Yoder 2004 645
Yoder 2004 645
Yoder 2004 645
Dielectric-Loaded Accelerator
R. B. Yoder1,2 and J. B. Rosenzweig1
1
Dept., of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547
2
Dept. of Physics, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471
INTRODUCTION
Slab-symmetric structures have recently generated interest as both radiation- and
beam-driven accelerators [1]; their advantages include the suppression of transverse
beam wakefields and insensitivity to beam misalignment as well as breakdown
mitigation [2]. For several years, a slab-symmetric optically-driven accelerator that
can be resonantly excited when driven by an external radiation source has been under
investigation at UCLA [3,4,5]. These devices utilize dielectric loading combined with
longitudinal modulation of the structure properties to generate accelerating fields on
axis which are a significant multiple of the source radiation fields. In this paper, we
present a detailed demonstration of the time-dependent behavior of a structure
designed to resonate at 340 µm, extending previous work [5] on terahertz accelerators,
with further consideration of scaling this device to the FIR regime.
The choice of 340 µm for the resonant wavelength is appropriate for a proof-of-
principle experiment, since larger structure dimensions allow easy passage for an
electron beam and longitudinal wakefields are negligibly small. Such an experiment
will be possible in the near future at UCLA, using a planned multimegawatt terahertz
radiation source under development [6].
conductor y
laser light
z
λ
x
ebeam ε
dielectric a b
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1. (a) Schematic drawing of the structure geometry. Two layers of dielectric-lined conductor
surround a vacuum gap; a very wide electron beam is injected into the gap and travels in the +z
direction, while radiation (polarized in z) is coupled in from above through transverse slots in the
conductor. (b) A cross-section in x, showing the parameters used in the analysis.
Coupling
The coupling slots which enforce the field periodicity as well as allowing radiation
into the structure are an effective way to drive the accelerating mode efficiently, but in
contrast to the usual waveguide couplers employed with microwave accelerating
cavities, these slots have a width which is effectively infinite, and hence they are not
cut off for the relevant radiation frequency. They will thus inevitably be filled with
field as the structure itself fills, with two consequences: first, there are unavoidably
large fields within the slots, which become the most likely electric breakdown site, and
second, the resonant frequency of the structure will be perturbed by the slots.
To estimate the effects of the slot fields, we can consider each slot to represent a
parallel-plate transmission line of length Λ equal to the thickness of the structure's
metal wall. The line is driven by wall currents on the inner surface of the structure
boundaries and terminates in an open circuit at the outer surface. This strategy
assumes that the slot width w is small compared to the radiation wavelength λ0. The
driving field for the “transmission line” can be estimated from the wall current Jx
associated with the structure accelerating field, and will be inversely proportional to
εg, the dielectric permittivity within the slot.
Consideration of the slot as a transmission line implies that setting the slot length Λ
equal to λg /4 = λ0 /4 εg will give rise to a quarter-wave matching condition in
which the slot fields vanish at the inner surface. The structure fields are then
unperturbed by the presence of the slots. We will show below that simulation of
structure filling under these conditions confirms this behavior, with very long filling
times (large coupling Q).
To estimate the perturbation of the resonant frequency by the presence of the slot
fields, we can employ a version of the Slater perturbation theorem. We implicitly
assume that the field energy in the slots is small compared to the total field energy of
the structure, which will be true for sufficiently narrow slots, and ignore the
perturbation of the structure fields by the slots. Explicit calculation gives the result
∆ω −4 λ0 (sin2k g Λ) /kg w
= 4 (4)
ω 0 π [asin 2 ξ + 2 εacosξ + (b − a)ε]
3
where ξ = kz ε −1(b − a). Eqn. 4 predicts that for small w and Λ the frequency
detuning should be proportional to Λ/w and that there should be no detuning effect for
Λ = π/(2kg) = λg/4, as mentioned previously.
All-Dielectric Structure
As mentioned, a structure without metallic boundaries would be advantageous at
lower wavelength, when the thickness of the outer conductive layer would become
less than a skin-depth. One approach for scaling the slab-symmetric resonant
structure to near-optical frequencies is the replacement of the metal boundary by a
dielectric multilayer (or Bragg reflector) arrangement. In this design, the structure Q
is controlled by the number of layers employed and their permittivities. Using
standard formulas, we find that a nine-layer design results in reflectances for each
mirror of 99.2% using permittivities of 3.6 and 11.6 (see Figure 4). The exact field
distribution within the structure can only be found from simulation. Preliminary
results indicate peak accelerating fields of 5–10 times the driving radiation amplitude,
but nearly equal Fabry-Perot and accelerating field components.
SIMULATION RESULTS
In previous work, we presented eigensolutions for the fields of an infinite-width
slab structure without coupling slots, showing agreement with the analysis in the
previous section, and verified the vanishing of transverse wakefields using a particle-
in-cell code [5]. Here, we present time-domain simulations, carried out using a
custom 2D finite-difference code [4], demonstrating the effect of the coupling slots.
The theoretical dependence of the frequency perturbation on slot dimensions agrees
approximately with simulation for small slot depths, though frequency resolution is
limited by the simulation grid size. Further, the use of quarter-wavelength matching in
the slot length to give unperturbed structure fields was verified, as shown in Figure 2,
where a two-dimensional calculation shows strong fields in the slots that have no
effect on acceleration fields when the slot length Λ is approximately λg/4. In the same
figure, these fields are compared with those of a structure with much shorter (5 µm)
coupling slots. In this second case, the accelerating field is deformed in the vicinity of
the slot and the resonant frequency is increased.
Figure 3 compares the relative amplitudes of the accelerating and Fabry-Perot
modes for these two structures (detailed parameters of which are presented in
Table 1). The quarter-wavelength slots give a structure with high Q-factor—the
accelerating field amplitude is more than 15 times that of the drive laser—with a
concomitant long filling time (more than half a nanosecond). There is excellent mode
quality, as the competing Fabry-Perot mode has less than one-half percent the
amplitude of the accelerating mode. However, the field strength within the slots is
also very large—more than three times the peak accelerating field at the outer
end—which gives strict breakdown limitations. The 5-µm slots lead to a significantly
reduced Q-factor and field enhancement, with noticeably poorer mode quality, but the
field in the slot is less than the peak fields, and the filling time (150–200 ns) is much
more realistic for an experiment driven by a short-pulse source such as would be
obtained by frequency conversion of a CO2 laser. The shorter pulse duration also
reduces the risk of breakdown. Both structures show accelerating fields on the order
of 100 MV/m when driven with a 100 MW laser source focused to a 2 cm spot.
MANUFACTURE
Since these dielectric-loaded structures are both planar and essentially constructed
of metal and semiconductor layers, they can easily be manufactured using vapor-
deposition techniques, as is done in the semiconductor industry. The main issue to be
confronted is that of tunability; two possible approaches have been investigated.
TABLE 1. Structure dimensions and filling parameters from simulation, for two versions of the
340 µm design.
Parameter Quarter-Wave Slots Short slots
Vacuum gap (2a) 230 µm 237 µm
Dielectric thickness (b–a) 30 µm 17 µm
Dielectric ε 3.0 11.69
Slot width w 5 µm 20 µm
Slot depth Λ 69 µm 5 µm
Accel. field enhancement Ez,max/E0 15.7 11.3
Peak accel. field per 100 MW drive 122 MV/m 89 MV/m
Fabry-Perot mode amplitude 0.0038 Ez,max 0.099 Ez,max
1/e filling time τ 335 ps 137 ps
Q = ωτ 1850 750
Maximum slot field 3 Ez,max 0.4 Ez,max
Frequency detuning ∆ω/ω0 0 +0.033
FIGURE 2. Surface plots of Ez over one structure period in z, for slab symmetric structures with (left)
slot length 69 µm, slot width 5 µm; (right) slot length 5 µm and slot width 20 µm. The y > 0 halfplane
is shown; field strengths are relative to the amplitude of the driving radiation. The conductor appears as
a zero-field region.
16
69 µm slots, F-P mode (x10)
14 69 µm slots, acc. mode
5 µm slots, F-P mode
5 µm slots, acc. mode
12
10
E(t) / E0
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
time (ps)
FIGURE 3. Time history of electric field amplitudes for the accelerating and Fabry-Perot modes,
comparing the two slot geometries from Table 1. All fields are normalized to the amplitude of the
driving radiation.
λ
y
n=1.9
n=3.4 x
a b
ε
a b
L
ε'
FIGURE 4. Two generalizations of the slab-symmetric structure. Left: A design for a dielectric-only
structure, suitable for use at 1–10 µm. Right: Geometry (cross-section in z) of a monolithic slab
structure capable of manufacture through vapor deposition. A second dielectric material (having
permittivity ε' near 1) serves as a substrate for the whole structure.
The simpler method involves constructing the top and bottom dielectric/conductor
slabs separately, and positioning them correctly relative to each other using
micropositioning technology. Such a structure would have open sides, much like a
traditional Fabry-Perot resonator, and would need to be considerably wider than the
laser spot size in order to limit diffraction of power out of the structure through the
sides. In this case, we expect the resonant fields to follow the laser profile in x; hence
any transverse (x-dimension) mode structure in the laser beam will tend to be
imprinted on the cavity fields, which could potentially affect the phase synchronism.
An alternate construction method would use a monolithic approach, in which the
top and bottom dielectrics are supported by a larger dielectric structure produced
through multilayer deposition, as shown in Fig. 4. Such a design removes the need for
precise external positioning if dimensional tolerances can be made sufficiently small;
however, in order for the structure to be tuned through deformation the upper layer
will need to be quite thin, which would be challenging to manufacture successfully. In
principle, it should be possible to obtain the unperturbed infinite-width fields (i.e. Eqn.
1) within the vacuum gap, if they are correctly matched to a superposition of cavity
modes in the |x| > L regions.
CONCLUSION
A slab-symmetric resonant structure is an attractive optical accelerator, with usable
acceleration fields of at least 10 times the driving radiation amplitude. A proof-of-
principle experiment at 340 µm is planned to investigate the details of coupling
radiation into the structures as well as the engineering questions regarding their
manufacture. A successful demonstration at terahertz could lead to a FIR accelerator
with extremely high gradients.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, grant number DE-
FG03-92ER40693. We thank G. Travish and the members of the EM Structures
Working Group for helpful discussions.
REFERENCES
1. Wang, C., et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 051301 (2004); Hill, M., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87,
094801 (2001); Xiao, L., et al., in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Tenth Workshop, 2002, ed.
C. Clayton and P. Muggli, AIP Conf. Proc. 647, pp. 542-555.
2. Tremaine, A., Rosenzweig, J., and Schoessow, P., Phys. Rev. E 56, 7204-7216 (1997).
3. Rosenzweig, J., Murokh, A., and Pellegrini, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2467-2470 (1995).
4. Rosenzweig, J. B., and Schoessow, P. V., in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Eighth Workshop,
1998, ed. W. Lawson, AIP Conf. Proc. 472, pp. 693-700.
5. Yoder, R. B., and Rosenzweig, J. B., in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Tenth Workshop, 2002, ed.
C. Clayton and P. Muggli, AIP Conf. Proc. 647, pp. 331-340.
6. Tochitsky, S. Ya., et al., in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Tenth Workshop, 2002, ed. C. Clayton
and P. Muggli, AIP Conf. Prof. 647, pp. 786-801.