and high labour wage made crop
production unviable.
Lack of irrigation and over-dependence on irregular monsoon rainfall.
Soil erosion, low moisture retention and micro-nutrient deficit.
Absence of processing and value additions and backward and forward
linkages.
Migration of younger generations and dependence on old people.
Absence of good market infrastructure and well connected market link.
Lack of dissemination of market information
Prospects:
Diversification into high-value and labour saving horticulture, dairy and
goat enterprises.
Increase cropping intensity and productivity by promotion of irrigation
projects by building vented dams to rivers and setting up lift irrigations.
Value additions through setting up agro-processing and contract farming
initiatives.
Improve rural infrastructure (roads, electricity, markets) for market
linkages.
Export of flowers, fresh vegetables and fruits with opening of international
airport at Mangaluru
Development of both marine and inland fisheries and fish processing for
value additions.
046
District Overview
2.8 Industry
Dakshina Kannada district was
historically and internationally known for the
red-clay tiles (Mangalore tiles), cashew-nut
processing and beedi rolling industries. The tile
and beedi rolling industries are now losing
importance due to declining demand. The
cashew-nut processing is still pre-dominant
industry in the district. Mangaluru is the main
industrial belt of the district. The major
industries in and around Mangaluru include
Mangalore Chemical and Fertilizers Ltd (MCF),
Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd
(MRPL), Kudremukh Iron Ore Company
(KIOCL), The Canara Workshop Ltd., BASF,
TOTAL GAZ and Bharati Shipyard Ltd. At
Puttur, there is a cooperative chocolate
manufacturing plant called Central Areca nut
and Cocoa Marketing and Processing
Cooperative Ltd (CAMPCO). As per the data
available, there are 24 chemical factories, 48
engineering firms and 373 others employing
34156 people. In recent years, information
technology and outsourcing companies are
emerging as the new players in the medium and
large scale industry segment. They include
Infosys, Lasersoft Infosystems Ltd, MPhasis
BPO etc. Three IT parks are under construction;
one Export Promotion Industrial Park at
Ganjimutt, and second, IT SEZ near Mangalore
University. Another IT SEZ of 2 million sq. ft.
(180000 m2) is also under construction at
Thumbe.
The small scale industrial sector in the
Bykampadi Industrial Estate and industrial
estates in other taluks in the district is mainly
dominated by 484 automobile, 730 electrical and
electronic, 365 chemicals manufacturing, 357
Ferrous and non-ferrous, 4252 food and
047
048
District Overview
2.9 Infrastructure
Well-knit and well-connected motorable
roads are the hall mark of Dakshina Kannada
district. Transport network within and outside
the district is one of the best in the country. All
villages are connected by all weather motorable
roads. The total road length in the district is
127042 km. National Highway 169, 66, 75 and
73 pass through the district. The district has
National Highway road length of 239.7 km. The
State Highways of 528.8 km length are well
linked to major urban centres in the state. Within
the district, the road network includes inter alia
1321 km municipality roads and 7567.29 km
rural/Panchayat roads. As per the RTO
registration, the district has 23002 goods
transport vehicles, 4426 buses, 19222 taxies,
28290 auto-rickshaws, 318387 two-wheelers,
105061 four-wheeler vehicle and 14326 other
vehicles in the year 2011-12.
Mangaluru city is well connected
throughout India through both Konkan and
Southern Railways. The district has 118.63 km
broad gauge railway route with 11 railway
stations; 8 in Mangaluru taluk, two in Puttur
taluk and one in Bantwal taluk. The district has
major ports at Mangaluru. The district can also
boast of well connected telecommunication
facilities by BSNL and private mobile, landline
and WLL service providers. 2G service is veered
throughout the district and 3G in selected areas.
Broadband connectivity is available in all urban
areas. All GPs are provided with internet facility.
Every village has postal office. There are 147
telephone exchanges with 124317 telephone
connections.
The district falls under Mangaluru
Electricity Supply Company (MESCOM). The
district gets electricity from Varahi and also from
049
050
District Overview
Table 2.7
Change in sector-wise Contribution to GDP (percentage)
Sector
1990-91
2005-06
2008-09
Dakshina
Primary
22.47
14.23
11.71
Kannada
Secondary
24.19
36.14
30.06
District
Tertiary
53.34
49.63
58.23
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
Primary
34.60
19.63
15.66
Karnataka
Secondary
26.80
28.67
30.53
State
Tertiary
38.60
51.70
53.80
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
As per the district income and per capita income estimates made by the Directorate of Economics and Statistics in
their 'Sector wise Gross District Domestic Product at Constant prices.
051
Graph 2.4
Change in sector-wise Contribution to GDP
052
District Overview
053
Mangaladevi Temple
DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT - 2014
054
District Overview
2.11 An Overview
In this chapter an attempt has been made
to provide a synoptic review of physiogeographical and socio-economic features
together with historical and more recent
glimpses of the district's economy to provide a
backdrop for the Human Development Report of
Dakshina Kannada district. Dakshina Kannada
district is considered as one of the most
progressive districts in Karnataka state. It ranks
055
056
District Overview
057
058
060
Computation of Indices
3.1 Introduction
The Human Development Index (HDI)
is a summary measure which captures several
dimensions of human development. Thus, it
involves using key variables or indicators of core
dimensions of human development and
aggregating them to a summary index. The
concept of human development, the key factors
affecting the human development and the
conceptual and methodological framework for
computing human development index (HDI) as
envisaged by UNDP are discussed in detail in
Chapter one. Since the main purpose of the
DHDRs is to capture all the key dimensions
affecting human development at the taluk and
district levels, it was decided that instead of
focusing only on three-dimensional HDI, the
DHDRs should take into account all key human
developmental parameters required for
enhancing the wellbeing of the people at taluk
and district levels. To achieve this, a broader
approach and modified methodology was
suggested for the DHDR exercise particularly
from the view point of different dimensions of
human development and choice of indicators,
keeping in mind the data availability and the
basic three dimensional framework of UNDP
HDI. Accordingly, the following six measures of
human development were considered for
preparing the DHDR for Dakshina Kannada
district:
Component Index value =
CHAPTER 3
In the case of negative indicator, index value was computed using the following formula:
Component Index value =
061
3.2
Table 3.1
HDI and its Dimensions Indices of Dakshina Kannada District and the State Table 3.1
HDI and its Dimensions Indices of Dakshina Kannada District and the State
1991
Indicators
Health
Education
Income
HDI
District
0.683
0.799
0.500
0.661
2001
State
0.618
0.602
0.402
0.541
District
0.707
0.823
0.636
0.722
062
State
0.680
0.712
0.559
0.650
Computation of Indices
Table 3.2
Taluk-wise values of HDI Indicators
Indicators
Percentage of HHs
having access to
Cooking Fuel
Percentage of HHs
having access to Toilets
Percentage of HHs
having access to
Drinking Water
Percentage of HHs
having access to
Electricity
Percentage of houses
having access to Pucca
Houses
Percentage of Nonagricultural Workers to
Total workers
Per capita income (in
Rupee)
Child (under 5 years)
Mortality Rate (per
1000 live births) in a
year
Maternal Mortality Rate
(per 100000 live births)
Literacy Rate
Combined Gross
Enrolment in Primary
and Secondary
Education
Bantwal
Belthangady Mangaluru
Standard of Living
Puttur
Sullia
District
24.86
18.38
63.73
23.58
15.14
42.02
92.58
90.65
96.33
88.02
80.81
92.66
47.87
27.46
64.83
45.33
29.18
51.77
93.46
77.31
96.73
84.94
80.10
90.83
54.54
34.55
73.30
48.28
44.57
59.52
91.22
85.58
95.36
97.46
98.46
93.68
54572.15
50267.21
94715.90
Health
24
27
122
28
33
14
22
89
103
89
86.71
47
44
Education
84.06
91.50
86.02
86.69
88.57
86.7
85.76
92.18
85.91
89.22
90.94
Source: Census 2011 and DHFW and Education Departments, ZP, Mangaluru
063
Table 3.3
Taluk wise data of HDI and its Composition
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Standard of Living
Index
Rank
0.510
2
0.182
5
0.978
1
0.440
3
0.274
4
0.708
Health
Index
Rank
0.273
4
0.635
1
0.610
2
0.272
5
0.588
3
0.567
Education
Index
Rank
0.665
3
0.551
5
0.958
1
0.809
2
0.637
4
0.809
064
HDI Ranking
Index
Rank
0.452
4
0.399
5
0.830
1
0.459
3
0.468
2
0.687
Computation of Indices
Graph 3.1
065
Computation of Indices
Table 3.4
Taluk-wise Gender Inequality Index (GII) and Its Dimensions
Dimension
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Reproductive
Health
Index
Rank
0.681
5
0.769
1
0.760
2
0.702
4
0.712
3
0.725
Empowerment
Index
0.601
0.595
0.611
0.599
0.601
0.601
067
Rank
2
4
1
3
2
Labour
Market
Index Rank
0.808
1
0.721
4
0.699
5
0.782
2
0.737
3
0.749
GII
Index
0.061
0.026
0.034
0.049
0.046
0.043
Rank
5
1
2
4
3
Table 3.5
Taluk-wise Values of CDI Indicators
Dimension
Health
Nutrition
Education
Indicators
Child Mortality
Rate
Percentage of
Malnourished
children
Percentage of
children born
underweight
Percentage of
primary and
secondary school
drop-out of
schools
mainstreamed
Bantwal
24
Belthangady
27
Mangaluru
28
Puttur
33
Sullia
14
District
22
19.06
25.59
17.89
22.89
31.54
21.23
5.90
9.24
20.73
10.41
15.04
12.26
89.50
84.30
87.98
86.14
86.45
86.87
0.721, which can be categorized as 'good'. Talukwise, Bantwal taluk has the highest CDI value of
0.779 and ranks first. Inter-taluk differences in
CDI are not very significant. Surprisingly,
Mangaluru taluk has the lowest child
development index (0.559). This is mainly due
to its poor performance in nutrition and health.
In nutrition, Bantwal has the highest index value
(0.964), followed by Puttur (0.718). Mangaluru
and Sullia have the lowest index values. The
respective values are 0.350 and 0.294. In child
health, Bantwal ranks first followed by
Belthangady. Belthangady ranks second in child
health. Mangaluru has the lowest value of 0.123,
Table 3.6
Taluk-wise CDI and its Compositions
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Nutrition
Index
Rank
0.964
1
0.659
3
0.350
4
0.718
2
0.294
5
0.707
Health
Index
Rank
1.000
1
0.802
2
0.123
5
0.733
3
0.459
4
0.624
068
Education
Index Rank
0.632
5
1.000
1
0.740
4
0.870
2
0.848
3
0.818
CDI
Index Rank
0.779
1
0.690
2
0.559
5
0.613
4
0.624
3
0.721
Computation of Indices
Graph 3.2
069
Table 3.7
Food Security Index (FSI)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Availability
0.341
0.639
0.491
0.350
0.450
0.439
Accessibility
0.431
0.317
0.772
0.432
0.863
0.637
Absorption
0.656
0.409
0.544
0.466
0.466
0.638
070
FSI
0.476
0.455
0.603
0.416
0.593
0.571
Rank
3
4
1
5
2
Computation of Indices
071
Mulky TP
Belthangady TP
Sullia TP
Town Panchayats
0.380
0.397
0.636
UDI Rank
-
4
1
2
3
3
2
1
072
Computation of Indices
Table 3.9
Composite Taluk Development Index
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Standard of Living
Index
0.601
0.658
0.576
0.588
0.643
0.608
Health Index
Education Index
CTDI/DCDI
Rank
0.662
0.680
0.654
0.703
0.584
0.640
0.619
0.517
0.902
0.673
0.573
0.733
0.627
0.618
0.711
0.652
0.660
0.673
4
5
1
3
2
073
074
075
076
Chapter 4
Literacy and Education
078
CHAPTER 4
given more to gender, social, regional and ruralurban inequity and also on basic education
indicators such as access, enrolment, retention,
drop-out rate, transition rate, teacher-pupil
ratios, infrastructure and quality of education.
All these parameters are looked into at primary,
secondary and tertiary education levels. An
attempt is also made to carry out radar analysis
of key education indicators for intra and intertaluk comparisons.
080
Table 4.1
Taluk-wise Literacy Rates by Sex: 2001-2011 (Percentage)
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
Male
88.30
85.10
92.60
87.20
87.40
89.70
76.10
2001
Female
73.20
70.60
82.10
73.50
74.90
77.20
56.87
Total
80.60
77.70
87.30
80.30
81.20
83.40
66.64
Male
92.60
89.99
95.31
90.71
91.34
93.10
82.47
2011
Female
81.02
77.99
88.15
80.51
81.44
84.13
68.08
Total
86.76
83.92
91.67
85.92
86.35
88.57
75.36
Decadal Growth
Male Female Total
4.87
10.68
7.64
5.75
10.47
8.01
2.93
7.37
5.01
4.02
9.54
7.00
4.51
8.73
6.34
3.79
8.98
6.20
8.37
19.71
13.08
081
Table 4.2
Rural and Urban Literacy Disparity: 2011 (Percentage)
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
Male
92.28
89.91
87.52
90.31
90.72
90.97
77.61
Rural
Female
80.44
77.73
84.67
78.62
80.28
79.83
59.71
All
86.32
83.74
86.11
84.41
85.48
85.33
68.73
Male
95.40
92.67
98.35
96.23
95.37
95.50
90.04
Urban
Female
86.19
86.66
92.71
88.76
88.50
88.83
81.36
082
All
90.74
89.61
95.49
92.24
91.80
92.12
85.78
Gender Disparity
Rural
Urban
11.84
9.21
12.18
6.01
2.85
6.24
11.69
7.47
10.44
6.87
11.14
6.67
29.98
10.67
4.4
Primary Education
083
Table 4.3
Management-wise Classification of Primary Schools: 2011-12 (number)
Taluks
Government
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
195
180
231
183
140
929
Govt -aided
Private
56
21
129
13
6
225
Private-unaided
Social Welfare
Total
44
22
153
35
17
271
4
6
7
2
4
23
299
229
520
233
167
1448
Graph 4.1
4.4.2 Enrolment
Enrolment of all children in 6 to 14 agegroups is the first step in universalization of
primary education. It is also mandated
entitlement of every born child as per the RTE
084
Table 4.4
Enrolment of Students in Primary Schools in Dakshina Kannada District (I VII)
Year
2001-02
2004-05
2011-12
Boys
(Number)
Girls
(Number)
Total
(Number)
143359
133541
123327
130839
124631
115619
274198
258172
238946
Change in
Enrolment
(Percent)
(5.85)
(12.89)
Gender Participation
(Percent)
Boys
Girls
52.28
47.72
51.72
48.28
51.61
48.38
Graph 4.2
Enrolment of Students in Primary Schools in Dakshina Kannada District Gender Participation (Percent)
The taluk-wise data on gross enrolment and net enrolment in the primary education is analyzed in Table 4.5.
085
Table 4.5
Taluk-wise Gross and Net Enrolment in Primary Education: (2011 -12) (Percentage)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Boys
GER
96.44
95.84
104.24
104.69
96.34
101.03
Girls
NER
91.30
91.04
99.78
99.34
92.26
95.89
GER
96.00
94.80
103.63
101.53
95.83
100.36
All
NER
90.52
89.99
99.15
96.57
91.47
95.06
GER
96.23
95.34
103.94
103.13
96.09
100.56
NER
90.93
90.53
100.00
97.88
91.88
95.49
Graph 4.3
086
The analysis of enrolment data talukwise rural and urban as well as by social class ion
Table 4.6 and 4.8 clearly demonstrates almost
similar pattern in enrolment and gender-wise
participation in primary education in both rural
and urban areas in all taluks in the district.
Table 4.6
Taluk-wise Rural-Urban GER in Primary Education (Percentage)
Taluk
Boys
94.86
93.45
102.78
102.78
94.78
98.73
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Rural
Girls
93.56
91.82
102.23
100.78
93.43
98.53
All
94.21
92.64
102.51
101.78
94.11
98.63
Boys
97.89
97.57
105.63
105.93
97.82
101.29
Urban
Girls
98.34
97.86
104.96
102.76
98.29
101.96
All
98.12
97.72
105.30
104.35
98.06
101.63
Rural-Urban
Disparity
3.91
5.08
2.79
2.57
3.95
3.00
Table 4.7
Taluk-wise GER by Social Class in Primary Education (Percentage)
Blocks
Boys
Bantwal
97.89
Belthangady 97.89
Mangaluru
99.56
Puttur
99.79
Sullia
97.45
District
99.45
SC
Girls
98.12
98.46
99.94
99.71
97.59
99.24
ST
Others
All
Boys
Girls
All
Boys
Girls
All
98.01 95.89 94.89 95.39 99.54 98.89 99.22
98.18 94.86 92.49 93.68 98.12 99.15 98.64
99.75 101.02 101.96 101.49 105.45 104.56 105.01
99.75 100.89 99.89 100.39 104.69 100.98 102.84
97.52 95.46 94.56 95.01 97.42 96.48 96.95
99.64 98.16 97.46 97.81 103.24 101.32 102.28
087
Graph 4.4
Taluk-wise GER by Social Class in Primary Education Percentage - ALL
Table 4.8
Taluk-wise Drop-out Students by Sex and Social Groups (Number)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
General
Boys Girls All
3
0
3
2
2
4
46
20
66
5
1
6
0
1
1
56
24
80
Boys
2
7
12
4
4
29
SC
Girls
0
6
15
0
1
22
All
2
13
27
4
5
51
Boys
0
0
4
0
0
4
088
ST
Girls
0
1
1
0
0
2
All
0
1
5
0
0
6
Boys
5
9
62
9
4
89
All
Girls
9
36
1
2
48
All
5
18
98
10
6
137
Graph 4.5
Taluk - wise Dropout of Boys and Girls
089
Table 4.9
Taluk-wise Pupil /Teacher Ratio at Primary Education: 2011-12 (Number)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Total Enrolment
46227
31333
108802
36462
16122
238946
Teachers
1590
1039
3369
1267
681
7946
Graph 4.6
090
Table 4.10
Transition Rate from 7th to 8th Standard:
2011-12 (Percentage)
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
D.K. District
State
092
Table 4.11
Schools with Basic infrastructure Facilities at Primary Schools (Number)
Infrastructure
Facilities
No. of Schools
Boys Toilets
Separate Girl Toilets
Electricity
Playground
Drinking Water
Ramps
Compound Wall
Library
Computer
Infratructure Index
180
180
180
180
166
180
180
173
180
25
88.00
228
228
228
228
201
228
228
198
228
48
81.00
Puttur
Sullia
District
184
184
184
184
173
184
184
146
184
21
88.00
140
140
140
140
138
140
140
134
140
16
92.00
928
928
928
928
829
928
928
838
928
140
87.50
093
4.5.1 Access
Graph 4.7
Infrastructure Index
094
Table 4.12
Taluk and Management-wise High-Schools (Number)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Government
Rural
Urban
34
2
31
1
37
27
21
3
13
3
136
36
Rural
67
47
107
61
29
311
Total
Urban
15
6
138
12
10
181
Total
82
53
245
73
39
492
Graph 4.8
095
Table 4.13
Taluk-wise Gross Enrolment in High Schools-2011-12
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Boys
Number Percent
9142
51.94
6216
51.10
24032
50.89
7742
50.87
3312
51.94
50444
51.17
Number
8458
5949
23193
7478
3064
48142
Girls
Percent
48.06
48.90
49.11
49.13
48.06
48.83
Total
(number)
17600
12165
47225
15220
6376
98586
Table 4.14
GER in Secondary Education: 2011-12
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Boys
85.75
87.36
103.46
105.50
85.20
96.02
Girls
88.42
93.56
109.75
108.40
94.47
101.20
096
All
87.04
90.34
106.51
106.90
89.46
98.52
Table 4.15
Taluk-wise Drop-out Rate in Secondary Schools: 2011-12 (Percentage)
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Boys
18.19
18.17
10.49
14.47
21.91
14.23
Girls
6.65
7.74
5.25
4.26
0.83
5.38
All
12.73
13.05
7.94
9.45
12.51
9.96
097
Table 4.16
Pupil-Teacher Ratio in Secondary Education: 2011-12
Taluk
Total enrolment
(Number)
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
17600
12165
47225
15220
6476
98586
Male
298
198
578
284
116
1474
Teachers
(Number)
Female
312
192
1311
308
164
2287
Pupil/Teacher
Ratio
Total
610
390
1889
592
280
3761
28
31
25
25
22
26
Table 4.17
Taluk-wise SSLC Results by Social Groups: 2011-12 (Percentage)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
SC
80.97
80.57
81.02
76.92
76.25
79.64
ST
79.37
85.31
85.28
72.01
77.07
79.45
OBCs
82.73
88.59
87.14
83.47
85.62
85.84
098
All
88.00
91.00
94.00
87.00
88.00
89.55
Table 4.18
High Schools with Basic Infrastructure (Number of Schools):2011-12
Infrastructural Facilities
No. of High Schools
Drinking Water
Separate Boys Toilets
Separate Girls Toilets
Playground
Electricity
Library
Ramps
Compound wall
Computer
Infrastructure Index:
8 Basic Facilities (Percent)
Puttur
Sullia
District
35
35
35
35
19
35
35
35
9
35
33
33
33
33
29
33
33
12
10
33
57
57
57
57
46
57
57
51
40
57
23
23
23
23
18
23
23
23
6
23
15
15
15
15
14
15
15
15
8
15
163
163
163
163
126
163
163
136
73
163
85.00
81.82
92.54
88.04
93.33
88.19
099
Table 4.19
Pre-University Colleges and Student Enrolment In Dakshina Kannada District (2011-12)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
PU colleges
Number
25
20
85
26
13
169
Boys
Number Percent
2499
47.49
2742
47.80
13546
45.18
2984
47.64
1465
52.58
23236
46.46
100
Girls
Number Percent
2752
52.41
2995
52.20
16433
54.82
3279
52.36
1321
47.42
26780
53.54
Total
Number
5251
5737
29979
6263
2786
50016
National Institue
of Technology
Karnataka at
Surathkal
Table 4.20
Higher General Education: Number of Colleges and Enrolment (2011-12)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Colleges
(Number)
Government
Private
4
4
2
8
5
98
4
12
2
4
17
126
Total
4081
5394
27749
4441
2757
44422
Table 4.21
Professional Education in Dakshina Kannada District: 2011-12 (Number)
Category
Institutions
Medical (Allopathic)
Medical (Ayurvedic)
Dental
Engineering
Others
11
5
15
NA
Enrolment (Total)
Boys
Girls
2487
2898
610
1508
15189
7177
NA
NA
Total
5385
2118
22366
NA
Source: D.K. District at Glance: 2011-12, others include MBA, Nursing, Hotel
Management etc. NA: not available.
103
104
105
106
Mid-day Meal An Important Scheme implemented for promoting Literacy in the District
Table 4.22
Public Expenditure for Primary and Secondary Education: 2011-12 (Rs.in lakh)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
SSA
336.7265
249.5787
487.833
248.8703
128.655
1451.6635
510.52
281.54
426.04
162.99
249.48
326.11
107
Table 4.23
Radar for Education: Indicator Values and Radar Index
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Net Enrolment
Actual
90.93
90.53
100.00
97.98
91.88
95.49
Index
9.10
9.10
10.0
9.80
9.20
9.5
Dropout Rate
Actual
1.18
2.47
0.13
0.13
2.82
0.14
Index
9.88
9.75
9.99
9.99
9.72
9.98
School
Infrastructure
Actual
Index
0.88
8.80
0.88
8.80
0.81
8.10
0.88
8.0
0.92
9.20
0.87
8.70
Note: Since the Drop out rate being the negative value indicator, the index computed for radar
represents the retention rate
108
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
Actual Index
88
8.8
91
9.1
94
9.4
87
8.7
88
8.8
90
9.0
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
8.8
9.88
Dropout Rate
8.8
School Infrastructure
10
9.5 9.1
9
8.5
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
9.1
9.75
Dropout Rate
8.8
School Infrastructure
109
10
8
6
4
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
9.4
8.1
School Infrastructure
9.8
8
6
4
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
8.7
9.99
Dropout Rate
School Infrastructure
110
10
9.5
9
8.8
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
9.2
8.5
9.72
Dropout Rate
9.2
School Infrastructure
Sullia
4
2
Belthangady
Puttur
111
Mangaluru
Net Enrolment
Dropout Rate
School Infrastructure
SSLC Pass-out
Rate
112
Though the district has favorable pupilteacher ratio, in many rural lower primary
schools, a mandatory number of two
teachers have to manage classes I to V. With
the declining population and enrolment in
the district, the number of such schools in
rural areas will increase in near future. This
has serious implications on the quality of
education in rural areas.
"Ksheera Bhagya" - A prominent scheme introduced by the Government to improve the health of children
DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT - 2014
114
Chapter 5
Health and Nutrition
116
CHAPTER 5
118
Table 5.1
Taluk-wise IMR and MMR and other Health Indicators (2011-2012)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
IMR
22
23
24
25
13
19
35
CMR
24
27
28
33
14
22
40
MMR
122
47
44
89
103
89
144
CBR
14.06
13.81
10.14
14.02
13.40
12.1
19.20
CDR
3.59
3.27
2.45
4.09
4.98
3.23
7.10
119
120
121
Table 5.2
Beneficiaries of Family Planning Measures
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Vasectomy
(number
4
4
18
11
7
44
Tubectomy
(number)
1137
1146
3012
926
683
6904
I.U.D.
(number)
1687
1192
3269
1199
689
8036
C.C.
(number)
1381
1752
3501
1680
723
9037
122
O.P.
(number)
1109
1152
2313
999
525
6098
Couple
Protection
Rate
(Percent)
68.90
66.50
62.50
71.09
66.20
66.18
Table 5.3
Health Infrastructure in Dakshina Kannada District (2011-12)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Government
Hospitals
No.
20
13
25
12
7
77
Beds
186
102
1351
166
86
1891
Private
Hospitals/Nursing
Homes
No.
Beds
13
148
9
447
62
6960
16
556
7
845
107
8956
Private
Ayurvedic
Hospitals
No.
Beds
-
PHCs/CHCs*
No.
19
12
23
11
6
71
Beds
156
72
186
70
36
520
Clinics
No.
173
103
1042
180
83
1581
123
124
125
Table 5.4
Taluk-wise Number of Doctors
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Total
217
125
1203
245
345
2135
Graph 5.2
126
Table 5.5
Taluk-wise Health Facilities: Some Indicators
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Population
served by
sub-centres
4316
3688
4631
3925
2426
4670
Population
Served by
PHC
25089
23048
36261
26764
23462
29058
Doctors per
1000
population
0.52
0.47
1.23
0.81
0.59
0.89
Nurses per
1000
population
0.23
0.59
0.73
0.82
0.26
0.60
Hospital Beds
per 1000
population
1.24
2.45
8.54
2.75
6.66
5.44
127
Table 5.6
Full ANC Coverage and Anemia among Pregnant Women: 2011-12 (percent)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Pregnant Women
receiving Full ANC
88.82
Pregnant women
with Anemia
42.36
74.06
89.17
80.14
85.05
85.11
26.80
37.87
41.52
21.29
33.96
128
Table 5.7
Taluk-wise Institutional Deliveries: 2011-12 (Percent)
Taluk
Institutional Delivery
Bantwal
99.91
Belthangady
99.93
Mangaluru
99.90
Puttur
99.90
Sullia
99.93
District
99.92
129
Table 5.8
Taluk-wise Immunization of Children: 2011-12 (Number)
Taluk
D.P.T.
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
5250
3721
9911
3958
2057
Polio
5250
3721
9911
3958
2057
BCG
Measles
5605
3826
9887
4090
2021
5241
3572
9521
3820
1996
TT
5753
3956
4130
2147
10389
Hepatitis B
5470
3674
9280
3961
1963
Children fully
immunized
(percent)
88.76
87.41
66.12
88.26
89.74
Table 5.9
Taluk-wise Status of Underweight Children and Malnutrition: 2011-12 (Percentage)
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Male
Female
All
2.95
2.44
3.05
3.83
2.31
2.72
2.00
2.26
3.34
3.54
2.42
2.54
4.95
4.70
6.39
7.37
4.73
5.26
130
Percentage of
Children
Malnourished
19.06
25.59
17.89
22.89
31.54
21.23
The proportion of underweight children estimated by HDD, PD is significantly higher than the actual data provide by the
DHWF, For computation of CTDI, the estimates provided by the HDD, PD are used to fall n line with other districts. The
table contains the actual data on underweight children provide by the DHWF,
131
132
Table 5.10
People affected by major Communicable Diseases
(Percentage)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
2010-11
2.36
0.84
1.48
1.24
1.67
1.55
2011-12
2.20
0.96
1.55
1.16
1.46
1.56
133
134
Table 5.11
Taluk-wise Public Expenditure on Health in the District (Rupee)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
2001-02
Total
24980985
23045380
24433186
20644206
23735443
116839200
2011-12
Per capita
69.09
93.49
27.68
77.59
168.63
61.57
Total
75201276
69217168
117661417
70471682
64657965
397209508
Per capita
190.20
259.64
118.30
244.82
445.22
190.10
135
Table 5.12
Health Indicators : Values and Indices: 2011-12
Indicators
Percentage of
children born
underweight
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
Percentage of
pregnant
women
receive full
ANC
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
Percentage of
Households
with toilets
Percentage of
HHs provided
with safe
drinking
water
Bantwal
Value Index
Belthangady
Value Index
Mangaluru
Value Index
Puttur
Value Index
Sulia
Value Index
District
Value Index
5.90
9.40
9.24
9.10
20.73
7.90
10.41
9.00
15.04
8.50
12.26
8.77
99.91
9.99
99.93
9.99
99.90
9.99
99.90
9.99
99.93
9.99
99.92
9.99
88.82
8.88
74.06
7.41
89.17
8.92
80.14
8.01
85.05
8.50
85.11
8.51
88.76
8.88
87.41
8.74
66.12
6.61
88.26
8.83
89.74
8.97
78.02
7.80
92.58
9.26
90.65
9.06
96.33
9.63
88.02
8.80
80.01
8.00
92.66
9.27
47.87
4.79
27.46
2.75
64.83
6.48
45.33
4.53
29.18
2.92
51.77
5.18
136
10
9.4
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe
drinking water
4.79
9.99
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
0
9.26
8.88
Percentage of
Households with
toilets
Percentage of
pregnant women
receive full ANC
8.88
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
10
9.1
5
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe
drinking water
9.99
2.75
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
0
7.41
9.06
Percentage of
Households with
toilets
Percentage of
pregnant women
receive full ANC
8.74
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
137
10
7.9
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe
drinking water
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
6.48
9.99
0
9.63
Percentage of
pregnant women
receive full ANC
8.92
Percentage of
Households with
toilets
6.61
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
10
9
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe
drinking water
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
9.99
4.53
0
8.8
8.01
Percentage of
pregnant women
receive full ANC
Percentage of
Households with
toilets
8.83
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
138
10
8.5
5
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe
drinking water
9.99
2.92
Percentage of
Institutional
deliveries
0
8
8.5
Percentage of
Households with
toilets
Percentage of
pregnant women
receive full ANC
8.97
Percentage of
children fully
immunized
Sullia
Belthangady
Puttur
Mangaluru
139
Percentage of HHs
provided with safe drinking water
5.14.2 Methodology
The study aimed at covering all villages affected
by endosulfan spraying in four taluks namely
140
Taluks
PHCs
Sub-centres
Villages
Population
Teams
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
Belthangady
18
22
77166
77
Puttur
11
36
36
138411
139
Sullia
11
14
29429
30
Bantwal
13
43229
43
Total
23
78
77
288235
289
141
Taluks
Bantwal
Belthangady
Sullia
Puttur
Total
Completely bed
ridden cases (number)
26
53
39
61
179
Still birth
Abortions
Brain tumour
Hemiplegia
Lower limb deformities
Mental retardation
Deafness
Deaf-mutism
Mutism
10. Epilepsy
11. Blindness
12. Hand disability
13. Heart diseases
14. Joint Swelling
15. Handicap of limbs
16. Caliver
17. Strility
18. Mental disorders and others.
142
ojective:
144
145
146
Chapter 6
INCOME, POVERTY AND
EMPLOYMENT
148
CHAPTER 6
150
Table 6.1
Growth of District GDP and Per capita Income
Year
Total GDP
(Rupees in crore)
At Current At Constant
Prices
Prices
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
11567
11933
14197
17735
19673
10404
10791
11561
13690
14036
State GDP
Annual
Growth Rate
(Percent)
10.00
12.60
7.10
5.20
8.90
Source: Directorate of Economics and Statistics, GOK. Note: 2010-11 figure provisional estimate.
Growth rate is based on constant prices. Per capita is based on 2011 census population data for 2011.
There is no steady positive growth in the
primary sector. As against the state average
growth of 5.6 percent per annum, the district has
recorded only 2.7 percent average annual growth
in agricultural sector. The high growth achieved
in the primary sector during 2007-08 and 200910 was probably due to good monsoon, increase
in the contribution of forestry, fisheries and
Table 6.2
Sector-wise Annual Growth Rate of GDP (Percentage)
Year
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Overall
2006-07
-3.59
8.01
3.16
3.78
2007-08
9.33
9.89
-1.74
3.72
2008-09
1.71
25.54
-4.72
7.14
2009-10
12.45
-10.11
47.72
18.41
2010-11
-6.42
-4.14
8.51
2.53
2.69
5.84
10.59
7.12
5.62
8.12
10.28
8.76
151
Graph 6.1
Table 6.3
Change in Sectoral Composition in District GDP (at constant prices)
Dakshina Kannada
Karnataka
Sector
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
1999-00
22.47
24.19
53.34
28.30
24.30
47.40
152
2006-07
13.51
42.35
44.14
17.41
30.63
51.96
2010-11
10.94
22.46
66.60
16.83
27.71
55.46
Table 6.4
Taluk-wise Net Income (NTDP) and Per capita Income: 2010-11
Taluk
Current Prices
(Rs in Lakh)
208409
Constant Prices
(Rs. in lakh)
144083
Current Prices
(Rupee)
52711
Constant Prices
(Rupee)
36442
Belthangady
242146
156515
90831
58710
Mangaluru
1206618
874319
121317
87906
Puttur
176490
128537
61313
44654
Sullia
134356
96759
93203
66626
District
1968019
1400213
94179
67007
Bantwal
Source: Dakshina Kannada ZP. Note: Taluk net income computed as Net Taluk Domestic Product (NTDP).
153
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Agriculture Primary
10.74
13.77
13.97
17.87
1.00
5.27
10.10
15.50
38.18
41.10
6.85
10.97
Secondary
23.55
9.22
30.33
17.16
14.65
24.98
Tertiary
62.67
72.92
64.39
67.33
44.24
64.05
Total GDP
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Graph 6.2
Areas of Concern
155
i) Cropping Pattern
The scope for increasing agricultural income
through expansion of crop production appears to
be limited. Crop production in the district is
mainly concentrated on paddy. Other food crops
Cashew Plantation
156
157
ii) Irrigation
The lowest cropping intensity in the
district is mainly due to lack of irrigation
facilities. Out of 157683 gross cropped areas,
only 26237 ha are under double cropped area
through irrigation. In the case of food grains
crops, the proportion of irrigated area works out
to only 20 percent of total cultivated area. The
total area irrigated in the district is 72378 ha,
most of which is used for horticulture crops like
coconut and areca nut. Out of 72378 ha irrigated
area, 41104 ha (57 percent) is irrigated by open
wells and 9916 ha (14 percent) by tube-wells.
The lift irrigation accounts for 2147 ha (3
iii) Livestock
Another important agriculture allied
activity for increasing famer's income in the
district is animal husbandry. The district was,
once, considered unsuitable for livestock
development based on the agro-climatic
conditions,. The situation has now changed.
During the last two decades, the district
witnessed white revolution. Recognizing the
economic benefits of dairy, the small and
marginal farmers and other weaker sections of
158
159
160
iv) Fisheries
The coastal belt of 42 km comprises of
21 fishing villages in the district. Out of 53584
people living in the fishing villages, 30651
engage directly in fishing activity for their
livelihood. The annual fish catch has increased
from 47912 tonnes in 2001-02 to 138506 tonnes
in 2011-12. As stated in chapter 2, the district has
network of 60 purse-seiner boats, 890
mechanized traveller boats, 1206 gillnets, 60 ice
plants and 11 cold storages. There are 22
fishermen cooperative societies and 4
fisherwomen cooperative societies with
membership of 30651. There is, thus, good
162
Mechanized Fishing
163
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
164
Table: 6.6
Taluk-wise BPL Families in the District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
BPL Families
(Number)
39492
27002
68024
25818
14978
175314
Total Families
(Number)
61789
45367
166424
48642
27473
349695
Percentage
63.91
59.52
40.87
53.08
54.52
50.13
165
Table 6.7
BPL Card Holders in Dakshina Kannada District: 2011-12(number)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Anthyodaya
others
Total
3184
3068
5018
2753
1858
15881
36308
23934
63006
23065
13120
159433
39492
27002
68024
25818
14978
175314
Anthyodaya as
% of Total BPL
Cards
8.06
11.36
7.38
10.66
12.40
9.06
166
The rural poor include those unemployed who are willing to work at a low level of productivity and wages. They have no or
low assets, no skill, poor risk bearing capacity, and poor credit worthiness, and labor as only asset.
167
Table 6.8
Dakshina Kannada District: Implementation of MGNREGA Programme - 2011-12
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Job Cards
Issued
(Number)
25321
25660
15103
16163
12637
94884
Households
demanded
employment
(Number)
5521
4036
3644
2917
3006
19124
Persons/
Households
worked
(Number)
5517
4033
3629
2916
2999
19094
168
170
Table 6.9
Landless Households in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
No of Agricultural land
holders (Number)
Landless
Households
54562
52151
44003
46647
27880
225243
54008
43375
39645
46384
25685
209097
554
8776
4358
263
2195
16146
Graph 6.4
171
Table 6.10
Growth of Work Force in Dakshina Kannada District
Details
Dakshina
Kannada
District
Karnataka
State
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
2001
Number
Percent
546404
57.74
399986
42.26
946390
100.00
15235355
8299436
23534791
64.74
35.26
100.00
2011
Number
Percent
620903
62.23
376818
37.77
997721
100.00
18270116
9602481
27872597
172
65.55
34.45
100.00
Decadal Growth
Rate
Percent
13.63
-5.80
5.42
19.92
15.70
18.43
Table 6.11
Taluk-wise Growth of Work Force in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Male
106244
70721
242507
83140
43792
546404
2001
(number)
Female
93180
57218
152804
67298
29486
399986
Total
199424
127939
395311
150438
73278
946390
Male
119378
81262
286488
88803
44972
620903
2011
(number)
Female
85925
56804
151797
58226
24066
376818
Total
205303
138066
438285
147029
69038
997721
Decadal Growth
(percent)
Male Female Total
12.36
-7.79
2.95
14.90
-0.72
7.91
18.14
-0.66
10.87
6.81
-13.48 -2.27
2.69
-18.38 -5.79
13.63
-5.79
5.42
173
Graph 6.5
174
Table 6.12
Taluk-wise Growth of Non-workers in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
2001
(number)
2011
(number)
Decadal Growth
(percent)
162130
118555
487545
115634
67476
951340
190077
128523
556317
140822
76189
1091928
17.24
8.41
14.10
21.78
12.91
14.78
175
Table 6.13
Composition of workers and their Growth
Gender
Main
2001
(number)
Margl.
Total
Male
Female
Total
505962
335547
841509
40442
64439
104881
546404
399986
946390
Male
Female
Total
13897
5468
19365
1338
2832
4170
15236
8299
23535
2011
(number)
Main
Margl.
Total
District
582498
38405 620903
331978
44840 376818
914476
83245 997721
State (000)
16350
1920
18270
7047
2555
9602
23397
4475
27872
176
Growth rate
(Percent)
Main Margl. Total
15.1
-1.1
8.8
-40.4
-30.4
-20.6
13.6
-5.8
5.4
17.6
28.8
20.8
43,5
-10.8
7.3
19,9
15.7
18.4
The data in Table 6.15 analyses talukwise gender composition of both main and
marginal workers in the district during 2011.
Table 6.14
Rural and Urban Composition of Main and Marginal workers in the District (Number)
Main Workers
Details
Rural
Urban
Total
Male
Female
All
Male
Female
All
Male
Female
All
Marginal Workers
Total Workers
2001
2011
Percentage
Change
2001
2011
Percentage
Change
2001
2011
Percentage
Change
312367
233571
545938
193595
101976
295571
505962
335547
841509
312594
200115
512709
269904
131863
401767
582498
331978
914476
0.07
-14.32
-6.02
39.42
29.31
35.93
15.13
-1.06
8.67
30746
55538
86284
9696
8901
18597
40442
64439
104881
23145
32697
55842
15260
12143
27403
38405
44840
83245
-24.22
-41.13
-35.28
57.38
36.42
47.35
-5.04
-30.42
-20.63
343113
289109
632222
203291
110877
314168
546404
399986
946390
335739
232812
568551
285164
144006
429170
620903
376818
997721
-2.14
-19.47
-10.07
40.27
29.87
36.60
13.63
-5.79
5.42
Table 6.15
Taluk-wise Composition of Workforce: 2011
Taluk/
District
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Gender
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Main Workers
Number
Percent
111901
59.14
77323
40.86
189224
100.00
75379
60.43
49353
39.57
124732
100.00
267945
66.21
136758
33.79
404703
100.00
83762
64.44
46225
35.56
129987
100.00
43511
66.10
22319
33.90
65830
100.00
582498
63.70
331978
36.30
914476
100.00
Marginal Workers
Number
Percent
7477
46.50
8602
53.50
16079
100.00
5883
44.12
7451
55.88
13334
100.00
18543
55.22
15039
44.78
33582
100.00
5041
29.58
12001
70.42
17042
100.00
1461
45.54
1747
54.46
3208
100.00
38405
46.13
44840
53.87
83245
100.00
Graph 6.6
178
Total Workers
Number
119378
85925
205303
81262
56804
138066
286488
151797
438285
88803
58226
147029
44972
24066
69038
620903
376818
997721
Table 6.16
Work Participation Rate in Dakshina Kannada District (Percentage)
District/State
Dakshina Kannada
District
Karnataka State
Gender
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
1991
49.76
32.41
41.00
54.1
29.4
42.0
2001
58.22
41.70
49.87
56.60
32.00
44.50
2011
60.00
35.72
47.75
59.00
31.87
45.62
District/State
District
State
Gender
2001
Urban
55.88
30.33
43.08
53.85
16.37
35.67
Rural
59.71
48.69
54.10
58.10
39.87
49.09
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Rural
62.00
42.17
51.99
59.76
38.75
49.38
2011
Urban
57.82
28.64
43.09
57.81
20.81
39.66
Table 6.18
Taluk-wise Work Participation Rates in Dakshina Kannada District (Percentage)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Male
59.47
58.31
55.79
62.61
61.68
58.23
2001
Female
50.95
45.70
34.10
50.49
42.27
41.70
All
55.16
51.90
44.78
56.54
52.06
49.87
Male
60.64
61.58
58.37
62.05
62.35
60.00
180
2011
Female
43.25
42.19
30.13
40.23
32.92
35.77
All
51.92
51.79
44.07
51.06
47.54
47.75
Table 6.19
Taluk-wise Rural and Urban Work Participation Rates: 2011(Percentage)
Taluk/District
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State
Male
61.35
61.87
60.62
63.37
63.54
62.00
59.76
Rural
Female
45.55
42.67
40.24
43.28
34.74
42.17
38.78
All
53.40
52.17
50.24
53.26
49.10
51.99
49.38
Male
59.01
56.61
57.78
57.15
54.67
57.82
57.81
Urban
Female
37.69
34.20
27.37
28.84
21.75
28.64
20.81
All
48.36
45.26
42.41
42.94
37.75
43.09
39.66
Basket Weaver
182
Table 6.20
Occupation Pattern of Workers in Dakshina Kannada District: 2011
(Numbers)
Occupation
2001
Female
Male
Total
Male
2011
Female
Total
Cultivators
35310
14374
49684
25302
8508
33810
Agrl. Labourers
28046
14520
42566
21384
7890
29274
HH industry
15985
184262
200247
16149
172058
188207
Others
467063
186830
653893
558068
188362
746430
Total
546404
399986
946390
620903
376818
997721
Graph 6.7
183
184
185
The taluk-wise occupation pattern based on Census data is analyzed for the year 2011 in Table 6.21.
Table 6.21
Taluk-wise Occupation Pattern: 2011 (Number)
Taluk/
District
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Gender
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Cultivators
7032
2272
9304
8120
2039
10159
8180
3040
11220
1507
846
2353
463
311
774
25302
8508
33810
Agricultural
Labourers
7010
1719
8729
7076
2680
9756
6117
2997
9114
1007
377
1384
174
117
291
21384
7890
29274
Household
Activity
5618
53183
58801
2546
33040
35586
5904
53342
59246
1661
28285
29946
420
4208
4628
16149
172058
188207
Other
Activity
99718
28751
128469
63520
19045
82565
266287
92418
358705
84628
28718
113346
43915
19430
63345
558068
188362
746430
Total
Workers
119378
85925
205303
81262
56804
138066
286488
151797
438285
88803
58226
147029
44972
24066
69038
620903
376818
997721
186
Areas of Concern
187
188
Bantwal
Value Index
Belthangady
Value Index
Mangaluru
Value
Index
Puttur
Value Index
Sullia
Value Index
District
Value Index
1.66
10.0
2.35
10.0
2.35
10.0
2.41
10.0
2.36
10.0
2.38
10.0
4.25
9.6
7.07
9.3
2.08
9.8
0.94
9.9
0.42
9.9
2.93
9.7
75.14
2.5
81.62
1.8
36.27
6.4
76.42
2.4
84.86
1.5
57.98
4.2
54.54
5.5
34.55
3.4
73.30
7.3
48.28
4.8
44.57
4.5
59.52
5.9
55.35
4.6
52.24
4.8
42.26
5.8
46.42
5.4
49.25
5.1
47.38
5.3
93.46
9.3
77.31
7.7
96.73
9.7
84.94
8.5
80.10
8.0
90.83
9.1
10
8
9.3
9.6
HHs
with electricity
Agricultural labour
ratio
4
2
0
2.5
4.6
HHs with
traditional fuel
BPL HHs
5.5
HHs with
Pucca house
189
10
8
9.2
7.7
HHs
with electricity
Agricultural labour
ratio
2
0
1.8
4.8
BPL HHs
HHs with
traditional fuel
3.4
HHs with
Pucca house
10
8
9.7
9.8
HHs
with electricity
Agricultural labour
ratio
4
2
0
5.8
6.4
BPL HHs
HHs with
traditional fuel
7.3
HHs with
Pucca house
190
8
8.5
HHs
with electricity
9.9
6
4
Agricultural labour
ratio
2
0
2.4
5.4
HHs with
traditional fuel
BPL HHs
4.8
HHs with
Pucca house
10
8
HHs
with electricity
9.9
Agricultural labour
ratio
4
2
0
1.6
5.1
BPL HHs
4.5
HHs with
traditional fuel
HHs with
Pucca house
191
Bantwal
Sullia
10
8
6
4
2
0
Belthangady
Puttur
Mangaluru
192
194
Chapter 7
STANDARD OF LIVING
196
Standard of Living
7.1 Introduction
It is difficult to define standard of living
and what constitute good life. The conventional
approach followed by economists to measure
standard of living focuses on people's command
over resources in terms of income. Standard of
living has, in fact, many dimensions. Income is
definitely an important determinant of living
standard. It determines purchasing power to
access resources required for a decent standard
of living. But, it alone cannot capture the various
basic dimensions of well-being of people. The
quality of living is a broader concept than mere
income and consumption. It includes a range of
both material and non-material factors which are
basic and influence value in living. There is now
a general consensus that standard of living
depends not only on income and consumption
but also on access to basic amenities such as
health, education, housing, water supply,
sanitation, security and freedom. A good shelter
is a basic need for household security as well as
to raise families. Similarly, access to safe
drinking water, electricity and sanitation is
essential to lead a healthy and decent standard of
living. In view of the critical importance of these
basic amenities for quality life, this chapter
Chapter 7
Table 7.1
Rural-Urban Housing Status in Dakshina Kannada District (Percent)
Housing Status
Good
Livable
Dilapidated
All
Rural
37.82
55.16
7.02
100.00
2001
Urban
57.75
38.97
3.28
100.00
District
45.62
48.82
5.56
100.00
Rural
55.53
40.76
3.71
100.00
2011
Urban
72.11
26.28
1.61
100.0
District
63.51
33.79
2.70
100.00
197
Graph 7.1
Housing Status in Dakshina Kannada District
198
Table 7.2
Taluk-wise Houseless Households: 2011-12 (Percentage)
Taluk/
District
Bantwal
Belhangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sulla
District
Site -less
Households
33.31
25.89
41.35
16.46
18.29
30.76
Households
provided with
house sites
10.14
27.53
2.60
11.82
11.76
11.74
Houses Constructed
for houseless
52.18
57.25
24.74
36.66
68.28
47.80
199
200
Table 7.3
Dakshina Kannada District: Housing under various Schemes: 2011-12 (Number)
Programs
Indira Awas Yojana
Dr. B.R, Ambedkar Scheme
Ashraya Scheme
Special Fisheries Scheme
Karnataka Housing Board
Total
SC
1845
1450
5107
4
8406
ST
751
459
2327
5
3542
Others
3217
18016
69
32
21334
Total
5813
1909
25450
78
32
33282
Graph 7.2
201
Table 7.4
Taluk-wise Housing under various Schemes: 2011-12 (number)
Schemes
Ashraya
Ambedkar
Indira
Awas
Fisheries
KHB
Total
Bantwal
8087
801
623
Belthangady
4230
101
1172
Mangaluru
4774
54
575
Puttur
3457
136
1295
Sullia
4902
817
2148
District
25450
1909
5813
10
12
9533
10
5413
34
20
5457
10
4898
14
7881
78
32
33 282
202
Table 7.5
Dakshina Kannada District: Households having Modern Amenities (Percentage)
Household Assets
Radio/Transistor
Television
Telephone
Bicycle
Two Wheeler
Car, Jeep and Van
Rural
2001
65.59
21.48
12.80
9.45
7.98
3.7
2011
40.89
53.35
84.60
18.96
17.36
7.36
Urban
2001
2011
58.84
27.85
62.91
81.93
39.96
92.48
12.00
13.72
21.09
28.98
9.16
15.34
District
2001
2011
62.93
34. 82
37.80
67.09
23.50
88.39
10.46
16.44
13.15
22.95
5.85
11.20
Source: 2001 Census and 2011 Census. Two wheeler includes Scooter, motor-cycle, and Moped
Graph 7.3
Households having Modern Amenities
203
Table 7.6
Taluk-wise Household Assets: 2011(Percent of Households)
Household Assets
Radio/Transistor
Television
Telephone
Bicycle
Two -Wheeler
Car/Jeep/ Van
No Assets
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
37.94
62.35
87.18
16.59
14.53
6.84
6.08
43.20
48.00
85.10
23.52
18.88
7.63
7.24
28.50
80.21
91.49
13.29
27.08
14.08
4.13
39.55
54.67
85.00
20.39
23.03
10.37
7.05
43.37
48.1 7
82.55
17.61
22.61
10.34
8.88
34.62
67.09
88.39
16.44
22.95
11.20
5.62
Table 7.7 provides data on main sources of drinking water and its location.
Table 7.7
Dakshina Kannada District:
Households by Main source of Drinking water and Location (Percent)
Source of water
Tap Water treated
Tap water Untreated
Covered Well
Uncovered Well
Hand pump
Tube well/Bore well
Spring
River/Canal
Tank/Pond/Lake
Other sources
Total
Within Premises
Near Premises
Away
Total
2001
2011
20.37
10.65
2.50
54.65
2.30
5.23
0.41
0.61
2.52
0.76
100.00
-
31.90
11.80
2.50
40.70
0.70
8.20
0.50
0.50
2.00
1.20
100.00
79.30
13.50
7.20
100.00
Source: 2001 and 2011 Census. Note: Percentage based on total households.
Based on provision of 3 lit res for drinking water, 5 lit res for cooking, 15 lit res for bat hing, 7 lit res for washing utensils
205
Table 7.8
Taluk-wise Households by Safe Drinking Water (Percent)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sulli a
District
Safe Drinking
Water Source
31.57
17.72
54.79
29.92
27.35
38.55
2001
Unsafe Drinking
Water Source
Safe Drinking
Water Source
68.43
82.28
45.21
70.08
72.65
61.45
47.87
27.46
64.83
45.33
29.18
51.77
206
2011
Unsafe Drinking
Water Source
52.13
72.54
35.17
54.67
70.82
48.23
7.7 Electricity
A habitation is a locality in a village where a cluster of 20 families totaling 100 persons reside.
207
Table 7.9
Dakshina Kannada District: Households by Main Source of Lighting (Percent)
Source of Lighting
Electricity
Kerosene
Solar Energy
Others
No lightin g
Total
2001
2011
71.45
27.85
0.38
0.16
0.18
100.00
90.83
8.41
0.40
0.14
0.20
100.00
Table 7.10
Taluk-wise Households by Main source of Lighting 2011
(Percent)
Taluk/District
Electricity
Kerosene
Solar Energy
Others
No lighting
Total
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
93.46
6.04
0.09
0.13
0.26
100.00
77.31
20.52
1.60
0.23
0.33
100.00
96.73
2.9
0.05
0.10
0.13
100.00
84.94
14.49
0.21
0.08
0.22
100.00
80.1
17.59
1.73
0.32
0.24
100.00
90.83
8.41
0.40
0.14
0.20
100.00
Source: Census-2011
208
209
Type of Fuel
Fire wood
Kerosene
LPG
Electricity
Bio -gas
Others
Total
2001
2011
67.13
5.06
25.17
0.10
0.83
1.72
100.00
55.67
1.51
41.21
0.04
0.77
0.78
100.00
Table 7.12
Taluk-wise Households using different type of Fuels for Cooking(percent)
Type of Fuels
Fire wood
Kerosene
LPG
Electricity
Bio -gas
Others
Total
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
73.87
0.45
23.92
0.02
0.90
0. 82
100.00
80.57
0.15
17.02
0.02
1. 33
0. 85
100.00
32.65
2.80
63.35
0.06
0.31
0. 80
100.00
75.55
0.26
22.27
0.03
1.27
0.6 0
100.00
83.87
0.26
13.61
0.02
1.49
0. 72
100.00
55.57
1.51
41.21
0.04
0.77
0. 78
100.00
210
7.9 Sanitation
Sanitation broadly means safe disposal
of waste. Cleanliness and sanitation go hand in
hand in ensuring good health and hygienic
conditions and thereby, well-being of the
community living in a particular area. Moreover,
access to toilet facilities within the home
premises provides privacy, dignity, and a sense
of security to family members especially female
members. With the increase in population and
urbanization, human waste is the main source of
waste posing a big menace and nuisance leading
to health hazard. Faecal contamination is the
Table 7.13
Dakshina Kannada District: Households by Type of Latrine Facilities (2011)
Location/Type of Facilities
Number
Percent
Within Premises:
Flush latrine -Piped sewer system
Flush latrine -Septic tank
Flush latrine Other system
Pit latrine -Slab/ventilated pit
Pit latrine -Open pit
Night soil disposed into open drain
Service latrine removed by human
Service latrine - serviced by animal
No latrine within Premises:
Public latrine
Open
394245
52736
248370
2977
89736
425
0
0
425
9782
17 01
29345
92.7
12.4
58.4
0.7
21.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.3
0.4
6.9
212
213
toilets.
The highest numbers of toilets
constructed for rural households are in Bantwal,
(23439) followed by Belthangay (20563) and
Mangaluru (18585). Sullia has the lowest
number of 13935. The number of toilets
constructed in Puttur is 18488. Since rural
houses in the district are spread out, the drainage
is not a serious problem in the rural areas. It is a
serious problem only in urban areas, which has
been discussed separately in chapter 11.
With a view to encourage 100 percent
coverage of total sanitation, the Government of
India has instituted the Nirmal Grama Puraskar
award at Grama Panchayat, Taluk Panchayat and
Zilla Panchayat levels. The criterion for such
puraskar is 100 percent toilet construction and
their use by households, schools, and
anganawadis and efficient management of solid
and liquid wastes. The State Government
instituted Nirmalya Award to encourage Grama
Panchayats, Taluk Panchayats and Zilla
Panchayats for acceleration and sustainability of
TSC. The awards range from Rs.1 lakh to Rs. 19
lakh for GPs, Rs.10 lakh to Rs.20 lakh for Taluk
Panchayats and Rs.30 lakh for the ZPs. During
2006 12, out of 203 GPs, 203 were awarded
Nirmal Gram Puraskar by the Central
Government.
214
216
Chapter 8
GENDER
AND DEVELOPMENT
218
CHAPTER 8
Table 8.1
Key Indicators of Demographic Gender Differentials: 2011
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State (Lakh)
Population
(Number)
Male
Female
Total
Share
of
female
Percent
196708
131967
490797
143116
72126
1034714
309.67
198672
134622
503805
144735
73101
1054935
301.29
395380
266589
994602
287851
145227
2089649
610.95
50.25
50.50
50.65
50.28
50.34
50.48
49.31
Sex
Ratio
Sex Ratio
in 0 -6
Decadal growth
( 2011 over 2001)
Number
Number
Male
Female
1010
1020
1027
1011
1014
1020
973
945
962
941
945
967
947
948
10.10
8.80
12.90
7.78
1.59
10.26
15.12
8.63
7.52
12.42
8.59
4.79
9.97
16.09
Source: Census 2001 and 2011 * Sex Ratio of females per 1000 males.
Interestingly, in rural areas, the sex ratios
are higher than urban areas. It is 951 as against in
urban areas, 942.
Taluk-wise, Mangaluru has the highest
adult sex ratio (1027) and Bantwal has the lowest
(1010) adult sex ratio. In the case of child sex
ratio, Sullia has the highest (967) and Mangaluru
has the lowest (941). Taluk-wise differentials
are, however, not very wide. Besides declining
child sex ratio, what is disturbing is the
differential observed in the decadal growth in
male and female population. While at the state
level, decadal growth of women is higher than
men, in Dakshina Kannada district, it is lower.
As against 10.3 percent decadal growth in male
population, the decadal growth in female
population is 9.97 percent in the district. At the
state level, the decadal growth of men
population is 15 percent and female population,
16.1 percent. The comparative analysis of taluk
level data shows that Sullia and Puttur have
higher decadal growth of female population than
men, while in other three taluks, the male
population has higher decadal growth than
women. All these trends have serious
221
Graph 8.1
Gender Wise Decadal Population Growth
222
Table 8.2
Gender Gap in Literacy and Education (Percentage)
Indicators
Literacy Rate
Literacy rate in rural area
Literacy rate in urban area
Decadal growth in literacy rate
Literacy Rate in Bantwal
Literacy Rate in Belthangady
Literacy rate in Mangaluru
Literacy rate in Puttur
Literacy rate in Sullia
GER at Primary Education
NER at Primary Education
Drop-out at Primary Education
GER at Secondary Education
Drop-out at Secondary Education
Pass in S.S.L.C.
Teachers Ratio
PUC: Students Ratio
Pass in PUC
Higher General Education Student ratio
Male
93.13
90.97
95.50
3.82
92.60
89.99
95.31
90.71
91.34
101.03
95.89
1.22
96.02
14.23
66.52
39.19
46.46
82.08
47.88
Female
84.13
79.83
88.83
8.98
81.02
77.99
88.15
80.51
81.44
100.36
95.06
0.55
101.20
5.38
82.69
60.81
53.54
89.36
52.12
Gap
-9.00
-11.14
-6.67
5.16
-11.58
-12.00
-7.16
-10.20
-9.90
-0.67
-0.83
0.67
5.18
8.85
16.17
21.62
7.08
7.28
4.24
224
Table 8.3
Gender Gap in work Participation in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Male Workers
Number
Percent
119378
58.15
81262
58.86
286488
65.37
88803
60.40
44972
65.14
620903
62.23
Female Workers
Number
Percent
85925
41.85
56804
41.14
151797
34.63
58226
39.60
24066
34.86
376818
37.77
Total
Number
205303
138066
438285
147029
69038
997721
Gender Gap
Percent
16.30
17.72
30.74
20.80
30.28
24.46
Source: Census-2011
225
226
227
228
Table 8.4
Gender-wise Representation in Panchayat Raj in Dakshina Kannada District: 2011-12
Institutions
Male Members
Number
Percent
17
48.57
15
45.45
11
45.83
19
51.35
9
40.91
5
38.46
1796
54.91
36
60.00
65
61.90
24
52.17
Zilla Panchayat
Bantwal TP
Belthangady TP
Mangaluru TP
Puttur TP
Sullia TP
Grama Panchayats
Mangaluru City Corporation
Town Municipal Councils
Town Panchayats
Female Members
Number
Percent
18
51.43
18
54.55
13
54.17
18
48.65
13
59.09
18
61.54
1475
45.09
24
40.00
40
38.10
22
47.83
Total
Number
35
33
24
37
22
23
3271
60
105
46
230
231
232
Table 8.5
Crimes against Women Registered in Dakshina Kannada District (Number)
Type of Crime
Physical violence
Mental torture
Financial harassment
Dowry related crime
Adultery
Family quarrel
Divorce
Rape
Property dispute and quarrel
Court cases registered
Sexual violence
Others
Total
2009-10
24
0
0
4
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
31
64
2010-11
20
25
0
15
0
0
0
28
0
9
24
44
165
2011-12
36
21
0
27
0
0
0
16
0
17
27
49
193
Total
80
46
0
46
0
0
0
49
0
26
51
124
422
234
235
Table 8.6
Stree-Shakthi Women SHGs in Dakshina Kannada District: 2011-12 (Numbers)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sulla
District
Number
1237
514
860
766
286
3663
SC
1126
879
863
1517
568
4953
Members
ST
Others
1518
14582
606
6352
307
12552
835
7952
393
2389
3659
43827
236
Total
17226
7837
13722
10304
3350
52439
237
238
239
240
242
Chapter 9
STATUS OF
SCHEDULED CASTES
AND SCHEDULED TRIBES
244
CHAPTER 9
A caste foams a homogenous groups in terms of ritual status, customs and beliefs, food habits, habits and occupations.
Common belief is that families belonging to a caste descent from a common ancestor.
10
Schedule caste nomenclature was first time contained in the Government of India Act 1935.
245
Bhootaradhane
DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT - 2014
Table 9.1
Demographic Profile of SCs in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State (lakh)
Male
8465
11018
20633
15877
9825
65818
43.40
2001
(number)
Female
8499
11257
20745
15132
9709
65342
42.24
Total
16964
22275
41378
31009
19534
131160
85.64
2011
(number)
Female
9675
12890
25013
16938
10338
74854
52.10
Male
9585
12426
24262
17102
9949
73324
52.64
Sex Ratio*
Total
19260
25316
49275
34040
20287
148178
104.75
2001
1004
1022
1005
953
988
993
973
2011
1009
1037
1031
990
1039
1021
990
Decadal
Growth
Percent
13.53
13.65
19.08
9.77
3.85
12.97
22.31
Source Census: 2001 and 2011. * Sex ratio per 1000 males
Table 9.2
Demographic Profile of STs in Dakshina Kannada District
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
State (lakh)
2001
Male
7460
6334
5809
6563
5413
31579
17.56
Female
7389
6382
5730
6493
5363
31357
17.08
2011
Total
14849
12716
11539
13056
10776
62936
34.64
Male
10486
7733
8137
8773
5832
40961
21.35
Female
10426
7909
8109
8854
6009
41307
21.14
Sex Ratio
Total
20912
15642
16246
17627
11841
82268
42.49
2001
990
1008
986
989
991
993
973
2011
994
1023
996
1009
1030
1008
990
Decadal
Growth
Percent
40.83
23.01
40.79
35.01
9.88
30.72
22.66
Source Census: 2001 and 2011. * Sex ratio per 1000 males
According to the 2011 census, the
district has 148178 SC populations and 82268
ST populations. They constitute 7.09 percent
and 3.94 percent of the total district population.
The respective comparative figures at the state
level are 17.2 percent and 6.9 percent. The
decadal growth in the SC population works out
to 13 percent and for the ST population, 31
percent. The comparative decadal growth of
total population in the district was 10 percent.
247
Graph 9.1
Graph 9.2
248
Table 9.3
Rural Urban SC/ST Population: 2011
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Rural
(number)
S. C.
S. T.
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
7904
7948
15852
11736
12187
23923
7956
8019
15975
14524
14248
28772
8962
9253
18215
51082
51655
102737
9289
9185
18474
7520
7703
15223
3129
3150
6279
7552
7594
15146
5292
5430
10722
32782
33062
65844
Urban
(number)
S.C.
S.T.
1681
1727
3408
690
703
1393
16306
16994
33300
2578
2690
5268
987
1085
2072
22242
23199
45441
1197
1241
2438
213
206
419
5008
4959
9967
1221
1260
2481
540
579
1119
8179
8245
16424
Decadal Growth
(percent)
Rural
Urban
SC
ST
SC
ST
1.15
28.44 158.22 425.00
1.01
28.14 173.69 461.54
1.08
28.29 165.83 442.98
10.97
20.98
56.11
80.51
12.74
23.01
57.27
71.67
11.86
22.00
56.69
76.05
-9.60
5.67
37.80
75.84
-8.23
0.64
41.53
90.73
-8.92
3.09
39.68
82.95
5.53
30.07
21.95
61.29
9.22
31.04
28.89
80.52
7.33
30.56
25.40
70.51
1.12
6.78
2.60
18.16
5.65
10.50
14.09
28.95
3.37
8.63
8.31
23.51
2.54
20.6
38.99
85.54
4.95
21.24
43.89 101.69
3.74
20.95
41.45
93.31
A Shop Established by the ST Community Member with the Assistance of Govt. Subsidy.
DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT - 2014
250
Table 9.4
Taluk-wise Population of Koraga Community
Taluk
Mangaluru city
Mangaluru (Rural)
Bantwal
Belthangady
Puttur
Sullia
District
Families
(number)
271
503
187
100
113
32
1206
Male
621
1088
294
206
195
61
2465
Population
Female
583
1114
278
190
188
40
2393
Total
1204
2202
572
396
383
101
4858
251
Graph 9.3
252
253
Table 9.5
Literacy Status of SCs and STs in Dakshina Kannada District (percentage)
Details
District
State
S.C.
S.T.
All
S.C.
S.T.
All
Male
63.60
71.50
84.88
49.70
47.90
67.26
1991
Female
45.90
53.70
68.84
26.00
23.60
44.34
Total
54.90
62.70
76.74
38.10
36.00
56.04
Male
73.89
80.20
89.70
63.75
59.66
76.10
2001
Female
58.36
65.69
77.21
41.72
36.57
56.87
254
Total
66.14
72.95
83.35
52.87
48.27
66.64
Male
74.42
78.90
93.13
74.03
71.14
82.47
2011
Female
63.26
68.60
84.13
56.58
52.98
68.08
Total
68.78
73.73
88.57
65.33
62.00
75.36
Table 9.6
Enrolment of SC and ST Students: 2011-12(number)
Social Groups
SC
ST
OBC
Others
Total
Boys
9602
5057
98606
7686
120951
Primary (1-7)
Girls
9091
4803
92182
7391
113467
Total
18693
9860
190788
15077
234418
Boys
3593
2023
42529
4645
52820
Secondary (8-10)
Girls
3654
2044
39842
4754
50294
Total
7247
4067
82371
9429
103114
255
Table 9.7
Taluk-wise GER of Students by Social Groups At Primary
and Secondary Education: 2011-12 (Percentage)
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
SC
Primary Secondary
97.89
96.45
98.12
95.45
97.89
95.89
98.46
96.12
99.56
98.46
99.94
98.96
99.79
96.25
99.71
97.96
97.45
95.45
97.59
95.13
99.45
97.52
99.24
97.92
Primary
95.89
94.89
94.86
92.49
101.02
101.96
100.89
99.89
95.46
94.56
98.16
97.46
ST
Secondary
93.56
93.12
92.54
90.47
98.51
98.45
98.36
98.79
94.12
93.78
96.42
95.92
256
Others
Primary Secondary
99.54
97.59
98.89
97.58
98.12
96.23
99.15
97.41
105.45
100.60
104.56
100.40
104.69
99.56
100.98
99.92
97.42
96.45
96.48
96.45
103.24
99.89
101.32
99.35
Table 9.8
Government Hostels for SC and ST Students in the District (2011-12)
Details
Boys
Girls
Total
Hostels (No)
Students (No)
Hostels (No)
Students (No)
Hostels (No.)
Students (No)
SC Hostel
PreMetric
11
690
8
620
19
1310
PostMetric
4
324
4
319
8
643
ST Hostels
PreMetric
6
270
3
125
9
395
PreMetric
1
75
1
75
2
150
Morarji Desai
Residence School
PrePostMetric
Metric
3
563
375
938
-
Ashrama
School
12
421
341
762
257
The district has 19 pre-metric, 8 postmetric hostels exclusively for SC students and 9
pre-metric and 2 post-metric hostels for ST
students besides 3 residential pre-metric Morarji
Residential Schools and 12 Ashrama Schools.
During the academic year 2011-12, the total
student beneficiaries of these facilities were
2343 boys and 1855 girls. The number of the SC
and the ST students benefited from the
government scholarship during 2011-12 is given
in Table 9.9. During the academic year 2011-12,
The SC Student-beneficiaries from scholarship
were 16020 at primary level and 6342 at
secondary level for SC category. Similarly, 3126
at primary level and 3473 at secondary level ST
students benefitted from the government
scholarships.
The State Government has also launched
under SSA innovative interventions for socially
disadvantaged SCs and STs. Chinnara Zilla
Darshana is one such programme, which is an
educational tour progamme, free of costs to the
children. This programme is planned with an
intention to supplement the classroom learning
of the children by integrating school activities
with outside world and society. During the year
2011-12, about 2303 SC students and 475 ST
students have benefitted under this programme.
Table 9.9
Government Scholarship to SC and ST Students (Number)
Social Group
SC
ST
Level of Education
Primary
High School
Primary
High School
Boys
7952
2539
2160
1253
258
Girls
8058
3803
966
2220
Total
16020
6342
3126
3473
Graph 9.4
1.4
Health Awareness and Institutional
Delivery Rate
The health status of the SC/ST families
differs widely depending on the socio-economic
background of the various sub-castes. For
example, the health profile of Marathi Naikas is
more or less similar to other communities. As
against this, Koragas have relatively poorest
health status in the district because of their
cultural traditions and livelihood practices.
Korgas usually suffer from alcoholic, high
consumption of tobacco, malnutrition and
higher percentages of infant mortality and
maternal mortality rates. In the case of
Malekudiyas, who live in forest, they do not
have easy access to health facilities. As a result
of various healthcare programmes implemented
by the Government, there was a remarkable
improvement in almost all health indicators of
the SC/ST families in the district. Unfortunately,
the data on many RCH indicators for the SC/ST
families separately are not available.
259
and nutritional food for six months. Since 200809, the ITDP provides through anganwadis,
from June to November, for each family, 15 kg
rice, one kg pulse, 2kg dal, one litre edible oil,
2kg jaggery and 30 eggs with a view to reduce
malnutrition among Koraga community. The
government has also special arrangement in
Wenlock Hospital as well as with recognized
private hospitals for medical treatment of
Koragas at free of cost.
260
Table 9.10
Agricultural Land Holding Pattern of SCs and STs
in Dakshina Kannada District: 2010-11
Size of Land
Holding
(Ha)
Number
Below 1
1 -2
24
4 10
10 and above
Total
9224
1171
140
4
10539
SCs
Area
(ha)
3483.23
1569.95
337.46
18.44
5409.08
Average size
(ha)
0.38
1.34
2.41
4.61
0.51
Number
7431
1825
336
26
9618
STs
Area
(ha)
3155.77
2474.72
828.41
126.36
6585.26
Average size
(ha)
0.42
1.36
2.46
4.86
0.68
261
262
Table 9.11
Work Participation Rates of the SCs and STs (Percentage)
Details
S.C.
Dakshina
Kannada
District
S.T.
S.C.
Karnataka
S.T.
Men
63.10
56.70
61.50
64.30
57.50
63.40
55.70
49.20
54.00
57.60
52.60
58.30
Rural
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
2001
Women
58.30
43.20
54.50
54.20
34.00
51.60
44.30
20.50
38.40
45.30
21.90
41.70
All
60.70
49.90
58.10
59.30
46.20
57.50
50.10
35.10
44.70
51.50
37.60
49.40
263
Table 9.12
Housing for SCs and STs under various programs:2011-12(number)
Programs
House Sites allotted under Ashraya Scheme
House under Ashraya Scheme
Dr. B.R, Ambedkar Scheme
Indira Awas Yojana
Special Fisheries Scheme
Total
SC
497
5107
1450
1845
4
8903
264
ST
161
2327
459
751
5
3703
Graph 9.5
Housing for SCs and STs under various programs ( In Numbers) : 2011-12
265
Table 9.13
Marginalized Groups: indicators for Radar
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
Female Literacy
(Percent)
Actual
Value
81.02
77.99
88.15
80.51
81.44
84.13
Index
8.10
7.80
8.82
8.05
8.14
8.41
Women Elected
Representatives
(Percent)
Actual
Index
Value
45.60
4.50
46.14
4.61
43.86
4.39
45.18
4.52
49.40
4.94
45.50
4.55
266
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
Actual
Index
Value
14.86
1.49
17.59
1.76
12.18
1.22
20.30
2.03
27.08
2.71
16.74
1.67
The radar charts prepared for each taluks and for all taluks together are shown below:
Graph 9.6 Radar Chart
Bantwal Taluk - Margilised Groups
Female Literacy (Percent)
10
8.1
0
1.49
4.5
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
Women Elected
Representatives (Percent)
8
6
7.8
4
2
0
1.76
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
267
4.61
Women Elected
Representatives (Percent)
10
8.82
5
0
1.22
4.39
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
Women Elected
Representatives (Percent)
10
8.05
5
0
2.03
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
4.52
Women Elected
Representatives (Percent)
268
10
8.14
5
0
2.71
Elected SC/ST
Representatives
(Percent)
4.94
Women Elected
Representatives (Percent)
Belthangady
Sullia
Mangaluru
Puttur
269
'
Scheduled Castes' also referred to as
'Dalit, are traditionally deprived social group
involved mainly
in such pursuits like
scavenging, leather work, and manual labourers.
Historically, they were the disadvantaged
community and suffered through centuries from
social exclusion and discrimination. Socially
and economically, they still remain at the lowest
rung of the socio-economic ladder. Despite
constant, deliberate and conscious efforts to
eradicate negative and discriminatory practices,
there is still a general perception that the social
exclusion and discrimination of Dalit still persist
in the society. The Human Development Index
(HDI) which measures various dimensions of
human development, however, does not capture
various dimensions of discrimination and
exclusion, which are historically Dalit specific.
Electrification, Two-wheelers,
Gender Dimension: Pre/post delivery rest,
institutional delivery, Reproductive support
and
Access to Basic Facilities: Education,
Drinking Water, Toilets, and Sanitation.
With a view to measure various dimensions for
constructing the CDDI, the following
indicators were selected:
Institution Inclusion: Representation of SCs
in Panchayat, School Development and
Management Committees (SDMCs),
J F M C s , Wa t e r S o c i e t i e s , F i n a n c e
committees and Village Health and
Sanitation Committee.
Social Inclusion: Perception of Dalits on
open entry into non-Dalits' residences,
address them respectfully like non-dalits,
inclusion of Dalits in festivals on par with
non-Dalits, free entry to village temples and
treatment in hotels like non-Dalits.
Perception of Discrimination: Perception of
Dalits on access to all sources of drinking
water like non-Dalits, Treatment of SC
children in schools on par with non-Dalit
children in matters such as sitting in the class
rooms, plates given for mid-day meal,
participation in curriculum and extra
curriculum activities, sports and cultural
activities, discrimination in health matters
such as number of visits by health workers,
paying attention, delivery of drugs,
emergency services, social discrimination in
terms of treatment hotels, temples, social and
religious functions in matters such as
invitation, seating arrangements, plates or
glasses used, meals served and disposal of
271
272
Table 9.14
Composite Dalit Development Index (CDDI)
Dimensions
Institutional Inclusion
Social Inclusion
Perception of Discrimination,
Protest against Discrimination
Conflict Resolution
Standard of Living
Perception of Freedom
Gender Dimension of Development
Access to Basic Facilities: Water/ Sanitation
Access to Education
Total
CDDI (Total/10)
Dalit Deprivation Index (DDI)(1 - CDDI)
273
Maximum
Value
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
6
6
94
Actual Value
Index
6
9
10
10
10
7
10
6
3
4
75
0.500
0.900
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.700
1.000
0.600
0.500
0.667
7.867
0.787
0.213
implemented several multi-faceted and multipronged programmes for social and economic
welfare of the SCs and the STs and thereby bring
them to the mainstream development. The
analysis of the available data clearly has shown
that most of the government social programmes
implemented have been successful in provision
of the basic livelihood amenities to the SCs and
the STs. They are not lagging very much behind
other communities as regards housing, drinking
water supply, electricity and sanitation. The
historically existing wide gaps between them
and the rest of the population in regard to
housing and basic amenities no more exist.
Notwithstanding remarkable progress made
in social empowerment, the SCs and STs still lag
behind the rest of the population in regard to
higher and professional education, access to
healthcare facilities, organized job market,
access to productive assets and credit,
entrepreneurship and business world and
standard of living. Most of them remained as
resource poor and in low-end labourers. Though
there are many government programmes to
improve the education and economic status of
these communities, the effect is only marginal as
regards skill development and economic
empowerment. The district has still relatively a
larger percentage of the SCs and the STs below
poverty level. They have higher dropouts in
secondary and PUC education. Their
representation in higher-end professional
employment is only marginal. The setting up
separate colonies for SCs and STs also adversely
affects their participation in mainstream society
and becoming integral part of the society.
Another important emerging issue is the
existence of wide gaps among the sub-castes of
274
Chapter 10
GOVERNANCE ISSUES:
GOVERNANCE AND
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
276
CHAPTER 10
278
Chart 10.1
District Level Zilla Panchayat
279
280
281
282
Tale 10.1
Profile of Urban Local Bodies in Dakshina Kannada District
ULBs
Mangaluru CC
Bantwal TMC
Moodabidri TMC
Puttur TMC
Ullal TMC
Mulky TP
Belthangady TP
Sullia TP
Total
Total Area
(sq. km)
132.45
27.05
39.62
36.11
11.80
11.00
8.87
6.61
273.51
Wards
(number)
60
23
23
27
27
17
11
18
206
Household
(number)
115036
7939
6517
11378
9588
3962
1821
4194
160435
Total Population
(number)
499487
40155
29431
53061
53773
17274
7746
19958
720885
283
Urban Development
Cell in the DCs Office
City Councils
Commissioner/
Chief Officers
Administration
Department
Secretariat
Public health
And Environment
Protection
Revenue
Department
Works/
Engineering
Poverty
Alleviation/
Community
Public
Relations
Zonal Office
284
Finance/
Accounts
Town
Planning
Zilla Panchayat President Receiving the Award of Nirmal Gram Puraskar by Honble President of India
285
286
A Service centre and Rajiv Gandi Seva Kendra at Kolthige Gram Panchayat - Puttur
287
Defined Objectives of a Gram Panchayat Painted on a wall at Sangabettu Gram Panchayat, Bantwal
289
290
291
11
Voluntary sector and NGOs are generally understood to be not- for-profit, professional intermediary agencies,
which manage programmes in the areas of economic and social development and engage in welfare, relief,
rehabilitation and training. Sometimes, voluntary sector organizations and NGOs are synonymously used and
sometimes differently under the umbrella of civil socity organizations or community based organizations.
292
293
12
Microfinance and Rural Employment: An Appraisal of the Potentialities, Research Study submitted to NABARD, Mumbai,
October, 2004.
294
Table 10.2
Taluk-wise Composition of GP Elected Members: 2012
Taluk
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
SCs
STs
OBCs
Others
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Male
9
1.08 11
1.32 423 50.78 14
1.68
Female 51 6.12 55 6.60 265 31.81
5
0.60
Total
60 7.20 66 7.92 688 82.59 19
2.28
Male
18 2.91
5
0.81 121 19.58 192 31.07
Female 43 6.96 43 6.96
84 13.59 112 18.12
Total
61 9.87 48 7.77 205 33.17 304 49.19
Male
16 1.71
4
0.43 189 20.15 319 34.01
Female 49 5.22 48 5.12 124 13.22 189 20.15
Total
65 6.93 52 5.54 313 33.37 508 54.16
Male
30 5.33
7
1.24 111 19.72 164 29.13
Female 39 6.93 38 6.75
75 13.32 99 17.58
Total
69 12.25 45 7.99 186 33.04 263 46.71
Male
18 5.64 12 3.76
47 14.73 86 26.96
Female 30 9.40 28 8.78
29
9.09
69 21.63
Total
48 15.04 40 12.54 76 23.82 155 48.59
Male
91 2.78 39 1.19 891 27.24 775 23.69
Female 212 6.48 212 6.48 577 17.64 474 14.49
Total
303 9.26 251 7.67 1468 44.88 1249 38.18
Total
No.
%
457
54.86
376
45.14
833 100.00
336
54.37
282
45.63
618 100.00
528
56.29
410
43.71
938 100.00
312
55.42
251
44.58
563 100.00
163
51.10
156
48.90
319 100.00
1796 54.91
1475 45.09
3271 100.00
295
Graph 10.1
296
297
a i m e d a t i m p r o v i n g t r a n s p a r e n c y,
accountability, efficiency and procedural reform
to make them user-friendly. Special attention
should be given to the capacity building at GP
level for need assessment, priority setting,
formulation of projects/programmes, and
effective implementation of programs, sound
financial management, transparency and
accountability as well as right to information.
298
Chapter 11
URBAN ISSUES IN
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
300
301
CHAPTER 11
Table 11.1
Growth of Population in ULBs in Dakshina Kannada District
ULBs
Mangaluru CC
Bantwal TMC
Moodabidri TMC
Puttur TMC
Ullal TMC
Mulky TP
Belthangady TP
Sullia TP
Total
2001
(number)
399565
36830
25713
48070
49895
16389
7305
18028
601795
2011
(number)
499487
40155
29431
53061
53773
17274
7746
19958
720885
Graph 11.1
Decadal Growth
(Percent)
25.01
9.03
14.46
10.38
7.77
5.40
6.04
10.70
19.79
302
Table11.2
Basic Infrastructure Indicators of ULBs
ULBs
Mangaluru CC
Bantwal TMC
Moodabidri TMC
Puttur TMC
Ullal TMC
Mulky TP
Belthangady TP
Sullia TP
2313
539
151
423
685
302
160
208
Roads
(Km)
Road
Road per
Length
Sq. km
1029
7.77
86
3.18
142
5.57
205
5.68
269
22.79
47
4.22
40
4.51
136
20.57
65231
2344
2700
4234
4969
1500
1118
2180
Street
Lights
(number)
304
Table 11.3 shows the coverage of urban households with tap drinking water supply and the per capita
water availability per day.
Table 11.3
Households with Tap Water with meter and Per Capita Water Supply (LPCD)
Mangaluru CC
Bantwal TMC
Moodabidri TMC
Puttur TMC
Ullal TMC
Mulky TP
Belthangady TP
Sullia TP
Households with
Safe Drinking Water
Number
Percent
72748
63.24
4546
48.41
4803
49.35
4297
48.23
3187
29.00
2560
51.19
1131
47.14
3272
90.00
LPCD
135
100
114
100
70
70
126
100
305
306
307
310
Chapter 12
The Way Forward
312
CHAPTER 12
centres and major industries, scope for nonagricultural employment and diversification of
agriculture apparently played a significant role.
Whatever the gaps observed in values of indices
and their dimensions are mainly due to gaps in
the key performance indicators selected to
measure various human development
dimensions. The policy or strategic intervention
programmes for sustainable human
development should take into consideration
spatial, social and economic disparities observed
in these key parameters
315
The gender gap, social inequity and ruralurban disparity in literacy rates and
enrolment at ph. The missing out on school
attendance due to compulsion providing
livelihood support is an issue among the SC
and ST students, which adversely affects
their performance.
316
317
318
319
320
321
all spheres.
The primary and secondary education is
the foundation for integrated and holistic
development of the school-going children. It
should facilitate realization of all innate
potentials of children. The curriculum pedagogy
should not be limited to learning text book
subjects only. It should be extended to nonscholastic areas through innovative studentfriendly extra curriculum activities. The
emphasis in the education process should be
accorded more towards innovative exploration,
project work, experimentation; fields based
experiential learning and interactive
/communicative learning rather than mere class
room text book teaching. This would enable a
child to continuously pursue excellence in
his/her respective sphere of life.
The Government is the main primary and
secondary education provider in rural areas.
With the declining population growth and
declining number of students in the rural areas,
there is no justification for continuing lower
primary schools with one or two teachers and
depriving the children quality education at the
foundation level. Instead of spreading thinly the
scarce resources to number of schools, it would
be ideal to consider one model higher primary
school to one GP of population below 5000 to
provide required quality education. Since the
district is on the way to universal elementary
education, the emphasis should be now accorded
to universalization of secondary education and
PUC education. To improve employability and
skills of those who cannot pursue higher
education, there is a need for incorporating
vocational education at secondary and preuniversity courses.
322
323
doctor to do the field work. Every PHC subcenter should have its own building and one
staff nurse. PHCs should be made round the
clock medical services to rural people.
325
326
327
328
329
330
ANNEXURE
TECHNICAL NOTES
332
Technical Notes
Annexure
334
335
Methodology
Indirect estimates of infant and child
mortality is feasible using the information on
children ever born and children surviving by age
of the mother from surveys and census. The
census estimates of IMR and CMR are based on
this information. District Level Household
Surveys (DLHS) conducted in 2007-08 have
collected this information. Ram et al (2013)
have already estimated neonatal mortality rate
and CMR using this information and adjusted
the estimate for the year 2012 using a ratio
method of distributing the total deaths computed
for India to states and districts. But the estimates
they used are from the UN estimate of neonatal
and child mortality for India for the year 2012.
The neonatal and child mortality rate are
estimated by Ram et al (2013).
Ratio method is adopted here for
estimating district and sub-district IMR, CMR
and MMR for Karnataka. We have used the SRS
estimate of IMR, CMR and MMR for Karnataka
and distributed the corresponding deaths across
336
337
b.
c.
338
339
Member
Secretary
1)
2)
3)
Members:
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
Place
22/10/2014
11.00 A.M.
Nethravathi Hall,
D.K.Z.P.Mangalore
24/10/2014
11A.M.
24/10/2014
3.00 P.M.
08/11/2013
340
APPENDIX
STATISTICAL TABLES
342
Table 1
Dakshina Kannada District Profile: Basic Statistics (2011-12)
343
344
345
Source: Census of India 2011 and Dakshina Kannada Dist rict at Glance 2011-12.
346
Table 2
District wise Area & Population
Sl
N
o
District
Area
(in
Sq.Km)
2011 Population
Total
Male
Female
Bagalkot
6594
1889752
950111
939641
14.40
13.89
14.92
Bengaluru ( R )
5815
990923
509172
481751
16.45
16.39
16.51
Bengaluru ( U )
2190
9621551
5022661
4598890
47.18
46.58
47.85
Belagavi
13415
4779661
2423063
2356598
13.41
12.70
14.15
Ballari
8419
2452595
1236954
1215641
20.99
20.13
21.88
Bidar
5448
1703300
870665
832635
13.37
12.92
13.85
Vijayapura
10475
2177331
1111022
1066309
20.50
19.93
21.10
Chamarajnagar
5685
1020791
512231
508560
5.73
4.55
6.95
Chikaballapur
1255104
636437
618667
9.23
8.88
9.60
10
Chikkamagaluru
7201
1137961
566622
571339
-0.26
-1.44
0.94
11
Chitradurga
8388
1659456
840843
818613
9.33
8.33
10.37
12
D. Kannada
4843
2089649
1034714
1054935
10.11
10.26
9.97
13
Davangere
6018
1945497
986400
959097
8.63
7.49
9.83
14
Dharwad
4230
1847023
937206
909817
15.13
13.85
16.49
15
Gadag
4657
1064570
537147
527423
9.54
8.84
10.27
16
Kalaburagi
16224
2566326
1301755
1264571
18.01
17.23
18.82
17
Hassan
6814
1776421
883667
892754
3.18
2.86
3.50
18
Haveri
4851
1597668
819128
778540
11.02
10.62
11.44
19
Kodagu
4102
554519
274608
279911
1.09
-0.08
2.26
20
Kolar
8223
1536401
776396
760005
10.77
10.65
10.89
21
Koppal
8458
1389920
699926
689994
16.21
16.01
16.40
22
Mandya
4961
1805769
905085
900684
2.38
1.92
2.86
23
Mysuru
6269
3001127
1511600
1489527
13.63
12.41
14.90
24
Raichur
5559
1928812
964511
964301
15.51
14.57
16.47
25
Ramanagar
1082636
548008
534628
5.05
4.44
5.69
26
Shivamogga
8465
1752753
877415
875338
6.71
5.64
7.80
27
Tumkur
10598
2678980
1350594
1328386
3.65
2.80
4.52
28
Udupi
3598
1177361
562131
615230
5.85
7.64
4.27
29
Uttara Kannada
10291
1437169
726256
710913
6.17
5.73
6.62
30
Yadgir
1174271
590329
583942
22.81
22.39
23.24
6109529
7
3096665
7
3012864
0
15.60
15.12
16.10
Karnataka
191791
347
Table-3
District wise Rural and Urban Population
Sl
N
o
District
2011 Population
Total
Rural
Urban
Bagalkot
1889752
1291906
597846
14.40
10.10
24.94
Bengaluru (R)
990923
722179
268744
16.45
9.65
39.73
Bengaluru (U)
9621551
871607
8749944
47.18
12.16
51.91
Belagavi
4779661
3568466
1211195
13.41
11.45
19.60
Ballari
2452595
1532356
920239
20.99
16.06
30.19
Bidar
1703300
1277348
425952
13.37
10.35
23.51
Vijayapura
2177331
1675353
501978
20.50
18.75
26.73
Chamarajnagar
1020791
845817
174974
5.73
3.48
18.15
Chikaballapur
1255104
973985
281119
9.23
4.96
27.19
10
Chikmagalur
1137961
898453
239508
-0.26
-2.15
7.54
11
Chitradurga
1659456
1329923
329533
9.33
6.94
20.16
12
D. Kannada
2089649
1093563
996086
10.11
-6.41
36.58
13
Davangere
1945497
1316487
629010
8.63
5.49
15.84
14
Dharwad
1847023
797484
1049539
15.13
10.40
19.01
15
Gadag
1064570
685261
379309
9.54
8.83
10.85
16
Kalaburagi
2566326
1730775
835551
18.01
16.54
21.17
17
Hassan
1776421
1399658
376763
3.18
-1.22
23.66
18
Haveri
1597668
1242167
355501
11.02
8.95
18.89
19
Kodagu
554519
473531
80988
1.09
0.07
7.44
20
Kolar
1536401
1056328
480073
10.77
7.51
18.68
21
Koppal
1389920
1156216
233704
16.21
15.88
17.86
22
Mandya
1805769
1497407
308362
2.38
1.11
9.07
23
Mysuru
3001127
1755714
1245413
13.63
5.84
26.81
24
Raichur
1928812
1438464
490348
15.51
15.18
16.52
25
Ramanagar
1082636
814877
267759
5.05
-0.07
24.50
26
Shivamogga
1752753
1129026
623727
6.71
5.37
9.23
27
Tumakuru
2678980
2079902
599078
3.65
0.12
18.11
28
Udupi
1177361
843300
334061
5.85
-6.91
61.89
29
Uttara Kannada
1437169
1018188
418981
6.17
5.43
8.01
30
Yadgir
1174271
953594
220677
22.81
20.23
35.34
61095297
37469335
23625962
15.60
7.40
31.54
Karnataka
Source: Census of India 2011
348
Table 4
Human Development: Comparison of Dakshina Kannada with Other Districts
In Karnataka State
Districts
Bagalkot
Bengaluru Rural
Bengaluru Urban
Belagavi
Ballari
Bidar
Vijayapura
Chamrajnagar
Chikamagalur
Chitradurga
Dakshina Kannada
Davangere
Dharwad
Gadag
Kalaburagi
Hassan
Haveri
Kodagu
Kolar
Koppal
Mandya
Mysuru
Raichur
Shivamogga
Tumakuru
Udupi
Uttara Kannada
Karnataka
HDI-1991
Value
Rank
0.505
20
0.539
11
0.623
4
0.545
9
0.512
18
0.496
23
0.504
21
0.488
24
0.599
7
0.535
13
0.661
1
0.548
8
0.539
10
0.516
17
0.453
25
0.519
16
0.496
22
0.623
3
0.522
15
0.446
26
0.511
19
0.524
14
0.443
27
0.584
5
0.539
12
0.659
2
0.567
6
0.541
HDI-2001
Value
0.591
0.653
0.753
0.648
0.617
0.599
0.589
0.576
0.647
0.627
0.722
0.635
0.642
0.634
0.564
0.639
0.603
0.697
0.625
0.582
0.609
0.631
0.547
0.673
0.630
0.714
0.653
0.650
Rank
22
6
1
8
18
21
23
25
9
16
2
12
10
13
26
11
20
4
17
24
19
14
27
5
15
3
7
Source: KHDR-2005
349
Table 5
Taluk and District Level Key Human Development Indicators for HDI
(2011-12)
Sr.
Indicators
No.
Standard of Living
1
Percentage of HHs
having access to
Cooking fuel
2
Percentage of HHs
having access to Toilet
3
Percentage of HHs
having access to Water
4
Percentage of HHs
having access to
Electricity
5
Percentage of HHs
having access to Pucca
house
6
Percentage of Non
agricultural workers
(main + marginal)
7
Per-capita Income
(Rupees)
Sullia
District
24.86
18.38
63.73
23.58
15.14
42.02
92.58
90.65
96.33
88.02
80.81
92.66
47.87
27.46
64.83
45.33
29.18
51.77
93.46
77.31
96.73
84.94
80.10
90.83
54.54
34.55
73.30
48.28
44.57
59.52
91.22
85.58
95.36
97.46
98.46
93.68
54572
50267
94716
53245
81882
74528
24
27
28
33
14
22
122
47
44
89
103
89
86.71
84.06
91.50
86.02
86.69
88.57
86.70
85.76
90.94
92.18
85.91
89.22
Health
8
Maternal Mortality
Rate (No)
Education
10
11
350
Table 6
Key Indicators for Gender Inequality Index (GII) (2011-12)
Sr. No.
Indicators
Reproductive
Health
1
Empowerme
nt
4
Labour
Market
Participation
10
11
12
13
14
15
351
Bantwa
l
Belthan
gady
Mangalur
u
Puttu
r
Sullia
District
122
47
44
89
103
89
99.91
99.93
99.90
99.90
99.93
99.92
42.36
26.80
37.87
41.52
21.29
33.96
45.55
46.28
43.43
44.98
49.15
45.29
54.45
53.72
56.57
55.02
50.85
54.71
48.57
49.03
48.49
48.59
49.16
48.64
51.43
50.97
51.51
51.41
50.85
51.36
81.05
78.34
88.13
80.79
81.90
84.13
92.48
89.93
94.99
91.34
91.57
93.13
48.15
47.02
33.14
44.70
36.45
39.51
68.10
69.09
64.78
69.49
66.39
66.93
95.36
91.69
96.02
97.90
98.22
95.65
88.24
81.30
95.01
97.17
98.58
92.48
300
290
290
300
295
295
350
340
340
340
340
345
Table 7
Key Indicators for Child Development Index (CDI) (2011-12)
Indicators
Health:
Bantwal
Belthangady
Mangaluru
Puttur
Sullia
District
24
27
28
33
14
22
19.06
25.59
17.89
22.89
31.54
21.23
5.90
9.24
20.73
10.41
15.04
12.26
89.50
84.30
87.98
86.14
86.45
86.87
Nutrition:
Education:
Table 8
Key Indicators for Food Security Index (FSI) (2011-12)
Sr.
Indicators
No.
Availability
1 Cropping Intensity
2 Percentage Change in
NSA(Net Sown Area)
over the years (2001
District
102
120
7.06
-2.19
14.24
0.298
62.94
0.061
125
120
141
113
3.79
0.62
-20.52
-0.64
89.86
130.94
40.60
39.70
0.013
101.76
0.188
101.42
0.003
106.29
0.009
100.44
100.48
101.97
13.60
3.62
11.35
3.02
3.79
6.40
0.49
2.49
4.50
1.28
1.35
2.02
55.35
54572
52.24
50267
42.26
94716
46.42
53245
49.25
81882
47.38
74528
98.46
93.68
1.04
0.90
2011)
Sullia
10
11
91.22
85.88
95.36
97.46
0.95
0.96
0.83
0.80
352
12
Percentage of Agriculture
labourers to total workers
13 Percentage of villages having
PDS outlets within the village
Absorption
14 Child Mortality Rate
15 Percentage of households with
access to drinking water
16
17
18
19
4.25
7.07
2.08
0.94
0.42
2.93
100
100
100
100
100
100
24
27
28
33
14
22
47.87
27.46
64.83
45.33
29.18
51.77
42.36
26.80
37.87
41.52
21.29
33.96
19.06
25.59
17.89
22.89
31.54
21.23
5.9
81.05
9.24
78.34
20.73
88.13
10.41
80.79
15.04
81.89
12.26
84.13
353
Table 9
Key Indicators for Urban Development Index (UDI)(2011-12)
Sr.
No.
1
5
6
9
10
11
Indicators
Percentage of
urban
population to
total
population
Percentage of
HHs without
Own Houses
Percentage of
Slum
Population to
total
population
Percentage of
HHs with tap
water
connection
Sewerage/
Drainage
No. of
Hospital
Beds per
1000
population in
urban area
Growth Rate
of Own
Resources
Mobilisation
Per capita
expenditure
on
Development
Works
Road Kms
per sq. Km
Crime Rate
per 10000
Population
Road
accidents per
10000
population
Mangaluru
CC
Bantwal
TMC
Puttur
TMC
Ullal
TMC
Moodabidri
TMC
Belthangady
TP
Mulky
TP
Sullia TP
50.21
10.15
18.44
2.62
1.35
2.90
0.86
13.74
1.22
6.68
9.40
0.00
0.01
9.01
0.01
7.06
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
61.53
13.66
50.78
25.44
49.64
44.68
45.46
50.40
63.83
53.81
65.76
29.67
15.59
40.37
86.87
62.45
10.00
7.40
0.00
33.00
26.00
2.80
15.00
4.00
90.84
38.95
81.02
55.95
41.82
23.40
19.82
25.59
1667
290
220
281
265
167
177
225
9.58
3.18
5.62
7.78
3.57
4.51
4.22
20.57
52.20
51.94
23.81
51.85
56.74
20.29
57.26
22.58
61.83
8.74
35.86
4.97
19.05
15.29
8.04
11.89
354
Table 10
Key Indicators for Composite Taluk Development Index (CTDI)(2011-12)
355
356
357
Table-11
District wise Change in Sex Ratio 2001 2011(Per 100 males)
Sl
No
District
Sex Ratio
2001
2011
2001
2011
Bagalkot
980
989
921
934
Bengaluru (R)
945
946
939
950
Bengaluru (U)
908
916
943
944
Belagavi
960
973
921
934
Ballari
969
983
947
960
Bidar
949
956
941
942
Vijayapura
950
960
928
931
Chamarajnagar
971
993
964
953
Chikaballapur
966
972
952
953
10
Chikmagalur
984
1008
959
969
11
Chitradurga
955
974
946
947
12
D. Kannada
1022
1020
952
947
13
Davangere
952
972
946
948
14
Dharwad
949
971
943
944
15
Gadag
969
982
952
947
16
Kalaburagi
958
971
931
943
17
Hassan
1004
1010
958
973
18
Haveri
944
950
957
946
19
Kodagu
996
1019
977
978
20
Kolar
977
979
965
962
21
Koppal
983
986
953
958
22
Mandya
986
995
934
939
23
Mysuru
964
985
962
961
24
Raichur
983
1000
964
950
25
Ramanagar
964
969
945
962
26
Shivamogga
978
998
956
960
27
Tumakuru
967
984
949
959
28
Udupi
1130
1094
958
958
29
Uttara Kannada
971
979
946
955
30
Yadgir
982
989
952
951
Karnataka
965
973
946
948
358
Table-12
District wise Change in Literacy Rate by Sex: 2001 2011 (Percentage)
Sl
No
District
2001
2011
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Bagalkot
57.30
70.88
43.56
68.82
79.23
58.40
Bengaluru (R)
69.59
78.99
59.67
77.93
84.82
70.63
Bengaluru (U)
82.96
87.92
77.48
87.67
91.01
84.01
Belagavi
64.21
75.70
52.32
73.48
82.20
64.58
Ballari
57.40
69.20
45.28
67.43
76.64
58.09
Bidar
60.94
72.46
48.81
70.51
79.09
61.55
Bijapur
57.01
69.94
43.47
67.15
77.21
56.72
Chamarajnagar
50.87
59.03
42.48
61.43
67.93
54.92
Chikaballapur
59.24
69.80
48.33
69.76
77.75
61.55
10
Chikkamgaluru
72.20
80.29
64.01
79.25
85.41
73.16
11
Chitradurga
64.45
74.66
53.78
73.71
81.37
65.88
12
D. Kannada
83.35
89.70
77.21
88.57
93.13
84.13
13
Davangere
67.43
76.37
58.04
75.74
82.40
68.91
14
Dharwad
71.61
80.82
61.92
80.00
86.37
73.46
15
Gadag
66.11
79.32
52.52
75.12
84.66
65.44
16
Kalaburagi
54.34
66.18
42.06
64.85
74.38
55.09
17
Hassan
68.63
78.37
59.00
76.07
83.64
68.60
18
Haveri
67.79
77.61
57.37
77.40
84.00
70.46
19
Kodagu
7.99
83.70
72.26
82.61
87.19
78.14
20
Kolar
65.84
75.99
55.46
74.39
81.81
66.84
21
Koppal
54.10
68.42
39.61
68.09
78.54
57.55
22
Mandya
61.05
70.50
51.53
70.40
78.27
62.54
23
Mysuru
63.48
70.88
55.81
72.79
78.46
67.06
24
Raichur
48.81
61.52
35.93
59.56
70.47
48.73
25
Ramanagar
60.71
69.88
51.22
69.22
76.76
61.50
26
Shivamogga
74.52
82.01
66.68
80.45
86.07
74.84
27
Tumakuru
67.01
76.78
56.94
75.14
82.81
67.38
28
Udupi
81.25
88.23
75.19
86.24
91.41
81.58
29
Uttara Kannada
76.60
84.53
68.47
84.06
89.63
78.39
30
Yadgir
39.90
51.35
28.32
51.83
62.25
41.38
66.64
76.10
56.87
75.36
82.47
68.08
Karnataka
Source: Census of India 2011
359
Table-13
District wise Rural-Urban Literacy Rates by Sex : 2011 (Percentage)
Sl
No
District
Rural
Urban
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Bagalkot
64.20
75.77
52.58
78.58
86.55
70.65
Bengaluru (R)
75.16
83.06
66.80
85.37
89.57
80.95
Bengaluru (U)
78.21
84.54
70.92
88.61
91.66
85.27
Belagavi
69.28
79.12
59.20
85.56
91.10
79.95
Ballari
61.81
72.42
51.02
76.63
83.58
69.62
Bidar
66.73
76.28
56.82
81.81
87.42
75.88
Vijayapura
62.81
74.03
51.10
81.33
87.80
74.79
Chamarajnagar
57.95
64.80
51.06
78.39
83.29
73.54
Chikaballapur
66.39
75.41
57.10
81.57
86.01
77.06
10
Chikkamagaluru
76.95
83.82
70.15
87.93
91.40
84.51
11
Chitradurga
70.68
79.19
61.91
85.89
90.22
81.55
12
13
D. Kannada
Davangere
85.33
71.77
90.97
79.63
79.83
63.69
92.12
84.02
95.50
88.19
88.83
79.77
14
Dharwad
72.09
80.98
62.72
85.92
90.49
81.31
15
Gadag
71.86
82.83
60.62
80.94
88.01
73.92
16
Kalaburagi
58.09
69.08
46.86
78.61
85.12
71.91
17
Hassan
72.79
81.41
64.29
88.36
91.94
84.81
18
Haveri
75.69
83.05
67.89
83.39
87.39
79.29
19
Kodagu
81.09
85.94
76.37
91.48
94.41
88.58
20
Kolar
69.08
78.11
59.82
86.13
90.05
82.18
21
Koppal
66.05
77.12
54.85
78.03
85.48
70.59
22
Mandya
67.78
76.34
59.21
83.24
87.78
78.75
23
Mysuru
63.29
70.64
55.78
86.09
89.50
82.67
24
Raichur
54.11
66.01
42.37
75.12
83.10
67.10
25
Ramanagar
65.26
73.96
56.36
81.54
85.47
77.51
26
Shivamogga
76.37
83.14
69.60
87.79
91.35
84.24
27
Tumakuru
71.66
80.48
62.71
87.32
90.93
83.67
28
Udupi
83.91
89.85
78.65
92.13
95.22
89.21
29
Uttara Kannada
81.31
87.63
74.87
90.73
94.49
86.91
30
Yadgir
47.05
58.02
36.05
72.01
80.03
63.92
Karnataka
68.73
77.61
59.71
85.78
90.04
81.36
360
Table-14
District wise IMR, CMR and MMR: 2011 2012
Sl No
District
IMR
CMR
MMR
Bagalkot
43
49
163
Bengaluru (R)
27
31
119
Bengaluru (U)
15
17
73
Belagavi
37
42
155
Ballari
55
63
227
Bidar
31
35
134
Vijayapura
34
39
135
Chamarajnagar
34
39
142
Chikaballapur
34
39
137
10
Chikkamagaluru
22
25
94
11
Chitradurga
42
49
170
12
D. Kannada
19
22
89
13
Davangere
38
44
163
14
Dharwad
35
40
157
15
Gadag
50
57
215
16
Kalaburagi
49
56
182
17
Hassan
20
23
98
18
Haveri
35
41
163
19
Kodagu
29
33
101
20
Kolar
34
39
140
21
Koppal
58
66
236
22
Mandya
26
30
111
23
Mysuru
39
44
155
24
Raichur
67
77
244
25
Ramanagar
27
31
114
26
Shivamogga
24
27
106
27
Tumakuru
34
39
124
28
Udupi
11
13
50
29
Uttara Kannada
25
29
99
30
Yadgir
49
56
186
35
40
144
Karnataka
Source: SRS, 2011, Note: IM R and CM R per 1000 live birt hs and M M R per 100000 live birt hs.
361
Table-15
District wise Sectoral Composition of Gross District Domestic Product (GDDP)
At Current Prices: 2010-11 (Rs. Lakhs)
Sl No
Bagalkot
299830
184669
362080
846579
Per Capita
GDDP
(in Rs.)
45776
Bengaluru (R)
163583
378498
464883
1006965
105685
Bengaluru (U)
165802
4310273
8340770
12816846
175122
Belagavi
691427
623438
1005994
2320859
49187
Ballari
782947
419146
759995
1962087
86455
Bidar
170797
141961
306345
619102
36808
Vijaypura
347552
189795
361714
899061
44442
Chamarajnagar
145125
70328
165984
381437
35289
Chikaballapur
155667
95786
221463
472916
36763
10
Chikkamagaluru
311130
103779
336572
751482
58834
11
Chitradurga
331499
134131
380996
846626
49819
12
D. Kannada
239365
498360
1230292
1968018
92630
13
Davangere
319957
182045
456888
958890
47820
14
Dharwad
163684
360861
870975
1395520
77697
15
Gadag
129853
102185
245459
477496
43887
16
Kalaburgi
252190
241590
529761
1023541
42040
17
Hassan
359563
177030
454977
991570
51441
18
Haveri
201030
120575
281934
603538
37459
19
Kodagu
263678
65164
243774
572616
93230
20
Kolar
211091
241124
386869
839085
54030
21
Koppal
189744
162076
245020
596839
44570
22
Mandya
296705
179605
309419
785729
39792
23
Mysuru
323662
547296
1046830
1917788
64860
24
Raichur
231506
167954
336456
735916
39364
25
Ramanagar
160979
151564
476579
789122
68399
26
Shivamogga
297313
243953
467332
1008597
54848
27
Tumakuru
439975
371639
574504
1386119
47900
28
Udupi
189018
278355
472895
940268
75511
29
Uttara Kannada
204397
195241
406679
806317
53205
30
Yadgir
98794
68957
181638
349389
32641
8137863
11007378
21925075
41070316
69411
District
Karnataka
Primary
Sector
Secondary
Sector
Tertiary
Sector
GDDP
362
References
Alexander, Jeffreu c, 1998: Real Civil Societies: Dilemmas of Institutionalization, Sage Publications,
New Delhi.
Aziz Abdul, 1993: Decentalized Planning: Karnataka Experiment, Sage Publication, New Delhi.
Bhat, Gururaja P. 1975: Studies in Tuluva History and Culture (From Pre-historic Times upto Modern),
Manipal
Government of India, 2013: Economic Survey 2012-13, Ministry of Finance, Economic Division, New
Delhi.
Government of India, 2012: Faster, Sustainable and More Inclusive Growth, Draft Approach Paper for
Twelfth Five Year Plan, Planning Commssion, New Delhi.
Government of India, 2011: India Human Development Report 2011: Towards Social Inclusion,
Planning Commission, New Delhi.
Government of India, 2011: Census 2011, Office of Registrar General, India.
Government of India, 2006: Karnataka Development Report, Planning Commission, New Delhi.
Government of Karnataka, 2013: Guidelines Document: Preparation of District Human Development
Report, HDD, Planning, Programme, Monitoring and Statistices Department, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2013: State and District Domestic Product of Karnataka: New Series (Base
Year 2004-05, Directorate of Economics and Statstics, Bengaluru.
Government of Karataka, 2012: Economic Survey 20011-12 Planning, Programme, Monitoring and
Statistics Department, March 2012, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2012: Annual Report 2011-12, Sarvashiksha Abhiyana Karnataka, March
2012, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2012: Education in Karnataka 2011-12: An Analytical Report, SSA,
Karnataka, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2005: Karnataka: Human Development Reports 1999 and 2005 Planning
and Statstics Department, Bangalore.
Government of Karnataka, 1982: Karnataka State Gazetteer Part 1, Bangalore.
Government of Karnataka, 2008: Human Development Reports of Bijapura, Gulberga, Mysore and
Udupi Districts, Planning and Sttstics Departments, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2006: Employment and Unemployment in Karnataka: A Report Based on
NSS 59th Round, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka 1999: Human Development in Karnataka 1999, Planning Department,
2004, Bengaluru.
Government of Karnataka, 2002: High Power Committee for Redressal of Regional Imbalances, Final
Report, (Nanjundappa Committee) Bengaluru.
Government of Kerala (2006): Kerala Human Development Report 2005, Trivandrum.
KlugmanJ., Rogriguez F. And Choi H. 2011: The HDI 2010: New Controversies, Old Critiques,
Human Development Reaserach Paper, UNDP.
Mahbub ul Huq, 1995: Reflections on Human Development, Oxford University Press, New York.
Moodithaya M.S. 2005: Rural Self Employment Programmes in India: An Appraisal, Research Report
363
364
365