Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
XV I I
AU G U S T I N E O F H I P P O 3 5 4 4 3 0
A comparative latecomer in the history of patristic exegesis, Augustine surpasses most of the ancient Christian interpreters of scripture by the intensity
of his personal appropriation of the biblical text, and by the originality and
the profundity of his interpretations. He would not have been consistent
with his own life-long spiritual quest had he not struggled over long years
to give himself a properly Augustinian expertise in the art of interpreting
sacred scripture. However first he set out to learn the rules and principles
of interpretation from his predecessors, considering it his duty to conform
to their hermeneutical standards, and in no way to impose a new exegetical
method of his own invention. Augustines creative contribution consisted
in a deliberate synthesis of late antique rhetorical culture with the biblical
hermeneutics already elaborated over several centuries inside the church
community. Whereas in the works of other Christian interpreters, rhetorical culture and familiarity with scripture fused in a largely unreflected approach to scripture, for Augustine, these two streams, in their distinctive
resources as well as in the complexity of their interactions, became a matter
of fascinating inquiry.
Thus while Augustine never tired of discovering new aspects of the
biblical message, it was in exploring scripture that he explored himself as
well. His exegesis became an original contribution to biblical exegesis not
so much by the imposition of a new theoretical frame as by the freshness
and intensity of his inner inquiry. Scripture allowed him to interpret himself,
even more than he interpreted scripture. The focal importance of the self in
Augustinian exegesis is a key factor in the enduring relevance of Augustines
hermeneutics right into modern times.
The present survey of Augustinian writings calls for a chronological outline of the hermeneutical experience through which Augustine
slowly reached his maturity as an interpreter of scripture. Hence the divisions of this very short presentation of his exegesis: (I) A Hermeneutical
Apprenticeship; (II) A Theoretical Foundation: De doctrina christiana; (III)
A Practical Exercise in Biblical Hermeneutics: Confessions; (IV) The Truth
of Scripture: De trinitate IIV; (V) Exploring the Literal Sense: De Genesi ad
Litteram IIX; (VI) The Biblical Scholar; (VII) Augustines Ministry of the
Word, (VIII) The City of God.
I. A HERMENEUTICAL APPRENTICESHIP
For the years , while Augustine lived in turn in Cassiciacum, Rome
and Thagaste, before being ordained priest in Hippo, only those writings
are considered which are of some significance for his future career as an
interpreter of scripture.
In Contra Academicos (Cassiciacum, in the Fall of ), where Cicero
and Neoplatonists are omnipresent, one finds only one anonymous allusion
to scripture: Nam mihi credite, vel potius illi credite, qui ait: quaerite et invenieti, for believe me or rather believe him who said: Search and you will
find, Mt :) (II iii, ), a distinctly insignificant reminder on a Bible whose
very functioning, at this point, seems to be quiescent in the lively arena of
Augustines philosophical debate.
Again in De beata vita (November at Cassiciacum), a charming
conversation between Augustine, his mother Monica, his son Adeodatus,
his brother Navigius, two cousins, two students and the friend Alypius, only
one biblical citation surfaces: For this also is said: I am the truth (Jn :)
(IV, ), among a striking display of references to literary and philosophical sources. The more personal turn of the staged conversation does not yet
convey Augustines immersing himself into the sacred text.
De ordine (Cassiciacum, also November ) is a more ambitious discussion of a philosophical nature (disputatio) in two Books between Augustine
and friends. Numerous allusions and quotations exemplifying Augustines
past education or current intellectual concerns (Virgil and Ovid, Tacitus
and Terence, Cicero and Plotinus . . .) are mentioned at random in the vivid
exchange of views, mainly in Book I, in which one notes only one very vague
scriptural allusion on Col : (philosophos huius mundi evitandos), joined to
an explicit quotation of Jn :, satis ipse Christus significavit, qui non dicit:
regnum meum non est de mundo, sed regnum meum non est de hoc mundo
(I xi, ). While the Pauline allusion, if real, and the Johannine quotation,
have no impact whatsoever on Augustines thought, they do add a distinctive mark to the specific point of argument. It is worth observing that they
intervene at the conclusion of De ordine which has been built up around
an answer given by Augustine to the unexpectedly feminist request of his
mother: numquidnam in illis quos legitis libris etiam feminas umquam audivi
in hoc genus disputationis inductas?, Did I ever hear women introduced
in that kind of discussion in those books of your reading? (I: xi, ). This
isolated NT echo has the mark of a tribute paid by the son to the religious
devotion of the mother, and suggests that, right up to the time of his baptism,
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
benda est; altero fiet ut scientes inveniamus, altero ut scire mereamur (I, ).
Another traditional principle emphasized by main church apologists since
the second century There is only one God in both Testaments utriusque
testamenti deus unus est (I, xvii, ), leads Augustine to root the harmony of
both Testaments testamenti utriusque concordiam (I, xviii, ), in true love
caritas. Further on he concludes: The two voices of the one God, registered
in both Testaments attest to the sanctification of the soul in a common
declaration, so that is happens sometimes that the same data is taken over
from the old into the new scriptures, Quae duae voces unius dei in duobus
testamentis signatae sanctificationem animae concordi attestatione declarant,
ut fiat aliquando illud quod item in novam scripturam de veteri assumptum
est. Without the explicit invoking of the technical term, the typological interpretation of scripture is well secured.
The dialogue On Free Choice, De libero arbitrio, in three Books, argues
against the teaching of the Manichees that evil results only from peoples
free choice. The very first biblical reference in Book I, Is : (the only one
in that Book), is introduced as a prophetic proscription praescriptum enim
per prophetam (I, ii, , ). In Book II and III, added seven years later when
Augustine was a presbyter in Hippo, biblical quotations occur more frequently in a somewhat homiletic style referring to Wisdom literature and
the Prophets as much as to the Gospels and to Paul.
In De Genesi contra Manichaeos, dating from , the scriptural focus
of Augustines polemic against his former fellow Manichees for the first time
calls on allegorical exegesis, as learned from Ambrose. Augustines concern
to present a hermeneutically structured argument determines the whole
essay (Weber , ). In addition to Ambrose, a direct dependence on
Origens Homilies on Leviticus and On Genesis is claimed by Weber, following
Altaner () and Teske ().
A new stage in Augustines apprenticeship in biblical hermeneutics was
firmly announced shortly after his acceptance of the presbyterate in , in
another anti-Manichean writing De utilitate credendi, which was addressed
to his friend Honoratus, still a member of the sect. Here he carefully explains how to distinguish four possible senses of scripture: historical (what
happened), aetiological (why it happened; aetia: cause); analogical (in
OT and NT), and allegorical (not literal, but figurative). This teaching was
communicated just as he received it, in phrases with Greek terms, secundum
historiam, secundum aetiologiam, secundum analogiam, secundum allegoriam.
Immediately Augustine explains the foreign terms, for instance: According to
allegory, when one explains that something written should not be taken literally, but be understood figuratively non ad litteram esse accipienda quaedam,
Augustine of Hippo
The project of DDC must have been on its authors mind from the day
that he had to face the pastoral duty of preaching the word of God. Even
without this clerical charge, Augustines daily reading of scripture kept him
well aware of the needed procedures for its interpretation. Just to know
how to select quotations to contradict the scriptural claims of adversaries
was not enough for ministering to the community. How would he answer
the questions of the faithful puzzled by readings of the liturgy if he had not
clarified for himself the main rules appropriate for understanding biblical
texts? While the DDC directly addresses the pastoral requirements of that
exegetical task, it was in a way more significant for its authors idiosyncratic
interests than of the social and ecclesiastic context in Hippo around . In
his early forties Augustine certainly would not have been true to himself had
he not anchored his new project in a fresh reassessment of his inner self. On
a theoretical level his hermeneutic of sacred scripture would mirror the vital
trajectory of his own journey toward a spiritual goal. The first Book of DDC,
linear and unified in its composition, firm and clear in its distinctions, with
the intensity of its statements and its condensed aspirations, describes in
forty short capitula the deepest personal motivation of the author even more
than any exegetical theory: haec summa est, ut intellegatur legis et omnium
divinarum scripturarum plenitudo et finis esse dilectio, The chief purpose . . . is
to make it understood that the fulfillment and end of the law and all the
divine scriptures is to love (I, xxxv, ; R. P. H. Green, ).
Book I recapitulates Augustines quest during the past ten years. It rests
on his inner vision achieved at the end of that decade since baptism. It
takes advantage of the literary creativity generated by Augustines spiritual
journey during that recent past. At once, it summarizes past experiences and
already announces Confessions, the next dramatic initiative bursting forth
from the bishops religious genius. For lack of evidence, all direct datings are
blurred, but enough is said by Augustine himself to allow us to locate the
composition of the first nine Books of Confessions in the two years of interval between Book I and Book II of DDC. Indeed the contemporanity of the
two major projects of DDC and Confessions highlights structural anities. A
circular flow of creative motivation relativizes their chronological sequence,
like two complementary expressions of a same authorial urge to express a
self-awareness. Like the double face of a same coin, Augustines fascination
with scripture marks the author of the DDC who starts by contemplating
scripture at the very core of the spiritual journey before expanding into the
detail of hermeneutical and rhetorical rulings; whereas, in the reverse order,
Confessions starts with a long review of detailed incidents and life experiences
before ending with the most amazing self-description, in biblical terms, of the
Augustine of Hippo
man. More such thematic anities between DDC and earlier writings of
Augustine may be identifiable, but it is not only a set of philosophical and
religious commonplaces which one finds resonating. Rather, in a Christian
context, DDC is a replication of secular rhetorics calling on centuries old
learning, not at all as a challenge or a supplement to that learning, but, more
candidly, for exploiting its sophisticated resources in order to teach how to
interpret scripture.
Book II deals with basic data which the Bible has in common with any
other important writing: the very fact of the Bibles being a work of literature
and taking into consideration the peculiar style in which it is written leads
Augustine in Book III to discuss the biblical style as seen from the outside,
from a non-biblical culture. The cultural dierence between the biblical world
and the world of its reader creates special diculties, for instance, when
figurative phrases are wrongly taken as proper expressions to be understood
literally, or when several figurative meanings are equally possible. At that point
at the end of III, xxv, , with a quotation of Lk :, Augustine interrupted
the redaction of DDC. It took him thirty years to resume its composition.
Augustines theoretical foundation of biblical hermeneutics was shaken, if not
compromised, by such an abrupt ending, a unique case in the bishops prolific
experience as a writer. Certainly, short interruptions happened elsewhere. We
even noted one between DDC I and DDC II. Major works like De trinitate,
or De civitate dei, would need to be reactivated several times after periods of
busy distractions, but there is nothing comparable to Augustines apparent
failure to complete DDC in . Even more without parallel is the fact
that in , the old bishop felt obliged to complete that opus inperfectum,
while other writings indeed remained unfinished.
Augustinian critics frequently tend to minimize, if not ignore, the three
decades of interruption, insisting that the authors outline and motivation
for DDC remained unchanged, or that the interruption was purely circumstantial, and in the end, insignificant. Various fortuitous reasons for that
interruption are postulated: A. Pincherle (), calculating that the initial
work on Confessions had anticipated the composition of DDC IIII, xxv, ,
thought that the interruption was due to Augustines eagerness to continue his
writing on Confessions. Hill () suggested that a request of Bishop Aurelius
diverted Augustines attention to another assignment. Strauss () argued
on the basis of DDC III, xxv, that the puzzling analysis of signa ambigua
locked the author in a dead end. More recently, G. Lettieri () concluded
that Augustine interrupted DDC when he realized that what he had written
on revelatio in Ad Simplicianum , was inconsistent with the hermeneutical
and soteriological structure of DDC in . In all cases these hypotheses more
Augustine of Hippo
had kept alive the vivid memory of his rhetorical and professional past by
which he surpassed most of his educated contemporaries in Roman Africa.
However his new life-commitment as a Catholic on the provincial scene
of a church divided by the Donatist schism firmly urged him to submit his
skills to the divine authority of scripture. That appeared to him to be his
only responsible option in face of the troubled situation of the community
of believers to which he would be dedicated for the rest of his life. His public
rejection of the Manichean sect had already entailed a few substantial essays.
His real challenge now was to gain a grasp on scripture no longer limited to
the kind of polemics conditioned by his unfortunate nine years in the sect of
Mani, but henceforth oriented towards a fruitful assimilation of biblical and
spiritual values inside the new institutional frame of his life. To be a member
of the church could only mean for Augustine the presbyter, to exercise the
same degree of literacy in ecclesiastical culture which he had so brilliantly
displayed in his secular past. Therefore scripture was for him the challenge to
face. In order to face it, not only did he beg for help among church authorities
like Aurelius of Carthage, his hierarchical superior (Letter ), but he also
mobilized the many resources of his rhetorical expertise.
The passion of his recent conversion fused with his newly acquired
biblical knowledge drew Augustine to conceive a project highly significant
of his introspective creativity, the Confessions. Psalmic lyrics and Pauline affirmations would help him to project an image of his past journey, capable
of opposing sectarian claims of Donatists and Manichees alike, in showing
how a true sinner could eloquently also claim to be a true member of the
church.
Augustines hermeneutical approach to the Bible in Confessions was of a
practical nature, not aimed like in DDC at teaching others how to use scripture, but primarily self-serving. The author, already invested for six years with
the sacramental dignity of the presbyterate and since April sole bishop
of Hippo after the death of Valerius, was now deprived of the spiritual support of Ambrose, his distant, but still inspiring model of Milan (Ambrose
died April , ). With the genius of his own sensibility, Augustine needed
to redefine his whole person in the sacred terms of divine scripture, the only
form of language appropriate in the church, as he had learned from Ambrose.
Eager to acknowledge such a fundamental need, Augustine responded to it
with the literary inventiveness which he had so much enjoyed at Thagaste,
illustrated in particular by De magistro, the dialogues with his son, Adeodatus.
A restless intellectual, determined to assume his new pastoral dimension,
he conceived a literary project for which the Christian tradition did not
provide any precedent, namely a story of his life illustrating the spiritual
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Firmly leaning on the dogmatic conclusions of his unnamed predecessors, and remembering the recommendation of De doctrina christiana in
the case of scriptural ambiguities (cf DDC II , ) before the end of Book
II, Augustine hastens towards the familiar territory of biblical symbolism
much needed for his forthcoming demonstration: Nor again, as we call the
Son a rock (for it is written, And that rock was Christ, Cor :), can we
so call the Spirit a dove or fire. For that rock was a thing already created,
and after the mode of its action was called by the name of Christ, whom it
signified; like the stone placed under Jacobs head, and also anointed, which
he took in order to signify the Lord; or as Isaac was Christ, when he carried
the wood for the sacrifice of himself. A particular significative action was
added to those already existing things; they did not, as that dove (Mt :)
and fire (Acts :), suddenly come into being in order simply to signify (,
). Without using technical terms Augustine refers to the kind of typology already practised inside scripture before it was further elaborated by
his predecessors in the art of commenting on scripture. In the Preface of
Book III, he repeats with an unusual insistence the debt of learning which
he owes those former commentators with regard to the scriptural foundation of Trinitarian faith, not discounting the merits of his own research: I
myself confess that I have by writing learned many things which I did not
know . . . supported, then, very greatly and aided by the writings we have
already read of others on this subject. . . .
The purpose of Book III is to state the absolute transcendency of God
before discussing OT theophanies. Those divine apparitions to Abraham,
Moses and others, do not imply any visible essence of God, nor any changes
in that essence. The book focuses on that issue. It is noticeable that in the
Preface of Book IV, still close to DDC I, Augustine recovers the lyrical accents of prayer in his Confessions. His humble self-depreciation is balanced
by a firm armation of thy truth, veritas tua: And this truth, changeable
though I am, I so far drink in, as far as in it I see nothing changeable . . . for
the essence of God, whereby he is, has altogether nothing changeable, neither
in eternity, not in truth, nor in will. Without further technicality the author
expresses once more his central conviction: interpreting scripture means accounting for divine truth as such. What is read in scripture refers always to
that truth personified in Christ. Because therefore the Word of God is one,
by which all things were made which is the unchangeable truth, all things are
simultaneously therein, potentially and unchangeably; not only those things
which are now in the whole creation, but also those which have been and
those which shall be. The whole interpretation of Genesis I which Augustine
Augustine of Hippo
at once showing and hiding the meaning of Gods written message; a screen on
which the interpreter would unremittingly project his questions and reactions,
not without observing how irrelevant his behavior might be: Perhaps this is
an absurdly material way of thinking and speculating on the matter (I, , ).
Taken one word after another, line after line, the text of scripture constantly
imposes itself on the interpreter, and reinforces its categorical requirements
as the objective and definitive expression of divine truths, by definition, unchangeable. Therefore, for Augustine, interpretation would mean allowing
ones own thought to be consonant with the littera. Thus in front of the literal
screen of scripture a drama develops in the interpreters mind, keeping the
littera itself untouched and undisputed, but plunging Augustine into a decisive crisis of a hermeneutical nature. Through a consistent questioning of
the biblical text (and of himself) about light, water, darkness, heaven and
earth, and the Spirit stirring above the waters, this commentator of Gn :
would conclude in recognizing his apparent failure. He had kept true to
his initial purpose, to discuss sacred scripture according to the plain meaning
of the historical facts, not according to future events which they foreshadow
(I. . ), but he would wisely conclude: God does not work under the
limits of time by motions of body and soul, as do men and angels, but by the
eternal, unchangeable and fixed exemplars of his co-eternal Word, . . . hence
we must not think of the matter in a human way, as if the utterances of God
were subject to time throughout the various days of Gods works. The littera
itself, being utterances of God, transcends human thinking. A true interpreter
verifies that transcendency in exposing to the mystic evidence of the littera
all his thinking, rational yet deficient as it may be.
Book II, on Gn : or on Ps :, can with good reason be understood
figuratively, or better allegorically, as speaking about spiritual and carnal
persons in the church (II, , ), but that is not Augustines present purpose.
Though other commentators start interfering in his exegetical exercise, such
as people who engage in learned discussions about the weights of the elements, a certain commentator (who is Basil of Caesarea; II, , ); or again
certain writers (II, , ), certain commentators (II, , ), nobody distracts
him from multiplying his own questions and common-sense observations.
He is confident that the authority of scripture in this matter is greater than
all human ingenuity (II, , ), and that the narrative of the inspired writer
brings the matter down to the capacity of children (II, , ). Only once
does the author refer to an interpretation that would deviate from the plain
sense of the text under scrutiny, in recalling the beautiful image of the
scripture-firmament in his former work: My allegorical interpretation of
Augustine of Hippo
this passage (Ps :, who stretches out heaven like a skin) can be found
in the thirteenth book of my Confessions (II, , ).
Book III, about The works of the fifth and the sixth days, proceeds in
the same brilliant yet somehow pedestrian way as Book I and II, by bringing
the littera close to daily sense experience, a procedure which occasionally
gives the author some satisfaction: Considerable light is now thrown on this
text [Gn I:] which seemed obscure at first (II, , ). Several questions
are postponed: Concerning this question there may be an occasion later on,
God willing, for a more thorough discussion (III, , ); Later on there will
be ample opportunity to treat more thoroughly the nature of man (III, ,
); This theory [about a possible baby boom without the Fall] can be proposed, although how it could all be explained is another matter (III, , );
and As I have already indicated, we shall later investigate more thoroughly
the rest of the biblical account of the creation of man (III, , ).
Book IV recapitulates the consideration of the six days in the former
books and ponders the biblical phrase of Gods rest. In that recapitulation
one finds a new emphasis on what would become a distinctively Augustinian
mark in the present commentary: The author introduces the Book by pointing out very precisely: It is a laborious and dicult task for the powers of
our human understanding to see clearly the meaning of the sacred writer in
the matter of these six days (IV, , ). After a brilliant summary of mystical
numerology about the six days, flanked with the severe caveat: We must
first drive from our minds all anthropomorphic concepts that men might
have (IV, , ), Augustine stresses the radical transcendency of God about
the rest of the seventh day, only to conclude: But now, in view of what
we have seen about the seventh day, it is easier to admit our ignorance of a
thing that is beyond our experience. . . . It is easier to confess our ignorance
of these matters than to go against the obvious meaning of the words of holy
scripture by saying that the seventh day is something else than the seventh
recurrence of the day that God made (IV, , ). Thus the confession of
ignorance generates the idea of seven recurrences of the same primordial
day. That idea, immediately examined through more reasoning, allows
Augustine to dig out from the evidence of scripture other arguments in
favor of the transcendent meaning of day: Otherwise we might be forced
to say, against the evidence of scripture that beyond the works of the six
days a creature was made on the seventh day, or that the seventh day itself
was not a creature (IV, , ). That transcendent meaning, he insists, has
nothing to do with some figurative and allegorical way of interpreting
day, evening, or morning; it must be understood not in a prophetic or
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Qu
Gn :
:
Ex :; :; :
Ps :, strictly philosopical on body, soul, God.
Sg :
Jn :, numerology.
:, numerology.
Mt : etc.; John the Baptist.
:, ten virgins.
:, doomsday.
Jn :.
:.
:, Logos = ratio or verbum.
:, with a general rule: in omnibus scripturis summa
vigilantia custodiri oportet et secundum fidem sit sacramenti divini expositio (, f.).
Jn :.
Rom ::.
:.
:.
Cor :.
:.
Gal :.
Tit :.
Phil :.
Col :.
Heb :.
Jas :.
(, : non exegetical)
Adv Apollinaristas
De quadragesima et quinquagesima
Heb :.
In the first set of fifty quaestiones a very first allusion to scripture occurs in
Qu , the first quotation of scripture in Qu . Only from Qu on biblical references multiply. In Qu , , , , and still in Qu , Augustines
arguments are aiming towards the biblical quotations given at the end of
the quaestio, whereas in the second set (Qu ) the biblical text is center
stage in each quaestio. After Qu , specially in the second half of Qu , full
developments in Augustines exposition oer mainly a sequence of biblical
quotations.
Expositio quarundam propositionem ex epistola ad Romanos
In Retract I, , , Augustine explains that the short essay consists in
answers given to brothers in . Without much editing we hear echoes of
discussions entertained by Augustine and his friends during the happy years
of their spiritual incubation at Thagaste. As a bishop, Augustine would never
use it. The first to mention it in a much later time would be Cassiodorus, Inst
div , , . (See O. Bardenhewer, Misc Agost , , ).
Epistolae ad Galatas expositionis liber unus (Retract I, )
Of the same nature as the Expositio above, attempted after the return
to Hippo.
Epistolae ad Romanos inchoata expositio (Retract I, )
Another attempt quickly interrupted when found too dicult.
De diversis quaestionibus ad Simplicianum (Winter : Perler Mard
)
The work has been composed according to the genre of Quaestiones et
Responsiones inaugurated by Philo on Genesis and Exodus, and acclimated
to Christian literature by Ambrosiaster ca. .
Qu. , on Rom :, opposes the Manichean exegesis of two Laws,
one good, the other for death. Augustine proceeds by exploring the passage verse after verse in a continuous exegesis which actually exceeds the
limits of the genre.
Qu. , on Rom , a passage ignored by Marcion, but used by Origen
in defense of free will and divine justice. A similar use was already noticeable
in Ambrosiaster, and in Augustine, in Rom and (in /).
Qu. , is about Kgs : and :: is the literal meaning contradictory?
Qu. , treats Kgs :. Marcion had also wondered how God could
repent and he had concluded that there was a dierent God in OT and
NT. The same question was raised by Manichees, hence Augustines answer
defends the OT.
Qu. , is about Kgs :. In line with a tradition marked by
Augustine of Hippo
phrases interpreted have not been noted, and the very text of the biblical
book was severely questionable (Retract II, ). The same must be said of the
Expositio . . . epistolae Iacobi (Retract II, ). They are not proper books, but only
valuable witnesses to Augustines study of the Bible. (G. Madec, Introduction
aux Rvisions et la lecture des oeuvres de Saint Augustin, Paris, , ).
De consenu evangelistarum (/)
Expositio epistolae Iacobi ad duodecim tribus (before , lost).
Ad Hieronymum presbyterum libri duo
These libri are, in fact, two letters given to Orosius in for being delivered to Jerome. They were published only after Jeromes death ().
Locutiones/Quaestiones in Heptateuchum (Retract II, )
The work was composed at the time when Augustine was writing Books
XVXVI of the City of God probably in / . It consists of a minute exercise of literal exegesis on the first seven books of OT by which idiomata and
proprietates, words and particularities of the Greek and Hebrew language
taken over without explanation into Vetus Latina translations of the Bible
are clarified. Occasionally Augustine compares the Latin text with the LXX
Greek, but hastily tamquam a festinantibus (Prooemium). For the Questions
on Genesis, see Cavallera ().
Quaestiones in evangelium
Quaestiones XVI in Matthaeum
Augustine of Hippo
of the interpreters mind. One psalm calls on another. They are best understood in the light of the Gospels which themselves call on the whole Bible.
In the blinding light of the divine incarnation as he perceives it Augustine
dispenses from any investigation of the literal meaning of psalmic verses,
but he never fails to anchor his Christian dream-time exegesis in scriptural
evidence: His rule was to interpret scriptural obscurities only in the light
of other very clear passages. Hence, though reading in given verses things
that were not in them, it practically never happens that he reads in them a
truth that would not be in the Bible. A strictly located error does not aect
the general truth and if philologists disagree, theologians cannot protest.
(Pontet , ).
STUDIES
Pontet, M., Lexgse de S. Augustin prdicateur, Paris .
Zarb, S., Chronologia Enarrationum S. Augustini in Psalmos, Malta .
Rondet, H., Notes dexgse augustinienne, in: RSR (/) .
Le Landais, M., Deux annes de prdication de S. Augustin. in: tudes Augustiniennes, Paris .
Van der Meer, F., Augustine the Bishop. Church and Society at the Dawn of the
Middle Ages. New York and Evanston, .
. Other Sermons
A comprehensive survey of Augustines sermons by M. Pellegrino forms
the General Introduction to Edmund Hills superb translation: The Works
of Saint Augustine. A Translation for the st Century. Part III/ Sermons
() on the Old Testament (Brooklyn NY ); III/ Sermons ()
on the Old Testament (); III/ Sermons () on the New Testament
(); III/ Sermons (AA) on the New Testament ().
In III/, , the General Introduction, first published in Italian in
, starts by raising the most obvious questions: What is to be understood by the Sermons? (), given the variety of Latin terms used for them;
How have the Sermons come down to us? (), given their number:
, counted by P. P. Verbraken (), of which only half are available in
satisfactory editions, ten or fourteen times more of them being lost; When
and where did Augustine preach? (), namely at least twice a week,
daily during Easter week and on many special occasions, with sermons
preached at Hippo, at Carthage, a dozen at various cities; there is no
clues at all for ().
Augustine of Hippo
Chapter deals with The Use of the Bible in the Sermons ().
The biblical readings in the liturgical assembly, joined with the singing of
psalms entailed as many preached commentaries adapted to audiences and
circumstances. With these sermons it is possible to reconstruct the lectionary of Hippo for the seasons of Christmas, Easter and Pentecost, and to give
some information for a skeleton plan of the lessons of the Sanctorale (Willis
, ). The bishops homiletic comments on scripture, far from avoiding
dicult passages emphasize for the common believer what Augustine used
to call biblical mysteries, passages rather dicult to understand or whose
full explanation was impossible to provide in a short sermon. (Serm , ,
). Many things have been read that are important and necessary. In fact
every thing is important and necessary, but some things in the scriptures
are hidden in darkness and call for study while others are within easy reach,
being proposed with clarity so as to cure whoever wants to be cured (Serm
, ). In front of the challenging text of scripture, Augustines interpretive
humility was for his listeners an excellent invitation to become humble in
their turn.
More than once, the preacher interrupted his comments in turning to
prayer, begging for the needed intelligence of the sacred text. Or he gave
his interpretation reluctantly uneasy with his own thoughts. Not only textual obscurities, but also apparent contradictions between one passage and
another, or between one gospel and another, hampered the progress of his
expositions, to the point that he occasionally asked his congregation to rescue
him from his perplexity through prayer and moral support (Serm , ). Just
as in the written text of De Genesi ad litteram, when Augustine spoke from
the cathedra, he would not hesitate to multiply questions about the biblical
text which he would leave without answers.
His obvious focus in the Bible was in the NT, the OT being only considered
by him in regard to the NT. Thus the spiritual sense of the OT equaled for
him the OTs christological messianism. Indeed many valuable interpretations
could compete about a given episode in the OT if only all of them showed
fitting with the christocentric perspective of the interpreter. Augustine never
misses the occasion to denounce heretical interpretations, such as those of
Manichees or Donatists, but polemics never prevail in his sermons over the
pastoral care for the education of the faithful. Sometimes the learned rhetor
did not refrain from showing a preference for numeral symbolism (Serm , ;
, ; , ; /C, ; /B, ); or he could refer to the authority
of learned predecessors or colleagues (Serm /C, ); he could claim direct
knowledge of biblical manuscripts (Serm , ; , ; , ); but in the final
end it is always the pastoral leader whose voice one hears in the sermons, a
leader capable of addressing directly the faith experience of his listeners out
of his own inner conversion, and a cultural consensus inside the church for
which the Bible was the exclusive mode of religious communication.
Some Easter sermons of Augustine probably dating from or ,Serm
, , , Guelf III, Guelf V, , , , , , , , , and
have been studied and edited by S. Poque, Augustin dHippone. Sermons
pour la Pque, SC ().
For the Tractatus in epistolam Ioannis ad Parthos, preached during the
Easter week , and shortly after, see P. Agasse, SC ().
Also:
T. C. Lawler, St. Augustine. Sermons for Christmas and Epiphany, ACW , .
Augustinus. Sermones IL de vetere Testamento, ed. C. Lambot, CCSL XLI ().
Augustinus. in Iohannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV, ed. R. Williams, CCSL
XXXVI (): Sermons preached at Hippo in ; sermons ,
dictated probably .
Augustine of Hippo
In I, xi, , Augustine declares that the very notion of civitas dei was given
to him by scripture (see also v, ; xiv, ; xv, ). Indeed the city of God is
mentioned in Heb :, ; :; :, and in Rv :, :, ;
see also the strong suggestions of Gal : and Phil :. Before
Augustine, this biblical motif had attracted the attention of Tyconius, and
Ambrose, In Ps , , (PL , c). Before embarking on De civitate
dei, Augustine himself touched on this theme in a number of works: De
vera religione , (ca. ); Confessiones , , (in the late s); De
catechizandis rudibus (ca. ); Enarrationes in Ps. , in ; and in Ps.
, probably before De civitate dei Book VI, in or . Interesting
enough, in Retractationes II, , where Augustine gives information about the
circumstances which engaged him into composing De civitate dei, he restricts
his critical remarks only to biblical data, as in Books X and XVII.
In Book XIII, xxi, the Paradise of the origins (Genesis ), interpreted
allegorically, for the most part, by predecessors, must be seen as real, as
narrated in the Bible: dum tamne et illis historiae veritas fidelissima rerum
gestarum narratione commendata credaturIf only one also believes in the
truth of that story as most accurately recorded in the narration of what happened. The apostle Paul is the main authority for speaking about the bodily
mortallity resulting from the Fall. Before discussing at length the origin and
the nature of concupiscence, Augustine very deliberately states in Book
XIV, i, v that he found in scripture the notion of the two cities, the carnal
one and the spiritual one: quas civitates duas secundum scripturas nostras
merito appellari possemus(two forms of human society) which we could
rightly call two cities in accordance with our scriptures. In that discussion
(XIV, iix), Pauline quotations again prevail massively over Johannine and
OT references.
In line with traditional church apologetics, Book XV paraphrases Genesis,
aiming both to answer questions coming from non-Christians, and to teach
the biblical story to the community of believers. Quotations from Genesis
and the Pauline corpus, together with other scriptural passages punctuate
Augustines text, witnessing the constant proximity of the author to the sacred
sources. The paraphrase amplifies and interprets the biblical narrative on
the literal level, as an historical report whose veracity is beyond question.
From Book to Book of De civitate dei, Augustines interpretive rewriting of
scripture actualizes the biblical story without changing it in any way but in
stressing its enduring relevance.
A massive quotation of prophets occupies chapt. of Book XVIII,
called for by the mention of Cyrus and the return of the Jewish deportees
from exile.
Augustine of Hippo
Each Book starts with a reformulation of the general theme of the two
cities, the overarching focus of Augustines paraphrase of the Bible. Book XX,
vii, ix, , gives the author an opportunity to express in full detail his view
on the thousand year reign of Jesus at the end of time (Rv :). Rather
than refuting in detail the materialistic projections of the Millennarists,
Augustine decides to discuss directly the scriptural passage. He concludes
that the thousand years mean symbolically the present time of his (Christs)
first comingisto iam tempore prioris adventus (XX, ix, ), following in
particular Tyconiuss teaching in this regard. An extended quotation of
Thes in xix, , helps to investigate the mystery of iniquity linked with
Antichrist, of which Augustine concedes: I must confess that I totally ignore
what he (Paul, in Thes :) wanted to sayEgo prorsus quid dixerit me
fateor ignorare (xix, ), a candid admission of ignorance immediately followed by a short summary of human conjectures, and a broad survey of
OT prophecies about the final resurrection (xx, xxx, ).
The last two Books, XXI and XXII of De civitate dei deal with Hell and
Heaven, the final destinations of all humans. The aged Augustine excells in
treating the topic with a realistic and systematic application of his familiar
hermeneutics: his literal reading of biblical data calls again and again for
investigations in philosophical and scientific matters; his spiritual reading of
scriptural statements gives him a final opportunity in this immense work
(ingentis huius operis xxx, ) to celebrate the fulfillment of Gods salvific
work on earth.
In his seventies now, Augustine receives from scripture an over-streaming
inspiration for depicting afterlife; he gives back to scripture a commentary
enriched with nonbiblical wisdom and logic, but exclusively intended to let
scripture speak for itself. The vivid sensibility of the author fills each line of
the text with the same fire of eloquence that burned in the writings of his
youth, but the substance of thought consumed in the last chapters of the
City of God is more self-aware and communicative. The dedicated pastor,
the sharp critic of society, the passionate believer and the scholar eager to
transcend his own limited knowledge, all in one, express Augustines final
message to the world in the last part of his masterwork.
SUPPLEMENTARY BIBLIOGRAPHY
AUGUSTINE
EDITIONS
De utilitate credendi. Homan, A. FontChrq ().
TRANSLATIONS
Hill, E., Augustine of Hippo. Sermons: Newly Discovered Sermons. The Works
of St. Augustine: A Translation for the st Century III/. Hyde Park,
N.Y., .
Kearney, R., Augustine. Marriage and Virginity. The Works of St. Augustine:
A Translation for the st Century I/. Ed. with notes and introductions
by D. G. Hunter. Hyde Park, N.Y., .
STUDIES
Abrudan, D. Vechiul Testament n scirerile (scriptis) Fericitului (Beati) Augustin.
StTeol (): .
Agterberg, M. S. Augustin exgte de lEcclesia Virgo. Aug(L) ().
Albertine, R. Selected survey of the theme spiritual sacrifice to Augustine. EL
(): .
Alfeche, M. Groaning Creation in the Theology of Augustine. Aug(L) ():
.
. The Basis of Hope in the Resurrection of the Body according to Augustine.
Aug(L) (): .
. The Use of Some Verses of Cor in Augustines Theology of the
Resurrection. Aug(L) (): .
. The Rising of the Dead in the Works of Augustine ( Cor :). Aug(L)
(): .
Altaner, B. Augustinus und die neutestamentlichen Apokryphen, Sibyllinen und
Sextusaussprche. AB (): .
. Augustinus und die biblischen Onomastica. ECarm (): .
. Augustinus und die neutestamentlichen Apokryphen, Sibillen und Sextussprche. Pages in Kl. patrist. Schriften. TU . .
. Augustinus und Origenes. Pages in Kl. patrist. Schriften. TU ,
.
Andreae, S. Die Verheissung des Parakleten nach der Exegese des hl. Augustinus. Diss.,
Gregoriana, .
Anoz, J. El salmo en los escritos agustinianos. AugM (): .
. Zaqueo en la predicacin de san Agustin. Augustinus (): .
Anz, W. Zur Exegese von Rmer bei Bultmann, Luther, Augustin. Pages
in Fs. E. Dinkler. Theologia CrucisSignum Crucis. Edited by C. Andresen,
.
Arbesmann, R. Christ the medicus humilis in St. Augustine. Augustinus Magister
().
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Cohen, J. The Jews as killers of Christ in the Latin tradition, from Augustine to the
friars. Tr (): .
Cole-Turner, R. S. Anti-heretical issues in the debate over Galatians : in the
letters of St. Augustine to Jerome. AugSt (): .
Collin, L. Voix patristiques lcoute de lcriture: La tradition augustinienne de la
parole intrieure. Pages in Impacts. .
Collins, R. F. Augustine of Hippo precursor of modern biblical scholarship. LouvSt
(): .
Colunga, A. Die Auslegung der Prophetien in Augustins Gottesstaat (span).
Estudios sobre la Ciudad de Dios, vol. , (): .
. S. Augustin expositor de las profecas en la Ciudad de Dios. Estudios sobre la
Ciudad de Dios . CDios, .
A conflict of Christian hermeneutics in Roman Africa: Tyconius and Augustine.
Protocol of the . colloquy: Oct. . Edited by C. Kannengiesser. Berkeley,
Calif.: Center for Hermeneutical Studies.
Congar, Y. Civitas Dei et Ecclesia chez saint Augustin. Histoire de la recherche: son
tat prsent. REAug (): .
Costa Freitas, M. B. da. A imagem e semelhana de Deus; um tema de antropologia
Agostiniana. Did(L) (): .
Courcelle, P. S. Augustin a-t-il lu Philon dAlexandrie? REA (): .
Coward, H. G. Memory and Scripture in the conversion of Augustine. Pages
in Grace, politics and desire; essays on Augustine. Edited by H. A. Meynell.
Calgary: Univ., .
Coyle, J. K. Concordia; the Holy Spirit as Bond of the two Testaments in
Augustine. Aug (): .
Cremer, F. G. Der Beitrag Augustins zur Auslegung des Fastenstreitgesprchs (Mk :
parr.) und der Einfluss seiner Exegese auf die mittelalterliche Theologie.
tudes Augustiniennes. Paris, .
Cristiani, M. Plus quam homo. Santit e umanit dellEvangelista Giovanni fra
Agostino e Giovanni Eriugena. Pages in Signum pietatis. Festgabe
fr Cornelius Petrus Mayer OSA zum . Geburtstag, vol. . Edited by
A. Zumkeller. Wrzburg: Augustinus, .
. Tempo e parola della creazione nel libro XI delle Confessioni. Pages
in La Genesi nelle Confessioni. Atti della giornata di studio su S. Agostino, Roma,
dicembre (Academia Latinati fovendae, Acta, ). Rome: Herder, .
Dankbaar, W. P. Schriftgezag en Kerkgezag bij Augustinus. NedThT ():
.
Dassmann, E. berlegungen zu Augustinus Vortrgen ber das
Johannesevangelium. TThZ (): .
. Schriftverstndnis und religise Erkenntnis nach dem heiligen Augustinus.
TThZ (): .
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Ferraro, G. Lesegesi dei testi pneumatologici del Quarto Vangelo nell In Iohannis
Evangelium tractatus e nel De Trinitate di SantAgostino. Lat ():
.
Fiestas Le-Ngoc, E. El corpus paulinum en las obras antimanqueas de San Agustin.
Diss., Pamplona, .
Figueireido, F. A teologia dos Salmos em S. Agostino. REB (): .
Fischer, B. Zur interpretatio christiana des Ps in den Enarrationes in psalmos
Augustins. TThZ (): .
Fitzgerald, A. Arise! A scriptural model for Augustines conversion. Ang /
(): .
Folgado Florez, S. Sentido eclesial catlico de la Civitas Dei. Aug (): .
Folliet, G. Les trois catgories de chrtiens, partir de Lc :ss; Mt :s; Ex :
. AugM ().
. La typologie du sabbat chez S. Augustin. Son interprtation millnariste entre
et . REAug (): .
. Un passage du Tractatus in Joannem ,. REAug (): .
. Problmes Scripturaires REAug (): .
. Les citations de Actes : et Tite : chez Augustin. REAug ():
.
. S. Augustin: Enarratio in Ps :. La fortune de ce texte du Ve au XIVe sicle.
Pages in Studi Card. M. Pellegrino. Turin, .
. La double citation de I Rois ou Samuel : par saint Augustin (Confessions
XIII,, et Cit de Dieu XVII,. RBen (): .
Fontaine, J. Augustin, Grgoire et Isidore; esquisse dune recherche sur le style des
Moralia in Iob. Pages in Grgoire le Grand. Paris: CNRS, .
Fontanier, J.-M. Sur une image hironymienne; le visage sidral de Jsus (Ep ,
on Ps : quiddam siderum). RSPhTh (): .
Foubert, J. Ad gloriam corporis; au del de Sagesse :, corpus quod corrumpitur
adgravat animam. Pages in Fs. J. Ppin Sophias maietores. Edited by
M.-O. Goulet-Caz. Paris, .
Frahier, L. J. Linterprtation du rcit du jugement dernier (Mt :) dans
loeuvre dAugustin. REAug (): .
Fransen, I. Fragment indit dun sermon perdu de Saint Augustin sur le psaume
. In Mm Gelin, , .
Fredriksen, P. Augustines Early Interpretation of Paul. Diss., Princeton, .
. Augustine on Paul against the Manichees and the Pelagians. RechAug
(): .
. Apocalypse and redemption in early Christianity, from John of Patmos to
Augustine of Hippo. VigChr (): .
. Vile Bodies: Paul and Augustine on the Resurrection of the Flesh. Pages
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
. Augustines Use of Rhetoric in his Interpretation of John :. AugSt
(): .
. Habilidad exegtica de Agustn: Jn :. Augustinus (): .
. Listening to Augustine. Tractate on John ix. AugSt (): .
Le Blond, J. M. Les conversions de S. Augustin. Paris: Aubier, .
Le Landais, M. La seconde partie de lIn Jo de S. Augustin et la date du commentaire. RSR (): .
Lee, A. R. Numerical Taxonomy Revisited: John Grith, Cladistic Analysis and St.
Augustines Quaestiones in Heptateuchum, .
Lehmann, H. Espiritu de Dios sobre las aguas; fuentes de los commentarios de
Basilio y Agustin sobre el Gnesis ,. Pages in San Agustin en Oxford
= AugM ,s (). Edited by J. Oroz Rega. .
Lenihan, D. A. The just war theory in the work of Saint Augustine. AugSt
(): .
Lettieri, G. La Genesi nel libro XII delle Confessiones: ermeneutica, creazione, predestinazione, .
. Il senso della storia in Agostino dIppona; il saeculum e la gloria nel De Civitate
Dei: Cultura cristiana antica. Rome: Borla, .
. La crisi del De doctrina christiana di Agostino. CrSt (): .
Lcuyer, J. Loasis dlim et les ministres dans lglise. Pages in Fs.
C. Vagaggini: Lex orandi lex credendi. Edited by G. J.Bks. Rome: Anselmiana,
.
Lienhard, J. T. The glue itself is charity: Ps : in Augustines thought. Pages
in Collectanea Augustiniana Augustinus. Presbyter factus sum. Edited by
J. T. Lienhard, E. C. Muller, and R. Teske. New York: P. Lang, .
. Origen and Augustine: Preaching on John the Baptist. AugSt (): .
Lobato, A. Verdad y libertad. San Agustin y Santo Thoms exgetas de Juan :.
DC (): .
Locher, G. F. D. Martha en Maria in de prediking van Augustinus. NAKG
(): .
. De Hemelse Kerk in haar aardse toestand volgens Augustinus. NedThT
(): .
. Het probleem van het primaat van Petrus bij Augustinus naar aanleiding van
zijn uitleg van Galaten :. KTh (): .
Loewen, H. J. The use of Scripture in Augustines theology. SJTh (): .
Lof, L. J. van der. Lexgse exacte et objective des thophanies de lAT dans le De
Trin. Aug(L) (): .
. Die Autoritt des Apostels Paulus nach Augustin. Aug(L) (): .
. The prophet Abraham in the writings of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Ambrose and
Augustine. Aug(L) (): .
Augustine of Hippo
. Notas sobre el commentario de San Agustn a la Carta a los Romanos; exposicin de algunas proposiciones de la Epist. ad Romanos. AugM ():
.
. Linflusso di Paolo in Agostino. Pages in Le epistole paoline nei manichei, i donatisti e il primo Agostino. Edited by J. Ries, et al. Sussidi patristici .
Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, .
. Nota sulla tradizione giovannea presente nel Quis dives salvetur. SROC
(): .
. Agostino e la polemica antimanichea. Il ruolo di Paolo e del suo epistolario.
Augustinianum (): .
. Note sulla Espositio epistulae ad Galatas di Agostino. Pages in
Memoriam sanctorum venerantes. Miscellanea in onore di Monsignor Victor
Saxer. Studi di Antichit Cristiana . Citt del Vaticano: Pontificio Instituto
di Archeologia Cristiana, .
. Litinerario delluomo secondo Agostino: da spirituale a carnale, da carnale
a spirituale. Pages in Ricerche patristische in onore di Dom Basil
Studer OSB. Edited by V. Grossi and A. di Bernardino. Aug . Rome, .
. Dalla Expositio epistulae ad Galatas di Agostino, aspetti della polemica
antimanichea. Pages in . Studi storico-religiosi di
Ugo Bianchi. Edited by G. Sfameni Gasparro. Rome: L Erma di Bretschneider, .
. Interpretazione agostiniana di Rm :. Pages in Atti del II Simposio
di Tarso su S. Paolo Apostolo. Turchia: La Chiesa e la sua storia . Rome:
Istituto Francescano di Spiritualit, Pontificio Ateneo Antonianum, .
. Linterpretazione agostiniana del peccato contro la Spirito santo nella Epistolae
ad Romanos inchoata expositio. Pages in Paideia cristiana. Studi in
onore di Mario Naldini. Edited by G. A. Privitera. Rome: Gruppo Editoriale
Internazionale, .
. Agostino e la Lettera ai Romani. Pages in La Lettera ai Romani ieri e
oggi. Edited by S. Cipriani. Epifania della Parola . Bologna: EDB, .
Mariafioti, D. SantAgostino e la Nueva Alleanza. Linterpretazione agostiniana
di Geremia xxxi, nellambito dellesegesi patristica. Rome: Pontificia
Universit Gregoriana, .
Marin, M. Note sulla fortuna dellesegesi agostiniana di Mt :. VetChr
(): .
. Ricerche sullesegesi Agostiniana della parabola delle dieci vergini (Mt :
). QVetChr (): .
. Agostino e linterpretazione antica di Gal :; note sulla fortuna di allegoria in
ambito latino. VetChr (): .
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Sanguinetti Montero, A. Gratuidad y respuesta del hombre a Dios; estudio en las
Enarrationes in Psalmos de San Agustin. Diss., Montevideo: Ist. Telogica Soler,
.
Santos Ferreira, J. M. dos. Pneumatologia de Santo Agostinho. Did(L) ():
.
Sasse, H. Sacra Scriptura. Bemerkungen zur Inspirationslehre Augustins. Pages
in Fs. Franz Dornsei.
Scalabrella, S. La Samaritana segno di riconciliazione; la lettura di Agostino.
StudiumR (): .
Schaublin, C. Augustin, De utilitate credendi, ber das Verhltnis des Interpreten
zum Text. VigChr (): .
Schildenberger, J. Gegenwartsbedeutung exegetischer Grundstze des hl.
Augustinus. AugM ().
Schmidt, A. Kleine Theologie der Honung. Zur Predigt des heiligen Augustinus
ber den . (.) Psalm. EA / (): .
Schobinger, J.-P. La porte historique des thories de la lecture (Rflexions la
lumire du De doctrina christiana de saint Augustin). RThPh ():
.
Scholz, W. Christus bei Augustin. Diss., Kiel, .
Schrama, M. Prima lectio quae recitata est. The liturgical pericope in light of St.
Augustines Sermons. Augustiniana (): .
Schultz, S. J. Augustine and the OT Canon. EvQ (): .
Schwoebel, B. Augustine on Rhetoric and the Bible. HPR , (): .
Scorza Barcellona, F. La parabola della zizziania in Agostino; a proposito di
Quaestiones in Matthaeum . ASE (): .
Semple, W. H. Some letters of St. Augustine (to Jerome, on exegetical questions).
BJRL (): .
Shanzer, D. Latent Narrative Patterns, Allegorical Choices, and Literary Unity in
Augustines Confessions. VigChr (): .
Sieben, H.-J. Die res der Bibel. Eine Analyse von Augustinus, De doct. christ. IIII.
REAug (): .
. Der Psalter und die Bekehrung der VOCES und AFFECTUS. Zu Augustinus
Conf. IX, . und X, . ThPh (): .
Simon, P. Die Kirche als Braut des Hohenliedes nach dem hl. Augustinus. Festgabe
J. Kardinal Prings ().
Simonetti, M. Note sul testo di alcune Enerrationes agostiniane. Pages
in Mmorial Dom Jean Gribomont (). Studia Ephemeridis
Augustinianum . Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, .
. [Due note su testi di Agostino e] Arnobio il Giovane, Commentarii in
Psalmos. RFIC (): .
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo
access. This is the special insight that marks the character of the hermeneutical principles adumbrated in the final books of the Confessions.
II. THE SELF, UN-FORMED AND RE-FORMED
(CONFESSIONS XXIII)
The neediness and incompleteness of the human condition is a central theme
in the final books of the Confessions. It is this neediness that draws the Divine
Physician to us (Book X), while the not-yetness of the self in the web of
time (Book XI) and the incompleteness of the unformed earth/self (Book
XII) are revealed, paradoxically, as the real source of our thanksgivingthe
confession of praise for our re-formation in the image of the Triune God
(Book XIII):
Proceed with your confession, my faith. Say to the Lord your God:
Holy, holy, holy Lord my God, (Is :; Rv :). In your name we are
baptized, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matt :); in your name we
baptize, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Among us also in his Christ God
has made a heaven and an earth, meaning the spiritual and carnal
members of his church. Moreover, before our earth received form,
imparted by doctrine, it was invisible and unorganized (Gn :), and
we were covered by the darkness (Ps :) of ignorance. For you corrected man for his iniquity, and your judgements are like the great
abyss (Ps :; :). But because your Spirit was borne above the
waters, your mercy did not abandon our misery, and you said: Let
there be light (Gen :). Do penitence, for the kingdom of heaven
has drawn near (Mt :; :). . . . Our darkness displeased us. We were
converted to you (Ps :), light was created, and suddenly we who
were once darkness are now light in the Lord (Eph :). (Conf. XII
.)
Book X: The Wounded Self
Book X begins with a careful enunciation of the purpose of the Confessions:
to encourage his readers, shareres of my joy, conjoined with me in mortality,
my fellow citizens and pilgrims (X .) to take heart through his double
confession of praise and lamentpraise to God for what Augustine him. M.-A. Vannier, Creatio, conversio, formatio chez S. Augustin, coll. Paradosis
(Fribourg, ; repr. ), , n. .
Augustine of Hippo
self had become by Gods grace, and his lament over his past sinfulness. He
embarks with this crowd of witnesses on the inner journey into the fields
and vast palaces of memory (et venio in campos et lata praetoria memoriae,
X .) housing three great storehousesfirst that laid down by the senses
(X .), then that acquired by a lifetime of learning through the liberal arts (de doctrinis liberalis, X .) and the principles of numbers and
dimensions (X .), and finally that laid up by the recollections of affectionsthe four perturbations of the mind, cupidity, gladness, fear and
sadness (X .). The seeking for God through the inner depths of self
leads to Augustines reflection on the basic human drive for happiness (X
..), and culminates in the cry: That is the authentic happy life, to
set ones joy on you, grounded in you, and causede by you. This is the real
thing, and there is no other (X .). See how widely I have ranged, Lord,
searching for you in my memory (X .). The famous cry, Late have I
loved you, beauty so old and so new: late have I loved you, encapsulates
the wrong-headed seeking for happiness of his former life: See you were
within and I was in the external world. . . . You were with me, and I was not
with you. This leads to the final acknowledgement:
When I have adhered (Ps :) to you with the whole of myself, I
shall never have pain and toil (Ps :), and my entire life will be
full of you. You lift up the person whom you fill. But for the present,
because I am not full of you, I am a burden to myself. . . . See I do not
hide my wounds. You are the physician, I am the patient. (X .)
This confession sets the stage for the second half of Book X, an analysis of
the depth of the woundedness of the human condition, in the frame of John
:, the concupiscences of the flesh (cf. Book VI), of the eyes (cf. Book
VII) and of the pride of life (cf. Book VIII). But this painful introspection
in terms of woundedness has been well prepared for in the earlier reflection
on the inner self, within the rooms of the palace of memory. The continuing
unruliness of sense images (of the flesh), the diculty of curbing the appetite for curiositas (of the eyes), and the hydra-headed manifestations
of pride and ambition (the pride of life), are the distorted mirror images
. See also Conf. XIII ., . The haughtiness of pride, the pleasures of lust, and
the poison of curiosity are the passions of a dead soul. . . . Be not conformed to the
world, Rm :.
. See Pierre Courcelle, Recherches sur les Confessions de Saint Augustin (Paris:
E. de Boccard, ), . Courcelle suggests that the Soliloquies refer to the barrle
against the temptations of the flesh while the De Ordine focuses on intellectual
diculties.
Augustine of Hippo
are before me, not stretched out in distraction but extended in reach,
not by being pulled apart but by concentration. . . . The storms of incoherent things events tear to pieces my thoughts, the inmost entrails
of my soul, until that day when, purified and molten by the fire of
your love, I flow together to merge into you. (X . )
Book XII: The Two Abysses: the Self and the Scriptures
While time and eternity dominate Book XI, heaven and earth are the focus
of Book XII. Just as the self-in-time, rather than the question of eternity, became the center of inquiry in Book XI, so too, for all the wonderful passages
devoted to the contemplation of the heaven of heavens, that no experience
of time can ever touch, it is the unformed earth, next to nothing (prope
nihil . . . quam fecisti de nulla re paene nullam rem, XII .) that becomes the
preoccupation of Book XII. Indeed, it is the potential for conversion of the
almost formless earth that captures Augustines attention:
It is ture, Lord, that you made heaven and earth. . . . It is true that
everything mutable implies for us the notion of a kind of formlessness,
which allows it to receive form and to undergo change and modification. It is true that no experience of time can ever touch what has so
close and adherence to immutable form that, though mutable, it undergoes no changes. It is true that formlessness which is next to nothing
(prope nihil) cannot suer temporal successiveness. . . . It is true that
of all things with form nothing is closer to formless than earth and
the abyss. It is true that you made not only whatever is created and
endowed with form but also whatever is capable of being created and
receiving form. It is true that every being that is formed out of that
without form is itself first unformed and then formed. (XII .)
In what seems at first glance a digression from his contemplation of the two
creatures, the heaven of heavens and the earth and the abyss, Augustine
a major part of Book XII to the problem of the diversity of scriptural interpretations. However, it is questionable that his attention to the problems of
the truthful diversity (XII .) of scriptural interpretation is a digression. In contemplating the abyss of the first day of creation, Augustine is
. Marie-Anne Vannier discusses Augustines treatment of mutability as a source
of hope in her study of one of the newly discovered sermons of Augustine (Dolbeau ), Lapport des nouveaux sermons la christologie, Augustin Prdicateur
() (Collection des ditions Augustiniennes , S. Madec; Paris: Institut
dtudes Augustiniennes Press, ), .
Augustine of Hippo
They do not say this to me because they possess second sight and have
seen in the heart of your servant (Moses) the meaning which they
assert, but because they are proud. They have no knowledge of Moses
opinion at all, but love their own opinion, not because it is true, but
because it is their own. Otherwise they equally respect another true
interpretation as valid, just as I respect what they say when their
armation is true, not because it is theirs, but because it is true.
(XII .)
It is significant that Augustine has set this careful reflection about hermeneutical theory and exegetical practice in the context of a complex meditation
on the Six Days of Creation, ranging from the almost nothingness of the
earth on Day One to the re-formation of the human being in the image and
likeness of God in Day Six. This earth which is us (as he claims)is called
from almost nothingness in Book XII to fruitful multiplicity in Book XIII
(XIII .). In a similar inversion (or conversion), the very privation of
the words of Genesis (parvo sermonis modulo, Conf. XII .) necessitates a
multiplicity of true interpretations, so that the word of scripture can nourish
both the simple and the sophisicated, or can be adjusted to the needs of the
community as a whole, or to the individual at dierent stages of life. In other
words: The surface meaning lies open before us and charms beginners. Yet
the depth is amazing. (XII .)
Book XIII: The Human Condition as a Pilgrim State
Book XIII begins with a prayer of thanksgiving: Before I existed, you were,
and I had no being to which you could grant existence. Nevertheless here I
am as a result of your goodness, which goes before all that you made me to
be, and all out of which you made me (XIII .). The tone of thanksgiving
is maintained as Augustine reflects on the Trinity: Behold, the Trinity, my
God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, creator of all creation (XIII .). This
prayer continues in the contemplation of the Spirit: By your gift we are sest
on fire and carried upwards: we grown red hot and ascent. We climb the
ascents in our heart (Ps :), and sing the song of steps (Ps :). Lit by
your fire, your good fire, we grow red-hot and ascent, as we move upwards
to the peace of Jerusalem (Ps :; Conf. XIII .).
There is a constant imagery of our life as pilgrimage:
In the morning I will stand up and contemplate you. I will see the
salvation of my face (Ps :), my God, who shall vivify even our
mortal bodies through the Spirit who dwells in us (Rm :). For in
his mercy he was borne above the dark and fluid state, which was our
Augustine of Hippo
the phase of his ministry that is most marked by his newfound mastery of
biblical interpretation is also the phase where he fully assumes the limitations
of hermeneutics. But there is a very real distinction between a limitation
and a negation. An awareness of a limitation is an awareness of a need,
and it is the awareness of neediness and vulnerability that is foundational
in the process of conversion. In theological terms, it is the lowly access to
salvation modelled and incarnated by the Word of God:
I sought a way to obtain strength enough to enjoy you; but I did not
find it until I embraced the mediator between God and man, the man
Christ Jesus ( Tim :), who is above all things, God blessed forever
(Rm :). He called and said, I am the way, and the truth, and the life
(John :). The food which I was too weak to accept he mingled with
flesh, in that the Word was made flesh (John :) so that our infant
condition might come to suck milk from your wisdom by which you
created all things. To possess my God, the humble Jesus, I was not
yet humble enough. I did not know what his weakness was meant
to teach. Your Word, eternal truth, higher than the superior parts of
your creation, raises those submissive to him to himself. In the inferior parts he built for himself a humble house of our clay. By this he
detaches from themselves those who are to be made his subjects and
carries them across to himself, healing their swelling and nourishing
their love. They are no longer to place confidence in themselves, but
rather to become weak. They see at their feet divinity become weak by
his sharing in our coats of skin (Gn :). In their weakness they fall
prostrate before this divine weakness which rises and lifts them up.
(VII .)
Augustine tells us clearly that in his own journey towards conversion he had
discovered that self-suciency is the antithesis of conversion. I sought a way
to obtain strength enough to enjoy you, but did not find it until I embraced
the mediator between God and man. Conversion is the turning of the self
towards God, and in the very turning from self-suciency is the discovery
that the multiple, fractured self is transfigured in the image and likeness of
the Godhead whom one sees at ones feet.
The restless angst of the human condition (Conf. I .) is the precious
first gift of the Creator to the almost formless earth through which the selfin-time strains forward towards the Self-Same the Immutable One:
To know you as you are in an absolute sense is for you alone. You are
immutably, you know immutably, you will immutably. . . . In your sight
it does not seem right that the kind of self-knowledge possessed by
unchangeable light should also be possessed by changeable existence
which receives light. And so my soul is like waterless land before you
(Ps :), just as it has no power to illuminate itself. For with your
is the fountain of life, and so also it is in your light that we shall see
light. (Conf. XIII .)
The self that is not self-sucient is the self that is oriented in a turning,
or rather a re-turning to the Father, like the Prodigal Son, whose presence
haunts every stage of the narrative of the Confessions.
III. THE WORD MADE FLESH:
THE CHRISTOLOGICAL FRAME OF HERMENEUTICS
It is hardly surprising that the principles that govern the interpretation of
scripture elaborated in the Confessions are informed by Augustines central
Christological insight of the humility of the Word made Flesh. Just as the
Word in scripture is adapted to the human condition, so too the Incarnate
Word assumes the limitations of the human condition.
Augustine is not the first to draw together hermeneutics and anthropology. In the fourth book of the Peri Archon, Origen of Alexandria links
the threefold anthrology of body, soul, and spirit with the three senses of
scripture:
The individual ought then to portray the ideas of holy scripture in a
threefold manner upon his own soul; in order that the simple man
may be edified by the flesh as it were of the scripture, for so we
name the obvious sense; while he who has ascended a certain way
may be edified by the soul as it were of scripture. The perfect man,
again . . . (may receive edification) from the spiritual law. For just as
man consists of body and soul and spirit, so in the same way does
scripture which has been arranged to be given by God for the salvation of men (IV ).
However, though Augustine also links anthropology and hermeneutics in the
last books of the Confessions, he makes no attempt to elaborate a hermeneutical discussion of the senses of scripture in an anthropological frame. These
technical questions had received masterly attention in the second and third
books of De doctrina christiana, but in the Confessions Augustines focus is
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo