Mylchreest Gold London Bullion

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy
Death of the Gold Market

Reforming the LBMA and the true price of physical gold
Paul Mylchreest
May 2016
paul.mylchreest@admisi.com Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
4th May 2016
Executive Summary
Using data from the LBMA and Bank of England on gold stored in London vaults and net UK
gold export data from HM Revenue & Customs, we estimate that the float of physical gold in
London (excluding gold owned by ETFs and central banks) has recently declined to +/- zero.
Summarising the data in the report:
Gold in London in June 2015
Less:
Gold held by London-based ETFs

Central bank gold stored at BoE
Net UK exports since June 2015
Gold float/(deficit)
6,220 tonnes
(1,281)
(4,570)
(430)
(61) tonnes
If we are correct, the London Bullion Market is running into a problem and is facing the biggest
challenge since it collapsed from an insufficient supply of physical gold in March 1968.
Besides the growth in physical gold demand from existing sources (see below), there is more than
US$200 Billion of trading every day in unallocated (paper) gold. If buyers lose confidence in the
markets structure and ability to deliver actual bullion, the market could become disorderly (via
an old fashioned run on the vaults) as it seeks to find the true price of physical gold.
Reaching critical paper versus physical gold illusion in London
Is there any
there?
2
ADM Investor Services International Limited is authorised and regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority. Member of The Lon don Stock Exchange. Registered office: 4th Floor Millennium Bridge House, 2 Lambeth Hill, London EC4V 3TT. Registered in England No. 2547805 a subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland
Company. Risk Warning: Investments in Equities, CFDs, Futures, Options, Derivatives and Foreign Exchange can fluctuate in val ue, investors should therefore be aware that they may not realise the initial amount invested, and indeed may incur additional li abilities. These Investments may entail above average financial risk of
loss, and investors should therefore carefully consider whether their financial circumstances and investment experience permit them to invest and, if necessary, seek the advice of an independent Financial Advisor. Some services described are not available to certain customers due to regulatory constraints either in the United
Kingdom or elsewhere. 2014 ADM Investor Services International Limited 2014.

Paul Mylchreest
Email: paul.mylchreest@admisi.com
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Intuitively, we think that central banks might have lent/leased gold to maintain the status
quo and mask what is technically a default. However, rather than being used to provide temporary liquidity, it is possible that loans/leases are being rolled. This is not sustainable and implies dual ownership claims.
Going forward, the market is vulnerable to several trends in physical gold trading patterns:
Since 2009, central banks have switched from net sellers to net buyers ;
The extraordinary strength in Chinese gold demand as indicated by withdrawals of bullion on the Shanghai Gold Exchange, e.g. an astonishing 2,597 tonnes, or more than 80%
of all of the gold mined worldwide, in 2015;
The rebound in gold held by London-based gold ETFs, which has been increasing since
January 2016, as western investors dip their toes back into physical gold; and
Net gold exports by the UK mainly to support strong Asian (especially Chinese) demand
- which have been a feature of the market since 2013.
But the vulnerability is not confined to current trends in physical bullion.

If there is no gold float, there is nothing supporting more than US$200 Billion of trading every
day in unallocated (paper) gold instruments which accounts for more than 95% of gold trading in London.
The convention of trading unallocated gold has been based on a fractional reserve system. It
works as long as gold buyers retain confidence that the banks could deliver physical gold if demanded, but our analysis suggests that they could not.
For more than four years, selling of paper gold overwhelmed growing demand for physical gold
from the likes of China and central banks (in aggregate). The gold market became a chimera
as fundamentals were turned upside down. Banks added paper gold supply in almost elastic
fashion on occasions when western investors increased net gold exposure via paper gold instruments.
Weve argued for many years that a breakdown and bifurcation in the gold market between
physical and paper gold substitutes would be necessary for accurate price discovery of physical
gold bullion. The lead article in the January 2016 edition of the LBMAs quarterly magazine
was titled Wholesale Physical Markets are Broken, which might be confirmation that this
process is reaching an advanced stage.
In the interim, we could move towards a two-tier gold market - where physical gold trades at a
premium to paper gold instruments, such as unallocated gold in London and COMEX gold futures in the US.
3
ADM Investor Services International Limited is authorised and regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority. Member of The London Stock Exchange. Registered office: 4th Floor Millennium Bridge House, 2 Lambeth Hill, London EC4V 3TT. Registered in England No. 2547805 a subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland
Company. Risk Warning: Investments in Equities, CFDs, Futures, Options, Derivatives and Foreign Exchange can fluctuate in value, investors should therefore be aware that they may not realise the initial amount invested, and indeed may incur additional liabilities. These Investments may entail above average financial
risk of loss, and investors should therefore carefully consider whether their financial circumstances and investment experience permit them to invest and, if necessary, seek the advice of an independent Financial Advisor. Some services described are not available to certain customers due to regulatory constraints
either in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. 2014 ADM Investor Services International Limited 2014.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
It saddens us that Londons position and reputation as the hub of the world gold market is in
jeopardy unless the LBMA, BoE and other stakeholders embrace rapid and far-reaching reform.
The London Bullion Market is structurally flawed and overdue for reform - it is not an
exchange, it is under-regulated and there is near zero transparency. More than anything, it is
primarily a system of paper credits/debits which benefits the banks and undermines the
investment case for gold and, consequently, interests of gold investors.
Seeing the Achilles Heel of Londons gold market, Chinas Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE)
launched a Yuan-denominated physical gold benchmark gold contract on 19 April 2016.
Examining the SGEs white paper, its clear that China acknowledges that its introduction
should lead to a more realistic price for physical gold and that its strategy is to shift price discovery in the gold market from London to Asia.
Unfortunately time is running out for London and meanwhile
The vast pools of western capital are not underweight gold, they are almost zeroweighted.
Ultimately, gold is a bet on financial system mismanagement in many guises - such as inflation,
deflation, rising credit risk, declining confidence in policy makers, etc. The fact that mainstream
investors and commentators have started to have doubts about central bank policies has been
positive for gold.
For years, the typical pushback on investing in gold by western investors was that it had no
yield. In a bizarre twist of investing, more than US$7 Trillion of bonds now have negative
yields thanks to unconventional monetary policies like ZIRP/NIRP, and gold investing can be
justified on a yield basis. Unlike every other financial asset, including sovereign bonds, physical
gold has no counterparty risk.
We have been here before...
Someone once said, no one wants gold, thats why the US$ price keeps falling. Many thinking
ones laugh at such foolish chatter. They know that the price of gold is dropping precisely because too many people are buying it! Think now, if you are a person of great worth is it not
better for you to acquire gold over years, at better prices? If you are one of small worth, can
you not follow in the footsteps of giants? The real money is selling ALL FORMS of paper gold
and buying physical! Why? Because any form of paper gold is losing value much, much faster
than metal. Some paper will disappear all together in a fire of epic proportions! The massive
trading continues at LBMA, but something is now missing
Anonymous quote from many years ago (the 1990s!)
We contacted the LBMA (via telephone messages) and the Bank of England (via the Financial Sector Continuity enquiry
email address), to discuss the conclusions of this report, but neither replied.
4

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Contents
Gold and central bank credibility
When is a gold market not a gold market?
London Bullion Market - lacking regulation and transparency
13
LBMA and unallocated gold
17
Calculating the London gold float
23
Gold in the BoE vault and the float ex-central banks
30
China and a two-tier gold market
41
Untapped vast western pools of capital
52
5

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Gold and central bank credibility

Gold has suddenly enjoyed a resurgence in price and investor interest, partly as concerns have
emerged that central banks unconventional monetary policies might not work in a sustainable
way.
Source: ADMISI, Bloomberg
Its been a long road but

The inevitability of that outcome was clouded by the undoubted success for the Fed,
ECB and BoJ in extending the current cycle after it suffered its biggest post-GFC test during
2011-12.
However
With hindsight the BoJs move to negative rates might be seen as a crossing the threshold
event in terms of central bank ZIRP-QE-NIRP policy.
The BoJ has pursued the most aggressive ZIRP/QE policy and its credibility was already damaged with Japan flipping in and out of recession and the 2% inflation target remaining well out
of reach. Kurodas denial regarding any desire to implement NIRP just days before the announcement has hardly helped. More importantly, however, the post-NIRP strengthening of
the Yen was in sharp contrast with previous responses to globs of additional monetary stimulus.
6

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
The BoJs unexpected monetary largessse and adverse market reaction was followed by the
ECB on 10 March 2016. While Mario Draghis 10bp cut to -0.4% in the deposit rate was expected, he also upped the pace of QE by an additional Eur20bn per month (adding the ability
to purchase non-bank IG bonds) and launched new 4-year TLTROs effectively paying banks to
make loans.
The knee-jerk weakness in the Euro and rise in equities were reversed in the days after the ECBs announcement when Draghi indicated that he did not aniticipate further rate cuts. Markets
took this as suggesting that the chairman may have negotiated a grand bargain with the ECBs
council for one last major policy move, but no more. It raised a vexing question about whether
ECB policy was reaching a limit.
A week later was the FOMC announcement and Janet Yellens press conference. Despite the
reported unemployment rate falling below 5.0% and February 2016s core CPI rising to 2.3% above the 2.0% target the Fed stood pat and signalled a more dovish approach with regard to
further tightening.
There are no more compliant reporters than CNBCs Steve Liesman, but even he was moved
to call into question the Feds credibility in a question to Janet Yellen during the March 2016
press conference.
Madam Chair, as you know, inflation has gone up the last two months. We had another
strong jobs reportAnd yet the Fed stands pat while its in a process of what it said at launch
in December was a process of normalizationDoes the Fed have a credibility problem in the
sense that it says it will do one thing under certain conditions, but doesnt end up doing it?
Our sense is that even the mainstream perception of central bank policy is changing.
The fact that consensus thinking is expressing doubts about central bank policies, their stewardship of the financial system and questioning their credibility, is positive for gold.
Over the centuries periods of gold outperformance have tended to coincide with periods of
financial/economic mismanagement in one form or another, including rising inflation
(obvious), deflation (gold is money) or periodic fears about the financial system, e.g. rising
counterparty risk and confidence in policy makers.
However...
A barrier to efficient price discovery in gold is the flawed structure of the gold market. The
good news is that there are signs of imminent change.
7

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
When is a gold market not a gold market?

Now
The first rule of the gold market isits not a gold market (sounds slightly familiar).
Thats the cornerstone of understanding its mechanics. An assumption that the current gold
price reflects supply and demand for gold bullion is incorrect.
The gold price on our screens today is a hybrid price consisting of largely unbacked/paper
gold claims relative to a relatively miniscule amount of physical bullion.
For more than four years, selling of paper gold overwhelmed demand for physical gold bullion.
The gold market became a chimera.
Fundamentals were turned upside down, but this can only continue as long as there is a sufficient float of physical gold in the London Bullion Market and no serious competition, e.g.
China (see below).
For some, the only viable investment strategy has been to gradually accumulate undervalued
physical bullion and (very patiently) wait for gold to revalue when the decline in physical gold
availability basically the gold float in London - reaches a critical level.
Realistic maybe, but its been far from satisfactory.
Golds disappointing performance has kept it off the radar screens of most western investors. The vast pools of western capital are not underweight gold, they are almost ZERO
WEIGHT.
Most western investors probably havent stopped to think about their relative positioning in
gold vis--vis their own central banks. This was Greenspan in 2014 returning to his pro-gold
roots.
If the dollar or any other fiat currency were universally acceptable at all times, central banks
would see no need to hold any gold. The fact that they do indicates that such currencies are
not a universal substitute. Of the 30 advanced countries that report to the International
Monetary Fund, only four hold no gold as part of their reserve balancesthe gold held by the
central banks of developed economies was worth $762 billion as of December 31, 2013, comprising 10.3 percent of their overall reserve balances.
It has also contributed to an incredibly poor understanding, not just of golds monetary role
(see Financial Times online video Gold our dangerous obsession for an extreme example by a
normally talented journalist), but of the mechanics and structural flaws in todays gold market.
8

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
92: 1 paper versus physical

The vast majority of trading in todays gold market is in paper facsimiles which purport to be
gold bullion, or be readily exchangeable into gold bullion, when they are not.
In this category we include:
The most important - unallocated gold accounts created by LBMA members in London;
Futures and options contracts on COMEX in the US;
Unbacked ETFs or ETFs with unsatisfactory prospectuses/disclaimers; and
OTC derivatives.
There is only one official body which has attempted to estimate the ratio of paper gold instruments to physical gold. In its January 2013 report Report of the Working Group to Study the
Issues Related to Gold Imports and Gold Loans by NBFCs, the Reserve Bank of India estimated
the ratio of paper gold trading to physical gold trading at 92:1.
Source: RBI
According to the RBI:

the traded amount of paper linked to gold exceeds by far the actual supply of physical
gold: the volume on the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) OTC market and the major Futures and Options Exchanges was over 92 times that of the underlying Physical Market.
The extreme paper/physical ratio acts to the detriment of investors in the underlying physical
bullion and gold mining companies since the price is divorced from supply and demand for the
actual metal. Because gold facsimiles are effectively paper instruments, banks and other entities trading in the gold market have been able to add gold supply in an almost elastic fashion when investors increase net gold exposure via these types of instruments.
9

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Craig Hemke of the TF Metals report explained the situation in his podcast from 15 April 2016.
It (the gold price) has no bearing, no attachment to physical metal. The banks simply create
paper contracts, they feed them to the specs (buyers/speculators) as the specs demand
them. And then, as the specs sell, the banks buy them back and put them all back on the
shelf.
We are always surprised when we hear about experienced investors buying paper gold instruments rather than physical bullion. For example, a recent Zero Hedge article showed the top 10
holdings of one of Crispin Odeys hedge funds in which paper gold not physical gold - was by
far the biggest long position.
Source: Zero Hedge, Odey Asset Management
Back to Craig Hemke and he went on to emphasise the differences between the gold market
with the requirement to deliver the underlying (i.e. share certificates) when investors buy equities.
This would never be allowed in a stock. If you call up your stockbroker and say Hey, buy me
200 shares of Coca Cola and your brokers firm just simply created 200 shares of Coca Cola
and put them in your account, just created them out of the thin blue sky. Theyd never be
allowed to do thatthey have to go out on the market and find a willing seller of 200 shares
of Coca Cola. But thats not how it works (in gold and silver)
The best way of illustrating the impact of adding paper gold supply is show how the price of
gold has reacted on previous occasions when paper gold supply has not expanded elastically in
response to a rising gold price.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
While there is a lack of transparency in gold trading volumes in London, we can use the COMEX
gold futures market in the US as a proxy for the gold market in general.
If we look at the net positions in COMEX gold futures of the Commercials (mainly banks) during
the bull market from 2001-11, you can see how on the three occasions when the Net Commercials stopped increasing their net short position into a rising market, the gold price went
parabolic.
During the 2001-11 bull market, gold rose from about US$260/oz. to US$1,920/oz., a net increase of approximately US$1,660/oz. From the chart above, the gold price rose by approximately US$1,126 in aggregate during these three periods. This amounted to a substantial 68%
of the net rise from the beginning to the end of the bull market.
Following the gold price peak in September 2011, the following chart shows how the Commercials have merely increased net short positions into every rally in the gold price since. When
the buying was exhausted, the Commercials were able to cover their net short into the declining price.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
The scale of the current battle being fought by the Commercials to contain the recent price rise
is only too obviousthe instability is obvious.
This is the biggest battle seen in the gold market for nearly 5 years.
But lets not forget
Having shown how the supply (or not) of paper gold contracts has dominated price discovery in
the gold market, the status quo can only be maintained for as long as those investors who wish
to take delivery of physical gold can be accommodated.
Otherwise, the whole illusion will become obvious...
This takes us to the critical pre-condition for the orderly functioning of the gold market - an
adequate float of physical gold in London. Understanding how this float might have diminished to critically low levels, a pre-requisite is an understanding of the LBMA/London Bullion
Market.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
London Bullion Market lacking regulation and transparency

When people think of the gold market, they generally think of London and the LBMA. Our expectation for the gold markets death and resurrection focuses on the London Bullion Market
and the trading of unallocated gold by LBMA members.
This is the heart of the gold market chimera.
The gold market is full of misunderstandings and its worth clearing up some major ones with
regard to the LBMA.
The LBMA is essentially a trade body, which merely sets out best practices for its members. It is
not:
the London Bullion Market;
an exchange; or
a regulatory body.
In its prospectus, the SPDR Gold Trust (the well-known gold ETF with the GLD ticker) comments
that the LBMA.
sets out good practices for participants in the bullion market, the LBMA is not an official or
governmental regulatory body. In addition, while the Custodian is subject to general banking
regulations by U.S. regulators and is generally regulated in the U.K. by the Financial Conduct
Authority, or FCA, such regulatory provisions do not directly cover the Custodians custody
operations in the U.K. Accordingly, the Trust is dependent on the Custodian to comply with
the good practices of the LBMA
The London Bullion Market is an OTC market which means that transactions are conducted between principals rather than on an exchange, which means less regulatory oversight.
While gold is traded continuously on the OTC market, the so-called LBMA price is only set
twice each day by the ICE Benchmark Administration. The twice daily setting of the LBMA gold
price replaced the historic twice daily London Gold Fix on 20 March 2015. The LBMA gold
price has been regulated by the UKs FCA since 1 April 2015. This followed an investigation
which resulted in Barclays being fined US$44m for manipulating the London fix during 2004-13.
Aside from the two price settings, the OTC gold market is very lightly regulated, somewhat
reminiscent of the self-regulatory/gentlemans club style of the London Stock Exchange prior
to Big Bang deregulation in 1986.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
In its 1996 Gold Survey, the industry consultant, GFMS, commented that the advantage of
the OTC gold market for some of its participants was:
confidentiality and lack of transparency; business can be conducted privately, sheltered
from the attention of other market participants, competitors, regulators and, of course, analysts.
According to the World Gold Council in its 2010 report Liquidity in the Global Gold Market.
As the gold market is largely over-the-counter, there is little visibility to the many thousands
of transactions that take place every day. Given this opacity
The OTC gold market, based in London, has not kept up in an era of greater transparency and
regulatory oversight.
The Bank of England has some regulatory oversight of the gold market via The NonInvestment Products Code which applies to gold and other now infamous (for rigging) wholesale markets, such as LIBOR and forex.
Gold is both money AND an investment product, so its classification as a non-investment
product is incorrect. Furthermore, a cursory reading of the code raises red flags regarding the
limited regulation and investor protection vis--vis the major financial institutions which dominate the gold market. For example.
Its provisions are intended only as guidance on what is currently believed to constitute
good practice in these markets. The Code has no statutory underpinning
The Bank of England has acknowledged that there is very little regulation. In a speech, The
Role of the Bank of England in the Gold Market, the Senior Manager of the BoEs Foreign Exchange Division, Graham Young, commented on 3 June 2003.
I would like to say a word about the Banks role in the regulation of the gold market in the
UK. This is, in fact, a very limited oneThe wholesale bullion market is considered to be an
inter-professional market, or, in the distinctive parlance of the UK regulatory framework, a
non-investment products market.
And the key line
This means that, in general, the principle of caveat emptor applies and the market is expected to be self-regulating.
Weve learned to our cost that this is not enough.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
He immediately goes on to make a very (with hindsight) poorly judged remark in terms of his
support for the other markets subject to the code which were left to regulate themselves.
The same is true, as it should be, of the foreign exchange and cash money markets in the
UK.
Unfortunately since his speech, reams of evidence obviously came to light regarding misconduct in foreign exchange and cash (LIBOR) money markets.
On 13 April 2016, Deutsche Bank admitted guilt for manipulating the gold market in a lawsuit
filed in the Southern District of New York. Deutsche has agreed to turn over communications
to help plaintiffs pursue claims against other banks.
The manipulation of the gold market was obvious to us for a decade, not least from the
patterns of intra-day trading of the gold price, concentrated net short positions and their relationship with the gold price and the gold carry trade in its shifting form (e.g. the June 2014 report Long Nikkei/Short Gold: Profitable, dangerous and missed by everybody has 278,000
reads on Zero Hedge).
The second rule of the gold market isyou do not talk about market abuse in the gold market.
Weve been outlining the investment case for gold and gold mining stocks as well as market
abuses and the need for LBMA/COMEX gold reform since the January 2006 report
Remonetisation of gold: Start hoarding.
Source: Credit Agricole Cheuvreux

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Its been a long and sometimes tortuous road and, while our views are based on objective market and industry analysis, at times the reports have made us unpopular with some investors/
colleagues and popular with others. Approaches made to regulators and mainstream journalists were basically ignored.
Truth, it seems, really can navigate the proverbial three stages outlined by Schopenhauer.
First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being selfevident.
Gold was and is a very emotive subject in financial markets and we had little idea what wed
taken on.
How long have you been a goldbug?
Whats a goldbug?
In this report, our focus is the unsustainable market structure of paper gold instruments versus
physical gold bullion, the need to reform gold trading by LBMA members due to the growing
risk of market failure and the prospect of finding a true price for gold bullion.
The regulation of the London Bullion Market is inappropriate and inadequate and reform is
overdue. The regulators can be pro-active (preferably) and embrace reform or, alternatively,
will probably be forced into action as a result of a crisis. Sadly, we expect the latter at this
point. The acknowledgement of guilt on the part of bank(s) for abusing the current market
structure is another potential catalyst for reform.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
LBMA and unallocated gold

London remains the hub of global gold trading even though Shanghais influence is growing
rapidly (see below). This quote is from the LBMAs A Guide to the London Precious Metals
Markets.
the loco London price has become the common denominator amongst dealers around the
worlda credit balance on a loco London account with an LBMA member represents a holding of gold or silver in the same way that a credit balance in the relevant currency represents
a holding of dollars on account with a New York bank or yen with a Tokyo bank. In fact, because of these advantages, nearly all global OTC gold and silver trading is cleared through the
London bullion market clearing system.
Please note: loco London refers to settlement in gold that is, or is believed to be, stored in
London vaults.
The London Bullion Market is not quite what it seems and all gold transactions are not created
equallyfar from it.
In an allocated gold account, specific gold bars are held in clients names with full title
and the bank is not permitted to use the gold for its own purposes; and
In contrast, the overwhelming majority of LBMA trading is via unallocated gold accounts.
These are settled via nothing more than debits/credits in metal accounts with bullion
banks.
The assumption that the London-based LBMA members are primarily trading physical gold is
inaccurate. In reality, LESS THAN 5% of gold traded on the LBMA is settled by the delivery of
physical metal into what are known as allocated gold accounts.
Meanwhile
Holders of unallocated gold accounts are unsecured creditors of the bank with general claims
on an unspecified volume of gold in the banks vault. Any gold which is backing unallocated
gold accounts is legally part of the banks working capital, to do with it as it wishes.
The most succinct explanation of the LBMAs structural flaw was penned by Adrian Ash of
BullionVault.
Imagine you could sell someone something, but keep ownership of it, and then use it yourself. You could lend it out for interest, say, or raise loans of your own by pledging it as collateral. Or even sell it to raise cash when things get tight. And if your business fails entirely, the
owner will just have to queue up with all of your other creditors, and be thankful with
whatever small change is paid out by the courts. This is pretty much what big banks get away
with in gold

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Like us, you could easily be forgiven for asking why investors hold unallocated gold on the long
side when they have no entitlement to specific metal and are nothing more than the most junior of bank creditors. All the more, when one of the factors supporting the investment case for
gold is that gold bullion is the only financial asset which has zero counterparty risk.
As the global debt bubble grows (estimated at US$199 trillion by McKinsey in 2014), this becomes ever more relevant. In testimony to Congress in 1912, J.P. Morgan made the observation that.
Gold is money. Everything else is credit.
Its about counterparty risk and credit includes paper instruments purporting to be physical
gold.
To its credit (pun intended), the LBMA is starting to tell it like it is, although more than
$100bn of gold buying In London every day is not listening.
For example, the slide below is from a presentation by LBMA Chief Executive, Ruth Crowell, on
15 June 2015. It emphasises the paper gold versus physical gold of unallocated versus allocated.
Source: LBMA
Like traditional bank deposits, unallocated gold trading more than 95% of all gold traded in
London is merely a fractional reserve system.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
What the bullion banks keep secret (weve tried asking them) is the ratio of physical gold underpins unallocated gold accounts?
The current structure of the London Bullion market rests on confidence, i.e. that buyers of unallocated gold believe that they can convert into allocated gold on demand. With traditional
bank deposits, the central bank can always print bank notes if required. Phyiscal gold is obviously different.
A substantial imbalance in the trading of unallocated gold versus the fractional reserve, or
gold float, would increase instability and probability of system failure.
As well show, we doubt that there is much, or any, gold left in London vaults which is not already subject to existing ownerhip claims. On the other side of the ratio, the daily average
trade in unallocated gold is truly mind boggling as well explain.
Indeed
Weve been arguing for years that a breakdown and bifurcation in the gold market between
physical and paper gold substitutes would be necessary for accurate price discovery of physical gold bullion.
There has been a development. Its likely that this process has reached an advanced stage
when the lead article of the LBMAs own magazine in January 2016 was titled Wholesale Physical Markets are Broken.
Source: LBMA

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
In the article, Seamus Donoghue of Allocated Bullion Solutions commented.

All is not well in the wholesale markets. Despite the significant growth in the physical precious metals market and the strong outlook for continued demand growth, particularly in
Asia, the wholesale physical markets that service that demand are broken.
Lets delve into the structure of the London Bullion Market in detail.
Weve said that the gold market is just a chimera due to the dominance of paper goldits a
VERY, VERY large chimera.
In 1997, the LBMA released data on the amount of gold cleared through London for the first
time. The first data point for October 1996 showed that the daily average of gold cleared
through trading in London (loco London) was 27.5m oz. With an average gold price of
US$379.05/oz., this amounted to US$10.4bn each day.
Previously nobody had a clue and commentators were stunned by the size of the gold trade in
London. This was one response at the time which we found on the internet.
HOW HOW HOW...in this enlightened age of information, did something exist so large as
loco LondonIt has been hidden all this time not by government mandate but by private enterprise.
They werent stunned enoughby a long way.
The clearing statistics seemed large, but they substantially understated the true volume of gold
traded.
The key thing to note about the Clearing Statistics is that they represent NET RATHER THAN
GROSS volumes moved between accounts held with clearing members.
Here are a couple of examples of what the clearing statistics exclude from the LBMAs
Alchemist in-house magazine:
if one participant buys and then sells 10,000 ounces of gold with the same counterparty for
the same value date, although 20,000 ounces of gold have traded, there will be no movement of metal (actually debits/credits in unallocated accounts, Ed), and no impact on the
clearing statistics.
And:
the interbank (gold) market is also showing increased activity but if I now trade 50 times a
day rather than 20 with the same counterparty, it still comes down to only one (net) transfer
of metal.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
In Q1 2011, the LBMA conducted a survey of gold trading volumes, The LBMA Gold Turnover
Survey. The findings of the survey were startling.
The 173.7m oz. of gold traded daily in London was 9.2 times the 18.8m oz. the daily average
number of ounces cleared of 18.8m oz.
In dollar terms, the average daily turnover on the London Bullion Market was a surprisingly
large US$240.8bn.
Source: LBMA
Based on 2013 BIS data, this made gold the fifth most heavily global forex trade after the dollar
versus Euro, Yen, Pound and Aussie dollar.
With over 95% of trades settled by nothing more than paper debits/credits, there was more
than US$228.0bn of daily trading in paper gold. Dividing by two for buying and selling gives
US$114bn.
If we take the February 2016 monthly number of ounces transferred of 21.1m multiply by
8.9, then multiply by 95% (for unallocated proportion of the total), then multiply by the average gold price (US$1,232.07/oz.), we get US$219.8bn of trading. Dividing by two gives
US$109.9bn - which is still comfortably over US$100bn of gold which has been bought in
London each day.
So to emphasise
Every day there is over US$100bn of gold buying which if the market reflected the fundamentals of physical bullion would see the subsequent withdrawal of gold, either temporarily
(sometimes very temporarily) or permanently, from the float of gold available in the market place.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
However
Because of the current structure of the gold market, more than US$100bn of daily gold buying has zero impact on the float of available physical gold. For years banks have been able
to sell almost unlimited quantities of unallocated gold without risk of being called upon to
deliver physical bullion.
This has provided a boon for banks acting as market makers and clearers in the London Bullion
Market at the expense of gold investors and gold mining companies.
Lets put the US$109.9bn of daily gold buying in context. It is equivalent to 184.0m oz. or 5,724
tonnes. The latter figure amounted to 182% of the 3,186.2 tonnes of gold output from all of
the worlds gold mines in 2015.
Having estimated the (mind boggling) volume of gold trading on the London Bullion Market,
the next step is to estimate the float of available gold stored in London vaults.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Calculating the London gold float

Our calculation of the float of physical gold in London vaults is based on excellent work by
Ronan Manly of Bullionstar and Nick Laird of Sharelynx and we strongly recommend visiting
their websites.
Before analysing the data, we should point out that the LBMAs CEO has commented that in
the London Bullion Market.
Almost all gold is held in the form of Good Delivery bars
LGD bars are +/- 400oz.
In terms of estimating the float of physical gold stored in London, we are fortunate in having a
relatively recent data point from the LBMA, data from the BoE and monthly net export data
courtesy of the UK governments HMRC.
In June 2015, the CEO of the LBMA delivered a presentation in which she stated that there are
approximately 500,000 London Good Delivery 400 oz. bars of gold in London.
Source: LBMA
Converting bars to tonnes, 500,000 LGD bars weighing an average of 400 oz. amounted to
6,220 tonnes.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Gold bullion stored in London has been on a declining trend. In early 2015, Bullionstar noted
that the LBMAs website contained the following statement on its vaulting page.
In total it is estimated that there are approximately 7,500 tonnes of gold held in London
vaults, of which about three-quarters is stored in the Bank of England.
Accepting that these are ballpark numbers, this statistic seems to have been accurate at
some point between April 2014 and early 2015 since the same webpage contained the following comment in April 2014.
In total there is approximately 9,000 tonnes of gold held in London vaults, of which
about two-thirds is stored in the Bank of England.
From further research, we have found references to the 9,000 tonne gold figure as early as August 2013 in an article attributed to Goldcore on The Market Oracle website. However, it could
relate to a still earlier point in time. Some commentators believe that it first appeared in 2011,
but we cant be certain. However, the declining trend is clear.
Source: LBMA
The BoE provides an indication of the gold in its custody in its annual reports. The BoEs annual
reports for 2013-15 reported gold held in custody by the bank on 28 February in each year as
210bn, 140bn and 130bn, respectively.
Using the closing gold price and US$/ rate, this translates into gold tonnages held at the BoE
of approximately 6,271, 5,497 and 5,145 tonnes at the end of February 2013, 2014 and 2015,
respectively.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
As with total gold in London vaults, gold stored at the BoE has also been on a declining trend.
Source: BoE
Its not surprising that the trajectory of the decline in BoE vaulted gold has been shallower than
the gold in London vaults overall.
The amount of private sector gold held at the BoE was/is relatively small;
The central bank gold is not available for sale (obviously) and most is not available for
lending/leasing; and
Central bank gold which is loaned/leased to the market often remains in the BoE vault
(see below).
Sosummarising what we know about the gold float in London.
In June 2015, the total volume of gold in London vaults was 6,220 tonnes. It had been
on a declining trend since mid-2013 or earlier.
Of this 6,220 tonnes, about 5,145 tonnes or probably slightly less (because it had been
declining) was held in the BoEs vault.
The vast majority of gold in the BoE vault is owned by central banks (see below) and is,
therefore, not available to the private market except for short-term loans/leases; and
Subtracting 5,145 tonnes from 6,220 tonnes left approximately 1,075 tonnes of gold in
non-BoE vaults, primarily JPMorgan Chase and HSBC, which dominate physical gold
trading in London.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Of the 1,075 tonnes of gold in London outside the BoE vault, we can subtract gold held in ETFs
which hold physical bullion and see what the remaining float is.
This is where the maths starts to get interesting
There are at least eight physical gold ETFs which hold their gold in London. The eight that we
know of are listed below, together with their latest physical gold holdings.
ETF
Ticker
Custodian
SPDR Gold Trust
GLD
HSBC
824.9
iShares Gold Trust
IAU
JPMorgan Chase
117.1
ETF Securities
PHAU
HSBC
120.5
ETF Securities
GBS
HSBC
94.5
Source Physical Gold Trust
SGLD
JPMorgan Chase
76.8
ABSA NewGold ETF
GLD SJ
Barclays
29.2
DB Physical Gold ETC
XGLD
DB/JPM Chase
15.2
Van Eck Merk Gold Trust
OUNZ
Total
Tonnes
2.6
1280.8
Source: ETF factsheets
We should point out that the BoE is listed as a sub-custodian of the largest ETF, the SPDR Gold
Trust. According to the prospectus, however, this is only when the gold is in transit.
The Custodian may employ subcustodians to provide temporary custody and safekeeping of
gold bars until transported to the Custodian's London vault premises.
It becomes clear that there is a potential problem with the float of physical gold in London.
Subtracting 1,280.8 tonnes of physical gold in ETFs from the 1,075 tonnes of gold in London
outside the BoE, we immediately have a problem as it suggests a deficit of 205.8 tonnes.
Tonnes
Est. Gold outside BoE vault
Less: Est. Gold in London ETFs
Remaining Gold in private vaults
1,075.0
(1280.8)
(205.8)
Source: ETF factsheets


Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
This seems somewhat larger than might be attributable to a rounding error relating to 2015
data given by the BoE and LBMA.
It obviously raises concerns.
It implies that some of the physical gold which is claimed to be held in the physical gold
ETFs might not actually be there, is loaned/leased central bank gold (probably stored at
the BoE - which is being double-counted), or has been loaned/leased by ETFs.
It also invites the question what happened to other holdings of allocated gold belonging
to institutional investors and high net worth individuals which is stored outside of the
BoE; and
It also implies that there is nothing supporting the $200bn per day of unallocated
gold trading on the London Bullion Market.
An obvious pushback on the calculation would be

It was possible that gold was imported into the UK from overseas since the 2015 data BoE
and LBMA data points which has made up the shortfall?
It would seem notthe opposite in fact.
The UK via HM Revenue & Customs - publishes export and import data for non-monetary
gold, i.e. gold which is not owned by the official sector (governments/central banks) on a
monthly basis. The data tracks all non-monetary gold movement, whether there is a change in
ownership or not (in contrast to balance of payments data).
The next chart shows the UKs net gold exports since July 2015, the month following the most
recent LBMA data point.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Source: HMRC
In aggregate, a net 430 tonnes of gold was exported from the UK since the beginning of July
2015. While this relates to non-monetary gold, its not clear whether it was gold held at the
BoE or in other London vaults, or (most likely) both.
Subtracting 430 tonnes from the aforementioned 6,220 tonnes left in London suggests that
there was approximately 5,790 tonnes of gold left in London at the end of February 2016
(excluding net additions/substractions of central bank monetary gold).
Source: LBMA, HMRC

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
This might be a good estimate of the current gold float in London vaults.
But
What really matters is the gold float - how much gold is available in London excluding ETFs,
the gold which has been exported from the UK since June 2015 and
...the gold which is owned by central banks and stored at the BoE.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Gold in the BoE vault and the float ex-central banks

The LBMAs June 2015 data point (i.e. 500,000 LGD bars or approximately 6,220 tonnes) did
not, unlike the others, mention the proportion of Londons gold held at the BoE.
As noted above, the most recent data point that we have is the 5,145 tonnes at the end of February 2015. It might be lower now in keeping with the declining volume of gold in London overall and the BoE itself in recent years.
We dont know but
Our next step is to calculate how much of the 5,145 tonnes was/is owned by central banks
and, therefore, not available for sale and merely available to the market, in some cases, in
the form of loans/leases.
Because
Bullion loaned/leased to the market by central banks is not a sustainable source of physical
gold to maintain the function of the London Bullion Market.
In Graham Youngs speech, referred to earlier, he confirmed that the vast majority of gold
stored at the bank is owned by central banks.
we are a very significant custodian of physical gold. Primarily this is gold that belongs to
other central banks, but we also store gold in our vaults on behalf of a number of commercial firms that are active in the market.
The LBMA website states.
Those clearing members without their own vault operations - Scotiabank and UBS - will utilise their accounts with the Bank of England or one of the other custodians.
Compared to the major physical gold players, especially JPMorgan Chase and HSBC which dominate physical trade in London, Scotia and UBS are significantly smaller and, it seems from the
statement, might also hold gold at other vaults besides the BoE.
Sohow much of this 5,145 tonnes can we attribute to central banks?
A combination of central bank disclosures, work by Bullionstar (which sent questions to most
of the central banks) and Sharelynx and some of our analysis/estimates allow us to make what
we think are fairly high conviction estimates for gold held at the BoE by 31 central banks. We
refer to the estimate for these 31 central banks as:
Gold stored for central banks in BoE (1)

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Please refer to Ronan Manlys blog report:

Central bank gold at the Bank of England
at the Bullionstar website, which also references data on Nick Lairds Sharelynx website. We
agree with the vast majority of their estimates, which are largely based on central bank publications and replies to specific questions regarding the location of their gold reserves.
There are only three central banking institutions, the IMF, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and
the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), where our estimates differ in anything other than
a minor way.
1. IMF
We have taken the 898 tonnes (19%) of IMF reserves stored at the BoE in 1976 as our starting
point (like Bullionstar), since this was the last time it was publicly disclosed.
The IMF subsequently made two disposals of 25m oz. each (777.6 tonnes), one of which was to
ostensibly private sector buyers and the other in the form of distributions to its member countries.
Of the former, Bullionstar notes that 3.74m oz. (116.3 tonnes) was delivered at and probably
withdrawn from - the BoE.
With respect to the other 25.0m oz, we have assumed that 19% (in keeping with the last
known ratio of IMF gold at the BoE) of the 25.0m oz., i.e. 4.75m oz. (147.7 tonnes) was originally stored at the BoE. Conservatively, we estimate that all was removed apart from that received by the UK, i.e. 2.396m oz. (74.5 tonnes). This leads to the following calculation.
IMF gold changes
Starting point 1976
Tonnes
898.0
Private sector purchases
(116.3)
Distributions to member countries
(147.7)
Add back: distribution to UK

Sub-total
74.5
708.5
Source: IMF, ADM ISI est.
The next change In IMF gold reserves was the sale of 403.3 tonnes during 2009-10. Of this, we
know that 200 tonnes was sold to India, 10 tonnes to Sri Lanka, 10 tonnes to Bangladesh and 2
tonnes to Mauritius.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
We are fairly sure that the 200 tonnes relating to Indian sales was gold at the BoE and remains
there (see below), the same with Bangladesh we add these back to their respective central
bank holdings at the BoE. Give that the vast majority of IMF gold is in NY, we assume that the
gold sold to Sri Lanka and others was non-BoE gold.
IMF gold changes
Sub-total (from table above)
Less: India
Tonnes
708.5
(200.0)
Less: Bangladesh
(10.0)
Total
498.5
Source: IMF, ADM ISI est.
2. India
Indias central bank, the RBI, has commented that 65.5 tonnes has been held outside the country since 1991 and a further 200.0 tonnes (obviously the gold purchased from the IMF) since
2009. Indian gold held overseas is stored at the BoE and BIS, but the BIS is not one of the repositories for IMF gold, hence we assume that the 200.0 tonnes is at the BoE. Bullionstar found
a 2013 article in the Indian Business Standard which referred to gold loan of 46.9 tonnes which
involved gold being transferred to the BoE. In aggregate, therefore, we assume India has 246.9
tonnes at the BoE.
3. Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Bullionstar assumes that one third of total BIS gold (the total including 108 tonnes of its own
gold and 443 tonnes of custody gold) is held at the BoE. However, we think that the percentage
should be higher. The BIS is very active in gold loans/leases and gold market interventions, e.g.
Zero Hedge expose of LinkedIn profiles of BIS traders (the second rule of the gold market), so it
makes sense that the majority we assume 50% - of gold is held in London.
The estimates for these 31 central banks are summarised in the table below which, in aggregate, amount to 3,774.2 tonnes.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Country
Gold reserves in BoE Source
Germany
13%
Bundesbank
438.0
IMF
19%
IMF, ADM ISI
534.7
Italy
<1%
BullionStar
Switzerland
20%
SNB
208.0
Netherlands
18%
DNB
110.3
India
44%
RBI/BullionStar/ADM ISI
246.9
Portugal
49%
BdP
186.3
Venezuela
14%
BullionStar/Sharelynx
UK
100%
BoE
310.3
Austria
80%
OeNB
224.0
Belgium
88%
VTM-niuws/BullionStar
200.0
Philippines
95%
BSP/BullionStar/ADM ISI
186.1
Sweden
49%
Riksbank
Mexico
94%
BdeM/BullionStar/ADM ISI
118.3
Greece
20%
MoF/BullionStar/ADM ISI
22.5
BIS
50%
BIS/BullionStar/ADM ISI
275.5
South Korea
100%
BoK/BullionStar
104.4
Romania
59%
BullionStar
Poland
100%
NBP/BullionStar
Australia
99%
RBA
78.8
Brazil
100%
BullionStar
67.2
Denmark
94%
Danmark Nationalbank
62.7
Finland
51%
BoF
25.0
Bolivia
39%
BCB/BullionStar
16.6
Bulgaria
60%
BNB
24.1
Peru
50%
BCRP/BullionStar/ADM ISI
17.5
Bangladesh
84%
CBoB
11.8
Ghana
39%
BoG
3.4
Latvia
100%
Latvijas Banka
6.6
Ireland
95%
BullionStar
5.7
Iceland
100%
BoI/BullionStar
2.0
Total
Tonnes
12.0
50.0
61.4
61.2
102.9
3,774.2

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
We know from a diagram in the Bank of Englands Q2 2014 Quarterly Bulletin that there were
72 central banks holding gold in the BoEs vault at that time and its unlikely to have changed
much.
Source: BoE
However, this still leaves gold holdings of 41 central banks at the BoE unaccounted for. We refer to the estimate for these 41 central banks as:
Fortunately
We can make some educated guesses for another ten
1. South Africa
In a question for written reply submitted to the National Assembly, South Africas Finance Minister commented on 16 June 2015.
The SARB holds a large percentage of South Africas gold reserves in vaults of official sector
institutions at offshore bullion centres, while a smaller amount is held locally. It is operationally efficient to store gold at offshore bullion centres should the need arise to conduct gold
transactions.
The fact that London has been the hub of the gold market and South Africa was a British colony
suggests that the majority of South Africas gold is held at the BoE. We have assumed 70% of
the total.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
2. France
France was a member of the London Gold Pool in the late-1960s, so there is a historic precedent of holding gold at the Bank of England. Reports in the media suggest that approximately
9% of Frances gold is stored overseas and the far-right leader, Marine Le Pen, called for French
gold overseas to be repatriated in November 2014. In 1968, France removed its gold from New
York, so its logical to assume that whatever French gold is held outside Paris is located in London.
3. Turkey
Historically, Turkey has held gold reserves in London and the central bank states that.
The CBRTs gold reserves consist of international and non-international standard gold held
at CBRT vaults, foreign banks and Borsa Istanbul (BIST).
Foreign banks are likely to be based in either London (most likely) or the US and our assumption is that 25% of Turkeys gold reserves are held at the BoE.
4-7. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE/Qatar, Bahrain
Historians of the gold market remember that Middle Eastern nations, notably Saudi Arabia,
were large purchasers of gold during the IMF and US Treasury sales in the late-1970s. The recycling of petro-dollars in the wake of the 1973 oil crisis was based in London, which was the logical place to store gold. We assume that 20% of the gold reserves of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE/
Qatar and Bahrain are stored at the BoE.
8. Taiwan
In Asia, Taiwan is a large holder of gold. The following quote is from an FT article Taiwan: well
hold on to our gold, thanks on 20 October 2010.
Taiwans relatively large gold holdings, however, are not the result of canny buying by
Perng (Fai-nan, central bank governor) ahead of the recent rise in gold prices. Instead, their
provenance date much further back, to when the Kuomintang party fled mainland China for
Taiwan after losing the civil war with the communists. Chiang Kai-shek, then leader of the
Kuomintang, was said to have transferred Chinas entire gold reserves to Taiwan, physically
taking much of it out of China to be deposited in other countries.
When Chian Kai-shek fled to Taiwan in 1950, the logical places to have deposited the gold reserves would have been in the UK and US. We assume that a small percentage of current gold
reserves, say 10%, are in the BoE vault.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
9. Spain
Spain presents a problem give the secretive nature of the central bank regarding its gold, e.g.
refusing to answer questions from Bullionstar. While it would be surprising if it didnt store
some gold in London at the BoE, we are reluctant to assume that this is more than a minor percentage, say 5%.
10. China
We have a slightly different view from BullionStar regarding China and are prepared to believe
that at least a small amount of Chinas gold is stored in London for several reasons.
Firstly, while we wont go into it in this report, the evidence suggests that the PBoC does not
acquire gold on the Shanghai Gold Exchange. If thats the case, the obvious place is London.
Secondly, the Yuan has joined the SDR and China has aspirations for it to be a reserve currency.
Not only that, but on 19 April 2016, the Shanghai Gold Exchange launched a new benchmark
physical gold price denominated in Yuan. In this regard, it makes sense to have the capability
to mobilise gold in London.
We wonder if this is what Peter Mooslechner, an executive director of the Austrian central
bank was referring to in October 2015 when he commented.
It's quite different, I think, for central banks in Asia, for example, where they are increasing
their reserves a lot and they are much more active in using also their reserves in trading in
the market and intervening into the market."
It sounds like he was referring to China. There is strong logic for China keeping some of its gold
at the BoE but we have assumed only 5%.
From South Africa to China, we have estimated the gold reserves at the BoE for an additional
nine nations. This still leaves some very large holders.
Country
Tonnes
US
8,133.5
Russia
1,447.0
Japan
765.2
ECB
504.8
Total
10,850.5
Source: World Gold Council

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Given the strategic importance (something which passes by most commentators) of the gold
market and Londons role, its realistic to assume that some of this gold resides at the BoE.
To be conservative, well assume that the US, Russia and the ECB hold no gold at the BoE.
In the case of the US, the latest report from the US Treasury states that all of the US gold reserves are stored on US territory at Fort Knox, West Point, Denver and the NY Fed. Well ignore
activities of the Exchange Stabilisation Fund (and evidence that it mobilised gold in the relatively recent past) and our suspicion that it undertakes location swaps in the gold market.
We have also assumed that the ECB does not holding any of its gold at the BoE although, once
again, our suspicions are to the contrary.
Russia has been active in the London gold market in days gone by but, in the current geopolitical environment, we think its unlikely that it would take the risk of storing any of its 1,447
tonnes of gold in the BoE. Ditto other nations that might be considered as part of the Russian
bloc, e.g. the Stans (including Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan) and Belarus.
Excluding all of these nations, this leaves an additional 31 of the 72 nations unaccounted for.
We have conservatively assumed that these 31 nations store an additional 100 tonnes, or approximately 3.0 tonnes each.
Country
Gold reserves in BoE Source
South Africa
60%
ADM ISI
87.6
France
9%
ADM ISI
243.6
Turkey
25%
ADM ISI
119.9
Saudi Arabia
20%
ADM ISI
64.6
Kuwait
20%
ADM ISI
15.8
UAE/Qatar
20%
ADM ISI
4.0
Bahrain
20%
ADM ISI
0.9
Taiwan
20%
ADM ISI
42.3
China
5%
ADM ISI
89.4
Spain
10%
ADM ISI
28.2
ADM ISI
100.0
Other 31 nations
Total
Tonnes
796.3
Source: World Gold Council, ADMISI


Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Now to calculate the gold float in London...

Starting with the LBMAs figure of +/-500,000 LGD bars or 6,220 tonnes, we can subtract gold
held in ETFs in London, net UK gold exports and gold stored for central banks at the BoE.
Gold float in London vaultscalculation:

Tonnes
Gold in London in June 2015
Tonnes
6,220
Less:
Gold held by ETFs
(1,281)
(3,774)
(796)
Central bank gold stored in BoE

Net UK gold exports Jul 15-Feb 16
Gold float/(deficit)
(4,570)
(430)
(61)
Source: ADM ISI estimates
From the calculation, we are left with a deficit of 61 tonnes.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
If this is close to being correct..
Its possible that there has effectively been a hidden default in the London Bullion
Market which has been obscured by loans/leases of central bank gold;
Based on BoE and LBMA data, there is insufficient gold bullion merely to cover gold
owned by ETFs and our estimates for central banks - never mind allocated gold owned
by institutional investors and high net worth individuals;
Some of the gold held in London vaults may be subject to multiple ownership claims.
This could be obscured by dual ownership of central bank gold via gold loans/leasing
contracts;
With the UK being a net exporter of non-monetary gold, the situation could get worse
not better; and
To reiterate, there is no gold float supporting more than US$200 Billion per day of trading of unallocated gold In London.
Intuitively
We think that central bank gold lending/leasing might be maintaining the apparent status
quo in the London Bullion Market. Rather than being lent to the market to provide liquidity,
central bank gold loans/leases are probably being expanded and rolled over to preserve the
illusion.
In the Graham Young speech referred to above, he explained how central banks can
mobilise, i.e. undertake loans/leases, in the gold market.
What the Bank provides is an account management service on an allocated basis. That
means that those holding gold at the Bank, particularly other central banks, have the reassurance of knowing that they have title to specific bars; but they are also able to mobilise
those gold holdings conveniently by making or receiving so-called electronic book entry
transfers between their account at the Bank and the account of their counterparty. Such a
transfer does not require gold to be physically moved within the Banks vaults; rather, title
to the bars in question is transferred within the Banks IT systems.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
When the Danish central bank wanted to begin gold lending, it moved gold to the BoE. Bullionstar found these quotes by the Nationalbank from 1999.
In 1987 the Nationalbank began to lend gold to foreign banks against interest paid in gold
This made it necessary to move the gold to London. In August 1999, 62.7 tonnes of the Nationalbanks gold was in London, corresponding to a share of 94%.
And.
Gold deposited with the Bank of England is not necessarily physically moved when it is
lent.
This is significant as it is effectively confirmation that gold in the BoEs vaults is subject, in some
cases, to more than one ownership claim.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
China and a two-tier gold market

The structural flaws in London leave the gold markets integrity vulnerable to increasing offtake
of physical gold.
In other words, an old fashioned run.
As noted above, the article Wholesale Physical Markets are Broken, from the LBMAs Alchemist magazine, suggests that the break down in the current structure of the London Bullion
Market is well advanced.
We obviously agree.
The caveat is that vulnerability can remain masked indefinitely unless or until a run actually occurs and/or central banks cease/reduce supplying more gold to the market - as happened with
the collapse in the London Gold Pool in 1968.
Given the 92:1 imbalance between paper/physical, a shift in the balance in gold trading from
paper instruments towards physical could quickly destabilise the market.
This is especially true when there is an average of more than US$200bn of trading in unallocated gold every day.
If an increasing number of investors understand the fragile structure of the gold market vis-vis physical gold, it would be an incentive for them to take delivery of bullion instead of holding
paper contracts.
Source: LBMA

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
In the Alchemist article, Seamus Donoghue explicity addressed the risk from such a shift.
The OTC market dwarfs the physical market in terms of size. Any shift in flows from the OTC
market to the physical market as a result of a more efficient physical market could have an
outsized impact on physical premiums.
There are two key takeaways from that comment:
He tacitly acknowledged that the price of physical has been suppressed by the dominance
of paper gold instruments; and
It raises the possibility of a two-tier market emerging in gold between prices for paper
gold instruments and physical gold itself.
Donoghue then pursued the theme of supply constraints for physical gold leading to higher
prices.
There are supply constraints in physical markets that do not exist in OTC markets, and given
the near-term inelasticity of supply, the way to accommodate higher demand would be higher premiums.
In other words
a two-tier market.
Ironically, new bank regulation could also help to drive the migration from paper to physical
gold trading. Basel III, for example, puts tighter restrictions on the leverage of bank balance
sheets. Gold is treated differently depending on whether it is unallocated gold (a bank liability
so on balance sheet) or allocated gold (customer asset so off balance sheet). Donoghue explained.
The banks are already encouraging their investor accounts to migrate their unallocated positions to allocated, given the more favourable capital treatment for the bank
If this is happening, it really strikes us as ironic given the ability of banks to influence the gold
market via the dominance of paper instruments for more than two decades.
A recent and very significant move by China is also likely to promote a shift towards physical gold and a two-tiered price structure. On 19 April 2016, the Shanghai Gold Exchange
launched a new Yuan-denominated benchmark price for PHYSICAL GOLD.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
The settlement process is centrally cleared its an exchange unlike London - and the price is
for physically delivered 1-kilo 99.99 bars which is quoted in Yuan per gram. Delivery can take
place at any of the SGEs registered vaults in 36 cities with settlement T+2.
There are some stark contrasts with London where the settlement process is not centrally
cleared, settlement is by book entry rather than in physical metal (unless allocation is specifically requested) and the contracts are for 99.5% 400oz. bars.
The lack of central clearing in London necessitates the need to set up bilateral credit lines between market participants and also means CREDIT RISK, since there is no exchange acting as
counterparty. As Chinese banks have found, setting up bilateral credit lines with LBMA bullion banks is not necessarily straightforward.
Mimicking London, however, the Shanghai benchmark will have twice daily a.m. and p.m. prices which are fixed via auction processes beginning at 10.15am and 2.15pm respectively.
Important point
In London, the twice daily LBMA prices are fixed at 10.30am and 15.30pm. Because of the
eight hour time difference, the Shanghai benchmark prices will front run the London prices.
This was Simon Mikhailovich of Tocqueville Bullion Reserve commenting to the Epoch Times
last year about the new Shanghai contract.
I think the Chinese have a problem. The LBMA auction price is achieved by a group of banks.
Price for physical gold is determined in markets where you dont have to have physical gold
to affect the priceI think what the Chinese are trying to do is creating a real market that reflects supply and demand for physical gold.
Agreed.
The SGEs white paper on the new benchmark price notes that the new benchmark contract
should be be non-competitive and complement loco London. However, the same document
is fairly clear in its explanation of why and how China is planning to wrest control of the gold
market from London.
Here are some illustrations from the white paper, beginning with China setting out its gold credentials.
China is the largest producer and consumer of gold in the world. SGE...has ranked as the
world's largest physical gold exchange for nine consecutive years

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
It will support Chinas strategic desire to internationalise the Yuan.

The dollar-based gold price in todays market is not able to affect the need of price discovery process in different markets. It has remarkable strategic value for China to introduce its
new Renminbi-denominated Shanghai Gold Benchmark Price, to influence the power of the
Renminbi currency in the global gold market.
First gold then oil?
Damn right
If the SGE contract proves successful in its early stages of operation, this could open up further possibilities for renminbi pricing of commodities heavily traded and used by China in the
Chinese currency, as part of the currencys gradual move to full international status.
China is clearly developing a policy to be the centre for price discovery in the gold market.
There is a strong rationale for an international effort to shift price discovery to China, since
this country will be responsible for a large share of future growth in world gold consumption.
As a brief aside to the contents of the white paper
On the same day that the new Shanghai benchmark gold price began trading, Russia Today
published an article Moscow & Shanghai seek to dominate gold trade.
The Bank of Russia and the People's Bank of China want to create a joint platform that
would unite gold trading by the world's two biggest gold buying countries...BRICS countries
are large economies with large reserves of gold and an impressive volume of production and
consumption of this precious metal. In China, the gold trade is conducted in Shanghai, in Russia it is in Moscow. Our idea is to create a link between the two cities in order to increase
trade between the two markets," First Deputy Governor of the Russian Central Bank Sergey
Shvetsov told TASS.
Six days earlier on the 13 April 2016, Reuters ran the following story.
The Dubai Gold & Commodities Exchange (DGCX) said it had agreed to collaborate more
closely with two of China's biggest banks in a move that could pave the way for transactions
to be cleared in the yuan and attract more interest from Chinese investorsThe DGCX did
not elaborate on what yuan products it might developThe exchange also launched spot
gold contracts in December, enabling investors to buy and sell physical 1 kilogramme bars.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Back to the white paper

China is seeking to encourage further gold investment, which has been taking off domestically.
After the global financial crisis in 2008, institutional and individual investors are more concerned the function of gold as asset allocation. The launch of Shanghai Gold Benchmark Price
is expected to active (sic) the willingness of investors in gold investment.
So greater offtake of physical gold instead of paper alternatives.
Towards the end of the white paper is a section SGE Contract and its Role in Price Discovery.
This gets to the heart of how the SGE benchmark price should lead to better price discovery for
physical gold.
The new renminbi-denominated gold benchmark offered by the Shanghai Gold Exchange is
a necessary addition to the international gold market and should make the pricing of physical gold more open to the play of market forces.
While the London market is a fractional reserve system
The SGE is the worlds largest spot gold exchange, with all trades denominated in renminbi
and backed by physical gold held in SGE accounts.
The white paper even highlights how dollar gold prices in the west are dominated by paper
gold instruments and how China differs.
However prices are still derived from dollar-based benchmarks set by trading venues in London, New York and other locations far from China. The majority of trading on these venues is
made up of paper contracts, in contrast to China, where consumption is comprised mainly
of demand for gold bars, coins, jewellery and manufacturing inputs, as well as central bank
purchases.
It is confident that Chinese demand will continue to grow.
This demand is expected to expand in coming years, boosted by rising average incomes
(especially in Chinas interior provinces and third- and fourth-tier cities) and the rebalancing of Chinas economy towards greater private consumption. The relatively small portion of
gold holdings in Chinese households large overall savings and the uncertain outlook for investments in property or the stock market create opportunities for gold product development, boosting demand for physically-backed gold products.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
SGE withdrawals are a good proxy for Chinese gold purchases (excluding PBoC purchases) since
bars have to be recast if they are to be re-sold and this rarely happens. SGE withdrawals have
been on a strongly rising trend (with thanks to Koos Jansen).
Source: Koos Jansen, SGE, ADM ISI
In 2015, aggregate withdrawals during the year were 2,597 tonnes, which was equivalent to
more than 80% of all of the gold mined worldwide during the year.
In our opinion, the shift to a two-tiered market will be one of the stepping stones to reforming
the London Bullion Market and the convention of LBMA members to trade in unallocated gold
accounts.
These things take time
There have been signs that weve been taking tentative steps towards a two-tier gold market
for some time

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
The gold lending market moved into semi-permanent backwardation in mid-2013 as indicated
by a negative GOFO rate (GOFO = Gold Forward Offered Rate).
In an efficiently functioning market, this should not have happened.

GOFO was the interest rate to borrow dollars using gold as collateral. If you were in possession
of gold bullion, a negative GOFO meant that the market was prepared to lend you dollars AND
pay you interest to borrow them in return for the use of your gold for the duration of the loan.
It implied stress in the system with regard to the availability of physical gold in this case 400
oz. London Good Delivery bars on the LBMA.
The negative GOFO rate which emerged in 2013 was only the third occasion since 2001 when
GOFO had been negative. On the other occasions, the negative GOFO rates only lasted two
days and coincided with lows/turning points in the gold price in 2001 and 2008.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
GOFO went dark on 30 January 2015 when the LBMA stopped publishing GOFO rates.
Ironically, on the very same day that the LBMA went dark on GOFO, it responded to the Bank
of Englands Fair and Effective Markets Review with an 11 page letter in which it said it would
welcome further transparency.
The LBMA would also welcome further transparency through post trade reporting, providing the industry with data that at the moment does not exist for the bullion market.
Change its tune, even if it hasnt changed its modus operandi. In an October 2009 report, we
quoted the LBMAs website which made a virtue out of the lack of transparency.
It also provides confidentiality, as transactions are conducted solely between the principals
involved.
This sentiment is impossible to reconcile with the reality of gold trading by LBMA members. If
it welcomes further transparency, why hasnt the LBMA done something about it?
The LBMAs
it is important that the Review does not implement any new measures which will impact
the liquidity of the markets. We would like to reinforce the message presented by the FIA
that the Review should prioritise liquidity, as greater liquidity results in markets which are
less easily manipulated

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Instead, besides GOFO, we dont have any data on gold trading volumes and the positioning
of traders, as is customary with more effectively regulated exchanges.
The LBMAs assertion in its letter to the Bank of England
Gold is traded widely, and provides many banks, trading houses, refiners, and investors
with the opportunity to invest confidently.
has a hollow ring.
A run on a financial asset tends to develop slowly before transitioning to the acceleration
phase which is the essence of the word.
In gold, we can demonstrate how we are in the first phase of the run which will create a twotiered gold market. However, there are clear signs of acceleration in physical gold purchases.
Before we outline whats happening in the gold market, its vital to outline how analysing supply and demand for gold market differs markedly from commodities and physical goods with
the exception of silver.
Even ignoring the dominance of paper instruments, its actually impossible to model supply
and demand for gold. The reason for this is the extreme stock/flow ratio in gold (and silver).
New mine supply each year is about 2,800 tonnes, which is only a small fraction of the existing
(official figure) inventory of about 185,000 tonnes. Whether newly mined gold next year is
2,800 tonnes or 2,900 tonnes has a very minor impact on the gold price.
By not selling their gold inventory, gold holders (e.g. owners of gold bars, jewellery, coins, etc)
are effectively demanding it at the prevailing price. This is sometimes termed reservation demand.
Gold is not consumed like normal commodities/goods, which makes it similar to other financial assets which are also held as inventory. There is no way to calculate the supply and demand within the existing gold inventory. In the same way, you cant calculate the demand
for Coca Cola shares or 10-year Treasury bonds.
Consequently, the gold price is effectively dependent on portfolio adjustments vis--vis other
financial assets such as bonds, equities and cashnotwithstanding the elasticity of paper
gold supply which has had such a profound impact on the gold market for many years.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Although its impossible to model gold supply and demand, it never stops the institutions, like
the World Gold Council, banks and industry consultants, from doing just that. Data from the
World Gold Council and others is nothing more than best guesses of incremental gold supply in
terms of newly-mined gold and scrap together with best guesses as to where the incremental
bars, coins and jewellery ended up.
While its impossible to model supply and demand for gold, we can gauge the aggregate
strength of net physical gold buying from four major sources of identifiable purchases/sales:
Gold withdrawals on the Shanghai Gold Exchange (data from the SGE);
Gross gold imports into India;
Net change in gold holdings of all-known ETFs (Bloomberg); and
Net change in central bank gold holdings (WGC, quarterly data weighted on a monthly
basis according to the WGCs incomplete data for the latter).
Please note that the charts understate the actual purchases from these sources as we lack data
on two additional sources of buying.
There was a well-documented surge in gold smuggled into India after import duties were
imposed during 2012-13.
Net SGE and central bank demand do not include PBoC purchases until July 2015. The
PBoC does not purchase gold on the SGE and, until July 2015, did not report monthly additions to its gold reserves. Prior to July 2015, the PBoC reported gold reserves at approximately 6-year intervals.
Between April 2009-June 2015, the PBOC added 604 tonnes to its reserves. This would have
added an average purchase of 8.2 tonnes per month to the data in the above charts before July
2015.
Please also note, we can only calculate the aggregate net purchases by these four sources up
to February 2016 and it is somewhat clear whether the data will be available going forward.
However

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
In aggregate, these four sources alone were exceeding the output of all the worlds gold mines
in most months since late 2014 as shown in the chart below.
While the data can be volatile on a month-to-month basis, its clear that aggregate net purchases from these sources has been on a rising trend. Here is the same data based on a 12month moving average, which gives a clearer idea of the trend.
Its vital to emphasise that the these two charts exclude ALL other Asian and western sources
of retail and institutional gold buying.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Untapped vast western pools of capital

Rising purchases of physical gold represent a serious threat to a fractional reserve system like
the current gold market, for it to actually break down, we need this gold buying to accelerate
into a run on physical gold.
We are not there yet, even if we are moving in that direction.
In golds case, it might require an escalation of geopolitical/economic tensions between the US
and China/Russia, for example.
It was economic tension between the US and France over the value of the dollar which
smashed the London Gold Pool of gold price management in 1968.
Or
It might require the vast pools of western capital to dip their toes into the physical gold market. To say that gold as an asset class is under-owned by the vast pools of western capital is
to understate the situation in the extreme.
It is not as though they are underweight, it is more that they are almost zero weight.
Across the centuries of financial history, western prejudice towards gold is a recent and atypical phenomenon.
The prejudices which have built up in the minds of the modern day custodians of western capital essentially parallel the era of hyper-interventionist central banking since the 1980s, when
Greenspan took over the Fed.
Our view is that we are travelling a long and winding road certainly longer than we expected
when we first began analysing the gold market and gold mining companies in 2005 - which
sees gold recover its former role as an investible asset for western investors.
An increase in the current tiny allocation of the vast pools of western capital into physical
gold would have a disproportionate impact on the market.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
There are some signs of this emerging with the recent increase in gold held by ETFs.
But we need a catalyst for this process to accelerate.

One catalyst for western capital to enter the physical gold market could be some exhaustion of
buying in other major asset classes due to a combination of one or more of:
Loss of faith in central banks and other policy makers;
Overvaluation;
Unacceptable credit risk; and
Deteriorating fundamentals.
We argued earlier how even mainstream commentators are starting to question the credibility
of central banks. Equities and long-term sovereign bonds in many developed world markets are
still close to all-time highs, credit risk is being re-priced in a bearish manner and global growth
is deccelerating.
While the set-up for western funds to reassess gold as an investable asset is VERY POSITIVE,
its worth looking at the investment case in more detail. Specifically, in terms of yield and
credit risk.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
The oft used push back against investing in gold down the years has been Gold has no yield.
While it was no impediment to the 2001-11 bull market, even this argument has lost its validity
as yields on the highest quality credit instruments move towards and into negative territory.
There is currently some US$7 trillion of government bonds now trading with negative yields.
Swiss sovereign rates are negative out to ten years and German out to seven years.
It is creating the remarkable situation in which investment in physical gold can increasingly be
justified on a yield basis relative to the highest quality sovereign and (European/Japanese) corporate borrowers

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
This is a reflection of the bizarro financial system in which central banks have aggressively
distorted asset prices.
Then there is credit risk..
Gold has one advantage that sets it apart from EVERY other financial asset, not just credit instruments.
Gold, and we are specifically referring to physical bullion not the multitude of paper gold
instruments - is the only financial asset which has no counter-party risk.
This is becoming increasingly important (again).
A key theme in financial markets is the re-pricing of credit risk as credit markets are bifurcating
between the bad and good ends of the credit spectrum.
High yield and indicators relating to the banking system have been flashing warning signs
about the sustainability of the central banks ZIRP QE - NIRP driven bubble.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Barclays High Yield Average is currently almost 6.0%. This is more than 250bp higher than the
low in June 2014.
Japan has joined the Eurozone, Sweden and Denmark in the NIRP zone which, as our Chief
Economist, Stephen Lewis argued, could prove to be counter-productive both for bank earnings and economic growth.
The most obvious problem arising from a negative rate regime is that it tends to squeeze
bank profits. Mr Kuroda was right to point out that BoJs measure would affect only a small
proportion of Japanese banks assets, and would, therefore, have only a minor impact on
their earnings. However, when bank managements feel themselves under the regulators
cosh, as they do at the moment, even a small additional penalty may have a disproportionate impact on their willingness to take risks. In other words, there is a real danger that the
BoJs negative rate on banks excess reserves will turn out to be counter-productive in terms
of its effect on bank lending.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Japanese bank stocks have fallen more than 40% since last Summer.
We first heard feint rumblings about solvency issues at Deutsche Bank 2-3 years ago. The market seems to be taking them somewhat seriously, although the situation remains largely
opaque to outside observers.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
One might liken Bank sector analysts to the inhabitants of Platos Cave and that is not meant
to be a derogatory remark, more an empathetic one.
Its not just DB as markets are significantly re-pricing credit risk across the banking system in
general.
Its worth reiterating that the vast majority of gold investors are holding paper gold instruments. While their investment rationale might be because they dont trust the financial system
or require portfolio diversification, their counterparties are banks in which they are on the lowest rung of creditors.
The irony.
The key question for us is:
Could the physical gold market accommodate even a modest allocation of western capital
near the current gold price?
We doubt it.

Paul Mylchreest
Tel: +44 20 7716 8257
Investments in futures, options and foreign exchange can fluctuate in value, investors should therefore
be aware that they may not realise the initial amount invested, and indeed may incur additional liabilities. Investments in futures, options and foreign exchange entail above average risk, investors should
therefore carefully consider whether their financial circumstances permit them to invest and, if necessary, seek the advice of an Independent Financial Advisor. Some services described are not available to
all investors. Services may also not be available to certain customers due to legal and/or regulatory
constraints either in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. The contents of this electronic mail may have
been changed without the knowledge of the sender. ADM Investor Services International Limited
(ADMISI) does not, and will not, consider itself legally bound by the contents of any electronic mail
which appears to have originated from within the Company. If you believe you have been sent an email from ADMISI which is inappropriate, please contact the Compliance Department on 44 (0) 20 7716
8000. ADMISI is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority on any electronic site /
platform / website and is a member of The London Stock Exchange. In the event that this electronic
mail has been sent from Reef Capital LLP, please note the Officers and Representatives of Reef Capital
LLP are authorised and regulated under the auspices of ADM Investor Services International Limited.

Mylchreest Gold London Bullion

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mylchreest Gold London Bullion

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mylchreest Gold London Bullion

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Death of the Gold Market

paul.mylchreest@admisi.com Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

4th May 2016

Gold held by London-based ETFs

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

But the vulnerability is not confined to current trends in physical bullion.

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Gold and central bank credibility

When is a gold market not a gold market?

London Bullion Market - lacking regulation and transparency

LBMA and unallocated gold

Calculating the London gold float

Gold in the BoE vault and the float ex-central banks

China and a two-tier gold market

Untapped vast western pools of capital

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Gold and central bank credibility

Source: ADMISI, Bloomberg

Its been a long road but

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

When is a gold market not a gold market?

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

92: 1 paper versus physical

Futures and options contracts on COMEX in the US;

Unbacked ETFs or ETFs with unsatisfactory prospectuses/disclaimers; and

According to the RBI:

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Source: Zero Hedge, Odey Asset Management

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Source: ADMISI, Bloomberg

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Source: ADMISI, Bloomberg

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

London Bullion Market lacking regulation and transparency

the London Bullion Market;

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Source: Credit Agricole Cheuvreux

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257

Equity & Cross Asset Strategy

Tel: +44 20 7716 8257