Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Diseases: Unresolved Issues
Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Diseases: Unresolved Issues
Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Diseases: Unresolved Issues
Madrid, Spain
2 Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine,
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver,
Aurora, Colorado
Abstract
Keywords
connective tissue
disease
interstitial lung
disease
autoimmunity
interstitial pneumonia
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicating connective tissue disorders, such as scleroderma and rheumatoid arthritis, is associated with signicant morbidity and mortality.
Progress has been made in our understanding of these collective diseases; however,
there are still many unanswered questions. In this review, we describe the current views
on epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis in patients with
connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD. We also highlight several areas that
remain unresolved and in need of further investigation, including interstitial pneumonia
with autoimmune features, histopathologic phenotype, and pharmacologic management. A multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to diagnosis, management,
and investigation of CTD-associated ILD patients is essential to advance our understanding of the epidemiology and pathobiology of this challenging group of diseases.
Epidemiology
The prevalence of CTD-ILD varies in the literature. Depending
on the study design and population studied, the prevalence of
DOI http://dx.doi.org/
10.1055/s-0036-1580689.
ISSN 1069-3424.
Aparicio, Lee
469
Table 1 Interstitial lung disease in connective tissue diseaseprevalence and associated risk factors
Connective tissue disease
Prevalence
1.641%
580%
Ethnicity, serologies
(anti-amino-acyl-tRNA synthetases, anti-MDA-5 antibodies)
Scleroderma5,114
5565%
Sjgren syndrome115
975%a
Inconsistent data
115%
5070%
Limited data
Rheumatoid arthritis
112
116
Clinical Manifestations
Diagnostic Evaluation
In many patients, CTD-ILD is initially asymptomatic followed by the development of nonspecic symptoms. The
most common symptoms are exertional dyspnea and dry
cough. Often times, the symptom of dyspnea can be confused with generalized weakness and deconditioning, particularly due to the systemic nature of CTDs. As the lung
disease progresses, patients can develop pulmonary hypertension resulting in signs and symptoms of right heart
failure. Other respiratory signs and symptoms associated
with CTD-ILD include resting and exertional hypoxemia,
pleuritic chest pain, hemoptysis, expectoration of mucus,
and wheezing.
Although the presence of an underlying CTD is often well
dened in many patients presenting with ILD, the lungs
may be the rst and/or primary manifestation of an underlying CTD.7,8 If the underlying CTD is not known at the time
of presentation, specic attention to symptoms suggestive
of an underlying CTD is important.9 The medical history
should include questions regarding joint pain and swelling,
muscle weakness, and morning stiffness. Other signs and
symptoms include fever, mechanics hands, skin thickening, Raynaud phenomenon, rash or telangiectasias, gastroesophageal reux and regurgitation, and dryness of the
mucosal surfaces.
In some cases, the clinical features suggestive of an
underlying autoimmune process may not meet established
criteria for a dened CTD. This population of patients has
gained increasing recognition and several researchers have
proposed differing criteria to dene these patients.7,8,10,11
Although each of these criteria differ in regard to clinical
symptoms, serologies, and pathology, they generally identify a similar group of patients.12 Given the lack of consensus in this area, the European Respiratory Society and
American Thoracic Society Task Force came together to
build a diagnostic platform on which to better understand
this condition.13 They proposed the term interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features or IPAF. The proposed
denition is not meant for clinical use at this time and
future research should be done to better understand this
condition.
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
117
Aparicio, Lee
Fig. 1 (A) Radiologic pattern of nonspecic interstitial pneumonia in a patient with scleroderma. There are ground glass opacities with
reticulation and subpleural sparing. (B) Radiologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. There is
subpleural and basilar predominant honeycombing. (C) Radiologic pattern of organizing pneumonia in a patient with idiopathic inammatory
myositis. There are areas of dense consolidation. A subsequent lung biopsy demonstrated nonspecic interstitial pneumonia and organizing
pneumonia. (D) Radiologic pattern of lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia in a patient with Sjgren disease. There are scattered thin-walled cysts in
both lungs. (Images courtesy of Brett Elicker, MD.)
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
Future research should be done to determine if histopathologic phenotype is important in the diagnosis and management of CTD-ILD patients.
470
Aparicio, Lee
Fig. 2 (A) Histopathologic pattern of brotic nonspecic interstitial pneumonia in a patient with scleroderma. There is relatively diffuse alveolar
septal thickening by brosis. (B) Usual interstitial pneumonia pattern brosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. There is advanced subpleural
brosis with microscopic honeycombing and broblast foci. Other regions showed less brotic alveolar tissue. (C) Histopathologic pattern of
organizing pneumonia in a patient with dermatomyositis. Rounded plugs of granulation tissue are present within airspaces. (D) Histopathologic
pattern of lymphoid interstitial pneumonia in a patient with Sjgren syndrome. There are prominent lymphoid aggregates around bronchioles and
marked alveolar septal thickening by chronic lymphoplasmacytic inammation. (Images courtesy of Kirk Jones, MD.)
Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids are considered rst-line therapy in CTD-ILD29
despite the lack of controlled trials of corticosteroids in these
patients.3032 Corticosteroids are often used in combination
with other drugs called steroid sparing agents (e.g., azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil). When utilized in combination, the corticosteroid dose can often be reduced, which
decreases the cumulative toxicity and adverse side effects
Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide is a potent immunosuppressive medication. The use of cyclophosphamide has been studied in several
prospective and retrospective studies in CTD-ILD demonstrating stabilization or improvement in lung function.3541
The largest of these was the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS),
which was a clinical trial that randomized 158 subjects to oral
cyclophosphamide or placebo.42 After 12 months of treatment, subjects randomized to oral cyclophosphamide had a
more favorable change in FVC compared with placebo
(p< 0.03). This effect was not sustained, and the cyclophosphamide group and the placebo group had similar FVC
measures by 24 months. There is signicant toxicity
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
471
Aparicio, Lee
Azathioprine
Azathioprine is a commonly used and effective steroid-sparing agent for many CTDs.4548 The use of azathioprine for the
treatment of CTD-ILD is common; however, the data supporting its use are primarily limited to small retrospective series.40,4952 A retrospective review of 13 patients with
polymyositis- or dermatomyositis-associated ILD demonstrated a reduction in dyspnea, PFT stabilization, and a
reduction in corticosteroid dose after 12 months of treatment
with azathioprine.40 In another retrospective review of 11
patients with scleroderma-associated ILD, 8 subjects had at
least 12 months of treatment and had stable-to-improved
pulmonary function.52 The other three subjects discontinued
treatment due to side effects. A common starting dose is 0.5
mg/kg/day, increasing by 25 mg every 2 weeks up to 2 to 3
mg/kg/day, not exceeding a total dose of 200 mg/day.23 The
most common side effects are gastrointestinal intolerance,
bone marrow suppression, and infection.53,54
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Mycophenolate mofetil is an inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation and is increasingly being used as a steroid-sparing
agent in CTD-ILD.44 The data supporting the use of mycophenolate mofetil are limited to small retrospective series.5558 The largest series included 125 patients with
CTD-ILD, including patients with scleroderma, myositis,
and rheumatoid arthritis.58 They reported that treatment
with mycophenolate mofetil was well tolerated and associated with effective reduction in corticosteroid dosing during
the follow-up period. They also reported stable-to-improved
pulmonary function in this retrospective cohort. A typical
starting dose is 500 mg twice daily, increasing by 500 mg
every 2 weeks up to 2,000 to 3,000 mg daily. The most
common side effects are similar to those of azathioprine
with gastrointestinal intolerance, bone marrow suppression,
and infection.59
Calcineurin Inhibitors
Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine A and tacrolimus)
inhibit interleukin (IL-2)-mediated CD4 T cell activation.60
They are commonly used in the immunosuppression regimen
following solid organ transplantation.59 Among the CTD-ILDs,
the most experience is with the myositis-related ILDs
(e.g., polymyositis, dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome).6166 A recent retrospective study of 49 untreated
patients with polymyositis- or dermatomyositis-associated
ILD were analyzed.65 Approximately half of the patients
(n 25) were treated with tacrolimus plus conventional
therapy, while the other half were treated with conventional
therapy, dened as prednisolone plus an additional agent
(intravenous cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine). They
reported that those in the tacrolimus group had longer
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
event-free survival and longer disease-free survival compared with the conventional therapy group. The most common side effects of calcineurin inhibitors include
hypertension and renal impairment.67 Both cyclosporine A
and tacrolimus require serum monitoring. Suggested trough
levels for cyclosporine A are between 100 and 200 ng/mL68
and between 5 and 20 ng/mL for tacrolimus.61,63
Rituximab
Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against CD-20 B-cells,
which leads to B-cell depletion for up to 6 months. Rituximab
is a common treatment for many connective tissue disorders
(e.g., systemic vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis),69 but is
less well studied in those with CTD-ILD. A retrospective
review of 50 patients with severe and progressive ILD, despite
conventional immunosuppression, had a median improvement in FVC and stability in the diffusing capacity for carbon
monoxide.70 In this cohort, 33 patients had CTD-ILD, 2
developed serious infections requiring hospitalization, and
10 died from progressive lung disease. There are also some
case series describing the use of rituximab in ILD associated
with antisynthetase syndrome,7174 scleroderma,75,76 and
rheumatoid arthritis.77 Rituximab is now being studied in a
randomized, double-blind, controlled trial compared with
intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with CTD-ILD
(clinicaltrials.gov). The primary outcome of this study is
absolute change in FVC over 48 weeks. The most common
side effect of rituximab is opportunistic infection.7174
472
Conclusion
Signicant progress has been made in our understanding of
CTD-ILD. Several of the areas requiring further investigation
were highlighted in this review, including the unclear signicance of patients who have features suggestive of an underlying CTD (i.e., IPAF patients), the unknown role of
distinguishing histopathologic phenotypes among patients
with CTD-ILD, and the lack of controlled clinical trials to
inform pharmacologic management of patients with CTDILD. Moving forward, a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to diagnosis, management, and investigation
of CTD-ILD patients will be essential for us to better understand the epidemiology and pathobiology of this challenging
group of diseases.
Funding
None.
Acknowledgments
We thank Brett Elicker, MD, for the radiology images and
Kirk Jones, MD, for the pathology images.
References
1 Doyle TJ, Hunninghake GM, Rosas IO. Subclinical interstitial lung
Prognosis
ILD is one of the most serious complications observed among
patients with CTD and is associated with signicant morbidity and mortality. Among patients with scleroderma, ILD is
473
disease: why you should care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;
185(11):11471153
Kelly CA, Saravanan V, Nisar M, et al; British Rheumatoid
Interstitial Lung (BRILL) Network. Rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: associations, prognostic factors
and physiological and radiological characteristicsa large
multicentre UK study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53(9):
16761682
Mori S, Koga Y, Sugimoto M. Different risk factors between
interstitial lung disease and airway disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Respir Med 2012;106(11):15911599
Harlow L, Rosas IO, Gochuico BR, et al. Identication of citrullinated hsp90 isoforms as novel autoantigens in rheumatoid
arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheum
2013;65(4):869879
McNearney TA, Reveille JD, Fischbach M, et al. Pulmonary
involvement in systemic sclerosis: associations with genetic,
serologic, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors. Arthritis
Rheum 2007;57(2):318326
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
due to specic challenges related to transplantation in CTDILD. In particular, the presence of comorbid conditions and
extrapulmonary manifestations of their underlying CTD (e.g.,
gastroesophageal reux disease, pulmonary hypertension,
cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disease) may adversely affect survival and graft function following transplantation.88,89 Prognosis is also difcult to predict in this
population due to heterogeneity in the disease course and
poor understanding of the natural history of many CTD-ILDs.
Some encouraging data suggest that survival after transplantation is similar among patients with and without an underlying CTD, specically in patients with sclerodermaassociated ILD.90,91 In addition, improvements in respiratory-related quality of life have been observed among rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD patients who have undergone
lung transplantation.92
Aparicio, Lee
Aparicio, Lee
6 Kane GC, Varga J, Conant EF, Spirn PW, Jimenez S, Fish JE. Lung
and progression in scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. Chest 2014;146(2):422436
Ryerson CJ, OConnor D, Dunne JV, et al. Predicting mortality in
systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease using risk
prediction models derived from idiopathic pulmonary brosis.
Chest 2015;148(5):12681275
Goh NS, Desai SR, Veeraraghavan S, et al. Interstitial lung disease
in systemic sclerosis: a simple staging system. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 2008;177(11):12481254
Bradley B, Branley HM, Egan JJ, et al; British Thoracic Society
Interstitial Lung Disease Guideline Group, British Thoracic
Society Standards of Care Committee; Thoracic Society of
Australia; New Zealand Thoracic Society; Irish Thoracic Society. Interstitial lung disease guideline: the British Thoracic
Society in collaboration with the Thoracic Society of Australia
and New Zealand and the Irish Thoracic Society. Thorax 2008;
63(Suppl 5):v1v58
Sullivan WD, Hurst DJ, Harmon CE, et al. A prospective evaluation
emphasizing pulmonary involvement in patients with mixed
connective tissue disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 1984;63(2):
92107
Patterson CD, Harville WE, Pierce JA. Rheumatoid lung disease.
Ann Intern Med 1965;62:685697
Holgate ST, Glass DN, Haslam P, Maini RN, Turner-Warwick M.
Respiratory involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. A
clinical and immunological study. Clin Exp Immunol 1976;
24(3):385395
Flaherty KR, Toews GB, Lynch JP III, et al. Steroids in idiopathic
pulmonary brosis: a prospective assessment of adverse reactions, response to therapy, and survival. Am J Med 2001;110(4):
278282
Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison J, et al. Population-based assessment of adverse events associated with long-term glucocorticoid
use. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55(3):420426
Yamasaki Y, Yamada H, Yamasaki M, et al. Intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy for progressive interstitial pneumonia in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Rheumatology
(Oxford) 2007;46(1):124130
White B, Moore WC, Wigley FM, Xiao HQ, Wise RA. Cyclophosphamide is associated with pulmonary function and survival
benet in patients with scleroderma and alveolitis. Ann Intern
Med 2000;132(12):947954
Steen VD, Lanz JK Jr, Conte C, Owens GR, Medsger TA Jr. Therapy
for severe interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. A retrospective study. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37(9):12901296
Silver RM, Warrick JH, Kinsella MB, Staudt LS, Baumann MH,
Strange C. Cyclophosphamide and low-dose prednisone therapy
in patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) with interstitial
lung disease. J Rheumatol 1993;20(5):838844
Schnabel A, Reuter M, Gross WL. Intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in the treatment of interstitial lung disease due to
collagen vascular diseases. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(7):
12151220
Mira-Avendano IC, Parambil JG, Yadav R, et al. A retrospective
review of clinical features and treatment outcomes in steroidresistant interstitial lung disease from polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Respir Med 2013;107(6):890896
Akesson A, Scheja A, Lundin A, Wollheim FA. Improved pulmonary function in systemic sclerosis after treatment with cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37(5):729735
Tashkin DP, Elashoff R, Clements PJ, et al; Scleroderma Lung
Study Research Group. Cyclophosphamide versus placebo in
scleroderma lung disease. N Engl J Med 2006;354(25):
26552666
Brummaier T, Pohanka E, Studnicka-Benke A, Pieringer H. Using
cyclophosphamide in inammatory rheumatic diseases. Eur J
Intern Med 2013;24(7):590596
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
474
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Aparicio, Lee
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
475
Aparicio, Lee
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Vol. 37
No. 3/2016
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
476