Name: Sheraz Shahid Roll Number: 4151213071 Class: BBA-4-B Course: Business Communication Course Instructor: Mr. Saleem Siddiqi Date: 11 March 2014

Assignment: Book Review
Angels & Demons

Name: Sheraz Shahid
Roll Number: 4151213071
Class: BBA-4-B
Course: Business Communication
Course Instructor: Mr. Saleem Siddiqi
Date: 11th March 2014
Robert Langdon, a religious symbolist at Harvard, is called to the scene of a murder to

give the investigator some advice. So opens Dan Browns novel, Angels & Demons.
But questions arose in this readers mind immediately. What in the world is a religious
symbolist and why might he be of interest in a murder case? More questions tumbled
onto the floor and even some answers as the next few opening pages turned. Langdon
studies ancient and historic religions and does so in great measure by looking at the sorts
of symbols they use. He is famous for this work, and was mentioned in some recent
literature on the subject of a (seemingly) long-past anti-Catholic group, The Illuminati.
Langdon is most hesitant to run off to wherever this murder site is on the basis of a
telephone call, but the mention of The Illuminati and a couple details of the murder
immediately perk his attention, and he agrees. The novel then explodes into another facet,
wild science fiction-like details and machines as he gets on his way, whisked from
Boston to Switzerland by some new supersonic jet in under an hour. The murder itself has
taken place at a super secret research facility that studies various aspects physics, claims
its head, Maximilian Kohler.
Leonardo Vetra has been murdered in his lab. He and his daughter Vittoria have been
working on a very secret project of making anti-matter, as substance, perhaps best
described as an anti-substance, which could be made into bombs of a sort never before
imagined.
Not only was Vetra murdered, but he has a symbol of the Illuminati brunt into his chest.
Thus Kohlers call to Langdon and we are off.
And off we do go into a crazy and fascinating world of intrigue, murder, plots and
counter-plots, secrets and betrayals, always led by the brilliant and goody two-shoes,
Robert Langdon, and, oh yes, of course, joined in the search for the murdered is the
lovely daughter of the murdered man, herself a force to be reckoned with. There is a great
crisis of time since the murders are now possessors of the anti-mater material bomb. The
main plot line takes us to Rome and the Vatican where the pope has recently died and
a new one is about to be elected. But, the Illuminati seem to be on the verge of stopping
this election and destroying Vatican City, the material base of Roman Catholicism. While
Langdon and Vittoria Vetra are there to lend their expertise, he in religious symbolism,
and she in her knowledge of anti-matter, the two of them become the leading actors of the
good guys vs. the bad guys. It is a very face paced thriller with many twists and
turns, many of them delightful and scary forcing the reader to read fast, whipping pages
away, in a desperate rush to see how the world will be saved Fun, but not terribly
challenging or special, even if a great fantasy read.
At times Brown seems to be having fun with us. In the early few pages once Langdon
arrives at the physics lab, Kohler, the director is showing him around and they pass a
wind-tunnel experiment where a woman is floating in the room.
Friction, Kohler said. Decreases her aerodynamics so the fan can lift her. He stared
down the corridor again. One square yard of drag will slow a falling body almost twenty
percent.
That was it. That one quick sentence, and author Brown tweaks or kids with us by
dropping a dramatic hint:
He never suspected that later that night, in a country hundreds of miles away, the
information would save his life.
For me the more interesting parts of the book have to do with one historical story and one
theological / philosophical theme.
The historical story is that of the Illuminati. On Browns account this was a secret
organization founded by Galileo and other scientists after Galileos trial. They form this
secret society so that on the surface they can do what Galileo did, denounce his scientific
theory in order to save his life, but at this secret level they can continue their scientific
world and at the same time quietly and secretly battle the power of religion to interfere
with science.
Historians of such groups, like Robert Langdon, our super hero, had thought the group
had simply died out over the years, where it had, for some centuries, hidden itself inside
the Masonic movement, something even most Masons didnt know.
Now it seems they never really faded away, and now, with their possession of the antimatter, they are in a position to do something about this conflict.
Brown details a history of this group. His treatment is quite persuasive and one finds
oneself coming to think that this group might well be historical, and might really be what
Langdon tells us it is. When that happened I had to quickly bring myself up short and say:
whoa, wait a minute, this is a book of fiction, and Dan Brown is not Robert Langdon
At times that phenomenon, the bringing me to the edge of thinking of this as HISTORY,
not FICTION, almost made me want to get on the web and see what was there about the
Illuminati. Happily I resisted. First of all, to do the sort of historical research to figure out
whether this was pure Dan Brown fiction or rooted in something historical, would have
taken much more time than I was willing to spend, and probably involve skills I dont
have.
However, there was a second major theme about which I do know a good deal and do
have lots of the skills. The central theme of religion versus science.
The central question is of the existence of God, and the origins of the cosmos. This is one
question, not two in Dan Browns formulation. The battle is between the religious folks,
especially in this novel, the Roman Catholics, who following scripture, believe God
created the cosmos out of nothing, and the scientific community which tends not to
believe in such a creating spirit, but is working on scientific explanations for the origins
of the cosmos. The Big Bang theory wont work as a solution since it puts off the
question where did the matter come from that went bang. Even some Catholic
theologians could accept The Big Bang, but still hold that God created the original matter
and caused the bang to bang.
One of the theses put forward in the novel is that this work of Vittoria Vetra and her father
with anti-matter, might be close to a solution to this old question in a way that satisfies
BOTH the scientific community and the religious community, so that the old split
between religion and science would be seen as bogus.
And, on the novels hypothesis, this explains the Illuminatis involvement, since they are
bitterly opposed to religion and wouldnt want this accommodation to come to fruition.
Throughout the novel there is a running sub-theme of this question about the possible
compatibility of scientific and theological understandings of the origins of everything, the
cosmos, this planet Earth and the people on it. Kohler, the director of the physics lab sees
these questions a being historically theological and religious questions, but increasingly
scientific ones:
And these answers are in a physics lab?
You sound surprised.
I am. The questions seem spiritual.
Mr. Langdon, all questions were once spiritual. Since the beginning of time, spirituality
and religion have been called on to fill in the gaps that science did not understand. The
rising and setting of the sun was once attributed to Helios and a flaming chariot.
Earthquakes and tidal waves were the wrath of Poseidon. Science has now proven those
gods to be false idols. Soon all Gods will be proven to be false idols. Science has now
provided answers to almost every question man can ask. There are only a few questions
left, and they are the esoteric ones. Where do we come from? What are we doing here?
What is the meaning life and the universe?
Langdon was amazed. And these are questions CERN is trying to answer?
Correction. These are questions we are answering.
On another issue, Langdon asks the camerlengo (aide to the Pope) how is it that can God
be both omnipotent and benevolent given what happens to people in the world this is a
version of the problem of evil argument: How could a good God allow such suffering in
the world.
The camerlengo cites parenting and yet claiming even a good parent might let a child
skateboard, when he might get hurt. Langdon answers that he would allow it but give the
child some guidance and then let him learn on his own. The camerlengo replies:
So although you have the power to interfere and prevent your childs pain, you would
choose to show you love by letting him learn his own lessons?
Now, that reply might work to solve the problem of the benevolent parent allowing his or
her child to use a skateboard, but it utterly ignores the question of a God who is not only
supposed to be benevolent, but also omnipotent. And in the case the camerlengo sites, the
child is willful about the skateboarding. The interesting cases are when people who do
everything their God has asked, yet great misfortune, even death come to them. An
omnipotent God would know this an, were the God truly benevolent, wouldnt seem to be
able to allow this to happen.
In another place one of the theologians attacks the positions of science:
Who is the God science? Who is the God who offers his people powers but no moral
framework to tell you how to use that power? What kind of God gives a child fire but
does not warn the child of its dangers? Science textbooks tell us how to create a nuclear
reaction and yet they contain no chapter asking us if it is a good or bad idea.
This too is a trivial reply. It already assumes what it asks, namely that there must be an
absolute and external source of this knowledge. However, it is even THEOLOGICALLY
possible that the human beings must choose what is morally good and acceptable in the
face of a world where we humans do know for sure what the answers to such questions
are.
The frustration for me with this sort of theological / philosophical argumentation which
Brown presents is that he gives it the appearance of sophistication, but the discussions
remain at the level of the trivial.
It leads me to suspect the same situation may well be true of the scientific questions
involved, but that Im just not sophisticated enough in science to know where the lack of
seriousness occurs.
.

Name: Sheraz Shahid Roll Number: 4151213071 Class: BBA-4-B Course: Business Communication Course Instructor: Mr. Saleem Siddiqi Date: 11 March 2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Name: Sheraz Shahid Roll Number: 4151213071 Class: BBA-4-B Course: Business Communication Course Instructor: Mr. Saleem Siddiqi Date: 11 March 2014

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Name: Sheraz Shahid Roll Number: 4151213071 Class: BBA-4-B Course: Business Communication Course Instructor: Mr. Saleem Siddiqi Date: 11 March 2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assignment: Book Review

Angels & Demons

Robert Langdon, a religious symbolist at Harvard, is called to the scene of a murder to

You might also like